statement
stringlengths
1
2.88k
proof
stringlengths
0
13.9k
type
stringclasses
10 values
symbolic_name
stringlengths
1
131
library
stringclasses
417 values
filename
stringlengths
17
80
imports
listlengths
0
16
deps
listlengths
0
64
docstring
stringlengths
0
10.2k
source_url
stringclasses
1 value
commit
stringclasses
1 value
prove_neg (ic : instance_cache) (a : expr) : tactic (instance_cache × expr × expr)
match match_sign a with | sum.inl a := do (ic, p) ← ic.mk_app ``neg_neg [a], return (ic, a, p) | sum.inr ff := do (ic, p) ← ic.mk_app ``neg_zero [], return (ic, a, p) | sum.inr tt := do (ic, a') ← ic.mk_app ``has_neg.neg [a], p ← mk_eq_refl a', return (ic, a', p) end
def
norm_num.prove_neg
tactic
src/tactic/norm_num.lean
[ "data.rat.cast", "data.rat.meta_defs", "data.int.lemmas" ]
[]
Given `a` a rational numeral, returns `(b, ⊢ -a = b)`.
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib
65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83
sub_pos {α} [add_group α] (a b b' c : α) (hb : -b = b') (h : a + b' = c) : a - b = c
by rwa [← hb, ← sub_eq_add_neg] at h
theorem
norm_num.sub_pos
tactic
src/tactic/norm_num.lean
[ "data.rat.cast", "data.rat.meta_defs", "data.int.lemmas" ]
[ "add_group" ]
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib
65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83
sub_neg {α} [add_group α] (a b c : α) (h : a + b = c) : a - -b = c
by rwa sub_neg_eq_add
theorem
norm_num.sub_neg
tactic
src/tactic/norm_num.lean
[ "data.rat.cast", "data.rat.meta_defs", "data.int.lemmas" ]
[ "add_group" ]
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib
65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83
prove_sub (ic : instance_cache) (a b : expr) : tactic (instance_cache × expr × expr)
match match_sign b with | sum.inl b := do (ic, c, p) ← prove_add_rat' ic a b, (ic, p) ← ic.mk_app ``sub_neg [a, b, c, p], return (ic, c, p) | sum.inr ff := do (ic, p) ← ic.mk_app ``sub_zero [a], return (ic, a, p) | sum.inr tt := do (ic, b', pb) ← prove_neg ic b, (ic, c, p) ← prove_add_rat' ic a b', (ic,...
def
norm_num.prove_sub
tactic
src/tactic/norm_num.lean
[ "data.rat.cast", "data.rat.meta_defs", "data.int.lemmas" ]
[]
Given `a`,`b` rational numerals, returns `(c, ⊢ a - b = c)`.
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib
65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83
sub_nat_pos (a b c : ℕ) (h : b + c = a) : a - b = c
h ▸ add_tsub_cancel_left _ _
theorem
norm_num.sub_nat_pos
tactic
src/tactic/norm_num.lean
[ "data.rat.cast", "data.rat.meta_defs", "data.int.lemmas" ]
[ "add_tsub_cancel_left" ]
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib
65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83
sub_nat_neg (a b c : ℕ) (h : a + c = b) : a - b = 0
tsub_eq_zero_iff_le.mpr $ h ▸ nat.le_add_right _ _
theorem
norm_num.sub_nat_neg
tactic
src/tactic/norm_num.lean
[ "data.rat.cast", "data.rat.meta_defs", "data.int.lemmas" ]
[]
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib
65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83
prove_sub_nat (ic : instance_cache) (a b : expr) : tactic (expr × expr)
do na ← a.to_nat, nb ← b.to_nat, if nb ≤ na then do (ic, c) ← ic.of_nat (na - nb), (ic, p) ← prove_add_nat ic b c a, return (c, `(sub_nat_pos).mk_app [a, b, c, p]) else do (ic, c) ← ic.of_nat (nb - na), (ic, p) ← prove_add_nat ic a c b, return (`(0 : ℕ), `(sub_nat_neg).mk_app [a, b, c, p])
def
norm_num.prove_sub_nat
tactic
src/tactic/norm_num.lean
[ "data.rat.cast", "data.rat.meta_defs", "data.int.lemmas" ]
[]
Given `a : nat`,`b : nat` natural numerals, returns `(c, ⊢ a - b = c)`.
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib
65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83
eval_field : expr → tactic (expr × expr)
| `(%%e₁ + %%e₂) := do n₁ ← e₁.to_rat, n₂ ← e₂.to_rat, c ← infer_type e₁ >>= mk_instance_cache, let n₃ := n₁ + n₂, (c, e₃) ← c.of_rat n₃, (_, p) ← prove_add_rat c e₁ e₂ e₃ n₁ n₂ n₃, return (e₃, p) | `(%%e₁ * %%e₂) := do n₁ ← e₁.to_rat, n₂ ← e₂.to_rat, c ← infer_type e₁ >>= mk_instance_cache, prod.snd ...
def
norm_num.eval_field
tactic
src/tactic/norm_num.lean
[ "data.rat.cast", "data.rat.meta_defs", "data.int.lemmas" ]
[]
Evaluates the basic field operations `+`,`neg`,`-`,`*`,`inv`,`/` on numerals. Also handles nat subtraction. Does not do recursive simplification; that is, `1 + 1 + 1` will not simplify but `2 + 1` will. This is handled by the top level `simp` call in `norm_num.derive`.
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib
65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83
pow_bit0 [monoid α] (a c' c : α) (b : ℕ) (h : a ^ b = c') (h₂ : c' * c' = c) : a ^ bit0 b = c
h₂ ▸ by simp [pow_bit0, h]
lemma
norm_num.pow_bit0
tactic
src/tactic/norm_num.lean
[ "data.rat.cast", "data.rat.meta_defs", "data.int.lemmas" ]
[ "monoid", "pow_bit0" ]
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib
65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83
pow_bit1 [monoid α] (a c₁ c₂ c : α) (b : ℕ) (h : a ^ b = c₁) (h₂ : c₁ * c₁ = c₂) (h₃ : c₂ * a = c) : a ^ bit1 b = c
by rw [← h₃, ← h₂]; simp [pow_bit1, h]
lemma
norm_num.pow_bit1
tactic
src/tactic/norm_num.lean
[ "data.rat.cast", "data.rat.meta_defs", "data.int.lemmas" ]
[ "monoid", "pow_bit1" ]
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib
65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83
prove_pow (a : expr) (na : ℚ) : instance_cache → expr → tactic (instance_cache × expr × expr)
| ic b := match match_numeral b with | zero := do (ic, p) ← ic.mk_app ``pow_zero [a], (ic, o) ← ic.mk_app ``has_one.one [], return (ic, o, p) | one := do (ic, p) ← ic.mk_app ``pow_one [a], return (ic, a, p) | bit0 b := do (ic, c', p) ← prove_pow ic b, nc' ← expr.to_rat c', (ic, c...
def
norm_num.prove_pow
tactic
src/tactic/norm_num.lean
[ "data.rat.cast", "data.rat.meta_defs", "data.int.lemmas" ]
[ "expr.to_rat", "pow_bit0", "pow_bit1", "pow_one", "pow_zero" ]
Given `a` a rational numeral and `b : nat`, returns `(c, ⊢ a ^ b = c)`.
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib
65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83
zpow_pos {α} [div_inv_monoid α] (a : α) (b : ℤ) (b' : ℕ) (c : α) (hb : b = b') (h : a ^ b' = c) : a ^ b = c
by rw [← h, hb, zpow_coe_nat]
lemma
norm_num.zpow_pos
tactic
src/tactic/norm_num.lean
[ "data.rat.cast", "data.rat.meta_defs", "data.int.lemmas" ]
[ "div_inv_monoid", "zpow_coe_nat" ]
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib
65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83
zpow_neg {α} [div_inv_monoid α] (a : α) (b : ℤ) (b' : ℕ) (c c' : α) (b0 : 0 < b') (hb : b = b') (h : a ^ b' = c) (hc : c⁻¹ = c') : a ^ -b = c'
by rw [← hc, ← h, hb, zpow_neg_coe_of_pos _ b0]
lemma
norm_num.zpow_neg
tactic
src/tactic/norm_num.lean
[ "data.rat.cast", "data.rat.meta_defs", "data.int.lemmas" ]
[ "div_inv_monoid", "zpow_neg", "zpow_neg_coe_of_pos" ]
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib
65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83
prove_zpow (ic zc nc : instance_cache) (a : expr) (na : ℚ) (b : expr) : tactic (instance_cache × instance_cache × instance_cache × expr × expr)
match match_sign b with | sum.inl b := do (zc, nc, b', hb) ← prove_nat_uncast zc nc b, (nc, b0) ← prove_pos nc b', (ic, c, h) ← prove_pow a na ic b', (ic, c', hc) ← c.to_rat >>= prove_inv ic c, (ic, p) ← ic.mk_app ``zpow_neg [a, b, b', c, c', b0, hb, h, hc], pure (ic, zc, nc, c', p) | sum.in...
def
norm_num.prove_zpow
tactic
src/tactic/norm_num.lean
[ "data.rat.cast", "data.rat.meta_defs", "data.int.lemmas" ]
[ "zpow_neg", "zpow_zero" ]
Given `a` a rational numeral and `b : ℤ`, returns `(c, ⊢ a ^ b = c)`.
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib
65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83
eval_pow : expr → tactic (expr × expr)
| `(@has_pow.pow %%α %%β %%m %%e₁ %%e₂) := do n₁ ← e₁.to_rat, c ← mk_instance_cache α, match β with | `(ℕ) := do (c, m') ← c.mk_app ``monoid.has_pow [], is_def_eq m m', prod.snd <$> prove_pow e₁ n₁ c e₂ | `(ℤ) := do (c, m') ← c.mk_app ``div_inv_monoid.has_pow [], is_def_eq m m', zc ← m...
def
norm_num.eval_pow
tactic
src/tactic/norm_num.lean
[ "data.rat.cast", "data.rat.meta_defs", "data.int.lemmas" ]
[ "div_inv_monoid.has_pow", "monoid.has_pow" ]
Evaluates expressions of the form `a ^ b`, `monoid.npow a b` or `nat.pow a b`.
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib
65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83
true_intro (p : expr) : tactic (expr × expr)
prod.mk `(true) <$> mk_app ``eq_true_intro [p]
def
norm_num.true_intro
tactic
src/tactic/norm_num.lean
[ "data.rat.cast", "data.rat.meta_defs", "data.int.lemmas" ]
[]
Given `⊢ p`, returns `(true, ⊢ p = true)`.
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib
65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83
false_intro (p : expr) : tactic (expr × expr)
prod.mk `(false) <$> mk_app ``eq_false_intro [p]
def
norm_num.false_intro
tactic
src/tactic/norm_num.lean
[ "data.rat.cast", "data.rat.meta_defs", "data.int.lemmas" ]
[]
Given `⊢ ¬ p`, returns `(false, ⊢ p = false)`.
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib
65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83
not_refl_false_intro {α} (a : α) : (a ≠ a) = false
eq_false_intro $ not_not_intro rfl
theorem
norm_num.not_refl_false_intro
tactic
src/tactic/norm_num.lean
[ "data.rat.cast", "data.rat.meta_defs", "data.int.lemmas" ]
[]
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib
65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83
gt_intro {α} [has_lt α] (a b : α) (c) (h : a < b = c) : b > a = c
h
theorem
norm_num.gt_intro
tactic
src/tactic/norm_num.lean
[ "data.rat.cast", "data.rat.meta_defs", "data.int.lemmas" ]
[]
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib
65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83
ge_intro {α} [has_le α] (a b : α) (c) (h : a ≤ b = c) : b ≥ a = c
h
theorem
norm_num.ge_intro
tactic
src/tactic/norm_num.lean
[ "data.rat.cast", "data.rat.meta_defs", "data.int.lemmas" ]
[]
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib
65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83
eval_ineq : expr → tactic (expr × expr)
| `(%%e₁ < %%e₂) := do n₁ ← e₁.to_rat, n₂ ← e₂.to_rat, c ← infer_type e₁ >>= mk_instance_cache, if n₁ < n₂ then do (_, p) ← prove_lt_rat c e₁ e₂ n₁ n₂, true_intro p else if n₁ = n₂ then do (_, p) ← c.mk_app ``lt_irrefl [e₁], false_intro p else do (c, p') ← prove_lt_rat c e₂ e₁ n₂ n₁, (_, p...
def
norm_num.eval_ineq
tactic
src/tactic/norm_num.lean
[ "data.rat.cast", "data.rat.meta_defs", "data.int.lemmas" ]
[]
Evaluates the inequality operations `=`,`<`,`>`,`≤`,`≥`,`≠` on numerals.
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib
65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83
nat_succ_eq (a b c : ℕ) (h₁ : a = b) (h₂ : b + 1 = c) : nat.succ a = c
by rwa h₁
theorem
norm_num.nat_succ_eq
tactic
src/tactic/norm_num.lean
[ "data.rat.cast", "data.rat.meta_defs", "data.int.lemmas" ]
[]
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib
65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83
prove_nat_succ (ic : instance_cache) : expr → tactic (instance_cache × ℕ × expr × expr)
| `(nat.succ %%a) := do (ic, n, b, p₁) ← prove_nat_succ a, let n' := n + 1, (ic, c) ← ic.of_nat n', (ic, p₂) ← prove_add_nat ic b `(1) c, return (ic, n', c, `(nat_succ_eq).mk_app [a, b, c, p₁, p₂]) | e := do n ← e.to_nat, p ← mk_eq_refl e, return (ic, n, e, p)
def
norm_num.prove_nat_succ
tactic
src/tactic/norm_num.lean
[ "data.rat.cast", "data.rat.meta_defs", "data.int.lemmas" ]
[]
Evaluates the expression `nat.succ ... (nat.succ n)` where `n` is a natural numeral. (We could also just handle `nat.succ n` here and rely on `simp` to work bottom up, but we figure that towers of successors coming from e.g. `induction` are a common case.)
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib
65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83
int_to_nat_pos (a : ℤ) (b : ℕ) (h : (by haveI := @nat.cast_coe ℤ; exact b : ℤ) = a) : a.to_nat = b
by rw ← h; simp
theorem
norm_num.int_to_nat_pos
tactic
src/tactic/norm_num.lean
[ "data.rat.cast", "data.rat.meta_defs", "data.int.lemmas" ]
[ "nat.cast_coe" ]
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib
65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83
int_to_nat_neg (a : ℤ) (h : 0 < a) : (-a).to_nat = 0
by simp only [int.to_nat_of_nonpos, h.le, neg_nonpos]
theorem
norm_num.int_to_nat_neg
tactic
src/tactic/norm_num.lean
[ "data.rat.cast", "data.rat.meta_defs", "data.int.lemmas" ]
[ "int.to_nat_of_nonpos", "to_nat" ]
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib
65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83
nat_abs_pos (a : ℤ) (b : ℕ) (h : (by haveI := @nat.cast_coe ℤ; exact b : ℤ) = a) : a.nat_abs = b
by rw ← h; simp
theorem
norm_num.nat_abs_pos
tactic
src/tactic/norm_num.lean
[ "data.rat.cast", "data.rat.meta_defs", "data.int.lemmas" ]
[ "nat.cast_coe" ]
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib
65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83
nat_abs_neg (a : ℤ) (b : ℕ) (h : (by haveI := @nat.cast_coe ℤ; exact b : ℤ) = a) : (-a).nat_abs = b
by rw ← h; simp
theorem
norm_num.nat_abs_neg
tactic
src/tactic/norm_num.lean
[ "data.rat.cast", "data.rat.meta_defs", "data.int.lemmas" ]
[ "nat.cast_coe" ]
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib
65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83
neg_succ_of_nat (a b : ℕ) (c : ℤ) (h₁ : a + 1 = b) (h₂ : (by haveI := @nat.cast_coe ℤ; exact b : ℤ) = c) : -[1+ a] = -c
by rw [← h₂, ← h₁]; refl
theorem
norm_num.neg_succ_of_nat
tactic
src/tactic/norm_num.lean
[ "data.rat.cast", "data.rat.meta_defs", "data.int.lemmas" ]
[ "nat.cast_coe" ]
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib
65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83
eval_nat_int : expr → tactic (expr × expr)
| e@`(nat.succ _) := do ic ← mk_instance_cache `(ℕ), (_, _, ep) ← prove_nat_succ ic e, return ep | `(int.to_nat %%a) := do n ← a.to_int, ic ← mk_instance_cache `(ℤ), if n ≥ 0 then do nc ← mk_instance_cache `(ℕ), (_, _, b, p) ← prove_nat_uncast ic nc a, pure (b, `(int_to_nat_pos).mk_app [a, b, p]...
def
norm_num.eval_nat_int
tactic
src/tactic/norm_num.lean
[ "data.rat.cast", "data.rat.meta_defs", "data.int.lemmas" ]
[]
Evaluates `nat.succ`, `int.to_nat`, `int.nat_abs`, `int.neg_succ_of_nat`.
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib
65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83
int_to_nat_cast (a : ℕ) (b : ℤ) (h : (by haveI := @nat.cast_coe ℤ; exact a : ℤ) = b) : ↑a = b
eq.trans (by simp) h
theorem
norm_num.int_to_nat_cast
tactic
src/tactic/norm_num.lean
[ "data.rat.cast", "data.rat.meta_defs", "data.int.lemmas" ]
[ "nat.cast_coe" ]
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib
65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83
eval_cast : expr → tactic (expr × expr)
| `(@coe ℕ %%α %%inst %%a) := do if inst.is_app_of ``coe_to_lift then if inst.app_arg.is_app_of ``nat.cast_coe then do n ← a.to_nat, ic ← mk_instance_cache α, nc ← mk_instance_cache `(ℕ), (ic, b) ← ic.of_nat n, (_, _, _, p) ← prove_nat_uncast ic nc b, pure (b, p) else if in...
def
norm_num.eval_cast
tactic
src/tactic/norm_num.lean
[ "data.rat.cast", "data.rat.meta_defs", "data.int.lemmas" ]
[ "char_zero", "int.cast_coe", "nat.cast_coe", "rat.cast_coe" ]
Evaluates the `↑n` cast operation from `ℕ`, `ℤ`, `ℚ` to an arbitrary type `α`.
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib
65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83
derive.step (e : expr) : tactic (expr × expr)
eval_field e <|> eval_pow e <|> eval_ineq e <|> eval_cast e <|> eval_nat_int e
def
norm_num.derive.step
tactic
src/tactic/norm_num.lean
[ "data.rat.cast", "data.rat.meta_defs", "data.int.lemmas" ]
[]
This version of `derive` does not fail when the input is already a numeral
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib
65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83
attr : user_attribute (expr → tactic (expr × expr)) unit
{ name := `norm_num, descr := "Add norm_num derivers", cache_cfg := { mk_cache := λ ns, do { t ← ns.mfoldl (λ (t : expr → tactic (expr × expr)) n, do t' ← eval_expr (expr → tactic (expr × expr)) (expr.const n []), pure (λ e, t' e <|> t e)) (λ _, failed), pure...
def
norm_num.attr
tactic
src/tactic/norm_num.lean
[ "data.rat.cast", "data.rat.meta_defs", "data.int.lemmas" ]
[]
An attribute for adding additional extensions to `norm_num`. To use this attribute, put `@[norm_num]` on a tactic of type `expr → tactic (expr × expr)`; the tactic will be called on subterms by `norm_num`, and it is responsible for identifying that the expression is a numerical function applied to numerals, for example...
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib
65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83
get_step : tactic (expr → tactic (expr × expr))
norm_num.attr.get_cache
def
norm_num.get_step
tactic
src/tactic/norm_num.lean
[ "data.rat.cast", "data.rat.meta_defs", "data.int.lemmas" ]
[]
Look up the `norm_num` extensions in the cache and return a tactic extending `derive.step` with additional reduction procedures.
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib
65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83
derive' (step : expr → tactic (expr × expr)) : expr → tactic (expr × expr)
| e := do e ← instantiate_mvars e, (_, e', pr) ← ext_simplify_core () {} simp_lemmas.mk (λ _, failed) (λ _ _ _ _ _, failed) (λ _ _ _ _ e, do (new_e, pr) ← step e, guard (¬ new_e =ₐ e), pure ((), new_e, some pr, tt)) `eq e, pure (e', pr)
def
norm_num.derive'
tactic
src/tactic/norm_num.lean
[ "data.rat.cast", "data.rat.meta_defs", "data.int.lemmas" ]
[]
Simplify an expression bottom-up using `step` to simplify the subexpressions.
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib
65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83
derive (e : expr) : tactic (expr × expr)
do f ← get_step, derive' f e
def
norm_num.derive
tactic
src/tactic/norm_num.lean
[ "data.rat.cast", "data.rat.meta_defs", "data.int.lemmas" ]
[]
Simplify an expression bottom-up using the default `norm_num` set to simplify the subexpressions.
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib
65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83
tactic.norm_num1 (step : expr → tactic (expr × expr)) (loc : interactive.loc) : tactic unit
do ns ← loc.get_locals, success ← tactic.replace_at (norm_num.derive' step) ns loc.include_goal, when loc.include_goal $ try tactic.triv, when (¬ ns.empty) $ try tactic.contradiction, monad.unlessb success $ done <|> fail "norm_num failed to simplify"
def
norm_num.tactic.norm_num1
tactic
src/tactic/norm_num.lean
[ "data.rat.cast", "data.rat.meta_defs", "data.int.lemmas" ]
[ "norm_num.derive'", "tactic.replace_at" ]
Basic version of `norm_num` that does not call `simp`. It uses the provided `step` tactic to simplify the expression; use `get_step` to get the default `norm_num` set and `derive.step` for the basic builtin set of simplifications.
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib
65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83
tactic.norm_num (step : expr → tactic (expr × expr)) (hs : list simp_arg_type) (l : interactive.loc) : tactic unit
do -- Build and discard the simp lemma set, to validate it. mk_simp_set_core ff [] (simp_arg_type.except ``one_div :: hs) tt, repeat1 $ orelse' (tactic.norm_num1 step l) $ interactive.simp_core {} (tactic.norm_num1 step (interactive.loc.ns [none])) ff (simp_arg_type.except ``one_div :: hs) [] l >> skip
def
norm_num.tactic.norm_num
tactic
src/tactic/norm_num.lean
[ "data.rat.cast", "data.rat.meta_defs", "data.int.lemmas" ]
[ "one_div" ]
Normalize numerical expressions. It uses the provided `step` tactic to simplify the expression; use `get_step` to get the default `norm_num` set and `derive.step` for the basic builtin set of simplifications.
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib
65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83
_root_.expr.norm_num (step : expr → tactic (expr × expr)) (no_dflt : bool := ff) (hs : list simp_arg_type := []) (attr_names : list name := []) : expr → tactic (expr × expr)
let simp_step (e : expr) := do (e', p, _) ← e.simp {} (tactic.norm_num1 step (interactive.loc.ns [none])) no_dflt attr_names (simp_arg_type.except ``one_div :: hs), return (e', p) in or_refl_conv $ λ e, do (e', p') ← norm_num.derive' step e <|> simp_step e, (e'', p'') ← _root_.expr.no...
def
expr.norm_num
tactic
src/tactic/norm_num.lean
[ "data.rat.cast", "data.rat.meta_defs", "data.int.lemmas" ]
[ "norm_num.derive'", "one_div" ]
Carry out similar operations as `tactic.norm_num` but on an `expr` rather than a location. Given an expression `e`, returns `(e', ⊢ e = e')`. The `no_dflt`, `hs`, and `attr_names` are passed on to `simp`. Unlike `norm_num`, this tactic does not fail.
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib
65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83
norm_num1 (loc : parse location) : tactic unit
do f ← get_step, tactic.norm_num1 f loc
def
norm_num.tactic.interactive.norm_num1
tactic
src/tactic/norm_num.lean
[ "data.rat.cast", "data.rat.meta_defs", "data.int.lemmas" ]
[]
Basic version of `norm_num` that does not call `simp`.
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib
65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83
norm_num (hs : parse simp_arg_list) (l : parse location) : tactic unit
do f ← get_step, tactic.norm_num f hs l
def
norm_num.tactic.interactive.norm_num
tactic
src/tactic/norm_num.lean
[ "data.rat.cast", "data.rat.meta_defs", "data.int.lemmas" ]
[]
Normalize numerical expressions. Supports the operations `+` `-` `*` `/` `^` and `%` over numerical types such as `ℕ`, `ℤ`, `ℚ`, `ℝ`, `ℂ` and some general algebraic types, and can prove goals of the form `A = B`, `A ≠ B`, `A < B` and `A ≤ B`, where `A` and `B` are numerical expressions. It also has a relatively simple ...
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib
65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83
apply_normed (x : parse texpr) : tactic unit
do x₁ ← to_expr x, (x₂,_) ← derive x₁, tactic.exact x₂
def
norm_num.tactic.interactive.apply_normed
tactic
src/tactic/norm_num.lean
[ "data.rat.cast", "data.rat.meta_defs", "data.int.lemmas" ]
[]
Normalizes a numerical expression and tries to close the goal with the result.
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib
65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83
norm_num1 : conv unit
replace_lhs derive
def
norm_num.conv.interactive.norm_num1
tactic
src/tactic/norm_num.lean
[ "data.rat.cast", "data.rat.meta_defs", "data.int.lemmas" ]
[]
Basic version of `norm_num` that does not call `simp`.
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib
65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83
norm_num (hs : parse simp_arg_list) : conv unit
repeat1 $ orelse' norm_num1 $ conv.interactive.simp ff (simp_arg_type.except ``one_div :: hs) [] { discharger := tactic.interactive.norm_num1 (loc.ns [none]) }
def
norm_num.conv.interactive.norm_num
tactic
src/tactic/norm_num.lean
[ "data.rat.cast", "data.rat.meta_defs", "data.int.lemmas" ]
[ "one_div" ]
Normalize numerical expressions. Supports the operations `+` `-` `*` `/` `^` and `%` over numerical types such as `ℕ`, `ℤ`, `ℚ`, `ℝ`, `ℂ` and some general algebraic types, and can prove goals of the form `A = B`, `A ≠ B`, `A < B` and `A ≤ B`, where `A` and `B` are numerical expressions. It also has a relatively simple ...
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib
65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83
norm_num_cmd (_ : parse $ tk "#norm_num") : lean.parser unit
do no_dflt ← only_flag, hs ← simp_arg_list, attr_names ← with_ident_list, o ← optional (tk ":"), e ← texpr, /- Retrieve the `pexpr`s parsed as part of the simp args, and collate them into a big list. -/ let hs_es := list.join $ hs.map $ option.to_list ∘ simp_arg_type.to_pexpr, /- Synthesize a `tactic_...
def
norm_num.tactic.norm_num_cmd
tactic
src/tactic/norm_num.lean
[ "data.rat.cast", "data.rat.meta_defs", "data.int.lemmas" ]
[ "norm_num.get_step", "option.to_list" ]
The basic usage is `#norm_num e`, where `e` is an expression, which will print the `norm_num` form of `e`. Syntax: `#norm_num` (`only`)? (`[` simp lemma list `]`)? (`with` simp sets)? `:`? expression This accepts the same options as the `#simp` command. You can specify additional simp lemmas as usual, for example usi...
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib
65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83
nat_div (a b q r m : ℕ) (hm : q * b = m) (h : r + m = a) (h₂ : r < b) : a / b = q
by rw [← h, ← hm, nat.add_mul_div_right _ _ (lt_of_le_of_lt (nat.zero_le _) h₂), nat.div_eq_of_lt h₂, zero_add]
lemma
norm_num.norm_num.nat_div
tactic
src/tactic/norm_num.lean
[ "data.rat.cast", "data.rat.meta_defs", "data.int.lemmas" ]
[]
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib
65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83
int_div (a b q r m : ℤ) (hm : q * b = m) (h : r + m = a) (h₁ : 0 ≤ r) (h₂ : r < b) : a / b = q
by rw [← h, ← hm, int.add_mul_div_right _ _ (ne_of_gt (lt_of_le_of_lt h₁ h₂)), int.div_eq_zero_of_lt h₁ h₂, zero_add]
lemma
norm_num.norm_num.int_div
tactic
src/tactic/norm_num.lean
[ "data.rat.cast", "data.rat.meta_defs", "data.int.lemmas" ]
[ "int.add_mul_div_right", "int.div_eq_zero_of_lt" ]
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib
65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83
nat_mod (a b q r m : ℕ) (hm : q * b = m) (h : r + m = a) (h₂ : r < b) : a % b = r
by rw [← h, ← hm, nat.add_mul_mod_self_right, nat.mod_eq_of_lt h₂]
lemma
norm_num.norm_num.nat_mod
tactic
src/tactic/norm_num.lean
[ "data.rat.cast", "data.rat.meta_defs", "data.int.lemmas" ]
[]
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib
65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83
int_mod (a b q r m : ℤ) (hm : q * b = m) (h : r + m = a) (h₁ : 0 ≤ r) (h₂ : r < b) : a % b = r
by rw [← h, ← hm, int.add_mul_mod_self, int.mod_eq_of_lt h₁ h₂]
lemma
norm_num.norm_num.int_mod
tactic
src/tactic/norm_num.lean
[ "data.rat.cast", "data.rat.meta_defs", "data.int.lemmas" ]
[ "int.add_mul_mod_self", "int.mod_eq_of_lt" ]
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib
65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83
int_div_neg (a b c' c : ℤ) (h : a / b = c') (h₂ : -c' = c) : a / -b = c
h₂ ▸ h ▸ int.div_neg _ _
lemma
norm_num.norm_num.int_div_neg
tactic
src/tactic/norm_num.lean
[ "data.rat.cast", "data.rat.meta_defs", "data.int.lemmas" ]
[ "int.div_neg" ]
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib
65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83
int_mod_neg (a b c : ℤ) (h : a % b = c) : a % -b = c
(int.mod_neg _ _).trans h
lemma
norm_num.norm_num.int_mod_neg
tactic
src/tactic/norm_num.lean
[ "data.rat.cast", "data.rat.meta_defs", "data.int.lemmas" ]
[ "int.mod_neg" ]
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib
65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83
prove_div_mod (ic : instance_cache) : expr → expr → bool → tactic (instance_cache × expr × expr)
| a b mod := match match_neg b with | some b := do (ic, c', p) ← prove_div_mod a b mod, if mod then return (ic, c', `(int_mod_neg).mk_app [a, b, c', p]) else do (ic, c, p₂) ← prove_neg ic c', return (ic, c, `(int_div_neg).mk_app [a, b, c', c, p, p₂]) | none := do nb ← b.to_nat, ...
def
norm_num.norm_num.prove_div_mod
tactic
src/tactic/norm_num.lean
[ "data.rat.cast", "data.rat.meta_defs", "data.int.lemmas" ]
[]
Given `a`,`b` numerals in `nat` or `int`, * `prove_div_mod ic a b ff` returns `(c, ⊢ a / b = c)` * `prove_div_mod ic a b tt` returns `(c, ⊢ a % b = c)`
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib
65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83
dvd_eq_nat (a b c : ℕ) (p) (h₁ : b % a = c) (h₂ : (c = 0) = p) : (a ∣ b) = p
(propext $ by rw [← h₁, nat.dvd_iff_mod_eq_zero]).trans h₂
theorem
norm_num.norm_num.dvd_eq_nat
tactic
src/tactic/norm_num.lean
[ "data.rat.cast", "data.rat.meta_defs", "data.int.lemmas" ]
[]
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib
65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83
dvd_eq_int (a b c : ℤ) (p) (h₁ : b % a = c) (h₂ : (c = 0) = p) : (a ∣ b) = p
(propext $ by rw [← h₁, int.dvd_iff_mod_eq_zero]).trans h₂
theorem
norm_num.norm_num.dvd_eq_int
tactic
src/tactic/norm_num.lean
[ "data.rat.cast", "data.rat.meta_defs", "data.int.lemmas" ]
[ "int.dvd_iff_mod_eq_zero" ]
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib
65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83
eval_nat_int_ext : expr → tactic (expr × expr)
| `(%%a / %%b) := do c ← infer_type a >>= mk_instance_cache, prod.snd <$> prove_div_mod c a b ff | `(%%a % %%b) := do c ← infer_type a >>= mk_instance_cache, prod.snd <$> prove_div_mod c a b tt | `(%%a ∣ %%b) := do α ← infer_type a, ic ← mk_instance_cache α, th ← if α = `(nat) then return (`(dvd_eq_nat):e...
def
norm_num.norm_num.eval_nat_int_ext
tactic
src/tactic/norm_num.lean
[ "data.rat.cast", "data.rat.meta_defs", "data.int.lemmas" ]
[]
Evaluates some extra numeric operations on `nat` and `int`, specifically `/` and `%`, and `∣` (divisibility).
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib
65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83
eval : expr → tactic (expr × expr)
λ e, do (swapt, fun_ty, coe_fn_inst, fexpr, c) ← e.match_app_coe_fn <|> fail "did not get an app coe_fn expr", guard (fexpr.get_app_fn.const_name = ``equiv.swap) <|> fail "coe_fn not of equiv.swap", [α, deceq_inst, a, b] ← pure fexpr.get_app_args <|> fail "swap did not have exactly two args applied", na...
def
norm_swap.eval
tactic
src/tactic/norm_swap.lean
[ "logic.equiv.defs", "tactic.norm_fin" ]
[ "equiv.swap", "equiv.swap_apply_left", "equiv.swap_apply_of_ne_of_ne", "equiv.swap_apply_right" ]
A `norm_num` plugin for normalizing `equiv.swap a b c` where `a b c` are numerals of `ℕ`, `ℤ`, `ℚ` or `fin n`. ``` example : equiv.swap 1 2 1 = 2 := by norm_num ```
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib
65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83
tactic.interactive.observe (trc : parse $ optional (tk "?")) (h : parse ident?) (t : parse (tk ":" *> texpr)) : tactic unit
do let h' := h.get_or_else `this, t ← to_expr ``(%%t : Prop), assert h' t, s ← focus1 (tactic.library_search { try_this := ff }) <|> fail "observe failed", s ← s.get_rest "Try this: exact ", ppt ← pp t, let pph : string := (h.map (λ n : name, n.to_string ++ " ")).get_or_else "", when trc.is_some $ trace...
def
tactic.interactive.observe
tactic
src/tactic/observe.lean
[ "tactic.suggest" ]
[ "tactic.library_search" ]
`observe hp : p` asserts the proposition `p`, and tries to prove it using `library_search`. If no proof is found, the tactic fails. In other words, this tactic is equivalent to `have hp : p, { library_search }`. If `hp` is omitted, then the placeholder `this` is used. The variant `observe? hp : p` will emit a trace m...
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib
65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83
obviously'
tactic.sorry_if_contains_sorry <|> tactic.tidy <|> tactic.fail ( "`obviously` failed to solve a subgoal.\n" ++ "You may need to explicitly provide a proof of the corresponding structure field.")
def
obviously'
tactic
src/tactic/obviously.lean
[ "tactic.tidy", "tactic.replacer" ]
[ "tactic.sorry_if_contains_sorry", "tactic.tidy" ]
The default implementation of `obviously` discharges any goals which contain `sorry` in their type using `sorry`, and then calls `tidy`.
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib
65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83
pi_instance_derive_field : tactic unit
do b ← target >>= is_prop, field ← get_current_field, if b then do vs ← introv [] <|> pure [], hs ← intros <|> pure [], reset_instance_cache, xn ← get_unused_name, try (() <$ ext1 [rcases_patt.one xn] <|> () <$ intro xn), xv ← option.iget <$> try_core (get_local xn), applyc fiel...
def
tactic.pi_instance_derive_field
tactic
src/tactic/pi_instances.lean
[ "order.basic" ]
[ "field", "option.iget" ]
Attempt to clear a goal obtained by refining a `pi_instance` goal.
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib
65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83
pi_instance : tactic unit
refine_struct ``( { ..pi.partial_order, .. } ); propagate_tags (try $ pi_instance_derive_field >> done)
def
tactic.pi_instance
tactic
src/tactic/pi_instances.lean
[ "order.basic" ]
[]
`pi_instance` constructs an instance of `my_class (Π i : I, f i)` where we know `Π i, my_class (f i)`. If an order relation is required, it defaults to `pi.partial_order`. Any field of the instance that `pi_instance` cannot construct is left untouched and generated as a new goal.
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib
65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83
poly | const : ℚ → poly | var : ℕ → poly | add : poly → poly → poly | sub : poly → poly → poly | mul : poly → poly → poly | pow : poly → ℕ → poly | neg : poly → poly
inductive
polyrith.poly
tactic
src/tactic/polyrith.lean
[ "tactic.linear_combination", "data.buffer.parser.numeral", "data.json" ]
[ "poly" ]
A datatype representing the semantics of multivariable polynomials. Each `poly` can be converted into a string.
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib
65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83
poly.mk_string : poly → string
| (poly.const z) := to_string z | (poly.var n) := "var" ++ to_string n | (poly.add p q) := "(" ++ poly.mk_string p ++ " + " ++ poly.mk_string q ++ ")" | (poly.sub p q) := "(" ++ poly.mk_string p ++ " - " ++ poly.mk_string q ++ ")" | (poly.mul p q) := "(" ++ poly.mk_string p ++ " * " ++ poly.mk_string q ++ ")" | (poly.p...
def
polyrith.poly.mk_string
tactic
src/tactic/polyrith.lean
[ "tactic.linear_combination", "data.buffer.parser.numeral", "data.json" ]
[ "poly", "poly.const" ]
This converts a poly object into a string representing it. The string maintains the semantic structure of the poly object. The output of this function must be valid Python syntax, and it assumes the variables `varN` from `scripts/polyrith.py.`
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib
65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83
poly_form_of_atom (red : transparency) (vars : list expr) (e : expr) : tactic (list expr × poly)
do index_of_e ← vars.mfoldl_with_index (λ n last e', match last with | none := tactic.try_core $ tactic.is_def_eq e e' red >> return n | some k := return k end) none, return (match index_of_e with | some k := (vars, poly.var k) | none := (vars.concat e, poly.var vars.length) end)
def
polyrith.poly_form_of_atom
tactic
src/tactic/polyrith.lean
[ "tactic.linear_combination", "data.buffer.parser.numeral", "data.json" ]
[ "poly" ]
`(vars, p) ← poly_form_of_atom red vars e` is the atomic case for `poly_form_of_expr`. If `e` appears with index `k` in `vars`, it returns the singleton sum `p = poly.var k`. Otherwise it updates `vars`, adding `e` with index `n`, and returns the singleton `p = poly.var n`.
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib
65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83
poly_form_of_expr (red : transparency) : list expr → expr → tactic (list expr × poly)
| m `(%%e1 * %%e2) := do (m', comp1) ← poly_form_of_expr m e1, (m', comp2) ← poly_form_of_expr m' e2, return (m', comp1 * comp2) | m `(%%e1 + %%e2) := do (m', comp1) ← poly_form_of_expr m e1, (m', comp2) ← poly_form_of_expr m' e2, return (m', comp1 + comp2) | m `(%%e1 - %%e2) := do (m',...
def
polyrith.poly_form_of_expr
tactic
src/tactic/polyrith.lean
[ "tactic.linear_combination", "data.buffer.parser.numeral", "data.json" ]
[ "poly", "poly.const" ]
`poly_form_of_expr red map e` computes the polynomial form of `e`. `map` is a lookup map from atomic expressions to variable numbers. If a new atomic expression is encountered, it is added to the map with a new number. It matches atomic expressions up to reducibility given by `red`. Because it matches up to definitio...
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib
65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83
poly.to_pexpr : list expr → poly → tactic pexpr
| _ (poly.const z) := return z.to_pexpr | m (poly.var n) := do some (e) ← return $ m.nth n | fail! "unknown variable poly.var {n}", return ``(%%e) | m (poly.add p q) := do p_pexpr ← poly.to_pexpr m p, q_pexpr ← poly.to_pexpr m q, return ``(%%p_pexpr + %%q_pexpr) | m (poly.sub p q) := do p_...
def
polyrith.poly.to_pexpr
tactic
src/tactic/polyrith.lean
[ "tactic.linear_combination", "data.buffer.parser.numeral", "data.json" ]
[ "poly", "poly.const" ]
This can convert a `poly` into a `pexpr` that would evaluate to a polynomial. To do so, it uses a list `m` of expressions, the atomic expressions that appear in the `poly`. The index of an expression in this list corresponds to its `poly.var` argument: that is, if `e` is the `k`th element of `m`, then it is represented...
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib
65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83
var_parser : parser poly
do str "poly.var " >> poly.var <$> parser.nat
def
polyrith.var_parser
tactic
src/tactic/polyrith.lean
[ "tactic.linear_combination", "data.buffer.parser.numeral", "data.json" ]
[ "poly" ]
A parser object that parses `string`s of the form `"poly.var n"` to the appropriate `poly` object representing a variable. Here, `n` is a natural number
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib
65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83
const_fraction_parser : parser poly
str "poly.const " >> poly.const <$> parser.rat
def
polyrith.const_fraction_parser
tactic
src/tactic/polyrith.lean
[ "tactic.linear_combination", "data.buffer.parser.numeral", "data.json" ]
[ "parser.rat", "poly", "poly.const" ]
A parser object that parses `string`s of the form `"poly.const r"` to the appropriate `poly` object representing a rational coefficient. Here, `r` is a rational number
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib
65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83
add_parser (cont : parser poly) : parser poly
str "poly.add " >> poly.add <$> cont <*> (ch ' ' >> cont)
def
polyrith.add_parser
tactic
src/tactic/polyrith.lean
[ "tactic.linear_combination", "data.buffer.parser.numeral", "data.json" ]
[ "cont", "poly" ]
A parser object that parses `string`s of the form `"poly.add p q"` to the appropriate `poly` object representing the sum of two `poly`s. Here, `p` and `q` are themselves string forms of `poly`s.
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib
65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83
sub_parser (cont : parser poly) : parser poly
str "poly.sub " >> poly.sub <$> cont <*> (ch ' ' >> cont)
def
polyrith.sub_parser
tactic
src/tactic/polyrith.lean
[ "tactic.linear_combination", "data.buffer.parser.numeral", "data.json" ]
[ "cont", "poly" ]
A parser object that parses `string`s of the form `"poly.sub p q"` to the appropriate `poly` object representing the subtraction of two `poly`s. Here, `p` and `q` are themselves string forms of `poly`s.
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib
65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83
mul_parser (cont : parser poly) : parser poly
str "poly.mul " >> poly.mul <$> cont <*> (ch ' ' >> cont)
def
polyrith.mul_parser
tactic
src/tactic/polyrith.lean
[ "tactic.linear_combination", "data.buffer.parser.numeral", "data.json" ]
[ "cont", "poly" ]
A parser object that parses `string`s of the form `"poly.mul p q"` to the appropriate `poly` object representing the product of two `poly`s. Here, `p` and `q` are themselves string forms of `poly`s.
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib
65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83
pow_parser (cont : parser poly) : parser poly
str "poly.pow " >> poly.pow <$> cont <*> (ch ' ' >> nat)
def
polyrith.pow_parser
tactic
src/tactic/polyrith.lean
[ "tactic.linear_combination", "data.buffer.parser.numeral", "data.json" ]
[ "cont", "poly" ]
A parser object that parses `string`s of the form `"poly.pow p n"` to the appropriate `poly` object representing a `poly` raised to the power of a natural number. Here, `p` is the string form of a `poly` and `n` is a natural number.
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib
65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83
neg_parser (cont : parser poly) : parser poly
str "poly.neg " >> poly.neg <$> cont
def
polyrith.neg_parser
tactic
src/tactic/polyrith.lean
[ "tactic.linear_combination", "data.buffer.parser.numeral", "data.json" ]
[ "cont", "poly" ]
A parser object that parses `string`s of the form `"poly.neg p"` to the appropriate `poly` object representing the negation of a `poly`. Here, `p` is the string form of a `poly`.
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib
65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83
poly_parser : parser poly
ch '(' *> (var_parser <|> const_fraction_parser <|> add_parser poly_parser <|> sub_parser poly_parser <|> mul_parser poly_parser <|> pow_parser poly_parser <|> neg_parser poly_parser) <* ch ')'
def
polyrith.poly_parser
tactic
src/tactic/polyrith.lean
[ "tactic.linear_combination", "data.buffer.parser.numeral", "data.json" ]
[ "poly" ]
A parser for `poly` that uses an s-essresion style formats such as `(poly.add (poly.var 0) (poly.const 1)`.
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib
65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83
sage_json_success
(success : {b : bool // b = tt}) (trace : option string := none) (data : option (list poly) := none)
structure
polyrith.sage_json_success
tactic
src/tactic/polyrith.lean
[ "tactic.linear_combination", "data.buffer.parser.numeral", "data.json" ]
[ "poly" ]
A schema for success messages from the python script
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib
65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83
sage_json_failure
(success : {b : bool // b = ff}) (error_name : string) (error_value : string)
structure
polyrith.sage_json_failure
tactic
src/tactic/polyrith.lean
[ "tactic.linear_combination", "data.buffer.parser.numeral", "data.json" ]
[]
A schema for failure messages from the python script
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib
65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83
convert_sage_output (j : json) : tactic (option (list poly))
do r : sage_json_success ⊕ sage_json_failure ← decorate_ex "internal json error: " -- try the error format first, so that if both fail we get the message from the success parser (sum.inr <$> of_json sage_json_failure j <|> sum.inl <$> of_json sage_json_success j), match r with | sum.inr f := fail!"p...
def
polyrith.convert_sage_output
tactic
src/tactic/polyrith.lean
[ "tactic.linear_combination", "data.buffer.parser.numeral", "data.json" ]
[ "poly" ]
Parse the json output from `scripts/polyrith.py` into either an error message, a list of `poly` objects, or `none` if only trace output was requested.
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib
65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83
equality_to_left_side : expr → tactic expr
| `(%%lhs = %%rhs) := to_expr ``(%%lhs - %%rhs) | e := fail "expression is not an equality"
def
polyrith.equality_to_left_side
tactic
src/tactic/polyrith.lean
[ "tactic.linear_combination", "data.buffer.parser.numeral", "data.json" ]
[]
Convert an expression of the form `lhs = rhs` into the form `lhs - rhs`
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib
65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83
parse_target_to_poly : tactic (list expr × poly × expr)
do e@`(@eq %%R _ _) ← target, left_side ← equality_to_left_side e, (m, p) ← poly_form_of_expr transparency.reducible [] left_side, return (m, p, R)
def
polyrith.parse_target_to_poly
tactic
src/tactic/polyrith.lean
[ "tactic.linear_combination", "data.buffer.parser.numeral", "data.json" ]
[ "poly" ]
`(vars, poly, typ) ← parse_target_to_poly` interprets the current target (an equality over some field) into a `poly`. The result is a list of the atomic expressions in the target, the `poly` itself, and an `expr` representing the type of the field.
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib
65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83
get_equalities_of_type (expt : expr) (l : list expr) : tactic (list expr)
l.mfilter $ λ h_eq, succeeds $ do `(@eq %%R _ _) ← infer_type h_eq, unify expt R
def
polyrith.get_equalities_of_type
tactic
src/tactic/polyrith.lean
[ "tactic.linear_combination", "data.buffer.parser.numeral", "data.json" ]
[ "succeeds" ]
Filter `l` to the elements which are equalities of type `expt`.
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib
65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83
parse_ctx_to_polys (expt : expr) (m : list expr) (only_on : bool) (hyps : list pexpr) : tactic (list expr × list expr × list poly)
do hyps ← hyps.mmap i_to_expr, hyps ← if only_on then return hyps else (++ hyps) <$> local_context, eq_names ← get_equalities_of_type expt hyps, eqs ← eq_names.mmap infer_type, eqs_to_left ← eqs.mmap equality_to_left_side, -- convert the expressions to polynomials, tracking the variables in `m` (m, poly_l...
def
polyrith.parse_ctx_to_polys
tactic
src/tactic/polyrith.lean
[ "tactic.linear_combination", "data.buffer.parser.numeral", "data.json" ]
[ "poly" ]
The purpose of this tactic is to collect all the hypotheses and proof terms (specified by the user) that are equalities of the same type as the target. It takes in an `expr` representing the type, a list of expressions representing the atoms (typically this starts as only containing information about the target), a `bo...
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib
65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83
sage_output (arg_list : list string := []) : tactic json
do path ← get_mathlib_dir, let args := [path ++ "../scripts/polyrith_sage.py"] ++ arg_list, s ← unsafe_run_io $ io.cmd { cmd := "python3", args := args}, some j ← pure (json.parse s) | fail!"Invalid json: {s}", pure j
def
polyrith.sage_output
tactic
src/tactic/polyrith.lean
[ "tactic.linear_combination", "data.buffer.parser.numeral", "data.json" ]
[ "get_mathlib_dir", "path" ]
This tactic calls python from the command line with the args in `arg_list`. The output printed to the console is returned as a `string`. It assumes that `python3` is available on the path.
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib
65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83
add_parens : expr → tactic format
| e@`(_ + _) := pformat!"({e})" | e@`(_ - _) := pformat!"({e})" | e := pformat!"{e}"
def
polyrith.add_parens
tactic
src/tactic/polyrith.lean
[ "tactic.linear_combination", "data.buffer.parser.numeral", "data.json" ]
[]
Adds parentheses around additions and subtractions, for printing at precedence 65.
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib
65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83
component_to_lc_format : expr × expr → tactic (bool × format)
| (ex, `(@has_one.one _ _)) := prod.mk ff <$> pformat!"{ex}" | (ex, `(@has_one.one _ _ / %%cf)) := do f ← add_parens cf, prod.mk ff <$> pformat!"{ex} / {f}" | (ex, `(-%%cf)) := do (neg, fmt) ← component_to_lc_format (ex, cf), return (!neg, fmt) | (ex, cf) := do f ← add_parens cf, prod.mk ff <$> pformat!"{f} * {ex}"
def
polyrith.component_to_lc_format
tactic
src/tactic/polyrith.lean
[ "tactic.linear_combination", "data.buffer.parser.numeral", "data.json" ]
[]
Given a pair of `expr`s, where one represents the hypothesis/proof term, and the other representes the coefficient attached to it, this tactic creates a string combining the two in the appropriate format for `linear_combination`. The boolean value returned is `tt` if the format needs to be negated to accurately reflec...
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib
65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83
intersperse_ops_aux : list (bool × format) → format
| [] := "" | ((ff, fmt) :: t) := " +" ++ format.soft_break ++ fmt ++ intersperse_ops_aux t | ((tt, fmt) :: t) := " -" ++ format.soft_break ++ fmt ++ intersperse_ops_aux t
def
polyrith.intersperse_ops_aux
tactic
src/tactic/polyrith.lean
[ "tactic.linear_combination", "data.buffer.parser.numeral", "data.json" ]
[ "format.soft_break" ]
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib
65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83
intersperse_ops : list (bool × format) → format
| [] := "" | ((ff, fmt)::t) := fmt ++ intersperse_ops_aux t | ((tt, fmt)::t) := "-" ++ fmt ++ intersperse_ops_aux t
def
polyrith.intersperse_ops
tactic
src/tactic/polyrith.lean
[ "tactic.linear_combination", "data.buffer.parser.numeral", "data.json" ]
[]
Given a `list (bool × format)`, this function uses `+` and `-` to conjoin the `format`s in the list. A `format` is negated if its corresponding `bool` is `tt`.
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib
65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83
components_to_lc_format (components : list (expr × expr)) : tactic format
intersperse_ops <$> components.mmap component_to_lc_format /-! # Connecting with Python The following section contains code that allows lean to communicate with a python script. -/ declare_trace polyrith
def
polyrith.components_to_lc_format
tactic
src/tactic/polyrith.lean
[ "tactic.linear_combination", "data.buffer.parser.numeral", "data.json" ]
[]
This tactic repeats the process above for a `list` of pairs of `expr`s.
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib
65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83
create_args (only_on : bool) (hyps : list pexpr) : tactic (list expr × list expr × expr × list string)
do (m, p, R) ← parse_target_to_poly, (eq_names, m, polys) ← parse_ctx_to_polys R m only_on hyps, let args := [to_string R, to_string m.length, (polys.map poly.mk_string).to_string, p.mk_string], return $ (eq_names, m, R, to_string (is_trace_enabled_for `polyrith) :: args)
def
polyrith.create_args
tactic
src/tactic/polyrith.lean
[ "tactic.linear_combination", "data.buffer.parser.numeral", "data.json" ]
[]
The first half of `tactic.polyrith` produces a list of arguments to be sent to Sage.
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib
65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83
process_output (eq_names : list expr) (m : list expr) (R : expr) (sage_out : json) : tactic format
focus1 $ do some coeffs_as_poly ← convert_sage_output sage_out | fail!"internal error: No output available", coeffs_as_pexpr ← coeffs_as_poly.mmap (poly.to_pexpr m), let eq_names_pexpr := eq_names.map to_pexpr, coeffs_as_expr ← coeffs_as_pexpr.mmap $ λ e, to_expr ``(%%e : %%R), linear_combo.linear_combination...
def
polyrith.process_output
tactic
src/tactic/polyrith.lean
[ "tactic.linear_combination", "data.buffer.parser.numeral", "data.json" ]
[ "filter", "linear_combo.linear_combination" ]
The second half of `tactic.polyrith` processes the output from Sage into a call to `linear_combination`.
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib
65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83
no_hypotheses_case : tactic (option format)
(do `[ring], return $ some "ring") <|> fail "polyrith did not find any relevant hypotheses and the goal is not provable by ring"
def
polyrith.no_hypotheses_case
tactic
src/tactic/polyrith.lean
[ "tactic.linear_combination", "data.buffer.parser.numeral", "data.json" ]
[ "ring" ]
Tactic for the special case when no hypotheses are available.
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib
65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83
no_variables_case : tactic (option format)
(do `[ring], return $ some "ring") <|> fail "polyrith did not find any variables and the goal is not provable by ring"
def
polyrith.no_variables_case
tactic
src/tactic/polyrith.lean
[ "tactic.linear_combination", "data.buffer.parser.numeral", "data.json" ]
[ "ring" ]
Tactic for the special case when there are no variables.
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib
65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83
_root_.tactic.polyrith (only_on : bool) (hyps : list pexpr) : tactic (option format)
do sleep 10, -- otherwise can lead to weird errors when actively editing code with polyrith calls (eq_names, m, R, args) ← create_args only_on hyps, if eq_names.length = 0 then no_hypotheses_case else if m.length = 0 then no_variables_case else do sage_out ← sage_output args, if is_trace_enabled_for `polyri...
def
tactic.polyrith
tactic
src/tactic/polyrith.lean
[ "tactic.linear_combination", "data.buffer.parser.numeral", "data.json" ]
[]
This is the main body of the `polyrith` tactic. It takes in the following inputs: * `(only_on : bool)` - This represents whether the user used the key word "only" * `(hyps : list pexpr)` - the hypotheses/proof terms selecteed by the user First, the tactic converts the target into a `poly`, and finds out what type it i...
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib
65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83
_root_.tactic.interactive.polyrith (restr : parse (tk "only")?) (hyps : parse pexpr_list?) : tactic unit
do some f ← tactic.polyrith restr.is_some (hyps.get_or_else []) | skip, trace!"Try this: {f}"
def
tactic.interactive.polyrith
tactic
src/tactic/polyrith.lean
[ "tactic.linear_combination", "data.buffer.parser.numeral", "data.json" ]
[ "tactic.polyrith" ]
Attempts to prove polynomial equality goals through polynomial arithmetic on the hypotheses (and additional proof terms if the user specifies them). It proves the goal by generating an appropriate call to the tactic `linear_combination`. If this call succeeds, the call to `linear_combination` is suggested to the user. ...
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib
65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83
positivity.strictness : Type | positive : expr → positivity.strictness | nonnegative : expr → positivity.strictness | nonzero : expr → positivity.strictness
inductive
tactic.positivity.strictness
tactic
src/tactic/positivity.lean
[ "tactic.norm_num", "algebra.order.field.power", "algebra.order.hom.basic", "data.nat.factorial.basic" ]
[]
Inductive type recording either `positive` and an expression (typically a proof of a fact `0 < x`) or `nonnegative` and an expression (typically a proof of a fact `0 ≤ x`).
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib
65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83
lt_of_eq_of_lt'' {α} [preorder α] {b b' a : α} : b = b' → a < b' → a < b
λ h1 h2, lt_of_lt_of_eq h2 h1.symm
lemma
tactic.lt_of_eq_of_lt''
tactic
src/tactic/positivity.lean
[ "tactic.norm_num", "algebra.order.field.power", "algebra.order.hom.basic", "data.nat.factorial.basic" ]
[ "lt_of_lt_of_eq" ]
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib
65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83
norm_num.positivity (e : expr) : tactic strictness
do (e', p) ← norm_num.derive e <|> refl_conv e, e'' ← e'.to_rat, typ ← infer_type e', ic ← mk_instance_cache typ, if e'' > 0 then do (ic, p₁) ← norm_num.prove_pos ic e', positive <$> mk_app ``lt_of_eq_of_lt'' [p, p₁] else if e'' = 0 then nonnegative <$> mk_app ``ge_of_eq [p] else do (ic, p...
def
tactic.norm_num.positivity
tactic
src/tactic/positivity.lean
[ "tactic.norm_num", "algebra.order.field.power", "algebra.order.hom.basic", "data.nat.factorial.basic" ]
[ "ge_of_eq", "norm_num.derive", "norm_num.prove_ne_zero'", "norm_num.prove_pos" ]
First base case of the `positivity` tactic. We try `norm_num` to prove directly that an expression `e` is positive, nonnegative or non-zero.
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib
65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83
positivity_canon : expr → tactic strictness
| `(%%a) := nonnegative <$> mk_app ``zero_le [a]
def
tactic.positivity_canon
tactic
src/tactic/positivity.lean
[ "tactic.norm_num", "algebra.order.field.power", "algebra.order.hom.basic", "data.nat.factorial.basic" ]
[]
Second base case of the `positivity` tactic: Any element of a canonically ordered additive monoid is nonnegative.
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib
65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83
order_rel : Type | le : order_rel -- `0 ≤ a` | lt : order_rel -- `0 < a` | ne : order_rel -- `a ≠ 0` | ne' : order_rel
inductive
tactic.positivity.order_rel
tactic
src/tactic/positivity.lean
[ "tactic.norm_num", "algebra.order.field.power", "algebra.order.hom.basic", "data.nat.factorial.basic" ]
[]
Inductive type recording whether the goal `positivity` is called on is nonnegativity, positivity or different from `0`.
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib
65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83
orelse (tac1 tac2 : tactic strictness) : tactic strictness
do res1 ← try_core tac1, match res1 with | none := tac2 | some p1@(positive _) := pure p1 | some (nonnegative e1) := do res2 ← try_core tac2, match res2 with | some p2@(positive _) := pure p2 | some (nonzero e2) := positive <$> mk_app ``lt_of_le_of_ne' [e1, e2] | _ := pure (nonne...
def
tactic.positivity.orelse
tactic
src/tactic/positivity.lean
[ "tactic.norm_num", "algebra.order.field.power", "algebra.order.hom.basic", "data.nat.factorial.basic" ]
[ "lt_of_le_of_ne'", "orelse" ]
Given two tactics whose result is `strictness`, report a `strictness`: - if at least one gives `positive`, report `positive` and one of the expressions giving a proof of positivity - if one reports `nonnegative` and the other reports `nonzero`, report `positive` - else if at least one reports `nonnegative`, report `n...
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib
65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83
positivity_fail {α : Type*} (e a b : expr) (pa pb : strictness) : tactic α
do e' ← pp e, a' ← pp a, b' ← pp b, let f : strictness → format → format := λ p c, match p with | positive _ := "0 < " ++ c | nonnegative _ := "0 ≤ " ++ c | nonzero _ := c ++ " ≠ 0" end, fail (↑"`positivity` can't say anything about `" ++ e' ++ "` knowing only `" ++ f pa a' ++ "` and `" ++ f pb b'...
def
tactic.positivity.positivity_fail
tactic
src/tactic/positivity.lean
[ "tactic.norm_num", "algebra.order.field.power", "algebra.order.hom.basic", "data.nat.factorial.basic" ]
[]
This tactic fails with a message saying that `positivity` couldn't prove anything about `e` if we only know that `a` and `b` are positive/nonnegative/nonzero (according to `pa` and `pb`).
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib
65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83
ne_of_ne_of_eq' {α : Type*} {a b c : α} (ha : a ≠ c) (h : a = b) : b ≠ c
by rwa ←h
lemma
tactic.positivity.ne_of_ne_of_eq'
tactic
src/tactic/positivity.lean
[ "tactic.norm_num", "algebra.order.field.power", "algebra.order.hom.basic", "data.nat.factorial.basic" ]
[]
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib
65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83