text stringlengths 1 81 | start float64 0 10.1k | duration float64 0 24.9 |
|---|---|---|
on top of each other. | 2,756.41 | 1.35 |
But this is just a pointer to a number. | 2,757.76 | 3.07 |
Why might I want to implement a
stack as just a pointer to an int? | 2,760.83 | 3.64 |
That seems wrong. | 2,764.47 | 2.83 |
I want lots of numbers, not one number. | 2,767.3 | 3.75 |
So, what could I do? | 2,771.05 | 1.95 |
Well, what if in this world to implement
a stack I invoke our friend malloc | 2,773 | 4.86 |
and I say to malloc, malloc,
give me enough memory | 2,777.86 | 2.54 |
for 2,000 numbers or 5,000 numbers. | 2,780.4 | 3.32 |
What is malloc going to return? | 2,783.72 | 1.43 |
Well, by definition,
we know malloc is going | 2,785.15 | 1.98 |
to return the address of a chunk
of memory, and that chunk of memory | 2,787.13 | 5.17 |
is going to be of whatever
size I ask malloc for, | 2,792.3 | 3.48 |
and the address of the first is
really just equivalent to the address | 2,795.78 | 3.44 |
of one integer. | 2,799.22 | 1.28 |
And so long as I, the programmer,
remember that I asked malloc | 2,800.5 | 2.65 |
for 2,000 integers or
for 5,000 integers, | 2,803.15 | 3.28 |
I know implicitly the end of
that chunk of memory and malloc | 2,806.43 | 3.24 |
just need to tell me the beginning. | 2,809.67 | 1.61 |
So, it's perfectly fine to implement
the stack by way of a single pointer, | 2,811.28 | 4.53 |
because all I need to
know is, hey, malloc, | 2,815.81 | 2.19 |
where should I put my first integer? | 2,818 | 2.26 |
Because I know via pointer
arithmetic, per last week, | 2,820.26 | 2.99 |
that I can put my next
integer four bytes later, | 2,823.25 | 3.03 |
four bytes later, four bytes later. | 2,826.28 | 1.78 |
And I'm deliberately going
up this time, but it really | 2,828.06 | 2.249 |
is just an array where you can think
of the array as left and right. | 2,830.309 | 2.961 |
So, this would be a way of giving
ourselves a data structure called | 2,833.27 | 3.6 |
a stack that is not fixed from the
outset like this previous version | 2,836.87 | 4.64 |
to some specific capacity. | 2,841.51 | 1.87 |
Now, we are limited only by how much
physical memory or virtual memory | 2,843.38 | 4.24 |
my computer actually has. | 2,847.62 | 3.37 |
So, suppose Apple or someone
similar implemented the lines | 2,850.99 | 6.22 |
outside their stores for the
release of the iPhone as a stack. | 2,857.21 | 5.214 |
So, it's weird maybe to think of
people stacking on top of each other, | 2,862.424 | 2.916 |
but maybe you could imagine Apple
funneling everyone into the glass store | 2,865.34 | 6.89 |
here in Manhattan, and then whoever is
the last one in gets their phone first. | 2,872.23 | 5.5 |
Because why? | 2,877.73 | 0.65 |
They're closest to the exit. | 2,878.38 | 1.31 |
So, you have all these people show
up super early in the morning or days | 2,879.69 | 2.58 |
before, you pile them all into
the store saying everyone, hey, | 2,882.27 | 2.47 |
please go into the corner there. | 2,884.74 | 1.333 |
Please get into the store. | 2,886.073 | 1.097 |
And then as soon as 9:00
AM rolls around and it's | 2,887.17 | 2.217 |
time to give out the iPhones, just for
logistical convenience you realize, | 2,889.387 | 3.083 |
all right, why don't we just
give the person who came in | 2,892.47 | 1.65 |
last their phone first because
they're closest to the exit | 2,894.12 | 2.45 |
and get them out, last in, first out? | 2,896.57 | 3.21 |
Good design, bad design? | 2,899.78 | 2.1 |
It's correct in so far
as everyone's going | 2,901.88 | 2.92 |
to get an iPhone if supply is there,
and that's never going to be the case. | 2,904.8 | 4.27 |
So, it's not necessarily
very equitable or fair, | 2,909.07 | 2.802 |
and indeed the humans are not
going to be very pleased with Apple | 2,911.872 | 2.708 |
if they used a LIFO data
structure or a stack. | 2,914.58 | 4.34 |
What would these fans of Apple
hardware prefer that Apple use? | 2,918.92 | 6.25 |
We call it a line. | 2,925.17 | 0.87 |
If you go to the UK,
they call it a queue, | 2,926.04 | 1.85 |
which is actually a perfect answer,
because there's this other data | 2,927.89 | 3.49 |
structure in the world
called a queue, which | 2,931.38 | 2.65 |
is exactly what you would hope
the Apple store line would be, | 2,934.03 | 3.1 |
a line whereby it's first in, first out. | 2,937.13 | 3.41 |
So, the first person
there three days before, | 2,940.54 | 1.875 |
at 5:00 AM gets his or her
phone first, and the one person | 2,942.415 | 3.325 |
who comes in at 9:01 AM
doesn't get their phone | 2,945.74 | 2.26 |
because they're at the last
position in the queue or the list. | 2,948 | 3.015 |
And a queue, nicely enough, might
just have at least two operations-- | 2,951.015 | 2.875 |
enqueue and dequeue
whereby enqueue means get | 2,953.89 | 2.84 |
into line d queue means
get out of the line, | 2,956.73 | 2.32 |
but these happen at different places. | 2,959.05 | 1.604 |
For instance, if there's a whole bunch
of people lined up here on the stage, | 2,960.654 | 3.166 |
closest over there's
the front of the list. | 2,963.82 | 1.52 |
I get here last. | 2,965.34 | 0.84 |
I enqueue myself at the
end of this data structure, | 2,966.18 | 3.34 |
but you dequeue someone from
the beginning of the list. | 2,969.52 | 2.63 |
By contrast, when we had a stack,
when you push someone onto the stack, | 2,972.15 | 3.97 |
you pop it off, or him or
her off first by nature | 2,976.12 | 4.5 |
of it being a LIFO data structure. | 2,980.62 | 2.82 |
So, how might we implement a queue? | 2,983.44 | 2.7 |
It's actually slightly
more complicated, 50% more | 2,986.14 | 3.59 |
pieces of information you need to
keep track of, the front of the list. | 2,989.73 | 3.25 |
But you can still do it in an array. | 2,992.98 | 2.76 |
So, suppose that we do use an array,
and let me go ahead and draw this | 2,995.74 | 3.07 |
as follows. | 2,998.81 | 0.97 |
Suppose that like hopscotch we
draw the queue for an Apple Store | 2,999.78 | 6.37 |
like an array like this. | 3,006.15 | 1.85 |
And here is the door of the Apple store,
so you want to be at location zero, | 3,008 | 3.96 |
ideally. | 3,011.96 | 0.5 |
1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6-- so
this is how many people | 3,012.46 | 3.77 |
can fit into our queue in this case. | 3,016.23 | 2.64 |
So, suppose that Alice wants to buy an
iPhone and she gets to the store first. | 3,018.87 | 4.32 |
Where should she go to keep things fair? | 3,023.19 | 2.76 |
This is the queue, so we don't
want to put her into the corner, | 3,025.95 | 3.304 |
so to speak, in our first example. | 3,029.254 | 1.416 |
We want to put her at
the front of the list. | 3,030.67 | 1.833 |
So, Alice belongs right
there, pretty straightforward. | 3,032.503 | 3.367 |
Now, Bob arrives and he comes
in slightly after Alice, | 3,035.87 | 2.62 |
so he gets to get behind Alice in line. | 3,038.49 | 2.36 |
And so Bob is there, and maybe Charlie
arrives thereafter, and then so forth. | 3,040.85 | 3.96 |
David maybe comes in fourth and beyond. | 3,044.81 | 2.71 |
So, that's how people would
queue up, so to speak. | 3,047.52 | 2.64 |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.