fact
stringlengths
8
1.54k
type
stringclasses
19 values
library
stringclasses
8 values
imports
listlengths
1
10
filename
stringclasses
98 values
symbolic_name
stringlengths
1
42
docstring
stringclasses
1 value
rpredBrx y : x \in S -> (y - x \in S) = (y \in S). Proof. exact: (@gpredFr _ T). Qed.
Lemma
boot
[ "From HB Require Import structures", "From mathcomp Require Import ssreflect ssrfun ssrbool eqtype choice ssrnat seq", "From mathcomp Require Import bigop fintype finfun monoid" ]
boot/nmodule.v
rpredBr
rpredBlx y : x \in S -> (x - y \in S) = (y \in S). Proof. exact: (@gpredFl _ T). Qed.
Lemma
boot
[ "From HB Require Import structures", "From mathcomp Require Import ssreflect ssrfun ssrbool eqtype choice ssrnat seq", "From mathcomp Require Import bigop fintype finfun monoid" ]
boot/nmodule.v
rpredBl
zmodClosedP: zmod_closed S. Proof. split; [ exact: rpred0 | exact: rpredB ]. Qed.
Lemma
boot
[ "From HB Require Import structures", "From mathcomp Require Import ssreflect ssrfun ssrbool eqtype choice ssrnat seq", "From mathcomp Require Import bigop fintype finfun monoid" ]
boot/nmodule.v
zmodClosedP
RecordisSubBaseAddUMagma (V : baseAddUMagmaType) (S : pred V) U of SubType V S U & BaseAddUMagma U := { valD0_subproof : nmod_morphism (val : U -> V) }. #[short(type="subBaseAddUMagma")] HB.structure Definition SubBaseAddUMagma (V : baseAddUMagmaType) S := { U of SubChoice V S U & BaseAddUMagma U & isSubBaseAddUMagma V S U }. #[short(type="subAddUMagma")] HB.structure Definition SubAddUMagma (V : addUMagmaType) S := { U of SubChoice V S U & AddUMagma U & isSubBaseAddUMagma V S U }. #[short(type="subNmodType")] HB.structure Definition SubNmodule (V : nmodType) S := { U of SubChoice V S U & Nmodule U & isSubBaseAddUMagma V S U}.
HB.mixin
boot
[ "From HB Require Import structures", "From mathcomp Require Import ssreflect ssrfun ssrbool eqtype choice ssrnat seq", "From mathcomp Require Import bigop fintype finfun monoid" ]
boot/nmodule.v
Record
val:= (val : U -> V). #[export] HB.instance Definition _ := isNmodMorphism.Build U V val valD0_subproof.
Notation
boot
[ "From HB Require Import structures", "From mathcomp Require Import ssreflect ssrfun ssrbool eqtype choice ssrnat seq", "From mathcomp Require Import bigop fintype finfun monoid" ]
boot/nmodule.v
val
valD: {morph val : x y / x + y}. Proof. exact: raddfD. Qed.
Lemma
boot
[ "From HB Require Import structures", "From mathcomp Require Import ssreflect ssrfun ssrbool eqtype choice ssrnat seq", "From mathcomp Require Import bigop fintype finfun monoid" ]
boot/nmodule.v
valD
val0: val 0 = 0. Proof. exact: raddf0. Qed.
Lemma
boot
[ "From HB Require Import structures", "From mathcomp Require Import ssreflect ssrfun ssrbool eqtype choice ssrnat seq", "From mathcomp Require Import bigop fintype finfun monoid" ]
boot/nmodule.v
val0
RecordSubChoice_isSubAddUMagma (V : addUMagmaType) S U of SubChoice V S U := { addumagma_closed_subproof : addumagma_closed S }. HB.builders Context V S U of SubChoice_isSubAddUMagma V S U. HB.instance Definition _ := isAddClosed.Build V S addumagma_closed_subproof. Let inU v Sv : U := Sub v Sv. Let addU (u1 u2 : U) := inU (rpredD (valP u1) (valP u2)). Let oneU := inU (fst addumagma_closed_subproof).
HB.factory
boot
[ "From HB Require Import structures", "From mathcomp Require Import ssreflect ssrfun ssrbool eqtype choice ssrnat seq", "From mathcomp Require Import bigop fintype finfun monoid" ]
boot/nmodule.v
Record
addrC: commutative addU. Proof. by move=> x y; apply/val_inj; rewrite !SubK addrC. Qed.
Lemma
boot
[ "From HB Require Import structures", "From mathcomp Require Import ssreflect ssrfun ssrbool eqtype choice ssrnat seq", "From mathcomp Require Import bigop fintype finfun monoid" ]
boot/nmodule.v
addrC
add0r: left_id oneU addU. Proof. by move=> x; apply/val_inj; rewrite !SubK add0r. Qed. HB.instance Definition _ := isAddUMagma.Build U addrC add0r.
Lemma
boot
[ "From HB Require Import structures", "From mathcomp Require Import ssreflect ssrfun ssrbool eqtype choice ssrnat seq", "From mathcomp Require Import bigop fintype finfun monoid" ]
boot/nmodule.v
add0r
valD0: nmod_morphism (val : U -> V). Proof. by split=> [|x y]; rewrite !SubK. Qed. HB.instance Definition _ := isSubBaseAddUMagma.Build V S U valD0. HB.end. HB.factory Record SubChoice_isSubNmodule (V : nmodType) S U of SubChoice V S U := { nmod_closed_subproof : nmod_closed S }. HB.builders Context V S U of SubChoice_isSubNmodule V S U. HB.instance Definition _ := SubChoice_isSubAddUMagma.Build V S U nmod_closed_subproof.
Lemma
boot
[ "From HB Require Import structures", "From mathcomp Require Import ssreflect ssrfun ssrbool eqtype choice ssrnat seq", "From mathcomp Require Import bigop fintype finfun monoid" ]
boot/nmodule.v
valD0
addrA: associative (@add U). Proof. by move=> x y z; apply/val_inj; rewrite !SubK addrA. Qed. HB.instance Definition _ := AddMagma_isAddSemigroup.Build U addrA. HB.end. #[short(type="subZmodType")] HB.structure Definition SubZmodule (V : zmodType) S := { U of SubChoice V S U & Zmodule U & isSubBaseAddUMagma V S U}.
Lemma
boot
[ "From HB Require Import structures", "From mathcomp Require Import ssreflect ssrfun ssrbool eqtype choice ssrnat seq", "From mathcomp Require Import bigop fintype finfun monoid" ]
boot/nmodule.v
addrA
val:= (val : U -> V).
Notation
boot
[ "From HB Require Import structures", "From mathcomp Require Import ssreflect ssrfun ssrbool eqtype choice ssrnat seq", "From mathcomp Require Import bigop fintype finfun monoid" ]
boot/nmodule.v
val
valB: {morph val : x y / x - y}. Proof. exact: raddfB. Qed.
Lemma
boot
[ "From HB Require Import structures", "From mathcomp Require Import ssreflect ssrfun ssrbool eqtype choice ssrnat seq", "From mathcomp Require Import bigop fintype finfun monoid" ]
boot/nmodule.v
valB
valN: {morph val : x / - x}. Proof. exact: raddfN. Qed.
Lemma
boot
[ "From HB Require Import structures", "From mathcomp Require Import ssreflect ssrfun ssrbool eqtype choice ssrnat seq", "From mathcomp Require Import bigop fintype finfun monoid" ]
boot/nmodule.v
valN
RecordisSubZmodule (V : zmodType) S U of SubChoice V S U & Zmodule U := { valB_subproof : zmod_morphism (val : U -> V) }. HB.builders Context V S U of isSubZmodule V S U. Fact valD0 : nmod_morphism (val : U -> V). Proof. have val0: (val : U -> V) 0 = 0. by rewrite -[X in val X](subr0 0) valB_subproof subrr. split=> // x y; apply/(@subIr _ (val y)). by rewrite -valB_subproof -!addrA !subrr !addr0. Qed. HB.instance Definition _ := isSubBaseAddUMagma.Build V S U valD0. HB.end. HB.factory Record SubNmodule_isSubZmodule (V : zmodType) S U of SubNmodule V S U := { oppr_closed_subproof : oppr_closed S }. HB.builders Context V S U of SubNmodule_isSubZmodule V S U. HB.instance Definition _ := isOppClosed.Build V S oppr_closed_subproof. Let inU v Sv : U := Sub v Sv. Let oppU (u : U) := inU (rpredNr (valP u)). HB.instance Definition _ := hasOpp.Build U oppU.
HB.factory
boot
[ "From HB Require Import structures", "From mathcomp Require Import ssreflect ssrfun ssrbool eqtype choice ssrnat seq", "From mathcomp Require Import bigop fintype finfun monoid" ]
boot/nmodule.v
Record
addNr: left_inverse 0 oppU (@add U). Proof. by move=> x; apply/val_inj; rewrite raddf0 raddfD/= SubK addNr. Qed. HB.instance Definition _ := Nmodule_isZmodule.Build U addNr. HB.end. HB.factory Record SubChoice_isSubZmodule (V : zmodType) S U of SubChoice V S U := { zmod_closed_subproof : zmod_closed S }. HB.builders Context V S U of SubChoice_isSubZmodule V S U. HB.instance Definition _ := isZmodClosed.Build V S zmod_closed_subproof. HB.instance Definition _ := SubChoice_isSubNmodule.Build V S U nmod_closed_subproof. HB.instance Definition _ := SubNmodule_isSubZmodule.Build V S U (@rpredNr _ _). HB.end.
Lemma
boot
[ "From HB Require Import structures", "From mathcomp Require Import ssreflect ssrfun ssrbool eqtype choice ssrnat seq", "From mathcomp Require Import bigop fintype finfun monoid" ]
boot/nmodule.v
addNr
support:= 0.-support.
Notation
boot
[ "From HB Require Import structures", "From mathcomp Require Import ssreflect ssrfun ssrbool eqtype choice ssrnat seq", "From mathcomp Require Import bigop fintype finfun monoid" ]
boot/nmodule.v
support
ffun_addf g := [ffun a => f a + g a]. HB.instance Definition _ := hasAdd.Build {ffun aT -> rT} ffun_add.
Definition
boot
[ "From HB Require Import structures", "From mathcomp Require Import ssreflect ssrfun ssrbool eqtype choice ssrnat seq", "From mathcomp Require Import bigop fintype finfun monoid" ]
boot/nmodule.v
ffun_add
Definition_ := BaseAddMagma_isAddMagma.Build {ffun aT -> rT} ffun_addrC.
HB.instance
boot
[ "From HB Require Import structures", "From mathcomp Require Import ssreflect ssrfun ssrbool eqtype choice ssrnat seq", "From mathcomp Require Import bigop fintype finfun monoid" ]
boot/nmodule.v
Definition
Definition_ := AddMagma_isAddSemigroup.Build {ffun aT -> rT} ffun_addrA.
HB.instance
boot
[ "From HB Require Import structures", "From mathcomp Require Import ssreflect ssrfun ssrbool eqtype choice ssrnat seq", "From mathcomp Require Import bigop fintype finfun monoid" ]
boot/nmodule.v
Definition
ffun_zero:= [ffun a : aT => (0 : rT)]. HB.instance Definition _ := hasZero.Build {ffun aT -> rT} ffun_zero.
Definition
boot
[ "From HB Require Import structures", "From mathcomp Require Import ssreflect ssrfun ssrbool eqtype choice ssrnat seq", "From mathcomp Require Import bigop fintype finfun monoid" ]
boot/nmodule.v
ffun_zero
Definition_ := BaseAddUMagma_isAddUMagma.Build {ffun aT -> rT} ffun_add0r.
HB.instance
boot
[ "From HB Require Import structures", "From mathcomp Require Import ssreflect ssrfun ssrbool eqtype choice ssrnat seq", "From mathcomp Require Import bigop fintype finfun monoid" ]
boot/nmodule.v
Definition
Definition_ (aT : finType) (rT : ChoiceBaseAddMagma.type) := BaseAddMagma.on {ffun aT -> rT}. HB.instance Definition _ (aT : finType) (rT : ChoiceBaseAddUMagma.type) := BaseAddMagma.on {ffun aT -> rT}.
HB.instance
boot
[ "From HB Require Import structures", "From mathcomp Require Import ssreflect ssrfun ssrbool eqtype choice ssrnat seq", "From mathcomp Require Import bigop fintype finfun monoid" ]
boot/nmodule.v
Definition
Definition_ := AddSemigroup.on {ffun aT -> rT}.
HB.instance
boot
[ "From HB Require Import structures", "From mathcomp Require Import ssreflect ssrfun ssrbool eqtype choice ssrnat seq", "From mathcomp Require Import bigop fintype finfun monoid" ]
boot/nmodule.v
Definition
ffunMnEf n x : (f *+ n) x = f x *+ n. Proof. elim: n => [|n IHn]; first by rewrite ffunE. by rewrite !mulrS ffunE IHn. Qed.
Lemma
boot
[ "From HB Require Import structures", "From mathcomp Require Import ssreflect ssrfun ssrbool eqtype choice ssrnat seq", "From mathcomp Require Import bigop fintype finfun monoid" ]
boot/nmodule.v
ffunMnE
sum_ffunEx : (\sum_(i <- r | P i) F i) x = \sum_(i <- r | P i) F i x. Proof. by elim/big_rec2: _ => // [|i _ y _ <-]; rewrite !ffunE. Qed.
Lemma
boot
[ "From HB Require Import structures", "From mathcomp Require Import ssreflect ssrfun ssrbool eqtype choice ssrnat seq", "From mathcomp Require Import bigop fintype finfun monoid" ]
boot/nmodule.v
sum_ffunE
sum_ffun: \sum_(i <- r | P i) F i = [ffun x => \sum_(i <- r | P i) F i x]. Proof. by apply/ffunP=> i; rewrite sum_ffunE ffunE. Qed.
Lemma
boot
[ "From HB Require Import structures", "From mathcomp Require Import ssreflect ssrfun ssrbool eqtype choice ssrnat seq", "From mathcomp Require Import bigop fintype finfun monoid" ]
boot/nmodule.v
sum_ffun
ffun_oppf := [ffun a => - f a]. HB.instance Definition _ := hasOpp.Build {ffun aT -> rT} ffun_opp. Fact ffun_addNr : left_inverse 0 ffun_opp +%R. Proof. by move=> f; apply/ffunP => a; rewrite !ffunE addNr. Qed. HB.instance Definition _ := Nmodule_isZmodule.Build {ffun aT -> rT} ffun_addNr.
Definition
boot
[ "From HB Require Import structures", "From mathcomp Require Import ssreflect ssrfun ssrbool eqtype choice ssrnat seq", "From mathcomp Require Import bigop fintype finfun monoid" ]
boot/nmodule.v
ffun_opp
add_pair(a b : U * V) := (a.1 + b.1, a.2 + b.2). HB.instance Definition _ := hasAdd.Build (U * V)%type add_pair.
Definition
boot
[ "From HB Require Import structures", "From mathcomp Require Import ssreflect ssrfun ssrbool eqtype choice ssrnat seq", "From mathcomp Require Import bigop fintype finfun monoid" ]
boot/nmodule.v
add_pair
Definition_ := BaseAddMagma_isAddMagma.Build (U * V)%type pair_addrC.
HB.instance
boot
[ "From HB Require Import structures", "From mathcomp Require Import ssreflect ssrfun ssrbool eqtype choice ssrnat seq", "From mathcomp Require Import bigop fintype finfun monoid" ]
boot/nmodule.v
Definition
Definition_ := AddMagma_isAddSemigroup.Build (U * V)%type pair_addrA.
HB.instance
boot
[ "From HB Require Import structures", "From mathcomp Require Import ssreflect ssrfun ssrbool eqtype choice ssrnat seq", "From mathcomp Require Import bigop fintype finfun monoid" ]
boot/nmodule.v
Definition
pair_zero: U * V := (0, 0). HB.instance Definition _ := hasZero.Build (U * V)%type pair_zero. Fact fst_is_zmod_morphism : nmod_morphism (@fst U V). Proof. by []. Qed. Fact snd_is_zmod_morphism : nmod_morphism (@snd U V). Proof. by []. Qed. HB.instance Definition _ := isNmodMorphism.Build _ _ (@fst U V) fst_is_zmod_morphism. HB.instance Definition _ := isNmodMorphism.Build _ _ (@snd U V) snd_is_zmod_morphism.
Definition
boot
[ "From HB Require Import structures", "From mathcomp Require Import ssreflect ssrfun ssrbool eqtype choice ssrnat seq", "From mathcomp Require Import bigop fintype finfun monoid" ]
boot/nmodule.v
pair_zero
Definition_ := BaseAddUMagma_isAddUMagma.Build (U * V)%type pair_add0r.
HB.instance
boot
[ "From HB Require Import structures", "From mathcomp Require Import ssreflect ssrfun ssrbool eqtype choice ssrnat seq", "From mathcomp Require Import bigop fintype finfun monoid" ]
boot/nmodule.v
Definition
Definition_ (U V : ChoiceBaseAddMagma.type) := BaseAddMagma.on (U * V)%type. HB.instance Definition _ (U V : ChoiceBaseAddUMagma.type) := BaseAddMagma.on (U * V)%type. HB.instance Definition _ (U V : nmodType) := AddSemigroup.on (U * V)%type.
HB.instance
boot
[ "From HB Require Import structures", "From mathcomp Require Import ssreflect ssrfun ssrbool eqtype choice ssrnat seq", "From mathcomp Require Import bigop fintype finfun monoid" ]
boot/nmodule.v
Definition
pair_opp(a : U * V) := (- a.1, - a.2). HB.instance Definition _ := hasOpp.Build (U * V)%type pair_opp. Fact pair_addNr : left_inverse 0 pair_opp +%R. Proof. by move=> [] al ar; rewrite /pair_opp; congr pair; apply/addNr. Qed. HB.instance Definition _ := Nmodule_isZmodule.Build (U * V)%type pair_addNr.
Definition
boot
[ "From HB Require Import structures", "From mathcomp Require Import ssreflect ssrfun ssrbool eqtype choice ssrnat seq", "From mathcomp Require Import bigop fintype finfun monoid" ]
boot/nmodule.v
pair_opp
Definition_ := isZmodule.Build bool addbA addbC addFb addbb.
HB.instance
boot
[ "From HB Require Import structures", "From mathcomp Require Import ssreflect ssrfun ssrbool eqtype choice ssrnat seq", "From mathcomp Require Import bigop fintype finfun monoid" ]
boot/nmodule.v
Definition
Definition_ := isNmodule.Build nat addnA addnC add0n. HB.instance Definition _ (V : nmodType) (x : V) := isNmodMorphism.Build nat V (natmul x) (mulr0n x, mulrnDr x).
HB.instance
boot
[ "From HB Require Import structures", "From mathcomp Require Import ssreflect ssrfun ssrbool eqtype choice ssrnat seq", "From mathcomp Require Import bigop fintype finfun monoid" ]
boot/nmodule.v
Definition
natr0E: 0 = 0%N. Proof. by []. Qed.
Lemma
boot
[ "From HB Require Import structures", "From mathcomp Require Import ssreflect ssrfun ssrbool eqtype choice ssrnat seq", "From mathcomp Require Import bigop fintype finfun monoid" ]
boot/nmodule.v
natr0E
natrDEn m : n + m = (n + m)%N. Proof. by []. Qed.
Lemma
boot
[ "From HB Require Import structures", "From mathcomp Require Import ssreflect ssrfun ssrbool eqtype choice ssrnat seq", "From mathcomp Require Import bigop fintype finfun monoid" ]
boot/nmodule.v
natrDE
natrE:= (natr0E, natrDE).
Definition
boot
[ "From HB Require Import structures", "From mathcomp Require Import ssreflect ssrfun ssrbool eqtype choice ssrnat seq", "From mathcomp Require Import bigop fintype finfun monoid" ]
boot/nmodule.v
natrE
pathx (p : seq T) := if p is y :: p' then e x y && path y p' else true.
Fixpoint
boot
[ "From mathcomp Require Import ssreflect ssrfun ssrbool eqtype ssrnat seq" ]
boot/path.v
path
cat_pathx p1 p2 : path x (p1 ++ p2) = path x p1 && path (last x p1) p2. Proof. by elim: p1 x => [|y p1 Hrec] x //=; rewrite Hrec -!andbA. Qed.
Lemma
boot
[ "From mathcomp Require Import ssreflect ssrfun ssrbool eqtype ssrnat seq" ]
boot/path.v
cat_path
rcons_pathx p y : path x (rcons p y) = path x p && e (last x p) y. Proof. by rewrite -cats1 cat_path /= andbT. Qed.
Lemma
boot
[ "From mathcomp Require Import ssreflect ssrfun ssrbool eqtype ssrnat seq" ]
boot/path.v
rcons_path
take_pathx p i : path x p -> path x (take i p). Proof. elim: p x i => [//| x p] IHp x' [//| i] /= /andP[-> ?]; exact: IHp. Qed.
Lemma
boot
[ "From mathcomp Require Import ssreflect ssrfun ssrbool eqtype ssrnat seq" ]
boot/path.v
take_path
pathPx p x0 : reflect (forall i, i < size p -> e (nth x0 (x :: p) i) (nth x0 p i)) (path x p). Proof. elim: p x => [|y p IHp] x /=; first by left. apply: (iffP andP) => [[e_xy /IHp e_p [] //] | e_p]. by split; [apply: (e_p 0) | apply/(IHp y) => i; apply: e_p i.+1]. Qed.
Lemma
boot
[ "From mathcomp Require Import ssreflect ssrfun ssrbool eqtype ssrnat seq" ]
boot/path.v
pathP
cyclep := if p is x :: p' then path x (rcons p' x) else true.
Definition
boot
[ "From mathcomp Require Import ssreflect ssrfun ssrbool eqtype ssrnat seq" ]
boot/path.v
cycle
cycle_pathp : cycle p = path (last x0_cycle p) p. Proof. by case: p => //= x p; rewrite rcons_path andbC. Qed.
Lemma
boot
[ "From mathcomp Require Import ssreflect ssrfun ssrbool eqtype ssrnat seq" ]
boot/path.v
cycle_path
cycle_catCp q : cycle (p ++ q) = cycle (q ++ p). Proof. case: p q => [|x p] [|y q]; rewrite /= ?cats0 //=. by rewrite !rcons_path !cat_path !last_cat /= -!andbA; do !bool_congr. Qed.
Lemma
boot
[ "From mathcomp Require Import ssreflect ssrfun ssrbool eqtype ssrnat seq" ]
boot/path.v
cycle_catC
rot_cyclep : cycle (rot n0 p) = cycle p. Proof. by rewrite cycle_catC cat_take_drop. Qed.
Lemma
boot
[ "From mathcomp Require Import ssreflect ssrfun ssrbool eqtype ssrnat seq" ]
boot/path.v
rot_cycle
rotr_cyclep : cycle (rotr n0 p) = cycle p. Proof. by rewrite -rot_cycle rotrK. Qed.
Lemma
boot
[ "From mathcomp Require Import ssreflect ssrfun ssrbool eqtype ssrnat seq" ]
boot/path.v
rotr_cycle
sorteds := if s is x :: s' then path x s' else true.
Definition
boot
[ "From mathcomp Require Import ssreflect ssrfun ssrbool eqtype ssrnat seq" ]
boot/path.v
sorted
sortedPs x : reflect (forall i, i.+1 < size s -> e (nth x s i) (nth x s i.+1)) (sorted s). Proof. by case: s => *; [constructor|apply: (iffP (pathP _ _ _)); apply]. Qed.
Lemma
boot
[ "From mathcomp Require Import ssreflect ssrfun ssrbool eqtype ssrnat seq" ]
boot/path.v
sortedP
path_sortedx s : path x s -> sorted s. Proof. by case: s => //= y s /andP[]. Qed.
Lemma
boot
[ "From mathcomp Require Import ssreflect ssrfun ssrbool eqtype ssrnat seq" ]
boot/path.v
path_sorted
path_min_sortedx s : all (e x) s -> path x s = sorted s. Proof. by case: s => //= y s /andP [->]. Qed.
Lemma
boot
[ "From mathcomp Require Import ssreflect ssrfun ssrbool eqtype ssrnat seq" ]
boot/path.v
path_min_sorted
pairwise_sorteds : pairwise e s -> sorted s. Proof. by elim: s => //= x s IHs /andP[/path_min_sorted -> /IHs]. Qed.
Lemma
boot
[ "From mathcomp Require Import ssreflect ssrfun ssrbool eqtype ssrnat seq" ]
boot/path.v
pairwise_sorted
sorted_cat_conss1 x s2 : sorted (s1 ++ x :: s2) = sorted (rcons s1 x) && path x s2. Proof. by case: s1 => [ | e1 s1] //=; rewrite -cat_rcons cat_path last_rcons. Qed.
Lemma
boot
[ "From mathcomp Require Import ssreflect ssrfun ssrbool eqtype ssrnat seq" ]
boot/path.v
sorted_cat_cons
rev_pathx p : path e (last x p) (rev (belast x p)) = path (fun z => e^~ z) x p. Proof. elim: p x => //= y p IHp x; rewrite rev_cons rcons_path -{}IHp andbC. by rewrite -(last_cons x) -rev_rcons -lastI rev_cons last_rcons. Qed.
Lemma
boot
[ "From mathcomp Require Import ssreflect ssrfun ssrbool eqtype ssrnat seq" ]
boot/path.v
rev_path
rev_cyclep : cycle e (rev p) = cycle (fun z => e^~ z) p. Proof. case: p => //= x p; rewrite -rev_path last_rcons belast_rcons rev_cons. by rewrite -[in LHS]cats1 cycle_catC. Qed.
Lemma
boot
[ "From mathcomp Require Import ssreflect ssrfun ssrbool eqtype ssrnat seq" ]
boot/path.v
rev_cycle
rev_sortedp : sorted e (rev p) = sorted (fun z => e^~ z) p. Proof. by case: p => //= x p; rewrite -rev_path lastI rev_rcons. Qed.
Lemma
boot
[ "From mathcomp Require Import ssreflect ssrfun ssrbool eqtype ssrnat seq" ]
boot/path.v
rev_sorted
path_relIx s : path [rel x y | e x y && e' x y] x s = path e x s && path e' x s. Proof. by elim: s x => //= y s IHs x; rewrite andbACA IHs. Qed.
Lemma
boot
[ "From mathcomp Require Import ssreflect ssrfun ssrbool eqtype ssrnat seq" ]
boot/path.v
path_relI
cycle_relIs : cycle [rel x y | e x y && e' x y] s = cycle e s && cycle e' s. Proof. by case: s => [|? ?]; last apply: path_relI. Qed.
Lemma
boot
[ "From mathcomp Require Import ssreflect ssrfun ssrbool eqtype ssrnat seq" ]
boot/path.v
cycle_relI
sorted_relIs : sorted [rel x y | e x y && e' x y] s = sorted e s && sorted e' s. Proof. by case: s; last apply: path_relI. Qed.
Lemma
boot
[ "From mathcomp Require Import ssreflect ssrfun ssrbool eqtype ssrnat seq" ]
boot/path.v
sorted_relI
sub_in_pathx s : all P (x :: s) -> path e x s -> path e' x s. Proof. by elim: s x => //= y s ihs x /and3P [? ? ?] /andP [/ee' -> //]; apply/ihs/andP. Qed.
Lemma
boot
[ "From mathcomp Require Import ssreflect ssrfun ssrbool eqtype ssrnat seq" ]
boot/path.v
sub_in_path
sub_in_cycles : all P s -> cycle e s -> cycle e' s. Proof. case: s => //= x s /andP [Px Ps]. by apply: sub_in_path; rewrite /= all_rcons Px. Qed.
Lemma
boot
[ "From mathcomp Require Import ssreflect ssrfun ssrbool eqtype ssrnat seq" ]
boot/path.v
sub_in_cycle
sub_in_sorteds : all P s -> sorted e s -> sorted e' s. Proof. by case: s => //; apply: sub_in_path. Qed.
Lemma
boot
[ "From mathcomp Require Import ssreflect ssrfun ssrbool eqtype ssrnat seq" ]
boot/path.v
sub_in_sorted
eq_in_pathx s : all P (x :: s) -> path e x s = path e' x s. Proof. by move=> Pxs; apply/idP/idP; apply: sub_in_path Pxs. Qed.
Lemma
boot
[ "From mathcomp Require Import ssreflect ssrfun ssrbool eqtype ssrnat seq" ]
boot/path.v
eq_in_path
eq_in_cycles : all P s -> cycle e s = cycle e' s. Proof. by move=> Ps; apply/idP/idP; apply: sub_in_cycle Ps. Qed.
Lemma
boot
[ "From mathcomp Require Import ssreflect ssrfun ssrbool eqtype ssrnat seq" ]
boot/path.v
eq_in_cycle
eq_in_sorteds : all P s -> sorted e s = sorted e' s. Proof. by move=> Ps; apply/idP/idP; apply: sub_in_sorted Ps. Qed.
Lemma
boot
[ "From mathcomp Require Import ssreflect ssrfun ssrbool eqtype ssrnat seq" ]
boot/path.v
eq_in_sorted
sub_path: subrel e e' -> forall x p, path e x p -> path e' x p. Proof. by move=> ? ? ?; apply/sub_in_path/all_predT; apply: in2W. Qed.
Lemma
boot
[ "From mathcomp Require Import ssreflect ssrfun ssrbool eqtype ssrnat seq" ]
boot/path.v
sub_path
sub_cycle: subrel e e' -> subpred (cycle e) (cycle e'). Proof. by move=> ee' [] // ? ?; apply: sub_path. Qed.
Lemma
boot
[ "From mathcomp Require Import ssreflect ssrfun ssrbool eqtype ssrnat seq" ]
boot/path.v
sub_cycle
sub_sorted: subrel e e' -> subpred (sorted e) (sorted e'). Proof. by move=> ee' [] //=; apply: sub_path. Qed.
Lemma
boot
[ "From mathcomp Require Import ssreflect ssrfun ssrbool eqtype ssrnat seq" ]
boot/path.v
sub_sorted
eq_path: e =2 e' -> path e =2 path e'. Proof. by move=> ? ? ?; apply/eq_in_path/all_predT; apply: in2W. Qed.
Lemma
boot
[ "From mathcomp Require Import ssreflect ssrfun ssrbool eqtype ssrnat seq" ]
boot/path.v
eq_path
eq_cycle: e =2 e' -> cycle e =1 cycle e'. Proof. by move=> ee' [] // ? ?; apply: eq_path. Qed.
Lemma
boot
[ "From mathcomp Require Import ssreflect ssrfun ssrbool eqtype ssrnat seq" ]
boot/path.v
eq_cycle
eq_sorted: e =2 e' -> sorted e =1 sorted e'. Proof. by move=> ee' [] // ? ?; apply: eq_path. Qed.
Lemma
boot
[ "From mathcomp Require Import ssreflect ssrfun ssrbool eqtype ssrnat seq" ]
boot/path.v
eq_sorted
order_path_min_inx s : {in P & &, transitive leT} -> all P (x :: s) -> path leT x s -> all (leT x) s. Proof. move=> leT_tr; elim: s => //= y s ihs /and3P [Px Py Ps] /andP [xy ys]. rewrite xy {}ihs ?Px //=; case: s Ps ys => //= z s /andP [Pz Ps] /andP [yz ->]. by rewrite (leT_tr _ _ _ Py Px Pz). Qed. Hypothesis leT_tr : {in P & &, transitive leT}.
Lemma
boot
[ "From mathcomp Require Import ssreflect ssrfun ssrbool eqtype ssrnat seq" ]
boot/path.v
order_path_min_in
path_sorted_inEx s : all P (x :: s) -> path leT x s = all (leT x) s && sorted leT s. Proof. move=> Pxs; apply/idP/idP => [xs|/andP[/path_min_sorted<-//]]. by rewrite (order_path_min_in leT_tr) //; apply: path_sorted xs. Qed.
Lemma
boot
[ "From mathcomp Require Import ssreflect ssrfun ssrbool eqtype ssrnat seq" ]
boot/path.v
path_sorted_inE
sorted_pairwise_ins : all P s -> sorted leT s = pairwise leT s. Proof. by elim: s => //= x s IHs /andP [Px Ps]; rewrite path_sorted_inE ?IHs //= Px. Qed.
Lemma
boot
[ "From mathcomp Require Import ssreflect ssrfun ssrbool eqtype ssrnat seq" ]
boot/path.v
sorted_pairwise_in
path_pairwise_inx s : all P (x :: s) -> path leT x s = pairwise leT (x :: s). Proof. by move=> Pxs; rewrite -sorted_pairwise_in. Qed.
Lemma
boot
[ "From mathcomp Require Import ssreflect ssrfun ssrbool eqtype ssrnat seq" ]
boot/path.v
path_pairwise_in
cat_sorted2s s' : sorted leT (s ++ s') -> sorted leT s * sorted leT s'. Proof. by case: s => //= x s; rewrite cat_path => /andP[-> /path_sorted]. Qed.
Lemma
boot
[ "From mathcomp Require Import ssreflect ssrfun ssrbool eqtype ssrnat seq" ]
boot/path.v
cat_sorted2
sorted_mask_inm s : all P s -> sorted leT s -> sorted leT (mask m s). Proof. by move=> Ps; rewrite !sorted_pairwise_in ?all_mask //; exact: pairwise_mask. Qed.
Lemma
boot
[ "From mathcomp Require Import ssreflect ssrfun ssrbool eqtype ssrnat seq" ]
boot/path.v
sorted_mask_in
sorted_filter_ina s : all P s -> sorted leT s -> sorted leT (filter a s). Proof. rewrite filter_mask; exact: sorted_mask_in. Qed.
Lemma
boot
[ "From mathcomp Require Import ssreflect ssrfun ssrbool eqtype ssrnat seq" ]
boot/path.v
sorted_filter_in
path_mask_inx m s : all P (x :: s) -> path leT x s -> path leT x (mask m s). Proof. exact/(sorted_mask_in (true :: m)). Qed.
Lemma
boot
[ "From mathcomp Require Import ssreflect ssrfun ssrbool eqtype ssrnat seq" ]
boot/path.v
path_mask_in
path_filter_inx a s : all P (x :: s) -> path leT x s -> path leT x (filter a s). Proof. by move=> Pxs; rewrite filter_mask; exact: path_mask_in. Qed.
Lemma
boot
[ "From mathcomp Require Import ssreflect ssrfun ssrbool eqtype ssrnat seq" ]
boot/path.v
path_filter_in
sorted_ltn_nth_inx0 s : all P s -> sorted leT s -> {in [pred n | n < size s] &, {homo nth x0 s : i j / i < j >-> leT i j}}. Proof. by move=> Ps; rewrite sorted_pairwise_in //; apply/pairwiseP. Qed. Hypothesis leT_refl : {in P, reflexive leT}.
Lemma
boot
[ "From mathcomp Require Import ssreflect ssrfun ssrbool eqtype ssrnat seq" ]
boot/path.v
sorted_ltn_nth_in
sorted_leq_nth_inx0 s : all P s -> sorted leT s -> {in [pred n | n < size s] &, {homo nth x0 s : i j / i <= j >-> leT i j}}. Proof. move=> Ps s_sorted x y xs ys; rewrite leq_eqVlt=> /predU1P[->|]. exact/leT_refl/all_nthP. exact: sorted_ltn_nth_in. Qed.
Lemma
boot
[ "From mathcomp Require Import ssreflect ssrfun ssrbool eqtype ssrnat seq" ]
boot/path.v
sorted_leq_nth_in
order_path_minx s : transitive leT -> path leT x s -> all (leT x) s. Proof. by move=> leT_tr; apply/order_path_min_in/all_predT => //; apply: in3W. Qed. Hypothesis leT_tr : transitive leT.
Lemma
boot
[ "From mathcomp Require Import ssreflect ssrfun ssrbool eqtype ssrnat seq" ]
boot/path.v
order_path_min
path_lex x' s : leT x x' -> path leT x' s -> path leT x s. Proof. by case: s => [//| x'' s xlex' /= /andP[x'lex'' ->]]; rewrite (leT_tr xlex'). Qed. Let leT_tr' : {in predT & &, transitive leT}. Proof. exact: in3W. Qed.
Lemma
boot
[ "From mathcomp Require Import ssreflect ssrfun ssrbool eqtype ssrnat seq" ]
boot/path.v
path_le
path_sortedEx s : path leT x s = all (leT x) s && sorted leT s. Proof. exact/path_sorted_inE/all_predT. Qed.
Lemma
boot
[ "From mathcomp Require Import ssreflect ssrfun ssrbool eqtype ssrnat seq" ]
boot/path.v
path_sortedE
sorted_pairwises : sorted leT s = pairwise leT s. Proof. exact/sorted_pairwise_in/all_predT. Qed.
Lemma
boot
[ "From mathcomp Require Import ssreflect ssrfun ssrbool eqtype ssrnat seq" ]
boot/path.v
sorted_pairwise
path_pairwisex s : path leT x s = pairwise leT (x :: s). Proof. exact/path_pairwise_in/all_predT. Qed.
Lemma
boot
[ "From mathcomp Require Import ssreflect ssrfun ssrbool eqtype ssrnat seq" ]
boot/path.v
path_pairwise
sorted_maskm s : sorted leT s -> sorted leT (mask m s). Proof. exact/sorted_mask_in/all_predT. Qed.
Lemma
boot
[ "From mathcomp Require Import ssreflect ssrfun ssrbool eqtype ssrnat seq" ]
boot/path.v
sorted_mask
sorted_filtera s : sorted leT s -> sorted leT (filter a s). Proof. exact/sorted_filter_in/all_predT. Qed.
Lemma
boot
[ "From mathcomp Require Import ssreflect ssrfun ssrbool eqtype ssrnat seq" ]
boot/path.v
sorted_filter
path_maskx m s : path leT x s -> path leT x (mask m s). Proof. exact/path_mask_in/all_predT. Qed.
Lemma
boot
[ "From mathcomp Require Import ssreflect ssrfun ssrbool eqtype ssrnat seq" ]
boot/path.v
path_mask
path_filterx a s : path leT x s -> path leT x (filter a s). Proof. exact/path_filter_in/all_predT. Qed.
Lemma
boot
[ "From mathcomp Require Import ssreflect ssrfun ssrbool eqtype ssrnat seq" ]
boot/path.v
path_filter
sorted_ltn_nthx0 s : sorted leT s -> {in [pred n | n < size s] &, {homo nth x0 s : i j / i < j >-> leT i j}}. Proof. exact/sorted_ltn_nth_in/all_predT. Qed. Hypothesis leT_refl : reflexive leT.
Lemma
boot
[ "From mathcomp Require Import ssreflect ssrfun ssrbool eqtype ssrnat seq" ]
boot/path.v
sorted_ltn_nth
sorted_leq_nthx0 s : sorted leT s -> {in [pred n | n < size s] &, {homo nth x0 s : i j / i <= j >-> leT i j}}. Proof. exact/sorted_leq_nth_in/all_predT. Qed.
Lemma
boot
[ "From mathcomp Require Import ssreflect ssrfun ssrbool eqtype ssrnat seq" ]
boot/path.v
sorted_leq_nth
take_sortedn s : sorted leT s -> sorted leT (take n s). Proof. by rewrite -[s in sorted _ s](cat_take_drop n) => /cat_sorted2[]. Qed.
Lemma
boot
[ "From mathcomp Require Import ssreflect ssrfun ssrbool eqtype ssrnat seq" ]
boot/path.v
take_sorted
drop_sortedn s : sorted leT s -> sorted leT (drop n s). Proof. by rewrite -[s in sorted _ s](cat_take_drop n) => /cat_sorted2[]. Qed.
Lemma
boot
[ "From mathcomp Require Import ssreflect ssrfun ssrbool eqtype ssrnat seq" ]
boot/path.v
drop_sorted
path_mapx s : path e' (f x) (map f s) = path (relpre f e') x s. Proof. by elim: s x => //= y s <-. Qed.
Lemma
boot
[ "From mathcomp Require Import ssreflect ssrfun ssrbool eqtype ssrnat seq" ]
boot/path.v
path_map