text
stringlengths
0
182
said, O king, that these six kinds of sons are no sons.'
"Yudhishthira said, 'Some say that one's son is he that is born in one's soil. Some, on the other hand, say that one's son is he
who has been begotten from one's seed. Are both these kinds of sons equal? Whore, again, is the son to be? Do thou tell me
this, O grandsire!
"Bhishma said, 'His is the son from whose seed he has sprung. If, however, the owner of the seed abandons the son born of it,
such a son then becomes his upon whose spouse he has been begotten. The same rule applies to the son called Adhyudha. He
belongs to the person from whose seed he has taken his birth. If, however, the owner of the seed abandons him, he becomes the
son of the husband of his mother.[303] Know that even this is what the law declares.'
"Yudhishthira said, 'We know that the son becomes his from whose seed he has taken birth. Whence does the husband of the
woman that brings forth the son derive his right to the latter? Similarly, the son called Adhyudha should be known to be the son
of him from whose seed he has sprung. How can they be sons of others by reasons of the engagement about owning and rearing
them having been broken?'
"Bhishma said, 'He who having begotten a son of his own loins, abandons him for some reason or other, cannot be regarded as
the sire of such a son, for vital seed only cannot create sonship. Such a son must be held to belong to the person who owns the
soil. When a man, desiring to have a son, weds a girl quick with child, the son born of his spouse must belong to him, for it is
the fruit of his own soil. The person from whose vital seed the son has sprung can have no right to such a son. The son that is
born in one's soil but not begotten by the owner, O chief of Bharata's race, bears all the marks of the sire that has actually
begotten him (and not the marks of one that is only the husband of his mother). The son thus born is incapable of concealing
the evidences that physiognomy offers. He is at once known by eyesight (to belong to another).[304] As regards the son made,
he is sometimes regarded as the child of the person who has made him a son and so brings him up. In his case, neither the vital
seed of which he is born nor the soil in which he is born, becomes the cause of sonship.'
"Yudhishthira said, 'What kind of a son is that who is said to be a made son and whose sonship arises from the fact of his being
taken and brought up and in whose case neither the vital seed nor the soil of birth, O Bharata, is regarded as the cause of
sonship?'
"Bhishma said, 'When a person takes up and rears a son that has been cast off on the road by his father and mother, and when
the person thus taking and rearing him fails to find out his parents after search, he becomes the father of such a son and the
latter becomes what is called his made son. Not having anybody to own him, he becomes owned by him who brings him up.
Such a son, again, comes to be regarded as belonging to that order to which his owner or rearer belongs.'
"Yudhishthira said, How should the purificatory rites of such a person be performed? In whose case what sort of rites are to be
performed? With what girl should he be wedded? Do thou tell me all this, O grandsire!"
"Bhishma said, 'The rites of purification touching such a son should be performed conformably to the usage of the person
himself that raises him, for, cast off by his parents, such a son obtains the order of the person that takes him and brings him up.
Indeed, O thou of unfading glory, the rearer should perform all the purificatory rites with respect to such a son according to the
practices of the rearer's own race and kinsmen. As regards the girl also, O Yudhishthira, that should be bestowed in marriage
upon such a son, who belongs to the order of the rearer himself, All this is to be done only when the order of son's true mother
cannot be ascertained. Among sons, he that is born of a maiden and he that is born of a mother that had conceived before her
marriage but had brought him fourth subsequent to that are regarded as very disgraceful and degraded. Even those two,
however, should receive the same rites of purification that are laid down for the sons begotten by the father in lawful wedlock.
With respect to the son that becomes his sire's in consequence of his birth in the sire's soil and of those sons that are called
Apasadas and, those conceived by the spouse in her maidenhood but brought forth after marriage, Brahmanas and others
should apply the same rites of purification that hold good for their own orders. These are the conclusions that are to be found in
the scriptures with respect to the different orders. I have thus told thee everything appertaining to thy questions. What else dost
thou wish to hear?"
SECTION L
"Yudhishthira said, 'What is the nature of the compassion or pity that is felt at the sight of another's woe? What is the nature of
that compassion or sympathy that one feels for another in consequence of one's living in the companionship of that other? What
is the nature (and degree) of the high blessedness that attaches to kine? It behoveth thee, O grandsire, to expound all this to me.'
"Bhishma said, 'I shall, in this connection, O thou of great effulgence, recite to thee an ancient narrative of a conversation
between Nahusha and the Rishi Chyavana. In days of yore O Chief of Bharata's race, the great Rishi Chyavana of Bhrigu's
race, always observant of high vows, became desirous of leading for some time the mode of life called Udavasa and set himself
to commence it. Casting off pride and wrath and joy and grief, the ascetic, pledging himself to observe that vow, set himself to
live for twelve years according to the rules of Udavasa. The Rishi inspired all creatures with a happy trust. And he inspired
similar confidence in all creatures living in water. The puissant ascetic resembled the Moon himself in his behaviour to all.
Bowing unto all the deities and having cleansed himself of all sins, he entered the water at the confluence of the Ganga and the
Yamuna, and stood there like an inanimate post of wood. Placing his head against it, he bore the fierce and roaring current of
the two streams united together,--the current whose speed resembled that of the wind itself. The Ganga and the Yamuna,
however, and the other streams and lakes, whose waters unite together at the confluence at Prayaga, instead of afflicting the
Rishi, went past him (to show him respect). Assuming the attitude of a wooden post, the great Muni sometimes laid himself
down in the water and slept at ease. And sometimes, O chief of Bharata's race, the intelligent sage stood in an erect posture. He
became quite agreeable unto all creatures living in water. Without the least fear, all these used to smell the Rishi's lips. In this
way, the Rishi passed a long time at that grand confluence of waters. One day some fishermen came there. With nets in their
hands, O thou of great effulgence, those men came to that spot where the Rishi was. They were many in number and all of
them were bent upon catching fish. Well-formed and broad-chested, endued with great strength and courage and never
returning in fear from water, those men who lived upon the earnings by their nets, came to that spot, resolved to catch fish.
Arrived at the water which contained many fish, those fishermen, O chief of the Bharatas, tied all their nets together. Desirous
of fish, those Kaivartas, many in number united together and surrounded a portion of the waters of the Ganga and the Yamuna
with their nets. Indeed, they then cast into water their net which was made of new strings, capable of covering a large space,
and endued with sufficient length and breadth. All of them, getting into the water, then began to drag with great force that net
of theirs which was very large and had been well-spread over a large space. All of them were free from fear, cheerful, and fully
resolved to do one another's bidding. They had succeeded in enmeshing a large number of fish and other aquatic animals. And
as they dragged their net, O king, they easily dragged up Chyavana the son of Bhrigu along with a large number of fish. His
body was overgrown with the river moss. His beard and matted locks had become green. And all over his person could be seen
conchs and other molluscs attached with their heads. Beholding that Rishi who was well-conversant with the Vedas dragged up
by them from water, all the fishermen stood with joined palms and then prostrated themselves on the ground and repeatedly
bent their heads. Through fear and pain caused by the dragging of the net, and in consequence of their being brought upon land,
the fish enmeshed in the net yielded up their lives. The ascetic, beholding that great slaughter of fishes, became filled with
compassion and sighed repeatedly.'
"The fishermen said, 'We have committed this sin (of dragging thy sacred self from water) through ignorance. Be gratified with
us! What wish of thine shall we accomplish? Command us, O great ascetic!'
"Bhishma continued, 'This addressed by them, Chyauana, from among that heap of fishes around him, said, 'Do ye with
concentrated attention hear what my most cherished wish is. I shall either die with these fishes or do ye sell me with them. I
have lived with them for a long time within the water. I do not wish to abandon them at such a time.' When he said these words
unto them, the fishermen became exceedingly terrified. With pale faces they repaired to king Nahusha and informed him of all
that had taken place.'"
SECTION LI