text stringlengths 0 6.44k |
|---|
oyster bars were found “…buried by only a few centimeters to decimeters of |
sediment.” No live oysters were reported observed. Meeder et al. (1997) also |
notes that “No extensive fossil oyster bars have been located…” in South |
Biscayne Bay. |
Meeder et al. (1999), reports that no live oyster reefs, but nine historic reefs were |
found in a survey of 48 tidal creeks between the Coral Gables Canal and Mowry |
Canal, but that “oysters were seasonally abundant…” and “coon oysters (those |
that live on mangrove prop roots) were much more abundant.” These may not be |
the American oyster, but are likely one of three other species of oysters that are |
found associated with mangroves; Ostrea (Lopha) frons, Crassostrea rhizophorae and |
Isognomon alatus (Britton and Morton 1989). Meeder (pers. comm.) has confirmed |
recent observations of submerged live American oysters in this same vicinity. |
Healthy oyster bars are typically found in brackish water where salinities |
routinely drop below 15 psu. This provides protection from less euryhaline |
predators such as predatory gastropods and starfish. Changes in freshwater |
flows to Biscayne Bay (see above under “Mangrove Forests”) have altered |
conditions that historically were more favorable to oyster reef formation and |
persistence. |
Restoration of oyster reefs has been proposed as an indicator of successful |
management of freshwater flows to Biscayne Bay (Meeder 2001). |
Hardbottom |
Hardbottom refers to exposed rock or limestone where there are attached algae |
(Halimeda spp, Penicillus spp., Rhipocephalus spp., and Udotea spp.), sponges |
(Hippospongia lachne, Spongia barbara, S. germinea, S. cheiris), hard corals (Porites |
sp., Solenastrea sp. Siderastrea), fire coral (Millepora sp.) and/or soft corals (Eunicea |
spp., Plexaurella dichotoma and Pseudopterogorgia spp.) (Milano 1983). |
Valued Ecosystem Components |
Freshwater Flow and Ecological Relationships in Biscayne Bay 4-5 |
Softbottom |
Alleman et al. (1995) state that a benthic survey by Schroeder (1984) resulted in |
documentation of over 800 species of invertebrates. For softbottom habitats |
generally devoid of submerged aquatic vegetation and attached algae or |
invertebrates, the predominant organisms are epibenthic or infaunal |
invertebrates and some benthic fish like the toadfish, Opsanus beta. It is reported |
that Milano (1983) determined that 14% of Biscayne Bay was bare or softbottom |
habitat, supporting polycheate worms, molluscs (clams and snails), tunicates, |
nematodes, crabs, shrimp, amphipods and echinoderms, including sea |
cucumbers. |
POTENTIAL INDICATOR SPECIES |
The task of identifying individual species or suites of species that would serve as |
good indicators of ecosystem health is a challenging endeavor that must take into |
account a variety of inter-related factors, including: |
· The existing spatial distribution and abundance of the organism; |
· The salinity tolerance range of the species; |
· The degree to which non-salinity water quality parameters could affect |
changes in the presence/absence and spatial distribution of the species; |
· The extent to which changes in the species presence/absence over time could |
be determined to be based primarily on changes in salinity regime; and |
· The extent to which impacts to the species that might result from changes in |
fresh water flows could result in enforcement actions by local, state and/or |
federal governmental agencies (i.e., impacts to listed species).. |
Based on these criteria, a number of species and/or ecological communities have |
been identified as potential indicators for Biscayne Bay. Each species, or group |
of species is identified and described in the remainder of this section. |
Micro-organisms |
Several groups of micro-organisms have been analyzed for their potential utility |
as indicators of environmental health in Biscayne Bay. The groups that are |
analyzed in this sub-section include foraminiferans, phytoplankton and benthic |
diatoms. |
Formaniferans |
Foraminiferans (forams), tiny protozoans of the Order Foraminifera, are |
present in fairly large numbers on the surface of sediments in tidal waters. |
Valued Ecosystem Components |
Freshwater Flow and Ecological Relationships in Biscayne Bay 4-6 |
They are chiefly marine rhizopods that typically have calcareous shells that |
are often perforated with minute holes through which protrude slender |
pseudopodia. Although many species are comparatively minute, some |
exceed 3-5 cm in total length when various spines and ridges are included. |
Some forams cement sand grains and shell fragments that are gathered from |
the surface of the sediments, others secrete calcium carbonate. These |
organisms are a major component of the limestone sediments in tidal areas. |
They consume unicellular algae, algal spores, bacteria, other micro-organisms |
such as copepods, ciliates and worms, and organic debris. |
Fossil forams are particularly useful in identifying and interpreting historical |
sediment conditions, due to their overall widespread abundance and |
occurrence and their ‘convenient‘ size; sufficiently small to be recovered |
intact and an in large numbers, yet not so small that they cannot be easily |
examined, identified and counted. |
Life spans vary from species to species and generally range from a period of a |
week or so to several months. Different species have differing sensitivities to |
certain water quality parameters, and salinity is a key factor in determining |
the presence/absence of some species. |
Analyses of core samples taken at 23 sites located throughout Biscayne Bay |
during 1996 revealed the presence of 69 foram taxa (Ishman et. al., 1997). |
Two foram species (Ammonia parkinsoniana tepida and Elphidium galvestonense |
mexicanum) appear to have such similar water quality requirements that they |
often occur in close enough proximity to one another and have been |
characterized as constituting an Ammonia-Elphidium assemblage (Ishman et. |
al., 1997). These species presently exist in western areas of Biscayne Bay, and |
could serve as potential indicators of maintenance of desirable salinity |
regimes (S. Ishman, pers. comm.). Based on various characteristics, including |
their: a) life cycles, b) relatively narrow salinity tolerance range; c) high |
tolerance of non-salinity water quality parameters (e.g., elevated nutrients); |
d) relative abundance; and e) comparatively fast response time, the presence, |
absence and/or abundance of these species could be an excellent gauge of the |
extent to which reductions in freshwater flow (and the resulting changes in |
salinity) are causing harm or significant harm in Biscayne Bay. |
On-going studies by Ishman have led to the identification of four benthic |
foraminiferan assemblages in surficial sediment samples collected in Biscayne |
Bay. One such assemblage, a “restricted environmental assemblage” is |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.