sentence1
stringclasses
538 values
sentence2
stringlengths
12
241
labels
stringclasses
2 values
metadata
stringlengths
187
265
There is a need for developing tactical nuclear weapons
The development of tactical nuclear weapons by one state would lead to a new global arms race.
UNDERMINE
{"claim_id": 281, "id": "281:2082", "native_cluster": [2082], "perspective_id": 2082, "split_group_id": "7ccb7c6150072a2f49318cfc4fbf15e2561afbc9e8107292d94879d9f06e50d5", "votes": [0, 0, 0, 3, 0]}
There is a need for developing tactical nuclear weapons
Countries need to design nuclear devices to adapt with changing defensive technology.
SUPPORT
{"claim_id": 281, "id": "281:2074", "native_cluster": [2074], "perspective_id": 2074, "split_group_id": "7ccb7c6150072a2f49318cfc4fbf15e2561afbc9e8107292d94879d9f06e50d5", "votes": [3, 0, 0, 0, 0]}
There is a need for developing tactical nuclear weapons
Tactical nuclear weapons are very expensive to design and build, yet will likely have no new strategic value.
UNDERMINE
{"claim_id": 281, "id": "281:2079", "native_cluster": [2079], "perspective_id": 2079, "split_group_id": "7ccb7c6150072a2f49318cfc4fbf15e2561afbc9e8107292d94879d9f06e50d5", "votes": [0, 0, 0, 3, 0]}
There is a need for developing tactical nuclear weapons
Tactical nuclear warheads are more serviceable for use in intimidation and retaliation toward enemies, as they are considerably less catastrophically destructive than those of current nuclear arsenals.
SUPPORT
{"claim_id": 281, "id": "281:2076", "native_cluster": [2076], "perspective_id": 2076, "split_group_id": "7ccb7c6150072a2f49318cfc4fbf15e2561afbc9e8107292d94879d9f06e50d5", "votes": [3, 0, 0, 0, 0]}
There is a need for developing tactical nuclear weapons
The way tactical nuclear weapons need to be deployed control of their use is devolved to field commanders, vastly increasing the probability that in the event of conflict they would be used.
UNDERMINE
{"claim_id": 281, "id": "281:2081", "native_cluster": [2081], "perspective_id": 2081, "split_group_id": "7ccb7c6150072a2f49318cfc4fbf15e2561afbc9e8107292d94879d9f06e50d5", "votes": [0, 0, 1, 2, 0]}
There is a need for developing tactical nuclear weapons
Humanitarian intervention becomes impossible in states that possess nuclear weapons
UNDERMINE
{"claim_id": 281, "id": "281:1573", "native_cluster": [1573, 22362, 22364], "perspective_id": 1573, "split_group_id": "7ccb7c6150072a2f49318cfc4fbf15e2561afbc9e8107292d94879d9f06e50d5", "votes": [0, 0, 0, 3, 0]}
There is a need for developing tactical nuclear weapons
The threat of a state developing nuclear weapons could instigate pre-emptive strikes from its neighbours and rivals to prevent the acquisition of such weapons
UNDERMINE
{"claim_id": 281, "id": "281:1575", "native_cluster": [1575, 22369, 22370, 22372], "perspective_id": 1575, "split_group_id": "7ccb7c6150072a2f49318cfc4fbf15e2561afbc9e8107292d94879d9f06e50d5", "votes": [0, 0, 1, 2, 0]}
There is a need for developing tactical nuclear weapons
Nuclear weapons are required for deterrence
SUPPORT
{"claim_id": 281, "id": "281:2088", "native_cluster": [2088, 1570], "perspective_id": 2088, "split_group_id": "7ccb7c6150072a2f49318cfc4fbf15e2561afbc9e8107292d94879d9f06e50d5", "votes": [2, 1, 0, 0, 0]}
There is a need for developing tactical nuclear weapons
Nuclear weapons give states valuable agenda-setting power on the international stage
SUPPORT
{"claim_id": 281, "id": "281:1568", "native_cluster": [1568, 22357, 22359], "perspective_id": 1568, "split_group_id": "7ccb7c6150072a2f49318cfc4fbf15e2561afbc9e8107292d94879d9f06e50d5", "votes": [2, 1, 0, 0, 0]}
There is a need for developing tactical nuclear weapons
Possessing nuclear weapons will be counter to the peaceful interests of states
UNDERMINE
{"claim_id": 281, "id": "281:1574", "native_cluster": [1574], "perspective_id": 1574, "split_group_id": "7ccb7c6150072a2f49318cfc4fbf15e2561afbc9e8107292d94879d9f06e50d5", "votes": [0, 0, 1, 2, 0]}
There is a need for developing tactical nuclear weapons
No country has an inherent right to invade or use aggression against another.
SUPPORT
{"claim_id": 281, "id": "281:1989", "native_cluster": [1989], "perspective_id": 1989, "split_group_id": "7ccb7c6150072a2f49318cfc4fbf15e2561afbc9e8107292d94879d9f06e50d5", "votes": [0, 3, 0, 0, 0]}
There is a need for developing tactical nuclear weapons
The United States has an obligation to protect international stability due to its unique military strength.
UNDERMINE
{"claim_id": 281, "id": "281:1982", "native_cluster": [1982, 22725, 22726], "perspective_id": 1982, "split_group_id": "7ccb7c6150072a2f49318cfc4fbf15e2561afbc9e8107292d94879d9f06e50d5", "votes": [0, 0, 0, 1, 2]}
There is a need for developing tactical nuclear weapons
Nuclear waste disposal is rarely safe/efficient; it is too much to expect a sqeaky clean disposal/disarmament of nuclear weapons
UNDERMINE
{"claim_id": 281, "id": "281:5265", "native_cluster": [5265], "perspective_id": 5265, "split_group_id": "7ccb7c6150072a2f49318cfc4fbf15e2561afbc9e8107292d94879d9f06e50d5", "votes": [1, 1, 0, 0, 0]}
There is a need for developing tactical nuclear weapons
Disarmament is impossible, rendering efforts to disarm pointless and simply wasteful
SUPPORT
{"claim_id": 281, "id": "281:5264", "native_cluster": [5264, 2089], "perspective_id": 5264, "split_group_id": "7ccb7c6150072a2f49318cfc4fbf15e2561afbc9e8107292d94879d9f06e50d5", "votes": [0, 0, 1, 1, 0]}
There is a need for developing tactical nuclear weapons
Small countries would be able to pursue their independence without having to rely on larger countries.
SUPPORT
{"claim_id": 281, "id": "281:26469", "native_cluster": [26469, 25670, 26470, 25671, 5262, 6621], "perspective_id": 26469, "split_group_id": "7ccb7c6150072a2f49318cfc4fbf15e2561afbc9e8107292d94879d9f06e50d5", "votes": [0, 2, 0, 0, 0]}
There is a need for developing tactical nuclear weapons
The abolition of nuclear weapons would actually incentivize the development and use of even more dangerous weapons, such as chemical and biological weapons
SUPPORT
{"claim_id": 281, "id": "281:5263", "native_cluster": [5263], "perspective_id": 5263, "split_group_id": "7ccb7c6150072a2f49318cfc4fbf15e2561afbc9e8107292d94879d9f06e50d5", "votes": [0, 2, 0, 0, 0]}
There is a need for developing tactical nuclear weapons
Proliferation of nuclear weapons increases the chances of nuclear accidents
UNDERMINE
{"claim_id": 281, "id": "281:5257", "native_cluster": [5257], "perspective_id": 5257, "split_group_id": "7ccb7c6150072a2f49318cfc4fbf15e2561afbc9e8107292d94879d9f06e50d5", "votes": [0, 0, 0, 0, 2]}
There is a need for developing tactical nuclear weapons
Nuclear weapons can fall into the wrong hands.
UNDERMINE
{"claim_id": 281, "id": "281:1984", "native_cluster": [1984, 2085, 5254, 22727, 22728, 5255], "perspective_id": 1984, "split_group_id": "7ccb7c6150072a2f49318cfc4fbf15e2561afbc9e8107292d94879d9f06e50d5", "votes": [1, 1, 0, 0, 0]}
There is a need for developing tactical nuclear weapons
Irrational leaders make the possession of nuclear weapons dangerous
UNDERMINE
{"claim_id": 281, "id": "281:5256", "native_cluster": [5256], "perspective_id": 5256, "split_group_id": "7ccb7c6150072a2f49318cfc4fbf15e2561afbc9e8107292d94879d9f06e50d5", "votes": [0, 0, 0, 0, 2]}
There is a need for developing tactical nuclear weapons
It is immoral to use the threat of nuclear annihilation in order to achieve foreign policy aims
UNDERMINE
{"claim_id": 281, "id": "281:5258", "native_cluster": [5258], "perspective_id": 5258, "split_group_id": "7ccb7c6150072a2f49318cfc4fbf15e2561afbc9e8107292d94879d9f06e50d5", "votes": [0, 0, 0, 0, 2]}
There is a need for developing tactical nuclear weapons
All the people worldwide have the same rights and are equal to one another.
SUPPORT
{"claim_id": 281, "id": "281:6620", "native_cluster": [6620], "perspective_id": 6620, "split_group_id": "7ccb7c6150072a2f49318cfc4fbf15e2561afbc9e8107292d94879d9f06e50d5", "votes": [2, 1, 0, 0, 0]}
There is a need for developing tactical nuclear weapons
The pursuit of nuclear defence (respectively the possession of nuclear weapons) by more countries is a guarantee for peace.
SUPPORT
{"claim_id": 281, "id": "281:6619", "native_cluster": [6619], "perspective_id": 6619, "split_group_id": "7ccb7c6150072a2f49318cfc4fbf15e2561afbc9e8107292d94879d9f06e50d5", "votes": [3, 0, 0, 0, 0]}
There is a need for developing tactical nuclear weapons
any conflict will rapidly de-escalate
SUPPORT
{"claim_id": 281, "id": "281:5410", "native_cluster": [5410, 25769, 25770], "perspective_id": 5410, "split_group_id": "7ccb7c6150072a2f49318cfc4fbf15e2561afbc9e8107292d94879d9f06e50d5", "votes": [3, 0, 0, 0, 0]}
There is a need for developing tactical nuclear weapons
both sides will avoid threatening vital interests
SUPPORT
{"claim_id": 281, "id": "281:5411", "native_cluster": [5411], "perspective_id": 5411, "split_group_id": "7ccb7c6150072a2f49318cfc4fbf15e2561afbc9e8107292d94879d9f06e50d5", "votes": [3, 0, 0, 0, 0]}
There is a need for developing tactical nuclear weapons
Both the use and threat of nuclear weapons are illegal
UNDERMINE
{"claim_id": 281, "id": "281:2086", "native_cluster": [2086], "perspective_id": 2086, "split_group_id": "7ccb7c6150072a2f49318cfc4fbf15e2561afbc9e8107292d94879d9f06e50d5", "votes": [0, 0, 0, 3, 0]}
Greece should default on its debt and return to the Drachma
Defaulting would be the quickest route to economic recovery
SUPPORT
{"claim_id": 231, "id": "231:1706", "native_cluster": [1706], "perspective_id": 1706, "split_group_id": "cb20414d728b1408a485146843cb4b55907db584f8ab155e9bc37aa378d504fb", "votes": [3, 0, 0, 0, 0]}
Greece should default on its debt and return to the Drachma
A Greek default would have a negative domino-effect on other Eurozone countries.
UNDERMINE
{"claim_id": 231, "id": "231:1710", "native_cluster": [1710], "perspective_id": 1710, "split_group_id": "cb20414d728b1408a485146843cb4b55907db584f8ab155e9bc37aa378d504fb", "votes": [0, 0, 0, 3, 0]}
The state should provide broadband internet through nationalized companies
The state can work more effectively through the private sector
UNDERMINE
{"claim_id": 152, "id": "152:1126", "native_cluster": [1126], "perspective_id": 1126, "split_group_id": "9816dc13d5feddf9d1ef340cd7e5bd86dcac0dc035cc5b9b40a526017b16be11", "votes": [0, 0, 2, 1, 0]}
The state should provide broadband internet through nationalized companies
It would provide an efficient service for everyone
SUPPORT
{"claim_id": 152, "id": "152:1122", "native_cluster": [1122, 21873, 21874], "perspective_id": 1122, "split_group_id": "9816dc13d5feddf9d1ef340cd7e5bd86dcac0dc035cc5b9b40a526017b16be11", "votes": [2, 1, 0, 0, 0]}
The state should provide broadband internet through nationalized companies
The information age demands a right to broadband access
SUPPORT
{"claim_id": 152, "id": "152:1121", "native_cluster": [1121, 21871, 21872], "perspective_id": 1121, "split_group_id": "9816dc13d5feddf9d1ef340cd7e5bd86dcac0dc035cc5b9b40a526017b16be11", "votes": [3, 0, 0, 0, 0]}
The state should provide broadband internet through nationalized companies
Broad-based access to broadband is essential for countries to be competitive and to excel
SUPPORT
{"claim_id": 152, "id": "152:1123", "native_cluster": [1123, 21875, 21876], "perspective_id": 1123, "split_group_id": "9816dc13d5feddf9d1ef340cd7e5bd86dcac0dc035cc5b9b40a526017b16be11", "votes": [2, 1, 0, 0, 0]}
Immunity for head of state is a good idea
Necessity for diplomatic relations
SUPPORT
{"claim_id": 368, "id": "368:2738", "native_cluster": [2738], "perspective_id": 2738, "split_group_id": "1e280597719098d9125c0659b9b58700984d2c642c5946074723e97e6a1adbe5", "votes": [3, 0, 0, 0, 0]}
Immunity for head of state is a good idea
Helps avoid political stunt trials
SUPPORT
{"claim_id": 368, "id": "368:2739", "native_cluster": [2739, 23348, 23349], "perspective_id": 2739, "split_group_id": "1e280597719098d9125c0659b9b58700984d2c642c5946074723e97e6a1adbe5", "votes": [2, 1, 0, 0, 0]}
The Death Penalty Should Be Imposed For Acts Of Terror That Cause Death
There are more efficient policies than death penalty
UNDERMINE
{"claim_id": 674, "id": "674:5608", "native_cluster": [5608, 25893, 25894], "perspective_id": 5608, "split_group_id": "5ea0661c9105ef1885bc6222e389d90d4aef459af3c7c20a8832ed138e38d8c8", "votes": [0, 0, 0, 3, 0]}
The Death Penalty Should Be Imposed For Acts Of Terror That Cause Death
we are increasing the hate inside terrorist organizations and the dead person will be seen as a hero that animates their fight.
UNDERMINE
{"claim_id": 674, "id": "674:5609", "native_cluster": [5609, 25895, 25896], "perspective_id": 5609, "split_group_id": "5ea0661c9105ef1885bc6222e389d90d4aef459af3c7c20a8832ed138e38d8c8", "votes": [0, 0, 0, 3, 0]}
The Death Penalty Should Be Imposed For Acts Of Terror That Cause Death
Execution helps alleviate the overcrowding of prisons.
SUPPORT
{"claim_id": 674, "id": "674:2221", "native_cluster": [2221, 23019, 23020], "perspective_id": 2221, "split_group_id": "5ea0661c9105ef1885bc6222e389d90d4aef459af3c7c20a8832ed138e38d8c8", "votes": [3, 1, 0, 0, 0]}
The Death Penalty Should Be Imposed For Acts Of Terror That Cause Death
The death penalty can produce irreversible miscarriages of justice.
UNDERMINE
{"claim_id": 674, "id": "674:2225", "native_cluster": [2225, 23025, 23026], "perspective_id": 2225, "split_group_id": "5ea0661c9105ef1885bc6222e389d90d4aef459af3c7c20a8832ed138e38d8c8", "votes": [0, 0, 0, 4, 0]}
The Death Penalty Should Be Imposed For Acts Of Terror That Cause Death
Necessary for punitive justice
SUPPORT
{"claim_id": 674, "id": "674:2722", "native_cluster": [2722, 23018, 2220], "perspective_id": 2722, "split_group_id": "5ea0661c9105ef1885bc6222e389d90d4aef459af3c7c20a8832ed138e38d8c8", "votes": [4, 0, 0, 0, 0]}
The Death Penalty Should Be Imposed For Acts Of Terror That Cause Death
The death penalty is a financial burden on the state.
UNDERMINE
{"claim_id": 674, "id": "674:2223", "native_cluster": [2223, 23023, 23024], "perspective_id": 2223, "split_group_id": "5ea0661c9105ef1885bc6222e389d90d4aef459af3c7c20a8832ed138e38d8c8", "votes": [0, 0, 1, 3, 0]}
The Death Penalty Should Be Imposed For Acts Of Terror That Cause Death
The penalty of death is a crime deterrent.
SUPPORT
{"claim_id": 674, "id": "674:23011", "native_cluster": [23011, 23012, 23013, 23014, 2218, 2219], "perspective_id": 23011, "split_group_id": "5ea0661c9105ef1885bc6222e389d90d4aef459af3c7c20a8832ed138e38d8c8", "votes": [4, 0, 0, 0, 0]}
The Death Penalty Should Be Imposed For Acts Of Terror That Cause Death
State-sanctioned killing is wrong.
UNDERMINE
{"claim_id": 674, "id": "674:2222", "native_cluster": [2222, 23021, 23022], "perspective_id": 2222, "split_group_id": "5ea0661c9105ef1885bc6222e389d90d4aef459af3c7c20a8832ed138e38d8c8", "votes": [0, 0, 1, 3, 0]}
The Death Penalty Should Be Imposed For Acts Of Terror That Cause Death
Too many innocents killed
UNDERMINE
{"claim_id": 674, "id": "674:2727", "native_cluster": [2727, 23344, 23345], "perspective_id": 2727, "split_group_id": "5ea0661c9105ef1885bc6222e389d90d4aef459af3c7c20a8832ed138e38d8c8", "votes": [0, 0, 0, 3, 0]}
The Death Penalty Should Be Imposed For Acts Of Terror That Cause Death
Can be reserved for the worst of the worst
SUPPORT
{"claim_id": 674, "id": "674:2724", "native_cluster": [2724, 23342, 23343], "perspective_id": 2724, "split_group_id": "5ea0661c9105ef1885bc6222e389d90d4aef459af3c7c20a8832ed138e38d8c8", "votes": [3, 0, 0, 0, 0]}
The Death Penalty Should Be Imposed For Acts Of Terror That Cause Death
Killers must die to satisfy society
SUPPORT
{"claim_id": 674, "id": "674:2725", "native_cluster": [2725], "perspective_id": 2725, "split_group_id": "5ea0661c9105ef1885bc6222e389d90d4aef459af3c7c20a8832ed138e38d8c8", "votes": [3, 0, 0, 0, 0]}
There should be video replays for refs in football
Only in Top Class football - make a monitor available to the match officials for replay of 'ball over the goal line' incidents only.
SUPPORT
{"claim_id": 692, "id": "692:5743", "native_cluster": [5743], "perspective_id": 5743, "split_group_id": "c0a7fd0d3467a7e9e88161aec4fc715233440c0f0779b6798fb7fbc4039c6de9", "votes": [2, 0, 0, 0, 0]}
There should be video replays for refs in football
Video replays would take away from the entertainment
UNDERMINE
{"claim_id": 692, "id": "692:5744", "native_cluster": [5744, 25946], "perspective_id": 5744, "split_group_id": "c0a7fd0d3467a7e9e88161aec4fc715233440c0f0779b6798fb7fbc4039c6de9", "votes": [0, 0, 0, 2, 0]}
There should be video replays for refs in football
Football is political and we love to analyse
SUPPORT
{"claim_id": 692, "id": "692:5746", "native_cluster": [5746], "perspective_id": 5746, "split_group_id": "c0a7fd0d3467a7e9e88161aec4fc715233440c0f0779b6798fb7fbc4039c6de9", "votes": [2, 0, 0, 0, 0]}
There should be video replays for refs in football
It would ruin football’s simplicity and non-exclusivity.
UNDERMINE
{"claim_id": 692, "id": "692:5747", "native_cluster": [5747, 25947, 25948], "perspective_id": 5747, "split_group_id": "c0a7fd0d3467a7e9e88161aec4fc715233440c0f0779b6798fb7fbc4039c6de9", "votes": [0, 0, 0, 2, 0]}
Slang prevent young people from being able to communicate properly
Slang prevents young people to become potential employers as well as prepared for the future
SUPPORT
{"claim_id": 737, "id": "737:6086", "native_cluster": [6086, 26128, 26129], "perspective_id": 6086, "split_group_id": "6c7462ef7e96e4052928eff659a5a5aeb82d65b846fe7a8ab4bf5ce75feda68f", "votes": [3, 0, 0, 0, 0]}
We must extend NATO membership to Georgia and Ukraine
Expansion is in the interests of NATO
SUPPORT
{"claim_id": 265, "id": "265:1951", "native_cluster": [1951, 22707], "perspective_id": 1951, "split_group_id": "2a3adf2f2543f528820b1886f1ed7ea4d7a61d64d05f92edf2982f0577748101", "votes": [2, 1, 0, 0, 0]}
We must extend NATO membership to Georgia and Ukraine
The people of Ukraine and Georgia want to join
SUPPORT
{"claim_id": 265, "id": "265:1950", "native_cluster": [1950, 22705], "perspective_id": 1950, "split_group_id": "2a3adf2f2543f528820b1886f1ed7ea4d7a61d64d05f92edf2982f0577748101", "votes": [1, 2, 0, 0, 0]}
We must extend NATO membership to Georgia and Ukraine
There is a strong precedent for expansion
SUPPORT
{"claim_id": 265, "id": "265:1952", "native_cluster": [1952, 22710], "perspective_id": 1952, "split_group_id": "2a3adf2f2543f528820b1886f1ed7ea4d7a61d64d05f92edf2982f0577748101", "votes": [2, 1, 0, 0, 0]}
Net neutrality should be restored
Net neutrality regulations are unnecessary because the internet developed amazingly well in their absence
UNDERMINE
{"claim_id": 600, "id": "600:5027", "native_cluster": [5027], "perspective_id": 5027, "split_group_id": "f20c9604fda711c3c8ffabd427bda5ffed41e857fd029de3137d3ee99356ea5a", "votes": [0, 0, 0, 6, 0]}
Net neutrality should be restored
Net neutrality reduces investment in internet services resulting in less access and higher costs for consumers
UNDERMINE
{"claim_id": 600, "id": "600:5029", "native_cluster": [5029], "perspective_id": 5029, "split_group_id": "f20c9604fda711c3c8ffabd427bda5ffed41e857fd029de3137d3ee99356ea5a", "votes": [0, 0, 0, 6, 0]}
Net neutrality should be restored
Net neutrality protects consumers by preventing ISPs from speeding, slowing, or charging higher fees for select online content
SUPPORT
{"claim_id": 600, "id": "600:5025", "native_cluster": [5025, 25444, 25445, 25446, 25447], "perspective_id": 5025, "split_group_id": "f20c9604fda711c3c8ffabd427bda5ffed41e857fd029de3137d3ee99356ea5a", "votes": [6, 0, 0, 0, 0]}
Net neutrality should be restored
Net neutrality created burdensome and overreaching regulations to govern the internet
UNDERMINE
{"claim_id": 600, "id": "600:5028", "native_cluster": [5028, 25452, 25453, 25454, 25455, 8115], "perspective_id": 5028, "split_group_id": "f20c9604fda711c3c8ffabd427bda5ffed41e857fd029de3137d3ee99356ea5a", "votes": [0, 0, 0, 6, 0]}
Net neutrality should be restored
Free speech is a right that should be allowed online.
SUPPORT
{"claim_id": 600, "id": "600:25440", "native_cluster": [25440, 5024, 25441, 25442, 27209, 27210, 8113], "perspective_id": 25440, "split_group_id": "f20c9604fda711c3c8ffabd427bda5ffed41e857fd029de3137d3ee99356ea5a", "votes": [5, 1, 0, 0, 0]}
Net neutrality should be restored
Net neutrality is required to preserve the existing structure of the internet.
SUPPORT
{"claim_id": 600, "id": "600:8117", "native_cluster": [8117], "perspective_id": 8117, "split_group_id": "f20c9604fda711c3c8ffabd427bda5ffed41e857fd029de3137d3ee99356ea5a", "votes": [2, 0, 0, 0, 0]}
Net neutrality should be restored
A government that ensures net neutrality is one that violates principles of freedom.
UNDERMINE
{"claim_id": 600, "id": "600:8119", "native_cluster": [8119, 27211, 27212], "perspective_id": 8119, "split_group_id": "f20c9604fda711c3c8ffabd427bda5ffed41e857fd029de3137d3ee99356ea5a", "votes": [0, 0, 0, 2, 0]}
Net neutrality should be restored
Net neutrality provides for the free circulation of data and services.
SUPPORT
{"claim_id": 600, "id": "600:8112", "native_cluster": [8112], "perspective_id": 8112, "split_group_id": "f20c9604fda711c3c8ffabd427bda5ffed41e857fd029de3137d3ee99356ea5a", "votes": [2, 0, 0, 0, 0]}
Net neutrality should be restored
Ensuring net neutrality represents excessive government regulation and control over business.
UNDERMINE
{"claim_id": 600, "id": "600:8118", "native_cluster": [8118], "perspective_id": 8118, "split_group_id": "f20c9604fda711c3c8ffabd427bda5ffed41e857fd029de3137d3ee99356ea5a", "votes": [0, 0, 0, 2, 0]}
Net neutrality should be restored
Net neutrality promotes competition by providing a level playing field for new companies
SUPPORT
{"claim_id": 600, "id": "600:5026", "native_cluster": [5026, 25448, 25449, 25450, 25451, 8114], "perspective_id": 5026, "split_group_id": "f20c9604fda711c3c8ffabd427bda5ffed41e857fd029de3137d3ee99356ea5a", "votes": [2, 0, 0, 0, 0]}
States ought not possess nuclear weapons
Nuclear waste disposal is rarely safe/efficient; it is too much to expect a sqeaky clean disposal/disarmament of nuclear weapons
SUPPORT
{"claim_id": 633, "id": "633:5265", "native_cluster": [5265], "perspective_id": 5265, "split_group_id": "6f8d28dec116e556f453dd869b6df513f5f4f4dcfe891a25087673ad0363e3f1", "votes": [1, 1, 0, 0, 0]}
States ought not possess nuclear weapons
Disarmament is impossible, rendering efforts to disarm pointless and simply wasteful
UNDERMINE
{"claim_id": 633, "id": "633:5264", "native_cluster": [5264, 5708], "perspective_id": 5264, "split_group_id": "6f8d28dec116e556f453dd869b6df513f5f4f4dcfe891a25087673ad0363e3f1", "votes": [0, 0, 1, 1, 0]}
States ought not possess nuclear weapons
Disarmament would actually cause increased insecurity among nations, as there can never be any guarantee that a nation has disarmed
UNDERMINE
{"claim_id": 633, "id": "633:5262", "native_cluster": [5262, 25670, 25671], "perspective_id": 5262, "split_group_id": "6f8d28dec116e556f453dd869b6df513f5f4f4dcfe891a25087673ad0363e3f1", "votes": [0, 0, 0, 2, 0]}
States ought not possess nuclear weapons
The abolition of nuclear weapons would actually incentivize the development and use of even more dangerous weapons, such as chemical and biological weapons
UNDERMINE
{"claim_id": 633, "id": "633:5263", "native_cluster": [5263], "perspective_id": 5263, "split_group_id": "6f8d28dec116e556f453dd869b6df513f5f4f4dcfe891a25087673ad0363e3f1", "votes": [0, 0, 0, 2, 0]}
States ought not possess nuclear weapons
Proliferation of nuclear weapons increases the chances of nuclear accidents
SUPPORT
{"claim_id": 633, "id": "633:5257", "native_cluster": [5257], "perspective_id": 5257, "split_group_id": "6f8d28dec116e556f453dd869b6df513f5f4f4dcfe891a25087673ad0363e3f1", "votes": [2, 0, 0, 0, 0]}
States ought not possess nuclear weapons
Irrational leaders make the possession of nuclear weapons dangerous
SUPPORT
{"claim_id": 633, "id": "633:5256", "native_cluster": [5256], "perspective_id": 5256, "split_group_id": "6f8d28dec116e556f453dd869b6df513f5f4f4dcfe891a25087673ad0363e3f1", "votes": [2, 0, 0, 0, 0]}
States ought not possess nuclear weapons
It is immoral to use the threat of nuclear annihilation in order to achieve foreign policy aims
SUPPORT
{"claim_id": 633, "id": "633:5258", "native_cluster": [5258], "perspective_id": 5258, "split_group_id": "6f8d28dec116e556f453dd869b6df513f5f4f4dcfe891a25087673ad0363e3f1", "votes": [2, 0, 0, 0, 0]}
States ought not possess nuclear weapons
Nuclear weapons can fall into the wrong hands.
SUPPORT
{"claim_id": 633, "id": "633:1984", "native_cluster": [1984, 5254, 5255, 22728, 22727], "perspective_id": 1984, "split_group_id": "6f8d28dec116e556f453dd869b6df513f5f4f4dcfe891a25087673ad0363e3f1", "votes": [2, 0, 0, 0, 0]}
States ought not possess nuclear weapons
Humanitarian intervention becomes impossible in states that possess nuclear weapons
SUPPORT
{"claim_id": 633, "id": "633:1573", "native_cluster": [1573, 22362, 22364], "perspective_id": 1573, "split_group_id": "6f8d28dec116e556f453dd869b6df513f5f4f4dcfe891a25087673ad0363e3f1", "votes": [0, 3, 0, 0, 0]}
States ought not possess nuclear weapons
The threat of a state developing nuclear weapons could instigate pre-emptive strikes from its neighbours and rivals to prevent the acquisition of such weapons
SUPPORT
{"claim_id": 633, "id": "633:1575", "native_cluster": [1575, 22369, 22370, 22372], "perspective_id": 1575, "split_group_id": "6f8d28dec116e556f453dd869b6df513f5f4f4dcfe891a25087673ad0363e3f1", "votes": [0, 2, 1, 0, 0]}
States ought not possess nuclear weapons
Public acknowledgement of the right to nuclear deterrence will benefit the public regulation of nuclear weapons generally
UNDERMINE
{"claim_id": 633, "id": "633:1570", "native_cluster": [1570], "perspective_id": 1570, "split_group_id": "6f8d28dec116e556f453dd869b6df513f5f4f4dcfe891a25087673ad0363e3f1", "votes": [0, 0, 0, 1, 2]}
States ought not possess nuclear weapons
Nuclear weapons give states valuable agenda-setting power on the international stage
UNDERMINE
{"claim_id": 633, "id": "633:1568", "native_cluster": [1568, 22357, 22359], "perspective_id": 1568, "split_group_id": "6f8d28dec116e556f453dd869b6df513f5f4f4dcfe891a25087673ad0363e3f1", "votes": [0, 0, 0, 1, 2]}
States ought not possess nuclear weapons
All countries have a right to defend themselves with nuclear weapons, even when they lack the capacity in conventional weapons
UNDERMINE
{"claim_id": 633, "id": "633:1566", "native_cluster": [1566, 22353, 22354, 22355, 22356], "perspective_id": 1566, "split_group_id": "6f8d28dec116e556f453dd869b6df513f5f4f4dcfe891a25087673ad0363e3f1", "votes": [0, 0, 0, 1, 2]}
States ought not possess nuclear weapons
Possessing nuclear weapons will be counter to the peaceful interests of states
SUPPORT
{"claim_id": 633, "id": "633:1574", "native_cluster": [1574], "perspective_id": 1574, "split_group_id": "6f8d28dec116e556f453dd869b6df513f5f4f4dcfe891a25087673ad0363e3f1", "votes": [0, 2, 1, 0, 0]}
States ought not possess nuclear weapons
There will be less nuclear weapons
SUPPORT
{"claim_id": 633, "id": "633:5707", "native_cluster": [5707], "perspective_id": 5707, "split_group_id": "6f8d28dec116e556f453dd869b6df513f5f4f4dcfe891a25087673ad0363e3f1", "votes": [2, 1, 0, 0, 0]}
States ought not possess nuclear weapons
The potential for a safer world.
SUPPORT
{"claim_id": 633, "id": "633:5706", "native_cluster": [5706], "perspective_id": 5706, "split_group_id": "6f8d28dec116e556f453dd869b6df513f5f4f4dcfe891a25087673ad0363e3f1", "votes": [3, 0, 0, 0, 0]}
Foreign workers should be given the right to vote in local elections where they work
Granting Foreign Workers Suffrage would Protect Them from Human Exploitation
SUPPORT
{"claim_id": 967, "id": "967:7734", "native_cluster": [7734], "perspective_id": 7734, "split_group_id": "6624a5b09b30a2b3a16e77d24663b52729939583a31873d043855fedc64bae15", "votes": [1, 2, 0, 0, 0]}
Abolish nuclear weapons
Nuclear weapons are required for deterrence
UNDERMINE
{"claim_id": 282, "id": "282:2088", "native_cluster": [2088, 1570], "perspective_id": 2088, "split_group_id": "ab85f5d65651c6e4b2f440b17eafc57161ed6335ccff1eed57aea09d4763febd", "votes": [0, 0, 1, 2, 0]}
Abolish nuclear weapons
Nuclear weapons can fall into the wrong hands.
SUPPORT
{"claim_id": 282, "id": "282:1984", "native_cluster": [1984, 2085, 5254, 22727, 22728, 5255], "perspective_id": 1984, "split_group_id": "ab85f5d65651c6e4b2f440b17eafc57161ed6335ccff1eed57aea09d4763febd", "votes": [1, 2, 0, 0, 0]}
Abolish nuclear weapons
Disarmament is impossible, rendering efforts to disarm pointless and simply wasteful
UNDERMINE
{"claim_id": 282, "id": "282:5264", "native_cluster": [5264, 2089], "perspective_id": 5264, "split_group_id": "ab85f5d65651c6e4b2f440b17eafc57161ed6335ccff1eed57aea09d4763febd", "votes": [0, 0, 2, 1, 0]}
Abolish nuclear weapons
Both the use and threat of nuclear weapons are illegal
SUPPORT
{"claim_id": 282, "id": "282:2086", "native_cluster": [2086], "perspective_id": 2086, "split_group_id": "ab85f5d65651c6e4b2f440b17eafc57161ed6335ccff1eed57aea09d4763febd", "votes": [0, 3, 0, 0, 0]}
Abolish nuclear weapons
Humanitarian intervention becomes impossible in states that possess nuclear weapons
SUPPORT
{"claim_id": 282, "id": "282:1573", "native_cluster": [1573, 22362, 22364], "perspective_id": 1573, "split_group_id": "ab85f5d65651c6e4b2f440b17eafc57161ed6335ccff1eed57aea09d4763febd", "votes": [0, 3, 0, 0, 0]}
Abolish nuclear weapons
The threat of a state developing nuclear weapons could instigate pre-emptive strikes from its neighbours and rivals to prevent the acquisition of such weapons
SUPPORT
{"claim_id": 282, "id": "282:1575", "native_cluster": [1575, 22369, 22370, 22372], "perspective_id": 1575, "split_group_id": "ab85f5d65651c6e4b2f440b17eafc57161ed6335ccff1eed57aea09d4763febd", "votes": [0, 2, 1, 0, 0]}
Abolish nuclear weapons
Nuclear weapons give states valuable agenda-setting power on the international stage
UNDERMINE
{"claim_id": 282, "id": "282:1568", "native_cluster": [1568, 22357, 22359], "perspective_id": 1568, "split_group_id": "ab85f5d65651c6e4b2f440b17eafc57161ed6335ccff1eed57aea09d4763febd", "votes": [0, 0, 0, 1, 2]}
Abolish nuclear weapons
All countries have a right to defend themselves with nuclear weapons, even when they lack the capacity in conventional weapons
UNDERMINE
{"claim_id": 282, "id": "282:1566", "native_cluster": [1566, 22353, 22354, 22355, 22356], "perspective_id": 1566, "split_group_id": "ab85f5d65651c6e4b2f440b17eafc57161ed6335ccff1eed57aea09d4763febd", "votes": [0, 0, 0, 1, 2]}
Abolish nuclear weapons
Possessing nuclear weapons will be counter to the peaceful interests of states
SUPPORT
{"claim_id": 282, "id": "282:1574", "native_cluster": [1574], "perspective_id": 1574, "split_group_id": "ab85f5d65651c6e4b2f440b17eafc57161ed6335ccff1eed57aea09d4763febd", "votes": [0, 2, 1, 0, 0]}
Abolish nuclear weapons
No country has an inherent right to invade or use aggression against another.
UNDERMINE
{"claim_id": 282, "id": "282:1989", "native_cluster": [1989], "perspective_id": 1989, "split_group_id": "ab85f5d65651c6e4b2f440b17eafc57161ed6335ccff1eed57aea09d4763febd", "votes": [0, 0, 0, 3, 0]}
Abolish nuclear weapons
The United States has an obligation to protect international stability due to its unique military strength.
SUPPORT
{"claim_id": 282, "id": "282:1982", "native_cluster": [1982, 22725, 22726], "perspective_id": 1982, "split_group_id": "ab85f5d65651c6e4b2f440b17eafc57161ed6335ccff1eed57aea09d4763febd", "votes": [2, 1, 0, 0, 0]}
Abolish nuclear weapons
[Iran specific] Others, particularly Israel, would act if the United States did not
SUPPORT
{"claim_id": 282, "id": "282:1987", "native_cluster": [1987, 22731], "perspective_id": 1987, "split_group_id": "ab85f5d65651c6e4b2f440b17eafc57161ed6335ccff1eed57aea09d4763febd", "votes": [2, 1, 0, 0, 0]}
Abolish nuclear weapons
Nuclear waste disposal is rarely safe/efficient; it is too much to expect a sqeaky clean disposal/disarmament of nuclear weapons
SUPPORT
{"claim_id": 282, "id": "282:5265", "native_cluster": [5265], "perspective_id": 5265, "split_group_id": "ab85f5d65651c6e4b2f440b17eafc57161ed6335ccff1eed57aea09d4763febd", "votes": [1, 1, 0, 0, 0]}
Abolish nuclear weapons
Small countries would be able to pursue their independence without having to rely on larger countries.
UNDERMINE
{"claim_id": 282, "id": "282:26469", "native_cluster": [26469, 25670, 26470, 25671, 5262, 6621], "perspective_id": 26469, "split_group_id": "ab85f5d65651c6e4b2f440b17eafc57161ed6335ccff1eed57aea09d4763febd", "votes": [0, 0, 0, 2, 0]}
Abolish nuclear weapons
The abolition of nuclear weapons would actually incentivize the development and use of even more dangerous weapons, such as chemical and biological weapons
UNDERMINE
{"claim_id": 282, "id": "282:5263", "native_cluster": [5263], "perspective_id": 5263, "split_group_id": "ab85f5d65651c6e4b2f440b17eafc57161ed6335ccff1eed57aea09d4763febd", "votes": [0, 0, 0, 2, 0]}
Abolish nuclear weapons
Proliferation of nuclear weapons increases the chances of nuclear accidents
SUPPORT
{"claim_id": 282, "id": "282:5257", "native_cluster": [5257], "perspective_id": 5257, "split_group_id": "ab85f5d65651c6e4b2f440b17eafc57161ed6335ccff1eed57aea09d4763febd", "votes": [2, 0, 0, 0, 0]}
Abolish nuclear weapons
Irrational leaders make the possession of nuclear weapons dangerous
SUPPORT
{"claim_id": 282, "id": "282:5256", "native_cluster": [5256], "perspective_id": 5256, "split_group_id": "ab85f5d65651c6e4b2f440b17eafc57161ed6335ccff1eed57aea09d4763febd", "votes": [2, 0, 0, 0, 0]}
Abolish nuclear weapons
It is immoral to use the threat of nuclear annihilation in order to achieve foreign policy aims
SUPPORT
{"claim_id": 282, "id": "282:5258", "native_cluster": [5258], "perspective_id": 5258, "split_group_id": "ab85f5d65651c6e4b2f440b17eafc57161ed6335ccff1eed57aea09d4763febd", "votes": [2, 0, 0, 0, 0]}
Abolish nuclear weapons
All the people worldwide have the same rights and are equal to one another.
UNDERMINE
{"claim_id": 282, "id": "282:6620", "native_cluster": [6620], "perspective_id": 6620, "split_group_id": "ab85f5d65651c6e4b2f440b17eafc57161ed6335ccff1eed57aea09d4763febd", "votes": [0, 0, 0, 1, 2]}
Abolish nuclear weapons
The pursuit of nuclear defence (respectively the possession of nuclear weapons) by more countries is a guarantee for peace.
UNDERMINE
{"claim_id": 282, "id": "282:6619", "native_cluster": [6619], "perspective_id": 6619, "split_group_id": "ab85f5d65651c6e4b2f440b17eafc57161ed6335ccff1eed57aea09d4763febd", "votes": [0, 0, 0, 0, 3]}
Abolish nuclear weapons
any conflict will rapidly de-escalate
UNDERMINE
{"claim_id": 282, "id": "282:5410", "native_cluster": [5410, 25769, 25770], "perspective_id": 5410, "split_group_id": "ab85f5d65651c6e4b2f440b17eafc57161ed6335ccff1eed57aea09d4763febd", "votes": [0, 0, 0, 0, 3]}