text stringlengths 0 6.44k |
|---|
marsh species. Historically, fresh surface water flowed to |
the bay through natural sloughs, rivers, and wetlands, and |
fresh groundwater flowed through the Biscayne Aquifer |
(Parker et al. 1955; Kohout and Kolipinski 1967; Buchanan |
and Klein 1976) and seeped into the bay along the coast and |
through the bay bottom. At the southern end of the Miami |
Rock Ridge, freshwater wetlands in the Biscayne Bay watershed occupied extensive coastal marl prairies that were east |
of the ridge where it curves westward away from the coast. |
Prior to drainage and land development, these marshes were |
dominated by sawgrass (Cladium jamaicense), spike rush (Eleocharis cellulosa), and other freshwater graminoids, including |
grasses and herbs (Gaiser and Ross 2004). The hydropattern |
depended on direct precipitation, surface flow from the Everglades through breaks in the ridge called “transverse glades,” |
or rising groundwater when the regional water table was high |
(Wanless 1976). In a study of the paleoecology using soil cores |
along the coast, Gaiser and Ross (2004) showed a change from |
freshwater swamp forest to mangrove forest and a change in |
salinity from approximately 6.5 ppt to 12.5 ppt. |
The transverse glades and freshwater forests and wetlands |
drained into a transition zone of coastal creeks and a mix of |
herbaceous freshwater-brackish wetlands, tidal marshes, and |
mangrove forests on the edge of the coast. These supported |
the bay ecosystem by spreading freshwater inflow, absorbing excess nutrients, and providing habitat - including critical nursery habitat - for fish and shellfish, as well as feeding |
habitat for wading birds. Local rainfall, groundwater seepage, |
overland sheet flow, and small coastal rivers fed water to the |
bay all along its mainland margins. The flow of freshwater |
through the forested wetlands and freshwater marshes provided dynamic storage of water and a buffer to reduce the amplitude of rainfall runoff events, and moderated the transition |
from freshwater inflows to estuarine and marine conditions |
in the bay (Wanless 1976; Browder and Wanless 2001). Egler |
(1952) documented the distinct vegetation bands parallel to |
the coast prior to construction of major drainage canals. He |
concluded that changes in vegetation composition were a |
result of increases in salinities between freshwater wetlands |
and saline wetlands near the coast. The area was still largely |
dominated by graminoid freshwater wetland, followed by |
dwarf mangrove scrub, and a narrow band of coastal mangroves in the 1940’s and early 1950’s. Kohout and Kolipinski |
(1967) found a distinct biological zonation of flora and fauna |
in nearshore Biscayne Bay based on salinity in the area around |
the old Cutler power plant north of the old Burger King headquarters site. Ishman et al. (1998) documented increasing |
salinity with distance offshore in pre-drainage Biscayne Bay. |
They also compared historical salinities from 1850-1900 to salinities in 1996. Gaiser and Ross (2004) also documented the |
historic salinity gradients in the remnant coastal wetlands. Average annual mean pre-drainage salinities were less than 2 ppt |
and freshwater marshes and associated forest units covered |
90% of the area, with only a narrow band of mangroves along |
the coastline. Today that same area has a mean salinity of 13.2 |
ppt, and 95% of the area is covered by mangroves. Estuarine |
conditions, which were maintained by freshwater inflow, provided a broad band of habitats for organisms having a variety |
of salinity needs. |
Western Bay Zone. Many different estuarine species flourished in the western part of Biscayne Bay. Miami-Dade County was at the core of the American crocodile ( Crocodylus acutus) geographic range in the U.S. (Kushlan and Mazzotti 1989), |
with the coastal wetlands along the western shore of Biscayne |
Bay providing important habitat. Oyster reefs and associated |
fauna could be found in the bay (Smith 1896; Meeder et al. |
2001). A large number of fish species could also be found in |
Biscayne Bay, with Smith (1896) listing 95 fish taxa.The presence of several species of drum (family Sciaenidae), which |
prefer brackish conditions, and the description of some of |
these species as either abundant or common, is particularly |
revealing of more estuarine conditions over 100 years ago (Serafy et al. 2001). |
Recent paleoecological research conducted by the U.S. |
Geological Survey provided insight into pre-drainage conditions and general trends in bay salinities since 1900 (Ishman |
et al. 1998; Wingard et al. 2003, 2004). Results from sediment |
cores showed a long-term trend of increasing salinity at virtually all sites studied in Biscayne Bay, particularly since 1900. In |
the vicinity of Black Point, these data indicated that mid-level |
mesohaline conditions existed prior to 1900, tending toward |
more polyhaline conditions after that time. Sediment core |
data indicated that, since 1950, salinities have increased to |
mostly polyhaline conditions at these sites. Middle Key and |
Manatee Bay sites to the far south (Barnes Sound area) are |
farthest from the influence of Everglades transverse glades |
drainage, but are instead under the influence of the eastern |
margin of the Taylor Slough drainage system. Sediment cores |
from these two sites indicated conditions were predominantly |
freshwater (0 ppt) until about 1900. After that, oligohaline |
and low-end mesohaline conditions appeared, possibly in |
response to construction of the Flagler railroad, initial land |
drainage activities, and the construction of roadways (Wingard et al. 2004). The final shift occurred around the 1960’s |
to mid-1970’s when marine conditions (30-40 ppt) appeared |
in the sediment record, as evidenced by the remains of invertebrate species that can tolerate high salinities in areas that |
were once estuarine. Clearly, since 1900, a significant amount |
of freshwater from the historic Everglades drainage has been |
diverted, converting what were once fresh-to-brackish, estuarine habitats in the nearshore areas to marine conditions with |
the loss of estuarine productivity and function. |
8 South Florida Natural Resources Center Technical Series (2006 1) |
Current Conditions |
Hydrology has been altered by regional drainage, canal construction and operation, and urban development, as well as by |
construction of roads, levees, and other hydrologic barriers |
to surface flow. The bay currently receives freshwater inflow |
as canal flow, with only minor overland flow, and occasional |
groundwater seeps (Kohout and Kolipinski 1967; Buchanan |
and Klein 1976; SFWMD 1995). Freshwater flow to the Card |
and Barnes Sounds section comes only through moderateto-light discharges from the C - l l l Canal, and from overland |
runoff from extensive freshwater and coastal wetlands contiguous with the mainland shoreline of these two basins. |
Coastal Mangrove Zone. The L31E levee and canal run parallel to the coast about 2 km inland and intercept the local subbasin drainages and transverse glades that used to discharge |
water to southern Biscayne Bay. As a result, a narrow strip of |
isolated coastal stream remnants and coastal fringe mangrove |
forest, most of which is within the park, is disconnected from |
the regional hydrology. The loss of freshwater inflows has resulted in the expansion of the fringing mangrove forest to the |
eastern side of the levee system (Ross et al. 2000; Gaiser and |
Ross 2004). |
Currently, the hydrologic conditions within the CMZ are |
dependent upon canal stages and local rainfall. Although there |
are no current freshwater deliveries to this area, water levels in |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.