text stringlengths 0 6.44k |
|---|
recent commercial fishery harvesting pink shrimp from |
the bay for human consumption is expanding. The distribution of juvenile pink shrimp in Biscayne Bay has |
been measured and modeled (Campos and Berkley |
1986, Ault et al. 1999a, b). Spotted pink shrimp (Farfantepenaeus brasiliensis Latreille) also is present in |
Biscayne Bay but in very low number compared to F. |
duorarum). |
The blue crab resides in the south-central area of |
Biscayne Bay and also supports a commercial fishery. |
An average of 50,768 kilograms of blue crabs was |
taken annually from Biscayne Bay from 1996 to 2000 |
(Murphy et al. 2001). Optimum blue crab egg hatching |
occurs at salinity between 23 ppt and 28 ppt, and juveniles prefer a seagrass habitat with salinity between |
2 and 21 ppt (Pattillo et al. 1997). |
The eastern or American oyster is not currently harvested in south-central Biscayne Bay but is present |
nearshore in small numbers where conditions are suitable. The species was apparently more abundant in the |
past when surface water drained through a series of |
small creeks into the bay (Meeder et al. 2001, 2002) |
and provided a salinity regime more conducive to oyster growth and survival. Growth rates of oysters are |
reported to be best at 14–28 ppt (Shumway 1996); |
however, at the higher salinity range, mortality can |
increase as a result of infection by Perkinsus marinus |
(Mackin, Owen, and Collier), a parasite (Burreson and |
Ragone-Calvo 1996, Soniat 1996, Chu and Volety |
1997). The oyster is important ecologically for several |
reasons. The accumulation of shells provides physical |
habitat structure for a variety of other species, their |
organic rich deposits are a food source for benthic |
feeders, and they filter particulates from the water, improving water quality (Pattillo et al. 1997). Other estuarine species have some dependence on oyster reefs; |
for example, 24 species were found associated with |
oyster reefs in the Caloosahatchee Estuary (Volety et |
al. 2003). |
Estuarine Fish Communities |
Several estuarine fish species known to have occurred in Biscayne Bay in the past (Smith 1896, Siebenaler 1953, Udey et al. 2002) contributed to the |
bay’s commercial and recreational fisheries but appear |
to be scarce or absent in the bay today. The opportunity for anglers has changed and, according to longtime residents, has diminished, possibly as a result of |
the loss of the estuarine component of the fauna. The |
estuarine fish community could make an important |
contribution to the recreational fishing experience in |
the bay if its abundance and diversity were restored. |
An increase of the bay’s estuarine habitat would be |
expected to lead to greater abundance and diversity of |
estuarine fishes, including those desired by anglers. |
An increase in the distribution and abundance of fish |
in the fresh to brackish water wetlands adjacent to Biscayne Bay would be an indication of restored functionality of the coastal wetland-estuarine nearshore |
habitat that is important to the bay’s diversity and productivity. |
Freshwater fish communities that spread into oliEXHIBIT 7 |
860 WETLANDS, Volume 25, No. 4, 2005 |
gohaline (0–5 ppt salinity) environments seasonally |
can reach high densities and provide abundant prey to |
pisciverous estuarine fish, as well as to wading birds |
(Lorenz 2000). |
Fish and Bottlenose Dolphin Health |
The health of fish communities and the health of a |
resident bottlenose dolphin group are valuable attributes of the Biscayne Bay ecosystem. Externally visible abnormalities such as scale and skeletal deformities have been observed to occur in a number of Biscayne Bay fish (Browder et al. 1993) and are more |
prevalent in fish sampled from human-impacted sites |
(Gassman et al. 1994). This is consistent with Fournie |
et al. (1996) for Gulf of Mexico estuaries and Sanders |
et al. (1999) for Ohio rivers. The prevalence of abnormal fish is being used as part of a biological integrity index in a growing number of state and national |
monitoring programs (Simon 1999). |
Bottlenose dolphins in Biscayne Bay include permanent residents and nearshore migrants. National |
Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) |
Fisheries conducts a photo identification program in |
Biscayne Bay that can potentially distinguish residents |
from migrants. Through the Southeast Fisheries Science Center, the NOAA Fisheries Miami Laboratory |
has been conducting health assessments of other bottlenose dolphin in the southeast to obttain baseline information on marine mammal contaminant levels, associated diseases and incidence, and impacts of human-related pollution on marine mammal populations. |
The program conducts current and retrospective evaluation for the accumulation of toxicants in various tissues of bottlenose dolphins and other marine mammal |
species in relation to their health, as reflected in histopathology, blood profiles, and other medical diagnostics (Sweeney 1992, Worthy 1992, Hansen and |
Wells 1996, Reddy et al. 2001, Schwacke et al. 2002). |
Biopsies of small amounts of subcutaneous blubber |
can be taken from living animals for contaminant analysis during low-level monitoring activities. Health assessment profiles of dolphin populations for comparison to regularly monitored and assessed ‘‘reference’’ |
populations can be developed in this manner. The bottlenose dolphin and other marine mammals are protected species under the Federal Marine Mammals Protection Act of 1972. Opportunistic biopsy sampling of |
the Biscayne Bay resident dolphin population began in |
February 2000 as a pilot study by the NOAA Fisheries |
Miami Laboratory. |
Crocodile |
The American crocodile is an endangered species |
that is known to range throughout southern Biscayne |
Bay. Historically, the range of the American crocodile |
extended north to at least Miami Beach (Kushlan and |
Mazzotti 1989). It nests primarily at the Florida Power |
and Light Turkey Point Power Plant cooling canals |
and Crocodile Lake National Wildlife Refuge. Recent |
studies indicate an increase in the number of nests occurring in the cooling canal area of the Turkey Point |
Power Plant since the early 1980s, while nest numbers |
at the Crocodile Lake National Wildlife Refuge have |
remained relatively stable (Mazzotti et al. 2002). Nesting success at the Turkey Point Power Plant may be |
responsible for an increase in the number of crocodile |
sightings occurring north of the plant and may indicate |
an expansion of the animal’s range. Crocodiles have |
been sighted as far north as Key Biscayne and the |
Miami River (M. Cherkiss, University of Florida, pers. |
comm.). Although nest numbers have remained relatively stable at the Crocodile Lake National Wildlife |
Refuge, the population in this area may be increasing, |
based on an increase in the number of crocodile sightings throughout the Florida Keys and an increase in |
the number of road kills occurring along U.S. 1 and |
Card Sound Road over the past several years (S. Klett, |
Crocodile Lake National Wildlife Refuge, pers. |
comm.). |
A habitat suitability model for crocodiles has been |
developed based on salinity levels (Mazzotti and |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.