workspace stringclasses 1
value | channel stringclasses 1
value | sentences stringlengths 1 3.93k | ts stringlengths 26 26 | user stringlengths 2 11 | sentence_id stringlengths 44 53 | timestamp float64 1.5B 1.56B | __index_level_0__ int64 0 106k |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
pythondev | help | ```The Qt open source licensing is ideal for use cases such as open source projects with open source distribution, student/academic purposes, hobby projects, internal research projects without external distribution, or other projects where all (L)GPL obligations can be met.``` | 2017-10-30T06:55:14.000230 | Ciera | pythondev_help_Ciera_2017-10-30T06:55:14.000230 | 1,509,346,514.00023 | 98,603 |
pythondev | help | ah ok, thanks | 2017-10-30T06:55:25.000213 | Toby | pythondev_help_Toby_2017-10-30T06:55:25.000213 | 1,509,346,525.000213 | 98,604 |
pythondev | help | ```The commercial Qt license gives you the full rights to create and distribute software on your own terms without any open source license obligations.``` | 2017-10-30T06:55:30.000170 | Ciera | pythondev_help_Ciera_2017-10-30T06:55:30.000170 | 1,509,346,530.00017 | 98,605 |
pythondev | help | Do u mind if i ask about you ?? | 2017-10-30T06:56:15.000097 | Emily | pythondev_help_Emily_2017-10-30T06:56:15.000097 | 1,509,346,575.000097 | 98,606 |
pythondev | help | in what way? | 2017-10-30T06:56:44.000134 | Toby | pythondev_help_Toby_2017-10-30T06:56:44.000134 | 1,509,346,604.000134 | 98,607 |
pythondev | help | tell me about you ! | 2017-10-30T06:57:14.000070 | Emily | pythondev_help_Emily_2017-10-30T06:57:14.000070 | 1,509,346,634.00007 | 98,608 |
pythondev | help | so maybe those presentations should bring topics like git workflow and its' benefits? | 2017-10-30T06:59:52.000386 | Mirian | pythondev_help_Mirian_2017-10-30T06:59:52.000386 | 1,509,346,792.000386 | 98,609 |
pythondev | help | This is a weird conversation with all the quoting | 2017-10-30T07:02:00.000232 | Vada | pythondev_help_Vada_2017-10-30T07:02:00.000232 | 1,509,346,920.000232 | 98,610 |
pythondev | help | There is no need to share every message as you respond. you can just respond - it's actually easier to follow that way | 2017-10-30T07:03:11.000187 | Vada | pythondev_help_Vada_2017-10-30T07:03:11.000187 | 1,509,346,991.000187 | 98,611 |
pythondev | help | Especially after Kevin Spacey's coming-out... | 2017-10-30T07:03:12.000104 | Collette | pythondev_help_Collette_2017-10-30T07:03:12.000104 | 1,509,346,992.000104 | 98,612 |
pythondev | help | By the ways, there are <#C07EFN21K|random> and <#C07EHQYFN|introductions> which are more suitable for such personal discussions. | 2017-10-30T07:03:57.000011 | Collette | pythondev_help_Collette_2017-10-30T07:03:57.000011 | 1,509,347,037.000011 | 98,613 |
pythondev | help | <@Collette> I am both surprised by the news and confused as to the relevance | 2017-10-30T07:04:00.000013 | Vada | pythondev_help_Vada_2017-10-30T07:04:00.000013 | 1,509,347,040.000013 | 98,614 |
pythondev | help | Or, even, personal messages. | 2017-10-30T07:04:02.000154 | Collette | pythondev_help_Collette_2017-10-30T07:04:02.000154 | 1,509,347,042.000154 | 98,615 |
pythondev | help | <@Emily> it is inappropriate to ask someone to talk about themselves in such a public forum. It's not exactly appropriate to ask in a private chat either, but it would be a better place than here. <@Toby> should also have no obligation to respond as well.
This is not a complaint, or necessarily a violation of any rule... | 2017-10-30T07:06:36.000122 | Vada | pythondev_help_Vada_2017-10-30T07:06:36.000122 | 1,509,347,196.000122 | 98,616 |
pythondev | help | Sorry sir ! | 2017-10-30T07:07:36.000274 | Emily | pythondev_help_Emily_2017-10-30T07:07:36.000274 | 1,509,347,256.000274 | 98,617 |
pythondev | help | i should have asked this question at <#C07EHQYFN|introductions> | 2017-10-30T07:07:59.000399 | Emily | pythondev_help_Emily_2017-10-30T07:07:59.000399 | 1,509,347,279.000399 | 98,618 |
pythondev | help | Ah right now I see why you asked | 2017-10-30T07:09:22.000025 | Vada | pythondev_help_Vada_2017-10-30T07:09:22.000025 | 1,509,347,362.000025 | 98,619 |
pythondev | help | yes <@Toby> feel free to introduce yourself to the group in <#C07EHQYFN|introductions> | 2017-10-30T07:09:36.000135 | Vada | pythondev_help_Vada_2017-10-30T07:09:36.000135 | 1,509,347,376.000135 | 98,620 |
pythondev | help | got messed up with group! <@Vada> sir | 2017-10-30T07:10:13.000050 | Emily | pythondev_help_Emily_2017-10-30T07:10:13.000050 | 1,509,347,413.00005 | 98,621 |
pythondev | help | no worries | 2017-10-30T07:10:18.000211 | Vada | pythondev_help_Vada_2017-10-30T07:10:18.000211 | 1,509,347,418.000211 | 98,622 |
pythondev | help | okay | 2017-10-30T07:10:28.000118 | Emily | pythondev_help_Emily_2017-10-30T07:10:28.000118 | 1,509,347,428.000118 | 98,623 |
pythondev | help | Should I be using list comprehension to `assert` that all members of a list parameter in my function are of a required custom class, or is there a cleaner way of doing it? | 2017-10-30T11:50:34.000449 | Margrett | pythondev_help_Margrett_2017-10-30T11:50:34.000449 | 1,509,364,234.000449 | 98,624 |
pythondev | help | I tend to do a lot of `assert isinstance(param1, CustomClass)` | 2017-10-30T11:51:43.000089 | Margrett | pythondev_help_Margrett_2017-10-30T11:51:43.000089 | 1,509,364,303.000089 | 98,625 |
pythondev | help | a list comprehension sounds like the best way to do it based on my experiences | 2017-10-30T11:53:11.000038 | Lory | pythondev_help_Lory_2017-10-30T11:53:11.000038 | 1,509,364,391.000038 | 98,626 |
pythondev | help | unless there's a way to just do the entire list in one go which I am not aware of personally | 2017-10-30T11:53:22.000728 | Lory | pythondev_help_Lory_2017-10-30T11:53:22.000728 | 1,509,364,402.000728 | 98,627 |
pythondev | help | Yah, I didn't see some hidden functionality in isinstance, at least from the official docs | 2017-10-30T11:53:44.000620 | Margrett | pythondev_help_Margrett_2017-10-30T11:53:44.000620 | 1,509,364,424.00062 | 98,628 |
pythondev | help | But you won't be using the resulting list anyway... Why not just `for param in params: assert(....)`? | 2017-10-30T11:54:00.000800 | Scot | pythondev_help_Scot_2017-10-30T11:54:00.000800 | 1,509,364,440.0008 | 98,629 |
pythondev | help | you could have your class self validate before being appended to the list or something too. depends on your code structure but the various approaches all do the same thing at the end of the day | 2017-10-30T11:54:45.000556 | Lory | pythondev_help_Lory_2017-10-30T11:54:45.000556 | 1,509,364,485.000556 | 98,630 |
pythondev | help | I probably should just use a normal for loop, that way I can complain about the specific non-conforming item. | 2017-10-30T11:54:54.000209 | Margrett | pythondev_help_Margrett_2017-10-30T11:54:54.000209 | 1,509,364,494.000209 | 98,631 |
pythondev | help | In my current code, I'm just talking to myself, but this is very similar to a another one of my projects where I expect random non-python proficient people to be using my classes | 2017-10-30T11:55:39.000284 | Margrett | pythondev_help_Margrett_2017-10-30T11:55:39.000284 | 1,509,364,539.000284 | 98,632 |
pythondev | help | Figured I should try to be consistent in my approach :slightly_smiling_face: | 2017-10-30T11:55:54.000216 | Margrett | pythondev_help_Margrett_2017-10-30T11:55:54.000216 | 1,509,364,554.000216 | 98,633 |
pythondev | help | I personally wouldn't use a list comprehension if I didn't intend to use the resulting list for anything | 2017-10-30T11:58:42.000401 | Scot | pythondev_help_Scot_2017-10-30T11:58:42.000401 | 1,509,364,722.000401 | 98,634 |
pythondev | help | could also do a test in the list comprehension, and use `any` and `all` type checks | 2017-10-30T11:58:43.000464 | Junita | pythondev_help_Junita_2017-10-30T11:58:43.000464 | 1,509,364,723.000464 | 98,635 |
pythondev | help | ```Should I be using list comprehension to `assert` that all members of a list parameter in my function are of a required custom class``` Should you really do that and not let it fails later on ? | 2017-10-30T12:01:26.000348 | Ciera | pythondev_help_Ciera_2017-10-30T12:01:26.000348 | 1,509,364,886.000348 | 98,636 |
pythondev | help | My general philosophy is to fail fast. In this tool, if a user provides me with wacky input data, it could be devastating to the downstream systems that I'm re-configuring. | 2017-10-30T12:03:14.000854 | Margrett | pythondev_help_Margrett_2017-10-30T12:03:14.000854 | 1,509,364,994.000854 | 98,637 |
pythondev | help | I do like the potential idea of using any/all, need to play with that. Could make the code more readable | 2017-10-30T12:04:12.000707 | Margrett | pythondev_help_Margrett_2017-10-30T12:04:12.000707 | 1,509,365,052.000707 | 98,638 |
pythondev | help | yeah I use that sometimes and like it. the inline assert seems nice too as well | 2017-10-30T12:05:04.000755 | Junita | pythondev_help_Junita_2017-10-30T12:05:04.000755 | 1,509,365,104.000755 | 98,639 |
pythondev | help | A simplified example:
```my_ints = [1,2,3]
assert all(isinstance(i, int) for i in my_ints), 'my_ints must all be integers'``` | 2017-10-30T12:11:29.000449 | Margrett | pythondev_help_Margrett_2017-10-30T12:11:29.000449 | 1,509,365,489.000449 | 98,640 |
pythondev | help | Seems to meet the test of being self-documenting | 2017-10-30T12:12:44.000542 | Margrett | pythondev_help_Margrett_2017-10-30T12:12:44.000542 | 1,509,365,564.000542 | 98,641 |
pythondev | help | Thanks <@Junita>, <@Truman>, <@Scot>,<@Ciera> Thanks for the help with the assert list question :taco: | 2017-10-30T12:19:55.000391 | Margrett | pythondev_help_Margrett_2017-10-30T12:19:55.000391 | 1,509,365,995.000391 | 98,642 |
pythondev | help | om nom nom. np | 2017-10-30T12:21:10.000413 | Junita | pythondev_help_Junita_2017-10-30T12:21:10.000413 | 1,509,366,070.000413 | 98,643 |
pythondev | help | Hurray, already prevented a shooting self in foot incident | 2017-10-30T12:43:15.000059 | Margrett | pythondev_help_Margrett_2017-10-30T12:43:15.000059 | 1,509,367,395.000059 | 98,644 |
pythondev | help | ` assert all(isinstance(ts, TrapServer) for ts in trap_servers), 'trap_servers must all be TrapServers'` | 2017-10-30T12:43:19.000281 | Margrett | pythondev_help_Margrett_2017-10-30T12:43:19.000281 | 1,509,367,399.000281 | 98,645 |
pythondev | help | `AssertionError: trap_servers must all be TrapServers` | 2017-10-30T12:43:30.000237 | Margrett | pythondev_help_Margrett_2017-10-30T12:43:30.000237 | 1,509,367,410.000237 | 98,646 |
pythondev | help | Trap music is infecting everything! | 2017-10-30T12:44:14.000028 | Mallie | pythondev_help_Mallie_2017-10-30T12:44:14.000028 | 1,509,367,454.000028 | 98,647 |
pythondev | help | :smile: | 2017-10-30T12:44:24.000012 | Mallie | pythondev_help_Mallie_2017-10-30T12:44:24.000012 | 1,509,367,464.000012 | 98,648 |
pythondev | help | Hi all, wondering if anyone could help make my code less repetitive. I have a list of excel files and I want to read data from different parts of them and combine them into DataFrames based on content. I have functions (e.g. `read_range_a`) that specify the portion of the document to read. Any advice would be appreciat... | 2017-10-30T13:04:04.000452 | Deadra | pythondev_help_Deadra_2017-10-30T13:04:04.000452 | 1,509,368,644.000452 | 98,649 |
pythondev | help | Anyone got any experience using the pyrebase library for Firebase? | 2017-10-30T13:07:16.000056 | Corrinne | pythondev_help_Corrinne_2017-10-30T13:07:16.000056 | 1,509,368,836.000056 | 98,650 |
pythondev | help | <https://github.com/ionelmc/pytest-benchmark> | 2017-10-30T14:43:34.000708 | Bruno | pythondev_help_Bruno_2017-10-30T14:43:34.000708 | 1,509,374,614.000708 | 98,651 |
pythondev | help | <@Meg> That's a really great list of things :taco:
<@Evelin> We did a rotating presentation at work on a dev focused topic, that helped a bit to open up discussion towards newer ways of doing things. We also had a couple hours a week dedicating to do "learning" but it worked better when there was a discussion about w... | 2017-10-30T16:03:26.000615 | Kiersten | pythondev_help_Kiersten_2017-10-30T16:03:26.000615 | 1,509,379,406.000615 | 98,652 |
pythondev | help | Hi Guys , I have a json Que and I want to check for some value ordering , what is the fastest way to do that?
{ First Property : true , Second Property:false} I want to be sure that the First Property showed in this que before the Second Property | 2017-10-30T16:30:49.000217 | Elanor | pythondev_help_Elanor_2017-10-30T16:30:49.000217 | 1,509,381,049.000217 | 98,653 |
pythondev | help | Do you know what the order is prior to run time or is it dynamic? | 2017-10-30T16:42:50.000589 | Lory | pythondev_help_Lory_2017-10-30T16:42:50.000589 | 1,509,381,770.000589 | 98,654 |
pythondev | help | sounds like you need to make a priority queue | 2017-10-30T16:43:03.000246 | Meg | pythondev_help_Meg_2017-10-30T16:43:03.000246 | 1,509,381,783.000246 | 98,655 |
pythondev | help | actually all I have is dictionary with some json objects in it ,I want to know how can I check if one of those objects come before another one or not | 2017-10-30T16:45:56.000015 | Elanor | pythondev_help_Elanor_2017-10-30T16:45:56.000015 | 1,509,381,956.000015 | 98,656 |
pythondev | help | Dictionaries are unordered by default | 2017-10-30T16:47:10.000440 | Rosetta | pythondev_help_Rosetta_2017-10-30T16:47:10.000440 | 1,509,382,030.00044 | 98,657 |
pythondev | help | yes you are right | 2017-10-30T16:47:24.000420 | Elanor | pythondev_help_Elanor_2017-10-30T16:47:24.000420 | 1,509,382,044.00042 | 98,658 |
pythondev | help | that's why is not that easy to do that , my dictionary is specific dictionary which the order is important to me | 2017-10-30T16:47:55.000092 | Elanor | pythondev_help_Elanor_2017-10-30T16:47:55.000092 | 1,509,382,075.000092 | 98,659 |
pythondev | help | Lists are ordered so that's reliable but only helps if you know what you're looking for. I've never used priority ques so I'm not sure how they work personally | 2017-10-30T16:47:59.000138 | Lory | pythondev_help_Lory_2017-10-30T16:47:59.000138 | 1,509,382,079.000138 | 98,660 |
pythondev | help | You could try using an ordereddict | 2017-10-30T16:48:13.000696 | Antionette | pythondev_help_Antionette_2017-10-30T16:48:13.000696 | 1,509,382,093.000696 | 98,661 |
pythondev | help | <https://docs.python.org/3/library/collections.html#collections.OrderedDict> | 2017-10-30T16:48:15.000549 | Antionette | pythondev_help_Antionette_2017-10-30T16:48:15.000549 | 1,509,382,095.000549 | 98,662 |
pythondev | help | let me check thnx | 2017-10-30T16:48:26.000370 | Elanor | pythondev_help_Elanor_2017-10-30T16:48:26.000370 | 1,509,382,106.00037 | 98,663 |
pythondev | help | I don't thinks that's will work <@Antionette> | 2017-10-30T16:49:55.000361 | Elanor | pythondev_help_Elanor_2017-10-30T16:49:55.000361 | 1,509,382,195.000361 | 98,664 |
pythondev | help | <@Elanor> are you looking to sort your dictionary by key or value? | 2017-10-30T16:51:22.000330 | Keesha | pythondev_help_Keesha_2017-10-30T16:51:22.000330 | 1,509,382,282.00033 | 98,665 |
pythondev | help | ordered dicts only work with insertion order | 2017-10-30T16:51:26.000250 | Meg | pythondev_help_Meg_2017-10-30T16:51:26.000250 | 1,509,382,286.00025 | 98,666 |
pythondev | help | sounds like you need to write a list comp to output your dict to a list based on the key value | 2017-10-30T16:51:48.000174 | Meg | pythondev_help_Meg_2017-10-30T16:51:48.000174 | 1,509,382,308.000174 | 98,667 |
pythondev | help | I thought 3.6 had order in order out for dicts, now I have to go check... | 2017-10-30T17:12:24.000419 | Seema | pythondev_help_Seema_2017-10-30T17:12:24.000419 | 1,509,383,544.000419 | 98,668 |
pythondev | help | 3.6 does have dicts that are ordered by default. However, they aren't promised to be in future versions. | 2017-10-30T17:12:52.000268 | Meghan | pythondev_help_Meghan_2017-10-30T17:12:52.000268 | 1,509,383,572.000268 | 98,669 |
pythondev | help | totally understand that, and he may not be able to 3.6 for a variety of reasons | 2017-10-30T17:13:15.000470 | Seema | pythondev_help_Seema_2017-10-30T17:13:15.000470 | 1,509,383,595.00047 | 98,670 |
pythondev | help | I;m using 2.7 | 2017-10-30T17:13:31.000029 | Elanor | pythondev_help_Elanor_2017-10-30T17:13:31.000029 | 1,509,383,611.000029 | 98,671 |
pythondev | help | and when you say they are ordered, are they ordered by a key or a value or are you thinking that they're are indexed? | 2017-10-30T17:14:11.000545 | Seema | pythondev_help_Seema_2017-10-30T17:14:11.000545 | 1,509,383,651.000545 | 98,672 |
pythondev | help | They are ordered in the way they were created, not based on any other logic. | 2017-10-30T17:15:17.000421 | Meghan | pythondev_help_Meghan_2017-10-30T17:15:17.000421 | 1,509,383,717.000421 | 98,673 |
pythondev | help | <@Elanor> what is it about OrderedDict that think won't work? | 2017-10-30T17:16:28.000192 | Seema | pythondev_help_Seema_2017-10-30T17:16:28.000192 | 1,509,383,788.000192 | 98,674 |
pythondev | help | and is the creation of the dictionary a one-time thing? | 2017-10-30T17:17:44.000098 | Seema | pythondev_help_Seema_2017-10-30T17:17:44.000098 | 1,509,383,864.000098 | 98,675 |
pythondev | help | my dict's value is another dictionary | 2017-10-30T17:19:50.000161 | Elanor | pythondev_help_Elanor_2017-10-30T17:19:50.000161 | 1,509,383,990.000161 | 98,676 |
pythondev | help | conceptually it doesn't change the problem of ordering if it is nested or not | 2017-10-30T17:30:09.000030 | Lory | pythondev_help_Lory_2017-10-30T17:30:09.000030 | 1,509,384,609.00003 | 98,677 |
pythondev | help | I think I solved this problem , because I have enabled the timpestamp | 2017-10-30T17:32:13.000244 | Elanor | pythondev_help_Elanor_2017-10-30T17:32:13.000244 | 1,509,384,733.000244 | 98,678 |
pythondev | help | and then I dont need to have the dictionary ordered or not , since it will come with timestamp | 2017-10-30T17:32:36.000128 | Elanor | pythondev_help_Elanor_2017-10-30T17:32:36.000128 | 1,509,384,756.000128 | 98,679 |
pythondev | help | Yeah there's an easy method there | 2017-10-30T17:52:14.000196 | Lory | pythondev_help_Lory_2017-10-30T17:52:14.000196 | 1,509,385,934.000196 | 98,680 |
pythondev | help | Hi, I recently was asked to work on a django project and I’m having a little difficulty getting the app set up locally. Python 3.6 and django 1.11. I created the database and went to run the migration files, but I get an error saying “relation table_name does not exist”. That table should be created by the first mig... | 2017-10-30T18:27:56.000147 | Daysi | pythondev_help_Daysi_2017-10-30T18:27:56.000147 | 1,509,388,076.000147 | 98,681 |
pythondev | help | You should probably run your own. Who knows what state the DB was in when those first migrations were generated | 2017-10-30T18:30:37.000123 | Rosetta | pythondev_help_Rosetta_2017-10-30T18:30:37.000123 | 1,509,388,237.000123 | 98,682 |
pythondev | help | It sounds like you're missing some or the tables/database were created outside of Django | 2017-10-30T18:31:00.000047 | Rosetta | pythondev_help_Rosetta_2017-10-30T18:31:00.000047 | 1,509,388,260.000047 | 98,683 |
pythondev | help | should I delete the migrations folder and run makemigrations? | 2017-10-30T18:31:33.000220 | Daysi | pythondev_help_Daysi_2017-10-30T18:31:33.000220 | 1,509,388,293.00022 | 98,684 |
pythondev | help | Yes.. | 2017-10-30T18:32:43.000266 | Cammy | pythondev_help_Cammy_2017-10-30T18:32:43.000266 | 1,509,388,363.000266 | 98,685 |
pythondev | help | an make sure you have the database existing | 2017-10-30T18:33:03.000466 | Cammy | pythondev_help_Cammy_2017-10-30T18:33:03.000466 | 1,509,388,383.000466 | 98,686 |
pythondev | help | makemigrations and migrate.. | 2017-10-30T18:33:34.000261 | Cammy | pythondev_help_Cammy_2017-10-30T18:33:34.000261 | 1,509,388,414.000261 | 98,687 |
pythondev | help | the database exists, so I deleted the migrations folder and ran makemigrations, I got the same error as before. ‘’'psycopg2.ProgrammingError: relation “proposals_proposal” does not exist
LINE 1: ...estions”, “proposals_proposal”.“final_price” FROM “proposals...‘’' | 2017-10-30T18:35:24.000419 | Daysi | pythondev_help_Daysi_2017-10-30T18:35:24.000419 | 1,509,388,524.000419 | 98,688 |
pythondev | help | Try running `manage.py migrate proposals` | 2017-10-30T18:48:58.000009 | Rosetta | pythondev_help_Rosetta_2017-10-30T18:48:58.000009 | 1,509,389,338.000009 | 98,689 |
pythondev | help | I've had migrations that got in to a state where one app had to be run before all the others | 2017-10-30T18:49:38.000244 | Rosetta | pythondev_help_Rosetta_2017-10-30T18:49:38.000244 | 1,509,389,378.000244 | 98,690 |
pythondev | help | same error, it’s like it’s stuck! I can’t get away from it. | 2017-10-30T18:52:54.000155 | Daysi | pythondev_help_Daysi_2017-10-30T18:52:54.000155 | 1,509,389,574.000155 | 98,691 |
pythondev | help | Which migration file is throwing the error? | 2017-10-30T18:59:59.000162 | Rosetta | pythondev_help_Rosetta_2017-10-30T18:59:59.000162 | 1,509,389,999.000162 | 98,692 |
pythondev | help | Well, there isn’t any migration files now, I deleted the entire directory. So in theory, it shouldn’t be throwing an error at all on a migration file. | 2017-10-30T19:05:11.000099 | Daysi | pythondev_help_Daysi_2017-10-30T19:05:11.000099 | 1,509,390,311.000099 | 98,693 |
pythondev | help | but prior to deleting the directory, I ran the very first migration file 0001_initial.py and it produced the same error. | 2017-10-30T19:06:01.000031 | Daysi | pythondev_help_Daysi_2017-10-30T19:06:01.000031 | 1,509,390,361.000031 | 98,694 |
pythondev | help | CAn you share the stack trace | 2017-10-30T19:31:57.000266 | Rosetta | pythondev_help_Rosetta_2017-10-30T19:31:57.000266 | 1,509,391,917.000266 | 98,695 |
pythondev | help | You can add an `__init__` and then print the variables of your choice. <@Vena> | 2017-10-30T23:48:21.000123 | Rosa | pythondev_help_Rosa_2017-10-30T23:48:21.000123 | 1,509,407,301.000123 | 98,696 |
pythondev | help | so, when making a library that you plan on only supporting 3.6+, do you still use or worry about things like `six` or custom `compat.py` modules? | 2017-10-31T00:08:20.000051 | Bruno | pythondev_help_Bruno_2017-10-31T00:08:20.000051 | 1,509,408,500.000051 | 98,697 |
pythondev | help | <@Bruno> I don't. Why? | 2017-10-31T00:08:43.000036 | Collette | pythondev_help_Collette_2017-10-31T00:08:43.000036 | 1,509,408,523.000036 | 98,698 |
pythondev | help | just curious. i havent either. | 2017-10-31T00:11:28.000191 | Bruno | pythondev_help_Bruno_2017-10-31T00:11:28.000191 | 1,509,408,688.000191 | 98,699 |
pythondev | help | Morning everyone! :} | 2017-10-31T00:14:17.000094 | Ricki | pythondev_help_Ricki_2017-10-31T00:14:17.000094 | 1,509,408,857.000094 | 98,700 |
pythondev | help | good evening | 2017-10-31T00:14:42.000044 | Bruno | pythondev_help_Bruno_2017-10-31T00:14:42.000044 | 1,509,408,882.000044 | 98,701 |
pythondev | help | <@Bruno> i would love some help if you don't mind me asking | 2017-10-31T00:15:32.000112 | Ricki | pythondev_help_Ricki_2017-10-31T00:15:32.000112 | 1,509,408,932.000112 | 98,702 |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.