statement
stringlengths
1
2.88k
proof
stringlengths
0
13.9k
type
stringclasses
10 values
symbolic_name
stringlengths
1
131
library
stringclasses
417 values
filename
stringlengths
17
80
imports
listlengths
0
16
deps
listlengths
0
64
docstring
stringlengths
0
10.2k
source_url
stringclasses
1 value
commit
stringclasses
1 value
compare_hyp_le (e a b p₂ : expr) : tactic strictness
do is_def_eq e b, strict_a ← norm_num.positivity a, match strict_a with | positive p₁ := positive <$> mk_app ``lt_of_lt_of_le [p₁, p₂] | nonnegative p₁ := nonnegative <$> mk_app ``le_trans [p₁, p₂] | _ := do e' ← pp e, p₂' ← pp p₂, fail (↑"`norm_num` can't prove nonnegativity o...
def
tactic.positivity.compare_hyp_le
tactic
src/tactic/positivity.lean
[ "tactic.norm_num", "algebra.order.field.power", "algebra.order.hom.basic", "data.nat.factorial.basic" ]
[]
Calls `norm_num` on `a` to prove positivity/nonnegativity of `e` assuming `b` is defeq to `e` and `p₂ : a ≤ b`.
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib
65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83
compare_hyp_lt (e a b p₂ : expr) : tactic strictness
do is_def_eq e b, strict_a ← norm_num.positivity a, match strict_a with | positive p₁ := positive <$> mk_app ``lt_trans [p₁, p₂] | nonnegative p₁ := positive <$> mk_app ``lt_of_le_of_lt [p₁, p₂] | _ := do e' ← pp e, p₂' ← pp p₂, fail (↑"`norm_num` can't prove positivity of " ++...
def
tactic.positivity.compare_hyp_lt
tactic
src/tactic/positivity.lean
[ "tactic.norm_num", "algebra.order.field.power", "algebra.order.hom.basic", "data.nat.factorial.basic" ]
[]
Calls `norm_num` on `a` to prove positivity/nonnegativity of `e` assuming `b` is defeq to `e` and `p₂ : a < b`.
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib
65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83
compare_hyp_eq (e a b p₂ : expr) : tactic strictness
do is_def_eq e b, strict_a ← norm_num.positivity a, match strict_a with | positive p₁ := positive <$> mk_app ``lt_of_lt_of_eq [p₁, p₂] | nonnegative p₁ := nonnegative <$> mk_app ``le_of_le_of_eq [p₁, p₂] | nonzero p₁ := nonzero <$> to_expr ``(ne_of_ne_of_eq' %%p₁ %%p₂) end
def
tactic.positivity.compare_hyp_eq
tactic
src/tactic/positivity.lean
[ "tactic.norm_num", "algebra.order.field.power", "algebra.order.hom.basic", "data.nat.factorial.basic" ]
[ "le_of_le_of_eq", "lt_of_lt_of_eq" ]
Calls `norm_num` on `a` to prove positivity/nonnegativity/nonzeroness of `e` assuming `b` is defeq to `e` and `p₂ : a = b`.
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib
65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83
compare_hyp_ne (e a b p₂ : expr) : tactic strictness
do is_def_eq e b, (a', p₁) ← norm_num.derive a <|> refl_conv a, a'' ← a'.to_rat, if a'' = 0 then nonzero <$> mk_mapp ``ne_of_ne_of_eq [none, none, none, none, p₂, p₁] else do e' ← pp e, p₂' ← pp p₂, a' ← pp a, fail (↑"`norm_num` can't prove non-zeroness of " ++ e' ++ " using " ++ p₂' ++ " ...
def
tactic.positivity.compare_hyp_ne
tactic
src/tactic/positivity.lean
[ "tactic.norm_num", "algebra.order.field.power", "algebra.order.hom.basic", "data.nat.factorial.basic" ]
[ "norm_num.derive" ]
Calls `norm_num` on `a` to prove nonzeroness of `e` assuming `b` is defeq to `e` and `p₂ : b ≠ a`.
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib
65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83
compare_hyp (e p₂ : expr) : tactic strictness
do p_typ ← infer_type p₂, match p_typ with | `(%%lo ≤ %%hi) := compare_hyp_le e lo hi p₂ | `(%%hi ≥ %%lo) := compare_hyp_le e lo hi p₂ | `(%%lo < %%hi) := compare_hyp_lt e lo hi p₂ | `(%%hi > %%lo) := compare_hyp_lt e lo hi p₂ | `(%%lo = %%hi) := compare_hyp_eq e lo hi p₂ <|> do p₂...
def
tactic.positivity.compare_hyp
tactic
src/tactic/positivity.lean
[ "tactic.norm_num", "algebra.order.field.power", "algebra.order.hom.basic", "data.nat.factorial.basic" ]
[]
Third base case of the `positivity` tactic. Prove an expression `e` is positive/nonnegative/nonzero by finding a hypothesis of the form `a < e`, `a ≤ e` or `a = e` in which `a` can be proved positive/nonnegative/nonzero by `norm_num`.
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib
65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83
attr : user_attribute (expr → tactic strictness) unit
{ name := `positivity, descr := "extensions handling particular operations for the `positivity` tactic", cache_cfg := { mk_cache := λ ns, do { t ← ns.mfoldl (λ (t : expr → tactic strictness) n, do t' ← eval_expr (expr → tactic strictness) (expr.const n []), pure (λ e, t' e...
def
tactic.positivity.attr
tactic
src/tactic/positivity.lean
[ "tactic.norm_num", "algebra.order.field.power", "algebra.order.hom.basic", "data.nat.factorial.basic" ]
[]
Attribute allowing a user to tag a tactic as an extension for `tactic.interactive.positivity`. The main (recursive) step of this tactic is to try successively all the extensions tagged with this attribute on the expression at hand, and also to try the two "base case" tactics `tactic.norm_num.positivity`, `tactic.positi...
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib
65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83
core (e : expr) : tactic strictness
do f ← attr.get_cache, f e <|> fail "failed to prove positivity/nonnegativity/nonzeroness"
def
tactic.positivity.core
tactic
src/tactic/positivity.lean
[ "tactic.norm_num", "algebra.order.field.power", "algebra.order.hom.basic", "data.nat.factorial.basic" ]
[]
Look for a proof of positivity/nonnegativity of an expression `e`; if found, return the proof together with a `strictness` stating whether the proof found was for strict positivity (`positive p`), nonnegativity (`nonnegative p`), or nonzeroness (`nonzero p`).
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib
65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83
positivity : tactic unit
focus1 $ do t ← target >>= instantiate_mvars, (rel_desired, a) ← match t with | `(0 ≤ %%e) := pure (order_rel.le, e) | `(%%e ≥ 0) := pure (order_rel.le, e) | `(0 < %%e) := pure (order_rel.lt, e) | `(%%e > 0) := pure (order_rel.lt, e) | `(%%e₁ ≠ %%e₂) := do match e₂ with ...
def
tactic.interactive.positivity
tactic
src/tactic/positivity.lean
[ "tactic.norm_num", "algebra.order.field.power", "algebra.order.hom.basic", "data.nat.factorial.basic" ]
[ "tactic.positivity.core" ]
Tactic solving goals of the form `0 ≤ x`, `0 < x` and `x ≠ 0`. The tactic works recursively according to the syntax of the expression `x`, if the atoms composing the expression all have numeric lower bounds which can be proved positive/nonnegative/nonzero by `norm_num`. This tactic either closes the goal or fails. E...
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib
65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83
ite_pos [has_lt α] (ha : 0 < a) (hb : 0 < b) : 0 < ite p a b
by by_cases p; simp [*]
lemma
tactic.ite_pos
tactic
src/tactic/positivity.lean
[ "tactic.norm_num", "algebra.order.field.power", "algebra.order.hom.basic", "data.nat.factorial.basic" ]
[]
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib
65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83
ite_nonneg [has_le α] (ha : 0 ≤ a) (hb : 0 ≤ b) : 0 ≤ ite p a b
by by_cases p; simp [*]
lemma
tactic.ite_nonneg
tactic
src/tactic/positivity.lean
[ "tactic.norm_num", "algebra.order.field.power", "algebra.order.hom.basic", "data.nat.factorial.basic" ]
[]
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib
65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83
ite_nonneg_of_pos_of_nonneg [preorder α] (ha : 0 < a) (hb : 0 ≤ b) : 0 ≤ ite p a b
ite_nonneg ha.le hb
lemma
tactic.ite_nonneg_of_pos_of_nonneg
tactic
src/tactic/positivity.lean
[ "tactic.norm_num", "algebra.order.field.power", "algebra.order.hom.basic", "data.nat.factorial.basic" ]
[]
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib
65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83
ite_nonneg_of_nonneg_of_pos [preorder α] (ha : 0 ≤ a) (hb : 0 < b) : 0 ≤ ite p a b
ite_nonneg ha hb.le
lemma
tactic.ite_nonneg_of_nonneg_of_pos
tactic
src/tactic/positivity.lean
[ "tactic.norm_num", "algebra.order.field.power", "algebra.order.hom.basic", "data.nat.factorial.basic" ]
[]
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib
65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83
ite_ne_zero (ha : a ≠ 0) (hb : b ≠ 0) : ite p a b ≠ 0
by by_cases p; simp [*]
lemma
tactic.ite_ne_zero
tactic
src/tactic/positivity.lean
[ "tactic.norm_num", "algebra.order.field.power", "algebra.order.hom.basic", "data.nat.factorial.basic" ]
[]
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib
65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83
ite_ne_zero_of_pos_of_ne_zero [preorder α] (ha : 0 < a) (hb : b ≠ 0) : ite p a b ≠ 0
ite_ne_zero ha.ne' hb
lemma
tactic.ite_ne_zero_of_pos_of_ne_zero
tactic
src/tactic/positivity.lean
[ "tactic.norm_num", "algebra.order.field.power", "algebra.order.hom.basic", "data.nat.factorial.basic" ]
[]
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib
65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83
ite_ne_zero_of_ne_zero_of_pos [preorder α] (ha : a ≠ 0) (hb : 0 < b) : ite p a b ≠ 0
ite_ne_zero ha hb.ne'
lemma
tactic.ite_ne_zero_of_ne_zero_of_pos
tactic
src/tactic/positivity.lean
[ "tactic.norm_num", "algebra.order.field.power", "algebra.order.hom.basic", "data.nat.factorial.basic" ]
[]
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib
65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83
positivity_ite : expr → tactic strictness
| e@`(@ite %%typ %%p %%hp %%a %%b) := do strictness_a ← core a, strictness_b ← core b, match strictness_a, strictness_b with | positive pa, positive pb := positive <$> mk_app ``ite_pos [pa, pb] | positive pa, nonnegative pb := nonnegative <$> mk_app ``ite_nonneg_of_pos_of_nonneg [pa, pb] | nonnegative pa, p...
def
tactic.positivity_ite
tactic
src/tactic/positivity.lean
[ "tactic.norm_num", "algebra.order.field.power", "algebra.order.hom.basic", "data.nat.factorial.basic" ]
[]
Extension for the `positivity` tactic: the `if then else` of two numbers is positive/nonnegative/nonzero if both are.
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib
65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83
le_min_of_lt_of_le (ha : a < b) (hb : a ≤ c) : a ≤ min b c
le_min ha.le hb
lemma
tactic.le_min_of_lt_of_le
tactic
src/tactic/positivity.lean
[ "tactic.norm_num", "algebra.order.field.power", "algebra.order.hom.basic", "data.nat.factorial.basic" ]
[]
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib
65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83
le_min_of_le_of_lt (ha : a ≤ b) (hb : a < c) : a ≤ min b c
le_min ha hb.le
lemma
tactic.le_min_of_le_of_lt
tactic
src/tactic/positivity.lean
[ "tactic.norm_num", "algebra.order.field.power", "algebra.order.hom.basic", "data.nat.factorial.basic" ]
[]
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib
65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83
min_ne (ha : a ≠ c) (hb : b ≠ c) : min a b ≠ c
by { rw min_def, split_ifs; assumption }
lemma
tactic.min_ne
tactic
src/tactic/positivity.lean
[ "tactic.norm_num", "algebra.order.field.power", "algebra.order.hom.basic", "data.nat.factorial.basic" ]
[]
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib
65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83
min_ne_of_ne_of_lt (ha : a ≠ c) (hb : c < b) : min a b ≠ c
min_ne ha hb.ne'
lemma
tactic.min_ne_of_ne_of_lt
tactic
src/tactic/positivity.lean
[ "tactic.norm_num", "algebra.order.field.power", "algebra.order.hom.basic", "data.nat.factorial.basic" ]
[]
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib
65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83
min_ne_of_lt_of_ne (ha : c < a) (hb : b ≠ c) : min a b ≠ c
min_ne ha.ne' hb
lemma
tactic.min_ne_of_lt_of_ne
tactic
src/tactic/positivity.lean
[ "tactic.norm_num", "algebra.order.field.power", "algebra.order.hom.basic", "data.nat.factorial.basic" ]
[]
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib
65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83
max_ne (ha : a ≠ c) (hb : b ≠ c) : max a b ≠ c
by { rw max_def, split_ifs; assumption }
lemma
tactic.max_ne
tactic
src/tactic/positivity.lean
[ "tactic.norm_num", "algebra.order.field.power", "algebra.order.hom.basic", "data.nat.factorial.basic" ]
[]
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib
65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83
positivity_min : expr → tactic strictness
| e@`(min %%a %%b) := do strictness_a ← core a, strictness_b ← core b, match strictness_a, strictness_b with | (positive pa), (positive pb) := positive <$> mk_app ``lt_min [pa, pb] | (positive pa), (nonnegative pb) := nonnegative <$> mk_app ``le_min_of_lt_of_le [pa, pb] | (nonnegative pa), (positive pb) :=...
def
tactic.positivity_min
tactic
src/tactic/positivity.lean
[ "tactic.norm_num", "algebra.order.field.power", "algebra.order.hom.basic", "data.nat.factorial.basic" ]
[]
Extension for the `positivity` tactic: the `min` of two numbers is nonnegative if both are nonnegative, and strictly positive if both are.
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib
65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83
positivity_max : expr → tactic strictness
| `(max %%a %%b) := do strictness_a ← try_core (core a), (do match strictness_a with | some (positive pa) := positive <$> mk_mapp ``lt_max_of_lt_left [none, none, none, a, b, pa] | some (nonnegative pa) := nonnegative <$> mk_mapp ``le_max_of_le_left [none, none, none, a, b, pa] | _...
def
tactic.positivity_max
tactic
src/tactic/positivity.lean
[ "tactic.norm_num", "algebra.order.field.power", "algebra.order.hom.basic", "data.nat.factorial.basic" ]
[ "le_max_of_le_left", "le_max_of_le_right", "lt_max_of_lt_left", "lt_max_of_lt_right" ]
Extension for the `positivity` tactic: the `max` of two numbers is nonnegative if at least one is nonnegative, strictly positive if at least one is positive, and nonzero if both are nonzero.
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib
65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83
positivity_add : expr → tactic strictness
| e@`(%%a + %%b) := do strictness_a ← core a, strictness_b ← core b, match strictness_a, strictness_b with | (positive pa), (positive pb) := positive <$> mk_app ``add_pos [pa, pb] | (positive pa), (nonnegative pb) := positive <$> mk_app ``lt_add_of_pos_of_le [pa, pb] | (nonnegative pa), (positive pb) := pos...
def
tactic.positivity_add
tactic
src/tactic/positivity.lean
[ "tactic.norm_num", "algebra.order.field.power", "algebra.order.hom.basic", "data.nat.factorial.basic" ]
[]
Extension for the `positivity` tactic: addition is nonnegative if both summands are nonnegative, and strictly positive if at least one summand is.
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib
65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83
mul_nonneg_of_pos_of_nonneg (ha : 0 < a) (hb : 0 ≤ b) : 0 ≤ a * b
mul_nonneg ha.le hb
lemma
tactic.mul_nonneg_of_pos_of_nonneg
tactic
src/tactic/positivity.lean
[ "tactic.norm_num", "algebra.order.field.power", "algebra.order.hom.basic", "data.nat.factorial.basic" ]
[]
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib
65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83
mul_nonneg_of_nonneg_of_pos (ha : 0 ≤ a) (hb : 0 < b) : 0 ≤ a * b
mul_nonneg ha hb.le
lemma
tactic.mul_nonneg_of_nonneg_of_pos
tactic
src/tactic/positivity.lean
[ "tactic.norm_num", "algebra.order.field.power", "algebra.order.hom.basic", "data.nat.factorial.basic" ]
[]
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib
65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83
mul_ne_zero_of_pos_of_ne_zero [no_zero_divisors R] (ha : 0 < a) (hb : b ≠ 0) : a * b ≠ 0
mul_ne_zero ha.ne' hb
lemma
tactic.mul_ne_zero_of_pos_of_ne_zero
tactic
src/tactic/positivity.lean
[ "tactic.norm_num", "algebra.order.field.power", "algebra.order.hom.basic", "data.nat.factorial.basic" ]
[ "mul_ne_zero", "no_zero_divisors" ]
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib
65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83
mul_ne_zero_of_ne_zero_of_pos [no_zero_divisors R] (ha : a ≠ 0) (hb : 0 < b) : a * b ≠ 0
mul_ne_zero ha hb.ne'
lemma
tactic.mul_ne_zero_of_ne_zero_of_pos
tactic
src/tactic/positivity.lean
[ "tactic.norm_num", "algebra.order.field.power", "algebra.order.hom.basic", "data.nat.factorial.basic" ]
[ "mul_ne_zero", "no_zero_divisors" ]
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib
65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83
positivity_mul : expr → tactic strictness
| e@`(%%a * %%b) := do strictness_a ← core a, strictness_b ← core b, match strictness_a, strictness_b with | (positive pa), (positive pb) := positive <$> mk_app ``mul_pos [pa, pb] | (positive pa), (nonnegative pb) := nonnegative <$> mk_app ``mul_nonneg_of_pos_of_nonneg [pa, pb] | (nonnegative pa), (positive...
def
tactic.positivity_mul
tactic
src/tactic/positivity.lean
[ "tactic.norm_num", "algebra.order.field.power", "algebra.order.hom.basic", "data.nat.factorial.basic" ]
[]
Extension for the `positivity` tactic: multiplication is nonnegative/positive/nonzero if both multiplicands are.
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib
65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83
div_nonneg_of_pos_of_nonneg (ha : 0 < a) (hb : 0 ≤ b) : 0 ≤ a / b
div_nonneg ha.le hb
lemma
tactic.div_nonneg_of_pos_of_nonneg
tactic
src/tactic/positivity.lean
[ "tactic.norm_num", "algebra.order.field.power", "algebra.order.hom.basic", "data.nat.factorial.basic" ]
[ "div_nonneg" ]
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib
65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83
div_nonneg_of_nonneg_of_pos (ha : 0 ≤ a) (hb : 0 < b) : 0 ≤ a / b
div_nonneg ha hb.le
lemma
tactic.div_nonneg_of_nonneg_of_pos
tactic
src/tactic/positivity.lean
[ "tactic.norm_num", "algebra.order.field.power", "algebra.order.hom.basic", "data.nat.factorial.basic" ]
[ "div_nonneg" ]
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib
65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83
div_ne_zero_of_pos_of_ne_zero (ha : 0 < a) (hb : b ≠ 0) : a / b ≠ 0
div_ne_zero ha.ne' hb
lemma
tactic.div_ne_zero_of_pos_of_ne_zero
tactic
src/tactic/positivity.lean
[ "tactic.norm_num", "algebra.order.field.power", "algebra.order.hom.basic", "data.nat.factorial.basic" ]
[ "div_ne_zero" ]
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib
65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83
div_ne_zero_of_ne_zero_of_pos (ha : a ≠ 0) (hb : 0 < b) : a / b ≠ 0
div_ne_zero ha hb.ne'
lemma
tactic.div_ne_zero_of_ne_zero_of_pos
tactic
src/tactic/positivity.lean
[ "tactic.norm_num", "algebra.order.field.power", "algebra.order.hom.basic", "data.nat.factorial.basic" ]
[ "div_ne_zero" ]
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib
65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83
int_div_self_pos {a : ℤ} (ha : 0 < a) : 0 < a / a
by { rw int.div_self ha.ne', exact zero_lt_one }
lemma
tactic.int_div_self_pos
tactic
src/tactic/positivity.lean
[ "tactic.norm_num", "algebra.order.field.power", "algebra.order.hom.basic", "data.nat.factorial.basic" ]
[ "int.div_self", "zero_lt_one" ]
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib
65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83
int_div_nonneg_of_pos_of_nonneg {a b : ℤ} (ha : 0 < a) (hb : 0 ≤ b) : 0 ≤ a / b
int.div_nonneg ha.le hb
lemma
tactic.int_div_nonneg_of_pos_of_nonneg
tactic
src/tactic/positivity.lean
[ "tactic.norm_num", "algebra.order.field.power", "algebra.order.hom.basic", "data.nat.factorial.basic" ]
[ "int.div_nonneg" ]
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib
65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83
int_div_nonneg_of_nonneg_of_pos {a b : ℤ} (ha : 0 ≤ a) (hb : 0 < b) : 0 ≤ a / b
int.div_nonneg ha hb.le
lemma
tactic.int_div_nonneg_of_nonneg_of_pos
tactic
src/tactic/positivity.lean
[ "tactic.norm_num", "algebra.order.field.power", "algebra.order.hom.basic", "data.nat.factorial.basic" ]
[ "int.div_nonneg" ]
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib
65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83
int_div_nonneg_of_pos_of_pos {a b : ℤ} (ha : 0 < a) (hb : 0 < b) : 0 ≤ a / b
int.div_nonneg ha.le hb.le
lemma
tactic.int_div_nonneg_of_pos_of_pos
tactic
src/tactic/positivity.lean
[ "tactic.norm_num", "algebra.order.field.power", "algebra.order.hom.basic", "data.nat.factorial.basic" ]
[ "int.div_nonneg" ]
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib
65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83
positivity_div : expr → tactic strictness
| e@`(@has_div.div ℤ _ %%a %%b) := do strictness_a ← core a, strictness_b ← core b, match strictness_a, strictness_b with | positive pa, positive pb := if a = b then -- Only attempts to prove `0 < a / a`, otherwise falls back to `0 ≤ a / b` positive <$> mk_app ``int_div_self_pos [pa] else ...
def
tactic.positivity_div
tactic
src/tactic/positivity.lean
[ "tactic.norm_num", "algebra.order.field.power", "algebra.order.hom.basic", "data.nat.factorial.basic" ]
[ "div_nonneg", "div_pos", "int.div_nonneg" ]
Extension for the `positivity` tactic: division is nonnegative if both numerator and denominator are nonnegative, and strictly positive if both numerator and denominator are.
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib
65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83
positivity_inv : expr → tactic strictness
| `((%%a)⁻¹) := do strictness_a ← core a, match strictness_a with | (positive pa) := positive <$> mk_app ``inv_pos_of_pos [pa] | (nonnegative pa) := nonnegative <$> mk_app ``inv_nonneg_of_nonneg [pa] | nonzero pa := nonzero <$> to_expr ``(inv_ne_zero %%pa) end | e := pp e >>= fail ∘ ...
def
tactic.positivity_inv
tactic
src/tactic/positivity.lean
[ "tactic.norm_num", "algebra.order.field.power", "algebra.order.hom.basic", "data.nat.factorial.basic" ]
[]
Extension for the `positivity` tactic: an inverse of a positive number is positive, an inverse of a nonnegative number is nonnegative.
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib
65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83
pow_zero_pos [ordered_semiring R] [nontrivial R] (a : R) : 0 < a ^ 0
zero_lt_one.trans_le (pow_zero a).ge
lemma
tactic.pow_zero_pos
tactic
src/tactic/positivity.lean
[ "tactic.norm_num", "algebra.order.field.power", "algebra.order.hom.basic", "data.nat.factorial.basic" ]
[ "nontrivial", "ordered_semiring", "pow_zero" ]
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib
65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83
zpow_zero_pos [linear_ordered_semifield R] (a : R) : 0 < a ^ (0 : ℤ)
zero_lt_one.trans_le (zpow_zero a).ge
lemma
tactic.zpow_zero_pos
tactic
src/tactic/positivity.lean
[ "tactic.norm_num", "algebra.order.field.power", "algebra.order.hom.basic", "data.nat.factorial.basic" ]
[ "linear_ordered_semifield", "zpow_zero" ]
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib
65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83
positivity_pow : expr → tactic strictness
| e@`(%%a ^ %%n) := do typ ← infer_type n, (do unify typ `(ℕ), if n = `(0) then positive <$> mk_app ``pow_zero_pos [a] else do -- even powers are nonnegative -- Note this is automatically strengthened to `0 < a ^ n` when `a ≠ 0` thanks to the `orelse'` match n with -- TODO: Dec...
def
tactic.positivity_pow
tactic
src/tactic/positivity.lean
[ "tactic.norm_num", "algebra.order.field.power", "algebra.order.hom.basic", "data.nat.factorial.basic" ]
[ "pow_bit0_nonneg", "pow_nonneg", "pow_pos", "zpow_bit0_nonneg", "zpow_nonneg", "zpow_pos_of_pos" ]
Extension for the `positivity` tactic: raising a number `a` to a natural/integer power `n` is positive if `n = 0` (since `a ^ 0 = 1`) or if `0 < a`, and is nonnegative if `n` is even (squares are nonnegative) or if `0 ≤ a`.
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib
65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83
positivity_canon_pow : expr → tactic strictness
| `(%%r ^ %%n) := do typ_n ← infer_type n, unify typ_n `(ℕ), positive p ← core r, positive <$> mk_app ``canonically_ordered_comm_semiring.pow_pos [p, n] -- The nonzero never happens because of `tactic.positivity_canon` | e := pp e >>= fail ∘ format.bracket "The expression `" "` is not of the for...
def
tactic.positivity_canon_pow
tactic
src/tactic/positivity.lean
[ "tactic.norm_num", "algebra.order.field.power", "algebra.order.hom.basic", "data.nat.factorial.basic" ]
[ "canonically_ordered_comm_semiring.pow_pos" ]
Extension for the `positivity` tactic: raising a positive number in a canonically ordered semiring gives a positive number.
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib
65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83
positivity_abs : expr → tactic strictness
| `(|%%a|) := do (do -- if can prove `0 < a` or `a ≠ 0`, report positivity strict_a ← core a, match strict_a with | positive p := positive <$> mk_app ``abs_pos_of_pos [p] | nonzero p := positive <$> mk_app ``abs_pos_of_ne_zero [p] | _ := failed end) <|> nonnegative <$> mk_app ``abs_nonneg [a...
def
tactic.positivity_abs
tactic
src/tactic/positivity.lean
[ "tactic.norm_num", "algebra.order.field.power", "algebra.order.hom.basic", "data.nat.factorial.basic" ]
[ "abs_nonneg", "abs_pos_of_pos" ]
Extension for the `positivity` tactic: an absolute value is nonnegative, and is strictly positive if its input is nonzero.
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib
65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83
int_nat_abs_pos {n : ℤ} (hn : 0 < n) : 0 < n.nat_abs
int.nat_abs_pos_of_ne_zero hn.ne'
lemma
tactic.int_nat_abs_pos
tactic
src/tactic/positivity.lean
[ "tactic.norm_num", "algebra.order.field.power", "algebra.order.hom.basic", "data.nat.factorial.basic" ]
[]
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib
65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83
positivity_nat_abs : expr → tactic strictness
| `(int.nat_abs %%a) := do strict_a ← core a, match strict_a with | positive p := positive <$> mk_app ``int_nat_abs_pos [p] | nonzero p := positive <$> mk_app ``int.nat_abs_pos_of_ne_zero [p] | _ := failed end | _ := failed
def
tactic.positivity_nat_abs
tactic
src/tactic/positivity.lean
[ "tactic.norm_num", "algebra.order.field.power", "algebra.order.hom.basic", "data.nat.factorial.basic" ]
[]
Extension for the `positivity` tactic: `int.nat_abs` is positive when its input is. Since the output type of `int.nat_abs` is `ℕ`, the nonnegative case is handled by the default `positivity` tactic.
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib
65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83
nat_cast_pos [ordered_semiring α] [nontrivial α] {n : ℕ} : 0 < n → 0 < (n : α)
nat.cast_pos.2
lemma
tactic.nat_cast_pos
tactic
src/tactic/positivity.lean
[ "tactic.norm_num", "algebra.order.field.power", "algebra.order.hom.basic", "data.nat.factorial.basic" ]
[ "nontrivial", "ordered_semiring" ]
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib
65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83
int_coe_nat_nonneg (n : ℕ) : 0 ≤ (n : ℤ)
n.cast_nonneg
lemma
tactic.int_coe_nat_nonneg
tactic
src/tactic/positivity.lean
[ "tactic.norm_num", "algebra.order.field.power", "algebra.order.hom.basic", "data.nat.factorial.basic" ]
[]
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib
65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83
int_coe_nat_pos {n : ℕ} : 0 < n → 0 < (n : ℤ)
nat.cast_pos.2
lemma
tactic.int_coe_nat_pos
tactic
src/tactic/positivity.lean
[ "tactic.norm_num", "algebra.order.field.power", "algebra.order.hom.basic", "data.nat.factorial.basic" ]
[]
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib
65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83
int_cast_ne_zero [add_group_with_one α] [char_zero α] {n : ℤ} : n ≠ 0 → (n : α) ≠ 0
int.cast_ne_zero.2
lemma
tactic.int_cast_ne_zero
tactic
src/tactic/positivity.lean
[ "tactic.norm_num", "algebra.order.field.power", "algebra.order.hom.basic", "data.nat.factorial.basic" ]
[ "add_group_with_one", "char_zero" ]
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib
65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83
int_cast_nonneg [ordered_ring α] {n : ℤ} (hn : 0 ≤ n) : 0 ≤ (n : α)
by { rw ←int.cast_zero, exact int.cast_mono hn }
lemma
tactic.int_cast_nonneg
tactic
src/tactic/positivity.lean
[ "tactic.norm_num", "algebra.order.field.power", "algebra.order.hom.basic", "data.nat.factorial.basic" ]
[ "int.cast_mono", "ordered_ring" ]
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib
65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83
int_cast_pos [ordered_ring α] [nontrivial α] {n : ℤ} : 0 < n → 0 < (n : α)
int.cast_pos.2
lemma
tactic.int_cast_pos
tactic
src/tactic/positivity.lean
[ "tactic.norm_num", "algebra.order.field.power", "algebra.order.hom.basic", "data.nat.factorial.basic" ]
[ "nontrivial", "ordered_ring" ]
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib
65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83
rat_cast_ne_zero [division_ring α] [char_zero α] {q : ℚ} : q ≠ 0 → (q : α) ≠ 0
rat.cast_ne_zero.2
lemma
tactic.rat_cast_ne_zero
tactic
src/tactic/positivity.lean
[ "tactic.norm_num", "algebra.order.field.power", "algebra.order.hom.basic", "data.nat.factorial.basic" ]
[ "char_zero", "division_ring" ]
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib
65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83
rat_cast_nonneg [linear_ordered_field α] {q : ℚ} : 0 ≤ q → 0 ≤ (q : α)
rat.cast_nonneg.2
lemma
tactic.rat_cast_nonneg
tactic
src/tactic/positivity.lean
[ "tactic.norm_num", "algebra.order.field.power", "algebra.order.hom.basic", "data.nat.factorial.basic" ]
[ "linear_ordered_field" ]
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib
65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83
rat_cast_pos [linear_ordered_field α] {q : ℚ} : 0 < q → 0 < (q : α)
rat.cast_pos.2
lemma
tactic.rat_cast_pos
tactic
src/tactic/positivity.lean
[ "tactic.norm_num", "algebra.order.field.power", "algebra.order.hom.basic", "data.nat.factorial.basic" ]
[ "linear_ordered_field" ]
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib
65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83
positivity_coe : expr → tactic strictness
| `(@coe _ %%typ %%inst %%a) := do -- TODO: Using `match` here might turn out too strict since we really want the instance to *unify* -- with one of the instances below rather than being equal on the nose. -- If this turns out to indeed be a problem, we should figure out the right way to pattern match -- up to ...
def
tactic.positivity_coe
tactic
src/tactic/positivity.lean
[ "tactic.norm_num", "algebra.order.field.power", "algebra.order.hom.basic", "data.nat.factorial.basic" ]
[ "nat.cast_nonneg" ]
Extension for the `positivity` tactic: casts from `ℕ`, `ℤ`, `ℚ`.
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib
65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83
positivity_succ : expr → tactic strictness
| `(nat.succ %%a) := positive <$> mk_app `nat.succ_pos [a] | e := pp e >>= fail ∘ format.bracket "The expression `" "` isn't of the form `nat.succ n`"
def
tactic.positivity_succ
tactic
src/tactic/positivity.lean
[ "tactic.norm_num", "algebra.order.field.power", "algebra.order.hom.basic", "data.nat.factorial.basic" ]
[]
Extension for the `positivity` tactic: `nat.succ` is always positive.
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib
65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83
positivity_factorial : expr → tactic strictness
| `(nat.factorial %%a) := positive <$> mk_app ``nat.factorial_pos [a] | e := pp e >>= fail ∘ format.bracket "The expression `" "` isn't of the form `n!`"
def
tactic.positivity_factorial
tactic
src/tactic/positivity.lean
[ "tactic.norm_num", "algebra.order.field.power", "algebra.order.hom.basic", "data.nat.factorial.basic" ]
[ "nat.factorial_pos" ]
Extension for the `positivity` tactic: `nat.factorial` is always positive.
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib
65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83
positivity_asc_factorial : expr → tactic strictness
| `(nat.asc_factorial %%a %%b) := positive <$> mk_app ``nat.asc_factorial_pos [a, b] | e := pp e >>= fail ∘ format.bracket "The expression `" "` isn't of the form `nat.asc_factorial n k`"
def
tactic.positivity_asc_factorial
tactic
src/tactic/positivity.lean
[ "tactic.norm_num", "algebra.order.field.power", "algebra.order.hom.basic", "data.nat.factorial.basic" ]
[ "nat.asc_factorial_pos" ]
Extension for the `positivity` tactic: `nat.asc_factorial` is always positive.
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib
65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83
positivity_map : expr → tactic strictness
| (expr.app `(⇑%%f) `(%%a)) := nonnegative <$> mk_app ``map_nonneg [f, a] | _ := failed
def
tactic.positivity_map
tactic
src/tactic/positivity.lean
[ "tactic.norm_num", "algebra.order.field.power", "algebra.order.hom.basic", "data.nat.factorial.basic" ]
[ "map_nonneg" ]
Extension for the `positivity` tactic: nonnegative maps take nonnegative values.
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib
65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83
pretty_cases_advice : tactic string
retrieve $ do gs ← get_goals, cases ← gs.mmap $ λ g, do { t : list name ← get_tag g, let vs := t.tail, let ⟨vs,ts⟩ := vs.span (λ n, name.last_string n = "_arg"), set_goals [g], ls ← local_context, let m := native.rb_map.of_list $ (ls.map expr.local_uniq_name).zip (ls.map expr.local_pp_name), let vs := vs.ma...
def
tactic.pretty_cases_advice
tactic
src/tactic/pretty_cases.lean
[ "tactic.core" ]
[ "name.last_string" ]
Query the proof goal and print the skeleton of a proof by cases.
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib
65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83
pretty_cases : tactic unit
pretty_cases_advice >>= trace
def
tactic.interactive.pretty_cases
tactic
src/tactic/pretty_cases.lean
[ "tactic.core" ]
[]
Query the proof goal and print the skeleton of a proof by cases. For example, let us consider the following proof: ```lean example {α} (xs ys : list α) (h : xs ~ ys) : true := begin induction h, pretty_cases, -- Try this: -- case list.perm.nil : -- { admit }, -- case list.perm.cons : h_x h_l...
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib
65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83
find_all_expr_data
(matching_subexpr : bool) -- this declaration contains a subexpression on which the test passes (test_passed : bool) -- the search has found a matching subexpression somewhere -- name, contains subexpression directly, direct descendants (descendants : list (name × bool × name_set)) (name_map : name_map bool) -- all dat...
structure
tactic.find_all_expr_data
tactic
src/tactic/print_sorry.lean
[ "tactic.core", "data.bool.basic" ]
[]
Auxiliary data type for `tactic.find_all_exprs`
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib
65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83
find_all_exprs_aux (env : environment) (f : expr → bool) (g : name → bool) : name → find_all_expr_data → tactic find_all_expr_data
| n ⟨b₀, b₁, l, ns, desc⟩ := match ns.find n with -- Skip declarations that we have already handled. | some b := pure ⟨b₀, b || b₁, l, ns, if b then desc.insert n else desc⟩ | none := if g n then pure ⟨b₀, b₁, l, ns.insert n ff, desc⟩ else do d ← env.get n, let process (v : expr) : tactic find_all_expr_da...
def
tactic.find_all_exprs_aux
tactic
src/tactic/print_sorry.lean
[ "tactic.core", "data.bool.basic" ]
[]
Auxiliary declaration for `tactic.find_all_exprs`. Traverse all declarations occurring in the declaration with the given name, excluding declarations `n` such that `g n` is true (and all their descendants), recording the structure of which declaration depends on which, and whether `f e` is true on any subexpression `e...
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib
65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83
find_all_exprs (env : environment) (test : expr → bool) (exclude : name → bool) (nm : name) : tactic $ list $ name × bool × name_set
do ⟨_, _, l, _, _⟩ ← find_all_exprs_aux env test exclude nm ⟨ff, ff, [], mk_name_map, mk_name_set⟩, pure l
def
tactic.find_all_exprs
tactic
src/tactic/print_sorry.lean
[ "tactic.core", "data.bool.basic" ]
[]
`tactic.find_all_exprs env test exclude nm` searches for all declarations (transitively) occuring in `nm` that contain a subexpression `e` such that `test e` is true. All declarations `n` such that `exclude n` is true (and all their descendants) are ignored.
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib
65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83
print_sorry_in (nm : name) (ignore_mathlib := tt) : tactic unit
do env ← get_env, dir ← get_mathlib_dir, data ← find_all_exprs env (λ e, e.is_sorry.is_some) (if ignore_mathlib then env.is_prefix_of_file dir else λ _, ff) nm, let to_print : list format := data.map $ λ ⟨nm, contains_sorry, desc⟩, let s1 := if contains_sorry then " contains sorry" else "", s2 :...
def
print_sorry_in
tactic
src/tactic/print_sorry.lean
[ "tactic.core", "data.bool.basic" ]
[ "get_mathlib_dir" ]
Print all declarations that (transitively) occur in the value of declaration `nm` and depend on `sorry`. If `ignore_mathlib` is set true, then all declarations in `mathlib` are assumed to be `sorry`-free, which greatly reduces the search space. We could also exclude `core`, but this doesn't speed up the search.
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib
65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83
print_sorry_in_cmd (_ : parse $ tk "#print_sorry_in") : parser unit
do nm ← ident, nm ← resolve_name nm, print_sorry_in nm.const_name
def
print_sorry_in_cmd
tactic
src/tactic/print_sorry.lean
[ "tactic.core", "data.bool.basic" ]
[ "print_sorry_in" ]
The command ``` #print_sorry_in nm ``` prints all declarations that (transitively) occur in the value of declaration `nm` and depend on `sorry`. This command assumes that no `sorry` occurs in mathlib. To find `sorry` in mathlib, use ``#eval print_sorry_in `nm ff`` instead. Example: ``` def foo1 : false := sorry def foo...
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib
65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83
mathlib_dir_locator : true
trivial
lemma
mathlib_dir_locator
tactic
src/tactic/project_dir.lean
[]
[]
This is a dummy declaration that is used to determine the project folder of mathlib, using the tactic `tactic.decl_olean`. This is used in `tactic.get_mathlib_dir`.
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib
65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83
protected_attr : user_attribute
{ name := "protected", descr := "Attribute to protect a declaration If a declaration `foo.bar` is marked protected, then it must be referred to by its full name `foo.bar`, even when the `foo` namespace is open.", after_set := some (λ n _ _, mk_protected n) }
def
tactic.protected_attr
tactic
src/tactic/protected.lean
[ "tactic.core" ]
[]
Attribute to protect a declaration. If a declaration `foo.bar` is marked protected, then it must be referred to by its full name `foo.bar`, even when the `foo` namespace is open. Protectedness is a built in parser feature that is independent of this attribute. A declaration may be protected even if it does not have th...
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib
65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83
protect_proj_tac (n : name) (l : list name) : tactic unit
do env ← get_env, match env.structure_fields_full n with | none := fail "protect_proj failed: declaration is not a structure" | some fields := fields.mmap' $ λ field, when (l.all $ λ m, bnot $ m.is_suffix_of field) $ mk_protected field end
def
tactic.protect_proj_tac
tactic
src/tactic/protected.lean
[ "tactic.core" ]
[ "field" ]
Tactic that is executed when a structure is marked with the `protect_proj` attribute
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib
65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83
protect_proj_attr : user_attribute unit (list name)
{ name := "protect_proj", descr := "Attribute to protect the projections of a structure. If a structure `foo` is marked with the `protect_proj` user attribute, then all of the projections become protected, meaning they must always be referred to by their full name `foo.bar`, even when the `foo` namespace ...
def
tactic.protect_proj_attr
tactic
src/tactic/protected.lean
[ "tactic.core" ]
[]
Attribute to protect the projections of a structure. If a structure `foo` is marked with the `protect_proj` user attribute, then all of the projections become protected, meaning they must always be referred to by their full name `foo.bar`, even when the `foo` namespace is open. `protect_proj without bar baz` will prot...
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib
65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83
not_and_eq : (¬ (p ∧ q)) = (p → ¬ q)
propext not_and
theorem
push_neg.not_and_eq
tactic
src/tactic/push_neg.lean
[ "tactic.core", "logic.basic" ]
[ "not_and" ]
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib
65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83
not_and_distrib_eq : (¬ (p ∧ q)) = (¬ p ∨ ¬ q)
propext not_and_distrib
theorem
push_neg.not_and_distrib_eq
tactic
src/tactic/push_neg.lean
[ "tactic.core", "logic.basic" ]
[ "not_and_distrib" ]
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib
65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83
not_eq (a b : α) : (¬ a = b) ↔ (a ≠ b)
iff.rfl
theorem
push_neg.not_eq
tactic
src/tactic/push_neg.lean
[ "tactic.core", "logic.basic" ]
[]
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib
65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83
not_le_eq (a b : β) : (¬ (a ≤ b)) = (b < a)
propext not_le
theorem
push_neg.not_le_eq
tactic
src/tactic/push_neg.lean
[ "tactic.core", "logic.basic" ]
[]
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib
65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83
not_lt_eq (a b : β) : (¬ (a < b)) = (b ≤ a)
propext not_lt
theorem
push_neg.not_lt_eq
tactic
src/tactic/push_neg.lean
[ "tactic.core", "logic.basic" ]
[]
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib
65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83
transform_negation_step (e : expr) : tactic (option (expr × expr))
do e ← whnf_reducible e, match e with | `(¬ %%ne) := (do ne ← whnf_reducible ne, match ne with | `(¬ %%a) := do pr ← mk_app ``not_not_eq [a], return (some (a, pr)) | `(%%a ∧ %%b) := do distrib ← get_bool_option `trace.push_neg.use_distrib ff, ...
def
push_neg.transform_negation_step
tactic
src/tactic/push_neg.lean
[ "tactic.core", "logic.basic" ]
[ "distrib" ]
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib
65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83
transform_negation : expr → tactic (option (expr × expr))
| e := do (some (e', pr)) ← transform_negation_step e | return none, (some (e'', pr')) ← transform_negation e' | return (some (e', pr)), pr'' ← mk_eq_trans pr pr', return (some (e'', pr''))
def
push_neg.transform_negation
tactic
src/tactic/push_neg.lean
[ "tactic.core", "logic.basic" ]
[]
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib
65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83
normalize_negations (t : expr) : tactic (expr × expr)
do (_, e, pr) ← simplify_top_down () (λ _, λ e, do oepr ← transform_negation e, match oepr with | (some (e', pr)) := return ((), e', pr) | none := do pr ← mk_eq_refl e, return ((), e, pr) ...
def
push_neg.normalize_negations
tactic
src/tactic/push_neg.lean
[ "tactic.core", "logic.basic" ]
[]
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib
65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83
push_neg_at_hyp (h : name) : tactic unit
do H ← get_local h, t ← infer_type H, (e, pr) ← normalize_negations t, replace_hyp H e pr, skip
def
push_neg.push_neg_at_hyp
tactic
src/tactic/push_neg.lean
[ "tactic.core", "logic.basic" ]
[]
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib
65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83
push_neg_at_goal : tactic unit
do H ← target, (e, pr) ← normalize_negations H, replace_target e pr
def
push_neg.push_neg_at_goal
tactic
src/tactic/push_neg.lean
[ "tactic.core", "logic.basic" ]
[]
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib
65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83
tactic.interactive.push_neg : parse location → tactic unit
| (loc.ns loc_l) := loc_l.mmap' (λ l, match l with | some h := do push_neg_at_hyp h, try $ interactive.simp_core { eta := ff } failed tt [simp_arg_type.expr ``(push_neg.not_eq)] [] (interactive.loc.ns [some h]) ...
def
tactic.interactive.push_neg
tactic
src/tactic/push_neg.lean
[ "tactic.core", "logic.basic" ]
[ "push_neg.not_eq" ]
Push negations in the goal of some assumption. For instance, a hypothesis `h : ¬ ∀ x, ∃ y, x ≤ y` will be transformed by `push_neg at h` into `h : ∃ x, ∀ y, y < x`. Variables names are conserved. This tactic pushes negations inside expressions. For instance, given an assumption ```lean h : ¬ ∀ ε > 0, ∃ δ > 0, ∀ x, |x...
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib
65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83
imp_of_not_imp_not (P Q : Prop) : (¬ Q → ¬ P) → (P → Q)
λ h hP, classical.by_contradiction (λ h', h h' hP)
lemma
imp_of_not_imp_not
tactic
src/tactic/push_neg.lean
[ "tactic.core", "logic.basic" ]
[]
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib
65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83
name_with_opt : lean.parser (name × option name)
prod.mk <$> ident <*> (some <$> (tk "with" *> ident) <|> return none)
def
name_with_opt
tactic
src/tactic/push_neg.lean
[ "tactic.core", "logic.basic" ]
[]
Matches either an identifier "h" or a pair of identifiers "h with k"
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib
65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83
tactic.interactive.contrapose (push : parse (tk "!" )?) : parse name_with_opt? → tactic unit
| (some (h, h')) := get_local h >>= revert >> tactic.interactive.contrapose none >> intro (h'.get_or_else h) >> skip | none := do `(%%P → %%Q) ← target | fail "The goal is not an implication, and you didn't specify an assumption", cp ← mk_mapp ``imp_of_not_imp_not [P, Q] <|> fail "contrapose only applies ...
def
tactic.interactive.contrapose
tactic
src/tactic/push_neg.lean
[ "tactic.core", "logic.basic" ]
[ "imp_of_not_imp_not", "tactic.interactive.push_neg" ]
Transforms the goal into its contrapositive. * `contrapose` turns a goal `P → Q` into `¬ Q → ¬ P` * `contrapose!` turns a goal `P → Q` into `¬ Q → ¬ P` and pushes negations inside `P` and `Q` using `push_neg` * `contrapose h` first reverts the local assumption `h`, and then uses `contrapose` and `intro h` *...
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib
65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83
push_neg_cmd (_ : parse $ tk "#push_neg") : lean.parser unit
do e ← texpr, /- Synthesize a `tactic_state` including local variables as hypotheses under which `normalize_negations` may be safely called with expected behaviour given the `variables` in the environment. -/ (ts, _) ← synthesize_tactic_state_with_variables_as_hyps [e], /- Enter the `tactic` monad, ...
def
tactic.push_neg_cmd
tactic
src/tactic/push_neg.lean
[ "tactic.core", "logic.basic" ]
[]
The syntax is `#push_neg e`, where `e` is an expression, which will print the `push_neg` form of `e`. `#push_neg` understands local variables, so you can use them to introduce parameters.
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib
65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83
qify_attr : user_attribute simp_lemmas unit
{ name := `qify, descr := "Used to tag lemmas for use in the `qify` tactic", cache_cfg := { mk_cache := λ ns, mmap (λ n, do c ← mk_const n, return (c, tt)) ns >>= simp_lemmas.mk.append_with_symm, dependencies := [] } }
def
qify.qify_attr
tactic
src/tactic/qify.lean
[ "tactic.norm_cast", "data.rat.cast" ]
[]
The `qify` attribute is used by the `qify` tactic. It applies to lemmas that shift propositions from `nat` or `int` to `rat`. `qify` lemmas should have the form `∀ a₁ ... aₙ : ℕ, Pq (a₁ : ℚ) ... (aₙ : ℚ) ↔ Pn a₁ ... aₙ` or `∀ a₁ ... aₙ : ℤ, Pq (a₁ : ℚ) ... (aₙ : ℚ) ↔ Pz a₁ ... aₙ`. For example, `rat.coe_nat_le_coe_na...
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib
65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83
lift_to_q (e : expr) : tactic (expr × expr)
do sl ← qify_attr.get_cache, sl ← sl.add_simp `ge_iff_le, sl ← sl.add_simp `gt_iff_lt, (e', prf, _) ← simplify sl [] e, return (e', prf)
def
qify.lift_to_q
tactic
src/tactic/qify.lean
[ "tactic.norm_cast", "data.rat.cast" ]
[ "ge_iff_le", "gt_iff_lt" ]
Given an expression `e`, `lift_to_q e` looks for subterms of `e` that are propositions "about" natural numbers or integers and change them to propositions about rational numbers. Returns an expression `e'` and a proof that `e = e'`. Includes `ge_iff_le` and `gt_iff_lt` in the simp set. These can't be tagged with `qif...
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib
65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83
rat.coe_nat_le_coe_nat_iff (a b : ℕ) : (a : ℚ) ≤ b ↔ a ≤ b
by simp
lemma
qify.rat.coe_nat_le_coe_nat_iff
tactic
src/tactic/qify.lean
[ "tactic.norm_cast", "data.rat.cast" ]
[]
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib
65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83
rat.coe_nat_lt_coe_nat_iff (a b : ℕ) : (a : ℚ) < b ↔ a < b
by simp
lemma
qify.rat.coe_nat_lt_coe_nat_iff
tactic
src/tactic/qify.lean
[ "tactic.norm_cast", "data.rat.cast" ]
[]
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib
65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83
rat.coe_nat_eq_coe_nat_iff (a b : ℕ) : (a : ℚ) = b ↔ a = b
by simp
lemma
qify.rat.coe_nat_eq_coe_nat_iff
tactic
src/tactic/qify.lean
[ "tactic.norm_cast", "data.rat.cast" ]
[]
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib
65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83
rat.coe_nat_ne_coe_nat_iff (a b : ℕ) : (a : ℚ) ≠ b ↔ a ≠ b
by simp
lemma
qify.rat.coe_nat_ne_coe_nat_iff
tactic
src/tactic/qify.lean
[ "tactic.norm_cast", "data.rat.cast" ]
[]
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib
65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83
rat.coe_int_le_coe_int_iff (a b : ℤ) : (a : ℚ) ≤ b ↔ a ≤ b
by simp
lemma
qify.rat.coe_int_le_coe_int_iff
tactic
src/tactic/qify.lean
[ "tactic.norm_cast", "data.rat.cast" ]
[]
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib
65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83
rat.coe_int_lt_coe_int_iff (a b : ℤ) : (a : ℚ) < b ↔ a < b
by simp
lemma
qify.rat.coe_int_lt_coe_int_iff
tactic
src/tactic/qify.lean
[ "tactic.norm_cast", "data.rat.cast" ]
[]
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib
65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83
rat.coe_int_eq_coe_int_iff (a b : ℤ) : (a : ℚ) = b ↔ a = b
by simp
lemma
qify.rat.coe_int_eq_coe_int_iff
tactic
src/tactic/qify.lean
[ "tactic.norm_cast", "data.rat.cast" ]
[]
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib
65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83
rat.coe_int_ne_coe_int_iff (a b : ℤ) : (a : ℚ) ≠ b ↔ a ≠ b
by simp
lemma
qify.rat.coe_int_ne_coe_int_iff
tactic
src/tactic/qify.lean
[ "tactic.norm_cast", "data.rat.cast" ]
[]
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib
65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83
tactic.qify (extra_lems : list simp_arg_type) : expr → tactic (expr × expr)
λ q, do (q1, p1) ← qify.lift_to_q q <|> fail "failed to find an applicable qify lemma", (q2, p2) ← norm_cast.derive_push_cast extra_lems q1, prod.mk q2 <$> mk_eq_trans p1 p2
def
tactic.qify
tactic
src/tactic/qify.lean
[ "tactic.norm_cast", "data.rat.cast" ]
[ "norm_cast.derive_push_cast", "qify.lift_to_q" ]
`qify extra_lems e` is used to shift propositions in `e` from `ℕ` or `ℤ` to `ℚ`. This is often useful since `ℚ` has well-behaved division and subtraction. The list of extra lemmas is used in the `push_cast` step. Returns an expression `e'` and a proof that `e = e'`.
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib
65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83
tactic.qify_proof (extra_lems : list simp_arg_type) (h : expr) : tactic expr
do (_, pf) ← infer_type h >>= tactic.qify extra_lems, mk_eq_mp pf h
def
tactic.qify_proof
tactic
src/tactic/qify.lean
[ "tactic.norm_cast", "data.rat.cast" ]
[ "tactic.qify" ]
A variant of `tactic.qify` that takes `h`, a proof of a proposition about natural numbers or integers, and returns a proof of the qified version of that propositon.
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib
65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83
tactic.interactive.qify (sl : parse simp_arg_list) (l : parse location) : tactic unit
do locs ← l.get_locals, replace_at (tactic.qify sl) locs l.include_goal >>= guardb
def
tactic.interactive.qify
tactic
src/tactic/qify.lean
[ "tactic.norm_cast", "data.rat.cast" ]
[ "tactic.qify" ]
The `qify` tactic is used to shift propositions from `ℕ` or `ℤ` to `ℚ`. This is often useful since `ℚ` has well-behaved division and subtraction. ```lean example (a b c : ℕ) (x y z : ℤ) (h : ¬ x*y*z < 0) : c < a + 3*b := begin qify, qify at h, /- h : ¬↑x * ↑y * ↑z < 0 ⊢ ↑c < ↑a + 3 * ↑b -/ end ``` `qify` ...
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib
65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83