text stringlengths 0 6.44k |
|---|
Brandt 1995). The model targets juvenile crocodiles |
because studies indicate that this life stage requires |
lower salinities due to osmoregulatory limitations |
(Mazzotti and Dunson 1984). This model shows that |
salinity between 0 and 20 ppt provides the most suitable habitat, 20–40 ppt provides intermediate suitability, and 40 ppt is least suitable. Applying the model |
to Biscayne Bay suggests that restoring freshwater |
flow to the coastal wetlands would benefit crocodiles, |
especially along the western shore in the central and |
southern regions. Most of this area is currently unsuitable for juvenile crocodile habitat. Restoration efforts will include redirecting flow from conveyance canals through coastal mangrove wetlands and maintaining flow into the beginning of the dry season. |
Manatee |
Endangered West Indian manatees occur throughout |
Biscayne Bay but are most frequently observed in tributaries and nearshore seagrass beds. Manatees are |
present year-round and are most abundant in winter, |
when more than 130 have been counted on a single |
day (Mayo and Markley 1995). Biscayne Bay seagrass |
meadows provide important foraging habitat for manatees wintering at warm water discharges (power |
plants) in Broward County, and the bay is a significant |
seasonal migratory corridor. Thus, the total number of |
EXHIBIT 7 |
Browder et al., Biscayne Bay CEM 861 |
animals using the Biscayne Bay area is likely to be |
greater than the maximum number observed on any |
given day. |
Manatees utilizing the bay are part of the larger Atlantic region ‘‘subpopulation,’’ which includes those |
animals ranging along the Atlantic coast from southern |
Georgia to the Florida Keys and including the lower |
St. John’s River. Atlantic coast manatees undertake |
seasonal, intraseasonal, and daily migrations or movements (Deutsch et al. 2003). Radio-telemetry studies |
and tracking or resighting of known scarred individuals have shown that manatees may travel hundreds of |
kilometers seasonally, moving to southeast Florida or |
unnatural sources of warmer water. Tracking studies |
of animals in the Biscayne Bay area also suggest a |
general diurnal pattern, with animals resting in canals |
and sheltered basins during the daytime and moving |
into bay areas to feed in late afternoon and evening |
(C. Beck, United States Geological Survey, pers. |
comm.). Although wide-ranging, manatees demonstrate a high degree of site fidelity, yet they also show |
individual patterns, flexibility, differential use of sites |
over time, and adaptation to changing conditions, |
moving among warm water refuges, freshwater sources, and feeding sites. The general distribution of manatees is strongly linked to fresh water; they more frequently occupy areas where freshwater sources are |
readily available (O’Shea and Kochman 1990, Mayo |
and Markley 1995, LeFebrve et al. 2001, Deutsch et |
al. 2003). Changes in timing and volume of freshwater |
delivery could affect manatee distribution, particularly |
in south Biscayne Bay. |
Adult annual survival rates for manatees in the Atlantic subpopulation have been estimated at 88.7– |
92.6%, a lower rate than has been estimated for other |
regions (Langtimm et al. 1998). Due to uncertainty in |
population model estimations, it is not possible to determine with statistical confidence whether the Atlantic |
population has been stable, decreasing, or increasing |
in recent years; however, annual manatee mortality in |
the Atlantic region remains high and appears to be |
increasing at a greater rate than optimistic estimates of |
population growth (USFWS 2001). Although many |
manatees have been killed or injured in Biscayne Bay |
by vessel collisions, the leading known cause of manatee in death in Miami-Dade County is crushing or |
entrapment in water-control structures (Mayo and |
Markley 1995). Thus, changes in operation of these |
structures may directly affect survival of individuals |
using the Biscayne Bay area and stability of the Atlantic subpopulation. |
Wading Birds |
Wading birds are being used as biological indicators |
throughout the region because of their close association with hydropattern. The islands, tidal flats, and |
coastal wetlands of Biscayne Bay provide valuable |
habitat for wading birds. Frequently used nesting sites |
occur at Greynold’s Park near the northern bay, in the |
Arsenicker Keys in the southern bay off Turkey Point, |
and on small islands off Key Biscayne and Virginia |
Key (Browder personal observation). Tidal flats and |
coastal wetlands of the bay provide important feeding |
habitat for wading birds that nest nearby. For example, |
roseate spoonbills (Ajaia ajaja Linnaeus) that nest in |
the Tern Keys of northeastern Florida Bay feed in |
mangrove creeks and herbaceous wetlands of southern |
Biscayne Bay (Card and Barnes Sound areas), as well |
as those of Florida Bay. Wood storks (Mycteria americana Linnaeus) that nest in the southern Everglades |
also feed in wetlands of southern Biscayne Bay. The |
natural pattern of seasonal variation in water stages |
alternately produces and concentrates forage fish for |
wading birds. A more natural seasonal variability in |
water stages in relation to the rainfall pattern will not |
only produce and concentrate fish for wading birds but |
also support favorable salinity conditions for estuarine |
fish and macroinvertebrates downstream in Biscayne |
Bay. |
ECOLOGICAL EFFECTS: CRITICAL LINKAGES |
BETWEEN STRESSORS AND ATTRIBUTES/ |
WORKING HYPOTHESES |
In the Biscayne Bay Conceptual Ecological Model |
(Figure 2), relationships between the five stressors and |
the ecological attributes discussed above are depicted |
in the four diamond-shaped modules representing |
pathways of effects. Most of the ecological attributes |
are directly affected by salinity patterns/coastal wetlands, water quality, or sediment/water column contamination. These are determined by the stressors according to the relationships depicted in the ‘‘effects |
pathways’’ modules (the diamonds in Figure 2). The |
discussion of these effects pathways is followed by a |
discussion of hypothesized linkages between the ecological attributes and these effects pathways, including |
physical impacts (depicted in its own ‘‘effects pathways’’ module, fourth diamond in Figure 2). Physical |
impacts include effects of dredging, water-management control structures, and fishing gear. |
Salinity Patterns/Coastal Wetlands |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.