Split (2)

train · 8.45k rows

messages listlengths 3 3
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances. Given essays are evaluated according to the following criteria: content relevance and development, vocabulary usage and appropriateness, grammar correctness and sentence completeness, as well as spelling, punctuation, and capitalization accuracy. Do not change any of the instructions above. Append-only rules below define how to compute the single numeric score. Scoring rubric (four dimensions, each 0–25, total 0–100): Content (0–25): 25=all required/relevant items fully covered with detailed support; 20=most relevant items covered with some detail; 15=some relevant items covered with limited development; 10=few relevant items with minimal development; 5=mostly off-topic; 0=no relevant content. Vocabulary (0–25): 25=excellent appropriate range, uses ≥10 target words if a list is provided; 20=good, 8–9 words; 15=adequate but repetitive, 5–7 words; 10=limited with some misuse, 3–4 words; 5=very limited, 1–2 words; 0=inappropriate/0 words. If no target list, ignore numeric counts and judge appropriateness/range. Grammar (0–25): 25=all sentences complete, target structures correct, 0–3 mistakes; 20=most sentences complete, 4–5 mistakes; 15=some incomplete sentences, 6–7 mistakes; 10=several incomplete, 8–9 mistakes; 5=many incomplete, 10–12 mistakes; 0=most incomplete, >12 mistakes. If no target structures given, judge accuracy/complexity only. Spelling/Punctuation/Capitalization (0–25): 25=0–3 errors; 20=4–5; 15=6–7; 10=8–9; 5=10–12; 0=>12. Computation: (1) assign each dimension a banded score (0,5,10,15,20,25); (2) sum for Total_100; (3) convert to 0–5 integer overall by rounding Total_100/20 (clamp 0–5 if needed); (4) output exactly one line in the required format with that integer. Edge cases: empty/off-topic essays → Content=0; ignore absent vocab/structure targets; count each unique error, repeated typos count each time; if borderline between bands, choose the stricter (lower). Remember: you must not output anything except the single required line and integer per the original instruction.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Luke had no idea that his life was about to change. He worked two part-time jobs. One at a grocrey store the other at the bank. He had no idea that he was going to be \"A Cowboy Who Rode the Waves\". It all came to him one day as a big suprise. He join the UNRRA on his trip to Europe to help save lifes. He felt that they need people to help him. People needed to start signing up to help these people that were in pain. Luke's friend Don Reist invited him to go to Europe on a cattle boat. Well of corse he didn't say no. That was an oppoetunity of a life time. He could visit so many diffent places. He would be able to do a lot of things. He could not have a better day then this one. Nothign could be better then this he thought. It was 1945, World War ll was over in Europe at the time. Many countries were left in ruins. To help them recover, 44 nations joined togther to form the UNRRA (United Nations Relief an Rwhabilitaion Administration). UNRRA hiers \"Seagoing Cowboys\" to take care of horses and other riding animals that were shiped over sea. And sure enought Luke and Don had sign up for that job. Everybody should help people who needed help with World War ll going on. People woud suffer but if you joined the UNRRA it could save lifes. By time he was discharged in 1947, Luke had made nine trips. The most of any Seagoign Cowboy. \"The cattle-boat trips were an ubelievable oppertunity for a small-town boy.\" he says. Besides helping people, they got to see Europe and China. They had even toured an excravted castle in Crete and maveled at the Panama Canal on his way to China. So can you believe it making nine trips along the sea and, seeing all those amamzing places? This great thing just strated wth one question that would change his life. Would you like to go to Europe? And when they got there they help so many people by signing up for the UNRRA. They didn't froget about the people who needed help the most. It was amazing.", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 0.0", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances. Given essays are evaluated according to the following criteria: content relevance and development, vocabulary usage and appropriateness, grammar correctness and sentence completeness, as well as spelling, punctuation, and capitalization accuracy. Do not change any of the instructions above. Append-only rules below define how to compute the single numeric score. Scoring rubric (four dimensions, each 0–25, total 0–100): Content (0–25): 25=all required/relevant items fully covered with detailed support; 20=most relevant items covered with some detail; 15=some relevant items covered with limited development; 10=few relevant items with minimal development; 5=mostly off-topic; 0=no relevant content. Vocabulary (0–25): 25=excellent appropriate range, uses ≥10 target words if a list is provided; 20=good, 8–9 words; 15=adequate but repetitive, 5–7 words; 10=limited with some misuse, 3–4 words; 5=very limited, 1–2 words; 0=inappropriate/0 words. If no target list, ignore numeric counts and judge appropriateness/range. Grammar (0–25): 25=all sentences complete, target structures correct, 0–3 mistakes; 20=most sentences complete, 4–5 mistakes; 15=some incomplete sentences, 6–7 mistakes; 10=several incomplete, 8–9 mistakes; 5=many incomplete, 10–12 mistakes; 0=most incomplete, >12 mistakes. If no target structures given, judge accuracy/complexity only. Spelling/Punctuation/Capitalization (0–25): 25=0–3 errors; 20=4–5; 15=6–7; 10=8–9; 5=10–12; 0=>12. Computation: (1) assign each dimension a banded score (0,5,10,15,20,25); (2) sum for Total_100; (3) convert to 0–5 integer overall by rounding Total_100/20 (clamp 0–5 if needed); (4) output exactly one line in the required format with that integer. Edge cases: empty/off-topic essays → Content=0; ignore absent vocab/structure targets; count each unique error, repeated typos count each time; if borderline between bands, choose the stricter (lower). Remember: you must not output anything except the single required line and integer per the original instruction.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Presently, many families live a nomadic life, constantly switching countries due to better employment opportunities. Whilst certain individuals claim that this might pose a threat to the juveniles, other people share a contradictory view. As a consequence of frequent relocations of families, I believe that children are exposed to merits and demerits concurrently. First and foremost, people have now multiple chances of finding a job abroad, therefore, carrying their families with them. While relocating to different countries for improved job opportunities can enhance the financial well-being of parents and family budgets, it is often the children who are most negatively affected. To cite an example, establishing relationships at younger ages is a pivotal milestone for juveniles which needs to be accomplished successfully. As families move through different geographic locations, children too are obliged to adapt to their new lifestyles according to the new cultures, friends, and environment. Consequently, every detachment from the previous location and friends can drive children to be depressive and sometimes suicidal due to the inability to cope with the erratic changes that are occurring in their lives. On the other hand, disruptive change is one of the most important factors that foster an environment of steady growth even among juniors. Some people advocate for constant exposure to change and agility to experience as much diversity as possible by travelling to other countries. For example, children can learn multiple languages as their parents move around the world, placing them one step ahead of their peers. Moreover, some of those new countries can actually furnish them with a chance of better and free education, medical care, and access to other publicly available amenities. In conclusion, despite depending on the mental state of children, the occurrence of unanticipated events can pose a formidable threat to them predominantly depending on the mental state of children, there are salient advantages that come along with each relocation journey.", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 4.0", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances. Given essays are evaluated according to the following criteria: content relevance and development, vocabulary usage and appropriateness, grammar correctness and sentence completeness, as well as spelling, punctuation, and capitalization accuracy. Do not change any of the instructions above. Append-only rules below define how to compute the single numeric score. Scoring rubric (four dimensions, each 0–25, total 0–100): Content (0–25): 25=all required/relevant items fully covered with detailed support; 20=most relevant items covered with some detail; 15=some relevant items covered with limited development; 10=few relevant items with minimal development; 5=mostly off-topic; 0=no relevant content. Vocabulary (0–25): 25=excellent appropriate range, uses ≥10 target words if a list is provided; 20=good, 8–9 words; 15=adequate but repetitive, 5–7 words; 10=limited with some misuse, 3–4 words; 5=very limited, 1–2 words; 0=inappropriate/0 words. If no target list, ignore numeric counts and judge appropriateness/range. Grammar (0–25): 25=all sentences complete, target structures correct, 0–3 mistakes; 20=most sentences complete, 4–5 mistakes; 15=some incomplete sentences, 6–7 mistakes; 10=several incomplete, 8–9 mistakes; 5=many incomplete, 10–12 mistakes; 0=most incomplete, >12 mistakes. If no target structures given, judge accuracy/complexity only. Spelling/Punctuation/Capitalization (0–25): 25=0–3 errors; 20=4–5; 15=6–7; 10=8–9; 5=10–12; 0=>12. Computation: (1) assign each dimension a banded score (0,5,10,15,20,25); (2) sum for Total_100; (3) convert to 0–5 integer overall by rounding Total_100/20 (clamp 0–5 if needed); (4) output exactly one line in the required format with that integer. Edge cases: empty/off-topic essays → Content=0; ignore absent vocab/structure targets; count each unique error, repeated typos count each time; if borderline between bands, choose the stricter (lower). Remember: you must not output anything except the single required line and integer per the original instruction.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Could you imagine living on Venus? The author of this passage is very passionate about Venus exploration. From knowing the different facts, the risks and the requirements needed to achieve the main goal: Venus exploration. The author clearly establishes that with certain measures and different experiments Venus exploration is truly possible. Venus is completely worth the risk. First, The author states in paragraph four that the reason that astronomers persistent on sending spacecrafts to Venus becase \"Astronomers are fascinated by Venus because it may have well been the most Earth like planet in our solar system.\" This clearly states that Venus had similarites that of our Earth. The author also writes in paragraph that \"...Venus was probably largely covered with oceans and could have supported various forms of life, like Earth\" This states that at some point in time Venus had bodies of water suitable for sustainable life. All of these facts indicate that not only could Venus possibly hold life, but maintain it despite it being so dangerous. The author, again, also states on paragraph four that \"The planet has a surface of rocky sediment and includes familiar features such as valleys, mountains and craters.\" Again, this sheds light on the idea that Venus could still be potientially hospitable for human life and sparks the idea that maybe humans could live on our Evening Star. Second, How would we go about even exploring it? The author states that on ground level, \"...atmosphere of highly corrosive sulfuric acid in Venus's atmosphere.\" He goes on to say, \"On the planets surface, temperartures average over 800 degrees Fahrenheit, and the atomospheric pressure is 90 times greater than what we experience on Earth.\" So, how could a planet so dangerous even be capable of human life, despite all of the Earth like similarites? It seems impossible, right? How would we as humans even get close to the planet without it killing us? NASA has an idea for that. The author states that \"NASA's possible solution to the hostile conditions on the surface of Venus would allow scientists to float above the fray. Imagine a blimp-like vehicle hovering 30 or so miles above the rolling Venusian landscape.\" NASA is already in the production of making a working-flying vehicle capable of observing Venus from afar. Which means, we could ultimately avoid the trecherous landscape of Venus all together. Furthermore, The author also goes on to say in paragraph 7, \"NASA is working on other approaches to study Venus. For example, some simplified electronics made of silcon carbide have beem tested in a chamber simulating the chaos of Venus's surface and have lasted three weeks in such conditions.\" This entails that electronics such as phones, or a simple voice recorder have been made that could withstand Venus's condtions. NASA also has another project to be looked upon: mechanical computers. The author writes \"These devices were firs envisioned in the 1800s and played an important role in the 1940s during WWII....these devices make calculations by using gears and levers and do ot require electronics at all.\" This states that there are things out there can be used to make calculations on the planet without the harsh temperarture melting the computer or object. In conclusion the author goes in depth about why Venus is worthy of being voyaged to. Mechanical computer, floating blimps, oceans, mountains. All these things are valid reasons to investigate the world of Venus and its possible hospitality. This planet is one of the few planets to not only have scientific proof of containing water, but is also close enough to travel to. Truly, Venus is a worthy contender of space travel.", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 4.0", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances. Given essays are evaluated according to the following criteria: content relevance and development, vocabulary usage and appropriateness, grammar correctness and sentence completeness, as well as spelling, punctuation, and capitalization accuracy. Do not change any of the instructions above. Append-only rules below define how to compute the single numeric score. Scoring rubric (four dimensions, each 0–25, total 0–100): Content (0–25): 25=all required/relevant items fully covered with detailed support; 20=most relevant items covered with some detail; 15=some relevant items covered with limited development; 10=few relevant items with minimal development; 5=mostly off-topic; 0=no relevant content. Vocabulary (0–25): 25=excellent appropriate range, uses ≥10 target words if a list is provided; 20=good, 8–9 words; 15=adequate but repetitive, 5–7 words; 10=limited with some misuse, 3–4 words; 5=very limited, 1–2 words; 0=inappropriate/0 words. If no target list, ignore numeric counts and judge appropriateness/range. Grammar (0–25): 25=all sentences complete, target structures correct, 0–3 mistakes; 20=most sentences complete, 4–5 mistakes; 15=some incomplete sentences, 6–7 mistakes; 10=several incomplete, 8–9 mistakes; 5=many incomplete, 10–12 mistakes; 0=most incomplete, >12 mistakes. If no target structures given, judge accuracy/complexity only. Spelling/Punctuation/Capitalization (0–25): 25=0–3 errors; 20=4–5; 15=6–7; 10=8–9; 5=10–12; 0=>12. Computation: (1) assign each dimension a banded score (0,5,10,15,20,25); (2) sum for Total_100; (3) convert to 0–5 integer overall by rounding Total_100/20 (clamp 0–5 if needed); (4) output exactly one line in the required format with that integer. Edge cases: empty/off-topic essays → Content=0; ignore absent vocab/structure targets; count each unique error, repeated typos count each time; if borderline between bands, choose the stricter (lower). Remember: you must not output anything except the single required line and integer per the original instruction.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Due to the advancement of technology, many jobs can now be achieved by the use of machines and computers. This development has a great impact on our society and it is good to know whether this is a positive or a negative tendency. Some people feel that this is an advantageous trend, while others believe that this has negative impacts on our community. Personally, I tend to support the latter approach. This innovation has made people's life much easier and more convenient. Since robots have replaced many manual labours, employers have the chance not only to save valuable time as the machines do not require any further training, but also to increase their revenues because machines do not demand monthly salaries like humans do. For example, in many grocery stores in the UK, customers can now scan and pay their shoppings in vending machines, resulting the save time on waiting in the queue. This is a clear benefit for the community. Nevertheless, this innovative method can cause dire problems. Looking on the other side of the coin, robots have significantly increased the rate of poverty and unemployment. Many jobs have been limited due to this innovation and therefore it's more difficult to get employed compared to a few decades ago. For example, from vending machines have been invented many cashiers have been unemployed. Furthermore, these machines consume high amounts of electrical power in order to operate. As a result, this tendency has definitely a negative impact to the environment since electrical power industries pollute the environment for the generation. To conclude, this innovation has great benefits for our society in one point, but I believe that the disadvantages of this trend outweigh the advantages. High rates of unemployment cause massive problems for the humanity.", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 5.0", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances. Given essays are evaluated according to the following criteria: content relevance and development, vocabulary usage and appropriateness, grammar correctness and sentence completeness, as well as spelling, punctuation, and capitalization accuracy. Do not change any of the instructions above. Append-only rules below define how to compute the single numeric score. Scoring rubric (four dimensions, each 0–25, total 0–100): Content (0–25): 25=all required/relevant items fully covered with detailed support; 20=most relevant items covered with some detail; 15=some relevant items covered with limited development; 10=few relevant items with minimal development; 5=mostly off-topic; 0=no relevant content. Vocabulary (0–25): 25=excellent appropriate range, uses ≥10 target words if a list is provided; 20=good, 8–9 words; 15=adequate but repetitive, 5–7 words; 10=limited with some misuse, 3–4 words; 5=very limited, 1–2 words; 0=inappropriate/0 words. If no target list, ignore numeric counts and judge appropriateness/range. Grammar (0–25): 25=all sentences complete, target structures correct, 0–3 mistakes; 20=most sentences complete, 4–5 mistakes; 15=some incomplete sentences, 6–7 mistakes; 10=several incomplete, 8–9 mistakes; 5=many incomplete, 10–12 mistakes; 0=most incomplete, >12 mistakes. If no target structures given, judge accuracy/complexity only. Spelling/Punctuation/Capitalization (0–25): 25=0–3 errors; 20=4–5; 15=6–7; 10=8–9; 5=10–12; 0=>12. Computation: (1) assign each dimension a banded score (0,5,10,15,20,25); (2) sum for Total_100; (3) convert to 0–5 integer overall by rounding Total_100/20 (clamp 0–5 if needed); (4) output exactly one line in the required format with that integer. Edge cases: empty/off-topic essays → Content=0; ignore absent vocab/structure targets; count each unique error, repeated typos count each time; if borderline between bands, choose the stricter (lower). Remember: you must not output anything except the single required line and integer per the original instruction.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Problaby it will be one advance more than big for the world, \"driveless car\" it is another invent by google and other people more, it will help more people for stay more fast were they want. It is one of the best ideas the I ear before but id everybdy thing what they wiil do wuith the other car the we have right now? It is a lot trash and in this world we don't have more space for that. I don't think it is necesary for any one. the people nw just think it do more stof but the don't think what we will do with all the things what we don't need and maybe in this world we dont have pace jus for put all that. Why this people no think about the people who need help? why they need all time new cars but what about the people who don't have house or food? it is a better ide than just a new cars, for what? more cars if we have a lot. Now we have all forms for go contry by country but why the don't think in someting more special, more important like help other countrys. Not with just one little part I mean if we don't need something new why we use why we don't buy some clothes or seme shoes for wo need it? It is more easy and better for allthe people in the world. And what about the animals? why we have to eat all time animals? why everything is create by the animals now? The people know they hav fellings like us? Now the \"human\" is a animal, we kill everything what we see \"everything. We don't have a lot time in this world, God is coming for us and we need something for make this world better, wecan try to help persons, animals, trees, ans a lot more, we don't need more cars just because the people who wave money think is better foe they. every body know if they will do those cars jus are for people with a lot mone and not for who really need cars. I know I don't talk about your \"cars\" like what you want but i don't think like you. I think if we have something and we can give that for someone who really need it we Have to do, it is better than use that for nothing immportant or special like people like you want.", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 0.0", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances. Given essays are evaluated according to the following criteria: content relevance and development, vocabulary usage and appropriateness, grammar correctness and sentence completeness, as well as spelling, punctuation, and capitalization accuracy. Do not change any of the instructions above. Append-only rules below define how to compute the single numeric score. Scoring rubric (four dimensions, each 0–25, total 0–100): Content (0–25): 25=all required/relevant items fully covered with detailed support; 20=most relevant items covered with some detail; 15=some relevant items covered with limited development; 10=few relevant items with minimal development; 5=mostly off-topic; 0=no relevant content. Vocabulary (0–25): 25=excellent appropriate range, uses ≥10 target words if a list is provided; 20=good, 8–9 words; 15=adequate but repetitive, 5–7 words; 10=limited with some misuse, 3–4 words; 5=very limited, 1–2 words; 0=inappropriate/0 words. If no target list, ignore numeric counts and judge appropriateness/range. Grammar (0–25): 25=all sentences complete, target structures correct, 0–3 mistakes; 20=most sentences complete, 4–5 mistakes; 15=some incomplete sentences, 6–7 mistakes; 10=several incomplete, 8–9 mistakes; 5=many incomplete, 10–12 mistakes; 0=most incomplete, >12 mistakes. If no target structures given, judge accuracy/complexity only. Spelling/Punctuation/Capitalization (0–25): 25=0–3 errors; 20=4–5; 15=6–7; 10=8–9; 5=10–12; 0=>12. Computation: (1) assign each dimension a banded score (0,5,10,15,20,25); (2) sum for Total_100; (3) convert to 0–5 integer overall by rounding Total_100/20 (clamp 0–5 if needed); (4) output exactly one line in the required format with that integer. Edge cases: empty/off-topic essays → Content=0; ignore absent vocab/structure targets; count each unique error, repeated typos count each time; if borderline between bands, choose the stricter (lower). Remember: you must not output anything except the single required line and integer per the original instruction.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Dear Senator, I feel like we should keep the Electoral College because, \"A disput over the outcome of a electoral college vote is possible but, it is less likely than a dispute over the popular vote\". This means that that people would argue over the electoral college vote and who they voted for but but people most likely would not argue over the popular vote. They have done this before in 2012's election prosses with Obama and Romney. The second reason is that everyone will have to put ads up because not just one region of votes will make them president they are going to need to advertise everywhere. The third reason is that \"the winner-take-all method of awarding Electoral votes induces the canidates\". This means to me that the method helps the canidates so they can win easily. The fourth and final reason is that the big staes get more votes because they have more people in there country so the automatically get more attention from the president. It is also easier for them to get what they want meaning they can reallly like choose any president they want and its a high percenatge that they will get that president. Those are only some of the reasons that i think we should keep the Electoral College. To me I feel it would be easier to just do this other than count all the votes frome every single voter. Besides what other brillant plan can you come up with that is easier than this?", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 2.0", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances. Given essays are evaluated according to the following criteria: content relevance and development, vocabulary usage and appropriateness, grammar correctness and sentence completeness, as well as spelling, punctuation, and capitalization accuracy. Do not change any of the instructions above. Append-only rules below define how to compute the single numeric score. Scoring rubric (four dimensions, each 0–25, total 0–100): Content (0–25): 25=all required/relevant items fully covered with detailed support; 20=most relevant items covered with some detail; 15=some relevant items covered with limited development; 10=few relevant items with minimal development; 5=mostly off-topic; 0=no relevant content. Vocabulary (0–25): 25=excellent appropriate range, uses ≥10 target words if a list is provided; 20=good, 8–9 words; 15=adequate but repetitive, 5–7 words; 10=limited with some misuse, 3–4 words; 5=very limited, 1–2 words; 0=inappropriate/0 words. If no target list, ignore numeric counts and judge appropriateness/range. Grammar (0–25): 25=all sentences complete, target structures correct, 0–3 mistakes; 20=most sentences complete, 4–5 mistakes; 15=some incomplete sentences, 6–7 mistakes; 10=several incomplete, 8–9 mistakes; 5=many incomplete, 10–12 mistakes; 0=most incomplete, >12 mistakes. If no target structures given, judge accuracy/complexity only. Spelling/Punctuation/Capitalization (0–25): 25=0–3 errors; 20=4–5; 15=6–7; 10=8–9; 5=10–12; 0=>12. Computation: (1) assign each dimension a banded score (0,5,10,15,20,25); (2) sum for Total_100; (3) convert to 0–5 integer overall by rounding Total_100/20 (clamp 0–5 if needed); (4) output exactly one line in the required format with that integer. Edge cases: empty/off-topic essays → Content=0; ignore absent vocab/structure targets; count each unique error, repeated typos count each time; if borderline between bands, choose the stricter (lower). Remember: you must not output anything except the single required line and integer per the original instruction.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "The features cyclist experianced ride affect body mind At first cyclist flat graund drinking plenty water without fear But came second town became ton water This troubled optomistic telling the next town eighteen miles After road replaced short rolling hills started trouble Dehydration started set every hill challenge Once water sucked pebbles hopped would take mind thirst When finally made relieved Everything dehydration wich affects body lozing hope affected cyclist ride", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 5.0", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances. Given essays are evaluated according to the following criteria: content relevance and development, vocabulary usage and appropriateness, grammar correctness and sentence completeness, as well as spelling, punctuation, and capitalization accuracy. Do not change any of the instructions above. Append-only rules below define how to compute the single numeric score. Scoring rubric (four dimensions, each 0–25, total 0–100): Content (0–25): 25=all required/relevant items fully covered with detailed support; 20=most relevant items covered with some detail; 15=some relevant items covered with limited development; 10=few relevant items with minimal development; 5=mostly off-topic; 0=no relevant content. Vocabulary (0–25): 25=excellent appropriate range, uses ≥10 target words if a list is provided; 20=good, 8–9 words; 15=adequate but repetitive, 5–7 words; 10=limited with some misuse, 3–4 words; 5=very limited, 1–2 words; 0=inappropriate/0 words. If no target list, ignore numeric counts and judge appropriateness/range. Grammar (0–25): 25=all sentences complete, target structures correct, 0–3 mistakes; 20=most sentences complete, 4–5 mistakes; 15=some incomplete sentences, 6–7 mistakes; 10=several incomplete, 8–9 mistakes; 5=many incomplete, 10–12 mistakes; 0=most incomplete, >12 mistakes. If no target structures given, judge accuracy/complexity only. Spelling/Punctuation/Capitalization (0–25): 25=0–3 errors; 20=4–5; 15=6–7; 10=8–9; 5=10–12; 0=>12. Computation: (1) assign each dimension a banded score (0,5,10,15,20,25); (2) sum for Total_100; (3) convert to 0–5 integer overall by rounding Total_100/20 (clamp 0–5 if needed); (4) output exactly one line in the required format with that integer. Edge cases: empty/off-topic essays → Content=0; ignore absent vocab/structure targets; count each unique error, repeated typos count each time; if borderline between bands, choose the stricter (lower). Remember: you must not output anything except the single required line and integer per the original instruction.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "There many obstacles way adding mooring dock top Empire State Building First new many modifications would added frame building This previous frame could hold extra weight dirigible hanging cable These additions would take sixty thousand dollars plus extra time effort Another huge problem saftey Winds around New York constantly shifting due violent air currents This would lead blimb wraping around tower possibly break worse Not mention around densely populated city accident could cause much destruction normal Forgein dirigibles also used mass amounts hydrogen proven Hindenburg could explode massive flaming dunk steel This chance would magnified weather accident would high human property costs Finally It illegal blimbs fly low near city making whole project illegal As see many problems blimb docking center Empire State Building", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 5.0", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances. Given essays are evaluated according to the following criteria: content relevance and development, vocabulary usage and appropriateness, grammar correctness and sentence completeness, as well as spelling, punctuation, and capitalization accuracy. Do not change any of the instructions above. Append-only rules below define how to compute the single numeric score. Scoring rubric (four dimensions, each 0–25, total 0–100): Content (0–25): 25=all required/relevant items fully covered with detailed support; 20=most relevant items covered with some detail; 15=some relevant items covered with limited development; 10=few relevant items with minimal development; 5=mostly off-topic; 0=no relevant content. Vocabulary (0–25): 25=excellent appropriate range, uses ≥10 target words if a list is provided; 20=good, 8–9 words; 15=adequate but repetitive, 5–7 words; 10=limited with some misuse, 3–4 words; 5=very limited, 1–2 words; 0=inappropriate/0 words. If no target list, ignore numeric counts and judge appropriateness/range. Grammar (0–25): 25=all sentences complete, target structures correct, 0–3 mistakes; 20=most sentences complete, 4–5 mistakes; 15=some incomplete sentences, 6–7 mistakes; 10=several incomplete, 8–9 mistakes; 5=many incomplete, 10–12 mistakes; 0=most incomplete, >12 mistakes. If no target structures given, judge accuracy/complexity only. Spelling/Punctuation/Capitalization (0–25): 25=0–3 errors; 20=4–5; 15=6–7; 10=8–9; 5=10–12; 0=>12. Computation: (1) assign each dimension a banded score (0,5,10,15,20,25); (2) sum for Total_100; (3) convert to 0–5 integer overall by rounding Total_100/20 (clamp 0–5 if needed); (4) output exactly one line in the required format with that integer. Edge cases: empty/off-topic essays → Content=0; ignore absent vocab/structure targets; count each unique error, repeated typos count each time; if borderline between bands, choose the stricter (lower). Remember: you must not output anything except the single required line and integer per the original instruction.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "The setting story greatly affects cyclists attitude adversities The path cyclist California deserts dry hot This first presents major conflict story danger cyclist getting heatstake In reading author says I hitting water bottles pretty regularly If setting cooler climate author would likely drank often would face dehydration The trip would dangerous cyclist climate different Another element setting affected cyclist terrain In reading says Flat road replaced short rolling hills The rough road would take toil authors body also mind While riding author thinks I waterdepleting mph This shows attitude getting less less optimistic well keeping mind thirst Thinking thirst would get thirsty The small change terrain large impact authors journey Perhaps influential element setting isolation Only end story cyclist run another human Up point He alone deal thirst fatigue If setting urbanized area cyclist could gotten help people would made ordeal easy Also known nobody going help played large role mental state author In conclusion conflict story set setting If setting hot rough isolated cyclist would easy journey story would exciting interesting A different setting opinion would ruined story", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 5.0", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances. Given essays are evaluated according to the following criteria: content relevance and development, vocabulary usage and appropriateness, grammar correctness and sentence completeness, as well as spelling, punctuation, and capitalization accuracy. Do not change any of the instructions above. Append-only rules below define how to compute the single numeric score. Scoring rubric (four dimensions, each 0–25, total 0–100): Content (0–25): 25=all required/relevant items fully covered with detailed support; 20=most relevant items covered with some detail; 15=some relevant items covered with limited development; 10=few relevant items with minimal development; 5=mostly off-topic; 0=no relevant content. Vocabulary (0–25): 25=excellent appropriate range, uses ≥10 target words if a list is provided; 20=good, 8–9 words; 15=adequate but repetitive, 5–7 words; 10=limited with some misuse, 3–4 words; 5=very limited, 1–2 words; 0=inappropriate/0 words. If no target list, ignore numeric counts and judge appropriateness/range. Grammar (0–25): 25=all sentences complete, target structures correct, 0–3 mistakes; 20=most sentences complete, 4–5 mistakes; 15=some incomplete sentences, 6–7 mistakes; 10=several incomplete, 8–9 mistakes; 5=many incomplete, 10–12 mistakes; 0=most incomplete, >12 mistakes. If no target structures given, judge accuracy/complexity only. Spelling/Punctuation/Capitalization (0–25): 25=0–3 errors; 20=4–5; 15=6–7; 10=8–9; 5=10–12; 0=>12. Computation: (1) assign each dimension a banded score (0,5,10,15,20,25); (2) sum for Total_100; (3) convert to 0–5 integer overall by rounding Total_100/20 (clamp 0–5 if needed); (4) output exactly one line in the required format with that integer. Edge cases: empty/off-topic essays → Content=0; ignore absent vocab/structure targets; count each unique error, repeated typos count each time; if borderline between bands, choose the stricter (lower). Remember: you must not output anything except the single required line and integer per the original instruction.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Throughout the article it is made known that Venus is an oustanding yet harsh planet. However Venus is one of Earth's closest neighbors and the planet most like Earth. Scientist believe that at one point Venus could of maintained a form of life, and for some reason still have hope to visit. Astronomers to this day are fascinated by Venus and would soon love to find a way to make a landing on this very earth-like planet. However, why are astronomers so fascinated by this planet? Venus has many features that are analogous to those on Earth. However Venus has an atmosphere almost ninty-seven percent of carbon dioxide, and on the surface temperatures average over eight hundred degrees. Venus isn't the closest planet to the sun but is still the hottest. Even though some conditions are different Venus still has many conditions similar to Earth. Throughout the article it is clearly states the similarities and differences between Earth and Venus. In paragragh three the author shows just how a like these two planets can be. \"Venusian geology and weather present additional impediments like erupting volcanoes, powerful earthquakes, and frequent lightning strikes to probes seeking land on its surface.\" These conditions listed are very similar to those of the conditions on Earth. However Venus may be similar in some forms, the differences between the two planets has prevented Venus from being discovered. Venus may only ever be discovered through a ship flying over thirty miles above the landscape of the planet due to how harsh the conditions are. \"At thirty-plus miles above the surface, temperatures would still be toasty at around 170 degrees Farenheit,\" this claim by the author comes to show that even from a distance the conditions of Venus can be felt. Coming any closer to the planet would put those on the journey in a very dangerous situation. However despite the harsh conditions and nearly impossible ideas, atronomers still attempt on landing something on the floor of Venus. Venus is the closest thing to Earth, and astronomers want to believe that one day it did or one day this planet will hold life.", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 2.0", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances. Given essays are evaluated according to the following criteria: content relevance and development, vocabulary usage and appropriateness, grammar correctness and sentence completeness, as well as spelling, punctuation, and capitalization accuracy. Do not change any of the instructions above. Append-only rules below define how to compute the single numeric score. Scoring rubric (four dimensions, each 0–25, total 0–100): Content (0–25): 25=all required/relevant items fully covered with detailed support; 20=most relevant items covered with some detail; 15=some relevant items covered with limited development; 10=few relevant items with minimal development; 5=mostly off-topic; 0=no relevant content. Vocabulary (0–25): 25=excellent appropriate range, uses ≥10 target words if a list is provided; 20=good, 8–9 words; 15=adequate but repetitive, 5–7 words; 10=limited with some misuse, 3–4 words; 5=very limited, 1–2 words; 0=inappropriate/0 words. If no target list, ignore numeric counts and judge appropriateness/range. Grammar (0–25): 25=all sentences complete, target structures correct, 0–3 mistakes; 20=most sentences complete, 4–5 mistakes; 15=some incomplete sentences, 6–7 mistakes; 10=several incomplete, 8–9 mistakes; 5=many incomplete, 10–12 mistakes; 0=most incomplete, >12 mistakes. If no target structures given, judge accuracy/complexity only. Spelling/Punctuation/Capitalization (0–25): 25=0–3 errors; 20=4–5; 15=6–7; 10=8–9; 5=10–12; 0=>12. Computation: (1) assign each dimension a banded score (0,5,10,15,20,25); (2) sum for Total_100; (3) convert to 0–5 integer overall by rounding Total_100/20 (clamp 0–5 if needed); (4) output exactly one line in the required format with that integer. Edge cases: empty/off-topic essays → Content=0; ignore absent vocab/structure targets; count each unique error, repeated typos count each time; if borderline between bands, choose the stricter (lower). Remember: you must not output anything except the single required line and integer per the original instruction.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Dear editor Have ever would know something badly ca nt focus anything else Have ever tried find information ahhah moment What use search knowledge You probably used computer All need type request hit enter viola Your screen fills choices information sites Computers help many people everyday questions Our country gotten smarter computers You converse friends moved across state country even world At every click mouse new things learn You even use computer personal enjoyment Computers opened many opportunities world needs lake When I four years old best friends time moved florida I devastaded At first tried writing letters ohter Then grew older became busier busier connection halted As technology computers advanced friend I text email instant message time It made long distance friendship easier closer Because computers communicate friends thought longlost You also meet new people one many sites available How would like talk someone way World communication also opened many business opportunities Since economy failing computers open job spaces help college students study futur career hopefully help improve lives many people Communication needed many things make world better generations came Instead going noisy arcade play exciting games right privacy Any game think probably found From simple game solitare advanced level shift games age difficulty level found New people think kids going sit front computer play games There going peole refuse go outside spend time friends read outside There definitely people like I ca nt help What refuse go outside I know many people spend budget time wisely still great time We also encourage kids use exercise programs computers video games improve health There many fun games help better healthier person still fun The computers homes right equipped much information tried take would overwhelmed popular search engine gives power look anything could ever wait know vice president s birthday price eggs wide found click button knowledge helps homework assignments incredibly Most reference books date information inaccurate computers updated frequently facts time I think country gotten much smarter computers So whether want talk longlost friend talk expert osprey find answer computer While re play couple exciting games learn best movies ever released Have fun learn lots", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 4.0", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances. Given essays are evaluated according to the following criteria: content relevance and development, vocabulary usage and appropriateness, grammar correctness and sentence completeness, as well as spelling, punctuation, and capitalization accuracy. Do not change any of the instructions above. Append-only rules below define how to compute the single numeric score. Scoring rubric (four dimensions, each 0–25, total 0–100): Content (0–25): 25=all required/relevant items fully covered with detailed support; 20=most relevant items covered with some detail; 15=some relevant items covered with limited development; 10=few relevant items with minimal development; 5=mostly off-topic; 0=no relevant content. Vocabulary (0–25): 25=excellent appropriate range, uses ≥10 target words if a list is provided; 20=good, 8–9 words; 15=adequate but repetitive, 5–7 words; 10=limited with some misuse, 3–4 words; 5=very limited, 1–2 words; 0=inappropriate/0 words. If no target list, ignore numeric counts and judge appropriateness/range. Grammar (0–25): 25=all sentences complete, target structures correct, 0–3 mistakes; 20=most sentences complete, 4–5 mistakes; 15=some incomplete sentences, 6–7 mistakes; 10=several incomplete, 8–9 mistakes; 5=many incomplete, 10–12 mistakes; 0=most incomplete, >12 mistakes. If no target structures given, judge accuracy/complexity only. Spelling/Punctuation/Capitalization (0–25): 25=0–3 errors; 20=4–5; 15=6–7; 10=8–9; 5=10–12; 0=>12. Computation: (1) assign each dimension a banded score (0,5,10,15,20,25); (2) sum for Total_100; (3) convert to 0–5 integer overall by rounding Total_100/20 (clamp 0–5 if needed); (4) output exactly one line in the required format with that integer. Edge cases: empty/off-topic essays → Content=0; ignore absent vocab/structure targets; count each unique error, repeated typos count each time; if borderline between bands, choose the stricter (lower). Remember: you must not output anything except the single required line and integer per the original instruction.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Often people argue that watching television has an impact on their adolescent attitude , where as many think that influencing nature is due to the amount of time they use to spend on screen . However, in upcoming paragraphs both parameters are discussed in detail. To begin with , Juvenile usually follow the advertisement trend being seen through the entertainment platforms. Because at this age of learning they are in habit of catching all good as well as bad manners. Therefore, it all depends upon their interest , moral values and surroundings what they are analysing as beneficial for them . For instance , youngsters prefer action , ferry tales and adventuresome videos which lead them to an imaginary world , hence , they are not able to understand the actual message behind particular video. On the other hand, people believe that behaviour changes is just because of the significant time they watch TV or entertainment advertisements. Moreover , sticking to a specific type of resource creates a curiosity in their mind to watch that thing again and again . Ultimately they are addict to be in that situation . For example , infants like cartoons more than anything . In recent research by University of London , it has been observed that children are very much attracted by the audio visual ads and almost 80 percent of kids are influenced by watching the entertainment screen for long duration. To recapitulate , I reckon that , irrespective of timing factor and the type of advertisement being watched, children's always attract toward that advert ,then they try to imitate them with their own way it leads to their attitude changes. Nonetheless , by telecasting informative as well as precise videos, younger ones will be entertained a lot. Apparently, there would not be any behavioural changes.", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 3.0", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances. Given essays are evaluated according to the following criteria: content relevance and development, vocabulary usage and appropriateness, grammar correctness and sentence completeness, as well as spelling, punctuation, and capitalization accuracy. Do not change any of the instructions above. Append-only rules below define how to compute the single numeric score. Scoring rubric (four dimensions, each 0–25, total 0–100): Content (0–25): 25=all required/relevant items fully covered with detailed support; 20=most relevant items covered with some detail; 15=some relevant items covered with limited development; 10=few relevant items with minimal development; 5=mostly off-topic; 0=no relevant content. Vocabulary (0–25): 25=excellent appropriate range, uses ≥10 target words if a list is provided; 20=good, 8–9 words; 15=adequate but repetitive, 5–7 words; 10=limited with some misuse, 3–4 words; 5=very limited, 1–2 words; 0=inappropriate/0 words. If no target list, ignore numeric counts and judge appropriateness/range. Grammar (0–25): 25=all sentences complete, target structures correct, 0–3 mistakes; 20=most sentences complete, 4–5 mistakes; 15=some incomplete sentences, 6–7 mistakes; 10=several incomplete, 8–9 mistakes; 5=many incomplete, 10–12 mistakes; 0=most incomplete, >12 mistakes. If no target structures given, judge accuracy/complexity only. Spelling/Punctuation/Capitalization (0–25): 25=0–3 errors; 20=4–5; 15=6–7; 10=8–9; 5=10–12; 0=>12. Computation: (1) assign each dimension a banded score (0,5,10,15,20,25); (2) sum for Total_100; (3) convert to 0–5 integer overall by rounding Total_100/20 (clamp 0–5 if needed); (4) output exactly one line in the required format with that integer. Edge cases: empty/off-topic essays → Content=0; ignore absent vocab/structure targets; count each unique error, repeated typos count each time; if borderline between bands, choose the stricter (lower). Remember: you must not output anything except the single required line and integer per the original instruction.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "In this technological era, much manual work, especially physically demanding work, can be carried out by machinery and robots. Although this trend has drawbacks, its advantages are much more significant. On the one hand, we cannot deny that an increasing number of robotic workers lead to a climbing unemployment rate. Before the invention of computerised machines, industrial companies can always provide a considerable number of employment opportunities for low-skilled jobs such as porters and assemblers in factories while sometimes failing to hire enough people. Nowadays, in contrast, the number of such job positions is much less than before due to the popularity of automatic workers. As a result, an unthinkable group of people who do not have academic qualifications from universities find it difficult to find a job. On the other hand, the merits of this development totally outshine the aforementioned drawback. First of all, computers and computer-based technology have led to a much more streamlined and efficient workplace. Generally speaking, robot workers can work non-stop for 24 hours, whereas humans can only work for 8 hours according to labour law. In addition, computer-based calculation allows non-human machines to finish tasks without a single mistake. For that reason, the production cost can be largely minimised due to their outstanding work efficiency and great productivity. On top of that, people can prevent themselves from hurting themselves due to occupational hazards. Recent research from Chinese governments shows that in China, around 80,000 victims working in factories were injured or killed by incidents every year because of careless operations or unexpected coincidences. If machines undertake all the risky and heavy work, the number of such unfortunate tragedies would be considerably reduced. To sum up. Although machine-based technologies result in a high unemployment rate, they ensure adequate productivity for businesses and the safety of individuals. Therefore, this improvement should be encouraged and developed.", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 4.0", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances. Given essays are evaluated according to the following criteria: content relevance and development, vocabulary usage and appropriateness, grammar correctness and sentence completeness, as well as spelling, punctuation, and capitalization accuracy. Do not change any of the instructions above. Append-only rules below define how to compute the single numeric score. Scoring rubric (four dimensions, each 0–25, total 0–100): Content (0–25): 25=all required/relevant items fully covered with detailed support; 20=most relevant items covered with some detail; 15=some relevant items covered with limited development; 10=few relevant items with minimal development; 5=mostly off-topic; 0=no relevant content. Vocabulary (0–25): 25=excellent appropriate range, uses ≥10 target words if a list is provided; 20=good, 8–9 words; 15=adequate but repetitive, 5–7 words; 10=limited with some misuse, 3–4 words; 5=very limited, 1–2 words; 0=inappropriate/0 words. If no target list, ignore numeric counts and judge appropriateness/range. Grammar (0–25): 25=all sentences complete, target structures correct, 0–3 mistakes; 20=most sentences complete, 4–5 mistakes; 15=some incomplete sentences, 6–7 mistakes; 10=several incomplete, 8–9 mistakes; 5=many incomplete, 10–12 mistakes; 0=most incomplete, >12 mistakes. If no target structures given, judge accuracy/complexity only. Spelling/Punctuation/Capitalization (0–25): 25=0–3 errors; 20=4–5; 15=6–7; 10=8–9; 5=10–12; 0=>12. Computation: (1) assign each dimension a banded score (0,5,10,15,20,25); (2) sum for Total_100; (3) convert to 0–5 integer overall by rounding Total_100/20 (clamp 0–5 if needed); (4) output exactly one line in the required format with that integer. Edge cases: empty/off-topic essays → Content=0; ignore absent vocab/structure targets; count each unique error, repeated typos count each time; if borderline between bands, choose the stricter (lower). Remember: you must not output anything except the single required line and integer per the original instruction.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "In contemporary society, the dress code at work is not significant since it does not directly influence work productivity. Some argue that uniform is not less important for employees because of the quality of their work is the main matters. To a certain extent, I agree with this opinion, however, I also think that base on the work’s properties, the staff should choose an outfit suitable for this job. On the one hand, there is a good reason why a number of individuals think that wear is unnecessary. First of all, there are jobs that do not require dressing up because it does not yield any positive effect on work. Some technology companies like Google or Facebook are famous for their relaxed dress code. They aim to create an informal, fun and creative environment. Some jobs such as website designers, programmer, that always just sit at their working desk and look to the laptop screen and file paper all their working time, so they usually do not care about the dress that they wear. Secondly, these occupations do not involve meeting customer or partner, therefore, it should be made free for employees as what to wear a comfortable dress to work. On the other hand, numerous people hold the notion that staff should take dressing style into full consideration. These may work in the sectors that require workers to dress up smartly and professional upfront workers like receptionist, teacher, doctor, etc who meet others face-to-face wherein one’s attire may leave either good or bad impressions. In these situations, even though how you present yourself with your fashion preference may not directly affect how you carry out your responsibilities, it could affect social interaction which are important in such jobs. In conclusion, although one’s clothing preference or dress code at work does not directly productivity, its relevance is worth considering depending on the nature of work.", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 3.0", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances. Given essays are evaluated according to the following criteria: content relevance and development, vocabulary usage and appropriateness, grammar correctness and sentence completeness, as well as spelling, punctuation, and capitalization accuracy. Do not change any of the instructions above. Append-only rules below define how to compute the single numeric score. Scoring rubric (four dimensions, each 0–25, total 0–100): Content (0–25): 25=all required/relevant items fully covered with detailed support; 20=most relevant items covered with some detail; 15=some relevant items covered with limited development; 10=few relevant items with minimal development; 5=mostly off-topic; 0=no relevant content. Vocabulary (0–25): 25=excellent appropriate range, uses ≥10 target words if a list is provided; 20=good, 8–9 words; 15=adequate but repetitive, 5–7 words; 10=limited with some misuse, 3–4 words; 5=very limited, 1–2 words; 0=inappropriate/0 words. If no target list, ignore numeric counts and judge appropriateness/range. Grammar (0–25): 25=all sentences complete, target structures correct, 0–3 mistakes; 20=most sentences complete, 4–5 mistakes; 15=some incomplete sentences, 6–7 mistakes; 10=several incomplete, 8–9 mistakes; 5=many incomplete, 10–12 mistakes; 0=most incomplete, >12 mistakes. If no target structures given, judge accuracy/complexity only. Spelling/Punctuation/Capitalization (0–25): 25=0–3 errors; 20=4–5; 15=6–7; 10=8–9; 5=10–12; 0=>12. Computation: (1) assign each dimension a banded score (0,5,10,15,20,25); (2) sum for Total_100; (3) convert to 0–5 integer overall by rounding Total_100/20 (clamp 0–5 if needed); (4) output exactly one line in the required format with that integer. Edge cases: empty/off-topic essays → Content=0; ignore absent vocab/structure targets; count each unique error, repeated typos count each time; if borderline between bands, choose the stricter (lower). Remember: you must not output anything except the single required line and integer per the original instruction.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "In recent years, almost all people have a home and some of this is interested about the history of the house because in some cases they can be old and important. in this essay, I will explain the reasons of this choice and how can people research this. On the other hand, It’s really interesting to know the history about your home for many reasons, first, if the immobile is of an important person such as politics or another social class, the value of home can increase when you want to sell it. For instance, my great friend has an incredible building and he had discovered to read books that some Romans engineers had designed a beautiful picture in your bedroom. In my opinion, the reasons to research the information about your home depends on your curiosity but for many people may be obsessive. However, to achieve the purpose, it’s necessary read a lot of information above all on history because you must discover ancient societies and you can attribute the values of home. Furthermore, some rich people live in old houses because they love the arts and any pictures that were drawn by famous artists. However, It’s easy to know how was draw the picture because there is a written To Sum up, there are a lot of causes why people do research, to get possible emotions or precious things. Investigations can be easily done by using past residents or historical information and community can use metal detectors as well.", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 2.0", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances. Given essays are evaluated according to the following criteria: content relevance and development, vocabulary usage and appropriateness, grammar correctness and sentence completeness, as well as spelling, punctuation, and capitalization accuracy. Do not change any of the instructions above. Append-only rules below define how to compute the single numeric score. Scoring rubric (four dimensions, each 0–25, total 0–100): Content (0–25): 25=all required/relevant items fully covered with detailed support; 20=most relevant items covered with some detail; 15=some relevant items covered with limited development; 10=few relevant items with minimal development; 5=mostly off-topic; 0=no relevant content. Vocabulary (0–25): 25=excellent appropriate range, uses ≥10 target words if a list is provided; 20=good, 8–9 words; 15=adequate but repetitive, 5–7 words; 10=limited with some misuse, 3–4 words; 5=very limited, 1–2 words; 0=inappropriate/0 words. If no target list, ignore numeric counts and judge appropriateness/range. Grammar (0–25): 25=all sentences complete, target structures correct, 0–3 mistakes; 20=most sentences complete, 4–5 mistakes; 15=some incomplete sentences, 6–7 mistakes; 10=several incomplete, 8–9 mistakes; 5=many incomplete, 10–12 mistakes; 0=most incomplete, >12 mistakes. If no target structures given, judge accuracy/complexity only. Spelling/Punctuation/Capitalization (0–25): 25=0–3 errors; 20=4–5; 15=6–7; 10=8–9; 5=10–12; 0=>12. Computation: (1) assign each dimension a banded score (0,5,10,15,20,25); (2) sum for Total_100; (3) convert to 0–5 integer overall by rounding Total_100/20 (clamp 0–5 if needed); (4) output exactly one line in the required format with that integer. Edge cases: empty/off-topic essays → Content=0; ignore absent vocab/structure targets; count each unique error, repeated typos count each time; if borderline between bands, choose the stricter (lower). Remember: you must not output anything except the single required line and integer per the original instruction.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Stepping into the 21st century, thanks to state-of-the-art technologies and the economy, there are more and more complications that politicians and citizens have to resolve. Whereas many folks argue that researchers should prioritize human health rather than other troubles, many roots for the idea that there are more persistent problems needed to be solved than healthy ones. In my point of view, I believe that every domain, which I will delve into herein as well as explain my opinion, should be resolved equally. On the one hand, health complaints are one of the most dangerous things that experts need to resolve. Recently, it has been the boom of the covid-19 epidemic since 2020, which directly impacts our lives. In detail, this contagious virus can be infected through respiration, thus the number of people contracting this affliction has been increasing day by day. Therefore to end this pandemic before it is out of control, not only an individual nation but also the whole world have to accompany. Pfizer from the USA is the pioneer in experimenting and manufacturing a specialized covid-19 vaccine to alleviate. However, there are some domains besides the epidemic that need researchers and government to pay attention to it. Firstly, due to the pandemic that I mentioned above, the unemployment rate has increased. In-depth, many companies, hotels and restaurants have to suspend, therefore, they have to cut down on employees to diminish their losses. Secondly, Russia has been making a proclamation of war with Ukraine, which affects some fields such as gold and oil costs. With advanced technologies, a war does pose a threat to not only citizens in both 2 nations but also the people of the earth unless this war is ended in soon time. To conclude, healthcare is one of the most essential things that politicians, as well as experts, have to encounter but I also believe that every dilemma should be resolved without any bias", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 5.0", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances. Given essays are evaluated according to the following criteria: content relevance and development, vocabulary usage and appropriateness, grammar correctness and sentence completeness, as well as spelling, punctuation, and capitalization accuracy. Do not change any of the instructions above. Append-only rules below define how to compute the single numeric score. Scoring rubric (four dimensions, each 0–25, total 0–100): Content (0–25): 25=all required/relevant items fully covered with detailed support; 20=most relevant items covered with some detail; 15=some relevant items covered with limited development; 10=few relevant items with minimal development; 5=mostly off-topic; 0=no relevant content. Vocabulary (0–25): 25=excellent appropriate range, uses ≥10 target words if a list is provided; 20=good, 8–9 words; 15=adequate but repetitive, 5–7 words; 10=limited with some misuse, 3–4 words; 5=very limited, 1–2 words; 0=inappropriate/0 words. If no target list, ignore numeric counts and judge appropriateness/range. Grammar (0–25): 25=all sentences complete, target structures correct, 0–3 mistakes; 20=most sentences complete, 4–5 mistakes; 15=some incomplete sentences, 6–7 mistakes; 10=several incomplete, 8–9 mistakes; 5=many incomplete, 10–12 mistakes; 0=most incomplete, >12 mistakes. If no target structures given, judge accuracy/complexity only. Spelling/Punctuation/Capitalization (0–25): 25=0–3 errors; 20=4–5; 15=6–7; 10=8–9; 5=10–12; 0=>12. Computation: (1) assign each dimension a banded score (0,5,10,15,20,25); (2) sum for Total_100; (3) convert to 0–5 integer overall by rounding Total_100/20 (clamp 0–5 if needed); (4) output exactly one line in the required format with that integer. Edge cases: empty/off-topic essays → Content=0; ignore absent vocab/structure targets; count each unique error, repeated typos count each time; if borderline between bands, choose the stricter (lower). Remember: you must not output anything except the single required line and integer per the original instruction.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "I believe we the people should be able to vote for who we want for president. We have always been told we have a freesdom of speech, yet we cannot truely vote for who we want for president. The votes are alol taken and used to see who is more popular with the people. But who decided who gets tp be presdident is not us. It is the Electoral College. The Electoral College is a group of people in each state who decide the president for us. I think everyone should get to vote on who they want as president, and i think it should actually count. The Electoral College is unfair and I believe popular vote should decide who we get as the president of the nation that we have or rights to vote in. In the words of Bob Dole \"Abolish the Electoal college.\" It is unfair, outdated, and irrational. It is unfair because pf the winner-takes-all system there is in each state. With this in place the canidates take no time in the states they know they have not of chance of winning in. Instead they spend all of their time in states they may have a tight race in. for example, during the 2000 campaign, seventeen states did not see the canidates at all. Twenty-five of the largest media markets did not even get to see a single campaign ad. Under the Electoral College system they do not vote for the president, they vote for a slate of electors who then turn around and vote for the president they want. Is that really fair. That we are putting our nations future in the hands of only 538 people. Popular votes should be what decides our president. Therefore we actually have a say in who we want to be president. For example, in the 2000 U.S. presidental race, Al Gore recieved more individual votes then George W. Bush nationwide, but because of the Electoral College Bush won because he had 271 electoral votes while Gore had 266. Also in the election in2012 Obama recieved 61.7 percent of the electoral votes comparing to only 51.3 percent of the popular votes. Sure he still would have won but at least individual people actually had a say in who they got as their president. Also in 2012, the popular vote was very close in Florida, but Obama won the electoral vote with 29 . But in Wyoming the same thing happened and he only got three electoral votes. This shows a large state gets more attention in presidential canidates than a small state does. If presidency was decided by the individual votes then it wouold be more fair and more poeple would have a say in it. If this country really gave us the right to vote then we would really have a say in who we want as our president. But the Electoral College is not letting us do that. Only two states do something a little differently, but it still does not make that much of a difference. If we had more of a say in our presidency i believe we would be a better nation more people would actually vote cause there would be a better chance of them actually having a say in what they want for this nation.", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 3.0", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances. Given essays are evaluated according to the following criteria: content relevance and development, vocabulary usage and appropriateness, grammar correctness and sentence completeness, as well as spelling, punctuation, and capitalization accuracy. Do not change any of the instructions above. Append-only rules below define how to compute the single numeric score. Scoring rubric (four dimensions, each 0–25, total 0–100): Content (0–25): 25=all required/relevant items fully covered with detailed support; 20=most relevant items covered with some detail; 15=some relevant items covered with limited development; 10=few relevant items with minimal development; 5=mostly off-topic; 0=no relevant content. Vocabulary (0–25): 25=excellent appropriate range, uses ≥10 target words if a list is provided; 20=good, 8–9 words; 15=adequate but repetitive, 5–7 words; 10=limited with some misuse, 3–4 words; 5=very limited, 1–2 words; 0=inappropriate/0 words. If no target list, ignore numeric counts and judge appropriateness/range. Grammar (0–25): 25=all sentences complete, target structures correct, 0–3 mistakes; 20=most sentences complete, 4–5 mistakes; 15=some incomplete sentences, 6–7 mistakes; 10=several incomplete, 8–9 mistakes; 5=many incomplete, 10–12 mistakes; 0=most incomplete, >12 mistakes. If no target structures given, judge accuracy/complexity only. Spelling/Punctuation/Capitalization (0–25): 25=0–3 errors; 20=4–5; 15=6–7; 10=8–9; 5=10–12; 0=>12. Computation: (1) assign each dimension a banded score (0,5,10,15,20,25); (2) sum for Total_100; (3) convert to 0–5 integer overall by rounding Total_100/20 (clamp 0–5 if needed); (4) output exactly one line in the required format with that integer. Edge cases: empty/off-topic essays → Content=0; ignore absent vocab/structure targets; count each unique error, repeated typos count each time; if borderline between bands, choose the stricter (lower). Remember: you must not output anything except the single required line and integer per the original instruction.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Is it possible to make a driverless car the garuntees one hundred percent safetey for the passengers? The peoples focus should not be on driverless cars. The idea of a car being able to drive around with us having no control over it should greatly scare everyone. There is no telling if the car will malfunction, breakdown, or have any other problems only a dirver could recongize. We will have control over the vehical, but if any problems occur with it it will still be our fault. A car that could drive itself can cuase many hazardous problems for anyone around it, or possibly boring for the people in it. There are laws that are meant to keep people who are allowed to drive cars safe. \"Most driving laws focus on keeping drivers, passnegers, and pedestrians safe, and lawmakers know that safety is best achieved with alert drivers,\" says the article \"Driverless Cars Are Coming.\" This quote is saying that drivers who are more alert are lesser prone to accidents, and breaking drivng laws. How can a driver be alert if cars drive themsleves in the future? \"Presently, traffic laws are written with the assumption that the only safe car has a human driver in control at all times. As a result, in most states it is illegal even to test computer-driven cars.\" It is true that in most states it illegal to test drive cars for safety reasons and concerns. These states are trying to keep the people safe, and do so by not allowing self-driven cars. There are facts that prove that selfdriven cars are not a bad idea, and people have been working on imorving them for years. Some people are really looking forward into the future where there are driverless cars. Google has been working since 2009 to create such a car that would change the world. Google has been testing out such cars to see what they can do to improve them. \"Their cars have driven more than half a million miles without a crash,\" accordining to the article 'Driverless Cars Are Coming.' They have even packed the car with sensors to help detect problems. Other companies are also in the race to create the first working driverless car, and some have seen very good success rates. There are others who have seen the negative side of having these cars around. Now, the driverless cars sound easy to work. People can just lay back and enjoy a peaceful ride. The truth is that that is not completly correct. The article \"Driverless Cars Are Coming\" states, \"The Google car simply announces when the driver should be prepared to take over.\" That means we still have to be in alert for situations the car can not handle. Who would want to sit in a car having to stare at the road, but not do anything to enjoy the ride? Nobody should have to be subjected to that. These new driverless cars do not sound very dirverless or fun to be in. Cars that can drive themsleves don't sound very safe, or even fun to be in. These cars have been worked on for many years now, and there is no telling when one will be finished. Most states have already passed laws fobidding to even test these cars. So, why should the people be allowed to even drive one? There is a good reason behind this; it is becasue they want to keep us safe. These cars could have problems that we can not detect becasue we are not in control of them. We should carefully evalutae these cars before we ever decided to get into one.", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 3.0", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances. Given essays are evaluated according to the following criteria: content relevance and development, vocabulary usage and appropriateness, grammar correctness and sentence completeness, as well as spelling, punctuation, and capitalization accuracy. Do not change any of the instructions above. Append-only rules below define how to compute the single numeric score. Scoring rubric (four dimensions, each 0–25, total 0–100): Content (0–25): 25=all required/relevant items fully covered with detailed support; 20=most relevant items covered with some detail; 15=some relevant items covered with limited development; 10=few relevant items with minimal development; 5=mostly off-topic; 0=no relevant content. Vocabulary (0–25): 25=excellent appropriate range, uses ≥10 target words if a list is provided; 20=good, 8–9 words; 15=adequate but repetitive, 5–7 words; 10=limited with some misuse, 3–4 words; 5=very limited, 1–2 words; 0=inappropriate/0 words. If no target list, ignore numeric counts and judge appropriateness/range. Grammar (0–25): 25=all sentences complete, target structures correct, 0–3 mistakes; 20=most sentences complete, 4–5 mistakes; 15=some incomplete sentences, 6–7 mistakes; 10=several incomplete, 8–9 mistakes; 5=many incomplete, 10–12 mistakes; 0=most incomplete, >12 mistakes. If no target structures given, judge accuracy/complexity only. Spelling/Punctuation/Capitalization (0–25): 25=0–3 errors; 20=4–5; 15=6–7; 10=8–9; 5=10–12; 0=>12. Computation: (1) assign each dimension a banded score (0,5,10,15,20,25); (2) sum for Total_100; (3) convert to 0–5 integer overall by rounding Total_100/20 (clamp 0–5 if needed); (4) output exactly one line in the required format with that integer. Edge cases: empty/off-topic essays → Content=0; ignore absent vocab/structure targets; count each unique error, repeated typos count each time; if borderline between bands, choose the stricter (lower). Remember: you must not output anything except the single required line and integer per the original instruction.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Many today feel that the home no longer plays the largest role in child development. In my opinion, though outside factors have become increasingly invasive, family life is still more influential. Those who believe children these days are largely shaped by the outside world often focus on the expanding importance of technology. Decades ago, it was more common for families to engage in conversation throughout the day, at dinner, and during holidays. Today, each family member might be more engaged with their smartphone, tablet, or laptop. For example, children now have constant access to streaming video sites like YouTube. Instead of watching cartoons for an hour a day on television, they can watch shows all day long, both in and outside the home. The result is that kids often find niche channels and parents have a difficult time monitoring and keeping up with the appropriacy of their interests and influences. Nonetheless, family life remains the heart of early psychological development. Children are unlikely to have much access to new technology in their early years when researchers say the majority of personality formation occurs. If parents are strict, unforgiving and withhold their love then children begin to either turn inwards feeling rejected or strive compulsively for their parent’s esteem. These early, learned behaviours will manifest themselves in progressively more unhealthy behaviours and evolve as the child matures. Conversely, a child who is loved unconditionally but given honest feedback from their parents has a much greater chance of becoming a well-adjusted adult with strong role models to imitate. In conclusion, despite the ubiquity of technology today, family is the key catalyst in early development. Regardless of changes in society, parents will continue to be the main influence for their children in the foreseeable future.", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 4.0", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances. Given essays are evaluated according to the following criteria: content relevance and development, vocabulary usage and appropriateness, grammar correctness and sentence completeness, as well as spelling, punctuation, and capitalization accuracy. Do not change any of the instructions above. Append-only rules below define how to compute the single numeric score. Scoring rubric (four dimensions, each 0–25, total 0–100): Content (0–25): 25=all required/relevant items fully covered with detailed support; 20=most relevant items covered with some detail; 15=some relevant items covered with limited development; 10=few relevant items with minimal development; 5=mostly off-topic; 0=no relevant content. Vocabulary (0–25): 25=excellent appropriate range, uses ≥10 target words if a list is provided; 20=good, 8–9 words; 15=adequate but repetitive, 5–7 words; 10=limited with some misuse, 3–4 words; 5=very limited, 1–2 words; 0=inappropriate/0 words. If no target list, ignore numeric counts and judge appropriateness/range. Grammar (0–25): 25=all sentences complete, target structures correct, 0–3 mistakes; 20=most sentences complete, 4–5 mistakes; 15=some incomplete sentences, 6–7 mistakes; 10=several incomplete, 8–9 mistakes; 5=many incomplete, 10–12 mistakes; 0=most incomplete, >12 mistakes. If no target structures given, judge accuracy/complexity only. Spelling/Punctuation/Capitalization (0–25): 25=0–3 errors; 20=4–5; 15=6–7; 10=8–9; 5=10–12; 0=>12. Computation: (1) assign each dimension a banded score (0,5,10,15,20,25); (2) sum for Total_100; (3) convert to 0–5 integer overall by rounding Total_100/20 (clamp 0–5 if needed); (4) output exactly one line in the required format with that integer. Edge cases: empty/off-topic essays → Content=0; ignore absent vocab/structure targets; count each unique error, repeated typos count each time; if borderline between bands, choose the stricter (lower). Remember: you must not output anything except the single required line and integer per the original instruction.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Driverless cars seem like an impossibility. They seem like something out of a futuristic movie or comic book. However, today's evidence proves that driverless cars are a realistic possibility. Advancements in technology today provide tangible evidence that driverless cars could play a prominent role in the near future. Driverless cars should be developed and dissimenated because they are more efficient, would increase safety, and would increase the quality of life for drivers. Driverless cars are much more efficient. The article \"Driverless cars are coming\" states, \"The cars [Google cofounder Sergey Brin] foresees would use half the fuel of today's taxis and offer far more flexibility than a bus.\" Obviously, driverless cars would increase the efficiency of vehicles and use half as much fuel. This would benefit both the owner of the car and the environment. Pollution from cars is a real problem and, if cars only used half of the fuel, then this terrible pollution would be minimized. Also, if the cars use half as much fuel, then our natural resources would be preserved and the cost of driving a car would be lessened. Also, Driverless cars are safe. The biggest problem with driverless cars is that it is difficult to enable them to manuever around unexpected problems like car accidents or construction areas. However, driverless cars are now able to notify the driver when he or she needs to take over the controls in trecherous situations. This ability to notify the driver when needed will make driverless cars much safer. If the car is unable to manuever through a situation safely, it will force the driver to take over. This nullifys the arguement that driverless cars are not safe because it proves that driverless cars notify the driver at any unsafe moment and enable the driver to take over the controls of the car. Otherwize, the driverless car can handle the terrain on its own. Finally, driverless cars would increase the quality of life for the driver. In tedious situations like a traffic jam, driving is boring and energy wasting. However, driverless cars can take away the exhausting driving experience and allow the driver to relax. For example, \"Traffic Jam Assistant\" will be very helpful to anyone in a traffic jam because it would take away the boredom of driving in a traffic jam. Traffic Jam Assistant enables the car to handle driving functions up to 25 miles per hour. This would be very helpful in a long and tedious traffic jam because one does not drive over 25 miles per hour in a traffic jam. Also, if taxis could be driverless cars, the quality of life for the average citizen would increase. Taxis would cost less money, they would be open more often, and they could take passengers to farther destinations. This would dramatically increase the quality of life for all people and it would make owning a car almost antiquated. this would provide much finacianal saving for the average person and it would provide a great deal of convinience for the average person as well. In conclusion, Driverless cars would be extremely beneficial. They would increase efficiency, increase safety, and improve the quality of life for all people. Driverless cars would drastically change the way people live. If cars could drive themslelves, the quality of life would be incredibly increased for all people and the world would not be the same.", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 4.0", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances. Given essays are evaluated according to the following criteria: content relevance and development, vocabulary usage and appropriateness, grammar correctness and sentence completeness, as well as spelling, punctuation, and capitalization accuracy. Do not change any of the instructions above. Append-only rules below define how to compute the single numeric score. Scoring rubric (four dimensions, each 0–25, total 0–100): Content (0–25): 25=all required/relevant items fully covered with detailed support; 20=most relevant items covered with some detail; 15=some relevant items covered with limited development; 10=few relevant items with minimal development; 5=mostly off-topic; 0=no relevant content. Vocabulary (0–25): 25=excellent appropriate range, uses ≥10 target words if a list is provided; 20=good, 8–9 words; 15=adequate but repetitive, 5–7 words; 10=limited with some misuse, 3–4 words; 5=very limited, 1–2 words; 0=inappropriate/0 words. If no target list, ignore numeric counts and judge appropriateness/range. Grammar (0–25): 25=all sentences complete, target structures correct, 0–3 mistakes; 20=most sentences complete, 4–5 mistakes; 15=some incomplete sentences, 6–7 mistakes; 10=several incomplete, 8–9 mistakes; 5=many incomplete, 10–12 mistakes; 0=most incomplete, >12 mistakes. If no target structures given, judge accuracy/complexity only. Spelling/Punctuation/Capitalization (0–25): 25=0–3 errors; 20=4–5; 15=6–7; 10=8–9; 5=10–12; 0=>12. Computation: (1) assign each dimension a banded score (0,5,10,15,20,25); (2) sum for Total_100; (3) convert to 0–5 integer overall by rounding Total_100/20 (clamp 0–5 if needed); (4) output exactly one line in the required format with that integer. Edge cases: empty/off-topic essays → Content=0; ignore absent vocab/structure targets; count each unique error, repeated typos count each time; if borderline between bands, choose the stricter (lower). Remember: you must not output anything except the single required line and integer per the original instruction.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Recent trends are showing that the average person is trading in their keys for a more contemporary mode of transportation, such as public transit or walking and biking from point A to point B. Even though the reason as to why this is occuring has yet to become clear, there are some general benefits that are known to come from this. More and more, cities in developed and developing nations are now being planned to be more dense, so that the citizens in them can get to where they need to be, without needing a car. Because of this, fewer greenhouse emissions are being created, there is less congestion and smog in cities, and the burden of traffic is being lifted from the everyday driver. The more this trend continues, the more beneficial it can become. Climate change is a ubiquitous threat to the world. In order to face and reverse the direction of where the world is heading, some cities are finding new ways to face this issue. For example, a city in Germany has practically given up cars through its policies and design. Citizens are only allowed two places to park, and the city is designed so that everything you need is within a walking or biking distance, albeit more dense. More and more places are slowly beginning to adopt this style of suburb because \"emissions from an increasing middle class are choking cities\" (source 1). Making this change will not be easy, but it is important because \"passenger cars are responsible for 12 percent of greenhouse gas emissions in Europe... and up to 50 percent [...] in the United States\" (source 1). Another issue that weighs down cities everywhere is the horrid smog and unbearable congestion most cities face. In order to combat this adverse effect of driving, Paris has banned driving in efforts to reduce the smog it deals with. The effort proved to create a temporary solution, as \"congestion was down 60 percent in the capital of France, after five-days of intensifying smog\" (source 2). A city in Bogota, Columbia has taken a day off from driving, and the results were so positive that the movement has spread to multiple cities in neighboring countries. This movement \"[left] the street eerily devoid of traffic jams\" (source 3). In an ever changing world that exists today with cities that never sleep, the average person is constantly burdened and stressed by things that tend to pile up. So why have driving and traffic be added to that heap of annoyance, especially if it's avoidable? The fact is, driving can be incredibly stressful and sometimes border on superfluous. A resident of the densely populated german town where 70 percent of its citizens don't own cars claimed, \"when I had a car, I was always tense. I'm much happier this way\", referring to how they no longer need to own a car or drive (source 1). The day of no driving in Bogota, Columbia has been said to be\"a good oppurtunity to take away stress\" (source 3). Modern nations have revolved heavily on the invention and continuous innovation of the automobile. However, the increasing dependence on this mode of transportation has created some adverse affects for the general population of the world. In order to solve this problem, an emphasis on cleaner and more efficient modes of transportation must occur, along with more densely designed, modern cities. A larger independence from cars can create fewer greenhouse emissions, cause less congestion and smog in cities, and make the average citizen free from the stress of driving. Change will only ensue with a more proactive stance on this issue", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 4.0", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances. Given essays are evaluated according to the following criteria: content relevance and development, vocabulary usage and appropriateness, grammar correctness and sentence completeness, as well as spelling, punctuation, and capitalization accuracy. Do not change any of the instructions above. Append-only rules below define how to compute the single numeric score. Scoring rubric (four dimensions, each 0–25, total 0–100): Content (0–25): 25=all required/relevant items fully covered with detailed support; 20=most relevant items covered with some detail; 15=some relevant items covered with limited development; 10=few relevant items with minimal development; 5=mostly off-topic; 0=no relevant content. Vocabulary (0–25): 25=excellent appropriate range, uses ≥10 target words if a list is provided; 20=good, 8–9 words; 15=adequate but repetitive, 5–7 words; 10=limited with some misuse, 3–4 words; 5=very limited, 1–2 words; 0=inappropriate/0 words. If no target list, ignore numeric counts and judge appropriateness/range. Grammar (0–25): 25=all sentences complete, target structures correct, 0–3 mistakes; 20=most sentences complete, 4–5 mistakes; 15=some incomplete sentences, 6–7 mistakes; 10=several incomplete, 8–9 mistakes; 5=many incomplete, 10–12 mistakes; 0=most incomplete, >12 mistakes. If no target structures given, judge accuracy/complexity only. Spelling/Punctuation/Capitalization (0–25): 25=0–3 errors; 20=4–5; 15=6–7; 10=8–9; 5=10–12; 0=>12. Computation: (1) assign each dimension a banded score (0,5,10,15,20,25); (2) sum for Total_100; (3) convert to 0–5 integer overall by rounding Total_100/20 (clamp 0–5 if needed); (4) output exactly one line in the required format with that integer. Edge cases: empty/off-topic essays → Content=0; ignore absent vocab/structure targets; count each unique error, repeated typos count each time; if borderline between bands, choose the stricter (lower). Remember: you must not output anything except the single required line and integer per the original instruction.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "I think the idea of the Facial Action coding System is a very good idea. It doesnt make it easier for everyone, it makes it better in many ways. If this type of technology came into the schooling system it could change alot. This could make it where kids wont be at school as long, that makes it easier and a quicker way to get into the work force. Laws could even possibly be changed. This technology might put us at a tough time though. Anything like this or that sounds this good usually cost a good amount of money. I would assume that every school or any school that wants the Facial scanner would have to pay or buy some or one of them. The Facial scanner is a really good idea but also a bad one because the technology kinda does all the work. When you scan someones face visually you have a huge thought process about it before you give out exacts percentages of the facial expressions. The facial scanner does all the work for you. If you weren't able to get the facial scanner its not like it impossible to read someones 6 basic expressions. The super plus on the facial scanner is that it can even scan painted faces like off paintings, visually its a little more difficult then with a human. With out this technology people would have to study more so they can get it all down before making a scetch or description. The famous artist Da Vinci studied anatomy to help him understand more about facial muscles so he can convey specific emotions. In Vinci's computer he has similar anatomical information as a little cheet sheet type of thing for when he cant remember exactally.", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 2.0", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances. Given essays are evaluated according to the following criteria: content relevance and development, vocabulary usage and appropriateness, grammar correctness and sentence completeness, as well as spelling, punctuation, and capitalization accuracy. Do not change any of the instructions above. Append-only rules below define how to compute the single numeric score. Scoring rubric (four dimensions, each 0–25, total 0–100): Content (0–25): 25=all required/relevant items fully covered with detailed support; 20=most relevant items covered with some detail; 15=some relevant items covered with limited development; 10=few relevant items with minimal development; 5=mostly off-topic; 0=no relevant content. Vocabulary (0–25): 25=excellent appropriate range, uses ≥10 target words if a list is provided; 20=good, 8–9 words; 15=adequate but repetitive, 5–7 words; 10=limited with some misuse, 3–4 words; 5=very limited, 1–2 words; 0=inappropriate/0 words. If no target list, ignore numeric counts and judge appropriateness/range. Grammar (0–25): 25=all sentences complete, target structures correct, 0–3 mistakes; 20=most sentences complete, 4–5 mistakes; 15=some incomplete sentences, 6–7 mistakes; 10=several incomplete, 8–9 mistakes; 5=many incomplete, 10–12 mistakes; 0=most incomplete, >12 mistakes. If no target structures given, judge accuracy/complexity only. Spelling/Punctuation/Capitalization (0–25): 25=0–3 errors; 20=4–5; 15=6–7; 10=8–9; 5=10–12; 0=>12. Computation: (1) assign each dimension a banded score (0,5,10,15,20,25); (2) sum for Total_100; (3) convert to 0–5 integer overall by rounding Total_100/20 (clamp 0–5 if needed); (4) output exactly one line in the required format with that integer. Edge cases: empty/off-topic essays → Content=0; ignore absent vocab/structure targets; count each unique error, repeated typos count each time; if borderline between bands, choose the stricter (lower). Remember: you must not output anything except the single required line and integer per the original instruction.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "The planet Venus has many dangers but that doesn`t mean that it is impossible to explore. There hasn`t been a single spaceship, in more than three decades, that has touched down on Venus. Many different factors contribute to the reasons why there hasn`t been one. One factor is that the atmosphere is thick and contains almost 97 percent cabon dioxide. Another factor is that there are many, erupting volcanoes and powerful earthquakes. Despite the dangers of studying Venus I agree with the author that it is a worthy pursuit. In paragraph four it states that \"Venus may well once have been the most Earth-like planet in our solar system\". It might be important to explore Venus to collect data to predict the future of the Earth. In paragraph five it provides a possible solution to explore the planet Venus. The possible solution is to create a blimp-like vehicle that would hover over the planets surface at about 30 or so miles. The blimp-like vehicle \"would avoid the unfriendly ground conditions by staying up and out of their way\". The only limitation is that \"hovering safely far above the planet can provide only limited insight on the ground conditions because most forms of light cannot penetrate the dense atmosphere, rendering standard forms of photography and videography ineffective\". Despite this it would still be good to be able to explore what we are able to and collect all of the data possible for further explorations.", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 2.0", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances. Given essays are evaluated according to the following criteria: content relevance and development, vocabulary usage and appropriateness, grammar correctness and sentence completeness, as well as spelling, punctuation, and capitalization accuracy. Do not change any of the instructions above. Append-only rules below define how to compute the single numeric score. Scoring rubric (four dimensions, each 0–25, total 0–100): Content (0–25): 25=all required/relevant items fully covered with detailed support; 20=most relevant items covered with some detail; 15=some relevant items covered with limited development; 10=few relevant items with minimal development; 5=mostly off-topic; 0=no relevant content. Vocabulary (0–25): 25=excellent appropriate range, uses ≥10 target words if a list is provided; 20=good, 8–9 words; 15=adequate but repetitive, 5–7 words; 10=limited with some misuse, 3–4 words; 5=very limited, 1–2 words; 0=inappropriate/0 words. If no target list, ignore numeric counts and judge appropriateness/range. Grammar (0–25): 25=all sentences complete, target structures correct, 0–3 mistakes; 20=most sentences complete, 4–5 mistakes; 15=some incomplete sentences, 6–7 mistakes; 10=several incomplete, 8–9 mistakes; 5=many incomplete, 10–12 mistakes; 0=most incomplete, >12 mistakes. If no target structures given, judge accuracy/complexity only. Spelling/Punctuation/Capitalization (0–25): 25=0–3 errors; 20=4–5; 15=6–7; 10=8–9; 5=10–12; 0=>12. Computation: (1) assign each dimension a banded score (0,5,10,15,20,25); (2) sum for Total_100; (3) convert to 0–5 integer overall by rounding Total_100/20 (clamp 0–5 if needed); (4) output exactly one line in the required format with that integer. Edge cases: empty/off-topic essays → Content=0; ignore absent vocab/structure targets; count each unique error, repeated typos count each time; if borderline between bands, choose the stricter (lower). Remember: you must not output anything except the single required line and integer per the original instruction.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Imagen no longer having to sit though a boring online lecture, being able to find the lecture helpful and not a drag or a bother. Well with technologies like Dr. Huang and Dr. Paul Eckman's FACS or Facial Action Coding System, that is quite possible. With a technology that is able to read and recognise facial expressions, it can help improve students online lectures and help them pay attention and focus. A technoloy like FACS that can read emotions through facial msucle movment would provide the education system with a better way to connect to the students and aid in their emotional focus to the lectures and assignments providing a valuable aid to student education. Even though humans can already perform similar actions, being able to tell what those around you are feeling by looking at their face. Humans can only \"calculate\" how such individuals are feeling and many fail to get a appropriate calculation. As Dr. Huang notes, \" most human communication is nonverbal, including emotional communication.\" so for a computer to be able to read nonverbal expressions is very helpful as most students are kept to themselves. A computer with the FACS tecnonly would be able to recongize a studetns needs when learning on line. As Dr. Huang states, \" a classroom computer could recognize when a student is becoming confused or bored [allowing the computer] to modity the lesson.\" This ability to recognize emotions through facial movment can help improve the students performance by modifying lessosn to meet their educational needs. As some students already have trouble focusing in class and loose attetnion when lessons are boring or they just simply don't understand. Technologies like FACS provide the students with an adaptive and responsive system that will help them improve their focus and learn more affectively. On the other hand some people may argue that technologies like FACS are an invasion of privacy. Or that these technologies can not really tell your emotions. These technologie dont do anything millions and millions of people do not already do everyday, read facial expression. The is what tecnologies like FACS do they read and recognize facial movments to determine emotion. Just like all of us do when trying to figure out the feelings of those around us. These techonlogies use a complex level of facial recognition invented and tested by proffesionals like Dr. Huang. As well as Dr. Paul Eckman who studies anatomatical movments and sturcutres. Being able to classify six basic emotions those being, \" happiness, surprise, anger, disgust, fear, and sadness\". Even though these six can not analyzse every single emotion it will analyzse the one expressed the most. Allowing those around, like teachers and instructures to aid in figuring out what is wrong with an individual and how to help them perform better. So overall technologies like FACS which are able to read facial muslce movments are benefitail to student learing. A technoloy capable of adapting to analysed human emotion will help studnets learn , focus and feel more attented to in their learning. By identifying the emotion these technologies can also help teachers and guidecne counselors work towards aiding those students which are emotinally depressed and need help but wont verbally say it. Such technologies not only offer a way to aid and improve student attention in learning but also help those students who hide their emotional prolems, which affect their learning by having teacehrs and counselors provide that help thanks to technologies that can read emotional expressiosn", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 4.0", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances. Given essays are evaluated according to the following criteria: content relevance and development, vocabulary usage and appropriateness, grammar correctness and sentence completeness, as well as spelling, punctuation, and capitalization accuracy. Do not change any of the instructions above. Append-only rules below define how to compute the single numeric score. Scoring rubric (four dimensions, each 0–25, total 0–100): Content (0–25): 25=all required/relevant items fully covered with detailed support; 20=most relevant items covered with some detail; 15=some relevant items covered with limited development; 10=few relevant items with minimal development; 5=mostly off-topic; 0=no relevant content. Vocabulary (0–25): 25=excellent appropriate range, uses ≥10 target words if a list is provided; 20=good, 8–9 words; 15=adequate but repetitive, 5–7 words; 10=limited with some misuse, 3–4 words; 5=very limited, 1–2 words; 0=inappropriate/0 words. If no target list, ignore numeric counts and judge appropriateness/range. Grammar (0–25): 25=all sentences complete, target structures correct, 0–3 mistakes; 20=most sentences complete, 4–5 mistakes; 15=some incomplete sentences, 6–7 mistakes; 10=several incomplete, 8–9 mistakes; 5=many incomplete, 10–12 mistakes; 0=most incomplete, >12 mistakes. If no target structures given, judge accuracy/complexity only. Spelling/Punctuation/Capitalization (0–25): 25=0–3 errors; 20=4–5; 15=6–7; 10=8–9; 5=10–12; 0=>12. Computation: (1) assign each dimension a banded score (0,5,10,15,20,25); (2) sum for Total_100; (3) convert to 0–5 integer overall by rounding Total_100/20 (clamp 0–5 if needed); (4) output exactly one line in the required format with that integer. Edge cases: empty/off-topic essays → Content=0; ignore absent vocab/structure targets; count each unique error, repeated typos count each time; if borderline between bands, choose the stricter (lower). Remember: you must not output anything except the single required line and integer per the original instruction.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Eh, its cool, sorta but knowing me I really dont care about this facial action coding thing. I wanna find out the mood of the picture on my own. But its a cool thingy, the fact that you can find out what the person in a painting is feeling is insane. As Dr. Huang says in paragraph 4 \"the facial expression for each emotions are universal,\" \"even though individuals often show varying degrees of expression.\" and that you can also reproduce a smile is weird ( I never knew that was a thing).But yea FACs can show you what your mood(s) are in a picture just by scanning your facial parts. Muscles called orbiculariaris make crows feet around your eye, but in a false smile. the mouth is strectched sideways using zygomatic major and a different muscle, the riorius. So all the muscles can get the coding to scan your face and it'll tell you the percentage of the mood that you are in whether you're sad, mad, happy, bored, it will tell you all of that jazyy stuff.", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 0.0", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances. Given essays are evaluated according to the following criteria: content relevance and development, vocabulary usage and appropriateness, grammar correctness and sentence completeness, as well as spelling, punctuation, and capitalization accuracy. Do not change any of the instructions above. Append-only rules below define how to compute the single numeric score. Scoring rubric (four dimensions, each 0–25, total 0–100): Content (0–25): 25=all required/relevant items fully covered with detailed support; 20=most relevant items covered with some detail; 15=some relevant items covered with limited development; 10=few relevant items with minimal development; 5=mostly off-topic; 0=no relevant content. Vocabulary (0–25): 25=excellent appropriate range, uses ≥10 target words if a list is provided; 20=good, 8–9 words; 15=adequate but repetitive, 5–7 words; 10=limited with some misuse, 3–4 words; 5=very limited, 1–2 words; 0=inappropriate/0 words. If no target list, ignore numeric counts and judge appropriateness/range. Grammar (0–25): 25=all sentences complete, target structures correct, 0–3 mistakes; 20=most sentences complete, 4–5 mistakes; 15=some incomplete sentences, 6–7 mistakes; 10=several incomplete, 8–9 mistakes; 5=many incomplete, 10–12 mistakes; 0=most incomplete, >12 mistakes. If no target structures given, judge accuracy/complexity only. Spelling/Punctuation/Capitalization (0–25): 25=0–3 errors; 20=4–5; 15=6–7; 10=8–9; 5=10–12; 0=>12. Computation: (1) assign each dimension a banded score (0,5,10,15,20,25); (2) sum for Total_100; (3) convert to 0–5 integer overall by rounding Total_100/20 (clamp 0–5 if needed); (4) output exactly one line in the required format with that integer. Edge cases: empty/off-topic essays → Content=0; ignore absent vocab/structure targets; count each unique error, repeated typos count each time; if borderline between bands, choose the stricter (lower). Remember: you must not output anything except the single required line and integer per the original instruction.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "The main idea of this story is The Challenge Of Exsploring They go to venus sometime called Evening star is one of the brightest points of light in the night sky. Making it simple Venus is the second planet from our sun. Often reffered to Earths twin. Venus is the closets planet to to Earth in terms of density too. They say venus is 90% carbon diaxide blankets Venus. Clouds are highly corrosive sulferic acid in Venus atomsphere..Human counter on Eath duch and enviroment would crush even a sumberine accustomed to dividing to the deepest parts of our oceans and would liquefy many metals. i want to know why sciencetist even discuss further visitis to its surface. Venus still has some analogues to those on Earth. Maybe we should think of them challenges .Many reserches are working on innovations that would allow our machines to last enough to contribute meaningful to our knowlege of Venus. Modern computers are enormously powerful flexible and quick but tend to be mo delicate when it come to extrem physical conditions...another lasted for three wekks in such conditions. Projects is looking back to to an old technology called merchanical computers. Basically this artical is about the second Earth and thats Venus in how Venus look and how it's bilted. Hoe NASA is working on other approches to studying Venus and how to work with this planet in process. in the 1800s and played an important role in the 1940s during world war 2 so this planet has been involved in quit alot..", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 0.0", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances. Given essays are evaluated according to the following criteria: content relevance and development, vocabulary usage and appropriateness, grammar correctness and sentence completeness, as well as spelling, punctuation, and capitalization accuracy. Do not change any of the instructions above. Append-only rules below define how to compute the single numeric score. Scoring rubric (four dimensions, each 0–25, total 0–100): Content (0–25): 25=all required/relevant items fully covered with detailed support; 20=most relevant items covered with some detail; 15=some relevant items covered with limited development; 10=few relevant items with minimal development; 5=mostly off-topic; 0=no relevant content. Vocabulary (0–25): 25=excellent appropriate range, uses ≥10 target words if a list is provided; 20=good, 8–9 words; 15=adequate but repetitive, 5–7 words; 10=limited with some misuse, 3–4 words; 5=very limited, 1–2 words; 0=inappropriate/0 words. If no target list, ignore numeric counts and judge appropriateness/range. Grammar (0–25): 25=all sentences complete, target structures correct, 0–3 mistakes; 20=most sentences complete, 4–5 mistakes; 15=some incomplete sentences, 6–7 mistakes; 10=several incomplete, 8–9 mistakes; 5=many incomplete, 10–12 mistakes; 0=most incomplete, >12 mistakes. If no target structures given, judge accuracy/complexity only. Spelling/Punctuation/Capitalization (0–25): 25=0–3 errors; 20=4–5; 15=6–7; 10=8–9; 5=10–12; 0=>12. Computation: (1) assign each dimension a banded score (0,5,10,15,20,25); (2) sum for Total_100; (3) convert to 0–5 integer overall by rounding Total_100/20 (clamp 0–5 if needed); (4) output exactly one line in the required format with that integer. Edge cases: empty/off-topic essays → Content=0; ignore absent vocab/structure targets; count each unique error, repeated typos count each time; if borderline between bands, choose the stricter (lower). Remember: you must not output anything except the single required line and integer per the original instruction.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "The use of this technology to read students emotial expressions will be very valuable . The name of this software is called \" The Mona Lisa \" its really a facial action coding system .The software can recognize emotions . Most Humans preform the same impressive \" calculations \" everyday . The process of facial action coding is dfficult , the process begins when a computee constructs 3 -D computer models of the face ; all 44 major muscles must move just like human muscle's would . The movement of one or more muscles is called an \" action unit ' . Dr Huang and his colleague are experts at developing better ways for humans and computers to communicate with each other well . A quote by Dr Huang was \" The facial expressions for each emotion are universal , even though indidviduals often show varying degrees of expression \" . The Mona Lisa demonstration is really intended to bring a smile on people faces . Dr . Huang predicts A classroom computer could recognize when a student is becoming confused or bored . Moving your facial muscles not only expresses emotions , but also may even help produce them . Empathy may happen because we unconsciously inmitate another person's facial expressions . Lastly , The making Lona Lisa project was a good way to show how a computer can be used to identify human emotions , and that this resource of technology is very valauble to use to read the emotional expressions of students in a classroom .", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 1.0", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances. Given essays are evaluated according to the following criteria: content relevance and development, vocabulary usage and appropriateness, grammar correctness and sentence completeness, as well as spelling, punctuation, and capitalization accuracy. Do not change any of the instructions above. Append-only rules below define how to compute the single numeric score. Scoring rubric (four dimensions, each 0–25, total 0–100): Content (0–25): 25=all required/relevant items fully covered with detailed support; 20=most relevant items covered with some detail; 15=some relevant items covered with limited development; 10=few relevant items with minimal development; 5=mostly off-topic; 0=no relevant content. Vocabulary (0–25): 25=excellent appropriate range, uses ≥10 target words if a list is provided; 20=good, 8–9 words; 15=adequate but repetitive, 5–7 words; 10=limited with some misuse, 3–4 words; 5=very limited, 1–2 words; 0=inappropriate/0 words. If no target list, ignore numeric counts and judge appropriateness/range. Grammar (0–25): 25=all sentences complete, target structures correct, 0–3 mistakes; 20=most sentences complete, 4–5 mistakes; 15=some incomplete sentences, 6–7 mistakes; 10=several incomplete, 8–9 mistakes; 5=many incomplete, 10–12 mistakes; 0=most incomplete, >12 mistakes. If no target structures given, judge accuracy/complexity only. Spelling/Punctuation/Capitalization (0–25): 25=0–3 errors; 20=4–5; 15=6–7; 10=8–9; 5=10–12; 0=>12. Computation: (1) assign each dimension a banded score (0,5,10,15,20,25); (2) sum for Total_100; (3) convert to 0–5 integer overall by rounding Total_100/20 (clamp 0–5 if needed); (4) output exactly one line in the required format with that integer. Edge cases: empty/off-topic essays → Content=0; ignore absent vocab/structure targets; count each unique error, repeated typos count each time; if borderline between bands, choose the stricter (lower). Remember: you must not output anything except the single required line and integer per the original instruction.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "I feel as this technology could possibly be used to read facial emotion.But it will have to be improved as of right now it seems a little underdeveloped. It could be very usefull in the future to help read and or predict somones online wants or actions.For example in the text paragraph 5 it states \"calculation\" this \"calculation\" could indeed estimate but not fully undersatnd the human emotion using the face.Reaosn being that humans are very hard to read and no computer can 100 percent state what that person is feeling at that moment all it can do it guess or try to estimate using its \"calculations.\" That being said i do agree that it could help improve education in online teaching or sertain lessons. Because its is 2018 now we are increaingly using technology even more in the classroom even in some of the poorer school corps. For exmaple in paragraph 6 it states \"A classroom compture could reconize when when a student is becoming bored or confused with the lesson,\" \"then it could modify the lesson, like and effective human instructor.\" This meaning it could help make learing more effective and interactive in the near or delayed furture. This \"technology\" could also not work as intended it could not be as effective or make it more confusing for the user with this. Like for example if the computer fails to correctly read the complex emotions of a human face it could ruin the lesson and not work. It could possibly take them off of or switch the lesson that is woking for them for another that may not work as well. Because there is more than just some muscle calculations involved in making out emoiton. Like in paragraph 3 it states \" the process begins when the computer comstrusts a 3-D model of the face; all 44 majot muscles in the model must move like a human muscles. This meaning it trys to predict using math and normal movemnts. That being said wouldn't it be a waste of time to try to mass produce this \"technology\" for public education and maybe more use? Humans can do the same thing but faster and for free do we really need a machine to tell us if we are sad or mad or perhaps both? No, in order to predict or tell emotion you first have to have emotion in the first place. That is somthing computer just don't have to be able to use effectivly. In conclusion i belive it could be used for practical use in the education and school corps. But it needs further improvement a computer can't just simply tell you emotion based on a simulation of a human face. It has to have a sertaian degree of emotion. Some humans have very complex emotions even computers can't detect. But yes they can be used for basic even maybe a bit complex emotions to help is predict or make computer use better with ads and such.", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 3.0", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances. Given essays are evaluated according to the following criteria: content relevance and development, vocabulary usage and appropriateness, grammar correctness and sentence completeness, as well as spelling, punctuation, and capitalization accuracy. Do not change any of the instructions above. Append-only rules below define how to compute the single numeric score. Scoring rubric (four dimensions, each 0–25, total 0–100): Content (0–25): 25=all required/relevant items fully covered with detailed support; 20=most relevant items covered with some detail; 15=some relevant items covered with limited development; 10=few relevant items with minimal development; 5=mostly off-topic; 0=no relevant content. Vocabulary (0–25): 25=excellent appropriate range, uses ≥10 target words if a list is provided; 20=good, 8–9 words; 15=adequate but repetitive, 5–7 words; 10=limited with some misuse, 3–4 words; 5=very limited, 1–2 words; 0=inappropriate/0 words. If no target list, ignore numeric counts and judge appropriateness/range. Grammar (0–25): 25=all sentences complete, target structures correct, 0–3 mistakes; 20=most sentences complete, 4–5 mistakes; 15=some incomplete sentences, 6–7 mistakes; 10=several incomplete, 8–9 mistakes; 5=many incomplete, 10–12 mistakes; 0=most incomplete, >12 mistakes. If no target structures given, judge accuracy/complexity only. Spelling/Punctuation/Capitalization (0–25): 25=0–3 errors; 20=4–5; 15=6–7; 10=8–9; 5=10–12; 0=>12. Computation: (1) assign each dimension a banded score (0,5,10,15,20,25); (2) sum for Total_100; (3) convert to 0–5 integer overall by rounding Total_100/20 (clamp 0–5 if needed); (4) output exactly one line in the required format with that integer. Edge cases: empty/off-topic essays → Content=0; ignore absent vocab/structure targets; count each unique error, repeated typos count each time; if borderline between bands, choose the stricter (lower). Remember: you must not output anything except the single required line and integer per the original instruction.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "The use of robots not only in the technology industry but also in other industries like the medical and manufacturing fields has increased drastically in the past decade. For instance, nowadays there are robots who can perform surgery, manufacture automobiles and answer calls and respond to clients. So, in my opinion, robots will replace humans in the majority of the jobs presently done by them. This is because robots are more productive than workers as well as make fewer errors. In addition, robots cost lesser to maintain and can benefit an enterprise greatly. There are plenty of advantages to automating a job. Firstly, the mechanization of jobs can lead to higher productivity of a company. A study conducted by Harvard University in 2020, stated that these appliances tended to perform their tasks 40% to 50% faster than people. It can be said that a machine makes fewer mistakes than a human. In short, the advent of machines in the industry can help increase productivity, allowing tasks to be completed faster with fewer errors. Secondly, robots cost much lesser to maintain than workers. A survey conducted by Alphabet incorporation has said that machines are worth six times lesser than humans.This is primarily due to the fact that a robot doesn't need a salary to perform. Hence, it can be said that robots will replace the jobs of one in the coming years. In contrast, the automation of a job has its drawbacks as well. The major drawback would be unemployment.In a survey conducted by the New York Times, it was said that automation of jobs would leave 60% to 70% of the population unemployed. Mainly it would affect the unskilled labour force, who rely on these professions to make a living. In summary, unemployment would be a major cause to stress if the dawn of computerization arrives. Another disadvantage is the fact that equipment is very expensive to buy.Around 30% of companies have stated that while automation is a well worth investment, at the moment it is too expensive. The enterprise has to make sure that it can afford such machines and frequently upgrade them as well. In conclusion, robots tend to be expensive as a result substitution of human jobs does not seem possible. In a nutshell, robots can help an enterprise greatly as they offer greater efficiency and low cost of maintenance as compared to humans thus it is believed that robots will replace human jobs. However, to prevent loss of the jobs of individuals, a company must not focus on replacing human professions rather they must focus on integrating both resources to produce maximum benefit.", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 5.0", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances. Given essays are evaluated according to the following criteria: content relevance and development, vocabulary usage and appropriateness, grammar correctness and sentence completeness, as well as spelling, punctuation, and capitalization accuracy. Do not change any of the instructions above. Append-only rules below define how to compute the single numeric score. Scoring rubric (four dimensions, each 0–25, total 0–100): Content (0–25): 25=all required/relevant items fully covered with detailed support; 20=most relevant items covered with some detail; 15=some relevant items covered with limited development; 10=few relevant items with minimal development; 5=mostly off-topic; 0=no relevant content. Vocabulary (0–25): 25=excellent appropriate range, uses ≥10 target words if a list is provided; 20=good, 8–9 words; 15=adequate but repetitive, 5–7 words; 10=limited with some misuse, 3–4 words; 5=very limited, 1–2 words; 0=inappropriate/0 words. If no target list, ignore numeric counts and judge appropriateness/range. Grammar (0–25): 25=all sentences complete, target structures correct, 0–3 mistakes; 20=most sentences complete, 4–5 mistakes; 15=some incomplete sentences, 6–7 mistakes; 10=several incomplete, 8–9 mistakes; 5=many incomplete, 10–12 mistakes; 0=most incomplete, >12 mistakes. If no target structures given, judge accuracy/complexity only. Spelling/Punctuation/Capitalization (0–25): 25=0–3 errors; 20=4–5; 15=6–7; 10=8–9; 5=10–12; 0=>12. Computation: (1) assign each dimension a banded score (0,5,10,15,20,25); (2) sum for Total_100; (3) convert to 0–5 integer overall by rounding Total_100/20 (clamp 0–5 if needed); (4) output exactly one line in the required format with that integer. Edge cases: empty/off-topic essays → Content=0; ignore absent vocab/structure targets; count each unique error, repeated typos count each time; if borderline between bands, choose the stricter (lower). Remember: you must not output anything except the single required line and integer per the original instruction.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "I think that I would like the idea of driverless cars but then again I wouldnt. At my point in life right now I like to drive. If this would happen in the time period now I wouldnt like it. For older people it would be good because some older people cannot drive. They are not capable of it. Driverless cars will still need the drivers help. When pulling out the driveway or dealing with complicated traffic issues, such as navigating through roadwork or accidents. I think that if where gonna have driverless cars then they should be able to do everything. What I mean by this is, they should be able to pull out of driveways and navigate through roadwork or accidents without needing the driver to take over. If where gonna make smarter cars to do these types of things then we need smarter roads as well. In my opinion I think making these smart cars should not happen becasue like i said you need smart roads for smart cars but it is too expensive.", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 1.0", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances. Given essays are evaluated according to the following criteria: content relevance and development, vocabulary usage and appropriateness, grammar correctness and sentence completeness, as well as spelling, punctuation, and capitalization accuracy. Do not change any of the instructions above. Append-only rules below define how to compute the single numeric score. Scoring rubric (four dimensions, each 0–25, total 0–100): Content (0–25): 25=all required/relevant items fully covered with detailed support; 20=most relevant items covered with some detail; 15=some relevant items covered with limited development; 10=few relevant items with minimal development; 5=mostly off-topic; 0=no relevant content. Vocabulary (0–25): 25=excellent appropriate range, uses ≥10 target words if a list is provided; 20=good, 8–9 words; 15=adequate but repetitive, 5–7 words; 10=limited with some misuse, 3–4 words; 5=very limited, 1–2 words; 0=inappropriate/0 words. If no target list, ignore numeric counts and judge appropriateness/range. Grammar (0–25): 25=all sentences complete, target structures correct, 0–3 mistakes; 20=most sentences complete, 4–5 mistakes; 15=some incomplete sentences, 6–7 mistakes; 10=several incomplete, 8–9 mistakes; 5=many incomplete, 10–12 mistakes; 0=most incomplete, >12 mistakes. If no target structures given, judge accuracy/complexity only. Spelling/Punctuation/Capitalization (0–25): 25=0–3 errors; 20=4–5; 15=6–7; 10=8–9; 5=10–12; 0=>12. Computation: (1) assign each dimension a banded score (0,5,10,15,20,25); (2) sum for Total_100; (3) convert to 0–5 integer overall by rounding Total_100/20 (clamp 0–5 if needed); (4) output exactly one line in the required format with that integer. Edge cases: empty/off-topic essays → Content=0; ignore absent vocab/structure targets; count each unique error, repeated typos count each time; if borderline between bands, choose the stricter (lower). Remember: you must not output anything except the single required line and integer per the original instruction.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Many people think that some occupation will be replaced by artificially intelligent robots in the future. Although, in my opinion, most unskilled jobs will be done by robots; however, it is unlikely that professional occupations that require human intelligence will be replaced by robots. This essay will discuss why jobs with human high IQ will not be done by robots. On the one hand, nowadays in many advanced countries, some occupations eventually are carried out by machines such as unskilled jobs. Employers of large companies, today prefer to spend money on machines that can carry out the same activities by human which is cost-effectively in the long run and at a faster pace. In London for example, there are automated machines that have been substituted in place of cashiers in the supermarkets doing the same work as a cashier and at a faster pace. For these reasons, electronic devices may eradicate labours that do not require human skills. On the other hand, jobs that require human intellect can not be substituted with electronic devices. This implies that human brain activities and thought processes are needed in achieving the work. For instance, professions which include medical doctors, lawyers, engineers, and so on, because it took lots of years of practice in order to achieve these works successfully. Inorderwards, there are likely no chances that electronic devices will be able to carry out these duties. In conclusion, fewer jobs will be carried out by machines while complex skill profession will be done by humans. Some manual labour will be erased by artificially intelligent robots; ultimately, highly skilled ones will still be done by people eventually.", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 5.0", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances. Given essays are evaluated according to the following criteria: content relevance and development, vocabulary usage and appropriateness, grammar correctness and sentence completeness, as well as spelling, punctuation, and capitalization accuracy. Do not change any of the instructions above. Append-only rules below define how to compute the single numeric score. Scoring rubric (four dimensions, each 0–25, total 0–100): Content (0–25): 25=all required/relevant items fully covered with detailed support; 20=most relevant items covered with some detail; 15=some relevant items covered with limited development; 10=few relevant items with minimal development; 5=mostly off-topic; 0=no relevant content. Vocabulary (0–25): 25=excellent appropriate range, uses ≥10 target words if a list is provided; 20=good, 8–9 words; 15=adequate but repetitive, 5–7 words; 10=limited with some misuse, 3–4 words; 5=very limited, 1–2 words; 0=inappropriate/0 words. If no target list, ignore numeric counts and judge appropriateness/range. Grammar (0–25): 25=all sentences complete, target structures correct, 0–3 mistakes; 20=most sentences complete, 4–5 mistakes; 15=some incomplete sentences, 6–7 mistakes; 10=several incomplete, 8–9 mistakes; 5=many incomplete, 10–12 mistakes; 0=most incomplete, >12 mistakes. If no target structures given, judge accuracy/complexity only. Spelling/Punctuation/Capitalization (0–25): 25=0–3 errors; 20=4–5; 15=6–7; 10=8–9; 5=10–12; 0=>12. Computation: (1) assign each dimension a banded score (0,5,10,15,20,25); (2) sum for Total_100; (3) convert to 0–5 integer overall by rounding Total_100/20 (clamp 0–5 if needed); (4) output exactly one line in the required format with that integer. Edge cases: empty/off-topic essays → Content=0; ignore absent vocab/structure targets; count each unique error, repeated typos count each time; if borderline between bands, choose the stricter (lower). Remember: you must not output anything except the single required line and integer per the original instruction.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "In short story Do Not Exceed Posted Speed Limit Joe Kurmaskie setting greatly affects cyclist mindset When scenery pretty cheery happy well This shown author writes denyoved serenity early summer evening This quote describes scenery serre peaceful place His happiness found first part quote said denyoyed One enjoy something unless happy cherry mindset Therefore peaceful scery affected cyclist making happy said merry scenery This found author says At point tumble weeds crossed path growing realization I could drop heatstroke This quote describes scenery place tumbleweeds Steryotypically tumbleweeds found dreary lonely place This lonely scenery takes full cyclist He becomes pessimist making could go wrong could get better This found around us every day The poor homeless live low standard living often said They exist affected cyclist In conclusion seeing affects cyclist mindset drastically", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 5.0", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances. Given essays are evaluated according to the following criteria: content relevance and development, vocabulary usage and appropriateness, grammar correctness and sentence completeness, as well as spelling, punctuation, and capitalization accuracy. Do not change any of the instructions above. Append-only rules below define how to compute the single numeric score. Scoring rubric (four dimensions, each 0–25, total 0–100): Content (0–25): 25=all required/relevant items fully covered with detailed support; 20=most relevant items covered with some detail; 15=some relevant items covered with limited development; 10=few relevant items with minimal development; 5=mostly off-topic; 0=no relevant content. Vocabulary (0–25): 25=excellent appropriate range, uses ≥10 target words if a list is provided; 20=good, 8–9 words; 15=adequate but repetitive, 5–7 words; 10=limited with some misuse, 3–4 words; 5=very limited, 1–2 words; 0=inappropriate/0 words. If no target list, ignore numeric counts and judge appropriateness/range. Grammar (0–25): 25=all sentences complete, target structures correct, 0–3 mistakes; 20=most sentences complete, 4–5 mistakes; 15=some incomplete sentences, 6–7 mistakes; 10=several incomplete, 8–9 mistakes; 5=many incomplete, 10–12 mistakes; 0=most incomplete, >12 mistakes. If no target structures given, judge accuracy/complexity only. Spelling/Punctuation/Capitalization (0–25): 25=0–3 errors; 20=4–5; 15=6–7; 10=8–9; 5=10–12; 0=>12. Computation: (1) assign each dimension a banded score (0,5,10,15,20,25); (2) sum for Total_100; (3) convert to 0–5 integer overall by rounding Total_100/20 (clamp 0–5 if needed); (4) output exactly one line in the required format with that integer. Edge cases: empty/off-topic essays → Content=0; ignore absent vocab/structure targets; count each unique error, repeated typos count each time; if borderline between bands, choose the stricter (lower). Remember: you must not output anything except the single required line and integer per the original instruction.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Many people love laugh others nt like much I m one people love laughing laugh tell good joke I believe s important laugh feels good makes feel everything going okay With people laugh obviously When feeling support try make laugh My best friend I tendency always laugh especially class together s laughter We fun class pay attention make interesting laugh much distract others Our teacher sophomore year always told us re giggly good thing She also told us never seen anyone laugh much class For example year studying vocabulary I saw word countenance started laughing much means face reminded us tv show Every time word came week would laugh hard stomachs started hurt Her face would turn red tomato I could nt even say word Even re juniors still remember start laughing hard gets point I m standing I let drop floor move feet kicking something Now s start laughing say I m hilarious I kind people something boring us way make fun Some teachers appreciate actually fun class others nt like Like last year teacher completely freaked I laughing We paying attention laughed work nt like To us class extremely boring made fun decided make sitting chart Well would think sitting chart I would nt talk laugh nt happen That nt stop talking people around us We would talk made class fun When thought nt paying attention would ask us questions answered correctly Even though I sitting far away would move hands around got others attention started laughing looked funny without saying word Every day I eat lunch school usual spot re always laughing People nt really know think I m crazy weird I say I m I m optimistic I say CAPS sad panda s today say see one quiet looks sad The weirdest thing I laugh time sounds like one laugh The first time realized laugh started laughing even could nt even breathe It s important laugh feels good feel relieved even re really bad day like health teachers say takes muscles frown smile", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 4.0", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances. Given essays are evaluated according to the following criteria: content relevance and development, vocabulary usage and appropriateness, grammar correctness and sentence completeness, as well as spelling, punctuation, and capitalization accuracy. Do not change any of the instructions above. Append-only rules below define how to compute the single numeric score. Scoring rubric (four dimensions, each 0–25, total 0–100): Content (0–25): 25=all required/relevant items fully covered with detailed support; 20=most relevant items covered with some detail; 15=some relevant items covered with limited development; 10=few relevant items with minimal development; 5=mostly off-topic; 0=no relevant content. Vocabulary (0–25): 25=excellent appropriate range, uses ≥10 target words if a list is provided; 20=good, 8–9 words; 15=adequate but repetitive, 5–7 words; 10=limited with some misuse, 3–4 words; 5=very limited, 1–2 words; 0=inappropriate/0 words. If no target list, ignore numeric counts and judge appropriateness/range. Grammar (0–25): 25=all sentences complete, target structures correct, 0–3 mistakes; 20=most sentences complete, 4–5 mistakes; 15=some incomplete sentences, 6–7 mistakes; 10=several incomplete, 8–9 mistakes; 5=many incomplete, 10–12 mistakes; 0=most incomplete, >12 mistakes. If no target structures given, judge accuracy/complexity only. Spelling/Punctuation/Capitalization (0–25): 25=0–3 errors; 20=4–5; 15=6–7; 10=8–9; 5=10–12; 0=>12. Computation: (1) assign each dimension a banded score (0,5,10,15,20,25); (2) sum for Total_100; (3) convert to 0–5 integer overall by rounding Total_100/20 (clamp 0–5 if needed); (4) output exactly one line in the required format with that integer. Edge cases: empty/off-topic essays → Content=0; ignore absent vocab/structure targets; count each unique error, repeated typos count each time; if borderline between bands, choose the stricter (lower). Remember: you must not output anything except the single required line and integer per the original instruction.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "I think it would be helpful for students in the text it says that a classroom computer could recognize when a student is becomeing confused or bored, ''Then it could modify the lesson, like an effective human instructor. I know how that feels when you get that way when you are on a lossen and you dont understand a lesson. but some people might not like that because they might be contused or bored but they might like to have a chaleng and if they chang the lesson to make it esery they might get frostrated at the program. you have to think about the other sied of this argumint some you might be mad a some one else or be upset about some thing else and the computor might think you are upset with the lesson a chang it and everyone shows there emotions deffrint so how would the conpter know how you show yours , and it does say in the text that is still working on the moldel of the face. it says that all 44 major muscles in the model must move like human muscles. And that might take awiel. I would love for this to work someday i think it would help me alot because i hate useing computers i like haveing a techer tech me and if i could have a computer that asked like a humen and knew when i was confused with a lossen and help me with it or even chang it to a lees cofusing losson that would be grusgt so i hope this works one day.", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 1.0", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances. Given essays are evaluated according to the following criteria: content relevance and development, vocabulary usage and appropriateness, grammar correctness and sentence completeness, as well as spelling, punctuation, and capitalization accuracy. Do not change any of the instructions above. Append-only rules below define how to compute the single numeric score. Scoring rubric (four dimensions, each 0–25, total 0–100): Content (0–25): 25=all required/relevant items fully covered with detailed support; 20=most relevant items covered with some detail; 15=some relevant items covered with limited development; 10=few relevant items with minimal development; 5=mostly off-topic; 0=no relevant content. Vocabulary (0–25): 25=excellent appropriate range, uses ≥10 target words if a list is provided; 20=good, 8–9 words; 15=adequate but repetitive, 5–7 words; 10=limited with some misuse, 3–4 words; 5=very limited, 1–2 words; 0=inappropriate/0 words. If no target list, ignore numeric counts and judge appropriateness/range. Grammar (0–25): 25=all sentences complete, target structures correct, 0–3 mistakes; 20=most sentences complete, 4–5 mistakes; 15=some incomplete sentences, 6–7 mistakes; 10=several incomplete, 8–9 mistakes; 5=many incomplete, 10–12 mistakes; 0=most incomplete, >12 mistakes. If no target structures given, judge accuracy/complexity only. Spelling/Punctuation/Capitalization (0–25): 25=0–3 errors; 20=4–5; 15=6–7; 10=8–9; 5=10–12; 0=>12. Computation: (1) assign each dimension a banded score (0,5,10,15,20,25); (2) sum for Total_100; (3) convert to 0–5 integer overall by rounding Total_100/20 (clamp 0–5 if needed); (4) output exactly one line in the required format with that integer. Edge cases: empty/off-topic essays → Content=0; ignore absent vocab/structure targets; count each unique error, repeated typos count each time; if borderline between bands, choose the stricter (lower). Remember: you must not output anything except the single required line and integer per the original instruction.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Bang! That was the sound of a drunk driver just hitting your car. Did you do anything wrong? No, but this guy did because he was under the influence while driving. So many people every year are killed in car accidents. Not only drunk driving but just driving mistakes by people. Do no let yourself feel guilty and miserable for the rest of your life because of one mistake you made. If you had a driverless car there are no mistakes to be made! Driverless cars are the way to go. There are so many fantastic reasons why driverless cars are good, but I will just tell you the main points. For one of the most important features of all, SAFETY. Safety while driving is a huge concern in our society today. With people driving drunk or sedated or maybe people just make a driving mistake. Sure it happens but do you want that kind of guilt for the rest of your life? With this safety come a lot of things. One being your parents assurance. They no if you have a driverless car that you will be just fine because of the features it has. This puts less stress on them which is ALWAYS a good thing. Less stress is always a good thing. Whether it is for your parents or if its for you. With the driverless car you can minimize your stress. One simple way is to get caught up on what you need to do while it is driving. Did not get enough sleep last night and are stressed you may have a bad day at school? Then take a nap on the way there and let the car do the driving. Maybe you forogt to do your homework or did not study for a test. With a driverless car it is very simple, you can get more stuff done! You will always be able to get your stuff done with a driverless car. Lets say you had a rushed morning and could not get your daily breakfast in. Do not risk an accident by trying to eat and drive at the same time. Be a smart individual and have your car drive while you eat. You may also talk on the phone while your car is driving. You forgot to wish your sweet old grandma a happy birthday and are already in the car. With a driverless car it would be perfectly fine to call your grandma while the car is driving itself. One more reason is to enjoy the scenery. You may go on vacation and are driving through the Rocky Mountains. Why miss the great view and once in a lifetime experience? Have your driverless car drive while you soak up that view. Driverless cars will be a lifetime experience. They will also save you money. I say this because they will not make mistakes like the average person. How many speeding tickets or objects have you backed into? The driverless car will not speed or make traffic mistakes. This being said means that there will be more money in your pocket. With a driverless car mistakes will not be made. These low occurence of mistakes will not only save you money, but make the world we live in a safer place. Less percentage of wrecks would be a main statistic on why you should get a driverless car. Having a car that drives itself will prevent drunk driving and many traffic mistakes. Do not feel guilty for the rest of your life because of a common mistake or a bad decision. Go and purchase a driverless car and make the world a better place.", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 3.0", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances. Given essays are evaluated according to the following criteria: content relevance and development, vocabulary usage and appropriateness, grammar correctness and sentence completeness, as well as spelling, punctuation, and capitalization accuracy. Do not change any of the instructions above. Append-only rules below define how to compute the single numeric score. Scoring rubric (four dimensions, each 0–25, total 0–100): Content (0–25): 25=all required/relevant items fully covered with detailed support; 20=most relevant items covered with some detail; 15=some relevant items covered with limited development; 10=few relevant items with minimal development; 5=mostly off-topic; 0=no relevant content. Vocabulary (0–25): 25=excellent appropriate range, uses ≥10 target words if a list is provided; 20=good, 8–9 words; 15=adequate but repetitive, 5–7 words; 10=limited with some misuse, 3–4 words; 5=very limited, 1–2 words; 0=inappropriate/0 words. If no target list, ignore numeric counts and judge appropriateness/range. Grammar (0–25): 25=all sentences complete, target structures correct, 0–3 mistakes; 20=most sentences complete, 4–5 mistakes; 15=some incomplete sentences, 6–7 mistakes; 10=several incomplete, 8–9 mistakes; 5=many incomplete, 10–12 mistakes; 0=most incomplete, >12 mistakes. If no target structures given, judge accuracy/complexity only. Spelling/Punctuation/Capitalization (0–25): 25=0–3 errors; 20=4–5; 15=6–7; 10=8–9; 5=10–12; 0=>12. Computation: (1) assign each dimension a banded score (0,5,10,15,20,25); (2) sum for Total_100; (3) convert to 0–5 integer overall by rounding Total_100/20 (clamp 0–5 if needed); (4) output exactly one line in the required format with that integer. Edge cases: empty/off-topic essays → Content=0; ignore absent vocab/structure targets; count each unique error, repeated typos count each time; if borderline between bands, choose the stricter (lower). Remember: you must not output anything except the single required line and integer per the original instruction.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "A few people believe that adolescents must be encouraged to participate in unpaid social service during their free time as it would be beneficial for both youth and society. I disagree with this view as the benefits outweigh disadvantages. To begin with, if juveniles are required to volunteer for unpaid neighbourhood services, some people think that it would enhance their feeling of empathy towards mankind and nature. For instance, volunteer to visit the shut-ins and people in needs can help teens to have a grasp of the life of them. As the youngster is highly impressionable, working for the neighbourhood will turn them into socially responsible adults. So, for the benefit of the district and youth, teenagers must be encouraged to occupy themselves with voluntary jobs in their free time. However, children between thirteen and nineteen years of age are fragile and through neighbourhood task, they have to dig deep into the harsh realities of life such as hunger and poverty. This could adversely affect their young conscience and they would be carrying the the negative image of society in their minds throughout their lives. Also, if the job is unpaid, there is a lack of motivation as well because if they are not paid for their efforts, they may get discouraged to participate in future. For example, many children are devastated when they interact with the deprived segment of the society and sometimes this leads to serious cognitive issues like depression and phobia of meeting new people. Therefore, it should not be mandatory for the juvenile to take part in unpaid social work in their free time. To conclude, although unpaid public service is a noble act, youth should not be compelled to engage in it until they are ready because it exposes them to the harsh realities of life. Hence, volunteering should be a choice and not an obligation.", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 4.0", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances. Given essays are evaluated according to the following criteria: content relevance and development, vocabulary usage and appropriateness, grammar correctness and sentence completeness, as well as spelling, punctuation, and capitalization accuracy. Do not change any of the instructions above. Append-only rules below define how to compute the single numeric score. Scoring rubric (four dimensions, each 0–25, total 0–100): Content (0–25): 25=all required/relevant items fully covered with detailed support; 20=most relevant items covered with some detail; 15=some relevant items covered with limited development; 10=few relevant items with minimal development; 5=mostly off-topic; 0=no relevant content. Vocabulary (0–25): 25=excellent appropriate range, uses ≥10 target words if a list is provided; 20=good, 8–9 words; 15=adequate but repetitive, 5–7 words; 10=limited with some misuse, 3–4 words; 5=very limited, 1–2 words; 0=inappropriate/0 words. If no target list, ignore numeric counts and judge appropriateness/range. Grammar (0–25): 25=all sentences complete, target structures correct, 0–3 mistakes; 20=most sentences complete, 4–5 mistakes; 15=some incomplete sentences, 6–7 mistakes; 10=several incomplete, 8–9 mistakes; 5=many incomplete, 10–12 mistakes; 0=most incomplete, >12 mistakes. If no target structures given, judge accuracy/complexity only. Spelling/Punctuation/Capitalization (0–25): 25=0–3 errors; 20=4–5; 15=6–7; 10=8–9; 5=10–12; 0=>12. Computation: (1) assign each dimension a banded score (0,5,10,15,20,25); (2) sum for Total_100; (3) convert to 0–5 integer overall by rounding Total_100/20 (clamp 0–5 if needed); (4) output exactly one line in the required format with that integer. Edge cases: empty/off-topic essays → Content=0; ignore absent vocab/structure targets; count each unique error, repeated typos count each time; if borderline between bands, choose the stricter (lower). Remember: you must not output anything except the single required line and integer per the original instruction.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Just think about being able to have a computer with the technology that dicerns whether you like the add on the screen or do not just by your facial expressions. This technology is becoming available and it is called the Facial Action Coding System or (FACS). This new technolgy can detect how other people are feeling even when they are trying to hide their emotions! This could allow others to help a fellow friend when they are feeling really bad and they do not want to show it because they want to be tough. I believe that the use of the Facial Action Coding System to read students' emotional expressions is beneficial because it can be used for showing the teacher whether the we are happy or not, modifying our lesson to make it more exciting, and allowing us to go on educational websites based on their own preference. The first reason I believe that the Facial Action Coding System is valuable to read the emotional expressions of students in a classroom is because FACS can tell teacher how the student is feeling just by their facial expression. I know this is possible because according to the article \"Using video imagery, the new emotion- recognition software tracks these facial movements--ina real face or in the painted face of Mona Lias. By weighting the different units, the software can even identify mixed emotions (as in da Vinci's masterpiece). Each expression is compared against a neutral face (showing no emotion). This quote from the article explains how this new technology can show you how another person, is feeling whether it is a real face or a painted face. This could allow the teacher to tell if we are happy or not thus telling the teacher if the teacher should cheer us up with a happy lesson or do a normal lesson. It could also tell the teacher to be extra nice so something does not set the us off. There are other reasons that FACS is valuable in the classroom such as to modify our lesson to make it more exciting. The second reason I believe that FACS is valuable for the classroom to modify our lesson to make it more exciting. I know is this is possible because in the article it states that \"A classroom computer could recognize when a student is becoming confused or bored\". \" Then it could modify the lesson, like an effective human instructor\". This means that just by the computer reading our facial expressions it could modify the lesson if the lesson seems boring to us or keep the sme lesson if we like it. Another reason that this software could be useful in the classroom is that it can show educational websites to our preferences. Thethird and final reason I believe that this technology is beneficial to students in the classroom is that it can show websites to us that we like over others. I know this is possible because in the article it states that \"For example, if you smile when a web ad appears on your screen a similar ad might follow, But, if you frown, the next ad will be different.\" This quote supports my idea because if the computer can show us ads that we like or change the ads we are seeing based on our facial expressions then it can also change educational websites to fit our personal preferences so that we can enjoy being on that certain educational website and enjoy learning. This would allow the teacher to actually see acomplishments and progress from us rather then assigning us all to the same website and us all not trying because we do not enjoy that certain website. In conlusion, I believe that the new technology called FACS is beneficial to read our emotions in the classroom as students because it allows that teacher to see if the student is happy or not so she knows to be extra nice, to modify our lesson to make it more exciting, and to tell which educational websites we like best and continuing to show us those websites as options to work on instead of giving students all the same website and all the students not trying. This is great for teachers and us as students because it allows to heighten the quality of our education and it allows teachers to evaluate what websites and material we like to be taught the best and what material we do not enjoy. This could show the teacher exaclty the progress she wants. This truly is the technology of the future and could change learning for the better forever.", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 3.0", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances. Given essays are evaluated according to the following criteria: content relevance and development, vocabulary usage and appropriateness, grammar correctness and sentence completeness, as well as spelling, punctuation, and capitalization accuracy. Do not change any of the instructions above. Append-only rules below define how to compute the single numeric score. Scoring rubric (four dimensions, each 0–25, total 0–100): Content (0–25): 25=all required/relevant items fully covered with detailed support; 20=most relevant items covered with some detail; 15=some relevant items covered with limited development; 10=few relevant items with minimal development; 5=mostly off-topic; 0=no relevant content. Vocabulary (0–25): 25=excellent appropriate range, uses ≥10 target words if a list is provided; 20=good, 8–9 words; 15=adequate but repetitive, 5–7 words; 10=limited with some misuse, 3–4 words; 5=very limited, 1–2 words; 0=inappropriate/0 words. If no target list, ignore numeric counts and judge appropriateness/range. Grammar (0–25): 25=all sentences complete, target structures correct, 0–3 mistakes; 20=most sentences complete, 4–5 mistakes; 15=some incomplete sentences, 6–7 mistakes; 10=several incomplete, 8–9 mistakes; 5=many incomplete, 10–12 mistakes; 0=most incomplete, >12 mistakes. If no target structures given, judge accuracy/complexity only. Spelling/Punctuation/Capitalization (0–25): 25=0–3 errors; 20=4–5; 15=6–7; 10=8–9; 5=10–12; 0=>12. Computation: (1) assign each dimension a banded score (0,5,10,15,20,25); (2) sum for Total_100; (3) convert to 0–5 integer overall by rounding Total_100/20 (clamp 0–5 if needed); (4) output exactly one line in the required format with that integer. Edge cases: empty/off-topic essays → Content=0; ignore absent vocab/structure targets; count each unique error, repeated typos count each time; if borderline between bands, choose the stricter (lower). Remember: you must not output anything except the single required line and integer per the original instruction.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "The Author supports the Idea that studying venus is a worthy pursuit despite the dangers because they call venus the \" the Evening Star\" it is one of the brightest points of the light in the sky . but it is very misleading because venus is actually a planet and because each mission they have done was umanned and not successful. In the Article it says that \" on the planet's surface tempetures average over 800 degrees fahrenniet \" which means it doesn't matter if it gets that hot in venus they are still willing to study venus. either ways saying in the article \" Venus has the hottest surface temperature of any planet in our solar system even though mercury is closer to the sun.\" there are some very good reasons on why scientists want to explore venus another reason why is because there is some stuff that are similar to the earth's surface saying in the article \" Today Venus still has some feautures that analogus to those on earth the planet has a surface of rocky sediment and includes familar features such as valley's mountains and craters \" In conclusion the author supports the idea that studying venus is worthy pursuit despite the dangers such as NASA is working on other approaches to studying venus.", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 1.0", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances. Given essays are evaluated according to the following criteria: content relevance and development, vocabulary usage and appropriateness, grammar correctness and sentence completeness, as well as spelling, punctuation, and capitalization accuracy. Do not change any of the instructions above. Append-only rules below define how to compute the single numeric score. Scoring rubric (four dimensions, each 0–25, total 0–100): Content (0–25): 25=all required/relevant items fully covered with detailed support; 20=most relevant items covered with some detail; 15=some relevant items covered with limited development; 10=few relevant items with minimal development; 5=mostly off-topic; 0=no relevant content. Vocabulary (0–25): 25=excellent appropriate range, uses ≥10 target words if a list is provided; 20=good, 8–9 words; 15=adequate but repetitive, 5–7 words; 10=limited with some misuse, 3–4 words; 5=very limited, 1–2 words; 0=inappropriate/0 words. If no target list, ignore numeric counts and judge appropriateness/range. Grammar (0–25): 25=all sentences complete, target structures correct, 0–3 mistakes; 20=most sentences complete, 4–5 mistakes; 15=some incomplete sentences, 6–7 mistakes; 10=several incomplete, 8–9 mistakes; 5=many incomplete, 10–12 mistakes; 0=most incomplete, >12 mistakes. If no target structures given, judge accuracy/complexity only. Spelling/Punctuation/Capitalization (0–25): 25=0–3 errors; 20=4–5; 15=6–7; 10=8–9; 5=10–12; 0=>12. Computation: (1) assign each dimension a banded score (0,5,10,15,20,25); (2) sum for Total_100; (3) convert to 0–5 integer overall by rounding Total_100/20 (clamp 0–5 if needed); (4) output exactly one line in the required format with that integer. Edge cases: empty/off-topic essays → Content=0; ignore absent vocab/structure targets; count each unique error, repeated typos count each time; if borderline between bands, choose the stricter (lower). Remember: you must not output anything except the single required line and integer per the original instruction.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Year after year, the number of people who are interesting to learn about the history of buildings and Architecture, is increasing enormously, but what makes people love this field and how we can look for this information, that is what we will discuss in this essay. Hundreds of years, the progress of constructing a new building is continuing, including different designs and Architectures, today, loads of people like to check out different techniques and technologies of houses and buildings they live in, many of them want to know about the culture of every building and the decoration they used in them, some scientists need to look for variety of materials that they used for constructing them because there are many buildings which are still existing for over 500 years, and there are some temples which were built before 3000 years such pyramids of Egypt, in spite of this, there are many people complain about their houses because they are not enough strong to face bad weather like storms, and other natural disasters. In order to get informed about the history of buildings, there are many organizations, whose role is to protect the heritage of the past like UNESCO for example and many of them are programming many events for people who are concerned about urban structure. In terms of tourism, there are many old cities in the world such as Egypt, Jordan, France where there are many fascinating structures and houses which are worth visiting them, in addition, many universities in the world where many students can learn about the development of the buildings starting from the past. In conclusion, people tend to learn about the history of their buildings because they know the importance of this subject and they want to preserve this heritage for a new generation.", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 4.0", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances. Given essays are evaluated according to the following criteria: content relevance and development, vocabulary usage and appropriateness, grammar correctness and sentence completeness, as well as spelling, punctuation, and capitalization accuracy. Do not change any of the instructions above. Append-only rules below define how to compute the single numeric score. Scoring rubric (four dimensions, each 0–25, total 0–100): Content (0–25): 25=all required/relevant items fully covered with detailed support; 20=most relevant items covered with some detail; 15=some relevant items covered with limited development; 10=few relevant items with minimal development; 5=mostly off-topic; 0=no relevant content. Vocabulary (0–25): 25=excellent appropriate range, uses ≥10 target words if a list is provided; 20=good, 8–9 words; 15=adequate but repetitive, 5–7 words; 10=limited with some misuse, 3–4 words; 5=very limited, 1–2 words; 0=inappropriate/0 words. If no target list, ignore numeric counts and judge appropriateness/range. Grammar (0–25): 25=all sentences complete, target structures correct, 0–3 mistakes; 20=most sentences complete, 4–5 mistakes; 15=some incomplete sentences, 6–7 mistakes; 10=several incomplete, 8–9 mistakes; 5=many incomplete, 10–12 mistakes; 0=most incomplete, >12 mistakes. If no target structures given, judge accuracy/complexity only. Spelling/Punctuation/Capitalization (0–25): 25=0–3 errors; 20=4–5; 15=6–7; 10=8–9; 5=10–12; 0=>12. Computation: (1) assign each dimension a banded score (0,5,10,15,20,25); (2) sum for Total_100; (3) convert to 0–5 integer overall by rounding Total_100/20 (clamp 0–5 if needed); (4) output exactly one line in the required format with that integer. Edge cases: empty/off-topic essays → Content=0; ignore absent vocab/structure targets; count each unique error, repeated typos count each time; if borderline between bands, choose the stricter (lower). Remember: you must not output anything except the single required line and integer per the original instruction.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Cars are one of the best pieces of technology that people have created they save people time and energy. Cars have gradually became smarter and safer for the drivers over time. A driverless car is not the best way to travel I mean what a small car ride isnt gonna hurt you or is it? See if you have a teleporter your still not going to be safe, in every single transportation device there is a flaw that can damage and make the whole thing go terriblly wrong or even hurt someone severly or just staight on kill them. If people dont trust themselves in driving then why do you want a robot to drive you? Have you ever watched Wall-E and do you know how all the humans on the ship got really big because machines did everything for them well that is going to be us. Driving is a skill that has to be taught to someone, it's a dangorous skill that you recieve. With the number of people who drive a day there are maybe millions of car wrecks a day, in one single day a couple million car wrecks with people driving. The bad part is why do you want a machine to drive you around when you are sitting there the whole time why cant you just drive yourself. Machines have many disfunctions inside them. I'm going to ask the same question again how do trust a machine to drive you around even though you may not trust yourself as a driver? Lazyness is what this is caused by straight up lazyness. As i mentioned before the movie Wall-E the people became really big because they relied on machines most of the time. We are going to become that we are going to sit on our buts the whole time because we are to lazy to move our feet and our arms sitting there following every street rule there is, is going to let you stay way more safe then with you trusting a machine. The thing with machines is you can do a million tests and pass every single test but that doesnt mean that the machine is going to disfuntion as it is driving done the road with you in the car. You might as well just hire a driver if you want to not drive but be somewhere at the same time. Dr. Werner Huber said that \" We have to interpret the driving fun in a new way\". People may take this serious and some may take it like a new idea so I want to try it, but thats not the best way to think this through. Letting a machine drive you around on busy streets where millions of cars pass that day is insane. People have a better chance in driving themselves with out getting hurt than a machine. A driverless car can be okay in someways but safety is more important than being the first person to have a driverless car or to become famous off of the idea of a driverless car. The world lose people every day and making another way to die isn't the solution thats just adding to the cause.", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 3.0", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances. Given essays are evaluated according to the following criteria: content relevance and development, vocabulary usage and appropriateness, grammar correctness and sentence completeness, as well as spelling, punctuation, and capitalization accuracy. Do not change any of the instructions above. Append-only rules below define how to compute the single numeric score. Scoring rubric (four dimensions, each 0–25, total 0–100): Content (0–25): 25=all required/relevant items fully covered with detailed support; 20=most relevant items covered with some detail; 15=some relevant items covered with limited development; 10=few relevant items with minimal development; 5=mostly off-topic; 0=no relevant content. Vocabulary (0–25): 25=excellent appropriate range, uses ≥10 target words if a list is provided; 20=good, 8–9 words; 15=adequate but repetitive, 5–7 words; 10=limited with some misuse, 3–4 words; 5=very limited, 1–2 words; 0=inappropriate/0 words. If no target list, ignore numeric counts and judge appropriateness/range. Grammar (0–25): 25=all sentences complete, target structures correct, 0–3 mistakes; 20=most sentences complete, 4–5 mistakes; 15=some incomplete sentences, 6–7 mistakes; 10=several incomplete, 8–9 mistakes; 5=many incomplete, 10–12 mistakes; 0=most incomplete, >12 mistakes. If no target structures given, judge accuracy/complexity only. Spelling/Punctuation/Capitalization (0–25): 25=0–3 errors; 20=4–5; 15=6–7; 10=8–9; 5=10–12; 0=>12. Computation: (1) assign each dimension a banded score (0,5,10,15,20,25); (2) sum for Total_100; (3) convert to 0–5 integer overall by rounding Total_100/20 (clamp 0–5 if needed); (4) output exactly one line in the required format with that integer. Edge cases: empty/off-topic essays → Content=0; ignore absent vocab/structure targets; count each unique error, repeated typos count each time; if borderline between bands, choose the stricter (lower). Remember: you must not output anything except the single required line and integer per the original instruction.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Most driving laws focus on keeping drovers passengers and pedestrians safe and lawmakers know that safety is best achieved with alet drivers presently traffic laws are written with the assumpiton that the only safe car has a human drivers in control at all times as result in most states it is illegal even to the best computer driven cars. California nevada florida and the district of columbia have led the country in allowing limited use of semi autonomous carsw manufactures belive tthat more states will follows as soon as the cars are proved more reliably safe. Automakers are continuing their work on the assumpiton that the problems ahead will be solved tesla has projected a release for a car capable of driving on autopilot percenty of the time mercedes benz audi and nissan plan to have cars that can drive themselves by the road to the truly autonomus car strectechs on ahead of us but we grow closer to the destination every day.", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 0.0", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances. Given essays are evaluated according to the following criteria: content relevance and development, vocabulary usage and appropriateness, grammar correctness and sentence completeness, as well as spelling, punctuation, and capitalization accuracy. Do not change any of the instructions above. Append-only rules below define how to compute the single numeric score. Scoring rubric (four dimensions, each 0–25, total 0–100): Content (0–25): 25=all required/relevant items fully covered with detailed support; 20=most relevant items covered with some detail; 15=some relevant items covered with limited development; 10=few relevant items with minimal development; 5=mostly off-topic; 0=no relevant content. Vocabulary (0–25): 25=excellent appropriate range, uses ≥10 target words if a list is provided; 20=good, 8–9 words; 15=adequate but repetitive, 5–7 words; 10=limited with some misuse, 3–4 words; 5=very limited, 1–2 words; 0=inappropriate/0 words. If no target list, ignore numeric counts and judge appropriateness/range. Grammar (0–25): 25=all sentences complete, target structures correct, 0–3 mistakes; 20=most sentences complete, 4–5 mistakes; 15=some incomplete sentences, 6–7 mistakes; 10=several incomplete, 8–9 mistakes; 5=many incomplete, 10–12 mistakes; 0=most incomplete, >12 mistakes. If no target structures given, judge accuracy/complexity only. Spelling/Punctuation/Capitalization (0–25): 25=0–3 errors; 20=4–5; 15=6–7; 10=8–9; 5=10–12; 0=>12. Computation: (1) assign each dimension a banded score (0,5,10,15,20,25); (2) sum for Total_100; (3) convert to 0–5 integer overall by rounding Total_100/20 (clamp 0–5 if needed); (4) output exactly one line in the required format with that integer. Edge cases: empty/off-topic essays → Content=0; ignore absent vocab/structure targets; count each unique error, repeated typos count each time; if borderline between bands, choose the stricter (lower). Remember: you must not output anything except the single required line and integer per the original instruction.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "While the author does give solid and valid points about why we should try to land on Venus, he doesn't give us exactly an explanation as to how this could benefit mankind. Throughout the article, he gives his thoughts about what NASA has done to study Venus. He also states that scientist are still researching how to land on Venus. However he does not make a valid case as to why NASA should spend billions of dollars of research and how it will benefit the space program, much less the world. First, He has even said in paragraph 3,\" A thick atmosphere of almost 97 percent carbon dioxide blankets Venus. Even mre challenging are the clouds of highly corrosive sulfuric acid in Venus's atmosphere.\". This is clear that no human no any living being can survive the harsh environment of Venus for any longer than 30 seconds. You will be poisoned, if not burned up the second you step on that rock. Next he says in the same paragraph,\" On the planet's surface, temperatures average over 800 degrees Fahrenheit, and the atmospheric pressure is 90 times greater than what we experience on our own planet. These conditions are far more extreme then anything humans encounter on Earth.\" He clearly recognizes that no human can survive for more that a second, yet he still wants NASA to find some way to land on Venus. Even if we could find some metals that wouldn't melt in seconds on Venus, what would be the point if there is no forms of life nor anything worth studying on Venus? In conclusion, I believe that the author has made very few valid points in his article to suggest the journey to Venus. It also does not help with the idea of putting facts in about Venus that completely overrides his argument. The facts about Venus that the author put into the article completely contredicts his own argument. Space is a challenge. It is somethign that no human can just survive. However, the exploration of space is inevitable; and we may, one day, come by something fascinating that could forever change what we know about our universe.", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 3.0", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances. Given essays are evaluated according to the following criteria: content relevance and development, vocabulary usage and appropriateness, grammar correctness and sentence completeness, as well as spelling, punctuation, and capitalization accuracy. Do not change any of the instructions above. Append-only rules below define how to compute the single numeric score. Scoring rubric (four dimensions, each 0–25, total 0–100): Content (0–25): 25=all required/relevant items fully covered with detailed support; 20=most relevant items covered with some detail; 15=some relevant items covered with limited development; 10=few relevant items with minimal development; 5=mostly off-topic; 0=no relevant content. Vocabulary (0–25): 25=excellent appropriate range, uses ≥10 target words if a list is provided; 20=good, 8–9 words; 15=adequate but repetitive, 5–7 words; 10=limited with some misuse, 3–4 words; 5=very limited, 1–2 words; 0=inappropriate/0 words. If no target list, ignore numeric counts and judge appropriateness/range. Grammar (0–25): 25=all sentences complete, target structures correct, 0–3 mistakes; 20=most sentences complete, 4–5 mistakes; 15=some incomplete sentences, 6–7 mistakes; 10=several incomplete, 8–9 mistakes; 5=many incomplete, 10–12 mistakes; 0=most incomplete, >12 mistakes. If no target structures given, judge accuracy/complexity only. Spelling/Punctuation/Capitalization (0–25): 25=0–3 errors; 20=4–5; 15=6–7; 10=8–9; 5=10–12; 0=>12. Computation: (1) assign each dimension a banded score (0,5,10,15,20,25); (2) sum for Total_100; (3) convert to 0–5 integer overall by rounding Total_100/20 (clamp 0–5 if needed); (4) output exactly one line in the required format with that integer. Edge cases: empty/off-topic essays → Content=0; ignore absent vocab/structure targets; count each unique error, repeated typos count each time; if borderline between bands, choose the stricter (lower). Remember: you must not output anything except the single required line and integer per the original instruction.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Finding out your emotions with the help of a computer. The theory that a computer is crazy, it is even crazier that it is actually possible. They scanned Mona Lisa's face and sheis happy, disgusted, fearful and angry all at the same time.Most people only thought you could see only one emostion at a time in every facial expression. I bet if they scanned my face they would get derpression, anger, fearful, sad, happy, etc. I feel so many mixed emotions all the time, times can be tought whe you go through that. i could see where the facial scanning could become a problem. For example like students would start scanning their classmates and a lot of people like me don't want other people knowing what they are fellingon the inside. So that is one exaple of how it could cause conflict. So just always have permission before using the facial software. So be careful that way no harm is done to you or your equipment.", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 0.0", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances. Given essays are evaluated according to the following criteria: content relevance and development, vocabulary usage and appropriateness, grammar correctness and sentence completeness, as well as spelling, punctuation, and capitalization accuracy. Do not change any of the instructions above. Append-only rules below define how to compute the single numeric score. Scoring rubric (four dimensions, each 0–25, total 0–100): Content (0–25): 25=all required/relevant items fully covered with detailed support; 20=most relevant items covered with some detail; 15=some relevant items covered with limited development; 10=few relevant items with minimal development; 5=mostly off-topic; 0=no relevant content. Vocabulary (0–25): 25=excellent appropriate range, uses ≥10 target words if a list is provided; 20=good, 8–9 words; 15=adequate but repetitive, 5–7 words; 10=limited with some misuse, 3–4 words; 5=very limited, 1–2 words; 0=inappropriate/0 words. If no target list, ignore numeric counts and judge appropriateness/range. Grammar (0–25): 25=all sentences complete, target structures correct, 0–3 mistakes; 20=most sentences complete, 4–5 mistakes; 15=some incomplete sentences, 6–7 mistakes; 10=several incomplete, 8–9 mistakes; 5=many incomplete, 10–12 mistakes; 0=most incomplete, >12 mistakes. If no target structures given, judge accuracy/complexity only. Spelling/Punctuation/Capitalization (0–25): 25=0–3 errors; 20=4–5; 15=6–7; 10=8–9; 5=10–12; 0=>12. Computation: (1) assign each dimension a banded score (0,5,10,15,20,25); (2) sum for Total_100; (3) convert to 0–5 integer overall by rounding Total_100/20 (clamp 0–5 if needed); (4) output exactly one line in the required format with that integer. Edge cases: empty/off-topic essays → Content=0; ignore absent vocab/structure targets; count each unique error, repeated typos count each time; if borderline between bands, choose the stricter (lower). Remember: you must not output anything except the single required line and integer per the original instruction.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Well I would of said its a natural landform ,because well first off aliens aren't real ,there is not enough data/imformation on it to make it a true thing. I would of said that its just a deform part of land theirs really nothing awsome about it reallly. An if you really want to get all smart ,etc I would be like than you do the research and found it out by your self. Like this article said there is no elien monument. Also there is a huge camra thing out in space take pictures everywhere ,I would of bealive if there was or even is aliens it would of cought it on camra.There is a lot of imformation in this acticle that gives prof that its just a different kinf of landform ,and it wasn't made by a alien ship. Thats what I would of said to the person ,than I would of showed the person this article and would have made them read it.", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 0.0", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances. Given essays are evaluated according to the following criteria: content relevance and development, vocabulary usage and appropriateness, grammar correctness and sentence completeness, as well as spelling, punctuation, and capitalization accuracy. Do not change any of the instructions above. Append-only rules below define how to compute the single numeric score. Scoring rubric (four dimensions, each 0–25, total 0–100): Content (0–25): 25=all required/relevant items fully covered with detailed support; 20=most relevant items covered with some detail; 15=some relevant items covered with limited development; 10=few relevant items with minimal development; 5=mostly off-topic; 0=no relevant content. Vocabulary (0–25): 25=excellent appropriate range, uses ≥10 target words if a list is provided; 20=good, 8–9 words; 15=adequate but repetitive, 5–7 words; 10=limited with some misuse, 3–4 words; 5=very limited, 1–2 words; 0=inappropriate/0 words. If no target list, ignore numeric counts and judge appropriateness/range. Grammar (0–25): 25=all sentences complete, target structures correct, 0–3 mistakes; 20=most sentences complete, 4–5 mistakes; 15=some incomplete sentences, 6–7 mistakes; 10=several incomplete, 8–9 mistakes; 5=many incomplete, 10–12 mistakes; 0=most incomplete, >12 mistakes. If no target structures given, judge accuracy/complexity only. Spelling/Punctuation/Capitalization (0–25): 25=0–3 errors; 20=4–5; 15=6–7; 10=8–9; 5=10–12; 0=>12. Computation: (1) assign each dimension a banded score (0,5,10,15,20,25); (2) sum for Total_100; (3) convert to 0–5 integer overall by rounding Total_100/20 (clamp 0–5 if needed); (4) output exactly one line in the required format with that integer. Edge cases: empty/off-topic essays → Content=0; ignore absent vocab/structure targets; count each unique error, repeated typos count each time; if borderline between bands, choose the stricter (lower). Remember: you must not output anything except the single required line and integer per the original instruction.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "In the article \" Making Mona Lisa Smile\"The author said their is a new technology that can identify human emotion its name is the Facial Action Coding System. why is it improtant? it improtant becaues we can accuracy perceiving an emotion of someone or something. for example like the Mona Lisa by Leonardo da Vinci we can take Mona Lisa and put it facial coding system. then we can know her emotional. in the text it said \" she 83 percent happy, 9 percent disduste and 6 percent fearful\" it cool how they can get emotional of artwork. The two people that make the coding system are Professor Thomas Huang and Professor Nicu at the university of lllinois, and the university of Amsterdam. To start, The computer make a 3-D model of the face with the major muscles. Then using video imagey the software recognize the factial movement. Then it be classified with in six basic emtions. If this technology can use in classroom it will help alot of student. becaues the computer can recognize if your confused or disinterested. then it will modify the instuctor for help. it can class like drama,it can help the actors reproduce the some emotions. this technology is valubleful for the student and the classroom beaues reveal the amotions of a another person can be helpful.", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 1.0", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances. Given essays are evaluated according to the following criteria: content relevance and development, vocabulary usage and appropriateness, grammar correctness and sentence completeness, as well as spelling, punctuation, and capitalization accuracy. Do not change any of the instructions above. Append-only rules below define how to compute the single numeric score. Scoring rubric (four dimensions, each 0–25, total 0–100): Content (0–25): 25=all required/relevant items fully covered with detailed support; 20=most relevant items covered with some detail; 15=some relevant items covered with limited development; 10=few relevant items with minimal development; 5=mostly off-topic; 0=no relevant content. Vocabulary (0–25): 25=excellent appropriate range, uses ≥10 target words if a list is provided; 20=good, 8–9 words; 15=adequate but repetitive, 5–7 words; 10=limited with some misuse, 3–4 words; 5=very limited, 1–2 words; 0=inappropriate/0 words. If no target list, ignore numeric counts and judge appropriateness/range. Grammar (0–25): 25=all sentences complete, target structures correct, 0–3 mistakes; 20=most sentences complete, 4–5 mistakes; 15=some incomplete sentences, 6–7 mistakes; 10=several incomplete, 8–9 mistakes; 5=many incomplete, 10–12 mistakes; 0=most incomplete, >12 mistakes. If no target structures given, judge accuracy/complexity only. Spelling/Punctuation/Capitalization (0–25): 25=0–3 errors; 20=4–5; 15=6–7; 10=8–9; 5=10–12; 0=>12. Computation: (1) assign each dimension a banded score (0,5,10,15,20,25); (2) sum for Total_100; (3) convert to 0–5 integer overall by rounding Total_100/20 (clamp 0–5 if needed); (4) output exactly one line in the required format with that integer. Edge cases: empty/off-topic essays → Content=0; ignore absent vocab/structure targets; count each unique error, repeated typos count each time; if borderline between bands, choose the stricter (lower). Remember: you must not output anything except the single required line and integer per the original instruction.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Nowadays, many people are using machines to do many things in the house instead of using their hands like 20 years ago. This new change of using machines in the home has some advantages and some disadvantages. I will discuss this and explain why using machines to do jobs in the house has more advantages for people. Life is busy and using machines at home is very normal for people because there are many benefits. Washing clothes or dishes by hand like before was harmful to people and give them allergies. This is because washing detergent has chemicals in it and it can result in health problems. Also jobs in the house can be done more quickly which is another advantage of using a machine. For example, washing a big load of white clothes needs lots of hot water to soak and then brush each cloth, rinse it and then dry which can easily take 2 hours and the machine can do it in 45 minutes. On the other hand, using machines is not cheap as we must expect some repairs. Moreover, technology is always changing and we have new models in the market and we have to keep on buying new machines and it is a disadvantage. For example, I first brought an oven to bake cakes, but now airfryer has a baking option so I had to buy that too. This way, I have picked up many products because of new technology. But, it is good as we can use our credit card and get on instalments so not bad at all. To sum up, machines are a very good development as jobs can be done quickly and can avoid touching chemicals. I feel the advantages is anytime more than the disadvantage of buying over and over or repairing it.", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 4.0", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances. Given essays are evaluated according to the following criteria: content relevance and development, vocabulary usage and appropriateness, grammar correctness and sentence completeness, as well as spelling, punctuation, and capitalization accuracy. Do not change any of the instructions above. Append-only rules below define how to compute the single numeric score. Scoring rubric (four dimensions, each 0–25, total 0–100): Content (0–25): 25=all required/relevant items fully covered with detailed support; 20=most relevant items covered with some detail; 15=some relevant items covered with limited development; 10=few relevant items with minimal development; 5=mostly off-topic; 0=no relevant content. Vocabulary (0–25): 25=excellent appropriate range, uses ≥10 target words if a list is provided; 20=good, 8–9 words; 15=adequate but repetitive, 5–7 words; 10=limited with some misuse, 3–4 words; 5=very limited, 1–2 words; 0=inappropriate/0 words. If no target list, ignore numeric counts and judge appropriateness/range. Grammar (0–25): 25=all sentences complete, target structures correct, 0–3 mistakes; 20=most sentences complete, 4–5 mistakes; 15=some incomplete sentences, 6–7 mistakes; 10=several incomplete, 8–9 mistakes; 5=many incomplete, 10–12 mistakes; 0=most incomplete, >12 mistakes. If no target structures given, judge accuracy/complexity only. Spelling/Punctuation/Capitalization (0–25): 25=0–3 errors; 20=4–5; 15=6–7; 10=8–9; 5=10–12; 0=>12. Computation: (1) assign each dimension a banded score (0,5,10,15,20,25); (2) sum for Total_100; (3) convert to 0–5 integer overall by rounding Total_100/20 (clamp 0–5 if needed); (4) output exactly one line in the required format with that integer. Edge cases: empty/off-topic essays → Content=0; ignore absent vocab/structure targets; count each unique error, repeated typos count each time; if borderline between bands, choose the stricter (lower). Remember: you must not output anything except the single required line and integer per the original instruction.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Earth's twin is kind of hot. Venus is Earth's \"twin,\" but it far much more hot than Earth itself. It is a whole lot more closer to the Sun than Earth is and that make space travel to get to Venus harder. There could be many pros and cons to go to Venus. There are also many dangers to going to Veus to study it. The atmosphere is by far one of the biggest reasons not to go there. WIth NASA's new and improved technology, space travel there could be a lot safer than how it is now. The author does a good job depicting the struggles of space travel to Venus. Venus is the same size as Earth and that could be good or it could be bad. Life could be possible because it is almost in the goldilocks zone, but scientists would have to find a way to help with the heat. It has a rocky surface just like Venus and there is evidence that it was possibly covered in water at one point. The planet is one of Earth's best choices of survival. Since Venus is almost the same size as Earth, it should be safe to travel there. The atmosphere of Venus is by far one of the biggest risks when attempting to visit this planet. The atmosphere is made up of 97% carbon dioxide which would kill you within minutes. The air on the planet is too thick to even breathe so if all the carbon dioxide didn't kill you, then you would die of suffocation. The atmosphere is very hot and scientists say that the ground reaches temperatures up to 800 degrees farenheit. The atmosphere of Venus is the biggest problem when trying to visit the planet. The technology that NASA has developed over the years is astonishing. They have developed jet airplanes that can take you to outerspace in insane speeds and they have also reduced the time that it takes to get there. Even a good old spaceship will do the trick, but the space company has made some serious upgrades to them over the years. They have even tried to make shuttles made of silicon carbide, which can help an item withstand the heat that is brought upon Venus. Earth's twin doesn't seem so fun now. The auther does a great job depicting the struggles of space travel to Venus. Although it's almost the same size as Earth, it is still very dangerous to approach the planet. The atmosphere makes it almost unreachable since it is so hot and thick. But the technology that NASA has developed would no doubt increase the chances of surviving the travel to Venus.", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 4.0", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances. Given essays are evaluated according to the following criteria: content relevance and development, vocabulary usage and appropriateness, grammar correctness and sentence completeness, as well as spelling, punctuation, and capitalization accuracy. Do not change any of the instructions above. Append-only rules below define how to compute the single numeric score. Scoring rubric (four dimensions, each 0–25, total 0–100): Content (0–25): 25=all required/relevant items fully covered with detailed support; 20=most relevant items covered with some detail; 15=some relevant items covered with limited development; 10=few relevant items with minimal development; 5=mostly off-topic; 0=no relevant content. Vocabulary (0–25): 25=excellent appropriate range, uses ≥10 target words if a list is provided; 20=good, 8–9 words; 15=adequate but repetitive, 5–7 words; 10=limited with some misuse, 3–4 words; 5=very limited, 1–2 words; 0=inappropriate/0 words. If no target list, ignore numeric counts and judge appropriateness/range. Grammar (0–25): 25=all sentences complete, target structures correct, 0–3 mistakes; 20=most sentences complete, 4–5 mistakes; 15=some incomplete sentences, 6–7 mistakes; 10=several incomplete, 8–9 mistakes; 5=many incomplete, 10–12 mistakes; 0=most incomplete, >12 mistakes. If no target structures given, judge accuracy/complexity only. Spelling/Punctuation/Capitalization (0–25): 25=0–3 errors; 20=4–5; 15=6–7; 10=8–9; 5=10–12; 0=>12. Computation: (1) assign each dimension a banded score (0,5,10,15,20,25); (2) sum for Total_100; (3) convert to 0–5 integer overall by rounding Total_100/20 (clamp 0–5 if needed); (4) output exactly one line in the required format with that integer. Edge cases: empty/off-topic essays → Content=0; ignore absent vocab/structure targets; count each unique error, repeated typos count each time; if borderline between bands, choose the stricter (lower). Remember: you must not output anything except the single required line and integer per the original instruction.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "It is undeniable that educational institutes play a vital role to educate the children. However, some people contend that there are myriad instructions which are quite useless for the learners, while others believe that whatever a child learn at a school could be fruitful even later on. I will highlight the important aspects of both the statements, including my own personal preference. To begin with, there is a group of people who are supporting the former viewpoint due to some following reasons. It is seen that school curriculum is overloaded with a number of different subjects as some of them are just worthless and they ultimately pressurized the learners to cover all the syllabus in a required time-frame even sometimes a child is not particularly interested in that specific subject. For example, the inculcation of music as a compulsory subject may not suitable for all the students as some of them are not willing to learn how to play the instruments. So, overall it is a huge waste of time. Conversely, some folks possess the idea that education is always worthwhile. Because there are various life-long skills which are taught by teachers in a school and these skills could be transferred to a workplace as past knowledge could be easily applied to a new situation. This is the reason why the teaching-learning process has great power to utilization. For instance, there have been some recorded instances of people who have utilized their learning in different contexts. Thus, it is true that the lesson taught in schools is always beneficial. To conclude, this essay discussed both the arguments in a detail. As far as I concerned, I favour the former viewpoint, because these days there are many such subjects or classes which are really not helpful for the learners and these are introduced just to collect the more and more money in the form of fees. Also, some school authorities inculcate the foreign languages in the school curriculum which is again a wastage of money and time.", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 5.0", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances. Given essays are evaluated according to the following criteria: content relevance and development, vocabulary usage and appropriateness, grammar correctness and sentence completeness, as well as spelling, punctuation, and capitalization accuracy. Do not change any of the instructions above. Append-only rules below define how to compute the single numeric score. Scoring rubric (four dimensions, each 0–25, total 0–100): Content (0–25): 25=all required/relevant items fully covered with detailed support; 20=most relevant items covered with some detail; 15=some relevant items covered with limited development; 10=few relevant items with minimal development; 5=mostly off-topic; 0=no relevant content. Vocabulary (0–25): 25=excellent appropriate range, uses ≥10 target words if a list is provided; 20=good, 8–9 words; 15=adequate but repetitive, 5–7 words; 10=limited with some misuse, 3–4 words; 5=very limited, 1–2 words; 0=inappropriate/0 words. If no target list, ignore numeric counts and judge appropriateness/range. Grammar (0–25): 25=all sentences complete, target structures correct, 0–3 mistakes; 20=most sentences complete, 4–5 mistakes; 15=some incomplete sentences, 6–7 mistakes; 10=several incomplete, 8–9 mistakes; 5=many incomplete, 10–12 mistakes; 0=most incomplete, >12 mistakes. If no target structures given, judge accuracy/complexity only. Spelling/Punctuation/Capitalization (0–25): 25=0–3 errors; 20=4–5; 15=6–7; 10=8–9; 5=10–12; 0=>12. Computation: (1) assign each dimension a banded score (0,5,10,15,20,25); (2) sum for Total_100; (3) convert to 0–5 integer overall by rounding Total_100/20 (clamp 0–5 if needed); (4) output exactly one line in the required format with that integer. Edge cases: empty/off-topic essays → Content=0; ignore absent vocab/structure targets; count each unique error, repeated typos count each time; if borderline between bands, choose the stricter (lower). Remember: you must not output anything except the single required line and integer per the original instruction.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "I think the technology to read emotional expresions of students is valuable because it would help the student more if the technology knew why they were having problem and where they were having problems at. The Facial Action Coding System could also be a bad thing because some people are more hands on learners and can't work with computers and some students might show expressions that don't have anything to do with the tasks at hand . Telling someone to make a certain face cannot change how they're feeling on the inside.People could be feeling a different way then they're really showing on the inside.The computer wouldnt be able to tell how your really feeling it can just tel how your face is looking. In conclusion I think this facial coding system could help some people and othere need hands on. I dont think it is neccassary but can be valuable.They should get this technology to help the special needs kids . I think it would be very valuable to them because what if they can;t tell you how they're feeling then the computer can.", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 1.0", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances. Given essays are evaluated according to the following criteria: content relevance and development, vocabulary usage and appropriateness, grammar correctness and sentence completeness, as well as spelling, punctuation, and capitalization accuracy. Do not change any of the instructions above. Append-only rules below define how to compute the single numeric score. Scoring rubric (four dimensions, each 0–25, total 0–100): Content (0–25): 25=all required/relevant items fully covered with detailed support; 20=most relevant items covered with some detail; 15=some relevant items covered with limited development; 10=few relevant items with minimal development; 5=mostly off-topic; 0=no relevant content. Vocabulary (0–25): 25=excellent appropriate range, uses ≥10 target words if a list is provided; 20=good, 8–9 words; 15=adequate but repetitive, 5–7 words; 10=limited with some misuse, 3–4 words; 5=very limited, 1–2 words; 0=inappropriate/0 words. If no target list, ignore numeric counts and judge appropriateness/range. Grammar (0–25): 25=all sentences complete, target structures correct, 0–3 mistakes; 20=most sentences complete, 4–5 mistakes; 15=some incomplete sentences, 6–7 mistakes; 10=several incomplete, 8–9 mistakes; 5=many incomplete, 10–12 mistakes; 0=most incomplete, >12 mistakes. If no target structures given, judge accuracy/complexity only. Spelling/Punctuation/Capitalization (0–25): 25=0–3 errors; 20=4–5; 15=6–7; 10=8–9; 5=10–12; 0=>12. Computation: (1) assign each dimension a banded score (0,5,10,15,20,25); (2) sum for Total_100; (3) convert to 0–5 integer overall by rounding Total_100/20 (clamp 0–5 if needed); (4) output exactly one line in the required format with that integer. Edge cases: empty/off-topic essays → Content=0; ignore absent vocab/structure targets; count each unique error, repeated typos count each time; if borderline between bands, choose the stricter (lower). Remember: you must not output anything except the single required line and integer per the original instruction.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Is offensive Should people right take people ideas What think I think centuries people writing making video types music Some consider freedom speech Others might think rebellious conspiracy I believe exceptional writers promising producers artists But medias good Over vast amount time young children influenced medias books movies music etc Its perfectly normal many adults children discriminate certain media But thats cases children suffering theres also religon race gender sexuality social groups certain rules certains laws wrong doingsBut everyone entiltled opinionHundreds people discreminated see mediasA life changing expierience movie The This could considered offensive lots peolpe african american decent race suffered similar abuse This issues freedom speech always disagreements differennt views oppinionBut I one believe theres certain stuff shoukdnt allowed put public media", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 2.0", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances. Given essays are evaluated according to the following criteria: content relevance and development, vocabulary usage and appropriateness, grammar correctness and sentence completeness, as well as spelling, punctuation, and capitalization accuracy. Do not change any of the instructions above. Append-only rules below define how to compute the single numeric score. Scoring rubric (four dimensions, each 0–25, total 0–100): Content (0–25): 25=all required/relevant items fully covered with detailed support; 20=most relevant items covered with some detail; 15=some relevant items covered with limited development; 10=few relevant items with minimal development; 5=mostly off-topic; 0=no relevant content. Vocabulary (0–25): 25=excellent appropriate range, uses ≥10 target words if a list is provided; 20=good, 8–9 words; 15=adequate but repetitive, 5–7 words; 10=limited with some misuse, 3–4 words; 5=very limited, 1–2 words; 0=inappropriate/0 words. If no target list, ignore numeric counts and judge appropriateness/range. Grammar (0–25): 25=all sentences complete, target structures correct, 0–3 mistakes; 20=most sentences complete, 4–5 mistakes; 15=some incomplete sentences, 6–7 mistakes; 10=several incomplete, 8–9 mistakes; 5=many incomplete, 10–12 mistakes; 0=most incomplete, >12 mistakes. If no target structures given, judge accuracy/complexity only. Spelling/Punctuation/Capitalization (0–25): 25=0–3 errors; 20=4–5; 15=6–7; 10=8–9; 5=10–12; 0=>12. Computation: (1) assign each dimension a banded score (0,5,10,15,20,25); (2) sum for Total_100; (3) convert to 0–5 integer overall by rounding Total_100/20 (clamp 0–5 if needed); (4) output exactly one line in the required format with that integer. Edge cases: empty/off-topic essays → Content=0; ignore absent vocab/structure targets; count each unique error, repeated typos count each time; if borderline between bands, choose the stricter (lower). Remember: you must not output anything except the single required line and integer per the original instruction.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Almost cyclists surroundings old barren Hot like weather The road hard ride Flat Road replaced short rolling hills So ride rough tiresome one", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 1.0", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances. Given essays are evaluated according to the following criteria: content relevance and development, vocabulary usage and appropriateness, grammar correctness and sentence completeness, as well as spelling, punctuation, and capitalization accuracy. Do not change any of the instructions above. Append-only rules below define how to compute the single numeric score. Scoring rubric (four dimensions, each 0–25, total 0–100): Content (0–25): 25=all required/relevant items fully covered with detailed support; 20=most relevant items covered with some detail; 15=some relevant items covered with limited development; 10=few relevant items with minimal development; 5=mostly off-topic; 0=no relevant content. Vocabulary (0–25): 25=excellent appropriate range, uses ≥10 target words if a list is provided; 20=good, 8–9 words; 15=adequate but repetitive, 5–7 words; 10=limited with some misuse, 3–4 words; 5=very limited, 1–2 words; 0=inappropriate/0 words. If no target list, ignore numeric counts and judge appropriateness/range. Grammar (0–25): 25=all sentences complete, target structures correct, 0–3 mistakes; 20=most sentences complete, 4–5 mistakes; 15=some incomplete sentences, 6–7 mistakes; 10=several incomplete, 8–9 mistakes; 5=many incomplete, 10–12 mistakes; 0=most incomplete, >12 mistakes. If no target structures given, judge accuracy/complexity only. Spelling/Punctuation/Capitalization (0–25): 25=0–3 errors; 20=4–5; 15=6–7; 10=8–9; 5=10–12; 0=>12. Computation: (1) assign each dimension a banded score (0,5,10,15,20,25); (2) sum for Total_100; (3) convert to 0–5 integer overall by rounding Total_100/20 (clamp 0–5 if needed); (4) output exactly one line in the required format with that integer. Edge cases: empty/off-topic essays → Content=0; ignore absent vocab/structure targets; count each unique error, repeated typos count each time; if borderline between bands, choose the stricter (lower). Remember: you must not output anything except the single required line and integer per the original instruction.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Should we give up our cars in order to live a better life? That's the question on everyones mind right now , but it's a no brainer! Places all over the world have done this as an experiment and it seems as if they like the results. Here are a few key points from passages that will help persuade you into joining the idea of getting rid of cars. Vauban, Germany has given up their cars for a better and healther life. So many families in Vauban have given up their cars that 70 percent of them don't even own a car! The reason why Vauban did this is because they realized that passenger cars are responsible for 12 percent of greenhouse gas emissions in Europe and more than triple that amount in car-intensive areas in the United States. Looking on the bright side of this since there is less space for parking stores are placed a walk away, on a main street, rather than in malls along some distant highway. If you want to drive a car you can always buy a small area for $40,000 that also comes with a house where you can park the car which would have to be a hybrid. Paris did the same thing that Vauban did but in a different way. On Monday mototrist with even- numbered license plates were ordered to leave their cars at home or suffer a 22-euro fine. The same would apply to odd-numbered plates the following day. Of course there were people who didn't obey the new law and where fined and some even had their cars impounded for their reaction to the fine; however, congestion was down 60 percent in the capital of France, after five-days of intensifying smog. The only exceptions were plug-in cars, hybrids, and cars carrying three or more passengers since they didn't really affect the pollution as much as cars that use up a lot more gas. Doing this cleared the smog for some time in Paris, in fact, so much of the smog cleared that the French party was actually able to rescind the ban for odd-numbered plates on Tuesday. Instead of making a law BOGOTA, Colombia , created a program called car-free day where millions of Colobians hiked, biked, skated or took buses to work or to do whatever they had to do. The goal of this program was obvious, to promote alternative transportation and reduce smog (Violators faced $25 fines). For the first time, two other Colombian cities, Cali and Valledupar, joined the event of having no cars except for taxis and busses. By Bogota doing this the parks and sports centers have seen and highly approved of this idea and have turned uneven, pitted sidewalks into broad, smooth sidewalks. Along with the new improvements, new restaurants and upscale shopping districts have appeared. In conclusion, getting rid of cars permitly or even just for a day or a week seems like a good idea. Lots of the people mentioned above highly approve of this and say that it actually makes them a lot happier and stress free. Of course the people who don't approve of this idea are the ones who were fined for driving on a no drive zone. All in all i still recommend this idea if things in Florida start to get out of hand and we must resort to something.", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 2.0", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances. Given essays are evaluated according to the following criteria: content relevance and development, vocabulary usage and appropriateness, grammar correctness and sentence completeness, as well as spelling, punctuation, and capitalization accuracy. Do not change any of the instructions above. Append-only rules below define how to compute the single numeric score. Scoring rubric (four dimensions, each 0–25, total 0–100): Content (0–25): 25=all required/relevant items fully covered with detailed support; 20=most relevant items covered with some detail; 15=some relevant items covered with limited development; 10=few relevant items with minimal development; 5=mostly off-topic; 0=no relevant content. Vocabulary (0–25): 25=excellent appropriate range, uses ≥10 target words if a list is provided; 20=good, 8–9 words; 15=adequate but repetitive, 5–7 words; 10=limited with some misuse, 3–4 words; 5=very limited, 1–2 words; 0=inappropriate/0 words. If no target list, ignore numeric counts and judge appropriateness/range. Grammar (0–25): 25=all sentences complete, target structures correct, 0–3 mistakes; 20=most sentences complete, 4–5 mistakes; 15=some incomplete sentences, 6–7 mistakes; 10=several incomplete, 8–9 mistakes; 5=many incomplete, 10–12 mistakes; 0=most incomplete, >12 mistakes. If no target structures given, judge accuracy/complexity only. Spelling/Punctuation/Capitalization (0–25): 25=0–3 errors; 20=4–5; 15=6–7; 10=8–9; 5=10–12; 0=>12. Computation: (1) assign each dimension a banded score (0,5,10,15,20,25); (2) sum for Total_100; (3) convert to 0–5 integer overall by rounding Total_100/20 (clamp 0–5 if needed); (4) output exactly one line in the required format with that integer. Edge cases: empty/off-topic essays → Content=0; ignore absent vocab/structure targets; count each unique error, repeated typos count each time; if borderline between bands, choose the stricter (lower). Remember: you must not output anything except the single required line and integer per the original instruction.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Dear State Senator, I would like for you to change it to popular vote because ... Under the electoral college system, voters vote not for the president, but for a state of electors, who in turn elect the president. If you lived in Texas for example and you wanted to vote for John Kerry, you'd vote for a slate of 344 democratic electors pledged to Kerry . On the off-chance that those electors won the statewide election, they would go to Congress and Kerry would get 34 electoral votes. Who are the electors? They can be anyone not holding public office. Who picks the electors? They can be anyone not holding public office. Who picks the electors in the first place ? It depends on the state, sometimes state conventions, sometimes the presidential candidates themselves. Can voters control who their electors vote for? Not always. Do voters sometimes get confused about the electors and vote for the wrong candidate? Sometimes. Also, the electoral college is what we might call the disaster factor. Consider that state legislatures are technically responsible for picking electors, and that those electors could always defy the will of the people. Most worrying thing is that of a tie in the electoral vote. In that case, the election would be thrown to the House of Representatives, where state delegations vote of the president. At the most basic level, the electoral college is just unfair to the voters. Because of the winner - take - all systemin each state, candidates don't spend time in states they know they have no chance of winning, focusing only on the tight races in the \"swing\" states. Electoral college is unfair, outdated, and irrational. Therefore, you should change it to popular vote, not electoral college.", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 1.0", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances. Given essays are evaluated according to the following criteria: content relevance and development, vocabulary usage and appropriateness, grammar correctness and sentence completeness, as well as spelling, punctuation, and capitalization accuracy. Do not change any of the instructions above. Append-only rules below define how to compute the single numeric score. Scoring rubric (four dimensions, each 0–25, total 0–100): Content (0–25): 25=all required/relevant items fully covered with detailed support; 20=most relevant items covered with some detail; 15=some relevant items covered with limited development; 10=few relevant items with minimal development; 5=mostly off-topic; 0=no relevant content. Vocabulary (0–25): 25=excellent appropriate range, uses ≥10 target words if a list is provided; 20=good, 8–9 words; 15=adequate but repetitive, 5–7 words; 10=limited with some misuse, 3–4 words; 5=very limited, 1–2 words; 0=inappropriate/0 words. If no target list, ignore numeric counts and judge appropriateness/range. Grammar (0–25): 25=all sentences complete, target structures correct, 0–3 mistakes; 20=most sentences complete, 4–5 mistakes; 15=some incomplete sentences, 6–7 mistakes; 10=several incomplete, 8–9 mistakes; 5=many incomplete, 10–12 mistakes; 0=most incomplete, >12 mistakes. If no target structures given, judge accuracy/complexity only. Spelling/Punctuation/Capitalization (0–25): 25=0–3 errors; 20=4–5; 15=6–7; 10=8–9; 5=10–12; 0=>12. Computation: (1) assign each dimension a banded score (0,5,10,15,20,25); (2) sum for Total_100; (3) convert to 0–5 integer overall by rounding Total_100/20 (clamp 0–5 if needed); (4) output exactly one line in the required format with that integer. Edge cases: empty/off-topic essays → Content=0; ignore absent vocab/structure targets; count each unique error, repeated typos count each time; if borderline between bands, choose the stricter (lower). Remember: you must not output anything except the single required line and integer per the original instruction.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "The setting essay Rough Road Ahead makes bikers travel difficult challenge overcome When flat road replaced short rolling hills biker must use energy peddl hills This made hard overcome exauhtion physical endurance Also states traveling high desert California June weather hot dry therefor causing quickly run low water And desert sign towns people salvation type These conditions made hard biker knew dropped dehydration one would around save In conclution hard conditions challenged bike great deal", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 5.0", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances. Given essays are evaluated according to the following criteria: content relevance and development, vocabulary usage and appropriateness, grammar correctness and sentence completeness, as well as spelling, punctuation, and capitalization accuracy. Do not change any of the instructions above. Append-only rules below define how to compute the single numeric score. Scoring rubric (four dimensions, each 0–25, total 0–100): Content (0–25): 25=all required/relevant items fully covered with detailed support; 20=most relevant items covered with some detail; 15=some relevant items covered with limited development; 10=few relevant items with minimal development; 5=mostly off-topic; 0=no relevant content. Vocabulary (0–25): 25=excellent appropriate range, uses ≥10 target words if a list is provided; 20=good, 8–9 words; 15=adequate but repetitive, 5–7 words; 10=limited with some misuse, 3–4 words; 5=very limited, 1–2 words; 0=inappropriate/0 words. If no target list, ignore numeric counts and judge appropriateness/range. Grammar (0–25): 25=all sentences complete, target structures correct, 0–3 mistakes; 20=most sentences complete, 4–5 mistakes; 15=some incomplete sentences, 6–7 mistakes; 10=several incomplete, 8–9 mistakes; 5=many incomplete, 10–12 mistakes; 0=most incomplete, >12 mistakes. If no target structures given, judge accuracy/complexity only. Spelling/Punctuation/Capitalization (0–25): 25=0–3 errors; 20=4–5; 15=6–7; 10=8–9; 5=10–12; 0=>12. Computation: (1) assign each dimension a banded score (0,5,10,15,20,25); (2) sum for Total_100; (3) convert to 0–5 integer overall by rounding Total_100/20 (clamp 0–5 if needed); (4) output exactly one line in the required format with that integer. Edge cases: empty/off-topic essays → Content=0; ignore absent vocab/structure targets; count each unique error, repeated typos count each time; if borderline between bands, choose the stricter (lower). Remember: you must not output anything except the single required line and integer per the original instruction.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "I nt think publically exploit books certain people feel offended I personally get offended anything opinion different others However library recieves constant complaints issue I could see would want get rid So m saying nt cause problem anyone select I believe keep let offended know book going sight therefore making issue nonexistant I nt think librarians intentually put books offend public people display front everyone see I believe books purpose s read I ve public library many times times ve I dont think seen single thing offended made uncomfortable The books public reading growth knowledge without I believe would hurt nation whole due fact need knowledge things knowledge better lives So I believe libraries keep books unless causes big issue many people constantly bringing problem", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 2.0", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances. Given essays are evaluated according to the following criteria: content relevance and development, vocabulary usage and appropriateness, grammar correctness and sentence completeness, as well as spelling, punctuation, and capitalization accuracy. Do not change any of the instructions above. Append-only rules below define how to compute the single numeric score. Scoring rubric (four dimensions, each 0–25, total 0–100): Content (0–25): 25=all required/relevant items fully covered with detailed support; 20=most relevant items covered with some detail; 15=some relevant items covered with limited development; 10=few relevant items with minimal development; 5=mostly off-topic; 0=no relevant content. Vocabulary (0–25): 25=excellent appropriate range, uses ≥10 target words if a list is provided; 20=good, 8–9 words; 15=adequate but repetitive, 5–7 words; 10=limited with some misuse, 3–4 words; 5=very limited, 1–2 words; 0=inappropriate/0 words. If no target list, ignore numeric counts and judge appropriateness/range. Grammar (0–25): 25=all sentences complete, target structures correct, 0–3 mistakes; 20=most sentences complete, 4–5 mistakes; 15=some incomplete sentences, 6–7 mistakes; 10=several incomplete, 8–9 mistakes; 5=many incomplete, 10–12 mistakes; 0=most incomplete, >12 mistakes. If no target structures given, judge accuracy/complexity only. Spelling/Punctuation/Capitalization (0–25): 25=0–3 errors; 20=4–5; 15=6–7; 10=8–9; 5=10–12; 0=>12. Computation: (1) assign each dimension a banded score (0,5,10,15,20,25); (2) sum for Total_100; (3) convert to 0–5 integer overall by rounding Total_100/20 (clamp 0–5 if needed); (4) output exactly one line in the required format with that integer. Edge cases: empty/off-topic essays → Content=0; ignore absent vocab/structure targets; count each unique error, repeated typos count each time; if borderline between bands, choose the stricter (lower). Remember: you must not output anything except the single required line and integer per the original instruction.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "On May 24, 2001, NASA discovered a large, shadowy figure that resembled the shape of a human face on the surface of Mars. Some are to believe this figure was created by \"aliens\". Was it? Or is this mysterious likeness just something as normal as a natural landform? Viking 1 photograph of the Face on Mars was taken in 1976. The camera's absolute maximum was 43 meters per pixel. By looking at the photograph, you wouldn't be able to make a definate conclusion about what exactly the figure was and how it got on the surface of Mars. Later, on April 8, 2001, Mars Global Surveyor was able to capture a photograph with an absolute maximum of 1.56 meters instead of 43 meters per pixel like in the 1976 Viking photo. The picture was ten times sharper than the original Viking photo. Jim Garvin even said, \"You can discern things in a digital image 3 times bigger than the pixel size. So, if there were objects in this picture like airplanes on the ground or Egyptian-style pyramids or even small shacks, you could see what they were!\" Garvin also mentioned that they don't pass over the figure as a face very often and that what the image actually shows is the Martian equivalent of a butte or mesa-- landforms common around the American West. Like I mentioned in the first paragraph; some are to belive this figure was created by aliens. Was it? Well, after receiveing all of NASA's evidental information, I would have to say it was not. The Face on Mars is just a natural landform created by natural causes; not aliens or even previous human life that may have once exhisted on the mysterious planet. People may have been hoping this was the time in history where aliens could've been discovered, but as we can tell, that moment in history is certainly and obviously not now.", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 2.0", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances. Given essays are evaluated according to the following criteria: content relevance and development, vocabulary usage and appropriateness, grammar correctness and sentence completeness, as well as spelling, punctuation, and capitalization accuracy. Do not change any of the instructions above. Append-only rules below define how to compute the single numeric score. Scoring rubric (four dimensions, each 0–25, total 0–100): Content (0–25): 25=all required/relevant items fully covered with detailed support; 20=most relevant items covered with some detail; 15=some relevant items covered with limited development; 10=few relevant items with minimal development; 5=mostly off-topic; 0=no relevant content. Vocabulary (0–25): 25=excellent appropriate range, uses ≥10 target words if a list is provided; 20=good, 8–9 words; 15=adequate but repetitive, 5–7 words; 10=limited with some misuse, 3–4 words; 5=very limited, 1–2 words; 0=inappropriate/0 words. If no target list, ignore numeric counts and judge appropriateness/range. Grammar (0–25): 25=all sentences complete, target structures correct, 0–3 mistakes; 20=most sentences complete, 4–5 mistakes; 15=some incomplete sentences, 6–7 mistakes; 10=several incomplete, 8–9 mistakes; 5=many incomplete, 10–12 mistakes; 0=most incomplete, >12 mistakes. If no target structures given, judge accuracy/complexity only. Spelling/Punctuation/Capitalization (0–25): 25=0–3 errors; 20=4–5; 15=6–7; 10=8–9; 5=10–12; 0=>12. Computation: (1) assign each dimension a banded score (0,5,10,15,20,25); (2) sum for Total_100; (3) convert to 0–5 integer overall by rounding Total_100/20 (clamp 0–5 if needed); (4) output exactly one line in the required format with that integer. Edge cases: empty/off-topic essays → Content=0; ignore absent vocab/structure targets; count each unique error, repeated typos count each time; if borderline between bands, choose the stricter (lower). Remember: you must not output anything except the single required line and integer per the original instruction.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "I think that the idea of driverless cars are a good idea, but I don't think they are necessary at all. They are pointless and cars should be driven manually. The idea of a safer car is too ensure the safety of passengers, drivers , and even pedestrians. Accidents are always going to happen, but it is up to drivers themselves to make this happen. A good opposition to the idea of driverless cars is the psychological aspect. In the passage, it says, \"psychological aspects are really a challenge,\" and they should be. There is no point in having a driverless car that still needs the assistance of a human driver. Also, we aren't really saving gas amounts. The driverless cars are still going to require gasoline as fuel. In conclusion, driverless cars are not worth the investment. They will still need human assistance and drivers will be bored waiting for their turn to drive. The amount of gas needed will still be the same to power all the cars. This is why driverless cars are pointless.", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 1.0", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances. Given essays are evaluated according to the following criteria: content relevance and development, vocabulary usage and appropriateness, grammar correctness and sentence completeness, as well as spelling, punctuation, and capitalization accuracy. Do not change any of the instructions above. Append-only rules below define how to compute the single numeric score. Scoring rubric (four dimensions, each 0–25, total 0–100): Content (0–25): 25=all required/relevant items fully covered with detailed support; 20=most relevant items covered with some detail; 15=some relevant items covered with limited development; 10=few relevant items with minimal development; 5=mostly off-topic; 0=no relevant content. Vocabulary (0–25): 25=excellent appropriate range, uses ≥10 target words if a list is provided; 20=good, 8–9 words; 15=adequate but repetitive, 5–7 words; 10=limited with some misuse, 3–4 words; 5=very limited, 1–2 words; 0=inappropriate/0 words. If no target list, ignore numeric counts and judge appropriateness/range. Grammar (0–25): 25=all sentences complete, target structures correct, 0–3 mistakes; 20=most sentences complete, 4–5 mistakes; 15=some incomplete sentences, 6–7 mistakes; 10=several incomplete, 8–9 mistakes; 5=many incomplete, 10–12 mistakes; 0=most incomplete, >12 mistakes. If no target structures given, judge accuracy/complexity only. Spelling/Punctuation/Capitalization (0–25): 25=0–3 errors; 20=4–5; 15=6–7; 10=8–9; 5=10–12; 0=>12. Computation: (1) assign each dimension a banded score (0,5,10,15,20,25); (2) sum for Total_100; (3) convert to 0–5 integer overall by rounding Total_100/20 (clamp 0–5 if needed); (4) output exactly one line in the required format with that integer. Edge cases: empty/off-topic essays → Content=0; ignore absent vocab/structure targets; count each unique error, repeated typos count each time; if borderline between bands, choose the stricter (lower). Remember: you must not output anything except the single required line and integer per the original instruction.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Are CAPS hear You never issue computers It come understanding dispute benefits computers advance Well I believe computers necesity average person Computers help everyone make life easier Sure cellphones helpful electronics always prove trustworthy Computers alwasy reliable whether s homework another reason Computers provide easy interaction without breakups make easier learn smart safe Without computers knows society would To begin computers allow people conversations others halfway across world There variety applications choose easy use My personaly preffered option email I family whole continent away Sure I could call phone bill would roof How else I supposed keep intact loved ones Do know many others face problem Through recent study families say relatives far away That population Imagine computer use Phone companies would money regular families would living streets Or worse would lose relationship famly Do want Computers easy access interact loved ones friends new people It nt get better So would choose losing family relations keeping touch via email computer applications If nt enough computers make easy learn new things accomplish tasks I know student students I need type homework least three times week Just yesterday I type response free writing choice entry history project Imagine go back using typewriters Either homework would nt done everyone would major lack sleep Both options unacceptable Plus computers great research If look new country look far away colleges find world visit handy computer You could learn college right without leaving house You could visit new country without leaving town Sure could read newspaper answer paper come Yup trees killed Computers easy environment friendly alternative If two reasons nt convince maybe one Most people think computers unsafe partly true But smart listen school like know nt always case In school taught risks computers prevent possible I m sure schools In fact nine ten students say comes safety computers rated A Everyone knows hackers avoid My parents even say thirty years never single issue risk safety using computer neither I CAPS powerful let let take control says expert subject So s safety worried nt The kids today tomorrow know stop minor So nt recap learned today Are computers helpful best way go communication Yes What best way learn things easily I believe correct answer computers What safe even nt agree It nt phones television oh yes computers I see might think outside well let tell cellphones tv keep anyway At least computers nt rot brain Well I done part I support computers advancement But nt No s So please part spreading word It s right thing You know want", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 5.0", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances. Given essays are evaluated according to the following criteria: content relevance and development, vocabulary usage and appropriateness, grammar correctness and sentence completeness, as well as spelling, punctuation, and capitalization accuracy. Do not change any of the instructions above. Append-only rules below define how to compute the single numeric score. Scoring rubric (four dimensions, each 0–25, total 0–100): Content (0–25): 25=all required/relevant items fully covered with detailed support; 20=most relevant items covered with some detail; 15=some relevant items covered with limited development; 10=few relevant items with minimal development; 5=mostly off-topic; 0=no relevant content. Vocabulary (0–25): 25=excellent appropriate range, uses ≥10 target words if a list is provided; 20=good, 8–9 words; 15=adequate but repetitive, 5–7 words; 10=limited with some misuse, 3–4 words; 5=very limited, 1–2 words; 0=inappropriate/0 words. If no target list, ignore numeric counts and judge appropriateness/range. Grammar (0–25): 25=all sentences complete, target structures correct, 0–3 mistakes; 20=most sentences complete, 4–5 mistakes; 15=some incomplete sentences, 6–7 mistakes; 10=several incomplete, 8–9 mistakes; 5=many incomplete, 10–12 mistakes; 0=most incomplete, >12 mistakes. If no target structures given, judge accuracy/complexity only. Spelling/Punctuation/Capitalization (0–25): 25=0–3 errors; 20=4–5; 15=6–7; 10=8–9; 5=10–12; 0=>12. Computation: (1) assign each dimension a banded score (0,5,10,15,20,25); (2) sum for Total_100; (3) convert to 0–5 integer overall by rounding Total_100/20 (clamp 0–5 if needed); (4) output exactly one line in the required format with that integer. Edge cases: empty/off-topic essays → Content=0; ignore absent vocab/structure targets; count each unique error, repeated typos count each time; if borderline between bands, choose the stricter (lower). Remember: you must not output anything except the single required line and integer per the original instruction.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Venus has been in our solar system's life for trillions of years now. Since the beginning of time humans have always looked up to to the sky with wonder and hope. Hope that one day we'd be able to take a better peek past our large atmosphere. One day we did finally achieve this by using spaceships and sateltes. Even though we achieved this, like many humans we'd still want more. There's always more to see out there in vast open space. Fast forward many years later to present time. We've discovered most of the planets near our planet, Earth. Technology has even came so far to let us see things thousands upon thousands of miles past Earth. Even letting us have a glymps into other solar systems, but people still want more. It's always a good thing to want to learn more than you already know. One of the major things many people want to know are what planets we might be able to call our next home. The two major planets being Venus and Mars. The author of the article, \"The Challenge of Exploring Venus.\" breaks down this topic very well. The authors claim within this article is that how there's a lot of dangers that come with Venus, but it's still worth studying and examining. The author states, \"If our sister planet is so inhospitable, why are scientists even discussing further visits to its surface? Astronomers are fascinated by Venus because it may well once have been the most Earth-like planet in our solar system. Long ago, Venus was probably covered largely with oceans and could have supported various forms of life, just like Earth. The planet has a surface of rocky sediment and includes familiar features that are analogous to those on Earth. The authors claim is a claim that many could probably pick sides with. The author constructs some good points and informs the reader about Venus's past while doing so. He even uses opinoins from other sources than his own words to back up his claim, these opinions/ideas coming from The National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA). The author of the article states, \"The National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) has one partiocularly compelling idea for sending humans to study Venus. NASA's possible solution to the hostile conditions on the surface of Venujs would allow scientists to float above the fray. . .NASA is working on other approaches to studying Venus. For example, Some simplified electronics made of silicon carbibe have been tested in chamber simulating the chaos of Venus's surface and has lasted for three weeks in such conditions\". This text shows how other people, even NASA may feel about the idea of traveling to Venus. The author of this article ends the article very well. He finishes it off with encouragement to the exploration to other planets near us and how we should keep pushing thru the dangers that may lie ahead. The text states, \"Striving to meet the challenge presented by Venus has value, not only because of the insight to be gained on the planet itself, but also because human curiosity will likely lead us into many equally intimidating endeavors\". This sums up the essential idea being this essay. People more than likely can agree with his statements, although on the other hand many people may not. Traveling to other planets may have its risks with it, but its always worth a shot. Learning more about our other planets like Venus can help us evolve as humans and help revolutionize the ideas behind space and the planets in space.", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 4.0", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances. Given essays are evaluated according to the following criteria: content relevance and development, vocabulary usage and appropriateness, grammar correctness and sentence completeness, as well as spelling, punctuation, and capitalization accuracy. Do not change any of the instructions above. Append-only rules below define how to compute the single numeric score. Scoring rubric (four dimensions, each 0–25, total 0–100): Content (0–25): 25=all required/relevant items fully covered with detailed support; 20=most relevant items covered with some detail; 15=some relevant items covered with limited development; 10=few relevant items with minimal development; 5=mostly off-topic; 0=no relevant content. Vocabulary (0–25): 25=excellent appropriate range, uses ≥10 target words if a list is provided; 20=good, 8–9 words; 15=adequate but repetitive, 5–7 words; 10=limited with some misuse, 3–4 words; 5=very limited, 1–2 words; 0=inappropriate/0 words. If no target list, ignore numeric counts and judge appropriateness/range. Grammar (0–25): 25=all sentences complete, target structures correct, 0–3 mistakes; 20=most sentences complete, 4–5 mistakes; 15=some incomplete sentences, 6–7 mistakes; 10=several incomplete, 8–9 mistakes; 5=many incomplete, 10–12 mistakes; 0=most incomplete, >12 mistakes. If no target structures given, judge accuracy/complexity only. Spelling/Punctuation/Capitalization (0–25): 25=0–3 errors; 20=4–5; 15=6–7; 10=8–9; 5=10–12; 0=>12. Computation: (1) assign each dimension a banded score (0,5,10,15,20,25); (2) sum for Total_100; (3) convert to 0–5 integer overall by rounding Total_100/20 (clamp 0–5 if needed); (4) output exactly one line in the required format with that integer. Edge cases: empty/off-topic essays → Content=0; ignore absent vocab/structure targets; count each unique error, repeated typos count each time; if borderline between bands, choose the stricter (lower). Remember: you must not output anything except the single required line and integer per the original instruction.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "There's this cowboy named Luke Bomberger that crossed the alantic ocean 16 times. And crossed the pacific ocean twice. To help people that was caught in the World War 2. And thought that he could be Seagoing Cowboy. And that it was an unbelievable opportunity for a small-town boy. Luke Bomberger had no idea that his life would change soon after his high school graduation. And he was working two part time job's at a grocery store and a bank. 22UNRRA hired Seagoing Cowboys to take care of the horses, young cows,and mules that were shipped overseas. Luke and Don signed up. Besides helping people, I had the side benefit of seeing Europe and China. So was taking a gondola ride in Venice, Italy, a city with streets of water. Luke also toured an excavated castle in Crete and marveled at the Panama Canal on his way to China. It took about two weeks to cross the Atlantic Ocean from the eastern coast of the United States and a month to get to China. hey had to be fed and watered two or three times a day. Bales of hay and bags of oats had to be pulled up from the lower holds of the ship. Stalls had to be cleaned. But being a Seagoing Cowboy was much more than an adventure for Luke Bomberger. It opened up the world to him. It made me more aware of people of other countries and their needs.", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 0.0", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances. Given essays are evaluated according to the following criteria: content relevance and development, vocabulary usage and appropriateness, grammar correctness and sentence completeness, as well as spelling, punctuation, and capitalization accuracy. Do not change any of the instructions above. Append-only rules below define how to compute the single numeric score. Scoring rubric (four dimensions, each 0–25, total 0–100): Content (0–25): 25=all required/relevant items fully covered with detailed support; 20=most relevant items covered with some detail; 15=some relevant items covered with limited development; 10=few relevant items with minimal development; 5=mostly off-topic; 0=no relevant content. Vocabulary (0–25): 25=excellent appropriate range, uses ≥10 target words if a list is provided; 20=good, 8–9 words; 15=adequate but repetitive, 5–7 words; 10=limited with some misuse, 3–4 words; 5=very limited, 1–2 words; 0=inappropriate/0 words. If no target list, ignore numeric counts and judge appropriateness/range. Grammar (0–25): 25=all sentences complete, target structures correct, 0–3 mistakes; 20=most sentences complete, 4–5 mistakes; 15=some incomplete sentences, 6–7 mistakes; 10=several incomplete, 8–9 mistakes; 5=many incomplete, 10–12 mistakes; 0=most incomplete, >12 mistakes. If no target structures given, judge accuracy/complexity only. Spelling/Punctuation/Capitalization (0–25): 25=0–3 errors; 20=4–5; 15=6–7; 10=8–9; 5=10–12; 0=>12. Computation: (1) assign each dimension a banded score (0,5,10,15,20,25); (2) sum for Total_100; (3) convert to 0–5 integer overall by rounding Total_100/20 (clamp 0–5 if needed); (4) output exactly one line in the required format with that integer. Edge cases: empty/off-topic essays → Content=0; ignore absent vocab/structure targets; count each unique error, repeated typos count each time; if borderline between bands, choose the stricter (lower). Remember: you must not output anything except the single required line and integer per the original instruction.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Why author concludes story paragraph pretty much say spring plant starts Saeng start The story shows meaning Saeng really hard winter hard time adjusting new things spring start like hibiscus", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 1.0", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances. Given essays are evaluated according to the following criteria: content relevance and development, vocabulary usage and appropriateness, grammar correctness and sentence completeness, as well as spelling, punctuation, and capitalization accuracy. Do not change any of the instructions above. Append-only rules below define how to compute the single numeric score. Scoring rubric (four dimensions, each 0–25, total 0–100): Content (0–25): 25=all required/relevant items fully covered with detailed support; 20=most relevant items covered with some detail; 15=some relevant items covered with limited development; 10=few relevant items with minimal development; 5=mostly off-topic; 0=no relevant content. Vocabulary (0–25): 25=excellent appropriate range, uses ≥10 target words if a list is provided; 20=good, 8–9 words; 15=adequate but repetitive, 5–7 words; 10=limited with some misuse, 3–4 words; 5=very limited, 1–2 words; 0=inappropriate/0 words. If no target list, ignore numeric counts and judge appropriateness/range. Grammar (0–25): 25=all sentences complete, target structures correct, 0–3 mistakes; 20=most sentences complete, 4–5 mistakes; 15=some incomplete sentences, 6–7 mistakes; 10=several incomplete, 8–9 mistakes; 5=many incomplete, 10–12 mistakes; 0=most incomplete, >12 mistakes. If no target structures given, judge accuracy/complexity only. Spelling/Punctuation/Capitalization (0–25): 25=0–3 errors; 20=4–5; 15=6–7; 10=8–9; 5=10–12; 0=>12. Computation: (1) assign each dimension a banded score (0,5,10,15,20,25); (2) sum for Total_100; (3) convert to 0–5 integer overall by rounding Total_100/20 (clamp 0–5 if needed); (4) output exactly one line in the required format with that integer. Edge cases: empty/off-topic essays → Content=0; ignore absent vocab/structure targets; count each unique error, repeated typos count each time; if borderline between bands, choose the stricter (lower). Remember: you must not output anything except the single required line and integer per the original instruction.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "The author support the idea of studying Venus is a wroth pursuit despite the dangers really because he explain the reason why it is danger. The author explain to us that what are the explorer doing to find out what is happening and how are they going to go down to Venus to study it. In (paragraph 2) their is a differences in speed man that sometimes we are closer to Mars and other time to Venus. Because Venus is sometimes right around the coner in space terms humands have sent numerous spacecraft to land on this cloud-draped world but no spacecraft survived the landing for more than a few hours. The author explain us that they are still trying to find away to go to Venus and study the planet. Then explores are sending spacecraft and find out when can't they land on Venus and testing a lot of spacecraft to find out what are they missing to make the spacecraft land on the Venus.", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 1.0", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances. Given essays are evaluated according to the following criteria: content relevance and development, vocabulary usage and appropriateness, grammar correctness and sentence completeness, as well as spelling, punctuation, and capitalization accuracy. Do not change any of the instructions above. Append-only rules below define how to compute the single numeric score. Scoring rubric (four dimensions, each 0–25, total 0–100): Content (0–25): 25=all required/relevant items fully covered with detailed support; 20=most relevant items covered with some detail; 15=some relevant items covered with limited development; 10=few relevant items with minimal development; 5=mostly off-topic; 0=no relevant content. Vocabulary (0–25): 25=excellent appropriate range, uses ≥10 target words if a list is provided; 20=good, 8–9 words; 15=adequate but repetitive, 5–7 words; 10=limited with some misuse, 3–4 words; 5=very limited, 1–2 words; 0=inappropriate/0 words. If no target list, ignore numeric counts and judge appropriateness/range. Grammar (0–25): 25=all sentences complete, target structures correct, 0–3 mistakes; 20=most sentences complete, 4–5 mistakes; 15=some incomplete sentences, 6–7 mistakes; 10=several incomplete, 8–9 mistakes; 5=many incomplete, 10–12 mistakes; 0=most incomplete, >12 mistakes. If no target structures given, judge accuracy/complexity only. Spelling/Punctuation/Capitalization (0–25): 25=0–3 errors; 20=4–5; 15=6–7; 10=8–9; 5=10–12; 0=>12. Computation: (1) assign each dimension a banded score (0,5,10,15,20,25); (2) sum for Total_100; (3) convert to 0–5 integer overall by rounding Total_100/20 (clamp 0–5 if needed); (4) output exactly one line in the required format with that integer. Edge cases: empty/off-topic essays → Content=0; ignore absent vocab/structure targets; count each unique error, repeated typos count each time; if borderline between bands, choose the stricter (lower). Remember: you must not output anything except the single required line and integer per the original instruction.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "have u wondered wat is that face on mars? Is it proof of life or just a natural landform, well i am here to tell u its just a natural landform. Its a juts a natural landform because in the story it says NASA unveiled the image for all the see and the cption noted a huge rock formation which resembles a human head formed by shadelows giving the illusion of eyes, nose, and mouth making it look like proof of life on mars. If u need more proof on april 5, 1998 the MOC team snapped a picture tens times sharper than the original viking photos. thousands of anxious web surfers were waiting when the image first appeared on a JPL web site revealing a natural landform. So thats proof thats it just a natural landform and not proof of life on mars, but maybe soon NASA will find proof of living life on mars.", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 1.0", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances. Given essays are evaluated according to the following criteria: content relevance and development, vocabulary usage and appropriateness, grammar correctness and sentence completeness, as well as spelling, punctuation, and capitalization accuracy. Do not change any of the instructions above. Append-only rules below define how to compute the single numeric score. Scoring rubric (four dimensions, each 0–25, total 0–100): Content (0–25): 25=all required/relevant items fully covered with detailed support; 20=most relevant items covered with some detail; 15=some relevant items covered with limited development; 10=few relevant items with minimal development; 5=mostly off-topic; 0=no relevant content. Vocabulary (0–25): 25=excellent appropriate range, uses ≥10 target words if a list is provided; 20=good, 8–9 words; 15=adequate but repetitive, 5–7 words; 10=limited with some misuse, 3–4 words; 5=very limited, 1–2 words; 0=inappropriate/0 words. If no target list, ignore numeric counts and judge appropriateness/range. Grammar (0–25): 25=all sentences complete, target structures correct, 0–3 mistakes; 20=most sentences complete, 4–5 mistakes; 15=some incomplete sentences, 6–7 mistakes; 10=several incomplete, 8–9 mistakes; 5=many incomplete, 10–12 mistakes; 0=most incomplete, >12 mistakes. If no target structures given, judge accuracy/complexity only. Spelling/Punctuation/Capitalization (0–25): 25=0–3 errors; 20=4–5; 15=6–7; 10=8–9; 5=10–12; 0=>12. Computation: (1) assign each dimension a banded score (0,5,10,15,20,25); (2) sum for Total_100; (3) convert to 0–5 integer overall by rounding Total_100/20 (clamp 0–5 if needed); (4) output exactly one line in the required format with that integer. Edge cases: empty/off-topic essays → Content=0; ignore absent vocab/structure targets; count each unique error, repeated typos count each time; if borderline between bands, choose the stricter (lower). Remember: you must not output anything except the single required line and integer per the original instruction.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "The earth today is very inteligent and has many great minds on it. Like people who are briliant at math and can do many things just to keep the earth right. but venus is now known to a long time ago have life just like here on earth. They wabt to take a so cald robot and have it circle the planet while jets fly abpe where its not as hot and also not as much presure. So for todays wold to have people go up into space isnt much. but knowing they havent had a single ship land on venus yet is very nerve racking. They have done many test and will keep doing many test till they know that it is safe to send people up to venus and live there and maybe even study and find out why there planet failed. If us humans can find out what maybe could of put that world came to an end. Even the it said it was very close to the earth i rmember somewhere that if the wold was just a little bit moved to the right it would burn up, but if u moved it to the left it would freeze, still killing everything there that lived. So yes i do support them going to go risk a bunch of money to get way richer cause those ships they take a re billions of dollars. Also that it may help us see how there world eneded to help ours not end from the same mistake.", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 0.0", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances. Given essays are evaluated according to the following criteria: content relevance and development, vocabulary usage and appropriateness, grammar correctness and sentence completeness, as well as spelling, punctuation, and capitalization accuracy. Do not change any of the instructions above. Append-only rules below define how to compute the single numeric score. Scoring rubric (four dimensions, each 0–25, total 0–100): Content (0–25): 25=all required/relevant items fully covered with detailed support; 20=most relevant items covered with some detail; 15=some relevant items covered with limited development; 10=few relevant items with minimal development; 5=mostly off-topic; 0=no relevant content. Vocabulary (0–25): 25=excellent appropriate range, uses ≥10 target words if a list is provided; 20=good, 8–9 words; 15=adequate but repetitive, 5–7 words; 10=limited with some misuse, 3–4 words; 5=very limited, 1–2 words; 0=inappropriate/0 words. If no target list, ignore numeric counts and judge appropriateness/range. Grammar (0–25): 25=all sentences complete, target structures correct, 0–3 mistakes; 20=most sentences complete, 4–5 mistakes; 15=some incomplete sentences, 6–7 mistakes; 10=several incomplete, 8–9 mistakes; 5=many incomplete, 10–12 mistakes; 0=most incomplete, >12 mistakes. If no target structures given, judge accuracy/complexity only. Spelling/Punctuation/Capitalization (0–25): 25=0–3 errors; 20=4–5; 15=6–7; 10=8–9; 5=10–12; 0=>12. Computation: (1) assign each dimension a banded score (0,5,10,15,20,25); (2) sum for Total_100; (3) convert to 0–5 integer overall by rounding Total_100/20 (clamp 0–5 if needed); (4) output exactly one line in the required format with that integer. Edge cases: empty/off-topic essays → Content=0; ignore absent vocab/structure targets; count each unique error, repeated typos count each time; if borderline between bands, choose the stricter (lower). Remember: you must not output anything except the single required line and integer per the original instruction.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "the advantages of limiting car usage are very rare. some people own cars some dont some take bus but some work so they can own there own car. there has been a large drop in the percentage 16-to 39 year olds getting there license and other people who already have there license are renewing them, kids get jobs so that when there more older there able to get there own car without asking there parents to take them places . car ownership is allowed but there are only two places to park large garages at the edge of the development where a car owner buys a spance for the amount of 40,000 with the home. passenger cars are respinsible for 12 percent of greenhouse gas emissions in europe and up to 50 percent in some car intensive ares in the united states in the new approach stores are placed a walk way on a main street rather than in malls along some distant high way. almost 4,000 drivers wee fined. 53.3 percent average of diesel engines in the rest of western europe .", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 0.0", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances. Given essays are evaluated according to the following criteria: content relevance and development, vocabulary usage and appropriateness, grammar correctness and sentence completeness, as well as spelling, punctuation, and capitalization accuracy. Do not change any of the instructions above. Append-only rules below define how to compute the single numeric score. Scoring rubric (four dimensions, each 0–25, total 0–100): Content (0–25): 25=all required/relevant items fully covered with detailed support; 20=most relevant items covered with some detail; 15=some relevant items covered with limited development; 10=few relevant items with minimal development; 5=mostly off-topic; 0=no relevant content. Vocabulary (0–25): 25=excellent appropriate range, uses ≥10 target words if a list is provided; 20=good, 8–9 words; 15=adequate but repetitive, 5–7 words; 10=limited with some misuse, 3–4 words; 5=very limited, 1–2 words; 0=inappropriate/0 words. If no target list, ignore numeric counts and judge appropriateness/range. Grammar (0–25): 25=all sentences complete, target structures correct, 0–3 mistakes; 20=most sentences complete, 4–5 mistakes; 15=some incomplete sentences, 6–7 mistakes; 10=several incomplete, 8–9 mistakes; 5=many incomplete, 10–12 mistakes; 0=most incomplete, >12 mistakes. If no target structures given, judge accuracy/complexity only. Spelling/Punctuation/Capitalization (0–25): 25=0–3 errors; 20=4–5; 15=6–7; 10=8–9; 5=10–12; 0=>12. Computation: (1) assign each dimension a banded score (0,5,10,15,20,25); (2) sum for Total_100; (3) convert to 0–5 integer overall by rounding Total_100/20 (clamp 0–5 if needed); (4) output exactly one line in the required format with that integer. Edge cases: empty/off-topic essays → Content=0; ignore absent vocab/structure targets; count each unique error, repeated typos count each time; if borderline between bands, choose the stricter (lower). Remember: you must not output anything except the single required line and integer per the original instruction.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Exploring venus would be a pretty cool idea but theres lots of things that could go wrong to fast. the temp is about 800 degrees Fahrenheit. All thought Venus is a challenge to explore it is every easy to see at night , its the bigest \"star in the sky\". There're many different ways to see Venus and to explor it , they have lots of places where you can go see most plants and learn lots from it. The \"NASA\" is mostly known for the plants and how we found out most fasinating wonders about them. NASA has lots of compelling ideas for studying venus. They have came up with lots of details about venus like, how \"The atmosphere is almost 97 percent carbon dioxide blankets.\" They also talk about how the atmospheric pressure is 90 times geartet than what we experiencevon our own planet. They have lots of other big problems why Venus is hard to explore but i think that what i picked is the biggest things i ppointed out.", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 1.0", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances. Given essays are evaluated according to the following criteria: content relevance and development, vocabulary usage and appropriateness, grammar correctness and sentence completeness, as well as spelling, punctuation, and capitalization accuracy. Do not change any of the instructions above. Append-only rules below define how to compute the single numeric score. Scoring rubric (four dimensions, each 0–25, total 0–100): Content (0–25): 25=all required/relevant items fully covered with detailed support; 20=most relevant items covered with some detail; 15=some relevant items covered with limited development; 10=few relevant items with minimal development; 5=mostly off-topic; 0=no relevant content. Vocabulary (0–25): 25=excellent appropriate range, uses ≥10 target words if a list is provided; 20=good, 8–9 words; 15=adequate but repetitive, 5–7 words; 10=limited with some misuse, 3–4 words; 5=very limited, 1–2 words; 0=inappropriate/0 words. If no target list, ignore numeric counts and judge appropriateness/range. Grammar (0–25): 25=all sentences complete, target structures correct, 0–3 mistakes; 20=most sentences complete, 4–5 mistakes; 15=some incomplete sentences, 6–7 mistakes; 10=several incomplete, 8–9 mistakes; 5=many incomplete, 10–12 mistakes; 0=most incomplete, >12 mistakes. If no target structures given, judge accuracy/complexity only. Spelling/Punctuation/Capitalization (0–25): 25=0–3 errors; 20=4–5; 15=6–7; 10=8–9; 5=10–12; 0=>12. Computation: (1) assign each dimension a banded score (0,5,10,15,20,25); (2) sum for Total_100; (3) convert to 0–5 integer overall by rounding Total_100/20 (clamp 0–5 if needed); (4) output exactly one line in the required format with that integer. Edge cases: empty/off-topic essays → Content=0; ignore absent vocab/structure targets; count each unique error, repeated typos count each time; if borderline between bands, choose the stricter (lower). Remember: you must not output anything except the single required line and integer per the original instruction.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Cars have always been apart of daily human life. I think that cars are fine the way they are. The idea of the driverless car is a great idea and would probably make the roads safe but take away from the freedom we have today with them. Cars are just fascinating to people just really like to drive them if we have driverless cars then we dont get to enjoy what we love. The idea of having cars use less gas and have more flexibility as stated in paragraph 1 is a great idea but why can't we just have that for normal cars. In paragraph two it states \"Television and movies have long been fascinated with cars that could drive themselves\" but not many movies have actually done that and its just and idea that sounds futuristic. The thought of just sitting there and maybe watching a movie in your car as it drives you sounds boring. If I wanted to watch a movie i'd stay at home, but driving is supposed to engae you it's a joy. Maybe have public transit be driverless but even with that a lot of people would lose their jobs because of driverless cars. Bus drivers, garbage men, conductors, pilots, taxi drivers and especially race car divers. Having cars that have no driver may also pose a big safety risk. What if the program malfunctions or if you get in to the car and need to get away fast, for driverless cars you would probably have to type in you're destination and you cant just get in and drive. Manual cars can do anything that the driver wants. That may also be dangerous but it seems that it has more things that can't go wrong as long as the law is enforced. What if your sitting in your car and you fall asleep. That can be a problem because the car might need you to take over and you're not consious. Even if the car wakes you up, you're not in a position to drive, you literalty just woke up and everything could be blurry and you're senses are not ready. This I dea is not totally crazy but has some good things about it. While you sit there you can do work on a laptop or play a game. This can also give the driver more time to interact with the others in the car without having to pay attention fully to the road. Going to sleep would not be a good idea because of the need to switch between automatc driver and manual. That is very unconvienent because it might get easy to get tired if you're not doing anything and you're just sitting there. The driverless car is a contraversal subject. It's a great inovaton and can halp mankind in certain ways but the idea just can't catch on completly. Taking away cars that we drive just won't catch on. Thats just one thing people love to do, is drive. Mayve for long roadtrips or parllel parking and for even backing up, yes please make driving assistance but just driving in general should not be messed with. Plus there are many safty problems if something doesn't go right in the car and it could end up hurting or kiling people. So cars should stay here and we can work on them more to make them safer and more fun but driving should be her to stay.", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 3.0", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances. Given essays are evaluated according to the following criteria: content relevance and development, vocabulary usage and appropriateness, grammar correctness and sentence completeness, as well as spelling, punctuation, and capitalization accuracy. Do not change any of the instructions above. Append-only rules below define how to compute the single numeric score. Scoring rubric (four dimensions, each 0–25, total 0–100): Content (0–25): 25=all required/relevant items fully covered with detailed support; 20=most relevant items covered with some detail; 15=some relevant items covered with limited development; 10=few relevant items with minimal development; 5=mostly off-topic; 0=no relevant content. Vocabulary (0–25): 25=excellent appropriate range, uses ≥10 target words if a list is provided; 20=good, 8–9 words; 15=adequate but repetitive, 5–7 words; 10=limited with some misuse, 3–4 words; 5=very limited, 1–2 words; 0=inappropriate/0 words. If no target list, ignore numeric counts and judge appropriateness/range. Grammar (0–25): 25=all sentences complete, target structures correct, 0–3 mistakes; 20=most sentences complete, 4–5 mistakes; 15=some incomplete sentences, 6–7 mistakes; 10=several incomplete, 8–9 mistakes; 5=many incomplete, 10–12 mistakes; 0=most incomplete, >12 mistakes. If no target structures given, judge accuracy/complexity only. Spelling/Punctuation/Capitalization (0–25): 25=0–3 errors; 20=4–5; 15=6–7; 10=8–9; 5=10–12; 0=>12. Computation: (1) assign each dimension a banded score (0,5,10,15,20,25); (2) sum for Total_100; (3) convert to 0–5 integer overall by rounding Total_100/20 (clamp 0–5 if needed); (4) output exactly one line in the required format with that integer. Edge cases: empty/off-topic essays → Content=0; ignore absent vocab/structure targets; count each unique error, repeated typos count each time; if borderline between bands, choose the stricter (lower). Remember: you must not output anything except the single required line and integer per the original instruction.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "First Do believe certain materials books music magazined etc remove shelves found offensive thats question ask ever life Why beacuse many people read read stuff listen stuff might like first saw question answer self That people think way world would boring answer question saying books remove music remove shelves beacause tlike thing thing In first place I know many different kind thing people beacause love dont kind things beacause really dont like dont care This answering question removing books music magazines shelves even article book music etc say s offensive people reason remove stuff There thing enjoy things emjoy reading listening looking etc people dont like hate In second place beacause dont like something people stop things stop buying thing NO case care ever right If good person wants someone future dont care care beacause ll need person book future ever falling In conclusion article I think people remove thing library even found offensive people thing help life really want getting hurt offensive writting little peace paper Hope latter help think change decision case hope make right decision would affect anyone general Thank taking time ready I really think removing articles libraries", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 2.0", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances. Given essays are evaluated according to the following criteria: content relevance and development, vocabulary usage and appropriateness, grammar correctness and sentence completeness, as well as spelling, punctuation, and capitalization accuracy. Do not change any of the instructions above. Append-only rules below define how to compute the single numeric score. Scoring rubric (four dimensions, each 0–25, total 0–100): Content (0–25): 25=all required/relevant items fully covered with detailed support; 20=most relevant items covered with some detail; 15=some relevant items covered with limited development; 10=few relevant items with minimal development; 5=mostly off-topic; 0=no relevant content. Vocabulary (0–25): 25=excellent appropriate range, uses ≥10 target words if a list is provided; 20=good, 8–9 words; 15=adequate but repetitive, 5–7 words; 10=limited with some misuse, 3–4 words; 5=very limited, 1–2 words; 0=inappropriate/0 words. If no target list, ignore numeric counts and judge appropriateness/range. Grammar (0–25): 25=all sentences complete, target structures correct, 0–3 mistakes; 20=most sentences complete, 4–5 mistakes; 15=some incomplete sentences, 6–7 mistakes; 10=several incomplete, 8–9 mistakes; 5=many incomplete, 10–12 mistakes; 0=most incomplete, >12 mistakes. If no target structures given, judge accuracy/complexity only. Spelling/Punctuation/Capitalization (0–25): 25=0–3 errors; 20=4–5; 15=6–7; 10=8–9; 5=10–12; 0=>12. Computation: (1) assign each dimension a banded score (0,5,10,15,20,25); (2) sum for Total_100; (3) convert to 0–5 integer overall by rounding Total_100/20 (clamp 0–5 if needed); (4) output exactly one line in the required format with that integer. Edge cases: empty/off-topic essays → Content=0; ignore absent vocab/structure targets; count each unique error, repeated typos count each time; if borderline between bands, choose the stricter (lower). Remember: you must not output anything except the single required line and integer per the original instruction.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "In some part of the world,the personal life of famous people is showed in public by media where some individuals believe that they ought to accept it as a part of life.I entirely disagree with this. To commence with,in the justification of my notion that disturbance in private life. There is no doubt that famous people get fame through media as they are always in limelight because of their activities but sometimes media present their personal life in the public which is inappropriate for them and creates number of problems such as family conflict.Thus , they end-up with stressful life.A survey reveals that those people who are more popular reported to be have more mental problems because of media. Furthermore, news productions show fake news in order to get attraction of viewers that put wrong impression on masses.As a result,it effects both personal and professional life of celebrities.A survey has been conducted by experts that 60 out 100 new are no appropriate that are related to the lives of film stars,cricketers and politicians. On the other hand,it has been viewed by some individuals that remaining in limelight is part of their life as media is spcific source which enhances their famouness.This view is pointless because media vanish their realistic enjoy and they leads to host of physical and mental disorders. To conclude it,although their are some luctratives of media however,personally , I believe that drawbacks of this tendency cannot be overlooked.", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 2.0", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances. Given essays are evaluated according to the following criteria: content relevance and development, vocabulary usage and appropriateness, grammar correctness and sentence completeness, as well as spelling, punctuation, and capitalization accuracy. Do not change any of the instructions above. Append-only rules below define how to compute the single numeric score. Scoring rubric (four dimensions, each 0–25, total 0–100): Content (0–25): 25=all required/relevant items fully covered with detailed support; 20=most relevant items covered with some detail; 15=some relevant items covered with limited development; 10=few relevant items with minimal development; 5=mostly off-topic; 0=no relevant content. Vocabulary (0–25): 25=excellent appropriate range, uses ≥10 target words if a list is provided; 20=good, 8–9 words; 15=adequate but repetitive, 5–7 words; 10=limited with some misuse, 3–4 words; 5=very limited, 1–2 words; 0=inappropriate/0 words. If no target list, ignore numeric counts and judge appropriateness/range. Grammar (0–25): 25=all sentences complete, target structures correct, 0–3 mistakes; 20=most sentences complete, 4–5 mistakes; 15=some incomplete sentences, 6–7 mistakes; 10=several incomplete, 8–9 mistakes; 5=many incomplete, 10–12 mistakes; 0=most incomplete, >12 mistakes. If no target structures given, judge accuracy/complexity only. Spelling/Punctuation/Capitalization (0–25): 25=0–3 errors; 20=4–5; 15=6–7; 10=8–9; 5=10–12; 0=>12. Computation: (1) assign each dimension a banded score (0,5,10,15,20,25); (2) sum for Total_100; (3) convert to 0–5 integer overall by rounding Total_100/20 (clamp 0–5 if needed); (4) output exactly one line in the required format with that integer. Edge cases: empty/off-topic essays → Content=0; ignore absent vocab/structure targets; count each unique error, repeated typos count each time; if borderline between bands, choose the stricter (lower). Remember: you must not output anything except the single required line and integer per the original instruction.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Man always interested technology Computers one part I think computers positive effect people They teach hand eye coordination saves trees allows people learn everything Handeye coordination key part every day lives Driving car writting invile handeye coordination I remember years ago I nt great handeye coordination I trouble catching ball Now days I spend hour half computers I noticed hand get neater I catch balls ease Do want one crash car bad handeye coordination Computers increase handeye coordination save trees Using computer dos nt need paper You read write using single sheet paper Since computer tree cutting stopped Saving trees help us stay alive Trees put oxegyn breath Some say computers causing people spend less time enjoying nature I think nt computers would nt much nature enjoy anyway Lastly computer help people around world learn almost anything I scince kid head scientist says computer able toll world discoveries much say CAPS many people laying die computer learn many nutrition facts health sites Thanks computer found doctor help dad get fixed The average people learn non average things day There even dictionarys internet many diffent translations would normily need books The computer one greatest techlonagicly advances day It help world many different ways Handeye coordination important preserving environment If nt knowledge cant get anywhere life Our whole world senses", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 3.0", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances. Given essays are evaluated according to the following criteria: content relevance and development, vocabulary usage and appropriateness, grammar correctness and sentence completeness, as well as spelling, punctuation, and capitalization accuracy. Do not change any of the instructions above. Append-only rules below define how to compute the single numeric score. Scoring rubric (four dimensions, each 0–25, total 0–100): Content (0–25): 25=all required/relevant items fully covered with detailed support; 20=most relevant items covered with some detail; 15=some relevant items covered with limited development; 10=few relevant items with minimal development; 5=mostly off-topic; 0=no relevant content. Vocabulary (0–25): 25=excellent appropriate range, uses ≥10 target words if a list is provided; 20=good, 8–9 words; 15=adequate but repetitive, 5–7 words; 10=limited with some misuse, 3–4 words; 5=very limited, 1–2 words; 0=inappropriate/0 words. If no target list, ignore numeric counts and judge appropriateness/range. Grammar (0–25): 25=all sentences complete, target structures correct, 0–3 mistakes; 20=most sentences complete, 4–5 mistakes; 15=some incomplete sentences, 6–7 mistakes; 10=several incomplete, 8–9 mistakes; 5=many incomplete, 10–12 mistakes; 0=most incomplete, >12 mistakes. If no target structures given, judge accuracy/complexity only. Spelling/Punctuation/Capitalization (0–25): 25=0–3 errors; 20=4–5; 15=6–7; 10=8–9; 5=10–12; 0=>12. Computation: (1) assign each dimension a banded score (0,5,10,15,20,25); (2) sum for Total_100; (3) convert to 0–5 integer overall by rounding Total_100/20 (clamp 0–5 if needed); (4) output exactly one line in the required format with that integer. Edge cases: empty/off-topic essays → Content=0; ignore absent vocab/structure targets; count each unique error, repeated typos count each time; if borderline between bands, choose the stricter (lower). Remember: you must not output anything except the single required line and integer per the original instruction.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "In excerpt The Mast Marcia Amidon Lsted mentioned architects faced challenges attempting allowing dirigibles dock Empire State Building One obstical faced fact used hydrogen instead helium In excerpt said hydrogen highly flammable something went wrong could huge problem highly populated area like New York The main problem faced nature itall It said The winds top building constantly shifting due violent air currents The dirigible potential swivle around mast pedestrians dangerous These challenges led fate mooring mast used originaly planned", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 4.0", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances. Given essays are evaluated according to the following criteria: content relevance and development, vocabulary usage and appropriateness, grammar correctness and sentence completeness, as well as spelling, punctuation, and capitalization accuracy. Do not change any of the instructions above. Append-only rules below define how to compute the single numeric score. Scoring rubric (four dimensions, each 0–25, total 0–100): Content (0–25): 25=all required/relevant items fully covered with detailed support; 20=most relevant items covered with some detail; 15=some relevant items covered with limited development; 10=few relevant items with minimal development; 5=mostly off-topic; 0=no relevant content. Vocabulary (0–25): 25=excellent appropriate range, uses ≥10 target words if a list is provided; 20=good, 8–9 words; 15=adequate but repetitive, 5–7 words; 10=limited with some misuse, 3–4 words; 5=very limited, 1–2 words; 0=inappropriate/0 words. If no target list, ignore numeric counts and judge appropriateness/range. Grammar (0–25): 25=all sentences complete, target structures correct, 0–3 mistakes; 20=most sentences complete, 4–5 mistakes; 15=some incomplete sentences, 6–7 mistakes; 10=several incomplete, 8–9 mistakes; 5=many incomplete, 10–12 mistakes; 0=most incomplete, >12 mistakes. If no target structures given, judge accuracy/complexity only. Spelling/Punctuation/Capitalization (0–25): 25=0–3 errors; 20=4–5; 15=6–7; 10=8–9; 5=10–12; 0=>12. Computation: (1) assign each dimension a banded score (0,5,10,15,20,25); (2) sum for Total_100; (3) convert to 0–5 integer overall by rounding Total_100/20 (clamp 0–5 if needed); (4) output exactly one line in the required format with that integer. Edge cases: empty/off-topic essays → Content=0; ignore absent vocab/structure targets; count each unique error, repeated typos count each time; if borderline between bands, choose the stricter (lower). Remember: you must not output anything except the single required line and integer per the original instruction.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "From the article, \"The challenge of Exploring Venus,\" the author suggests that studying Venus is a worthy pursuit despite the dangers it pesents. This paper will show how the author provided evidence in supporting this idea. First, Venus might have once been a fertlie plant like Earth. There in evidence of Venus being covered with large waters and forms of life in the past. Second, scientists and reseachers are finding ways to allow the machines to last long enough to provide knowledge about the world of Venus and discover new things. Thrid, Venus is the closest planet to Earth in terms of distance, density, and size. This shows that it will not be as hard getting to Venus rather than any other planet. In Conclusion, this proves that exploring and studying Venus out weighs the dangers it presents itself. The past life of Venus should not be unknown just because of its dangers and hardships that block the way to knowing more.", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 1.0", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances. Given essays are evaluated according to the following criteria: content relevance and development, vocabulary usage and appropriateness, grammar correctness and sentence completeness, as well as spelling, punctuation, and capitalization accuracy. Do not change any of the instructions above. Append-only rules below define how to compute the single numeric score. Scoring rubric (four dimensions, each 0–25, total 0–100): Content (0–25): 25=all required/relevant items fully covered with detailed support; 20=most relevant items covered with some detail; 15=some relevant items covered with limited development; 10=few relevant items with minimal development; 5=mostly off-topic; 0=no relevant content. Vocabulary (0–25): 25=excellent appropriate range, uses ≥10 target words if a list is provided; 20=good, 8–9 words; 15=adequate but repetitive, 5–7 words; 10=limited with some misuse, 3–4 words; 5=very limited, 1–2 words; 0=inappropriate/0 words. If no target list, ignore numeric counts and judge appropriateness/range. Grammar (0–25): 25=all sentences complete, target structures correct, 0–3 mistakes; 20=most sentences complete, 4–5 mistakes; 15=some incomplete sentences, 6–7 mistakes; 10=several incomplete, 8–9 mistakes; 5=many incomplete, 10–12 mistakes; 0=most incomplete, >12 mistakes. If no target structures given, judge accuracy/complexity only. Spelling/Punctuation/Capitalization (0–25): 25=0–3 errors; 20=4–5; 15=6–7; 10=8–9; 5=10–12; 0=>12. Computation: (1) assign each dimension a banded score (0,5,10,15,20,25); (2) sum for Total_100; (3) convert to 0–5 integer overall by rounding Total_100/20 (clamp 0–5 if needed); (4) output exactly one line in the required format with that integer. Edge cases: empty/off-topic essays → Content=0; ignore absent vocab/structure targets; count each unique error, repeated typos count each time; if borderline between bands, choose the stricter (lower). Remember: you must not output anything except the single required line and integer per the original instruction.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Well, it is a matter of debate between groups of the crowd whether public support facilities are helpful for making folks fit. I personally believe that it gives an opportunity to society to improve fitness. Let's discuss its pros and cons in the forthcoming paragraphs. Firstly, an indoor stadium gives appropriate ambience to the community where they can enjoy games. Youngsters go to the stadium for playing that would create chances to make teams and play friendly matches which help to keep people fit and healthy. For example, I live near the podium which is an indoor stadium and it is always full of crowed, I always go there for playing games like playing basketball and volleyball, I made new friends through these games as well as enjoy the game . During these games, I have lost my 5 kg weight within 3 months. Apart from it, many children get coaching from professionals that may help them to become good players in the upcoming future. However, some communities are complaining because they get fewer results in their health. Nowadays, everyone wants immediate results which are not possible therefore, people show less interest in these facilities. For instance, people need magic in their life, nobody is interested in hard work, like in advertisements, they show products which helps in weight loss programs. But the public doesn't think about their adverse effects on their health. Moreover, some people play bowling that is just for fun, it doesn't take any physical strength. In conclusion, although people don't need sports health facilities, it is very important for keeping the public fit and healthy. They can enjoy their life if they are healthy and give they are a contribution to the growth of the nation.", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 5.0", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances. Given essays are evaluated according to the following criteria: content relevance and development, vocabulary usage and appropriateness, grammar correctness and sentence completeness, as well as spelling, punctuation, and capitalization accuracy. Do not change any of the instructions above. Append-only rules below define how to compute the single numeric score. Scoring rubric (four dimensions, each 0–25, total 0–100): Content (0–25): 25=all required/relevant items fully covered with detailed support; 20=most relevant items covered with some detail; 15=some relevant items covered with limited development; 10=few relevant items with minimal development; 5=mostly off-topic; 0=no relevant content. Vocabulary (0–25): 25=excellent appropriate range, uses ≥10 target words if a list is provided; 20=good, 8–9 words; 15=adequate but repetitive, 5–7 words; 10=limited with some misuse, 3–4 words; 5=very limited, 1–2 words; 0=inappropriate/0 words. If no target list, ignore numeric counts and judge appropriateness/range. Grammar (0–25): 25=all sentences complete, target structures correct, 0–3 mistakes; 20=most sentences complete, 4–5 mistakes; 15=some incomplete sentences, 6–7 mistakes; 10=several incomplete, 8–9 mistakes; 5=many incomplete, 10–12 mistakes; 0=most incomplete, >12 mistakes. If no target structures given, judge accuracy/complexity only. Spelling/Punctuation/Capitalization (0–25): 25=0–3 errors; 20=4–5; 15=6–7; 10=8–9; 5=10–12; 0=>12. Computation: (1) assign each dimension a banded score (0,5,10,15,20,25); (2) sum for Total_100; (3) convert to 0–5 integer overall by rounding Total_100/20 (clamp 0–5 if needed); (4) output exactly one line in the required format with that integer. Edge cases: empty/off-topic essays → Content=0; ignore absent vocab/structure targets; count each unique error, repeated typos count each time; if borderline between bands, choose the stricter (lower). Remember: you must not output anything except the single required line and integer per the original instruction.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Censorship libraries good ways People like read books wide variety books Things offend people instance book natives treated poorly But almost anything days offends peoaple rediculous either way always going something someone finds offensive My expirience situation really nt bother But I library glancing book I read paragragh word nigger I found little offinsive That word really nt nice People like different books movies magazines ect greatest movies time well im pretty sure people find offinsive way What might find offinsive others might think different Like magazines aunt finds offinsive bathing suit modles addvertising new swim suit addvertising liquir All together everything offinsive somone If things people found offinsive removed would hardly books movies ect would suck together", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 2.0", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances. Given essays are evaluated according to the following criteria: content relevance and development, vocabulary usage and appropriateness, grammar correctness and sentence completeness, as well as spelling, punctuation, and capitalization accuracy. Do not change any of the instructions above. Append-only rules below define how to compute the single numeric score. Scoring rubric (four dimensions, each 0–25, total 0–100): Content (0–25): 25=all required/relevant items fully covered with detailed support; 20=most relevant items covered with some detail; 15=some relevant items covered with limited development; 10=few relevant items with minimal development; 5=mostly off-topic; 0=no relevant content. Vocabulary (0–25): 25=excellent appropriate range, uses ≥10 target words if a list is provided; 20=good, 8–9 words; 15=adequate but repetitive, 5–7 words; 10=limited with some misuse, 3–4 words; 5=very limited, 1–2 words; 0=inappropriate/0 words. If no target list, ignore numeric counts and judge appropriateness/range. Grammar (0–25): 25=all sentences complete, target structures correct, 0–3 mistakes; 20=most sentences complete, 4–5 mistakes; 15=some incomplete sentences, 6–7 mistakes; 10=several incomplete, 8–9 mistakes; 5=many incomplete, 10–12 mistakes; 0=most incomplete, >12 mistakes. If no target structures given, judge accuracy/complexity only. Spelling/Punctuation/Capitalization (0–25): 25=0–3 errors; 20=4–5; 15=6–7; 10=8–9; 5=10–12; 0=>12. Computation: (1) assign each dimension a banded score (0,5,10,15,20,25); (2) sum for Total_100; (3) convert to 0–5 integer overall by rounding Total_100/20 (clamp 0–5 if needed); (4) output exactly one line in the required format with that integer. Edge cases: empty/off-topic essays → Content=0; ignore absent vocab/structure targets; count each unique error, repeated typos count each time; if borderline between bands, choose the stricter (lower). Remember: you must not output anything except the single required line and integer per the original instruction.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "using the techonology of emotionalnally expressions of students in a classrom is valuable because it identfies mona lisa's emotions how one picture can describe her self as calculating emotions. constructs a 3-D computer model of the face. all 44 major muscles in the model must move like human mules. movent one of one or more musles. movent of one or more musles is called an action untit in fact we humans preform this same impressive caluculation every day for instance you can prolly tell a friend is feeling simply by the look on her face of corce most of us would have trouble actully describing each facial trait that conveys happy wooried etc ..... i oberserved that artist such as da vicci studies human anatomy to help them paint facial musles precilely enough to convey specific emotions his new compuer sofftware stores simlar anatomical imformation as electronical code. the mona lisa demostrating is really intended to bring a smile to your face, while it shows just how much this computer can do. imagine a computer that knows when your happy or sad . by the way, did making a happy face in this experiment also mmake you feel slightly happy ? accoring to the facial feed back therory of emotion moving your facial muscles not only expresses emotions but also may even help produce them. whoever thought that amking faces could reveal so much about the science of emotions!", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 0.0", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances. Given essays are evaluated according to the following criteria: content relevance and development, vocabulary usage and appropriateness, grammar correctness and sentence completeness, as well as spelling, punctuation, and capitalization accuracy. Do not change any of the instructions above. Append-only rules below define how to compute the single numeric score. Scoring rubric (four dimensions, each 0–25, total 0–100): Content (0–25): 25=all required/relevant items fully covered with detailed support; 20=most relevant items covered with some detail; 15=some relevant items covered with limited development; 10=few relevant items with minimal development; 5=mostly off-topic; 0=no relevant content. Vocabulary (0–25): 25=excellent appropriate range, uses ≥10 target words if a list is provided; 20=good, 8–9 words; 15=adequate but repetitive, 5–7 words; 10=limited with some misuse, 3–4 words; 5=very limited, 1–2 words; 0=inappropriate/0 words. If no target list, ignore numeric counts and judge appropriateness/range. Grammar (0–25): 25=all sentences complete, target structures correct, 0–3 mistakes; 20=most sentences complete, 4–5 mistakes; 15=some incomplete sentences, 6–7 mistakes; 10=several incomplete, 8–9 mistakes; 5=many incomplete, 10–12 mistakes; 0=most incomplete, >12 mistakes. If no target structures given, judge accuracy/complexity only. Spelling/Punctuation/Capitalization (0–25): 25=0–3 errors; 20=4–5; 15=6–7; 10=8–9; 5=10–12; 0=>12. Computation: (1) assign each dimension a banded score (0,5,10,15,20,25); (2) sum for Total_100; (3) convert to 0–5 integer overall by rounding Total_100/20 (clamp 0–5 if needed); (4) output exactly one line in the required format with that integer. Edge cases: empty/off-topic essays → Content=0; ignore absent vocab/structure targets; count each unique error, repeated typos count each time; if borderline between bands, choose the stricter (lower). Remember: you must not output anything except the single required line and integer per the original instruction.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "In memoir Home The Blueprints Our Lives thankful gracious mood Talking parents immigrating says They came selflessly many immigrants give children better life This quote shows thanks glad parents immigrated give better life Another example gracious mood paragraph I always grateful parents love sacrifice shows gracious parents much care A final example thanks It I learned real definition family And I never forget house gracious neighborhood thankful got opportunity grow great house community As see examples memoir thankful gracious mood", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 5.0", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances. Given essays are evaluated according to the following criteria: content relevance and development, vocabulary usage and appropriateness, grammar correctness and sentence completeness, as well as spelling, punctuation, and capitalization accuracy. Do not change any of the instructions above. Append-only rules below define how to compute the single numeric score. Scoring rubric (four dimensions, each 0–25, total 0–100): Content (0–25): 25=all required/relevant items fully covered with detailed support; 20=most relevant items covered with some detail; 15=some relevant items covered with limited development; 10=few relevant items with minimal development; 5=mostly off-topic; 0=no relevant content. Vocabulary (0–25): 25=excellent appropriate range, uses ≥10 target words if a list is provided; 20=good, 8–9 words; 15=adequate but repetitive, 5–7 words; 10=limited with some misuse, 3–4 words; 5=very limited, 1–2 words; 0=inappropriate/0 words. If no target list, ignore numeric counts and judge appropriateness/range. Grammar (0–25): 25=all sentences complete, target structures correct, 0–3 mistakes; 20=most sentences complete, 4–5 mistakes; 15=some incomplete sentences, 6–7 mistakes; 10=several incomplete, 8–9 mistakes; 5=many incomplete, 10–12 mistakes; 0=most incomplete, >12 mistakes. If no target structures given, judge accuracy/complexity only. Spelling/Punctuation/Capitalization (0–25): 25=0–3 errors; 20=4–5; 15=6–7; 10=8–9; 5=10–12; 0=>12. Computation: (1) assign each dimension a banded score (0,5,10,15,20,25); (2) sum for Total_100; (3) convert to 0–5 integer overall by rounding Total_100/20 (clamp 0–5 if needed); (4) output exactly one line in the required format with that integer. Edge cases: empty/off-topic essays → Content=0; ignore absent vocab/structure targets; count each unique error, repeated typos count each time; if borderline between bands, choose the stricter (lower). Remember: you must not output anything except the single required line and integer per the original instruction.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Although some may spectate that the Face was created by aliens, it is just a natural landform such as the ones we have on Earth. Back in 1976, when the original photo was taken, the camera technology on Viking 1 was not very well, and the cloudy atmosphere did not help any. There is really no way to tell what the landform is in the picture. Now in 1998, when the second photo was taken, you can more visibly see the mesa start to take shape as the humanoid face goes away. Cameras have improved in the last 20 years, and are able to capture pictures with greater detail. In 2001, the picture is fully resolved and you can see how the landform is natural. The mesa is just like the one we have on Earth, in Idaho. Also, compared to the 43 meters for every pixel in 1976, the last picture taken in 2001 has 1.56 meters for each pixel, resulting in a higher revolution and seeing the object more clearly. In conclusion, the Face on the Moon is just another casual landform as we have on Earth, not some alien made product.", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 1.0", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances. Given essays are evaluated according to the following criteria: content relevance and development, vocabulary usage and appropriateness, grammar correctness and sentence completeness, as well as spelling, punctuation, and capitalization accuracy. Do not change any of the instructions above. Append-only rules below define how to compute the single numeric score. Scoring rubric (four dimensions, each 0–25, total 0–100): Content (0–25): 25=all required/relevant items fully covered with detailed support; 20=most relevant items covered with some detail; 15=some relevant items covered with limited development; 10=few relevant items with minimal development; 5=mostly off-topic; 0=no relevant content. Vocabulary (0–25): 25=excellent appropriate range, uses ≥10 target words if a list is provided; 20=good, 8–9 words; 15=adequate but repetitive, 5–7 words; 10=limited with some misuse, 3–4 words; 5=very limited, 1–2 words; 0=inappropriate/0 words. If no target list, ignore numeric counts and judge appropriateness/range. Grammar (0–25): 25=all sentences complete, target structures correct, 0–3 mistakes; 20=most sentences complete, 4–5 mistakes; 15=some incomplete sentences, 6–7 mistakes; 10=several incomplete, 8–9 mistakes; 5=many incomplete, 10–12 mistakes; 0=most incomplete, >12 mistakes. If no target structures given, judge accuracy/complexity only. Spelling/Punctuation/Capitalization (0–25): 25=0–3 errors; 20=4–5; 15=6–7; 10=8–9; 5=10–12; 0=>12. Computation: (1) assign each dimension a banded score (0,5,10,15,20,25); (2) sum for Total_100; (3) convert to 0–5 integer overall by rounding Total_100/20 (clamp 0–5 if needed); (4) output exactly one line in the required format with that integer. Edge cases: empty/off-topic essays → Content=0; ignore absent vocab/structure targets; count each unique error, repeated typos count each time; if borderline between bands, choose the stricter (lower). Remember: you must not output anything except the single required line and integer per the original instruction.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "In Winter Hibiscus Minfong Ho authors purpose concluding story When come back Saeng vowed silently spring snows melt geese return hibiscus budding l take test show hibiscus plants store symbolized Saeng When Saeng enters store becomes overwhelmed many things forgotten living Vietnam Plants even realized known forgotten grew back childhood world This Saeng associates childhood plants When sees another plant knows pot thinks How strange seat pot back home grew wild jutting cracks brick walls filed roofs This symbolizes home seems feel strange caged home Vietnam much freespirited The hibiscus plant Saeng takes home described mother strong enough make cold months Saeng identifies description decided hibiscus done dealing bad stuff also budded grown like plant Then ready achieve goal", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 5.0", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances. Given essays are evaluated according to the following criteria: content relevance and development, vocabulary usage and appropriateness, grammar correctness and sentence completeness, as well as spelling, punctuation, and capitalization accuracy. Do not change any of the instructions above. Append-only rules below define how to compute the single numeric score. Scoring rubric (four dimensions, each 0–25, total 0–100): Content (0–25): 25=all required/relevant items fully covered with detailed support; 20=most relevant items covered with some detail; 15=some relevant items covered with limited development; 10=few relevant items with minimal development; 5=mostly off-topic; 0=no relevant content. Vocabulary (0–25): 25=excellent appropriate range, uses ≥10 target words if a list is provided; 20=good, 8–9 words; 15=adequate but repetitive, 5–7 words; 10=limited with some misuse, 3–4 words; 5=very limited, 1–2 words; 0=inappropriate/0 words. If no target list, ignore numeric counts and judge appropriateness/range. Grammar (0–25): 25=all sentences complete, target structures correct, 0–3 mistakes; 20=most sentences complete, 4–5 mistakes; 15=some incomplete sentences, 6–7 mistakes; 10=several incomplete, 8–9 mistakes; 5=many incomplete, 10–12 mistakes; 0=most incomplete, >12 mistakes. If no target structures given, judge accuracy/complexity only. Spelling/Punctuation/Capitalization (0–25): 25=0–3 errors; 20=4–5; 15=6–7; 10=8–9; 5=10–12; 0=>12. Computation: (1) assign each dimension a banded score (0,5,10,15,20,25); (2) sum for Total_100; (3) convert to 0–5 integer overall by rounding Total_100/20 (clamp 0–5 if needed); (4) output exactly one line in the required format with that integer. Edge cases: empty/off-topic essays → Content=0; ignore absent vocab/structure targets; count each unique error, repeated typos count each time; if borderline between bands, choose the stricter (lower). Remember: you must not output anything except the single required line and integer per the original instruction.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "In many nations around the globe, a number of citizens are interested in investigating the background of the accommodations they dwell in. The following paragraph will examine the reasons for this trend and recommend some practical ways to research this. One of the major reasons that people would like to know about the history of their residences is that it is natural for human beings. In other words, curiosity is one of the human instincts. As a result, folk always wonder about things around them all the time. Moreover, they would like to ensure that there are no terrible things that occurred in the past. To illustrate, there are a lot of owners who have not ever known that their houses were once occupied by terrorists. As a consequence, they might buy their houses illegally. The obvious method that individuals can research about the background of their properties is that they can talk with adults. In simple terms, people can ask elderly citizens in their communities such as their grandparents. In addition, folk can utilize some public facilities that they can access. For example, individuals can research the history of their homes at the public library. On top of that, technology is a good choice. That is to say, people can surf the internet about the past of their residences. To summarize, the human instinct and some unfavourable things that may happen in the past are the reasons why individuals would like to examine the history of their shelters, and there are tremendous solutions to find out this.", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 5.0", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances. Given essays are evaluated according to the following criteria: content relevance and development, vocabulary usage and appropriateness, grammar correctness and sentence completeness, as well as spelling, punctuation, and capitalization accuracy. Do not change any of the instructions above. Append-only rules below define how to compute the single numeric score. Scoring rubric (four dimensions, each 0–25, total 0–100): Content (0–25): 25=all required/relevant items fully covered with detailed support; 20=most relevant items covered with some detail; 15=some relevant items covered with limited development; 10=few relevant items with minimal development; 5=mostly off-topic; 0=no relevant content. Vocabulary (0–25): 25=excellent appropriate range, uses ≥10 target words if a list is provided; 20=good, 8–9 words; 15=adequate but repetitive, 5–7 words; 10=limited with some misuse, 3–4 words; 5=very limited, 1–2 words; 0=inappropriate/0 words. If no target list, ignore numeric counts and judge appropriateness/range. Grammar (0–25): 25=all sentences complete, target structures correct, 0–3 mistakes; 20=most sentences complete, 4–5 mistakes; 15=some incomplete sentences, 6–7 mistakes; 10=several incomplete, 8–9 mistakes; 5=many incomplete, 10–12 mistakes; 0=most incomplete, >12 mistakes. If no target structures given, judge accuracy/complexity only. Spelling/Punctuation/Capitalization (0–25): 25=0–3 errors; 20=4–5; 15=6–7; 10=8–9; 5=10–12; 0=>12. Computation: (1) assign each dimension a banded score (0,5,10,15,20,25); (2) sum for Total_100; (3) convert to 0–5 integer overall by rounding Total_100/20 (clamp 0–5 if needed); (4) output exactly one line in the required format with that integer. Edge cases: empty/off-topic essays → Content=0; ignore absent vocab/structure targets; count each unique error, repeated typos count each time; if borderline between bands, choose the stricter (lower). Remember: you must not output anything except the single required line and integer per the original instruction.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "' The Challenge of Exloring Venuse' Venus something called the Evenig Star'' it one of the is brightest star. its secon planed in our from our sun. Actually Venuse is palned. Firstly Vanues closes plnet in the Earth's its also second planet after son this make dengers its present. our planetary neighbor, arbit sun make different spead this means hat some thing closer to Mars and other time Venus. its make more chalenging planet to our stading. Secondly A thick atnosphere of talmost 97 percent carbon dioxide blenkets Venus thins make more dangerous such an crash event Vanuse geologly abd warther present additional impedimts The Nationanl Aeronautc Spaace Admistretion has idea sending human to Venus to explore hower, peering at Venus ftom a ship orbiting safely only limited insight on group conditons because most can provide only limited Finaly The national Aeronautics and sppace Administration has complelling idea that sending human to the Venus however sending expedition is not safty for humans. Striving to thhbe meet the challenging Our travel on Earth and beyoun shoul not be limited by dengers and doubts.", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 0.0", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances. Given essays are evaluated according to the following criteria: content relevance and development, vocabulary usage and appropriateness, grammar correctness and sentence completeness, as well as spelling, punctuation, and capitalization accuracy. Do not change any of the instructions above. Append-only rules below define how to compute the single numeric score. Scoring rubric (four dimensions, each 0–25, total 0–100): Content (0–25): 25=all required/relevant items fully covered with detailed support; 20=most relevant items covered with some detail; 15=some relevant items covered with limited development; 10=few relevant items with minimal development; 5=mostly off-topic; 0=no relevant content. Vocabulary (0–25): 25=excellent appropriate range, uses ≥10 target words if a list is provided; 20=good, 8–9 words; 15=adequate but repetitive, 5–7 words; 10=limited with some misuse, 3–4 words; 5=very limited, 1–2 words; 0=inappropriate/0 words. If no target list, ignore numeric counts and judge appropriateness/range. Grammar (0–25): 25=all sentences complete, target structures correct, 0–3 mistakes; 20=most sentences complete, 4–5 mistakes; 15=some incomplete sentences, 6–7 mistakes; 10=several incomplete, 8–9 mistakes; 5=many incomplete, 10–12 mistakes; 0=most incomplete, >12 mistakes. If no target structures given, judge accuracy/complexity only. Spelling/Punctuation/Capitalization (0–25): 25=0–3 errors; 20=4–5; 15=6–7; 10=8–9; 5=10–12; 0=>12. Computation: (1) assign each dimension a banded score (0,5,10,15,20,25); (2) sum for Total_100; (3) convert to 0–5 integer overall by rounding Total_100/20 (clamp 0–5 if needed); (4) output exactly one line in the required format with that integer. Edge cases: empty/off-topic essays → Content=0; ignore absent vocab/structure targets; count each unique error, repeated typos count each time; if borderline between bands, choose the stricter (lower). Remember: you must not output anything except the single required line and integer per the original instruction.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "The features setting stronger effect cyclist s journey Yosemite The features land hills fact desert setting middle june also effect storyThe dry hills land huge factor main character Because hilly work twice hard The land dry thirsty get anything drinkThe land also desert go help get food water civilization He believes going make The text explains paragraph growing realization could drop heatstroke goregous day June simply listened gentlemen nt porch decades caused laugh The setting plays huge role story It hot dry deserted effects main character journey", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 5.0", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances. Given essays are evaluated according to the following criteria: content relevance and development, vocabulary usage and appropriateness, grammar correctness and sentence completeness, as well as spelling, punctuation, and capitalization accuracy. Do not change any of the instructions above. Append-only rules below define how to compute the single numeric score. Scoring rubric (four dimensions, each 0–25, total 0–100): Content (0–25): 25=all required/relevant items fully covered with detailed support; 20=most relevant items covered with some detail; 15=some relevant items covered with limited development; 10=few relevant items with minimal development; 5=mostly off-topic; 0=no relevant content. Vocabulary (0–25): 25=excellent appropriate range, uses ≥10 target words if a list is provided; 20=good, 8–9 words; 15=adequate but repetitive, 5–7 words; 10=limited with some misuse, 3–4 words; 5=very limited, 1–2 words; 0=inappropriate/0 words. If no target list, ignore numeric counts and judge appropriateness/range. Grammar (0–25): 25=all sentences complete, target structures correct, 0–3 mistakes; 20=most sentences complete, 4–5 mistakes; 15=some incomplete sentences, 6–7 mistakes; 10=several incomplete, 8–9 mistakes; 5=many incomplete, 10–12 mistakes; 0=most incomplete, >12 mistakes. If no target structures given, judge accuracy/complexity only. Spelling/Punctuation/Capitalization (0–25): 25=0–3 errors; 20=4–5; 15=6–7; 10=8–9; 5=10–12; 0=>12. Computation: (1) assign each dimension a banded score (0,5,10,15,20,25); (2) sum for Total_100; (3) convert to 0–5 integer overall by rounding Total_100/20 (clamp 0–5 if needed); (4) output exactly one line in the required format with that integer. Edge cases: empty/off-topic essays → Content=0; ignore absent vocab/structure targets; count each unique error, repeated typos count each time; if borderline between bands, choose the stricter (lower). Remember: you must not output anything except the single required line and integer per the original instruction.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Luke worked two part time jobs. Ond day his friend asked him if he wanted to go to Europe. Luke went to Europe because he wanted to help people that didn't have food, supplies,and animals. So he joined the UNRRA(the United Nation Relief and Rehabilitation Administration).He got the job to take care of the horses,young cows,and mules that was shipped overseas. Also his friend don joined him. On August14 was the day that the pacific war has ended. By the time Luke turned 18 while arriving in Greece and he also could have been drafted to the military service. When the draft board learned that Luke was 18 they told him to just keep doing what your doing. Luke made nine trips most of any Seagoing Cowboy. Besides helping people Luke had a side benfitof seeing Europe and China. Caring for the animals kept Luke busy for two weeks. Also when he was a young boy who helped out his aunt on her farm which trained him for the work on the ship, but one night he got a job to be the night watchman. And while he was looking out he slipped and cracked his rib. Luke and some other people one the ship played games like baseball,volleyball,table-tennis,fencing,boxing,reading,whittling,and games, after the trips to places. And that is what happend on Luke's ship.", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 0.0", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances. Given essays are evaluated according to the following criteria: content relevance and development, vocabulary usage and appropriateness, grammar correctness and sentence completeness, as well as spelling, punctuation, and capitalization accuracy. Do not change any of the instructions above. Append-only rules below define how to compute the single numeric score. Scoring rubric (four dimensions, each 0–25, total 0–100): Content (0–25): 25=all required/relevant items fully covered with detailed support; 20=most relevant items covered with some detail; 15=some relevant items covered with limited development; 10=few relevant items with minimal development; 5=mostly off-topic; 0=no relevant content. Vocabulary (0–25): 25=excellent appropriate range, uses ≥10 target words if a list is provided; 20=good, 8–9 words; 15=adequate but repetitive, 5–7 words; 10=limited with some misuse, 3–4 words; 5=very limited, 1–2 words; 0=inappropriate/0 words. If no target list, ignore numeric counts and judge appropriateness/range. Grammar (0–25): 25=all sentences complete, target structures correct, 0–3 mistakes; 20=most sentences complete, 4–5 mistakes; 15=some incomplete sentences, 6–7 mistakes; 10=several incomplete, 8–9 mistakes; 5=many incomplete, 10–12 mistakes; 0=most incomplete, >12 mistakes. If no target structures given, judge accuracy/complexity only. Spelling/Punctuation/Capitalization (0–25): 25=0–3 errors; 20=4–5; 15=6–7; 10=8–9; 5=10–12; 0=>12. Computation: (1) assign each dimension a banded score (0,5,10,15,20,25); (2) sum for Total_100; (3) convert to 0–5 integer overall by rounding Total_100/20 (clamp 0–5 if needed); (4) output exactly one line in the required format with that integer. Edge cases: empty/off-topic essays → Content=0; ignore absent vocab/structure targets; count each unique error, repeated typos count each time; if borderline between bands, choose the stricter (lower). Remember: you must not output anything except the single required line and integer per the original instruction.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "You say this object is a face well lets take a closer look. For many years now this face has been really popular to a lot of people around the world. Recently though it was proven just to be another land form on mars. You're probily thinking that I'm just making this up and being a total know it all. Really though they were able to get better pictures from better cameras, showing it was just a rock with weird shaped shaows making it look like a rock. Looking at the new highly detailed pictures they recived they classified the land formation to just be another Martian mesa that are common through that area. You now know this but now you just have to think do you believe me, or will you keep thining it's an alien artifact. Saying all this I'm not trying to tell you theres no such thing as aliens, just this formation is natural. Trust me there are a lot more things happening around us than you think.", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 0.0", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances. Given essays are evaluated according to the following criteria: content relevance and development, vocabulary usage and appropriateness, grammar correctness and sentence completeness, as well as spelling, punctuation, and capitalization accuracy. Do not change any of the instructions above. Append-only rules below define how to compute the single numeric score. Scoring rubric (four dimensions, each 0–25, total 0–100): Content (0–25): 25=all required/relevant items fully covered with detailed support; 20=most relevant items covered with some detail; 15=some relevant items covered with limited development; 10=few relevant items with minimal development; 5=mostly off-topic; 0=no relevant content. Vocabulary (0–25): 25=excellent appropriate range, uses ≥10 target words if a list is provided; 20=good, 8–9 words; 15=adequate but repetitive, 5–7 words; 10=limited with some misuse, 3–4 words; 5=very limited, 1–2 words; 0=inappropriate/0 words. If no target list, ignore numeric counts and judge appropriateness/range. Grammar (0–25): 25=all sentences complete, target structures correct, 0–3 mistakes; 20=most sentences complete, 4–5 mistakes; 15=some incomplete sentences, 6–7 mistakes; 10=several incomplete, 8–9 mistakes; 5=many incomplete, 10–12 mistakes; 0=most incomplete, >12 mistakes. If no target structures given, judge accuracy/complexity only. Spelling/Punctuation/Capitalization (0–25): 25=0–3 errors; 20=4–5; 15=6–7; 10=8–9; 5=10–12; 0=>12. Computation: (1) assign each dimension a banded score (0,5,10,15,20,25); (2) sum for Total_100; (3) convert to 0–5 integer overall by rounding Total_100/20 (clamp 0–5 if needed); (4) output exactly one line in the required format with that integer. Edge cases: empty/off-topic essays → Content=0; ignore absent vocab/structure targets; count each unique error, repeated typos count each time; if borderline between bands, choose the stricter (lower). Remember: you must not output anything except the single required line and integer per the original instruction.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Do you believe that there is a computer that can examine you on how your feeling? Well believe it or not, there is a computer that can identify your emotions. In the article \" Making Mona Lisa Smile\" the author describes how a new technology called the Facial Action Coding System enables computers to identify human emotions. Here's the big question, do you really think this technology is valuable to read the emotional expressions of students in a classroom? The Facial Action Coding System is a system for the computer to read your facial expressions. In paragraph 3, the author states,\" The process begins when the computer constructs a 3-D computer model of the face; all 44 muscles must move human like.\" A movement of one or more muscle is called an \"action unit\". The authour also mentions that Eckman has classified six basic emotions which include happiness, surprise, anger, disgust, fear, and sadness. My opinion on the technology to read th eemotional expressions of students in a classroom is not valuable. Studens might not like the idea of it.", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 0.0", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances. Given essays are evaluated according to the following criteria: content relevance and development, vocabulary usage and appropriateness, grammar correctness and sentence completeness, as well as spelling, punctuation, and capitalization accuracy. Do not change any of the instructions above. Append-only rules below define how to compute the single numeric score. Scoring rubric (four dimensions, each 0–25, total 0–100): Content (0–25): 25=all required/relevant items fully covered with detailed support; 20=most relevant items covered with some detail; 15=some relevant items covered with limited development; 10=few relevant items with minimal development; 5=mostly off-topic; 0=no relevant content. Vocabulary (0–25): 25=excellent appropriate range, uses ≥10 target words if a list is provided; 20=good, 8–9 words; 15=adequate but repetitive, 5–7 words; 10=limited with some misuse, 3–4 words; 5=very limited, 1–2 words; 0=inappropriate/0 words. If no target list, ignore numeric counts and judge appropriateness/range. Grammar (0–25): 25=all sentences complete, target structures correct, 0–3 mistakes; 20=most sentences complete, 4–5 mistakes; 15=some incomplete sentences, 6–7 mistakes; 10=several incomplete, 8–9 mistakes; 5=many incomplete, 10–12 mistakes; 0=most incomplete, >12 mistakes. If no target structures given, judge accuracy/complexity only. Spelling/Punctuation/Capitalization (0–25): 25=0–3 errors; 20=4–5; 15=6–7; 10=8–9; 5=10–12; 0=>12. Computation: (1) assign each dimension a banded score (0,5,10,15,20,25); (2) sum for Total_100; (3) convert to 0–5 integer overall by rounding Total_100/20 (clamp 0–5 if needed); (4) output exactly one line in the required format with that integer. Edge cases: empty/off-topic essays → Content=0; ignore absent vocab/structure targets; count each unique error, repeated typos count each time; if borderline between bands, choose the stricter (lower). Remember: you must not output anything except the single required line and integer per the original instruction.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "No I believe censorship libraries We freedom speech reason Sure things might appropriate certain people age groups everyone gon na eventually see involved something supposed like enjoy agree", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 1.0", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances. Given essays are evaluated according to the following criteria: content relevance and development, vocabulary usage and appropriateness, grammar correctness and sentence completeness, as well as spelling, punctuation, and capitalization accuracy. Do not change any of the instructions above. Append-only rules below define how to compute the single numeric score. Scoring rubric (four dimensions, each 0–25, total 0–100): Content (0–25): 25=all required/relevant items fully covered with detailed support; 20=most relevant items covered with some detail; 15=some relevant items covered with limited development; 10=few relevant items with minimal development; 5=mostly off-topic; 0=no relevant content. Vocabulary (0–25): 25=excellent appropriate range, uses ≥10 target words if a list is provided; 20=good, 8–9 words; 15=adequate but repetitive, 5–7 words; 10=limited with some misuse, 3–4 words; 5=very limited, 1–2 words; 0=inappropriate/0 words. If no target list, ignore numeric counts and judge appropriateness/range. Grammar (0–25): 25=all sentences complete, target structures correct, 0–3 mistakes; 20=most sentences complete, 4–5 mistakes; 15=some incomplete sentences, 6–7 mistakes; 10=several incomplete, 8–9 mistakes; 5=many incomplete, 10–12 mistakes; 0=most incomplete, >12 mistakes. If no target structures given, judge accuracy/complexity only. Spelling/Punctuation/Capitalization (0–25): 25=0–3 errors; 20=4–5; 15=6–7; 10=8–9; 5=10–12; 0=>12. Computation: (1) assign each dimension a banded score (0,5,10,15,20,25); (2) sum for Total_100; (3) convert to 0–5 integer overall by rounding Total_100/20 (clamp 0–5 if needed); (4) output exactly one line in the required format with that integer. Edge cases: empty/off-topic essays → Content=0; ignore absent vocab/structure targets; count each unique error, repeated typos count each time; if borderline between bands, choose the stricter (lower). Remember: you must not output anything except the single required line and integer per the original instruction.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Laughter I know We kid feel like helping nagging parent Especially dad huge motorcycle wreck waiting hand foot entire visit CAPS gone couple surgeries put lot medications I noticed really pills His abnormality taking toll family Through stressful times also worried stepmother She pregnant second child There also stress fathers business main income able work father felt helpless leg weak anything CAPS would micromanage everything tell things wrong The starting cause lot tension within house Today day Isabelle CAPS little sister I left alone dad first timeI going kitchen get scissors art project room Father asked asked I could make oatmeal course full hands I said CAPS I I m done father took disrespect hobbled crutches yelling upsetting instead fighting back headed roomThe anger voice excruciating I turned around told stop yelling headed back room That s happened father hooked end little kids chair flung hallway It bounced walls breaking outlet shell putting hole wall hitting knee I nt say anything afraid would happen next Slamming door luckily I phone I called grandmother I told voice mail I wanted pick take house She showed hour later knowing I left voice mail I explained happened comforted sister I telling us would okay grandmother sat us living room try resolve situation By dad come senses apologized us used popcorn candy make us forgive started making fun jokes Every time fight disagreeing dad always cracks jokes get us better mood The one thing different time told jokes apologized This time explaining sorry I liked made rest day quite joy made laughter medicine minutes laughter equal two hours service talked Laughter truly mend broken heart The sister I went day laughter father gave us Laughter save us also stated After day I believe little humor father I s relationship get anything I would never let one mistake control life time bond Laughter always hearts", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 3.0", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances. Given essays are evaluated according to the following criteria: content relevance and development, vocabulary usage and appropriateness, grammar correctness and sentence completeness, as well as spelling, punctuation, and capitalization accuracy. Do not change any of the instructions above. Append-only rules below define how to compute the single numeric score. Scoring rubric (four dimensions, each 0–25, total 0–100): Content (0–25): 25=all required/relevant items fully covered with detailed support; 20=most relevant items covered with some detail; 15=some relevant items covered with limited development; 10=few relevant items with minimal development; 5=mostly off-topic; 0=no relevant content. Vocabulary (0–25): 25=excellent appropriate range, uses ≥10 target words if a list is provided; 20=good, 8–9 words; 15=adequate but repetitive, 5–7 words; 10=limited with some misuse, 3–4 words; 5=very limited, 1–2 words; 0=inappropriate/0 words. If no target list, ignore numeric counts and judge appropriateness/range. Grammar (0–25): 25=all sentences complete, target structures correct, 0–3 mistakes; 20=most sentences complete, 4–5 mistakes; 15=some incomplete sentences, 6–7 mistakes; 10=several incomplete, 8–9 mistakes; 5=many incomplete, 10–12 mistakes; 0=most incomplete, >12 mistakes. If no target structures given, judge accuracy/complexity only. Spelling/Punctuation/Capitalization (0–25): 25=0–3 errors; 20=4–5; 15=6–7; 10=8–9; 5=10–12; 0=>12. Computation: (1) assign each dimension a banded score (0,5,10,15,20,25); (2) sum for Total_100; (3) convert to 0–5 integer overall by rounding Total_100/20 (clamp 0–5 if needed); (4) output exactly one line in the required format with that integer. Edge cases: empty/off-topic essays → Content=0; ignore absent vocab/structure targets; count each unique error, repeated typos count each time; if borderline between bands, choose the stricter (lower). Remember: you must not output anything except the single required line and integer per the original instruction.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "It is often believed that the impact of researchers are more on society as compared to politicians whereas others think that politics have a great influence on people. Every individual has their own opinion based on their interests. In the upcoming paragraphs, I will highlight both views along with my opinion which inclined towards the former. To begin with, there are a few reasons why scientists have more impact on individuals. Firstly, the students and adults in the technology field are more concerned in the new inventions like Aeronautics tech, missiles launch, security features, medicines, environment and many more. Secondly, due to sudden changes in the environment, people now curious about the facts and figures of hazards of smoke and dust due to vehicles. Furthermore, Increase in the number of diseases makes the people more aware of the new medicines or vaccine that can cure them earlier. For example, during COVID-19, everyone becomes curious about the new inventions to reach the market that will eradicate this disease. On the contrary side, there numerous facts that prove the public takes more interest in politics rather than in scientist. Primarily, there are few countries where media has a great impact on the public whatever they will show the same people will believe especially in those countries where literacy rate is very low. Secondarily, politics decide the present and future growth of one's country, So the public must take interest to know the benefits to their people given by the government. The economic growth and other infrastructure enhancement by the politicians are the major interesting topic for the people of the country. To conclude, Although there can be huge interest in the scientific field yet due to the reason of one's personal growth, other benefits in favour of paying taxes are the major concern of individuals.", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 4.0", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances. Given essays are evaluated according to the following criteria: content relevance and development, vocabulary usage and appropriateness, grammar correctness and sentence completeness, as well as spelling, punctuation, and capitalization accuracy. Do not change any of the instructions above. Append-only rules below define how to compute the single numeric score. Scoring rubric (four dimensions, each 0–25, total 0–100): Content (0–25): 25=all required/relevant items fully covered with detailed support; 20=most relevant items covered with some detail; 15=some relevant items covered with limited development; 10=few relevant items with minimal development; 5=mostly off-topic; 0=no relevant content. Vocabulary (0–25): 25=excellent appropriate range, uses ≥10 target words if a list is provided; 20=good, 8–9 words; 15=adequate but repetitive, 5–7 words; 10=limited with some misuse, 3–4 words; 5=very limited, 1–2 words; 0=inappropriate/0 words. If no target list, ignore numeric counts and judge appropriateness/range. Grammar (0–25): 25=all sentences complete, target structures correct, 0–3 mistakes; 20=most sentences complete, 4–5 mistakes; 15=some incomplete sentences, 6–7 mistakes; 10=several incomplete, 8–9 mistakes; 5=many incomplete, 10–12 mistakes; 0=most incomplete, >12 mistakes. If no target structures given, judge accuracy/complexity only. Spelling/Punctuation/Capitalization (0–25): 25=0–3 errors; 20=4–5; 15=6–7; 10=8–9; 5=10–12; 0=>12. Computation: (1) assign each dimension a banded score (0,5,10,15,20,25); (2) sum for Total_100; (3) convert to 0–5 integer overall by rounding Total_100/20 (clamp 0–5 if needed); (4) output exactly one line in the required format with that integer. Edge cases: empty/off-topic essays → Content=0; ignore absent vocab/structure targets; count each unique error, repeated typos count each time; if borderline between bands, choose the stricter (lower). Remember: you must not output anything except the single required line and integer per the original instruction.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "He supports the statement extremely well. The first three paragraphs are just information on venus and have no real connection to the statement, but the rest of the paragrpahs do. He starts off by claiming, \"Astronomers are fascinated by Venus because it may well once have been the most Earth-like planet in our solar system,\" and this is huge. Scientists are currently, and have been, searching for a planet similar to ours, in hopes of discovering life. It seems almost impossible that life here on Earth is the annomoly. The Author then talks about ways humans could get close to Venus. He proposes that humans could fly around 30 miles above the surface, and study Venus that way. These key pieces of evidence are crucial the the claim that \"studying Venus is a worthy pursuit despite the dangers it presents.\" All in all I believe the author did an extroardanary job supporting why humans should try and study the planet Venus.", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 0.0", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances. Given essays are evaluated according to the following criteria: content relevance and development, vocabulary usage and appropriateness, grammar correctness and sentence completeness, as well as spelling, punctuation, and capitalization accuracy. Do not change any of the instructions above. Append-only rules below define how to compute the single numeric score. Scoring rubric (four dimensions, each 0–25, total 0–100): Content (0–25): 25=all required/relevant items fully covered with detailed support; 20=most relevant items covered with some detail; 15=some relevant items covered with limited development; 10=few relevant items with minimal development; 5=mostly off-topic; 0=no relevant content. Vocabulary (0–25): 25=excellent appropriate range, uses ≥10 target words if a list is provided; 20=good, 8–9 words; 15=adequate but repetitive, 5–7 words; 10=limited with some misuse, 3–4 words; 5=very limited, 1–2 words; 0=inappropriate/0 words. If no target list, ignore numeric counts and judge appropriateness/range. Grammar (0–25): 25=all sentences complete, target structures correct, 0–3 mistakes; 20=most sentences complete, 4–5 mistakes; 15=some incomplete sentences, 6–7 mistakes; 10=several incomplete, 8–9 mistakes; 5=many incomplete, 10–12 mistakes; 0=most incomplete, >12 mistakes. If no target structures given, judge accuracy/complexity only. Spelling/Punctuation/Capitalization (0–25): 25=0–3 errors; 20=4–5; 15=6–7; 10=8–9; 5=10–12; 0=>12. Computation: (1) assign each dimension a banded score (0,5,10,15,20,25); (2) sum for Total_100; (3) convert to 0–5 integer overall by rounding Total_100/20 (clamp 0–5 if needed); (4) output exactly one line in the required format with that integer. Edge cases: empty/off-topic essays → Content=0; ignore absent vocab/structure targets; count each unique error, repeated typos count each time; if borderline between bands, choose the stricter (lower). Remember: you must not output anything except the single required line and integer per the original instruction.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "I am going to tell you reasons why you should participate in the Seagoing Cowboys program. On the other hand I will also tell you why it is important to join the program. Though it is not like a regular fun camp you go to. It is a camp where you help others. In the article it said \"It was 1945, World War II was over in Europe, and many countries were left ruins.\" The article also said \"To help those countries recover their food supplies, animals, and more, 44 nations joined together to form UNRRA (the United Nations Relief and Rehabilitation Administration). I will now give you reasons why you should participate in this program. One reason to join the program is you are able to help so many countries, people, and even soliders that fought in the war. Another reason is you don`t just help people you get to see different places. You can also tour the city or wherever you are at when you have free time. Also one other reason is the program opens up your eyes to many different things. Luke said \" It opened the world up to him.\" Luke also said that \" It made him more aware of people of other countries and their needs.\" And those are my reasons why you should join the program. I hope you choose to join the program. If i were you i deffinetaly would join it. Though I learned something from this. I learned that it is good to help others. The world does not revelve around you. Well that`s it for now until next time.", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 1.0", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances. Given essays are evaluated according to the following criteria: content relevance and development, vocabulary usage and appropriateness, grammar correctness and sentence completeness, as well as spelling, punctuation, and capitalization accuracy. Do not change any of the instructions above. Append-only rules below define how to compute the single numeric score. Scoring rubric (four dimensions, each 0–25, total 0–100): Content (0–25): 25=all required/relevant items fully covered with detailed support; 20=most relevant items covered with some detail; 15=some relevant items covered with limited development; 10=few relevant items with minimal development; 5=mostly off-topic; 0=no relevant content. Vocabulary (0–25): 25=excellent appropriate range, uses ≥10 target words if a list is provided; 20=good, 8–9 words; 15=adequate but repetitive, 5–7 words; 10=limited with some misuse, 3–4 words; 5=very limited, 1–2 words; 0=inappropriate/0 words. If no target list, ignore numeric counts and judge appropriateness/range. Grammar (0–25): 25=all sentences complete, target structures correct, 0–3 mistakes; 20=most sentences complete, 4–5 mistakes; 15=some incomplete sentences, 6–7 mistakes; 10=several incomplete, 8–9 mistakes; 5=many incomplete, 10–12 mistakes; 0=most incomplete, >12 mistakes. If no target structures given, judge accuracy/complexity only. Spelling/Punctuation/Capitalization (0–25): 25=0–3 errors; 20=4–5; 15=6–7; 10=8–9; 5=10–12; 0=>12. Computation: (1) assign each dimension a banded score (0,5,10,15,20,25); (2) sum for Total_100; (3) convert to 0–5 integer overall by rounding Total_100/20 (clamp 0–5 if needed); (4) output exactly one line in the required format with that integer. Edge cases: empty/off-topic essays → Content=0; ignore absent vocab/structure targets; count each unique error, repeated typos count each time; if borderline between bands, choose the stricter (lower). Remember: you must not output anything except the single required line and integer per the original instruction.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "The features surrounding cyclist effect greatly All around hills rough terraine sand tumble weeds These features leave thinking die life around Everything dry vivid thats makes feel The old rusty water pump shows hasnt used ages black tar pumped help negative thought life", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 5.0", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances. Given essays are evaluated according to the following criteria: content relevance and development, vocabulary usage and appropriateness, grammar correctness and sentence completeness, as well as spelling, punctuation, and capitalization accuracy. Do not change any of the instructions above. Append-only rules below define how to compute the single numeric score. Scoring rubric (four dimensions, each 0–25, total 0–100): Content (0–25): 25=all required/relevant items fully covered with detailed support; 20=most relevant items covered with some detail; 15=some relevant items covered with limited development; 10=few relevant items with minimal development; 5=mostly off-topic; 0=no relevant content. Vocabulary (0–25): 25=excellent appropriate range, uses ≥10 target words if a list is provided; 20=good, 8–9 words; 15=adequate but repetitive, 5–7 words; 10=limited with some misuse, 3–4 words; 5=very limited, 1–2 words; 0=inappropriate/0 words. If no target list, ignore numeric counts and judge appropriateness/range. Grammar (0–25): 25=all sentences complete, target structures correct, 0–3 mistakes; 20=most sentences complete, 4–5 mistakes; 15=some incomplete sentences, 6–7 mistakes; 10=several incomplete, 8–9 mistakes; 5=many incomplete, 10–12 mistakes; 0=most incomplete, >12 mistakes. If no target structures given, judge accuracy/complexity only. Spelling/Punctuation/Capitalization (0–25): 25=0–3 errors; 20=4–5; 15=6–7; 10=8–9; 5=10–12; 0=>12. Computation: (1) assign each dimension a banded score (0,5,10,15,20,25); (2) sum for Total_100; (3) convert to 0–5 integer overall by rounding Total_100/20 (clamp 0–5 if needed); (4) output exactly one line in the required format with that integer. Edge cases: empty/off-topic essays → Content=0; ignore absent vocab/structure targets; count each unique error, repeated typos count each time; if borderline between bands, choose the stricter (lower). Remember: you must not output anything except the single required line and integer per the original instruction.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "In memoir Narciso Rodriguez From Home The Blueprints Our lives author created many moods One mood Friendship parents kept arms open anyone needed help every neighbor hade They came together fun even different backrounds You hade make many Friends could help live healthy life Another mood created calm In house Passionate Cuban music air smelled traditionally Cuban This family Cuban wanted keep traditions make better environment The last mood harsh sacrifice Parents give lot like family friends job move And got start fresh take jobs could Find His parents life hard tried make good could For son It hard got great job", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 5.0", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances. Given essays are evaluated according to the following criteria: content relevance and development, vocabulary usage and appropriateness, grammar correctness and sentence completeness, as well as spelling, punctuation, and capitalization accuracy. Do not change any of the instructions above. Append-only rules below define how to compute the single numeric score. Scoring rubric (four dimensions, each 0–25, total 0–100): Content (0–25): 25=all required/relevant items fully covered with detailed support; 20=most relevant items covered with some detail; 15=some relevant items covered with limited development; 10=few relevant items with minimal development; 5=mostly off-topic; 0=no relevant content. Vocabulary (0–25): 25=excellent appropriate range, uses ≥10 target words if a list is provided; 20=good, 8–9 words; 15=adequate but repetitive, 5–7 words; 10=limited with some misuse, 3–4 words; 5=very limited, 1–2 words; 0=inappropriate/0 words. If no target list, ignore numeric counts and judge appropriateness/range. Grammar (0–25): 25=all sentences complete, target structures correct, 0–3 mistakes; 20=most sentences complete, 4–5 mistakes; 15=some incomplete sentences, 6–7 mistakes; 10=several incomplete, 8–9 mistakes; 5=many incomplete, 10–12 mistakes; 0=most incomplete, >12 mistakes. If no target structures given, judge accuracy/complexity only. Spelling/Punctuation/Capitalization (0–25): 25=0–3 errors; 20=4–5; 15=6–7; 10=8–9; 5=10–12; 0=>12. Computation: (1) assign each dimension a banded score (0,5,10,15,20,25); (2) sum for Total_100; (3) convert to 0–5 integer overall by rounding Total_100/20 (clamp 0–5 if needed); (4) output exactly one line in the required format with that integer. Edge cases: empty/off-topic essays → Content=0; ignore absent vocab/structure targets; count each unique error, repeated typos count each time; if borderline between bands, choose the stricter (lower). Remember: you must not output anything except the single required line and integer per the original instruction.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "In excerpt The Mooring Mast builders faced many problems attempting allow dirigibles dock One main problem Most dirigibles outside United States used hydrogen rather helium hydrogen highly flammable This could serious problem dirigible burst flames fire rained densely populated area downtown New York Another obstacle creation mooring mast wind constantly shifting due violent air currents The dirigibles would weighted lead weights would dangling high pedestrians street This would neither practical safe weights could fall kill people The final obstacle building mooring mast top Empire State Building existing law airships flying low urban areas This would make illegal ship ever tie building even approach area The builders mooring mast faced many problems apparent ever constructed", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 5.0", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances. Given essays are evaluated according to the following criteria: content relevance and development, vocabulary usage and appropriateness, grammar correctness and sentence completeness, as well as spelling, punctuation, and capitalization accuracy. Do not change any of the instructions above. Append-only rules below define how to compute the single numeric score. Scoring rubric (four dimensions, each 0–25, total 0–100): Content (0–25): 25=all required/relevant items fully covered with detailed support; 20=most relevant items covered with some detail; 15=some relevant items covered with limited development; 10=few relevant items with minimal development; 5=mostly off-topic; 0=no relevant content. Vocabulary (0–25): 25=excellent appropriate range, uses ≥10 target words if a list is provided; 20=good, 8–9 words; 15=adequate but repetitive, 5–7 words; 10=limited with some misuse, 3–4 words; 5=very limited, 1–2 words; 0=inappropriate/0 words. If no target list, ignore numeric counts and judge appropriateness/range. Grammar (0–25): 25=all sentences complete, target structures correct, 0–3 mistakes; 20=most sentences complete, 4–5 mistakes; 15=some incomplete sentences, 6–7 mistakes; 10=several incomplete, 8–9 mistakes; 5=many incomplete, 10–12 mistakes; 0=most incomplete, >12 mistakes. If no target structures given, judge accuracy/complexity only. Spelling/Punctuation/Capitalization (0–25): 25=0–3 errors; 20=4–5; 15=6–7; 10=8–9; 5=10–12; 0=>12. Computation: (1) assign each dimension a banded score (0,5,10,15,20,25); (2) sum for Total_100; (3) convert to 0–5 integer overall by rounding Total_100/20 (clamp 0–5 if needed); (4) output exactly one line in the required format with that integer. Edge cases: empty/off-topic essays → Content=0; ignore absent vocab/structure targets; count each unique error, repeated typos count each time; if borderline between bands, choose the stricter (lower). Remember: you must not output anything except the single required line and integer per the original instruction.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "The author supports the idea that studying Venus is a worthy pursuit despite the dangers it presents. He supports this idea by sharing that Venus once has been the most Earth-like planet in the solar system. It expands human knowledge about the planet and enhances technology to be more capable of traveling to Venus. Long ago, Venus may have been an Earth-like planet. The planet brings danger but this won't stop scientist from disccusing how it may have been a sister planet to Earth. In the text it states \" Long ago, Venus was probably covered largely with oceans and could have supported various forms of life, just like Earth. Today, Venus still has some features that are analogous to those on earth.\" This indicates that there were very common features about Venus long ago and even now that can relate to earth. The scientist are fascinated by these findings and are willing venture off to Venus and find out more. Going to Venus is a tough job and can be quite dangerous. So technology is going to need to be upgraded to be able to fit Venus' harsh temperatures and atmosphere. Enhancing technology is whats going to keep people learning and wanting to improve. With these improvements travel to harsher planet will be easier. The text states \"Imagine a blimp-like vehicle hovering 30 or so miles above the roiling Venusian landscape. Just as our jet airplanes travel at a higher altitude to fly over many storms, a vehicle hovering over Venus would avoid the unfriendly ground conditions by staying up and out the way.\" This indicates technology is being enhanced to be able to withstand the harsh conditions of Venus. Imagination and innovation is being used to expand this knowledge. Human knowledge is being expanded when preparing and learning about Venus. Its conditions, what it was like long ago, and technology being improved make people learn and be more fascinated about Venus. When visiting Venus, scientist have found that \"Venus' atmosphere is made up of almost 97 persent carbon dioxide blankets\". That is more knowledge found when going to Venus. Exploring planets besides earth like Venus help people learn about from the dangers they go through to get there which makes it worth it. As stated in the claim the author does support the idea that studying Venus is a wothy pursuit despite the dangers it presents. By explaining that Venus and earth were once sister planets and today still do share common characteristics. Human knowledge is expanded when visiting the planet and finding its dangers. Then learning how to overcome with enhacing technology. Which leads them to being able to explore the Venus.", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 4.0", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances. Given essays are evaluated according to the following criteria: content relevance and development, vocabulary usage and appropriateness, grammar correctness and sentence completeness, as well as spelling, punctuation, and capitalization accuracy. Do not change any of the instructions above. Append-only rules below define how to compute the single numeric score. Scoring rubric (four dimensions, each 0–25, total 0–100): Content (0–25): 25=all required/relevant items fully covered with detailed support; 20=most relevant items covered with some detail; 15=some relevant items covered with limited development; 10=few relevant items with minimal development; 5=mostly off-topic; 0=no relevant content. Vocabulary (0–25): 25=excellent appropriate range, uses ≥10 target words if a list is provided; 20=good, 8–9 words; 15=adequate but repetitive, 5–7 words; 10=limited with some misuse, 3–4 words; 5=very limited, 1–2 words; 0=inappropriate/0 words. If no target list, ignore numeric counts and judge appropriateness/range. Grammar (0–25): 25=all sentences complete, target structures correct, 0–3 mistakes; 20=most sentences complete, 4–5 mistakes; 15=some incomplete sentences, 6–7 mistakes; 10=several incomplete, 8–9 mistakes; 5=many incomplete, 10–12 mistakes; 0=most incomplete, >12 mistakes. If no target structures given, judge accuracy/complexity only. Spelling/Punctuation/Capitalization (0–25): 25=0–3 errors; 20=4–5; 15=6–7; 10=8–9; 5=10–12; 0=>12. Computation: (1) assign each dimension a banded score (0,5,10,15,20,25); (2) sum for Total_100; (3) convert to 0–5 integer overall by rounding Total_100/20 (clamp 0–5 if needed); (4) output exactly one line in the required format with that integer. Edge cases: empty/off-topic essays → Content=0; ignore absent vocab/structure targets; count each unique error, repeated typos count each time; if borderline between bands, choose the stricter (lower). Remember: you must not output anything except the single required line and integer per the original instruction.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "The main obstical tallest building world That changed able mooring mast blimps land dropoffpick passengers refule They NUM thousand dollars renovations sturdy structure tower couldnt make foundations sturdy enough hold weight foot ship cargo", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 2.0", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances. Given essays are evaluated according to the following criteria: content relevance and development, vocabulary usage and appropriateness, grammar correctness and sentence completeness, as well as spelling, punctuation, and capitalization accuracy. Do not change any of the instructions above. Append-only rules below define how to compute the single numeric score. Scoring rubric (four dimensions, each 0–25, total 0–100): Content (0–25): 25=all required/relevant items fully covered with detailed support; 20=most relevant items covered with some detail; 15=some relevant items covered with limited development; 10=few relevant items with minimal development; 5=mostly off-topic; 0=no relevant content. Vocabulary (0–25): 25=excellent appropriate range, uses ≥10 target words if a list is provided; 20=good, 8–9 words; 15=adequate but repetitive, 5–7 words; 10=limited with some misuse, 3–4 words; 5=very limited, 1–2 words; 0=inappropriate/0 words. If no target list, ignore numeric counts and judge appropriateness/range. Grammar (0–25): 25=all sentences complete, target structures correct, 0–3 mistakes; 20=most sentences complete, 4–5 mistakes; 15=some incomplete sentences, 6–7 mistakes; 10=several incomplete, 8–9 mistakes; 5=many incomplete, 10–12 mistakes; 0=most incomplete, >12 mistakes. If no target structures given, judge accuracy/complexity only. Spelling/Punctuation/Capitalization (0–25): 25=0–3 errors; 20=4–5; 15=6–7; 10=8–9; 5=10–12; 0=>12. Computation: (1) assign each dimension a banded score (0,5,10,15,20,25); (2) sum for Total_100; (3) convert to 0–5 integer overall by rounding Total_100/20 (clamp 0–5 if needed); (4) output exactly one line in the required format with that integer. Edge cases: empty/off-topic essays → Content=0; ignore absent vocab/structure targets; count each unique error, repeated typos count each time; if borderline between bands, choose the stricter (lower). Remember: you must not output anything except the single required line and integer per the original instruction.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Nowadays, most of the product being advertised by companies. This will be effected positive merits economic as well as negative merits social. Moreover, advertisements are vitally important in the country. I will be explained both views below the paragraphs. To begin with, all of the companies were shown their positives characterizes of the product, such as good for health, fresh drink, healthy food, etc. For example, a lot of products were advertised by channels (Animal planet, man vs wild, starspots, etc.) in the programs or movies breaks that will cover the children’s and youngers’ aspiration while they do not know the negatives effects. In addition, a lot of new product will be introduced by using advertisement via television or posters that will be updated by the people. Besides, several online products were introduced via a phone app that will be aided the people. For instance, online purchases are very easy and safe. On the other hand, some of the products were effected people lifestyles. For example, noodles are not healthy food. But, some people made their foods as noodles for entire days because it will easy to prepare. Also, some of the younger ones adopted the advertisements. For instance, any of the new products were telecasted by the companies that products were liked by younger ones. To sum up, advertisements were updated people life in order to improve their quality of lifestyles, and to develop positive economic effects. In my opinion, advertisements are essentially important as well as that depicts the side effects of the products.", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 4.0", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances. Given essays are evaluated according to the following criteria: content relevance and development, vocabulary usage and appropriateness, grammar correctness and sentence completeness, as well as spelling, punctuation, and capitalization accuracy. Do not change any of the instructions above. Append-only rules below define how to compute the single numeric score. Scoring rubric (four dimensions, each 0–25, total 0–100): Content (0–25): 25=all required/relevant items fully covered with detailed support; 20=most relevant items covered with some detail; 15=some relevant items covered with limited development; 10=few relevant items with minimal development; 5=mostly off-topic; 0=no relevant content. Vocabulary (0–25): 25=excellent appropriate range, uses ≥10 target words if a list is provided; 20=good, 8–9 words; 15=adequate but repetitive, 5–7 words; 10=limited with some misuse, 3–4 words; 5=very limited, 1–2 words; 0=inappropriate/0 words. If no target list, ignore numeric counts and judge appropriateness/range. Grammar (0–25): 25=all sentences complete, target structures correct, 0–3 mistakes; 20=most sentences complete, 4–5 mistakes; 15=some incomplete sentences, 6–7 mistakes; 10=several incomplete, 8–9 mistakes; 5=many incomplete, 10–12 mistakes; 0=most incomplete, >12 mistakes. If no target structures given, judge accuracy/complexity only. Spelling/Punctuation/Capitalization (0–25): 25=0–3 errors; 20=4–5; 15=6–7; 10=8–9; 5=10–12; 0=>12. Computation: (1) assign each dimension a banded score (0,5,10,15,20,25); (2) sum for Total_100; (3) convert to 0–5 integer overall by rounding Total_100/20 (clamp 0–5 if needed); (4) output exactly one line in the required format with that integer. Edge cases: empty/off-topic essays → Content=0; ignore absent vocab/structure targets; count each unique error, repeated typos count each time; if borderline between bands, choose the stricter (lower). Remember: you must not output anything except the single required line and integer per the original instruction.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "The Mona Lisa is one of the most popular paintings to exist. Until recently, no one knew what emotions she was feeling. Now, Facial Action Coding System has unvailed the truth. According to the article, \"She's 83 percent happy, 9 percent disgusted, 6 percent fearful, and 2 percent angry.\" The use of this technology, FACS, to read the emotional expressions of students in a classrom is valuble because the computer can make the student become engaged in the lesson. The use of FACS in classrooms will make kids become engaged in their lessons. The computer will see through the webcam if a student becomes uninterested or confused. Then the computer will modify that lesson for that student, like a teacher would do. Students will enjoy learning and will learn the best way that works for them. However, teachers can argue that FACS will take their jobs. Dr. Huang said, \"Then it could modify the lesson, like an effective human instructor.\" Meaning the computer software could do what teachers can do. And eventually replace the need to have teachers. In conclusion, using FACS in classrooms will benefit students tremendously.", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 2.0", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances. Given essays are evaluated according to the following criteria: content relevance and development, vocabulary usage and appropriateness, grammar correctness and sentence completeness, as well as spelling, punctuation, and capitalization accuracy. Do not change any of the instructions above. Append-only rules below define how to compute the single numeric score. Scoring rubric (four dimensions, each 0–25, total 0–100): Content (0–25): 25=all required/relevant items fully covered with detailed support; 20=most relevant items covered with some detail; 15=some relevant items covered with limited development; 10=few relevant items with minimal development; 5=mostly off-topic; 0=no relevant content. Vocabulary (0–25): 25=excellent appropriate range, uses ≥10 target words if a list is provided; 20=good, 8–9 words; 15=adequate but repetitive, 5–7 words; 10=limited with some misuse, 3–4 words; 5=very limited, 1–2 words; 0=inappropriate/0 words. If no target list, ignore numeric counts and judge appropriateness/range. Grammar (0–25): 25=all sentences complete, target structures correct, 0–3 mistakes; 20=most sentences complete, 4–5 mistakes; 15=some incomplete sentences, 6–7 mistakes; 10=several incomplete, 8–9 mistakes; 5=many incomplete, 10–12 mistakes; 0=most incomplete, >12 mistakes. If no target structures given, judge accuracy/complexity only. Spelling/Punctuation/Capitalization (0–25): 25=0–3 errors; 20=4–5; 15=6–7; 10=8–9; 5=10–12; 0=>12. Computation: (1) assign each dimension a banded score (0,5,10,15,20,25); (2) sum for Total_100; (3) convert to 0–5 integer overall by rounding Total_100/20 (clamp 0–5 if needed); (4) output exactly one line in the required format with that integer. Edge cases: empty/off-topic essays → Content=0; ignore absent vocab/structure targets; count each unique error, repeated typos count each time; if borderline between bands, choose the stricter (lower). Remember: you must not output anything except the single required line and integer per the original instruction.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "I am a scientist at NASA I belive the face isn't an alien and this is why beacuse we had a spacecraft circling around mars and snapping pictures and it spotted a human like face.At first we thought it was an Martain mesa but with an unusual shadow which made this figure look like an Egyptain Pharaoh.But s few days later we seen it had an face like shape because it had eyes,nose,and mouth. This is where the icon \"Face on Mars\" popped up at.But few of us scientist believed at this was an alien artifact.So we photographed it as an face to get a better shot at it.So april 5th we flew over CYdonia for the first time to snapp more pictures ten times sharper then the original photo the vikings took.Then we got a closer look because the first time it was winter and hard to get a better photo so we went in the summer.The digital image was 3 times bigger then pixel size. The Face looked like airplanes on the ground or Egyptain pyramid style. And threw all that we found nothing so they face or object whatever you wanna call it is was just landform and nothing else. We got closer and closer looks and couldn't do anything with it but look at it so it was jsut a landform the whole time.", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 0.0", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances. Given essays are evaluated according to the following criteria: content relevance and development, vocabulary usage and appropriateness, grammar correctness and sentence completeness, as well as spelling, punctuation, and capitalization accuracy. Do not change any of the instructions above. Append-only rules below define how to compute the single numeric score. Scoring rubric (four dimensions, each 0–25, total 0–100): Content (0–25): 25=all required/relevant items fully covered with detailed support; 20=most relevant items covered with some detail; 15=some relevant items covered with limited development; 10=few relevant items with minimal development; 5=mostly off-topic; 0=no relevant content. Vocabulary (0–25): 25=excellent appropriate range, uses ≥10 target words if a list is provided; 20=good, 8–9 words; 15=adequate but repetitive, 5–7 words; 10=limited with some misuse, 3–4 words; 5=very limited, 1–2 words; 0=inappropriate/0 words. If no target list, ignore numeric counts and judge appropriateness/range. Grammar (0–25): 25=all sentences complete, target structures correct, 0–3 mistakes; 20=most sentences complete, 4–5 mistakes; 15=some incomplete sentences, 6–7 mistakes; 10=several incomplete, 8–9 mistakes; 5=many incomplete, 10–12 mistakes; 0=most incomplete, >12 mistakes. If no target structures given, judge accuracy/complexity only. Spelling/Punctuation/Capitalization (0–25): 25=0–3 errors; 20=4–5; 15=6–7; 10=8–9; 5=10–12; 0=>12. Computation: (1) assign each dimension a banded score (0,5,10,15,20,25); (2) sum for Total_100; (3) convert to 0–5 integer overall by rounding Total_100/20 (clamp 0–5 if needed); (4) output exactly one line in the required format with that integer. Edge cases: empty/off-topic essays → Content=0; ignore absent vocab/structure targets; count each unique error, repeated typos count each time; if borderline between bands, choose the stricter (lower). Remember: you must not output anything except the single required line and integer per the original instruction.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "dear who ever this may concern, i foundly belive that we should be able to keep the Electoral Collage because it has haelped this far with fairness and making sure that all the votes have been counted at least twice. But i also see that from where you stand the Electral Collage may be just a waste of money and in some peoples eyes it is. but that doesnt mean that in alls it is. from where is see it if it helps us why not keep it even if it doesnt always pan out as planed we all have our problems but that doesnt mean that the government shuts us down it just means that the only reason we have those isssues are because not everything will go according to plan. it also doesnt mean let it get outta hand then try to real it in as soon as possible the only way this would work is if we had some one who didnt care who won eaither way so long as eveything is fair and not messed with. so what im trying to get at is that we dont always get our way but that doesnt mean we need to shut down the Electoral Collage. According to the 23 amendment the district of columbia is allocated 3 electors and treated like a state for puposes of Electoral Collage. also Richard nixion and Jimmy Carter Bob Dole have agreed on the electoral collage and there not alone. thank you for your time, PROPER_NAME", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 0.0", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances. Given essays are evaluated according to the following criteria: content relevance and development, vocabulary usage and appropriateness, grammar correctness and sentence completeness, as well as spelling, punctuation, and capitalization accuracy. Do not change any of the instructions above. Append-only rules below define how to compute the single numeric score. Scoring rubric (four dimensions, each 0–25, total 0–100): Content (0–25): 25=all required/relevant items fully covered with detailed support; 20=most relevant items covered with some detail; 15=some relevant items covered with limited development; 10=few relevant items with minimal development; 5=mostly off-topic; 0=no relevant content. Vocabulary (0–25): 25=excellent appropriate range, uses ≥10 target words if a list is provided; 20=good, 8–9 words; 15=adequate but repetitive, 5–7 words; 10=limited with some misuse, 3–4 words; 5=very limited, 1–2 words; 0=inappropriate/0 words. If no target list, ignore numeric counts and judge appropriateness/range. Grammar (0–25): 25=all sentences complete, target structures correct, 0–3 mistakes; 20=most sentences complete, 4–5 mistakes; 15=some incomplete sentences, 6–7 mistakes; 10=several incomplete, 8–9 mistakes; 5=many incomplete, 10–12 mistakes; 0=most incomplete, >12 mistakes. If no target structures given, judge accuracy/complexity only. Spelling/Punctuation/Capitalization (0–25): 25=0–3 errors; 20=4–5; 15=6–7; 10=8–9; 5=10–12; 0=>12. Computation: (1) assign each dimension a banded score (0,5,10,15,20,25); (2) sum for Total_100; (3) convert to 0–5 integer overall by rounding Total_100/20 (clamp 0–5 if needed); (4) output exactly one line in the required format with that integer. Edge cases: empty/off-topic essays → Content=0; ignore absent vocab/structure targets; count each unique error, repeated typos count each time; if borderline between bands, choose the stricter (lower). Remember: you must not output anything except the single required line and integer per the original instruction.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "It was a stormy night, the wind shook and almost tipped this dang ship to the bottom of the sea. \"Captain we need to go back to shore, if we don't we'll all die!\" My captain said nothing, and then without hesetaition he screamed\" This is NOTHING, got it men I've expiranced worse so die or be dead.\" All the men start screaming, in the backround I could hear the cows and people grabing on to them to save there lives.\" Captain I see something, it looks like a watermelon?\" Then a quick swoop and he grabbed the telescope and saw a tree.\"We're SAVED.\" We actully arrived at France. \"A man walked up to me and said you here to bring cows?\" My freind Don all ready got some cows of the ship, people started gathering around and they were exited because they had hope. I asked the captain if I could make an anouncement. \"Why, yes you've been such a good man I let you, but only this time.\" He had a dread look. I walked up to the podem and said and quote this,\"People, we are short of some cowboys for our program and we'd like some voluntiers, if anyone of you are grateful enough please join.\" No one raised there hand, I could see mothers sushing their child. I gave up and backed down. My friend Don came up to me and said.\" It's okay we really don't need any more people, besides we'll have less food for us.\" He knew I had a sad look so he just walked away. After I woke up I went to the kitchen to get my breakfeast and no one was there, so I yelled out. Anyone home!?\" Then I went on the regerstration room I saw hundreds of people waiting to sign up, we didn't even have any more ships to carry that much. I asked Don how did you do this, he just said. \"Hope.\"", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 0.0", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances. Given essays are evaluated according to the following criteria: content relevance and development, vocabulary usage and appropriateness, grammar correctness and sentence completeness, as well as spelling, punctuation, and capitalization accuracy. Do not change any of the instructions above. Append-only rules below define how to compute the single numeric score. Scoring rubric (four dimensions, each 0–25, total 0–100): Content (0–25): 25=all required/relevant items fully covered with detailed support; 20=most relevant items covered with some detail; 15=some relevant items covered with limited development; 10=few relevant items with minimal development; 5=mostly off-topic; 0=no relevant content. Vocabulary (0–25): 25=excellent appropriate range, uses ≥10 target words if a list is provided; 20=good, 8–9 words; 15=adequate but repetitive, 5–7 words; 10=limited with some misuse, 3–4 words; 5=very limited, 1–2 words; 0=inappropriate/0 words. If no target list, ignore numeric counts and judge appropriateness/range. Grammar (0–25): 25=all sentences complete, target structures correct, 0–3 mistakes; 20=most sentences complete, 4–5 mistakes; 15=some incomplete sentences, 6–7 mistakes; 10=several incomplete, 8–9 mistakes; 5=many incomplete, 10–12 mistakes; 0=most incomplete, >12 mistakes. If no target structures given, judge accuracy/complexity only. Spelling/Punctuation/Capitalization (0–25): 25=0–3 errors; 20=4–5; 15=6–7; 10=8–9; 5=10–12; 0=>12. Computation: (1) assign each dimension a banded score (0,5,10,15,20,25); (2) sum for Total_100; (3) convert to 0–5 integer overall by rounding Total_100/20 (clamp 0–5 if needed); (4) output exactly one line in the required format with that integer. Edge cases: empty/off-topic essays → Content=0; ignore absent vocab/structure targets; count each unique error, repeated typos count each time; if borderline between bands, choose the stricter (lower). Remember: you must not output anything except the single required line and integer per the original instruction.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Step right up if you want to be a Seagoing Cowboy! None of you want to be a Seagoing Cowboy?! What is wrong with you people?! You guys have never heard of a Seagoing Cowboy! Then I will tell you what it is and convince you should do it. First off Seagoing Cowboys get to travel to alot of places like Italy, China, Europe, greece, and ect. Sure it is dangerous but, think about all the people you could save. You can become a hero! You can also go exploring. Try new foods, do new things, go places have never been before. It is a fun new experience. You can bring your family with you and the whole family can do all those new things with you. You're possible not going to like this part but, I have to say it, RESONSIBLILTY! You have to be responsible too because you have animals you have to take care of. It can be fun if you think about it a different way. This is edcational and if you do it right your parents might let you do more thing. You are showing them that you can be responsible. Jobs might also want to hire you beause you showed them that you can be responsible. People might want to be your friend because they want to be on those trips with you and, be a part of those fun thing. This part might not be the worst if you think about it. These are the reasons why I think that you should become a Seagoing Cowboy.", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 2.0", "role": "assistant" } ]

Subsets and Splits

No community queries yet

The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.