text
stringlengths
0
182
make gifts of food, having earned it by lawful means. The householder should always seek to eat after having made a gift of
food unto a Brahmana. Every man should make the day fruitful by making gifts of food.[518] A person by feeding, O king, a
thousand Brahmanas all of whom are conversant with duties and the scriptures and the sacred histories, has not to go to Hell
and to return to this world for undergoing rebirths. Endued with the fruition of every wish, he enjoys great felicity hereafter.
Possessed of such merit, he sports in happiness, freed from every anxiety, possessed of beauty of form and great fame and
endued with wealth. I have thus told thee all about the high merit of gifts of food. Even this is the root of all righteousness and
merit, as also of all gifts, O Bharata!'"
SECTION CXIII
"Yudhishthira said, 'Abstention from injury, the observance of the Vedic ritual, meditation, subjugation of the senses,
penances, and obedient services rendered to the preceptors,--which amongst these is fraught with the greatest merit with
respect to a person?'
"Vrihaspati said, All these six are fraught with merit. They are different doors of piety. I shall discourse upon them presently.
Do thou listen to them, O chief of the Bharatas! I shall tell thee what constitutes the highest good of a human being. That man
who practises the religion of universal compassion achieves his highest good. That man who keeps under control the three
faults, viz., lust, wrath, and cupidity, by throwing them upon all creatures (and practises the virtue of compassion), attains to
success[519]. He who, from motives of his own happiness, slays other harmless creatures with the rod of chastisement, never
attains to happiness, in the next world. That man who regards all creatures as his own self, and behaves towards them as
towards his own self, laying aside the rod of chastisement and completely subjugating his wrath, succeeds in attaining to
happiness. The very deities, who are desirous of a fixed abode, become stupefied in ascertaining the track of that person who
constitutes himself the soul of all creatures and looks upon them all as his own self, for such a person leaves no track
behind.[520] One should never do that to another which one regards as injurious to one's own self. This, in brief, is the rule of
Righteousness. One by acting in a different way by yielding to desire, becomes guilty of unrighteousness. In refusals and gifts,
in happiness and misery, in the agreeable, and the disagreeable, one should judge of their effects by a reference to one's own
self.[521] When One injures another, the injured turns round and injures the injurer. Similarly, when one cherishes another,
that other cherishes the cherisher. One should frame one's rule of conduct according to this. I have told thee what
Righteousness is even by this subtile way.'
"Vaisampayana continued, 'The preceptor of the deities, possessed of great intelligence, having said this unto king
Yudhishthira the just, ascended upwards for proceeding to Heaven, before our eyes.'"
SECTION CXIV
"Vaisampayana said, 'After this, king Yudhishthira, endued with great energy, and the foremost of eloquent men, addressed his
grandsire lying on his bed of arrows, in the following words.'
"Yudhishthira said, 'O thou of great intelligence, the Rishis and Brahmanas and the deities, led by the authority of the Vedas,
all applaud that religion which has compassion for its indication. But, O king, whet I ask thee is this: how does a man, who has
perpetrated acts of injury to others in word, thought and deed, succeed in cleansing himself from misery?'
"Bhishma said, 'Utterers of Brahma have said that there are four kinds of compassion or abstention from injury. If even one of
those four kinds be not observed, the religion of compassion, it is said, is not observed. As all four-footed animals are
incapable of standing on three legs, even so the religion of compassion cannot stand if any of those four divisions or parts be
wanting. As the footprints of all other animals are engulfed in those of the elephant, even so all other religions are said to be
comprehended in that of compassion. A person becomes guilty of injury through acts, words and thoughts[522]. Discarding it
mentally at the outset, one should next discard in word and thought. He who, according to this rule, abstains from eating meat
is said to be cleansed in a threefold way. It is heard that utterers of Brahma ascribe to three causes (the sin of eating meat). That
sin may attach to the mind, to words, and to acts. It is for this reason that men of wisdom who are endued with penances refrain
from eating meat. Listen to me, O king, as I tell thee what the faults are that attach to the eating of meat. The meat of other
animals is like the flesh of one's son. That foolish person, stupefied by folly, who eats meat is regarded as the vilest of human
beings. The union of father and mother produces an offspring. After the same manner, the cruelty that a helpless and sinful
wretch commits, produces its progeny of repeated rebirths fraught with great misery. As the tongue is the cause of the
knowledge or sensation of taste, so the scriptures declare, attachment proceeds from taste.[523] Well-dressed, cooked with salt
or without salt, meat, in whatever form one may take it, gradually attracts the mind and enslaves it. How will those foolish men
that subsist upon meat succeed in listening to the sweet music of (celestial) drums and cymbals and lyres and harps? They who
eat meat applaud it highly, suffering themselves to be stupefied by its taste which they pronounce to be something
inconceivable, undescribable, and unimaginable. Such praise even of meat is fraught with demerit. In former days, many
righteous men, by giving the flesh of their own bodies, protected the flesh of other creatures and as a consequence of such acts
of merit, have proceeded to heaven. In this way, O monarch the religion of compassion is surrounded by four considerations. I
have thus declared to thee that religion which comprises all other religions within it.'"
SECTION CXV
"Yudhishthira said, 'Thou hast told it many times that abstention from injury is the highest religion. In Sraddhas, however, that
are performed in honour of the Pitris, persons for their own good should make offerings of diverse kinds of meat. Thou hast
said so while discoursing formerly upon the ordinances in respect of Sraddhas. How can meat, however, be procured without
slaying a living creature? Thy declarations, therefore, seem to me to be contradictory. A doubt has, therefore, arisen in our
mind respecting the duty of abstaining from meat. What are the faults that one incurs by eating meat, and what are the merits
that one wins? What are the demerits of him who eats meat by himself killing a living creature? What are the merits of him
who eats the meat of animals killed by others? What the merits and demerits of him who kills a living creature for another? Or
of him who eats meat buying it of others? I desire, O sinless one, that thou shouldst discourse to me on this topic in detail. I
desire to ascertain this eternal religion with certainty. How does one attain to longevity? How does one acquire strength? How
does one attain to faultlessness of limbs? Indeed, how does one become endued with excellent indications?
"Bhishma said, 'Listen to me, O, scion of Kuru's race, what the merit is that attaches to abstention from meat. Listen to me as I
declare to thee what the excellent ordinances, in truth, are on this head. Those high-souled persons who desire beauty,
faultlessness of limbs, long life, understanding, mental and physical strength, and memory, should abstain from acts of injury.
On this topic, O scion of Kuru's race, innumerable discourses took place between the Rishis. Listen, O Yudhishthira, what their
opinion was. The merit acquired by that person, O Yudhishthira, who, with the steadiness of a vow, adores the deities every
month in horse-sacrifices, is equal to his who discards honey and meat. The seven celestial Rishis, the Valakhilyas, and those
Rishis who drink the rays of the sun, endued with great wisdom, applaud abstention from meat. The Self-born Manu has said
that that man who does not eat meat, or who does not slay living creatures, or who does not cause them to be slain, is a friend
of all creatures. Such a man is incapable of being oppressed by any creature. He enjoys the confidence of all living beings. He
always enjoys, besides, the approbation and commendation of the righteous. The righteous-souled Narada has said that that
man who wishes to increase his own flesh by eating the flesh of other creatures, meets with calamity. Vrihaspati has said that
that man who abstains from honey and meat acquires the merit of gifts and sacrifices and penances. In my estimation, these
two persons are equal, viz., he who adores the deities every month in a horse-sacrifice for a space of hundred years and he who
abstains from honey and meat. In consequence of abstention from meat one comes to be regarded as one who always adores the
deities in sacrifices, or as one who always makes gifts to others, or as one who always undergoes the severest austerities. That
man who having eaten meat gives it up afterwards, acquires merit by such an act that is so great that a study of all the Vedas or
a performance, O Bharata, of all the sacrifices, cannot bestow its like. It is exceedingly difficult to give up meat after one has
become acquainted with its taste. Indeed, it is exceedingly difficult for such a person to observe the high vow of abstention
from meat, a vow that assures every creature by dispelling all fear. That learned person who giveth to all living creatures the
Dakshina of complete assurance comes to be regarded, without doubt, as the giver of life-breaths in this world.[524] Even this
is the high religion which men of wisdom applaud. The life-breaths of other creatures are as dear to them as those of one's to
one's own self. Men endued with intelligence and cleansed souls should always behave towards other creatures after the
manner of that behaviour which they like others to observe towards themselves. It is seen that even those men who are
possessed of learning and who seek to achieve the highest good in the form of Emancipation, are not free from the fear of