fact
stringlengths
6
3.84k
type
stringclasses
11 values
library
stringclasses
32 values
imports
listlengths
1
14
filename
stringlengths
20
95
symbolic_name
stringlengths
1
90
docstring
stringlengths
7
20k
isNat_lt_true [Semiring α] [PartialOrder α] [IsOrderedRing α] [CharZero α] : {a b : α} → {a' b' : ℕ} → IsNat a a' → IsNat b b' → Nat.ble b' a' = false → a < b | _, _, _, _, ⟨rfl⟩, ⟨rfl⟩, h => Nat.cast_lt.2 <| ble_eq_false.1 h
theorem
Tactic
[ "Mathlib.Tactic.NormNum.Eq", "Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Field.Defs", "Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Invertible", "Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Monoid.WithTop", "Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Ring.Cast" ]
Mathlib/Tactic/NormNum/Ineq.lean
isNat_lt_true
null
isNat_le_false [Semiring α] [PartialOrder α] [IsOrderedRing α] [CharZero α] {a b : α} {a' b' : ℕ} (ha : IsNat a a') (hb : IsNat b b') (h : Nat.ble a' b' = false) : ¬a ≤ b := not_le_of_gt (isNat_lt_true hb ha h)
theorem
Tactic
[ "Mathlib.Tactic.NormNum.Eq", "Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Field.Defs", "Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Invertible", "Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Monoid.WithTop", "Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Ring.Cast" ]
Mathlib/Tactic/NormNum/Ineq.lean
isNat_le_false
null
isInt_le_true [Ring α] [PartialOrder α] [IsOrderedRing α] : {a b : α} → {a' b' : ℤ} → IsInt a a' → IsInt b b' → decide (a' ≤ b') → a ≤ b | _, _, _, _, ⟨rfl⟩, ⟨rfl⟩, h => Int.cast_mono <| of_decide_eq_true h
theorem
Tactic
[ "Mathlib.Tactic.NormNum.Eq", "Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Field.Defs", "Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Invertible", "Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Monoid.WithTop", "Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Ring.Cast" ]
Mathlib/Tactic/NormNum/Ineq.lean
isInt_le_true
null
isInt_lt_true [Ring α] [PartialOrder α] [IsOrderedRing α] [Nontrivial α] : {a b : α} → {a' b' : ℤ} → IsInt a a' → IsInt b b' → decide (a' < b') → a < b | _, _, _, _, ⟨rfl⟩, ⟨rfl⟩, h => Int.cast_lt.2 <| of_decide_eq_true h
theorem
Tactic
[ "Mathlib.Tactic.NormNum.Eq", "Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Field.Defs", "Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Invertible", "Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Monoid.WithTop", "Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Ring.Cast" ]
Mathlib/Tactic/NormNum/Ineq.lean
isInt_lt_true
null
isInt_le_false [Ring α] [PartialOrder α] [IsOrderedRing α] [Nontrivial α] {a b : α} {a' b' : ℤ} (ha : IsInt a a') (hb : IsInt b b') (h : decide (b' < a')) : ¬a ≤ b := not_le_of_gt (isInt_lt_true hb ha h)
theorem
Tactic
[ "Mathlib.Tactic.NormNum.Eq", "Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Field.Defs", "Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Invertible", "Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Monoid.WithTop", "Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Ring.Cast" ]
Mathlib/Tactic/NormNum/Ineq.lean
isInt_le_false
null
isInt_lt_false [Ring α] [PartialOrder α] [IsOrderedRing α] {a b : α} {a' b' : ℤ} (ha : IsInt a a') (hb : IsInt b b') (h : decide (b' ≤ a')) : ¬a < b := not_lt_of_ge (isInt_le_true hb ha h) attribute [local instance] monadLiftOptionMetaM in
theorem
Tactic
[ "Mathlib.Tactic.NormNum.Eq", "Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Field.Defs", "Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Invertible", "Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Monoid.WithTop", "Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Ring.Cast" ]
Mathlib/Tactic/NormNum/Ineq.lean
isInt_lt_false
null
@[norm_num _ ≤ _] evalLE : NormNumExt where eval {v β} e := do haveI' : v =QL 0 := ⟨⟩; haveI' : $β =Q Prop := ⟨⟩ let .app (.app f a) b ← whnfR e | failure let ⟨u, α, a⟩ ← inferTypeQ' a have b : Q($α) := b let ra ← derive a; let rb ← derive b let lα ← synthInstanceQ q(LE $α) guard <|← withNewMCtxDepth <| isDefEq f q(LE.le (α := $α)) core lα ra rb where /-- Identify (as `true` or `false`) expressions of the form `a ≤ b`, where `a` and `b` are numeric expressions whose evaluations to `NormNum.Result` have already been computed. -/ core {u : Level} {α : Q(Type u)} (lα : Q(LE $α)) {a b : Q($α)} (ra : NormNum.Result a) (rb : NormNum.Result b) : MetaM (NormNum.Result q($a ≤ $b)) := do let e := q($a ≤ $b) let rec intArm : MetaM (Result e) := do let ⟨_ir, _, _i⟩ ← inferOrderedRing α haveI' : $e =Q ($a ≤ $b) := ⟨⟩ let ⟨za, na, pa⟩ ← ra.toInt q($_ir) let ⟨zb, nb, pb⟩ ← rb.toInt q($_ir) assumeInstancesCommute if decide (za ≤ zb) then let r : Q(decide ($na ≤ $nb) = true) := (q(Eq.refl true) : Expr) return .isTrue q(isInt_le_true $pa $pb $r) else if let .some _i ← trySynthInstanceQ q(Nontrivial $α) then let r : Q(decide ($nb < $na) = true) := (q(Eq.refl true) : Expr) return .isFalse q(isInt_le_false $pa $pb $r) else failure let rec ratArm : MetaM (Result e) := do let ⟨_if, _, _i⟩ ← inferLinearOrderedField α haveI' : $e =Q ($a ≤ $b) := ⟨⟩ let ⟨qa, na, da, pa⟩ ← ra.toRat' q(Field.toDivisionRing) let ⟨qb, nb, db, pb⟩ ← rb.toRat' q(Field.toDivisionRing) assumeInstancesCommute if decide (qa ≤ qb) then let r : Q(decide ($na * $db ≤ $nb * $da) = true) := (q(Eq.refl true) : Expr) return (.isTrue q(isRat_le_true $pa $pb $r)) else let _i : Q(Nontrivial $α) := q(IsStrictOrderedRing.toNontrivial) let r : Q(decide ($nb * $da < $na * $db) = true) := (q(Eq.refl true) : Expr) return .isFalse q(isRat_le_false $pa $pb $r) match ra, rb with | .isBool .., _ | _, .isBool .. => failure | .isNNRat _ .., _ | _, .isNNRat _ .. => ratArm | .isNegNNRat _ .., _ | _, .isNegNNRat _ .. => ratArm | .isNegNat _ .., _ | _, .isNegNat _ .. => intArm | .isNat ra na pa, .isNat rb nb pb => let ⟨_, _, _i⟩ ← inferOrderedSemiring α haveI' : $ra =Q by clear! $ra $rb; infer_instance := ⟨⟩ haveI' : $rb =Q by clear! $ra $rb; infer_instance := ⟨⟩ ...
def
Tactic
[ "Mathlib.Tactic.NormNum.Eq", "Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Field.Defs", "Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Invertible", "Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Monoid.WithTop", "Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Ring.Cast" ]
Mathlib/Tactic/NormNum/Ineq.lean
evalLE
The `norm_num` extension which identifies expressions of the form `a ≤ b`, such that `norm_num` successfully recognises both `a` and `b`.
@[norm_num _ < _] evalLT : NormNumExt where eval {v β} e := do haveI' : v =QL 0 := ⟨⟩; haveI' : $β =Q Prop := ⟨⟩ let .app (.app f a) b ← whnfR e | failure let ⟨u, α, a⟩ ← inferTypeQ' a have b : Q($α) := b let ra ← derive a; let rb ← derive b let lα ← synthInstanceQ q(LT $α) guard <|← withNewMCtxDepth <| isDefEq f q(LT.lt (α := $α)) core lα ra rb where /-- Identify (as `true` or `false`) expressions of the form `a < b`, where `a` and `b` are numeric expressions whose evaluations to `NormNum.Result` have already been computed. -/ core {u : Level} {α : Q(Type u)} (lα : Q(LT $α)) {a b : Q($α)} (ra : NormNum.Result a) (rb : NormNum.Result b) : MetaM (NormNum.Result q($a < $b)) := do let e := q($a < $b) let rec intArm : MetaM (Result e) := do let ⟨_ir, _, _i⟩ ← inferOrderedRing α haveI' : $e =Q ($a < $b) := ⟨⟩ let ⟨za, na, pa⟩ ← ra.toInt q($_ir) let ⟨zb, nb, pb⟩ ← rb.toInt q($_ir) assumeInstancesCommute if za < zb then if let .some _i ← trySynthInstanceQ q(Nontrivial $α) then let r : Q(decide ($na < $nb) = true) := (q(Eq.refl true) : Expr) return .isTrue q(isInt_lt_true $pa $pb $r) else failure else let r : Q(decide ($nb ≤ $na) = true) := (q(Eq.refl true) : Expr) return .isFalse q(isInt_lt_false $pa $pb $r) let rec nnratArm : MetaM (Result e) := do /- NOTE: after the ordered algebra refactor, this is not true anymore, so there may be a better typeclass -/ let ⟨_, _, _⟩ ← inferLinearOrderedSemifield α assumeInstancesCommute haveI' : $e =Q ($a < $b) := ⟨⟩ let ⟨qa, na, da, pa⟩ ← ra.toNNRat' q(Semifield.toDivisionSemiring) let ⟨qb, nb, db, pb⟩ ← rb.toNNRat' q(Semifield.toDivisionSemiring) if qa < qb then let r : Q(decide ($na * $db < $nb * $da) = true) := (q(Eq.refl true) : Expr) return .isTrue q(isNNRat_lt_true $pa $pb $r) else let r : Q(decide ($nb * $da ≤ $na * $db) = true) := (q(Eq.refl true) : Expr) return .isFalse q(isNNRat_lt_false $pa $pb $r) let rec ratArm : MetaM (Result e) := do /- NOTE: after the ordered algebra refactor, this is not true anymore, so there may be a better typeclass -/ ...
def
Tactic
[ "Mathlib.Tactic.NormNum.Eq", "Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Field.Defs", "Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Invertible", "Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Monoid.WithTop", "Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Ring.Cast" ]
Mathlib/Tactic/NormNum/Ineq.lean
evalLT
The `norm_num` extension which identifies expressions of the form `a < b`, such that `norm_num` successfully recognises both `a` and `b`.
inferCharZeroOfRing {α : Q(Type u)} (_i : Q(Ring $α) := by with_reducible assumption) : MetaM Q(CharZero $α) := return ← synthInstanceQ q(CharZero $α) <|> throwError "not a characteristic zero ring"
def
Tactic
[ "Mathlib.Tactic.NormNum.Basic", "Mathlib.Data.Rat.Cast.CharZero", "Mathlib.Algebra.Field.Basic" ]
Mathlib/Tactic/NormNum/Inv.lean
inferCharZeroOfRing
Helper function to synthesize a typed `CharZero α` expression given `Ring α`.
inferCharZeroOfRing? {α : Q(Type u)} (_i : Q(Ring $α) := by with_reducible assumption) : MetaM (Option Q(CharZero $α)) := return (← trySynthInstanceQ q(CharZero $α)).toOption
def
Tactic
[ "Mathlib.Tactic.NormNum.Basic", "Mathlib.Data.Rat.Cast.CharZero", "Mathlib.Algebra.Field.Basic" ]
Mathlib/Tactic/NormNum/Inv.lean
inferCharZeroOfRing
Helper function to synthesize a typed `CharZero α` expression given `Ring α`, if it exists.
inferCharZeroOfAddMonoidWithOne {α : Q(Type u)} (_i : Q(AddMonoidWithOne $α) := by with_reducible assumption) : MetaM Q(CharZero $α) := return ← synthInstanceQ q(CharZero $α) <|> throwError "not a characteristic zero AddMonoidWithOne"
def
Tactic
[ "Mathlib.Tactic.NormNum.Basic", "Mathlib.Data.Rat.Cast.CharZero", "Mathlib.Algebra.Field.Basic" ]
Mathlib/Tactic/NormNum/Inv.lean
inferCharZeroOfAddMonoidWithOne
Helper function to synthesize a typed `CharZero α` expression given `AddMonoidWithOne α`.
inferCharZeroOfAddMonoidWithOne? {α : Q(Type u)} (_i : Q(AddMonoidWithOne $α) := by with_reducible assumption) : MetaM (Option Q(CharZero $α)) := return (← trySynthInstanceQ q(CharZero $α)).toOption
def
Tactic
[ "Mathlib.Tactic.NormNum.Basic", "Mathlib.Data.Rat.Cast.CharZero", "Mathlib.Algebra.Field.Basic" ]
Mathlib/Tactic/NormNum/Inv.lean
inferCharZeroOfAddMonoidWithOne
Helper function to synthesize a typed `CharZero α` expression given `AddMonoidWithOne α`, if it exists.
inferCharZeroOfDivisionRing {α : Q(Type u)} (_i : Q(DivisionRing $α) := by with_reducible assumption) : MetaM Q(CharZero $α) := return ← synthInstanceQ q(CharZero $α) <|> throwError "not a characteristic zero division ring"
def
Tactic
[ "Mathlib.Tactic.NormNum.Basic", "Mathlib.Data.Rat.Cast.CharZero", "Mathlib.Algebra.Field.Basic" ]
Mathlib/Tactic/NormNum/Inv.lean
inferCharZeroOfDivisionRing
Helper function to synthesize a typed `CharZero α` expression given `DivisionRing α`.
inferCharZeroOfDivisionSemiring? {α : Q(Type u)} (_i : Q(DivisionSemiring $α) := by with_reducible assumption) : MetaM (Option Q(CharZero $α)) := return (← trySynthInstanceQ (q(CharZero $α) : Q(Prop))).toOption
def
Tactic
[ "Mathlib.Tactic.NormNum.Basic", "Mathlib.Data.Rat.Cast.CharZero", "Mathlib.Algebra.Field.Basic" ]
Mathlib/Tactic/NormNum/Inv.lean
inferCharZeroOfDivisionSemiring
Helper function to synthesize a typed `CharZero α` expression given `Divisionsemiring α`, if it exists.
inferCharZeroOfDivisionRing? {α : Q(Type u)} (_i : Q(DivisionRing $α) := by with_reducible assumption) : MetaM (Option Q(CharZero $α)) := return (← trySynthInstanceQ q(CharZero $α)).toOption
def
Tactic
[ "Mathlib.Tactic.NormNum.Basic", "Mathlib.Data.Rat.Cast.CharZero", "Mathlib.Algebra.Field.Basic" ]
Mathlib/Tactic/NormNum/Inv.lean
inferCharZeroOfDivisionRing
Helper function to synthesize a typed `CharZero α` expression given `DivisionRing α`, if it exists.
isRat_mkRat : {a na n : ℤ} → {b nb d : ℕ} → IsInt a na → IsNat b nb → IsRat (na / nb : ℚ) n d → IsRat (mkRat a b) n d | _, _, _, _, _, _, ⟨rfl⟩, ⟨rfl⟩, ⟨_, h⟩ => by rw [Rat.mkRat_eq_div]; exact ⟨_, h⟩ attribute [local instance] monadLiftOptionMetaM in
theorem
Tactic
[ "Mathlib.Tactic.NormNum.Basic", "Mathlib.Data.Rat.Cast.CharZero", "Mathlib.Algebra.Field.Basic" ]
Mathlib/Tactic/NormNum/Inv.lean
isRat_mkRat
null
@[norm_num mkRat _ _] evalMkRat : NormNumExt where eval {u α} (e : Q(ℚ)) : MetaM (Result e) := do let .app (.app (.const ``mkRat _) (a : Q(ℤ))) (b : Q(ℕ)) ← whnfR e | failure haveI' : $e =Q mkRat $a $b := ⟨⟩ let ra ← derive a let some ⟨_, na, pa⟩ := ra.toInt (q(Int.instRing) : Q(Ring Int)) | failure let ⟨nb, pb⟩ ← deriveNat q($b) q(AddCommMonoidWithOne.toAddMonoidWithOne) let rab ← derive q($na / $nb : Rat) let ⟨q, n, d, p⟩ ← rab.toRat' q(Rat.instDivisionRing) return .isRat _ q n d q(isRat_mkRat $pa $pb $p)
def
Tactic
[ "Mathlib.Tactic.NormNum.Basic", "Mathlib.Data.Rat.Cast.CharZero", "Mathlib.Algebra.Field.Basic" ]
Mathlib/Tactic/NormNum/Inv.lean
evalMkRat
The `norm_num` extension which identifies expressions of the form `mkRat a b`, such that `norm_num` successfully recognises both `a` and `b`, and returns `a / b`.
isNat_ratCast {R : Type*} [DivisionRing R] : {q : ℚ} → {n : ℕ} → IsNat q n → IsNat (q : R) n | _, _, ⟨rfl⟩ => ⟨by simp⟩
theorem
Tactic
[ "Mathlib.Tactic.NormNum.Basic", "Mathlib.Data.Rat.Cast.CharZero", "Mathlib.Algebra.Field.Basic" ]
Mathlib/Tactic/NormNum/Inv.lean
isNat_ratCast
null
isInt_ratCast {R : Type*} [DivisionRing R] : {q : ℚ} → {n : ℤ} → IsInt q n → IsInt (q : R) n | _, _, ⟨rfl⟩ => ⟨by simp⟩
theorem
Tactic
[ "Mathlib.Tactic.NormNum.Basic", "Mathlib.Data.Rat.Cast.CharZero", "Mathlib.Algebra.Field.Basic" ]
Mathlib/Tactic/NormNum/Inv.lean
isInt_ratCast
null
isNNRat_ratCast {R : Type*} [DivisionRing R] [CharZero R] : {q : ℚ} → {n : ℕ} → {d : ℕ} → IsNNRat q n d → IsNNRat (q : R) n d | _, _, _, ⟨⟨qi,_,_⟩, rfl⟩ => ⟨⟨qi, by norm_cast, by norm_cast⟩, by simp only; norm_cast⟩
theorem
Tactic
[ "Mathlib.Tactic.NormNum.Basic", "Mathlib.Data.Rat.Cast.CharZero", "Mathlib.Algebra.Field.Basic" ]
Mathlib/Tactic/NormNum/Inv.lean
isNNRat_ratCast
null
isRat_ratCast {R : Type*} [DivisionRing R] [CharZero R] : {q : ℚ} → {n : ℤ} → {d : ℕ} → IsRat q n d → IsRat (q : R) n d | _, _, _, ⟨⟨qi,_,_⟩, rfl⟩ => ⟨⟨qi, by norm_cast, by norm_cast⟩, by simp only; norm_cast⟩
theorem
Tactic
[ "Mathlib.Tactic.NormNum.Basic", "Mathlib.Data.Rat.Cast.CharZero", "Mathlib.Algebra.Field.Basic" ]
Mathlib/Tactic/NormNum/Inv.lean
isRat_ratCast
null
@[norm_num Rat.cast _, RatCast.ratCast _] evalRatCast : NormNumExt where eval {u α} e := do let dα ← inferDivisionRing α let .app r (a : Q(ℚ)) ← whnfR e | failure guard <|← withNewMCtxDepth <| isDefEq r q(Rat.cast (K := $α)) let r ← derive q($a) haveI' : $e =Q Rat.cast $a := ⟨⟩ match r with | .isNat _ na pa => assumeInstancesCommute return .isNat _ na q(isNat_ratCast $pa) | .isNegNat _ na pa => assumeInstancesCommute return .isNegNat _ na q(isInt_ratCast $pa) | .isNNRat _ qa na da pa => assumeInstancesCommute let i ← inferCharZeroOfDivisionRing dα return .isNNRat q(inferInstance) qa na da q(isNNRat_ratCast $pa) | .isNegNNRat _ qa na da pa => assumeInstancesCommute let i ← inferCharZeroOfDivisionRing dα return .isNegNNRat dα qa na da q(isRat_ratCast $pa) | _ => failure
def
Tactic
[ "Mathlib.Tactic.NormNum.Basic", "Mathlib.Data.Rat.Cast.CharZero", "Mathlib.Algebra.Field.Basic" ]
Mathlib/Tactic/NormNum/Inv.lean
evalRatCast
The `norm_num` extension which identifies an expression `RatCast.ratCast q` where `norm_num` recognizes `q`, returning the cast of `q`.
isNNRat_inv_pos {α} [DivisionSemiring α] [CharZero α] {a : α} {n d : ℕ} : IsNNRat a (Nat.succ n) d → IsNNRat a⁻¹ d (Nat.succ n) := by rintro ⟨_, rfl⟩ have := invertibleOfNonzero (α := α) (Nat.cast_ne_zero.2 (Nat.succ_ne_zero n)) exact ⟨this, by simp⟩
theorem
Tactic
[ "Mathlib.Tactic.NormNum.Basic", "Mathlib.Data.Rat.Cast.CharZero", "Mathlib.Algebra.Field.Basic" ]
Mathlib/Tactic/NormNum/Inv.lean
isNNRat_inv_pos
null
isRat_inv_pos {α} [DivisionRing α] [CharZero α] {a : α} {n d : ℕ} : IsRat a (.ofNat (Nat.succ n)) d → IsRat a⁻¹ (.ofNat d) (Nat.succ n) := by rintro ⟨_, rfl⟩ have := invertibleOfNonzero (α := α) (Nat.cast_ne_zero.2 (Nat.succ_ne_zero n)) exact ⟨this, by simp⟩
theorem
Tactic
[ "Mathlib.Tactic.NormNum.Basic", "Mathlib.Data.Rat.Cast.CharZero", "Mathlib.Algebra.Field.Basic" ]
Mathlib/Tactic/NormNum/Inv.lean
isRat_inv_pos
null
isNat_inv_one {α} [DivisionSemiring α] : {a : α} → IsNat a (nat_lit 1) → IsNat a⁻¹ (nat_lit 1) | _, ⟨rfl⟩ => ⟨by simp⟩
theorem
Tactic
[ "Mathlib.Tactic.NormNum.Basic", "Mathlib.Data.Rat.Cast.CharZero", "Mathlib.Algebra.Field.Basic" ]
Mathlib/Tactic/NormNum/Inv.lean
isNat_inv_one
null
isNat_inv_zero {α} [DivisionSemiring α] : {a : α} → IsNat a (nat_lit 0) → IsNat a⁻¹ (nat_lit 0) | _, ⟨rfl⟩ => ⟨by simp⟩
theorem
Tactic
[ "Mathlib.Tactic.NormNum.Basic", "Mathlib.Data.Rat.Cast.CharZero", "Mathlib.Algebra.Field.Basic" ]
Mathlib/Tactic/NormNum/Inv.lean
isNat_inv_zero
null
isInt_inv_neg_one {α} [DivisionRing α] : {a : α} → IsInt a (.negOfNat (nat_lit 1)) → IsInt a⁻¹ (.negOfNat (nat_lit 1)) | _, ⟨rfl⟩ => ⟨by simp⟩
theorem
Tactic
[ "Mathlib.Tactic.NormNum.Basic", "Mathlib.Data.Rat.Cast.CharZero", "Mathlib.Algebra.Field.Basic" ]
Mathlib/Tactic/NormNum/Inv.lean
isInt_inv_neg_one
null
isRat_inv_neg {α} [DivisionRing α] [CharZero α] {a : α} {n d : ℕ} : IsRat a (.negOfNat (Nat.succ n)) d → IsRat a⁻¹ (.negOfNat d) (Nat.succ n) := by rintro ⟨_, rfl⟩ simp only [Int.negOfNat_eq] have := invertibleOfNonzero (α := α) (Nat.cast_ne_zero.2 (Nat.succ_ne_zero n)) generalize Nat.succ n = n at * use this; simp only [Int.ofNat_eq_coe, Int.cast_neg, Int.cast_natCast, invOf_eq_inv, inv_neg, neg_mul, mul_inv_rev, inv_inv] open Lean attribute [local instance] monadLiftOptionMetaM in
theorem
Tactic
[ "Mathlib.Tactic.NormNum.Basic", "Mathlib.Data.Rat.Cast.CharZero", "Mathlib.Algebra.Field.Basic" ]
Mathlib/Tactic/NormNum/Inv.lean
isRat_inv_neg
null
Result.inv {u : Level} {α : Q(Type u)} {a : Q($α)} (ra : Result a) (dsα : Q(DivisionSemiring $α)) (czα? : Option Q(CharZero $α)) : MetaM (Result q($a⁻¹)) := do if let .some ⟨qa, na, da, pa⟩ := ra.toNNRat' dsα then let qb := qa⁻¹ if qa > 0 then if let some _i := czα? then have lit2 : Q(ℕ) := mkRawNatLit (na.natLit! - 1) haveI : $na =Q ($lit2).succ := ⟨⟩ return .isNNRat' dsα qb q($da) q($na) q(isNNRat_inv_pos $pa) else guard (qa = 1) let .isNat inst n pa := ra | failure haveI' : $n =Q nat_lit 1 := ⟨⟩ assumeInstancesCommute return .isNat inst n q(isNat_inv_one $pa) else let .isNat inst n pa := ra | failure haveI' : $n =Q nat_lit 0 := ⟨⟩ assumeInstancesCommute return .isNat inst n q(isNat_inv_zero $pa) else let dα ← inferDivisionRing α assertInstancesCommute let ⟨qa, na, da, pa⟩ ← ra.toRat' dα let qb := qa⁻¹ guard <| qa < 0 if let some _i := czα? then have lit : Q(ℕ) := na.appArg! haveI : $na =Q Int.negOfNat $lit := ⟨⟩ have lit2 : Q(ℕ) := mkRawNatLit (lit.natLit! - 1) haveI : $lit =Q ($lit2).succ := ⟨⟩ return .isRat dα qb q(.negOfNat $da) lit q(isRat_inv_neg $pa) else guard (qa = -1) let .isNegNat inst n pa := ra | failure haveI' : $n =Q nat_lit 1 := ⟨⟩ assumeInstancesCommute return .isNegNat inst n q(isInt_inv_neg_one $pa)
def
Tactic
[ "Mathlib.Tactic.NormNum.Basic", "Mathlib.Data.Rat.Cast.CharZero", "Mathlib.Algebra.Field.Basic" ]
Mathlib/Tactic/NormNum/Inv.lean
Result.inv
The result of inverting a norm_num result.
@[norm_num _⁻¹] evalInv : NormNumExt where eval {u α} e := do let .app f (a : Q($α)) ← whnfR e | failure let ra ← derive a let dsα ← inferDivisionSemiring α guard <| ← withNewMCtxDepth <| isDefEq f q(Inv.inv (α := $α)) haveI' : $e =Q $a⁻¹ := ⟨⟩ assumeInstancesCommute ra.inv q($dsα) (← inferCharZeroOfDivisionSemiring? dsα)
def
Tactic
[ "Mathlib.Tactic.NormNum.Basic", "Mathlib.Data.Rat.Cast.CharZero", "Mathlib.Algebra.Field.Basic" ]
Mathlib/Tactic/NormNum/Inv.lean
evalInv
The `norm_num` extension which identifies expressions of the form `a⁻¹`, such that `norm_num` successfully recognises `a`.
private irrational_rpow_rat_of_not_power {q : ℚ} {a b : ℕ} (h : ∀ p : ℚ, q ^ a ≠ p ^ b) (hb : 0 < b) (hq : 0 ≤ q) : Irrational (Real.rpow q (a / b : ℚ)) := by simp only [Irrational, Rat.cast_div, Rat.cast_natCast, Real.rpow_eq_pow, Set.mem_range, not_exists] intro x hx absurd h x rify rw [hx, ← Real.rpow_mul_natCast, div_mul_cancel₀] <;> simp · cutsat · assumption
theorem
Tactic
[ "Mathlib.Analysis.SpecialFunctions.Pow.Real", "Mathlib.Data.Real.Irrational", "Mathlib.Tactic.NormNum.GCD", "Mathlib.Tactic.Rify" ]
Mathlib/Tactic/NormNum/Irrational.lean
irrational_rpow_rat_of_not_power
null
private not_power_nat_pow {n p q : ℕ} (h_coprime : p.Coprime q) (hq : 0 < q) (h : ∀ m, n ≠ m ^ q) (m : ℕ) : n ^ p ≠ m ^ q := by by_cases hn : n = 0 · specialize h 0 simp [hn, zero_pow hq.ne.symm] at h contrapose! h apply_fun Nat.factorization at h simp only [Nat.factorization_pow] at h suffices ∃ f : ℕ →₀ ℕ, n.factorization = q • f by obtain ⟨f, hf⟩ := this have : f = (f.prod fun x1 x2 => x1 ^ x2).factorization := by rw [Nat.prod_pow_factorization_eq_self] intro z hz apply_fun Finsupp.support at hf rw [Finsupp.support_smul_eq (by cutsat)] at hf rw [← hf] at hz exact Nat.prime_of_mem_primeFactors hz have hf0 : f 0 = 0 := by apply_fun (· 0) at hf simp only [Nat.factorization_zero_right, Finsupp.coe_smul, Pi.smul_apply, smul_eq_mul, zero_eq_mul] at hf cases hf · cutsat · assumption rw [this, ← Nat.factorization_pow] at hf apply Nat.factorization_inj at hf · use f.prod (· ^ ·) · exact hn · simp only [ne_eq, Set.mem_setOf_eq, pow_eq_zero_iff', Finsupp.prod_eq_zero_iff, Finsupp.mem_support_iff, existsAndEq, true_and, and_self, not_and, Decidable.not_not] tauto use n.factorization.mapRange (fun e ↦ e / q) (by simp) ext z apply_fun (· z) at h simp only [Finsupp.coe_smul, Pi.smul_apply, smul_eq_mul, Finsupp.mapRange_apply] at h ⊢ rw [Nat.mul_div_cancel'] apply Nat.Coprime.dvd_of_dvd_mul_left _ ⟨_, h⟩ rwa [Nat.coprime_comm]
theorem
Tactic
[ "Mathlib.Analysis.SpecialFunctions.Pow.Real", "Mathlib.Data.Real.Irrational", "Mathlib.Tactic.NormNum.GCD", "Mathlib.Tactic.Rify" ]
Mathlib/Tactic/NormNum/Irrational.lean
not_power_nat_pow
null
private not_power_nat_of_bounds {n k d : ℕ} (h_left : k ^ d < n) (h_right : n < (k + 1) ^ d) {m : ℕ} : n ≠ m ^ d := by intro h rw [h] at h_left h_right have : k < m := lt_of_pow_lt_pow_left' d h_left have : m < k + 1 := lt_of_pow_lt_pow_left' d h_right cutsat
theorem
Tactic
[ "Mathlib.Analysis.SpecialFunctions.Pow.Real", "Mathlib.Data.Real.Irrational", "Mathlib.Tactic.NormNum.GCD", "Mathlib.Tactic.Rify" ]
Mathlib/Tactic/NormNum/Irrational.lean
not_power_nat_of_bounds
null
private not_power_nat_pow_of_bounds {n k p q : ℕ} (hq : 0 < q) (h_coprime : p.Coprime q) (h_left : k ^ q < n) (h_right : n < (k + 1) ^ q) (m : ℕ) : n ^ p ≠ m ^ q := by apply not_power_nat_pow h_coprime hq intro m apply not_power_nat_of_bounds h_left h_right
theorem
Tactic
[ "Mathlib.Analysis.SpecialFunctions.Pow.Real", "Mathlib.Data.Real.Irrational", "Mathlib.Tactic.NormNum.GCD", "Mathlib.Tactic.Rify" ]
Mathlib/Tactic/NormNum/Irrational.lean
not_power_nat_pow_of_bounds
null
private eq_of_mul_eq_mul_of_coprime_aux {a b x y : ℕ} (hab : a.Coprime b) (h : a * x = b * y) : a ∣ y := Nat.Coprime.dvd_of_dvd_mul_left hab (Dvd.intro x h)
lemma
Tactic
[ "Mathlib.Analysis.SpecialFunctions.Pow.Real", "Mathlib.Data.Real.Irrational", "Mathlib.Tactic.NormNum.GCD", "Mathlib.Tactic.Rify" ]
Mathlib/Tactic/NormNum/Irrational.lean
eq_of_mul_eq_mul_of_coprime_aux
null
private eq_of_mul_eq_mul_of_coprime {a b x y : ℕ} (hab : a.Coprime b) (hxy : x.Coprime y) (h : a * x = b * y) : a = y := by apply Nat.dvd_antisymm · exact eq_of_mul_eq_mul_of_coprime_aux hab h · exact eq_of_mul_eq_mul_of_coprime_aux (x := b) hxy.symm (by rw [mul_comm, ← h, mul_comm])
lemma
Tactic
[ "Mathlib.Analysis.SpecialFunctions.Pow.Real", "Mathlib.Data.Real.Irrational", "Mathlib.Tactic.NormNum.GCD", "Mathlib.Tactic.Rify" ]
Mathlib/Tactic/NormNum/Irrational.lean
eq_of_mul_eq_mul_of_coprime
null
private not_power_rat_of_num_aux {a b d : ℕ} (h_coprime : a.Coprime b) (ha : ∀ x, a ≠ x ^ d) {q : ℚ} (hq : 0 ≤ q) : (a / b : ℚ) ≠ q ^ d := by by_cases hb_zero : b = 0 · subst hb_zero contrapose! ha simp only [Nat.coprime_zero_right] at h_coprime subst h_coprime use 1 simp by_contra! h rw [← Rat.num_div_den q] at h set x' := q.num set y := q.den obtain ⟨x, hx'⟩ := Int.eq_ofNat_of_zero_le (show 0 ≤ x' by rwa [Rat.num_nonneg]) rw [hx'] at h specialize ha x simp only [Int.cast_natCast, div_pow] at h rw [div_eq_div_iff] at h rotate_left · simpa · simp [y] replace h : a * y ^ d = x ^ d * b := by qify assumption apply ha conv at h => rhs; rw [mul_comm] apply eq_of_mul_eq_mul_of_coprime h_coprime _ h apply Nat.Coprime.pow_left apply Nat.Coprime.pow_right apply Nat.Coprime.symm simpa [hx'] using (show x'.natAbs.Coprime y from Rat.reduced q)
theorem
Tactic
[ "Mathlib.Analysis.SpecialFunctions.Pow.Real", "Mathlib.Data.Real.Irrational", "Mathlib.Tactic.NormNum.GCD", "Mathlib.Tactic.Rify" ]
Mathlib/Tactic/NormNum/Irrational.lean
not_power_rat_of_num_aux
Weaker version of `not_power_rat_of_num` with extra `q ≥ 0` assumption.
private not_power_rat_of_num {a b d : ℕ} (h_coprime : a.Coprime b) (ha : ∀ x, a ≠ x ^ d) (q : ℚ) : (a / b : ℚ) ≠ q ^ d := by by_cases hq : 0 ≤ q · apply not_power_rat_of_num_aux h_coprime ha hq rcases d.even_or_odd with (h_even | h_odd) · have := not_power_rat_of_num_aux h_coprime (q := -q) ha (by linarith) rwa [h_even.neg_pow] at this · contrapose! hq rw [← h_odd.pow_nonneg_iff, ← hq] positivity
theorem
Tactic
[ "Mathlib.Analysis.SpecialFunctions.Pow.Real", "Mathlib.Data.Real.Irrational", "Mathlib.Tactic.NormNum.GCD", "Mathlib.Tactic.Rify" ]
Mathlib/Tactic/NormNum/Irrational.lean
not_power_rat_of_num
null
private irrational_rpow_rat_rat_of_num {x y : ℝ} {x_num x_den y_num y_den k_num : ℕ} (hx_isNNRat : IsNNRat x x_num x_den) (hy_isNNRat : IsNNRat y y_num y_den) (hx_coprime : Nat.Coprime x_num x_den) (hy_coprime : Nat.Coprime y_num y_den) (hn1 : k_num ^ y_den < x_num) (hn2 : x_num < (k_num + 1) ^ y_den) : Irrational (x ^ y) := by have hy_den_pos : 0 < y_den := by by_contra! h simp only [nonpos_iff_eq_zero] at h simp only [h, pow_zero, Nat.lt_one_iff] at hn1 hn2 omega rcases hx_isNNRat with ⟨hx_inv, hx_eq⟩ rcases hy_isNNRat with ⟨hy_inv, hy_eq⟩ rw [hy_eq, hx_eq] have h1 : (y_num * ⅟(y_den : ℝ) : ℝ) = ((y_num / y_den : ℚ) : ℝ) := by simp rfl have h2 : (x_num * ⅟(x_den : ℝ) : ℝ) = ((x_num / x_den : ℚ) : ℝ) := by simp rfl rw [h1, h2] refine irrational_rpow_rat_of_not_power ?_ hy_den_pos ?_ · simp only [div_pow, ← Nat.cast_pow] apply not_power_rat_of_num · apply Nat.Coprime.pow _ _ hx_coprime · apply not_power_nat_pow_of_bounds hy_den_pos hy_coprime hn1 hn2 · positivity
theorem
Tactic
[ "Mathlib.Analysis.SpecialFunctions.Pow.Real", "Mathlib.Data.Real.Irrational", "Mathlib.Tactic.NormNum.GCD", "Mathlib.Tactic.Rify" ]
Mathlib/Tactic/NormNum/Irrational.lean
irrational_rpow_rat_rat_of_num
null
private irrational_rpow_rat_rat_of_den {x y : ℝ} {x_num x_den y_num y_den k_den : ℕ} (hx_isNNRat : IsNNRat x x_num x_den) (hy_isNNRat : IsNNRat y y_num y_den) (hx_coprime : Nat.Coprime x_num x_den) (hy_coprime : Nat.Coprime y_num y_den) (hd1 : k_den ^ y_den < x_den) (hd2 : x_den < (k_den + 1) ^ y_den) : Irrational (x ^ y) := by rcases hx_isNNRat with ⟨hx_inv, hx_eq⟩ apply Irrational.of_inv rw [← Real.inv_rpow (by simp [hx_eq]; positivity)] apply irrational_rpow_rat_rat_of_num (x_num := x_den) (x_den := x_num) _ hy_isNNRat (Nat.coprime_comm.mp hx_coprime) hy_coprime hd1 hd2 refine ⟨invertibleOfNonzero (fun _ ↦ ?_), by simp [hx_eq]⟩ simp_all
theorem
Tactic
[ "Mathlib.Analysis.SpecialFunctions.Pow.Real", "Mathlib.Data.Real.Irrational", "Mathlib.Tactic.NormNum.GCD", "Mathlib.Tactic.Rify" ]
Mathlib/Tactic/NormNum/Irrational.lean
irrational_rpow_rat_rat_of_den
null
private irrational_rpow_nat_rat {x y : ℝ} {x_num y_num y_den k : ℕ} (hx_isNat : IsNat x x_num) (hy_isNNRat : IsNNRat y y_num y_den) (hy_coprime : Nat.Coprime y_num y_den) (hn1 : k ^ y_den < x_num) (hn2 : x_num < (k + 1) ^ y_den) : Irrational (x ^ y) := irrational_rpow_rat_rat_of_num hx_isNat.to_isNNRat hy_isNNRat (by simp) hy_coprime hn1 hn2
theorem
Tactic
[ "Mathlib.Analysis.SpecialFunctions.Pow.Real", "Mathlib.Data.Real.Irrational", "Mathlib.Tactic.NormNum.GCD", "Mathlib.Tactic.Rify" ]
Mathlib/Tactic/NormNum/Irrational.lean
irrational_rpow_nat_rat
null
private irrational_sqrt_rat_of_num {x : ℝ} {num den num_k : ℕ} (hx_isNNRat : IsNNRat x num den) (hx_coprime : Nat.Coprime num den) (hn1 : num_k ^ 2 < num) (hn2 : num < (num_k + 1) ^ 2) : Irrational (Real.sqrt x) := by rw [Real.sqrt_eq_rpow] apply irrational_rpow_rat_rat_of_num hx_isNNRat (y_num := 1) (y_den := 2) _ hx_coprime (by simp) hn1 hn2 exact ⟨Invertible.mk (1/2) (by simp) (by simp), by simp⟩
theorem
Tactic
[ "Mathlib.Analysis.SpecialFunctions.Pow.Real", "Mathlib.Data.Real.Irrational", "Mathlib.Tactic.NormNum.GCD", "Mathlib.Tactic.Rify" ]
Mathlib/Tactic/NormNum/Irrational.lean
irrational_sqrt_rat_of_num
null
private irrational_sqrt_rat_of_den {x : ℝ} {num den den_k : ℕ} (hx_isNNRat : IsNNRat x num den) (hx_coprime : Nat.Coprime num den) (hd1 : den_k ^ 2 < den) (hd2 : den < (den_k + 1) ^ 2) : Irrational (Real.sqrt x) := by rw [Real.sqrt_eq_rpow] apply irrational_rpow_rat_rat_of_den hx_isNNRat (y_num := 1) (y_den := 2) _ hx_coprime (by simp) hd1 hd2 exact ⟨Invertible.mk (1/2) (by simp) (by simp), by simp⟩
theorem
Tactic
[ "Mathlib.Analysis.SpecialFunctions.Pow.Real", "Mathlib.Data.Real.Irrational", "Mathlib.Tactic.NormNum.GCD", "Mathlib.Tactic.Rify" ]
Mathlib/Tactic/NormNum/Irrational.lean
irrational_sqrt_rat_of_den
null
private irrational_sqrt_nat {x : ℝ} {n k : ℕ} (hx_isNat : IsNat x n) (hn1 : k ^ 2 < n) (hn2 : n < (k + 1) ^ 2) : Irrational (Real.sqrt x) := irrational_sqrt_rat_of_num hx_isNat.to_isNNRat (by simp) hn1 hn2
theorem
Tactic
[ "Mathlib.Analysis.SpecialFunctions.Pow.Real", "Mathlib.Data.Real.Irrational", "Mathlib.Tactic.NormNum.GCD", "Mathlib.Tactic.Rify" ]
Mathlib/Tactic/NormNum/Irrational.lean
irrational_sqrt_nat
null
NotPowerCertificate (m n : Q(ℕ)) where /-- Natural `k` such that `k ^ n < m < (k + 1) ^ n`. -/ k : Q(ℕ) /-- Proof of `k ^ n < m`. -/ pf_left : Q($k ^ $n < $m) /-- Proof of `m < (k + 1) ^ n`. -/ pf_right : Q($m < ($k + 1) ^ $n)
structure
Tactic
[ "Mathlib.Analysis.SpecialFunctions.Pow.Real", "Mathlib.Data.Real.Irrational", "Mathlib.Tactic.NormNum.GCD", "Mathlib.Tactic.Rify" ]
Mathlib/Tactic/NormNum/Irrational.lean
NotPowerCertificate
To prove that `m` is not `n`-power (and thus `m ^ (1/n)` is irrational), we find `k` such that `k ^ n < m < (k + 1) ^ n`.
findNotPowerCertificateCore (m n : ℕ) : Option ℕ := Id.run do let mut left := 0 let mut right := m + 1 while right - left > 1 do let middle := (left + right) / 2 if middle ^ n ≤ m then left := middle else right := middle if left ^ n < m then return some left return none
def
Tactic
[ "Mathlib.Analysis.SpecialFunctions.Pow.Real", "Mathlib.Data.Real.Irrational", "Mathlib.Tactic.NormNum.GCD", "Mathlib.Tactic.Rify" ]
Mathlib/Tactic/NormNum/Irrational.lean
findNotPowerCertificateCore
Finds `k` such that `k ^ n < m < (k + 1) ^ n` using bisection method. It assumes `n > 0`.
findNotPowerCertificate (m n : Q(ℕ)) : MetaM (NotPowerCertificate m n) := do let .isNat (_ : Q(AddMonoidWithOne ℕ)) m _ := ← derive m | failure let .isNat (_ : Q(AddMonoidWithOne ℕ)) n _ := ← derive n | failure let mVal := m.natLit! let nVal := n.natLit! let some k := findNotPowerCertificateCore mVal nVal | failure let .isBool true pf_left ← derive q($k ^ $n < $m) | failure let .isBool true pf_right ← derive q($m < ($k + 1) ^ $n) | failure return ⟨q($k), pf_left, pf_right⟩
def
Tactic
[ "Mathlib.Analysis.SpecialFunctions.Pow.Real", "Mathlib.Data.Real.Irrational", "Mathlib.Tactic.NormNum.GCD", "Mathlib.Tactic.Rify" ]
Mathlib/Tactic/NormNum/Irrational.lean
findNotPowerCertificate
Finds `NotPowerCertificate` showing that `m` is not `n`-power.
@[norm_num Irrational (_ ^ (_ : ℝ))] evalIrrationalRpow : NormNumExt where eval {u α} e := do let 0 := u | failure let ~q(Prop) := α | failure let ~q(Irrational (($x : ℝ) ^ ($y : ℝ))) := e | failure let .isNNRat sℝ _ y_num y_den y_isNNRat ← derive y | failure let ⟨gy, hy_coprime⟩ := proveNatGCD y_num y_den if gy.natLit! != 1 then failure let _ : $gy =Q 1 := ⟨⟩ match ← derive x with | .isNat sℝ ex x_isNat => let cert ← findNotPowerCertificate q($ex) y_den assumeInstancesCommute return .isTrue q(irrational_rpow_nat_rat $x_isNat $y_isNNRat $hy_coprime $cert.pf_left $cert.pf_right) | .isNNRat sℝ _ x_num x_den x_isNNRat => let ⟨gx, hx_coprime⟩ := proveNatGCD x_num x_den if gx.natLit! != 1 then failure let _ : $gx =Q 1 := ⟨⟩ let hx_isNNRat' : Q(IsNNRat $x $x_num $x_den) := x_isNNRat let hy_isNNRat' : Q(IsNNRat $y $y_num $y_den) := y_isNNRat try let numCert ← findNotPowerCertificate q($x_num) y_den assumeInstancesCommute return Result.isTrue q(irrational_rpow_rat_rat_of_num $hx_isNNRat' $hy_isNNRat' $hx_coprime $hy_coprime $numCert.pf_left $numCert.pf_right) catch _ => let denCert ← findNotPowerCertificate q($x_den) y_den assumeInstancesCommute return Result.isTrue q(irrational_rpow_rat_rat_of_den $hx_isNNRat' $hy_isNNRat' $hx_coprime $hy_coprime $denCert.pf_left $denCert.pf_right) | _ => failure
def
Tactic
[ "Mathlib.Analysis.SpecialFunctions.Pow.Real", "Mathlib.Data.Real.Irrational", "Mathlib.Tactic.NormNum.GCD", "Mathlib.Tactic.Rify" ]
Mathlib/Tactic/NormNum/Irrational.lean
evalIrrationalRpow
`norm_num` extension that proves `Irrational x ^ y` for rational `y`. `x` may be natural or rational.
@[norm_num Irrational (Real.sqrt _)] evalIrrationalSqrt : NormNumExt where eval {u α} e := do let 0 := u | failure let ~q(Prop) := α | failure let ~q(Irrational (√$x)) := e | failure match ← derive x with | .isNat sℝ ex pf => let cert ← findNotPowerCertificate ex q(nat_lit 2) assumeInstancesCommute return .isTrue q(irrational_sqrt_nat $pf $cert.pf_left $cert.pf_right) | .isNNRat sℝ eq en ed pf => let ⟨g, pf_coprime⟩ := proveNatGCD en ed if g.natLit! != 1 then failure let _ : $g =Q 1 := ⟨⟩ try let numCert ← findNotPowerCertificate en q(nat_lit 2) assumeInstancesCommute return Result.isTrue q(irrational_sqrt_rat_of_num $pf $pf_coprime $numCert.pf_left $numCert.pf_right) catch _ => let denCert ← findNotPowerCertificate ed q(nat_lit 2) assumeInstancesCommute return Result.isTrue q(irrational_sqrt_rat_of_den $pf $pf_coprime $denCert.pf_left $denCert.pf_right) | _ => failure
def
Tactic
[ "Mathlib.Analysis.SpecialFunctions.Pow.Real", "Mathlib.Data.Real.Irrational", "Mathlib.Tactic.NormNum.GCD", "Mathlib.Tactic.Rify" ]
Mathlib/Tactic/NormNum/Irrational.lean
evalIrrationalSqrt
`norm_num` extension that proves `Irrational √x` for rational `x`.
int_not_isCoprime_helper (x y : ℤ) (d : ℕ) (hd : Int.gcd x y = d) (h : Nat.beq d 1 = false) : ¬ IsCoprime x y := by rw [Int.isCoprime_iff_gcd_eq_one, hd] exact Nat.ne_of_beq_eq_false h
theorem
Tactic
[ "Mathlib.RingTheory.Coprime.Lemmas", "Mathlib.Tactic.NormNum.GCD" ]
Mathlib/Tactic/NormNum/IsCoprime.lean
int_not_isCoprime_helper
null
isInt_isCoprime : {x y nx ny : ℤ} → IsInt x nx → IsInt y ny → IsCoprime nx ny → IsCoprime x y | _, _, _, _, ⟨rfl⟩, ⟨rfl⟩, h => h
theorem
Tactic
[ "Mathlib.RingTheory.Coprime.Lemmas", "Mathlib.Tactic.NormNum.GCD" ]
Mathlib/Tactic/NormNum/IsCoprime.lean
isInt_isCoprime
null
isInt_not_isCoprime : {x y nx ny : ℤ} → IsInt x nx → IsInt y ny → ¬ IsCoprime nx ny → ¬ IsCoprime x y | _, _, _, _, ⟨rfl⟩, ⟨rfl⟩, h => h
theorem
Tactic
[ "Mathlib.RingTheory.Coprime.Lemmas", "Mathlib.Tactic.NormNum.GCD" ]
Mathlib/Tactic/NormNum/IsCoprime.lean
isInt_not_isCoprime
null
proveIntIsCoprime (ex ey : Q(ℤ)) : Q(IsCoprime $ex $ey) ⊕ Q(¬ IsCoprime $ex $ey) := let ⟨ed, pf⟩ := proveIntGCD ex ey if ed.natLit! = 1 then have pf' : Q(Int.gcd $ex $ey = 1) := pf Sum.inl q(Int.isCoprime_iff_gcd_eq_one.mpr $pf') else have h : Q(Nat.beq $ed 1 = false) := (q(Eq.refl false) : Expr) Sum.inr q(int_not_isCoprime_helper $ex $ey $ed $pf $h)
def
Tactic
[ "Mathlib.RingTheory.Coprime.Lemmas", "Mathlib.Tactic.NormNum.GCD" ]
Mathlib/Tactic/NormNum/IsCoprime.lean
proveIntIsCoprime
Evaluates `IsCoprime` for the given integer number literals. Panics if `ex` or `ey` aren't integer number literals.
@[norm_num IsCoprime (_ : ℤ) (_ : ℤ)] evalIntIsCoprime : NormNumExt where eval {_ _} e := do let .app (.app _ (x : Q(ℤ))) (y : Q(ℤ)) ← Meta.whnfR e | failure let ⟨ex, p⟩ ← deriveInt x _ let ⟨ey, q⟩ ← deriveInt y _ match proveIntIsCoprime ex ey with | .inl pf => have pf' : Q(IsCoprime $x $y) := q(isInt_isCoprime $p $q $pf) return .isTrue pf' | .inr pf => have pf' : Q(¬ IsCoprime $x $y) := q(isInt_not_isCoprime $p $q $pf) return .isFalse pf'
def
Tactic
[ "Mathlib.RingTheory.Coprime.Lemmas", "Mathlib.Tactic.NormNum.GCD" ]
Mathlib/Tactic/NormNum/IsCoprime.lean
evalIntIsCoprime
Evaluates the `IsCoprime` predicate over `ℤ`.
jacobiSymNat (a b : ℕ) : ℤ := jacobiSym a b /-!
def
Tactic
[ "Mathlib.NumberTheory.LegendreSymbol.JacobiSymbol" ]
Mathlib/Tactic/NormNum/LegendreSymbol.lean
jacobiSymNat
The Jacobi symbol restricted to natural numbers in both arguments.
jacobiSymNat.zero_right (a : ℕ) : jacobiSymNat a 0 = 1 := by rw [jacobiSymNat, jacobiSym.zero_right]
theorem
Tactic
[ "Mathlib.NumberTheory.LegendreSymbol.JacobiSymbol" ]
Mathlib/Tactic/NormNum/LegendreSymbol.lean
jacobiSymNat.zero_right
Base cases: `b = 0`, `b = 1`, `a = 0`, `a = 1`.
jacobiSymNat.one_right (a : ℕ) : jacobiSymNat a 1 = 1 := by rw [jacobiSymNat, jacobiSym.one_right]
theorem
Tactic
[ "Mathlib.NumberTheory.LegendreSymbol.JacobiSymbol" ]
Mathlib/Tactic/NormNum/LegendreSymbol.lean
jacobiSymNat.one_right
null
jacobiSymNat.zero_left (b : ℕ) (hb : Nat.beq (b / 2) 0 = false) : jacobiSymNat 0 b = 0 := by rw [jacobiSymNat, Nat.cast_zero, jacobiSym.zero_left ?_] calc 1 < 2 * 1 := by decide _ ≤ 2 * (b / 2) := Nat.mul_le_mul_left _ (Nat.succ_le.mpr (Nat.pos_of_ne_zero (Nat.ne_of_beq_eq_false hb))) _ ≤ b := Nat.mul_div_le b 2
theorem
Tactic
[ "Mathlib.NumberTheory.LegendreSymbol.JacobiSymbol" ]
Mathlib/Tactic/NormNum/LegendreSymbol.lean
jacobiSymNat.zero_left
null
jacobiSymNat.one_left (b : ℕ) : jacobiSymNat 1 b = 1 := by rw [jacobiSymNat, Nat.cast_one, jacobiSym.one_left]
theorem
Tactic
[ "Mathlib.NumberTheory.LegendreSymbol.JacobiSymbol" ]
Mathlib/Tactic/NormNum/LegendreSymbol.lean
jacobiSymNat.one_left
null
LegendreSym.to_jacobiSym (p : ℕ) (pp : Fact p.Prime) (a r : ℤ) (hr : IsInt (jacobiSym a p) r) : IsInt (legendreSym p a) r := by rwa [@jacobiSym.legendreSym.to_jacobiSym p pp a]
theorem
Tactic
[ "Mathlib.NumberTheory.LegendreSymbol.JacobiSymbol" ]
Mathlib/Tactic/NormNum/LegendreSymbol.lean
LegendreSym.to_jacobiSym
Turn a Legendre symbol into a Jacobi symbol.
JacobiSym.mod_left (a : ℤ) (b ab' : ℕ) (ab r b' : ℤ) (hb' : (b : ℤ) = b') (hab : a % b' = ab) (h : (ab' : ℤ) = ab) (hr : jacobiSymNat ab' b = r) : jacobiSym a b = r := by rw [← hr, jacobiSymNat, jacobiSym.mod_left, hb', hab, ← h]
theorem
Tactic
[ "Mathlib.NumberTheory.LegendreSymbol.JacobiSymbol" ]
Mathlib/Tactic/NormNum/LegendreSymbol.lean
JacobiSym.mod_left
The value depends only on the residue class of `a` mod `b`.
jacobiSymNat.mod_left (a b ab : ℕ) (r : ℤ) (hab : a % b = ab) (hr : jacobiSymNat ab b = r) : jacobiSymNat a b = r := by rw [← hr, jacobiSymNat, jacobiSymNat, _root_.jacobiSym.mod_left a b, ← hab]; rfl
theorem
Tactic
[ "Mathlib.NumberTheory.LegendreSymbol.JacobiSymbol" ]
Mathlib/Tactic/NormNum/LegendreSymbol.lean
jacobiSymNat.mod_left
null
jacobiSymNat.even_even (a b : ℕ) (hb₀ : Nat.beq (b / 2) 0 = false) (ha : a % 2 = 0) (hb₁ : b % 2 = 0) : jacobiSymNat a b = 0 := by refine jacobiSym.eq_zero_iff.mpr ⟨ne_of_gt ((Nat.pos_of_ne_zero (Nat.ne_of_beq_eq_false hb₀)).trans_le (Nat.div_le_self b 2)), fun hf => ?_⟩ have h : 2 ∣ a.gcd b := Nat.dvd_gcd (Nat.dvd_of_mod_eq_zero ha) (Nat.dvd_of_mod_eq_zero hb₁) change 2 ∣ (a : ℤ).gcd b at h rw [hf, ← even_iff_two_dvd] at h exact Nat.not_even_one h
theorem
Tactic
[ "Mathlib.NumberTheory.LegendreSymbol.JacobiSymbol" ]
Mathlib/Tactic/NormNum/LegendreSymbol.lean
jacobiSymNat.even_even
The symbol vanishes when both entries are even (and `b / 2 ≠ 0`).
jacobiSymNat.odd_even (a b c : ℕ) (r : ℤ) (ha : a % 2 = 1) (hb : b % 2 = 0) (hc : b / 2 = c) (hr : jacobiSymNat a c = r) : jacobiSymNat a b = r := by have ha' : legendreSym 2 a = 1 := by simp only [legendreSym.mod 2 a, Int.ofNat_mod_ofNat, ha] decide rcases eq_or_ne c 0 with (rfl | hc') · rw [← hr, Nat.eq_zero_of_dvd_of_div_eq_zero (Nat.dvd_of_mod_eq_zero hb) hc] · haveI : NeZero c := ⟨hc'⟩ rwa [← Nat.mod_add_div b 2, hb, hc, Nat.zero_add, jacobiSymNat, jacobiSym.mul_right, ← jacobiSym.legendreSym.to_jacobiSym, ha', one_mul]
theorem
Tactic
[ "Mathlib.NumberTheory.LegendreSymbol.JacobiSymbol" ]
Mathlib/Tactic/NormNum/LegendreSymbol.lean
jacobiSymNat.odd_even
When `a` is odd and `b` is even, we can replace `b` by `b / 2`.
jacobiSymNat.double_even (a b c : ℕ) (r : ℤ) (ha : a % 4 = 0) (hb : b % 2 = 1) (hc : a / 4 = c) (hr : jacobiSymNat c b = r) : jacobiSymNat a b = r := by simp only [jacobiSymNat, ← hr, ← hc, Int.natCast_ediv, Nat.cast_ofNat] exact (jacobiSym.div_four_left (mod_cast ha) hb).symm
theorem
Tactic
[ "Mathlib.NumberTheory.LegendreSymbol.JacobiSymbol" ]
Mathlib/Tactic/NormNum/LegendreSymbol.lean
jacobiSymNat.double_even
If `a` is divisible by `4` and `b` is odd, then we can remove the factor `4` from `a`.
jacobiSymNat.even_odd₁ (a b c : ℕ) (r : ℤ) (ha : a % 2 = 0) (hb : b % 8 = 1) (hc : a / 2 = c) (hr : jacobiSymNat c b = r) : jacobiSymNat a b = r := by simp only [jacobiSymNat, ← hr, ← hc, Int.natCast_ediv, Nat.cast_ofNat] rw [← jacobiSym.even_odd (mod_cast ha), if_neg (by simp [hb])] rw [← Nat.mod_mod_of_dvd, hb]; simp
theorem
Tactic
[ "Mathlib.NumberTheory.LegendreSymbol.JacobiSymbol" ]
Mathlib/Tactic/NormNum/LegendreSymbol.lean
jacobiSymNat.even_odd₁
If `a` is even and `b` is odd, then we can remove a factor `2` from `a`, but we may have to change the sign, depending on `b % 8`. We give one version for each of the four odd residue classes mod `8`.
jacobiSymNat.even_odd₇ (a b c : ℕ) (r : ℤ) (ha : a % 2 = 0) (hb : b % 8 = 7) (hc : a / 2 = c) (hr : jacobiSymNat c b = r) : jacobiSymNat a b = r := by simp only [jacobiSymNat, ← hr, ← hc, Int.natCast_ediv, Nat.cast_ofNat] rw [← jacobiSym.even_odd (mod_cast ha), if_neg (by simp [hb])] rw [← Nat.mod_mod_of_dvd, hb]; simp
theorem
Tactic
[ "Mathlib.NumberTheory.LegendreSymbol.JacobiSymbol" ]
Mathlib/Tactic/NormNum/LegendreSymbol.lean
jacobiSymNat.even_odd₇
null
jacobiSymNat.even_odd₃ (a b c : ℕ) (r : ℤ) (ha : a % 2 = 0) (hb : b % 8 = 3) (hc : a / 2 = c) (hr : jacobiSymNat c b = r) : jacobiSymNat a b = -r := by simp only [jacobiSymNat, ← hr, ← hc, Int.natCast_ediv, Nat.cast_ofNat] rw [← jacobiSym.even_odd (mod_cast ha), if_pos (by simp [hb])] rw [← Nat.mod_mod_of_dvd, hb]; simp
theorem
Tactic
[ "Mathlib.NumberTheory.LegendreSymbol.JacobiSymbol" ]
Mathlib/Tactic/NormNum/LegendreSymbol.lean
jacobiSymNat.even_odd₃
null
jacobiSymNat.even_odd₅ (a b c : ℕ) (r : ℤ) (ha : a % 2 = 0) (hb : b % 8 = 5) (hc : a / 2 = c) (hr : jacobiSymNat c b = r) : jacobiSymNat a b = -r := by simp only [jacobiSymNat, ← hr, ← hc, Int.natCast_ediv, Nat.cast_ofNat] rw [← jacobiSym.even_odd (mod_cast ha), if_pos (by simp [hb])] rw [← Nat.mod_mod_of_dvd, hb]; simp
theorem
Tactic
[ "Mathlib.NumberTheory.LegendreSymbol.JacobiSymbol" ]
Mathlib/Tactic/NormNum/LegendreSymbol.lean
jacobiSymNat.even_odd₅
null
jacobiSymNat.qr₁ (a b : ℕ) (r : ℤ) (ha : a % 4 = 1) (hb : b % 2 = 1) (hr : jacobiSymNat b a = r) : jacobiSymNat a b = r := by rwa [jacobiSymNat, jacobiSym.quadratic_reciprocity_one_mod_four ha (Nat.odd_iff.mpr hb)]
theorem
Tactic
[ "Mathlib.NumberTheory.LegendreSymbol.JacobiSymbol" ]
Mathlib/Tactic/NormNum/LegendreSymbol.lean
jacobiSymNat.qr₁
Use quadratic reciprocity to reduce to smaller `b`.
jacobiSymNat.qr₁_mod (a b ab : ℕ) (r : ℤ) (ha : a % 4 = 1) (hb : b % 2 = 1) (hab : b % a = ab) (hr : jacobiSymNat ab a = r) : jacobiSymNat a b = r := jacobiSymNat.qr₁ _ _ _ ha hb <| jacobiSymNat.mod_left _ _ ab r hab hr
theorem
Tactic
[ "Mathlib.NumberTheory.LegendreSymbol.JacobiSymbol" ]
Mathlib/Tactic/NormNum/LegendreSymbol.lean
jacobiSymNat.qr₁_mod
null
jacobiSymNat.qr₁' (a b : ℕ) (r : ℤ) (ha : a % 2 = 1) (hb : b % 4 = 1) (hr : jacobiSymNat b a = r) : jacobiSymNat a b = r := by rwa [jacobiSymNat, ← jacobiSym.quadratic_reciprocity_one_mod_four hb (Nat.odd_iff.mpr ha)]
theorem
Tactic
[ "Mathlib.NumberTheory.LegendreSymbol.JacobiSymbol" ]
Mathlib/Tactic/NormNum/LegendreSymbol.lean
jacobiSymNat.qr₁'
null
jacobiSymNat.qr₁'_mod (a b ab : ℕ) (r : ℤ) (ha : a % 2 = 1) (hb : b % 4 = 1) (hab : b % a = ab) (hr : jacobiSymNat ab a = r) : jacobiSymNat a b = r := jacobiSymNat.qr₁' _ _ _ ha hb <| jacobiSymNat.mod_left _ _ ab r hab hr
theorem
Tactic
[ "Mathlib.NumberTheory.LegendreSymbol.JacobiSymbol" ]
Mathlib/Tactic/NormNum/LegendreSymbol.lean
jacobiSymNat.qr₁'_mod
null
jacobiSymNat.qr₃ (a b : ℕ) (r : ℤ) (ha : a % 4 = 3) (hb : b % 4 = 3) (hr : jacobiSymNat b a = r) : jacobiSymNat a b = -r := by rwa [jacobiSymNat, jacobiSym.quadratic_reciprocity_three_mod_four ha hb, neg_inj]
theorem
Tactic
[ "Mathlib.NumberTheory.LegendreSymbol.JacobiSymbol" ]
Mathlib/Tactic/NormNum/LegendreSymbol.lean
jacobiSymNat.qr₃
null
jacobiSymNat.qr₃_mod (a b ab : ℕ) (r : ℤ) (ha : a % 4 = 3) (hb : b % 4 = 3) (hab : b % a = ab) (hr : jacobiSymNat ab a = r) : jacobiSymNat a b = -r := jacobiSymNat.qr₃ _ _ _ ha hb <| jacobiSymNat.mod_left _ _ ab r hab hr
theorem
Tactic
[ "Mathlib.NumberTheory.LegendreSymbol.JacobiSymbol" ]
Mathlib/Tactic/NormNum/LegendreSymbol.lean
jacobiSymNat.qr₃_mod
null
isInt_jacobiSym : {a na : ℤ} → {b nb : ℕ} → {r : ℤ} → IsInt a na → IsNat b nb → jacobiSym na nb = r → IsInt (jacobiSym a b) r | _, _, _, _, _, ⟨rfl⟩, ⟨rfl⟩, rfl => ⟨rfl⟩
theorem
Tactic
[ "Mathlib.NumberTheory.LegendreSymbol.JacobiSymbol" ]
Mathlib/Tactic/NormNum/LegendreSymbol.lean
isInt_jacobiSym
null
isInt_jacobiSymNat : {a na : ℕ} → {b nb : ℕ} → {r : ℤ} → IsNat a na → IsNat b nb → jacobiSymNat na nb = r → IsInt (jacobiSymNat a b) r | _, _, _, _, _, ⟨rfl⟩, ⟨rfl⟩, rfl => ⟨rfl⟩
theorem
Tactic
[ "Mathlib.NumberTheory.LegendreSymbol.JacobiSymbol" ]
Mathlib/Tactic/NormNum/LegendreSymbol.lean
isInt_jacobiSymNat
null
partial proveJacobiSymOdd (ea eb : Q(ℕ)) : (er : Q(ℤ)) × Q(jacobiSymNat $ea $eb = $er) := match eb.natLit! with | 1 => haveI : $eb =Q 1 := ⟨⟩ ⟨mkRawIntLit 1, q(jacobiSymNat.one_right $ea)⟩ | b => match ea.natLit! with | 0 => haveI : $ea =Q 0 := ⟨⟩ have hb : Q(Nat.beq ($eb / 2) 0 = false) := (q(Eq.refl false) : Expr) ⟨mkRawIntLit 0, q(jacobiSymNat.zero_left $eb $hb)⟩ | 1 => haveI : $ea =Q 1 := ⟨⟩ ⟨mkRawIntLit 1, q(jacobiSymNat.one_left $eb)⟩ | a => match a % 2 with | 0 => match a % 4 with | 0 => have ha : Q(Nat.mod $ea 4 = 0) := (q(Eq.refl 0) : Expr) have hb : Q(Nat.mod $eb 2 = 1) := (q(Eq.refl 1) : Expr) have ec : Q(ℕ) := mkRawNatLit (a / 4) have hc : Q(Nat.div $ea 4 = $ec) := (q(Eq.refl $ec) : Expr) have ⟨er, p⟩ := proveJacobiSymOdd ec eb ⟨er, q(jacobiSymNat.double_even $ea $eb $ec $er $ha $hb $hc $p)⟩ | _ => have ha : Q(Nat.mod $ea 2 = 0) := (q(Eq.refl 0) : Expr) have ec : Q(ℕ) := mkRawNatLit (a / 2) have hc : Q(Nat.div $ea 2 = $ec) := (q(Eq.refl $ec) : Expr) have ⟨er, p⟩ := proveJacobiSymOdd ec eb match b % 8 with | 1 => have hb : Q(Nat.mod $eb 8 = 1) := (q(Eq.refl 1) : Expr) ⟨er, q(jacobiSymNat.even_odd₁ $ea $eb $ec $er $ha $hb $hc $p)⟩ | 3 => have er' := mkRawIntLit (-er.intLit!) have hb : Q(Nat.mod $eb 8 = 3) := (q(Eq.refl 3) : Expr) show (_ : Q(ℤ)) × Q(jacobiSymNat $ea $eb = -$er) from ⟨er', q(jacobiSymNat.even_odd₃ $ea $eb $ec $er $ha $hb $hc $p)⟩ | 5 => have er' := mkRawIntLit (-er.intLit!) haveI : $er' =Q -$er := ⟨⟩ have hb : Q(Nat.mod $eb 8 = 5) := (q(Eq.refl 5) : Expr) ⟨er', q(jacobiSymNat.even_odd₅ $ea $eb $ec $er $ha $hb $hc $p)⟩ | _ => have hb : Q(Nat.mod $eb 8 = 7) := (q(Eq.refl 7) : Expr) ⟨er, q(jacobiSymNat.even_odd₇ $ea $eb $ec $er $ha $hb $hc $p)⟩ | _ => have eab : Q(ℕ) := mkRawNatLit (b % a) have hab : Q(Nat.mod $eb $ea = $eab) := (q(Eq.refl $eab) : Expr) have ⟨er, p⟩ := proveJacobiSymOdd eab ea ...
def
Tactic
[ "Mathlib.NumberTheory.LegendreSymbol.JacobiSymbol" ]
Mathlib/Tactic/NormNum/LegendreSymbol.lean
proveJacobiSymOdd
This evaluates `r := jacobiSymNat a b` recursively using quadratic reciprocity and produces a proof term for the equality, assuming that `a < b` and `b` is odd.
partial proveJacobiSymNat (ea eb : Q(ℕ)) : (er : Q(ℤ)) × Q(jacobiSymNat $ea $eb = $er) := match eb.natLit! with | 0 => haveI : $eb =Q 0 := ⟨⟩ ⟨mkRawIntLit 1, q(jacobiSymNat.zero_right $ea)⟩ | 1 => haveI : $eb =Q 1 := ⟨⟩ ⟨mkRawIntLit 1, q(jacobiSymNat.one_right $ea)⟩ | b => match b % 2 with | 0 => match ea.natLit! with | 0 => have hb : Q(Nat.beq ($eb / 2) 0 = false) := (q(Eq.refl false) : Expr) show (er : Q(ℤ)) × Q(jacobiSymNat 0 $eb = $er) from ⟨mkRawIntLit 0, q(jacobiSymNat.zero_left $eb $hb)⟩ | 1 => show (er : Q(ℤ)) × Q(jacobiSymNat 1 $eb = $er) from ⟨mkRawIntLit 1, q(jacobiSymNat.one_left $eb)⟩ | a => match a % 2 with | 0 => have hb₀ : Q(Nat.beq ($eb / 2) 0 = false) := (q(Eq.refl false) : Expr) have ha : Q(Nat.mod $ea 2 = 0) := (q(Eq.refl 0) : Expr) have hb₁ : Q(Nat.mod $eb 2 = 0) := (q(Eq.refl 0) : Expr) ⟨mkRawIntLit 0, q(jacobiSymNat.even_even $ea $eb $hb₀ $ha $hb₁)⟩ | _ => have ha : Q(Nat.mod $ea 2 = 1) := (q(Eq.refl 1) : Expr) have hb : Q(Nat.mod $eb 2 = 0) := (q(Eq.refl 0) : Expr) have ec : Q(ℕ) := mkRawNatLit (b / 2) have hc : Q(Nat.div $eb 2 = $ec) := (q(Eq.refl $ec) : Expr) have ⟨er, p⟩ := proveJacobiSymOdd ea ec ⟨er, q(jacobiSymNat.odd_even $ea $eb $ec $er $ha $hb $hc $p)⟩ | _ => have a := ea.natLit! if b ≤ a then have eab : Q(ℕ) := mkRawNatLit (a % b) have hab : Q(Nat.mod $ea $eb = $eab) := (q(Eq.refl $eab) : Expr) have ⟨er, p⟩ := proveJacobiSymOdd eab eb ⟨er, q(jacobiSymNat.mod_left $ea $eb $eab $er $hab $p)⟩ else proveJacobiSymOdd ea eb
def
Tactic
[ "Mathlib.NumberTheory.LegendreSymbol.JacobiSymbol" ]
Mathlib/Tactic/NormNum/LegendreSymbol.lean
proveJacobiSymNat
This evaluates `r := jacobiSymNat a b` and produces a proof term for the equality by removing powers of `2` from `b` and then calling `proveJacobiSymOdd`.
partial proveJacobiSym (ea : Q(ℤ)) (eb : Q(ℕ)) : (er : Q(ℤ)) × Q(jacobiSym $ea $eb = $er) := match eb.natLit! with | 0 => haveI : $eb =Q 0 := ⟨⟩ ⟨mkRawIntLit 1, q(jacobiSym.zero_right $ea)⟩ | 1 => haveI : $eb =Q 1 := ⟨⟩ ⟨mkRawIntLit 1, q(jacobiSym.one_right $ea)⟩ | b => have eb' := mkRawIntLit b have hb' : Q(($eb : ℤ) = $eb') := (q(Eq.refl $eb') : Expr) have ab := ea.intLit! % b have eab := mkRawIntLit ab have hab : Q(Int.emod $ea $eb' = $eab) := (q(Eq.refl $eab) : Expr) have eab' : Q(ℕ) := mkRawNatLit ab.toNat have hab' : Q(($eab' : ℤ) = $eab) := (q(Eq.refl $eab) : Expr) have ⟨er, p⟩ := proveJacobiSymNat eab' eb ⟨er, q(JacobiSym.mod_left $ea $eb $eab' $eab $er $eb' $hb' $hab $hab' $p)⟩
def
Tactic
[ "Mathlib.NumberTheory.LegendreSymbol.JacobiSymbol" ]
Mathlib/Tactic/NormNum/LegendreSymbol.lean
proveJacobiSym
This evaluates `r := jacobiSym a b` and produces a proof term for the equality. This is done by reducing to `r := jacobiSymNat (a % b) b`.
@[norm_num jacobiSym _ _] evalJacobiSym : NormNumExt where eval {u α} e := do let .app (.app _ (a : Q(ℤ))) (b : Q(ℕ)) ← Meta.whnfR e | failure let ⟨ea, pa⟩ ← deriveInt a _ let ⟨eb, pb⟩ ← deriveNat b _ haveI' : u =QL 0 := ⟨⟩ haveI' : $α =Q ℤ := ⟨⟩ have ⟨er, pr⟩ := proveJacobiSym ea eb haveI' : $e =Q jacobiSym $a $b := ⟨⟩ return .isInt _ er er.intLit! q(isInt_jacobiSym $pa $pb $pr)
def
Tactic
[ "Mathlib.NumberTheory.LegendreSymbol.JacobiSymbol" ]
Mathlib/Tactic/NormNum/LegendreSymbol.lean
evalJacobiSym
This is the `norm_num` plug-in that evaluates Jacobi symbols.
@[norm_num jacobiSymNat _ _] evalJacobiSymNat : NormNumExt where eval {u α} e := do let .app (.app _ (a : Q(ℕ))) (b : Q(ℕ)) ← Meta.whnfR e | failure let ⟨ea, pa⟩ ← deriveNat a _ let ⟨eb, pb⟩ ← deriveNat b _ haveI' : u =QL 0 := ⟨⟩ haveI' : $α =Q ℤ := ⟨⟩ have ⟨er, pr⟩ := proveJacobiSymNat ea eb haveI' : $e =Q jacobiSymNat $a $b := ⟨⟩ return .isInt _ er er.intLit! q(isInt_jacobiSymNat $pa $pb $pr)
def
Tactic
[ "Mathlib.NumberTheory.LegendreSymbol.JacobiSymbol" ]
Mathlib/Tactic/NormNum/LegendreSymbol.lean
evalJacobiSymNat
This is the `norm_num` plug-in that evaluates Jacobi symbols on natural numbers.
@[norm_num legendreSym _ _] evalLegendreSym : NormNumExt where eval {u α} e := do let .app (.app (.app _ (p : Q(ℕ))) (fp : Q(Fact (Nat.Prime $p)))) (a : Q(ℤ)) ← Meta.whnfR e | failure let ⟨ea, pa⟩ ← deriveInt a _ let ⟨ep, pp⟩ ← deriveNat p _ haveI' : u =QL 0 := ⟨⟩ haveI' : $α =Q ℤ := ⟨⟩ have ⟨er, pr⟩ := proveJacobiSym ea ep haveI' : $e =Q legendreSym $p $a := ⟨⟩ return .isInt _ er er.intLit! q(LegendreSym.to_jacobiSym $p $fp $a $er (isInt_jacobiSym $pa $pp $pr))
def
Tactic
[ "Mathlib.NumberTheory.LegendreSymbol.JacobiSymbol" ]
Mathlib/Tactic/NormNum/LegendreSymbol.lean
evalLegendreSym
This is the `norm_num` plug-in that evaluates Legendre symbols.
evalNatModEq : NormNumExt where eval {u αP} e := do match u, αP, e with | 0, ~q(Prop), ~q($a ≡ $b [MOD $n]) => let ⟨b, pb⟩ ← deriveBoolOfIff _ e q(Nat.modEq_iff_dvd.symm) return .ofBoolResult pb | _, _, _ => failure
def
Tactic
[ "Mathlib.Tactic.NormNum.DivMod", "Mathlib.Data.Int.ModEq" ]
Mathlib/Tactic/NormNum/ModEq.lean
evalNatModEq
null
evalIntModEq : NormNumExt where eval {u αP} e := do match u, αP, e with | 0, ~q(Prop), ~q($a ≡ $b [ZMOD $n]) => let ⟨b, pb⟩ ← deriveBoolOfIff _ e q(Int.modEq_iff_dvd.symm) return .ofBoolResult pb | _, _, _ => failure
def
Tactic
[ "Mathlib.Tactic.NormNum.DivMod", "Mathlib.Data.Int.ModEq" ]
Mathlib/Tactic/NormNum/ModEq.lean
evalIntModEq
null
asc_factorial_aux (n l m a b : ℕ) (h₁ : n.ascFactorial l = a) (h₂ : (n + l).ascFactorial m = b) : n.ascFactorial (l + m) = a * b := by rw [← h₁, ← h₂] symm apply ascFactorial_mul_ascFactorial
lemma
Tactic
[ "Mathlib.Data.Nat.Factorial.Basic", "Mathlib.Tactic.NormNum" ]
Mathlib/Tactic/NormNum/NatFactorial.lean
asc_factorial_aux
null
partial proveAscFactorial (n l : ℕ) (en el : Q(ℕ)) : ℕ × (eresult : Q(ℕ)) × Q(($en).ascFactorial $el = $eresult) := if l ≤ 50 then have res : ℕ := n.ascFactorial l have eres : Q(ℕ) := mkRawNatLit (n.ascFactorial l) have : ($en).ascFactorial $el =Q $eres := ⟨⟩ ⟨res, eres, q(Eq.refl $eres)⟩ else have m : ℕ := l / 2 have em : Q(ℕ) := mkRawNatLit m have : $em =Q $el / 2 := ⟨⟩ have r : ℕ := l - m have er : Q(ℕ) := mkRawNatLit r have : $er =Q $el - $em := ⟨⟩ have : $el =Q ($em + $er) := ⟨⟩ have nm : ℕ := n + m have enm : Q(ℕ) := mkRawNatLit nm have : $enm =Q $en + $em := ⟨⟩ let ⟨a, ea, a_prf⟩ := proveAscFactorial n m en em let ⟨b, eb, b_prf⟩ := proveAscFactorial (n + m) r enm er have eab : Q(ℕ) := mkRawNatLit (a * b) have : $eab =Q $ea * $eb := ⟨⟩ ⟨a * b, eab, q(by convert asc_factorial_aux $en $em $er $ea $eb $a_prf $b_prf)⟩
def
Tactic
[ "Mathlib.Data.Nat.Factorial.Basic", "Mathlib.Tactic.NormNum" ]
Mathlib/Tactic/NormNum/NatFactorial.lean
proveAscFactorial
Calculate `n.ascFactorial l` and return this value along with a proof of the result.
isNat_factorial {n x : ℕ} (h₁ : IsNat n x) (a : ℕ) (h₂ : (1).ascFactorial x = a) : IsNat (n !) a := by constructor simp only [h₁.out, cast_id, ← h₂, one_ascFactorial]
lemma
Tactic
[ "Mathlib.Data.Nat.Factorial.Basic", "Mathlib.Tactic.NormNum" ]
Mathlib/Tactic/NormNum/NatFactorial.lean
isNat_factorial
null
@[nolint unusedHavesSuffices, norm_num Nat.factorial _] evalNatFactorial : NormNumExt where eval {u α} e := do let .app _ (x : Q(ℕ)) ← Meta.whnfR e | failure have : u =QL 0 := ⟨⟩; have : $α =Q ℕ := ⟨⟩; have : $e =Q Nat.factorial $x := ⟨⟩ let sℕ : Q(AddMonoidWithOne ℕ) := q(instAddMonoidWithOneNat) let ⟨ex, p⟩ ← deriveNat x sℕ let ⟨_, val, ascPrf⟩ := proveAscFactorial 1 ex.natLit! q(nat_lit 1) ex return .isNat sℕ q($val) q(isNat_factorial $p $val $ascPrf)
def
Tactic
[ "Mathlib.Data.Nat.Factorial.Basic", "Mathlib.Tactic.NormNum" ]
Mathlib/Tactic/NormNum/NatFactorial.lean
evalNatFactorial
Evaluates the `Nat.factorial` function.
isNat_ascFactorial {n x l y : ℕ} (h₁ : IsNat n x) (h₂ : IsNat l y) (a : ℕ) (p : x.ascFactorial y = a) : IsNat (n.ascFactorial l) a := by constructor simp [h₁.out, h₂.out, ← p]
lemma
Tactic
[ "Mathlib.Data.Nat.Factorial.Basic", "Mathlib.Tactic.NormNum" ]
Mathlib/Tactic/NormNum/NatFactorial.lean
isNat_ascFactorial
null
@[nolint unusedHavesSuffices, norm_num Nat.ascFactorial _ _] evalNatAscFactorial : NormNumExt where eval {u α} e := do let .app (.app _ (x : Q(ℕ))) (y : Q(ℕ)) ← Meta.whnfR e | failure have : u =QL 0 := ⟨⟩; have : $α =Q ℕ := ⟨⟩; have : $e =Q Nat.ascFactorial $x $y := ⟨⟩ let sℕ : Q(AddMonoidWithOne ℕ) := q(instAddMonoidWithOneNat) let ⟨ex₁, p₁⟩ ← deriveNat x sℕ let ⟨ex₂, p₂⟩ ← deriveNat y sℕ let ⟨_, val, ascPrf⟩ := proveAscFactorial ex₁.natLit! ex₂.natLit! ex₁ ex₂ return .isNat sℕ q($val) q(isNat_ascFactorial $p₁ $p₂ $val $ascPrf)
def
Tactic
[ "Mathlib.Data.Nat.Factorial.Basic", "Mathlib.Tactic.NormNum" ]
Mathlib/Tactic/NormNum/NatFactorial.lean
evalNatAscFactorial
Evaluates the Nat.ascFactorial function.
isNat_descFactorial {n x l y : ℕ} (z : ℕ) (h₁ : IsNat n x) (h₂ : IsNat l y) (h₃ : x = z + y) (a : ℕ) (p : (z + 1).ascFactorial y = a) : IsNat (n.descFactorial l) a := by constructor simpa [h₁.out, h₂.out, ← p, h₃] using Nat.add_descFactorial_eq_ascFactorial _ _
lemma
Tactic
[ "Mathlib.Data.Nat.Factorial.Basic", "Mathlib.Tactic.NormNum" ]
Mathlib/Tactic/NormNum/NatFactorial.lean
isNat_descFactorial
null
isNat_descFactorial_zero {n x l y : ℕ} (z : ℕ) (h₁ : IsNat n x) (h₂ : IsNat l y) (h₃ : y = z + x + 1) : IsNat (n.descFactorial l) 0 := by constructor simp [h₁.out, h₂.out, h₃] private partial def evalNatDescFactorialNotZero {x' y' : Q(ℕ)} (x y z : Q(ℕ)) (_hx : $x =Q $z + $y) (px : Q(IsNat $x' $x)) (py : Q(IsNat $y' $y)) : (n : Q(ℕ)) × Q(IsNat (descFactorial $x' $y') $n) := have zp1 :Q(ℕ) := mkRawNatLit (z.natLit! + 1) have : $zp1 =Q $z + 1 := ⟨⟩ let ⟨_, val, ascPrf⟩ := proveAscFactorial (z.natLit! + 1) y.natLit! zp1 y ⟨val, q(isNat_descFactorial $z $px $py rfl $val $ascPrf)⟩ private partial def evalNatDescFactorialZero {x' y' : Q(ℕ)} (x y z : Q(ℕ)) (_hy : $y =Q $z + $x + 1) (px : Q(IsNat $x' $x)) (py : Q(IsNat $y' $y)) : (n : Q(ℕ)) × Q(IsNat (descFactorial $x' $y') $n) := ⟨q(nat_lit 0), q(isNat_descFactorial_zero $z $px $py rfl)⟩
lemma
Tactic
[ "Mathlib.Data.Nat.Factorial.Basic", "Mathlib.Tactic.NormNum" ]
Mathlib/Tactic/NormNum/NatFactorial.lean
isNat_descFactorial_zero
null
@[nolint unusedHavesSuffices, norm_num Nat.descFactorial _ _] evalNatDescFactorial : NormNumExt where eval {u α} e := do let .app (.app _ (x' : Q(ℕ))) (y' : Q(ℕ)) ← Meta.whnfR e | failure have : u =QL 0 := ⟨⟩ have : $α =Q ℕ := ⟨⟩ have : $e =Q Nat.descFactorial $x' $y' := ⟨⟩ let sℕ : Q(AddMonoidWithOne ℕ) := q(instAddMonoidWithOneNat) let ⟨x, p₁⟩ ← deriveNat x' sℕ let ⟨y, p₂⟩ ← deriveNat y' sℕ if x.natLit! ≥ y.natLit! then have z : Q(ℕ) := mkRawNatLit (x.natLit! - y.natLit!) have : $x =Q $z + $y := ⟨⟩ let ⟨val, prf⟩ := evalNatDescFactorialNotZero (x' := x') (y' := y') x y z ‹_› p₁ p₂ return .isNat sℕ val q($prf) else have z : Q(ℕ) := mkRawNatLit (y.natLit! - x.natLit! - 1) have : $y =Q $z + $x + 1 := ⟨⟩ let ⟨val, prf⟩ := evalNatDescFactorialZero (x' := x') (y' := y') x y z ‹_› p₁ p₂ return .isNat sℕ val q($prf)
def
Tactic
[ "Mathlib.Data.Nat.Factorial.Basic", "Mathlib.Tactic.NormNum" ]
Mathlib/Tactic/NormNum/NatFactorial.lean
evalNatDescFactorial
Evaluates the `Nat.descFactorial` function.
IsFibAux (n a b : ℕ) := fib n = a ∧ fib (n + 1) = b
def
Tactic
[ "Mathlib.Data.Nat.Fib.Basic", "Mathlib.Tactic.NormNum" ]
Mathlib/Tactic/NormNum/NatFib.lean
IsFibAux
Auxiliary definition for `proveFib` extension.
isFibAux_zero : IsFibAux 0 0 1 := ⟨fib_zero, fib_one⟩
theorem
Tactic
[ "Mathlib.Data.Nat.Fib.Basic", "Mathlib.Tactic.NormNum" ]
Mathlib/Tactic/NormNum/NatFib.lean
isFibAux_zero
null
isFibAux_one : IsFibAux 1 1 1 := ⟨fib_one, fib_two⟩
theorem
Tactic
[ "Mathlib.Data.Nat.Fib.Basic", "Mathlib.Tactic.NormNum" ]
Mathlib/Tactic/NormNum/NatFib.lean
isFibAux_one
null
isFibAux_two_mul {n a b n' a' b' : ℕ} (H : IsFibAux n a b) (hn : 2 * n = n') (h1 : a * (2 * b - a) = a') (h2 : a * a + b * b = b') : IsFibAux n' a' b' := ⟨by rw [← hn, fib_two_mul, H.1, H.2, ← h1], by rw [← hn, fib_two_mul_add_one, H.1, H.2, pow_two, pow_two, add_comm, h2]⟩
theorem
Tactic
[ "Mathlib.Data.Nat.Fib.Basic", "Mathlib.Tactic.NormNum" ]
Mathlib/Tactic/NormNum/NatFib.lean
isFibAux_two_mul
null
isFibAux_two_mul_add_one {n a b n' a' b' : ℕ} (H : IsFibAux n a b) (hn : 2 * n + 1 = n') (h1 : a * a + b * b = a') (h2 : b * (2 * a + b) = b') : IsFibAux n' a' b' := ⟨by rw [← hn, fib_two_mul_add_one, H.1, H.2, pow_two, pow_two, add_comm, h1], by rw [← hn, fib_two_mul_add_two, H.1, H.2, h2]⟩
theorem
Tactic
[ "Mathlib.Data.Nat.Fib.Basic", "Mathlib.Tactic.NormNum" ]
Mathlib/Tactic/NormNum/NatFib.lean
isFibAux_two_mul_add_one
null
partial proveNatFibAux (en' : Q(ℕ)) : (ea' eb' : Q(ℕ)) × Q(IsFibAux $en' $ea' $eb') := match en'.natLit! with | 0 => have : $en' =Q nat_lit 0 := ⟨⟩; ⟨q(nat_lit 0), q(nat_lit 1), q(isFibAux_zero)⟩ | 1 => have : $en' =Q nat_lit 1 := ⟨⟩; ⟨q(nat_lit 1), q(nat_lit 1), q(isFibAux_one)⟩ | n' => have en : Q(ℕ) := mkRawNatLit <| n' / 2 let ⟨ea, eb, H⟩ := proveNatFibAux en let a := ea.natLit! let b := eb.natLit! if n' % 2 == 0 then have hn : Q(2 * $en = $en') := (q(Eq.refl $en') : Expr) have ea' : Q(ℕ) := mkRawNatLit <| a * (2 * b - a) have eb' : Q(ℕ) := mkRawNatLit <| a * a + b * b have h1 : Q($ea * (2 * $eb - $ea) = $ea') := (q(Eq.refl $ea') : Expr) have h2 : Q($ea * $ea + $eb * $eb = $eb') := (q(Eq.refl $eb') : Expr) ⟨ea', eb', q(isFibAux_two_mul $H $hn $h1 $h2)⟩ else have hn : Q(2 * $en + 1 = $en') := (q(Eq.refl $en') : Expr) have ea' : Q(ℕ) := mkRawNatLit <| a * a + b * b have eb' : Q(ℕ) := mkRawNatLit <| b * (2 * a + b) have h1 : Q($ea * $ea + $eb * $eb = $ea') := (q(Eq.refl $ea') : Expr) have h2 : Q($eb * (2 * $ea + $eb) = $eb') := (q(Eq.refl $eb') : Expr) ⟨ea', eb', q(isFibAux_two_mul_add_one $H $hn $h1 $h2)⟩
def
Tactic
[ "Mathlib.Data.Nat.Fib.Basic", "Mathlib.Tactic.NormNum" ]
Mathlib/Tactic/NormNum/NatFib.lean
proveNatFibAux
null