text stringlengths 1 2.97k |
|---|
Phone: (609) 258-4626 |
Fax: (609) 258-3585 |
Pager: (888) 200-3481 |
E-mail: gleskova at princeton.edu |
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |
From mark.crain at louisville.edu Tue Feb 20 13:39:53 2007 |
From: mark.crain at louisville.edu (Mark M Crain) |
Date: Tue, 20 Feb 2007 13:39:53 -0500 |
Subject: [labnetwork] Cleanroom Buddy protocol |
Message-ID: <45DAFA2A.716B.0008.0@gwise.louisville.edu> |
Hi Everyone |
I am interested in an informal survey of facilities implementing a |
*buddy system* in their multi user labs. Our microfabrication |
cleanroom user base is around 50 research students and staff. The user |
size of this facility puts us in a situation where there may not always |
2 or more people in the cleanroom at all times; this has precipitated a |
number of requests from students and faculty about conditions in which |
they can enter the cleanroom as a *solitary user*. |
Here are some of the conditions in which people want to be able to work |
in the facility alone. |
1) staff cleaning the floors, stock wafers, organize in dry bays |
alone |
2) using tools like profilometers, ellipsometers, or wire bonder |
alone |
3) sputtering and evaporation systems |
4) Can staff walk through chemical storage areas alone? |
5) What is your schools *buddy system* policy for individual |
researchers labs? |
6) Do cameras and a TGM system count as a buddy? |
PRO*s to the *Solitary User* |
Researchers can work during hours most productive to them. It*s good |
to have happy paying users. |
CON*s to the *Solitary User* |
Even if the solitary access requests are to complete some relatively |
safe task, there are still many hazards in the facility and some |
equipment (furnaces, PECVD) may actually be in active use even without |
the tool user being in the room. This is the foundation of my concern |
for permitting any *solitary users*. Users may be tempted to do |
short unapproved *solitary user* processes like an HF dip before a |
potentially approved process such as sputtering. |
I am looking forward your replies about the Buddy System. Thank you |
for your time. |
Mark Crain |
Cleanroom Manager |
University of Louisville |
From mark.crain at louisville.edu Mon Feb 26 16:14:50 2007 |
From: mark.crain at louisville.edu (Mark M Crain) |
Date: Mon, 26 Feb 2007 16:14:50 -0500 |
Subject: [labnetwork] Buddy System Synopsis |
Message-ID: <45E3077B.716B.0008.0@gwise.louisville.edu> |
Hi Everyone |
I am sure it has come as no surprise that there were a range of answers |
regarding the implementation of the *buddy system*. Of the |
respondents, it seems that the buddy system is used mostly to address |
requirements of the cleanroom users defined as Student, Staff |
Researcher, or External User. There was no real discussion of a buddy |
system required for those who are maintenance staff. Some respondents |
use interlocks to prevent unauthorized use of equipment and others |
depend on the honor system. In our facility the wet benches are really |
the most dangerous tools we have, so I would be interested in knowing |
how those can be interlocked. |
Here are the composite answers to the "solitary users" conditions we |
are considering |
1) Staff cleaning the floors, stock wafers, organize in dry bays |
Alone |
(Answer: Requires no buddy according to all respondents |
who addressed the issue.) |
2) Using tools like profilometers, ellipsometers, or wire bonder |
Alone |
(Answer: Requires no buddy by a majority of |
respondents.) |
3) sputtering and evaporation systems |
(Answer: Needs a buddy by most respondents.) |
4) Can staff walk through chemical storage areas alone? |
(Answer: No buddy required by majority of |
respondents.) |
5) What is your schools *buddy system* policy for individual |
researchers labs? |
(Answer: No Reply, I am guessing that most |
schools have not gotten to the point of addressing this policy.) |
7) Do cameras and a TGM system count as a buddy? |
(Answer: Of course not!) |
Based on the results, we plan to implement a solitary user policy so |
that profilometers, ellipsometers, microscope, and probe stations can be |
used alone. Staff should be allowed to clean non wet bench areas alone, |
take inventory, stock non hazardous items, and inspect areas without a |
buddy. Maintenance and tool hook up will require a buddy. |
Thank You all for the comments and insight. |
Best Regards, |
Mark |
--- |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.