text stringlengths 0 6.44k |
|---|
the canals determine the adjacent water table and, therefore, |
the water level in the CMZ. Water enters the area as groundwater seepage and as rainfall. These changes in surficial drainage have affected surface and groundwater hydrology (Parker |
et al. 1955; Parker 1974), reducing or eliminating coastal |
creek function and productivity. West of the L31E levee, the |
landscape is drained and compartmentalized by a network |
of mosquito control ditches, wetland drainage ditches, and |
flood control canals (e.g., Ruiz and Ross 2004). Although the |
wetland value of this area has decreased substantially because |
of increasing salinities and drainage, the ecological function |
of habitat created by the invasion of salinity-tolerant coastal |
mangroves remains particularly important to Biscayne Bay |
(Odum and Heald 1975; Teas 1976). |
The area between Convoy Point and the northern mainland extent of the park covers some 1,500 acres of potentially |
high value fish and wildlife habitat that forms the longest contiguous coastal mangrove forest on the east coast of Florida. |
It is comprised of coastal fringe forest (primarily red mangroves), interior transitional forest (red and white mangroves), |
dwarf mangrove forest (red mangroves), and a mosaic of relict |
stream channels and coastal wetlands. This area provides |
food, shelter, and nursery habitat critical to sustaining the |
recreational and commercial fisheries in south Florida (Teas |
1976; Serafy et al. 2003). Salinity fluctuations imposed by water management operations and loss of water to coastal creeks |
that once created brackish conditions in the prop root zone |
have created impaired fishery habitat with impaired nursery |
function. |
Western Bay Zone. East of the mangroves, the WBZ is dominated by the seagrass (approximately 64% of the bottom) and |
hard bottom (17%) benthic communities (NOAA 1996). Submerged aquatic vegetation (SAV) in the bay is typically a mixed |
species community that may include shoal grass (Halodule |
wrightii), manatee grass (Syringodium filiforme), turtle grass |
(Thalassia testudinum), wigeon grass (Ruppia maritime), and |
three species of an uncommon SAV Halophila. Freshwater |
algae {Chara spp.) may also be found in low salinity coastal |
streams, tidal creeks, ponds, and around canal and creek |
outlets where fresher water predominates. The distribution |
of Chara in the WBZ is limited by its intolerance of the marine conditions now common in nearshore areas of the bay. |
Currently, the SAV community is dominated by turtle grass |
(Christian et al. 2004), an indicator of true marine conditions |
because of its low tolerance for brackish conditions. |
The CERP Monitoring and Assessment Plan conceptual |
models identify salinity as the primary stressor in the WBZ, |
affecting biology when conditions deviate from a natural |
range. Salinity in this area is controlled by tidal circulation, |
which tends to increase salinities toward an offshore level (33- |
35 ppt), and by canal discharge, which is a function of canal |
operations and introduces freshwater (<1 ppt). To a lesser extent, salinity in this zone is affected by local rainfall (SFWMD |
1995; Lirman and Cropper 2003; Faunce et al. 2003; Serafy |
et al. 1997). Another stressor is poor-quality water containing nutrients and contaminants (SFWMD 1995), carried by |
the six canals discharging into this zone (Black Creek (C -l), |
Princeton Canal (C-102), Military Canal, and Mowry Canal |
(C-103), C - l ll , Snapper Creek (C-2), and the Coral Gables |
Waterway (C-3)). |
Indicator Species: Benthic Community, |
Endangered Species, and Important |
Fishery Resources |
Many of the species described in this report are considered to |
be dependent on estuarine conditions. They require a brackish environment or they are reliant on estuarine salinities at |
specific stages in their life cycle. The presence of these species, |
both historically and at present, supports the importance of |
maintaining and restoring the estuarine nature of the WBZ. |
Many of these species are declining and some have presumably disappeared because of the lack of freshwater currently |
reaching the bay; therefore, the salinity range of these organisms can be used to define a beneficial salinity range for Biscayne Bay that will protect fish and wildlife. Many species |
including stone crab, Spanish mackerel, Crevalle jack, grey |
snapper, and tarpon are either recreationally or commercially |
important within the WBZ fishery. However, more historical |
information and field studies with site-specific information on |
Ecological and Hydrologic Targets for Western Biscayne National Park 9 |
preferred salinity ranges were available for the six species presented in Table 1, therefore we chose to use them as biological |
indicators. |
Biscayne National Park’s creel data (based on interviews |
of anglers when they return from fishing to local marinas) has |
been collected since about 1976. Most of the data pertain to |
reef fish, since a majority of the anglers fish on the reef, and |
are, therefore, less useful in this paper which focuses on the |
near-shore area. The bay species that might be affected by |
salinity changes near the coast (i.e., snook, spotted sea trout, |
red drum) are now landed infrequently in the areas we survey |
making it impossible to identify trends in population abundance from the creel data. The only species that are affected by |
salinity changes and are frequently reported are snappers and |
grunts, which utilize bayside seagrass beds as juvenile habitat. Also, it is impossible to distinguish the effects of salinity |
changes over time from fishing effects over time. For all these |
reasons, the Biscayne National Park creel dataset was used to |
provide supporting evidence of the continued presence of the |
biological indicator species in the bay, and was not used for |
more quantitative analyses of the effects of salinity changes. |
The American crocodile (Crocodylus acutus) is primarily |
found in areas characterized by brackish estuarine conditions |
and average salinities of 14 ppt (Mazzotti 1983; Kushlan 1988; |
Kushlan and Mazzotti 1989). Hatchling crocodiles are particularly reliant on low salinities, generally 0 to 5 ppt (Mazzotti |
and Cherkiss 1998). Mazzotti and Cherkiss also determined |
that all size classes (hatchlings, juveniles and adults) favor |
water bodies with an intermediate salinity of 20 ppt. Juvenile |
crocodiles, in particular, seek out and seem to require a mesohaline (<20ppt with an optimum of 9 ppt) habitat for survival |
(Mazzotti et al. 2002). |
The Eastern oyster (Crassostrea virginica) has long been |
recognized as an indicator of estuarine conditions (Dean |
1892; Oemier 1894, Ritter 1896; Grave 1905; Pearse and |
Wharton 1938; Nelson et al. 1991; Estevez 2000; Meeder et al. |
2001). The life cycle of oysters occurs entirely within estuaries. Oysters are capable of surviving salt concentrations from |
5 to 40 ppt, however the optimum range for oyster reef growth |
is 10-20 ppt (Stenzel 1971; Meeder et al. 2000). This allows for |
oyster reproduction while decreasing predation rates (Grave |
1905; Gunter 1950; Wells 1961). |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.