url
stringclasses
147 values
commit
stringclasses
147 values
file_path
stringlengths
7
101
full_name
stringlengths
1
94
start
stringlengths
6
10
end
stringlengths
6
11
tactic
stringlengths
1
11.2k
state_before
stringlengths
3
2.09M
state_after
stringlengths
6
2.09M
input
stringlengths
73
2.09M
https://github.com/katydid/proofs.git
8105af686a3bdf193909567f5165835001240640
Katydid/Std/Lists.lean
list_take_length_prefix_is_prefix
[822, 1]
[829, 13]
exact ih
case cons α : Type u_1 ys : List α x : α xs : List α ih : take (length xs) (xs ++ ys) = xs ⊢ take (length xs) (xs ++ ys) = xs
no goals
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case cons α : Type u_1 ys : List α x : α xs : List α ih : take (length xs) (xs ++ ys) = xs ⊢ take (length xs) (xs ++ ys) = xs TACTIC:
https://github.com/katydid/proofs.git
8105af686a3bdf193909567f5165835001240640
Katydid/Std/Lists.lean
list_prefix_length_leq
[831, 1]
[836, 15]
intro xs ys zs xsyszs
α : Type u_1 ⊢ ∀ (xs ys zs : List α), xs ++ ys = zs → length xs ≤ length zs
α : Type u_1 xs ys zs : List α xsyszs : xs ++ ys = zs ⊢ length xs ≤ length zs
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: α : Type u_1 ⊢ ∀ (xs ys zs : List α), xs ++ ys = zs → length xs ≤ length zs TACTIC:
https://github.com/katydid/proofs.git
8105af686a3bdf193909567f5165835001240640
Katydid/Std/Lists.lean
list_prefix_length_leq
[831, 1]
[836, 15]
apply (list_prefix_leq_length zs xs ys)
α : Type u_1 xs ys zs : List α xsyszs : xs ++ ys = zs ⊢ length xs ≤ length zs
α : Type u_1 xs ys zs : List α xsyszs : xs ++ ys = zs ⊢ zs = xs ++ ys
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: α : Type u_1 xs ys zs : List α xsyszs : xs ++ ys = zs ⊢ length xs ≤ length zs TACTIC:
https://github.com/katydid/proofs.git
8105af686a3bdf193909567f5165835001240640
Katydid/Std/Lists.lean
list_prefix_length_leq
[831, 1]
[836, 15]
apply Eq.symm
α : Type u_1 xs ys zs : List α xsyszs : xs ++ ys = zs ⊢ zs = xs ++ ys
case h α : Type u_1 xs ys zs : List α xsyszs : xs ++ ys = zs ⊢ xs ++ ys = zs
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: α : Type u_1 xs ys zs : List α xsyszs : xs ++ ys = zs ⊢ zs = xs ++ ys TACTIC:
https://github.com/katydid/proofs.git
8105af686a3bdf193909567f5165835001240640
Katydid/Std/Lists.lean
list_prefix_length_leq
[831, 1]
[836, 15]
exact xsyszs
case h α : Type u_1 xs ys zs : List α xsyszs : xs ++ ys = zs ⊢ xs ++ ys = zs
no goals
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case h α : Type u_1 xs ys zs : List α xsyszs : xs ++ ys = zs ⊢ xs ++ ys = zs TACTIC:
https://github.com/katydid/proofs.git
8105af686a3bdf193909567f5165835001240640
Katydid/Std/Lists.lean
list_length_gt_zero
[838, 1]
[848, 27]
intro xs
α : Type u_1 ⊢ ∀ (xs : List α), xs ≠ [] → 0 < length xs
α : Type u_1 xs : List α ⊢ xs ≠ [] → 0 < length xs
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: α : Type u_1 ⊢ ∀ (xs : List α), xs ≠ [] → 0 < length xs TACTIC:
https://github.com/katydid/proofs.git
8105af686a3bdf193909567f5165835001240640
Katydid/Std/Lists.lean
list_length_gt_zero
[838, 1]
[848, 27]
cases xs with | nil => intro h contradiction | cons x xs => intro _ rw [length] apply Nat.zero_lt_succ
α : Type u_1 xs : List α ⊢ xs ≠ [] → 0 < length xs
no goals
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: α : Type u_1 xs : List α ⊢ xs ≠ [] → 0 < length xs TACTIC:
https://github.com/katydid/proofs.git
8105af686a3bdf193909567f5165835001240640
Katydid/Std/Lists.lean
list_length_gt_zero
[838, 1]
[848, 27]
intro h
case nil α : Type u_1 ⊢ [] ≠ [] → 0 < length []
case nil α : Type u_1 h : [] ≠ [] ⊢ 0 < length []
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case nil α : Type u_1 ⊢ [] ≠ [] → 0 < length [] TACTIC:
https://github.com/katydid/proofs.git
8105af686a3bdf193909567f5165835001240640
Katydid/Std/Lists.lean
list_length_gt_zero
[838, 1]
[848, 27]
contradiction
case nil α : Type u_1 h : [] ≠ [] ⊢ 0 < length []
no goals
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case nil α : Type u_1 h : [] ≠ [] ⊢ 0 < length [] TACTIC:
https://github.com/katydid/proofs.git
8105af686a3bdf193909567f5165835001240640
Katydid/Std/Lists.lean
list_length_gt_zero
[838, 1]
[848, 27]
intro _
case cons α : Type u_1 x : α xs : List α ⊢ x :: xs ≠ [] → 0 < length (x :: xs)
case cons α : Type u_1 x : α xs : List α a✝ : x :: xs ≠ [] ⊢ 0 < length (x :: xs)
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case cons α : Type u_1 x : α xs : List α ⊢ x :: xs ≠ [] → 0 < length (x :: xs) TACTIC:
https://github.com/katydid/proofs.git
8105af686a3bdf193909567f5165835001240640
Katydid/Std/Lists.lean
list_length_gt_zero
[838, 1]
[848, 27]
rw [length]
case cons α : Type u_1 x : α xs : List α a✝ : x :: xs ≠ [] ⊢ 0 < length (x :: xs)
case cons α : Type u_1 x : α xs : List α a✝ : x :: xs ≠ [] ⊢ 0 < length xs + 1
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case cons α : Type u_1 x : α xs : List α a✝ : x :: xs ≠ [] ⊢ 0 < length (x :: xs) TACTIC:
https://github.com/katydid/proofs.git
8105af686a3bdf193909567f5165835001240640
Katydid/Std/Lists.lean
list_length_gt_zero
[838, 1]
[848, 27]
apply Nat.zero_lt_succ
case cons α : Type u_1 x : α xs : List α a✝ : x :: xs ≠ [] ⊢ 0 < length xs + 1
no goals
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case cons α : Type u_1 x : α xs : List α a✝ : x :: xs ≠ [] ⊢ 0 < length xs + 1 TACTIC:
https://github.com/katydid/proofs.git
8105af686a3bdf193909567f5165835001240640
Katydid/Std/Lists.lean
list_prefix_is_gt_zero_and_leq
[850, 1]
[872, 29]
intro xs ys zs
α : Type u_1 ⊢ ∀ (xs ys zs : List α), xs ≠ [] → xs ++ ys = zs → 0 < length xs ∧ length xs ≤ length zs
α : Type u_1 xs ys zs : List α ⊢ xs ≠ [] → xs ++ ys = zs → 0 < length xs ∧ length xs ≤ length zs
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: α : Type u_1 ⊢ ∀ (xs ys zs : List α), xs ≠ [] → xs ++ ys = zs → 0 < length xs ∧ length xs ≤ length zs TACTIC:
https://github.com/katydid/proofs.git
8105af686a3bdf193909567f5165835001240640
Katydid/Std/Lists.lean
list_prefix_is_gt_zero_and_leq
[850, 1]
[872, 29]
revert xs ys
α : Type u_1 xs ys zs : List α ⊢ xs ≠ [] → xs ++ ys = zs → 0 < length xs ∧ length xs ≤ length zs
α : Type u_1 zs : List α ⊢ ∀ (xs ys : List α), xs ≠ [] → xs ++ ys = zs → 0 < length xs ∧ length xs ≤ length zs
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: α : Type u_1 xs ys zs : List α ⊢ xs ≠ [] → xs ++ ys = zs → 0 < length xs ∧ length xs ≤ length zs TACTIC:
https://github.com/katydid/proofs.git
8105af686a3bdf193909567f5165835001240640
Katydid/Std/Lists.lean
list_prefix_is_gt_zero_and_leq
[850, 1]
[872, 29]
cases zs with | nil => intro xs ys hneq ha rw [list_app_nil_nil] at ha cases ha with | intro hxs hys => contradiction | cons z zs => intro xs ys hneq ha have hl := list_length_gt_zero _ hneq rw [<- ha] apply And.intro case left => exact hl case right => rw [list_app_length] apply Nat.le_add_right
α : Type u_1 zs : List α ⊢ ∀ (xs ys : List α), xs ≠ [] → xs ++ ys = zs → 0 < length xs ∧ length xs ≤ length zs
no goals
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: α : Type u_1 zs : List α ⊢ ∀ (xs ys : List α), xs ≠ [] → xs ++ ys = zs → 0 < length xs ∧ length xs ≤ length zs TACTIC:
https://github.com/katydid/proofs.git
8105af686a3bdf193909567f5165835001240640
Katydid/Std/Lists.lean
list_prefix_is_gt_zero_and_leq
[850, 1]
[872, 29]
intro xs ys hneq ha
case nil α : Type u_1 ⊢ ∀ (xs ys : List α), xs ≠ [] → xs ++ ys = [] → 0 < length xs ∧ length xs ≤ length []
case nil α : Type u_1 xs ys : List α hneq : xs ≠ [] ha : xs ++ ys = [] ⊢ 0 < length xs ∧ length xs ≤ length []
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case nil α : Type u_1 ⊢ ∀ (xs ys : List α), xs ≠ [] → xs ++ ys = [] → 0 < length xs ∧ length xs ≤ length [] TACTIC:
https://github.com/katydid/proofs.git
8105af686a3bdf193909567f5165835001240640
Katydid/Std/Lists.lean
list_prefix_is_gt_zero_and_leq
[850, 1]
[872, 29]
rw [list_app_nil_nil] at ha
case nil α : Type u_1 xs ys : List α hneq : xs ≠ [] ha : xs ++ ys = [] ⊢ 0 < length xs ∧ length xs ≤ length []
case nil α : Type u_1 xs ys : List α hneq : xs ≠ [] ha : xs = [] ∧ ys = [] ⊢ 0 < length xs ∧ length xs ≤ length []
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case nil α : Type u_1 xs ys : List α hneq : xs ≠ [] ha : xs ++ ys = [] ⊢ 0 < length xs ∧ length xs ≤ length [] TACTIC:
https://github.com/katydid/proofs.git
8105af686a3bdf193909567f5165835001240640
Katydid/Std/Lists.lean
list_prefix_is_gt_zero_and_leq
[850, 1]
[872, 29]
cases ha with | intro hxs hys => contradiction
case nil α : Type u_1 xs ys : List α hneq : xs ≠ [] ha : xs = [] ∧ ys = [] ⊢ 0 < length xs ∧ length xs ≤ length []
no goals
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case nil α : Type u_1 xs ys : List α hneq : xs ≠ [] ha : xs = [] ∧ ys = [] ⊢ 0 < length xs ∧ length xs ≤ length [] TACTIC:
https://github.com/katydid/proofs.git
8105af686a3bdf193909567f5165835001240640
Katydid/Std/Lists.lean
list_prefix_is_gt_zero_and_leq
[850, 1]
[872, 29]
contradiction
case nil.intro α : Type u_1 xs ys : List α hneq : xs ≠ [] hxs : xs = [] hys : ys = [] ⊢ 0 < length xs ∧ length xs ≤ length []
no goals
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case nil.intro α : Type u_1 xs ys : List α hneq : xs ≠ [] hxs : xs = [] hys : ys = [] ⊢ 0 < length xs ∧ length xs ≤ length [] TACTIC:
https://github.com/katydid/proofs.git
8105af686a3bdf193909567f5165835001240640
Katydid/Std/Lists.lean
list_prefix_is_gt_zero_and_leq
[850, 1]
[872, 29]
intro xs ys hneq ha
case cons α : Type u_1 z : α zs : List α ⊢ ∀ (xs ys : List α), xs ≠ [] → xs ++ ys = z :: zs → 0 < length xs ∧ length xs ≤ length (z :: zs)
case cons α : Type u_1 z : α zs xs ys : List α hneq : xs ≠ [] ha : xs ++ ys = z :: zs ⊢ 0 < length xs ∧ length xs ≤ length (z :: zs)
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case cons α : Type u_1 z : α zs : List α ⊢ ∀ (xs ys : List α), xs ≠ [] → xs ++ ys = z :: zs → 0 < length xs ∧ length xs ≤ length (z :: zs) TACTIC:
https://github.com/katydid/proofs.git
8105af686a3bdf193909567f5165835001240640
Katydid/Std/Lists.lean
list_prefix_is_gt_zero_and_leq
[850, 1]
[872, 29]
have hl := list_length_gt_zero _ hneq
case cons α : Type u_1 z : α zs xs ys : List α hneq : xs ≠ [] ha : xs ++ ys = z :: zs ⊢ 0 < length xs ∧ length xs ≤ length (z :: zs)
case cons α : Type u_1 z : α zs xs ys : List α hneq : xs ≠ [] ha : xs ++ ys = z :: zs hl : 0 < length xs ⊢ 0 < length xs ∧ length xs ≤ length (z :: zs)
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case cons α : Type u_1 z : α zs xs ys : List α hneq : xs ≠ [] ha : xs ++ ys = z :: zs ⊢ 0 < length xs ∧ length xs ≤ length (z :: zs) TACTIC:
https://github.com/katydid/proofs.git
8105af686a3bdf193909567f5165835001240640
Katydid/Std/Lists.lean
list_prefix_is_gt_zero_and_leq
[850, 1]
[872, 29]
rw [<- ha]
case cons α : Type u_1 z : α zs xs ys : List α hneq : xs ≠ [] ha : xs ++ ys = z :: zs hl : 0 < length xs ⊢ 0 < length xs ∧ length xs ≤ length (z :: zs)
case cons α : Type u_1 z : α zs xs ys : List α hneq : xs ≠ [] ha : xs ++ ys = z :: zs hl : 0 < length xs ⊢ 0 < length xs ∧ length xs ≤ length (xs ++ ys)
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case cons α : Type u_1 z : α zs xs ys : List α hneq : xs ≠ [] ha : xs ++ ys = z :: zs hl : 0 < length xs ⊢ 0 < length xs ∧ length xs ≤ length (z :: zs) TACTIC:
https://github.com/katydid/proofs.git
8105af686a3bdf193909567f5165835001240640
Katydid/Std/Lists.lean
list_prefix_is_gt_zero_and_leq
[850, 1]
[872, 29]
apply And.intro
case cons α : Type u_1 z : α zs xs ys : List α hneq : xs ≠ [] ha : xs ++ ys = z :: zs hl : 0 < length xs ⊢ 0 < length xs ∧ length xs ≤ length (xs ++ ys)
case cons.left α : Type u_1 z : α zs xs ys : List α hneq : xs ≠ [] ha : xs ++ ys = z :: zs hl : 0 < length xs ⊢ 0 < length xs case cons.right α : Type u_1 z : α zs xs ys : List α hneq : xs ≠ [] ha : xs ++ ys = z :: zs hl : 0 < length xs ⊢ length xs ≤ length (xs ++ ys)
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case cons α : Type u_1 z : α zs xs ys : List α hneq : xs ≠ [] ha : xs ++ ys = z :: zs hl : 0 < length xs ⊢ 0 < length xs ∧ length xs ≤ length (xs ++ ys) TACTIC:
https://github.com/katydid/proofs.git
8105af686a3bdf193909567f5165835001240640
Katydid/Std/Lists.lean
list_prefix_is_gt_zero_and_leq
[850, 1]
[872, 29]
case left => exact hl
α : Type u_1 z : α zs xs ys : List α hneq : xs ≠ [] ha : xs ++ ys = z :: zs hl : 0 < length xs ⊢ 0 < length xs
no goals
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: α : Type u_1 z : α zs xs ys : List α hneq : xs ≠ [] ha : xs ++ ys = z :: zs hl : 0 < length xs ⊢ 0 < length xs TACTIC:
https://github.com/katydid/proofs.git
8105af686a3bdf193909567f5165835001240640
Katydid/Std/Lists.lean
list_prefix_is_gt_zero_and_leq
[850, 1]
[872, 29]
case right => rw [list_app_length] apply Nat.le_add_right
α : Type u_1 z : α zs xs ys : List α hneq : xs ≠ [] ha : xs ++ ys = z :: zs hl : 0 < length xs ⊢ length xs ≤ length (xs ++ ys)
no goals
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: α : Type u_1 z : α zs xs ys : List α hneq : xs ≠ [] ha : xs ++ ys = z :: zs hl : 0 < length xs ⊢ length xs ≤ length (xs ++ ys) TACTIC:
https://github.com/katydid/proofs.git
8105af686a3bdf193909567f5165835001240640
Katydid/Std/Lists.lean
list_prefix_is_gt_zero_and_leq
[850, 1]
[872, 29]
exact hl
α : Type u_1 z : α zs xs ys : List α hneq : xs ≠ [] ha : xs ++ ys = z :: zs hl : 0 < length xs ⊢ 0 < length xs
no goals
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: α : Type u_1 z : α zs xs ys : List α hneq : xs ≠ [] ha : xs ++ ys = z :: zs hl : 0 < length xs ⊢ 0 < length xs TACTIC:
https://github.com/katydid/proofs.git
8105af686a3bdf193909567f5165835001240640
Katydid/Std/Lists.lean
list_prefix_is_gt_zero_and_leq
[850, 1]
[872, 29]
rw [list_app_length]
α : Type u_1 z : α zs xs ys : List α hneq : xs ≠ [] ha : xs ++ ys = z :: zs hl : 0 < length xs ⊢ length xs ≤ length (xs ++ ys)
α : Type u_1 z : α zs xs ys : List α hneq : xs ≠ [] ha : xs ++ ys = z :: zs hl : 0 < length xs ⊢ length xs ≤ length xs + length ys
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: α : Type u_1 z : α zs xs ys : List α hneq : xs ≠ [] ha : xs ++ ys = z :: zs hl : 0 < length xs ⊢ length xs ≤ length (xs ++ ys) TACTIC:
https://github.com/katydid/proofs.git
8105af686a3bdf193909567f5165835001240640
Katydid/Std/Lists.lean
list_prefix_is_gt_zero_and_leq
[850, 1]
[872, 29]
apply Nat.le_add_right
α : Type u_1 z : α zs xs ys : List α hneq : xs ≠ [] ha : xs ++ ys = z :: zs hl : 0 < length xs ⊢ length xs ≤ length xs + length ys
no goals
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: α : Type u_1 z : α zs xs ys : List α hneq : xs ≠ [] ha : xs ++ ys = z :: zs hl : 0 < length xs ⊢ length xs ≤ length xs + length ys TACTIC:
https://github.com/katydid/proofs.git
8105af686a3bdf193909567f5165835001240640
Katydid/Std/Lists.lean
list_prefix_is_not_empty_with_index_gt_zero
[874, 1]
[888, 41]
intro xs n range h
α : Type u_1 ⊢ ∀ (xs : List α) (n : ℕ), 0 < n ∧ n ≤ length xs → take n xs ≠ []
α : Type u_1 xs : List α n : ℕ range : 0 < n ∧ n ≤ length xs h : take n xs = [] ⊢ False
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: α : Type u_1 ⊢ ∀ (xs : List α) (n : ℕ), 0 < n ∧ n ≤ length xs → take n xs ≠ [] TACTIC:
https://github.com/katydid/proofs.git
8105af686a3bdf193909567f5165835001240640
Katydid/Std/Lists.lean
list_prefix_is_not_empty_with_index_gt_zero
[874, 1]
[888, 41]
cases range with | intro notzero max => cases n with | zero => contradiction | succ n => cases xs with | nil => contradiction | cons x xs => simp only [succ_pos', take] at *
α : Type u_1 xs : List α n : ℕ range : 0 < n ∧ n ≤ length xs h : take n xs = [] ⊢ False
no goals
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: α : Type u_1 xs : List α n : ℕ range : 0 < n ∧ n ≤ length xs h : take n xs = [] ⊢ False TACTIC:
https://github.com/katydid/proofs.git
8105af686a3bdf193909567f5165835001240640
Katydid/Std/Lists.lean
list_prefix_is_not_empty_with_index_gt_zero
[874, 1]
[888, 41]
cases n with | zero => contradiction | succ n => cases xs with | nil => contradiction | cons x xs => simp only [succ_pos', take] at *
case intro α : Type u_1 xs : List α n : ℕ h : take n xs = [] notzero : 0 < n max : n ≤ length xs ⊢ False
no goals
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case intro α : Type u_1 xs : List α n : ℕ h : take n xs = [] notzero : 0 < n max : n ≤ length xs ⊢ False TACTIC:
https://github.com/katydid/proofs.git
8105af686a3bdf193909567f5165835001240640
Katydid/Std/Lists.lean
list_prefix_is_not_empty_with_index_gt_zero
[874, 1]
[888, 41]
contradiction
case intro.zero α : Type u_1 xs : List α h : take zero xs = [] notzero : 0 < zero max : zero ≤ length xs ⊢ False
no goals
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case intro.zero α : Type u_1 xs : List α h : take zero xs = [] notzero : 0 < zero max : zero ≤ length xs ⊢ False TACTIC:
https://github.com/katydid/proofs.git
8105af686a3bdf193909567f5165835001240640
Katydid/Std/Lists.lean
list_prefix_is_not_empty_with_index_gt_zero
[874, 1]
[888, 41]
cases xs with | nil => contradiction | cons x xs => simp only [succ_pos', take] at *
case intro.succ α : Type u_1 xs : List α n : ℕ h : take (succ n) xs = [] notzero : 0 < succ n max : succ n ≤ length xs ⊢ False
no goals
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case intro.succ α : Type u_1 xs : List α n : ℕ h : take (succ n) xs = [] notzero : 0 < succ n max : succ n ≤ length xs ⊢ False TACTIC:
https://github.com/katydid/proofs.git
8105af686a3bdf193909567f5165835001240640
Katydid/Std/Lists.lean
list_prefix_is_not_empty_with_index_gt_zero
[874, 1]
[888, 41]
contradiction
case intro.succ.nil α : Type u_1 n : ℕ notzero : 0 < succ n h : take (succ n) [] = [] max : succ n ≤ length [] ⊢ False
no goals
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case intro.succ.nil α : Type u_1 n : ℕ notzero : 0 < succ n h : take (succ n) [] = [] max : succ n ≤ length [] ⊢ False TACTIC:
https://github.com/katydid/proofs.git
8105af686a3bdf193909567f5165835001240640
Katydid/Std/Lists.lean
list_prefix_is_not_empty_with_index_gt_zero
[874, 1]
[888, 41]
simp only [succ_pos', take] at *
case intro.succ.cons α : Type u_1 n : ℕ notzero : 0 < succ n x : α xs : List α h : take (succ n) (x :: xs) = [] max : succ n ≤ length (x :: xs) ⊢ False
no goals
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case intro.succ.cons α : Type u_1 n : ℕ notzero : 0 < succ n x : α xs : List α h : take (succ n) (x :: xs) = [] max : succ n ≤ length (x :: xs) ⊢ False TACTIC:
https://github.com/katydid/proofs.git
8105af686a3bdf193909567f5165835001240640
Katydid/Std/Lists.lean
list_app_uncons
[890, 1]
[918, 13]
intro x xs ys zs H
α : Type u_1 ⊢ ∀ {x : α} {xs ys zs : List α}, ys ++ zs = x :: xs → ys = [] ∧ zs = x :: xs ∨ ∃ ys', ∃ (_ : ys = x :: ys'), ys' ++ zs = xs
α : Type u_1 x : α xs ys zs : List α H : ys ++ zs = x :: xs ⊢ ys = [] ∧ zs = x :: xs ∨ ∃ ys', ∃ (_ : ys = x :: ys'), ys' ++ zs = xs
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: α : Type u_1 ⊢ ∀ {x : α} {xs ys zs : List α}, ys ++ zs = x :: xs → ys = [] ∧ zs = x :: xs ∨ ∃ ys', ∃ (_ : ys = x :: ys'), ys' ++ zs = xs TACTIC:
https://github.com/katydid/proofs.git
8105af686a3bdf193909567f5165835001240640
Katydid/Std/Lists.lean
list_app_uncons
[890, 1]
[918, 13]
apply Or.inl
case nil α : Type u_1 x : α xs zs : List α H : [] ++ zs = x :: xs ⊢ [] = [] ∧ zs = x :: xs ∨ ∃ ys', ∃ (_ : [] = x :: ys'), ys' ++ zs = xs
case nil.h α : Type u_1 x : α xs zs : List α H : [] ++ zs = x :: xs ⊢ [] = [] ∧ zs = x :: xs
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case nil α : Type u_1 x : α xs zs : List α H : [] ++ zs = x :: xs ⊢ [] = [] ∧ zs = x :: xs ∨ ∃ ys', ∃ (_ : [] = x :: ys'), ys' ++ zs = xs TACTIC:
https://github.com/katydid/proofs.git
8105af686a3bdf193909567f5165835001240640
Katydid/Std/Lists.lean
list_app_uncons
[890, 1]
[918, 13]
apply And.intro
case nil.h α : Type u_1 x : α xs zs : List α H : [] ++ zs = x :: xs ⊢ [] = [] ∧ zs = x :: xs
case nil.h.left α : Type u_1 x : α xs zs : List α H : [] ++ zs = x :: xs ⊢ [] = [] case nil.h.right α : Type u_1 x : α xs zs : List α H : [] ++ zs = x :: xs ⊢ zs = x :: xs
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case nil.h α : Type u_1 x : α xs zs : List α H : [] ++ zs = x :: xs ⊢ [] = [] ∧ zs = x :: xs TACTIC:
https://github.com/katydid/proofs.git
8105af686a3bdf193909567f5165835001240640
Katydid/Std/Lists.lean
list_app_uncons
[890, 1]
[918, 13]
rfl
case nil.h.left α : Type u_1 x : α xs zs : List α H : [] ++ zs = x :: xs ⊢ [] = []
no goals
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case nil.h.left α : Type u_1 x : α xs zs : List α H : [] ++ zs = x :: xs ⊢ [] = [] TACTIC:
https://github.com/katydid/proofs.git
8105af686a3bdf193909567f5165835001240640
Katydid/Std/Lists.lean
list_app_uncons
[890, 1]
[918, 13]
simp only [nil_append] at H
case nil.h.right α : Type u_1 x : α xs zs : List α H : [] ++ zs = x :: xs ⊢ zs = x :: xs
case nil.h.right α : Type u_1 x : α xs zs : List α H : zs = x :: xs ⊢ zs = x :: xs
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case nil.h.right α : Type u_1 x : α xs zs : List α H : [] ++ zs = x :: xs ⊢ zs = x :: xs TACTIC:
https://github.com/katydid/proofs.git
8105af686a3bdf193909567f5165835001240640
Katydid/Std/Lists.lean
list_app_uncons
[890, 1]
[918, 13]
assumption
case nil.h.right α : Type u_1 x : α xs zs : List α H : zs = x :: xs ⊢ zs = x :: xs
no goals
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case nil.h.right α : Type u_1 x : α xs zs : List α H : zs = x :: xs ⊢ zs = x :: xs TACTIC:
https://github.com/katydid/proofs.git
8105af686a3bdf193909567f5165835001240640
Katydid/Std/Lists.lean
list_app_uncons
[890, 1]
[918, 13]
apply Or.inr
case cons α : Type u_1 x : α xs zs : List α y_ : α ys_ : List α H : y_ :: ys_ ++ zs = x :: xs ⊢ y_ :: ys_ = [] ∧ zs = x :: xs ∨ ∃ ys', ∃ (_ : y_ :: ys_ = x :: ys'), ys' ++ zs = xs
case cons.h α : Type u_1 x : α xs zs : List α y_ : α ys_ : List α H : y_ :: ys_ ++ zs = x :: xs ⊢ ∃ ys', ∃ (_ : y_ :: ys_ = x :: ys'), ys' ++ zs = xs
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case cons α : Type u_1 x : α xs zs : List α y_ : α ys_ : List α H : y_ :: ys_ ++ zs = x :: xs ⊢ y_ :: ys_ = [] ∧ zs = x :: xs ∨ ∃ ys', ∃ (_ : y_ :: ys_ = x :: ys'), ys' ++ zs = xs TACTIC:
https://github.com/katydid/proofs.git
8105af686a3bdf193909567f5165835001240640
Katydid/Std/Lists.lean
list_app_uncons
[890, 1]
[918, 13]
have H' := list_cons_eq.mp H
case cons.h α : Type u_1 x : α xs zs : List α y_ : α ys_ : List α H : y_ :: ys_ ++ zs = x :: xs ⊢ ∃ ys', ∃ (_ : y_ :: ys_ = x :: ys'), ys' ++ zs = xs
case cons.h α : Type u_1 x : α xs zs : List α y_ : α ys_ : List α H : y_ :: ys_ ++ zs = x :: xs H' : y_ = x ∧ List.append ys_ zs = xs ⊢ ∃ ys', ∃ (_ : y_ :: ys_ = x :: ys'), ys' ++ zs = xs
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case cons.h α : Type u_1 x : α xs zs : List α y_ : α ys_ : List α H : y_ :: ys_ ++ zs = x :: xs ⊢ ∃ ys', ∃ (_ : y_ :: ys_ = x :: ys'), ys' ++ zs = xs TACTIC:
https://github.com/katydid/proofs.git
8105af686a3bdf193909567f5165835001240640
Katydid/Std/Lists.lean
list_app_uncons
[890, 1]
[918, 13]
have HR := H'.right
case cons.h α : Type u_1 x : α xs zs : List α y_ : α ys_ : List α H : y_ :: ys_ ++ zs = x :: xs H' : y_ = x ∧ List.append ys_ zs = xs ⊢ ∃ ys', ∃ (_ : y_ :: ys_ = x :: ys'), ys' ++ zs = xs
case cons.h α : Type u_1 x : α xs zs : List α y_ : α ys_ : List α H : y_ :: ys_ ++ zs = x :: xs H' : y_ = x ∧ List.append ys_ zs = xs HR : List.append ys_ zs = xs ⊢ ∃ ys', ∃ (_ : y_ :: ys_ = x :: ys'), ys' ++ zs = xs
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case cons.h α : Type u_1 x : α xs zs : List α y_ : α ys_ : List α H : y_ :: ys_ ++ zs = x :: xs H' : y_ = x ∧ List.append ys_ zs = xs ⊢ ∃ ys', ∃ (_ : y_ :: ys_ = x :: ys'), ys' ++ zs = xs TACTIC:
https://github.com/katydid/proofs.git
8105af686a3bdf193909567f5165835001240640
Katydid/Std/Lists.lean
list_app_uncons
[890, 1]
[918, 13]
have HL := H'.left
case cons.h α : Type u_1 x : α xs zs : List α y_ : α ys_ : List α H : y_ :: ys_ ++ zs = x :: xs H' : y_ = x ∧ List.append ys_ zs = xs HR : List.append ys_ zs = xs ⊢ ∃ ys', ∃ (_ : y_ :: ys_ = x :: ys'), ys' ++ zs = xs
case cons.h α : Type u_1 x : α xs zs : List α y_ : α ys_ : List α H : y_ :: ys_ ++ zs = x :: xs H' : y_ = x ∧ List.append ys_ zs = xs HR : List.append ys_ zs = xs HL : y_ = x ⊢ ∃ ys', ∃ (_ : y_ :: ys_ = x :: ys'), ys' ++ zs = xs
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case cons.h α : Type u_1 x : α xs zs : List α y_ : α ys_ : List α H : y_ :: ys_ ++ zs = x :: xs H' : y_ = x ∧ List.append ys_ zs = xs HR : List.append ys_ zs = xs ⊢ ∃ ys', ∃ (_ : y_ :: ys_ = x :: ys'), ys' ++ zs = xs TACTIC:
https://github.com/katydid/proofs.git
8105af686a3bdf193909567f5165835001240640
Katydid/Std/Lists.lean
list_app_uncons
[890, 1]
[918, 13]
apply Exists.intro ys_
case cons.h α : Type u_1 x : α xs zs : List α y_ : α ys_ : List α H : y_ :: ys_ ++ zs = x :: xs H' : y_ = x ∧ List.append ys_ zs = xs HR : List.append ys_ zs = xs HL : y_ = x ⊢ ∃ ys', ∃ (_ : y_ :: ys_ = x :: ys'), ys' ++ zs = xs
case cons.h α : Type u_1 x : α xs zs : List α y_ : α ys_ : List α H : y_ :: ys_ ++ zs = x :: xs H' : y_ = x ∧ List.append ys_ zs = xs HR : List.append ys_ zs = xs HL : y_ = x ⊢ ∃ (_ : y_ :: ys_ = x :: ys_), ys_ ++ zs = xs
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case cons.h α : Type u_1 x : α xs zs : List α y_ : α ys_ : List α H : y_ :: ys_ ++ zs = x :: xs H' : y_ = x ∧ List.append ys_ zs = xs HR : List.append ys_ zs = xs HL : y_ = x ⊢ ∃ ys', ∃ (_ : y_ :: ys_ = x :: ys'), ys' ++ zs = xs TACTIC:
https://github.com/katydid/proofs.git
8105af686a3bdf193909567f5165835001240640
Katydid/Std/Lists.lean
list_app_uncons
[890, 1]
[918, 13]
rw [HL]
case cons.h α : Type u_1 x : α xs zs : List α y_ : α ys_ : List α H : y_ :: ys_ ++ zs = x :: xs H' : y_ = x ∧ List.append ys_ zs = xs HR : List.append ys_ zs = xs HL : y_ = x ⊢ ∃ (_ : y_ :: ys_ = x :: ys_), ys_ ++ zs = xs
case cons.h α : Type u_1 x : α xs zs : List α y_ : α ys_ : List α H : y_ :: ys_ ++ zs = x :: xs H' : y_ = x ∧ List.append ys_ zs = xs HR : List.append ys_ zs = xs HL : y_ = x ⊢ ∃ (_ : x :: ys_ = x :: ys_), ys_ ++ zs = xs
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case cons.h α : Type u_1 x : α xs zs : List α y_ : α ys_ : List α H : y_ :: ys_ ++ zs = x :: xs H' : y_ = x ∧ List.append ys_ zs = xs HR : List.append ys_ zs = xs HL : y_ = x ⊢ ∃ (_ : y_ :: ys_ = x :: ys_), ys_ ++ zs = xs TACTIC:
https://github.com/katydid/proofs.git
8105af686a3bdf193909567f5165835001240640
Katydid/Std/Lists.lean
list_app_uncons
[890, 1]
[918, 13]
apply Exists.intro rfl
case cons.h α : Type u_1 x : α xs zs : List α y_ : α ys_ : List α H : y_ :: ys_ ++ zs = x :: xs H' : y_ = x ∧ List.append ys_ zs = xs HR : List.append ys_ zs = xs HL : y_ = x ⊢ ∃ (_ : x :: ys_ = x :: ys_), ys_ ++ zs = xs
case cons.h α : Type u_1 x : α xs zs : List α y_ : α ys_ : List α H : y_ :: ys_ ++ zs = x :: xs H' : y_ = x ∧ List.append ys_ zs = xs HR : List.append ys_ zs = xs HL : y_ = x ⊢ ys_ ++ zs = xs
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case cons.h α : Type u_1 x : α xs zs : List α y_ : α ys_ : List α H : y_ :: ys_ ++ zs = x :: xs H' : y_ = x ∧ List.append ys_ zs = xs HR : List.append ys_ zs = xs HL : y_ = x ⊢ ∃ (_ : x :: ys_ = x :: ys_), ys_ ++ zs = xs TACTIC:
https://github.com/katydid/proofs.git
8105af686a3bdf193909567f5165835001240640
Katydid/Std/Lists.lean
list_app_uncons
[890, 1]
[918, 13]
exact HR
case cons.h α : Type u_1 x : α xs zs : List α y_ : α ys_ : List α H : y_ :: ys_ ++ zs = x :: xs H' : y_ = x ∧ List.append ys_ zs = xs HR : List.append ys_ zs = xs HL : y_ = x ⊢ ys_ ++ zs = xs
no goals
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case cons.h α : Type u_1 x : α xs zs : List α y_ : α ys_ : List α H : y_ :: ys_ ++ zs = x :: xs H' : y_ = x ∧ List.append ys_ zs = xs HR : List.append ys_ zs = xs HL : y_ = x ⊢ ys_ ++ zs = xs TACTIC:
https://github.com/katydid/proofs.git
8105af686a3bdf193909567f5165835001240640
Katydid/Std/Lists.lean
list_app_inv_head
[920, 1]
[924, 13]
intro xs ys zs H
α : Type u_1 ⊢ ∀ {xs ys zs : List α}, xs ++ ys = xs ++ zs → ys = zs
α : Type u_1 xs ys zs : List α H : xs ++ ys = xs ++ zs ⊢ ys = zs
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: α : Type u_1 ⊢ ∀ {xs ys zs : List α}, xs ++ ys = xs ++ zs → ys = zs TACTIC:
https://github.com/katydid/proofs.git
8105af686a3bdf193909567f5165835001240640
Katydid/Std/Lists.lean
list_app_inv_head
[920, 1]
[924, 13]
simp only [append_cancel_left_eq] at H
α : Type u_1 xs ys zs : List α H : xs ++ ys = xs ++ zs ⊢ ys = zs
α : Type u_1 xs ys zs : List α H : ys = zs ⊢ ys = zs
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: α : Type u_1 xs ys zs : List α H : xs ++ ys = xs ++ zs ⊢ ys = zs TACTIC:
https://github.com/katydid/proofs.git
8105af686a3bdf193909567f5165835001240640
Katydid/Std/Lists.lean
list_app_inv_head
[920, 1]
[924, 13]
assumption
α : Type u_1 xs ys zs : List α H : ys = zs ⊢ ys = zs
no goals
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: α : Type u_1 xs ys zs : List α H : ys = zs ⊢ ys = zs TACTIC:
https://github.com/katydid/proofs.git
8105af686a3bdf193909567f5165835001240640
Katydid/Std/Lists.lean
list_app_inv_head_reverse
[926, 1]
[930, 13]
intro xs ys zs H
α : Type u_1 ⊢ ∀ {xs ys zs : List α}, ys = zs → xs ++ ys = xs ++ zs
α : Type u_1 xs ys zs : List α H : ys = zs ⊢ xs ++ ys = xs ++ zs
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: α : Type u_1 ⊢ ∀ {xs ys zs : List α}, ys = zs → xs ++ ys = xs ++ zs TACTIC:
https://github.com/katydid/proofs.git
8105af686a3bdf193909567f5165835001240640
Katydid/Std/Lists.lean
list_app_inv_head_reverse
[926, 1]
[930, 13]
simp only [append_cancel_left_eq]
α : Type u_1 xs ys zs : List α H : ys = zs ⊢ xs ++ ys = xs ++ zs
α : Type u_1 xs ys zs : List α H : ys = zs ⊢ ys = zs
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: α : Type u_1 xs ys zs : List α H : ys = zs ⊢ xs ++ ys = xs ++ zs TACTIC:
https://github.com/katydid/proofs.git
8105af686a3bdf193909567f5165835001240640
Katydid/Std/Lists.lean
list_app_inv_head_reverse
[926, 1]
[930, 13]
assumption
α : Type u_1 xs ys zs : List α H : ys = zs ⊢ ys = zs
no goals
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: α : Type u_1 xs ys zs : List α H : ys = zs ⊢ ys = zs TACTIC:
https://github.com/katydid/proofs.git
8105af686a3bdf193909567f5165835001240640
Katydid/Std/Lists.lean
list_app_inv_tail
[932, 1]
[936, 13]
intro xs ys zs H
α : Type u_1 ⊢ ∀ {xs ys zs : List α}, xs ++ zs = ys ++ zs → xs = ys
α : Type u_1 xs ys zs : List α H : xs ++ zs = ys ++ zs ⊢ xs = ys
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: α : Type u_1 ⊢ ∀ {xs ys zs : List α}, xs ++ zs = ys ++ zs → xs = ys TACTIC:
https://github.com/katydid/proofs.git
8105af686a3bdf193909567f5165835001240640
Katydid/Std/Lists.lean
list_app_inv_tail
[932, 1]
[936, 13]
simp only [append_cancel_right_eq] at H
α : Type u_1 xs ys zs : List α H : xs ++ zs = ys ++ zs ⊢ xs = ys
α : Type u_1 xs ys zs : List α H : xs = ys ⊢ xs = ys
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: α : Type u_1 xs ys zs : List α H : xs ++ zs = ys ++ zs ⊢ xs = ys TACTIC:
https://github.com/katydid/proofs.git
8105af686a3bdf193909567f5165835001240640
Katydid/Std/Lists.lean
list_app_inv_tail
[932, 1]
[936, 13]
assumption
α : Type u_1 xs ys zs : List α H : xs = ys ⊢ xs = ys
no goals
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: α : Type u_1 xs ys zs : List α H : xs = ys ⊢ xs = ys TACTIC:
https://github.com/katydid/proofs.git
8105af686a3bdf193909567f5165835001240640
Katydid/Std/Lists.lean
list_app_inv_tail_reverse
[938, 1]
[942, 13]
intro xs ys zs H
α : Type u_1 ⊢ ∀ {xs ys zs : List α}, xs = ys → xs ++ zs = ys ++ zs
α : Type u_1 xs ys zs : List α H : xs = ys ⊢ xs ++ zs = ys ++ zs
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: α : Type u_1 ⊢ ∀ {xs ys zs : List α}, xs = ys → xs ++ zs = ys ++ zs TACTIC:
https://github.com/katydid/proofs.git
8105af686a3bdf193909567f5165835001240640
Katydid/Std/Lists.lean
list_app_inv_tail_reverse
[938, 1]
[942, 13]
simp only [append_cancel_right_eq]
α : Type u_1 xs ys zs : List α H : xs = ys ⊢ xs ++ zs = ys ++ zs
α : Type u_1 xs ys zs : List α H : xs = ys ⊢ xs = ys
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: α : Type u_1 xs ys zs : List α H : xs = ys ⊢ xs ++ zs = ys ++ zs TACTIC:
https://github.com/katydid/proofs.git
8105af686a3bdf193909567f5165835001240640
Katydid/Std/Lists.lean
list_app_inv_tail_reverse
[938, 1]
[942, 13]
assumption
α : Type u_1 xs ys zs : List α H : xs = ys ⊢ xs = ys
no goals
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: α : Type u_1 xs ys zs : List α H : xs = ys ⊢ xs = ys TACTIC:
https://github.com/katydid/proofs.git
8105af686a3bdf193909567f5165835001240640
Katydid/Std/Simp.lean
nat_min_zero
[5, 9]
[9, 7]
unfold min
n : Nat ⊢ min 0 n = 0
n : Nat ⊢ instMinNat.1 0 n = 0
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: n : Nat ⊢ min 0 n = 0 TACTIC:
https://github.com/katydid/proofs.git
8105af686a3bdf193909567f5165835001240640
Katydid/Std/Simp.lean
nat_min_zero
[5, 9]
[9, 7]
unfold instMinNat
n : Nat ⊢ instMinNat.1 0 n = 0
n : Nat ⊢ minOfLe.1 0 n = 0
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: n : Nat ⊢ instMinNat.1 0 n = 0 TACTIC:
https://github.com/katydid/proofs.git
8105af686a3bdf193909567f5165835001240640
Katydid/Std/Simp.lean
nat_min_zero
[5, 9]
[9, 7]
unfold minOfLe
n : Nat ⊢ minOfLe.1 0 n = 0
n : Nat ⊢ { min := fun x y => if x ≤ y then x else y }.1 0 n = 0
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: n : Nat ⊢ minOfLe.1 0 n = 0 TACTIC:
https://github.com/katydid/proofs.git
8105af686a3bdf193909567f5165835001240640
Katydid/Std/Simp.lean
nat_min_zero
[5, 9]
[9, 7]
simp
n : Nat ⊢ { min := fun x y => if x ≤ y then x else y }.1 0 n = 0
no goals
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: n : Nat ⊢ { min := fun x y => if x ≤ y then x else y }.1 0 n = 0 TACTIC:
https://github.com/katydid/proofs.git
8105af686a3bdf193909567f5165835001240640
Katydid/Std/Simp.lean
nat_min_zero'
[11, 1]
[12, 7]
simp
n : Nat ⊢ min 0 n = 0
no goals
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: n : Nat ⊢ min 0 n = 0 TACTIC:
https://github.com/katydid/proofs.git
8105af686a3bdf193909567f5165835001240640
Katydid/Conal/Calculus.lean
nullable_emptySet
[69, 1]
[74, 6]
intro α
⊢ (α : Type) → ν' ∅ ≡ PEmpty.{1}
α : Type ⊢ ν' ∅ ≡ PEmpty.{1}
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: ⊢ (α : Type) → ν' ∅ ≡ PEmpty.{1} TACTIC:
https://github.com/katydid/proofs.git
8105af686a3bdf193909567f5165835001240640
Katydid/Conal/Calculus.lean
nullable_emptySet
[69, 1]
[74, 6]
constructor
α : Type ⊢ ν' ∅ ≡ PEmpty.{1}
case a α : Type ⊢ ν' ∅ = PEmpty.{1}
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: α : Type ⊢ ν' ∅ ≡ PEmpty.{1} TACTIC:
https://github.com/katydid/proofs.git
8105af686a3bdf193909567f5165835001240640
Katydid/Conal/Calculus.lean
nullable_emptySet
[69, 1]
[74, 6]
rfl
case a α : Type ⊢ ν' ∅ = PEmpty.{1}
no goals
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case a α : Type ⊢ ν' ∅ = PEmpty.{1} TACTIC:
https://github.com/katydid/proofs.git
8105af686a3bdf193909567f5165835001240640
Katydid/Conal/Calculus.lean
nullable_universal
[78, 1]
[83, 6]
intro α
⊢ (α : Type) → ν' 𝒰 ≡ PUnit.{1}
α : Type ⊢ ν' 𝒰 ≡ PUnit.{1}
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: ⊢ (α : Type) → ν' 𝒰 ≡ PUnit.{1} TACTIC:
https://github.com/katydid/proofs.git
8105af686a3bdf193909567f5165835001240640
Katydid/Conal/Calculus.lean
nullable_universal
[78, 1]
[83, 6]
constructor
α : Type ⊢ ν' 𝒰 ≡ PUnit.{1}
case a α : Type ⊢ ν' 𝒰 = PUnit.{1}
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: α : Type ⊢ ν' 𝒰 ≡ PUnit.{1} TACTIC:
https://github.com/katydid/proofs.git
8105af686a3bdf193909567f5165835001240640
Katydid/Conal/Calculus.lean
nullable_universal
[78, 1]
[83, 6]
rfl
case a α : Type ⊢ ν' 𝒰 = PUnit.{1}
no goals
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case a α : Type ⊢ ν' 𝒰 = PUnit.{1} TACTIC:
https://github.com/katydid/proofs.git
8105af686a3bdf193909567f5165835001240640
Katydid/Conal/Calculus.lean
nullable_emptyStr
[91, 1]
[105, 7]
intro α
⊢ (α : Type) → ν' ε ≃ PUnit.{u_1}
α : Type ⊢ ν' ε ≃ PUnit.{u_1}
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: ⊢ (α : Type) → ν' ε ≃ PUnit.{u_1} TACTIC:
https://github.com/katydid/proofs.git
8105af686a3bdf193909567f5165835001240640
Katydid/Conal/Calculus.lean
nullable_emptyStr
[91, 1]
[105, 7]
refine Equiv.mk ?a ?b ?c ?d
α : Type ⊢ ν' ε ≃ PUnit.{u_1}
case a α : Type ⊢ ν' ε → PUnit.{u_1} case b α : Type ⊢ PUnit.{u_1} → ν' ε case c α : Type ⊢ Function.LeftInverse ?b ?a case d α : Type ⊢ Function.RightInverse ?b ?a
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: α : Type ⊢ ν' ε ≃ PUnit.{u_1} TACTIC:
https://github.com/katydid/proofs.git
8105af686a3bdf193909567f5165835001240640
Katydid/Conal/Calculus.lean
nullable_emptyStr
[91, 1]
[105, 7]
intro _
case a α : Type ⊢ ν' ε → PUnit.{u_1} case b α : Type ⊢ PUnit.{u_1} → ν' ε case c α : Type ⊢ Function.LeftInverse ?b ?a case d α : Type ⊢ Function.RightInverse ?b ?a
case a α : Type a✝ : ν' ε ⊢ PUnit.{u_1} case b α : Type ⊢ PUnit.{u_1} → ν' ε case c α : Type ⊢ Function.LeftInverse ?b fun a => ?m.3703 a case d α : Type ⊢ Function.RightInverse ?b fun a => ?m.3703 a
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case a α : Type ⊢ ν' ε → PUnit.{u_1} case b α : Type ⊢ PUnit.{u_1} → ν' ε case c α : Type ⊢ Function.LeftInverse ?b ?a case d α : Type ⊢ Function.RightInverse ?b ?a TACTIC:
https://github.com/katydid/proofs.git
8105af686a3bdf193909567f5165835001240640
Katydid/Conal/Calculus.lean
nullable_emptyStr
[91, 1]
[105, 7]
exact PUnit.unit
case a α : Type a✝ : ν' ε ⊢ PUnit.{u_1} case b α : Type ⊢ PUnit.{u_1} → ν' ε case c α : Type ⊢ Function.LeftInverse ?b fun a => ?m.3703 a case d α : Type ⊢ Function.RightInverse ?b fun a => ?m.3703 a
case b α : Type ⊢ PUnit.{u_1} → ν' ε case c α : Type ⊢ Function.LeftInverse ?b fun a => PUnit.unit case d α : Type ⊢ Function.RightInverse ?b fun a => PUnit.unit
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case a α : Type a✝ : ν' ε ⊢ PUnit.{u_1} case b α : Type ⊢ PUnit.{u_1} → ν' ε case c α : Type ⊢ Function.LeftInverse ?b fun a => ?m.3703 a case d α : Type ⊢ Function.RightInverse ?b fun a => ?m.3703 a TACTIC:
https://github.com/katydid/proofs.git
8105af686a3bdf193909567f5165835001240640
Katydid/Conal/Calculus.lean
nullable_emptyStr
[91, 1]
[105, 7]
intro _
case b α : Type ⊢ PUnit.{u_1} → ν' ε case c α : Type ⊢ Function.LeftInverse ?b fun a => PUnit.unit case d α : Type ⊢ Function.RightInverse ?b fun a => PUnit.unit
case b α : Type a✝ : PUnit.{u_1} ⊢ ν' ε case c α : Type ⊢ Function.LeftInverse (fun a => ?m.3707 a) fun a => PUnit.unit case d α : Type ⊢ Function.RightInverse (fun a => ?m.3707 a) fun a => PUnit.unit
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case b α : Type ⊢ PUnit.{u_1} → ν' ε case c α : Type ⊢ Function.LeftInverse ?b fun a => PUnit.unit case d α : Type ⊢ Function.RightInverse ?b fun a => PUnit.unit TACTIC:
https://github.com/katydid/proofs.git
8105af686a3bdf193909567f5165835001240640
Katydid/Conal/Calculus.lean
nullable_emptyStr
[91, 1]
[105, 7]
constructor
case b α : Type a✝ : PUnit.{u_1} ⊢ ν' ε case c α : Type ⊢ Function.LeftInverse (fun a => ?m.3707 a) fun a => PUnit.unit case d α : Type ⊢ Function.RightInverse (fun a => ?m.3707 a) fun a => PUnit.unit
case b.a α : Type a✝ : PUnit.{u_1} ⊢ [] = [] case c α : Type ⊢ Function.LeftInverse (fun a => ?m.3707 a) fun a => PUnit.unit case d α : Type ⊢ Function.RightInverse (fun a => ?m.3707 a) fun a => PUnit.unit
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case b α : Type a✝ : PUnit.{u_1} ⊢ ν' ε case c α : Type ⊢ Function.LeftInverse (fun a => ?m.3707 a) fun a => PUnit.unit case d α : Type ⊢ Function.RightInverse (fun a => ?m.3707 a) fun a => PUnit.unit TACTIC:
https://github.com/katydid/proofs.git
8105af686a3bdf193909567f5165835001240640
Katydid/Conal/Calculus.lean
nullable_emptyStr
[91, 1]
[105, 7]
rfl
case b.a α : Type a✝ : PUnit.{u_1} ⊢ [] = [] case c α : Type ⊢ Function.LeftInverse (fun a => ?m.3707 a) fun a => PUnit.unit case d α : Type ⊢ Function.RightInverse (fun a => ?m.3707 a) fun a => PUnit.unit
case c α : Type ⊢ Function.LeftInverse (fun a => TEq.mk (_ : [] = [])) fun a => PUnit.unit case d α : Type ⊢ Function.RightInverse (fun a => TEq.mk (_ : [] = [])) fun a => PUnit.unit
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case b.a α : Type a✝ : PUnit.{u_1} ⊢ [] = [] case c α : Type ⊢ Function.LeftInverse (fun a => ?m.3707 a) fun a => PUnit.unit case d α : Type ⊢ Function.RightInverse (fun a => ?m.3707 a) fun a => PUnit.unit TACTIC:
https://github.com/katydid/proofs.git
8105af686a3bdf193909567f5165835001240640
Katydid/Conal/Calculus.lean
nullable_emptyStr
[91, 1]
[105, 7]
intro c
case c α : Type ⊢ Function.LeftInverse (fun a => TEq.mk (_ : [] = [])) fun a => PUnit.unit case d α : Type ⊢ Function.RightInverse (fun a => TEq.mk (_ : [] = [])) fun a => PUnit.unit
case c α : Type c : ν' ε ⊢ (fun a => TEq.mk (_ : [] = [])) ((fun a => PUnit.unit) c) = c case d α : Type ⊢ Function.RightInverse (fun a => TEq.mk (_ : [] = [])) fun a => PUnit.unit
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case c α : Type ⊢ Function.LeftInverse (fun a => TEq.mk (_ : [] = [])) fun a => PUnit.unit case d α : Type ⊢ Function.RightInverse (fun a => TEq.mk (_ : [] = [])) fun a => PUnit.unit TACTIC:
https://github.com/katydid/proofs.git
8105af686a3bdf193909567f5165835001240640
Katydid/Conal/Calculus.lean
nullable_emptyStr
[91, 1]
[105, 7]
simp
case c α : Type c : ν' ε ⊢ (fun a => TEq.mk (_ : [] = [])) ((fun a => PUnit.unit) c) = c case d α : Type ⊢ Function.RightInverse (fun a => TEq.mk (_ : [] = [])) fun a => PUnit.unit
case c α : Type c : ν' ε ⊢ TEq.mk (_ : [] = []) = c case d α : Type ⊢ Function.RightInverse (fun a => TEq.mk (_ : [] = [])) fun a => PUnit.unit
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case c α : Type c : ν' ε ⊢ (fun a => TEq.mk (_ : [] = [])) ((fun a => PUnit.unit) c) = c case d α : Type ⊢ Function.RightInverse (fun a => TEq.mk (_ : [] = [])) fun a => PUnit.unit TACTIC:
https://github.com/katydid/proofs.git
8105af686a3bdf193909567f5165835001240640
Katydid/Conal/Calculus.lean
nullable_emptyStr
[91, 1]
[105, 7]
constructor
case c α : Type c : ν' ε ⊢ TEq.mk (_ : [] = []) = c case d α : Type ⊢ Function.RightInverse (fun a => TEq.mk (_ : [] = [])) fun a => PUnit.unit
case d α : Type ⊢ Function.RightInverse (fun a => TEq.mk (_ : [] = [])) fun a => PUnit.unit
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case c α : Type c : ν' ε ⊢ TEq.mk (_ : [] = []) = c case d α : Type ⊢ Function.RightInverse (fun a => TEq.mk (_ : [] = [])) fun a => PUnit.unit TACTIC:
https://github.com/katydid/proofs.git
8105af686a3bdf193909567f5165835001240640
Katydid/Conal/Calculus.lean
nullable_emptyStr
[91, 1]
[105, 7]
intro _
case d α : Type ⊢ Function.RightInverse (fun a => TEq.mk (_ : [] = [])) fun a => PUnit.unit
case d α : Type x✝ : PUnit.{u_1} ⊢ (fun a => PUnit.unit) ((fun a => TEq.mk (_ : [] = [])) x✝) = x✝
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case d α : Type ⊢ Function.RightInverse (fun a => TEq.mk (_ : [] = [])) fun a => PUnit.unit TACTIC:
https://github.com/katydid/proofs.git
8105af686a3bdf193909567f5165835001240640
Katydid/Conal/Calculus.lean
nullable_emptyStr
[91, 1]
[105, 7]
simp
case d α : Type x✝ : PUnit.{u_1} ⊢ (fun a => PUnit.unit) ((fun a => TEq.mk (_ : [] = [])) x✝) = x✝
no goals
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case d α : Type x✝ : PUnit.{u_1} ⊢ (fun a => PUnit.unit) ((fun a => TEq.mk (_ : [] = [])) x✝) = x✝ TACTIC:
https://github.com/katydid/proofs.git
8105af686a3bdf193909567f5165835001240640
Katydid/Conal/Calculus.lean
nullable_emptyStr'
[107, 1]
[114, 14]
constructor
x✝¹ : Type x✝ : PUnit.{u_1} ⊢ ν' ε
case a x✝¹ : Type x✝ : PUnit.{u_1} ⊢ [] = []
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: x✝¹ : Type x✝ : PUnit.{u_1} ⊢ ν' ε TACTIC:
https://github.com/katydid/proofs.git
8105af686a3bdf193909567f5165835001240640
Katydid/Conal/Calculus.lean
nullable_emptyStr'
[107, 1]
[114, 14]
rfl
case a x✝¹ : Type x✝ : PUnit.{u_1} ⊢ [] = []
no goals
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case a x✝¹ : Type x✝ : PUnit.{u_1} ⊢ [] = [] TACTIC:
https://github.com/katydid/proofs.git
8105af686a3bdf193909567f5165835001240640
Katydid/Conal/Calculus.lean
nullable_char
[118, 1]
[131, 8]
intro α
α : Type u_1 ⊢ (c : α) → ν' (char c) ≃ PEmpty.{u_2}
α✝ : Type u_1 α : α✝ ⊢ ν' (char α) ≃ PEmpty.{u_2}
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: α : Type u_1 ⊢ (c : α) → ν' (char c) ≃ PEmpty.{u_2} TACTIC:
https://github.com/katydid/proofs.git
8105af686a3bdf193909567f5165835001240640
Katydid/Conal/Calculus.lean
nullable_char
[118, 1]
[131, 8]
simp
α✝ : Type u_1 α : α✝ ⊢ ν' (char α) ≃ PEmpty.{u_2}
α✝ : Type u_1 α : α✝ ⊢ [] ≡ [α] ≃ PEmpty.{u_2}
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: α✝ : Type u_1 α : α✝ ⊢ ν' (char α) ≃ PEmpty.{u_2} TACTIC:
https://github.com/katydid/proofs.git
8105af686a3bdf193909567f5165835001240640
Katydid/Conal/Calculus.lean
nullable_char
[118, 1]
[131, 8]
apply Equiv.mk
α✝ : Type u_1 α : α✝ ⊢ [] ≡ [α] ≃ PEmpty.{u_2}
case left_inv α✝ : Type u_1 α : α✝ ⊢ Function.LeftInverse ?invFun ?toFun case right_inv α✝ : Type u_1 α : α✝ ⊢ Function.RightInverse ?invFun ?toFun case toFun α✝ : Type u_1 α : α✝ ⊢ [] ≡ [α] → PEmpty.{u_2} case invFun α✝ : Type u_1 α : α✝ ⊢ PEmpty.{u_2} → [] ≡ [α]
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: α✝ : Type u_1 α : α✝ ⊢ [] ≡ [α] ≃ PEmpty.{u_2} TACTIC:
https://github.com/katydid/proofs.git
8105af686a3bdf193909567f5165835001240640
Katydid/Conal/Calculus.lean
nullable_char
[118, 1]
[131, 8]
intro x
case left_inv α✝ : Type u_1 α : α✝ ⊢ Function.LeftInverse ?invFun ?toFun case right_inv α✝ : Type u_1 α : α✝ ⊢ Function.RightInverse ?invFun ?toFun case toFun α✝ : Type u_1 α : α✝ ⊢ [] ≡ [α] → PEmpty.{u_2} case invFun α✝ : Type u_1 α : α✝ ⊢ PEmpty.{u_2} → [] ≡ [α]
case left_inv α✝ : Type u_1 α : α✝ x : [] ≡ [α] ⊢ ?invFun (?toFun x) = x case right_inv α✝ : Type u_1 α : α✝ ⊢ Function.RightInverse ?invFun ?toFun case toFun α✝ : Type u_1 α : α✝ ⊢ [] ≡ [α] → PEmpty.{u_2} case invFun α✝ : Type u_1 α : α✝ ⊢ PEmpty.{u_2} → [] ≡ [α]
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case left_inv α✝ : Type u_1 α : α✝ ⊢ Function.LeftInverse ?invFun ?toFun case right_inv α✝ : Type u_1 α : α✝ ⊢ Function.RightInverse ?invFun ?toFun case toFun α✝ : Type u_1 α : α✝ ⊢ [] ≡ [α] → PEmpty.{u_2} case invFun α✝ : Type u_1 α : α✝ ⊢ PEmpty.{u_2} → [] ≡ [α] TACTIC:
https://github.com/katydid/proofs.git
8105af686a3bdf193909567f5165835001240640
Katydid/Conal/Calculus.lean
nullable_char
[118, 1]
[131, 8]
cases x with | mk x => contradiction
case left_inv α✝ : Type u_1 α : α✝ x : [] ≡ [α] ⊢ ?invFun (?toFun x) = x case right_inv α✝ : Type u_1 α : α✝ ⊢ Function.RightInverse ?invFun ?toFun case toFun α✝ : Type u_1 α : α✝ ⊢ [] ≡ [α] → PEmpty.{u_2} case invFun α✝ : Type u_1 α : α✝ ⊢ PEmpty.{u_2} → [] ≡ [α]
case right_inv α✝ : Type u_1 α : α✝ ⊢ Function.RightInverse ?invFun ?toFun case toFun α✝ : Type u_1 α : α✝ ⊢ [] ≡ [α] → PEmpty.{u_2} case invFun α✝ : Type u_1 α : α✝ ⊢ PEmpty.{u_2} → [] ≡ [α]
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case left_inv α✝ : Type u_1 α : α✝ x : [] ≡ [α] ⊢ ?invFun (?toFun x) = x case right_inv α✝ : Type u_1 α : α✝ ⊢ Function.RightInverse ?invFun ?toFun case toFun α✝ : Type u_1 α : α✝ ⊢ [] ≡ [α] → PEmpty.{u_2} case invFun α✝ : Type u_1 α : α✝ ⊢ PEmpty.{u_2} → [] ≡ [α] TACTIC:
https://github.com/katydid/proofs.git
8105af686a3bdf193909567f5165835001240640
Katydid/Conal/Calculus.lean
nullable_char
[118, 1]
[131, 8]
intro
case right_inv α✝ : Type u_1 α : α✝ ⊢ Function.RightInverse ?invFun ?toFun case toFun α✝ : Type u_1 α : α✝ ⊢ [] ≡ [α] → PEmpty.{u_2} case invFun α✝ : Type u_1 α : α✝ ⊢ PEmpty.{u_2} → [] ≡ [α]
case right_inv α✝ : Type u_1 α : α✝ x✝ : PEmpty.{u_2} ⊢ ?toFun (?invFun x✝) = x✝ case toFun α✝ : Type u_1 α : α✝ ⊢ [] ≡ [α] → PEmpty.{u_2} case invFun α✝ : Type u_1 α : α✝ ⊢ PEmpty.{u_2} → [] ≡ [α]
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case right_inv α✝ : Type u_1 α : α✝ ⊢ Function.RightInverse ?invFun ?toFun case toFun α✝ : Type u_1 α : α✝ ⊢ [] ≡ [α] → PEmpty.{u_2} case invFun α✝ : Type u_1 α : α✝ ⊢ PEmpty.{u_2} → [] ≡ [α] TACTIC:
https://github.com/katydid/proofs.git
8105af686a3bdf193909567f5165835001240640
Katydid/Conal/Calculus.lean
nullable_char
[118, 1]
[131, 8]
contradiction
case right_inv α✝ : Type u_1 α : α✝ x✝ : PEmpty.{u_2} ⊢ ?toFun (?invFun x✝) = x✝ case toFun α✝ : Type u_1 α : α✝ ⊢ [] ≡ [α] → PEmpty.{u_2} case invFun α✝ : Type u_1 α : α✝ ⊢ PEmpty.{u_2} → [] ≡ [α]
case toFun α✝ : Type u_1 α : α✝ ⊢ [] ≡ [α] → PEmpty.{u_2} case invFun α✝ : Type u_1 α : α✝ ⊢ PEmpty.{u_2} → [] ≡ [α]
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case right_inv α✝ : Type u_1 α : α✝ x✝ : PEmpty.{u_2} ⊢ ?toFun (?invFun x✝) = x✝ case toFun α✝ : Type u_1 α : α✝ ⊢ [] ≡ [α] → PEmpty.{u_2} case invFun α✝ : Type u_1 α : α✝ ⊢ PEmpty.{u_2} → [] ≡ [α] TACTIC:
https://github.com/katydid/proofs.git
8105af686a3bdf193909567f5165835001240640
Katydid/Conal/Calculus.lean
nullable_char
[118, 1]
[131, 8]
sorry
case toFun α✝ : Type u_1 α : α✝ ⊢ [] ≡ [α] → PEmpty.{u_2} case invFun α✝ : Type u_1 α : α✝ ⊢ PEmpty.{u_2} → [] ≡ [α]
case invFun α✝ : Type u_1 α : α✝ ⊢ PEmpty.{u_2} → [] ≡ [α]
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case toFun α✝ : Type u_1 α : α✝ ⊢ [] ≡ [α] → PEmpty.{u_2} case invFun α✝ : Type u_1 α : α✝ ⊢ PEmpty.{u_2} → [] ≡ [α] TACTIC:
https://github.com/katydid/proofs.git
8105af686a3bdf193909567f5165835001240640
Katydid/Conal/Calculus.lean
nullable_char
[118, 1]
[131, 8]
sorry
case invFun α✝ : Type u_1 α : α✝ ⊢ PEmpty.{u_2} → [] ≡ [α]
no goals
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case invFun α✝ : Type u_1 α : α✝ ⊢ PEmpty.{u_2} → [] ≡ [α] TACTIC:
https://github.com/katydid/proofs.git
8105af686a3bdf193909567f5165835001240640
Katydid/Conal/Calculus.lean
nullable_char
[118, 1]
[131, 8]
contradiction
case left_inv.mk α✝ : Type u_1 α : α✝ x : [] = [α] ⊢ ?invFun (?toFun (TEq.mk x)) = TEq.mk x
no goals
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case left_inv.mk α✝ : Type u_1 α : α✝ x : [] = [α] ⊢ ?invFun (?toFun (TEq.mk x)) = TEq.mk x TACTIC:
https://github.com/katydid/proofs.git
8105af686a3bdf193909567f5165835001240640
Katydid/Conal/Calculus.lean
nullable_char'
[133, 1]
[141, 18]
intro
α : Type u_1 ⊢ (c : α) → ν' (char c) → PEmpty.{u_2}
α : Type u_1 c✝ : α ⊢ ν' (char c✝) → PEmpty.{u_2}
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: α : Type u_1 ⊢ (c : α) → ν' (char c) → PEmpty.{u_2} TACTIC:
https://github.com/katydid/proofs.git
8105af686a3bdf193909567f5165835001240640
Katydid/Conal/Calculus.lean
nullable_char'
[133, 1]
[141, 18]
refine (fun x => ?c)
α : Type u_1 c✝ : α ⊢ ν' (char c✝) → PEmpty.{u_2}
case c α : Type u_1 c✝ : α x : ν' (char c✝) ⊢ PEmpty.{u_2}
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: α : Type u_1 c✝ : α ⊢ ν' (char c✝) → PEmpty.{u_2} TACTIC:
https://github.com/katydid/proofs.git
8105af686a3bdf193909567f5165835001240640
Katydid/Conal/Calculus.lean
nullable_char'
[133, 1]
[141, 18]
simp at x
case c α : Type u_1 c✝ : α x : ν' (char c✝) ⊢ PEmpty.{u_2}
case c α : Type u_1 c✝ : α x : [] ≡ [c✝] ⊢ PEmpty.{u_2}
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case c α : Type u_1 c✝ : α x : ν' (char c✝) ⊢ PEmpty.{u_2} TACTIC:
https://github.com/katydid/proofs.git
8105af686a3bdf193909567f5165835001240640
Katydid/Conal/Calculus.lean
nullable_char'
[133, 1]
[141, 18]
cases x with | mk x => contradiction
case c α : Type u_1 c✝ : α x : [] ≡ [c✝] ⊢ PEmpty.{u_2}
no goals
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case c α : Type u_1 c✝ : α x : [] ≡ [c✝] ⊢ PEmpty.{u_2} TACTIC: