text
stringlengths
1
2.97k
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>labnetwork mailing list
>labnetwork at mtl.mit.edu
>https://www-mtl.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo.cgi/labnetwork
Daniel C. Christensen
dan at engr.wisc.edu
Univ of WI-Madison
(608) 262-6877
FAX (608) 265-2614
---
From mtang at stanford.edu Wed Feb 18 01:13:38 2009
From: mtang at stanford.edu (Mary Tang)
Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2009 22:13:38 -0800
Subject: [labnetwork] Toxic Gas Monitoring System Survey
Message-ID: <499BA712.8020800@stanford.edu>
Dear Labnetwork Members --
We're taking a good, hard look at our toxic gas monitoring systems here
at the Stanford Nanofab -- and are wondering what other University
facilities do for monitoring. We've spoken with several other
facilities informally, but thought a survey might be a more systematic
way of gathering information -- and if the discussions we've had so far
are any indication, might be of general interest to many of those on
this list working with life safety systems.
So, we've put together a survey consisting of 20 questions, mostly of
the button-click type, but with plenty of opportunity for comment. We
would really appreciate your inputs. If people are willing, we'll post
results to this list. The survey link is here:
http://www.surveymonkey.com/s.aspx?sm=28zi33siVWKKSbvjXg9NUg_3d_3d
Just a bit of background: Our TGO system was designed and specified
some years ago. Some of the modules are no longer supported or are in
danger of becoming obsolete. The technology has improved since then,
but there still does not seem to be a simple solution to our needs for
reliability, ease of maintenance, and need for research flexibility.
Our needs are certainly not unique, and we are hoping to learn from your
collective experience.
And if you'd rather not participate in a survey but are willing to share
your experiences, please do give me a call -- advice, comments, and
suggestions are appreciated!
Thanks!
Mary
____
Mary X. Tang, Ph.D.
Process Manager
Stanford Nanofabrication Facility
420 Via Palou Mall
Stanford, CA. 94305-4070
(650)723-9980
http://snf.stanford.edu
From dan at engr.wisc.edu Wed Feb 18 10:25:16 2009
From: dan at engr.wisc.edu (Daniel Christensen)
Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2009 09:25:16 -0600
Subject: [labnetwork] Reply: Toxic Gas Monitoring System Survey
Message-ID: <7.0.1.0.2.20090218092252.02be0d70@engr.wisc.edu>
Mary,
I input the data from the Univ of Wisconsin into your survey. I
would be very interested in the results when they are
compiled. Thank you for taking the time to do this....
Dan C
Daniel C. Christensen
dan at engr.wisc.edu
Univ of WI-Madison
(608) 262-6877
FAX (608) 265-2614
From mtang at stanford.edu Wed Feb 18 13:26:41 2009
From: mtang at stanford.edu (Mary Tang)
Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2009 10:26:41 -0800
Subject: [labnetwork] Toxic Gas Monitoring System Survey
In-Reply-To: <499BA712.8020800@stanford.edu>
References: <499BA712.8020800@stanford.edu>
Message-ID: <499C52E1.90208@stanford.edu>
Hello again --
Gosh, it's only been a few hours since the posting and we've got 10
responders! And we've also had the feedback that more confidentiality
would be appreciated. So, rather than spam the network, we will
distribute results just to survey participants. If other labnetwork
members are interested in the results, please email me and I'll send you
an anonymous version of the results.
We'll keep the survey open for a week. Thanks again to those of who are
participating -- based on what we've seen so far, many of our
experiences are quite similar...
Mary
Mary Tang wrote:
> Dear Labnetwork Members --
>
>
> We're taking a good, hard look at our toxic gas monitoring systems here
> at the Stanford Nanofab -- and are wondering what other University
> facilities do for monitoring. We've spoken with several other
> facilities informally, but thought a survey might be a more systematic
> way of gathering information -- and if the discussions we've had so far
> are any indication, might be of general interest to many of those on
> this list working with life safety systems.
>
>
> So, we've put together a survey consisting of 20 questions, mostly of
> the button-click type, but with plenty of opportunity for comment. We
> would really appreciate your inputs. If people are willing, we'll post
> results to this list. The survey link is here: