text stringlengths 1 330k |
|---|
The carriage rides to meet the groom |
And opens wide and welcome doors |
But he hesitates, then withdraws |
Deeper in the shadows |
And the train is gone suddenly |
On wheels clicking silently |
Like a gently tapping litany |
And he holds his crayon rosary |
Tighter in his hand |
Now from his pocket quick he flashes |
The crayon on the wall he slashes |
Deep upon the advertising |
A single worded poem comprised |
Of four letters |
And his heart is laughing, screaming, pounding |
The poem across the tracks rebounding |
Shadowed by the exit light |
His legs take their ascending flight |
To seek the breast of darkness and be suckled by the night |
Men More Likely To Cheat If They Are Economically Dependent On Their Female Partners |
August 16, 2010 |
Economic dependency has the opposite effect on women |
“But for women, economic dependency seems to have the opposite effect: the more dependent they are on their male partners, the less likely they are to engage in infidelity,” said Christin Munsch, a sociology Ph.D. candidate at Cornell University, and author of the study, “The Effect of Relative Income Disparity on Infidelity for Men and Women.” |
“One or more of these variables is impacting the relationship,” Munsch said. “For example, it may be that men who make less money than their partners are more unhappy and cheat because they are unhappy, not necessarily because they make less money.” |
Ironically, men who make significantly more than their female partners were also more likely to cheat. “At one end of the spectrum, making less money than a female partner may threaten men’s gender identity by calling into question the traditional notion of men as breadwinners,” Munsch said. “At the other end of the spectrum, men who make a lot more money than their partners may be in jobs that offer more opportunities for cheating like long work hours, travel, and higher incomes that make cheating easier to conceal.” |
“For women, making less money than a male partner is not threatening, it is the status quo,” said Munsch. “More importantly, economically dependent women may encounter fewer opportunities to cheat, and they may make a calculated decision that cheating just isn’t worth it. If they get caught, their livelihood is at risk.” |
On the Net: |
comments powered by Disqus |
## Changelog See full history at: #### (2014-04-07) * Fix optimizations that were not applied and add codegen test cases. #### (2014-03-17) * Allow `optparse-applicative 0.8.*` ### 0.19.1 (2014-03-13) * Added Data.Char to fay-base Dependency bumps: * Allow `Cabal 1.19.*` * Allow `process 1.2.*` #### (2014-01-30) Bugfixes: * Don't export transcoding information for fay-base packages when compiling with --no-stdlib * Better error messages when forgetting the type signature in an FFI declaration #### (2014-01-15) Dependency bumps: * Allow `aeson 0.7.*` ## 0.19 (2014-01-14) * Made import Prelude is implicit, but note that RebindableSyntax implies NoImplicitPrelude. * Allow FFI declarations in let and where statements: `let f :: X; f = ffi "..."` and `where f :: X; f = ffi "..."` Bugfixes: * Removed extra tag that was generated by --html-wrapper * FFI expressions in top level declarations now produce identical code to a normal top level FFI declaration * Don't export Data.Ratio and Debug.Trace when using --no-stdlib Dependency bumps: * Allow text 1.1 * Allow attoparsec 0.11 **Note: added source mappings returned by `Fay:compileFile` and friends meaning it should have been a major bump. Sorry about this!** #### (2013-12-14) * Add parsing of Integer to Fay.Convert (note that the runtime doesn't have arbitrary precision Integers) * Allow text 1.0.* #### (2013-11-26) * Add support for indirect application of newtypes (such as `p = NewType; foo = p x` and `bar = NewType $ y`) #### (2013-11-22) * Fix a bug where records with the same name as top level modules wouldn't be initialized correctly. * Fail when using enum syntax on unsupported literal types (for instance ['a'..'z']) ### 0.18.1 (2013-11-07) * Add support for TupleSections #### (2013-10-28) Bugfixes: * Disallow unsupported patterns in where/let declarations instead of `<>`ing on them Minor: * Put upper bounds on all dependencies #### (2013-10-25) Bugfixes: * Allow `//` as an operator name (added flag to `hse-cpp`) * Don't transcode function values when using an EmptyDataDecl #### (2013-10-23) Minor: * Allow `optparse-applicative == 0.7.*` * Fix `examples/Cont.hs` #### (2013-10-16) Bug fixes: * Regression: Work around a bug in optparse-applicative 0.6 that prevents `--strict` from being used. #### (2013-10-16) * Source maps for top level definitions, use `--sourcemap` Bug fixes: * Regression: Equality checks for (G)ADTs (`deriving Eq`) * Fix `--strict` for top level ADT values (such as `module M where g = R`) * Regression: Serialization in the presence of compression/renaming * Pass NoImplicitPrelude (and other enabled extensions) to haskell-names to resolve ambiguities when Prelude isn't imported. Minor: * Bump optparse-applicative to 0.6.* * Bump haskell-names to 0.3.1 to allow compilation with Cabal 1.14 * Ignore more declarations (useful when code sharing with GHC) ## (2013-09-24) New features: * Support for qualified imports. Note: You still can't have multiple constructors with the same name in the FFI since the `instance` field in the serialization is still unqualified. * `Automatic` transcoding now works for functions. See [Calling Fay From JavaScript](https://github.com/faylang/fay/wiki/Calling-Fay-from-JavaScript) * `--strict modulename[, ..]` generates strict and transcoding wrappers for a module's exports. See [Calling Fay From JavaScript](https://github.com/faylang/fay/wiki/Calling-Fay-from-JavaScript) * `--typecheck-only` just runs the GHC type checker with the appropriate Fay flags. * `--runtime-path FILEPATH` allows you to supply a custom runtime. Probably only useful for debugging. Bug fixes: * Don't crash when trying to get the fayToJsFun of an object without constructor.name * Fixed bug that accidentally flattened list arguments in `jsToFay` * Fix construction with RecordWildCards not taking already listed fields into account Breaking Changes: * Fay.Compiler.Debug has been removed (for now) * The interactive compilation mode has been removed (for now) Internal changes: * Migrated to haskell-src-ext's annotated AST. * Name resolution is now done using haskell-names, Fay's name resolution code is now pure and a lot simpler. ## (2013-08-27) * With the `RebindableSyntax` and `OverloadedStrings` extensions Fay will treat Haskell string literals as JavaScript Strings. Add this in all modules and import Fay.Text (from the `fay-text` package). This is *not* a breaking change, without these extensions in a module `String` will be used, as before. All modules can still interoperate normally even if only some of them use this feature. Note that you may have to define `fromInteger` when using this with Num literals. * The type signature of `Fay.FFI.ffi` (in fay) and `FFI.ffi` (in fay-base) has been generalized to `IsString s => s -> a` to support `RebindableSyntax`. * Much faster compile time (of the compiler itself) by having the executables depend on the library. Bugfixes: * The empty list and unit is now serialized to `null` when using Automatic (it used to throw an error). Minor: * Restrict upper bound on `language-ecmascript` to `< 1.0` #### (2013-08-23) * Support for tuple constructors (`(,,) 1,2,3`) Minor: * Bump `pretty-show` to `>= 1.6` * Remove the `-fdevel` flag (when compiling fay itself) #### (2013-08-21) Minor: * Bump `haskell-src-exts` to `>= 1.14` #### (2013-08-08) Bugfixes: * Allow combining multiline strings with CPP ## (2013-08-05) * New module generation, modules generate code separately in the format `My.Module.foo` instead of `My$Module$foo` * Transcoding information is also produced separately for each module * Removed `--naked`, `--dispatcher`, and `--no-dispatcher`. They are probably not needed anymore * Removed `Fay$$fayToJsUserDefined` and `Fay$$jsToFayUserDefined`, instead call `Fay$$fayToJs` and `Fay$$jsToFay` respectively * Escape semi reserved words from `Object` when printing (`constructor` -> `$constructor`). This only matters if you call Fay from JS * `Automatic` now handles lists and tuples (#251) * `Language.Fay.FFI` renamed to `Fay.FFI` (as before, Fay code can import `FFI` from `fay-base`) Minor: * Print location of parse errors * Compile with -XNoImplicitPrelude * Support for testing nested modules (module A, module A.B) * Bump `language-ecmascript to >= 0.15` (new API) * Rename/remove some CompileErrors * All tests are now included in dist Bug fixes: * Force cars in string serialization (#306) ## (2013-06-08) * Expression level FFI calls, `ffi "alert('hello!')" :: Fay ()` * Support let pattern matches * Smaller output for serialization code * --base-path flag to use a custom base (mainly for fay-prim) * Allow ExistentialQuantification, FlexibleContexts, FlexibleInstances, KindSignatures * Verify that GADTs using non-record syntax works * JS->Fay function serialization * Serialization support for `()`, tuples and `Char` * Add more reserved words for Google Closure Bugfixes: * Fix a bug when an imported module contains types * Fix a bug with EModuleContents exports * Fix where clause inside pattern guards in function definitions * Fix type variables in serialization for multiple constructors * Fix EThingAll exports for types with constructors with a different name * Don't export types in EThingAll and EThingWith ### (2013-04-24) * Support for newtypes (with no runtime cost!) * --base-path flag to specify custom locations for fay-base * Fix a bug where imports shadowing local bindings would prevent the local binding from being exported ### (2013-04-21) * Fix record updates on IE <= 8 * Import tweaks, will make compilation a lot faster (4x reported) when there are a lot of imports * Parse hs sources with base fixities |
Take the 2-minute tour × |
Sections of the floor in our dining room have worn sections, where the polyurethane coating has worn through to the bare wood. Having the room emptied and properly refinished isn't really an option at the moment. I understand that you really can't stay in the house while the pros are using their giant floor sanders and spraying polyurethane, and that it takes several days. |
Can I sand the section of floor by hand and paint or spray polyurethane on the damaged sections? Is there any way of doing this so it'll last for more than a few months? Or are we best off simply waiting the several months or so it'll be until we can have this done properly? |
The research I've done has yielded several opinions on the subject. This one, for example, seems to outline a procedure I could do on my own, but can I do this to just a section of the floor? |
share|improve this question |
does the wood show signs of wear also? Urethane over damaged wood will lock in and highlight the defects. Actual refinishing urethane is easy, but restoring the color of the wood can be tricky. Can you elaborate on the condition a bit? – shirlock homes Feb 29 '12 at 10:58 |
1 Answer 1 |
I have had repairs done on oak floors that resulted in refinishing small areas. It looks remarkably good. The process is straightforward: sand the area, clean it with a solvent afterwards (denatured alcohol), apply polyurethane, let dry. |
Use solvent based polyurethane and get the same finish type (gloss, satin, etc.) and apply a few thick coats. |
share|improve this answer |
Good to hear. I didn't finish these floors, how do I tell what finish was used? (Or is that an entirely different question?) – neilfein Feb 29 '12 at 4:48 |
Always use thin coats of urethane, let dry, lightly sand, clean dust off with a damp cloth, let dry and add more coats. Never try to rush the job with heavy coats. It will take forever to dry, collect dust and look uneven. – shirlock homes Feb 29 '12 at 11:01 |
Your Answer |
What’s Really Behind Bush Hate For USC TV Guy |
If you still think Twitter hasn’t changed sports media dramatically, the train has officially left without you. Witness Reggie Bush during the USC-San Jose State telecast yesterday on Fox Sports West TV: |
Reggie Bush Tweet |
(It’s time to play The Feud, Trojan fans!) |
Most of you are probably like Larry Fitzgerald on this, so if you don’t who Papadakis is and/or why Bush would say such an inflammatory thing about a fellow former Trojan, I can help. (I assure you there’s much more to this story than what happened yesterday.) |
First, what exactly did Papadakis say during the USC-San Jose State telecast that made Bush upset enough to Tweet his disdain for the former USC football captain to his 230,000 Twitter followers? |
Transcript after the jump. Read more… |
Take the 2-minute tour × |
We run a remote system and would like the servers to be able to alert us to their status via SMS. Is it possible to setup our own SMS gateway (or our own GSM network) so we DO NOT have to pay for an SMS provider? |
Is this possible? if so, please let us know what are the required hardwares and how we get started.. |
I'm sure this is possible, because when the operator A want to send an SMS to the operator B, it do not pay any cent to the operator B. also, there are ton of online services like: Atompark.com, clickatell, ...etc |
please Note: we know how to build an sms gateway using Linux system, a Modem GSM and a valid SIM, but we are looking a way that we do not have to pay any cent for sending sms messages... |
share|improve this question |
3 Answers 3 |
Here's How It Works |
You >>> Forwarding Aggregator >>> SMS Aggregator >>> Mobile Operator >>> Mobile Company >>> Your Customer |
3 Major Parties Are Involved in the Whole Process: |
1. Mobile Operators: They Manage SMSC (Short Message Service Centers). AT&T, Sprint/NEXTEL, T-Mobile USA, U.S.Cellular and Verizon Wireless are few of the major mobile operators in the whole world. They have deep connections with all major mobile phone companies. Most of them have 800 to 950 telecommunication/mobile companies in their pannel. All of your messages came to them via SMS Aggregators and they forward them to reciever's Mobile Company which send it to receiver in the end. |
Cost of becoming a Mobile Operator: Billion Dollar Business if not Trillion. |
2. SMS Aggregators: mBlox, air2web and motricity are few of them. They have deep connections with Mobile operators. |
Cost of becoming SMS Aggregator: in Millions |
3. Forwarding Aggregators/SMS Gateways: Clickatell, Twilio and esendex and few others are providing SMS Gateway APIs and most of the developers are using Clickatell to integrate its SMS API with their app. They charge different rates for different countries (NO FIXED RATE FOR ALL COUNTRIES). It would cost you rougly around $600-$700 for 100,000 messages (internationally). |
Cost of becoming Forwarding Aggregator: May be in Millions |
Bottom Line: I'm working on a FREE solution but till today there are no FREE reliable solution in the whole world to send Bulk Messages for FREE internationally. So stop wasting your time on searching for a FREE solution. You have to come up with a new technology in order to achive this. |
Though there are many options to send Bulk messages within your country for FREE or by spending little money but you simply can't achieve this if you're planning to send messages internationally. |
Usually I avoid adding comments in any forum but this man really forced me to put my legs in. Here's what he commented: "Can we own an SMSC with a small private GSM network?" |
lol - Thanks for giving me first laughter of the day :) |
For any queries you can contact me at: zzzaix@gmail.com |
share|improve this answer |
Aside from any operator provided email-to-sms system there is no "free" way to do this. |
This is balanced by the fact that B will not pay A for messages going in the other direction. Internationally they often do pay SMS interconnect fees. |
... setup our own SMS gateway |
Yes, but you need access to an SMSC on a GSM network to send the messages either directly or via a device with a SIM, thats what you pay for. |
or our own GSM network |
Not practically, no. |
share|improve this answer |
can we own an SMSC with a small private GSM network? if not, ow we can have an own system to send sms to other operators for free? – عبدالإله فرحاوي Sep 20 '12 at 11:36 |
a "private" gsm network is only of use over a small local area and is rarely usefull – Alex K. Sep 20 '12 at 11:42 |
but how can I send sms (for free) like Atompark.com or clickatell or like any free online service? – عبدالإله فرحاوي Sep 20 '12 at 12:08 |
They are not free, you pay them – Alex K. Sep 20 '12 at 12:08 |
While there are no free ways to send proper text messages, you might be better off buying an GSM module for a server (usb in racks would not be ideal, but there should be proper hw expansion buses). You would query the module itself rather then relying on a 3rd party middle server to send those messages, saving a notable portion of money. |
Though I have not realized this per se, I created this plan for sending text messages for a service of mine. It was by far the cheapest option. |
share|improve this answer |
Your Answer |
Karaoke Bars in Norristown |
Select Local Merchants |
211 N 11th St |
Hearty helpings abound at Pirone's, where chefs construct a sizeable menu of steaks, seafood, pizzas, and other traditional Italian specialties. As the dinner curtain rises, feast your eyes and your lips upon an opening number of fried calamari ($11) or mussels marinara ($10) before moving on to sing the praises of a tender, boneless chicken cacciatore ($17) backed by peppers and onions, and simmering in a marinara mushroom sauce. Waiters cart plates of meat- or cheese-tortellini alfredo ($16), chosen from among more than 22 pasta picks that range from traditional spaghetti with meatballs ($22) to an eggplant-topped baked ziti ($16). Meal-goers can appease meaty appetites with a mushroom-infused veal marsala ($19) or a thick-cut steak à la Pirone ($21) topped with mushrooms, provolone, shrimp, sherry sauce, and a miniature model of the restaurant, and those who prefer sliceable sustenance can snack on a sliver of spinach-and-ricotta pizza ($8–$17) or divide a mini calzone ($7) into five mini-er calzones. |
60 Fostertown Road |
'Closer' Star Gets Closer to The Rock |
Emmy nominee Kyra Sedgwick, hot off the second season of TNT's "The Closer," will take a main role in Dwayne "The Rock" Johnson's football comedy "The Game Plan." |
"The Game Plan" is set up at Disney and has been on hold since June, when Johnson ruptured his Achilles tendon. |
Johnson will play a football player who attempts to bond with his newly discovered daughter (Madison Pettis). Sedgwick will appear as the player's ruthless sports agent who doesn't care about the kid, at least according to The Hollywood Reporter. |
Morris Chestnut and Paige Turco are also co-starring in the Andy Fickman-directed project. |
Sedgwick has earned Emmy and Golden Globe nominations for her turn as master interrogator Brenda Johnson in "The Closer." Her film credits include "The Woodsman" (opposite husband Kevin Bacon), "Phenomenon" and "Something to Talk About." |
Copyright © 2014, The Morning Call |
At yesterday's Nintendo press conference, president of Nintendo America Reggie Fils-Aime revealed himself to be a rotting, stinking monstrosity. |
And then, he used the Wii's augmented reality to make himself look like a zombie! |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.