text
stringlengths
1
330k
Sexual needs which must be met?! This isn't the 1950s.
I'm with cognito.
themaltesecat Tue 09-Jul-13 13:54:38
Can I just say, you should know if she isn't faking it. Things, er, quiver and jolt and pulse around your cock / tongue / fingers in a way which leaves you in no doubt.
That you have a doubt about this matter suggests to me that she was faking orgasms.
Which suggests to me that it was pretty inevitable that your sex life petered out.
You make yourself sound reasonable enough, but reading texts about feminist issues isn't going to help (you do realise that just because one author has a vagina, she doesn't speak for all womankind, don't you?). I'd be well suspicious if my husband did that, and find it a turn-off, whether it was done in a "I've been a good boy and done my homework and now can I have a shag, please" way, or a more sinister, "Look, I've done THIS, THIS and THIS in the house, and even read THIS shite by a WOMAN, now SHAG me for fuck's sake" way!
Ragwort Tue 09-Jul-13 14:00:29
Sexual needs which must be met?! This isn't the 1950s - personally I agree with this statement however there are many threads on mumsnet when if the woman isn't satisfied with her sex life it is considered perfectly acceptable for her to give her DH/DP an 'ultimatam' - there are countless threads about a woman's 'right to a satisfying sex life'.
Why doesn't this work the other way, double standards (again) on Mumsnet hmm?
Keepithidden Tue 09-Jul-13 14:26:26
Whoa, loads of responses now. Okay I'll try and cover all questions.
Career - Yes she had a career of sorts, and still maintains it to a certain extent (small business, working from home) it's the type that can be dipped into and out of as she wants/has time. I've sked her if she'd rather be at work than a SAHM and she says she'd rather be a SAHM. I'm sure she misses the adult company though, who wouldn't?
DC waking at night - DD sleeps well and generally all the way through. If she needs attending then it's generally serious and will require Calpol and reassurance. So we'll both get up. DS doesn't sleep as well, but is older, we used to take it in turns, but now it is more often me as he plays up for his mum more than me. Not sure this is an issue, I can get by on far less sleep than DW.
Contraception - I had the snip last year, FDW has been off the pill for a few years now. I know she's concerned about another pregnancy. I have more faith in Marie Stopes than she does!
Wobbly - May be a bit overkill, I've read about sex-rank, alpha males etc... on the Talkaboutmarriage forum. Not that convinced about it all. Yet. May be a tactic to use in the future, mind you when it gets to that stage all-bets-are-off anyway. I get your point about marriage contracts etc. but that argument smacks too much of power games for my liking (call me a Beta male if you like!).
Themaltesecat - Yeah, I know I should know. Not easy to be objective when you're involved in the situation. I know I'm paranoid, I just don't know how much!
I think it's a bit unfair to pin those other two arguments on me. I'm not after a pity shag, or a forced sex, I'd rather go without, either of those two may as well be voluntary rape from my POV. I want to be the lover my wife wants, and if that's not possible (either because I'm not attractive, or because she's asexual) I want to get out so she can find someone who can fulfil her needs.
Wellwobbly Tue 09-Jul-13 15:13:39
You sound like such a lovely man, Keep. What loving and caring loyalty.
Do go to counselling, you might find you are a bit too 'nice' and that once the dynamics in the family are tweaked somewhat, you will all be so much happier. All of you.
Join the discussion
Join the discussion
Register now
Last updated on March 16, 2014 at 9:20 EDT
Guyana Frontier Provides Review of Marudi Mountain Historical Resource Estimate
June 6, 2012
VANCOUVER, June 6, 2012 /PRNewswire/ – Guyana Frontier Mining Corp. (TSX-V:
GYG) (“Guyana Frontier”) is pleased to announce that it has carried out
a review of a historical resource estimate for the Mazoa Hill deposit
at the Marudi Mountain Gold Project (“Marudi Mountain”) in southern
Guyana, South America. The historical resource estimate was first
published in 1995, prior to the implementation of National Instrument
43-101 (“N.I. 43-101″). Guyana Frontier engaged Reserva International
LLC, of Reno, Nevada to conduct the review.
About the Marudi Mountain Historical Resource Estimate
The Marudi Mountain property has been the subject of extensive
historical work, including approximately 28,000 metres of diamond
drilling. In June 1995, Kilborn Engineering Pacific Ltd. (“Kilborn”),
of Vancouver, B.C., Canada, prepared an evaluation report (the
“Evaluation Report”) of Marudi Mountain for Sutton Resources Ltd
(“Sutton”). The Evaluation Report included a resource estimate for the
Mazoa Hill target area, where approximately 13,530 metres were drilled
in 70 historical holes, based on drill core data, geological
descriptions, surface trenching channel samples, and adit channel
samples provided to Kilborn by Sutton. Metallurgical test data used for
the Evaluation Report were taken from 1982 and 1991-1993 work programs.
Geological resources as depicted in Table 1 at selected cut-off grades
of 0.50, 1.00 and 1.50 grams/tonne gold were classified by Kilborn as
“Measured & Indicated”, and “Inferred” categories based on the
“Principles of Resources/Reserve Classification for Minerals” contained
in Circular 831 published by the U.S. Bureau of Mines and the U.S.
Geological Survey (“USGS”). See Table 2 for a comparison between the
mineral resource category definitions described in USGS Circular 831,
and those definitions published by the Canadian Institute of Mining,
Metallurgy and Petroleum (“CIM”) in 2010, which were adopted under N.I.
Table1. Historical Geological Resources of the Mazoa Hill Deposit (from
“Evaluation Report of the Marudi Mountain Project”, by Kilborn, 1995)
| Mineral | Above | Volume | Average | Tonnage | Metal Content |
| Resource|Cut-off Gold | (m3) | Grade | (metric | (Gold) |
| Category| Grade | | Gold | tonnes) | |
| |(grams/tonne)| |(grams/tonne)| | (grams) |
| | | | | | (oz.) |
|Measured | 0.50 |1,584,187| 2.36 |4,594,143|10,842,177|348,589|
|& | | | | | | |
|Indicated| | | | | | |
|Inferred | 0.50 | 407,910 | 1.99 |1,182,940|2,354,051 |75,686 |
|Measured | 1.00 |1,165,890| 2.94 |3,381,081|9,940,378 |319,595|
|& | | | | | | |
|Indicated| | | | | | |
|Inferred | 1.00 | 296,870 | 2.45 | 860,924 |2,109,264 |67,815 |
|Measured | 1.50 | 906,425 | 3.42 |2,628,633|8,989,925 |289,037|
|& | | | | | | |
|Indicated| | | | | | |
|Inferred | 1.50 | 202,448 | 3.02 | 587,100 |1,773,042 |57,005 |
The resource estimate contained in the Evaluation Report is historical
in nature, and is not based on an existing technical report prepared
under the guidelines of N.I. 43-101. Guyana Frontier considers the
historical resource estimate to be relevant to ongoing exploration and
believes that it provides a conceptual indication of the potential of
the gold occurrence but does not consider it to be reliable at this
time. No more recent mineral resource estimate regarding the Mazoa Hill
deposit is available to Guyana Frontier. A Qualified Person, as defined
by the guidelines of N.I. 43-101, has not done sufficient work to
classify the historical estimate as current mineral resources or
mineral reserves, and Guyana Frontier is not treating the historical
estimate as current mineral resources or mineral reserves.
Reserva International LLC recommends that in conjunction with additional
drilling, the implementation of a comprehensive QA/QC program, standard
data verification procedures, and additional measurements of specific
gravity and core recovery would be required to validate the historical
resource estimate and align it more closely with current best practice
guidelines. Guyana Frontier has implemented industry standard QA/QC
procedures in its 2012 drilling program.
As Table 2 shows below, the implementation of the CIM mineral resource
category definitions presents a higher degree of detail than the
definitions used prior to the implementation of N.I. 43-101. For
example, the 1995 Kilborn mineral resource estimate provides a combined
measured and indicated resource, and does not separate or distinguish
between the two categories.