workspace stringclasses 1
value | channel stringclasses 1
value | sentences stringlengths 1 3.93k | ts stringlengths 26 26 | user stringlengths 2 11 | sentence_id stringlengths 44 53 | timestamp float64 1.5B 1.56B | __index_level_0__ int64 0 106k |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
pythondev | help | would you have a suggestion as to how to constructively build a date with arbitrary y/m/d information using the date time method? I am not too familiar with how to use it correctly so I may have had a bad implementation | 2017-10-31T10:16:11.000196 | Lory | pythondev_help_Lory_2017-10-31T10:16:11.000196 | 1,509,444,971.000196 | 98,803 |
pythondev | help | <@Lory> sounds like a job for <http://dateutil.readthedocs.io/en/stable/parser.html> | 2017-10-31T10:19:04.000490 | Collette | pythondev_help_Collette_2017-10-31T10:19:04.000490 | 1,509,445,144.00049 | 98,804 |
pythondev | help | <https://docs.python.org/3/library/datetime.html#datetime.datetime.strptime> | 2017-10-31T10:19:05.000066 | Ciera | pythondev_help_Ciera_2017-10-31T10:19:05.000066 | 1,509,445,145.000066 | 98,805 |
pythondev | help | `strptime` is good when you have a fixed known format, `dateutil` is good when you just need to parse damn dates :slightly_smiling_face: | 2017-10-31T10:19:38.000342 | Collette | pythondev_help_Collette_2017-10-31T10:19:38.000342 | 1,509,445,178.000342 | 98,806 |
pythondev | help | yep. with only a few different format I'm not sure which one is the best, but idk how many different format mike expect | 2017-10-31T10:21:05.000369 | Ciera | pythondev_help_Ciera_2017-10-31T10:21:05.000369 | 1,509,445,265.000369 | 98,807 |
pythondev | help | I'll look deeper into that aspect. However, ignoring the dates and looking at the if/else structure I have set up, is there any other way to construct it such that I don't need 2 areas in which I check the status of `has_day` or is that inherently impossible because I need to first check the length of the date I have? | 2017-10-31T10:25:14.000221 | Lory | pythondev_help_Lory_2017-10-31T10:25:14.000221 | 1,509,445,514.000221 | 98,808 |
pythondev | help | and all formats end up being `yymmdd` it's just a matter of what does it have currently, what is it expected to have and then any missing information is appended if needed, aka the day information which defaults to `01` | 2017-10-31T10:26:16.000545 | Lory | pythondev_help_Lory_2017-10-31T10:26:16.000545 | 1,509,445,576.000545 | 98,809 |
pythondev | help | on the top of my head I don't have any idea to check both condition | 2017-10-31T10:27:07.000154 | Ciera | pythondev_help_Ciera_2017-10-31T10:27:07.000154 | 1,509,445,627.000154 | 98,810 |
pythondev | help | Fair enough. I have a tendency to look too much into optimization lol. I'm going to dive into those date formats and see how that goes | 2017-10-31T10:29:53.000362 | Lory | pythondev_help_Lory_2017-10-31T10:29:53.000362 | 1,509,445,793.000362 | 98,811 |
pythondev | help | well you could do a function but if the check is only a line or two long it's not necessary | 2017-10-31T10:30:33.000261 | Ciera | pythondev_help_Ciera_2017-10-31T10:30:33.000261 | 1,509,445,833.000261 | 98,812 |
pythondev | help | Exactly what I was thinking, it would just take from the readability of the code | 2017-10-31T10:31:06.000519 | Lory | pythondev_help_Lory_2017-10-31T10:31:06.000519 | 1,509,445,866.000519 | 98,813 |
pythondev | help | depending on the conditions sometime having a 4 branch if/elif might be more readable but ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ | 2017-10-31T10:31:21.000363 | Ciera | pythondev_help_Ciera_2017-10-31T10:31:21.000363 | 1,509,445,881.000363 | 98,814 |
pythondev | help | lol thanks. I'll just let it be for now and maybe I'll have an epiphany one day | 2017-10-31T10:33:10.000773 | Lory | pythondev_help_Lory_2017-10-31T10:33:10.000773 | 1,509,445,990.000773 | 98,815 |
pythondev | help | Quick question... What does the line "Global E" (Line 6) do in the following code snippet? | 2017-10-31T11:13:22.000044 | Virgen | pythondev_help_Virgen_2017-10-31T11:13:22.000044 | 1,509,448,402.000044 | 98,816 |
pythondev | help | as I recently found out, that allows you to create mutable global variables | 2017-10-31T11:14:26.000584 | Lory | pythondev_help_Lory_2017-10-31T11:14:26.000584 | 1,509,448,466.000584 | 98,817 |
pythondev | help | It doesn't create them, it says the global is mutable from within this function. | 2017-10-31T11:15:05.000384 | Meghan | pythondev_help_Meghan_2017-10-31T11:15:05.000384 | 1,509,448,505.000384 | 98,818 |
pythondev | help | Well in that one it is in a comment | 2017-10-31T11:15:09.000384 | Vada | pythondev_help_Vada_2017-10-31T11:15:09.000384 | 1,509,448,509.000384 | 98,819 |
pythondev | help | so it doesn't do anything | 2017-10-31T11:15:17.000447 | Vada | pythondev_help_Vada_2017-10-31T11:15:17.000447 | 1,509,448,517.000447 | 98,820 |
pythondev | help | Which is something you generally want to avoid doing in a production level piece of software. I personally cheat when writing test scripts to work out a specific function | 2017-10-31T11:15:20.000882 | Lory | pythondev_help_Lory_2017-10-31T11:15:20.000882 | 1,509,448,520.000882 | 98,821 |
pythondev | help | correct. commented or not makes no difference when I run the snippet. | 2017-10-31T11:15:35.000351 | Virgen | pythondev_help_Virgen_2017-10-31T11:15:35.000351 | 1,509,448,535.000351 | 98,822 |
pythondev | help | They are probably indicating they are using the global E. | 2017-10-31T11:15:36.000357 | Meghan | pythondev_help_Meghan_2017-10-31T11:15:36.000357 | 1,509,448,536.000357 | 98,823 |
pythondev | help | <@Meghan> E has not been created beforehand so does get created there. | 2017-10-31T11:15:47.000375 | Vada | pythondev_help_Vada_2017-10-31T11:15:47.000375 | 1,509,448,547.000375 | 98,824 |
pythondev | help | And yes, there is rarely a reason for it. | 2017-10-31T11:15:54.000746 | Meghan | pythondev_help_Meghan_2017-10-31T11:15:54.000746 | 1,509,448,554.000746 | 98,825 |
pythondev | help | actually you are right sorry | 2017-10-31T11:16:02.000353 | Vada | pythondev_help_Vada_2017-10-31T11:16:02.000353 | 1,509,448,562.000353 | 98,826 |
pythondev | help | it gets declared later - this is just the person saying it is the global E | 2017-10-31T11:16:18.000171 | Vada | pythondev_help_Vada_2017-10-31T11:16:18.000171 | 1,509,448,578.000171 | 98,827 |
pythondev | help | <@Virgen> without `global foo`, `foo = something` creates a local variable `foo` instead of modifying the global one | 2017-10-31T11:16:22.000599 | Collette | pythondev_help_Collette_2017-10-31T11:16:22.000599 | 1,509,448,582.000599 | 98,828 |
pythondev | help | That isn't really later, since the stuff outside of the function are executed before the function. | 2017-10-31T11:16:44.000101 | Meghan | pythondev_help_Meghan_2017-10-31T11:16:44.000101 | 1,509,448,604.000101 | 98,829 |
pythondev | help | <@Meghan> corrected myself after :wink: | 2017-10-31T11:19:26.000399 | Vada | pythondev_help_Vada_2017-10-31T11:19:26.000399 | 1,509,448,766.000399 | 98,830 |
pythondev | help | I think I understand. So, if I were to expand on this initial snippet and wanted to use "E" later on, outside of the function, I would need to use the "Global E" to change the Global variable. | 2017-10-31T11:20:05.000618 | Virgen | pythondev_help_Virgen_2017-10-31T11:20:05.000618 | 1,509,448,805.000618 | 98,831 |
pythondev | help | without the "Global E", the value of E would be unchanged outside of the function. | 2017-10-31T11:20:27.000175 | Virgen | pythondev_help_Virgen_2017-10-31T11:20:27.000175 | 1,509,448,827.000175 | 98,832 |
pythondev | help | correct? | 2017-10-31T11:20:29.000097 | Virgen | pythondev_help_Virgen_2017-10-31T11:20:29.000097 | 1,509,448,829.000097 | 98,833 |
pythondev | help | If you wanted to modify it in some way yes, otherwise if it is simply a reference variable like a file path or something that you do not plan on modifying, then you do not need `global` | 2017-10-31T11:21:27.000498 | Lory | pythondev_help_Lory_2017-10-31T11:21:27.000498 | 1,509,448,887.000498 | 98,834 |
pythondev | help | you only need `global VARIABLE` when you plan on modifying that data structure, which as everyone says, shouldn't really be done | 2017-10-31T11:22:04.000362 | Lory | pythondev_help_Lory_2017-10-31T11:22:04.000362 | 1,509,448,924.000362 | 98,835 |
pythondev | help | In that snippet, in that function. Is "E" getting modified? Or is it being used to assign the users input to "string"? | 2017-10-31T11:23:36.000674 | Virgen | pythondev_help_Virgen_2017-10-31T11:23:36.000674 | 1,509,449,016.000674 | 98,836 |
pythondev | help | here is a good SO post on it. | 2017-10-31T11:23:47.000123 | Vada | pythondev_help_Vada_2017-10-31T11:23:47.000123 | 1,509,449,027.000123 | 98,837 |
pythondev | help | <https://stackoverflow.com/a/4693385> | 2017-10-31T11:23:47.000465 | Vada | pythondev_help_Vada_2017-10-31T11:23:47.000465 | 1,509,449,027.000465 | 98,838 |
pythondev | help | in which case, "string" is what would hold that data that would get used later. | 2017-10-31T11:23:52.000972 | Virgen | pythondev_help_Virgen_2017-10-31T11:23:52.000972 | 1,509,449,032.000972 | 98,839 |
pythondev | help | And in the code given, E is not modified | 2017-10-31T11:23:59.000379 | Vada | pythondev_help_Vada_2017-10-31T11:23:59.000379 | 1,509,449,039.000379 | 98,840 |
pythondev | help | it is assigning the users input to `string` | 2017-10-31T11:24:16.000043 | Vada | pythondev_help_Vada_2017-10-31T11:24:16.000043 | 1,509,449,056.000043 | 98,841 |
pythondev | help | it isn't it is simply being referenced and saved in the variable `string` which is local to that function and therefore mutable | 2017-10-31T11:24:24.000004 | Lory | pythondev_help_Lory_2017-10-31T11:24:24.000004 | 1,509,449,064.000004 | 98,842 |
pythondev | help | so even more of a reason that "Global E" is unnecessary. | 2017-10-31T11:24:41.000315 | Virgen | pythondev_help_Virgen_2017-10-31T11:24:41.000315 | 1,509,449,081.000315 | 98,843 |
pythondev | help | mutability is a different thing.... | 2017-10-31T11:24:42.000549 | Vada | pythondev_help_Vada_2017-10-31T11:24:42.000549 | 1,509,449,082.000549 | 98,844 |
pythondev | help | ? | 2017-10-31T11:24:43.000322 | Virgen | pythondev_help_Virgen_2017-10-31T11:24:43.000322 | 1,509,449,083.000322 | 98,845 |
pythondev | help | yep | 2017-10-31T11:24:50.000732 | Vada | pythondev_help_Vada_2017-10-31T11:24:50.000732 | 1,509,449,090.000732 | 98,846 |
pythondev | help | got it. Thank you all! | 2017-10-31T11:25:28.000921 | Virgen | pythondev_help_Virgen_2017-10-31T11:25:28.000921 | 1,509,449,128.000921 | 98,847 |
pythondev | help | and, <@Vada> I'll check out that SO post. thank you! | 2017-10-31T11:26:30.000768 | Virgen | pythondev_help_Virgen_2017-10-31T11:26:30.000768 | 1,509,449,190.000768 | 98,848 |
pythondev | help | <@Lory> how did you format the snippets in your posts? | 2017-10-31T11:28:15.000396 | Virgen | pythondev_help_Virgen_2017-10-31T11:28:15.000396 | 1,509,449,295.000396 | 98,849 |
pythondev | help | and <@Vada> is correct I didn't mean mutable, just that it is local and you can assign new data to that variable. mutability has to do with 'identity' <https://stackoverflow.com/questions/8056130/immutable-vs-mutable-types>
and how do you mean <@Virgen>, your formatted code looks the same as mine as far as I can tell | 2017-10-31T11:29:27.000571 | Lory | pythondev_help_Lory_2017-10-31T11:29:27.000571 | 1,509,449,367.000571 | 98,850 |
pythondev | help | <@Virgen> <https://get.slack.help/hc/en-us/articles/202288908-Format-your-messages#code-blocks> | 2017-10-31T11:29:54.000375 | Meg | pythondev_help_Meg_2017-10-31T11:29:54.000375 | 1,509,449,394.000375 | 98,851 |
pythondev | help | The problem I am finding with this is I don't know how to then modify the `day` if I need to later on in my code depending the `has_day` flag I was showing off earlier. Would I have to convert it back to a string, modify it and then reconvert back to date time? | 2017-10-31T11:42:44.000214 | Lory | pythondev_help_Lory_2017-10-31T11:42:44.000214 | 1,509,450,164.000214 | 98,852 |
pythondev | help | I believe you can do `date.day = 1` | 2017-10-31T11:46:05.000382 | Ciera | pythondev_help_Ciera_2017-10-31T11:46:05.000382 | 1,509,450,365.000382 | 98,853 |
pythondev | help | but you'll need to test | 2017-10-31T11:46:09.000235 | Ciera | pythondev_help_Ciera_2017-10-31T11:46:09.000235 | 1,509,450,369.000235 | 98,854 |
pythondev | help | <@Lory> I meant the small bits within your replies. `like this`. which I have now figured out is back ticks. thanks <@Meg> | 2017-10-31T11:53:38.000931 | Virgen | pythondev_help_Virgen_2017-10-31T11:53:38.000931 | 1,509,450,818.000931 | 98,855 |
pythondev | help | <@Virgen> ah, sorry didn't realize you meant those. Glad you figured it out though! | 2017-10-31T11:54:02.000066 | Lory | pythondev_help_Lory_2017-10-31T11:54:02.000066 | 1,509,450,842.000066 | 98,856 |
pythondev | help | :thumbsup: it helps alot | 2017-10-31T11:54:04.000928 | Meg | pythondev_help_Meg_2017-10-31T11:54:04.000928 | 1,509,450,844.000928 | 98,857 |
pythondev | help | and also, it carries over from github issues too | 2017-10-31T11:54:12.000818 | Meg | pythondev_help_Meg_2017-10-31T11:54:12.000818 | 1,509,450,852.000818 | 98,858 |
pythondev | help | and StackOverflow | 2017-10-31T11:54:20.000596 | Meg | pythondev_help_Meg_2017-10-31T11:54:20.000596 | 1,509,450,860.000596 | 98,859 |
pythondev | help | <@Lory> anytime date/time/day anything like that shows up, I immediate ask if they've check out the arrow package, if either for implementation or for source code analysis
<http://arrow.readthedocs.io/en/latest/> | 2017-10-31T13:33:22.000271 | Seema | pythondev_help_Seema_2017-10-31T13:33:22.000271 | 1,509,456,802.000271 | 98,860 |
pythondev | help | Thanks <@Seema>! I'll look into that as soon as I can | 2017-10-31T13:46:10.000255 | Lory | pythondev_help_Lory_2017-10-31T13:46:10.000255 | 1,509,457,570.000255 | 98,861 |
pythondev | help | i get this output | 2017-10-31T14:30:45.000537 | Kandis | pythondev_help_Kandis_2017-10-31T14:30:45.000537 | 1,509,460,245.000537 | 98,862 |
pythondev | help | : | 2017-10-31T14:30:47.000107 | Kandis | pythondev_help_Kandis_2017-10-31T14:30:47.000107 | 1,509,460,247.000107 | 98,863 |
pythondev | help | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
TypeError Traceback (most recent call last)
<ipython-input-165-ac8e0e59e314> in <module>()
6 return non_udacity_data
7
----> 8 non_udacity_enrollments=udacity_removed(enrollments)
... | 2017-10-31T14:30:48.000687 | Kandis | pythondev_help_Kandis_2017-10-31T14:30:48.000687 | 1,509,460,248.000687 | 98,864 |
pythondev | help | why?? | 2017-10-31T14:30:58.000071 | Kandis | pythondev_help_Kandis_2017-10-31T14:30:58.000071 | 1,509,460,258.000071 | 98,865 |
pythondev | help | :thinking_face: | 2017-10-31T14:31:19.000263 | Kandis | pythondev_help_Kandis_2017-10-31T14:31:19.000263 | 1,509,460,279.000263 | 98,866 |
pythondev | help | `data_point` must be a list | 2017-10-31T14:31:45.000086 | Frieda | pythondev_help_Frieda_2017-10-31T14:31:45.000086 | 1,509,460,305.000086 | 98,867 |
pythondev | help | why can I use :” | 2017-10-31T14:33:18.000379 | Kandis | pythondev_help_Kandis_2017-10-31T14:33:18.000379 | 1,509,460,398.000379 | 98,868 |
pythondev | help | for enrollment in enrollments | 2017-10-31T14:33:21.000035 | Kandis | pythondev_help_Kandis_2017-10-31T14:33:21.000035 | 1,509,460,401.000035 | 98,869 |
pythondev | help | if enrollment[‘is_udacity’]: | 2017-10-31T14:33:31.000341 | Kandis | pythondev_help_Kandis_2017-10-31T14:33:31.000341 | 1,509,460,411.000341 | 98,870 |
pythondev | help | " | 2017-10-31T14:33:37.000062 | Kandis | pythondev_help_Kandis_2017-10-31T14:33:37.000062 | 1,509,460,417.000062 | 98,871 |
pythondev | help | enrollment here should be a list too? | 2017-10-31T14:33:46.000115 | Kandis | pythondev_help_Kandis_2017-10-31T14:33:46.000115 | 1,509,460,426.000115 | 98,872 |
pythondev | help | uhm, enrollement is a dict, apparently | 2017-10-31T14:34:01.000656 | Meg | pythondev_help_Meg_2017-10-31T14:34:01.000656 | 1,509,460,441.000656 | 98,873 |
pythondev | help | oh! so unless i define the “data” as a dictionary, i can only use data_point as a string? | 2017-10-31T14:35:02.000556 | Kandis | pythondev_help_Kandis_2017-10-31T14:35:02.000556 | 1,509,460,502.000556 | 98,874 |
pythondev | help | and based on my code now, what do you think i should modify it | 2017-10-31T14:35:20.000151 | Kandis | pythondev_help_Kandis_2017-10-31T14:35:20.000151 | 1,509,460,520.000151 | 98,875 |
pythondev | help | remember, you can access a list by index. eg `some_list[3]`, but a dict has to be accessted by a key. eg `some_dict['some_key']` | 2017-10-31T14:35:20.000434 | Meg | pythondev_help_Meg_2017-10-31T14:35:20.000434 | 1,509,460,520.000434 | 98,876 |
pythondev | help | yup yup | 2017-10-31T14:35:33.000432 | Kandis | pythondev_help_Kandis_2017-10-31T14:35:33.000432 | 1,509,460,533.000432 | 98,877 |
pythondev | help | so, you need to iterate over a dict | 2017-10-31T14:35:51.000195 | Meg | pythondev_help_Meg_2017-10-31T14:35:51.000195 | 1,509,460,551.000195 | 98,878 |
pythondev | help | are you using python 2 or 3? | 2017-10-31T14:35:55.000804 | Meg | pythondev_help_Meg_2017-10-31T14:35:55.000804 | 1,509,460,555.000804 | 98,879 |
pythondev | help | 3 | 2017-10-31T14:36:01.000457 | Kandis | pythondev_help_Kandis_2017-10-31T14:36:01.000457 | 1,509,460,561.000457 | 98,880 |
pythondev | help | do i add: data={} | 2017-10-31T14:36:20.000262 | Kandis | pythondev_help_Kandis_2017-10-31T14:36:20.000262 | 1,509,460,580.000262 | 98,881 |
pythondev | help | what you want is `for key, value in enrollments.items():` | 2017-10-31T14:36:34.000485 | Meg | pythondev_help_Meg_2017-10-31T14:36:34.000485 | 1,509,460,594.000485 | 98,882 |
pythondev | help | i dont understand | 2017-10-31T14:38:02.000369 | Kandis | pythondev_help_Kandis_2017-10-31T14:38:02.000369 | 1,509,460,682.000369 | 98,883 |
pythondev | help | and also i want it to be a function | 2017-10-31T14:38:27.000554 | Kandis | pythondev_help_Kandis_2017-10-31T14:38:27.000554 | 1,509,460,707.000554 | 98,884 |
pythondev | help | :thinking_face: | 2017-10-31T14:38:33.000391 | Kandis | pythondev_help_Kandis_2017-10-31T14:38:33.000391 | 1,509,460,713.000391 | 98,885 |
pythondev | help | how about you step back a bit, and tell us what you’re trying to accomplish | 2017-10-31T14:39:38.000716 | Meg | pythondev_help_Meg_2017-10-31T14:39:38.000716 | 1,509,460,778.000716 | 98,886 |
pythondev | help | its obvious you’re trying to add and remove some enrollments, but any more than that is unknown | 2017-10-31T14:40:21.000514 | Meg | pythondev_help_Meg_2017-10-31T14:40:21.000514 | 1,509,460,821.000514 | 98,887 |
pythondev | help | for example, what is `enrollements`? | 2017-10-31T14:40:34.000351 | Meg | pythondev_help_Meg_2017-10-31T14:40:34.000351 | 1,509,460,834.000351 | 98,888 |
pythondev | help | here it is <@Meg> | 2017-10-31T14:46:12.000153 | Kandis | pythondev_help_Kandis_2017-10-31T14:46:12.000153 | 1,509,461,172.000153 | 98,889 |
pythondev | help | :laughing: | 2017-10-31T14:46:19.000401 | Kandis | pythondev_help_Kandis_2017-10-31T14:46:19.000401 | 1,509,461,179.000401 | 98,890 |
pythondev | help | sorry for the typos in my description hehe | 2017-10-31T14:46:46.000748 | Kandis | pythondev_help_Kandis_2017-10-31T14:46:46.000748 | 1,509,461,206.000748 | 98,891 |
pythondev | help | so, enrollments is a list of dicts? | 2017-10-31T14:48:55.000395 | Meg | pythondev_help_Meg_2017-10-31T14:48:55.000395 | 1,509,461,335.000395 | 98,892 |
pythondev | help | and for some reason, in `udacity_removed`, it gets moved to a regular list | 2017-10-31T14:49:17.000566 | Meg | pythondev_help_Meg_2017-10-31T14:49:17.000566 | 1,509,461,357.000566 | 98,893 |
pythondev | help | yes enrollments is a csv file | 2017-10-31T14:51:23.000286 | Kandis | pythondev_help_Kandis_2017-10-31T14:51:23.000286 | 1,509,461,483.000286 | 98,894 |
pythondev | help | uhm | 2017-10-31T14:51:40.000613 | Meg | pythondev_help_Meg_2017-10-31T14:51:40.000613 | 1,509,461,500.000613 | 98,895 |
pythondev | help | Couldn't it also be coming from daily_engagement since the function is also being called with that? | 2017-10-31T14:51:49.000409 | Antionette | pythondev_help_Antionette_2017-10-31T14:51:49.000409 | 1,509,461,509.000409 | 98,896 |
pythondev | help | OrderedDict([('account_key', '1304'), ('status', 'canceled'), ('join_date', datetime.datetime(2015, 1, 10, 0, 0)), ('cancel_date', datetime.datetime(2015, 3, 10, 0, 0)), ('days_to_cancel', 59), ('is_udacity', True), ('is_canceled', True)]) | 2017-10-31T14:51:54.000359 | Kandis | pythondev_help_Kandis_2017-10-31T14:51:54.000359 | 1,509,461,514.000359 | 98,897 |
pythondev | help | OrderedDict([(‘account_key’, ‘1304’), (‘status’, ‘canceled’), (‘join_date’, datetime.datetime(2015, 1, 10, 0, 0)), (‘cancel_date’, datetime.datetime(2015, 3, 10, 0, 0)), (‘days_to_cancel’, 59), (‘is_udacity’, True), (‘is_canceled’, True)]) | 2017-10-31T14:51:58.000466 | Kandis | pythondev_help_Kandis_2017-10-31T14:51:58.000466 | 1,509,461,518.000466 | 98,898 |
pythondev | help | like this | 2017-10-31T14:52:01.000343 | Kandis | pythondev_help_Kandis_2017-10-31T14:52:01.000343 | 1,509,461,521.000343 | 98,899 |
pythondev | help | I don’t think so, <@Antionette>, because the original error comes from `non_udacity_enrollments=udacity_removed(enrollments)` | 2017-10-31T14:52:19.000444 | Meg | pythondev_help_Meg_2017-10-31T14:52:19.000444 | 1,509,461,539.000444 | 98,900 |
pythondev | help | <https://jefflirion.github.io/udacity/Intro_to_Data_Analysis/Lesson1/L1_Starter_Code.html> | 2017-10-31T14:53:03.000045 | Kandis | pythondev_help_Kandis_2017-10-31T14:53:03.000045 | 1,509,461,583.000045 | 98,901 |
pythondev | help | it is in the “Tracking Down the Remaining Problems” | 2017-10-31T14:53:15.000037 | Kandis | pythondev_help_Kandis_2017-10-31T14:53:15.000037 | 1,509,461,595.000037 | 98,902 |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.