url
stringclasses
147 values
commit
stringclasses
147 values
file_path
stringlengths
7
101
full_name
stringlengths
1
94
start
stringlengths
6
10
end
stringlengths
6
11
tactic
stringlengths
1
11.2k
state_before
stringlengths
3
2.09M
state_after
stringlengths
6
2.09M
input
stringlengths
73
2.09M
https://github.com/AntoineChambert-Loir/Jordan4.git
d49910c127be01229697737a55a2d756e908d3e1
Jordan/PermFibration.lean
arrowAction.mem_stabilizer_iff
[13, 1]
[14, 84]
rw [eq_comm, ← g.comp_symm_eq]
α : Type u_1 ι : Type u_2 p : α → ι g : Perm α ⊢ g ∈ stabilizer (Perm α) p ↔ p ∘ ⇑g = p
α : Type u_1 ι : Type u_2 p : α → ι g : Perm α ⊢ g ∈ stabilizer (Perm α) p ↔ p ∘ ⇑g.symm = p
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: α : Type u_1 ι : Type u_2 p : α → ι g : Perm α ⊢ g ∈ stabilizer (Perm α) p ↔ p ∘ ⇑g = p TACTIC:
https://github.com/AntoineChambert-Loir/Jordan4.git
d49910c127be01229697737a55a2d756e908d3e1
Jordan/PermFibration.lean
arrowAction.mem_stabilizer_iff
[13, 1]
[14, 84]
rfl
α : Type u_1 ι : Type u_2 p : α → ι g : Perm α ⊢ g ∈ stabilizer (Perm α) p ↔ p ∘ ⇑g.symm = p
no goals
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: α : Type u_1 ι : Type u_2 p : α → ι g : Perm α ⊢ g ∈ stabilizer (Perm α) p ↔ p ∘ ⇑g.symm = p TACTIC:
https://github.com/AntoineChambert-Loir/Jordan4.git
d49910c127be01229697737a55a2d756e908d3e1
Jordan/PermFibration.lean
φ_invFun_eq
[18, 1]
[19, 49]
subst h
α : Type u_1 ι : Type u_2 p : α → ι g : (i : ι) → Perm ↑{a | p a = i} a : α i : ι h : p a = i ⊢ φ_invFun g a = ↑((g i) { val := a, property := h })
α : Type u_1 ι : Type u_2 p : α → ι g : (i : ι) → Perm ↑{a | p a = i} a : α ⊢ φ_invFun g a = ↑((g (p a)) { val := a, property := ⋯ })
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: α : Type u_1 ι : Type u_2 p : α → ι g : (i : ι) → Perm ↑{a | p a = i} a : α i : ι h : p a = i ⊢ φ_invFun g a = ↑((g i) { val := a, property := h }) TACTIC:
https://github.com/AntoineChambert-Loir/Jordan4.git
d49910c127be01229697737a55a2d756e908d3e1
Jordan/PermFibration.lean
φ_invFun_eq
[18, 1]
[19, 49]
rfl
α : Type u_1 ι : Type u_2 p : α → ι g : (i : ι) → Perm ↑{a | p a = i} a : α ⊢ φ_invFun g a = ↑((g (p a)) { val := a, property := ⋯ })
no goals
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: α : Type u_1 ι : Type u_2 p : α → ι g : (i : ι) → Perm ↑{a | p a = i} a : α ⊢ φ_invFun g a = ↑((g (p a)) { val := a, property := ⋯ }) TACTIC:
https://github.com/AntoineChambert-Loir/Jordan4.git
d49910c127be01229697737a55a2d756e908d3e1
Jordan/Mathlib/GroupTheory/Subgroup/Basic.lean
MonoidHom.range_isCommutative
[11, 1]
[17, 52]
apply Subgroup.IsCommutative.mk
G : Type u_1 H : Type u_2 inst✝¹ : Group G inst✝ : Group H f : G →* H hG : Std.Commutative fun x x_1 => x * x_1 ⊢ Subgroup.IsCommutative (range f)
case is_comm G : Type u_1 H : Type u_2 inst✝¹ : Group G inst✝ : Group H f : G →* H hG : Std.Commutative fun x x_1 => x * x_1 ⊢ Std.Commutative fun x x_1 => x * x_1
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: G : Type u_1 H : Type u_2 inst✝¹ : Group G inst✝ : Group H f : G →* H hG : Std.Commutative fun x x_1 => x * x_1 ⊢ Subgroup.IsCommutative (range f) TACTIC:
https://github.com/AntoineChambert-Loir/Jordan4.git
d49910c127be01229697737a55a2d756e908d3e1
Jordan/Mathlib/GroupTheory/Subgroup/Basic.lean
MonoidHom.range_isCommutative
[11, 1]
[17, 52]
constructor
case is_comm G : Type u_1 H : Type u_2 inst✝¹ : Group G inst✝ : Group H f : G →* H hG : Std.Commutative fun x x_1 => x * x_1 ⊢ Std.Commutative fun x x_1 => x * x_1
case is_comm.comm G : Type u_1 H : Type u_2 inst✝¹ : Group G inst✝ : Group H f : G →* H hG : Std.Commutative fun x x_1 => x * x_1 ⊢ ∀ (a b : ↥(range f)), a * b = b * a
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case is_comm G : Type u_1 H : Type u_2 inst✝¹ : Group G inst✝ : Group H f : G →* H hG : Std.Commutative fun x x_1 => x * x_1 ⊢ Std.Commutative fun x x_1 => x * x_1 TACTIC:
https://github.com/AntoineChambert-Loir/Jordan4.git
d49910c127be01229697737a55a2d756e908d3e1
Jordan/Mathlib/GroupTheory/Subgroup/Basic.lean
MonoidHom.range_isCommutative
[11, 1]
[17, 52]
rintro ⟨_, a, rfl⟩ ⟨_, b, rfl⟩
case is_comm.comm G : Type u_1 H : Type u_2 inst✝¹ : Group G inst✝ : Group H f : G →* H hG : Std.Commutative fun x x_1 => x * x_1 ⊢ ∀ (a b : ↥(range f)), a * b = b * a
case is_comm.comm.mk.intro.mk.intro G : Type u_1 H : Type u_2 inst✝¹ : Group G inst✝ : Group H f : G →* H hG : Std.Commutative fun x x_1 => x * x_1 a b : G ⊢ { val := f a, property := ⋯ } * { val := f b, property := ⋯ } = { val := f b, property := ⋯ } * { val := f a, property := ⋯ }
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case is_comm.comm G : Type u_1 H : Type u_2 inst✝¹ : Group G inst✝ : Group H f : G →* H hG : Std.Commutative fun x x_1 => x * x_1 ⊢ ∀ (a b : ↥(range f)), a * b = b * a TACTIC:
https://github.com/AntoineChambert-Loir/Jordan4.git
d49910c127be01229697737a55a2d756e908d3e1
Jordan/Mathlib/GroupTheory/Subgroup/Basic.lean
MonoidHom.range_isCommutative
[11, 1]
[17, 52]
rw [← Subtype.coe_inj]
case is_comm.comm.mk.intro.mk.intro G : Type u_1 H : Type u_2 inst✝¹ : Group G inst✝ : Group H f : G →* H hG : Std.Commutative fun x x_1 => x * x_1 a b : G ⊢ { val := f a, property := ⋯ } * { val := f b, property := ⋯ } = { val := f b, property := ⋯ } * { val := f a, property := ⋯ }
case is_comm.comm.mk.intro.mk.intro G : Type u_1 H : Type u_2 inst✝¹ : Group G inst✝ : Group H f : G →* H hG : Std.Commutative fun x x_1 => x * x_1 a b : G ⊢ ↑({ val := f a, property := ⋯ } * { val := f b, property := ⋯ }) = ↑({ val := f b, property := ⋯ } * { val := f a, property := ⋯ })
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case is_comm.comm.mk.intro.mk.intro G : Type u_1 H : Type u_2 inst✝¹ : Group G inst✝ : Group H f : G →* H hG : Std.Commutative fun x x_1 => x * x_1 a b : G ⊢ { val := f a, property := ⋯ } * { val := f b, property := ⋯ } = { val := f b, property := ⋯ } * { val := f a, property := ⋯ } TACTIC:
https://github.com/AntoineChambert-Loir/Jordan4.git
d49910c127be01229697737a55a2d756e908d3e1
Jordan/Mathlib/GroupTheory/Subgroup/Basic.lean
MonoidHom.range_isCommutative
[11, 1]
[17, 52]
simp only [Submonoid.coe_mul, ← map_mul, hG.comm]
case is_comm.comm.mk.intro.mk.intro G : Type u_1 H : Type u_2 inst✝¹ : Group G inst✝ : Group H f : G →* H hG : Std.Commutative fun x x_1 => x * x_1 a b : G ⊢ ↑({ val := f a, property := ⋯ } * { val := f b, property := ⋯ }) = ↑({ val := f b, property := ⋯ } * { val := f a, property := ⋯ })
no goals
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case is_comm.comm.mk.intro.mk.intro G : Type u_1 H : Type u_2 inst✝¹ : Group G inst✝ : Group H f : G →* H hG : Std.Commutative fun x x_1 => x * x_1 a b : G ⊢ ↑({ val := f a, property := ⋯ } * { val := f b, property := ⋯ }) = ↑({ val := f b, property := ⋯ } * { val := f a, property := ⋯ }) TACTIC:
https://github.com/AntoineChambert-Loir/Jordan4.git
d49910c127be01229697737a55a2d756e908d3e1
Jordan/Mathlib/GroupTheory/Subgroup/Basic.lean
Equiv.perm_is_nontrivial
[20, 1]
[22, 85]
rw [← Fintype.one_lt_card_iff_nontrivial, Fintype.card_perm, Nat.one_lt_factorial]
α : Type u_1 inst✝¹ : DecidableEq α inst✝ : Fintype α ⊢ 1 < Fintype.card α ↔ Nontrivial (Perm α)
no goals
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: α : Type u_1 inst✝¹ : DecidableEq α inst✝ : Fintype α ⊢ 1 < Fintype.card α ↔ Nontrivial (Perm α) TACTIC:
https://github.com/AntoineChambert-Loir/Jordan4.git
d49910c127be01229697737a55a2d756e908d3e1
Jordan/Mathlib/GroupTheory/Subgroup/Basic.lean
Monoid.isCommutative_of_fintype_card_le_2
[25, 1]
[41, 33]
by_contra h
G : Type u_1 inst✝² : DecidableEq G inst✝¹ : Fintype G inst✝ : Monoid G hG : Fintype.card G ≤ 2 ⊢ ∀ (a b : G), a ≠ 1 → b ≠ 1 → a = b
G : Type u_1 inst✝² : DecidableEq G inst✝¹ : Fintype G inst✝ : Monoid G hG : Fintype.card G ≤ 2 h : ¬∀ (a b : G), a ≠ 1 → b ≠ 1 → a = b ⊢ False
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: G : Type u_1 inst✝² : DecidableEq G inst✝¹ : Fintype G inst✝ : Monoid G hG : Fintype.card G ≤ 2 ⊢ ∀ (a b : G), a ≠ 1 → b ≠ 1 → a = b TACTIC:
https://github.com/AntoineChambert-Loir/Jordan4.git
d49910c127be01229697737a55a2d756e908d3e1
Jordan/Mathlib/GroupTheory/Subgroup/Basic.lean
Monoid.isCommutative_of_fintype_card_le_2
[25, 1]
[41, 33]
apply not_lt.mpr hG
G : Type u_1 inst✝² : DecidableEq G inst✝¹ : Fintype G inst✝ : Monoid G hG : Fintype.card G ≤ 2 h : ¬∀ (a b : G), a ≠ 1 → b ≠ 1 → a = b ⊢ False
G : Type u_1 inst✝² : DecidableEq G inst✝¹ : Fintype G inst✝ : Monoid G hG : Fintype.card G ≤ 2 h : ¬∀ (a b : G), a ≠ 1 → b ≠ 1 → a = b ⊢ 2 < Fintype.card G
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: G : Type u_1 inst✝² : DecidableEq G inst✝¹ : Fintype G inst✝ : Monoid G hG : Fintype.card G ≤ 2 h : ¬∀ (a b : G), a ≠ 1 → b ≠ 1 → a = b ⊢ False TACTIC:
https://github.com/AntoineChambert-Loir/Jordan4.git
d49910c127be01229697737a55a2d756e908d3e1
Jordan/Mathlib/GroupTheory/Subgroup/Basic.lean
Monoid.isCommutative_of_fintype_card_le_2
[25, 1]
[41, 33]
push_neg at h
G : Type u_1 inst✝² : DecidableEq G inst✝¹ : Fintype G inst✝ : Monoid G hG : Fintype.card G ≤ 2 h : ¬∀ (a b : G), a ≠ 1 → b ≠ 1 → a = b ⊢ 2 < Fintype.card G
G : Type u_1 inst✝² : DecidableEq G inst✝¹ : Fintype G inst✝ : Monoid G hG : Fintype.card G ≤ 2 h : ∃ a b, a ≠ 1 ∧ b ≠ 1 ∧ a ≠ b ⊢ 2 < Fintype.card G
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: G : Type u_1 inst✝² : DecidableEq G inst✝¹ : Fintype G inst✝ : Monoid G hG : Fintype.card G ≤ 2 h : ¬∀ (a b : G), a ≠ 1 → b ≠ 1 → a = b ⊢ 2 < Fintype.card G TACTIC:
https://github.com/AntoineChambert-Loir/Jordan4.git
d49910c127be01229697737a55a2d756e908d3e1
Jordan/Mathlib/GroupTheory/Subgroup/Basic.lean
Monoid.isCommutative_of_fintype_card_le_2
[25, 1]
[41, 33]
obtain ⟨a, b, ha1, hb1, hab⟩ := h
G : Type u_1 inst✝² : DecidableEq G inst✝¹ : Fintype G inst✝ : Monoid G hG : Fintype.card G ≤ 2 h : ∃ a b, a ≠ 1 ∧ b ≠ 1 ∧ a ≠ b ⊢ 2 < Fintype.card G
case intro.intro.intro.intro G : Type u_1 inst✝² : DecidableEq G inst✝¹ : Fintype G inst✝ : Monoid G hG : Fintype.card G ≤ 2 a b : G ha1 : a ≠ 1 hb1 : b ≠ 1 hab : a ≠ b ⊢ 2 < Fintype.card G
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: G : Type u_1 inst✝² : DecidableEq G inst✝¹ : Fintype G inst✝ : Monoid G hG : Fintype.card G ≤ 2 h : ∃ a b, a ≠ 1 ∧ b ≠ 1 ∧ a ≠ b ⊢ 2 < Fintype.card G TACTIC:
https://github.com/AntoineChambert-Loir/Jordan4.git
d49910c127be01229697737a55a2d756e908d3e1
Jordan/Mathlib/GroupTheory/Subgroup/Basic.lean
Monoid.isCommutative_of_fintype_card_le_2
[25, 1]
[41, 33]
rw [Fintype.two_lt_card_iff]
case intro.intro.intro.intro G : Type u_1 inst✝² : DecidableEq G inst✝¹ : Fintype G inst✝ : Monoid G hG : Fintype.card G ≤ 2 a b : G ha1 : a ≠ 1 hb1 : b ≠ 1 hab : a ≠ b ⊢ 2 < Fintype.card G
case intro.intro.intro.intro G : Type u_1 inst✝² : DecidableEq G inst✝¹ : Fintype G inst✝ : Monoid G hG : Fintype.card G ≤ 2 a b : G ha1 : a ≠ 1 hb1 : b ≠ 1 hab : a ≠ b ⊢ ∃ a b c, a ≠ b ∧ a ≠ c ∧ b ≠ c
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case intro.intro.intro.intro G : Type u_1 inst✝² : DecidableEq G inst✝¹ : Fintype G inst✝ : Monoid G hG : Fintype.card G ≤ 2 a b : G ha1 : a ≠ 1 hb1 : b ≠ 1 hab : a ≠ b ⊢ 2 < Fintype.card G TACTIC:
https://github.com/AntoineChambert-Loir/Jordan4.git
d49910c127be01229697737a55a2d756e908d3e1
Jordan/Mathlib/GroupTheory/Subgroup/Basic.lean
Monoid.isCommutative_of_fintype_card_le_2
[25, 1]
[41, 33]
exact ⟨a, b, 1, hab, ha1, hb1⟩
case intro.intro.intro.intro G : Type u_1 inst✝² : DecidableEq G inst✝¹ : Fintype G inst✝ : Monoid G hG : Fintype.card G ≤ 2 a b : G ha1 : a ≠ 1 hb1 : b ≠ 1 hab : a ≠ b ⊢ ∃ a b c, a ≠ b ∧ a ≠ c ∧ b ≠ c
no goals
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case intro.intro.intro.intro G : Type u_1 inst✝² : DecidableEq G inst✝¹ : Fintype G inst✝ : Monoid G hG : Fintype.card G ≤ 2 a b : G ha1 : a ≠ 1 hb1 : b ≠ 1 hab : a ≠ b ⊢ ∃ a b c, a ≠ b ∧ a ≠ c ∧ b ≠ c TACTIC:
https://github.com/AntoineChambert-Loir/Jordan4.git
d49910c127be01229697737a55a2d756e908d3e1
Jordan/Mathlib/GroupTheory/Subgroup/Basic.lean
Monoid.isCommutative_of_fintype_card_le_2
[25, 1]
[41, 33]
constructor
G : Type u_1 inst✝² : DecidableEq G inst✝¹ : Fintype G inst✝ : Monoid G hG : Fintype.card G ≤ 2 this : ∀ (a b : G), a ≠ 1 → b ≠ 1 → a = b ⊢ Std.Commutative fun x x_1 => x * x_1
case comm G : Type u_1 inst✝² : DecidableEq G inst✝¹ : Fintype G inst✝ : Monoid G hG : Fintype.card G ≤ 2 this : ∀ (a b : G), a ≠ 1 → b ≠ 1 → a = b ⊢ ∀ (a b : G), a * b = b * a
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: G : Type u_1 inst✝² : DecidableEq G inst✝¹ : Fintype G inst✝ : Monoid G hG : Fintype.card G ≤ 2 this : ∀ (a b : G), a ≠ 1 → b ≠ 1 → a = b ⊢ Std.Commutative fun x x_1 => x * x_1 TACTIC:
https://github.com/AntoineChambert-Loir/Jordan4.git
d49910c127be01229697737a55a2d756e908d3e1
Jordan/Mathlib/GroupTheory/Subgroup/Basic.lean
Monoid.isCommutative_of_fintype_card_le_2
[25, 1]
[41, 33]
intro a b
case comm G : Type u_1 inst✝² : DecidableEq G inst✝¹ : Fintype G inst✝ : Monoid G hG : Fintype.card G ≤ 2 this : ∀ (a b : G), a ≠ 1 → b ≠ 1 → a = b ⊢ ∀ (a b : G), a * b = b * a
case comm G : Type u_1 inst✝² : DecidableEq G inst✝¹ : Fintype G inst✝ : Monoid G hG : Fintype.card G ≤ 2 this : ∀ (a b : G), a ≠ 1 → b ≠ 1 → a = b a b : G ⊢ a * b = b * a
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case comm G : Type u_1 inst✝² : DecidableEq G inst✝¹ : Fintype G inst✝ : Monoid G hG : Fintype.card G ≤ 2 this : ∀ (a b : G), a ≠ 1 → b ≠ 1 → a = b ⊢ ∀ (a b : G), a * b = b * a TACTIC:
https://github.com/AntoineChambert-Loir/Jordan4.git
d49910c127be01229697737a55a2d756e908d3e1
Jordan/Mathlib/GroupTheory/Subgroup/Basic.lean
Monoid.isCommutative_of_fintype_card_le_2
[25, 1]
[41, 33]
cases' dec_em (a = 1) with ha ha
case comm G : Type u_1 inst✝² : DecidableEq G inst✝¹ : Fintype G inst✝ : Monoid G hG : Fintype.card G ≤ 2 this : ∀ (a b : G), a ≠ 1 → b ≠ 1 → a = b a b : G ⊢ a * b = b * a
case comm.inl G : Type u_1 inst✝² : DecidableEq G inst✝¹ : Fintype G inst✝ : Monoid G hG : Fintype.card G ≤ 2 this : ∀ (a b : G), a ≠ 1 → b ≠ 1 → a = b a b : G ha : a = 1 ⊢ a * b = b * a case comm.inr G : Type u_1 inst✝² : DecidableEq G inst✝¹ : Fintype G inst✝ : Monoid G hG : Fintype.card G ≤ 2 this : ∀ (a b : G), a ≠ 1 → b ≠ 1 → a = b a b : G ha : ¬a = 1 ⊢ a * b = b * a
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case comm G : Type u_1 inst✝² : DecidableEq G inst✝¹ : Fintype G inst✝ : Monoid G hG : Fintype.card G ≤ 2 this : ∀ (a b : G), a ≠ 1 → b ≠ 1 → a = b a b : G ⊢ a * b = b * a TACTIC:
https://github.com/AntoineChambert-Loir/Jordan4.git
d49910c127be01229697737a55a2d756e908d3e1
Jordan/Mathlib/GroupTheory/Subgroup/Basic.lean
Monoid.isCommutative_of_fintype_card_le_2
[25, 1]
[41, 33]
cases' dec_em (b = 1) with hb hb
case comm.inr G : Type u_1 inst✝² : DecidableEq G inst✝¹ : Fintype G inst✝ : Monoid G hG : Fintype.card G ≤ 2 this : ∀ (a b : G), a ≠ 1 → b ≠ 1 → a = b a b : G ha : ¬a = 1 ⊢ a * b = b * a
case comm.inr.inl G : Type u_1 inst✝² : DecidableEq G inst✝¹ : Fintype G inst✝ : Monoid G hG : Fintype.card G ≤ 2 this : ∀ (a b : G), a ≠ 1 → b ≠ 1 → a = b a b : G ha : ¬a = 1 hb : b = 1 ⊢ a * b = b * a case comm.inr.inr G : Type u_1 inst✝² : DecidableEq G inst✝¹ : Fintype G inst✝ : Monoid G hG : Fintype.card G ≤ 2 this : ∀ (a b : G), a ≠ 1 → b ≠ 1 → a = b a b : G ha : ¬a = 1 hb : ¬b = 1 ⊢ a * b = b * a
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case comm.inr G : Type u_1 inst✝² : DecidableEq G inst✝¹ : Fintype G inst✝ : Monoid G hG : Fintype.card G ≤ 2 this : ∀ (a b : G), a ≠ 1 → b ≠ 1 → a = b a b : G ha : ¬a = 1 ⊢ a * b = b * a TACTIC:
https://github.com/AntoineChambert-Loir/Jordan4.git
d49910c127be01229697737a55a2d756e908d3e1
Jordan/Mathlib/GroupTheory/Subgroup/Basic.lean
Monoid.isCommutative_of_fintype_card_le_2
[25, 1]
[41, 33]
rw [this a b ha hb]
case comm.inr.inr G : Type u_1 inst✝² : DecidableEq G inst✝¹ : Fintype G inst✝ : Monoid G hG : Fintype.card G ≤ 2 this : ∀ (a b : G), a ≠ 1 → b ≠ 1 → a = b a b : G ha : ¬a = 1 hb : ¬b = 1 ⊢ a * b = b * a
no goals
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case comm.inr.inr G : Type u_1 inst✝² : DecidableEq G inst✝¹ : Fintype G inst✝ : Monoid G hG : Fintype.card G ≤ 2 this : ∀ (a b : G), a ≠ 1 → b ≠ 1 → a = b a b : G ha : ¬a = 1 hb : ¬b = 1 ⊢ a * b = b * a TACTIC:
https://github.com/AntoineChambert-Loir/Jordan4.git
d49910c127be01229697737a55a2d756e908d3e1
Jordan/Mathlib/GroupTheory/Subgroup/Basic.lean
Monoid.isCommutative_of_fintype_card_le_2
[25, 1]
[41, 33]
rw [ha]
case comm.inl G : Type u_1 inst✝² : DecidableEq G inst✝¹ : Fintype G inst✝ : Monoid G hG : Fintype.card G ≤ 2 this : ∀ (a b : G), a ≠ 1 → b ≠ 1 → a = b a b : G ha : a = 1 ⊢ a * b = b * a
case comm.inl G : Type u_1 inst✝² : DecidableEq G inst✝¹ : Fintype G inst✝ : Monoid G hG : Fintype.card G ≤ 2 this : ∀ (a b : G), a ≠ 1 → b ≠ 1 → a = b a b : G ha : a = 1 ⊢ 1 * b = b * 1
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case comm.inl G : Type u_1 inst✝² : DecidableEq G inst✝¹ : Fintype G inst✝ : Monoid G hG : Fintype.card G ≤ 2 this : ∀ (a b : G), a ≠ 1 → b ≠ 1 → a = b a b : G ha : a = 1 ⊢ a * b = b * a TACTIC:
https://github.com/AntoineChambert-Loir/Jordan4.git
d49910c127be01229697737a55a2d756e908d3e1
Jordan/Mathlib/GroupTheory/Subgroup/Basic.lean
Monoid.isCommutative_of_fintype_card_le_2
[25, 1]
[41, 33]
simp only [one_mul, mul_one]
case comm.inl G : Type u_1 inst✝² : DecidableEq G inst✝¹ : Fintype G inst✝ : Monoid G hG : Fintype.card G ≤ 2 this : ∀ (a b : G), a ≠ 1 → b ≠ 1 → a = b a b : G ha : a = 1 ⊢ 1 * b = b * 1
no goals
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case comm.inl G : Type u_1 inst✝² : DecidableEq G inst✝¹ : Fintype G inst✝ : Monoid G hG : Fintype.card G ≤ 2 this : ∀ (a b : G), a ≠ 1 → b ≠ 1 → a = b a b : G ha : a = 1 ⊢ 1 * b = b * 1 TACTIC:
https://github.com/AntoineChambert-Loir/Jordan4.git
d49910c127be01229697737a55a2d756e908d3e1
Jordan/Mathlib/GroupTheory/Subgroup/Basic.lean
Monoid.isCommutative_of_fintype_card_le_2
[25, 1]
[41, 33]
rw [hb]
case comm.inr.inl G : Type u_1 inst✝² : DecidableEq G inst✝¹ : Fintype G inst✝ : Monoid G hG : Fintype.card G ≤ 2 this : ∀ (a b : G), a ≠ 1 → b ≠ 1 → a = b a b : G ha : ¬a = 1 hb : b = 1 ⊢ a * b = b * a
case comm.inr.inl G : Type u_1 inst✝² : DecidableEq G inst✝¹ : Fintype G inst✝ : Monoid G hG : Fintype.card G ≤ 2 this : ∀ (a b : G), a ≠ 1 → b ≠ 1 → a = b a b : G ha : ¬a = 1 hb : b = 1 ⊢ a * 1 = 1 * a
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case comm.inr.inl G : Type u_1 inst✝² : DecidableEq G inst✝¹ : Fintype G inst✝ : Monoid G hG : Fintype.card G ≤ 2 this : ∀ (a b : G), a ≠ 1 → b ≠ 1 → a = b a b : G ha : ¬a = 1 hb : b = 1 ⊢ a * b = b * a TACTIC:
https://github.com/AntoineChambert-Loir/Jordan4.git
d49910c127be01229697737a55a2d756e908d3e1
Jordan/Mathlib/GroupTheory/Subgroup/Basic.lean
Monoid.isCommutative_of_fintype_card_le_2
[25, 1]
[41, 33]
simp only [one_mul, mul_one]
case comm.inr.inl G : Type u_1 inst✝² : DecidableEq G inst✝¹ : Fintype G inst✝ : Monoid G hG : Fintype.card G ≤ 2 this : ∀ (a b : G), a ≠ 1 → b ≠ 1 → a = b a b : G ha : ¬a = 1 hb : b = 1 ⊢ a * 1 = 1 * a
no goals
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case comm.inr.inl G : Type u_1 inst✝² : DecidableEq G inst✝¹ : Fintype G inst✝ : Monoid G hG : Fintype.card G ≤ 2 this : ∀ (a b : G), a ≠ 1 → b ≠ 1 → a = b a b : G ha : ¬a = 1 hb : b = 1 ⊢ a * 1 = 1 * a TACTIC:
https://github.com/AntoineChambert-Loir/Jordan4.git
d49910c127be01229697737a55a2d756e908d3e1
Jordan/Mathlib/GroupTheory/Subgroup/Basic.lean
Equiv.Perm.isCommutative_iff
[44, 1]
[62, 30]
cases' Nat.lt_or_ge 2 (Fintype.card α) with hα hα
α : Type u_1 inst✝¹ : DecidableEq α inst✝ : Fintype α ⊢ (Std.Commutative fun x x_1 => x * x_1) ↔ Fintype.card α ≤ 2
case inl α : Type u_1 inst✝¹ : DecidableEq α inst✝ : Fintype α hα : 2 < Fintype.card α ⊢ (Std.Commutative fun x x_1 => x * x_1) ↔ Fintype.card α ≤ 2 case inr α : Type u_1 inst✝¹ : DecidableEq α inst✝ : Fintype α hα : 2 ≥ Fintype.card α ⊢ (Std.Commutative fun x x_1 => x * x_1) ↔ Fintype.card α ≤ 2
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: α : Type u_1 inst✝¹ : DecidableEq α inst✝ : Fintype α ⊢ (Std.Commutative fun x x_1 => x * x_1) ↔ Fintype.card α ≤ 2 TACTIC:
https://github.com/AntoineChambert-Loir/Jordan4.git
d49910c127be01229697737a55a2d756e908d3e1
Jordan/Mathlib/GroupTheory/Subgroup/Basic.lean
Equiv.Perm.isCommutative_iff
[44, 1]
[62, 30]
rw [← not_lt]
case inl α : Type u_1 inst✝¹ : DecidableEq α inst✝ : Fintype α hα : 2 < Fintype.card α ⊢ (Std.Commutative fun x x_1 => x * x_1) ↔ Fintype.card α ≤ 2
case inl α : Type u_1 inst✝¹ : DecidableEq α inst✝ : Fintype α hα : 2 < Fintype.card α ⊢ (Std.Commutative fun x x_1 => x * x_1) ↔ ¬2 < Fintype.card α
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case inl α : Type u_1 inst✝¹ : DecidableEq α inst✝ : Fintype α hα : 2 < Fintype.card α ⊢ (Std.Commutative fun x x_1 => x * x_1) ↔ Fintype.card α ≤ 2 TACTIC:
https://github.com/AntoineChambert-Loir/Jordan4.git
d49910c127be01229697737a55a2d756e908d3e1
Jordan/Mathlib/GroupTheory/Subgroup/Basic.lean
Equiv.Perm.isCommutative_iff
[44, 1]
[62, 30]
simp only [hα, not_true_eq_false, iff_false]
case inl α : Type u_1 inst✝¹ : DecidableEq α inst✝ : Fintype α hα : 2 < Fintype.card α ⊢ (Std.Commutative fun x x_1 => x * x_1) ↔ ¬2 < Fintype.card α
case inl α : Type u_1 inst✝¹ : DecidableEq α inst✝ : Fintype α hα : 2 < Fintype.card α ⊢ ¬Std.Commutative fun x x_1 => x * x_1
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case inl α : Type u_1 inst✝¹ : DecidableEq α inst✝ : Fintype α hα : 2 < Fintype.card α ⊢ (Std.Commutative fun x x_1 => x * x_1) ↔ ¬2 < Fintype.card α TACTIC:
https://github.com/AntoineChambert-Loir/Jordan4.git
d49910c127be01229697737a55a2d756e908d3e1
Jordan/Mathlib/GroupTheory/Subgroup/Basic.lean
Equiv.Perm.isCommutative_iff
[44, 1]
[62, 30]
intro h
case inl α : Type u_1 inst✝¹ : DecidableEq α inst✝ : Fintype α hα : 2 < Fintype.card α ⊢ ¬Std.Commutative fun x x_1 => x * x_1
case inl α : Type u_1 inst✝¹ : DecidableEq α inst✝ : Fintype α hα : 2 < Fintype.card α h : Std.Commutative fun x x_1 => x * x_1 ⊢ False
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case inl α : Type u_1 inst✝¹ : DecidableEq α inst✝ : Fintype α hα : 2 < Fintype.card α ⊢ ¬Std.Commutative fun x x_1 => x * x_1 TACTIC:
https://github.com/AntoineChambert-Loir/Jordan4.git
d49910c127be01229697737a55a2d756e908d3e1
Jordan/Mathlib/GroupTheory/Subgroup/Basic.lean
Equiv.Perm.isCommutative_iff
[44, 1]
[62, 30]
rw [Fintype.two_lt_card_iff] at hα
case inl α : Type u_1 inst✝¹ : DecidableEq α inst✝ : Fintype α hα : 2 < Fintype.card α h : Std.Commutative fun x x_1 => x * x_1 ⊢ False
case inl α : Type u_1 inst✝¹ : DecidableEq α inst✝ : Fintype α hα : ∃ a b c, a ≠ b ∧ a ≠ c ∧ b ≠ c h : Std.Commutative fun x x_1 => x * x_1 ⊢ False
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case inl α : Type u_1 inst✝¹ : DecidableEq α inst✝ : Fintype α hα : 2 < Fintype.card α h : Std.Commutative fun x x_1 => x * x_1 ⊢ False TACTIC:
https://github.com/AntoineChambert-Loir/Jordan4.git
d49910c127be01229697737a55a2d756e908d3e1
Jordan/Mathlib/GroupTheory/Subgroup/Basic.lean
Equiv.Perm.isCommutative_iff
[44, 1]
[62, 30]
obtain ⟨a, b, c, hab, hac, hbc⟩ := hα
case inl α : Type u_1 inst✝¹ : DecidableEq α inst✝ : Fintype α hα : ∃ a b c, a ≠ b ∧ a ≠ c ∧ b ≠ c h : Std.Commutative fun x x_1 => x * x_1 ⊢ False
case inl.intro.intro.intro.intro.intro α : Type u_1 inst✝¹ : DecidableEq α inst✝ : Fintype α h : Std.Commutative fun x x_1 => x * x_1 a b c : α hab : a ≠ b hac : a ≠ c hbc : b ≠ c ⊢ False
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case inl α : Type u_1 inst✝¹ : DecidableEq α inst✝ : Fintype α hα : ∃ a b c, a ≠ b ∧ a ≠ c ∧ b ≠ c h : Std.Commutative fun x x_1 => x * x_1 ⊢ False TACTIC:
https://github.com/AntoineChambert-Loir/Jordan4.git
d49910c127be01229697737a55a2d756e908d3e1
Jordan/Mathlib/GroupTheory/Subgroup/Basic.lean
Equiv.Perm.isCommutative_iff
[44, 1]
[62, 30]
apply hbc
case inl.intro.intro.intro.intro.intro α : Type u_1 inst✝¹ : DecidableEq α inst✝ : Fintype α h : Std.Commutative fun x x_1 => x * x_1 a b c : α hab : a ≠ b hac : a ≠ c hbc : b ≠ c ⊢ False
case inl.intro.intro.intro.intro.intro α : Type u_1 inst✝¹ : DecidableEq α inst✝ : Fintype α h : Std.Commutative fun x x_1 => x * x_1 a b c : α hab : a ≠ b hac : a ≠ c hbc : b ≠ c ⊢ b = c
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case inl.intro.intro.intro.intro.intro α : Type u_1 inst✝¹ : DecidableEq α inst✝ : Fintype α h : Std.Commutative fun x x_1 => x * x_1 a b c : α hab : a ≠ b hac : a ≠ c hbc : b ≠ c ⊢ False TACTIC:
https://github.com/AntoineChambert-Loir/Jordan4.git
d49910c127be01229697737a55a2d756e908d3e1
Jordan/Mathlib/GroupTheory/Subgroup/Basic.lean
Equiv.Perm.isCommutative_iff
[44, 1]
[62, 30]
convert Equiv.ext_iff.mp (h.comm (Equiv.swap a c) (Equiv.swap a b)) a
case inl.intro.intro.intro.intro.intro α : Type u_1 inst✝¹ : DecidableEq α inst✝ : Fintype α h : Std.Commutative fun x x_1 => x * x_1 a b c : α hab : a ≠ b hac : a ≠ c hbc : b ≠ c ⊢ b = c
case h.e'_2 α : Type u_1 inst✝¹ : DecidableEq α inst✝ : Fintype α h : Std.Commutative fun x x_1 => x * x_1 a b c : α hab : a ≠ b hac : a ≠ c hbc : b ≠ c ⊢ b = (swap a c * swap a b) a case h.e'_3 α : Type u_1 inst✝¹ : DecidableEq α inst✝ : Fintype α h : Std.Commutative fun x x_1 => x * x_1 a b c : α hab : a ≠ b hac : a ≠ c hbc : b ≠ c ⊢ c = (swap a b * swap a c) a
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case inl.intro.intro.intro.intro.intro α : Type u_1 inst✝¹ : DecidableEq α inst✝ : Fintype α h : Std.Commutative fun x x_1 => x * x_1 a b c : α hab : a ≠ b hac : a ≠ c hbc : b ≠ c ⊢ b = c TACTIC:
https://github.com/AntoineChambert-Loir/Jordan4.git
d49910c127be01229697737a55a2d756e908d3e1
Jordan/Mathlib/GroupTheory/Subgroup/Basic.lean
Equiv.Perm.isCommutative_iff
[44, 1]
[62, 30]
rw [coe_mul, Function.comp_apply, Equiv.swap_apply_left, Equiv.swap_apply_of_ne_of_ne hab.symm hbc]
case h.e'_2 α : Type u_1 inst✝¹ : DecidableEq α inst✝ : Fintype α h : Std.Commutative fun x x_1 => x * x_1 a b c : α hab : a ≠ b hac : a ≠ c hbc : b ≠ c ⊢ b = (swap a c * swap a b) a case h.e'_3 α : Type u_1 inst✝¹ : DecidableEq α inst✝ : Fintype α h : Std.Commutative fun x x_1 => x * x_1 a b c : α hab : a ≠ b hac : a ≠ c hbc : b ≠ c ⊢ c = (swap a b * swap a c) a
case h.e'_3 α : Type u_1 inst✝¹ : DecidableEq α inst✝ : Fintype α h : Std.Commutative fun x x_1 => x * x_1 a b c : α hab : a ≠ b hac : a ≠ c hbc : b ≠ c ⊢ c = (swap a b * swap a c) a
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case h.e'_2 α : Type u_1 inst✝¹ : DecidableEq α inst✝ : Fintype α h : Std.Commutative fun x x_1 => x * x_1 a b c : α hab : a ≠ b hac : a ≠ c hbc : b ≠ c ⊢ b = (swap a c * swap a b) a case h.e'_3 α : Type u_1 inst✝¹ : DecidableEq α inst✝ : Fintype α h : Std.Commutative fun x x_1 => x * x_1 a b c : α hab : a ≠ b hac : a ≠ c hbc : b ≠ c ⊢ c = (swap a b * swap a c) a TACTIC:
https://github.com/AntoineChambert-Loir/Jordan4.git
d49910c127be01229697737a55a2d756e908d3e1
Jordan/Mathlib/GroupTheory/Subgroup/Basic.lean
Equiv.Perm.isCommutative_iff
[44, 1]
[62, 30]
rw [coe_mul, Function.comp_apply, Equiv.swap_apply_left, Equiv.swap_apply_of_ne_of_ne hac.symm hbc.symm]
case h.e'_3 α : Type u_1 inst✝¹ : DecidableEq α inst✝ : Fintype α h : Std.Commutative fun x x_1 => x * x_1 a b c : α hab : a ≠ b hac : a ≠ c hbc : b ≠ c ⊢ c = (swap a b * swap a c) a
no goals
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case h.e'_3 α : Type u_1 inst✝¹ : DecidableEq α inst✝ : Fintype α h : Std.Commutative fun x x_1 => x * x_1 a b c : α hab : a ≠ b hac : a ≠ c hbc : b ≠ c ⊢ c = (swap a b * swap a c) a TACTIC:
https://github.com/AntoineChambert-Loir/Jordan4.git
d49910c127be01229697737a55a2d756e908d3e1
Jordan/Mathlib/GroupTheory/Subgroup/Basic.lean
Equiv.Perm.isCommutative_iff
[44, 1]
[62, 30]
simp only [hα, iff_true]
case inr α : Type u_1 inst✝¹ : DecidableEq α inst✝ : Fintype α hα : 2 ≥ Fintype.card α ⊢ (Std.Commutative fun x x_1 => x * x_1) ↔ Fintype.card α ≤ 2
case inr α : Type u_1 inst✝¹ : DecidableEq α inst✝ : Fintype α hα : 2 ≥ Fintype.card α ⊢ Std.Commutative fun x x_1 => x * x_1
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case inr α : Type u_1 inst✝¹ : DecidableEq α inst✝ : Fintype α hα : 2 ≥ Fintype.card α ⊢ (Std.Commutative fun x x_1 => x * x_1) ↔ Fintype.card α ≤ 2 TACTIC:
https://github.com/AntoineChambert-Loir/Jordan4.git
d49910c127be01229697737a55a2d756e908d3e1
Jordan/Mathlib/GroupTheory/Subgroup/Basic.lean
Equiv.Perm.isCommutative_iff
[44, 1]
[62, 30]
apply Monoid.isCommutative_of_fintype_card_le_2
case inr α : Type u_1 inst✝¹ : DecidableEq α inst✝ : Fintype α hα : 2 ≥ Fintype.card α ⊢ Std.Commutative fun x x_1 => x * x_1
case inr.hG α : Type u_1 inst✝¹ : DecidableEq α inst✝ : Fintype α hα : 2 ≥ Fintype.card α ⊢ Fintype.card (Perm α) ≤ 2
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case inr α : Type u_1 inst✝¹ : DecidableEq α inst✝ : Fintype α hα : 2 ≥ Fintype.card α ⊢ Std.Commutative fun x x_1 => x * x_1 TACTIC:
https://github.com/AntoineChambert-Loir/Jordan4.git
d49910c127be01229697737a55a2d756e908d3e1
Jordan/Mathlib/GroupTheory/Subgroup/Basic.lean
Equiv.Perm.isCommutative_iff
[44, 1]
[62, 30]
rw [← Nat.factorial_two, Fintype.card_perm]
case inr.hG α : Type u_1 inst✝¹ : DecidableEq α inst✝ : Fintype α hα : 2 ≥ Fintype.card α ⊢ Fintype.card (Perm α) ≤ 2
case inr.hG α : Type u_1 inst✝¹ : DecidableEq α inst✝ : Fintype α hα : 2 ≥ Fintype.card α ⊢ Nat.factorial (Fintype.card α) ≤ Nat.factorial 2
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case inr.hG α : Type u_1 inst✝¹ : DecidableEq α inst✝ : Fintype α hα : 2 ≥ Fintype.card α ⊢ Fintype.card (Perm α) ≤ 2 TACTIC:
https://github.com/AntoineChambert-Loir/Jordan4.git
d49910c127be01229697737a55a2d756e908d3e1
Jordan/Mathlib/GroupTheory/Subgroup/Basic.lean
Equiv.Perm.isCommutative_iff
[44, 1]
[62, 30]
exact Nat.factorial_le hα
case inr.hG α : Type u_1 inst✝¹ : DecidableEq α inst✝ : Fintype α hα : 2 ≥ Fintype.card α ⊢ Nat.factorial (Fintype.card α) ≤ Nat.factorial 2
no goals
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case inr.hG α : Type u_1 inst✝¹ : DecidableEq α inst✝ : Fintype α hα : 2 ≥ Fintype.card α ⊢ Nat.factorial (Fintype.card α) ≤ Nat.factorial 2 TACTIC:
https://github.com/AntoineChambert-Loir/Jordan4.git
d49910c127be01229697737a55a2d756e908d3e1
Jordan/SubMulActions.lean
SubMulAction.image_inclusion
[58, 1]
[69, 8]
ext a
M : Type u_1 N : Type ?u.2410 α : Type u_2 inst✝ : SMul M α s : SubMulAction M α ⊢ Set.range ⇑(inclusion s) = s.carrier
case h M : Type u_1 N : Type ?u.2410 α : Type u_2 inst✝ : SMul M α s : SubMulAction M α a : α ⊢ a ∈ Set.range ⇑(inclusion s) ↔ a ∈ s.carrier
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: M : Type u_1 N : Type ?u.2410 α : Type u_2 inst✝ : SMul M α s : SubMulAction M α ⊢ Set.range ⇑(inclusion s) = s.carrier TACTIC:
https://github.com/AntoineChambert-Loir/Jordan4.git
d49910c127be01229697737a55a2d756e908d3e1
Jordan/SubMulActions.lean
SubMulAction.image_inclusion
[58, 1]
[69, 8]
simp only [Set.mem_range, Subtype.exists, mem_carrier, SetLike.mem_coe]
case h M : Type u_1 N : Type ?u.2410 α : Type u_2 inst✝ : SMul M α s : SubMulAction M α a : α ⊢ a ∈ Set.range ⇑(inclusion s) ↔ a ∈ s.carrier
case h M : Type u_1 N : Type ?u.2410 α : Type u_2 inst✝ : SMul M α s : SubMulAction M α a : α ⊢ (∃ a_1, ∃ (b : a_1 ∈ s), (inclusion s) { val := a_1, property := b } = a) ↔ a ∈ s
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case h M : Type u_1 N : Type ?u.2410 α : Type u_2 inst✝ : SMul M α s : SubMulAction M α a : α ⊢ a ∈ Set.range ⇑(inclusion s) ↔ a ∈ s.carrier TACTIC:
https://github.com/AntoineChambert-Loir/Jordan4.git
d49910c127be01229697737a55a2d756e908d3e1
Jordan/SubMulActions.lean
SubMulAction.image_inclusion
[58, 1]
[69, 8]
constructor
case h M : Type u_1 N : Type ?u.2410 α : Type u_2 inst✝ : SMul M α s : SubMulAction M α a : α ⊢ (∃ a_1, ∃ (b : a_1 ∈ s), (inclusion s) { val := a_1, property := b } = a) ↔ a ∈ s
case h.mp M : Type u_1 N : Type ?u.2410 α : Type u_2 inst✝ : SMul M α s : SubMulAction M α a : α ⊢ (∃ a_1, ∃ (b : a_1 ∈ s), (inclusion s) { val := a_1, property := b } = a) → a ∈ s case h.mpr M : Type u_1 N : Type ?u.2410 α : Type u_2 inst✝ : SMul M α s : SubMulAction M α a : α ⊢ a ∈ s → ∃ a_2, ∃ (b : a_2 ∈ s), (inclusion s) { val := a_2, property := b } = a
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case h M : Type u_1 N : Type ?u.2410 α : Type u_2 inst✝ : SMul M α s : SubMulAction M α a : α ⊢ (∃ a_1, ∃ (b : a_1 ∈ s), (inclusion s) { val := a_1, property := b } = a) ↔ a ∈ s TACTIC:
https://github.com/AntoineChambert-Loir/Jordan4.git
d49910c127be01229697737a55a2d756e908d3e1
Jordan/SubMulActions.lean
SubMulAction.image_inclusion
[58, 1]
[69, 8]
intro ha
case h.mp M : Type u_1 N : Type ?u.2410 α : Type u_2 inst✝ : SMul M α s : SubMulAction M α a : α ⊢ (∃ a_1, ∃ (b : a_1 ∈ s), (inclusion s) { val := a_1, property := b } = a) → a ∈ s
case h.mp M : Type u_1 N : Type ?u.2410 α : Type u_2 inst✝ : SMul M α s : SubMulAction M α a : α ha : ∃ a_1, ∃ (b : a_1 ∈ s), (inclusion s) { val := a_1, property := b } = a ⊢ a ∈ s
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case h.mp M : Type u_1 N : Type ?u.2410 α : Type u_2 inst✝ : SMul M α s : SubMulAction M α a : α ⊢ (∃ a_1, ∃ (b : a_1 ∈ s), (inclusion s) { val := a_1, property := b } = a) → a ∈ s TACTIC:
https://github.com/AntoineChambert-Loir/Jordan4.git
d49910c127be01229697737a55a2d756e908d3e1
Jordan/SubMulActions.lean
SubMulAction.image_inclusion
[58, 1]
[69, 8]
obtain ⟨a, h, rfl⟩ := ha
case h.mp M : Type u_1 N : Type ?u.2410 α : Type u_2 inst✝ : SMul M α s : SubMulAction M α a : α ha : ∃ a_1, ∃ (b : a_1 ∈ s), (inclusion s) { val := a_1, property := b } = a ⊢ a ∈ s
case h.mp.intro.intro M : Type u_1 N : Type ?u.2410 α : Type u_2 inst✝ : SMul M α s : SubMulAction M α a : α h : a ∈ s ⊢ (inclusion s) { val := a, property := h } ∈ s
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case h.mp M : Type u_1 N : Type ?u.2410 α : Type u_2 inst✝ : SMul M α s : SubMulAction M α a : α ha : ∃ a_1, ∃ (b : a_1 ∈ s), (inclusion s) { val := a_1, property := b } = a ⊢ a ∈ s TACTIC:
https://github.com/AntoineChambert-Loir/Jordan4.git
d49910c127be01229697737a55a2d756e908d3e1
Jordan/SubMulActions.lean
SubMulAction.image_inclusion
[58, 1]
[69, 8]
exact h
case h.mp.intro.intro M : Type u_1 N : Type ?u.2410 α : Type u_2 inst✝ : SMul M α s : SubMulAction M α a : α h : a ∈ s ⊢ (inclusion s) { val := a, property := h } ∈ s
no goals
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case h.mp.intro.intro M : Type u_1 N : Type ?u.2410 α : Type u_2 inst✝ : SMul M α s : SubMulAction M α a : α h : a ∈ s ⊢ (inclusion s) { val := a, property := h } ∈ s TACTIC:
https://github.com/AntoineChambert-Loir/Jordan4.git
d49910c127be01229697737a55a2d756e908d3e1
Jordan/SubMulActions.lean
SubMulAction.image_inclusion
[58, 1]
[69, 8]
intro h
case h.mpr M : Type u_1 N : Type ?u.2410 α : Type u_2 inst✝ : SMul M α s : SubMulAction M α a : α ⊢ a ∈ s → ∃ a_2, ∃ (b : a_2 ∈ s), (inclusion s) { val := a_2, property := b } = a
case h.mpr M : Type u_1 N : Type ?u.2410 α : Type u_2 inst✝ : SMul M α s : SubMulAction M α a : α h : a ∈ s ⊢ ∃ a_1, ∃ (b : a_1 ∈ s), (inclusion s) { val := a_1, property := b } = a
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case h.mpr M : Type u_1 N : Type ?u.2410 α : Type u_2 inst✝ : SMul M α s : SubMulAction M α a : α ⊢ a ∈ s → ∃ a_2, ∃ (b : a_2 ∈ s), (inclusion s) { val := a_2, property := b } = a TACTIC:
https://github.com/AntoineChambert-Loir/Jordan4.git
d49910c127be01229697737a55a2d756e908d3e1
Jordan/SubMulActions.lean
SubMulAction.image_inclusion
[58, 1]
[69, 8]
use a
case h.mpr M : Type u_1 N : Type ?u.2410 α : Type u_2 inst✝ : SMul M α s : SubMulAction M α a : α h : a ∈ s ⊢ ∃ a_1, ∃ (b : a_1 ∈ s), (inclusion s) { val := a_1, property := b } = a
case h M : Type u_1 N : Type ?u.2410 α : Type u_2 inst✝ : SMul M α s : SubMulAction M α a : α h : a ∈ s ⊢ ∃ (b : a ∈ s), (inclusion s) { val := a, property := b } = a
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case h.mpr M : Type u_1 N : Type ?u.2410 α : Type u_2 inst✝ : SMul M α s : SubMulAction M α a : α h : a ∈ s ⊢ ∃ a_1, ∃ (b : a_1 ∈ s), (inclusion s) { val := a_1, property := b } = a TACTIC:
https://github.com/AntoineChambert-Loir/Jordan4.git
d49910c127be01229697737a55a2d756e908d3e1
Jordan/SubMulActions.lean
SubMulAction.image_inclusion
[58, 1]
[69, 8]
use h
case h M : Type u_1 N : Type ?u.2410 α : Type u_2 inst✝ : SMul M α s : SubMulAction M α a : α h : a ∈ s ⊢ ∃ (b : a ∈ s), (inclusion s) { val := a, property := b } = a
case h M : Type u_1 N : Type ?u.2410 α : Type u_2 inst✝ : SMul M α s : SubMulAction M α a : α h : a ∈ s ⊢ (inclusion s) { val := a, property := h } = a
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case h M : Type u_1 N : Type ?u.2410 α : Type u_2 inst✝ : SMul M α s : SubMulAction M α a : α h : a ∈ s ⊢ ∃ (b : a ∈ s), (inclusion s) { val := a, property := b } = a TACTIC:
https://github.com/AntoineChambert-Loir/Jordan4.git
d49910c127be01229697737a55a2d756e908d3e1
Jordan/SubMulActions.lean
SubMulAction.image_inclusion
[58, 1]
[69, 8]
rfl
case h M : Type u_1 N : Type ?u.2410 α : Type u_2 inst✝ : SMul M α s : SubMulAction M α a : α h : a ∈ s ⊢ (inclusion s) { val := a, property := h } = a
no goals
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case h M : Type u_1 N : Type ?u.2410 α : Type u_2 inst✝ : SMul M α s : SubMulAction M α a : α h : a ∈ s ⊢ (inclusion s) { val := a, property := h } = a TACTIC:
https://github.com/AntoineChambert-Loir/Jordan4.git
d49910c127be01229697737a55a2d756e908d3e1
Jordan/SubMulActions.lean
SubMulAction.inclusion_injective
[71, 1]
[75, 10]
rintro ⟨a, ha⟩ ⟨b, hb⟩ h
M : Type u_1 N : Type ?u.3198 α : Type u_2 inst✝ : SMul M α s : SubMulAction M α ⊢ Function.Injective ⇑(inclusion s)
case mk.mk M : Type u_1 N : Type ?u.3198 α : Type u_2 inst✝ : SMul M α s : SubMulAction M α a : α ha : a ∈ s b : α hb : b ∈ s h : (inclusion s) { val := a, property := ha } = (inclusion s) { val := b, property := hb } ⊢ { val := a, property := ha } = { val := b, property := hb }
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: M : Type u_1 N : Type ?u.3198 α : Type u_2 inst✝ : SMul M α s : SubMulAction M α ⊢ Function.Injective ⇑(inclusion s) TACTIC:
https://github.com/AntoineChambert-Loir/Jordan4.git
d49910c127be01229697737a55a2d756e908d3e1
Jordan/SubMulActions.lean
SubMulAction.inclusion_injective
[71, 1]
[75, 10]
simp only [Subtype.mk.injEq]
case mk.mk M : Type u_1 N : Type ?u.3198 α : Type u_2 inst✝ : SMul M α s : SubMulAction M α a : α ha : a ∈ s b : α hb : b ∈ s h : (inclusion s) { val := a, property := ha } = (inclusion s) { val := b, property := hb } ⊢ { val := a, property := ha } = { val := b, property := hb }
case mk.mk M : Type u_1 N : Type ?u.3198 α : Type u_2 inst✝ : SMul M α s : SubMulAction M α a : α ha : a ∈ s b : α hb : b ∈ s h : (inclusion s) { val := a, property := ha } = (inclusion s) { val := b, property := hb } ⊢ a = b
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case mk.mk M : Type u_1 N : Type ?u.3198 α : Type u_2 inst✝ : SMul M α s : SubMulAction M α a : α ha : a ∈ s b : α hb : b ∈ s h : (inclusion s) { val := a, property := ha } = (inclusion s) { val := b, property := hb } ⊢ { val := a, property := ha } = { val := b, property := hb } TACTIC:
https://github.com/AntoineChambert-Loir/Jordan4.git
d49910c127be01229697737a55a2d756e908d3e1
Jordan/SubMulActions.lean
SubMulAction.inclusion_injective
[71, 1]
[75, 10]
exact h
case mk.mk M : Type u_1 N : Type ?u.3198 α : Type u_2 inst✝ : SMul M α s : SubMulAction M α a : α ha : a ∈ s b : α hb : b ∈ s h : (inclusion s) { val := a, property := ha } = (inclusion s) { val := b, property := hb } ⊢ a = b
no goals
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case mk.mk M : Type u_1 N : Type ?u.3198 α : Type u_2 inst✝ : SMul M α s : SubMulAction M α a : α ha : a ∈ s b : α hb : b ∈ s h : (inclusion s) { val := a, property := ha } = (inclusion s) { val := b, property := hb } ⊢ a = b TACTIC:
https://github.com/AntoineChambert-Loir/Jordan4.git
d49910c127be01229697737a55a2d756e908d3e1
Jordan/SubMulActions.lean
SubMulAction.add_card_ofStabilizer_eq
[130, 1]
[138, 55]
unfold PartENat.card
M : Type u_2 inst✝¹ : Group M α : Type u_1 inst✝ : MulAction M α a : α ⊢ 1 + PartENat.card ↥(ofStabilizer M a) = PartENat.card α
M : Type u_2 inst✝¹ : Group M α : Type u_1 inst✝ : MulAction M α a : α ⊢ 1 + Cardinal.toPartENat (Cardinal.mk ↥(ofStabilizer M a)) = Cardinal.toPartENat (Cardinal.mk α)
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: M : Type u_2 inst✝¹ : Group M α : Type u_1 inst✝ : MulAction M α a : α ⊢ 1 + PartENat.card ↥(ofStabilizer M a) = PartENat.card α TACTIC:
https://github.com/AntoineChambert-Loir/Jordan4.git
d49910c127be01229697737a55a2d756e908d3e1
Jordan/SubMulActions.lean
SubMulAction.add_card_ofStabilizer_eq
[130, 1]
[138, 55]
rw [← Cardinal.mk_sum_compl {a}, map_add]
M : Type u_2 inst✝¹ : Group M α : Type u_1 inst✝ : MulAction M α a : α ⊢ 1 + Cardinal.toPartENat (Cardinal.mk ↥(ofStabilizer M a)) = Cardinal.toPartENat (Cardinal.mk α)
M : Type u_2 inst✝¹ : Group M α : Type u_1 inst✝ : MulAction M α a : α ⊢ 1 + Cardinal.toPartENat (Cardinal.mk ↥(ofStabilizer M a)) = Cardinal.toPartENat (Cardinal.mk ↑{a}) + Cardinal.toPartENat (Cardinal.mk ↑{a}ᶜ)
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: M : Type u_2 inst✝¹ : Group M α : Type u_1 inst✝ : MulAction M α a : α ⊢ 1 + Cardinal.toPartENat (Cardinal.mk ↥(ofStabilizer M a)) = Cardinal.toPartENat (Cardinal.mk α) TACTIC:
https://github.com/AntoineChambert-Loir/Jordan4.git
d49910c127be01229697737a55a2d756e908d3e1
Jordan/SubMulActions.lean
SubMulAction.add_card_ofStabilizer_eq
[130, 1]
[138, 55]
congr
M : Type u_2 inst✝¹ : Group M α : Type u_1 inst✝ : MulAction M α a : α ⊢ 1 + Cardinal.toPartENat (Cardinal.mk ↥(ofStabilizer M a)) = Cardinal.toPartENat (Cardinal.mk ↑{a}) + Cardinal.toPartENat (Cardinal.mk ↑{a}ᶜ)
case e_a M : Type u_2 inst✝¹ : Group M α : Type u_1 inst✝ : MulAction M α a : α ⊢ 1 = Cardinal.toPartENat (Cardinal.mk ↑{a})
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: M : Type u_2 inst✝¹ : Group M α : Type u_1 inst✝ : MulAction M α a : α ⊢ 1 + Cardinal.toPartENat (Cardinal.mk ↥(ofStabilizer M a)) = Cardinal.toPartENat (Cardinal.mk ↑{a}) + Cardinal.toPartENat (Cardinal.mk ↑{a}ᶜ) TACTIC:
https://github.com/AntoineChambert-Loir/Jordan4.git
d49910c127be01229697737a55a2d756e908d3e1
Jordan/SubMulActions.lean
SubMulAction.add_card_ofStabilizer_eq
[130, 1]
[138, 55]
simp only [Cardinal.mk_fintype, Fintype.card_ofSubsingleton, Nat.cast_one]
case e_a M : Type u_2 inst✝¹ : Group M α : Type u_1 inst✝ : MulAction M α a : α ⊢ 1 = Cardinal.toPartENat (Cardinal.mk ↑{a})
case e_a M : Type u_2 inst✝¹ : Group M α : Type u_1 inst✝ : MulAction M α a : α ⊢ 1 = Cardinal.toPartENat 1
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case e_a M : Type u_2 inst✝¹ : Group M α : Type u_1 inst✝ : MulAction M α a : α ⊢ 1 = Cardinal.toPartENat (Cardinal.mk ↑{a}) TACTIC:
https://github.com/AntoineChambert-Loir/Jordan4.git
d49910c127be01229697737a55a2d756e908d3e1
Jordan/SubMulActions.lean
SubMulAction.add_card_ofStabilizer_eq
[130, 1]
[138, 55]
conv_lhs => rw [← Nat.cast_one]
case e_a M : Type u_2 inst✝¹ : Group M α : Type u_1 inst✝ : MulAction M α a : α ⊢ 1 = Cardinal.toPartENat 1
case e_a M : Type u_2 inst✝¹ : Group M α : Type u_1 inst✝ : MulAction M α a : α ⊢ ↑1 = Cardinal.toPartENat 1
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case e_a M : Type u_2 inst✝¹ : Group M α : Type u_1 inst✝ : MulAction M α a : α ⊢ 1 = Cardinal.toPartENat 1 TACTIC:
https://github.com/AntoineChambert-Loir/Jordan4.git
d49910c127be01229697737a55a2d756e908d3e1
Jordan/SubMulActions.lean
SubMulAction.add_card_ofStabilizer_eq
[130, 1]
[138, 55]
apply symm
case e_a M : Type u_2 inst✝¹ : Group M α : Type u_1 inst✝ : MulAction M α a : α ⊢ ↑1 = Cardinal.toPartENat 1
case e_a.a M : Type u_2 inst✝¹ : Group M α : Type u_1 inst✝ : MulAction M α a : α ⊢ Cardinal.toPartENat 1 = ↑1
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case e_a M : Type u_2 inst✝¹ : Group M α : Type u_1 inst✝ : MulAction M α a : α ⊢ ↑1 = Cardinal.toPartENat 1 TACTIC:
https://github.com/AntoineChambert-Loir/Jordan4.git
d49910c127be01229697737a55a2d756e908d3e1
Jordan/SubMulActions.lean
SubMulAction.add_card_ofStabilizer_eq
[130, 1]
[138, 55]
exact Iff.mpr Cardinal.toPartENat_eq_natCast_iff rfl
case e_a.a M : Type u_2 inst✝¹ : Group M α : Type u_1 inst✝ : MulAction M α a : α ⊢ Cardinal.toPartENat 1 = ↑1
no goals
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case e_a.a M : Type u_2 inst✝¹ : Group M α : Type u_1 inst✝ : MulAction M α a : α ⊢ Cardinal.toPartENat 1 = ↑1 TACTIC:
https://github.com/AntoineChambert-Loir/Jordan4.git
d49910c127be01229697737a55a2d756e908d3e1
Jordan/SubMulActions.lean
fixingSubgroup_of_insert
[191, 1]
[222, 33]
ext m
M : Type u_2 inst✝¹ : Group M α : Type u_1 inst✝ : MulAction M α a : α s : Set ↥(SubMulAction.ofStabilizer M a) ⊢ fixingSubgroup M (insert a ((fun x => ↑x) '' s)) = Subgroup.map (Subgroup.subtype (stabilizer M a)) (fixingSubgroup (↥(stabilizer M a)) s)
case h M : Type u_2 inst✝¹ : Group M α : Type u_1 inst✝ : MulAction M α a : α s : Set ↥(SubMulAction.ofStabilizer M a) m : M ⊢ m ∈ fixingSubgroup M (insert a ((fun x => ↑x) '' s)) ↔ m ∈ Subgroup.map (Subgroup.subtype (stabilizer M a)) (fixingSubgroup (↥(stabilizer M a)) s)
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: M : Type u_2 inst✝¹ : Group M α : Type u_1 inst✝ : MulAction M α a : α s : Set ↥(SubMulAction.ofStabilizer M a) ⊢ fixingSubgroup M (insert a ((fun x => ↑x) '' s)) = Subgroup.map (Subgroup.subtype (stabilizer M a)) (fixingSubgroup (↥(stabilizer M a)) s) TACTIC:
https://github.com/AntoineChambert-Loir/Jordan4.git
d49910c127be01229697737a55a2d756e908d3e1
Jordan/SubMulActions.lean
fixingSubgroup_of_insert
[191, 1]
[222, 33]
constructor
case h M : Type u_2 inst✝¹ : Group M α : Type u_1 inst✝ : MulAction M α a : α s : Set ↥(SubMulAction.ofStabilizer M a) m : M ⊢ m ∈ fixingSubgroup M (insert a ((fun x => ↑x) '' s)) ↔ m ∈ Subgroup.map (Subgroup.subtype (stabilizer M a)) (fixingSubgroup (↥(stabilizer M a)) s)
case h.mp M : Type u_2 inst✝¹ : Group M α : Type u_1 inst✝ : MulAction M α a : α s : Set ↥(SubMulAction.ofStabilizer M a) m : M ⊢ m ∈ fixingSubgroup M (insert a ((fun x => ↑x) '' s)) → m ∈ Subgroup.map (Subgroup.subtype (stabilizer M a)) (fixingSubgroup (↥(stabilizer M a)) s) case h.mpr M : Type u_2 inst✝¹ : Group M α : Type u_1 inst✝ : MulAction M α a : α s : Set ↥(SubMulAction.ofStabilizer M a) m : M ⊢ m ∈ Subgroup.map (Subgroup.subtype (stabilizer M a)) (fixingSubgroup (↥(stabilizer M a)) s) → m ∈ fixingSubgroup M (insert a ((fun x => ↑x) '' s))
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case h M : Type u_2 inst✝¹ : Group M α : Type u_1 inst✝ : MulAction M α a : α s : Set ↥(SubMulAction.ofStabilizer M a) m : M ⊢ m ∈ fixingSubgroup M (insert a ((fun x => ↑x) '' s)) ↔ m ∈ Subgroup.map (Subgroup.subtype (stabilizer M a)) (fixingSubgroup (↥(stabilizer M a)) s) TACTIC:
https://github.com/AntoineChambert-Loir/Jordan4.git
d49910c127be01229697737a55a2d756e908d3e1
Jordan/SubMulActions.lean
fixingSubgroup_of_insert
[191, 1]
[222, 33]
intro hm
case h.mp M : Type u_2 inst✝¹ : Group M α : Type u_1 inst✝ : MulAction M α a : α s : Set ↥(SubMulAction.ofStabilizer M a) m : M ⊢ m ∈ fixingSubgroup M (insert a ((fun x => ↑x) '' s)) → m ∈ Subgroup.map (Subgroup.subtype (stabilizer M a)) (fixingSubgroup (↥(stabilizer M a)) s)
case h.mp M : Type u_2 inst✝¹ : Group M α : Type u_1 inst✝ : MulAction M α a : α s : Set ↥(SubMulAction.ofStabilizer M a) m : M hm : m ∈ fixingSubgroup M (insert a ((fun x => ↑x) '' s)) ⊢ m ∈ Subgroup.map (Subgroup.subtype (stabilizer M a)) (fixingSubgroup (↥(stabilizer M a)) s)
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case h.mp M : Type u_2 inst✝¹ : Group M α : Type u_1 inst✝ : MulAction M α a : α s : Set ↥(SubMulAction.ofStabilizer M a) m : M ⊢ m ∈ fixingSubgroup M (insert a ((fun x => ↑x) '' s)) → m ∈ Subgroup.map (Subgroup.subtype (stabilizer M a)) (fixingSubgroup (↥(stabilizer M a)) s) TACTIC:
https://github.com/AntoineChambert-Loir/Jordan4.git
d49910c127be01229697737a55a2d756e908d3e1
Jordan/SubMulActions.lean
fixingSubgroup_of_insert
[191, 1]
[222, 33]
rw [mem_fixingSubgroup_iff] at hm
case h.mp M : Type u_2 inst✝¹ : Group M α : Type u_1 inst✝ : MulAction M α a : α s : Set ↥(SubMulAction.ofStabilizer M a) m : M hm : m ∈ fixingSubgroup M (insert a ((fun x => ↑x) '' s)) ⊢ m ∈ Subgroup.map (Subgroup.subtype (stabilizer M a)) (fixingSubgroup (↥(stabilizer M a)) s)
case h.mp M : Type u_2 inst✝¹ : Group M α : Type u_1 inst✝ : MulAction M α a : α s : Set ↥(SubMulAction.ofStabilizer M a) m : M hm : ∀ y ∈ insert a ((fun x => ↑x) '' s), m • y = y ⊢ m ∈ Subgroup.map (Subgroup.subtype (stabilizer M a)) (fixingSubgroup (↥(stabilizer M a)) s)
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case h.mp M : Type u_2 inst✝¹ : Group M α : Type u_1 inst✝ : MulAction M α a : α s : Set ↥(SubMulAction.ofStabilizer M a) m : M hm : m ∈ fixingSubgroup M (insert a ((fun x => ↑x) '' s)) ⊢ m ∈ Subgroup.map (Subgroup.subtype (stabilizer M a)) (fixingSubgroup (↥(stabilizer M a)) s) TACTIC:
https://github.com/AntoineChambert-Loir/Jordan4.git
d49910c127be01229697737a55a2d756e908d3e1
Jordan/SubMulActions.lean
fixingSubgroup_of_insert
[191, 1]
[222, 33]
rw [Subgroup.mem_map]
case h.mp M : Type u_2 inst✝¹ : Group M α : Type u_1 inst✝ : MulAction M α a : α s : Set ↥(SubMulAction.ofStabilizer M a) m : M hm : ∀ y ∈ insert a ((fun x => ↑x) '' s), m • y = y ⊢ m ∈ Subgroup.map (Subgroup.subtype (stabilizer M a)) (fixingSubgroup (↥(stabilizer M a)) s)
case h.mp M : Type u_2 inst✝¹ : Group M α : Type u_1 inst✝ : MulAction M α a : α s : Set ↥(SubMulAction.ofStabilizer M a) m : M hm : ∀ y ∈ insert a ((fun x => ↑x) '' s), m • y = y ⊢ ∃ x ∈ fixingSubgroup (↥(stabilizer M a)) s, (Subgroup.subtype (stabilizer M a)) x = m
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case h.mp M : Type u_2 inst✝¹ : Group M α : Type u_1 inst✝ : MulAction M α a : α s : Set ↥(SubMulAction.ofStabilizer M a) m : M hm : ∀ y ∈ insert a ((fun x => ↑x) '' s), m • y = y ⊢ m ∈ Subgroup.map (Subgroup.subtype (stabilizer M a)) (fixingSubgroup (↥(stabilizer M a)) s) TACTIC:
https://github.com/AntoineChambert-Loir/Jordan4.git
d49910c127be01229697737a55a2d756e908d3e1
Jordan/SubMulActions.lean
fixingSubgroup_of_insert
[191, 1]
[222, 33]
suffices hm' : m ∈ stabilizer M a by use ⟨m, hm'⟩ simp only [Subgroup.coeSubtype, and_true] rw [mem_fixingSubgroup_iff] rintro ⟨y, hy⟩ hy' simp only [SetLike.mk_smul_mk, Subtype.mk.injEq] change m • y = y apply hm apply Set.mem_insert_of_mem use ⟨y, hy⟩
case h.mp M : Type u_2 inst✝¹ : Group M α : Type u_1 inst✝ : MulAction M α a : α s : Set ↥(SubMulAction.ofStabilizer M a) m : M hm : ∀ y ∈ insert a ((fun x => ↑x) '' s), m • y = y ⊢ ∃ x ∈ fixingSubgroup (↥(stabilizer M a)) s, (Subgroup.subtype (stabilizer M a)) x = m
case h.mp M : Type u_2 inst✝¹ : Group M α : Type u_1 inst✝ : MulAction M α a : α s : Set ↥(SubMulAction.ofStabilizer M a) m : M hm : ∀ y ∈ insert a ((fun x => ↑x) '' s), m • y = y ⊢ m ∈ stabilizer M a
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case h.mp M : Type u_2 inst✝¹ : Group M α : Type u_1 inst✝ : MulAction M α a : α s : Set ↥(SubMulAction.ofStabilizer M a) m : M hm : ∀ y ∈ insert a ((fun x => ↑x) '' s), m • y = y ⊢ ∃ x ∈ fixingSubgroup (↥(stabilizer M a)) s, (Subgroup.subtype (stabilizer M a)) x = m TACTIC:
https://github.com/AntoineChambert-Loir/Jordan4.git
d49910c127be01229697737a55a2d756e908d3e1
Jordan/SubMulActions.lean
fixingSubgroup_of_insert
[191, 1]
[222, 33]
simp only [mem_stabilizer_iff]
case h.mp M : Type u_2 inst✝¹ : Group M α : Type u_1 inst✝ : MulAction M α a : α s : Set ↥(SubMulAction.ofStabilizer M a) m : M hm : ∀ y ∈ insert a ((fun x => ↑x) '' s), m • y = y ⊢ m ∈ stabilizer M a
case h.mp M : Type u_2 inst✝¹ : Group M α : Type u_1 inst✝ : MulAction M α a : α s : Set ↥(SubMulAction.ofStabilizer M a) m : M hm : ∀ y ∈ insert a ((fun x => ↑x) '' s), m • y = y ⊢ m • a = a
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case h.mp M : Type u_2 inst✝¹ : Group M α : Type u_1 inst✝ : MulAction M α a : α s : Set ↥(SubMulAction.ofStabilizer M a) m : M hm : ∀ y ∈ insert a ((fun x => ↑x) '' s), m • y = y ⊢ m ∈ stabilizer M a TACTIC:
https://github.com/AntoineChambert-Loir/Jordan4.git
d49910c127be01229697737a55a2d756e908d3e1
Jordan/SubMulActions.lean
fixingSubgroup_of_insert
[191, 1]
[222, 33]
apply hm
case h.mp M : Type u_2 inst✝¹ : Group M α : Type u_1 inst✝ : MulAction M α a : α s : Set ↥(SubMulAction.ofStabilizer M a) m : M hm : ∀ y ∈ insert a ((fun x => ↑x) '' s), m • y = y ⊢ m • a = a
case h.mp.a M : Type u_2 inst✝¹ : Group M α : Type u_1 inst✝ : MulAction M α a : α s : Set ↥(SubMulAction.ofStabilizer M a) m : M hm : ∀ y ∈ insert a ((fun x => ↑x) '' s), m • y = y ⊢ a ∈ insert a ((fun x => ↑x) '' s)
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case h.mp M : Type u_2 inst✝¹ : Group M α : Type u_1 inst✝ : MulAction M α a : α s : Set ↥(SubMulAction.ofStabilizer M a) m : M hm : ∀ y ∈ insert a ((fun x => ↑x) '' s), m • y = y ⊢ m • a = a TACTIC:
https://github.com/AntoineChambert-Loir/Jordan4.git
d49910c127be01229697737a55a2d756e908d3e1
Jordan/SubMulActions.lean
fixingSubgroup_of_insert
[191, 1]
[222, 33]
apply Set.mem_insert a
case h.mp.a M : Type u_2 inst✝¹ : Group M α : Type u_1 inst✝ : MulAction M α a : α s : Set ↥(SubMulAction.ofStabilizer M a) m : M hm : ∀ y ∈ insert a ((fun x => ↑x) '' s), m • y = y ⊢ a ∈ insert a ((fun x => ↑x) '' s)
no goals
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case h.mp.a M : Type u_2 inst✝¹ : Group M α : Type u_1 inst✝ : MulAction M α a : α s : Set ↥(SubMulAction.ofStabilizer M a) m : M hm : ∀ y ∈ insert a ((fun x => ↑x) '' s), m • y = y ⊢ a ∈ insert a ((fun x => ↑x) '' s) TACTIC:
https://github.com/AntoineChambert-Loir/Jordan4.git
d49910c127be01229697737a55a2d756e908d3e1
Jordan/SubMulActions.lean
fixingSubgroup_of_insert
[191, 1]
[222, 33]
use ⟨m, hm'⟩
M : Type u_2 inst✝¹ : Group M α : Type u_1 inst✝ : MulAction M α a : α s : Set ↥(SubMulAction.ofStabilizer M a) m : M hm : ∀ y ∈ insert a ((fun x => ↑x) '' s), m • y = y hm' : m ∈ stabilizer M a ⊢ ∃ x ∈ fixingSubgroup (↥(stabilizer M a)) s, (Subgroup.subtype (stabilizer M a)) x = m
case h M : Type u_2 inst✝¹ : Group M α : Type u_1 inst✝ : MulAction M α a : α s : Set ↥(SubMulAction.ofStabilizer M a) m : M hm : ∀ y ∈ insert a ((fun x => ↑x) '' s), m • y = y hm' : m ∈ stabilizer M a ⊢ { val := m, property := hm' } ∈ fixingSubgroup (↥(stabilizer M a)) s ∧ (Subgroup.subtype (stabilizer M a)) { val := m, property := hm' } = m
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: M : Type u_2 inst✝¹ : Group M α : Type u_1 inst✝ : MulAction M α a : α s : Set ↥(SubMulAction.ofStabilizer M a) m : M hm : ∀ y ∈ insert a ((fun x => ↑x) '' s), m • y = y hm' : m ∈ stabilizer M a ⊢ ∃ x ∈ fixingSubgroup (↥(stabilizer M a)) s, (Subgroup.subtype (stabilizer M a)) x = m TACTIC:
https://github.com/AntoineChambert-Loir/Jordan4.git
d49910c127be01229697737a55a2d756e908d3e1
Jordan/SubMulActions.lean
fixingSubgroup_of_insert
[191, 1]
[222, 33]
simp only [Subgroup.coeSubtype, and_true]
case h M : Type u_2 inst✝¹ : Group M α : Type u_1 inst✝ : MulAction M α a : α s : Set ↥(SubMulAction.ofStabilizer M a) m : M hm : ∀ y ∈ insert a ((fun x => ↑x) '' s), m • y = y hm' : m ∈ stabilizer M a ⊢ { val := m, property := hm' } ∈ fixingSubgroup (↥(stabilizer M a)) s ∧ (Subgroup.subtype (stabilizer M a)) { val := m, property := hm' } = m
case h M : Type u_2 inst✝¹ : Group M α : Type u_1 inst✝ : MulAction M α a : α s : Set ↥(SubMulAction.ofStabilizer M a) m : M hm : ∀ y ∈ insert a ((fun x => ↑x) '' s), m • y = y hm' : m ∈ stabilizer M a ⊢ { val := m, property := hm' } ∈ fixingSubgroup (↥(stabilizer M a)) s
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case h M : Type u_2 inst✝¹ : Group M α : Type u_1 inst✝ : MulAction M α a : α s : Set ↥(SubMulAction.ofStabilizer M a) m : M hm : ∀ y ∈ insert a ((fun x => ↑x) '' s), m • y = y hm' : m ∈ stabilizer M a ⊢ { val := m, property := hm' } ∈ fixingSubgroup (↥(stabilizer M a)) s ∧ (Subgroup.subtype (stabilizer M a)) { val := m, property := hm' } = m TACTIC:
https://github.com/AntoineChambert-Loir/Jordan4.git
d49910c127be01229697737a55a2d756e908d3e1
Jordan/SubMulActions.lean
fixingSubgroup_of_insert
[191, 1]
[222, 33]
rw [mem_fixingSubgroup_iff]
case h M : Type u_2 inst✝¹ : Group M α : Type u_1 inst✝ : MulAction M α a : α s : Set ↥(SubMulAction.ofStabilizer M a) m : M hm : ∀ y ∈ insert a ((fun x => ↑x) '' s), m • y = y hm' : m ∈ stabilizer M a ⊢ { val := m, property := hm' } ∈ fixingSubgroup (↥(stabilizer M a)) s
case h M : Type u_2 inst✝¹ : Group M α : Type u_1 inst✝ : MulAction M α a : α s : Set ↥(SubMulAction.ofStabilizer M a) m : M hm : ∀ y ∈ insert a ((fun x => ↑x) '' s), m • y = y hm' : m ∈ stabilizer M a ⊢ ∀ y ∈ s, { val := m, property := hm' } • y = y
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case h M : Type u_2 inst✝¹ : Group M α : Type u_1 inst✝ : MulAction M α a : α s : Set ↥(SubMulAction.ofStabilizer M a) m : M hm : ∀ y ∈ insert a ((fun x => ↑x) '' s), m • y = y hm' : m ∈ stabilizer M a ⊢ { val := m, property := hm' } ∈ fixingSubgroup (↥(stabilizer M a)) s TACTIC:
https://github.com/AntoineChambert-Loir/Jordan4.git
d49910c127be01229697737a55a2d756e908d3e1
Jordan/SubMulActions.lean
fixingSubgroup_of_insert
[191, 1]
[222, 33]
rintro ⟨y, hy⟩ hy'
case h M : Type u_2 inst✝¹ : Group M α : Type u_1 inst✝ : MulAction M α a : α s : Set ↥(SubMulAction.ofStabilizer M a) m : M hm : ∀ y ∈ insert a ((fun x => ↑x) '' s), m • y = y hm' : m ∈ stabilizer M a ⊢ ∀ y ∈ s, { val := m, property := hm' } • y = y
case h.mk M : Type u_2 inst✝¹ : Group M α : Type u_1 inst✝ : MulAction M α a : α s : Set ↥(SubMulAction.ofStabilizer M a) m : M hm : ∀ y ∈ insert a ((fun x => ↑x) '' s), m • y = y hm' : m ∈ stabilizer M a y : α hy : y ∈ SubMulAction.ofStabilizer M a hy' : { val := y, property := hy } ∈ s ⊢ { val := m, property := hm' } • { val := y, property := hy } = { val := y, property := hy }
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case h M : Type u_2 inst✝¹ : Group M α : Type u_1 inst✝ : MulAction M α a : α s : Set ↥(SubMulAction.ofStabilizer M a) m : M hm : ∀ y ∈ insert a ((fun x => ↑x) '' s), m • y = y hm' : m ∈ stabilizer M a ⊢ ∀ y ∈ s, { val := m, property := hm' } • y = y TACTIC:
https://github.com/AntoineChambert-Loir/Jordan4.git
d49910c127be01229697737a55a2d756e908d3e1
Jordan/SubMulActions.lean
fixingSubgroup_of_insert
[191, 1]
[222, 33]
simp only [SetLike.mk_smul_mk, Subtype.mk.injEq]
case h.mk M : Type u_2 inst✝¹ : Group M α : Type u_1 inst✝ : MulAction M α a : α s : Set ↥(SubMulAction.ofStabilizer M a) m : M hm : ∀ y ∈ insert a ((fun x => ↑x) '' s), m • y = y hm' : m ∈ stabilizer M a y : α hy : y ∈ SubMulAction.ofStabilizer M a hy' : { val := y, property := hy } ∈ s ⊢ { val := m, property := hm' } • { val := y, property := hy } = { val := y, property := hy }
case h.mk M : Type u_2 inst✝¹ : Group M α : Type u_1 inst✝ : MulAction M α a : α s : Set ↥(SubMulAction.ofStabilizer M a) m : M hm : ∀ y ∈ insert a ((fun x => ↑x) '' s), m • y = y hm' : m ∈ stabilizer M a y : α hy : y ∈ SubMulAction.ofStabilizer M a hy' : { val := y, property := hy } ∈ s ⊢ { val := m, property := hm' } • y = y
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case h.mk M : Type u_2 inst✝¹ : Group M α : Type u_1 inst✝ : MulAction M α a : α s : Set ↥(SubMulAction.ofStabilizer M a) m : M hm : ∀ y ∈ insert a ((fun x => ↑x) '' s), m • y = y hm' : m ∈ stabilizer M a y : α hy : y ∈ SubMulAction.ofStabilizer M a hy' : { val := y, property := hy } ∈ s ⊢ { val := m, property := hm' } • { val := y, property := hy } = { val := y, property := hy } TACTIC:
https://github.com/AntoineChambert-Loir/Jordan4.git
d49910c127be01229697737a55a2d756e908d3e1
Jordan/SubMulActions.lean
fixingSubgroup_of_insert
[191, 1]
[222, 33]
change m • y = y
case h.mk M : Type u_2 inst✝¹ : Group M α : Type u_1 inst✝ : MulAction M α a : α s : Set ↥(SubMulAction.ofStabilizer M a) m : M hm : ∀ y ∈ insert a ((fun x => ↑x) '' s), m • y = y hm' : m ∈ stabilizer M a y : α hy : y ∈ SubMulAction.ofStabilizer M a hy' : { val := y, property := hy } ∈ s ⊢ { val := m, property := hm' } • y = y
case h.mk M : Type u_2 inst✝¹ : Group M α : Type u_1 inst✝ : MulAction M α a : α s : Set ↥(SubMulAction.ofStabilizer M a) m : M hm : ∀ y ∈ insert a ((fun x => ↑x) '' s), m • y = y hm' : m ∈ stabilizer M a y : α hy : y ∈ SubMulAction.ofStabilizer M a hy' : { val := y, property := hy } ∈ s ⊢ m • y = y
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case h.mk M : Type u_2 inst✝¹ : Group M α : Type u_1 inst✝ : MulAction M α a : α s : Set ↥(SubMulAction.ofStabilizer M a) m : M hm : ∀ y ∈ insert a ((fun x => ↑x) '' s), m • y = y hm' : m ∈ stabilizer M a y : α hy : y ∈ SubMulAction.ofStabilizer M a hy' : { val := y, property := hy } ∈ s ⊢ { val := m, property := hm' } • y = y TACTIC:
https://github.com/AntoineChambert-Loir/Jordan4.git
d49910c127be01229697737a55a2d756e908d3e1
Jordan/SubMulActions.lean
fixingSubgroup_of_insert
[191, 1]
[222, 33]
apply hm
case h.mk M : Type u_2 inst✝¹ : Group M α : Type u_1 inst✝ : MulAction M α a : α s : Set ↥(SubMulAction.ofStabilizer M a) m : M hm : ∀ y ∈ insert a ((fun x => ↑x) '' s), m • y = y hm' : m ∈ stabilizer M a y : α hy : y ∈ SubMulAction.ofStabilizer M a hy' : { val := y, property := hy } ∈ s ⊢ m • y = y
case h.mk.a M : Type u_2 inst✝¹ : Group M α : Type u_1 inst✝ : MulAction M α a : α s : Set ↥(SubMulAction.ofStabilizer M a) m : M hm : ∀ y ∈ insert a ((fun x => ↑x) '' s), m • y = y hm' : m ∈ stabilizer M a y : α hy : y ∈ SubMulAction.ofStabilizer M a hy' : { val := y, property := hy } ∈ s ⊢ y ∈ insert a ((fun x => ↑x) '' s)
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case h.mk M : Type u_2 inst✝¹ : Group M α : Type u_1 inst✝ : MulAction M α a : α s : Set ↥(SubMulAction.ofStabilizer M a) m : M hm : ∀ y ∈ insert a ((fun x => ↑x) '' s), m • y = y hm' : m ∈ stabilizer M a y : α hy : y ∈ SubMulAction.ofStabilizer M a hy' : { val := y, property := hy } ∈ s ⊢ m • y = y TACTIC:
https://github.com/AntoineChambert-Loir/Jordan4.git
d49910c127be01229697737a55a2d756e908d3e1
Jordan/SubMulActions.lean
fixingSubgroup_of_insert
[191, 1]
[222, 33]
apply Set.mem_insert_of_mem
case h.mk.a M : Type u_2 inst✝¹ : Group M α : Type u_1 inst✝ : MulAction M α a : α s : Set ↥(SubMulAction.ofStabilizer M a) m : M hm : ∀ y ∈ insert a ((fun x => ↑x) '' s), m • y = y hm' : m ∈ stabilizer M a y : α hy : y ∈ SubMulAction.ofStabilizer M a hy' : { val := y, property := hy } ∈ s ⊢ y ∈ insert a ((fun x => ↑x) '' s)
case h.mk.a.a M : Type u_2 inst✝¹ : Group M α : Type u_1 inst✝ : MulAction M α a : α s : Set ↥(SubMulAction.ofStabilizer M a) m : M hm : ∀ y ∈ insert a ((fun x => ↑x) '' s), m • y = y hm' : m ∈ stabilizer M a y : α hy : y ∈ SubMulAction.ofStabilizer M a hy' : { val := y, property := hy } ∈ s ⊢ y ∈ (fun x => ↑x) '' s
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case h.mk.a M : Type u_2 inst✝¹ : Group M α : Type u_1 inst✝ : MulAction M α a : α s : Set ↥(SubMulAction.ofStabilizer M a) m : M hm : ∀ y ∈ insert a ((fun x => ↑x) '' s), m • y = y hm' : m ∈ stabilizer M a y : α hy : y ∈ SubMulAction.ofStabilizer M a hy' : { val := y, property := hy } ∈ s ⊢ y ∈ insert a ((fun x => ↑x) '' s) TACTIC:
https://github.com/AntoineChambert-Loir/Jordan4.git
d49910c127be01229697737a55a2d756e908d3e1
Jordan/SubMulActions.lean
fixingSubgroup_of_insert
[191, 1]
[222, 33]
use ⟨y, hy⟩
case h.mk.a.a M : Type u_2 inst✝¹ : Group M α : Type u_1 inst✝ : MulAction M α a : α s : Set ↥(SubMulAction.ofStabilizer M a) m : M hm : ∀ y ∈ insert a ((fun x => ↑x) '' s), m • y = y hm' : m ∈ stabilizer M a y : α hy : y ∈ SubMulAction.ofStabilizer M a hy' : { val := y, property := hy } ∈ s ⊢ y ∈ (fun x => ↑x) '' s
no goals
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case h.mk.a.a M : Type u_2 inst✝¹ : Group M α : Type u_1 inst✝ : MulAction M α a : α s : Set ↥(SubMulAction.ofStabilizer M a) m : M hm : ∀ y ∈ insert a ((fun x => ↑x) '' s), m • y = y hm' : m ∈ stabilizer M a y : α hy : y ∈ SubMulAction.ofStabilizer M a hy' : { val := y, property := hy } ∈ s ⊢ y ∈ (fun x => ↑x) '' s TACTIC:
https://github.com/AntoineChambert-Loir/Jordan4.git
d49910c127be01229697737a55a2d756e908d3e1
Jordan/SubMulActions.lean
fixingSubgroup_of_insert
[191, 1]
[222, 33]
rintro ⟨⟨n, hn'⟩, hn, rfl⟩
case h.mpr M : Type u_2 inst✝¹ : Group M α : Type u_1 inst✝ : MulAction M α a : α s : Set ↥(SubMulAction.ofStabilizer M a) m : M ⊢ m ∈ Subgroup.map (Subgroup.subtype (stabilizer M a)) (fixingSubgroup (↥(stabilizer M a)) s) → m ∈ fixingSubgroup M (insert a ((fun x => ↑x) '' s))
case h.mpr.intro.mk.intro M : Type u_2 inst✝¹ : Group M α : Type u_1 inst✝ : MulAction M α a : α s : Set ↥(SubMulAction.ofStabilizer M a) n : M hn' : n ∈ stabilizer M a hn : { val := n, property := hn' } ∈ ↑(fixingSubgroup (↥(stabilizer M a)) s) ⊢ (Subgroup.subtype (stabilizer M a)) { val := n, property := hn' } ∈ fixingSubgroup M (insert a ((fun x => ↑x) '' s))
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case h.mpr M : Type u_2 inst✝¹ : Group M α : Type u_1 inst✝ : MulAction M α a : α s : Set ↥(SubMulAction.ofStabilizer M a) m : M ⊢ m ∈ Subgroup.map (Subgroup.subtype (stabilizer M a)) (fixingSubgroup (↥(stabilizer M a)) s) → m ∈ fixingSubgroup M (insert a ((fun x => ↑x) '' s)) TACTIC:
https://github.com/AntoineChambert-Loir/Jordan4.git
d49910c127be01229697737a55a2d756e908d3e1
Jordan/SubMulActions.lean
fixingSubgroup_of_insert
[191, 1]
[222, 33]
simp only [Subgroup.coeSubtype, SetLike.mem_coe, mem_fixingSubgroup_iff] at hn ⊢
case h.mpr.intro.mk.intro M : Type u_2 inst✝¹ : Group M α : Type u_1 inst✝ : MulAction M α a : α s : Set ↥(SubMulAction.ofStabilizer M a) n : M hn' : n ∈ stabilizer M a hn : { val := n, property := hn' } ∈ ↑(fixingSubgroup (↥(stabilizer M a)) s) ⊢ (Subgroup.subtype (stabilizer M a)) { val := n, property := hn' } ∈ fixingSubgroup M (insert a ((fun x => ↑x) '' s))
case h.mpr.intro.mk.intro M : Type u_2 inst✝¹ : Group M α : Type u_1 inst✝ : MulAction M α a : α s : Set ↥(SubMulAction.ofStabilizer M a) n : M hn' : n ∈ stabilizer M a hn : ∀ y ∈ s, { val := n, property := hn' } • y = y ⊢ ∀ y ∈ insert a ((fun x => ↑x) '' s), n • y = y
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case h.mpr.intro.mk.intro M : Type u_2 inst✝¹ : Group M α : Type u_1 inst✝ : MulAction M α a : α s : Set ↥(SubMulAction.ofStabilizer M a) n : M hn' : n ∈ stabilizer M a hn : { val := n, property := hn' } ∈ ↑(fixingSubgroup (↥(stabilizer M a)) s) ⊢ (Subgroup.subtype (stabilizer M a)) { val := n, property := hn' } ∈ fixingSubgroup M (insert a ((fun x => ↑x) '' s)) TACTIC:
https://github.com/AntoineChambert-Loir/Jordan4.git
d49910c127be01229697737a55a2d756e908d3e1
Jordan/SubMulActions.lean
fixingSubgroup_of_insert
[191, 1]
[222, 33]
intro x hx
case h.mpr.intro.mk.intro M : Type u_2 inst✝¹ : Group M α : Type u_1 inst✝ : MulAction M α a : α s : Set ↥(SubMulAction.ofStabilizer M a) n : M hn' : n ∈ stabilizer M a hn : ∀ y ∈ s, { val := n, property := hn' } • y = y ⊢ ∀ y ∈ insert a ((fun x => ↑x) '' s), n • y = y
case h.mpr.intro.mk.intro M : Type u_2 inst✝¹ : Group M α : Type u_1 inst✝ : MulAction M α a : α s : Set ↥(SubMulAction.ofStabilizer M a) n : M hn' : n ∈ stabilizer M a hn : ∀ y ∈ s, { val := n, property := hn' } • y = y x : α hx : x ∈ insert a ((fun x => ↑x) '' s) ⊢ n • x = x
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case h.mpr.intro.mk.intro M : Type u_2 inst✝¹ : Group M α : Type u_1 inst✝ : MulAction M α a : α s : Set ↥(SubMulAction.ofStabilizer M a) n : M hn' : n ∈ stabilizer M a hn : ∀ y ∈ s, { val := n, property := hn' } • y = y ⊢ ∀ y ∈ insert a ((fun x => ↑x) '' s), n • y = y TACTIC:
https://github.com/AntoineChambert-Loir/Jordan4.git
d49910c127be01229697737a55a2d756e908d3e1
Jordan/SubMulActions.lean
fixingSubgroup_of_insert
[191, 1]
[222, 33]
rw [Set.mem_insert_iff] at hx
case h.mpr.intro.mk.intro M : Type u_2 inst✝¹ : Group M α : Type u_1 inst✝ : MulAction M α a : α s : Set ↥(SubMulAction.ofStabilizer M a) n : M hn' : n ∈ stabilizer M a hn : ∀ y ∈ s, { val := n, property := hn' } • y = y x : α hx : x ∈ insert a ((fun x => ↑x) '' s) ⊢ n • x = x
case h.mpr.intro.mk.intro M : Type u_2 inst✝¹ : Group M α : Type u_1 inst✝ : MulAction M α a : α s : Set ↥(SubMulAction.ofStabilizer M a) n : M hn' : n ∈ stabilizer M a hn : ∀ y ∈ s, { val := n, property := hn' } • y = y x : α hx : x = a ∨ x ∈ (fun x => ↑x) '' s ⊢ n • x = x
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case h.mpr.intro.mk.intro M : Type u_2 inst✝¹ : Group M α : Type u_1 inst✝ : MulAction M α a : α s : Set ↥(SubMulAction.ofStabilizer M a) n : M hn' : n ∈ stabilizer M a hn : ∀ y ∈ s, { val := n, property := hn' } • y = y x : α hx : x ∈ insert a ((fun x => ↑x) '' s) ⊢ n • x = x TACTIC:
https://github.com/AntoineChambert-Loir/Jordan4.git
d49910c127be01229697737a55a2d756e908d3e1
Jordan/SubMulActions.lean
fixingSubgroup_of_insert
[191, 1]
[222, 33]
cases' hx with hx hx
case h.mpr.intro.mk.intro M : Type u_2 inst✝¹ : Group M α : Type u_1 inst✝ : MulAction M α a : α s : Set ↥(SubMulAction.ofStabilizer M a) n : M hn' : n ∈ stabilizer M a hn : ∀ y ∈ s, { val := n, property := hn' } • y = y x : α hx : x = a ∨ x ∈ (fun x => ↑x) '' s ⊢ n • x = x
case h.mpr.intro.mk.intro.inl M : Type u_2 inst✝¹ : Group M α : Type u_1 inst✝ : MulAction M α a : α s : Set ↥(SubMulAction.ofStabilizer M a) n : M hn' : n ∈ stabilizer M a hn : ∀ y ∈ s, { val := n, property := hn' } • y = y x : α hx : x = a ⊢ n • x = x case h.mpr.intro.mk.intro.inr M : Type u_2 inst✝¹ : Group M α : Type u_1 inst✝ : MulAction M α a : α s : Set ↥(SubMulAction.ofStabilizer M a) n : M hn' : n ∈ stabilizer M a hn : ∀ y ∈ s, { val := n, property := hn' } • y = y x : α hx : x ∈ (fun x => ↑x) '' s ⊢ n • x = x
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case h.mpr.intro.mk.intro M : Type u_2 inst✝¹ : Group M α : Type u_1 inst✝ : MulAction M α a : α s : Set ↥(SubMulAction.ofStabilizer M a) n : M hn' : n ∈ stabilizer M a hn : ∀ y ∈ s, { val := n, property := hn' } • y = y x : α hx : x = a ∨ x ∈ (fun x => ↑x) '' s ⊢ n • x = x TACTIC:
https://github.com/AntoineChambert-Loir/Jordan4.git
d49910c127be01229697737a55a2d756e908d3e1
Jordan/SubMulActions.lean
fixingSubgroup_of_insert
[191, 1]
[222, 33]
. simpa [hx] using hn'
case h.mpr.intro.mk.intro.inl M : Type u_2 inst✝¹ : Group M α : Type u_1 inst✝ : MulAction M α a : α s : Set ↥(SubMulAction.ofStabilizer M a) n : M hn' : n ∈ stabilizer M a hn : ∀ y ∈ s, { val := n, property := hn' } • y = y x : α hx : x = a ⊢ n • x = x case h.mpr.intro.mk.intro.inr M : Type u_2 inst✝¹ : Group M α : Type u_1 inst✝ : MulAction M α a : α s : Set ↥(SubMulAction.ofStabilizer M a) n : M hn' : n ∈ stabilizer M a hn : ∀ y ∈ s, { val := n, property := hn' } • y = y x : α hx : x ∈ (fun x => ↑x) '' s ⊢ n • x = x
case h.mpr.intro.mk.intro.inr M : Type u_2 inst✝¹ : Group M α : Type u_1 inst✝ : MulAction M α a : α s : Set ↥(SubMulAction.ofStabilizer M a) n : M hn' : n ∈ stabilizer M a hn : ∀ y ∈ s, { val := n, property := hn' } • y = y x : α hx : x ∈ (fun x => ↑x) '' s ⊢ n • x = x
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case h.mpr.intro.mk.intro.inl M : Type u_2 inst✝¹ : Group M α : Type u_1 inst✝ : MulAction M α a : α s : Set ↥(SubMulAction.ofStabilizer M a) n : M hn' : n ∈ stabilizer M a hn : ∀ y ∈ s, { val := n, property := hn' } • y = y x : α hx : x = a ⊢ n • x = x case h.mpr.intro.mk.intro.inr M : Type u_2 inst✝¹ : Group M α : Type u_1 inst✝ : MulAction M α a : α s : Set ↥(SubMulAction.ofStabilizer M a) n : M hn' : n ∈ stabilizer M a hn : ∀ y ∈ s, { val := n, property := hn' } • y = y x : α hx : x ∈ (fun x => ↑x) '' s ⊢ n • x = x TACTIC:
https://github.com/AntoineChambert-Loir/Jordan4.git
d49910c127be01229697737a55a2d756e908d3e1
Jordan/SubMulActions.lean
fixingSubgroup_of_insert
[191, 1]
[222, 33]
. simp only [Set.mem_image] at hx rcases hx with ⟨y, hy, rfl⟩ conv_rhs => rw [← hn y hy]
case h.mpr.intro.mk.intro.inr M : Type u_2 inst✝¹ : Group M α : Type u_1 inst✝ : MulAction M α a : α s : Set ↥(SubMulAction.ofStabilizer M a) n : M hn' : n ∈ stabilizer M a hn : ∀ y ∈ s, { val := n, property := hn' } • y = y x : α hx : x ∈ (fun x => ↑x) '' s ⊢ n • x = x
no goals
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case h.mpr.intro.mk.intro.inr M : Type u_2 inst✝¹ : Group M α : Type u_1 inst✝ : MulAction M α a : α s : Set ↥(SubMulAction.ofStabilizer M a) n : M hn' : n ∈ stabilizer M a hn : ∀ y ∈ s, { val := n, property := hn' } • y = y x : α hx : x ∈ (fun x => ↑x) '' s ⊢ n • x = x TACTIC:
https://github.com/AntoineChambert-Loir/Jordan4.git
d49910c127be01229697737a55a2d756e908d3e1
Jordan/SubMulActions.lean
fixingSubgroup_of_insert
[191, 1]
[222, 33]
simpa [hx] using hn'
case h.mpr.intro.mk.intro.inl M : Type u_2 inst✝¹ : Group M α : Type u_1 inst✝ : MulAction M α a : α s : Set ↥(SubMulAction.ofStabilizer M a) n : M hn' : n ∈ stabilizer M a hn : ∀ y ∈ s, { val := n, property := hn' } • y = y x : α hx : x = a ⊢ n • x = x
no goals
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case h.mpr.intro.mk.intro.inl M : Type u_2 inst✝¹ : Group M α : Type u_1 inst✝ : MulAction M α a : α s : Set ↥(SubMulAction.ofStabilizer M a) n : M hn' : n ∈ stabilizer M a hn : ∀ y ∈ s, { val := n, property := hn' } • y = y x : α hx : x = a ⊢ n • x = x TACTIC:
https://github.com/AntoineChambert-Loir/Jordan4.git
d49910c127be01229697737a55a2d756e908d3e1
Jordan/SubMulActions.lean
fixingSubgroup_of_insert
[191, 1]
[222, 33]
simp only [Set.mem_image] at hx
case h.mpr.intro.mk.intro.inr M : Type u_2 inst✝¹ : Group M α : Type u_1 inst✝ : MulAction M α a : α s : Set ↥(SubMulAction.ofStabilizer M a) n : M hn' : n ∈ stabilizer M a hn : ∀ y ∈ s, { val := n, property := hn' } • y = y x : α hx : x ∈ (fun x => ↑x) '' s ⊢ n • x = x
case h.mpr.intro.mk.intro.inr M : Type u_2 inst✝¹ : Group M α : Type u_1 inst✝ : MulAction M α a : α s : Set ↥(SubMulAction.ofStabilizer M a) n : M hn' : n ∈ stabilizer M a hn : ∀ y ∈ s, { val := n, property := hn' } • y = y x : α hx : ∃ x_1 ∈ s, ↑x_1 = x ⊢ n • x = x
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case h.mpr.intro.mk.intro.inr M : Type u_2 inst✝¹ : Group M α : Type u_1 inst✝ : MulAction M α a : α s : Set ↥(SubMulAction.ofStabilizer M a) n : M hn' : n ∈ stabilizer M a hn : ∀ y ∈ s, { val := n, property := hn' } • y = y x : α hx : x ∈ (fun x => ↑x) '' s ⊢ n • x = x TACTIC:
https://github.com/AntoineChambert-Loir/Jordan4.git
d49910c127be01229697737a55a2d756e908d3e1
Jordan/SubMulActions.lean
fixingSubgroup_of_insert
[191, 1]
[222, 33]
rcases hx with ⟨y, hy, rfl⟩
case h.mpr.intro.mk.intro.inr M : Type u_2 inst✝¹ : Group M α : Type u_1 inst✝ : MulAction M α a : α s : Set ↥(SubMulAction.ofStabilizer M a) n : M hn' : n ∈ stabilizer M a hn : ∀ y ∈ s, { val := n, property := hn' } • y = y x : α hx : ∃ x_1 ∈ s, ↑x_1 = x ⊢ n • x = x
case h.mpr.intro.mk.intro.inr.intro.intro M : Type u_2 inst✝¹ : Group M α : Type u_1 inst✝ : MulAction M α a : α s : Set ↥(SubMulAction.ofStabilizer M a) n : M hn' : n ∈ stabilizer M a hn : ∀ y ∈ s, { val := n, property := hn' } • y = y y : ↥(SubMulAction.ofStabilizer M a) hy : y ∈ s ⊢ n • ↑y = ↑y
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case h.mpr.intro.mk.intro.inr M : Type u_2 inst✝¹ : Group M α : Type u_1 inst✝ : MulAction M α a : α s : Set ↥(SubMulAction.ofStabilizer M a) n : M hn' : n ∈ stabilizer M a hn : ∀ y ∈ s, { val := n, property := hn' } • y = y x : α hx : ∃ x_1 ∈ s, ↑x_1 = x ⊢ n • x = x TACTIC:
https://github.com/AntoineChambert-Loir/Jordan4.git
d49910c127be01229697737a55a2d756e908d3e1
Jordan/SubMulActions.lean
fixingSubgroup_of_insert
[191, 1]
[222, 33]
conv_rhs => rw [← hn y hy]
case h.mpr.intro.mk.intro.inr.intro.intro M : Type u_2 inst✝¹ : Group M α : Type u_1 inst✝ : MulAction M α a : α s : Set ↥(SubMulAction.ofStabilizer M a) n : M hn' : n ∈ stabilizer M a hn : ∀ y ∈ s, { val := n, property := hn' } • y = y y : ↥(SubMulAction.ofStabilizer M a) hy : y ∈ s ⊢ n • ↑y = ↑y
no goals
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case h.mpr.intro.mk.intro.inr.intro.intro M : Type u_2 inst✝¹ : Group M α : Type u_1 inst✝ : MulAction M α a : α s : Set ↥(SubMulAction.ofStabilizer M a) n : M hn' : n ∈ stabilizer M a hn : ∀ y ∈ s, { val := n, property := hn' } • y = y y : ↥(SubMulAction.ofStabilizer M a) hy : y ∈ s ⊢ n • ↑y = ↑y TACTIC:
https://github.com/AntoineChambert-Loir/Jordan4.git
d49910c127be01229697737a55a2d756e908d3e1
Jordan/SubMulActions.lean
SubMulAction.ofFixingSubgroupEmpty_equivariantMap_bijective
[258, 1]
[267, 8]
constructor
M : Type u_2 inst✝¹ : Group M α : Type u_1 inst✝ : MulAction M α ⊢ Function.Bijective ⇑(ofFixingSubgroupEmpty_equivariantMap M α)
case left M : Type u_2 inst✝¹ : Group M α : Type u_1 inst✝ : MulAction M α ⊢ Function.Injective ⇑(ofFixingSubgroupEmpty_equivariantMap M α) case right M : Type u_2 inst✝¹ : Group M α : Type u_1 inst✝ : MulAction M α ⊢ Function.Surjective ⇑(ofFixingSubgroupEmpty_equivariantMap M α)
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: M : Type u_2 inst✝¹ : Group M α : Type u_1 inst✝ : MulAction M α ⊢ Function.Bijective ⇑(ofFixingSubgroupEmpty_equivariantMap M α) TACTIC:
https://github.com/AntoineChambert-Loir/Jordan4.git
d49910c127be01229697737a55a2d756e908d3e1
Jordan/SubMulActions.lean
SubMulAction.ofFixingSubgroupEmpty_equivariantMap_bijective
[258, 1]
[267, 8]
rintro ⟨x, hx⟩ ⟨y, hy⟩ hxy
case left M : Type u_2 inst✝¹ : Group M α : Type u_1 inst✝ : MulAction M α ⊢ Function.Injective ⇑(ofFixingSubgroupEmpty_equivariantMap M α)
case left.mk.mk M : Type u_2 inst✝¹ : Group M α : Type u_1 inst✝ : MulAction M α x : α hx : x ∈ ofFixingSubgroup M ∅ y : α hy : y ∈ ofFixingSubgroup M ∅ hxy : (ofFixingSubgroupEmpty_equivariantMap M α) { val := x, property := hx } = (ofFixingSubgroupEmpty_equivariantMap M α) { val := y, property := hy } ⊢ { val := x, property := hx } = { val := y, property := hy }
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case left M : Type u_2 inst✝¹ : Group M α : Type u_1 inst✝ : MulAction M α ⊢ Function.Injective ⇑(ofFixingSubgroupEmpty_equivariantMap M α) TACTIC:
https://github.com/AntoineChambert-Loir/Jordan4.git
d49910c127be01229697737a55a2d756e908d3e1
Jordan/SubMulActions.lean
SubMulAction.ofFixingSubgroupEmpty_equivariantMap_bijective
[258, 1]
[267, 8]
simp only [Subtype.mk_eq_mk]
case left.mk.mk M : Type u_2 inst✝¹ : Group M α : Type u_1 inst✝ : MulAction M α x : α hx : x ∈ ofFixingSubgroup M ∅ y : α hy : y ∈ ofFixingSubgroup M ∅ hxy : (ofFixingSubgroupEmpty_equivariantMap M α) { val := x, property := hx } = (ofFixingSubgroupEmpty_equivariantMap M α) { val := y, property := hy } ⊢ { val := x, property := hx } = { val := y, property := hy }
case left.mk.mk M : Type u_2 inst✝¹ : Group M α : Type u_1 inst✝ : MulAction M α x : α hx : x ∈ ofFixingSubgroup M ∅ y : α hy : y ∈ ofFixingSubgroup M ∅ hxy : (ofFixingSubgroupEmpty_equivariantMap M α) { val := x, property := hx } = (ofFixingSubgroupEmpty_equivariantMap M α) { val := y, property := hy } ⊢ x = y
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case left.mk.mk M : Type u_2 inst✝¹ : Group M α : Type u_1 inst✝ : MulAction M α x : α hx : x ∈ ofFixingSubgroup M ∅ y : α hy : y ∈ ofFixingSubgroup M ∅ hxy : (ofFixingSubgroupEmpty_equivariantMap M α) { val := x, property := hx } = (ofFixingSubgroupEmpty_equivariantMap M α) { val := y, property := hy } ⊢ { val := x, property := hx } = { val := y, property := hy } TACTIC:
https://github.com/AntoineChambert-Loir/Jordan4.git
d49910c127be01229697737a55a2d756e908d3e1
Jordan/SubMulActions.lean
SubMulAction.ofFixingSubgroupEmpty_equivariantMap_bijective
[258, 1]
[267, 8]
exact hxy
case left.mk.mk M : Type u_2 inst✝¹ : Group M α : Type u_1 inst✝ : MulAction M α x : α hx : x ∈ ofFixingSubgroup M ∅ y : α hy : y ∈ ofFixingSubgroup M ∅ hxy : (ofFixingSubgroupEmpty_equivariantMap M α) { val := x, property := hx } = (ofFixingSubgroupEmpty_equivariantMap M α) { val := y, property := hy } ⊢ x = y
no goals
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case left.mk.mk M : Type u_2 inst✝¹ : Group M α : Type u_1 inst✝ : MulAction M α x : α hx : x ∈ ofFixingSubgroup M ∅ y : α hy : y ∈ ofFixingSubgroup M ∅ hxy : (ofFixingSubgroupEmpty_equivariantMap M α) { val := x, property := hx } = (ofFixingSubgroupEmpty_equivariantMap M α) { val := y, property := hy } ⊢ x = y TACTIC:
https://github.com/AntoineChambert-Loir/Jordan4.git
d49910c127be01229697737a55a2d756e908d3e1
Jordan/SubMulActions.lean
SubMulAction.ofFixingSubgroupEmpty_equivariantMap_bijective
[258, 1]
[267, 8]
intro x
case right M : Type u_2 inst✝¹ : Group M α : Type u_1 inst✝ : MulAction M α ⊢ Function.Surjective ⇑(ofFixingSubgroupEmpty_equivariantMap M α)
case right M : Type u_2 inst✝¹ : Group M α : Type u_1 inst✝ : MulAction M α x : α ⊢ ∃ a, (ofFixingSubgroupEmpty_equivariantMap M α) a = x
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case right M : Type u_2 inst✝¹ : Group M α : Type u_1 inst✝ : MulAction M α ⊢ Function.Surjective ⇑(ofFixingSubgroupEmpty_equivariantMap M α) TACTIC:
https://github.com/AntoineChambert-Loir/Jordan4.git
d49910c127be01229697737a55a2d756e908d3e1
Jordan/SubMulActions.lean
SubMulAction.ofFixingSubgroupEmpty_equivariantMap_bijective
[258, 1]
[267, 8]
use ⟨x, (SubMulAction.mem_ofFixingSubgroup_iff M).mp (Set.not_mem_empty x)⟩
case right M : Type u_2 inst✝¹ : Group M α : Type u_1 inst✝ : MulAction M α x : α ⊢ ∃ a, (ofFixingSubgroupEmpty_equivariantMap M α) a = x
case h M : Type u_2 inst✝¹ : Group M α : Type u_1 inst✝ : MulAction M α x : α ⊢ (ofFixingSubgroupEmpty_equivariantMap M α) { val := x, property := ⋯ } = x
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case right M : Type u_2 inst✝¹ : Group M α : Type u_1 inst✝ : MulAction M α x : α ⊢ ∃ a, (ofFixingSubgroupEmpty_equivariantMap M α) a = x TACTIC:
https://github.com/AntoineChambert-Loir/Jordan4.git
d49910c127be01229697737a55a2d756e908d3e1
Jordan/SubMulActions.lean
SubMulAction.ofFixingSubgroupEmpty_equivariantMap_bijective
[258, 1]
[267, 8]
rfl
case h M : Type u_2 inst✝¹ : Group M α : Type u_1 inst✝ : MulAction M α x : α ⊢ (ofFixingSubgroupEmpty_equivariantMap M α) { val := x, property := ⋯ } = x
no goals
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case h M : Type u_2 inst✝¹ : Group M α : Type u_1 inst✝ : MulAction M α x : α ⊢ (ofFixingSubgroupEmpty_equivariantMap M α) { val := x, property := ⋯ } = x TACTIC:
https://github.com/AntoineChambert-Loir/Jordan4.git
d49910c127be01229697737a55a2d756e908d3e1
Jordan/SubMulActions.lean
SubMulAction.of_fixingSubgroupEmpty_mapScalars_surjective
[270, 1]
[276, 72]
intro g
M : Type u_1 inst✝¹ : Group M α : Type u_2 inst✝ : MulAction M α ⊢ Function.Surjective ⇑(Subgroup.subtype (fixingSubgroup M ∅))
M : Type u_1 inst✝¹ : Group M α : Type u_2 inst✝ : MulAction M α g : M ⊢ ∃ a, (Subgroup.subtype (fixingSubgroup M ∅)) a = g
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: M : Type u_1 inst✝¹ : Group M α : Type u_2 inst✝ : MulAction M α ⊢ Function.Surjective ⇑(Subgroup.subtype (fixingSubgroup M ∅)) TACTIC:
https://github.com/AntoineChambert-Loir/Jordan4.git
d49910c127be01229697737a55a2d756e908d3e1
Jordan/SubMulActions.lean
SubMulAction.of_fixingSubgroupEmpty_mapScalars_surjective
[270, 1]
[276, 72]
suffices g ∈ fixingSubgroup M (∅ : Set α) by exact ⟨⟨g, this⟩, rfl⟩
M : Type u_1 inst✝¹ : Group M α : Type u_2 inst✝ : MulAction M α g : M ⊢ ∃ a, (Subgroup.subtype (fixingSubgroup M ∅)) a = g
M : Type u_1 inst✝¹ : Group M α : Type u_2 inst✝ : MulAction M α g : M ⊢ g ∈ fixingSubgroup M ∅
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: M : Type u_1 inst✝¹ : Group M α : Type u_2 inst✝ : MulAction M α g : M ⊢ ∃ a, (Subgroup.subtype (fixingSubgroup M ∅)) a = g TACTIC:
https://github.com/AntoineChambert-Loir/Jordan4.git
d49910c127be01229697737a55a2d756e908d3e1
Jordan/SubMulActions.lean
SubMulAction.of_fixingSubgroupEmpty_mapScalars_surjective
[270, 1]
[276, 72]
rw [mem_fixingSubgroup_iff]
M : Type u_1 inst✝¹ : Group M α : Type u_2 inst✝ : MulAction M α g : M ⊢ g ∈ fixingSubgroup M ∅
M : Type u_1 inst✝¹ : Group M α : Type u_2 inst✝ : MulAction M α g : M ⊢ ∀ y ∈ ∅, g • y = y
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: M : Type u_1 inst✝¹ : Group M α : Type u_2 inst✝ : MulAction M α g : M ⊢ g ∈ fixingSubgroup M ∅ TACTIC:
https://github.com/AntoineChambert-Loir/Jordan4.git
d49910c127be01229697737a55a2d756e908d3e1
Jordan/SubMulActions.lean
SubMulAction.of_fixingSubgroupEmpty_mapScalars_surjective
[270, 1]
[276, 72]
simp only [Set.mem_empty_iff_false, IsEmpty.forall_iff, implies_true]
M : Type u_1 inst✝¹ : Group M α : Type u_2 inst✝ : MulAction M α g : M ⊢ ∀ y ∈ ∅, g • y = y
no goals
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: M : Type u_1 inst✝¹ : Group M α : Type u_2 inst✝ : MulAction M α g : M ⊢ ∀ y ∈ ∅, g • y = y TACTIC:
https://github.com/AntoineChambert-Loir/Jordan4.git
d49910c127be01229697737a55a2d756e908d3e1
Jordan/SubMulActions.lean
SubMulAction.of_fixingSubgroupEmpty_mapScalars_surjective
[270, 1]
[276, 72]
exact ⟨⟨g, this⟩, rfl⟩
M : Type u_1 inst✝¹ : Group M α : Type u_2 inst✝ : MulAction M α g : M this : g ∈ fixingSubgroup M ∅ ⊢ ∃ a, (Subgroup.subtype (fixingSubgroup M ∅)) a = g
no goals
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: M : Type u_1 inst✝¹ : Group M α : Type u_2 inst✝ : MulAction M α g : M this : g ∈ fixingSubgroup M ∅ ⊢ ∃ a, (Subgroup.subtype (fixingSubgroup M ∅)) a = g TACTIC: