text stringlengths 0 6.44k |
|---|
Everglades Restoration Program (RECOVER 2004; 2006; Robblee and Browder 2012). |
Seagrass, algae and associated environmental and physical measurements collected in |
FIAN are coupled with data available from other environmental agencies. The primary |
objectives are: 1) to characterize the seagrass community (e.g., species composition, |
22 |
cover-density, and distribution); and 2) to characterize the environmental and physical |
conditions (e.g., surface and bottom salinity and temperature, turbidity, sediment depth, |
and water depth) observed in POM; 3) to determine if there are relationships between the |
seagrass community and the environmental and physical conditions in POM; and 4) to |
evaluate if the natural and/or anthropogenic changes documented during the study period |
have influenced the seagrass habitat in POM. |
Hypothesis 1: There are short and long term temporal and spatial changes evident in |
the seagrass composition, cover-density, and distribution within the Port of Miami. |
The Port of Miami, within North Biscayne Bay, has been influenced by |
development in Miami and expansion of the major shipping port within the last century. |
Areas with high human activity are prone to more drastic and frequent changes than other |
less populated areas. This can alter water quality within a system and impact the benthic |
habitat. The seagrass habitat in Port of Miami will be assessed to evaluate whether there |
has been a decline in seagrass composition, cover-density, or distribution over time. |
Hypothesis 2: There are short and long term temporal and spatial changes evident in |
the environmental and physical conditions in the Port of Miami. |
A natural cycle of weather events occur in South Florida, creating two distinct |
seasons (dry and wet). The amount of rain and storm activity can be severe some years |
and can in turn cause changes to the environmental and physical conditions (e.g. water |
depth, sediment depth, temperature, salinity, and turbidity) within the coastal habitats. |
The extent of these environmental and physical changes in the system will be assessed. |
Hypothesis 3: Changes in the environmental and physical conditions within the Port of |
Miami relate with changes in the composition, density and distribution of the benthic |
community. |
Short and long-term changes in quality of the water within a system can impact |
the benthic habitat. Trends/associations between the seagrass and environmental and |
physical data will be assessed within the basin. |
23 |
Hypothesis 4: Natural and anthropogenic influences have caused changes to the |
seagrass habitats within the Port of Miami over time. |
Seagrass communities in North Biscayne Bay have been highly variable because |
of habitat modifications that have been taking place since the early 1900s (Caccia and |
Boyer 2005). Human activities and development, as well as natural events, stress the |
nearshore coastal marine environments in South Florida. Areas with high levels of |
human activity are at greater risk for unnatural habitat disturbances. |
2.0 Materials and Methods |
Data used for this study come from an existing data set developed in the South |
Florida Seagrass Fish and Invertebrate Network, FIAN (Robblee and Browder 2012) (see |
Table 2). Data are located on the USGS Benthic Database maintained by Everglades |
National Park. As a Monitoring and Assessment Plan project, FIAN is part of |
RECOVER, the Restoration, Coordination and Verification Program of the |
Comprehensive Everglades Restoration Plan (CERP) (RECOVER 2004; USACE and |
SFWMD1999). |
2.1 FIAN Data |
The FIAN project sampled 19 basins in three regions of South Florida: Biscayne |
Bay, Florida Bay, and the Lower Southwest Mangrove Coast. For this study of Port of |
Miami, data from one of the nineteen FIAN locations (POM) are used in analyses (Figure |
2). To assess changes between sampling years and season, samples were collected at the |
end of the spring (dry season Apr/May) and fall (wet season Sept/Oct) from 2005 through |
2011, for a total of fourteen collections. Using a geographic information system (GIS), a |
grid of 30 equal-sized cells was superimposed over the basin (Figure 3) to encompass the |
observable or expected gradients of physical and environmental conditions and |
vegetation characterizing the location. The sample grid-cells only encompassed waters |
that were accessible to a shallow-draft boat (Robblee and Browder 2012). Within each |
cell a single randomly located point was sampled. This method allowed FIAN the ability |
to randomly, but quasi-evenly, sample the environmental and habitat gradients present in |
an area and still create an accurate representation of the entire basin. The grid-cell size |
sampled in the Port of Miami covered a total of 1060.5 hectares (10,605,000 m2 |
) across |
24 |
the basin. A total of 420 samples were collected for analysis in the basin during the 7 |
years of FIAN. |
2.1.1 Seagrass Community Vegetation Sampling |
A Garmin GPSMAP492 GPS was used to locate each sampling sample site and |
the latitude and longitude coordinates were recorded. The vegetation observations and |
sediment composition were recorded by a free-diving researcher. A modified BraunBlanquet cover-abundance method was used to quantify the seagrass and algae in a 0.25 |
m2 |
quadrat at each site (Braun-Blanquet 1932; Mueller-Dombois and Ellenberg 1974; |
Fourqurean et al. 2002). This method involves classifying all vegetative species present |
and assigning an abundance code for each species present (Braun-Blanquet 1932). This |
allows for large areas to be sampled in a short time (Wikum 1978), while still accurately |
representing the overall vegetation composition. Braun-Blanquet is a useful tool for |
establishing baseline data for assessment of environmental impacts (Wikum 1978). |
Replicate quadrats were sampled at each individual site within a basin, and a coverabundance rating from 0 to 5 was assigned to each vegetative group: 0 = no species |
present, 0.1 = individual or solitary stem, 0.5 = sparse covering, 1 = 0-5% cover, 2 = 5- |
25%, 3 = 25-50%, 4 = 50-75%, and 5 = 75-100% (Robblee 2009; Collado-Vides et al. |
2007) (Table 1). Canopy height was measured in conjunction with Braun-Blanquet |
cover/abundance because it provided a simple and quick measure of the physical |
structure of the grass community (Robblee and Browder 2012). For this study, the mean |
of all replicate samples per site were used for analyses. |
FIAN underwent several modifications in order to better monitor the habitat and |
optimize resources. After the 2005 and 2006 collections, the number of quadrat |
replicates increased from three to six at a sample site. Greater numbers of samples |
increase precision and provide a more accurate picture of the habitat and distribution of |
species (Braun-Blanquet 1932). In 2007 it was determined that broad plant groupings |
could provide an estimate of overall habitat (nearly comparable to other more time |
consuming methods). Therefore, beginning with the fall 2007 collections, estimation of |
cover/abundance was expanded to include the three aggregate plant groupings: allvegetation, all-seagrass and all-algae. With the earlier collections spring 2005 through |
25 |
spring 2007, aggregate plant groupings were not observed and therefore could not be |
calculated from the available cover/abundance scores of the individual species. With |
Braun-Blanquet cover/abundance estimates, averaging is only appropriate by species and |
scores are not additive between groups. Due to the ordinal scale, once averaged, |
abundance cannot be converted back to a cover/abundance index score. The estimate of |
overall habitat could only be measured for nine of the fourteen collections (fall 2007 |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.