url
stringclasses
147 values
commit
stringclasses
147 values
file_path
stringlengths
7
101
full_name
stringlengths
1
94
start
stringlengths
6
10
end
stringlengths
6
11
tactic
stringlengths
1
11.2k
state_before
stringlengths
3
2.09M
state_after
stringlengths
6
2.09M
input
stringlengths
73
2.09M
https://github.com/katydid/proofs.git
8105af686a3bdf193909567f5165835001240640
Katydid/Conal/Calculus.lean
nullable_char'
[133, 1]
[141, 18]
contradiction
case c.mk α : Type u_1 c✝ : α x : [] = [c✝] ⊢ PEmpty.{u_2}
no goals
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case c.mk α : Type u_1 c✝ : α x : [] = [c✝] ⊢ PEmpty.{u_2} TACTIC:
https://github.com/katydid/proofs.git
8105af686a3bdf193909567f5165835001240640
Katydid/Conal/Calculus.lean
nullable_or
[148, 1]
[153, 6]
intro P Q
α : Type (max u_1 u_2) ⊢ (P Q : dLang α) → ν' (P ⋃ Q) ≡ (ν' P ⊕ ν' Q)
α : Type (max u_1 u_2) P Q : dLang α ⊢ ν' (P ⋃ Q) ≡ (ν' P ⊕ ν' Q)
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: α : Type (max u_1 u_2) ⊢ (P Q : dLang α) → ν' (P ⋃ Q) ≡ (ν' P ⊕ ν' Q) TACTIC:
https://github.com/katydid/proofs.git
8105af686a3bdf193909567f5165835001240640
Katydid/Conal/Calculus.lean
nullable_or
[148, 1]
[153, 6]
constructor
α : Type (max u_1 u_2) P Q : dLang α ⊢ ν' (P ⋃ Q) ≡ (ν' P ⊕ ν' Q)
case a α : Type (max u_1 u_2) P Q : dLang α ⊢ ν' (P ⋃ Q) = (ν' P ⊕ ν' Q)
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: α : Type (max u_1 u_2) P Q : dLang α ⊢ ν' (P ⋃ Q) ≡ (ν' P ⊕ ν' Q) TACTIC:
https://github.com/katydid/proofs.git
8105af686a3bdf193909567f5165835001240640
Katydid/Conal/Calculus.lean
nullable_or
[148, 1]
[153, 6]
rfl
case a α : Type (max u_1 u_2) P Q : dLang α ⊢ ν' (P ⋃ Q) = (ν' P ⊕ ν' Q)
no goals
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case a α : Type (max u_1 u_2) P Q : dLang α ⊢ ν' (P ⋃ Q) = (ν' P ⊕ ν' Q) TACTIC:
https://github.com/katydid/proofs.git
8105af686a3bdf193909567f5165835001240640
Katydid/Conal/Calculus.lean
nullable_and
[157, 1]
[162, 6]
intro P Q
α : Type (max u_1 u_2) ⊢ (P Q : dLang α) → ν' (P ⋂ Q) ≡ (ν' P × ν' Q)
α : Type (max u_1 u_2) P Q : dLang α ⊢ ν' (P ⋂ Q) ≡ (ν' P × ν' Q)
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: α : Type (max u_1 u_2) ⊢ (P Q : dLang α) → ν' (P ⋂ Q) ≡ (ν' P × ν' Q) TACTIC:
https://github.com/katydid/proofs.git
8105af686a3bdf193909567f5165835001240640
Katydid/Conal/Calculus.lean
nullable_and
[157, 1]
[162, 6]
constructor
α : Type (max u_1 u_2) P Q : dLang α ⊢ ν' (P ⋂ Q) ≡ (ν' P × ν' Q)
case a α : Type (max u_1 u_2) P Q : dLang α ⊢ ν' (P ⋂ Q) = (ν' P × ν' Q)
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: α : Type (max u_1 u_2) P Q : dLang α ⊢ ν' (P ⋂ Q) ≡ (ν' P × ν' Q) TACTIC:
https://github.com/katydid/proofs.git
8105af686a3bdf193909567f5165835001240640
Katydid/Conal/Calculus.lean
nullable_and
[157, 1]
[162, 6]
rfl
case a α : Type (max u_1 u_2) P Q : dLang α ⊢ ν' (P ⋂ Q) = (ν' P × ν' Q)
no goals
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case a α : Type (max u_1 u_2) P Q : dLang α ⊢ ν' (P ⋂ Q) = (ν' P × ν' Q) TACTIC:
https://github.com/katydid/proofs.git
8105af686a3bdf193909567f5165835001240640
Katydid/Conal/Calculus.lean
nullable_scalar
[166, 1]
[171, 6]
intro P Q
α : Type ⊢ (s : Type) → (P : dLang α) → ν' (s · P) ≡ (s × ν' P)
α P : Type Q : dLang α ⊢ ν' (P · Q) ≡ (P × ν' Q)
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: α : Type ⊢ (s : Type) → (P : dLang α) → ν' (s · P) ≡ (s × ν' P) TACTIC:
https://github.com/katydid/proofs.git
8105af686a3bdf193909567f5165835001240640
Katydid/Conal/Calculus.lean
nullable_scalar
[166, 1]
[171, 6]
constructor
α P : Type Q : dLang α ⊢ ν' (P · Q) ≡ (P × ν' Q)
case a α P : Type Q : dLang α ⊢ ν' (P · Q) = (P × ν' Q)
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: α P : Type Q : dLang α ⊢ ν' (P · Q) ≡ (P × ν' Q) TACTIC:
https://github.com/katydid/proofs.git
8105af686a3bdf193909567f5165835001240640
Katydid/Conal/Calculus.lean
nullable_scalar
[166, 1]
[171, 6]
rfl
case a α P : Type Q : dLang α ⊢ ν' (P · Q) = (P × ν' Q)
no goals
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case a α P : Type Q : dLang α ⊢ ν' (P · Q) = (P × ν' Q) TACTIC:
https://github.com/katydid/proofs.git
8105af686a3bdf193909567f5165835001240640
Katydid/Conal/Calculus.lean
nullable_concat
[179, 1]
[183, 8]
sorry
α : Type u_1 ⊢ (P Q : dLang α) → ν' (P , Q) ≃ ν' Q × ν' P
no goals
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: α : Type u_1 ⊢ (P Q : dLang α) → ν' (P , Q) ≃ ν' Q × ν' P TACTIC:
https://github.com/katydid/proofs.git
8105af686a3bdf193909567f5165835001240640
Katydid/Conal/Calculus.lean
nullable_star
[213, 1]
[217, 8]
sorry
α : Type u_1 ⊢ (P : dLang α) → ν' (P*) ≃ List (ν' P)
no goals
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: α : Type u_1 ⊢ (P : dLang α) → ν' (P*) ≃ List (ν' P) TACTIC:
https://github.com/katydid/proofs.git
8105af686a3bdf193909567f5165835001240640
Katydid/Conal/Calculus.lean
derivative_emptySet
[221, 1]
[226, 6]
intro a
α : Type u_1 ⊢ (a : α) → δ' ∅ a ≡ ∅
α : Type u_1 a : α ⊢ δ' ∅ a ≡ ∅
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: α : Type u_1 ⊢ (a : α) → δ' ∅ a ≡ ∅ TACTIC:
https://github.com/katydid/proofs.git
8105af686a3bdf193909567f5165835001240640
Katydid/Conal/Calculus.lean
derivative_emptySet
[221, 1]
[226, 6]
constructor
α : Type u_1 a : α ⊢ δ' ∅ a ≡ ∅
case a α : Type u_1 a : α ⊢ δ' ∅ a = ∅
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: α : Type u_1 a : α ⊢ δ' ∅ a ≡ ∅ TACTIC:
https://github.com/katydid/proofs.git
8105af686a3bdf193909567f5165835001240640
Katydid/Conal/Calculus.lean
derivative_emptySet
[221, 1]
[226, 6]
rfl
case a α : Type u_1 a : α ⊢ δ' ∅ a = ∅
no goals
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case a α : Type u_1 a : α ⊢ δ' ∅ a = ∅ TACTIC:
https://github.com/katydid/proofs.git
8105af686a3bdf193909567f5165835001240640
Katydid/Conal/Calculus.lean
derivative_universal
[230, 1]
[235, 6]
intro a
α : Type u_1 ⊢ (a : α) → δ' 𝒰 a ≡ 𝒰
α : Type u_1 a : α ⊢ δ' 𝒰 a ≡ 𝒰
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: α : Type u_1 ⊢ (a : α) → δ' 𝒰 a ≡ 𝒰 TACTIC:
https://github.com/katydid/proofs.git
8105af686a3bdf193909567f5165835001240640
Katydid/Conal/Calculus.lean
derivative_universal
[230, 1]
[235, 6]
constructor
α : Type u_1 a : α ⊢ δ' 𝒰 a ≡ 𝒰
case a α : Type u_1 a : α ⊢ δ' 𝒰 a = 𝒰
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: α : Type u_1 a : α ⊢ δ' 𝒰 a ≡ 𝒰 TACTIC:
https://github.com/katydid/proofs.git
8105af686a3bdf193909567f5165835001240640
Katydid/Conal/Calculus.lean
derivative_universal
[230, 1]
[235, 6]
rfl
case a α : Type u_1 a : α ⊢ δ' 𝒰 a = 𝒰
no goals
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case a α : Type u_1 a : α ⊢ δ' 𝒰 a = 𝒰 TACTIC:
https://github.com/katydid/proofs.git
8105af686a3bdf193909567f5165835001240640
Katydid/Conal/Calculus.lean
derivative_emptyStr
[240, 1]
[244, 8]
sorry
α : Type u_1 ⊢ (a : α) → δ' ε a ≡ ∅
no goals
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: α : Type u_1 ⊢ (a : α) → δ' ε a ≡ ∅ TACTIC:
https://github.com/katydid/proofs.git
8105af686a3bdf193909567f5165835001240640
Katydid/Conal/Calculus.lean
derivative_char
[253, 1]
[261, 10]
intros a c
α : Type u_1 ⊢ (a c : α) → δ' (char c) a ≡ (a ≡ c · ε)
α : Type u_1 a c : α ⊢ δ' (char c) a ≡ (a ≡ c · ε)
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: α : Type u_1 ⊢ (a c : α) → δ' (char c) a ≡ (a ≡ c · ε) TACTIC:
https://github.com/katydid/proofs.git
8105af686a3bdf193909567f5165835001240640
Katydid/Conal/Calculus.lean
derivative_char
[253, 1]
[261, 10]
unfold δ'
α : Type u_1 a c : α ⊢ δ' (char c) a ≡ (a ≡ c · ε)
α : Type u_1 a c : α ⊢ (fun w => char c (a :: w)) ≡ (a ≡ c · ε)
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: α : Type u_1 a c : α ⊢ δ' (char c) a ≡ (a ≡ c · ε) TACTIC:
https://github.com/katydid/proofs.git
8105af686a3bdf193909567f5165835001240640
Katydid/Conal/Calculus.lean
derivative_char
[253, 1]
[261, 10]
unfold char
α : Type u_1 a c : α ⊢ (fun w => char c (a :: w)) ≡ (a ≡ c · ε)
α : Type u_1 a c : α ⊢ (fun w => a :: w ≡ [c]) ≡ (a ≡ c · ε)
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: α : Type u_1 a c : α ⊢ (fun w => char c (a :: w)) ≡ (a ≡ c · ε) TACTIC:
https://github.com/katydid/proofs.git
8105af686a3bdf193909567f5165835001240640
Katydid/Conal/Calculus.lean
derivative_char
[253, 1]
[261, 10]
unfold emptyStr
α : Type u_1 a c : α ⊢ (fun w => a :: w ≡ [c]) ≡ (a ≡ c · ε)
α : Type u_1 a c : α ⊢ (fun w => a :: w ≡ [c]) ≡ (a ≡ c · fun w => w ≡ [])
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: α : Type u_1 a c : α ⊢ (fun w => a :: w ≡ [c]) ≡ (a ≡ c · ε) TACTIC:
https://github.com/katydid/proofs.git
8105af686a3bdf193909567f5165835001240640
Katydid/Conal/Calculus.lean
derivative_char
[253, 1]
[261, 10]
unfold scalar
α : Type u_1 a c : α ⊢ (fun w => a :: w ≡ [c]) ≡ (a ≡ c · fun w => w ≡ [])
α : Type u_1 a c : α ⊢ (fun w => a :: w ≡ [c]) ≡ fun w => a ≡ c × (fun w => w ≡ []) w
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: α : Type u_1 a c : α ⊢ (fun w => a :: w ≡ [c]) ≡ (a ≡ c · fun w => w ≡ []) TACTIC:
https://github.com/katydid/proofs.git
8105af686a3bdf193909567f5165835001240640
Katydid/Conal/Calculus.lean
derivative_char
[253, 1]
[261, 10]
sorry
α : Type u_1 a c : α ⊢ (fun w => a :: w ≡ [c]) ≡ fun w => a ≡ c × (fun w => w ≡ []) w
no goals
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: α : Type u_1 a c : α ⊢ (fun w => a :: w ≡ [c]) ≡ fun w => a ≡ c × (fun w => w ≡ []) w TACTIC:
https://github.com/katydid/proofs.git
8105af686a3bdf193909567f5165835001240640
Katydid/Conal/Calculus.lean
derivative_or
[265, 1]
[270, 6]
intro a P Q
α : Type u_1 ⊢ (a : α) → (P Q : dLang α) → δ' (P ⋃ Q) a ≡ (δ' P a ⋃ δ' Q a)
α : Type u_1 a : α P Q : dLang α ⊢ δ' (P ⋃ Q) a ≡ (δ' P a ⋃ δ' Q a)
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: α : Type u_1 ⊢ (a : α) → (P Q : dLang α) → δ' (P ⋃ Q) a ≡ (δ' P a ⋃ δ' Q a) TACTIC:
https://github.com/katydid/proofs.git
8105af686a3bdf193909567f5165835001240640
Katydid/Conal/Calculus.lean
derivative_or
[265, 1]
[270, 6]
constructor
α : Type u_1 a : α P Q : dLang α ⊢ δ' (P ⋃ Q) a ≡ (δ' P a ⋃ δ' Q a)
case a α : Type u_1 a : α P Q : dLang α ⊢ δ' (P ⋃ Q) a = (δ' P a ⋃ δ' Q a)
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: α : Type u_1 a : α P Q : dLang α ⊢ δ' (P ⋃ Q) a ≡ (δ' P a ⋃ δ' Q a) TACTIC:
https://github.com/katydid/proofs.git
8105af686a3bdf193909567f5165835001240640
Katydid/Conal/Calculus.lean
derivative_or
[265, 1]
[270, 6]
rfl
case a α : Type u_1 a : α P Q : dLang α ⊢ δ' (P ⋃ Q) a = (δ' P a ⋃ δ' Q a)
no goals
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case a α : Type u_1 a : α P Q : dLang α ⊢ δ' (P ⋃ Q) a = (δ' P a ⋃ δ' Q a) TACTIC:
https://github.com/katydid/proofs.git
8105af686a3bdf193909567f5165835001240640
Katydid/Conal/Calculus.lean
derivative_and
[274, 1]
[279, 6]
intro a P Q
α : Type u_1 ⊢ (a : α) → (P Q : dLang α) → δ' (P ⋂ Q) a ≡ (δ' P a ⋂ δ' Q a)
α : Type u_1 a : α P Q : dLang α ⊢ δ' (P ⋂ Q) a ≡ (δ' P a ⋂ δ' Q a)
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: α : Type u_1 ⊢ (a : α) → (P Q : dLang α) → δ' (P ⋂ Q) a ≡ (δ' P a ⋂ δ' Q a) TACTIC:
https://github.com/katydid/proofs.git
8105af686a3bdf193909567f5165835001240640
Katydid/Conal/Calculus.lean
derivative_and
[274, 1]
[279, 6]
constructor
α : Type u_1 a : α P Q : dLang α ⊢ δ' (P ⋂ Q) a ≡ (δ' P a ⋂ δ' Q a)
case a α : Type u_1 a : α P Q : dLang α ⊢ δ' (P ⋂ Q) a = (δ' P a ⋂ δ' Q a)
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: α : Type u_1 a : α P Q : dLang α ⊢ δ' (P ⋂ Q) a ≡ (δ' P a ⋂ δ' Q a) TACTIC:
https://github.com/katydid/proofs.git
8105af686a3bdf193909567f5165835001240640
Katydid/Conal/Calculus.lean
derivative_and
[274, 1]
[279, 6]
rfl
case a α : Type u_1 a : α P Q : dLang α ⊢ δ' (P ⋂ Q) a = (δ' P a ⋂ δ' Q a)
no goals
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case a α : Type u_1 a : α P Q : dLang α ⊢ δ' (P ⋂ Q) a = (δ' P a ⋂ δ' Q a) TACTIC:
https://github.com/katydid/proofs.git
8105af686a3bdf193909567f5165835001240640
Katydid/Conal/Calculus.lean
derivative_scalar
[283, 1]
[288, 6]
intro a s P
α : Type ⊢ (a : α) → (s : Type) → (P : dLang α) → δ (s · P) a ≡ (s · δ' P a)
α : Type a : α s : Type P : dLang α ⊢ δ (s · P) a ≡ (s · δ' P a)
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: α : Type ⊢ (a : α) → (s : Type) → (P : dLang α) → δ (s · P) a ≡ (s · δ' P a) TACTIC:
https://github.com/katydid/proofs.git
8105af686a3bdf193909567f5165835001240640
Katydid/Conal/Calculus.lean
derivative_scalar
[283, 1]
[288, 6]
constructor
α : Type a : α s : Type P : dLang α ⊢ δ (s · P) a ≡ (s · δ' P a)
case a α : Type a : α s : Type P : dLang α ⊢ δ (s · P) a = (s · δ' P a)
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: α : Type a : α s : Type P : dLang α ⊢ δ (s · P) a ≡ (s · δ' P a) TACTIC:
https://github.com/katydid/proofs.git
8105af686a3bdf193909567f5165835001240640
Katydid/Conal/Calculus.lean
derivative_scalar
[283, 1]
[288, 6]
rfl
case a α : Type a : α s : Type P : dLang α ⊢ δ (s · P) a = (s · δ' P a)
no goals
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case a α : Type a : α s : Type P : dLang α ⊢ δ (s · P) a = (s · δ' P a) TACTIC:
https://github.com/katydid/proofs.git
8105af686a3bdf193909567f5165835001240640
Katydid/Conal/Calculus.lean
derivative_concat
[301, 1]
[306, 8]
sorry
α : Type u_1 ⊢ (a : α) → (P Q : dLang α) → δ' (P , Q) a ≡ (ν' P · δ' Q a ⋃ (δ' P a , Q))
no goals
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: α : Type u_1 ⊢ (a : α) → (P Q : dLang α) → δ' (P , Q) a ≡ (ν' P · δ' Q a ⋃ (δ' P a , Q)) TACTIC:
https://github.com/katydid/proofs.git
8105af686a3bdf193909567f5165835001240640
Katydid/Conal/Calculus.lean
derivative_star
[341, 1]
[346, 8]
sorry
α : Type u_1 ⊢ (a : α) → (P : dLang α) → δ' (P*) a ≡ (List (ν' P) · δ' P a , P*)
no goals
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: α : Type u_1 ⊢ (a : α) → (P : dLang α) → δ' (P*) a ≡ (List (ν' P) · δ' P a , P*) TACTIC:
https://github.com/fgdorais/lean4-ascii.git
c01f0c30c6c0bca60d2f2216a70f500de38d75f2
ASCII/Lemmas.lean
ASCII.Char.toNat_eq_iff_ofNatAux_eq
[14, 1]
[19, 68]
simp only [toNat, ofNatAux]
c : ASCII.Char n : Nat hn : n < 128 ⊢ c.toNat = n ↔ ofNatAux n hn = c
c : ASCII.Char n : Nat hn : n < 128 ⊢ c.toByte.toNat = n ↔ { toByte := { val := ⟨n, ⋯⟩ }, valid := hn } = c
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: c : ASCII.Char n : Nat hn : n < 128 ⊢ c.toNat = n ↔ ofNatAux n hn = c TACTIC:
https://github.com/fgdorais/lean4-ascii.git
c01f0c30c6c0bca60d2f2216a70f500de38d75f2
ASCII/Lemmas.lean
ASCII.Char.toNat_eq_iff_ofNatAux_eq
[14, 1]
[19, 68]
constructor
c : ASCII.Char n : Nat hn : n < 128 ⊢ c.toByte.toNat = n ↔ { toByte := { val := ⟨n, ⋯⟩ }, valid := hn } = c
case mp c : ASCII.Char n : Nat hn : n < 128 ⊢ c.toByte.toNat = n → { toByte := { val := ⟨n, ⋯⟩ }, valid := hn } = c case mpr c : ASCII.Char n : Nat hn : n < 128 ⊢ { toByte := { val := ⟨n, ⋯⟩ }, valid := hn } = c → c.toByte.toNat = n
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: c : ASCII.Char n : Nat hn : n < 128 ⊢ c.toByte.toNat = n ↔ { toByte := { val := ⟨n, ⋯⟩ }, valid := hn } = c TACTIC:
https://github.com/fgdorais/lean4-ascii.git
c01f0c30c6c0bca60d2f2216a70f500de38d75f2
ASCII/Lemmas.lean
ASCII.Char.toNat_eq_iff_ofNatAux_eq
[14, 1]
[19, 68]
intro h
case mp c : ASCII.Char n : Nat hn : n < 128 ⊢ c.toByte.toNat = n → { toByte := { val := ⟨n, ⋯⟩ }, valid := hn } = c
case mp c : ASCII.Char n : Nat hn : n < 128 h : c.toByte.toNat = n ⊢ { toByte := { val := ⟨n, ⋯⟩ }, valid := hn } = c
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case mp c : ASCII.Char n : Nat hn : n < 128 ⊢ c.toByte.toNat = n → { toByte := { val := ⟨n, ⋯⟩ }, valid := hn } = c TACTIC:
https://github.com/fgdorais/lean4-ascii.git
c01f0c30c6c0bca60d2f2216a70f500de38d75f2
ASCII/Lemmas.lean
ASCII.Char.toNat_eq_iff_ofNatAux_eq
[14, 1]
[19, 68]
cases h
case mp c : ASCII.Char n : Nat hn : n < 128 h : c.toByte.toNat = n ⊢ { toByte := { val := ⟨n, ⋯⟩ }, valid := hn } = c
case mp.refl c : ASCII.Char hn : c.toByte.toNat < 128 ⊢ { toByte := { val := ⟨c.toByte.toNat, ⋯⟩ }, valid := hn } = c
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case mp c : ASCII.Char n : Nat hn : n < 128 h : c.toByte.toNat = n ⊢ { toByte := { val := ⟨n, ⋯⟩ }, valid := hn } = c TACTIC:
https://github.com/fgdorais/lean4-ascii.git
c01f0c30c6c0bca60d2f2216a70f500de38d75f2
ASCII/Lemmas.lean
ASCII.Char.toNat_eq_iff_ofNatAux_eq
[14, 1]
[19, 68]
ext
case mp.refl c : ASCII.Char hn : c.toByte.toNat < 128 ⊢ { toByte := { val := ⟨c.toByte.toNat, ⋯⟩ }, valid := hn } = c
case mp.refl.a.a c : ASCII.Char hn : c.toByte.toNat < 128 ⊢ { toByte := { val := ⟨c.toByte.toNat, ⋯⟩ }, valid := hn }.toByte.toNat = c.toByte.toNat
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case mp.refl c : ASCII.Char hn : c.toByte.toNat < 128 ⊢ { toByte := { val := ⟨c.toByte.toNat, ⋯⟩ }, valid := hn } = c TACTIC:
https://github.com/fgdorais/lean4-ascii.git
c01f0c30c6c0bca60d2f2216a70f500de38d75f2
ASCII/Lemmas.lean
ASCII.Char.toNat_eq_iff_ofNatAux_eq
[14, 1]
[19, 68]
simp only [dif_pos c.toNat_lt, UInt8.toNat]
case mp.refl.a.a c : ASCII.Char hn : c.toByte.toNat < 128 ⊢ { toByte := { val := ⟨c.toByte.toNat, ⋯⟩ }, valid := hn }.toByte.toNat = c.toByte.toNat
no goals
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case mp.refl.a.a c : ASCII.Char hn : c.toByte.toNat < 128 ⊢ { toByte := { val := ⟨c.toByte.toNat, ⋯⟩ }, valid := hn }.toByte.toNat = c.toByte.toNat TACTIC:
https://github.com/fgdorais/lean4-ascii.git
c01f0c30c6c0bca60d2f2216a70f500de38d75f2
ASCII/Lemmas.lean
ASCII.Char.toNat_eq_iff_ofNatAux_eq
[14, 1]
[19, 68]
intro h
case mpr c : ASCII.Char n : Nat hn : n < 128 ⊢ { toByte := { val := ⟨n, ⋯⟩ }, valid := hn } = c → c.toByte.toNat = n
case mpr c : ASCII.Char n : Nat hn : n < 128 h : { toByte := { val := ⟨n, ⋯⟩ }, valid := hn } = c ⊢ c.toByte.toNat = n
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case mpr c : ASCII.Char n : Nat hn : n < 128 ⊢ { toByte := { val := ⟨n, ⋯⟩ }, valid := hn } = c → c.toByte.toNat = n TACTIC:
https://github.com/fgdorais/lean4-ascii.git
c01f0c30c6c0bca60d2f2216a70f500de38d75f2
ASCII/Lemmas.lean
ASCII.Char.toNat_eq_iff_ofNatAux_eq
[14, 1]
[19, 68]
cases h
case mpr c : ASCII.Char n : Nat hn : n < 128 h : { toByte := { val := ⟨n, ⋯⟩ }, valid := hn } = c ⊢ c.toByte.toNat = n
case mpr.refl n : Nat hn : n < 128 ⊢ { toByte := { val := ⟨n, ⋯⟩ }, valid := hn }.toByte.toNat = n
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case mpr c : ASCII.Char n : Nat hn : n < 128 h : { toByte := { val := ⟨n, ⋯⟩ }, valid := hn } = c ⊢ c.toByte.toNat = n TACTIC:
https://github.com/fgdorais/lean4-ascii.git
c01f0c30c6c0bca60d2f2216a70f500de38d75f2
ASCII/Lemmas.lean
ASCII.Char.toNat_eq_iff_ofNatAux_eq
[14, 1]
[19, 68]
simp only [dif_pos hn, ofNatAux, UInt8.toNat]
case mpr.refl n : Nat hn : n < 128 ⊢ { toByte := { val := ⟨n, ⋯⟩ }, valid := hn }.toByte.toNat = n
no goals
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case mpr.refl n : Nat hn : n < 128 ⊢ { toByte := { val := ⟨n, ⋯⟩ }, valid := hn }.toByte.toNat = n TACTIC:
https://github.com/fgdorais/lean4-ascii.git
c01f0c30c6c0bca60d2f2216a70f500de38d75f2
ASCII/Lemmas.lean
ASCII.Char.toNat_ofNatAux
[21, 1]
[22, 32]
rw [toNat_eq_iff_ofNatAux_eq]
n : Nat hn : n < 128 ⊢ (ofNatAux n hn).toNat = n
no goals
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: n : Nat hn : n < 128 ⊢ (ofNatAux n hn).toNat = n TACTIC:
https://github.com/fgdorais/lean4-ascii.git
c01f0c30c6c0bca60d2f2216a70f500de38d75f2
ASCII/Lemmas.lean
ASCII.Char.ofNatAux_toNat
[24, 1]
[25, 34]
rw [← toNat_eq_iff_ofNatAux_eq]
c : ASCII.Char ⊢ ofNatAux c.toNat ⋯ = c
no goals
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: c : ASCII.Char ⊢ ofNatAux c.toNat ⋯ = c TACTIC:
https://github.com/fgdorais/lean4-ascii.git
c01f0c30c6c0bca60d2f2216a70f500de38d75f2
ASCII/Lemmas.lean
ASCII.Char.toNat_eq_iff_ofNat_eq
[27, 1]
[29, 60]
rw [ofNat, dif_pos hn]
c : ASCII.Char n : Nat hn : n < 128 ⊢ c.toNat = n ↔ ofNat n = c
c : ASCII.Char n : Nat hn : n < 128 ⊢ c.toNat = n ↔ ofNatAux n hn = c
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: c : ASCII.Char n : Nat hn : n < 128 ⊢ c.toNat = n ↔ ofNat n = c TACTIC:
https://github.com/fgdorais/lean4-ascii.git
c01f0c30c6c0bca60d2f2216a70f500de38d75f2
ASCII/Lemmas.lean
ASCII.Char.toNat_eq_iff_ofNat_eq
[27, 1]
[29, 60]
exact toNat_eq_iff_ofNatAux_eq ..
c : ASCII.Char n : Nat hn : n < 128 ⊢ c.toNat = n ↔ ofNatAux n hn = c
no goals
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: c : ASCII.Char n : Nat hn : n < 128 ⊢ c.toNat = n ↔ ofNatAux n hn = c TACTIC:
https://github.com/fgdorais/lean4-ascii.git
c01f0c30c6c0bca60d2f2216a70f500de38d75f2
ASCII/Lemmas.lean
ASCII.Char.toNat_ofNat
[31, 1]
[32, 39]
rw [toNat_eq_iff_ofNat_eq]
n : Nat hn : n < 128 ⊢ (ofNat n).toNat = n
case hn n : Nat hn : n < 128 ⊢ n < 128
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: n : Nat hn : n < 128 ⊢ (ofNat n).toNat = n TACTIC:
https://github.com/fgdorais/lean4-ascii.git
c01f0c30c6c0bca60d2f2216a70f500de38d75f2
ASCII/Lemmas.lean
ASCII.Char.toNat_ofNat
[31, 1]
[32, 39]
exact hn
case hn n : Nat hn : n < 128 ⊢ n < 128
no goals
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case hn n : Nat hn : n < 128 ⊢ n < 128 TACTIC:
https://github.com/fgdorais/lean4-ascii.git
c01f0c30c6c0bca60d2f2216a70f500de38d75f2
ASCII/Lemmas.lean
ASCII.Char.ofNat_toNat
[34, 1]
[35, 49]
rw [← toNat_eq_iff_ofNat_eq]
c : ASCII.Char ⊢ ofNat c.toNat = c
case hn c : ASCII.Char ⊢ c.toNat < 128
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: c : ASCII.Char ⊢ ofNat c.toNat = c TACTIC:
https://github.com/fgdorais/lean4-ascii.git
c01f0c30c6c0bca60d2f2216a70f500de38d75f2
ASCII/Lemmas.lean
ASCII.Char.ofNat_toNat
[34, 1]
[35, 49]
exact c.toNat_lt
case hn c : ASCII.Char ⊢ c.toNat < 128
no goals
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case hn c : ASCII.Char ⊢ c.toNat < 128 TACTIC:
https://github.com/fgdorais/lean4-ascii.git
c01f0c30c6c0bca60d2f2216a70f500de38d75f2
ASCII/Lemmas.lean
ASCII.Char.toUnicode_eq_iff_ofUnicode_eq
[39, 1]
[50, 37]
simp only [Char.toUnicode, ofUnicode]
c : ASCII.Char u : Unicode.Char hu : Char.isASCII u = true ⊢ ↑c = u ↔ ofUnicode u hu = c
c : ASCII.Char u : Unicode.Char hu : Char.isASCII u = true ⊢ { val := c.toByte.toUInt32, valid := ⋯ } = u ↔ { toByte := u.val.toUInt8, valid := ⋯ } = c
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: c : ASCII.Char u : Unicode.Char hu : Char.isASCII u = true ⊢ ↑c = u ↔ ofUnicode u hu = c TACTIC:
https://github.com/fgdorais/lean4-ascii.git
c01f0c30c6c0bca60d2f2216a70f500de38d75f2
ASCII/Lemmas.lean
ASCII.Char.toUnicode_eq_iff_ofUnicode_eq
[39, 1]
[50, 37]
constructor
c : ASCII.Char u : Unicode.Char hu : Char.isASCII u = true ⊢ { val := c.toByte.toUInt32, valid := ⋯ } = u ↔ { toByte := u.val.toUInt8, valid := ⋯ } = c
case mp c : ASCII.Char u : Unicode.Char hu : Char.isASCII u = true ⊢ { val := c.toByte.toUInt32, valid := ⋯ } = u → { toByte := u.val.toUInt8, valid := ⋯ } = c case mpr c : ASCII.Char u : Unicode.Char hu : Char.isASCII u = true ⊢ { toByte := u.val.toUInt8, valid := ⋯ } = c → { val := c.toByte.toUInt32, valid := ⋯ } = u
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: c : ASCII.Char u : Unicode.Char hu : Char.isASCII u = true ⊢ { val := c.toByte.toUInt32, valid := ⋯ } = u ↔ { toByte := u.val.toUInt8, valid := ⋯ } = c TACTIC:
https://github.com/fgdorais/lean4-ascii.git
c01f0c30c6c0bca60d2f2216a70f500de38d75f2
ASCII/Lemmas.lean
ASCII.Char.toUnicode_eq_iff_ofUnicode_eq
[39, 1]
[50, 37]
intro h
case mp c : ASCII.Char u : Unicode.Char hu : Char.isASCII u = true ⊢ { val := c.toByte.toUInt32, valid := ⋯ } = u → { toByte := u.val.toUInt8, valid := ⋯ } = c
case mp c : ASCII.Char u : Unicode.Char hu : Char.isASCII u = true h : { val := c.toByte.toUInt32, valid := ⋯ } = u ⊢ { toByte := u.val.toUInt8, valid := ⋯ } = c
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case mp c : ASCII.Char u : Unicode.Char hu : Char.isASCII u = true ⊢ { val := c.toByte.toUInt32, valid := ⋯ } = u → { toByte := u.val.toUInt8, valid := ⋯ } = c TACTIC:
https://github.com/fgdorais/lean4-ascii.git
c01f0c30c6c0bca60d2f2216a70f500de38d75f2
ASCII/Lemmas.lean
ASCII.Char.toUnicode_eq_iff_ofUnicode_eq
[39, 1]
[50, 37]
cases h
case mp c : ASCII.Char u : Unicode.Char hu : Char.isASCII u = true h : { val := c.toByte.toUInt32, valid := ⋯ } = u ⊢ { toByte := u.val.toUInt8, valid := ⋯ } = c
case mp.refl c : ASCII.Char hu : { val := c.toByte.toUInt32, valid := ⋯ }.isASCII = true ⊢ { toByte := { val := c.toByte.toUInt32, valid := ⋯ }.val.toUInt8, valid := ⋯ } = c
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case mp c : ASCII.Char u : Unicode.Char hu : Char.isASCII u = true h : { val := c.toByte.toUInt32, valid := ⋯ } = u ⊢ { toByte := u.val.toUInt8, valid := ⋯ } = c TACTIC:
https://github.com/fgdorais/lean4-ascii.git
c01f0c30c6c0bca60d2f2216a70f500de38d75f2
ASCII/Lemmas.lean
ASCII.Char.toUnicode_eq_iff_ofUnicode_eq
[39, 1]
[50, 37]
simp [_root_.Char.isASCII, _root_.Char.toNat] at hu
case mp.refl c : ASCII.Char hu : { val := c.toByte.toUInt32, valid := ⋯ }.isASCII = true ⊢ { toByte := { val := c.toByte.toUInt32, valid := ⋯ }.val.toUInt8, valid := ⋯ } = c
case mp.refl c : ASCII.Char hu✝ : { val := c.toByte.toUInt32, valid := ⋯ }.isASCII = true hu : c.toByte.toNat < 128 ⊢ { toByte := { val := c.toByte.toUInt32, valid := ⋯ }.val.toUInt8, valid := ⋯ } = c
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case mp.refl c : ASCII.Char hu : { val := c.toByte.toUInt32, valid := ⋯ }.isASCII = true ⊢ { toByte := { val := c.toByte.toUInt32, valid := ⋯ }.val.toUInt8, valid := ⋯ } = c TACTIC:
https://github.com/fgdorais/lean4-ascii.git
c01f0c30c6c0bca60d2f2216a70f500de38d75f2
ASCII/Lemmas.lean
ASCII.Char.toUnicode_eq_iff_ofUnicode_eq
[39, 1]
[50, 37]
have hlt : c.toNat < 256 := by apply Nat.lt_trans hu; decide
case mp.refl c : ASCII.Char hu✝ : { val := c.toByte.toUInt32, valid := ⋯ }.isASCII = true hu : c.toByte.toNat < 128 ⊢ { toByte := { val := c.toByte.toUInt32, valid := ⋯ }.val.toUInt8, valid := ⋯ } = c
case mp.refl c : ASCII.Char hu✝ : { val := c.toByte.toUInt32, valid := ⋯ }.isASCII = true hu : c.toByte.toNat < 128 hlt : c.toNat < 256 ⊢ { toByte := { val := c.toByte.toUInt32, valid := ⋯ }.val.toUInt8, valid := ⋯ } = c
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case mp.refl c : ASCII.Char hu✝ : { val := c.toByte.toUInt32, valid := ⋯ }.isASCII = true hu : c.toByte.toNat < 128 ⊢ { toByte := { val := c.toByte.toUInt32, valid := ⋯ }.val.toUInt8, valid := ⋯ } = c TACTIC:
https://github.com/fgdorais/lean4-ascii.git
c01f0c30c6c0bca60d2f2216a70f500de38d75f2
ASCII/Lemmas.lean
ASCII.Char.toUnicode_eq_iff_ofUnicode_eq
[39, 1]
[50, 37]
ext
case mp.refl c : ASCII.Char hu✝ : { val := c.toByte.toUInt32, valid := ⋯ }.isASCII = true hu : c.toByte.toNat < 128 hlt : c.toNat < 256 ⊢ { toByte := { val := c.toByte.toUInt32, valid := ⋯ }.val.toUInt8, valid := ⋯ } = c
case mp.refl.a.a c : ASCII.Char hu✝ : { val := c.toByte.toUInt32, valid := ⋯ }.isASCII = true hu : c.toByte.toNat < 128 hlt : c.toNat < 256 ⊢ { toByte := { val := c.toByte.toUInt32, valid := ⋯ }.val.toUInt8, valid := ⋯ }.toByte.toNat = c.toByte.toNat
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case mp.refl c : ASCII.Char hu✝ : { val := c.toByte.toUInt32, valid := ⋯ }.isASCII = true hu : c.toByte.toNat < 128 hlt : c.toNat < 256 ⊢ { toByte := { val := c.toByte.toUInt32, valid := ⋯ }.val.toUInt8, valid := ⋯ } = c TACTIC:
https://github.com/fgdorais/lean4-ascii.git
c01f0c30c6c0bca60d2f2216a70f500de38d75f2
ASCII/Lemmas.lean
ASCII.Char.toUnicode_eq_iff_ofUnicode_eq
[39, 1]
[50, 37]
simp [Nat.mod_eq_of_lt hlt]
case mp.refl.a.a c : ASCII.Char hu✝ : { val := c.toByte.toUInt32, valid := ⋯ }.isASCII = true hu : c.toByte.toNat < 128 hlt : c.toNat < 256 ⊢ { toByte := { val := c.toByte.toUInt32, valid := ⋯ }.val.toUInt8, valid := ⋯ }.toByte.toNat = c.toByte.toNat
no goals
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case mp.refl.a.a c : ASCII.Char hu✝ : { val := c.toByte.toUInt32, valid := ⋯ }.isASCII = true hu : c.toByte.toNat < 128 hlt : c.toNat < 256 ⊢ { toByte := { val := c.toByte.toUInt32, valid := ⋯ }.val.toUInt8, valid := ⋯ }.toByte.toNat = c.toByte.toNat TACTIC:
https://github.com/fgdorais/lean4-ascii.git
c01f0c30c6c0bca60d2f2216a70f500de38d75f2
ASCII/Lemmas.lean
ASCII.Char.toUnicode_eq_iff_ofUnicode_eq
[39, 1]
[50, 37]
apply Nat.lt_trans hu
c : ASCII.Char hu✝ : { val := c.toByte.toUInt32, valid := ⋯ }.isASCII = true hu : c.toByte.toNat < 128 ⊢ c.toNat < 256
c : ASCII.Char hu✝ : { val := c.toByte.toUInt32, valid := ⋯ }.isASCII = true hu : c.toByte.toNat < 128 ⊢ 128 < 256
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: c : ASCII.Char hu✝ : { val := c.toByte.toUInt32, valid := ⋯ }.isASCII = true hu : c.toByte.toNat < 128 ⊢ c.toNat < 256 TACTIC:
https://github.com/fgdorais/lean4-ascii.git
c01f0c30c6c0bca60d2f2216a70f500de38d75f2
ASCII/Lemmas.lean
ASCII.Char.toUnicode_eq_iff_ofUnicode_eq
[39, 1]
[50, 37]
decide
c : ASCII.Char hu✝ : { val := c.toByte.toUInt32, valid := ⋯ }.isASCII = true hu : c.toByte.toNat < 128 ⊢ 128 < 256
no goals
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: c : ASCII.Char hu✝ : { val := c.toByte.toUInt32, valid := ⋯ }.isASCII = true hu : c.toByte.toNat < 128 ⊢ 128 < 256 TACTIC:
https://github.com/fgdorais/lean4-ascii.git
c01f0c30c6c0bca60d2f2216a70f500de38d75f2
ASCII/Lemmas.lean
ASCII.Char.toUnicode_eq_iff_ofUnicode_eq
[39, 1]
[50, 37]
intro h
case mpr c : ASCII.Char u : Unicode.Char hu : Char.isASCII u = true ⊢ { toByte := u.val.toUInt8, valid := ⋯ } = c → { val := c.toByte.toUInt32, valid := ⋯ } = u
case mpr c : ASCII.Char u : Unicode.Char hu : Char.isASCII u = true h : { toByte := u.val.toUInt8, valid := ⋯ } = c ⊢ { val := c.toByte.toUInt32, valid := ⋯ } = u
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case mpr c : ASCII.Char u : Unicode.Char hu : Char.isASCII u = true ⊢ { toByte := u.val.toUInt8, valid := ⋯ } = c → { val := c.toByte.toUInt32, valid := ⋯ } = u TACTIC:
https://github.com/fgdorais/lean4-ascii.git
c01f0c30c6c0bca60d2f2216a70f500de38d75f2
ASCII/Lemmas.lean
ASCII.Char.toUnicode_eq_iff_ofUnicode_eq
[39, 1]
[50, 37]
cases h
case mpr c : ASCII.Char u : Unicode.Char hu : Char.isASCII u = true h : { toByte := u.val.toUInt8, valid := ⋯ } = c ⊢ { val := c.toByte.toUInt32, valid := ⋯ } = u
case mpr.refl u : Unicode.Char hu : Char.isASCII u = true ⊢ { val := { toByte := u.val.toUInt8, valid := ⋯ }.toByte.toUInt32, valid := ⋯ } = u
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case mpr c : ASCII.Char u : Unicode.Char hu : Char.isASCII u = true h : { toByte := u.val.toUInt8, valid := ⋯ } = c ⊢ { val := c.toByte.toUInt32, valid := ⋯ } = u TACTIC:
https://github.com/fgdorais/lean4-ascii.git
c01f0c30c6c0bca60d2f2216a70f500de38d75f2
ASCII/Lemmas.lean
ASCII.Char.toUnicode_eq_iff_ofUnicode_eq
[39, 1]
[50, 37]
simp [_root_.Char.isASCII, _root_.Char.toNat] at hu
case mpr.refl u : Unicode.Char hu : Char.isASCII u = true ⊢ { val := { toByte := u.val.toUInt8, valid := ⋯ }.toByte.toUInt32, valid := ⋯ } = u
case mpr.refl u : Unicode.Char hu✝ : Char.isASCII u = true hu : u.val.toNat < 128 ⊢ { val := { toByte := u.val.toUInt8, valid := ⋯ }.toByte.toUInt32, valid := ⋯ } = u
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case mpr.refl u : Unicode.Char hu : Char.isASCII u = true ⊢ { val := { toByte := u.val.toUInt8, valid := ⋯ }.toByte.toUInt32, valid := ⋯ } = u TACTIC:
https://github.com/fgdorais/lean4-ascii.git
c01f0c30c6c0bca60d2f2216a70f500de38d75f2
ASCII/Lemmas.lean
ASCII.Char.toUnicode_eq_iff_ofUnicode_eq
[39, 1]
[50, 37]
have hlt : u.val.toNat < 256 := by apply Nat.lt_trans hu; decide
case mpr.refl u : Unicode.Char hu✝ : Char.isASCII u = true hu : u.val.toNat < 128 ⊢ { val := { toByte := u.val.toUInt8, valid := ⋯ }.toByte.toUInt32, valid := ⋯ } = u
case mpr.refl u : Unicode.Char hu✝ : Char.isASCII u = true hu : u.val.toNat < 128 hlt : u.val.toNat < 256 ⊢ { val := { toByte := u.val.toUInt8, valid := ⋯ }.toByte.toUInt32, valid := ⋯ } = u
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case mpr.refl u : Unicode.Char hu✝ : Char.isASCII u = true hu : u.val.toNat < 128 ⊢ { val := { toByte := u.val.toUInt8, valid := ⋯ }.toByte.toUInt32, valid := ⋯ } = u TACTIC:
https://github.com/fgdorais/lean4-ascii.git
c01f0c30c6c0bca60d2f2216a70f500de38d75f2
ASCII/Lemmas.lean
ASCII.Char.toUnicode_eq_iff_ofUnicode_eq
[39, 1]
[50, 37]
ext
case mpr.refl u : Unicode.Char hu✝ : Char.isASCII u = true hu : u.val.toNat < 128 hlt : u.val.toNat < 256 ⊢ { val := { toByte := u.val.toUInt8, valid := ⋯ }.toByte.toUInt32, valid := ⋯ } = u
case mpr.refl.a.a u : Unicode.Char hu✝ : Char.isASCII u = true hu : u.val.toNat < 128 hlt : u.val.toNat < 256 ⊢ { val := { toByte := u.val.toUInt8, valid := ⋯ }.toByte.toUInt32, valid := ⋯ }.val.toNat = u.val.toNat
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case mpr.refl u : Unicode.Char hu✝ : Char.isASCII u = true hu : u.val.toNat < 128 hlt : u.val.toNat < 256 ⊢ { val := { toByte := u.val.toUInt8, valid := ⋯ }.toByte.toUInt32, valid := ⋯ } = u TACTIC:
https://github.com/fgdorais/lean4-ascii.git
c01f0c30c6c0bca60d2f2216a70f500de38d75f2
ASCII/Lemmas.lean
ASCII.Char.toUnicode_eq_iff_ofUnicode_eq
[39, 1]
[50, 37]
simp [Nat.mod_eq_of_lt hlt]
case mpr.refl.a.a u : Unicode.Char hu✝ : Char.isASCII u = true hu : u.val.toNat < 128 hlt : u.val.toNat < 256 ⊢ { val := { toByte := u.val.toUInt8, valid := ⋯ }.toByte.toUInt32, valid := ⋯ }.val.toNat = u.val.toNat
no goals
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case mpr.refl.a.a u : Unicode.Char hu✝ : Char.isASCII u = true hu : u.val.toNat < 128 hlt : u.val.toNat < 256 ⊢ { val := { toByte := u.val.toUInt8, valid := ⋯ }.toByte.toUInt32, valid := ⋯ }.val.toNat = u.val.toNat TACTIC:
https://github.com/fgdorais/lean4-ascii.git
c01f0c30c6c0bca60d2f2216a70f500de38d75f2
ASCII/Lemmas.lean
ASCII.Char.toUnicode_eq_iff_ofUnicode_eq
[39, 1]
[50, 37]
apply Nat.lt_trans hu
u : Unicode.Char hu✝ : Char.isASCII u = true hu : u.val.toNat < 128 ⊢ u.val.toNat < 256
u : Unicode.Char hu✝ : Char.isASCII u = true hu : u.val.toNat < 128 ⊢ 128 < 256
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: u : Unicode.Char hu✝ : Char.isASCII u = true hu : u.val.toNat < 128 ⊢ u.val.toNat < 256 TACTIC:
https://github.com/fgdorais/lean4-ascii.git
c01f0c30c6c0bca60d2f2216a70f500de38d75f2
ASCII/Lemmas.lean
ASCII.Char.toUnicode_eq_iff_ofUnicode_eq
[39, 1]
[50, 37]
decide
u : Unicode.Char hu✝ : Char.isASCII u = true hu : u.val.toNat < 128 ⊢ 128 < 256
no goals
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: u : Unicode.Char hu✝ : Char.isASCII u = true hu : u.val.toNat < 128 ⊢ 128 < 256 TACTIC:
https://github.com/fgdorais/lean4-ascii.git
c01f0c30c6c0bca60d2f2216a70f500de38d75f2
ASCII/Lemmas.lean
ASCII.Char.toUnicode_ofUnicode
[52, 1]
[54, 37]
rw [toUnicode_eq_iff_ofUnicode_eq]
u : Unicode.Char hu : Char.isASCII u = true ⊢ ↑(ofUnicode u hu) = u
no goals
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: u : Unicode.Char hu : Char.isASCII u = true ⊢ ↑(ofUnicode u hu) = u TACTIC:
https://github.com/fgdorais/lean4-ascii.git
c01f0c30c6c0bca60d2f2216a70f500de38d75f2
ASCII/Lemmas.lean
ASCII.Char.ofUnicode_toUnicode
[56, 1]
[58, 39]
rw [← toUnicode_eq_iff_ofUnicode_eq]
c : ASCII.Char ⊢ ofUnicode ↑c ⋯ = c
no goals
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: c : ASCII.Char ⊢ ofUnicode ↑c ⋯ = c TACTIC:
https://github.com/fgdorais/lean4-ascii.git
c01f0c30c6c0bca60d2f2216a70f500de38d75f2
ASCII/Lemmas.lean
ASCII.Char.ofUnicode?_eq_ofUnicode
[60, 1]
[61, 77]
simp [ofUnicode?, dif_pos hu]
u : Unicode.Char hu : Char.isASCII u = true ⊢ ofUnicode? u = some (ofUnicode u hu)
no goals
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: u : Unicode.Char hu : Char.isASCII u = true ⊢ ofUnicode? u = some (ofUnicode u hu) TACTIC:
https://github.com/fgdorais/lean4-ascii.git
c01f0c30c6c0bca60d2f2216a70f500de38d75f2
ASCII/Lemmas.lean
ASCII.Char.ofUnicode!_eq_ofUnicode
[63, 1]
[64, 70]
simp [ofUnicode!, dif_pos hu]
u : Unicode.Char hu : Char.isASCII u = true ⊢ ofUnicode! u = ofUnicode u hu
no goals
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: u : Unicode.Char hu : Char.isASCII u = true ⊢ ofUnicode! u = ofUnicode u hu TACTIC:
https://github.com/fgdorais/lean4-ascii.git
c01f0c30c6c0bca60d2f2216a70f500de38d75f2
ASCII/Lemmas.lean
ASCII.Char.isLower_iff
[68, 1]
[69, 22]
simp [isLower]
c : ASCII.Char ⊢ c.isLower = true ↔ 97 ≤ c.toNat ∧ c.toNat ≤ 122
c : ASCII.Char ⊢ 97 ≤ c.toByte ∧ c.toByte ≤ 122 ↔ 97 ≤ c.toNat ∧ c.toNat ≤ 122
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: c : ASCII.Char ⊢ c.isLower = true ↔ 97 ≤ c.toNat ∧ c.toNat ≤ 122 TACTIC:
https://github.com/fgdorais/lean4-ascii.git
c01f0c30c6c0bca60d2f2216a70f500de38d75f2
ASCII/Lemmas.lean
ASCII.Char.isLower_iff
[68, 1]
[69, 22]
rfl
c : ASCII.Char ⊢ 97 ≤ c.toByte ∧ c.toByte ≤ 122 ↔ 97 ≤ c.toNat ∧ c.toNat ≤ 122
no goals
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: c : ASCII.Char ⊢ 97 ≤ c.toByte ∧ c.toByte ≤ 122 ↔ 97 ≤ c.toNat ∧ c.toNat ≤ 122 TACTIC:
https://github.com/fgdorais/lean4-ascii.git
c01f0c30c6c0bca60d2f2216a70f500de38d75f2
ASCII/Lemmas.lean
ASCII.Char.isUpper_iff
[71, 1]
[72, 22]
simp [isUpper]
c : ASCII.Char ⊢ c.isUpper = true ↔ 65 ≤ c.toNat ∧ c.toNat ≤ 90
c : ASCII.Char ⊢ 65 ≤ c.toByte ∧ c.toByte ≤ 90 ↔ 65 ≤ c.toNat ∧ c.toNat ≤ 90
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: c : ASCII.Char ⊢ c.isUpper = true ↔ 65 ≤ c.toNat ∧ c.toNat ≤ 90 TACTIC:
https://github.com/fgdorais/lean4-ascii.git
c01f0c30c6c0bca60d2f2216a70f500de38d75f2
ASCII/Lemmas.lean
ASCII.Char.isUpper_iff
[71, 1]
[72, 22]
rfl
c : ASCII.Char ⊢ 65 ≤ c.toByte ∧ c.toByte ≤ 90 ↔ 65 ≤ c.toNat ∧ c.toNat ≤ 90
no goals
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: c : ASCII.Char ⊢ 65 ≤ c.toByte ∧ c.toByte ≤ 90 ↔ 65 ≤ c.toNat ∧ c.toNat ≤ 90 TACTIC:
https://github.com/fgdorais/lean4-ascii.git
c01f0c30c6c0bca60d2f2216a70f500de38d75f2
ASCII/Lemmas.lean
ASCII.Char.not_isUpper_of_isLower
[74, 1]
[80, 9]
simp only [isLower_iff, isUpper_iff]
c : ASCII.Char ⊢ c.isLower = true → ¬c.isUpper = true
c : ASCII.Char ⊢ 97 ≤ c.toNat ∧ c.toNat ≤ 122 → ¬(65 ≤ c.toNat ∧ c.toNat ≤ 90)
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: c : ASCII.Char ⊢ c.isLower = true → ¬c.isUpper = true TACTIC:
https://github.com/fgdorais/lean4-ascii.git
c01f0c30c6c0bca60d2f2216a70f500de38d75f2
ASCII/Lemmas.lean
ASCII.Char.not_isUpper_of_isLower
[74, 1]
[80, 9]
intro ⟨hl, _⟩ ⟨_, hu⟩
c : ASCII.Char ⊢ 97 ≤ c.toNat ∧ c.toNat ≤ 122 → ¬(65 ≤ c.toNat ∧ c.toNat ≤ 90)
c : ASCII.Char hl : 97 ≤ c.toNat right✝ : c.toNat ≤ 122 left✝ : 65 ≤ c.toNat hu : c.toNat ≤ 90 ⊢ False
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: c : ASCII.Char ⊢ 97 ≤ c.toNat ∧ c.toNat ≤ 122 → ¬(65 ≤ c.toNat ∧ c.toNat ≤ 90) TACTIC:
https://github.com/fgdorais/lean4-ascii.git
c01f0c30c6c0bca60d2f2216a70f500de38d75f2
ASCII/Lemmas.lean
ASCII.Char.not_isUpper_of_isLower
[74, 1]
[80, 9]
apply Nat.lt_irrefl c.toNat
c : ASCII.Char hl : 97 ≤ c.toNat right✝ : c.toNat ≤ 122 left✝ : 65 ≤ c.toNat hu : c.toNat ≤ 90 ⊢ False
c : ASCII.Char hl : 97 ≤ c.toNat right✝ : c.toNat ≤ 122 left✝ : 65 ≤ c.toNat hu : c.toNat ≤ 90 ⊢ c.toNat < c.toNat
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: c : ASCII.Char hl : 97 ≤ c.toNat right✝ : c.toNat ≤ 122 left✝ : 65 ≤ c.toNat hu : c.toNat ≤ 90 ⊢ False TACTIC:
https://github.com/fgdorais/lean4-ascii.git
c01f0c30c6c0bca60d2f2216a70f500de38d75f2
ASCII/Lemmas.lean
ASCII.Char.not_isUpper_of_isLower
[74, 1]
[80, 9]
apply Nat.lt_of_le_of_lt hu
c : ASCII.Char hl : 97 ≤ c.toNat right✝ : c.toNat ≤ 122 left✝ : 65 ≤ c.toNat hu : c.toNat ≤ 90 ⊢ c.toNat < c.toNat
c : ASCII.Char hl : 97 ≤ c.toNat right✝ : c.toNat ≤ 122 left✝ : 65 ≤ c.toNat hu : c.toNat ≤ 90 ⊢ 90 < c.toNat
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: c : ASCII.Char hl : 97 ≤ c.toNat right✝ : c.toNat ≤ 122 left✝ : 65 ≤ c.toNat hu : c.toNat ≤ 90 ⊢ c.toNat < c.toNat TACTIC:
https://github.com/fgdorais/lean4-ascii.git
c01f0c30c6c0bca60d2f2216a70f500de38d75f2
ASCII/Lemmas.lean
ASCII.Char.not_isUpper_of_isLower
[74, 1]
[80, 9]
apply Nat.lt_of_lt_of_le _ hl
c : ASCII.Char hl : 97 ≤ c.toNat right✝ : c.toNat ≤ 122 left✝ : 65 ≤ c.toNat hu : c.toNat ≤ 90 ⊢ 90 < c.toNat
c : ASCII.Char hl : 97 ≤ c.toNat right✝ : c.toNat ≤ 122 left✝ : 65 ≤ c.toNat hu : c.toNat ≤ 90 ⊢ 90 < 97
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: c : ASCII.Char hl : 97 ≤ c.toNat right✝ : c.toNat ≤ 122 left✝ : 65 ≤ c.toNat hu : c.toNat ≤ 90 ⊢ 90 < c.toNat TACTIC:
https://github.com/fgdorais/lean4-ascii.git
c01f0c30c6c0bca60d2f2216a70f500de38d75f2
ASCII/Lemmas.lean
ASCII.Char.not_isUpper_of_isLower
[74, 1]
[80, 9]
decide
c : ASCII.Char hl : 97 ≤ c.toNat right✝ : c.toNat ≤ 122 left✝ : 65 ≤ c.toNat hu : c.toNat ≤ 90 ⊢ 90 < 97
no goals
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: c : ASCII.Char hl : 97 ≤ c.toNat right✝ : c.toNat ≤ 122 left✝ : 65 ≤ c.toNat hu : c.toNat ≤ 90 ⊢ 90 < 97 TACTIC:
https://github.com/fgdorais/lean4-ascii.git
c01f0c30c6c0bca60d2f2216a70f500de38d75f2
ASCII/Lemmas.lean
ASCII.Char.not_isUpper_toLower
[85, 1]
[95, 15]
simp [-not_and, toLower, isUpper_iff]
c : ASCII.Char ⊢ ¬c.toLower.isUpper = true
c : ASCII.Char ⊢ ¬(65 ≤ (if h : 65 ≤ c.toNat ∧ c.toNat ≤ 90 then ofNatAux (c.toNat + 32) ⋯ else c).toNat ∧ (if h : 65 ≤ c.toNat ∧ c.toNat ≤ 90 then ofNatAux (c.toNat + 32) ⋯ else c).toNat ≤ 90)
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: c : ASCII.Char ⊢ ¬c.toLower.isUpper = true TACTIC:
https://github.com/fgdorais/lean4-ascii.git
c01f0c30c6c0bca60d2f2216a70f500de38d75f2
ASCII/Lemmas.lean
ASCII.Char.not_isUpper_toLower
[85, 1]
[95, 15]
split
c : ASCII.Char ⊢ ¬(65 ≤ (if h : 65 ≤ c.toNat ∧ c.toNat ≤ 90 then ofNatAux (c.toNat + 32) ⋯ else c).toNat ∧ (if h : 65 ≤ c.toNat ∧ c.toNat ≤ 90 then ofNatAux (c.toNat + 32) ⋯ else c).toNat ≤ 90)
case isTrue c : ASCII.Char h✝ : 65 ≤ c.toNat ∧ c.toNat ≤ 90 ⊢ ¬(65 ≤ (ofNatAux (c.toNat + 32) ⋯).toNat ∧ (ofNatAux (c.toNat + 32) ⋯).toNat ≤ 90) case isFalse c : ASCII.Char h✝ : ¬(65 ≤ c.toNat ∧ c.toNat ≤ 90) ⊢ ¬(65 ≤ c.toNat ∧ c.toNat ≤ 90)
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: c : ASCII.Char ⊢ ¬(65 ≤ (if h : 65 ≤ c.toNat ∧ c.toNat ≤ 90 then ofNatAux (c.toNat + 32) ⋯ else c).toNat ∧ (if h : 65 ≤ c.toNat ∧ c.toNat ≤ 90 then ofNatAux (c.toNat + 32) ⋯ else c).toNat ≤ 90) TACTIC:
https://github.com/fgdorais/lean4-ascii.git
c01f0c30c6c0bca60d2f2216a70f500de38d75f2
ASCII/Lemmas.lean
ASCII.Char.not_isUpper_toLower
[85, 1]
[95, 15]
next h => simp [-not_and, toNat_ofNatAux] intro h' absurd h'.2 apply Nat.not_le_of_gt apply Nat.lt_of_lt_of_le _ h.1 decide
case isTrue c : ASCII.Char h✝ : 65 ≤ c.toNat ∧ c.toNat ≤ 90 ⊢ ¬(65 ≤ (ofNatAux (c.toNat + 32) ⋯).toNat ∧ (ofNatAux (c.toNat + 32) ⋯).toNat ≤ 90)
no goals
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case isTrue c : ASCII.Char h✝ : 65 ≤ c.toNat ∧ c.toNat ≤ 90 ⊢ ¬(65 ≤ (ofNatAux (c.toNat + 32) ⋯).toNat ∧ (ofNatAux (c.toNat + 32) ⋯).toNat ≤ 90) TACTIC:
https://github.com/fgdorais/lean4-ascii.git
c01f0c30c6c0bca60d2f2216a70f500de38d75f2
ASCII/Lemmas.lean
ASCII.Char.not_isUpper_toLower
[85, 1]
[95, 15]
simp [-not_and, toNat_ofNatAux]
c : ASCII.Char h : 65 ≤ c.toNat ∧ c.toNat ≤ 90 ⊢ ¬(65 ≤ (ofNatAux (c.toNat + 32) ⋯).toNat ∧ (ofNatAux (c.toNat + 32) ⋯).toNat ≤ 90)
c : ASCII.Char h : 65 ≤ c.toNat ∧ c.toNat ≤ 90 ⊢ ¬(33 ≤ c.toNat ∧ c.toNat ≤ 58)
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: c : ASCII.Char h : 65 ≤ c.toNat ∧ c.toNat ≤ 90 ⊢ ¬(65 ≤ (ofNatAux (c.toNat + 32) ⋯).toNat ∧ (ofNatAux (c.toNat + 32) ⋯).toNat ≤ 90) TACTIC:
https://github.com/fgdorais/lean4-ascii.git
c01f0c30c6c0bca60d2f2216a70f500de38d75f2
ASCII/Lemmas.lean
ASCII.Char.not_isUpper_toLower
[85, 1]
[95, 15]
intro h'
c : ASCII.Char h : 65 ≤ c.toNat ∧ c.toNat ≤ 90 ⊢ ¬(33 ≤ c.toNat ∧ c.toNat ≤ 58)
c : ASCII.Char h : 65 ≤ c.toNat ∧ c.toNat ≤ 90 h' : 33 ≤ c.toNat ∧ c.toNat ≤ 58 ⊢ False
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: c : ASCII.Char h : 65 ≤ c.toNat ∧ c.toNat ≤ 90 ⊢ ¬(33 ≤ c.toNat ∧ c.toNat ≤ 58) TACTIC:
https://github.com/fgdorais/lean4-ascii.git
c01f0c30c6c0bca60d2f2216a70f500de38d75f2
ASCII/Lemmas.lean
ASCII.Char.not_isUpper_toLower
[85, 1]
[95, 15]
absurd h'.2
c : ASCII.Char h : 65 ≤ c.toNat ∧ c.toNat ≤ 90 h' : 33 ≤ c.toNat ∧ c.toNat ≤ 58 ⊢ False
c : ASCII.Char h : 65 ≤ c.toNat ∧ c.toNat ≤ 90 h' : 33 ≤ c.toNat ∧ c.toNat ≤ 58 ⊢ ¬c.toNat ≤ 58
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: c : ASCII.Char h : 65 ≤ c.toNat ∧ c.toNat ≤ 90 h' : 33 ≤ c.toNat ∧ c.toNat ≤ 58 ⊢ False TACTIC:
https://github.com/fgdorais/lean4-ascii.git
c01f0c30c6c0bca60d2f2216a70f500de38d75f2
ASCII/Lemmas.lean
ASCII.Char.not_isUpper_toLower
[85, 1]
[95, 15]
apply Nat.not_le_of_gt
c : ASCII.Char h : 65 ≤ c.toNat ∧ c.toNat ≤ 90 h' : 33 ≤ c.toNat ∧ c.toNat ≤ 58 ⊢ ¬c.toNat ≤ 58
case h c : ASCII.Char h : 65 ≤ c.toNat ∧ c.toNat ≤ 90 h' : 33 ≤ c.toNat ∧ c.toNat ≤ 58 ⊢ c.toNat > 58
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: c : ASCII.Char h : 65 ≤ c.toNat ∧ c.toNat ≤ 90 h' : 33 ≤ c.toNat ∧ c.toNat ≤ 58 ⊢ ¬c.toNat ≤ 58 TACTIC:
https://github.com/fgdorais/lean4-ascii.git
c01f0c30c6c0bca60d2f2216a70f500de38d75f2
ASCII/Lemmas.lean
ASCII.Char.not_isUpper_toLower
[85, 1]
[95, 15]
apply Nat.lt_of_lt_of_le _ h.1
case h c : ASCII.Char h : 65 ≤ c.toNat ∧ c.toNat ≤ 90 h' : 33 ≤ c.toNat ∧ c.toNat ≤ 58 ⊢ c.toNat > 58
c : ASCII.Char h : 65 ≤ c.toNat ∧ c.toNat ≤ 90 h' : 33 ≤ c.toNat ∧ c.toNat ≤ 58 ⊢ 58 < 65
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case h c : ASCII.Char h : 65 ≤ c.toNat ∧ c.toNat ≤ 90 h' : 33 ≤ c.toNat ∧ c.toNat ≤ 58 ⊢ c.toNat > 58 TACTIC:
https://github.com/fgdorais/lean4-ascii.git
c01f0c30c6c0bca60d2f2216a70f500de38d75f2
ASCII/Lemmas.lean
ASCII.Char.not_isUpper_toLower
[85, 1]
[95, 15]
decide
c : ASCII.Char h : 65 ≤ c.toNat ∧ c.toNat ≤ 90 h' : 33 ≤ c.toNat ∧ c.toNat ≤ 58 ⊢ 58 < 65
no goals
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: c : ASCII.Char h : 65 ≤ c.toNat ∧ c.toNat ≤ 90 h' : 33 ≤ c.toNat ∧ c.toNat ≤ 58 ⊢ 58 < 65 TACTIC:
https://github.com/fgdorais/lean4-ascii.git
c01f0c30c6c0bca60d2f2216a70f500de38d75f2
ASCII/Lemmas.lean
ASCII.Char.not_isUpper_toLower
[85, 1]
[95, 15]
assumption
case isFalse c : ASCII.Char h✝ : ¬(65 ≤ c.toNat ∧ c.toNat ≤ 90) ⊢ ¬(65 ≤ c.toNat ∧ c.toNat ≤ 90)
no goals
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case isFalse c : ASCII.Char h✝ : ¬(65 ≤ c.toNat ∧ c.toNat ≤ 90) ⊢ ¬(65 ≤ c.toNat ∧ c.toNat ≤ 90) TACTIC:
https://github.com/fgdorais/lean4-ascii.git
c01f0c30c6c0bca60d2f2216a70f500de38d75f2
ASCII/Lemmas.lean
ASCII.Char.not_isLower_toUpper
[97, 1]
[107, 15]
simp [-not_and, toUpper, isLower_iff]
c : ASCII.Char ⊢ ¬c.toUpper.isLower = true
c : ASCII.Char ⊢ ¬(97 ≤ (if h : 97 ≤ c.toNat ∧ c.toNat ≤ 122 then ofNatAux (c.toNat - 32) ⋯ else c).toNat ∧ (if h : 97 ≤ c.toNat ∧ c.toNat ≤ 122 then ofNatAux (c.toNat - 32) ⋯ else c).toNat ≤ 122)
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: c : ASCII.Char ⊢ ¬c.toUpper.isLower = true TACTIC:
https://github.com/fgdorais/lean4-ascii.git
c01f0c30c6c0bca60d2f2216a70f500de38d75f2
ASCII/Lemmas.lean
ASCII.Char.not_isLower_toUpper
[97, 1]
[107, 15]
split
c : ASCII.Char ⊢ ¬(97 ≤ (if h : 97 ≤ c.toNat ∧ c.toNat ≤ 122 then ofNatAux (c.toNat - 32) ⋯ else c).toNat ∧ (if h : 97 ≤ c.toNat ∧ c.toNat ≤ 122 then ofNatAux (c.toNat - 32) ⋯ else c).toNat ≤ 122)
case isTrue c : ASCII.Char h✝ : 97 ≤ c.toNat ∧ c.toNat ≤ 122 ⊢ ¬(97 ≤ (ofNatAux (c.toNat - 32) ⋯).toNat ∧ (ofNatAux (c.toNat - 32) ⋯).toNat ≤ 122) case isFalse c : ASCII.Char h✝ : ¬(97 ≤ c.toNat ∧ c.toNat ≤ 122) ⊢ ¬(97 ≤ c.toNat ∧ c.toNat ≤ 122)
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: c : ASCII.Char ⊢ ¬(97 ≤ (if h : 97 ≤ c.toNat ∧ c.toNat ≤ 122 then ofNatAux (c.toNat - 32) ⋯ else c).toNat ∧ (if h : 97 ≤ c.toNat ∧ c.toNat ≤ 122 then ofNatAux (c.toNat - 32) ⋯ else c).toNat ≤ 122) TACTIC:
https://github.com/fgdorais/lean4-ascii.git
c01f0c30c6c0bca60d2f2216a70f500de38d75f2
ASCII/Lemmas.lean
ASCII.Char.not_isLower_toUpper
[97, 1]
[107, 15]
next h => simp [-not_and, toNat_ofNatAux] intro h' absurd h'.1 apply Nat.not_le_of_gt apply Nat.lt_of_le_of_lt (Nat.sub_le_sub_right h.2 32) decide
case isTrue c : ASCII.Char h✝ : 97 ≤ c.toNat ∧ c.toNat ≤ 122 ⊢ ¬(97 ≤ (ofNatAux (c.toNat - 32) ⋯).toNat ∧ (ofNatAux (c.toNat - 32) ⋯).toNat ≤ 122)
no goals
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case isTrue c : ASCII.Char h✝ : 97 ≤ c.toNat ∧ c.toNat ≤ 122 ⊢ ¬(97 ≤ (ofNatAux (c.toNat - 32) ⋯).toNat ∧ (ofNatAux (c.toNat - 32) ⋯).toNat ≤ 122) TACTIC:
https://github.com/fgdorais/lean4-ascii.git
c01f0c30c6c0bca60d2f2216a70f500de38d75f2
ASCII/Lemmas.lean
ASCII.Char.not_isLower_toUpper
[97, 1]
[107, 15]
simp [-not_and, toNat_ofNatAux]
c : ASCII.Char h : 97 ≤ c.toNat ∧ c.toNat ≤ 122 ⊢ ¬(97 ≤ (ofNatAux (c.toNat - 32) ⋯).toNat ∧ (ofNatAux (c.toNat - 32) ⋯).toNat ≤ 122)
c : ASCII.Char h : 97 ≤ c.toNat ∧ c.toNat ≤ 122 ⊢ ¬(97 ≤ c.toNat - 32 ∧ c.toNat - 32 ≤ 122)
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: c : ASCII.Char h : 97 ≤ c.toNat ∧ c.toNat ≤ 122 ⊢ ¬(97 ≤ (ofNatAux (c.toNat - 32) ⋯).toNat ∧ (ofNatAux (c.toNat - 32) ⋯).toNat ≤ 122) TACTIC:
https://github.com/fgdorais/lean4-ascii.git
c01f0c30c6c0bca60d2f2216a70f500de38d75f2
ASCII/Lemmas.lean
ASCII.Char.not_isLower_toUpper
[97, 1]
[107, 15]
intro h'
c : ASCII.Char h : 97 ≤ c.toNat ∧ c.toNat ≤ 122 ⊢ ¬(97 ≤ c.toNat - 32 ∧ c.toNat - 32 ≤ 122)
c : ASCII.Char h : 97 ≤ c.toNat ∧ c.toNat ≤ 122 h' : 97 ≤ c.toNat - 32 ∧ c.toNat - 32 ≤ 122 ⊢ False
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: c : ASCII.Char h : 97 ≤ c.toNat ∧ c.toNat ≤ 122 ⊢ ¬(97 ≤ c.toNat - 32 ∧ c.toNat - 32 ≤ 122) TACTIC: