workspace stringclasses 1
value | channel stringclasses 1
value | sentences stringlengths 1 3.93k | ts stringlengths 26 26 | user stringlengths 2 11 | sentence_id stringlengths 44 53 | timestamp float64 1.5B 1.56B | __index_level_0__ int64 0 106k |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
pythondev | help | <@Orpha> :point_up: i have two examples there. | 2017-09-07T11:22:26.000413 | Johana | pythondev_help_Johana_2017-09-07T11:22:26.000413 | 1,504,783,346.000413 | 92,503 |
pythondev | help | I was looking for more of an add_all replacement | 2017-09-07T11:23:56.000736 | Orpha | pythondev_help_Orpha_2017-09-07T11:23:56.000736 | 1,504,783,436.000736 | 92,504 |
pythondev | help | add_all ? | 2017-09-07T11:24:51.000049 | Johana | pythondev_help_Johana_2017-09-07T11:24:51.000049 | 1,504,783,491.000049 | 92,505 |
pythondev | help | so right now | 2017-09-07T11:26:26.000182 | Orpha | pythondev_help_Orpha_2017-09-07T11:26:26.000182 | 1,504,783,586.000182 | 92,506 |
pythondev | help | i have this in a for loop | 2017-09-07T11:26:39.000593 | Orpha | pythondev_help_Orpha_2017-09-07T11:26:39.000593 | 1,504,783,599.000593 | 92,507 |
pythondev | help | oh you are using the orm. | 2017-09-07T11:27:07.000774 | Johana | pythondev_help_Johana_2017-09-07T11:27:07.000774 | 1,504,783,627.000774 | 92,508 |
pythondev | help | yea | 2017-09-07T11:27:12.000322 | Orpha | pythondev_help_Orpha_2017-09-07T11:27:12.000322 | 1,504,783,632.000322 | 92,509 |
pythondev | help | then you will need to use session.merge() | 2017-09-07T11:27:27.000619 | Johana | pythondev_help_Johana_2017-09-07T11:27:27.000619 | 1,504,783,647.000619 | 92,510 |
pythondev | help | i can take it out of the loop and use add_all | 2017-09-07T11:27:28.000183 | Orpha | pythondev_help_Orpha_2017-09-07T11:27:28.000183 | 1,504,783,648.000183 | 92,511 |
pythondev | help | ok, yea i was looking at that just now | 2017-09-07T11:27:39.000776 | Orpha | pythondev_help_Orpha_2017-09-07T11:27:39.000776 | 1,504,783,659.000776 | 92,512 |
pythondev | help | im moving files to s3 and storing url in db, but i have to handle duplicates | 2017-09-07T11:28:15.000685 | Orpha | pythondev_help_Orpha_2017-09-07T11:28:15.000685 | 1,504,783,695.000685 | 92,513 |
pythondev | help | just incase #clients | 2017-09-07T11:28:29.000310 | Orpha | pythondev_help_Orpha_2017-09-07T11:28:29.000310 | 1,504,783,709.00031 | 92,514 |
pythondev | help | i wouldn’t consider that a bulk insert but ok. | 2017-09-07T11:28:33.000249 | Johana | pythondev_help_Johana_2017-09-07T11:28:33.000249 | 1,504,783,713.000249 | 92,515 |
pythondev | help | fair enough | 2017-09-07T11:28:40.000420 | Orpha | pythondev_help_Orpha_2017-09-07T11:28:40.000420 | 1,504,783,720.00042 | 92,516 |
pythondev | help | through the orm you would have to look through all of them and .merge() them to the system. | 2017-09-07T11:29:23.000887 | Johana | pythondev_help_Johana_2017-09-07T11:29:23.000887 | 1,504,783,763.000887 | 92,517 |
pythondev | help | i haven’t actually read into it, but im assuming the current way im doing it is bad performance wise | 2017-09-07T11:29:28.000342 | Orpha | pythondev_help_Orpha_2017-09-07T11:29:28.000342 | 1,504,783,768.000342 | 92,518 |
pythondev | help | yea, the fastest thing you’ll get is using the core. | 2017-09-07T11:29:45.000749 | Johana | pythondev_help_Johana_2017-09-07T11:29:45.000749 | 1,504,783,785.000749 | 92,519 |
pythondev | help | sort of like doing a raw insert in a for loop 1000x times | 2017-09-07T11:30:05.000588 | Orpha | pythondev_help_Orpha_2017-09-07T11:30:05.000588 | 1,504,783,805.000588 | 92,520 |
pythondev | help | Moving the commit out of the loop will likely help a lot | 2017-09-07T11:30:33.000877 | Gabriele | pythondev_help_Gabriele_2017-09-07T11:30:33.000877 | 1,504,783,833.000877 | 92,521 |
pythondev | help | Hi! Does anyone know the way to validate json string without `json.loads`? `eval` is faster, but no :slightly_smiling_face: | 2017-09-07T11:30:39.000171 | Chu | pythondev_help_Chu_2017-09-07T11:30:39.000171 | 1,504,783,839.000171 | 92,522 |
pythondev | help | yea | 2017-09-07T11:30:43.000856 | Johana | pythondev_help_Johana_2017-09-07T11:30:43.000856 | 1,504,783,843.000856 | 92,523 |
pythondev | help | it will commit everything at once. | 2017-09-07T11:30:48.000059 | Johana | pythondev_help_Johana_2017-09-07T11:30:48.000059 | 1,504,783,848.000059 | 92,524 |
pythondev | help | remember that the session is like a recorder. | 2017-09-07T11:30:55.000354 | Johana | pythondev_help_Johana_2017-09-07T11:30:55.000354 | 1,504,783,855.000354 | 92,525 |
pythondev | help | yea, that was my other question | 2017-09-07T11:30:55.000500 | Orpha | pythondev_help_Orpha_2017-09-07T11:30:55.000500 | 1,504,783,855.0005 | 92,526 |
pythondev | help | it records everything in order and executes everything in that order when you do `session.commit()` | 2017-09-07T11:31:08.000403 | Johana | pythondev_help_Johana_2017-09-07T11:31:08.000403 | 1,504,783,868.000403 | 92,527 |
pythondev | help | is it worth doing a list then add all at once then commit, or just move the commit out | 2017-09-07T11:31:23.000317 | Orpha | pythondev_help_Orpha_2017-09-07T11:31:23.000317 | 1,504,783,883.000317 | 92,528 |
pythondev | help | <@Chu> Why don't you want to use `loads`? | 2017-09-07T11:31:33.000019 | Gabriele | pythondev_help_Gabriele_2017-09-07T11:31:33.000019 | 1,504,783,893.000019 | 92,529 |
pythondev | help | your loop above is doing an insert statement for every iteration. | 2017-09-07T11:31:39.000110 | Johana | pythondev_help_Johana_2017-09-07T11:31:39.000110 | 1,504,783,899.00011 | 92,530 |
pythondev | help | I'm receiveing string from client side and need to store in database as is. But I need to know that my json is valid. (There is no way to make json field in db, too large db under load) | 2017-09-07T11:32:30.000222 | Chu | pythondev_help_Chu_2017-09-07T11:32:30.000222 | 1,504,783,950.000222 | 92,531 |
pythondev | help | it depends <@Orpha>. how many inserts do you suspect? | 2017-09-07T11:32:34.000108 | Johana | pythondev_help_Johana_2017-09-07T11:32:34.000108 | 1,504,783,954.000108 | 92,532 |
pythondev | help | <@Orpha> If there's no good reason why you need to commit after each one, then don't do it. Usually you would commit after a coherent block of work has been completed. In this case, finishing inserting everything is a logical block of work, I'd say | 2017-09-07T11:32:39.000565 | Gabriele | pythondev_help_Gabriele_2017-09-07T11:32:39.000565 | 1,504,783,959.000565 | 92,533 |
pythondev | help | That doesn't explain why you don't want to use `loads` | 2017-09-07T11:33:04.000105 | Gabriele | pythondev_help_Gabriele_2017-09-07T11:33:04.000105 | 1,504,783,984.000105 | 92,534 |
pythondev | help | It consumes a lot of memory and CPU time in my scale. Looking for optimization. | 2017-09-07T11:33:44.000270 | Chu | pythondev_help_Chu_2017-09-07T11:33:44.000270 | 1,504,784,024.00027 | 92,535 |
pythondev | help | anywhere from 1 to 7k | 2017-09-07T11:34:11.000772 | Orpha | pythondev_help_Orpha_2017-09-07T11:34:11.000772 | 1,504,784,051.000772 | 92,536 |
pythondev | help | I don't know of a faster way than to use `loads`, sorry | 2017-09-07T11:35:42.000631 | Gabriele | pythondev_help_Gabriele_2017-09-07T11:35:42.000631 | 1,504,784,142.000631 | 92,537 |
pythondev | help | moving the commit out throws the duplicate entry error | 2017-09-07T11:37:41.000458 | Orpha | pythondev_help_Orpha_2017-09-07T11:37:41.000458 | 1,504,784,261.000458 | 92,538 |
pythondev | help | the commit won't affect that | 2017-09-07T11:38:17.000276 | Gabriele | pythondev_help_Gabriele_2017-09-07T11:38:17.000276 | 1,504,784,297.000276 | 92,539 |
pythondev | help | well… it does | 2017-09-07T11:38:38.000892 | Orpha | pythondev_help_Orpha_2017-09-07T11:38:38.000892 | 1,504,784,318.000892 | 92,540 |
pythondev | help | did you try .merge instead of .add? | 2017-09-07T11:38:54.000068 | Johana | pythondev_help_Johana_2017-09-07T11:38:54.000068 | 1,504,784,334.000068 | 92,541 |
pythondev | help | at some point, a commit will happen, and your duplicates will get found | 2017-09-07T11:38:58.000031 | Gabriele | pythondev_help_Gabriele_2017-09-07T11:38:58.000031 | 1,504,784,338.000031 | 92,542 |
pythondev | help | not yet | 2017-09-07T11:39:08.000016 | Orpha | pythondev_help_Orpha_2017-09-07T11:39:08.000016 | 1,504,784,348.000016 | 92,543 |
pythondev | help | only tried moving the commit out | 2017-09-07T11:39:13.000061 | Orpha | pythondev_help_Orpha_2017-09-07T11:39:13.000061 | 1,504,784,353.000061 | 92,544 |
pythondev | help | moving the commit is to speed things up, that's all | 2017-09-07T11:39:47.000166 | Gabriele | pythondev_help_Gabriele_2017-09-07T11:39:47.000166 | 1,504,784,387.000166 | 92,545 |
pythondev | help | :point_up: | 2017-09-07T11:39:58.000034 | Johana | pythondev_help_Johana_2017-09-07T11:39:58.000034 | 1,504,784,398.000034 | 92,546 |
pythondev | help | :thumbsup: | 2017-09-07T11:40:02.000483 | Orpha | pythondev_help_Orpha_2017-09-07T11:40:02.000483 | 1,504,784,402.000483 | 92,547 |
pythondev | help | for ultimate performance gains i urge using the core. | 2017-09-07T11:40:21.000301 | Johana | pythondev_help_Johana_2017-09-07T11:40:21.000301 | 1,504,784,421.000301 | 92,548 |
pythondev | help | but if that isn’t of utmost importance … carry on. | 2017-09-07T11:40:48.000405 | Johana | pythondev_help_Johana_2017-09-07T11:40:48.000405 | 1,504,784,448.000405 | 92,549 |
pythondev | help | not the most important | 2017-09-07T11:41:10.000544 | Orpha | pythondev_help_Orpha_2017-09-07T11:41:10.000544 | 1,504,784,470.000544 | 92,550 |
pythondev | help | so merge needs an existing object? | 2017-09-07T11:41:29.000178 | Orpha | pythondev_help_Orpha_2017-09-07T11:41:29.000178 | 1,504,784,489.000178 | 92,551 |
pythondev | help | ah, same duplicate error too | 2017-09-07T11:42:08.000175 | Orpha | pythondev_help_Orpha_2017-09-07T11:42:08.000175 | 1,504,784,528.000175 | 92,552 |
pythondev | help | i think so. | 2017-09-07T11:42:12.000390 | Johana | pythondev_help_Johana_2017-09-07T11:42:12.000390 | 1,504,784,532.00039 | 92,553 |
pythondev | help | yea it will need the id of the entity and it will merge the records. | 2017-09-07T11:42:29.000025 | Johana | pythondev_help_Johana_2017-09-07T11:42:29.000025 | 1,504,784,549.000025 | 92,554 |
pythondev | help | ah, forget it… ill just leave it as is… it works, and it’s not slow at all… was just bored seeing what other way i could quickly change it to | 2017-09-07T11:43:20.000063 | Orpha | pythondev_help_Orpha_2017-09-07T11:43:20.000063 | 1,504,784,600.000063 | 92,555 |
pythondev | help | argh. i keep getting slow connection and connection errors to websites. happens both at home and work. both of which are pretty fast connections. at least 100mpbs. even google search stalls. some times i have to hit the search button again. not connected to vpn. even in incognito window. and other browsers. | 2017-09-07T11:43:22.000206 | Bruno | pythondev_help_Bruno_2017-09-07T11:43:22.000206 | 1,504,784,602.000206 | 92,556 |
pythondev | help | <@Bruno> you have problems, your phone doesn’t even get text messages for a few days | 2017-09-07T11:44:05.000004 | Orpha | pythondev_help_Orpha_2017-09-07T11:44:05.000004 | 1,504,784,645.000004 | 92,557 |
pythondev | help | you’re hax0red | 2017-09-07T11:44:09.000077 | Johana | pythondev_help_Johana_2017-09-07T11:44:09.000077 | 1,504,784,649.000077 | 92,558 |
pythondev | help | wipe and pave | 2017-09-07T11:44:20.000058 | Johana | pythondev_help_Johana_2017-09-07T11:44:20.000058 | 1,504,784,660.000058 | 92,559 |
pythondev | help | i recommend buying all new hardware | 2017-09-07T11:44:27.000508 | Orpha | pythondev_help_Orpha_2017-09-07T11:44:27.000508 | 1,504,784,667.000508 | 92,560 |
pythondev | help | <@Orpha> lol that was over night. and only once | 2017-09-07T11:44:29.000179 | Bruno | pythondev_help_Bruno_2017-09-07T11:44:29.000179 | 1,504,784,669.000179 | 92,561 |
pythondev | help | lol i wish | 2017-09-07T11:44:35.000105 | Bruno | pythondev_help_Bruno_2017-09-07T11:44:35.000105 | 1,504,784,675.000105 | 92,562 |
pythondev | help | check all your network connections for any outgoing tor nodes | 2017-09-07T11:44:49.000117 | Johana | pythondev_help_Johana_2017-09-07T11:44:49.000117 | 1,504,784,689.000117 | 92,563 |
pythondev | help | ^ oh fun | 2017-09-07T11:45:03.000036 | Orpha | pythondev_help_Orpha_2017-09-07T11:45:03.000036 | 1,504,784,703.000036 | 92,564 |
pythondev | help | it does sound like a dns related thing. if it keeps happening you may want to flush your dns. | 2017-09-07T11:45:55.000394 | Johana | pythondev_help_Johana_2017-09-07T11:45:55.000394 | 1,504,784,755.000394 | 92,565 |
pythondev | help | maybe even try changing dns servers | 2017-09-07T11:46:13.000516 | Johana | pythondev_help_Johana_2017-09-07T11:46:13.000516 | 1,504,784,773.000516 | 92,566 |
pythondev | help | flushed. | 2017-09-07T11:46:32.000148 | Bruno | pythondev_help_Bruno_2017-09-07T11:46:32.000148 | 1,504,784,792.000148 | 92,567 |
pythondev | help | yea. i may try using googles. | 2017-09-07T11:47:02.000340 | Bruno | pythondev_help_Bruno_2017-09-07T11:47:02.000340 | 1,504,784,822.00034 | 92,568 |
pythondev | help | or opendns | 2017-09-07T11:47:12.000100 | Orpha | pythondev_help_Orpha_2017-09-07T11:47:12.000100 | 1,504,784,832.0001 | 92,569 |
pythondev | help | you may want to even do a traceroute and see what hops you’re taking. | 2017-09-07T11:48:03.000525 | Johana | pythondev_help_Johana_2017-09-07T11:48:03.000525 | 1,504,784,883.000525 | 92,570 |
pythondev | help | are you on windows? | 2017-09-07T11:48:32.000253 | Johana | pythondev_help_Johana_2017-09-07T11:48:32.000253 | 1,504,784,912.000253 | 92,571 |
pythondev | help | xubuntu. yea tracert is windows. running it now | 2017-09-07T11:48:56.000776 | Bruno | pythondev_help_Bruno_2017-09-07T11:48:56.000776 | 1,504,784,936.000776 | 92,572 |
pythondev | help | that was pretty quick just to <http://google.com|google.com> | 2017-09-07T11:49:21.000466 | Bruno | pythondev_help_Bruno_2017-09-07T11:49:21.000466 | 1,504,784,961.000466 | 92,573 |
pythondev | help | Try using a different browser | 2017-09-07T11:50:05.000323 | Orpha | pythondev_help_Orpha_2017-09-07T11:50:05.000323 | 1,504,785,005.000323 | 92,574 |
pythondev | help | yea. gonna test vivaldi for a bit. | 2017-09-07T12:00:29.000359 | Bruno | pythondev_help_Bruno_2017-09-07T12:00:29.000359 | 1,504,785,629.000359 | 92,575 |
pythondev | help | i’ve been using brave. i really like it. | 2017-09-07T12:01:33.000287 | Johana | pythondev_help_Johana_2017-09-07T12:01:33.000287 | 1,504,785,693.000287 | 92,576 |
pythondev | help | cool. i havent used that one. i do like vivaldi but the lack of tab sync across devices is a no go for full time usage for me. for personal use at least | 2017-09-07T12:07:31.000202 | Bruno | pythondev_help_Bruno_2017-09-07T12:07:31.000202 | 1,504,786,051.000202 | 92,577 |
pythondev | help | brave is more security oriented. | 2017-09-07T12:14:13.000492 | Johana | pythondev_help_Johana_2017-09-07T12:14:13.000492 | 1,504,786,453.000492 | 92,578 |
pythondev | help | could someone help me with this python code? I’m trying to build my own tuple by looping through a list and adding them to the tuple, but something seems wrong and I can’t really figure why:
```
myTuple = (('', ''),)
answers = ['Test1', 'Test2', 'Test3']
l = list(myTuple)
for x in answers:
l.append((x, x))
widget.choices = (myTuple)```
What i want my widget.choices to look like is
```widget.choices = (('', ''),('Test1', 'Test1'), ('Test2','Test2'), ('Test3','Test3'))``` | 2017-09-07T12:52:46.000075 | Adrian | pythondev_help_Adrian_2017-09-07T12:52:46.000075 | 1,504,788,766.000075 | 92,579 |
pythondev | help | What does `widget.choices` look like in reality? You are modifying a list `l` but then you assign `myTuple` to `widget.choices`. Also know that `(myTuple)` won't make `myTuple` a tuple, if that is what you were thinking the paren would do in that case. | 2017-09-07T13:00:17.000290 | Mallie | pythondev_help_Mallie_2017-09-07T13:00:17.000290 | 1,504,789,217.00029 | 92,580 |
pythondev | help | Looks like you want a tuple of tuples. | 2017-09-07T13:01:23.000533 | Glinda | pythondev_help_Glinda_2017-09-07T13:01:23.000533 | 1,504,789,283.000533 | 92,581 |
pythondev | help | When you're better off using a list of namedtuple | 2017-09-07T13:01:34.000216 | Glinda | pythondev_help_Glinda_2017-09-07T13:01:34.000216 | 1,504,789,294.000216 | 92,582 |
pythondev | help | Or any other object that isn't tuple of tuple | 2017-09-07T13:01:59.000369 | Glinda | pythondev_help_Glinda_2017-09-07T13:01:59.000369 | 1,504,789,319.000369 | 92,583 |
pythondev | help | Looks like your widget.choices is waiting a tuple of tuples… | 2017-09-07T13:02:59.000172 | Cassondra | pythondev_help_Cassondra_2017-09-07T13:02:59.000172 | 1,504,789,379.000172 | 92,584 |
pythondev | help | well I just figured my mistake, I had to give widget.choices `l` instead of `myTuple` | 2017-09-07T13:03:24.000497 | Adrian | pythondev_help_Adrian_2017-09-07T13:03:24.000497 | 1,504,789,404.000497 | 92,585 |
pythondev | help | Anyone know of a way to make the `pd.read_csv` function change the header columns to lower case during import operation? I'm currently pre-processing each input file to make this happen, but it feels like something that's a common enough problem that I've overlooked a feature. | 2017-09-07T13:07:33.000157 | Margrett | pythondev_help_Margrett_2017-09-07T13:07:33.000157 | 1,504,789,653.000157 | 92,586 |
pythondev | help | `pd` being pandas in this scenario | 2017-09-07T13:07:56.000452 | Margrett | pythondev_help_Margrett_2017-09-07T13:07:56.000452 | 1,504,789,676.000452 | 92,587 |
pythondev | help | The ordering is important, as you can't be specific about which column names to bring in, if they don't match case. | 2017-09-07T13:09:37.000318 | Margrett | pythondev_help_Margrett_2017-09-07T13:09:37.000318 | 1,504,789,777.000318 | 92,588 |
pythondev | help | can you be sure there won't be duplicate column names? | 2017-09-07T13:10:59.000232 | Meg | pythondev_help_Meg_2017-09-07T13:10:59.000232 | 1,504,789,859.000232 | 92,589 |
pythondev | help | Yep, all my datasets are from database dumps of individual tables | 2017-09-07T13:11:17.000710 | Margrett | pythondev_help_Margrett_2017-09-07T13:11:17.000710 | 1,504,789,877.00071 | 92,590 |
pythondev | help | ```from collections import namedtuple
# build the tuple class
example_named_tuple = namedtuple('example_named_tuple', ('val1', 'val2'))
# example call single one
single_tuple = example_named_tuple('','')
print('this is value 1', single_tuple.val1, 'BLANK')
print('this is value 2', single_tuple.val2, 'BLANK')
# your items and making all named tuples
answers = ['','Test1', 'Test2', 'Test3']
choices = [example_named_tuple(item, item) for item in answers]
# print the list of tuples
print(choices)
# individually
for item in choices:
print(item.val1, item.val2)
```
<https://repl.it/Knzz/3> | 2017-09-07T13:11:39.000192 | Glinda | pythondev_help_Glinda_2017-09-07T13:11:39.000192 | 1,504,789,899.000192 | 92,591 |
pythondev | help | I think I have one dataset based on Oracle (which loves all uppercase field names), and 10 others which are always lowercase | 2017-09-07T13:12:13.000006 | Margrett | pythondev_help_Margrett_2017-09-07T13:12:13.000006 | 1,504,789,933.000006 | 92,592 |
pythondev | help | I mean, you can do conversion after import, but I don't think the `read_csv` options allow column name case change | 2017-09-07T13:13:32.000002 | Meg | pythondev_help_Meg_2017-09-07T13:13:32.000002 | 1,504,790,012.000002 | 92,593 |
pythondev | help | I mean, ther eis a `converters` option, but that's just for you to apply functions to convert values in specific columns | 2017-09-07T13:14:19.000127 | Meg | pythondev_help_Meg_2017-09-07T13:14:19.000127 | 1,504,790,059.000127 | 92,594 |
pythondev | help | <@Adrian> this way works really well if you need to keep your items intact. | 2017-09-07T13:14:38.000145 | Glinda | pythondev_help_Glinda_2017-09-07T13:14:38.000145 | 1,504,790,078.000145 | 92,595 |
pythondev | help | You can apply a lambda function for pandas on import | 2017-09-07T13:14:54.000705 | Glinda | pythondev_help_Glinda_2017-09-07T13:14:54.000705 | 1,504,790,094.000705 | 92,596 |
pythondev | help | <https://github.com/pandas-dev/pandas/issues/15799> | 2017-09-07T13:16:35.000412 | Glinda | pythondev_help_Glinda_2017-09-07T13:16:35.000412 | 1,504,790,195.000412 | 92,597 |
pythondev | help | ```skipcols = [...]
userows = [...]
read_csv(..., usecols=lambda x: x not in skipcols,
skiprows=lambda x: x not in userows])``` | 2017-09-07T13:16:52.000150 | Glinda | pythondev_help_Glinda_2017-09-07T13:16:52.000150 | 1,504,790,212.00015 | 92,598 |
pythondev | help | <https://www.programiz.com/python-programming/anonymous-function>
` double = lambda x: x* 2` is equivalent to :
```def double(x):
return x * 2``` | 2017-09-07T13:18:01.000283 | Glinda | pythondev_help_Glinda_2017-09-07T13:18:01.000283 | 1,504,790,281.000283 | 92,599 |
pythondev | help | Ohh, okay, I can make that work. didn't realize usecols was that flexible | 2017-09-07T13:18:15.000650 | Margrett | pythondev_help_Margrett_2017-09-07T13:18:15.000650 | 1,504,790,295.00065 | 92,600 |
pythondev | help | It's really amazing | 2017-09-07T13:18:41.000028 | Glinda | pythondev_help_Glinda_2017-09-07T13:18:41.000028 | 1,504,790,321.000028 | 92,601 |
pythondev | help | The reason it's better to use a named tuple is you can preserve your relationship between the first and second item. You don't have to worry about inserting in any order. You can also do things like create a dictionary of named tuples. | 2017-09-07T13:20:29.000331 | Glinda | pythondev_help_Glinda_2017-09-07T13:20:29.000331 | 1,504,790,429.000331 | 92,602 |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.