text stringlengths 1 330k |
|---|
Included in the package are ways of doing distributed calculations over an MPI cluster, or optionally only using the local solver with built in parallelization. Two SDE instances have been implemented; geometric brownian motion and the Langevin equation, see the haddock documentation for an example. |
The main interface is accessible through Numeric.DSDE which provides various way of solving generic problems. This module supports either local or distributed calculations in the IO monad and gathering the results as a distribution. Under the surface there is also a working pure implementation for monadic environments,... |
Internally there are several abstractions used when dealing with each component building up a solution. Given some SDE and SDESolver instances, it is also required to have some PRNG providing normally distributed numbers. This has been implemented over some specific monads and only results of type Double. All of the in... |
Dependenciesbase (>=4.5 && <5), cereal (>=0.3 && <1), cereal-vector (>=0.2 && <1), ghc-prim (>=0.2 && <1), haskell-mpi (>=1.2 && <2), mersenne-random-pure64 (>= && <1), mtl (>=2.1 && <3), mwc-random (>=0.12 && <1), normaldistribution (>= && <2), parallel (>=3.2 && <4), vector (>=0.10 && <1) |
AuthorDavid Nilsson |
CategoryMath, Numerical |
Home page |
Source repositoryhead: git clone git:// |
Upload dateTue Dec 18 20:48:57 UTC 2012 |
Uploaded byDavidNilsson |
Downloads6 total |
Maintainers' corner |
For package maintainers and hackage trustees |
np: UU Stage 13 - Ghosts N Stuff |
Discussion in 'BW UU' started by kokoloko, Jul 7, 2013. |
1. Ernesto |
Ernesto is a motionless pedophile |
is a Forum Moderator |
Jun 25, 2012 |
Well, according to koko it would last until the 6th, so sunday. But considering he'd written August first, and also that he smells, he could've tried to put the deadline on friday. |
EDIT: Yea, I just asked him and he said sunday. |
Last edited: Oct 4, 2013 |
2. ShootingStarmie |
ShootingStarmie Weenie |
is an official Team Rateris a Tiering Contributor |
Sep 3, 2011 |
Right, since we're near the end of the suspect test, I'm going to share my thoughts about Victini. During my laddering to reach requirements, I ran a stall team, consisting of what I consider 2 checks to Victini (defensive Arcanine, and Blastoise). Now, I did not chose to use these Pokemon because they are the best... |
All in all, I just don't think Victini is overwhelming enough to be banned to BL. It's a great Pokemon, sure, but it has solid checks, and has exploitable weaknesses. Victini should stay UU. |
Grey Knight and Godsend like this. |
3. Fat Lenny |
Fat Lenny |
is a Tiering Contributor |
Jun 23, 2012 |
I ran a hyper offensive team in the uucurrent ladder with a banded Victini to wear down sub-CM Raikou's counters, such as Rhyperior, Snorlax, Swampert and Bronzong. Victini wasn’t given any team support like magic bounce or rapid spinning. He was there to simply open holes in Raikou's counters (3HKO’ing Rhyperior, ... |
While banded Victini hits like a truck and wears down Raikou’s counters, his signature move “v-created” problematic issues for Victini and the rest of my team. After Victini uses V-create, he is very easily revenge-killed and allows some very threatening pokemon to set-up. As a supporting attacker, Victini is very ... |
Victini can open holes in teams with banded V-Create, but requires major team support and smart plays to be successful. I believe that Victini’s advantages and weaknesses make him a very balanced pokemon and that he deserves to stay UU. |
4. kokoloko |
kokoloko nice dogs :) |
Underused Leader |
Aug 21, 2009 |
Victini wasn't banned and I know no one's gonna wanna do another suspect test now that XY is here (and I sure as fuck don't wanna conduct one!!) so we're done with BW UU tiering. |
See you in XY, gents. |
Magcargo 2, Fat Lenny, SJCrew and 3 others like this. |
5. ScraftyIsTheBest |
ScraftyIsTheBest i'm bored |
is a Contributor to Smogon |
Sep 5, 2012 |
Kay, just feel like opening up some discussion here, and the current topic I'll bring up is pretty fitting for this month, but anyways. |
With UU literally running amok with Fighting-types such as Heracross and Mienshao, it's no wonder Ghost-types are quite effective in the current metagame. They have a nifty Fighting-type immunity, with the extra bonus of being able to spinblock, which is always neat. In addition, Ghost STAB has pretty decent neutra... |
6. noknuckles |
Mar 21, 2013 |
I like Cofagrigus the best. It's the best spinblocker in UU. Hitmontop and Blastoise without Foresight have a tough time spinning against this thing, and Foresight gives it one free setup turn (Foresight on the switch, Rapid Spin on the turn it sets up). The best Blastoise can do is Foresight+Spin+Roar, which means... |
Chandelure is amazingly strong, but is a pretty bad spin blocker. It doesn't like switching in repeatedly to block spins, and it also can't safely switch into Blastoise/Hitmontop. It's probably a better ghost than Cofag overall, but a far worse spin blocker. It fears Stealth Rocks, Scald, Stone Edge and even Sucker... |
I've never tried Golurk in UU, but it seems pretty good. Immunity to Volt Switch and resistance to Heracross makes it automatically useful in most matches. |
7. GULLY |
Jul 8, 2013 |
Golurk has an extremly good niche in uu. The ability to set up rocks and counter most fighting types is only comparable to nidoqueen, which has its own drawbacks. I use the No Guard set with D-Punch and it becomes a defensive threat as well as a moderate offensive one. Also I suggest trying out Flame Orb Chandy. It... |
(Dusclops has little to no viablity, its a thorn in my side but thorns can be removed) |
Kingler12345 and Godsend like this. |
8. Megapants |
Jul 3, 2009 |
I've been using sableye on hail stall with good results. sub/wow/taunt/recover just goes infinite on pretty much anything that can't break through recover. it works as a check to a ton of set-ups as well with taunt preventing boosts and subsitutes, letting you switch in a better check. there's also a good chance of... |
however, i've been struggling with umbreon and snorlax so i think running either a cleric of your own or a good bait + STAB fighting combo to try to combat those guys. its harder for me to play it out vs snorlax, particularly resttalk with whirlwind because you don't have a way to rub salt into the wound, he just s... |
9. GULLY |
Jul 8, 2013 |
please leave =) |
but Sub SD Cobalion consistently shits on things like Umbreon and Snorlax, it could actually work on hail stall |
Users Viewing Thread (Users: 0, Guests: 0) |
Take the 2-minute tour × |
My company is developing driver for our hardware. Now I need to sign my driver for 32 and 64 bit platforms. |
Please tell, now I need to buy Authenticode certificate, right? |
What CA to use? |
GlobalSign? ( http://www.sslshopper.com/microsoft-authenticode-certificates.html ) |
Symantec? ( http://www.symantec.com/verisign/code-signing/microsoft-authenticode ) |
What is the difference between this CA offers? |
I need to use tools from WDK? |
share|improve this question |
Please don't cross post stackoverflow.com/questions/12495082/windows-driver-signing – ChrisF Sep 19 '12 at 16:30 |
add comment |
3 Answers |
up vote 5 down vote accepted |
Yes, you'll need a code signing or Authenticode certificate. (It looks like not all CA vendors call it an Authenticode certificate; GoDaddy, for example, simply calls it a driver signing certificate.) |
As far as I know, with one major exception (see below), there is very little difference between CA vendors, and I'd generally just recommend using whoever's cheapest. Our Authenticode certificate is through Verisign / Symantec; I don't have experience with the other vendors. From my shopping around for regular (not cod... |
Update: The one major exception, as Brian points out, is that a certificate from Symantec / VeriSign in particular is required for features like Windows Error Reporting and Windows Hardware Certification, so if you want to use those features, you might as well buy VeriSign. (This is discussed further on Stack Overflow.... |
Once you get your certificate: |
1. If necessary, run inf2cat to create or update your .cat file from your driver's .inf file. |
2. Run signtool signwizard (for the GUI mode) or signtool with the appropriate command-line arguments to sign the .cat file. |
inf2cat is part of the Windows Driver Kit (WDK). signtool comes with the Platform SDK and the WDK. |
The following web sites were useful to me when I was working on driver signing: |
share|improve this answer |
add comment |
If you just want to be allowed to install a driver on a windows machine, your CA use shouldn't matter (unless the CA isn't trusted by Microsoft). |
However, only VeriSign certificates are supported as a means of identifying your organization to Microsoft for features like Windows Error Reporting and Windows Hardware Certification. E.g., the Manage Your Digital Certificates page explicitly states to buy your certificate from VeriSign. |
If you plan to make use of such functionality, you should buy a VeriSign certificate now rather than another certificate now and a VeriSign certificate later. |
share|improve this answer |
I remember reading this now, and I think this is why we went with VeriSign for our cert. There's further discussion on SO on the VeriSign-only requirement. – Josh Kelley Sep 19 '12 at 15:31 |
add comment |
You need a certificate which satisfies the kernel mode code signing policy (KMCS). |
Here is a MSDN list of possible certificate authorities. |
BUT, it seems WHQL (or how it is currently called) needs a Verisign certificate to allow you participation in the WHQL program for windows logo ... things .... So I would buy a Verisign certificate if a windows logo is needed in the future. |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.