dataset_name
stringlengths 3
28
| dataset_config
stringlengths 1
34
| text
stringlengths 44
22.4k
|
|---|---|---|
super_glue
|
rte
|
A man is due in court later charged with the murder 26 years ago of a teenager whose case was the first to be featured on BBC One's Crimewatch. Colette Aram, 16, was walking to her boyfriend's house in Keyworth, Nottinghamshire, on 30 October 1983 when she disappeared. Her body was later found in a field close to her home. Paul Stewart Hutchinson, 50, has been charged with murder and is due before Nottingham magistrates later.
Question: Does this imply that "Paul Stewart Hutchinson is accused of having stabbed a girl."? Yes or no?
No
|
super_glue
|
rte
|
Given Britain said, Friday, that it has barred cleric, Omar Bakri, from returning to the country from Lebanon, where he was released by police after being detained for 24 hours. Should we assume that "Bakri was briefly detained, but was released." is true? Yes or no?
Yes
|
super_glue
|
rte
|
Given that Nearly 4 million children who have at least one parent who entered the U.S. illegally were born in the United States and are U.S. citizens as a result, according to the study conducted by the Pew Hispanic Center. That's about three quarters of the estimated 5.5 million children of illegal immigrants inside the United States, according to the study. About 1.8 million children of undocumented immigrants live in poverty, the study found. Does it follow that Three quarters of U.S. illegal immigrants have children. Yes or no?
No
|
super_glue
|
rte
|
Like the United States, U.N. officials are also dismayed that Aristide killed a conference called by Prime Minister Robert Malval in Port-au-Prince in hopes of bringing all the feuding parties together. Based on the previous passage, is it true that "Aristide had Prime Minister Robert Malval murdered in Port-au-Prince."? Yes or no?
No
|
super_glue
|
rte
|
WASHINGTON -- A newly declassified narrative of the Bush administration's advice to the CIA on harsh interrogations shows that the small group of Justice Department lawyers who wrote memos authorizing controversial interrogation techniques were operating not on their own but with direction from top administration officials, including then-Vice President Dick Cheney and national security adviser Condoleezza Rice. At the same time, the narrative suggests that then-Defense Secretary Donald H. Rumsfeld and then-Secretary of State Colin Powell were largely left out of the decision-making process. Are we justified in saying that "Dick Cheney was the Vice President of Bush."? Yes or no?
Yes
|
super_glue
|
rte
|
Given that Only a week after it had no comment on upping the storage capacity of its Hotmail e-mail service, Microsoft early Thursday announced it was boosting the allowance to 250MB to follow similar moves by rivals such as Google, Yahoo, and Lycos. Therefore, it must be true that "Microsoft's Hotmail has raised its storage capacity to 250MB."? Yes or no?
Yes
|
super_glue
|
wsc.fixed
|
Mark told Pete many lies about himself, which Pete included in his book. He should have been more skeptical. In the previous sentence, does the pronoun "he" refer to Mark? Yes or no?
No
|
super_glue
|
wsc.fixed
|
The mothers of Arthur and Celeste have come to the town to fetch them. They are very happy to have them back, but they scold them just the same because they ran away. Here, by "them" they mean "mothers". Yes or no?
No
|
super_glue
|
wsc.fixed
|
Mark was close to Mr. Singer 's heels. He heard him calling for the captain, promising him, in the jargon everyone talked that night, that not one thing should be damaged on the ship except only the ammunition, but the captain and all his crew had best stay in the cabin until the work was over
In other words, Mr. Singer heard him calling for the captain, promising him, in the jargon everyone talked that night, that not one thing should be damaged on the ship except only the ammunition, but the captain and all his crew had best stay in the cabin until the work was over True or false?
False
|
super_glue
|
wsc.fixed
|
The pony behaved well, sir, and showed no vice; but at last he just threw up his heels and tipped the young gentleman into the thorn hedge. He wanted me to help him out, but I hope you will excuse me, sir, I did not feel inclined to do so. I think they mean "young gentleman wanted me to help him out, but I hope you will excuse me, sir, I did not feel inclined to do so." Yes or no?
Yes
|
super_glue
|
wsc.fixed
|
I poured water from the bottle into the cup until it was full. Here, does "it" stand for the cup? Yes or no?
Yes
|
super_glue
|
wsc.fixed
|
Passage: Dan had to stop Bill from toying with the injured bird. He is very compassionate.
Question: In the passage above, does the pronoun "He" refer to Dan?
Answer:
Yes
|
super_glue
|
wsc.fixed
|
Sam Goodman 's biography of the Spartan general Xenophanes conveys a vivid sense of the difficulties he faced in his childhood. In the previous sentence, can the pronoun "he" be replaced with "Goodman"? Yes or no?
No
|
super_glue
|
wsc.fixed
|
Context: Pam's parents came home and found her having sex with her boyfriend, Paul. They were furious about it.
Question: "They" are Pam's parents. True or false?
Answer:
True
|
super_glue
|
wsc.fixed
|
Bob paid for Charlie 's college education, but now Charlie acts as though it never happened. He is very hurt.
In the passage above, the pronoun "He" refers to Bob. True or false?
True
|
super_glue
|
wsc.fixed
|
Billy cried because Toby wouldn't share his toy.
Question: Who or what is "his"? Is it Toby?
Answer:
Yes
|
super_glue
|
cb
|
Suppose It was a complex language. Not written down but handed down. One might say it was peeled down. Can we infer that "the language was peeled down"? Yes, no, or maybe?
Yes
|
super_glue
|
cb
|
It is part of their religion, a religion I do not scoff at as it holds many elements which match our own even though it lacks the truth of ours. At one of their great festivals they have the ritual of driving out the devils from their bodies. First the drummers come on - I may say that no women are allowed to take part in this ritual and the ladies here will perhaps agree with me that they are fortunate in that omission. Based on the previous passage, is it true that "no women are allowed to take part in this ritual"? Yes, no, or maybe?
Yes
|
super_glue
|
cb
|
The Paris to Rouen railway was being extended to Le Havre, and the line cut straight through Dr Flaubert's land. Part of it was to be compulsorily purchased. You could say that Gustave was shepherded into creative retreat at Croisset by epilepsy. Based on that information, is the claim: "Gustave was shepherded into creative retreat at Croisset by epilepsy" true, false, or inconclusive?
True
|
super_glue
|
cb
|
Given that Part of it was to be compulsorily purchased. You could say that Gustave was shepherded into creative retreat at Croisset by epilepsy. You could also say he was driven there by the railway. Does it follow that Gustave was driven to creative retreat in Croisset by the railway Yes, no, or maybe?
Yes
|
super_glue
|
cb
|
Some of them, like for instance the farm in Connecticut, are quite small. If I like a place I buy it. I guess you could say it's a hobby. Are we justified in saying that "buying places is a hobby"? Yes, no, or maybe?
Yes
|
super_glue
|
cb
|
Suppose it's true that Look, my dear, I'm not in my dotage yet, and I know I'm a grumbler and a complainer. You could say the only form of comfort I 've got are my complaints. Then, is "the only form of comfort he has are his complaints" always, sometimes, or never true?
Always
|
super_glue
|
cb
|
Then the silence in the Zoo became complete. Woil stared around him and then suddenly with a push of his wings raised himself into the air, turned, and landed ten feet away on the back of a green bench. Creggan could see that he was afraid and that his fear was making him terribly uncertain.
Question: Woil was afraid True, False, or Neither?
True
|
super_glue
|
cb
|
But, of course, that just wasn't possible. Her disappointment over Jonathan, which had driven her to France in the first place, had been relegated somewhere to the back of her mind. Now in retrospect she could see that marriage to him would have been a ghastly mistake and that her reaction to discovering that he had been seeing other women while he had been engaged to her had had far more to do with wounded pride than with a wounded heart.
Keeping in mind the above text, consider: marriage to Jonathan would have been a ghastly mistake Is this always, sometimes, or never correct?
Always
|
super_glue
|
cb
|
Given Like now. The Community in Knockglen would defend Eve vociferously. Even some of the Sisters here in Dublin might see that the girl had a point. Is it guaranteed true that "the girl had a point"? Yes, no, or maybe?
Yes
|
super_glue
|
cb
|
Given that ``They have to be crushed, Bobkins!'' So saying, she marched off down the gravel path, making the kind of crunching noise Robert had thought could only be produced by the BBC sound-effects department. As they rounded the edge of the building he could see that behind the house was a vast garden. Therefore, it must be true that "behind the house was a vast garden"? Yes, no, or maybe?
Yes
|
super_glue
|
cb
|
Assume it is true that ``Do you mind if I use your phone?'' Ronni could see that Guido's brain was whirring.
Therefore, "Guido's brain was whirring" is guaranteed, possible, or impossible?
Guaranteed
|
super_glue
|
cb
|
``Look, lady, give me a break. I just deliver the stuff, I don't interview it for the Sunday papers.'' He waved the paper at her and even at a distance she could see that it said very little.
Question: Does this imply that "the paper said very little"? Yes, no, or maybe?
Yes
|
super_glue
|
cb
|
``You 've heard something like that before. Haven't you, Jimmy?'' Jimmy had been shaken by those sounds more shaken than the others for good reason but Cardiff could see that he was unprepared to show it as he pushed himself away from the reception counter. Using only the above description and what you know about the world, "Jimmy was unprepared to show he had been shaken" is definitely correct, incorrect, or inconclusive?
Correct
|
super_glue
|
cb
|
Given It was Alan's idea. He made a sour kind of joke out of it, that they must wait until their wedding night. Carolyn agreed because she could see he meant it although she didn't understand why. Should we assume that "Alan meant it" is true? Yes, no, or maybe?
Yes
|
super_glue
|
cb
|
Take the following as truth: And why bother to write anyway? What was there to say? Mary had some vague idea that Adam's parents might suspect he was down here and come to see him.
Then the following statement: "Adam was down here" is true, false, or inconclusive?
True
|
super_glue
|
multirc
|
While this process moved along, diplomacy continued its rounds. Direct pressure on the Taliban had proved unsuccessful. As one NSC staff note put it, "Under the Taliban, Afghanistan is not so much a state sponsor of terrorism as it is a state sponsored by terrorists." In early 2000, the United States began a high-level effort to persuade Pakistan to use its influence over the Taliban. In January 2000, Assistant Secretary of State Karl Inderfurth and the State Department's counterterrorism coordinator, Michael Sheehan, met with General Musharraf in Islamabad, dangling before him the possibility of a presidential visit in March as a reward for Pakistani cooperation. Such a visit was coveted by Musharraf, partly as a sign of his government's legitimacy. He told the two envoys that he would meet with Mullah Omar and press him on Bin Laden. They left, however, reporting to Washington that Pakistan was unlikely in fact to do anything," given what it sees as the benefits of Taliban control of Afghanistan." President Clinton was scheduled to travel to India. The State Department felt that he should not visit India without also visiting Pakistan. The Secret Service and the CIA, however, warned in the strongest terms that visiting Pakistan would risk the President's life. Counterterrorism officials also argued that Pakistan had not done enough to merit a presidential visit. But President Clinton insisted on including Pakistan in the itinerary for his trip to South Asia. His one-day stopover on March 25, 2000, was the first time a U.S. president had been there since 1969. At his meeting with Musharraf and others, President Clinton concentrated on tensions between Pakistan and India and the dangers of nuclear proliferation, but also discussed Bin Laden. President Clinton told us that when he pulled Musharraf aside for a brief, one-on-one meeting, he pleaded with the general for help regarding Bin Laden." I offered him the moon when I went to see him, in terms of better relations with the United States, if he'd help us...
Question: What did the high-level effort to persuade Pakistan include?
I found this answer "Children, Gerd, or Dorian Popa". Is that correct? Yes or no?
No
|
super_glue
|
multirc
|
While this process moved along, diplomacy continued its rounds. Direct pressure on the Taliban had proved unsuccessful. As one NSC staff note put it, "Under the Taliban, Afghanistan is not so much a state sponsor of terrorism as it is a state sponsored by terrorists." In early 2000, the United States began a high-level effort to persuade Pakistan to use its influence over the Taliban. In January 2000, Assistant Secretary of State Karl Inderfurth and the State Department's counterterrorism coordinator, Michael Sheehan, met with General Musharraf in Islamabad, dangling before him the possibility of a presidential visit in March as a reward for Pakistani cooperation. Such a visit was coveted by Musharraf, partly as a sign of his government's legitimacy. He told the two envoys that he would meet with Mullah Omar and press him on Bin Laden. They left, however, reporting to Washington that Pakistan was unlikely in fact to do anything," given what it sees as the benefits of Taliban control of Afghanistan." President Clinton was scheduled to travel to India. The State Department felt that he should not visit India without also visiting Pakistan. The Secret Service and the CIA, however, warned in the strongest terms that visiting Pakistan would risk the President's life. Counterterrorism officials also argued that Pakistan had not done enough to merit a presidential visit. But President Clinton insisted on including Pakistan in the itinerary for his trip to South Asia. His one-day stopover on March 25, 2000, was the first time a U.S. president had been there since 1969. At his meeting with Musharraf and others, President Clinton concentrated on tensions between Pakistan and India and the dangers of nuclear proliferation, but also discussed Bin Laden. President Clinton told us that when he pulled Musharraf aside for a brief, one-on-one meeting, he pleaded with the general for help regarding Bin Laden." I offered him the moon when I went to see him, in terms of better relations with the United States, if he'd help us...
Based on the previous passage, What did the high-level effort to persuade Pakistan include?
Is "Monetary rewards" a correct answer?
No
|
super_glue
|
multirc
|
While this process moved along, diplomacy continued its rounds. Direct pressure on the Taliban had proved unsuccessful. As one NSC staff note put it, "Under the Taliban, Afghanistan is not so much a state sponsor of terrorism as it is a state sponsored by terrorists." In early 2000, the United States began a high-level effort to persuade Pakistan to use its influence over the Taliban. In January 2000, Assistant Secretary of State Karl Inderfurth and the State Department's counterterrorism coordinator, Michael Sheehan, met with General Musharraf in Islamabad, dangling before him the possibility of a presidential visit in March as a reward for Pakistani cooperation. Such a visit was coveted by Musharraf, partly as a sign of his government's legitimacy. He told the two envoys that he would meet with Mullah Omar and press him on Bin Laden. They left, however, reporting to Washington that Pakistan was unlikely in fact to do anything," given what it sees as the benefits of Taliban control of Afghanistan." President Clinton was scheduled to travel to India. The State Department felt that he should not visit India without also visiting Pakistan. The Secret Service and the CIA, however, warned in the strongest terms that visiting Pakistan would risk the President's life. Counterterrorism officials also argued that Pakistan had not done enough to merit a presidential visit. But President Clinton insisted on including Pakistan in the itinerary for his trip to South Asia. His one-day stopover on March 25, 2000, was the first time a U.S. president had been there since 1969. At his meeting with Musharraf and others, President Clinton concentrated on tensions between Pakistan and India and the dangers of nuclear proliferation, but also discussed Bin Laden. President Clinton told us that when he pulled Musharraf aside for a brief, one-on-one meeting, he pleaded with the general for help regarding Bin Laden." I offered him the moon when I went to see him, in terms of better relations with the United States, if he'd help us...
Question: What did the high-level effort to persuade Pakistan include?
I am grading my students' exercises. Is the answer "Asking Pakistan to help the USA" correct?
Yes
|
super_glue
|
multirc
|
While this process moved along, diplomacy continued its rounds. Direct pressure on the Taliban had proved unsuccessful. As one NSC staff note put it, "Under the Taliban, Afghanistan is not so much a state sponsor of terrorism as it is a state sponsored by terrorists." In early 2000, the United States began a high-level effort to persuade Pakistan to use its influence over the Taliban. In January 2000, Assistant Secretary of State Karl Inderfurth and the State Department's counterterrorism coordinator, Michael Sheehan, met with General Musharraf in Islamabad, dangling before him the possibility of a presidential visit in March as a reward for Pakistani cooperation. Such a visit was coveted by Musharraf, partly as a sign of his government's legitimacy. He told the two envoys that he would meet with Mullah Omar and press him on Bin Laden. They left, however, reporting to Washington that Pakistan was unlikely in fact to do anything," given what it sees as the benefits of Taliban control of Afghanistan." President Clinton was scheduled to travel to India. The State Department felt that he should not visit India without also visiting Pakistan. The Secret Service and the CIA, however, warned in the strongest terms that visiting Pakistan would risk the President's life. Counterterrorism officials also argued that Pakistan had not done enough to merit a presidential visit. But President Clinton insisted on including Pakistan in the itinerary for his trip to South Asia. His one-day stopover on March 25, 2000, was the first time a U.S. president had been there since 1969. At his meeting with Musharraf and others, President Clinton concentrated on tensions between Pakistan and India and the dangers of nuclear proliferation, but also discussed Bin Laden. President Clinton told us that when he pulled Musharraf aside for a brief, one-on-one meeting, he pleaded with the general for help regarding Bin Laden." I offered him the moon when I went to see him, in terms of better relations with the United States, if he'd help us...
What did the high-level effort to persuade Pakistan include?
Would it be good to answer "Meeting with General Musharraf"?
Yes
|
super_glue
|
multirc
|
While this process moved along, diplomacy continued its rounds. Direct pressure on the Taliban had proved unsuccessful. As one NSC staff note put it, "Under the Taliban, Afghanistan is not so much a state sponsor of terrorism as it is a state sponsored by terrorists." In early 2000, the United States began a high-level effort to persuade Pakistan to use its influence over the Taliban. In January 2000, Assistant Secretary of State Karl Inderfurth and the State Department's counterterrorism coordinator, Michael Sheehan, met with General Musharraf in Islamabad, dangling before him the possibility of a presidential visit in March as a reward for Pakistani cooperation. Such a visit was coveted by Musharraf, partly as a sign of his government's legitimacy. He told the two envoys that he would meet with Mullah Omar and press him on Bin Laden. They left, however, reporting to Washington that Pakistan was unlikely in fact to do anything," given what it sees as the benefits of Taliban control of Afghanistan." President Clinton was scheduled to travel to India. The State Department felt that he should not visit India without also visiting Pakistan. The Secret Service and the CIA, however, warned in the strongest terms that visiting Pakistan would risk the President's life. Counterterrorism officials also argued that Pakistan had not done enough to merit a presidential visit. But President Clinton insisted on including Pakistan in the itinerary for his trip to South Asia. His one-day stopover on March 25, 2000, was the first time a U.S. president had been there since 1969. At his meeting with Musharraf and others, President Clinton concentrated on tensions between Pakistan and India and the dangers of nuclear proliferation, but also discussed Bin Laden. President Clinton told us that when he pulled Musharraf aside for a brief, one-on-one meeting, he pleaded with the general for help regarding Bin Laden." I offered him the moon when I went to see him, in terms of better relations with the United States, if he'd help us...
Question: What did the high-level effort to persuade Pakistan include?
Is it President Clinton offered the moon in terms of better relations with the United States?
Yes
|
super_glue
|
multirc
|
While this process moved along, diplomacy continued its rounds. Direct pressure on the Taliban had proved unsuccessful. As one NSC staff note put it, "Under the Taliban, Afghanistan is not so much a state sponsor of terrorism as it is a state sponsored by terrorists." In early 2000, the United States began a high-level effort to persuade Pakistan to use its influence over the Taliban. In January 2000, Assistant Secretary of State Karl Inderfurth and the State Department's counterterrorism coordinator, Michael Sheehan, met with General Musharraf in Islamabad, dangling before him the possibility of a presidential visit in March as a reward for Pakistani cooperation. Such a visit was coveted by Musharraf, partly as a sign of his government's legitimacy. He told the two envoys that he would meet with Mullah Omar and press him on Bin Laden. They left, however, reporting to Washington that Pakistan was unlikely in fact to do anything," given what it sees as the benefits of Taliban control of Afghanistan." President Clinton was scheduled to travel to India. The State Department felt that he should not visit India without also visiting Pakistan. The Secret Service and the CIA, however, warned in the strongest terms that visiting Pakistan would risk the President's life. Counterterrorism officials also argued that Pakistan had not done enough to merit a presidential visit. But President Clinton insisted on including Pakistan in the itinerary for his trip to South Asia. His one-day stopover on March 25, 2000, was the first time a U.S. president had been there since 1969. At his meeting with Musharraf and others, President Clinton concentrated on tensions between Pakistan and India and the dangers of nuclear proliferation, but also discussed Bin Laden. President Clinton told us that when he pulled Musharraf aside for a brief, one-on-one meeting, he pleaded with the general for help regarding Bin Laden." I offered him the moon when I went to see him, in terms of better relations with the United States, if he'd help us...
Decide whether "A Presidential visit in March" is a valid answer to the following question: What did the high-level effort to persuade Pakistan include?
Answer yes or no.
No
|
super_glue
|
multirc
|
While this process moved along, diplomacy continued its rounds. Direct pressure on the Taliban had proved unsuccessful. As one NSC staff note put it, "Under the Taliban, Afghanistan is not so much a state sponsor of terrorism as it is a state sponsored by terrorists." In early 2000, the United States began a high-level effort to persuade Pakistan to use its influence over the Taliban. In January 2000, Assistant Secretary of State Karl Inderfurth and the State Department's counterterrorism coordinator, Michael Sheehan, met with General Musharraf in Islamabad, dangling before him the possibility of a presidential visit in March as a reward for Pakistani cooperation. Such a visit was coveted by Musharraf, partly as a sign of his government's legitimacy. He told the two envoys that he would meet with Mullah Omar and press him on Bin Laden. They left, however, reporting to Washington that Pakistan was unlikely in fact to do anything," given what it sees as the benefits of Taliban control of Afghanistan." President Clinton was scheduled to travel to India. The State Department felt that he should not visit India without also visiting Pakistan. The Secret Service and the CIA, however, warned in the strongest terms that visiting Pakistan would risk the President's life. Counterterrorism officials also argued that Pakistan had not done enough to merit a presidential visit. But President Clinton insisted on including Pakistan in the itinerary for his trip to South Asia. His one-day stopover on March 25, 2000, was the first time a U.S. president had been there since 1969. At his meeting with Musharraf and others, President Clinton concentrated on tensions between Pakistan and India and the dangers of nuclear proliferation, but also discussed Bin Laden. President Clinton told us that when he pulled Musharraf aside for a brief, one-on-one meeting, he pleaded with the general for help regarding Bin Laden." I offered him the moon when I went to see him, in terms of better relations with the United States, if he'd help us...
Question: What did the high-level effort to persuade Pakistan include?
Is the correct answer Paper checks?
Yes
|
super_glue
|
multirc
|
Is "Increasing trade with Pakistan" a correct answer to the following question?
Question: What did the high-level effort to persuade Pakistan include?
Rely on the following text: While this process moved along, diplomacy continued its rounds. Direct pressure on the Taliban had proved unsuccessful. As one NSC staff note put it, "Under the Taliban, Afghanistan is not so much a state sponsor of terrorism as it is a state sponsored by terrorists." In early 2000, the United States began a high-level effort to persuade Pakistan to use its influence over the Taliban. In January 2000, Assistant Secretary of State Karl Inderfurth and the State Department's counterterrorism coordinator, Michael Sheehan, met with General Musharraf in Islamabad, dangling before him the possibility of a presidential visit in March as a reward for Pakistani cooperation. Such a visit was coveted by Musharraf, partly as a sign of his government's legitimacy. He told the two envoys that he would meet with Mullah Omar and press him on Bin Laden. They left, however, reporting to Washington that Pakistan was unlikely in fact to do anything," given what it sees as the benefits of Taliban control of Afghanistan." President Clinton was scheduled to travel to India. The State Department felt that he should not visit India without also visiting Pakistan. The Secret Service and the CIA, however, warned in the strongest terms that visiting Pakistan would risk the President's life. Counterterrorism officials also argued that Pakistan had not done enough to merit a presidential visit. But President Clinton insisted on including Pakistan in the itinerary for his trip to South Asia. His one-day stopover on March 25, 2000, was the first time a U.S. president had been there since 1969. At his meeting with Musharraf and others, President Clinton concentrated on tensions between Pakistan and India and the dangers of nuclear proliferation, but also discussed Bin Laden. President Clinton told us that when he pulled Musharraf aside for a brief, one-on-one meeting, he pleaded with the general for help regarding Bin Laden." I offered him the moon when I went to see him, in terms of better relations with the United States, if he'd help us...
No
|
super_glue
|
multirc
|
While this process moved along, diplomacy continued its rounds. Direct pressure on the Taliban had proved unsuccessful. As one NSC staff note put it, "Under the Taliban, Afghanistan is not so much a state sponsor of terrorism as it is a state sponsored by terrorists." In early 2000, the United States began a high-level effort to persuade Pakistan to use its influence over the Taliban. In January 2000, Assistant Secretary of State Karl Inderfurth and the State Department's counterterrorism coordinator, Michael Sheehan, met with General Musharraf in Islamabad, dangling before him the possibility of a presidential visit in March as a reward for Pakistani cooperation. Such a visit was coveted by Musharraf, partly as a sign of his government's legitimacy. He told the two envoys that he would meet with Mullah Omar and press him on Bin Laden. They left, however, reporting to Washington that Pakistan was unlikely in fact to do anything," given what it sees as the benefits of Taliban control of Afghanistan." President Clinton was scheduled to travel to India. The State Department felt that he should not visit India without also visiting Pakistan. The Secret Service and the CIA, however, warned in the strongest terms that visiting Pakistan would risk the President's life. Counterterrorism officials also argued that Pakistan had not done enough to merit a presidential visit. But President Clinton insisted on including Pakistan in the itinerary for his trip to South Asia. His one-day stopover on March 25, 2000, was the first time a U.S. president had been there since 1969. At his meeting with Musharraf and others, President Clinton concentrated on tensions between Pakistan and India and the dangers of nuclear proliferation, but also discussed Bin Laden. President Clinton told us that when he pulled Musharraf aside for a brief, one-on-one meeting, he pleaded with the general for help regarding Bin Laden." I offered him the moon when I went to see him, in terms of better relations with the United States, if he'd help us...
Question: What did the high-level effort to persuade Pakistan include?
I think "Persuading Pakistan to use its influence over the Taliban by dangling before him the possibility of a presidential visit in March as a reward for Pakistani cooperation" is a valid answer. Could you confirm? Yes or no?
Yes
|
super_glue
|
multirc
|
While this process moved along, diplomacy continued its rounds. Direct pressure on the Taliban had proved unsuccessful. As one NSC staff note put it, "Under the Taliban, Afghanistan is not so much a state sponsor of terrorism as it is a state sponsored by terrorists." In early 2000, the United States began a high-level effort to persuade Pakistan to use its influence over the Taliban. In January 2000, Assistant Secretary of State Karl Inderfurth and the State Department's counterterrorism coordinator, Michael Sheehan, met with General Musharraf in Islamabad, dangling before him the possibility of a presidential visit in March as a reward for Pakistani cooperation. Such a visit was coveted by Musharraf, partly as a sign of his government's legitimacy. He told the two envoys that he would meet with Mullah Omar and press him on Bin Laden. They left, however, reporting to Washington that Pakistan was unlikely in fact to do anything," given what it sees as the benefits of Taliban control of Afghanistan." President Clinton was scheduled to travel to India. The State Department felt that he should not visit India without also visiting Pakistan. The Secret Service and the CIA, however, warned in the strongest terms that visiting Pakistan would risk the President's life. Counterterrorism officials also argued that Pakistan had not done enough to merit a presidential visit. But President Clinton insisted on including Pakistan in the itinerary for his trip to South Asia. His one-day stopover on March 25, 2000, was the first time a U.S. president had been there since 1969. At his meeting with Musharraf and others, President Clinton concentrated on tensions between Pakistan and India and the dangers of nuclear proliferation, but also discussed Bin Laden. President Clinton told us that when he pulled Musharraf aside for a brief, one-on-one meeting, he pleaded with the general for help regarding Bin Laden." I offered him the moon when I went to see him, in terms of better relations with the United States, if he'd help us...
Following his meeting with US Assistant Secretary of State and US State Department's counterterrorism coordinator, who did Musharraf intend to meet to discuss Bin Laden?
I was going to say "Romanian police or secret service". Does that sound right?
No
|
super_glue
|
record
|
The harrowing stories of women and children locked up for so-called 'moral crimes' in Afghanistan's notorious female prison have been revealed after cameras were allowed inside. Mariam has been in Badam Bagh prison for three months after she shot a man who just raped her at gunpoint and then turned the weapon on herself - but she has yet to been charged. Nuria has eight months left to serve of her sentence for trying to divorce her husband. She gave birth in prison to her son and they share a cell together. Scroll down for video Nuria was jailed for trying to divorce her husband. Her son is one of 62 children living at Badam Bagh prison
@highlight
Most of the 202 Badam Bagh inmates are jailed for so-called 'moral crimes'
@highlight
Crimes include leaving their husbands or refusing an arrange marriage
@highlight
62 children live there and share cells with their mothers and five others
The baby she gave birth to is her husbands and he has even offered to have the courts set her free if she returns, but @placeholder has refused.
Which one is the "@placeholder"? Afghanistan, Badam Bagh, Mariam, Nuria?
Nuria
|
super_glue
|
record
|
The following document has been corrupted. Tell me what "@placeholder" is referring to.
Document: Caracas, Venezuela (CNN) -- It's been more than 180 years since Venezuelans saw Simon Bolivar's face. But the revolutionary leader's thick sideburns, bushy eyebrows and steely gaze popped out from behind picture frames Tuesday in new 3-D images unveiled by President Hugo Chavez. Researchers used several software programs to reconstruct the face of the man who liberated Bolivia, Colombia, Ecuador, Panama, Peru and Venezuela from the Spanish crown. Scans of Bolivar's skeletal remains, which investigators exhumed two years ago, factored into their calculations. So did historical paintings, photos of restored uniforms Bolivar wore and images of middle-aged Venezuelans, officials said.
@highlight
Researchers use computer programs to reconstruct Simon Bolivar's face
@highlight
Venezuelan President Hugo Chavez unveils new, 3-D portraits of Bolivar
@highlight
Researchers use data from skeletal remains exhumed two years ago
@highlight
An investigation into Bolivar's 1830 death has been inconclusive, the government says
The broadcast then faded to black, showing @placeholder singing along to the national anthem.
Hugo Chavez
|
super_glue
|
record
|
Summary:
-
Researchers use computer programs to reconstruct Simon Bolivar's face
-
Venezuelan President Hugo Chavez unveils new, 3-D portraits of Bolivar
-
Researchers use data from skeletal remains exhumed two years ago
-
An investigation into Bolivar's 1830 death has been inconclusive, the government says
Article:
Caracas, Venezuela (CNN) -- It's been more than 180 years since Venezuelans saw Simon Bolivar's face. But the revolutionary leader's thick sideburns, bushy eyebrows and steely gaze popped out from behind picture frames Tuesday in new 3-D images unveiled by President Hugo Chavez. Researchers used several software programs to reconstruct the face of the man who liberated Bolivia, Colombia, Ecuador, Panama, Peru and Venezuela from the Spanish crown. Scans of Bolivar's skeletal remains, which investigators exhumed two years ago, factored into their calculations. So did historical paintings, photos of restored uniforms Bolivar wore and images of middle-aged Venezuelans, officials said.
In 1819, Bolivar founded Gran Colombia, a federation of what is now Venezuela, Colombia, Panama and Ecuador.
|
super_glue
|
record
|
Summary:
-
Researchers use computer programs to reconstruct Simon Bolivar's face
-
Venezuelan President Hugo Chavez unveils new, 3-D portraits of Bolivar
-
Researchers use data from skeletal remains exhumed two years ago
-
An investigation into Bolivar's 1830 death has been inconclusive, the government says
Article:
Caracas, Venezuela (CNN) -- It's been more than 180 years since Venezuelans saw Simon Bolivar's face. But the revolutionary leader's thick sideburns, bushy eyebrows and steely gaze popped out from behind picture frames Tuesday in new 3-D images unveiled by President Hugo Chavez. Researchers used several software programs to reconstruct the face of the man who liberated Bolivia, Colombia, Ecuador, Panama, Peru and Venezuela from the Spanish crown. Scans of Bolivar's skeletal remains, which investigators exhumed two years ago, factored into their calculations. So did historical paintings, photos of restored uniforms Bolivar wore and images of middle-aged Venezuelans, officials said.
Now that you've read the article, please write a new sentence to add to it.
In 1819, Bolivar founded Colombia, a federation of what is now Venezuela, Colombia, Panama and Ecuador.
|
super_glue
|
record
|
Caracas, Venezuela (CNN) -- It's been more than 180 years since Venezuelans saw Simon Bolivar's face. But the revolutionary leader's thick sideburns, bushy eyebrows and steely gaze popped out from behind picture frames Tuesday in new 3-D images unveiled by President Hugo Chavez. Researchers used several software programs to reconstruct the face of the man who liberated Bolivia, Colombia, Ecuador, Panama, Peru and Venezuela from the Spanish crown. Scans of Bolivar's skeletal remains, which investigators exhumed two years ago, factored into their calculations. So did historical paintings, photos of restored uniforms Bolivar wore and images of middle-aged Venezuelans, officials said.
@highlight
Researchers use computer programs to reconstruct Simon Bolivar's face
@highlight
Venezuelan President Hugo Chavez unveils new, 3-D portraits of Bolivar
@highlight
Researchers use data from skeletal remains exhumed two years ago
@highlight
An investigation into Bolivar's 1830 death has been inconclusive, the government says
In 1819, Bolivar founded Gran Colombia, a federation of what is now @placeholder, Colombia, Panama and Ecuador.
You should decide what "@placeholder" is referring to. Choose between:
- 3-D
- Bolivar
- Bolivia
- CNN
- Caracas
- Colombia
- Ecuador
- Hugo Chavez
- Panama
- Peru
- Simon Bolivar
- Spanish
- Venezuela
- Venezuelan
- Venezuelans
Venezuelans
|
super_glue
|
record
|
Caracas, Venezuela (CNN) -- It's been more than 180 years since Venezuelans saw Simon Bolivar's face. But the revolutionary leader's thick sideburns, bushy eyebrows and steely gaze popped out from behind picture frames Tuesday in new 3-D images unveiled by President Hugo Chavez. Researchers used several software programs to reconstruct the face of the man who liberated Bolivia, Colombia, Ecuador, Panama, Peru and Venezuela from the Spanish crown. Scans of Bolivar's skeletal remains, which investigators exhumed two years ago, factored into their calculations. So did historical paintings, photos of restored uniforms Bolivar wore and images of middle-aged Venezuelans, officials said.
Summary:
-
Researchers use computer programs to reconstruct Simon Bolivar's face
-
Venezuelan President Hugo Chavez unveils new, 3-D portraits of Bolivar
-
Researchers use data from skeletal remains exhumed two years ago
-
An investigation into Bolivar's 1830 death has been inconclusive, the government says
- A new $116 million mausoleum to house Bolivar's remains is under construction in Caracas, Venezuela's government said in a statement Tuesday.
|
super_glue
|
record
|
Article:
Caracas, Venezuela (CNN) -- It's been more than 180 years since Venezuelans saw Simon Bolivar's face. But the revolutionary leader's thick sideburns, bushy eyebrows and steely gaze popped out from behind picture frames Tuesday in new 3-D images unveiled by President Hugo Chavez. Researchers used several software programs to reconstruct the face of the man who liberated Bolivia, Colombia, Ecuador, Panama, Peru and Venezuela from the Spanish crown. Scans of Bolivar's skeletal remains, which investigators exhumed two years ago, factored into their calculations. So did historical paintings, photos of restored uniforms Bolivar wore and images of middle-aged Venezuelans, officials said.
Highlights:
Researchers use computer programs to reconstruct Simon Bolivar's face
Venezuelan President Hugo Chavez unveils new, 3-D portraits of Bolivar
Researchers use data from skeletal remains exhumed two years ago
An investigation into Bolivar's 1830 death has been inconclusive, the government says
A new $116 million mausoleum to house Bolivar's remains is under construction in Caracas, Venezuela's government said in a statement Tuesday.
|
super_glue
|
record
|
U.S. Secretary of State Henry Kissinger ordered contingency plans drawn up nearly 40 years ago to attack Cuba, incensed over the small island's deployment of troops to Angola, according to declassified government documents posted online Wednesday. In several White House meetings, Kissinger advocated for strong action to stop Castro, fearful that his incursion in Africa was making the U.S. look weak. He argued that Cuba's actions were driving fears around the world of a wider race war that could spill over into Latin America and even destabilize the Middle East. In a series of contingency plans that followed, options ranged from a military blockade to airstrikes and mining of Cuban ports.
@highlight
Then-U.S. Secretary of State angered by Fidel Castro's decision to send troops into Angola in 1975
@highlight
Kissinger feared it would ruin his plans for Africa and wanted to retaliate
@highlight
Drew up plans in 1976 to attack ports and military installations in Cuba
@highlight
'I would be in favor of clobbering them,' Kissinger said, according to the documents
@highlight
Plans never eventuated as Jimmy Carter was elected
The contingency plans outlined military options from blocking outgoing Cuban ships carrying troops and war material to airstrikes against @placeholder bases and airfields.
In the question above, the "@placeholder" stands for
Cuba
|
super_glue
|
record
|
After reading the article, write another sentence to add to it.
U.S. Secretary of State Henry Kissinger ordered contingency plans drawn up nearly 40 years ago to attack Cuba, incensed over the small island's deployment of troops to Angola, according to declassified government documents posted online Wednesday. In several White House meetings, Kissinger advocated for strong action to stop Castro, fearful that his incursion in Africa was making the U.S. look weak. He argued that Cuba's actions were driving fears around the world of a wider race war that could spill over into Latin America and even destabilize the Middle East. In a series of contingency plans that followed, options ranged from a military blockade to airstrikes and mining of Cuban ports.
-
Then-U.S. Secretary of State angered by Fidel Castro's decision to send troops into Angola in 1975
-
Kissinger feared it would ruin his plans for Africa and wanted to retaliate
-
Drew up plans in 1976 to attack ports and military installations in Cuba
-
'I would be in favor of clobbering them,' Kissinger said, according to the documents
-
Plans never eventuated as Jimmy Carter was elected
They stated that while the 'threshold' should be low if Cuba moves against U.S. territories, it should be 'highest' for Africa.
|
super_glue
|
record
|
Please read the following news article and write another sentence to add to it.
A Peruvian tribe once revered by the Inca's for their fierce hunting skills and formidable warriors are clinging on to their traditional existence in the coca growing valleys of South America, sharing their land with drug traffickers, rebels and illegal loggers. Ashaninka Indians are the largest group of indigenous people in the mountainous nation's Amazon region, but their settlements are so sparse that they now make up less than one per cent of Peru's 30 million population. Ever since they battled rival tribes for territory and food during native rule in the rainforests of South America, the Ashaninka have rarely known peace.
-
The Ashaninka tribe once shared the Amazon with the like of the Incas hundreds of years ago
-
They have been forced to share their land after years of conflict forced rebels and drug dealers into the forest
-
Despite settling in valleys rich with valuable coca, they live a poor pre-industrial existence
Innocence of youth: Many of the Ashaninka's younger generations have turned their backs on tribal life and moved to the cities where living conditions are better
|
super_glue
|
record
|
For everyone who has ever thought about shooting their boss - metaphorically, o fcourse - this one is for you. An employee of a Texas armored car company got to do just that this week to 'demonstrate that they take client safety seriously'. And to further that demonstration, the CEO was sitting alone inside the Mercedes-Benz as 12 rounds from an AK-47 rained down upon the SUV. The company, Texas Armoring Corporation, has supplied protected vehicles to the Pope, celebrities like rapper T.I. and actor Steven Segal and oil executives in West Africa, according to My San Antonio. Texas Armoring Corp. & Jason Forston.
@highlight
Texas Armoring Corporation created a video to show the effectiveness of their armored
@highlight
CEO R. Trent Kimball sat in the drivers seat of a Mercedes-Benz SUV
@highlight
Total of 12 rounds fired at the windscreen
@highlight
Company known for working with celebrities, oil barons and even the Pope
'When it comes to assuring our clients' safety, we take product testing extremely seriously,' @placeholder says in a video taken of the display.
What could the "@placeholder" be? AK-47, Jason Forston, Mercedes-Benz, Pope, San Antonio, Steven Segal, Texas, Texas Armoring Corp., Texas Armoring Corporation, Trent Kimball, West Africa, rapper T.I.?
Trent Kimball
|
super_glue
|
record
|
By Damien Gayle PUBLISHED: 15:38 EST, 10 January 2014 | UPDATED: 19:30 EST, 10 January 2014 China's space agency today distributed fresh new pictures of the Moon's surface from its lunar lander and rover. The Jade Rabbit rover can be seen trundling across the pockmarked surface of Earth's satellite in pictures released today by the Chinese Academy of Sciences. The successful soft-landing of the Chang'e 3 lander in December made China the third country to complete a lunar rover mission after the United States and Russia. Chasing the horizon: The sky over the Moon appears inky black in this picture showing the Jade Rabbit rover trundling across the lunar surface taken from the Chang'e 3 lander and released today by Chinese scientists
@highlight
President Xi Xinping made the comments while congratulating scientists
@highlight
Could be a self-aware spin on worldwide ubiquity of Chinese-made goods
@highlight
Ironically, even Jade Rabbit's engineers admit their design is derivative
Knock off or not, there's no denying the ambition of the China's @placeholder mission, which on December 14 achieved the first lunar soft landing in nearly four decades and aims at a manned mission by 2020.
I am trying to decide what "@placeholder" means in the previous text.
Help by choosing an option between:
- Chang'e 3
- China
- Chinese
- Chinese Academy of Sciences
- Damien Gayle
- Earth
- Jade Rabbit
- Moon
- Russia
- United States
- Xi Xinping
Moon
|
super_glue
|
record
|
(CNN) -- The father of a 6-year-old girl, one of four relatives who police say were killed by another family member on Thanksgiving Day, said it was "unbelievable" how a tip from a television viewer brought about the arrest of the suspect. "Before the show even came on, Paul was being surrounded by the people behind me," Jim Sitton said Tuesday in Jupiter, Florida, standing in front of police officers. Paul M. Merhige is accused of fatally shooting his twin sisters, Sitton's 6-year-old daughter Makayla -- Merhige's cousin -- and a 79-year-old aunt at a family home in Jupiter, Florida, on November 26.
@highlight
Dad of slain girl, 6, says arrest of relative is first step towards justice
@highlight
Viewer tip led to arrest of suspect in fatal Thanksgiving shooting
@highlight
Paul Michael Merhige was arrested Saturday at motel in Florida Keys
@highlight
Couple who called police lifted tarp to check license plate on Merhige's car
He said Sitton's home had been under police protection and @placeholder had patrolled his home nights with a shotgun since the incident.
Here, the placeholder refers to
Sitton
|
super_glue
|
record
|
The way you use Facebook and Twitter could mirror how narcissistic you are, according to a new university study. Research by the University of Michigan examined how social media websites reflect a growing culture of narcissism in the US. Scientists found that middle-aged narcissists are more likely to frequently update their Facebook status, while their younger counterparts take to Twitter to satisfy their vanity. So vain: Adult narcissists are more likely to use Facebook to gain the approval of their peers to boost their ego, according to new research According to Elliot Panek, who was one of three scientists behind the research, middle-aged people use Facebook as a way of gaining approval of their image from their peers, while college students prefer Twitter because they over-value their own opinions.
Highlights:
-
New research examines link between social media and narcissism
-
It found younger users are most likely to take to Twitter to boost their ego
-
But older users will update Facebook in a bid to gain approval from friends
Please write an additional highlight.
- According to the study, Twitter acts as a megaphone for younger web users.
|
super_glue
|
record
|
Exercise: Extract from the text the correct entity that "@placeholder" is referring to.
Why always me? It was Mario Balotelli who first asked the question of himself, and years later we’re still no closer to finding an answer. The man just seems to be a magnet for everything: good and bad. The centre of attention, like he’s involved in a little exhibition game all of his own. And if we thought the white-hot atmosphere of Istanbul’s Ataturk Stadium would make Mario rein himself in a little after those penalty shenanigans in the first leg at Anfield last week, we were very much mistaken. Liverpool striker Mario Balotelli looks over at manager Brendan Rodgers after being substituted
@highlight
Mario Balotelli received a yellow card after just 11 minutes
@highlight
Balotelli and Daniel Sturridge were paired up front against Besiktas
@highlight
Balotelli was substituted in the 82nd minute for Adam Lallana
@highlight
The striker did not look happy to be going off with extra time looming
Soon afterwards, he went stumbling backwards and fell on his backside while trying to control a relatively simple pass from @placeholder.
Daniel Sturridge
|
super_glue
|
record
|
(CNN) -- President Barack Obama has done the right thing by asking Congress to authorize the use of force against Syria to punish President Bashar al-Assad for using chemical weapons on his own people. I say that even as someone who has been a sharp critic of the administration's Syria policy and an outspoken advocate of intervening in various ways to try to protect the millions of innocent Syrians whose lives are at risk, prevent the conflict from destabilizing the region and support members of the Syrian opposition who share our values. The president, as he announced in May, is trying to steer this nation back to a world in which we are not permanently at war and we do not turn to our military as the weapon of first resort in any international crisis.
@highlight
Anne-Marie Slaughter: Obama right to go to Congress about using force in Syria
@highlight
Slaughter: A world in which nations use chemical weapons with impunity is too dangerous
@highlight
She says striking Syria now will be a strike to protect the Syrian people, even if belated
@highlight
Slaughter: It's time for Congress to step up to its responsibility and support Obama
A former constitutional law professor, Obama understands that although he has a limited reserve of power that could allow him to act alone, his power will be far greater with @placeholder.
Pick one option, "@placeholder" refers to:
- Anne-Marie Slaughter
- Barack Obama
- Bashar al-Assad
- CNN
- Congress
- Obama
- Slaughter
- Syria
- Syrian
- Syrians
Congress
|
super_glue
|
record
|
(CNN) -- During a 1996 interview with television talk show host Charlie Rose, Apple co-founder Steve Jobs took exception to Rose's characterization of him as "a guy who founds high-tech companies and tries to make another billion." "Yeah, well, I don't think of myself that way," Jobs said. "The things that I have done in my life, I think the things we do now at Pixar [the animation company he bought in 1986], these are team sports. They are not something one person does." If pop culture were a team sport, Jobs would have certainly played quarterback. From the invention of iTunes, which completely changed the business of music, to offering the world its first completely full-length computer-generated animated film with Pixar's "Toy Story" in 1995, Jobs left his indelible fingerprints on the entertainment industry.
-
Steve Jobs pioneered inventions that changed the way the world consumed media
-
Pixar made the first fully computer-generated animated film
-
Billboard editor says Jobs brillance made buying music easy and fun
- As chairman and chief executive officer of Pixar, Jobs led the way in marrying the endless possibilities of technology with the glitz and glamour of the entertainment industry.
|
super_glue
|
record
|
Article:
(CNN) -- During a 1996 interview with television talk show host Charlie Rose, Apple co-founder Steve Jobs took exception to Rose's characterization of him as "a guy who founds high-tech companies and tries to make another billion." "Yeah, well, I don't think of myself that way," Jobs said. "The things that I have done in my life, I think the things we do now at Pixar [the animation company he bought in 1986], these are team sports. They are not something one person does." If pop culture were a team sport, Jobs would have certainly played quarterback. From the invention of iTunes, which completely changed the business of music, to offering the world its first completely full-length computer-generated animated film with Pixar's "Toy Story" in 1995, Jobs left his indelible fingerprints on the entertainment industry.
Highlights:
-
Steve Jobs pioneered inventions that changed the way the world consumed media
-
Pixar made the first fully computer-generated animated film
-
Billboard editor says Jobs brillance made buying music easy and fun
- By then he was firmly back in the driver's seat as the chief executive officer of Apple, which was setting the world afire with its inventions.
|
super_glue
|
record
|
(CNN) -- During a 1996 interview with television talk show host Charlie Rose, Apple co-founder Steve Jobs took exception to Rose's characterization of him as "a guy who founds high-tech companies and tries to make another billion." "Yeah, well, I don't think of myself that way," Jobs said. "The things that I have done in my life, I think the things we do now at Pixar [the animation company he bought in 1986], these are team sports. They are not something one person does." If pop culture were a team sport, Jobs would have certainly played quarterback. From the invention of iTunes, which completely changed the business of music, to offering the world its first completely full-length computer-generated animated film with Pixar's "Toy Story" in 1995, Jobs left his indelible fingerprints on the entertainment industry.
@highlight
Steve Jobs pioneered inventions that changed the way the world consumed media
@highlight
Pixar made the first fully computer-generated animated film
@highlight
Billboard editor says Jobs brillance made buying music easy and fun
@placeholder was a major influence on portable media, which paved the way for gamers to be able to engage in their favorite past time via handheld devices and film fans to be able to stream movies almost anywhere.
Can you figure out what does the "@placeholder" mean? It means
Steve Jobs
|
super_glue
|
record
|
Ahead of this weekend's Premier League action, Sportsmail will be providing you with all you need to know about every fixture, with team news, provisional squads, betting odds and Opta stats... Here is all the information you need for Arsenal's home clash with Manchester City... You can like our Arsenal Facebook page here Arsenal vs Manchester City (Emirates Stadium) Kick-off: Saturday 12.45pm - BT Sport 1 Odds (subject to change): Arsenal 7/4 Draw 12/5 Manchester City 6/4 Referee: Mark Clattenburg Managers: Arsene Wenger (Arsenal), Manuel Pellegrini (Manchester City) Head-to-head league record: Arsenal wins 85, draws 41, Manchester City wins 46
Danny Welbeck could make his Arsenal debut following £16million arrival from Manchester United on transfer deadline day
Aaron Ramsey to be assessed while Mikel Arteta back in full training
David Ospina and Kieran Gibbs are also on the mend for Gunners
Mesut Ozil likely to be fit after missing out for Germany
Stevan Jovetic will miss out for Manchester City with hamstring injury
Fernando will also miss out but Vincent Kompany likely to start
Eliaquim Mangala and Frank Lampard could make debuts
Manchester City are without midfielder Fernando (groin) and striker Stevan Jovetic (hamstring) will miss Saturday's Barclays Premier League trip to Arsenal.
|
kelm
|
None
|
Given facts from a knowledge base encoded in the form "subject relation object, relation object, ..." below (the subject and object are entities that are involved in a relationship defined by the relation), what would be a natural language sentence that uses all facts provided as input?
Mikhail Belyaev position held minister of war, country of citizenship Russian Empire, allegiance Russian Empire, date of birth 23 December 1863, date of death 01 January 1918
Mikhail Alekseyevich Belyaev (Russian: ; December 23, 1863Â - 1918) was a Russian general of the Infantry, statesman, Chief of Staff of the Imperial Russian Army from August 1, 1914 to August 10, 1916, and was the last Minister of War of the Russian Empire from January 3, 1917 to February 28, 1917.
|
kelm
|
None
|
Given a sentence below, generate knowledge base triples in the form of "subject relation object, relation object, ...". The subject and object are entities that are involved in a relationship defined by the relation.
Sentence: Shiels Jewellers is an Australian jewellery retailer and was founded by Jack Shiels in Adelaide in 1945.
Shiels Jewellers inception 01 January 1945
|
kelm
|
None
|
How would you rephrase the following information in the format of "subject relation object, relation object, ..." (the subject and object are entities that are involved in a relationship defined by the relation) into something easier to understand? Give your response in a complete sentence.
Information: Assassin 's Creed II Roger Craig Smith character role Ezio Auditore da Firenze, Nolan North character role Desmond Miles
The framing story is set in the 21st century and follows Desmond Miles as Assassin 's Creed II relives the genetic memories of his ancestor Ezio Auditore da Firenze.
|
kelm
|
None
|
How would you combine the following facts of the form "subject relation object, relation object, ..." (the subject and object are entities that are involved in a relationship defined by the relation) into a sentence?
"Cyclopites taxon rank Genus"
Cyclopites is a genus of aglaspidid arthropods that lived in shallow seas in what is now Wisconsin during Late Cambrian times.
|
kelm
|
None
|
Given knowledge base triples in the format of "subject relation object, relation object, ..." (the subject and object are entities that are involved in a relationship defined by the relation) generate a natural language sentence.
Triple: Confessions from the David Galaxy Affair instance of Film
Dors performed the film's theme song over the opening titles.
|
kelm
|
None
|
I am going through my notes about facts, and my notes are written in the form of "subject relation object, relation object, ...". The subject and object are entities that are involved in a relationship defined by the relation. I want to convert the facts into a sentence to include in my written report. What is the sentence?
Facts: The Planets ( 1999 TV series ) publication date 01 January 1999, narrator Samuel West
The series featured appearances from famous pioneering space scientists and explorers, and was narrated by Samuel West in the original 1999 edition, and Mark Halliley in the 2004 remastered edition.
|
humicroedit
|
subtask-2
|
Given an original sentence "" Gene Cernan , Last Astronaut on the Moon , Dies at 82 "", is it more humorous to replace "Astronaut" with "Dancer", or to replace "Dies" with "impregnated", or are both equally hilarious?
A. replace "Astronaut" with "Dancer"
B. replace "Dies" with "impregnated"
C. both equally hilarious
A
|
humicroedit
|
subtask-2
|
Original sentence: " I 'm done " : Fed up with California , some conservatives look to Texas.
Edited sentence A: " I 'm done " : Fed up with California , some vagrants look to Texas.
Edited sentence B: " I 'm done " : Fed up with pancakes , some conservatives look to Texas.
There are two edited sentences based on the original sentence, which is more humorous (A or B) or are they equally humorous?
A. Edited sentence A
B. Edited sentence B
C. Equal
C
|
humicroedit
|
subtask-2
|
Given an original sentence "" I 'm done " : Fed up with California , some conservatives look to Texas", we have two replacement strategies. The first is to replace "conservatives" with "vagrants", and the second is to replace "California" with "life".
Is the first strategy more humorous or the second, or are they equally funny?
A. The first strategy
B. The second strategy
C. Both are equally funny
A
|
humicroedit
|
subtask-2
|
There are two sentences:
Sentence1: " I 'm done " : Fed up with pancakes , some conservatives look to Texas
Sentence2: " I 'm done " : Fed up with life , some conservatives look to Texas
Which sentence is more humorous?
A. Sentence 1
B. Sentence 2
C. Equal
A
|
humicroedit
|
subtask-2
|
Which of the following sentences is more humorous? If they are equally funny, please answer "equal".
A. " Our expectations of what civic engagement looks like do n’t match reality . Can we imagine that ? "
B. " Our expectations of what civic engagement smells like do n’t match reality . Can we fix that ? "
B
|
humicroedit
|
subtask-2
|
There are two sentences:
Sentence1: " System safeguards are lacking " , quote following a Tesla 's flight during autopilot
Sentence2: " System safeguards are lacking " , quote following a Tesla 's explosion during autopilot
Which sentence is more humorous?
- Sentence 1
- Sentence 2
- Equal
Sentence 2
|
humicroedit
|
subtask-2
|
Given an original sentence "" System safeguards are lacking " , quote following a Tesla 's crash during autopilot", we have two replacement strategies:
The first is to replace "crash" with "flight".
The second is to replace "System" with "Deodorant".
Which strategy is more humorous (respond with "First" or "Second") or equally funny (if so, respond with "Equal")?
Second
|
humicroedit
|
subtask-2
|
Given an original sentence "" System safeguards are lacking " , quote following a Tesla 's crash during autopilot", we have two edited sentences. The first is "" System safeguards are lacking " , quote following a Tesla 's explosion during autopilot", and the second is "" Deodorant safeguards are lacking " , quote following a Tesla 's crash during autopilot".
Which edited sentence is more humorous (answer with "First" or "Second") or equally humorous (if so, answer 'Equally funny')?
Second
|
humicroedit
|
subtask-1
|
I need to know how funny it is to replace "Isis" with "twins" in the sentence "France is ‘ hunting down its citizens who joined Isis ’ without trial in Iraq ".
Question: Can you give me a number from 0.0 to 3.0 that denotes how funny it is, where 0.0 means not funny and 3.0 means funny?
0.2
|
humicroedit
|
subtask-1
|
I need to know how funny the edited sentence is compared to the original sentence:
Original: Pentagon claims 2,000 % increase in Russian trolls after Syria strikes . What does that mean ?
Edited: Pentagon claims 2,000 % increase in Russian trolls after bowling strikes . What does that mean ?
Question: Can you give me a number from 0.0 to 3.0 that denotes how funny it is, where 0.0 means not funny and 3.0 means funny?
1.6
|
humicroedit
|
subtask-1
|
Please give a score between 0 (not funny) and 3 (very funny) denoting the funniness of replacing "Coalition" with "party" in the sentence "Iceland PM Calls Snap Vote as Pedophile Furor Crashes Coalition ".
1.0
|
humicroedit
|
subtask-1
|
I need to assign a score from 0.0 to 3.0 that denotes how funny it is to replace "engage" with "slap" in the sentence "In an apparent first , Iran and Israel engage each other militarily ".
What score should I assign? A low score means not funny whereas a high score means very funny.
0.4
|
humicroedit
|
subtask-1
|
How funny is the following edited sentence compared to the original sentence?
Original: Trump was told weeks ago that Flynn misled Vice President .
Edited: Trump was told weeks ago that Flynn misled school President .
Your answer should be something like 1.5, where 0.0 means not funny and 3.0 means funny.
0.0
|
humicroedit
|
subtask-1
|
Give your best shot to rate how funny the following edited sentence is compared to the original sentence:
Original: All 22 promises Trump made in his speech to Congress , in one chart
Edited: All 22 sounds Trump made in his speech to Congress , in one chart
Use a scale of 0.0, which denotes not funny, to 3.0, which means really hilarious.
1.2
|
hellaswag
|
None
|
Complete the description with an appropriate ending:
First, then, the man writes over the snow covering the window of a car, and a woman wearing winter clothes smiles. Then, then ...
(a) , the man adds wax to the windshield and cuts it.
(b) , a person board a ski lift, while two men supporting the head of the person wearing winter clothes snow as the we girls sled.
(c) , the man puts on a christmas coat, knitted with netting.
(d) , the man continues removing the snow on his car.
, the man continues removing the snow on his car.
|
hellaswag
|
None
|
What is the topic of the sentence: A female chef in white uniform shows a stack of baking pans in a large kitchen presenting them. the pans
Baking cookies
|
hellaswag
|
None
|
Complete the sentence: A female chef in white uniform shows a stack of baking pans in a large kitchen presenting them. The pans are filled with pastries and loaded into the oven. a knife
is used to cut cylinder shaped dough into rounds.
|
hellaswag
|
None
|
A tray of potatoes is loaded into the oven and removed. A large tray of cake is flipped over and placed on counter. a large tray of meat is prepared then it is removed from the oven by a helper when done.
Can you identify the topic of the paragraph?
Baking cookies
|
hellaswag
|
None
|
Can you pick the correct ending for the sentence:
The man in the center is demonstrating a hairstyle on the person wearing the blue shirt. the man in the blue shirt
(a) is standing on the sponge cutting the hair of the person wearing the blue shirt.
(b) is doing the hairstyle with his hand and the hairspray.
(c) sits on the chair next to the sink.
(d) is being shown eye to eye.
sits on the chair next to the sink.
|
hellaswag
|
None
|
Consider the following description: The man in the blue shirt sits on the chair next to the sink. The other man begins washing his hair.
Is the following an appropriate continuation?
he then walks over to the sink and smiles while shaking his wet hair.
Yes or No?
No
|
hellaswag
|
None
|
How does this sentence end?
The man in the blue shirt sits on the chair next to the sink. The other man begins washing his hair. He scrubs in the shampoo and then washes it off. he
(a) then combs it and blow dries his hair after styling it with gel.
(b) shows the razor that he has for shaving his hair.
(c) hair is now dry, he is on his way to the barber.
(d) moves the bucket to the other side of the sink and continues washing his hair.
Hint: the topic of the sentence is Getting a haircut
then combs it and blow dries his hair after styling it with gel.
|
hellaswag
|
None
|
How would you start the sentence:
uses an electric clipper to groom the sideburns and the temples.
He scrubs in the shampoo and then washes it off. He then combs it and blow dries his hair after styling it with gel. he
|
hellaswag
|
None
|
Consider the following text: he also trims the back and sides of his head with the clippers.
Is it an appropriate continuation of the following text:
He then combs it and blow dries his hair after styling it with gel. He uses an electric clipper to groom the sideburns and the temples. ?
Yes or No?
Yes
|
hellaswag
|
None
|
He uses an electric clipper to groom the sideburns and the temples. He also trims the back and sides of his head with the clippers. he...
How does the description likely end?
Ending 1: then picks up some lipstick on the table to apply it to his face.
Ending 2: uses scissors to trim the hair and give it a finished look.
Ending 3: decorates with a very light style lip liner to complete the look.
Ending 4: then polishes his front teeth with a razor.
Ending 2
|
hellaswag
|
None
|
If a description of a situation begins like this: He also trims the back and sides of his head with the clippers. He uses scissors to trim the hair and give it a finished look. the model... Then how
does it continue?
Ending 1: poses with how to complete the look using the partial and then suggests a computer graphic tool.
Ending 2: poses and begins to talk while holding up a piece of metal.
Ending 3: uses some hair gel to style his hair after the haircut.
Ending 4: uses rollers to take some of the hair off the brush and enjoy the ending.
Ending 3
|
mocha
|
None
|
On a scale of 1.0 (completely different) to 5 (identical), how similar are these two sentences "He's a child and it's a very rare thing." and "Because he likes her a lot ."?
These sentences answer the question "What's a possible reason the guy stares into the writer's eyes ?" with the context of "Somewhere in me I knew it all along , there are all those moments when he stares into my eyes and his start to sparkle while this gorgeous grin spreads across his face . When he first started to do it I would ask him " what ? What s funny ? " he would always say nothing and attempt to divert his attention elsewhere ."
1.0
|
mocha
|
None
|
Given the passage and the answers given below, generate a relevant question.
Passage: Her dog and another kitten kept trying to escape the house while all this was going on . It was awkward and sad . I tried to be comforting because I could tell she was truly distraught but I was honestly mad at her for letting her animals out in the first place . She told me that she gave three of the kittens away to a home with dogs and two of them had been killed by the dogs already .
Answer 1 (Correct): Two of the kittens wouldn't have been killed
Answer 2: The kitten would have been killed.
What might be different if the friend didn't give away kittens to homes with dogs ?
|
mocha
|
None
|
Person A: What may be your reason for leaving the Malaysian Studies class ?
Person B: It didn't offer an accurate representation of that culture .
Person C: it does not have a clear idea about culture in it .
Does Person B give a similar answer as Person C? Answer "Similar" or "Not similar".
|
mocha
|
None
|
Given these two sentences "when they wear something" and "If they wear something a lot", return a value on a scale of 1.0 (completely different) to 5 (identical) indicating their similarity.
These sentences answer the following question about the given context.
Question: How would the narrator feel like they are getting their money's worth ?
Context: I'll wear once or twice then I'm back to what I already have . Then , the season changes and I pack it away with the others . So I feel like I don't get my money's worth if its not something I wear alot . I don't have a signature scent .
1.0
|
mocha
|
None
|
Give the similarity measure (on a scale of 1.0 to 5.0) for answers A and B. A value of 1.0 means completely different, whereas a value of 5.0 means identical.
Question: Why might he be wearing a dressing gown ?
Answer A: "He might have been in a costumes party ."
Answer B: "He is a fan of Vince McMahon."
1.0
|
mocha
|
None
|
How similar are Sentence A and B? Output the result value between 1.0 (completely different) and 5.0 (identical).
A: "it brought a heavy appetite ."
B: "It brought on a heavy taste ."
1.0
|
mocha
|
None
|
I don't have any mean intentions toward anyone . I am going to go read some of that training book . I think I have wrote everything that I wanted to say . I hope tomorrow will bring a better day .
Given the passage above, what is the answer to the question "What may be your reason for stopping your writing for today ?"
I needed to read a manual .
|
mocha
|
None
|
Output the similarity value between 1.0 (completely different) and 5.0 (identical) for Sentence A and B.
A: "We got it at our friend's place."
B: "Somebody else made it for us ."
2.0
|
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.