Split (2)

train · 8.45k rows

messages listlengths 3 3
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances. Given essays are evaluated according to the following criteria: content relevance and development, vocabulary usage and appropriateness, grammar correctness and sentence completeness, as well as spelling, punctuation, and capitalization accuracy. Do not change any of the instructions above. Append-only rules below define how to compute the single numeric score. Scoring rubric (four dimensions, each 0–25, total 0–100): Content (0–25): 25=all required/relevant items fully covered with detailed support; 20=most relevant items covered with some detail; 15=some relevant items covered with limited development; 10=few relevant items with minimal development; 5=mostly off-topic; 0=no relevant content. Vocabulary (0–25): 25=excellent appropriate range, uses ≥10 target words if a list is provided; 20=good, 8–9 words; 15=adequate but repetitive, 5–7 words; 10=limited with some misuse, 3–4 words; 5=very limited, 1–2 words; 0=inappropriate/0 words. If no target list, ignore numeric counts and judge appropriateness/range. Grammar (0–25): 25=all sentences complete, target structures correct, 0–3 mistakes; 20=most sentences complete, 4–5 mistakes; 15=some incomplete sentences, 6–7 mistakes; 10=several incomplete, 8–9 mistakes; 5=many incomplete, 10–12 mistakes; 0=most incomplete, >12 mistakes. If no target structures given, judge accuracy/complexity only. Spelling/Punctuation/Capitalization (0–25): 25=0–3 errors; 20=4–5; 15=6–7; 10=8–9; 5=10–12; 0=>12. Computation: (1) assign each dimension a banded score (0,5,10,15,20,25); (2) sum for Total_100; (3) convert to 0–5 integer overall by rounding Total_100/20 (clamp 0–5 if needed); (4) output exactly one line in the required format with that integer. Edge cases: empty/off-topic essays → Content=0; ignore absent vocab/structure targets; count each unique error, repeated typos count each time; if borderline between bands, choose the stricter (lower). Remember: you must not output anything except the single required line and integer per the original instruction.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "My opinion on driverless cars is a good start for the new \"future\". As seen in movies people have created amazing things to the world today that no one could think it could be created do to the fact of our resources. Also in todays world poeple are gonna develope these cars do too the fact of creating something different to the human mind and nature. The reason behind making driverless cars is a good idea to the delievering company. I think the first driverless anything should be semi's due to the fact people get paid over a 1000$ a week. In this way people will start being able to transport stuff a lot cheaper and more effactive then what it is today. If they make the driverless car its good for the use of traveling due to the fact of you can sleep while your car is drivering and show up to a place a lot faster than you should. It takes 24 hours to get across the USA without stopping. If a human is driving it willl take most likely 2-3 days to complete this trip. Due to the fact of driverless semi's delivering goods and supplies if that make it possible to where a driver doesnt even have to be in the car or truck there will still be a question asked. How will you fill the gas tank? Like they said in the passage of driverless taxis.(Pargraph 1) How would a taxi be able to fill the tank up if a driver is not presant. You cant ask the passenger too. There are some problems with driverless cars but most of them will be fixed in the next few years due to more and more smarter people and more technology being made.", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 1.0", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances. Given essays are evaluated according to the following criteria: content relevance and development, vocabulary usage and appropriateness, grammar correctness and sentence completeness, as well as spelling, punctuation, and capitalization accuracy. Do not change any of the instructions above. Append-only rules below define how to compute the single numeric score. Scoring rubric (four dimensions, each 0–25, total 0–100): Content (0–25): 25=all required/relevant items fully covered with detailed support; 20=most relevant items covered with some detail; 15=some relevant items covered with limited development; 10=few relevant items with minimal development; 5=mostly off-topic; 0=no relevant content. Vocabulary (0–25): 25=excellent appropriate range, uses ≥10 target words if a list is provided; 20=good, 8–9 words; 15=adequate but repetitive, 5–7 words; 10=limited with some misuse, 3–4 words; 5=very limited, 1–2 words; 0=inappropriate/0 words. If no target list, ignore numeric counts and judge appropriateness/range. Grammar (0–25): 25=all sentences complete, target structures correct, 0–3 mistakes; 20=most sentences complete, 4–5 mistakes; 15=some incomplete sentences, 6–7 mistakes; 10=several incomplete, 8–9 mistakes; 5=many incomplete, 10–12 mistakes; 0=most incomplete, >12 mistakes. If no target structures given, judge accuracy/complexity only. Spelling/Punctuation/Capitalization (0–25): 25=0–3 errors; 20=4–5; 15=6–7; 10=8–9; 5=10–12; 0=>12. Computation: (1) assign each dimension a banded score (0,5,10,15,20,25); (2) sum for Total_100; (3) convert to 0–5 integer overall by rounding Total_100/20 (clamp 0–5 if needed); (4) output exactly one line in the required format with that integer. Edge cases: empty/off-topic essays → Content=0; ignore absent vocab/structure targets; count each unique error, repeated typos count each time; if borderline between bands, choose the stricter (lower). Remember: you must not output anything except the single required line and integer per the original instruction.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "The most conspicuous trend in today's world is the colossal upsurge in the number of people who believe that the goal of the academy is to make students better-disciplined citizens while others believe that a school is a place where they give offer educational knowledge and give good grades. I agree with this statement because seminary institutions teach good qualities and skills that are important for offspring today. I will give some of my opinions which I will explain in the forthcoming paragraphs. To begin with, young generations learn good habits and skills at schools as teachers train their pupils to follow the routine and make the student more organized and disciplined. Furthermore, the moral values that are given in the institute while teaching other all subjects that are helpful in upbringing and to bring up good qualities. For example, while having coaching of all other subjects likewise psychology which taught many lessons as such good or bad, right and wrong which helps a lot to prove a person as a good human being. Moreover, the task of academy activities the rules and regulations of civil behaviour ,as a result, will help to reduce the number of crimes and accidents and will maintain discipline among citizens. Additionally, the educational institutes can teach qualities like not too unclean the streets and public transports and what the causes of these kinds of activities so basically the masses can get the education of these ethical things from the schools. For example, almost the public who are qualified they care more the country development and all this positive stuff which can bring any nation on the top and success so its all happened because of moral study of schools. In conclusion, in view of the arguments outlined above one can conclude that the institute is fully responsible for ensuring that offspring are qualified members of society.", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 4.0", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances. Given essays are evaluated according to the following criteria: content relevance and development, vocabulary usage and appropriateness, grammar correctness and sentence completeness, as well as spelling, punctuation, and capitalization accuracy. Do not change any of the instructions above. Append-only rules below define how to compute the single numeric score. Scoring rubric (four dimensions, each 0–25, total 0–100): Content (0–25): 25=all required/relevant items fully covered with detailed support; 20=most relevant items covered with some detail; 15=some relevant items covered with limited development; 10=few relevant items with minimal development; 5=mostly off-topic; 0=no relevant content. Vocabulary (0–25): 25=excellent appropriate range, uses ≥10 target words if a list is provided; 20=good, 8–9 words; 15=adequate but repetitive, 5–7 words; 10=limited with some misuse, 3–4 words; 5=very limited, 1–2 words; 0=inappropriate/0 words. If no target list, ignore numeric counts and judge appropriateness/range. Grammar (0–25): 25=all sentences complete, target structures correct, 0–3 mistakes; 20=most sentences complete, 4–5 mistakes; 15=some incomplete sentences, 6–7 mistakes; 10=several incomplete, 8–9 mistakes; 5=many incomplete, 10–12 mistakes; 0=most incomplete, >12 mistakes. If no target structures given, judge accuracy/complexity only. Spelling/Punctuation/Capitalization (0–25): 25=0–3 errors; 20=4–5; 15=6–7; 10=8–9; 5=10–12; 0=>12. Computation: (1) assign each dimension a banded score (0,5,10,15,20,25); (2) sum for Total_100; (3) convert to 0–5 integer overall by rounding Total_100/20 (clamp 0–5 if needed); (4) output exactly one line in the required format with that integer. Edge cases: empty/off-topic essays → Content=0; ignore absent vocab/structure targets; count each unique error, repeated typos count each time; if borderline between bands, choose the stricter (lower). Remember: you must not output anything except the single required line and integer per the original instruction.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "The claim of the idea is about the challenge of exploring venus. HE TALKING ABOUT THE PLANET OF VENUS, SAYS THAT VENUS AND EARTH IS SIMILAR BUT THERE DIFERENCES BECAUSE IN VENUS NUMEROUS FACTORS CANTRIBUTE TO VENUS'S REPUTATION AS A CHALLENGIN PLANET FOR HUMANS TO STUDY, DEPITE ITS PROCIMITY TO US. SOMEONE HUMANS HAS ONE PARTYCULARY COMPELLING IDEA FOR SENDING HUMANS TO STUDY VENUS. SOME SIMPLIFIED ELECTROCNICS MADE OF SILICON NOT CAN HAVE BEEN TESTED IN A CHAMBER SIMULATUING THE CAOS VENUS'S SURFRACE AND HAVE LASTED FOR THREE WEEKS IN SUCH CONDITION. THE NASA TALK ABOUT A WORK ON ANOTHER SPROACHES TO STUYING VENUS. VENUS HAS VALUE NOT ONLY BECAESE OF THE INSIGTH TO BE GAINED ON THE PANET ITSELF. AN EXPLATION OF EVIDENCE FROM THE ARTICULE IS A THICK ATMOSPHERE OF ALMOSTS 97 PERCET,, ON THE PLANET'S SURFACE, TEMPERATURES AVERANGE OVER 800 DEGREES. THE CONCLUSION IS THAT THE HUMANS NOT CAN SURVIVE IN VENUS THOUGH ABOVE ARE SIMILARES.", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 1.0", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances. Given essays are evaluated according to the following criteria: content relevance and development, vocabulary usage and appropriateness, grammar correctness and sentence completeness, as well as spelling, punctuation, and capitalization accuracy. Do not change any of the instructions above. Append-only rules below define how to compute the single numeric score. Scoring rubric (four dimensions, each 0–25, total 0–100): Content (0–25): 25=all required/relevant items fully covered with detailed support; 20=most relevant items covered with some detail; 15=some relevant items covered with limited development; 10=few relevant items with minimal development; 5=mostly off-topic; 0=no relevant content. Vocabulary (0–25): 25=excellent appropriate range, uses ≥10 target words if a list is provided; 20=good, 8–9 words; 15=adequate but repetitive, 5–7 words; 10=limited with some misuse, 3–4 words; 5=very limited, 1–2 words; 0=inappropriate/0 words. If no target list, ignore numeric counts and judge appropriateness/range. Grammar (0–25): 25=all sentences complete, target structures correct, 0–3 mistakes; 20=most sentences complete, 4–5 mistakes; 15=some incomplete sentences, 6–7 mistakes; 10=several incomplete, 8–9 mistakes; 5=many incomplete, 10–12 mistakes; 0=most incomplete, >12 mistakes. If no target structures given, judge accuracy/complexity only. Spelling/Punctuation/Capitalization (0–25): 25=0–3 errors; 20=4–5; 15=6–7; 10=8–9; 5=10–12; 0=>12. Computation: (1) assign each dimension a banded score (0,5,10,15,20,25); (2) sum for Total_100; (3) convert to 0–5 integer overall by rounding Total_100/20 (clamp 0–5 if needed); (4) output exactly one line in the required format with that integer. Edge cases: empty/off-topic essays → Content=0; ignore absent vocab/structure targets; count each unique error, repeated typos count each time; if borderline between bands, choose the stricter (lower). Remember: you must not output anything except the single required line and integer per the original instruction.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Setting affect cyclsit many ways Just I read story desert dehidrated It hot road bumpy dangers poisnous snakes The cycclist could died many ways heatstroke falling bike dehidration bite form snake Say mountains There many problems face", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 1.0", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances. Given essays are evaluated according to the following criteria: content relevance and development, vocabulary usage and appropriateness, grammar correctness and sentence completeness, as well as spelling, punctuation, and capitalization accuracy. Do not change any of the instructions above. Append-only rules below define how to compute the single numeric score. Scoring rubric (four dimensions, each 0–25, total 0–100): Content (0–25): 25=all required/relevant items fully covered with detailed support; 20=most relevant items covered with some detail; 15=some relevant items covered with limited development; 10=few relevant items with minimal development; 5=mostly off-topic; 0=no relevant content. Vocabulary (0–25): 25=excellent appropriate range, uses ≥10 target words if a list is provided; 20=good, 8–9 words; 15=adequate but repetitive, 5–7 words; 10=limited with some misuse, 3–4 words; 5=very limited, 1–2 words; 0=inappropriate/0 words. If no target list, ignore numeric counts and judge appropriateness/range. Grammar (0–25): 25=all sentences complete, target structures correct, 0–3 mistakes; 20=most sentences complete, 4–5 mistakes; 15=some incomplete sentences, 6–7 mistakes; 10=several incomplete, 8–9 mistakes; 5=many incomplete, 10–12 mistakes; 0=most incomplete, >12 mistakes. If no target structures given, judge accuracy/complexity only. Spelling/Punctuation/Capitalization (0–25): 25=0–3 errors; 20=4–5; 15=6–7; 10=8–9; 5=10–12; 0=>12. Computation: (1) assign each dimension a banded score (0,5,10,15,20,25); (2) sum for Total_100; (3) convert to 0–5 integer overall by rounding Total_100/20 (clamp 0–5 if needed); (4) output exactly one line in the required format with that integer. Edge cases: empty/off-topic essays → Content=0; ignore absent vocab/structure targets; count each unique error, repeated typos count each time; if borderline between bands, choose the stricter (lower). Remember: you must not output anything except the single required line and integer per the original instruction.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "The assertion that team sports are the best method to teach youngsters how to cooperate is a viewpoint that has gained considerable attention. Although team sports can indeed foster collaboration skills, I believe that there are other effective avenues for teaching cooperation as well. Essentially, team sports are very efficient when it comes to teaching young people how to cooperate with each other. Through a competitive environment, teenagers develop teamwork skills, self-esteem and strategising. For example, students can have many opportunities to recognise the strengths as well as the shortcomings of each teammate which can be used to better compete against their opponents, especially in sports with more than 5 participants such as football, volleyball and basketball. Additionally, playing sports also stimulates a working environment where people work towards a common goal together. Thus, pupils learn how to work together more effectively when they engage in these sporting activities. On the other hand, it is important to recognize that cooperation skills can be cultivated through a range of activities beyond team sports. Firstly, cooperative learning strategies in classrooms, group projects, community service activities and even creative pursuits like theatre or music can also provide valuable opportunities for young adults to develop collaboration skills. In fact, these activities promote cooperation, and the ability to work effectively in a group setting. They encourage the youth to understand diverse perspectives, value teamwork and appreciate the benefit of collective effort. Secondly, not all offspring may be inclined toward or have the opportunity to participate in team sports. Thus, it is essential to provide a range of activities and environments that cater to diverse interests or abilities, ensuring that all youngsters have a chance to develop their cooperation skills. In conclusion, while team sports offer valuable opportunities for teaching offspring to cooperate, I believe that cooperation skills can be developed through a variety of activities and environments. By providing a balanced approach that includes all activities, we can effectively nurture the value and skill of cooperation in adolescents.", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 4.0", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances. Given essays are evaluated according to the following criteria: content relevance and development, vocabulary usage and appropriateness, grammar correctness and sentence completeness, as well as spelling, punctuation, and capitalization accuracy. Do not change any of the instructions above. Append-only rules below define how to compute the single numeric score. Scoring rubric (four dimensions, each 0–25, total 0–100): Content (0–25): 25=all required/relevant items fully covered with detailed support; 20=most relevant items covered with some detail; 15=some relevant items covered with limited development; 10=few relevant items with minimal development; 5=mostly off-topic; 0=no relevant content. Vocabulary (0–25): 25=excellent appropriate range, uses ≥10 target words if a list is provided; 20=good, 8–9 words; 15=adequate but repetitive, 5–7 words; 10=limited with some misuse, 3–4 words; 5=very limited, 1–2 words; 0=inappropriate/0 words. If no target list, ignore numeric counts and judge appropriateness/range. Grammar (0–25): 25=all sentences complete, target structures correct, 0–3 mistakes; 20=most sentences complete, 4–5 mistakes; 15=some incomplete sentences, 6–7 mistakes; 10=several incomplete, 8–9 mistakes; 5=many incomplete, 10–12 mistakes; 0=most incomplete, >12 mistakes. If no target structures given, judge accuracy/complexity only. Spelling/Punctuation/Capitalization (0–25): 25=0–3 errors; 20=4–5; 15=6–7; 10=8–9; 5=10–12; 0=>12. Computation: (1) assign each dimension a banded score (0,5,10,15,20,25); (2) sum for Total_100; (3) convert to 0–5 integer overall by rounding Total_100/20 (clamp 0–5 if needed); (4) output exactly one line in the required format with that integer. Edge cases: empty/off-topic essays → Content=0; ignore absent vocab/structure targets; count each unique error, repeated typos count each time; if borderline between bands, choose the stricter (lower). Remember: you must not output anything except the single required line and integer per the original instruction.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Imagine having a teacher or classmate being able to constantly know how you are feeling, or what you were thinking. Would that benefit the lesson being taught at all? Or is that simply an invasion of privacy? This technology would not be beneficial to those in a classroom. Rather than putting this technology into use, both teachers and students could instead be honest or simply use the instincts already given to them; doing so would allow this technology to be utilized for something that could advance our society instead of staying in a classroom, and humans cannot always depend on technology to begin with. This article states that this computer could be used in benefits to teachers in classrooms. According to this article, this advanced technology would be able to detect \"when a student is becoming confused or bored.\" While this could be helpful in some situations, if you are a teacher, you should be able to detect a student's confusion without the help of a computer at your side. Relating to students' boredom, a teacher's only job is to push students to learn, not to entertain them. There has to be communication in both the students' and the teachers' roles; if one is confused, one should express it, and if a teacher assumes one is confused, they should ask. Though it is understandable that one would wonder what those around them think about, it would be easier to use one's common sense to determine this, as oppose to technology that one would have to carry around. If this kind of technology were to be used on an every day basis, our society would immediately begin to deteriorate. Being amusing at first, this computer would change our lives, possibly not for the better. Those able to use it would become too reliant on the machine, and they would be unable to interact with people around them without it. Likewise, there are many more emotions than the ones listed (happiness, surprise, anger, disgust, fear, and sadness), and we should be able to detect those on our own; detecting emotions cannot be something learned through a computer. Any classroom would be better off without utillizing this technology. Even though society has to advance at some point, the use of this computer in a classroom would be inappropriate and unnecessary. Any functioning human being could detect a friend or collegue's emotion without the help of a computer, which is even stated in paragraph five: \"In fact, we humans perform this same impressive \"calculation\" every day.\" Also stated in this article, this computer could be utilized for \"video games or video surgery.\" Rather than using it in a classroom, this new technology should instead be used to advance in branches that need discoveries. It is human nature to cling to any new technology as if we cannot breathe without it. While technology will always advance, it is not necessary to use it if we will not benefit it. Likewise, we should not constantly be depending on it. If humans continue to ignore our unsettling dependence on technology, it could eventually turn against us and harm us. It is unnecessary for computers to even understand human emotion, though Dr. Huang states \"Most human communication is nonverbal, including emotional communication, so computers need to understand that, too.\" The use of this technology in a classroom would be pointless; it would not be beneficial a lesson at all, unless the class being taught was related to that of computer science or computer engineering. Having to rely on a machine such as this would send our progress backwards. Instead, we should utilize our instincts provided to us and recognize how important it is to be able to deduct emotions by ourselves. Using this technology every day would be an advancement that we are not prepared for. Though we act like it and think it, we as humans do not need technology at our side to function on a day to day basis.", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 4.0", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances. Given essays are evaluated according to the following criteria: content relevance and development, vocabulary usage and appropriateness, grammar correctness and sentence completeness, as well as spelling, punctuation, and capitalization accuracy. Do not change any of the instructions above. Append-only rules below define how to compute the single numeric score. Scoring rubric (four dimensions, each 0–25, total 0–100): Content (0–25): 25=all required/relevant items fully covered with detailed support; 20=most relevant items covered with some detail; 15=some relevant items covered with limited development; 10=few relevant items with minimal development; 5=mostly off-topic; 0=no relevant content. Vocabulary (0–25): 25=excellent appropriate range, uses ≥10 target words if a list is provided; 20=good, 8–9 words; 15=adequate but repetitive, 5–7 words; 10=limited with some misuse, 3–4 words; 5=very limited, 1–2 words; 0=inappropriate/0 words. If no target list, ignore numeric counts and judge appropriateness/range. Grammar (0–25): 25=all sentences complete, target structures correct, 0–3 mistakes; 20=most sentences complete, 4–5 mistakes; 15=some incomplete sentences, 6–7 mistakes; 10=several incomplete, 8–9 mistakes; 5=many incomplete, 10–12 mistakes; 0=most incomplete, >12 mistakes. If no target structures given, judge accuracy/complexity only. Spelling/Punctuation/Capitalization (0–25): 25=0–3 errors; 20=4–5; 15=6–7; 10=8–9; 5=10–12; 0=>12. Computation: (1) assign each dimension a banded score (0,5,10,15,20,25); (2) sum for Total_100; (3) convert to 0–5 integer overall by rounding Total_100/20 (clamp 0–5 if needed); (4) output exactly one line in the required format with that integer. Edge cases: empty/off-topic essays → Content=0; ignore absent vocab/structure targets; count each unique error, repeated typos count each time; if borderline between bands, choose the stricter (lower). Remember: you must not output anything except the single required line and integer per the original instruction.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "In memoir author creates peaceful mood He achieves using blunt voice unusual punctuationThe author s voice blunt example describes house simple house numerous times memoir He tells reader enough simple home almost conflict memoir This gives reader sense peace never leaves reader hanging wondering somethingTo help author uses lots unusual punctuation Parenthesis used five times writing well five words dashes This punctuation used give extra information like age twentyoneyearold Rawedia Maria Passionate Cuban music Which I adore day When author gives extra information gives reader sense peace makes feel home topic memoir", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 4.0", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances. Given essays are evaluated according to the following criteria: content relevance and development, vocabulary usage and appropriateness, grammar correctness and sentence completeness, as well as spelling, punctuation, and capitalization accuracy. Do not change any of the instructions above. Append-only rules below define how to compute the single numeric score. Scoring rubric (four dimensions, each 0–25, total 0–100): Content (0–25): 25=all required/relevant items fully covered with detailed support; 20=most relevant items covered with some detail; 15=some relevant items covered with limited development; 10=few relevant items with minimal development; 5=mostly off-topic; 0=no relevant content. Vocabulary (0–25): 25=excellent appropriate range, uses ≥10 target words if a list is provided; 20=good, 8–9 words; 15=adequate but repetitive, 5–7 words; 10=limited with some misuse, 3–4 words; 5=very limited, 1–2 words; 0=inappropriate/0 words. If no target list, ignore numeric counts and judge appropriateness/range. Grammar (0–25): 25=all sentences complete, target structures correct, 0–3 mistakes; 20=most sentences complete, 4–5 mistakes; 15=some incomplete sentences, 6–7 mistakes; 10=several incomplete, 8–9 mistakes; 5=many incomplete, 10–12 mistakes; 0=most incomplete, >12 mistakes. If no target structures given, judge accuracy/complexity only. Spelling/Punctuation/Capitalization (0–25): 25=0–3 errors; 20=4–5; 15=6–7; 10=8–9; 5=10–12; 0=>12. Computation: (1) assign each dimension a banded score (0,5,10,15,20,25); (2) sum for Total_100; (3) convert to 0–5 integer overall by rounding Total_100/20 (clamp 0–5 if needed); (4) output exactly one line in the required format with that integer. Edge cases: empty/off-topic essays → Content=0; ignore absent vocab/structure targets; count each unique error, repeated typos count each time; if borderline between bands, choose the stricter (lower). Remember: you must not output anything except the single required line and integer per the original instruction.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Patience waiting thing Like say new shoes becoming two weeks instead paceing around worrying time walk around like honnel For example hunting sit wait deer come If inpatient would go look Sometimes lot people got inpatient something become mean Being patient understanding taking long time something You herdteif dont come come supposed This one tim I appointment mom I wait five oclock And never got mad little board This one time friend mine waiting dad didnt come home", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 1.0", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances. Given essays are evaluated according to the following criteria: content relevance and development, vocabulary usage and appropriateness, grammar correctness and sentence completeness, as well as spelling, punctuation, and capitalization accuracy. Do not change any of the instructions above. Append-only rules below define how to compute the single numeric score. Scoring rubric (four dimensions, each 0–25, total 0–100): Content (0–25): 25=all required/relevant items fully covered with detailed support; 20=most relevant items covered with some detail; 15=some relevant items covered with limited development; 10=few relevant items with minimal development; 5=mostly off-topic; 0=no relevant content. Vocabulary (0–25): 25=excellent appropriate range, uses ≥10 target words if a list is provided; 20=good, 8–9 words; 15=adequate but repetitive, 5–7 words; 10=limited with some misuse, 3–4 words; 5=very limited, 1–2 words; 0=inappropriate/0 words. If no target list, ignore numeric counts and judge appropriateness/range. Grammar (0–25): 25=all sentences complete, target structures correct, 0–3 mistakes; 20=most sentences complete, 4–5 mistakes; 15=some incomplete sentences, 6–7 mistakes; 10=several incomplete, 8–9 mistakes; 5=many incomplete, 10–12 mistakes; 0=most incomplete, >12 mistakes. If no target structures given, judge accuracy/complexity only. Spelling/Punctuation/Capitalization (0–25): 25=0–3 errors; 20=4–5; 15=6–7; 10=8–9; 5=10–12; 0=>12. Computation: (1) assign each dimension a banded score (0,5,10,15,20,25); (2) sum for Total_100; (3) convert to 0–5 integer overall by rounding Total_100/20 (clamp 0–5 if needed); (4) output exactly one line in the required format with that integer. Edge cases: empty/off-topic essays → Content=0; ignore absent vocab/structure targets; count each unique error, repeated typos count each time; if borderline between bands, choose the stricter (lower). Remember: you must not output anything except the single required line and integer per the original instruction.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "The Empire State Building started huge skyskraper Then Al Smith get competitive put crew full work The crew many obsticles fufil First modify strengthen building s steel frame costing sixty thousand dollars Second men made shiny glass chromenickle stainless steel tower illuminated inside next add four wings shiny aluminum rise conical roof housing mooring arm Fourth crew add stairs elevators accomidate blimps passengers And lastly would add couple observation rooms floors Smith s men worked hard came many obsticles attempting allow dirigibles dock Empire State Building", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 2.0", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances. Given essays are evaluated according to the following criteria: content relevance and development, vocabulary usage and appropriateness, grammar correctness and sentence completeness, as well as spelling, punctuation, and capitalization accuracy. Do not change any of the instructions above. Append-only rules below define how to compute the single numeric score. Scoring rubric (four dimensions, each 0–25, total 0–100): Content (0–25): 25=all required/relevant items fully covered with detailed support; 20=most relevant items covered with some detail; 15=some relevant items covered with limited development; 10=few relevant items with minimal development; 5=mostly off-topic; 0=no relevant content. Vocabulary (0–25): 25=excellent appropriate range, uses ≥10 target words if a list is provided; 20=good, 8–9 words; 15=adequate but repetitive, 5–7 words; 10=limited with some misuse, 3–4 words; 5=very limited, 1–2 words; 0=inappropriate/0 words. If no target list, ignore numeric counts and judge appropriateness/range. Grammar (0–25): 25=all sentences complete, target structures correct, 0–3 mistakes; 20=most sentences complete, 4–5 mistakes; 15=some incomplete sentences, 6–7 mistakes; 10=several incomplete, 8–9 mistakes; 5=many incomplete, 10–12 mistakes; 0=most incomplete, >12 mistakes. If no target structures given, judge accuracy/complexity only. Spelling/Punctuation/Capitalization (0–25): 25=0–3 errors; 20=4–5; 15=6–7; 10=8–9; 5=10–12; 0=>12. Computation: (1) assign each dimension a banded score (0,5,10,15,20,25); (2) sum for Total_100; (3) convert to 0–5 integer overall by rounding Total_100/20 (clamp 0–5 if needed); (4) output exactly one line in the required format with that integer. Edge cases: empty/off-topic essays → Content=0; ignore absent vocab/structure targets; count each unique error, repeated typos count each time; if borderline between bands, choose the stricter (lower). Remember: you must not output anything except the single required line and integer per the original instruction.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "In recent years, there has been a significant increase in the number of people turning to cosmetic surgery. This phenomenon is caused by various reasons and it has stirred up many heated arguments on whether cosmetic surgery is a positive or negative trend. Personally, I see myself siding with the former. People’s recent preference for cosmetic surgery is said to stem from a number of factors. To begin with, the higher demand for plastic surgery is due to the fact that nowadays, people seem to care more about their physical appearance than ever before, as such, they develop a desire to look more attractive. Therefore, when this mindset is taken into consideration, it is not difficult to explain why there is a rapid growth in the number of people undertaking plastic operations. In addition, the incredible and meteoric development of technology in recent times further contributes to the widespread use of cosmetic procedures. The utilization of highly advanced machinery undoubtedly results in increased efficiency, quality, as well as safety, allowing patients to put more trust in the process. In my opinion, an individual's wish to become more beautiful is not something that should be criticized or ridiculed owning thank to the fact that an attractive and pleasing physical appearance can be greatly beneficial, such as remarkably boosting a person’s confidence and self-esteem, or improving one’s sense of happiness. Consequently, I am convinced cosmetic surgery is a viable method for those who want to refine their looks. Nevertheless, it is unwise to abuse plastic surgery, as overusing this method can lead to various health issues. When an individual undertakes a plethora of operations, an exceedingly large quantity of risks will become apparent, these consequences include blood loss, organ damage or even more horrifying, death. In conclusion, in recent times, cosmetic surgery has greatly soared in popularity, mostly thanks to the fact people are becoming more and more conscious of their outward appearance. In my point of view, the fact that people can have their ideal appearance through cosmetic operations is a positive development, though it would be completely inappropriate to heavily overuse it.", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 4.0", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances. Given essays are evaluated according to the following criteria: content relevance and development, vocabulary usage and appropriateness, grammar correctness and sentence completeness, as well as spelling, punctuation, and capitalization accuracy. Do not change any of the instructions above. Append-only rules below define how to compute the single numeric score. Scoring rubric (four dimensions, each 0–25, total 0–100): Content (0–25): 25=all required/relevant items fully covered with detailed support; 20=most relevant items covered with some detail; 15=some relevant items covered with limited development; 10=few relevant items with minimal development; 5=mostly off-topic; 0=no relevant content. Vocabulary (0–25): 25=excellent appropriate range, uses ≥10 target words if a list is provided; 20=good, 8–9 words; 15=adequate but repetitive, 5–7 words; 10=limited with some misuse, 3–4 words; 5=very limited, 1–2 words; 0=inappropriate/0 words. If no target list, ignore numeric counts and judge appropriateness/range. Grammar (0–25): 25=all sentences complete, target structures correct, 0–3 mistakes; 20=most sentences complete, 4–5 mistakes; 15=some incomplete sentences, 6–7 mistakes; 10=several incomplete, 8–9 mistakes; 5=many incomplete, 10–12 mistakes; 0=most incomplete, >12 mistakes. If no target structures given, judge accuracy/complexity only. Spelling/Punctuation/Capitalization (0–25): 25=0–3 errors; 20=4–5; 15=6–7; 10=8–9; 5=10–12; 0=>12. Computation: (1) assign each dimension a banded score (0,5,10,15,20,25); (2) sum for Total_100; (3) convert to 0–5 integer overall by rounding Total_100/20 (clamp 0–5 if needed); (4) output exactly one line in the required format with that integer. Edge cases: empty/off-topic essays → Content=0; ignore absent vocab/structure targets; count each unique error, repeated typos count each time; if borderline between bands, choose the stricter (lower). Remember: you must not output anything except the single required line and integer per the original instruction.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Looking for something to do and deals with animals and military that you and your friend can sign up for? You should try UNRRA which means United Nations Relief and Rehabilition Administration. The UNRRA hired \" Seagoing Cowboys\" to take care of the horses,Young cows,and mules that are shipped overseas. My friend and I signed up for it we had a fun time playing games when the animals were unloaded. We took care of the animal's in the ship that was going overseas. In August 1945, We recevided orders to report to New Orleans. We arrived on Ausust 14, the day the Pacific War ended, My friend Don and I got seaman's paper's and boared the SS Charles W. Wooster and headed for Greece with 335 horses and enough hay and nuts to keep them all alive. We took about two weeks to cross the Atlanitc Ocean from the eastern coast of United States and a month, But during these weeks and month we did a lot of stuff. You would have a benefit of seeing Europe and China , But seeing Acropoils in Greece is special.We also did fun stuff more fun stuff when the animals were unloaded. We play baseball and volleyball in empty hold's that animals lived in. We played table tennis, fencing, boxing, reading, whitttling and games.If your on the ship and sign up and are suposed to be drafted to the army they might let you be a seacowboy instead. This is why you should join the UNRRA. It will keep u working and having fun at the same time. This will also make you aware of other peoples needs. Sign up for the UNRRA today. Also your awareness will stay with you forever and always. Help out the animals and have fun. You can even be a lookout for the ship watching over the animals when everyone else goes to sleep, But just to warn you dont get a broken rib then you cant work for a few days.It'll open up a new world for you it did to me. But being a Seagoing Cowboy is much more than an adventure for you and me, Its a grateful opportunity for all boys who want to be a Seagoing Cowboy. Think about it you'll probaly like it.", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 3.0", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances. Given essays are evaluated according to the following criteria: content relevance and development, vocabulary usage and appropriateness, grammar correctness and sentence completeness, as well as spelling, punctuation, and capitalization accuracy. Do not change any of the instructions above. Append-only rules below define how to compute the single numeric score. Scoring rubric (four dimensions, each 0–25, total 0–100): Content (0–25): 25=all required/relevant items fully covered with detailed support; 20=most relevant items covered with some detail; 15=some relevant items covered with limited development; 10=few relevant items with minimal development; 5=mostly off-topic; 0=no relevant content. Vocabulary (0–25): 25=excellent appropriate range, uses ≥10 target words if a list is provided; 20=good, 8–9 words; 15=adequate but repetitive, 5–7 words; 10=limited with some misuse, 3–4 words; 5=very limited, 1–2 words; 0=inappropriate/0 words. If no target list, ignore numeric counts and judge appropriateness/range. Grammar (0–25): 25=all sentences complete, target structures correct, 0–3 mistakes; 20=most sentences complete, 4–5 mistakes; 15=some incomplete sentences, 6–7 mistakes; 10=several incomplete, 8–9 mistakes; 5=many incomplete, 10–12 mistakes; 0=most incomplete, >12 mistakes. If no target structures given, judge accuracy/complexity only. Spelling/Punctuation/Capitalization (0–25): 25=0–3 errors; 20=4–5; 15=6–7; 10=8–9; 5=10–12; 0=>12. Computation: (1) assign each dimension a banded score (0,5,10,15,20,25); (2) sum for Total_100; (3) convert to 0–5 integer overall by rounding Total_100/20 (clamp 0–5 if needed); (4) output exactly one line in the required format with that integer. Edge cases: empty/off-topic essays → Content=0; ignore absent vocab/structure targets; count each unique error, repeated typos count each time; if borderline between bands, choose the stricter (lower). Remember: you must not output anything except the single required line and integer per the original instruction.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "To concern Computers great source technology many people spend much time People nt get see outside world busy computers use find things play games outside fresh air Computers people spend much time instead outdoor experience exercising talk bonding family friends First people nt enjoy nature much enjoy computers When re stuck side school work nt get go outside see natural beauty nature get take minutes go enjoy wilderness You nt go outside every day feels good get explore world Expecially little break alone nature get away lose stress Some say enjoy nature explore new places online yes would nt want firsthand You nt get real experience looking pictures You explore In nature always thing new Secondly computer nt anything body need go exercise Fresh air good Spending time computer nt spend time family friends Family important thing life get older time family get less less You also see friends school work everyday nt really get sit catch Online programs chat friends family would nt want see personaly especially nt see everyweek It s better experience made many moments Just going far even going run give time loved ones In conclusion people spend much time computers They nt get experience outside world wonders nature The computers less exercise get less fresh air Family friends greatest things life dont get bond Computers good using spread sheets typing essays nt good spend time mailing missing adventures life venture", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 4.0", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances. Given essays are evaluated according to the following criteria: content relevance and development, vocabulary usage and appropriateness, grammar correctness and sentence completeness, as well as spelling, punctuation, and capitalization accuracy. Do not change any of the instructions above. Append-only rules below define how to compute the single numeric score. Scoring rubric (four dimensions, each 0–25, total 0–100): Content (0–25): 25=all required/relevant items fully covered with detailed support; 20=most relevant items covered with some detail; 15=some relevant items covered with limited development; 10=few relevant items with minimal development; 5=mostly off-topic; 0=no relevant content. Vocabulary (0–25): 25=excellent appropriate range, uses ≥10 target words if a list is provided; 20=good, 8–9 words; 15=adequate but repetitive, 5–7 words; 10=limited with some misuse, 3–4 words; 5=very limited, 1–2 words; 0=inappropriate/0 words. If no target list, ignore numeric counts and judge appropriateness/range. Grammar (0–25): 25=all sentences complete, target structures correct, 0–3 mistakes; 20=most sentences complete, 4–5 mistakes; 15=some incomplete sentences, 6–7 mistakes; 10=several incomplete, 8–9 mistakes; 5=many incomplete, 10–12 mistakes; 0=most incomplete, >12 mistakes. If no target structures given, judge accuracy/complexity only. Spelling/Punctuation/Capitalization (0–25): 25=0–3 errors; 20=4–5; 15=6–7; 10=8–9; 5=10–12; 0=>12. Computation: (1) assign each dimension a banded score (0,5,10,15,20,25); (2) sum for Total_100; (3) convert to 0–5 integer overall by rounding Total_100/20 (clamp 0–5 if needed); (4) output exactly one line in the required format with that integer. Edge cases: empty/off-topic essays → Content=0; ignore absent vocab/structure targets; count each unique error, repeated typos count each time; if borderline between bands, choose the stricter (lower). Remember: you must not output anything except the single required line and integer per the original instruction.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Driverless cars are beneficial to today's society as they present a promising future of safety, while engaging the human driver so that there can still be some control over this manmade object powered by 0's and 1's. Not only do they provide in such criteria but they also are ecofriendly for the environment, and more convenient, offering \"far more flexibility than a bus\", to where we can spend less on fuel. Driverless cars are the innovative inspiration we need to progress in, in order to better the safety globally on the roads and in traffic. So far with progress, the following advancements have been established over the span of many decades: sensors at the wheels to create antilock brakes, which over several years have achieved a skill to respond to the danger of potentially hazarous sways a car can produce; this results in the car automatically reacting with \"far better control than a human driver could manage alone\". This is just an example of how bettering driverless cars research can be. Other instruments that help better driving habits can automatically drive themselves until there is a demand for human assistance, for example if one was backing out into an object or experiencing heavy traffic. An AI, as of this moment, is unable to resolve such dilemmas on their own. However, manufacturers plan to install cameras into vehicles to monitor the driver's attention towards the road to prevent any human error as the car would alert when focus is taken off. Safety, with autonomous cars would be a priority and would benefit and definitely cut down on the number of car accidents significantly. The prevolent need these cars have to require a human driver does not take away from the fact that driverless cars are an amazing invention we should continually experiment with. In actuality, it allows for human engagement to occur, as there are some things that AI may be unable to do, giving the human a chance to have control over their technology. Human engagement is actually beneficial for drivers to aleviate symptoms of boredom and the prompt of taking control of the wheel will not be an inconvenience or abrupt to any driver as manufacturers plan to incorporate displays to show whether or whether not the driver should have control. As referencing from the article, \"the in-car system is actually a safety feature, and safety is a big concern.\" Being mindful of the environment has been a primary issue over the last several decades. With autonomous cars, there is potential that there would be cars that utilize less fuel than a standalone taxi, and less oil equals less pollution and products relating. And not to mention, in crisises today where there is ongoing disphoria on where we mainly get our fuel, it is in the best interests economy-wise as well to spend less on the oil industry. To clarify, not only does it help the natural aspect in today's society, it also aids the economic aspect. To conclude, autonomous cars present a strong ideal future if further research is initiated. Countless accidents will be prevented with these cars, and with these cars they would inspire us to achieve a better grasp of safety in our society. These cars will be promoting better economy and a better alternative to regular cars who spend infinite amounts of dollars on large intake of fuel. A long road is ahead for improvements but noticing that we are progressing very quickly in recent decades, it is foreseen that mark will eventually be reached and all problems currently and further would resolve.", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 4.0", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances. Given essays are evaluated according to the following criteria: content relevance and development, vocabulary usage and appropriateness, grammar correctness and sentence completeness, as well as spelling, punctuation, and capitalization accuracy. Do not change any of the instructions above. Append-only rules below define how to compute the single numeric score. Scoring rubric (four dimensions, each 0–25, total 0–100): Content (0–25): 25=all required/relevant items fully covered with detailed support; 20=most relevant items covered with some detail; 15=some relevant items covered with limited development; 10=few relevant items with minimal development; 5=mostly off-topic; 0=no relevant content. Vocabulary (0–25): 25=excellent appropriate range, uses ≥10 target words if a list is provided; 20=good, 8–9 words; 15=adequate but repetitive, 5–7 words; 10=limited with some misuse, 3–4 words; 5=very limited, 1–2 words; 0=inappropriate/0 words. If no target list, ignore numeric counts and judge appropriateness/range. Grammar (0–25): 25=all sentences complete, target structures correct, 0–3 mistakes; 20=most sentences complete, 4–5 mistakes; 15=some incomplete sentences, 6–7 mistakes; 10=several incomplete, 8–9 mistakes; 5=many incomplete, 10–12 mistakes; 0=most incomplete, >12 mistakes. If no target structures given, judge accuracy/complexity only. Spelling/Punctuation/Capitalization (0–25): 25=0–3 errors; 20=4–5; 15=6–7; 10=8–9; 5=10–12; 0=>12. Computation: (1) assign each dimension a banded score (0,5,10,15,20,25); (2) sum for Total_100; (3) convert to 0–5 integer overall by rounding Total_100/20 (clamp 0–5 if needed); (4) output exactly one line in the required format with that integer. Edge cases: empty/off-topic essays → Content=0; ignore absent vocab/structure targets; count each unique error, repeated typos count each time; if borderline between bands, choose the stricter (lower). Remember: you must not output anything except the single required line and integer per the original instruction.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "In the article that I just read the author wrote about how venus is very similar to earh and how humans can maybe one day live on that planet. The author talks about the time NASA has tried putting a robot up there but has fialed and how the technolgy back then could have laste a longer time but had lacked the information. And how technology has advanced and is more powerful but is more fragile. And the article points out a good statement on how us as a human race should take those chances of risk and discover new places. Venus is the very similar to earth in the article it says \" venus has a surface of rocky sediment and includes familiar features such as valleys, mountains, and craters\". And they say that venus problably at one point had oceans and could've had various forms of life. In paragraph eight the author says \" insight to be gained on the planet itself but also because human curiosity will likely lead us into many equally intimidating endeavors\". Meaning that if we don't oush oursleves to go further we might not know what our limit is. And we wouldn't know what venus would be like or other planets. I think that this article really supports his idea on pushing forward and discovering new places.", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 1.0", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances. Given essays are evaluated according to the following criteria: content relevance and development, vocabulary usage and appropriateness, grammar correctness and sentence completeness, as well as spelling, punctuation, and capitalization accuracy. Do not change any of the instructions above. Append-only rules below define how to compute the single numeric score. Scoring rubric (four dimensions, each 0–25, total 0–100): Content (0–25): 25=all required/relevant items fully covered with detailed support; 20=most relevant items covered with some detail; 15=some relevant items covered with limited development; 10=few relevant items with minimal development; 5=mostly off-topic; 0=no relevant content. Vocabulary (0–25): 25=excellent appropriate range, uses ≥10 target words if a list is provided; 20=good, 8–9 words; 15=adequate but repetitive, 5–7 words; 10=limited with some misuse, 3–4 words; 5=very limited, 1–2 words; 0=inappropriate/0 words. If no target list, ignore numeric counts and judge appropriateness/range. Grammar (0–25): 25=all sentences complete, target structures correct, 0–3 mistakes; 20=most sentences complete, 4–5 mistakes; 15=some incomplete sentences, 6–7 mistakes; 10=several incomplete, 8–9 mistakes; 5=many incomplete, 10–12 mistakes; 0=most incomplete, >12 mistakes. If no target structures given, judge accuracy/complexity only. Spelling/Punctuation/Capitalization (0–25): 25=0–3 errors; 20=4–5; 15=6–7; 10=8–9; 5=10–12; 0=>12. Computation: (1) assign each dimension a banded score (0,5,10,15,20,25); (2) sum for Total_100; (3) convert to 0–5 integer overall by rounding Total_100/20 (clamp 0–5 if needed); (4) output exactly one line in the required format with that integer. Edge cases: empty/off-topic essays → Content=0; ignore absent vocab/structure targets; count each unique error, repeated typos count each time; if borderline between bands, choose the stricter (lower). Remember: you must not output anything except the single required line and integer per the original instruction.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "In the first story it is talking about how cars aren't really drivin near the French and Swiss. Though theyallow the cars they just allow them to be parked in only two places: the car-owner buys a space or it to, $40,000 along with the home, or large garages at the edge of the development. David Goldberg said \" All of our development since World War ll has been centered on the car, and that will have to change.\" Paris, France has enforeced a partial driving ban to clear the air of the gobal city. Diesel fuel was blamed, since diesels make up 67 percent of vehicles in France, compared to a 53.3 percent average of diesel engines in the Western Europe. In Bogota, Colombia they ban cars altogether. they go rid of the roads and made them into sidwalks. Now that people have to walk to get to their final destination a lot of people now go to the parks and to the sports centers that they have there. President Obama's goals are to curb the United States ' greenhouse gas emissions will get a fortuitous assit from the incipient shift in American behavior. Obama said that if we Americans buy less cars then there would be less drivers lisenes each year and fewer driving altoether.", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 0.0", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances. Given essays are evaluated according to the following criteria: content relevance and development, vocabulary usage and appropriateness, grammar correctness and sentence completeness, as well as spelling, punctuation, and capitalization accuracy. Do not change any of the instructions above. Append-only rules below define how to compute the single numeric score. Scoring rubric (four dimensions, each 0–25, total 0–100): Content (0–25): 25=all required/relevant items fully covered with detailed support; 20=most relevant items covered with some detail; 15=some relevant items covered with limited development; 10=few relevant items with minimal development; 5=mostly off-topic; 0=no relevant content. Vocabulary (0–25): 25=excellent appropriate range, uses ≥10 target words if a list is provided; 20=good, 8–9 words; 15=adequate but repetitive, 5–7 words; 10=limited with some misuse, 3–4 words; 5=very limited, 1–2 words; 0=inappropriate/0 words. If no target list, ignore numeric counts and judge appropriateness/range. Grammar (0–25): 25=all sentences complete, target structures correct, 0–3 mistakes; 20=most sentences complete, 4–5 mistakes; 15=some incomplete sentences, 6–7 mistakes; 10=several incomplete, 8–9 mistakes; 5=many incomplete, 10–12 mistakes; 0=most incomplete, >12 mistakes. If no target structures given, judge accuracy/complexity only. Spelling/Punctuation/Capitalization (0–25): 25=0–3 errors; 20=4–5; 15=6–7; 10=8–9; 5=10–12; 0=>12. Computation: (1) assign each dimension a banded score (0,5,10,15,20,25); (2) sum for Total_100; (3) convert to 0–5 integer overall by rounding Total_100/20 (clamp 0–5 if needed); (4) output exactly one line in the required format with that integer. Edge cases: empty/off-topic essays → Content=0; ignore absent vocab/structure targets; count each unique error, repeated typos count each time; if borderline between bands, choose the stricter (lower). Remember: you must not output anything except the single required line and integer per the original instruction.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "ever felt like wasent enugh time day everything would like CAPS s feel every day CAPS find tireing screwed started got job sinc got job never time school CAPS hardly get rest CAPS greads dropping little little CAPS always tired falling asleep classes lazy work I would cut hours need much money get help mom much CAPS mom nt really much nothing really live So feel help much CAPS older brother would hade responsibility got hes girlfriend pragnet moved live hes early ageSo second oldest find responsibility take care mom I love mom much dad ill much see stays wealthyBecuse shes gone sure would without little brother pain back never dose anything help aroud house like help mom breings home grossuries anything like think going set streathI know mom wont like All needs stop lazy help mom Now back pertty good kid think anyways CAPS trubel maker dont get wrong right things could secssful kidI try kid times s boring cant becuse try feel like tryung hole different person CAPS loud hiper kid class clown class roomsLike pepole always asking plans galleage ever say dont think calleage smart ill lucky graduate CAPS trying bring grades back hard much othere stuff school like job seens winter spring s way means work going get alot busyer going work alot moreTo tell truth sure going With responsibility going one tired teen age boy CAPS pertty sure handl really try bestAll know need find better job thats less stressful tireing less days work get payed better moneyLike jiffy lube someting anyting better working fast foods place", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 2.0", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances. Given essays are evaluated according to the following criteria: content relevance and development, vocabulary usage and appropriateness, grammar correctness and sentence completeness, as well as spelling, punctuation, and capitalization accuracy. Do not change any of the instructions above. Append-only rules below define how to compute the single numeric score. Scoring rubric (four dimensions, each 0–25, total 0–100): Content (0–25): 25=all required/relevant items fully covered with detailed support; 20=most relevant items covered with some detail; 15=some relevant items covered with limited development; 10=few relevant items with minimal development; 5=mostly off-topic; 0=no relevant content. Vocabulary (0–25): 25=excellent appropriate range, uses ≥10 target words if a list is provided; 20=good, 8–9 words; 15=adequate but repetitive, 5–7 words; 10=limited with some misuse, 3–4 words; 5=very limited, 1–2 words; 0=inappropriate/0 words. If no target list, ignore numeric counts and judge appropriateness/range. Grammar (0–25): 25=all sentences complete, target structures correct, 0–3 mistakes; 20=most sentences complete, 4–5 mistakes; 15=some incomplete sentences, 6–7 mistakes; 10=several incomplete, 8–9 mistakes; 5=many incomplete, 10–12 mistakes; 0=most incomplete, >12 mistakes. If no target structures given, judge accuracy/complexity only. Spelling/Punctuation/Capitalization (0–25): 25=0–3 errors; 20=4–5; 15=6–7; 10=8–9; 5=10–12; 0=>12. Computation: (1) assign each dimension a banded score (0,5,10,15,20,25); (2) sum for Total_100; (3) convert to 0–5 integer overall by rounding Total_100/20 (clamp 0–5 if needed); (4) output exactly one line in the required format with that integer. Edge cases: empty/off-topic essays → Content=0; ignore absent vocab/structure targets; count each unique error, repeated typos count each time; if borderline between bands, choose the stricter (lower). Remember: you must not output anything except the single required line and integer per the original instruction.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "The provided bar chart presents the mobile phone revenue of market-dominated brands including Samsung, Apple, Nokia, LG and ZTE between 2009 and 2013. Overall, the mobile phone market was mainly dominated Samsung and Nokia, whereas Apple's sales witnessed a significant surge in these periods. To delve deeper, in 2009, Nokia was the biggest brand that gain the most revenue about $440mn, followed by Samsung $230mn and LG $120mn, respectively. Meanwhile, Apple was the least market share with about $25mn of sales. However, we can see that Samsung got the great performance and taken down the Nokia to be the biggest brand in 2013, they got $450mn of revenue compared to $250mn by Nokia. Apple was the 3rd rank which gain sales exceed the LG also, $150mn and $80mb, respetively. Note that ZTE revenue was steadily in the periods about $50mn - $60mn in the periods.", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 3.0", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances. Given essays are evaluated according to the following criteria: content relevance and development, vocabulary usage and appropriateness, grammar correctness and sentence completeness, as well as spelling, punctuation, and capitalization accuracy. Do not change any of the instructions above. Append-only rules below define how to compute the single numeric score. Scoring rubric (four dimensions, each 0–25, total 0–100): Content (0–25): 25=all required/relevant items fully covered with detailed support; 20=most relevant items covered with some detail; 15=some relevant items covered with limited development; 10=few relevant items with minimal development; 5=mostly off-topic; 0=no relevant content. Vocabulary (0–25): 25=excellent appropriate range, uses ≥10 target words if a list is provided; 20=good, 8–9 words; 15=adequate but repetitive, 5–7 words; 10=limited with some misuse, 3–4 words; 5=very limited, 1–2 words; 0=inappropriate/0 words. If no target list, ignore numeric counts and judge appropriateness/range. Grammar (0–25): 25=all sentences complete, target structures correct, 0–3 mistakes; 20=most sentences complete, 4–5 mistakes; 15=some incomplete sentences, 6–7 mistakes; 10=several incomplete, 8–9 mistakes; 5=many incomplete, 10–12 mistakes; 0=most incomplete, >12 mistakes. If no target structures given, judge accuracy/complexity only. Spelling/Punctuation/Capitalization (0–25): 25=0–3 errors; 20=4–5; 15=6–7; 10=8–9; 5=10–12; 0=>12. Computation: (1) assign each dimension a banded score (0,5,10,15,20,25); (2) sum for Total_100; (3) convert to 0–5 integer overall by rounding Total_100/20 (clamp 0–5 if needed); (4) output exactly one line in the required format with that integer. Edge cases: empty/off-topic essays → Content=0; ignore absent vocab/structure targets; count each unique error, repeated typos count each time; if borderline between bands, choose the stricter (lower). Remember: you must not output anything except the single required line and integer per the original instruction.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Dear Senator, I believe the way the American Goverment is run is injust and outdated. I believe this because the way we as America elect a new president is unfair to many people. The reason I say that is the electoral college is unjust is 538 people should'nt be voting for more than a billion people. The way I believe our new President should be selected is by a majority rule, which ever Canidate has the most votes should win not based off people who vote for our state we live in. Even though the majority of the time the representative from his or her state votes depending on the popular vote from there state, but the reason im saying this is that he or she has the power to pick whatever he or she wants. Also another reason would be that the people only vote for a slate whether it be democratic or republic people in the slate can just change there mind and pick a differnt side. I would understand this system before our time but now we have so much technology people can vote from anywhere they dont have to go put a paper in a box anymore. The system is outdated and unfair to many people. Some people would argue against the point that the representative votes depending on his or her states popular vote, but there has been and will be more of the representative picking against his state if it stays like this. If this actually ever does get to you I hope you take into consideration some of the points I have given you. Like I said before the Electoral College system is outdated and unfair.", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 1.0", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances. Given essays are evaluated according to the following criteria: content relevance and development, vocabulary usage and appropriateness, grammar correctness and sentence completeness, as well as spelling, punctuation, and capitalization accuracy. Do not change any of the instructions above. Append-only rules below define how to compute the single numeric score. Scoring rubric (four dimensions, each 0–25, total 0–100): Content (0–25): 25=all required/relevant items fully covered with detailed support; 20=most relevant items covered with some detail; 15=some relevant items covered with limited development; 10=few relevant items with minimal development; 5=mostly off-topic; 0=no relevant content. Vocabulary (0–25): 25=excellent appropriate range, uses ≥10 target words if a list is provided; 20=good, 8–9 words; 15=adequate but repetitive, 5–7 words; 10=limited with some misuse, 3–4 words; 5=very limited, 1–2 words; 0=inappropriate/0 words. If no target list, ignore numeric counts and judge appropriateness/range. Grammar (0–25): 25=all sentences complete, target structures correct, 0–3 mistakes; 20=most sentences complete, 4–5 mistakes; 15=some incomplete sentences, 6–7 mistakes; 10=several incomplete, 8–9 mistakes; 5=many incomplete, 10–12 mistakes; 0=most incomplete, >12 mistakes. If no target structures given, judge accuracy/complexity only. Spelling/Punctuation/Capitalization (0–25): 25=0–3 errors; 20=4–5; 15=6–7; 10=8–9; 5=10–12; 0=>12. Computation: (1) assign each dimension a banded score (0,5,10,15,20,25); (2) sum for Total_100; (3) convert to 0–5 integer overall by rounding Total_100/20 (clamp 0–5 if needed); (4) output exactly one line in the required format with that integer. Edge cases: empty/off-topic essays → Content=0; ignore absent vocab/structure targets; count each unique error, repeated typos count each time; if borderline between bands, choose the stricter (lower). Remember: you must not output anything except the single required line and integer per the original instruction.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "The \"face\" on mars is not a face at all, although it may look like a face it is not. The \"face is very similar to some land formations on earth like a butte or a mesa. The \"eyes\" of the face and the \"nose\" of the face are just shadow on the rocks. The day that the picture of the \"face\" was taken it was cloudy and may have crated the shadows, or there are rocks that are higher up that created the shadows. It is stated in the article that the \"face\" does not actually have eyes or a nose, that it was just the shadows that made them. scientists proved that it was not a face by takeing another more clear image of the \"face\", showing that it was a land formation and not an alien. They also proved that there were no alien pyramids, shacks, or any alien artifacts near the rock formation. In conclusion the \"face\" is not an alien artifact or a giant head. the \"face\" is only a large land formation like a mesa or a butte like we have on earth.", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 1.0", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances. Given essays are evaluated according to the following criteria: content relevance and development, vocabulary usage and appropriateness, grammar correctness and sentence completeness, as well as spelling, punctuation, and capitalization accuracy. Do not change any of the instructions above. Append-only rules below define how to compute the single numeric score. Scoring rubric (four dimensions, each 0–25, total 0–100): Content (0–25): 25=all required/relevant items fully covered with detailed support; 20=most relevant items covered with some detail; 15=some relevant items covered with limited development; 10=few relevant items with minimal development; 5=mostly off-topic; 0=no relevant content. Vocabulary (0–25): 25=excellent appropriate range, uses ≥10 target words if a list is provided; 20=good, 8–9 words; 15=adequate but repetitive, 5–7 words; 10=limited with some misuse, 3–4 words; 5=very limited, 1–2 words; 0=inappropriate/0 words. If no target list, ignore numeric counts and judge appropriateness/range. Grammar (0–25): 25=all sentences complete, target structures correct, 0–3 mistakes; 20=most sentences complete, 4–5 mistakes; 15=some incomplete sentences, 6–7 mistakes; 10=several incomplete, 8–9 mistakes; 5=many incomplete, 10–12 mistakes; 0=most incomplete, >12 mistakes. If no target structures given, judge accuracy/complexity only. Spelling/Punctuation/Capitalization (0–25): 25=0–3 errors; 20=4–5; 15=6–7; 10=8–9; 5=10–12; 0=>12. Computation: (1) assign each dimension a banded score (0,5,10,15,20,25); (2) sum for Total_100; (3) convert to 0–5 integer overall by rounding Total_100/20 (clamp 0–5 if needed); (4) output exactly one line in the required format with that integer. Edge cases: empty/off-topic essays → Content=0; ignore absent vocab/structure targets; count each unique error, repeated typos count each time; if borderline between bands, choose the stricter (lower). Remember: you must not output anything except the single required line and integer per the original instruction.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Using the Facial Action Coding Sytem is a great idea to have in a classroom. When a teacher is teaching sometimes kids don't understand what they are teaching about, but if they have an asasignment on the computer and they use the system it will help a lot of teachers out. If the student gets confused on a problem and the computer can read that they are confused and it notifys the teacher the teacher can go over and help the student. In the classroom there are some students who don't like speaking out or ask questions because they are shy or don't feel smart because they have to ask questions but in this way they won't have to deal with any of that because the computer reads that they are having trouble. In the article it says that Dr. Huang could read how Mona Lisa was feeling just by a computer telling him. This system could also be a way to teach kids how to read how people are really feeling because in today's world no one can fully read how people are feeling. In paragraph 6 Dr. Huang says \" most human communication is nonverbal, including emotional communication, so computers need to understand that too\" computers should understand that so they can read how people are feeling to make things easier. The computers in todays society hare very good technology but i think this would make it better. In most schools nowadays the students already have lap tops so this would be a great idea. All schools should have this system. This system will help out students dramaticly. This system wont make them get out of there comfort zone to ask a teacher for help instead the teacher will come to them.", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 2.0", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances. Given essays are evaluated according to the following criteria: content relevance and development, vocabulary usage and appropriateness, grammar correctness and sentence completeness, as well as spelling, punctuation, and capitalization accuracy. Do not change any of the instructions above. Append-only rules below define how to compute the single numeric score. Scoring rubric (four dimensions, each 0–25, total 0–100): Content (0–25): 25=all required/relevant items fully covered with detailed support; 20=most relevant items covered with some detail; 15=some relevant items covered with limited development; 10=few relevant items with minimal development; 5=mostly off-topic; 0=no relevant content. Vocabulary (0–25): 25=excellent appropriate range, uses ≥10 target words if a list is provided; 20=good, 8–9 words; 15=adequate but repetitive, 5–7 words; 10=limited with some misuse, 3–4 words; 5=very limited, 1–2 words; 0=inappropriate/0 words. If no target list, ignore numeric counts and judge appropriateness/range. Grammar (0–25): 25=all sentences complete, target structures correct, 0–3 mistakes; 20=most sentences complete, 4–5 mistakes; 15=some incomplete sentences, 6–7 mistakes; 10=several incomplete, 8–9 mistakes; 5=many incomplete, 10–12 mistakes; 0=most incomplete, >12 mistakes. If no target structures given, judge accuracy/complexity only. Spelling/Punctuation/Capitalization (0–25): 25=0–3 errors; 20=4–5; 15=6–7; 10=8–9; 5=10–12; 0=>12. Computation: (1) assign each dimension a banded score (0,5,10,15,20,25); (2) sum for Total_100; (3) convert to 0–5 integer overall by rounding Total_100/20 (clamp 0–5 if needed); (4) output exactly one line in the required format with that integer. Edge cases: empty/off-topic essays → Content=0; ignore absent vocab/structure targets; count each unique error, repeated typos count each time; if borderline between bands, choose the stricter (lower). Remember: you must not output anything except the single required line and integer per the original instruction.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Libraries hold books magazines movies They hold history With doubt offensive material printed numerous pages spread thousands books magazines library holds Some find terrible I hand completly disagree Every book different story tell everyone comprehends content differently I think libraries nt take offensive material shelves What s really considered offensive This question would hard answer everyone different veiw different opinons different background Some would say violence drugs gangs sexual situations offensive While others consider religion beliefs traditions morals offensive With different veiws someone finds offensive library would almost completly clean shelves remove small porportion There s many sections library fiction children stories If area children books adult books ca nt one materials readers would find offensive Libraries could even mark book held something offensiveThis would settle many conflicts If reader chooses read book marked offensive content would right get upset Limiting libraries shelves unthinkable If someone got offended read could put book fast picked A public library public place many people go one person gets offended something read saw nt mean next person Bottom line book taking away someone could nt handle sad If I right remove book shelf work I abhor exactly right everyone else And books left shelf us everyone s veiw offensive material different eliminating would hard One person found book offensive s gone The library would pointless The shelves would empty loss many phenomenal books People get offended s life I nt think able take book away everyone one person s opinon", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 3.0", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances. Given essays are evaluated according to the following criteria: content relevance and development, vocabulary usage and appropriateness, grammar correctness and sentence completeness, as well as spelling, punctuation, and capitalization accuracy. Do not change any of the instructions above. Append-only rules below define how to compute the single numeric score. Scoring rubric (four dimensions, each 0–25, total 0–100): Content (0–25): 25=all required/relevant items fully covered with detailed support; 20=most relevant items covered with some detail; 15=some relevant items covered with limited development; 10=few relevant items with minimal development; 5=mostly off-topic; 0=no relevant content. Vocabulary (0–25): 25=excellent appropriate range, uses ≥10 target words if a list is provided; 20=good, 8–9 words; 15=adequate but repetitive, 5–7 words; 10=limited with some misuse, 3–4 words; 5=very limited, 1–2 words; 0=inappropriate/0 words. If no target list, ignore numeric counts and judge appropriateness/range. Grammar (0–25): 25=all sentences complete, target structures correct, 0–3 mistakes; 20=most sentences complete, 4–5 mistakes; 15=some incomplete sentences, 6–7 mistakes; 10=several incomplete, 8–9 mistakes; 5=many incomplete, 10–12 mistakes; 0=most incomplete, >12 mistakes. If no target structures given, judge accuracy/complexity only. Spelling/Punctuation/Capitalization (0–25): 25=0–3 errors; 20=4–5; 15=6–7; 10=8–9; 5=10–12; 0=>12. Computation: (1) assign each dimension a banded score (0,5,10,15,20,25); (2) sum for Total_100; (3) convert to 0–5 integer overall by rounding Total_100/20 (clamp 0–5 if needed); (4) output exactly one line in the required format with that integer. Edge cases: empty/off-topic essays → Content=0; ignore absent vocab/structure targets; count each unique error, repeated typos count each time; if borderline between bands, choose the stricter (lower). Remember: you must not output anything except the single required line and integer per the original instruction.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "There many obstacles builders went trying dock dirigibles top Empire State Building One exact would wind although would tying dirigible back wind would blow decide Which would affect building The stress dirigible s load wind pressure would transmitted way building s foundation nearly eleven hundred feet With discovery make changes building would cost money Other obstacles went actually able dock s law ca nt people The practical reason dirigibles could moor Empire State Building existing law airships flying low urban areas obstacles architects went trying dock dirigibles", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 4.0", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances. Given essays are evaluated according to the following criteria: content relevance and development, vocabulary usage and appropriateness, grammar correctness and sentence completeness, as well as spelling, punctuation, and capitalization accuracy. Do not change any of the instructions above. Append-only rules below define how to compute the single numeric score. Scoring rubric (four dimensions, each 0–25, total 0–100): Content (0–25): 25=all required/relevant items fully covered with detailed support; 20=most relevant items covered with some detail; 15=some relevant items covered with limited development; 10=few relevant items with minimal development; 5=mostly off-topic; 0=no relevant content. Vocabulary (0–25): 25=excellent appropriate range, uses ≥10 target words if a list is provided; 20=good, 8–9 words; 15=adequate but repetitive, 5–7 words; 10=limited with some misuse, 3–4 words; 5=very limited, 1–2 words; 0=inappropriate/0 words. If no target list, ignore numeric counts and judge appropriateness/range. Grammar (0–25): 25=all sentences complete, target structures correct, 0–3 mistakes; 20=most sentences complete, 4–5 mistakes; 15=some incomplete sentences, 6–7 mistakes; 10=several incomplete, 8–9 mistakes; 5=many incomplete, 10–12 mistakes; 0=most incomplete, >12 mistakes. If no target structures given, judge accuracy/complexity only. Spelling/Punctuation/Capitalization (0–25): 25=0–3 errors; 20=4–5; 15=6–7; 10=8–9; 5=10–12; 0=>12. Computation: (1) assign each dimension a banded score (0,5,10,15,20,25); (2) sum for Total_100; (3) convert to 0–5 integer overall by rounding Total_100/20 (clamp 0–5 if needed); (4) output exactly one line in the required format with that integer. Edge cases: empty/off-topic essays → Content=0; ignore absent vocab/structure targets; count each unique error, repeated typos count each time; if borderline between bands, choose the stricter (lower). Remember: you must not output anything except the single required line and integer per the original instruction.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "The terrain described essay add affect strugles cyclist For example author says their cars buildings sight adds affect really middle nowhere Also adds lot affect comes upon abandond juice factory thirsty puts stones mouth gather saliva Also finally finds water oldtimer asks knows best way go", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 3.0", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances. Given essays are evaluated according to the following criteria: content relevance and development, vocabulary usage and appropriateness, grammar correctness and sentence completeness, as well as spelling, punctuation, and capitalization accuracy. Do not change any of the instructions above. Append-only rules below define how to compute the single numeric score. Scoring rubric (four dimensions, each 0–25, total 0–100): Content (0–25): 25=all required/relevant items fully covered with detailed support; 20=most relevant items covered with some detail; 15=some relevant items covered with limited development; 10=few relevant items with minimal development; 5=mostly off-topic; 0=no relevant content. Vocabulary (0–25): 25=excellent appropriate range, uses ≥10 target words if a list is provided; 20=good, 8–9 words; 15=adequate but repetitive, 5–7 words; 10=limited with some misuse, 3–4 words; 5=very limited, 1–2 words; 0=inappropriate/0 words. If no target list, ignore numeric counts and judge appropriateness/range. Grammar (0–25): 25=all sentences complete, target structures correct, 0–3 mistakes; 20=most sentences complete, 4–5 mistakes; 15=some incomplete sentences, 6–7 mistakes; 10=several incomplete, 8–9 mistakes; 5=many incomplete, 10–12 mistakes; 0=most incomplete, >12 mistakes. If no target structures given, judge accuracy/complexity only. Spelling/Punctuation/Capitalization (0–25): 25=0–3 errors; 20=4–5; 15=6–7; 10=8–9; 5=10–12; 0=>12. Computation: (1) assign each dimension a banded score (0,5,10,15,20,25); (2) sum for Total_100; (3) convert to 0–5 integer overall by rounding Total_100/20 (clamp 0–5 if needed); (4) output exactly one line in the required format with that integer. Edge cases: empty/off-topic essays → Content=0; ignore absent vocab/structure targets; count each unique error, repeated typos count each time; if borderline between bands, choose the stricter (lower). Remember: you must not output anything except the single required line and integer per the original instruction.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Varias faetures setting affect journey mooble cyclist text The first feature setting affect cyclist desert He traveling high deserts California June making really thirsty He hitting water bottles pretty regularly because He later runs water becomes hopeless He becomes hopelee building establishments anywere sight Therefore water isnt place get water Another feature setting affects people gave directions They told abait shoutcut listened This everything left despair Another feature Gary Wilbers fish campThis lead sicocss finding water This affected mood hope In conlusio many features setting affected mood many ways", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 5.0", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances. Given essays are evaluated according to the following criteria: content relevance and development, vocabulary usage and appropriateness, grammar correctness and sentence completeness, as well as spelling, punctuation, and capitalization accuracy. Do not change any of the instructions above. Append-only rules below define how to compute the single numeric score. Scoring rubric (four dimensions, each 0–25, total 0–100): Content (0–25): 25=all required/relevant items fully covered with detailed support; 20=most relevant items covered with some detail; 15=some relevant items covered with limited development; 10=few relevant items with minimal development; 5=mostly off-topic; 0=no relevant content. Vocabulary (0–25): 25=excellent appropriate range, uses ≥10 target words if a list is provided; 20=good, 8–9 words; 15=adequate but repetitive, 5–7 words; 10=limited with some misuse, 3–4 words; 5=very limited, 1–2 words; 0=inappropriate/0 words. If no target list, ignore numeric counts and judge appropriateness/range. Grammar (0–25): 25=all sentences complete, target structures correct, 0–3 mistakes; 20=most sentences complete, 4–5 mistakes; 15=some incomplete sentences, 6–7 mistakes; 10=several incomplete, 8–9 mistakes; 5=many incomplete, 10–12 mistakes; 0=most incomplete, >12 mistakes. If no target structures given, judge accuracy/complexity only. Spelling/Punctuation/Capitalization (0–25): 25=0–3 errors; 20=4–5; 15=6–7; 10=8–9; 5=10–12; 0=>12. Computation: (1) assign each dimension a banded score (0,5,10,15,20,25); (2) sum for Total_100; (3) convert to 0–5 integer overall by rounding Total_100/20 (clamp 0–5 if needed); (4) output exactly one line in the required format with that integer. Edge cases: empty/off-topic essays → Content=0; ignore absent vocab/structure targets; count each unique error, repeated typos count each time; if borderline between bands, choose the stricter (lower). Remember: you must not output anything except the single required line and integer per the original instruction.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "The article \"A Cowboy Who Rode the Waves\" talks about a boy named Luck who recently graduated high school. Luck worked two part-time jobs in a grocery store and a bank, when Don Reist Luck's friend invited him to go to Europe on a cattle boat Luck could never said no, because he knew it was an opportunity of a lifetime. To help the European cuntires recover from World War 2,the United Nations Relief and Rehabilitation Administration hired \"Seagoing Cowboys\" to transport the horses,young cows,and mules Luck and Don signed up. Luck and Don received their ordes to repot to New Orleans, they arrived August 14,the day the Pacific War ended. They were headed for Greece with a cargo of 335 horses plus enough hay and oats to feed them. Luck had just turned eighteen before they arriving in Greece. By the time he was discharged in '47 Luke had made nine trips. To past the time on return trips they would play baseball, volleyball,table-tennis tournaments,fencing boxing ,reading whitting and games also helped to pass the time. In concluion, Luck had the most amazing two years of his life.", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 0.0", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances. Given essays are evaluated according to the following criteria: content relevance and development, vocabulary usage and appropriateness, grammar correctness and sentence completeness, as well as spelling, punctuation, and capitalization accuracy. Do not change any of the instructions above. Append-only rules below define how to compute the single numeric score. Scoring rubric (four dimensions, each 0–25, total 0–100): Content (0–25): 25=all required/relevant items fully covered with detailed support; 20=most relevant items covered with some detail; 15=some relevant items covered with limited development; 10=few relevant items with minimal development; 5=mostly off-topic; 0=no relevant content. Vocabulary (0–25): 25=excellent appropriate range, uses ≥10 target words if a list is provided; 20=good, 8–9 words; 15=adequate but repetitive, 5–7 words; 10=limited with some misuse, 3–4 words; 5=very limited, 1–2 words; 0=inappropriate/0 words. If no target list, ignore numeric counts and judge appropriateness/range. Grammar (0–25): 25=all sentences complete, target structures correct, 0–3 mistakes; 20=most sentences complete, 4–5 mistakes; 15=some incomplete sentences, 6–7 mistakes; 10=several incomplete, 8–9 mistakes; 5=many incomplete, 10–12 mistakes; 0=most incomplete, >12 mistakes. If no target structures given, judge accuracy/complexity only. Spelling/Punctuation/Capitalization (0–25): 25=0–3 errors; 20=4–5; 15=6–7; 10=8–9; 5=10–12; 0=>12. Computation: (1) assign each dimension a banded score (0,5,10,15,20,25); (2) sum for Total_100; (3) convert to 0–5 integer overall by rounding Total_100/20 (clamp 0–5 if needed); (4) output exactly one line in the required format with that integer. Edge cases: empty/off-topic essays → Content=0; ignore absent vocab/structure targets; count each unique error, repeated typos count each time; if borderline between bands, choose the stricter (lower). Remember: you must not output anything except the single required line and integer per the original instruction.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "The electoral college should be eliminated. It should be changed to popular vote for the presidential election. With the electoral college, people don't get to have the freedom to vote for who they want to be elected. Instead they vote for a slate of electors who in turn, elect the president for you. There are a few problems with this. One, the electors could end up not doing their job. They might refuse to vote for their party's candidate and end up voting for whomever they please. That could turn into a riot or just leave a lot of people very unhappy. The electors could also mess up their vote and end up voting for the wrong candidate. Say they are loyal to the president they are suppose to vote for, but then end up choking and voting for the opposing president. Further more, what if a state sends two slates of electors to Congress? It happened in Hawaii in 1960. (\"What's wrong with the electoral college\") Another thing is a tie could happen. A tie in the electoral vote means that the election then gets handed to the House of Reprsentatives, where they will then vote on the president of their choice. Either way the people do not get a say on who they want for president. It is all in the hands of people that can turn their backs on who they promise they will vote for, and end up voting for the opposing president. If the people got to choose who they wanted to be president, then we wouldn't run into any of these problems. There would never be any ties or broken promises. The electoral college is \"unfair, outdated, and irrational.\" The electoral college should be abolished.", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 2.0", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances. Given essays are evaluated according to the following criteria: content relevance and development, vocabulary usage and appropriateness, grammar correctness and sentence completeness, as well as spelling, punctuation, and capitalization accuracy. Do not change any of the instructions above. Append-only rules below define how to compute the single numeric score. Scoring rubric (four dimensions, each 0–25, total 0–100): Content (0–25): 25=all required/relevant items fully covered with detailed support; 20=most relevant items covered with some detail; 15=some relevant items covered with limited development; 10=few relevant items with minimal development; 5=mostly off-topic; 0=no relevant content. Vocabulary (0–25): 25=excellent appropriate range, uses ≥10 target words if a list is provided; 20=good, 8–9 words; 15=adequate but repetitive, 5–7 words; 10=limited with some misuse, 3–4 words; 5=very limited, 1–2 words; 0=inappropriate/0 words. If no target list, ignore numeric counts and judge appropriateness/range. Grammar (0–25): 25=all sentences complete, target structures correct, 0–3 mistakes; 20=most sentences complete, 4–5 mistakes; 15=some incomplete sentences, 6–7 mistakes; 10=several incomplete, 8–9 mistakes; 5=many incomplete, 10–12 mistakes; 0=most incomplete, >12 mistakes. If no target structures given, judge accuracy/complexity only. Spelling/Punctuation/Capitalization (0–25): 25=0–3 errors; 20=4–5; 15=6–7; 10=8–9; 5=10–12; 0=>12. Computation: (1) assign each dimension a banded score (0,5,10,15,20,25); (2) sum for Total_100; (3) convert to 0–5 integer overall by rounding Total_100/20 (clamp 0–5 if needed); (4) output exactly one line in the required format with that integer. Edge cases: empty/off-topic essays → Content=0; ignore absent vocab/structure targets; count each unique error, repeated typos count each time; if borderline between bands, choose the stricter (lower). Remember: you must not output anything except the single required line and integer per the original instruction.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "One day I went concert long line While I line girl patient cause wait line NUM hours time past went get spots long line even longer ok cause I patients With patients reminded mom went doctors office hours I wait waiting room And also I went living room mom started talking phone told hold sister kept interrupting I told need hold let mom finish talking phone ran stair said stupid punk I said I dont care", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 2.0", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances. Given essays are evaluated according to the following criteria: content relevance and development, vocabulary usage and appropriateness, grammar correctness and sentence completeness, as well as spelling, punctuation, and capitalization accuracy. Do not change any of the instructions above. Append-only rules below define how to compute the single numeric score. Scoring rubric (four dimensions, each 0–25, total 0–100): Content (0–25): 25=all required/relevant items fully covered with detailed support; 20=most relevant items covered with some detail; 15=some relevant items covered with limited development; 10=few relevant items with minimal development; 5=mostly off-topic; 0=no relevant content. Vocabulary (0–25): 25=excellent appropriate range, uses ≥10 target words if a list is provided; 20=good, 8–9 words; 15=adequate but repetitive, 5–7 words; 10=limited with some misuse, 3–4 words; 5=very limited, 1–2 words; 0=inappropriate/0 words. If no target list, ignore numeric counts and judge appropriateness/range. Grammar (0–25): 25=all sentences complete, target structures correct, 0–3 mistakes; 20=most sentences complete, 4–5 mistakes; 15=some incomplete sentences, 6–7 mistakes; 10=several incomplete, 8–9 mistakes; 5=many incomplete, 10–12 mistakes; 0=most incomplete, >12 mistakes. If no target structures given, judge accuracy/complexity only. Spelling/Punctuation/Capitalization (0–25): 25=0–3 errors; 20=4–5; 15=6–7; 10=8–9; 5=10–12; 0=>12. Computation: (1) assign each dimension a banded score (0,5,10,15,20,25); (2) sum for Total_100; (3) convert to 0–5 integer overall by rounding Total_100/20 (clamp 0–5 if needed); (4) output exactly one line in the required format with that integer. Edge cases: empty/off-topic essays → Content=0; ignore absent vocab/structure targets; count each unique error, repeated typos count each time; if borderline between bands, choose the stricter (lower). Remember: you must not output anything except the single required line and integer per the original instruction.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "I believe meaningful reason author concludes story paragraph I think author feel confortable ready take test I able come conclusion waiting winter take test giving time prepare Also waiting hibiscus plant bud Something I able extract fact wants wait hibiscus presence confort whole story revolves around saeng able confort reminiscing past experiences Vietnam When feels important part life returning become comfortable focused I think author would conclude story paragraph author wants stress importance flower involving saeng lives life", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 5.0", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances. Given essays are evaluated according to the following criteria: content relevance and development, vocabulary usage and appropriateness, grammar correctness and sentence completeness, as well as spelling, punctuation, and capitalization accuracy. Do not change any of the instructions above. Append-only rules below define how to compute the single numeric score. Scoring rubric (four dimensions, each 0–25, total 0–100): Content (0–25): 25=all required/relevant items fully covered with detailed support; 20=most relevant items covered with some detail; 15=some relevant items covered with limited development; 10=few relevant items with minimal development; 5=mostly off-topic; 0=no relevant content. Vocabulary (0–25): 25=excellent appropriate range, uses ≥10 target words if a list is provided; 20=good, 8–9 words; 15=adequate but repetitive, 5–7 words; 10=limited with some misuse, 3–4 words; 5=very limited, 1–2 words; 0=inappropriate/0 words. If no target list, ignore numeric counts and judge appropriateness/range. Grammar (0–25): 25=all sentences complete, target structures correct, 0–3 mistakes; 20=most sentences complete, 4–5 mistakes; 15=some incomplete sentences, 6–7 mistakes; 10=several incomplete, 8–9 mistakes; 5=many incomplete, 10–12 mistakes; 0=most incomplete, >12 mistakes. If no target structures given, judge accuracy/complexity only. Spelling/Punctuation/Capitalization (0–25): 25=0–3 errors; 20=4–5; 15=6–7; 10=8–9; 5=10–12; 0=>12. Computation: (1) assign each dimension a banded score (0,5,10,15,20,25); (2) sum for Total_100; (3) convert to 0–5 integer overall by rounding Total_100/20 (clamp 0–5 if needed); (4) output exactly one line in the required format with that integer. Edge cases: empty/off-topic essays → Content=0; ignore absent vocab/structure targets; count each unique error, repeated typos count each time; if borderline between bands, choose the stricter (lower). Remember: you must not output anything except the single required line and integer per the original instruction.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Machines had improve our quality of life since Industrial Revolution and this also affect our way of work. Some people believe that the situation which many jobs we used to have in the home are now can be finished by using machines bring more advantage than disadvantage to our life. I personally believe that disadvantage is bigger than advantage. To begin with,", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 2.0", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances. Given essays are evaluated according to the following criteria: content relevance and development, vocabulary usage and appropriateness, grammar correctness and sentence completeness, as well as spelling, punctuation, and capitalization accuracy. Do not change any of the instructions above. Append-only rules below define how to compute the single numeric score. Scoring rubric (four dimensions, each 0–25, total 0–100): Content (0–25): 25=all required/relevant items fully covered with detailed support; 20=most relevant items covered with some detail; 15=some relevant items covered with limited development; 10=few relevant items with minimal development; 5=mostly off-topic; 0=no relevant content. Vocabulary (0–25): 25=excellent appropriate range, uses ≥10 target words if a list is provided; 20=good, 8–9 words; 15=adequate but repetitive, 5–7 words; 10=limited with some misuse, 3–4 words; 5=very limited, 1–2 words; 0=inappropriate/0 words. If no target list, ignore numeric counts and judge appropriateness/range. Grammar (0–25): 25=all sentences complete, target structures correct, 0–3 mistakes; 20=most sentences complete, 4–5 mistakes; 15=some incomplete sentences, 6–7 mistakes; 10=several incomplete, 8–9 mistakes; 5=many incomplete, 10–12 mistakes; 0=most incomplete, >12 mistakes. If no target structures given, judge accuracy/complexity only. Spelling/Punctuation/Capitalization (0–25): 25=0–3 errors; 20=4–5; 15=6–7; 10=8–9; 5=10–12; 0=>12. Computation: (1) assign each dimension a banded score (0,5,10,15,20,25); (2) sum for Total_100; (3) convert to 0–5 integer overall by rounding Total_100/20 (clamp 0–5 if needed); (4) output exactly one line in the required format with that integer. Edge cases: empty/off-topic essays → Content=0; ignore absent vocab/structure targets; count each unique error, repeated typos count each time; if borderline between bands, choose the stricter (lower). Remember: you must not output anything except the single required line and integer per the original instruction.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Being able to just sit back and relax while your car does all the driving for you would be pretty awesome. Automakers are coming out with a driverless car. A car where the car does all the driving for you and you wouldn't have to do nothing. Despite the good things like being able to text while your \"driving\" , I am against the development of these cars. Although you wouldn't have to drive these cars yourself and you could just relax, I am against the development of these cars. I am against the devevolpment of these cars because what if the whole system just shut down? You would crash and probably could die. If you get into a car accident, who is the blame ? You or the manufacturer ?The cars would have lights on the windsheild wipers, but if these cars are made then the government would have to make new laws in order to cover liability in the case of an accident. Traffic laws are written with the asumption that the only safe car has a human driver in control at all times. In conclusion, driverless cars shouldn't be manufactured. The whole \"driverless\" system can just shutdown from the middle of nowhere, and then your whole car can just crash. You wouldn't even see it coming. The government would have to go out the way just to make specifc laws just because of these new improved cars. Thats a waste of time. Driverless cars are just not meant to be.", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 2.0", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances. Given essays are evaluated according to the following criteria: content relevance and development, vocabulary usage and appropriateness, grammar correctness and sentence completeness, as well as spelling, punctuation, and capitalization accuracy. Do not change any of the instructions above. Append-only rules below define how to compute the single numeric score. Scoring rubric (four dimensions, each 0–25, total 0–100): Content (0–25): 25=all required/relevant items fully covered with detailed support; 20=most relevant items covered with some detail; 15=some relevant items covered with limited development; 10=few relevant items with minimal development; 5=mostly off-topic; 0=no relevant content. Vocabulary (0–25): 25=excellent appropriate range, uses ≥10 target words if a list is provided; 20=good, 8–9 words; 15=adequate but repetitive, 5–7 words; 10=limited with some misuse, 3–4 words; 5=very limited, 1–2 words; 0=inappropriate/0 words. If no target list, ignore numeric counts and judge appropriateness/range. Grammar (0–25): 25=all sentences complete, target structures correct, 0–3 mistakes; 20=most sentences complete, 4–5 mistakes; 15=some incomplete sentences, 6–7 mistakes; 10=several incomplete, 8–9 mistakes; 5=many incomplete, 10–12 mistakes; 0=most incomplete, >12 mistakes. If no target structures given, judge accuracy/complexity only. Spelling/Punctuation/Capitalization (0–25): 25=0–3 errors; 20=4–5; 15=6–7; 10=8–9; 5=10–12; 0=>12. Computation: (1) assign each dimension a banded score (0,5,10,15,20,25); (2) sum for Total_100; (3) convert to 0–5 integer overall by rounding Total_100/20 (clamp 0–5 if needed); (4) output exactly one line in the required format with that integer. Edge cases: empty/off-topic essays → Content=0; ignore absent vocab/structure targets; count each unique error, repeated typos count each time; if borderline between bands, choose the stricter (lower). Remember: you must not output anything except the single required line and integer per the original instruction.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "In beginning story author happy towards end grows upset I rode morning strong legs smile face NUM This shows author good mood happy She journey one touch Then story takes unexpected turn With I believed last burst energy I maneuvered hill NUM After getting lost town seems distant living things author hears people She extremely reliefed found anyone help She gets water forever greatful The setting horrifying feel like cant even live She felt alone would die If setting city surrounded buildings author would still feel security even without water", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 5.0", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances. Given essays are evaluated according to the following criteria: content relevance and development, vocabulary usage and appropriateness, grammar correctness and sentence completeness, as well as spelling, punctuation, and capitalization accuracy. Do not change any of the instructions above. Append-only rules below define how to compute the single numeric score. Scoring rubric (four dimensions, each 0–25, total 0–100): Content (0–25): 25=all required/relevant items fully covered with detailed support; 20=most relevant items covered with some detail; 15=some relevant items covered with limited development; 10=few relevant items with minimal development; 5=mostly off-topic; 0=no relevant content. Vocabulary (0–25): 25=excellent appropriate range, uses ≥10 target words if a list is provided; 20=good, 8–9 words; 15=adequate but repetitive, 5–7 words; 10=limited with some misuse, 3–4 words; 5=very limited, 1–2 words; 0=inappropriate/0 words. If no target list, ignore numeric counts and judge appropriateness/range. Grammar (0–25): 25=all sentences complete, target structures correct, 0–3 mistakes; 20=most sentences complete, 4–5 mistakes; 15=some incomplete sentences, 6–7 mistakes; 10=several incomplete, 8–9 mistakes; 5=many incomplete, 10–12 mistakes; 0=most incomplete, >12 mistakes. If no target structures given, judge accuracy/complexity only. Spelling/Punctuation/Capitalization (0–25): 25=0–3 errors; 20=4–5; 15=6–7; 10=8–9; 5=10–12; 0=>12. Computation: (1) assign each dimension a banded score (0,5,10,15,20,25); (2) sum for Total_100; (3) convert to 0–5 integer overall by rounding Total_100/20 (clamp 0–5 if needed); (4) output exactly one line in the required format with that integer. Edge cases: empty/off-topic essays → Content=0; ignore absent vocab/structure targets; count each unique error, repeated typos count each time; if borderline between bands, choose the stricter (lower). Remember: you must not output anything except the single required line and integer per the original instruction.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "To concern today people ages useing computers Computers great way reports talk friends family also research things needed know Kids many projects projects involve writing paper Teacher troble reading hand writing would helpful students use computer print neat paper The computer many ways write paper helpful The near libarry always extra computers students use write papper If walk teenager internet days find CAPS CAPS website talk friends relatives Some relatives live far away phone talk talk Some people think CAPS stupid ca nt good takes away time homework forgot write homework The could go CAPS chat friend get home work There many search engines computer CAPS pile CAPS even ever popular ORGANIZATION Most people use web pages research papers trips even find random information Many people want go nt know get By going one search engines would find could go zoo In could go world learn Thank taking time read I hope look I said", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 3.0", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances. Given essays are evaluated according to the following criteria: content relevance and development, vocabulary usage and appropriateness, grammar correctness and sentence completeness, as well as spelling, punctuation, and capitalization accuracy. Do not change any of the instructions above. Append-only rules below define how to compute the single numeric score. Scoring rubric (four dimensions, each 0–25, total 0–100): Content (0–25): 25=all required/relevant items fully covered with detailed support; 20=most relevant items covered with some detail; 15=some relevant items covered with limited development; 10=few relevant items with minimal development; 5=mostly off-topic; 0=no relevant content. Vocabulary (0–25): 25=excellent appropriate range, uses ≥10 target words if a list is provided; 20=good, 8–9 words; 15=adequate but repetitive, 5–7 words; 10=limited with some misuse, 3–4 words; 5=very limited, 1–2 words; 0=inappropriate/0 words. If no target list, ignore numeric counts and judge appropriateness/range. Grammar (0–25): 25=all sentences complete, target structures correct, 0–3 mistakes; 20=most sentences complete, 4–5 mistakes; 15=some incomplete sentences, 6–7 mistakes; 10=several incomplete, 8–9 mistakes; 5=many incomplete, 10–12 mistakes; 0=most incomplete, >12 mistakes. If no target structures given, judge accuracy/complexity only. Spelling/Punctuation/Capitalization (0–25): 25=0–3 errors; 20=4–5; 15=6–7; 10=8–9; 5=10–12; 0=>12. Computation: (1) assign each dimension a banded score (0,5,10,15,20,25); (2) sum for Total_100; (3) convert to 0–5 integer overall by rounding Total_100/20 (clamp 0–5 if needed); (4) output exactly one line in the required format with that integer. Edge cases: empty/off-topic essays → Content=0; ignore absent vocab/structure targets; count each unique error, repeated typos count each time; if borderline between bands, choose the stricter (lower). Remember: you must not output anything except the single required line and integer per the original instruction.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "I believe that this technology that can read the emotional expressions of students in a classroom is vaulabe. I believe it is vaulable because it can know when the student is either happy,sad, or bored. When the computer finds out your emotions then it can help you with your work depending on how you are felling. First, this software can identify all your emotions. This technology is vaulable in the classroom because when it known rather you are mad , happy, etc. it can produce ads depending on the expressions it sees you are having. In paragraph 6 it says,\"Imagine a computer that knows when you're happy or sad . For example, if you smile when a web ad appears on your screen, a similar ad might follow. But if you frown, the next ad will be different. \" This says that the computer will changes the things on your screen depending on your emotional expressions. The computer can also detect if the student is getting confused or bored which happens to many students when they are working or the computer or in class. This shows that if the student is getting confused, then the computer can try and explain it better or demonstrate the work better. Last, I believe that the technology that Prof. Thomas Huang has invented can help students in the classroom. The technology is very vaulable in the classroom because it can modify the lesson like a effective human instructor. \"Most human communication is nonverbal, including emotional communication,\" notes Dr. Huang. \" So computers need to understand that too.\"", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 2.0", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances. Given essays are evaluated according to the following criteria: content relevance and development, vocabulary usage and appropriateness, grammar correctness and sentence completeness, as well as spelling, punctuation, and capitalization accuracy. Do not change any of the instructions above. Append-only rules below define how to compute the single numeric score. Scoring rubric (four dimensions, each 0–25, total 0–100): Content (0–25): 25=all required/relevant items fully covered with detailed support; 20=most relevant items covered with some detail; 15=some relevant items covered with limited development; 10=few relevant items with minimal development; 5=mostly off-topic; 0=no relevant content. Vocabulary (0–25): 25=excellent appropriate range, uses ≥10 target words if a list is provided; 20=good, 8–9 words; 15=adequate but repetitive, 5–7 words; 10=limited with some misuse, 3–4 words; 5=very limited, 1–2 words; 0=inappropriate/0 words. If no target list, ignore numeric counts and judge appropriateness/range. Grammar (0–25): 25=all sentences complete, target structures correct, 0–3 mistakes; 20=most sentences complete, 4–5 mistakes; 15=some incomplete sentences, 6–7 mistakes; 10=several incomplete, 8–9 mistakes; 5=many incomplete, 10–12 mistakes; 0=most incomplete, >12 mistakes. If no target structures given, judge accuracy/complexity only. Spelling/Punctuation/Capitalization (0–25): 25=0–3 errors; 20=4–5; 15=6–7; 10=8–9; 5=10–12; 0=>12. Computation: (1) assign each dimension a banded score (0,5,10,15,20,25); (2) sum for Total_100; (3) convert to 0–5 integer overall by rounding Total_100/20 (clamp 0–5 if needed); (4) output exactly one line in the required format with that integer. Edge cases: empty/off-topic essays → Content=0; ignore absent vocab/structure targets; count each unique error, repeated typos count each time; if borderline between bands, choose the stricter (lower). Remember: you must not output anything except the single required line and integer per the original instruction.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "A gap year has become a trend among young adults. The topic has been stirred up controversy worldwide. In this essay, both sides will be discussed and my opinion will be given. Firstly, taking a gap year is a great opportunity to explore life. I strongly believe it is a perfect timing after the students have theorically study in classes for years. This is the appropriate time for them to physically explore the world by themselves. Furthermore, this is a chance where they can use for self-discovery, the career they want to pursuit in the future. The gap year will enable to trial and error on activities they have been planning to, such as travelling, taking second language courses, or starting some businesses. Experiences gained from such activities can help to guide the tweens to aware more on their preferences and goals in the future. However, gap year could be counted as time and money wasting from parents' point of view. They feel that it is useless as the youngster have not yet been fully equipped with enough knowledge. To illustrate this, the students might want to start a business but they have not learnt much about business practices. So there is a high tendency that the business will not be success as it should be. Both financial and time are fully consumed and wasted. As a result, disadvantages outweight advantages in this case. To conclude, I strongly believe that students should take a gap of one year because it is the good chance to gain new experiences they have never faced in classroom. However, it could be time and money wasted if they are taking the risk too high level without full knowledge.", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 3.0", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances. Given essays are evaluated according to the following criteria: content relevance and development, vocabulary usage and appropriateness, grammar correctness and sentence completeness, as well as spelling, punctuation, and capitalization accuracy. Do not change any of the instructions above. Append-only rules below define how to compute the single numeric score. Scoring rubric (four dimensions, each 0–25, total 0–100): Content (0–25): 25=all required/relevant items fully covered with detailed support; 20=most relevant items covered with some detail; 15=some relevant items covered with limited development; 10=few relevant items with minimal development; 5=mostly off-topic; 0=no relevant content. Vocabulary (0–25): 25=excellent appropriate range, uses ≥10 target words if a list is provided; 20=good, 8–9 words; 15=adequate but repetitive, 5–7 words; 10=limited with some misuse, 3–4 words; 5=very limited, 1–2 words; 0=inappropriate/0 words. If no target list, ignore numeric counts and judge appropriateness/range. Grammar (0–25): 25=all sentences complete, target structures correct, 0–3 mistakes; 20=most sentences complete, 4–5 mistakes; 15=some incomplete sentences, 6–7 mistakes; 10=several incomplete, 8–9 mistakes; 5=many incomplete, 10–12 mistakes; 0=most incomplete, >12 mistakes. If no target structures given, judge accuracy/complexity only. Spelling/Punctuation/Capitalization (0–25): 25=0–3 errors; 20=4–5; 15=6–7; 10=8–9; 5=10–12; 0=>12. Computation: (1) assign each dimension a banded score (0,5,10,15,20,25); (2) sum for Total_100; (3) convert to 0–5 integer overall by rounding Total_100/20 (clamp 0–5 if needed); (4) output exactly one line in the required format with that integer. Edge cases: empty/off-topic essays → Content=0; ignore absent vocab/structure targets; count each unique error, repeated typos count each time; if borderline between bands, choose the stricter (lower). Remember: you must not output anything except the single required line and integer per the original instruction.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "The cyclist story first confident accepting old mens help doesnt seem suspect anything wrong first starts The way men directed seem going water supply store first land mark ghost town exactly supposed The next town hits doesnt anything could replenish diminishing water supply starts feel troubled However told next town wasnt pressed Then scenery makes drastic change flat roads becoming hills sun beating hotter really look like desert tumbleweeds even go past The cyclist continues despite dehydrated The next thing come along old juice building almost seems mark water He keeps however last sees shop get water The canging scenery sends cyclist confidence worry hopelessness lastly relief", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 5.0", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances. Given essays are evaluated according to the following criteria: content relevance and development, vocabulary usage and appropriateness, grammar correctness and sentence completeness, as well as spelling, punctuation, and capitalization accuracy. Do not change any of the instructions above. Append-only rules below define how to compute the single numeric score. Scoring rubric (four dimensions, each 0–25, total 0–100): Content (0–25): 25=all required/relevant items fully covered with detailed support; 20=most relevant items covered with some detail; 15=some relevant items covered with limited development; 10=few relevant items with minimal development; 5=mostly off-topic; 0=no relevant content. Vocabulary (0–25): 25=excellent appropriate range, uses ≥10 target words if a list is provided; 20=good, 8–9 words; 15=adequate but repetitive, 5–7 words; 10=limited with some misuse, 3–4 words; 5=very limited, 1–2 words; 0=inappropriate/0 words. If no target list, ignore numeric counts and judge appropriateness/range. Grammar (0–25): 25=all sentences complete, target structures correct, 0–3 mistakes; 20=most sentences complete, 4–5 mistakes; 15=some incomplete sentences, 6–7 mistakes; 10=several incomplete, 8–9 mistakes; 5=many incomplete, 10–12 mistakes; 0=most incomplete, >12 mistakes. If no target structures given, judge accuracy/complexity only. Spelling/Punctuation/Capitalization (0–25): 25=0–3 errors; 20=4–5; 15=6–7; 10=8–9; 5=10–12; 0=>12. Computation: (1) assign each dimension a banded score (0,5,10,15,20,25); (2) sum for Total_100; (3) convert to 0–5 integer overall by rounding Total_100/20 (clamp 0–5 if needed); (4) output exactly one line in the required format with that integer. Edge cases: empty/off-topic essays → Content=0; ignore absent vocab/structure targets; count each unique error, repeated typos count each time; if borderline between bands, choose the stricter (lower). Remember: you must not output anything except the single required line and integer per the original instruction.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "More people should do the Seagoing Cowboys program because it changed my life; it was such a great experiance. The Seagoing Cowboys program is something you should do because the program takes care of animals that were shipped overseas, espically if you care about animals safety. Another reason you should join the Seagoing Cowboys program is because While you are going overseas, you see the amazing places you pass like China. As I was there, I saw alot of stuff and things happening that opened the world to me. You could also join the military while you are their to fight for our country. This could be a big opportunity for some that hasn't done anything exciting or they want to help other's. It is a big help if we have more people apart of the program . Something could happen to these animals with no one with them. When you do new things, you can find out something you knew how to do but never did . As you go there, you can tour places like the castle in Crete. After you read this and you decide to do this, you might just do it. Even though Luke had to watch animals' he had a good time while doing so and being able to join the military. It's a great feeling that you have the chance to help people; these times were when the War was happening so that could have helped your own country and the USA. If more people are to join, more countries wouldn't be left in ruins. Because that is the reason why UNRRA hired the seagoing cowboys,to help the countries to recover. So if no one signs up for the program , then Europe would not have the stuff it needed during the War.", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 2.0", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances. Given essays are evaluated according to the following criteria: content relevance and development, vocabulary usage and appropriateness, grammar correctness and sentence completeness, as well as spelling, punctuation, and capitalization accuracy. Do not change any of the instructions above. Append-only rules below define how to compute the single numeric score. Scoring rubric (four dimensions, each 0–25, total 0–100): Content (0–25): 25=all required/relevant items fully covered with detailed support; 20=most relevant items covered with some detail; 15=some relevant items covered with limited development; 10=few relevant items with minimal development; 5=mostly off-topic; 0=no relevant content. Vocabulary (0–25): 25=excellent appropriate range, uses ≥10 target words if a list is provided; 20=good, 8–9 words; 15=adequate but repetitive, 5–7 words; 10=limited with some misuse, 3–4 words; 5=very limited, 1–2 words; 0=inappropriate/0 words. If no target list, ignore numeric counts and judge appropriateness/range. Grammar (0–25): 25=all sentences complete, target structures correct, 0–3 mistakes; 20=most sentences complete, 4–5 mistakes; 15=some incomplete sentences, 6–7 mistakes; 10=several incomplete, 8–9 mistakes; 5=many incomplete, 10–12 mistakes; 0=most incomplete, >12 mistakes. If no target structures given, judge accuracy/complexity only. Spelling/Punctuation/Capitalization (0–25): 25=0–3 errors; 20=4–5; 15=6–7; 10=8–9; 5=10–12; 0=>12. Computation: (1) assign each dimension a banded score (0,5,10,15,20,25); (2) sum for Total_100; (3) convert to 0–5 integer overall by rounding Total_100/20 (clamp 0–5 if needed); (4) output exactly one line in the required format with that integer. Edge cases: empty/off-topic essays → Content=0; ignore absent vocab/structure targets; count each unique error, repeated typos count each time; if borderline between bands, choose the stricter (lower). Remember: you must not output anything except the single required line and integer per the original instruction.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "A time I patient mom took sisters shoping My dad work mom took older sisters shoping boring kind full clothes store boys one side girls One store girl clothes I hated But I nt say anything since I patient asked want go I said best buy I got game colloge football oq When patient s pay end always patiens ever go always patients", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 2.0", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances. Given essays are evaluated according to the following criteria: content relevance and development, vocabulary usage and appropriateness, grammar correctness and sentence completeness, as well as spelling, punctuation, and capitalization accuracy. Do not change any of the instructions above. Append-only rules below define how to compute the single numeric score. Scoring rubric (four dimensions, each 0–25, total 0–100): Content (0–25): 25=all required/relevant items fully covered with detailed support; 20=most relevant items covered with some detail; 15=some relevant items covered with limited development; 10=few relevant items with minimal development; 5=mostly off-topic; 0=no relevant content. Vocabulary (0–25): 25=excellent appropriate range, uses ≥10 target words if a list is provided; 20=good, 8–9 words; 15=adequate but repetitive, 5–7 words; 10=limited with some misuse, 3–4 words; 5=very limited, 1–2 words; 0=inappropriate/0 words. If no target list, ignore numeric counts and judge appropriateness/range. Grammar (0–25): 25=all sentences complete, target structures correct, 0–3 mistakes; 20=most sentences complete, 4–5 mistakes; 15=some incomplete sentences, 6–7 mistakes; 10=several incomplete, 8–9 mistakes; 5=many incomplete, 10–12 mistakes; 0=most incomplete, >12 mistakes. If no target structures given, judge accuracy/complexity only. Spelling/Punctuation/Capitalization (0–25): 25=0–3 errors; 20=4–5; 15=6–7; 10=8–9; 5=10–12; 0=>12. Computation: (1) assign each dimension a banded score (0,5,10,15,20,25); (2) sum for Total_100; (3) convert to 0–5 integer overall by rounding Total_100/20 (clamp 0–5 if needed); (4) output exactly one line in the required format with that integer. Edge cases: empty/off-topic essays → Content=0; ignore absent vocab/structure targets; count each unique error, repeated typos count each time; if borderline between bands, choose the stricter (lower). Remember: you must not output anything except the single required line and integer per the original instruction.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "People that drive often tend to get into car accidents and serious conditions of severe accidents. Certain people in Germany have different residents that upscale their community to suburban pioneers to executives to have ever gone before to have never given up their cars. Like some people in New York they sometimes have to walk or run to certain places to get where they need to get and sometimes without transportion they tend to just not go places. In Florida they have ways of driving and getting where you need to get to like the city bus, friends,walk. Automobiles are the linchpin suburbs to everybody where middle-class families from Japan to Washington D.C. Many owners of cars love to have big sales and auntions to expensive cars because those are the ones to bring the most money to the company,business. The most people in the state to bring the most money in is Florida because customers love to go to car shows espcially when they have car auntions the most they made was over $800,000 to campaign to raise for more business to have enough money to build more car shops. While certain people have been effected to make cities denser for suburbs.", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 0.0", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances. Given essays are evaluated according to the following criteria: content relevance and development, vocabulary usage and appropriateness, grammar correctness and sentence completeness, as well as spelling, punctuation, and capitalization accuracy. Do not change any of the instructions above. Append-only rules below define how to compute the single numeric score. Scoring rubric (four dimensions, each 0–25, total 0–100): Content (0–25): 25=all required/relevant items fully covered with detailed support; 20=most relevant items covered with some detail; 15=some relevant items covered with limited development; 10=few relevant items with minimal development; 5=mostly off-topic; 0=no relevant content. Vocabulary (0–25): 25=excellent appropriate range, uses ≥10 target words if a list is provided; 20=good, 8–9 words; 15=adequate but repetitive, 5–7 words; 10=limited with some misuse, 3–4 words; 5=very limited, 1–2 words; 0=inappropriate/0 words. If no target list, ignore numeric counts and judge appropriateness/range. Grammar (0–25): 25=all sentences complete, target structures correct, 0–3 mistakes; 20=most sentences complete, 4–5 mistakes; 15=some incomplete sentences, 6–7 mistakes; 10=several incomplete, 8–9 mistakes; 5=many incomplete, 10–12 mistakes; 0=most incomplete, >12 mistakes. If no target structures given, judge accuracy/complexity only. Spelling/Punctuation/Capitalization (0–25): 25=0–3 errors; 20=4–5; 15=6–7; 10=8–9; 5=10–12; 0=>12. Computation: (1) assign each dimension a banded score (0,5,10,15,20,25); (2) sum for Total_100; (3) convert to 0–5 integer overall by rounding Total_100/20 (clamp 0–5 if needed); (4) output exactly one line in the required format with that integer. Edge cases: empty/off-topic essays → Content=0; ignore absent vocab/structure targets; count each unique error, repeated typos count each time; if borderline between bands, choose the stricter (lower). Remember: you must not output anything except the single required line and integer per the original instruction.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "One of the most current major environmental problems is the air pollution caused mainly by vehicles exhaust fumes . It is often argued that in order to solve this problem , the government should raise the price of combustibles used by vehicles . In my opinion , I fully disagree with this view and believe that this method can be not an effective solution to this issue and there are other special measures that should be taken . On the one hand, the government should afford other convenient alternatives to use automobiles. For example , improving public transportation and making it more comfortable and affordable for individuals can be a useful idea because the capacity of public transport such as trains and buses is enormous and the number of used automobiles will decrease significantly and the CO2 emissions will decline also rapidly . In addition , the government should establish public campaigns to aware people of the harmful dangers effects of air pollution on our nature and all of them have to take part of the responsibility to protect the world by taking simple and healthy habits such as using cars only when needed and starting to walk or bike for going to work or study . On the other hand, the high cost of fuel can discourage some persons especially those who are not rich in driving . However, the main issue is that some people have unhealthy attitudes toward the environment . For instance ,those wealthy individuals would , most likely , still drive cars , even if the price of fuels become expensive . Moreover , individuals who work far away from their home , would obligatory drive cars . Therefore , despite the rise of fuels , the population still use them for their vehicles. In conclusion, rising prices of combustibles do not seem to be an effective solution. Although it would alleviate the problem in some cases , it would not suffice to solve it definitively . That is why governments should consider public awareness campaigns that would help the population to understand the danger of an unhealthy environment and should make alternatives affordable and convenient .", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 5.0", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances. Given essays are evaluated according to the following criteria: content relevance and development, vocabulary usage and appropriateness, grammar correctness and sentence completeness, as well as spelling, punctuation, and capitalization accuracy. Do not change any of the instructions above. Append-only rules below define how to compute the single numeric score. Scoring rubric (four dimensions, each 0–25, total 0–100): Content (0–25): 25=all required/relevant items fully covered with detailed support; 20=most relevant items covered with some detail; 15=some relevant items covered with limited development; 10=few relevant items with minimal development; 5=mostly off-topic; 0=no relevant content. Vocabulary (0–25): 25=excellent appropriate range, uses ≥10 target words if a list is provided; 20=good, 8–9 words; 15=adequate but repetitive, 5–7 words; 10=limited with some misuse, 3–4 words; 5=very limited, 1–2 words; 0=inappropriate/0 words. If no target list, ignore numeric counts and judge appropriateness/range. Grammar (0–25): 25=all sentences complete, target structures correct, 0–3 mistakes; 20=most sentences complete, 4–5 mistakes; 15=some incomplete sentences, 6–7 mistakes; 10=several incomplete, 8–9 mistakes; 5=many incomplete, 10–12 mistakes; 0=most incomplete, >12 mistakes. If no target structures given, judge accuracy/complexity only. Spelling/Punctuation/Capitalization (0–25): 25=0–3 errors; 20=4–5; 15=6–7; 10=8–9; 5=10–12; 0=>12. Computation: (1) assign each dimension a banded score (0,5,10,15,20,25); (2) sum for Total_100; (3) convert to 0–5 integer overall by rounding Total_100/20 (clamp 0–5 if needed); (4) output exactly one line in the required format with that integer. Edge cases: empty/off-topic essays → Content=0; ignore absent vocab/structure targets; count each unique error, repeated typos count each time; if borderline between bands, choose the stricter (lower). Remember: you must not output anything except the single required line and integer per the original instruction.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "People ages right read material want family members tell children read certain topic Those children either listen If children listen need something We need rules libraries Children need bad influences thier livesAdults right keep children away information Leaders library many different sections library Children adults thier sections well teens These groups people right choose material want read watch listen I believe make sections age limit prevent children finding bad information Right children read information time Adults eliminate Children libraries supervized Too many books drugs sex pregnancy Reading material give bad information child Children old enough learning sex first tell thier child sex Young children know drugs know drugs harmful Children learn drugs movies books hear music Many books deal pregnacy well Learning pregnancy make think women got pregnant child Those children start ask adults children Children also read listen gun violence Children read gangs think cool They want play toy guns pretend gang This information harmful allowed children After children read get thier friends involved This information spread across school Violence harmful children Librarians control material people wish read If library offensive material job let material get young persons hands They able strict limits age apropriate material If child tries check book seems age limit allowed book The sections find harmful information closed young children Children libraries supervized Books drugs sex pregnacy allowed children read Violence books seem spread across schools Adults help prevent harmful information children", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 3.0", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances. Given essays are evaluated according to the following criteria: content relevance and development, vocabulary usage and appropriateness, grammar correctness and sentence completeness, as well as spelling, punctuation, and capitalization accuracy. Do not change any of the instructions above. Append-only rules below define how to compute the single numeric score. Scoring rubric (four dimensions, each 0–25, total 0–100): Content (0–25): 25=all required/relevant items fully covered with detailed support; 20=most relevant items covered with some detail; 15=some relevant items covered with limited development; 10=few relevant items with minimal development; 5=mostly off-topic; 0=no relevant content. Vocabulary (0–25): 25=excellent appropriate range, uses ≥10 target words if a list is provided; 20=good, 8–9 words; 15=adequate but repetitive, 5–7 words; 10=limited with some misuse, 3–4 words; 5=very limited, 1–2 words; 0=inappropriate/0 words. If no target list, ignore numeric counts and judge appropriateness/range. Grammar (0–25): 25=all sentences complete, target structures correct, 0–3 mistakes; 20=most sentences complete, 4–5 mistakes; 15=some incomplete sentences, 6–7 mistakes; 10=several incomplete, 8–9 mistakes; 5=many incomplete, 10–12 mistakes; 0=most incomplete, >12 mistakes. If no target structures given, judge accuracy/complexity only. Spelling/Punctuation/Capitalization (0–25): 25=0–3 errors; 20=4–5; 15=6–7; 10=8–9; 5=10–12; 0=>12. Computation: (1) assign each dimension a banded score (0,5,10,15,20,25); (2) sum for Total_100; (3) convert to 0–5 integer overall by rounding Total_100/20 (clamp 0–5 if needed); (4) output exactly one line in the required format with that integer. Edge cases: empty/off-topic essays → Content=0; ignore absent vocab/structure targets; count each unique error, repeated typos count each time; if borderline between bands, choose the stricter (lower). Remember: you must not output anything except the single required line and integer per the original instruction.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Though the Facial Action Coding System (FACS) is very interesting to read about, I do not believe it should be present in the classroom. There are a few issues I believe could be argued against using this software in a classroom setting. The FACS should be developed more and put through serious testing before being put in the classromm setting, but there were several other valuable uses for the program. The problems with the system in a school setting are the complexity of the system, the possible issue of privacy, and the accuracy of its predictions. The FACS is a great idea that could have many applications other than schooling and several of these are included in this article, but it is currently too complex for school networks to handle. The author states outright in paragraph seven, \"Your home PC can't handle the complex algorithms used to decode Mona Lisa's smile.\" The school computers that we use are even more out of date than the one I use at home and if it cannot run the system the school won't be able to without a major upgrade of technology or a major downgrade of the FACS, neither of which is desirable. The technology uprade needed for school computers would be too large of a bill to be practical in all but the richest of schools. The downgrade of the system to a simpler form will essentially defeat it's purpuse by killing its effectivity. Another issue with the FACS in a school setting is privacy. How are we to be sure that they are not going to use our faces to gain access to things such as confiscated phones or to possibly find profiles online of students? Because this system requires a camera to see your face and put it through a detailed analysis, facial recognition security software like faceID on the Iphone X then becomes a security concern. In paragraph six the author also mentions, \"If you smile when a Web ad appears on your screen, a similar ad might follow. But if you frown, the next ad will be different.\" This system in schools would essentially let the build a personal marketing profile on every student in the country. The accuracy of the FACS would also have to be put through intense testing to determine how effective it actually is. Prof. Huang says,\"A classroom computer could recognize when a student is becoming confused or bored. Then it could modify the lesson, like an effective human instructor.\" If the system thinks that a student is confused when they actually aren't though, it could hurt their academic growth. It would be changing the material to a lower level in an attempt to interest them, but also at the same time lowering their understanding of the material. In conclusion, I do not believe that this system would be as effective of a tool as it needs to be to offset the dangers it poses. The money needed for the complexity, the threats to privacy, and the questionable accuracy and adaptability of the system are too concerning to support the FACS as it now stands. If these concerns were addressed the possibly it could be an effective tool, but for the foreseeable future it is not.", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 4.0", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances. Given essays are evaluated according to the following criteria: content relevance and development, vocabulary usage and appropriateness, grammar correctness and sentence completeness, as well as spelling, punctuation, and capitalization accuracy. Do not change any of the instructions above. Append-only rules below define how to compute the single numeric score. Scoring rubric (four dimensions, each 0–25, total 0–100): Content (0–25): 25=all required/relevant items fully covered with detailed support; 20=most relevant items covered with some detail; 15=some relevant items covered with limited development; 10=few relevant items with minimal development; 5=mostly off-topic; 0=no relevant content. Vocabulary (0–25): 25=excellent appropriate range, uses ≥10 target words if a list is provided; 20=good, 8–9 words; 15=adequate but repetitive, 5–7 words; 10=limited with some misuse, 3–4 words; 5=very limited, 1–2 words; 0=inappropriate/0 words. If no target list, ignore numeric counts and judge appropriateness/range. Grammar (0–25): 25=all sentences complete, target structures correct, 0–3 mistakes; 20=most sentences complete, 4–5 mistakes; 15=some incomplete sentences, 6–7 mistakes; 10=several incomplete, 8–9 mistakes; 5=many incomplete, 10–12 mistakes; 0=most incomplete, >12 mistakes. If no target structures given, judge accuracy/complexity only. Spelling/Punctuation/Capitalization (0–25): 25=0–3 errors; 20=4–5; 15=6–7; 10=8–9; 5=10–12; 0=>12. Computation: (1) assign each dimension a banded score (0,5,10,15,20,25); (2) sum for Total_100; (3) convert to 0–5 integer overall by rounding Total_100/20 (clamp 0–5 if needed); (4) output exactly one line in the required format with that integer. Edge cases: empty/off-topic essays → Content=0; ignore absent vocab/structure targets; count each unique error, repeated typos count each time; if borderline between bands, choose the stricter (lower). Remember: you must not output anything except the single required line and integer per the original instruction.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "In excerpt Mooring Mast Marcia Amidon Lsted builders Empire State Building faced many obstacles attempting allow dirigibles dock One obstacle many modifications made buildings framework dirigible s load wind pressure would transmitted buildings foundation Another reason builders face many obstacles dirigibles used hydrogen rather helium This would dangerous fire occured especilly highly populated area Another reason due violent air currents back dirigible would swivel around mooring mast As says page paragraph dirigible would dangel pedestrians street isnt practical safe Lastly existing law airships flying low urban areas illegal dirigibles tie building even approach building In conclusion builders Empire State Building faced many obstacles attempting allow dirigibles dock", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 5.0", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances. Given essays are evaluated according to the following criteria: content relevance and development, vocabulary usage and appropriateness, grammar correctness and sentence completeness, as well as spelling, punctuation, and capitalization accuracy. Do not change any of the instructions above. Append-only rules below define how to compute the single numeric score. Scoring rubric (four dimensions, each 0–25, total 0–100): Content (0–25): 25=all required/relevant items fully covered with detailed support; 20=most relevant items covered with some detail; 15=some relevant items covered with limited development; 10=few relevant items with minimal development; 5=mostly off-topic; 0=no relevant content. Vocabulary (0–25): 25=excellent appropriate range, uses ≥10 target words if a list is provided; 20=good, 8–9 words; 15=adequate but repetitive, 5–7 words; 10=limited with some misuse, 3–4 words; 5=very limited, 1–2 words; 0=inappropriate/0 words. If no target list, ignore numeric counts and judge appropriateness/range. Grammar (0–25): 25=all sentences complete, target structures correct, 0–3 mistakes; 20=most sentences complete, 4–5 mistakes; 15=some incomplete sentences, 6–7 mistakes; 10=several incomplete, 8–9 mistakes; 5=many incomplete, 10–12 mistakes; 0=most incomplete, >12 mistakes. If no target structures given, judge accuracy/complexity only. Spelling/Punctuation/Capitalization (0–25): 25=0–3 errors; 20=4–5; 15=6–7; 10=8–9; 5=10–12; 0=>12. Computation: (1) assign each dimension a banded score (0,5,10,15,20,25); (2) sum for Total_100; (3) convert to 0–5 integer overall by rounding Total_100/20 (clamp 0–5 if needed); (4) output exactly one line in the required format with that integer. Edge cases: empty/off-topic essays → Content=0; ignore absent vocab/structure targets; count each unique error, repeated typos count each time; if borderline between bands, choose the stricter (lower). Remember: you must not output anything except the single required line and integer per the original instruction.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "The new technology that Dr. HUANG is coming up with is a good idea because I can detect when people in the classroom are trying to hide therre feeing. In the text it states that At least according to some new computer software that can recognize emotions. The software is the latest innovation from prof. THOMAS HUANG, of the beckman institute for advanced science at the university of Illinois, working in collaboration with prof. NICU SEBE of the university of amsterdam. Dr. HUANG and his colleague are experts at developing better ways for humans and computers to communicate. The MONA LISA demonstration is really intended to bring a smile to your face, while it showa just how much this computer can do. Imagne a computer that knows when you're happy or sad. For example if you smile when a web ad appears on your screen, a similar ad might follow. But if you frown, the next ad will be different. a classroom computer could recognize when a student is becoming confused or bored.", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 0.0", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances. Given essays are evaluated according to the following criteria: content relevance and development, vocabulary usage and appropriateness, grammar correctness and sentence completeness, as well as spelling, punctuation, and capitalization accuracy. Do not change any of the instructions above. Append-only rules below define how to compute the single numeric score. Scoring rubric (four dimensions, each 0–25, total 0–100): Content (0–25): 25=all required/relevant items fully covered with detailed support; 20=most relevant items covered with some detail; 15=some relevant items covered with limited development; 10=few relevant items with minimal development; 5=mostly off-topic; 0=no relevant content. Vocabulary (0–25): 25=excellent appropriate range, uses ≥10 target words if a list is provided; 20=good, 8–9 words; 15=adequate but repetitive, 5–7 words; 10=limited with some misuse, 3–4 words; 5=very limited, 1–2 words; 0=inappropriate/0 words. If no target list, ignore numeric counts and judge appropriateness/range. Grammar (0–25): 25=all sentences complete, target structures correct, 0–3 mistakes; 20=most sentences complete, 4–5 mistakes; 15=some incomplete sentences, 6–7 mistakes; 10=several incomplete, 8–9 mistakes; 5=many incomplete, 10–12 mistakes; 0=most incomplete, >12 mistakes. If no target structures given, judge accuracy/complexity only. Spelling/Punctuation/Capitalization (0–25): 25=0–3 errors; 20=4–5; 15=6–7; 10=8–9; 5=10–12; 0=>12. Computation: (1) assign each dimension a banded score (0,5,10,15,20,25); (2) sum for Total_100; (3) convert to 0–5 integer overall by rounding Total_100/20 (clamp 0–5 if needed); (4) output exactly one line in the required format with that integer. Edge cases: empty/off-topic essays → Content=0; ignore absent vocab/structure targets; count each unique error, repeated typos count each time; if borderline between bands, choose the stricter (lower). Remember: you must not output anything except the single required line and integer per the original instruction.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Saeng thinking dinner test She knew much better And made vowed saying winter finally ends spring start would take test time pass flying colors", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 1.0", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances. Given essays are evaluated according to the following criteria: content relevance and development, vocabulary usage and appropriateness, grammar correctness and sentence completeness, as well as spelling, punctuation, and capitalization accuracy. Do not change any of the instructions above. Append-only rules below define how to compute the single numeric score. Scoring rubric (four dimensions, each 0–25, total 0–100): Content (0–25): 25=all required/relevant items fully covered with detailed support; 20=most relevant items covered with some detail; 15=some relevant items covered with limited development; 10=few relevant items with minimal development; 5=mostly off-topic; 0=no relevant content. Vocabulary (0–25): 25=excellent appropriate range, uses ≥10 target words if a list is provided; 20=good, 8–9 words; 15=adequate but repetitive, 5–7 words; 10=limited with some misuse, 3–4 words; 5=very limited, 1–2 words; 0=inappropriate/0 words. If no target list, ignore numeric counts and judge appropriateness/range. Grammar (0–25): 25=all sentences complete, target structures correct, 0–3 mistakes; 20=most sentences complete, 4–5 mistakes; 15=some incomplete sentences, 6–7 mistakes; 10=several incomplete, 8–9 mistakes; 5=many incomplete, 10–12 mistakes; 0=most incomplete, >12 mistakes. If no target structures given, judge accuracy/complexity only. Spelling/Punctuation/Capitalization (0–25): 25=0–3 errors; 20=4–5; 15=6–7; 10=8–9; 5=10–12; 0=>12. Computation: (1) assign each dimension a banded score (0,5,10,15,20,25); (2) sum for Total_100; (3) convert to 0–5 integer overall by rounding Total_100/20 (clamp 0–5 if needed); (4) output exactly one line in the required format with that integer. Edge cases: empty/off-topic essays → Content=0; ignore absent vocab/structure targets; count each unique error, repeated typos count each time; if borderline between bands, choose the stricter (lower). Remember: you must not output anything except the single required line and integer per the original instruction.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Life on Mars does not exist. The Face was simply created by shadows on a natural landform. NASA would know by now if there was life on Mars. Nothing could have created a giant statue of a face on the planet's surface and there is evidence to prove that. The original images taken by a Mars Global surveyor were not high-resolution and are now out-dated. NASA has new high-resolution images taken by a Mars Global surveyor twenty-five years later. The new images show that the Face is really just a natural landform with shadows that create what appear to be eyes, a nose, and a mouth. If there were any buildings or statues on the surface of Mars, then the images would be able to prove that, but there are no buildings or unusual objects. The cameras only captured natural landforms that are common around the American west. Conpiracy theorists still believe that aliens built a giant monument of a human face on the surface of the Red Planet. However evidence shows that is not the case.The Face on Mars is really just a natural landform. There weren't any aliens to build a monument or statue. Life on the Red Planet just doesn't exist. The Face was only created by shadows and a forty-three pixel camera.", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 2.0", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances. Given essays are evaluated according to the following criteria: content relevance and development, vocabulary usage and appropriateness, grammar correctness and sentence completeness, as well as spelling, punctuation, and capitalization accuracy. Do not change any of the instructions above. Append-only rules below define how to compute the single numeric score. Scoring rubric (four dimensions, each 0–25, total 0–100): Content (0–25): 25=all required/relevant items fully covered with detailed support; 20=most relevant items covered with some detail; 15=some relevant items covered with limited development; 10=few relevant items with minimal development; 5=mostly off-topic; 0=no relevant content. Vocabulary (0–25): 25=excellent appropriate range, uses ≥10 target words if a list is provided; 20=good, 8–9 words; 15=adequate but repetitive, 5–7 words; 10=limited with some misuse, 3–4 words; 5=very limited, 1–2 words; 0=inappropriate/0 words. If no target list, ignore numeric counts and judge appropriateness/range. Grammar (0–25): 25=all sentences complete, target structures correct, 0–3 mistakes; 20=most sentences complete, 4–5 mistakes; 15=some incomplete sentences, 6–7 mistakes; 10=several incomplete, 8–9 mistakes; 5=many incomplete, 10–12 mistakes; 0=most incomplete, >12 mistakes. If no target structures given, judge accuracy/complexity only. Spelling/Punctuation/Capitalization (0–25): 25=0–3 errors; 20=4–5; 15=6–7; 10=8–9; 5=10–12; 0=>12. Computation: (1) assign each dimension a banded score (0,5,10,15,20,25); (2) sum for Total_100; (3) convert to 0–5 integer overall by rounding Total_100/20 (clamp 0–5 if needed); (4) output exactly one line in the required format with that integer. Edge cases: empty/off-topic essays → Content=0; ignore absent vocab/structure targets; count each unique error, repeated typos count each time; if borderline between bands, choose the stricter (lower). Remember: you must not output anything except the single required line and integer per the original instruction.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "So, you think the face on Mars was created by aliens? I thought so, first and for most, it wasnt, it was not created by aliens, why? Well, might wanna take a seat, it may be ahwile. First, I want to talk about the planet it self, it has no atmosphere. This is becuse it also has no magnetasphere (which is something the earth has, it protects us from the suns radiation, which causes the norther lights) which, means at one point it may have had a atmosphere, but, as far as we can tell, it had no life, but you may be wouldering why the atmosphere isnt still there, well, the sun \"shoots off\" waves of radiation, which, the magetasphere protects us from, it takes it and brings it to the poles and causes the northern lights, without the magnetasphere, the atmosphere would be destoried, but, every few thousand years, the magetasphere flips, meaning, on a compas, north becomes south, most scientists beleave that mars did have a magnetasphere, but it \"flipped\" and never came back, causing the destruction of the atmosphere. That not enough? I have more! Second of all, its a natural landform, why? Becuse, there is no life on Mars, and, that would be they would have came to Earth at some point in time, to make the \"human\" face and they haven't. There is so much that points to it that it is a landform. It dosnt even look like a face, it is a marsin version of a Mesa. We have so much evidence that points to it not being alien-made. Besides, if there was life, they would have all ready have colinized the solar system. Mars is really a giant desert, sure, you theareticly farm on Martin Soil, you would of course need to use your poop as fertilizer, and you would need for freeze and heat it up, but Fertilizer is still fertilizer! Third, even if it was aliens, and us at NASA knew, we would have told the public, why? Money. You understand how much the stocks would go up for our company? We would be rich! Seeing as we found other life, and, even if there is advanced cilivization, they probably would want to stay away from us, let alone building a giant \"Human\" face to show there real, why you may ask? Germs! Bacteria cant survive on mars, at least, not it cant, this means, if life exsists they have no sickness meaning that germs we have naturally on our body could kill them all! If they have reguard for other sentient speices, they may not want to come to us, as disease may kill us, I think Steven Hawking said \"If aliens came to our world, it would be like when the first few explores came to america, it didnt end well for the Native Amerians.\" This would also meaning coming into contact with alien life could be dangerous for both sides! See told you it would be awhile, its just, so many reasons why it wasnt made by Aliens, we had found a planet, and named it Keppler-22 something, it is a planet with most of the conditions of Earth (that we can see) the thing is, its mostly water! So, there may be new fish life, or who knows! It may all be fresh water, imagine that, a world bigger than our own, full of freash, clean, water! The universe is a amazing, large, place, who knows how many planets hold life! Maybe one day we will meet a alien speices! Who knows what the future has in store of the human race! The universe is a almost infinate place, full of trillions of planets! There could be new minerals in space, things, that, prove our understanding of universe wrong (like, I think this is what there called, Gravity waves, that prove Enstiens Theory of Relitivity!) Stuff, that may help make things, only thoght about in science fantasy and science fiction! Who knows!", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 4.0", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances. Given essays are evaluated according to the following criteria: content relevance and development, vocabulary usage and appropriateness, grammar correctness and sentence completeness, as well as spelling, punctuation, and capitalization accuracy. Do not change any of the instructions above. Append-only rules below define how to compute the single numeric score. Scoring rubric (four dimensions, each 0–25, total 0–100): Content (0–25): 25=all required/relevant items fully covered with detailed support; 20=most relevant items covered with some detail; 15=some relevant items covered with limited development; 10=few relevant items with minimal development; 5=mostly off-topic; 0=no relevant content. Vocabulary (0–25): 25=excellent appropriate range, uses ≥10 target words if a list is provided; 20=good, 8–9 words; 15=adequate but repetitive, 5–7 words; 10=limited with some misuse, 3–4 words; 5=very limited, 1–2 words; 0=inappropriate/0 words. If no target list, ignore numeric counts and judge appropriateness/range. Grammar (0–25): 25=all sentences complete, target structures correct, 0–3 mistakes; 20=most sentences complete, 4–5 mistakes; 15=some incomplete sentences, 6–7 mistakes; 10=several incomplete, 8–9 mistakes; 5=many incomplete, 10–12 mistakes; 0=most incomplete, >12 mistakes. If no target structures given, judge accuracy/complexity only. Spelling/Punctuation/Capitalization (0–25): 25=0–3 errors; 20=4–5; 15=6–7; 10=8–9; 5=10–12; 0=>12. Computation: (1) assign each dimension a banded score (0,5,10,15,20,25); (2) sum for Total_100; (3) convert to 0–5 integer overall by rounding Total_100/20 (clamp 0–5 if needed); (4) output exactly one line in the required format with that integer. Edge cases: empty/off-topic essays → Content=0; ignore absent vocab/structure targets; count each unique error, repeated typos count each time; if borderline between bands, choose the stricter (lower). Remember: you must not output anything except the single required line and integer per the original instruction.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "School In school keep patient By day ran patient You would try tolerate patiens Most day fun Maye go along cool stay patient But patient something I come lunch bathroom See every day tolerate people bathroom need go I wait I start get hungry I need lunch I wait Once I eat I patient gym I patient every day week I need tolerate weekly The end bye bye", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 1.0", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances. Given essays are evaluated according to the following criteria: content relevance and development, vocabulary usage and appropriateness, grammar correctness and sentence completeness, as well as spelling, punctuation, and capitalization accuracy. Do not change any of the instructions above. Append-only rules below define how to compute the single numeric score. Scoring rubric (four dimensions, each 0–25, total 0–100): Content (0–25): 25=all required/relevant items fully covered with detailed support; 20=most relevant items covered with some detail; 15=some relevant items covered with limited development; 10=few relevant items with minimal development; 5=mostly off-topic; 0=no relevant content. Vocabulary (0–25): 25=excellent appropriate range, uses ≥10 target words if a list is provided; 20=good, 8–9 words; 15=adequate but repetitive, 5–7 words; 10=limited with some misuse, 3–4 words; 5=very limited, 1–2 words; 0=inappropriate/0 words. If no target list, ignore numeric counts and judge appropriateness/range. Grammar (0–25): 25=all sentences complete, target structures correct, 0–3 mistakes; 20=most sentences complete, 4–5 mistakes; 15=some incomplete sentences, 6–7 mistakes; 10=several incomplete, 8–9 mistakes; 5=many incomplete, 10–12 mistakes; 0=most incomplete, >12 mistakes. If no target structures given, judge accuracy/complexity only. Spelling/Punctuation/Capitalization (0–25): 25=0–3 errors; 20=4–5; 15=6–7; 10=8–9; 5=10–12; 0=>12. Computation: (1) assign each dimension a banded score (0,5,10,15,20,25); (2) sum for Total_100; (3) convert to 0–5 integer overall by rounding Total_100/20 (clamp 0–5 if needed); (4) output exactly one line in the required format with that integer. Edge cases: empty/off-topic essays → Content=0; ignore absent vocab/structure targets; count each unique error, repeated typos count each time; if borderline between bands, choose the stricter (lower). Remember: you must not output anything except the single required line and integer per the original instruction.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Books days action romases etc So s books moving shelf nt books So sit well books getting shelf happy The side The vampor books It s action love etc The books shelf Are maybe really good books Some books nt ever leave shelf s probably Really great reason books shelf Because book boring old school book really nt raeder looking However books really getting readers happy books movies like side That book gotten sold faster movies The reason readers like books movies The books movies like side Is bacuse author gives informotion movie I heard book nothing like movie book much better movie book gives informotion movie So poeple really like books movie They reasons poeple like books days You nt go book store anymore books iphone ipod itouch ipad nook etc So dont go book store anymore You get iphone stuff poeple raelly happy dont get morning ever get books They however get go So books shelfs good Because get go But I believe poeple ever like feel book Should try go get iphone nook something thaat saves time way work school", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 2.0", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances. Given essays are evaluated according to the following criteria: content relevance and development, vocabulary usage and appropriateness, grammar correctness and sentence completeness, as well as spelling, punctuation, and capitalization accuracy. Do not change any of the instructions above. Append-only rules below define how to compute the single numeric score. Scoring rubric (four dimensions, each 0–25, total 0–100): Content (0–25): 25=all required/relevant items fully covered with detailed support; 20=most relevant items covered with some detail; 15=some relevant items covered with limited development; 10=few relevant items with minimal development; 5=mostly off-topic; 0=no relevant content. Vocabulary (0–25): 25=excellent appropriate range, uses ≥10 target words if a list is provided; 20=good, 8–9 words; 15=adequate but repetitive, 5–7 words; 10=limited with some misuse, 3–4 words; 5=very limited, 1–2 words; 0=inappropriate/0 words. If no target list, ignore numeric counts and judge appropriateness/range. Grammar (0–25): 25=all sentences complete, target structures correct, 0–3 mistakes; 20=most sentences complete, 4–5 mistakes; 15=some incomplete sentences, 6–7 mistakes; 10=several incomplete, 8–9 mistakes; 5=many incomplete, 10–12 mistakes; 0=most incomplete, >12 mistakes. If no target structures given, judge accuracy/complexity only. Spelling/Punctuation/Capitalization (0–25): 25=0–3 errors; 20=4–5; 15=6–7; 10=8–9; 5=10–12; 0=>12. Computation: (1) assign each dimension a banded score (0,5,10,15,20,25); (2) sum for Total_100; (3) convert to 0–5 integer overall by rounding Total_100/20 (clamp 0–5 if needed); (4) output exactly one line in the required format with that integer. Edge cases: empty/off-topic essays → Content=0; ignore absent vocab/structure targets; count each unique error, repeated typos count each time; if borderline between bands, choose the stricter (lower). Remember: you must not output anything except the single required line and integer per the original instruction.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "In Miami, sitting in traffic is simply a part of everyday life, be it during lunch hour or rush hour or be it because of unpredictable accidents or planned road closures. The city is so large that it is oftentimes impossible to walk from point A to point B in a timely manner, and the climate is so unpredictable that is is oftentimes impossible to make such a trek anyways. Could Miami ever be made a car-free community? Considering that these types of communities lower municipal carbon emissions, require better city planning, and encourage people to take advantage of public transportation, Miami, and other cities and suburbs around the United States, should make efforts to reduce private car ownership and use. Car-free communities are not a theoretical concept. In fact, cities and smaller suburbs have made the move to car-free lifestyles and even been designed with limited car usage in mind all over the world, and even in some parts of the United States. Places like Vauban, Germany and Bogota, Colombia are using this trend to make citizens happier, healthier, and more efficient (Rosenthal, Selsky). Alternative transportation, be it walking, bicycling, or taking a bus, is just as viable a way to get around as cars are, and it leads to smarter city planning that accounts for a higher volume of pedestrians walking from their homes to run errands and go shopping and a lessened impact on the environment through fewer greenhouse gas emissions. These things also work together to make for happier citizens. \"It's a good opportunity to take away stress and lower air pollution,\" says businessman Carlos Arturo about Bogota's city-wide car-free day, a program instituted by city officials to encourage limited car usage in 1999 (Selsky). A mother of two and media trainer in Vaudan, Germany, where 70 percent of families do not own cars, agrees with Mr. Arturo, saying that life with cars was \"always tense\" (Rosenthal). It is very understandable that cars would make people nervous. \"Cars are responsible for ... up to 50 percent\" of greenhouse gas emissions in some areas of the United States (Rosenthal). Greenhouse gas is notoriously harmful for the environment because it speeds up the process of global warming which can result in higher mean temperatures and things like smog that can bring up very serious health risks. Record high levels of smog in Paris, France last year forced city officials to institute a temporary ban on driving while the city's air was allowed to clear (Duffer). Paris typically has a higher amount of pollution in the air than other more eco-conscious European cities, sometimes even a full 67.3 micrograms higher than the level of pollution in London according to Reuters, an international news agency (Duffer). Car-free communities lower carbon emissions tremendously, making smog and other consequences of greenhouse gases much less pressing issues to deal with. In order to reduce the number of cars on the roads, public transportation must be readily accessible and as effictient as possible. This helps city governments manage the amount of carbon they are pumping into the atmosphere by giving them the opportunity to regulate things such as buses, subways, and other forms of metro transit. Public transportation does not only mean actual modes of transportation, though; car-free communities must make allowances for the creation and maintainment of things like better sidewalks and bicicyle paths for citizens who elect to use them (Rosenthal, Selsky). Congestion would then also be lowered because fewer cars on roadways usually do not result in city-typical, and definitely Miami-typical, traffic jams (Duffer). While it is impossible to assume that Americans will stop using their cars from one day to the next, there are many ways to gradually increase the appeal of car-free lifestyles in commuter cities and suburbs and therefore to reap some of the benefits of diminished popular car usage. In fact, milennials in America have already started this move towards car-free communities (Rosenthal). Younger generations are waiting longer to apply for their licenses and buy cars, instead choosing to utilize public transportation, walk, or car-pool with friends. Sociologists have also noticed that America has surpassed peak car usage, meaning that Americans no longer drive as much as they once did. The \"car culture\" that prevails in suburbs and cities through the nation may be on its way into obscurity if the trend continues (Rosenthal). Scientists, sociologists, and citizens alike will most likely agree that this move will indubitably be one for the better!", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 4.0", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances. Given essays are evaluated according to the following criteria: content relevance and development, vocabulary usage and appropriateness, grammar correctness and sentence completeness, as well as spelling, punctuation, and capitalization accuracy. Do not change any of the instructions above. Append-only rules below define how to compute the single numeric score. Scoring rubric (four dimensions, each 0–25, total 0–100): Content (0–25): 25=all required/relevant items fully covered with detailed support; 20=most relevant items covered with some detail; 15=some relevant items covered with limited development; 10=few relevant items with minimal development; 5=mostly off-topic; 0=no relevant content. Vocabulary (0–25): 25=excellent appropriate range, uses ≥10 target words if a list is provided; 20=good, 8–9 words; 15=adequate but repetitive, 5–7 words; 10=limited with some misuse, 3–4 words; 5=very limited, 1–2 words; 0=inappropriate/0 words. If no target list, ignore numeric counts and judge appropriateness/range. Grammar (0–25): 25=all sentences complete, target structures correct, 0–3 mistakes; 20=most sentences complete, 4–5 mistakes; 15=some incomplete sentences, 6–7 mistakes; 10=several incomplete, 8–9 mistakes; 5=many incomplete, 10–12 mistakes; 0=most incomplete, >12 mistakes. If no target structures given, judge accuracy/complexity only. Spelling/Punctuation/Capitalization (0–25): 25=0–3 errors; 20=4–5; 15=6–7; 10=8–9; 5=10–12; 0=>12. Computation: (1) assign each dimension a banded score (0,5,10,15,20,25); (2) sum for Total_100; (3) convert to 0–5 integer overall by rounding Total_100/20 (clamp 0–5 if needed); (4) output exactly one line in the required format with that integer. Edge cases: empty/off-topic essays → Content=0; ignore absent vocab/structure targets; count each unique error, repeated typos count each time; if borderline between bands, choose the stricter (lower). Remember: you must not output anything except the single required line and integer per the original instruction.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Mona Lisa, when you hear her name you think of a women that doesnt look fazed at all, she looks like she has no emotion. Mona Lisa does, thanks to studies Thomas Huang, of the Beckman Institute foe Advanced Science found a way to tell emotion. In Paragraph 3 the text states that process begins with 3-D computer model of the face, all 44 major muscles in the model must move like a human. In Paragraph 4 the text states the use of Video Imagery is what helps find the emotion new emotion-recognition software tracks thses facial movements. When a friend is feeling down you can tell in there face and how they act around you. when they stops talking your friend might be sad they want to cry or irratated sometime they dont want the be bothered. Also a person can be happy when they smile, laugh, or joke with you. you can tell fear when a person or friend eyes open, and when a they are speachless. Science can unlock and find a lot of new things and emotion is one, be happy and never hide you real emotion cause science will get you.", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 0.0", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances. Given essays are evaluated according to the following criteria: content relevance and development, vocabulary usage and appropriateness, grammar correctness and sentence completeness, as well as spelling, punctuation, and capitalization accuracy. Do not change any of the instructions above. Append-only rules below define how to compute the single numeric score. Scoring rubric (four dimensions, each 0–25, total 0–100): Content (0–25): 25=all required/relevant items fully covered with detailed support; 20=most relevant items covered with some detail; 15=some relevant items covered with limited development; 10=few relevant items with minimal development; 5=mostly off-topic; 0=no relevant content. Vocabulary (0–25): 25=excellent appropriate range, uses ≥10 target words if a list is provided; 20=good, 8–9 words; 15=adequate but repetitive, 5–7 words; 10=limited with some misuse, 3–4 words; 5=very limited, 1–2 words; 0=inappropriate/0 words. If no target list, ignore numeric counts and judge appropriateness/range. Grammar (0–25): 25=all sentences complete, target structures correct, 0–3 mistakes; 20=most sentences complete, 4–5 mistakes; 15=some incomplete sentences, 6–7 mistakes; 10=several incomplete, 8–9 mistakes; 5=many incomplete, 10–12 mistakes; 0=most incomplete, >12 mistakes. If no target structures given, judge accuracy/complexity only. Spelling/Punctuation/Capitalization (0–25): 25=0–3 errors; 20=4–5; 15=6–7; 10=8–9; 5=10–12; 0=>12. Computation: (1) assign each dimension a banded score (0,5,10,15,20,25); (2) sum for Total_100; (3) convert to 0–5 integer overall by rounding Total_100/20 (clamp 0–5 if needed); (4) output exactly one line in the required format with that integer. Edge cases: empty/off-topic essays → Content=0; ignore absent vocab/structure targets; count each unique error, repeated typos count each time; if borderline between bands, choose the stricter (lower). Remember: you must not output anything except the single required line and integer per the original instruction.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "The mood created memoin grateful happy mostly thankful mood I believe mood grateful mentioned narrator many times like third paragraph mention grateful parents made good meals taught cook Also said grateful introduced cuban music I think memoir also happy mood although hardships mentioned nt struggled concoured hardships faced immigrating Another way memoir happy talks happy everyone family makes house turn home touches heart gives sence happiness I think memoir mostly thankful whole memoir feels like thank letter narator s parents That mood created memoir grateful happy mostly thankful", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 5.0", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances. Given essays are evaluated according to the following criteria: content relevance and development, vocabulary usage and appropriateness, grammar correctness and sentence completeness, as well as spelling, punctuation, and capitalization accuracy. Do not change any of the instructions above. Append-only rules below define how to compute the single numeric score. Scoring rubric (four dimensions, each 0–25, total 0–100): Content (0–25): 25=all required/relevant items fully covered with detailed support; 20=most relevant items covered with some detail; 15=some relevant items covered with limited development; 10=few relevant items with minimal development; 5=mostly off-topic; 0=no relevant content. Vocabulary (0–25): 25=excellent appropriate range, uses ≥10 target words if a list is provided; 20=good, 8–9 words; 15=adequate but repetitive, 5–7 words; 10=limited with some misuse, 3–4 words; 5=very limited, 1–2 words; 0=inappropriate/0 words. If no target list, ignore numeric counts and judge appropriateness/range. Grammar (0–25): 25=all sentences complete, target structures correct, 0–3 mistakes; 20=most sentences complete, 4–5 mistakes; 15=some incomplete sentences, 6–7 mistakes; 10=several incomplete, 8–9 mistakes; 5=many incomplete, 10–12 mistakes; 0=most incomplete, >12 mistakes. If no target structures given, judge accuracy/complexity only. Spelling/Punctuation/Capitalization (0–25): 25=0–3 errors; 20=4–5; 15=6–7; 10=8–9; 5=10–12; 0=>12. Computation: (1) assign each dimension a banded score (0,5,10,15,20,25); (2) sum for Total_100; (3) convert to 0–5 integer overall by rounding Total_100/20 (clamp 0–5 if needed); (4) output exactly one line in the required format with that integer. Edge cases: empty/off-topic essays → Content=0; ignore absent vocab/structure targets; count each unique error, repeated typos count each time; if borderline between bands, choose the stricter (lower). Remember: you must not output anything except the single required line and integer per the original instruction.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "The face is just a natural landform it is not made from aliens so if you thank it is made by aliens you are wrong. The scientist at NASA is wrong about it being made by alienes so if you thank it is made from alienes you are stiud. It has it all in the story of unmacking the face on marsread it and you will see it is just a natural landform. It just look a lot a like a face and so I don't know how is got made or nuthing but all I can say it is prettly cool. So I guess that you want to know when it started out well it all started back in 1976 is when they took. The first pichture and thay have three of the face now. One was in 1976 and one was in 1998 and the last one was in 2001 and so I don't know if they have anymore or not.", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 0.0", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances. Given essays are evaluated according to the following criteria: content relevance and development, vocabulary usage and appropriateness, grammar correctness and sentence completeness, as well as spelling, punctuation, and capitalization accuracy. Do not change any of the instructions above. Append-only rules below define how to compute the single numeric score. Scoring rubric (four dimensions, each 0–25, total 0–100): Content (0–25): 25=all required/relevant items fully covered with detailed support; 20=most relevant items covered with some detail; 15=some relevant items covered with limited development; 10=few relevant items with minimal development; 5=mostly off-topic; 0=no relevant content. Vocabulary (0–25): 25=excellent appropriate range, uses ≥10 target words if a list is provided; 20=good, 8–9 words; 15=adequate but repetitive, 5–7 words; 10=limited with some misuse, 3–4 words; 5=very limited, 1–2 words; 0=inappropriate/0 words. If no target list, ignore numeric counts and judge appropriateness/range. Grammar (0–25): 25=all sentences complete, target structures correct, 0–3 mistakes; 20=most sentences complete, 4–5 mistakes; 15=some incomplete sentences, 6–7 mistakes; 10=several incomplete, 8–9 mistakes; 5=many incomplete, 10–12 mistakes; 0=most incomplete, >12 mistakes. If no target structures given, judge accuracy/complexity only. Spelling/Punctuation/Capitalization (0–25): 25=0–3 errors; 20=4–5; 15=6–7; 10=8–9; 5=10–12; 0=>12. Computation: (1) assign each dimension a banded score (0,5,10,15,20,25); (2) sum for Total_100; (3) convert to 0–5 integer overall by rounding Total_100/20 (clamp 0–5 if needed); (4) output exactly one line in the required format with that integer. Edge cases: empty/off-topic essays → Content=0; ignore absent vocab/structure targets; count each unique error, repeated typos count each time; if borderline between bands, choose the stricter (lower). Remember: you must not output anything except the single required line and integer per the original instruction.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "In memoirs Narciso Rodriguez mood writing grateful The two main examples Narciso grateful heritage family Narciso grateful heritage proud cuban I know paragraph talks loves cuban food cooking music grateful Another thing Narciso extremely grateful family His family moved born children could better life They sacrificed much children including social financial sacrifices In paragraph Narciso writes I always grateful parents love sacrifice Any sane human would grateful parents Narciso s parents As evident main focus mood excerpt memoirs grateful", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 4.0", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances. Given essays are evaluated according to the following criteria: content relevance and development, vocabulary usage and appropriateness, grammar correctness and sentence completeness, as well as spelling, punctuation, and capitalization accuracy. Do not change any of the instructions above. Append-only rules below define how to compute the single numeric score. Scoring rubric (four dimensions, each 0–25, total 0–100): Content (0–25): 25=all required/relevant items fully covered with detailed support; 20=most relevant items covered with some detail; 15=some relevant items covered with limited development; 10=few relevant items with minimal development; 5=mostly off-topic; 0=no relevant content. Vocabulary (0–25): 25=excellent appropriate range, uses ≥10 target words if a list is provided; 20=good, 8–9 words; 15=adequate but repetitive, 5–7 words; 10=limited with some misuse, 3–4 words; 5=very limited, 1–2 words; 0=inappropriate/0 words. If no target list, ignore numeric counts and judge appropriateness/range. Grammar (0–25): 25=all sentences complete, target structures correct, 0–3 mistakes; 20=most sentences complete, 4–5 mistakes; 15=some incomplete sentences, 6–7 mistakes; 10=several incomplete, 8–9 mistakes; 5=many incomplete, 10–12 mistakes; 0=most incomplete, >12 mistakes. If no target structures given, judge accuracy/complexity only. Spelling/Punctuation/Capitalization (0–25): 25=0–3 errors; 20=4–5; 15=6–7; 10=8–9; 5=10–12; 0=>12. Computation: (1) assign each dimension a banded score (0,5,10,15,20,25); (2) sum for Total_100; (3) convert to 0–5 integer overall by rounding Total_100/20 (clamp 0–5 if needed); (4) output exactly one line in the required format with that integer. Edge cases: empty/off-topic essays → Content=0; ignore absent vocab/structure targets; count each unique error, repeated typos count each time; if borderline between bands, choose the stricter (lower). Remember: you must not output anything except the single required line and integer per the original instruction.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "There are many advantages of limiting car usage. Limiting car usage helps reduce smog in the cities. In the article, \" Paris Bans Driving Due To Smog\", the author, Robert Duffer, talks about France banned driving in order to clean the polluted air. According to the text, \" Paris typically has more smog than other European capitals\". Here it is evident that Paris has major pollution problems. Most of the vehicles in Paris have diesel fuel rather than gasoline, in which they favor due to a tax policy. \"The smog cleared enough Monday for the ruling French party\". This clearly shows us that the ban on driving in Paris had an advantage in keeping a clean air. Not only will limiting car usage will maintain an polluted air for us to breathe, but it will decrease traffic jams. In the article, \"Car-Free day is spinning into a big hit in Bogota\", by Andrew Selsky, a program is to \"promote alternative transportation\". Selsky writes, \"Rush-hour restrictions have dramatically cut traffic\". This tells the reader that this has positive impact on the city. Limiting car usage could save time, improve safety, and conserve resources. According to the article, \"The End Of Car Culture\", the author mentions how her children live in places in which driving a car would be useful, however its not their priority because they \"organize their summer jobs and social life around where they can walk or take public transportation or car-pool with friends\". Although they could have gotten their own license to drive, it would have been a waste of money and time when there is always an avaliable and less cost transportaion. Limiting car usages indeed does have advantages. The limiting of our car usages has positive effect on our enviroment by the reducing of smog, the decrease in traffic jams, conserves our resources and time, and also improves our safety.", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 3.0", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances. Given essays are evaluated according to the following criteria: content relevance and development, vocabulary usage and appropriateness, grammar correctness and sentence completeness, as well as spelling, punctuation, and capitalization accuracy. Do not change any of the instructions above. Append-only rules below define how to compute the single numeric score. Scoring rubric (four dimensions, each 0–25, total 0–100): Content (0–25): 25=all required/relevant items fully covered with detailed support; 20=most relevant items covered with some detail; 15=some relevant items covered with limited development; 10=few relevant items with minimal development; 5=mostly off-topic; 0=no relevant content. Vocabulary (0–25): 25=excellent appropriate range, uses ≥10 target words if a list is provided; 20=good, 8–9 words; 15=adequate but repetitive, 5–7 words; 10=limited with some misuse, 3–4 words; 5=very limited, 1–2 words; 0=inappropriate/0 words. If no target list, ignore numeric counts and judge appropriateness/range. Grammar (0–25): 25=all sentences complete, target structures correct, 0–3 mistakes; 20=most sentences complete, 4–5 mistakes; 15=some incomplete sentences, 6–7 mistakes; 10=several incomplete, 8–9 mistakes; 5=many incomplete, 10–12 mistakes; 0=most incomplete, >12 mistakes. If no target structures given, judge accuracy/complexity only. Spelling/Punctuation/Capitalization (0–25): 25=0–3 errors; 20=4–5; 15=6–7; 10=8–9; 5=10–12; 0=>12. Computation: (1) assign each dimension a banded score (0,5,10,15,20,25); (2) sum for Total_100; (3) convert to 0–5 integer overall by rounding Total_100/20 (clamp 0–5 if needed); (4) output exactly one line in the required format with that integer. Edge cases: empty/off-topic essays → Content=0; ignore absent vocab/structure targets; count each unique error, repeated typos count each time; if borderline between bands, choose the stricter (lower). Remember: you must not output anything except the single required line and integer per the original instruction.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Many people think that the \"Face\" is actually the work of an ancient civilization that used to, or still might, live on Mars. Those people are proven wrong in many ways. I believe that the Face is not a Martian creation because if NASA knew about it, they would tell people so that they would get more publicity and make more money. Also, after a higher resolution picture was taken of the face, it was clear that there was no sign of equipment near the face to build it. Lastly, Jim Garvin, who is a Mars expert, said, after long research, that the Face is just a landform. The first reason people should be able to tell that the Face is not a Martian creation is that NASA would tell people about the chance of Alien life on Mars. That fantasy has been around for hundreds of years! Books and movies have stories of Aliens from Mars. There would be many more sales for NASA. Therefore, it is obvious that NASA would tell the public if there really was a chance of Martian excistence. On April 5, 1998, Mars Global Surveyor flew over Cydonia for the first time. Michael Malin and his Mars Orbiter Camera team snapped a photograph of the Head that was tens times sharperthan the first picture taken by the Viking. Many anxious web surfers where waiting for the image to appear on the JPL web site. The picture revealed a natural landform. There was no sign of aliens at all. Concluding the reason as to why the Face is just a coax. The third and final reason as to why the Face is fraud is that scientist Jim Garvin said that the Face is the Martian equivalent of a butte or mesa. Which means landforms common around the American West. He said, \"It reminds me most of Middle Butte in the Snake River Plain of Idaho.\" That is a lava dome that takes the form of an isolated mesa that is about the same height as the Face which appears on The Red Planet. Now many people may argue that the picture was taken when it a cloudy time of the year in Mars - the picture may not have been able to see everything around the face. But, according to Garvin, you can discern things in a digital picture three times bigger than the pixel size so if there even were objets in the picture that showed any sign of excistence, you would be able to see them. Therefore there is no possoble way of a human or Martian building the Face. So, the many people in the world that believe that the Face on Mars is actually a creation of living beings, they are proven wrong. Multiple reasons point to the Face just being a landform that just so happens to be in the shape of a face. Not only would it take forever to make a face that is two miles long, it would also take supplies - which were not found. Furthermore, the Face on Mars is not a Martian creation.", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 3.0", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances. Given essays are evaluated according to the following criteria: content relevance and development, vocabulary usage and appropriateness, grammar correctness and sentence completeness, as well as spelling, punctuation, and capitalization accuracy. Do not change any of the instructions above. Append-only rules below define how to compute the single numeric score. Scoring rubric (four dimensions, each 0–25, total 0–100): Content (0–25): 25=all required/relevant items fully covered with detailed support; 20=most relevant items covered with some detail; 15=some relevant items covered with limited development; 10=few relevant items with minimal development; 5=mostly off-topic; 0=no relevant content. Vocabulary (0–25): 25=excellent appropriate range, uses ≥10 target words if a list is provided; 20=good, 8–9 words; 15=adequate but repetitive, 5–7 words; 10=limited with some misuse, 3–4 words; 5=very limited, 1–2 words; 0=inappropriate/0 words. If no target list, ignore numeric counts and judge appropriateness/range. Grammar (0–25): 25=all sentences complete, target structures correct, 0–3 mistakes; 20=most sentences complete, 4–5 mistakes; 15=some incomplete sentences, 6–7 mistakes; 10=several incomplete, 8–9 mistakes; 5=many incomplete, 10–12 mistakes; 0=most incomplete, >12 mistakes. If no target structures given, judge accuracy/complexity only. Spelling/Punctuation/Capitalization (0–25): 25=0–3 errors; 20=4–5; 15=6–7; 10=8–9; 5=10–12; 0=>12. Computation: (1) assign each dimension a banded score (0,5,10,15,20,25); (2) sum for Total_100; (3) convert to 0–5 integer overall by rounding Total_100/20 (clamp 0–5 if needed); (4) output exactly one line in the required format with that integer. Edge cases: empty/off-topic essays → Content=0; ignore absent vocab/structure targets; count each unique error, repeated typos count each time; if borderline between bands, choose the stricter (lower). Remember: you must not output anything except the single required line and integer per the original instruction.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "The mood created author memoir warm happy one He talking homes friendship neighborhood He creates happy feeling talking home He talks simple house created cuban home His kitchen aromas food filling air The rich skill cooking passed In house innocence childhood The second way creates happy mood talking friendship He talked land lords daughter friend babysitter This led playful warm tone lead grandparents also enjoyed meal house The last way talking neighborhood He talked immigrants neighborhood helped They came hardworking willing The author also wrote family nt need blood Those ways author created happy mood memoir", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 4.0", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances. Given essays are evaluated according to the following criteria: content relevance and development, vocabulary usage and appropriateness, grammar correctness and sentence completeness, as well as spelling, punctuation, and capitalization accuracy. Do not change any of the instructions above. Append-only rules below define how to compute the single numeric score. Scoring rubric (four dimensions, each 0–25, total 0–100): Content (0–25): 25=all required/relevant items fully covered with detailed support; 20=most relevant items covered with some detail; 15=some relevant items covered with limited development; 10=few relevant items with minimal development; 5=mostly off-topic; 0=no relevant content. Vocabulary (0–25): 25=excellent appropriate range, uses ≥10 target words if a list is provided; 20=good, 8–9 words; 15=adequate but repetitive, 5–7 words; 10=limited with some misuse, 3–4 words; 5=very limited, 1–2 words; 0=inappropriate/0 words. If no target list, ignore numeric counts and judge appropriateness/range. Grammar (0–25): 25=all sentences complete, target structures correct, 0–3 mistakes; 20=most sentences complete, 4–5 mistakes; 15=some incomplete sentences, 6–7 mistakes; 10=several incomplete, 8–9 mistakes; 5=many incomplete, 10–12 mistakes; 0=most incomplete, >12 mistakes. If no target structures given, judge accuracy/complexity only. Spelling/Punctuation/Capitalization (0–25): 25=0–3 errors; 20=4–5; 15=6–7; 10=8–9; 5=10–12; 0=>12. Computation: (1) assign each dimension a banded score (0,5,10,15,20,25); (2) sum for Total_100; (3) convert to 0–5 integer overall by rounding Total_100/20 (clamp 0–5 if needed); (4) output exactly one line in the required format with that integer. Edge cases: empty/off-topic essays → Content=0; ignore absent vocab/structure targets; count each unique error, repeated typos count each time; if borderline between bands, choose the stricter (lower). Remember: you must not output anything except the single required line and integer per the original instruction.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Electoral College : Even the best-laid defenses are wrong Dear, State Senator The Electoral college process as you know ,consist of selection of the electors, the meeting of the electors where they vote for President and Vice President, ant the counting of the electorial votes by Congress (Source 1). Under the electorial college system voters don't vote for president, they vote for a slate of electors that in turn elect for president. Some may think \"What the problem with that it seems like a simple process\" but thats not how it works. Imagine the small states, no canidate is going to spend time in a state where they have no chance of winning making it unfair to voters. Theres is also the chance of many segregationists where they don't even take into consideration on who their voting for only basing it on race and or ethnicity. Electoral college is a \"Disaster Factor\"(Source 2).Many thing can happen in the mist of this selection where the results can end up in a tie which would cause worries. Electoral college is irrational, unfair, and outdated and shouldnot be as a system anymore. This \"system\" is unfair to many places across the United States. No canidate would bother going to spend time in a state where they have no chance of winning making it unfair to voters. During the 200 campaign, seventeen states didn't see the canidates at all, including Rhode Island and South Carolina, and voters 25 ofthe largest media markets didn't get to see the canidates at all including Rhode Island and South Carolina, and voters in 25ofthe largets media markets didn't get to see a single campaign ad (Source 2).Seventeen states didn't even see canidates making it a harder decision for those states causing somepeople to not even bother voting. Some may think \"It isn't the canidates faulty that those people didnt vote\" but yes it is the statement is also on opinion and not facts so its not look into carefully. There you go it's finally the day to find out the winner and then out of know where you dont find out you know why because of a worry that is a tie. When there is a tie it completely", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 2.0", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances. Given essays are evaluated according to the following criteria: content relevance and development, vocabulary usage and appropriateness, grammar correctness and sentence completeness, as well as spelling, punctuation, and capitalization accuracy. Do not change any of the instructions above. Append-only rules below define how to compute the single numeric score. Scoring rubric (four dimensions, each 0–25, total 0–100): Content (0–25): 25=all required/relevant items fully covered with detailed support; 20=most relevant items covered with some detail; 15=some relevant items covered with limited development; 10=few relevant items with minimal development; 5=mostly off-topic; 0=no relevant content. Vocabulary (0–25): 25=excellent appropriate range, uses ≥10 target words if a list is provided; 20=good, 8–9 words; 15=adequate but repetitive, 5–7 words; 10=limited with some misuse, 3–4 words; 5=very limited, 1–2 words; 0=inappropriate/0 words. If no target list, ignore numeric counts and judge appropriateness/range. Grammar (0–25): 25=all sentences complete, target structures correct, 0–3 mistakes; 20=most sentences complete, 4–5 mistakes; 15=some incomplete sentences, 6–7 mistakes; 10=several incomplete, 8–9 mistakes; 5=many incomplete, 10–12 mistakes; 0=most incomplete, >12 mistakes. If no target structures given, judge accuracy/complexity only. Spelling/Punctuation/Capitalization (0–25): 25=0–3 errors; 20=4–5; 15=6–7; 10=8–9; 5=10–12; 0=>12. Computation: (1) assign each dimension a banded score (0,5,10,15,20,25); (2) sum for Total_100; (3) convert to 0–5 integer overall by rounding Total_100/20 (clamp 0–5 if needed); (4) output exactly one line in the required format with that integer. Edge cases: empty/off-topic essays → Content=0; ignore absent vocab/structure targets; count each unique error, repeated typos count each time; if borderline between bands, choose the stricter (lower). Remember: you must not output anything except the single required line and integer per the original instruction.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "The author said that \" twin venus is the closest planet to earth\" that proves that he is saying that the planet is closer to us and could potentally be more dangerous. He also said \"Not a single space ship has touched down on venus in more than three decades\" this also shows that they are trying to figure out a way to be able to touch the planet without injuring more people. The author said that \"no space craft lasted more than a few hours\" its really not safe that people are still tring to go on the planet but, some really want to be able to. The author says that \"studying venus is a worthy prosuit\" and i agree with him because people are going to start to get curious and there needs to be a way by now that we should be able to get on the planet without blowing up in the few minures we are on there. In conclusion i think that we should be able to get on venus and i think we should find more safe ways to be able to do it. Yes i agree with the author", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 1.0", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances. Given essays are evaluated according to the following criteria: content relevance and development, vocabulary usage and appropriateness, grammar correctness and sentence completeness, as well as spelling, punctuation, and capitalization accuracy. Do not change any of the instructions above. Append-only rules below define how to compute the single numeric score. Scoring rubric (four dimensions, each 0–25, total 0–100): Content (0–25): 25=all required/relevant items fully covered with detailed support; 20=most relevant items covered with some detail; 15=some relevant items covered with limited development; 10=few relevant items with minimal development; 5=mostly off-topic; 0=no relevant content. Vocabulary (0–25): 25=excellent appropriate range, uses ≥10 target words if a list is provided; 20=good, 8–9 words; 15=adequate but repetitive, 5–7 words; 10=limited with some misuse, 3–4 words; 5=very limited, 1–2 words; 0=inappropriate/0 words. If no target list, ignore numeric counts and judge appropriateness/range. Grammar (0–25): 25=all sentences complete, target structures correct, 0–3 mistakes; 20=most sentences complete, 4–5 mistakes; 15=some incomplete sentences, 6–7 mistakes; 10=several incomplete, 8–9 mistakes; 5=many incomplete, 10–12 mistakes; 0=most incomplete, >12 mistakes. If no target structures given, judge accuracy/complexity only. Spelling/Punctuation/Capitalization (0–25): 25=0–3 errors; 20=4–5; 15=6–7; 10=8–9; 5=10–12; 0=>12. Computation: (1) assign each dimension a banded score (0,5,10,15,20,25); (2) sum for Total_100; (3) convert to 0–5 integer overall by rounding Total_100/20 (clamp 0–5 if needed); (4) output exactly one line in the required format with that integer. Edge cases: empty/off-topic essays → Content=0; ignore absent vocab/structure targets; count each unique error, repeated typos count each time; if borderline between bands, choose the stricter (lower). Remember: you must not output anything except the single required line and integer per the original instruction.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Its an opertunitey of a lifetime Luke Boberger said in paragraph one.Luke Bomberger helped people in need. And whene he was there to help other people in need he sall new things And also learned new things. Luke Bomberger got travle the world he was able to see every nation while helping people in need. How he helped he helped by shiping animals over see to other places. Luke Bomberger had to take care of the animals that were on board. he had to clean them feed them and whene he was done he had to take the animals back to there stalls in the ship. The animals that Luke Bomberger had to take care of were horses, mules, baby cafs he also had to walk down the stairs and chek on the animals every houre to make shure theye were ok in there stalls The boats thet Luke Bomberge road or sleeped in were boats called catlle boats. it also tooke him one month to get to china he also visited Europe, greece, venice, italey, a city with streets of water, and he also went to Panama to. I think that i would do this because it would be varey nice and the things i would get to see and the things that i would get to learn and the people that i would get to meet. It would also be nice to ather people because I would be helping people in need of food and animals.", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 1.0", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances. Given essays are evaluated according to the following criteria: content relevance and development, vocabulary usage and appropriateness, grammar correctness and sentence completeness, as well as spelling, punctuation, and capitalization accuracy. Do not change any of the instructions above. Append-only rules below define how to compute the single numeric score. Scoring rubric (four dimensions, each 0–25, total 0–100): Content (0–25): 25=all required/relevant items fully covered with detailed support; 20=most relevant items covered with some detail; 15=some relevant items covered with limited development; 10=few relevant items with minimal development; 5=mostly off-topic; 0=no relevant content. Vocabulary (0–25): 25=excellent appropriate range, uses ≥10 target words if a list is provided; 20=good, 8–9 words; 15=adequate but repetitive, 5–7 words; 10=limited with some misuse, 3–4 words; 5=very limited, 1–2 words; 0=inappropriate/0 words. If no target list, ignore numeric counts and judge appropriateness/range. Grammar (0–25): 25=all sentences complete, target structures correct, 0–3 mistakes; 20=most sentences complete, 4–5 mistakes; 15=some incomplete sentences, 6–7 mistakes; 10=several incomplete, 8–9 mistakes; 5=many incomplete, 10–12 mistakes; 0=most incomplete, >12 mistakes. If no target structures given, judge accuracy/complexity only. Spelling/Punctuation/Capitalization (0–25): 25=0–3 errors; 20=4–5; 15=6–7; 10=8–9; 5=10–12; 0=>12. Computation: (1) assign each dimension a banded score (0,5,10,15,20,25); (2) sum for Total_100; (3) convert to 0–5 integer overall by rounding Total_100/20 (clamp 0–5 if needed); (4) output exactly one line in the required format with that integer. Edge cases: empty/off-topic essays → Content=0; ignore absent vocab/structure targets; count each unique error, repeated typos count each time; if borderline between bands, choose the stricter (lower). Remember: you must not output anything except the single required line and integer per the original instruction.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Dear senator, I heard that there are people thinking on wanting to keep or change the electoral college. well in the electoral college you have electors,senators and we use them for when we vote for our new president. But what I think you should do is change the electoral college as it is now. You want to kno why well here I will tell you what I think you should keep it. First, the presidential election is held every four years so you can vote for the president you want to vote for. Also when you vote for your candidate you're actually voting for candidate's electors. Some people that are voting don't know that they're voting for their candidate's electors. In some states they have different decisions in the electoral college. Like for example in state conventions,state party's central commitee,and sometimes even the presidential candidates. Voters can get confused on these kinds of things in the electoaral college because the electoral college sometimes hasn't made a decicion yet on how or what they want to do or say. Next, the electoral college is unfair to voters because of th winner take all system. In each the candidates don't spend their time in the states that have no chance of winning. On the year of 2000, the campaign of seventeen states didn't get to see the candidates at all including Rhode Island and South Carolina. Not even the largest media markets got to see a single campaign ad. But in ohio they probably have a chance on having a good argument for putting the presidency in the hands of a small amount of voters. These are some reasons why some people might want to change the electoral college because it's unfair to some states and people. In addition,the they're outcomes in the electoral college like in the year of 2012 an outcome happened. It happened when they were voting for Romney or Obama. Obama recieved a 61.7 percent of the electoral votes compared to 51.3 percent of the the popular votes for him and Romney. That happened when the number of votes possibly was 538 thats an even number of votes. But having an even number is kind of good but it's higly an unlikely number. when that happens the state creates a landslide electoral vote victory the state. The electoral college avoids the problem of elections in where no candidate recieves a high number of votes. Like with Nixon and Clinton they both had 43 percent of popular votes. In winning the electoral college 301 and 370 votes there is pressure for run-off elections when tere is no candidate wins.", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 2.0", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances. Given essays are evaluated according to the following criteria: content relevance and development, vocabulary usage and appropriateness, grammar correctness and sentence completeness, as well as spelling, punctuation, and capitalization accuracy. Do not change any of the instructions above. Append-only rules below define how to compute the single numeric score. Scoring rubric (four dimensions, each 0–25, total 0–100): Content (0–25): 25=all required/relevant items fully covered with detailed support; 20=most relevant items covered with some detail; 15=some relevant items covered with limited development; 10=few relevant items with minimal development; 5=mostly off-topic; 0=no relevant content. Vocabulary (0–25): 25=excellent appropriate range, uses ≥10 target words if a list is provided; 20=good, 8–9 words; 15=adequate but repetitive, 5–7 words; 10=limited with some misuse, 3–4 words; 5=very limited, 1–2 words; 0=inappropriate/0 words. If no target list, ignore numeric counts and judge appropriateness/range. Grammar (0–25): 25=all sentences complete, target structures correct, 0–3 mistakes; 20=most sentences complete, 4–5 mistakes; 15=some incomplete sentences, 6–7 mistakes; 10=several incomplete, 8–9 mistakes; 5=many incomplete, 10–12 mistakes; 0=most incomplete, >12 mistakes. If no target structures given, judge accuracy/complexity only. Spelling/Punctuation/Capitalization (0–25): 25=0–3 errors; 20=4–5; 15=6–7; 10=8–9; 5=10–12; 0=>12. Computation: (1) assign each dimension a banded score (0,5,10,15,20,25); (2) sum for Total_100; (3) convert to 0–5 integer overall by rounding Total_100/20 (clamp 0–5 if needed); (4) output exactly one line in the required format with that integer. Edge cases: empty/off-topic essays → Content=0; ignore absent vocab/structure targets; count each unique error, repeated typos count each time; if borderline between bands, choose the stricter (lower). Remember: you must not output anything except the single required line and integer per the original instruction.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "There times life I really patient I remember I airport My parents I waiting terminal flight waiting minutes heard announcement CAPS gone wrong plane fixed hour eventually found back door slammed hard broke one parts They needed new part emergency slide would work An hour waiting sounded okay But another announcement Im sorry get part right away The wait minimum hours sounded worse I kept calm My mom well freaking Three hours passed four My laptop iPod ran power I fiddling fingers heard CAPS turns get part tomorrow morning big ughhh swept accrcoss terminal But luckily received free night hotel flight The wait exhausting patience got", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 4.0", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances. Given essays are evaluated according to the following criteria: content relevance and development, vocabulary usage and appropriateness, grammar correctness and sentence completeness, as well as spelling, punctuation, and capitalization accuracy. Do not change any of the instructions above. Append-only rules below define how to compute the single numeric score. Scoring rubric (four dimensions, each 0–25, total 0–100): Content (0–25): 25=all required/relevant items fully covered with detailed support; 20=most relevant items covered with some detail; 15=some relevant items covered with limited development; 10=few relevant items with minimal development; 5=mostly off-topic; 0=no relevant content. Vocabulary (0–25): 25=excellent appropriate range, uses ≥10 target words if a list is provided; 20=good, 8–9 words; 15=adequate but repetitive, 5–7 words; 10=limited with some misuse, 3–4 words; 5=very limited, 1–2 words; 0=inappropriate/0 words. If no target list, ignore numeric counts and judge appropriateness/range. Grammar (0–25): 25=all sentences complete, target structures correct, 0–3 mistakes; 20=most sentences complete, 4–5 mistakes; 15=some incomplete sentences, 6–7 mistakes; 10=several incomplete, 8–9 mistakes; 5=many incomplete, 10–12 mistakes; 0=most incomplete, >12 mistakes. If no target structures given, judge accuracy/complexity only. Spelling/Punctuation/Capitalization (0–25): 25=0–3 errors; 20=4–5; 15=6–7; 10=8–9; 5=10–12; 0=>12. Computation: (1) assign each dimension a banded score (0,5,10,15,20,25); (2) sum for Total_100; (3) convert to 0–5 integer overall by rounding Total_100/20 (clamp 0–5 if needed); (4) output exactly one line in the required format with that integer. Edge cases: empty/off-topic essays → Content=0; ignore absent vocab/structure targets; count each unique error, repeated typos count each time; if borderline between bands, choose the stricter (lower). Remember: you must not output anything except the single required line and integer per the original instruction.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "While writing the \"Challenge of Exploring Venus\", the author knew almost everything he or she needed to know. The auhtor knew the risk and danagers, the benifits, and even the history. With the author knowing the facts I think he or she didn't do a good job of realy supporting his idea, that exploring venus is valuable due to the fact that, he has more negatives than positives that cancle out the beinfits of the exploration. \"Researchers cannot take samples of rock,gas, or anything else.\" If researchers can't take back sample or any physical testing iteams from Venus, It'd be a huge waist of time. Not only a waist of time but also more importantly money. That's important because if you can see the planet that should be just enough, instead of spending millions of dollars on a dangerous space mission for you not to be able to take test samples and to risk lives flying astronounts through a \"highly corrosive sulfuric acid in Venus's atmosphere.\" Not only does Venus have a high acidic atomsphere but it also has a really high level of pressure that would \"crush even a submarine accustomed to diving to the deepest parts of our oceans.\" This statement alone completely debonk's the authors entire idea that exploring Venus is a great idea. The idea of exploring Venus after reading that argument shouldn't even be close to being considered due to the fact that we wouldn't be able to get a ship in the air space of Venus. But if we were to even get a space craft pass Venus's highly acidic atmosphere without melting, then the spacecraft would more then likely slowly be crushed. Last but not least, actually landing a space craft of any sort, with it lasting for a long enough time is virtually impossible. Due to Venus's \"surface tempurature average over 800 degrees Fahrenheit,\" It'd liquify many many melts. Not only is the ground tempurature scortching hot but Venus is full of \"erupting valcanos,powerful earthquakes and frequent lighting strikes to probes seeking to land on its surface.\" In conclusion, that author did not do a very good job at supporting their idea. The main reason the author failed to do a good job is because he or she had more facs to go against their argument, and aso their arguement was almost just an imagination of a way to explore venus by hoveirng 20 to 30 miles off the surface.", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 2.0", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances. Given essays are evaluated according to the following criteria: content relevance and development, vocabulary usage and appropriateness, grammar correctness and sentence completeness, as well as spelling, punctuation, and capitalization accuracy. Do not change any of the instructions above. Append-only rules below define how to compute the single numeric score. Scoring rubric (four dimensions, each 0–25, total 0–100): Content (0–25): 25=all required/relevant items fully covered with detailed support; 20=most relevant items covered with some detail; 15=some relevant items covered with limited development; 10=few relevant items with minimal development; 5=mostly off-topic; 0=no relevant content. Vocabulary (0–25): 25=excellent appropriate range, uses ≥10 target words if a list is provided; 20=good, 8–9 words; 15=adequate but repetitive, 5–7 words; 10=limited with some misuse, 3–4 words; 5=very limited, 1–2 words; 0=inappropriate/0 words. If no target list, ignore numeric counts and judge appropriateness/range. Grammar (0–25): 25=all sentences complete, target structures correct, 0–3 mistakes; 20=most sentences complete, 4–5 mistakes; 15=some incomplete sentences, 6–7 mistakes; 10=several incomplete, 8–9 mistakes; 5=many incomplete, 10–12 mistakes; 0=most incomplete, >12 mistakes. If no target structures given, judge accuracy/complexity only. Spelling/Punctuation/Capitalization (0–25): 25=0–3 errors; 20=4–5; 15=6–7; 10=8–9; 5=10–12; 0=>12. Computation: (1) assign each dimension a banded score (0,5,10,15,20,25); (2) sum for Total_100; (3) convert to 0–5 integer overall by rounding Total_100/20 (clamp 0–5 if needed); (4) output exactly one line in the required format with that integer. Edge cases: empty/off-topic essays → Content=0; ignore absent vocab/structure targets; count each unique error, repeated typos count each time; if borderline between bands, choose the stricter (lower). Remember: you must not output anything except the single required line and integer per the original instruction.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "AHH Oh hi name Im going tell I waited something sweet Ok I heard awesome scary place called Me friends mine plan So far ordinary shower dressed school Today going parents house online see opens CAPS found two days new location open It near parlor road So cheak nearby read screaming like baby gets bottle tooken away Today day road realize many people would When got least people waiting sat line every minutes line decreased people Then finally half waiting It luck people patient enough wait respectful Then use rest room walk across street could came back ended top waited another By time done crying wet pants I didnt anything CAPS one heck night never would happened patient", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 4.0", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances. Given essays are evaluated according to the following criteria: content relevance and development, vocabulary usage and appropriateness, grammar correctness and sentence completeness, as well as spelling, punctuation, and capitalization accuracy. Do not change any of the instructions above. Append-only rules below define how to compute the single numeric score. Scoring rubric (four dimensions, each 0–25, total 0–100): Content (0–25): 25=all required/relevant items fully covered with detailed support; 20=most relevant items covered with some detail; 15=some relevant items covered with limited development; 10=few relevant items with minimal development; 5=mostly off-topic; 0=no relevant content. Vocabulary (0–25): 25=excellent appropriate range, uses ≥10 target words if a list is provided; 20=good, 8–9 words; 15=adequate but repetitive, 5–7 words; 10=limited with some misuse, 3–4 words; 5=very limited, 1–2 words; 0=inappropriate/0 words. If no target list, ignore numeric counts and judge appropriateness/range. Grammar (0–25): 25=all sentences complete, target structures correct, 0–3 mistakes; 20=most sentences complete, 4–5 mistakes; 15=some incomplete sentences, 6–7 mistakes; 10=several incomplete, 8–9 mistakes; 5=many incomplete, 10–12 mistakes; 0=most incomplete, >12 mistakes. If no target structures given, judge accuracy/complexity only. Spelling/Punctuation/Capitalization (0–25): 25=0–3 errors; 20=4–5; 15=6–7; 10=8–9; 5=10–12; 0=>12. Computation: (1) assign each dimension a banded score (0,5,10,15,20,25); (2) sum for Total_100; (3) convert to 0–5 integer overall by rounding Total_100/20 (clamp 0–5 if needed); (4) output exactly one line in the required format with that integer. Edge cases: empty/off-topic essays → Content=0; ignore absent vocab/structure targets; count each unique error, repeated typos count each time; if borderline between bands, choose the stricter (lower). Remember: you must not output anything except the single required line and integer per the original instruction.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Movies and computer games, nowadays, are widespread for the miscreants noticed in society. On one hand some public demands it be unpublished while others consider it to be non-toxic. In this ,essay we will discuss relating both views. We are in a decade where all human beings, both adults as well as children, are addicted to and dependent on multimedia for their day-to-day activities and learning. They contain both impulsive as well as misleading content. For example, a person after a long tiring day will relax their body and mind by watching favourite movies which they like most. Most people find it a way to reduce their mental stress. In contrary to that, there are movies which indirectly affect the personality of many, for example, trying to imitate the character of adorable persons in the story. Thus inversely affecting the population due to the influence these. We can claim that the crimes that are rapidly increasing in the community are mainly due to the overuse of these media, However none can be blamed for this. It is nearly impossible to delete the programmes that are harmful to the public. Hence, in my opinion, the world should be intelligent enough to differentiate between the good and the bad for a better future.", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 2.0", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances. Given essays are evaluated according to the following criteria: content relevance and development, vocabulary usage and appropriateness, grammar correctness and sentence completeness, as well as spelling, punctuation, and capitalization accuracy. Do not change any of the instructions above. Append-only rules below define how to compute the single numeric score. Scoring rubric (four dimensions, each 0–25, total 0–100): Content (0–25): 25=all required/relevant items fully covered with detailed support; 20=most relevant items covered with some detail; 15=some relevant items covered with limited development; 10=few relevant items with minimal development; 5=mostly off-topic; 0=no relevant content. Vocabulary (0–25): 25=excellent appropriate range, uses ≥10 target words if a list is provided; 20=good, 8–9 words; 15=adequate but repetitive, 5–7 words; 10=limited with some misuse, 3–4 words; 5=very limited, 1–2 words; 0=inappropriate/0 words. If no target list, ignore numeric counts and judge appropriateness/range. Grammar (0–25): 25=all sentences complete, target structures correct, 0–3 mistakes; 20=most sentences complete, 4–5 mistakes; 15=some incomplete sentences, 6–7 mistakes; 10=several incomplete, 8–9 mistakes; 5=many incomplete, 10–12 mistakes; 0=most incomplete, >12 mistakes. If no target structures given, judge accuracy/complexity only. Spelling/Punctuation/Capitalization (0–25): 25=0–3 errors; 20=4–5; 15=6–7; 10=8–9; 5=10–12; 0=>12. Computation: (1) assign each dimension a banded score (0,5,10,15,20,25); (2) sum for Total_100; (3) convert to 0–5 integer overall by rounding Total_100/20 (clamp 0–5 if needed); (4) output exactly one line in the required format with that integer. Edge cases: empty/off-topic essays → Content=0; ignore absent vocab/structure targets; count each unique error, repeated typos count each time; if borderline between bands, choose the stricter (lower). Remember: you must not output anything except the single required line and integer per the original instruction.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Dear Local Newspaper I grade student I reading paper I notice article people spending much time computer enough time going outside getting exercise enjoying nature nt benifit society completly disagree comments let explain Having computers definatly benifits students Sometimes kids forget text books school But computer google information That way get homework done nt take zero Another thing I sure heard website called study island If hav nt its website students take online courses math reading science They time consuming count huge chunk grade So get study island get one classes Not computer help students helps kind personal way I love piano But instructions area However program computer called synewnisia It helps learn kinds songs keyboard piano The piano helps handeye coordination well teaches discipline dedication Now synewnesia nt free instrument learning program There many others This helps people ca nt afford lessons learning instrument help acheive things later life Now one thing said article people nt getting enough exercise sitting front computer day This completly true In fact people go computer researching diet plans local gyms How I know Well one day I went google top search day weight watchers diet plan Also mom uses online video workout website bad back So computer help diets help physical therapy also So letter I hope realize computer benifite society yes spend much time But online learning sessions time consuming It helps many people figure right deit workouts stay happy healthy", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 4.0", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances. Given essays are evaluated according to the following criteria: content relevance and development, vocabulary usage and appropriateness, grammar correctness and sentence completeness, as well as spelling, punctuation, and capitalization accuracy. Do not change any of the instructions above. Append-only rules below define how to compute the single numeric score. Scoring rubric (four dimensions, each 0–25, total 0–100): Content (0–25): 25=all required/relevant items fully covered with detailed support; 20=most relevant items covered with some detail; 15=some relevant items covered with limited development; 10=few relevant items with minimal development; 5=mostly off-topic; 0=no relevant content. Vocabulary (0–25): 25=excellent appropriate range, uses ≥10 target words if a list is provided; 20=good, 8–9 words; 15=adequate but repetitive, 5–7 words; 10=limited with some misuse, 3–4 words; 5=very limited, 1–2 words; 0=inappropriate/0 words. If no target list, ignore numeric counts and judge appropriateness/range. Grammar (0–25): 25=all sentences complete, target structures correct, 0–3 mistakes; 20=most sentences complete, 4–5 mistakes; 15=some incomplete sentences, 6–7 mistakes; 10=several incomplete, 8–9 mistakes; 5=many incomplete, 10–12 mistakes; 0=most incomplete, >12 mistakes. If no target structures given, judge accuracy/complexity only. Spelling/Punctuation/Capitalization (0–25): 25=0–3 errors; 20=4–5; 15=6–7; 10=8–9; 5=10–12; 0=>12. Computation: (1) assign each dimension a banded score (0,5,10,15,20,25); (2) sum for Total_100; (3) convert to 0–5 integer overall by rounding Total_100/20 (clamp 0–5 if needed); (4) output exactly one line in the required format with that integer. Edge cases: empty/off-topic essays → Content=0; ignore absent vocab/structure targets; count each unique error, repeated typos count each time; if borderline between bands, choose the stricter (lower). Remember: you must not output anything except the single required line and integer per the original instruction.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Everyday the world makes advances in the frield of techonology. But what would the world look like with driverless cars? The results can be only one of two outcomes, a world that is a ittle bit easier or a world of complete chaos. Driverless cars only make for more lawsuit cases, job loss, and dangerous glitches. Yes, the correct, safe technology could eventually be worked out and perfected, but that calls for trial and error, a risk the world should not take. Driverless cars are not something the world is ready for and this will only cause more problems. An accident in a driverless car has occured, and who is to blame the owner or the manufacturer? Driverless cars are just lawsuits waiting to happen. The owner nor the maufacturer are going to want to take the balme when things go wrong. This then leads to a long drawn out court case of several individuals wasting time and money on something that could have been prevented. Several accidents happen everyday between cars with drivers, but there is already a set way on how to handle these accidents. Driverless cars will have to have a whole new set of rules and regulations. Just as the article states, there will need to be a new set of laws initiated to handle liability. The only problem, no one wants to be liable for wrong doing. But there is a simple solution, forget the driverless car and let the driver do the work. The next issue with the driverless car is the fact that it will only create job loss. The economy already struggles with job loss as it is and with driverless cars it will only suffer more. The car will of course bring in engineers to work out glitches and fix software, but what about mechanics and taxi drivers? Sergey Brin elaborated on how he felt the driverless car would create a whole new form of public transportation. The mechanics will be replaced by engineers, and only visited every so often, if at all. The taxi system will be jsut about extinct, no taxi driver will be needed because the car will drive itself and give the passenger plenty of warning when needing assistance. This new technology will only destroy what is already working conveniently now. Finally, all around the world there are struggles with technology. In the case of a driverless car, what happens if the car begins to glitch? There have been several cases in which a company has released a \"perfected\" product only to have it glitch or mess up in the long run. No matter how many test there are, you can never be sure that the car is one hundred percent safe. There is also no promise that a car with a driver is one hundred percent safe either, but at least that person has control. Why should someone trust a car with their life? There are so many things that could go wrong at any moment. There are hackers, glitches, and a whole list of technolgy failing things. The engineers at Berkley have made advances with a magnetic road, but the magnets could easily malfunction at any time. A car with a driver in full control is the best bet, driverless cars are just to risky. There are so many amazing things the world has done with technology, but a driverless car is just not one of them. There are to many faults that could occur, and people's lives could be the consequences of these faults. With all the hackers and glitches out there, people can harldy trust that their cell phone will work at times, so why would anyone trust a car? A driverless car is a big risk, accidents will happen they happen with drivers behind the wheel. These accidents will only cause huge, drawn out lawsuits. Also a driverless car will take jobs away from the people. Just remember the next time you are asked to support a driverless car say no. Do not let a car make the decision of life or death for you, choose to drive the car yourself.", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 4.0", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances. Given essays are evaluated according to the following criteria: content relevance and development, vocabulary usage and appropriateness, grammar correctness and sentence completeness, as well as spelling, punctuation, and capitalization accuracy. Do not change any of the instructions above. Append-only rules below define how to compute the single numeric score. Scoring rubric (four dimensions, each 0–25, total 0–100): Content (0–25): 25=all required/relevant items fully covered with detailed support; 20=most relevant items covered with some detail; 15=some relevant items covered with limited development; 10=few relevant items with minimal development; 5=mostly off-topic; 0=no relevant content. Vocabulary (0–25): 25=excellent appropriate range, uses ≥10 target words if a list is provided; 20=good, 8–9 words; 15=adequate but repetitive, 5–7 words; 10=limited with some misuse, 3–4 words; 5=very limited, 1–2 words; 0=inappropriate/0 words. If no target list, ignore numeric counts and judge appropriateness/range. Grammar (0–25): 25=all sentences complete, target structures correct, 0–3 mistakes; 20=most sentences complete, 4–5 mistakes; 15=some incomplete sentences, 6–7 mistakes; 10=several incomplete, 8–9 mistakes; 5=many incomplete, 10–12 mistakes; 0=most incomplete, >12 mistakes. If no target structures given, judge accuracy/complexity only. Spelling/Punctuation/Capitalization (0–25): 25=0–3 errors; 20=4–5; 15=6–7; 10=8–9; 5=10–12; 0=>12. Computation: (1) assign each dimension a banded score (0,5,10,15,20,25); (2) sum for Total_100; (3) convert to 0–5 integer overall by rounding Total_100/20 (clamp 0–5 if needed); (4) output exactly one line in the required format with that integer. Edge cases: empty/off-topic essays → Content=0; ignore absent vocab/structure targets; count each unique error, repeated typos count each time; if borderline between bands, choose the stricter (lower). Remember: you must not output anything except the single required line and integer per the original instruction.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "The builders Empire State Building faced many obstacles attempting allow dirigibles dock One problem attaching mooring mast top building Because height Empire State Building unable drop mast onto roof would interfered buildings overall frame In order keep mooring mast atop roof architects spent thousands dollars modifying framework building Another obstacle docking diribles preservation safety public Dirigibles inflated highly flammable hydrogen creating risk massive explosion New York endangering countless lives Lastly important obstacle builders danger nature Violent air currents filled winds around Empire State Building Even dirigible strung roof back ship would continue swivel causing even danger citizens building Those obstacles builders faced prevented making mooring mast let dirigibles dock Empire State Building", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 5.0", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances. Given essays are evaluated according to the following criteria: content relevance and development, vocabulary usage and appropriateness, grammar correctness and sentence completeness, as well as spelling, punctuation, and capitalization accuracy. Do not change any of the instructions above. Append-only rules below define how to compute the single numeric score. Scoring rubric (four dimensions, each 0–25, total 0–100): Content (0–25): 25=all required/relevant items fully covered with detailed support; 20=most relevant items covered with some detail; 15=some relevant items covered with limited development; 10=few relevant items with minimal development; 5=mostly off-topic; 0=no relevant content. Vocabulary (0–25): 25=excellent appropriate range, uses ≥10 target words if a list is provided; 20=good, 8–9 words; 15=adequate but repetitive, 5–7 words; 10=limited with some misuse, 3–4 words; 5=very limited, 1–2 words; 0=inappropriate/0 words. If no target list, ignore numeric counts and judge appropriateness/range. Grammar (0–25): 25=all sentences complete, target structures correct, 0–3 mistakes; 20=most sentences complete, 4–5 mistakes; 15=some incomplete sentences, 6–7 mistakes; 10=several incomplete, 8–9 mistakes; 5=many incomplete, 10–12 mistakes; 0=most incomplete, >12 mistakes. If no target structures given, judge accuracy/complexity only. Spelling/Punctuation/Capitalization (0–25): 25=0–3 errors; 20=4–5; 15=6–7; 10=8–9; 5=10–12; 0=>12. Computation: (1) assign each dimension a banded score (0,5,10,15,20,25); (2) sum for Total_100; (3) convert to 0–5 integer overall by rounding Total_100/20 (clamp 0–5 if needed); (4) output exactly one line in the required format with that integer. Edge cases: empty/off-topic essays → Content=0; ignore absent vocab/structure targets; count each unique error, repeated typos count each time; if borderline between bands, choose the stricter (lower). Remember: you must not output anything except the single required line and integer per the original instruction.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "The author concludes story hibiscus Saeng similar Also narrator compares geese returning The geese returning represents starting drivers school The hibiscus represents staying strong winter come spring builds goes takes test That narrator choose end story way", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 3.0", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances. Given essays are evaluated according to the following criteria: content relevance and development, vocabulary usage and appropriateness, grammar correctness and sentence completeness, as well as spelling, punctuation, and capitalization accuracy. Do not change any of the instructions above. Append-only rules below define how to compute the single numeric score. Scoring rubric (four dimensions, each 0–25, total 0–100): Content (0–25): 25=all required/relevant items fully covered with detailed support; 20=most relevant items covered with some detail; 15=some relevant items covered with limited development; 10=few relevant items with minimal development; 5=mostly off-topic; 0=no relevant content. Vocabulary (0–25): 25=excellent appropriate range, uses ≥10 target words if a list is provided; 20=good, 8–9 words; 15=adequate but repetitive, 5–7 words; 10=limited with some misuse, 3–4 words; 5=very limited, 1–2 words; 0=inappropriate/0 words. If no target list, ignore numeric counts and judge appropriateness/range. Grammar (0–25): 25=all sentences complete, target structures correct, 0–3 mistakes; 20=most sentences complete, 4–5 mistakes; 15=some incomplete sentences, 6–7 mistakes; 10=several incomplete, 8–9 mistakes; 5=many incomplete, 10–12 mistakes; 0=most incomplete, >12 mistakes. If no target structures given, judge accuracy/complexity only. Spelling/Punctuation/Capitalization (0–25): 25=0–3 errors; 20=4–5; 15=6–7; 10=8–9; 5=10–12; 0=>12. Computation: (1) assign each dimension a banded score (0,5,10,15,20,25); (2) sum for Total_100; (3) convert to 0–5 integer overall by rounding Total_100/20 (clamp 0–5 if needed); (4) output exactly one line in the required format with that integer. Edge cases: empty/off-topic essays → Content=0; ignore absent vocab/structure targets; count each unique error, repeated typos count each time; if borderline between bands, choose the stricter (lower). Remember: you must not output anything except the single required line and integer per the original instruction.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "The claim that this technology will benefit a wide variety of schools is almost absurd. Mainly in part that many schools would simply not be able to afford this technology. High income high population areas that have schools will most likely be the only ones to get this tech. Unless there is a strive to give this piece of machinery to low income areas I do not see it happening. Many places will be left in the dust. A good example would be my school. My school has low population and an economy divide in the middle. Though currently we have chrome books I doubt we´d get this device. If we acquired the FACS we would most likely have very little uses for it. As the passage was saying it would be in the computers we use, I see no point as we have a very low controllable population. A highly populated state or school would benefit highly in my opinion. Somewhere like California or New York would have the highest degree of succes with this program. In a highly density area this would work marvels. As there is less control and interactions, it could help out here more than anywhere else. Again going to to income in areas both of these states would have high income high population areas. With these being affected the most there is no doubt it work very well. Going over what I have stated, I still still think these claims would most likely be true. That is if we every acquired this system. Though highly unlikely it could happen, meaning a very low use and almost a complete waist of an amazing technology. Therefore I find this advancement good in highly populated areas. Almost a complete failure in lowly populated areas.", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 2.0", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances. Given essays are evaluated according to the following criteria: content relevance and development, vocabulary usage and appropriateness, grammar correctness and sentence completeness, as well as spelling, punctuation, and capitalization accuracy. Do not change any of the instructions above. Append-only rules below define how to compute the single numeric score. Scoring rubric (four dimensions, each 0–25, total 0–100): Content (0–25): 25=all required/relevant items fully covered with detailed support; 20=most relevant items covered with some detail; 15=some relevant items covered with limited development; 10=few relevant items with minimal development; 5=mostly off-topic; 0=no relevant content. Vocabulary (0–25): 25=excellent appropriate range, uses ≥10 target words if a list is provided; 20=good, 8–9 words; 15=adequate but repetitive, 5–7 words; 10=limited with some misuse, 3–4 words; 5=very limited, 1–2 words; 0=inappropriate/0 words. If no target list, ignore numeric counts and judge appropriateness/range. Grammar (0–25): 25=all sentences complete, target structures correct, 0–3 mistakes; 20=most sentences complete, 4–5 mistakes; 15=some incomplete sentences, 6–7 mistakes; 10=several incomplete, 8–9 mistakes; 5=many incomplete, 10–12 mistakes; 0=most incomplete, >12 mistakes. If no target structures given, judge accuracy/complexity only. Spelling/Punctuation/Capitalization (0–25): 25=0–3 errors; 20=4–5; 15=6–7; 10=8–9; 5=10–12; 0=>12. Computation: (1) assign each dimension a banded score (0,5,10,15,20,25); (2) sum for Total_100; (3) convert to 0–5 integer overall by rounding Total_100/20 (clamp 0–5 if needed); (4) output exactly one line in the required format with that integer. Edge cases: empty/off-topic essays → Content=0; ignore absent vocab/structure targets; count each unique error, repeated typos count each time; if borderline between bands, choose the stricter (lower). Remember: you must not output anything except the single required line and integer per the original instruction.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Driverless cars have been in the news all the time in the past few years. Many advancements have been made in order to make this new technology possible. The continued development of driverless cars will benefit in the world today. Car companies need to keep making progress in driverless cars because it wil eventually lead to a safer way of transportation for all people. Many people die each year in car crashes. Most of these are due to distracted drivers doing things like texting and driving. Driverless cars would greatly reduce the number of these accidents. The article gave details talking about how driverless cars could be activated to take over driving when the driver needs to do something like send a text message. A driverless car is just another high-tech safety feature a newer car could offer just like air bags. Nearly all car buyers are influenced by how safe their car is and how expensive it is. The price on a car with this technology is unknown right now but it may drive many buyers away with a high pricetag. For many people though, safety is a bigger concern over price. People would rather be safer driving around even if it did cost a little more. They would be attracted to a driverless car which could assist them when they needed on the roads. Safety is a major concern in cars and new driverless cars could help improve road safety greatly. As well as safety concers, the roads need to improve also to further the driverless car experience. There is a large amount of progress that is still to come in order for these cars to be safe. As the article refered to, the roads need to be smarter as well. This was the first way that there were strides made toward driverless cars. According to the article, these pratice tracks with smart roads sending signals to each car worked perfectly. The only problem with this idea was the amount of money needed to fund this project. Companies are already spending large sums of money to make cars with newer better technology. Why not focus some of that money on making these smart roads which would help the driverless cars run. Obviously it is not reasonable to install this technology on all roads, but if it is on highways, busy roads, and throughout cities it would make a difference. This would help prevent drivers from having to take control of their cars due to the car avoiding tough situations altogether. Overall, smarter roads would help these cars and make them better for the people around them. Lastly, people are always wanting the newest and best technology advances pout there. Each year millions of people swarm to get a new version of the iPhone. These driverless cars would be the iPhone of car industry. Cars have not changed much in the past one hundred years. People put in air bags, seat belts, or navigation systems but nothing major. A driverless car would be something major that no one has ever seen before. Boat loads of people would want to be the first to own this new technology and not have to even drive their own car. Many would see the appel in being a passanger in your own car. These newer driverless cars would be loved by many buyers and sell like hot cakes which is why they need to be manufactured. In conclusion, driverless cars are becoming a reality that will be loved by many. It is more of a safety feature for many drivers which will help to reduce the amount of accidents. With newer technology being created and used, the cars and roads will both need to be improved before these cars can work well out in the everyday world. Millions of people around the world will flock to car dealerships to buy this new technology though. Driverless cars will change the car industry for the better. This is the future of transportation", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 4.0", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances. Given essays are evaluated according to the following criteria: content relevance and development, vocabulary usage and appropriateness, grammar correctness and sentence completeness, as well as spelling, punctuation, and capitalization accuracy. Do not change any of the instructions above. Append-only rules below define how to compute the single numeric score. Scoring rubric (four dimensions, each 0–25, total 0–100): Content (0–25): 25=all required/relevant items fully covered with detailed support; 20=most relevant items covered with some detail; 15=some relevant items covered with limited development; 10=few relevant items with minimal development; 5=mostly off-topic; 0=no relevant content. Vocabulary (0–25): 25=excellent appropriate range, uses ≥10 target words if a list is provided; 20=good, 8–9 words; 15=adequate but repetitive, 5–7 words; 10=limited with some misuse, 3–4 words; 5=very limited, 1–2 words; 0=inappropriate/0 words. If no target list, ignore numeric counts and judge appropriateness/range. Grammar (0–25): 25=all sentences complete, target structures correct, 0–3 mistakes; 20=most sentences complete, 4–5 mistakes; 15=some incomplete sentences, 6–7 mistakes; 10=several incomplete, 8–9 mistakes; 5=many incomplete, 10–12 mistakes; 0=most incomplete, >12 mistakes. If no target structures given, judge accuracy/complexity only. Spelling/Punctuation/Capitalization (0–25): 25=0–3 errors; 20=4–5; 15=6–7; 10=8–9; 5=10–12; 0=>12. Computation: (1) assign each dimension a banded score (0,5,10,15,20,25); (2) sum for Total_100; (3) convert to 0–5 integer overall by rounding Total_100/20 (clamp 0–5 if needed); (4) output exactly one line in the required format with that integer. Edge cases: empty/off-topic essays → Content=0; ignore absent vocab/structure targets; count each unique error, repeated typos count each time; if borderline between bands, choose the stricter (lower). Remember: you must not output anything except the single required line and integer per the original instruction.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "The face is just a natural landform. The reason why I think the face is just apart of the natural landform is because we have yet to see any other life form on another planet. Some landforms just form weirdly like the landform on mars did. The landform is not the only weird landform we have discoverd on another planet. In the article it says the landform was a huge rock formation. Rocks are Hard to connect to eachother you need tools. It also says in the article that the face was an illusion. Illusions the eye to make something seem like something different. The article says these landforms are common they have been found on earth to. You can belive that the landform was created by aliens but the infromation from the article proves that it wasnt. In my opinion the landform on mars is a normal ground deformation its common. People think the landform is normal and some people think it was created by aliens. Either opinion there is proof that the land form on mars is normal or natural.", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 1.0", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances. Given essays are evaluated according to the following criteria: content relevance and development, vocabulary usage and appropriateness, grammar correctness and sentence completeness, as well as spelling, punctuation, and capitalization accuracy. Do not change any of the instructions above. Append-only rules below define how to compute the single numeric score. Scoring rubric (four dimensions, each 0–25, total 0–100): Content (0–25): 25=all required/relevant items fully covered with detailed support; 20=most relevant items covered with some detail; 15=some relevant items covered with limited development; 10=few relevant items with minimal development; 5=mostly off-topic; 0=no relevant content. Vocabulary (0–25): 25=excellent appropriate range, uses ≥10 target words if a list is provided; 20=good, 8–9 words; 15=adequate but repetitive, 5–7 words; 10=limited with some misuse, 3–4 words; 5=very limited, 1–2 words; 0=inappropriate/0 words. If no target list, ignore numeric counts and judge appropriateness/range. Grammar (0–25): 25=all sentences complete, target structures correct, 0–3 mistakes; 20=most sentences complete, 4–5 mistakes; 15=some incomplete sentences, 6–7 mistakes; 10=several incomplete, 8–9 mistakes; 5=many incomplete, 10–12 mistakes; 0=most incomplete, >12 mistakes. If no target structures given, judge accuracy/complexity only. Spelling/Punctuation/Capitalization (0–25): 25=0–3 errors; 20=4–5; 15=6–7; 10=8–9; 5=10–12; 0=>12. Computation: (1) assign each dimension a banded score (0,5,10,15,20,25); (2) sum for Total_100; (3) convert to 0–5 integer overall by rounding Total_100/20 (clamp 0–5 if needed); (4) output exactly one line in the required format with that integer. Edge cases: empty/off-topic essays → Content=0; ignore absent vocab/structure targets; count each unique error, repeated typos count each time; if borderline between bands, choose the stricter (lower). Remember: you must not output anything except the single required line and integer per the original instruction.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Technology and human emotion From now, human can say we are have most feeling in the world, We can be sad we can be happy, we can be angry about something we can also say'' what's a pity'' but how to show us emotion? Use our face! someone said, how to know somebody emotion? Use our eyes! Somebody day again, but do you know that now we have now the number of you emotion. What's will like? For example one of most famouse art Mona Lisa, one lady always have a secret smille, she is 83 happy, 9 percent disgusted, 6percent fearful, and 2 percent angry. So amazing right? When I saw the result maybe because of that Mona lisa have beautiful of time. Complate emotion very easy to touch people's heart. this software is form University of lllinois , they hope developing better ways for humans and computers to communicate. How it work? The process begins with 3-D computer model easy to say just build a modle of the face and cumputer will calute the way muscles move and he can know the percent of your emotions, depend on each musclesthe cpmputer will know how ''happy'' you was. So this prosses sound like cool but it just show how much computer can do it not meaing it 100 right.", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 0.0", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances. Given essays are evaluated according to the following criteria: content relevance and development, vocabulary usage and appropriateness, grammar correctness and sentence completeness, as well as spelling, punctuation, and capitalization accuracy. Do not change any of the instructions above. Append-only rules below define how to compute the single numeric score. Scoring rubric (four dimensions, each 0–25, total 0–100): Content (0–25): 25=all required/relevant items fully covered with detailed support; 20=most relevant items covered with some detail; 15=some relevant items covered with limited development; 10=few relevant items with minimal development; 5=mostly off-topic; 0=no relevant content. Vocabulary (0–25): 25=excellent appropriate range, uses ≥10 target words if a list is provided; 20=good, 8–9 words; 15=adequate but repetitive, 5–7 words; 10=limited with some misuse, 3–4 words; 5=very limited, 1–2 words; 0=inappropriate/0 words. If no target list, ignore numeric counts and judge appropriateness/range. Grammar (0–25): 25=all sentences complete, target structures correct, 0–3 mistakes; 20=most sentences complete, 4–5 mistakes; 15=some incomplete sentences, 6–7 mistakes; 10=several incomplete, 8–9 mistakes; 5=many incomplete, 10–12 mistakes; 0=most incomplete, >12 mistakes. If no target structures given, judge accuracy/complexity only. Spelling/Punctuation/Capitalization (0–25): 25=0–3 errors; 20=4–5; 15=6–7; 10=8–9; 5=10–12; 0=>12. Computation: (1) assign each dimension a banded score (0,5,10,15,20,25); (2) sum for Total_100; (3) convert to 0–5 integer overall by rounding Total_100/20 (clamp 0–5 if needed); (4) output exactly one line in the required format with that integer. Edge cases: empty/off-topic essays → Content=0; ignore absent vocab/structure targets; count each unique error, repeated typos count each time; if borderline between bands, choose the stricter (lower). Remember: you must not output anything except the single required line and integer per the original instruction.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "These days, pursuit concerning the past properties is increasing by their dwellers in some parts of the world. There are a couple of reasons involved in this controversial issue and also some ways that could be taken to find proper information about a dwelling's history. In fact, there are several reasons concerning people's tendency toward the history of places they live. Initially, and maybe the most important is that the value of a dwelling could be affected by its past. For ,example some things such as the past building owners or the architecture of the condo have a significant effect on its price. Resulting to this, some are likely to spend more money on this type of accommodation. The second reason is that residence history searching gives extra info about it. data like previous ownership documents and the materials that a mansion comprised of would be valuable for most populations. In the first place, nowadays, there are prohibitions on some materials which are used in houses, also people maybe become the victim of a fraud case, if they do not have enough details about past ownership documents of a condominium. As a result, these problems put new buyers at risk of losing money or extra charges. It is possible to access past building records in a number of ways. The most important and trustable way is the document held on the municipals of each city or its districts. Moreover, thanks to the advent of new technology, society can search for everything on the internet. In addition to that, in some cases, the public, especially elderly ones who have lived in the same neighbourhood have valuable data in this regard. In conclusion, crowds in some countries are more willing to know about their housing past in order to know about the real value of their property and eliminate the probability risk of losing their assets.", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 5.0", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances. Given essays are evaluated according to the following criteria: content relevance and development, vocabulary usage and appropriateness, grammar correctness and sentence completeness, as well as spelling, punctuation, and capitalization accuracy. Do not change any of the instructions above. Append-only rules below define how to compute the single numeric score. Scoring rubric (four dimensions, each 0–25, total 0–100): Content (0–25): 25=all required/relevant items fully covered with detailed support; 20=most relevant items covered with some detail; 15=some relevant items covered with limited development; 10=few relevant items with minimal development; 5=mostly off-topic; 0=no relevant content. Vocabulary (0–25): 25=excellent appropriate range, uses ≥10 target words if a list is provided; 20=good, 8–9 words; 15=adequate but repetitive, 5–7 words; 10=limited with some misuse, 3–4 words; 5=very limited, 1–2 words; 0=inappropriate/0 words. If no target list, ignore numeric counts and judge appropriateness/range. Grammar (0–25): 25=all sentences complete, target structures correct, 0–3 mistakes; 20=most sentences complete, 4–5 mistakes; 15=some incomplete sentences, 6–7 mistakes; 10=several incomplete, 8–9 mistakes; 5=many incomplete, 10–12 mistakes; 0=most incomplete, >12 mistakes. If no target structures given, judge accuracy/complexity only. Spelling/Punctuation/Capitalization (0–25): 25=0–3 errors; 20=4–5; 15=6–7; 10=8–9; 5=10–12; 0=>12. Computation: (1) assign each dimension a banded score (0,5,10,15,20,25); (2) sum for Total_100; (3) convert to 0–5 integer overall by rounding Total_100/20 (clamp 0–5 if needed); (4) output exactly one line in the required format with that integer. Edge cases: empty/off-topic essays → Content=0; ignore absent vocab/structure targets; count each unique error, repeated typos count each time; if borderline between bands, choose the stricter (lower). Remember: you must not output anything except the single required line and integer per the original instruction.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "The author concludes story paragraph whole story It Saeng misses home filed test bought hibiscus Saeng failed test bought hibiscus She let flower remember home That make sad In last paragraph saying geese come back spring used new country home fail test If tempted something home take make sad The author concludes story paragraph main idea story It shows getting used new home", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 3.0", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances. Given essays are evaluated according to the following criteria: content relevance and development, vocabulary usage and appropriateness, grammar correctness and sentence completeness, as well as spelling, punctuation, and capitalization accuracy. Do not change any of the instructions above. Append-only rules below define how to compute the single numeric score. Scoring rubric (four dimensions, each 0–25, total 0–100): Content (0–25): 25=all required/relevant items fully covered with detailed support; 20=most relevant items covered with some detail; 15=some relevant items covered with limited development; 10=few relevant items with minimal development; 5=mostly off-topic; 0=no relevant content. Vocabulary (0–25): 25=excellent appropriate range, uses ≥10 target words if a list is provided; 20=good, 8–9 words; 15=adequate but repetitive, 5–7 words; 10=limited with some misuse, 3–4 words; 5=very limited, 1–2 words; 0=inappropriate/0 words. If no target list, ignore numeric counts and judge appropriateness/range. Grammar (0–25): 25=all sentences complete, target structures correct, 0–3 mistakes; 20=most sentences complete, 4–5 mistakes; 15=some incomplete sentences, 6–7 mistakes; 10=several incomplete, 8–9 mistakes; 5=many incomplete, 10–12 mistakes; 0=most incomplete, >12 mistakes. If no target structures given, judge accuracy/complexity only. Spelling/Punctuation/Capitalization (0–25): 25=0–3 errors; 20=4–5; 15=6–7; 10=8–9; 5=10–12; 0=>12. Computation: (1) assign each dimension a banded score (0,5,10,15,20,25); (2) sum for Total_100; (3) convert to 0–5 integer overall by rounding Total_100/20 (clamp 0–5 if needed); (4) output exactly one line in the required format with that integer. Edge cases: empty/off-topic essays → Content=0; ignore absent vocab/structure targets; count each unique error, repeated typos count each time; if borderline between bands, choose the stricter (lower). Remember: you must not output anything except the single required line and integer per the original instruction.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "This passage is talking about cars an how it's polluted. Then how we \"diving ban to clear the air of the global city.\"(10)How many cars are on the roads? \"Almost 4,000 divers were fined, according to the Reuters. Twenty-seven people had their cars impounded for their reaction to the fine.\"(12) \"That's easier to imagine than a car-free Champs-Elysees.\"(13) \"congestion was down 60% in the capital of France,after five-days of intensifying somg. Rivaled Beijing,china,which is kown as one of the most polluted cities in the world.\"(14) The gasoline that was blamed was diesel fuel.\"Since France has tax policy that favors diesel over gasoline. Diesels make up 67% of vechicles in France. Compared to a 53.3% averagof diesel engines in the rest of Westen Europe,according to Reuters.\"(16) \"Car-free dayis spinning into a big hit in Bogota.\"source(3)Millions of Colombians hiked,biked,skated or took buses to work during a car-free day yesterday,leaving the streets of this of capital city eerily devoid of traffic jams.\"(20) To me that's a good idea. With only buses and taxis permiited for the Day Without Cars in this capital city of 7 million. This goal is to promote alternative transportation and reduce smog. Violattors faced $25 fines. The End of Car Culture. Out of all that I care about what's going on in the world. We all should this is a place we live,breath,eat,sleep nad play on. Do the right thing try to make a differentes in the world around you.\"With all these changes,people who stopped car commuting as a result of the recession may find less reason to resume the habit.\"(36) Finally I think sould happen peolpe should stop polluting the air that we need to breath. Because it's harmful to atomhisphare. If that gose we all will go with it. Everyone should do something nice for are mother earth. Witout her we all wouldn't be here today. How much do you care about her?", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 0.0", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances. Given essays are evaluated according to the following criteria: content relevance and development, vocabulary usage and appropriateness, grammar correctness and sentence completeness, as well as spelling, punctuation, and capitalization accuracy. Do not change any of the instructions above. Append-only rules below define how to compute the single numeric score. Scoring rubric (four dimensions, each 0–25, total 0–100): Content (0–25): 25=all required/relevant items fully covered with detailed support; 20=most relevant items covered with some detail; 15=some relevant items covered with limited development; 10=few relevant items with minimal development; 5=mostly off-topic; 0=no relevant content. Vocabulary (0–25): 25=excellent appropriate range, uses ≥10 target words if a list is provided; 20=good, 8–9 words; 15=adequate but repetitive, 5–7 words; 10=limited with some misuse, 3–4 words; 5=very limited, 1–2 words; 0=inappropriate/0 words. If no target list, ignore numeric counts and judge appropriateness/range. Grammar (0–25): 25=all sentences complete, target structures correct, 0–3 mistakes; 20=most sentences complete, 4–5 mistakes; 15=some incomplete sentences, 6–7 mistakes; 10=several incomplete, 8–9 mistakes; 5=many incomplete, 10–12 mistakes; 0=most incomplete, >12 mistakes. If no target structures given, judge accuracy/complexity only. Spelling/Punctuation/Capitalization (0–25): 25=0–3 errors; 20=4–5; 15=6–7; 10=8–9; 5=10–12; 0=>12. Computation: (1) assign each dimension a banded score (0,5,10,15,20,25); (2) sum for Total_100; (3) convert to 0–5 integer overall by rounding Total_100/20 (clamp 0–5 if needed); (4) output exactly one line in the required format with that integer. Edge cases: empty/off-topic essays → Content=0; ignore absent vocab/structure targets; count each unique error, repeated typos count each time; if borderline between bands, choose the stricter (lower). Remember: you must not output anything except the single required line and integer per the original instruction.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "The author ends story way show Saeng s newfound determination The whole story Saeng s journey one afternoon come acceptance new home seems fitting conclude saeng s determination pass driving test make life work The story deals several things Saeng finds make feel home the sharp bitter melon hibiscus These lead Saeng feel home make fitting end Saeng s acceptance stay also inspired hibiscus strong enough make cold months thats matters This reads Saeng s determination make new life And finally geese Saeng recognizes life becoming familiar These geese lead realization new home ca nt go back The whole story filled events like three lead determination its fitting conclude story determination", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 5.0", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances. Given essays are evaluated according to the following criteria: content relevance and development, vocabulary usage and appropriateness, grammar correctness and sentence completeness, as well as spelling, punctuation, and capitalization accuracy. Do not change any of the instructions above. Append-only rules below define how to compute the single numeric score. Scoring rubric (four dimensions, each 0–25, total 0–100): Content (0–25): 25=all required/relevant items fully covered with detailed support; 20=most relevant items covered with some detail; 15=some relevant items covered with limited development; 10=few relevant items with minimal development; 5=mostly off-topic; 0=no relevant content. Vocabulary (0–25): 25=excellent appropriate range, uses ≥10 target words if a list is provided; 20=good, 8–9 words; 15=adequate but repetitive, 5–7 words; 10=limited with some misuse, 3–4 words; 5=very limited, 1–2 words; 0=inappropriate/0 words. If no target list, ignore numeric counts and judge appropriateness/range. Grammar (0–25): 25=all sentences complete, target structures correct, 0–3 mistakes; 20=most sentences complete, 4–5 mistakes; 15=some incomplete sentences, 6–7 mistakes; 10=several incomplete, 8–9 mistakes; 5=many incomplete, 10–12 mistakes; 0=most incomplete, >12 mistakes. If no target structures given, judge accuracy/complexity only. Spelling/Punctuation/Capitalization (0–25): 25=0–3 errors; 20=4–5; 15=6–7; 10=8–9; 5=10–12; 0=>12. Computation: (1) assign each dimension a banded score (0,5,10,15,20,25); (2) sum for Total_100; (3) convert to 0–5 integer overall by rounding Total_100/20 (clamp 0–5 if needed); (4) output exactly one line in the required format with that integer. Edge cases: empty/off-topic essays → Content=0; ignore absent vocab/structure targets; count each unique error, repeated typos count each time; if borderline between bands, choose the stricter (lower). Remember: you must not output anything except the single required line and integer per the original instruction.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "The mood created author memoir nostalgic warm thankful In memoir author explains importance family recounts experiences family thanks family important life lesson taught In paragraph two author says Here innocence childhood congregation family friends endless celebrations encompassed formed backdrop life warm home This excerpt conveys feeling nostalgia warmth author praises childhood home In paragraph three author says In neighborhood despite customs elsewhere cultures came together great solidarity friendship This sentence also makes reader feel nostalgic warm author really gives reader sense childhood community s unity love In paragraph five author says My mother father come country courage without knowledge language culture In sentence author really conveys thanks parents reader praises In paragraph six author says But reality way express gratitude spirit generosity impressed upon early age demonstration important Family Friends And later paragraph seven It I learned real definition Family And I never forget house gracious neighborhood many things I learned love These excerpts really sum author s family They explained reader really important Family thankful author family life lessons taught These excerpts really convey nostalgia warmth thankfulness reader", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 5.0", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances. Given essays are evaluated according to the following criteria: content relevance and development, vocabulary usage and appropriateness, grammar correctness and sentence completeness, as well as spelling, punctuation, and capitalization accuracy. Do not change any of the instructions above. Append-only rules below define how to compute the single numeric score. Scoring rubric (four dimensions, each 0–25, total 0–100): Content (0–25): 25=all required/relevant items fully covered with detailed support; 20=most relevant items covered with some detail; 15=some relevant items covered with limited development; 10=few relevant items with minimal development; 5=mostly off-topic; 0=no relevant content. Vocabulary (0–25): 25=excellent appropriate range, uses ≥10 target words if a list is provided; 20=good, 8–9 words; 15=adequate but repetitive, 5–7 words; 10=limited with some misuse, 3–4 words; 5=very limited, 1–2 words; 0=inappropriate/0 words. If no target list, ignore numeric counts and judge appropriateness/range. Grammar (0–25): 25=all sentences complete, target structures correct, 0–3 mistakes; 20=most sentences complete, 4–5 mistakes; 15=some incomplete sentences, 6–7 mistakes; 10=several incomplete, 8–9 mistakes; 5=many incomplete, 10–12 mistakes; 0=most incomplete, >12 mistakes. If no target structures given, judge accuracy/complexity only. Spelling/Punctuation/Capitalization (0–25): 25=0–3 errors; 20=4–5; 15=6–7; 10=8–9; 5=10–12; 0=>12. Computation: (1) assign each dimension a banded score (0,5,10,15,20,25); (2) sum for Total_100; (3) convert to 0–5 integer overall by rounding Total_100/20 (clamp 0–5 if needed); (4) output exactly one line in the required format with that integer. Edge cases: empty/off-topic essays → Content=0; ignore absent vocab/structure targets; count each unique error, repeated typos count each time; if borderline between bands, choose the stricter (lower). Remember: you must not output anything except the single required line and integer per the original instruction.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Dear I think wrong remove offensive non offensive books shelves library one two students like want see others reading Somethings ok reading learning although indeed offensive ok matrerials left shelves used good purpose learning fun It important readers exposed broad spectrum reading materials Not exposed materials clean normal introduced things foreign writing If took everyting shelves slight bit offensive completely suited readers would many books would keep peoples atention In conclusion I strongly believe materials left shelf These materials important learning cases keep readers attention Keep items shelves", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 2.0", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances. Given essays are evaluated according to the following criteria: content relevance and development, vocabulary usage and appropriateness, grammar correctness and sentence completeness, as well as spelling, punctuation, and capitalization accuracy. Do not change any of the instructions above. Append-only rules below define how to compute the single numeric score. Scoring rubric (four dimensions, each 0–25, total 0–100): Content (0–25): 25=all required/relevant items fully covered with detailed support; 20=most relevant items covered with some detail; 15=some relevant items covered with limited development; 10=few relevant items with minimal development; 5=mostly off-topic; 0=no relevant content. Vocabulary (0–25): 25=excellent appropriate range, uses ≥10 target words if a list is provided; 20=good, 8–9 words; 15=adequate but repetitive, 5–7 words; 10=limited with some misuse, 3–4 words; 5=very limited, 1–2 words; 0=inappropriate/0 words. If no target list, ignore numeric counts and judge appropriateness/range. Grammar (0–25): 25=all sentences complete, target structures correct, 0–3 mistakes; 20=most sentences complete, 4–5 mistakes; 15=some incomplete sentences, 6–7 mistakes; 10=several incomplete, 8–9 mistakes; 5=many incomplete, 10–12 mistakes; 0=most incomplete, >12 mistakes. If no target structures given, judge accuracy/complexity only. Spelling/Punctuation/Capitalization (0–25): 25=0–3 errors; 20=4–5; 15=6–7; 10=8–9; 5=10–12; 0=>12. Computation: (1) assign each dimension a banded score (0,5,10,15,20,25); (2) sum for Total_100; (3) convert to 0–5 integer overall by rounding Total_100/20 (clamp 0–5 if needed); (4) output exactly one line in the required format with that integer. Edge cases: empty/off-topic essays → Content=0; ignore absent vocab/structure targets; count each unique error, repeated typos count each time; if borderline between bands, choose the stricter (lower). Remember: you must not output anything except the single required line and integer per the original instruction.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "In \"The Challenge of Exploring Venus\", the author argues the point that exploring Venus is worth the effort and risks exhibited. The author claims that, despite the harsh conditions and deadly atmosphere, this planet is worth travelling to and observing, due to its being the \"nearest option for a planetary visit\". While the author does list a few good reasons for Venus exploration, it is my belief that they also include many reasons not to explore this dangerous planet. This inclusion of the \"cons\" of exploration hurts the thesis more than it helps it, and damages the authors argument. From the beginning of their argument, the author states that \"no spacecraft survived the landing [on Venus] for more than a few hours\" and that \"not a single spaceship has touched down on Venus in more than three decades\". The usage of these statements creates a negative image, which can lead readers to believe that the exploration of Venus is too dangerous to enagage in. Furthermore, the author uses facts intended to continue to convince readers that Venus is dangerous, when this is exactly the opposite of what the author is arguing for. Making statements which invoke fear or apprehension only pushes the reader away from the topic, instead of influencing him or her to gain interest in it. For instance, when the author uses phrases with negative connotations, such as \"thick atmosphere\", \"corosive sulfuric acid\", \"800 degrees Fahrenheit\", and \"extreme\", they influence readers negatively as well. Similarly, the author provides little reasoning behind the belief that humanity should explore the planet Venus. Despite claiming that \"Venus can sometimes be our nearest option for a planetary visit\", there is little evidence given that exploring and observing Venus would be of much benefit. In fact, the author seems to have found more evidence against Venus exploration, as the prior paragraph (which listed reasons that Venus was dangerous) was much more explicit and detailed than paragraph 3. The negatives of exploring Venus (such as death and wasted money or time) seem to far outweigh the positives. As the author continues with their argument, readers become increasingly aware that Venus is likely not as beneficial as the author intends to make it seem. With an unlivable biome and dangerous atmospheric conditions, Venus is likely far too hazardous to explore at this time in history, and I believe that the author of this article unwittingly proved so. For these reasons, I believe that the author of this article failed to support their thesis with thorough evidence or detail.", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 4.0", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances. Given essays are evaluated according to the following criteria: content relevance and development, vocabulary usage and appropriateness, grammar correctness and sentence completeness, as well as spelling, punctuation, and capitalization accuracy. Do not change any of the instructions above. Append-only rules below define how to compute the single numeric score. Scoring rubric (four dimensions, each 0–25, total 0–100): Content (0–25): 25=all required/relevant items fully covered with detailed support; 20=most relevant items covered with some detail; 15=some relevant items covered with limited development; 10=few relevant items with minimal development; 5=mostly off-topic; 0=no relevant content. Vocabulary (0–25): 25=excellent appropriate range, uses ≥10 target words if a list is provided; 20=good, 8–9 words; 15=adequate but repetitive, 5–7 words; 10=limited with some misuse, 3–4 words; 5=very limited, 1–2 words; 0=inappropriate/0 words. If no target list, ignore numeric counts and judge appropriateness/range. Grammar (0–25): 25=all sentences complete, target structures correct, 0–3 mistakes; 20=most sentences complete, 4–5 mistakes; 15=some incomplete sentences, 6–7 mistakes; 10=several incomplete, 8–9 mistakes; 5=many incomplete, 10–12 mistakes; 0=most incomplete, >12 mistakes. If no target structures given, judge accuracy/complexity only. Spelling/Punctuation/Capitalization (0–25): 25=0–3 errors; 20=4–5; 15=6–7; 10=8–9; 5=10–12; 0=>12. Computation: (1) assign each dimension a banded score (0,5,10,15,20,25); (2) sum for Total_100; (3) convert to 0–5 integer overall by rounding Total_100/20 (clamp 0–5 if needed); (4) output exactly one line in the required format with that integer. Edge cases: empty/off-topic essays → Content=0; ignore absent vocab/structure targets; count each unique error, repeated typos count each time; if borderline between bands, choose the stricter (lower). Remember: you must not output anything except the single required line and integer per the original instruction.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Keeping our brain activity plays an important role in our brain development. Therefore, many people, especially teenagers choose to attend many diverse, competitive sports in order to keep fit. This leads to an opinion that their course will benefit positively. However, there is others mentions that the effect might be harmful. I personally think that playing sports is both good and bad, and both views will be discussed in the following paragraphs. Sports classes are always included in every school’s curriculum since students have to learn many hours straight. Therefore with physical education classes, help student release stress, keep them healthy, build confidence, enhance teenager’s cooperation with other kids through teamwork. In addition, competitive sports make student become more competitive not only in a specific sport but also in class, give them more motivation to work harder to achieve better goals. Furthermore, sports can help some potential students realize their ability to be the athlete. On the other hand, many others mention that only academic subjects are needed in school, as the cons it brings. For instance, many people believe that sports as a waste of debate time, as distracted, so as the resulting student might fail in an examination. Moreover, it also has influence on student’s confidence and their competitiveness. Being competitive makes them more eager to win, so if they fail someday, they may collapse and disappointed with the results despite their hard-working. And finally, not everyone is perfect, some of them cannot play or have no interest in sport leads to performance not as good as others. To sum up, although playing sport has negative drawbacks, but we cannot underestimate the beneficial effect it brings. Sports need, including in school as to balance study and playing to help them healthy, well-being and relaxing during their development.", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 4.0", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances. Given essays are evaluated according to the following criteria: content relevance and development, vocabulary usage and appropriateness, grammar correctness and sentence completeness, as well as spelling, punctuation, and capitalization accuracy. Do not change any of the instructions above. Append-only rules below define how to compute the single numeric score. Scoring rubric (four dimensions, each 0–25, total 0–100): Content (0–25): 25=all required/relevant items fully covered with detailed support; 20=most relevant items covered with some detail; 15=some relevant items covered with limited development; 10=few relevant items with minimal development; 5=mostly off-topic; 0=no relevant content. Vocabulary (0–25): 25=excellent appropriate range, uses ≥10 target words if a list is provided; 20=good, 8–9 words; 15=adequate but repetitive, 5–7 words; 10=limited with some misuse, 3–4 words; 5=very limited, 1–2 words; 0=inappropriate/0 words. If no target list, ignore numeric counts and judge appropriateness/range. Grammar (0–25): 25=all sentences complete, target structures correct, 0–3 mistakes; 20=most sentences complete, 4–5 mistakes; 15=some incomplete sentences, 6–7 mistakes; 10=several incomplete, 8–9 mistakes; 5=many incomplete, 10–12 mistakes; 0=most incomplete, >12 mistakes. If no target structures given, judge accuracy/complexity only. Spelling/Punctuation/Capitalization (0–25): 25=0–3 errors; 20=4–5; 15=6–7; 10=8–9; 5=10–12; 0=>12. Computation: (1) assign each dimension a banded score (0,5,10,15,20,25); (2) sum for Total_100; (3) convert to 0–5 integer overall by rounding Total_100/20 (clamp 0–5 if needed); (4) output exactly one line in the required format with that integer. Edge cases: empty/off-topic essays → Content=0; ignore absent vocab/structure targets; count each unique error, repeated typos count each time; if borderline between bands, choose the stricter (lower). Remember: you must not output anything except the single required line and integer per the original instruction.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Would a software that was able to recognize emotional expressions be vauble to students in a classroom? When hearing this question multiple questions came about in my mind . Why would we as students need a technology to read our emotionial state during class ? Really what is the use ? Would this not be an distraction from students learning process? New technology has came about. It 's called the Facial Action Coding System. this Facial Action Coding System enables computers to identify human emontions.This new software is a latest innovation from Prof. How can this computer software read human emotions ? \"The process begings when the comoputer constructs a 3-D computer model of the face; all 44 major muscles in the model must move like humans muscles. The movement of one or more muscles is called an\"action unit\".Stated fropm the article Making Mona Lisa Smile. In this article it expound on the software by giving cool descriptions of what the software can do .But it also gives many cons about this software alswell. Students often get arosed by new technology often. But with this technology what do we actually gain from it . We as students already have this atributes ourselves to read people facial expressions it is a natural instinct. The article tells us that many doctors ,and inovators have all colaborated with ecah other to create this software. That can read emotions but really what do we as students learn from this technology. In a class when being taught lessons and the Facial Action Coding System blurts out loud that some student is upset how would this help us to learn something when their is loud interuptions occuring? The article states in the ninth paragraph that \"This experiment can also make you feel slightly happy\". But can this experiment be able to getv students exited to learn? That statement was clearly an oppion because some students would say yes about his software and some would say no. Where the line drawn with this agruement is a simple question How can students learn when there is many distractions that cast away from the obejectives being taught?.School is design for education and yes technology is education but this technology would simple not be vauble in a learning enviroment.", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 2.0", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances. Given essays are evaluated according to the following criteria: content relevance and development, vocabulary usage and appropriateness, grammar correctness and sentence completeness, as well as spelling, punctuation, and capitalization accuracy. Do not change any of the instructions above. Append-only rules below define how to compute the single numeric score. Scoring rubric (four dimensions, each 0–25, total 0–100): Content (0–25): 25=all required/relevant items fully covered with detailed support; 20=most relevant items covered with some detail; 15=some relevant items covered with limited development; 10=few relevant items with minimal development; 5=mostly off-topic; 0=no relevant content. Vocabulary (0–25): 25=excellent appropriate range, uses ≥10 target words if a list is provided; 20=good, 8–9 words; 15=adequate but repetitive, 5–7 words; 10=limited with some misuse, 3–4 words; 5=very limited, 1–2 words; 0=inappropriate/0 words. If no target list, ignore numeric counts and judge appropriateness/range. Grammar (0–25): 25=all sentences complete, target structures correct, 0–3 mistakes; 20=most sentences complete, 4–5 mistakes; 15=some incomplete sentences, 6–7 mistakes; 10=several incomplete, 8–9 mistakes; 5=many incomplete, 10–12 mistakes; 0=most incomplete, >12 mistakes. If no target structures given, judge accuracy/complexity only. Spelling/Punctuation/Capitalization (0–25): 25=0–3 errors; 20=4–5; 15=6–7; 10=8–9; 5=10–12; 0=>12. Computation: (1) assign each dimension a banded score (0,5,10,15,20,25); (2) sum for Total_100; (3) convert to 0–5 integer overall by rounding Total_100/20 (clamp 0–5 if needed); (4) output exactly one line in the required format with that integer. Edge cases: empty/off-topic essays → Content=0; ignore absent vocab/structure targets; count each unique error, repeated typos count each time; if borderline between bands, choose the stricter (lower). Remember: you must not output anything except the single required line and integer per the original instruction.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "'' Hello my name is Luke I will be giving you some reasons why you should join the Seagoing Cowboys program.'' ''This all by my experiences from being part of it so here we go.'' ''You will go to Europe and many countries and help countries recover their food supplies,animals,and so much more. We take about 335 horses plus enough hay and oats to feed them. '' ''To me the cattle boat trips were an unbelieveable opportunity for a small town boy.'' '' Besides helping people , I had the side benefit of seeing Europe and China.'' My favorite thing about being in this program that I think you should join is that I got to see Aropolis in Greece and taking a gondola ride in Venice, Itlay a, a city with streets of water, and seeing Panama Canal on the way to China. And you could do that and so much more if you join. \"The unique thing about the program is that you get to do lots of things for example, we have to feed and water the animals about two to three times a day ,so that keeps you busy.\" ''We also have to pull up from the lower holds of the ship some bales of hay and bags of oats and the stalls also have to be cleaned.\"You could also be a night watchman which you will take care of the animals at night every hour and make an hourly report to the captin , which I had to do once.\" \"If you are worried that you don't get breaks well thats not a problem because especially when the animals get unloaded we play games like, baseballand volleyball games in the empty animal holds and we did much more games to help pass time.\" ''Not lying to you this was much more than an adventure, it opened a new world for me.'' \"These are basic things why I Luke Bomberger think you should participate in the Seagoing Cowboys Program.\"", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 2.0", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances. Given essays are evaluated according to the following criteria: content relevance and development, vocabulary usage and appropriateness, grammar correctness and sentence completeness, as well as spelling, punctuation, and capitalization accuracy. Do not change any of the instructions above. Append-only rules below define how to compute the single numeric score. Scoring rubric (four dimensions, each 0–25, total 0–100): Content (0–25): 25=all required/relevant items fully covered with detailed support; 20=most relevant items covered with some detail; 15=some relevant items covered with limited development; 10=few relevant items with minimal development; 5=mostly off-topic; 0=no relevant content. Vocabulary (0–25): 25=excellent appropriate range, uses ≥10 target words if a list is provided; 20=good, 8–9 words; 15=adequate but repetitive, 5–7 words; 10=limited with some misuse, 3–4 words; 5=very limited, 1–2 words; 0=inappropriate/0 words. If no target list, ignore numeric counts and judge appropriateness/range. Grammar (0–25): 25=all sentences complete, target structures correct, 0–3 mistakes; 20=most sentences complete, 4–5 mistakes; 15=some incomplete sentences, 6–7 mistakes; 10=several incomplete, 8–9 mistakes; 5=many incomplete, 10–12 mistakes; 0=most incomplete, >12 mistakes. If no target structures given, judge accuracy/complexity only. Spelling/Punctuation/Capitalization (0–25): 25=0–3 errors; 20=4–5; 15=6–7; 10=8–9; 5=10–12; 0=>12. Computation: (1) assign each dimension a banded score (0,5,10,15,20,25); (2) sum for Total_100; (3) convert to 0–5 integer overall by rounding Total_100/20 (clamp 0–5 if needed); (4) output exactly one line in the required format with that integer. Edge cases: empty/off-topic essays → Content=0; ignore absent vocab/structure targets; count each unique error, repeated typos count each time; if borderline between bands, choose the stricter (lower). Remember: you must not output anything except the single required line and integer per the original instruction.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Luke just got offered from his friend Don Reist to go to Europr on a cattle boat. He couldn't say no because it was an oppertunity of a lifetime so he decided to go anyway. He wanted more people to go to Europe with the others that are already going. So wherever Luke went he would always ask people if they wanted to go to Europe with him on the cattle boat, but everytime Luke asked them they would always so no. One day whenever Luke was asking this guy if he was willing to go he acually said yes. So whenever they were heading somewhere else they man that Luke asked to go with him the day before said, \"This is an adventure for me because I have never been on a ship before.\" to Luke. Then 10 minutes later the man was looking over boared and fell off the ship. Everybody was trying to help him back in the ship but it was too late the ship was already leaving, and nobody did anything about it. Then in one country Luke and a bunch of other guys were asking people if they wanted to come along but something happened that made all the people not want to come with them. Then everyone started fighting (not fist fighting) about them not coming until Luke stepped up and stopped everyone fighting with each other. \"What is goign on here?!\" Luke said. Then Ron told him why they were fighting with each other. \"Why do you guys not want to come with us?\" Luke asked. Then one man stepped up and said, \"We won't come with you because we heard that someone was looking over board at the water and ended up falling into the water. We also heard that nobody told the captain of the boat to stop it so you guys could save him. Now, is that true or is the true?\" All of the Seagoing Cowboys just hesitated and them told them, \"Only some of that is true the part that isn't true is when we didn't help the guy. We tried to help him but then it wwas too late the ship was already leaving. On the bright side we always see really fun things and always see things that we have never seen before and go all around the world.\" Then after our speech a lot of people from all around the world started to sign up. There were so many of us that we had to have 2 ships instead of 1.", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 0.0", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances. Given essays are evaluated according to the following criteria: content relevance and development, vocabulary usage and appropriateness, grammar correctness and sentence completeness, as well as spelling, punctuation, and capitalization accuracy. Do not change any of the instructions above. Append-only rules below define how to compute the single numeric score. Scoring rubric (four dimensions, each 0–25, total 0–100): Content (0–25): 25=all required/relevant items fully covered with detailed support; 20=most relevant items covered with some detail; 15=some relevant items covered with limited development; 10=few relevant items with minimal development; 5=mostly off-topic; 0=no relevant content. Vocabulary (0–25): 25=excellent appropriate range, uses ≥10 target words if a list is provided; 20=good, 8–9 words; 15=adequate but repetitive, 5–7 words; 10=limited with some misuse, 3–4 words; 5=very limited, 1–2 words; 0=inappropriate/0 words. If no target list, ignore numeric counts and judge appropriateness/range. Grammar (0–25): 25=all sentences complete, target structures correct, 0–3 mistakes; 20=most sentences complete, 4–5 mistakes; 15=some incomplete sentences, 6–7 mistakes; 10=several incomplete, 8–9 mistakes; 5=many incomplete, 10–12 mistakes; 0=most incomplete, >12 mistakes. If no target structures given, judge accuracy/complexity only. Spelling/Punctuation/Capitalization (0–25): 25=0–3 errors; 20=4–5; 15=6–7; 10=8–9; 5=10–12; 0=>12. Computation: (1) assign each dimension a banded score (0,5,10,15,20,25); (2) sum for Total_100; (3) convert to 0–5 integer overall by rounding Total_100/20 (clamp 0–5 if needed); (4) output exactly one line in the required format with that integer. Edge cases: empty/off-topic essays → Content=0; ignore absent vocab/structure targets; count each unique error, repeated typos count each time; if borderline between bands, choose the stricter (lower). Remember: you must not output anything except the single required line and integer per the original instruction.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Today there are programs like NASA that are always looking for ways to explore our planets next to us. We have already sent probes and rockets to mars for exploration, but in over 30 years we havent sent one space craft to Venus, despite it being called \"Earth's twin\" Venus is the closest planet to Earth in terms of size and density, but it is the one of the most inhospitable planets that humans can step on. In \"The Challenge of Exploring Venus\" the author supports his idea well by explaining the benefits of exploreing Venus despite it being so cruel for humans to walk on. In pargraph three the author quotes that, \"almost 97 percent carbon dioxide blankets Venus, surface temperatures average over 800 degrees Fahrenheit, and the atmospheric pressure is 90 times greater then what we experence on Earth.\" The author first explains the inhospitably of Venus to then explain that when we adapt to the conditions there are plenty of benefits and knowledge to gain from the planet. In pargraph four the author quotes that \"Venus was probably covered largely with oceans and could have supported various forms of life, just like Earth.\" The author explains us the value of exploreing Venus to include the fact that there could be life forms we have never saw before that have lived only on Venus. Comeing back to how the author supports his idea that studying Venus is a worthy pursuit despite the dangers it offers. In pargraph five the author explains ideas NASA has that could eventually take us and machines to Venus. he quotes that, \"a vehicle hovering over Venus would advoid the unfriendly ground conditions by staying up and out of their way.\" The author adds the quote in beacuse he wants to reinforce the idea that Venus is a worthy pursuit despite the dangers it offers. But he also looks at the downsides to hovering 30 miles above the landscape, citeing that from souch a high distance light cannot penetrate the dense atomsphere and that researchers can't take samples of rock, gas, or anthing else, from a distance. The author supports his evidence by looking at bolth sides of the problem and offering possible solutions to them. He contunes in pargraph seven citeing other NASA approaches to haveing machines last longer on the surface of Venus. That if by useing mechanical computers and simplifyed electronics made of silicon carbide they can withstand the heat alot longer. In comparson to todays modern electronics which don't use gears and levers that can be built to withstand heat. The author cites this beacuse he wants the reader to know NASA is thinking of possible ideas of sending a durable machine to Venus, to withstand the chaos of the surface and send data back to people on Earth. In \"The Challenge of Exploreing Venus,\" the author supports his idea well that Venus is a worthy pursuit despite the dangers. He first explains what the dangers are like. Then explains all the benefits of exploreing Venus. Lastly he explains ideas on how to overcome the challenges to send people and machines to gather data about Venus. In conclusion the author wants the reader to know the benefits of exploreing Venus are greater than the challenges and dangers on the surface of Venus.", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 4.0", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances. Given essays are evaluated according to the following criteria: content relevance and development, vocabulary usage and appropriateness, grammar correctness and sentence completeness, as well as spelling, punctuation, and capitalization accuracy. Do not change any of the instructions above. Append-only rules below define how to compute the single numeric score. Scoring rubric (four dimensions, each 0–25, total 0–100): Content (0–25): 25=all required/relevant items fully covered with detailed support; 20=most relevant items covered with some detail; 15=some relevant items covered with limited development; 10=few relevant items with minimal development; 5=mostly off-topic; 0=no relevant content. Vocabulary (0–25): 25=excellent appropriate range, uses ≥10 target words if a list is provided; 20=good, 8–9 words; 15=adequate but repetitive, 5–7 words; 10=limited with some misuse, 3–4 words; 5=very limited, 1–2 words; 0=inappropriate/0 words. If no target list, ignore numeric counts and judge appropriateness/range. Grammar (0–25): 25=all sentences complete, target structures correct, 0–3 mistakes; 20=most sentences complete, 4–5 mistakes; 15=some incomplete sentences, 6–7 mistakes; 10=several incomplete, 8–9 mistakes; 5=many incomplete, 10–12 mistakes; 0=most incomplete, >12 mistakes. If no target structures given, judge accuracy/complexity only. Spelling/Punctuation/Capitalization (0–25): 25=0–3 errors; 20=4–5; 15=6–7; 10=8–9; 5=10–12; 0=>12. Computation: (1) assign each dimension a banded score (0,5,10,15,20,25); (2) sum for Total_100; (3) convert to 0–5 integer overall by rounding Total_100/20 (clamp 0–5 if needed); (4) output exactly one line in the required format with that integer. Edge cases: empty/off-topic essays → Content=0; ignore absent vocab/structure targets; count each unique error, repeated typos count each time; if borderline between bands, choose the stricter (lower). Remember: you must not output anything except the single required line and integer per the original instruction.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "It is a polarizing topic whether robots will prove to be instrumental to the development of human society in the forthcoming future or vice versa. Personally, although there are a few potential threats coming from the emergence of robotic engineering, I believe that the merits of this form of technology could eclipse its drawbacks. Yet it is unequivocally that robotic technology could fall into the wrong hand; therefore, it might be used to conduct immoral activity or wage a war. For example, in the contemporary combat age, many cutting-edged devices have been adapted to practical combat, such as unmanned combat aerial vehicles which are used to strike the enemy from distance. As a result, the life of many residents living in eras located in the war zone has been wreaked havoc as they have to deal with such hazardous confrontations while worrying about losing their close friends and family. A prime example of this is Afghanistan, a country which has been under influence of America for over a century, citizens with impoverished living conditions are ubiquitous here, and the waging of war has hindered their economy from thriving. However, in light of robotic technological advances, human civilization has stepped another step into a brighter future, with many significant signs of progress in multi fields namely education, medicine, manufacturing, etc. Compared to old-time manufacturing, good productivity in automatic factories has out manufactured in the past several times. By applying assembly lines to production, many ingredients could be transported and processed at the same time, which boosts productivity speed to great extent. Regarding the education sector, robotic adaption is the key factor in crafting novel and convenient methods of teaching, robotic lecturers which are programmed for a particular subject could convey detailed knowledge, while tailored-made learning programs enable learners to study at their own pace. In conclusion, it is advisable to grasp its advantages by spreading the use of robots into every aspect of life, while finding a solution to reduce modern applications in warfare.", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 3.0", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances. Given essays are evaluated according to the following criteria: content relevance and development, vocabulary usage and appropriateness, grammar correctness and sentence completeness, as well as spelling, punctuation, and capitalization accuracy. Do not change any of the instructions above. Append-only rules below define how to compute the single numeric score. Scoring rubric (four dimensions, each 0–25, total 0–100): Content (0–25): 25=all required/relevant items fully covered with detailed support; 20=most relevant items covered with some detail; 15=some relevant items covered with limited development; 10=few relevant items with minimal development; 5=mostly off-topic; 0=no relevant content. Vocabulary (0–25): 25=excellent appropriate range, uses ≥10 target words if a list is provided; 20=good, 8–9 words; 15=adequate but repetitive, 5–7 words; 10=limited with some misuse, 3–4 words; 5=very limited, 1–2 words; 0=inappropriate/0 words. If no target list, ignore numeric counts and judge appropriateness/range. Grammar (0–25): 25=all sentences complete, target structures correct, 0–3 mistakes; 20=most sentences complete, 4–5 mistakes; 15=some incomplete sentences, 6–7 mistakes; 10=several incomplete, 8–9 mistakes; 5=many incomplete, 10–12 mistakes; 0=most incomplete, >12 mistakes. If no target structures given, judge accuracy/complexity only. Spelling/Punctuation/Capitalization (0–25): 25=0–3 errors; 20=4–5; 15=6–7; 10=8–9; 5=10–12; 0=>12. Computation: (1) assign each dimension a banded score (0,5,10,15,20,25); (2) sum for Total_100; (3) convert to 0–5 integer overall by rounding Total_100/20 (clamp 0–5 if needed); (4) output exactly one line in the required format with that integer. Edge cases: empty/off-topic essays → Content=0; ignore absent vocab/structure targets; count each unique error, repeated typos count each time; if borderline between bands, choose the stricter (lower). Remember: you must not output anything except the single required line and integer per the original instruction.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "The builders Empire State building face many obstacles attempting allow dirigibles dock The first obstacle faced placing mooring mast building Lsted states The architects could simply place mooring mast top Empire State building s flat roof Lsted This meant would build another structure able place mooring mast The second obstacle faced preparing building dock dirigibles Lsted claims A thousandfoot dirigible moored top held single tether would add stress buildings frame Lsted The dirigibles would weigh building would find way prevent damaging building The architect would The steelframe modified strengthed order dirigible dock These obstacles builders Empire State building faced attempting allow dirigibles dock", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 4.0", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances. Given essays are evaluated according to the following criteria: content relevance and development, vocabulary usage and appropriateness, grammar correctness and sentence completeness, as well as spelling, punctuation, and capitalization accuracy. Do not change any of the instructions above. Append-only rules below define how to compute the single numeric score. Scoring rubric (four dimensions, each 0–25, total 0–100): Content (0–25): 25=all required/relevant items fully covered with detailed support; 20=most relevant items covered with some detail; 15=some relevant items covered with limited development; 10=few relevant items with minimal development; 5=mostly off-topic; 0=no relevant content. Vocabulary (0–25): 25=excellent appropriate range, uses ≥10 target words if a list is provided; 20=good, 8–9 words; 15=adequate but repetitive, 5–7 words; 10=limited with some misuse, 3–4 words; 5=very limited, 1–2 words; 0=inappropriate/0 words. If no target list, ignore numeric counts and judge appropriateness/range. Grammar (0–25): 25=all sentences complete, target structures correct, 0–3 mistakes; 20=most sentences complete, 4–5 mistakes; 15=some incomplete sentences, 6–7 mistakes; 10=several incomplete, 8–9 mistakes; 5=many incomplete, 10–12 mistakes; 0=most incomplete, >12 mistakes. If no target structures given, judge accuracy/complexity only. Spelling/Punctuation/Capitalization (0–25): 25=0–3 errors; 20=4–5; 15=6–7; 10=8–9; 5=10–12; 0=>12. Computation: (1) assign each dimension a banded score (0,5,10,15,20,25); (2) sum for Total_100; (3) convert to 0–5 integer overall by rounding Total_100/20 (clamp 0–5 if needed); (4) output exactly one line in the required format with that integer. Edge cases: empty/off-topic essays → Content=0; ignore absent vocab/structure targets; count each unique error, repeated typos count each time; if borderline between bands, choose the stricter (lower). Remember: you must not output anything except the single required line and integer per the original instruction.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "In modern life, having large outdoor public spaces, such as parks and squares, has become essential for all cities and towns. This essay agrees with this statement as these open green areas and accessible spaces positively impact the population and environment. The green open areas like gardens and parks will act as a stress reliever and a source of joy and quality time for citizens. The working people will benefit from these areas by relaxing and meditating, thus improving their focus and mental health, especially after spending their day in closed offices. Children are full of energy and joy; these open free spaces will allow them to play and express themselves. It will also allow the Families to enjoy each other and spend outdoor time together doing activities such as picnics and barbeque. These areas are perfect for social activities and events in cities and towns. In addition to the positive effect of the open green spaces on the people and community, it dramatically impacts the environment as green landscapes and trees are known to reduce pollution. The oxygen level will increase, and carbon dioxide will decrease, leading to a better atmosphere. Planting trees and landscaping will allow a partial return of the wildlife, and maybe along the way, it could prevent the extinction of another species or even us. In conclusion, the large public open free spaces and green areas are crucial for citizens to relax and have good times to recharge. They are also essential for improving the environment and reducing pollution.", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 4.0", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances. Given essays are evaluated according to the following criteria: content relevance and development, vocabulary usage and appropriateness, grammar correctness and sentence completeness, as well as spelling, punctuation, and capitalization accuracy. Do not change any of the instructions above. Append-only rules below define how to compute the single numeric score. Scoring rubric (four dimensions, each 0–25, total 0–100): Content (0–25): 25=all required/relevant items fully covered with detailed support; 20=most relevant items covered with some detail; 15=some relevant items covered with limited development; 10=few relevant items with minimal development; 5=mostly off-topic; 0=no relevant content. Vocabulary (0–25): 25=excellent appropriate range, uses ≥10 target words if a list is provided; 20=good, 8–9 words; 15=adequate but repetitive, 5–7 words; 10=limited with some misuse, 3–4 words; 5=very limited, 1–2 words; 0=inappropriate/0 words. If no target list, ignore numeric counts and judge appropriateness/range. Grammar (0–25): 25=all sentences complete, target structures correct, 0–3 mistakes; 20=most sentences complete, 4–5 mistakes; 15=some incomplete sentences, 6–7 mistakes; 10=several incomplete, 8–9 mistakes; 5=many incomplete, 10–12 mistakes; 0=most incomplete, >12 mistakes. If no target structures given, judge accuracy/complexity only. Spelling/Punctuation/Capitalization (0–25): 25=0–3 errors; 20=4–5; 15=6–7; 10=8–9; 5=10–12; 0=>12. Computation: (1) assign each dimension a banded score (0,5,10,15,20,25); (2) sum for Total_100; (3) convert to 0–5 integer overall by rounding Total_100/20 (clamp 0–5 if needed); (4) output exactly one line in the required format with that integer. Edge cases: empty/off-topic essays → Content=0; ignore absent vocab/structure targets; count each unique error, repeated typos count each time; if borderline between bands, choose the stricter (lower). Remember: you must not output anything except the single required line and integer per the original instruction.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "The obstacles builders Empire State Building faced attempting allow dirigibles dock ware extrem comeone obstacles builders trying make building self could handle stress dirigibles tied building wind pulling swaying back forth wind direction changesAlso low dirigibles flying buildings The important gases inside dirigible flamible would devistation people New York City", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 4.0", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances. Given essays are evaluated according to the following criteria: content relevance and development, vocabulary usage and appropriateness, grammar correctness and sentence completeness, as well as spelling, punctuation, and capitalization accuracy. Do not change any of the instructions above. Append-only rules below define how to compute the single numeric score. Scoring rubric (four dimensions, each 0–25, total 0–100): Content (0–25): 25=all required/relevant items fully covered with detailed support; 20=most relevant items covered with some detail; 15=some relevant items covered with limited development; 10=few relevant items with minimal development; 5=mostly off-topic; 0=no relevant content. Vocabulary (0–25): 25=excellent appropriate range, uses ≥10 target words if a list is provided; 20=good, 8–9 words; 15=adequate but repetitive, 5–7 words; 10=limited with some misuse, 3–4 words; 5=very limited, 1–2 words; 0=inappropriate/0 words. If no target list, ignore numeric counts and judge appropriateness/range. Grammar (0–25): 25=all sentences complete, target structures correct, 0–3 mistakes; 20=most sentences complete, 4–5 mistakes; 15=some incomplete sentences, 6–7 mistakes; 10=several incomplete, 8–9 mistakes; 5=many incomplete, 10–12 mistakes; 0=most incomplete, >12 mistakes. If no target structures given, judge accuracy/complexity only. Spelling/Punctuation/Capitalization (0–25): 25=0–3 errors; 20=4–5; 15=6–7; 10=8–9; 5=10–12; 0=>12. Computation: (1) assign each dimension a banded score (0,5,10,15,20,25); (2) sum for Total_100; (3) convert to 0–5 integer overall by rounding Total_100/20 (clamp 0–5 if needed); (4) output exactly one line in the required format with that integer. Edge cases: empty/off-topic essays → Content=0; ignore absent vocab/structure targets; count each unique error, repeated typos count each time; if borderline between bands, choose the stricter (lower). Remember: you must not output anything except the single required line and integer per the original instruction.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "The face you see was not created by aliens because there has been many of rock shape figuers on other planets. We have in NASA came across many differnt type of natural landforms through out space. The rock formation is a mesa the NASA came acrossed and it was a huge rock formed by shadows giving the illusion eyes, nose, and mouth. The picture actually shows is the Martain equivilent of a butte or mesa land form common around the American west. The head shape is just like a volcano it looks like it is a huge rock that comes up just like a volcano. Then once a clear shot was given it was shadowed as a face but really it was just a huge natural land form. There are probly all types of land masses that might look like a face, on planet earth or on other planets that we have not found yet might have faces exactly like this one so there is no way to say a alein created this when the NASA has came across this more than once. the only reason the NASA paied attention to the land formation is because it has a face on it that was made by a shadow. That is why aleins did not make the land mass because volcanoes come up to pionts and rise as so due the land formation and some volcanoes have faces as well as the land formation. So no this is just a natural landfom created by outerspace and gravity.", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 2.0", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances. Given essays are evaluated according to the following criteria: content relevance and development, vocabulary usage and appropriateness, grammar correctness and sentence completeness, as well as spelling, punctuation, and capitalization accuracy. Do not change any of the instructions above. Append-only rules below define how to compute the single numeric score. Scoring rubric (four dimensions, each 0–25, total 0–100): Content (0–25): 25=all required/relevant items fully covered with detailed support; 20=most relevant items covered with some detail; 15=some relevant items covered with limited development; 10=few relevant items with minimal development; 5=mostly off-topic; 0=no relevant content. Vocabulary (0–25): 25=excellent appropriate range, uses ≥10 target words if a list is provided; 20=good, 8–9 words; 15=adequate but repetitive, 5–7 words; 10=limited with some misuse, 3–4 words; 5=very limited, 1–2 words; 0=inappropriate/0 words. If no target list, ignore numeric counts and judge appropriateness/range. Grammar (0–25): 25=all sentences complete, target structures correct, 0–3 mistakes; 20=most sentences complete, 4–5 mistakes; 15=some incomplete sentences, 6–7 mistakes; 10=several incomplete, 8–9 mistakes; 5=many incomplete, 10–12 mistakes; 0=most incomplete, >12 mistakes. If no target structures given, judge accuracy/complexity only. Spelling/Punctuation/Capitalization (0–25): 25=0–3 errors; 20=4–5; 15=6–7; 10=8–9; 5=10–12; 0=>12. Computation: (1) assign each dimension a banded score (0,5,10,15,20,25); (2) sum for Total_100; (3) convert to 0–5 integer overall by rounding Total_100/20 (clamp 0–5 if needed); (4) output exactly one line in the required format with that integer. Edge cases: empty/off-topic essays → Content=0; ignore absent vocab/structure targets; count each unique error, repeated typos count each time; if borderline between bands, choose the stricter (lower). Remember: you must not output anything except the single required line and integer per the original instruction.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "The first main obsticale builders faced fact blimps even though propellers rudders still mercy wind And since wind top building described Constantly shifting due violen air currents would impossible keep blimps stable moored Empire state building Just docking blimp onto building impossible feet blimp even tried dock onto Empire state building naval dirigible Los Angeles could get close enough building get mooring lines Fearing wind would blow dirigible onto sharp spires othe building area would puncture dirigible s shell causing dirigible fall onto cityThe second main obsticale public safety aspect trying moore dirigible Empire State building There many things could go wrong The blimp could explode like Hindenburg could run one spires surrounding buildings plumet ground potentially killing severely injuring hundreds people That trying dock dirigible Empire State building impractical idea", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 5.0", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances. Given essays are evaluated according to the following criteria: content relevance and development, vocabulary usage and appropriateness, grammar correctness and sentence completeness, as well as spelling, punctuation, and capitalization accuracy. Do not change any of the instructions above. Append-only rules below define how to compute the single numeric score. Scoring rubric (four dimensions, each 0–25, total 0–100): Content (0–25): 25=all required/relevant items fully covered with detailed support; 20=most relevant items covered with some detail; 15=some relevant items covered with limited development; 10=few relevant items with minimal development; 5=mostly off-topic; 0=no relevant content. Vocabulary (0–25): 25=excellent appropriate range, uses ≥10 target words if a list is provided; 20=good, 8–9 words; 15=adequate but repetitive, 5–7 words; 10=limited with some misuse, 3–4 words; 5=very limited, 1–2 words; 0=inappropriate/0 words. If no target list, ignore numeric counts and judge appropriateness/range. Grammar (0–25): 25=all sentences complete, target structures correct, 0–3 mistakes; 20=most sentences complete, 4–5 mistakes; 15=some incomplete sentences, 6–7 mistakes; 10=several incomplete, 8–9 mistakes; 5=many incomplete, 10–12 mistakes; 0=most incomplete, >12 mistakes. If no target structures given, judge accuracy/complexity only. Spelling/Punctuation/Capitalization (0–25): 25=0–3 errors; 20=4–5; 15=6–7; 10=8–9; 5=10–12; 0=>12. Computation: (1) assign each dimension a banded score (0,5,10,15,20,25); (2) sum for Total_100; (3) convert to 0–5 integer overall by rounding Total_100/20 (clamp 0–5 if needed); (4) output exactly one line in the required format with that integer. Edge cases: empty/off-topic essays → Content=0; ignore absent vocab/structure targets; count each unique error, repeated typos count each time; if borderline between bands, choose the stricter (lower). Remember: you must not output anything except the single required line and integer per the original instruction.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "In the contemporary epoch, whilst opponents hold the view that influencers have detrimental effects on society, proponents have a diverse perspective. However, I am a staunch believer that these well-known characters have their own touch in pervading moral and appropriate doings. In this essay both perspectives along with my opinion will be further explained. On the one hand, a category of individuals in the belief that singers, actors, and some public figures have a negative effect on adolescents and they do not have any salient role in the community compared to other vocations. In other words, if teachers who rear zillions of generations or engineers who explore new technologies every day for the environment safety are followed and imitated by youth, they help their society more than any other entertainer can do. An eminent example is the Egyptian actor “Mohamed Ramadan” who keeps presenting unprofessional content such as violent movies that pervades immoral concepts in society. Thus, what can be said is that not all influencers deserve to be praised as they negatively affect youth's way of thinking. On the other hand, some celebrities are worthy of appreciation as they have an indispensable role. To illustrate more, some characters who constructively affect the community by their well doings such as donating to hospitals or participating in awareness campaigns, they deserve to be role models for most youngsters. For example, The Egyptian footballer “Mohamed salah” who encouraged a plethora of young people to be involved in anti-drug campaigns. Therefore, not only do these luminaries deserve massive refunds, but also they deserve to be rewarded by the governments. In conclusion, after this essay has manifested the above-mentioned points, it can be reiterated that some influencers inspire and admonish youth from crooked directions. I am convinced that those qualified public figures are worthy of being well-paid.", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 4.0", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances. Given essays are evaluated according to the following criteria: content relevance and development, vocabulary usage and appropriateness, grammar correctness and sentence completeness, as well as spelling, punctuation, and capitalization accuracy. Do not change any of the instructions above. Append-only rules below define how to compute the single numeric score. Scoring rubric (four dimensions, each 0–25, total 0–100): Content (0–25): 25=all required/relevant items fully covered with detailed support; 20=most relevant items covered with some detail; 15=some relevant items covered with limited development; 10=few relevant items with minimal development; 5=mostly off-topic; 0=no relevant content. Vocabulary (0–25): 25=excellent appropriate range, uses ≥10 target words if a list is provided; 20=good, 8–9 words; 15=adequate but repetitive, 5–7 words; 10=limited with some misuse, 3–4 words; 5=very limited, 1–2 words; 0=inappropriate/0 words. If no target list, ignore numeric counts and judge appropriateness/range. Grammar (0–25): 25=all sentences complete, target structures correct, 0–3 mistakes; 20=most sentences complete, 4–5 mistakes; 15=some incomplete sentences, 6–7 mistakes; 10=several incomplete, 8–9 mistakes; 5=many incomplete, 10–12 mistakes; 0=most incomplete, >12 mistakes. If no target structures given, judge accuracy/complexity only. Spelling/Punctuation/Capitalization (0–25): 25=0–3 errors; 20=4–5; 15=6–7; 10=8–9; 5=10–12; 0=>12. Computation: (1) assign each dimension a banded score (0,5,10,15,20,25); (2) sum for Total_100; (3) convert to 0–5 integer overall by rounding Total_100/20 (clamp 0–5 if needed); (4) output exactly one line in the required format with that integer. Edge cases: empty/off-topic essays → Content=0; ignore absent vocab/structure targets; count each unique error, repeated typos count each time; if borderline between bands, choose the stricter (lower). Remember: you must not output anything except the single required line and integer per the original instruction.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "The sets good mood memoir housethe states house sign life love The states always filled air scent music life love The explains mood Cuban feast Also learns neighborhood love The states And I never forget house gracious neiborhood many things I learned love The shows many cultures countrys show satisfaction whole neiborhood filled mostly Spanish Cuban Italian immigrants time overt racism norm segregation prevailed The shows good positive geneorus mood book started kitchen Cuban feast", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 4.0", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances. Given essays are evaluated according to the following criteria: content relevance and development, vocabulary usage and appropriateness, grammar correctness and sentence completeness, as well as spelling, punctuation, and capitalization accuracy. Do not change any of the instructions above. Append-only rules below define how to compute the single numeric score. Scoring rubric (four dimensions, each 0–25, total 0–100): Content (0–25): 25=all required/relevant items fully covered with detailed support; 20=most relevant items covered with some detail; 15=some relevant items covered with limited development; 10=few relevant items with minimal development; 5=mostly off-topic; 0=no relevant content. Vocabulary (0–25): 25=excellent appropriate range, uses ≥10 target words if a list is provided; 20=good, 8–9 words; 15=adequate but repetitive, 5–7 words; 10=limited with some misuse, 3–4 words; 5=very limited, 1–2 words; 0=inappropriate/0 words. If no target list, ignore numeric counts and judge appropriateness/range. Grammar (0–25): 25=all sentences complete, target structures correct, 0–3 mistakes; 20=most sentences complete, 4–5 mistakes; 15=some incomplete sentences, 6–7 mistakes; 10=several incomplete, 8–9 mistakes; 5=many incomplete, 10–12 mistakes; 0=most incomplete, >12 mistakes. If no target structures given, judge accuracy/complexity only. Spelling/Punctuation/Capitalization (0–25): 25=0–3 errors; 20=4–5; 15=6–7; 10=8–9; 5=10–12; 0=>12. Computation: (1) assign each dimension a banded score (0,5,10,15,20,25); (2) sum for Total_100; (3) convert to 0–5 integer overall by rounding Total_100/20 (clamp 0–5 if needed); (4) output exactly one line in the required format with that integer. Edge cases: empty/off-topic essays → Content=0; ignore absent vocab/structure targets; count each unique error, repeated typos count each time; if borderline between bands, choose the stricter (lower). Remember: you must not output anything except the single required line and integer per the original instruction.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "The author concludes story paragraph sadness The test telling supposed use twenty dollars buying one Big spent money besides buy plant reminded home last paragraph saying chance test supposed", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 1.0", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances. Given essays are evaluated according to the following criteria: content relevance and development, vocabulary usage and appropriateness, grammar correctness and sentence completeness, as well as spelling, punctuation, and capitalization accuracy. Do not change any of the instructions above. Append-only rules below define how to compute the single numeric score. Scoring rubric (four dimensions, each 0–25, total 0–100): Content (0–25): 25=all required/relevant items fully covered with detailed support; 20=most relevant items covered with some detail; 15=some relevant items covered with limited development; 10=few relevant items with minimal development; 5=mostly off-topic; 0=no relevant content. Vocabulary (0–25): 25=excellent appropriate range, uses ≥10 target words if a list is provided; 20=good, 8–9 words; 15=adequate but repetitive, 5–7 words; 10=limited with some misuse, 3–4 words; 5=very limited, 1–2 words; 0=inappropriate/0 words. If no target list, ignore numeric counts and judge appropriateness/range. Grammar (0–25): 25=all sentences complete, target structures correct, 0–3 mistakes; 20=most sentences complete, 4–5 mistakes; 15=some incomplete sentences, 6–7 mistakes; 10=several incomplete, 8–9 mistakes; 5=many incomplete, 10–12 mistakes; 0=most incomplete, >12 mistakes. If no target structures given, judge accuracy/complexity only. Spelling/Punctuation/Capitalization (0–25): 25=0–3 errors; 20=4–5; 15=6–7; 10=8–9; 5=10–12; 0=>12. Computation: (1) assign each dimension a banded score (0,5,10,15,20,25); (2) sum for Total_100; (3) convert to 0–5 integer overall by rounding Total_100/20 (clamp 0–5 if needed); (4) output exactly one line in the required format with that integer. Edge cases: empty/off-topic essays → Content=0; ignore absent vocab/structure targets; count each unique error, repeated typos count each time; if borderline between bands, choose the stricter (lower). Remember: you must not output anything except the single required line and integer per the original instruction.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "It is believed that to find an answer to environmental issues we need a worldwide institution Instead of each country imposing their politics on this problem .I strongly regard it as a fact that we need a national organization to solve our problems . as far as I know, when there is a unique organization it can impose its plans and regulations on governments throughout the world otherwise they might apply nothing or at least minor protocols to preserve habitats, Which is depended on their budget and financial resources. for example, the world health organization coerce nations to obey particular plans for vaccinations for even poor or developing countries and also help them to achieve their goals .thus, we can observe that many viruses and disease have been wiped out and no one is infected by them anymore. To sum up, all nations demand prompt and beneficial action to survive our only planet and deter environmental issues such as global warming Which has an irreversible effect on humankind and all species.", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 2.0", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances. Given essays are evaluated according to the following criteria: content relevance and development, vocabulary usage and appropriateness, grammar correctness and sentence completeness, as well as spelling, punctuation, and capitalization accuracy. Do not change any of the instructions above. Append-only rules below define how to compute the single numeric score. Scoring rubric (four dimensions, each 0–25, total 0–100): Content (0–25): 25=all required/relevant items fully covered with detailed support; 20=most relevant items covered with some detail; 15=some relevant items covered with limited development; 10=few relevant items with minimal development; 5=mostly off-topic; 0=no relevant content. Vocabulary (0–25): 25=excellent appropriate range, uses ≥10 target words if a list is provided; 20=good, 8–9 words; 15=adequate but repetitive, 5–7 words; 10=limited with some misuse, 3–4 words; 5=very limited, 1–2 words; 0=inappropriate/0 words. If no target list, ignore numeric counts and judge appropriateness/range. Grammar (0–25): 25=all sentences complete, target structures correct, 0–3 mistakes; 20=most sentences complete, 4–5 mistakes; 15=some incomplete sentences, 6–7 mistakes; 10=several incomplete, 8–9 mistakes; 5=many incomplete, 10–12 mistakes; 0=most incomplete, >12 mistakes. If no target structures given, judge accuracy/complexity only. Spelling/Punctuation/Capitalization (0–25): 25=0–3 errors; 20=4–5; 15=6–7; 10=8–9; 5=10–12; 0=>12. Computation: (1) assign each dimension a banded score (0,5,10,15,20,25); (2) sum for Total_100; (3) convert to 0–5 integer overall by rounding Total_100/20 (clamp 0–5 if needed); (4) output exactly one line in the required format with that integer. Edge cases: empty/off-topic essays → Content=0; ignore absent vocab/structure targets; count each unique error, repeated typos count each time; if borderline between bands, choose the stricter (lower). Remember: you must not output anything except the single required line and integer per the original instruction.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "What if I told you that there were these special kind of cars that didn't require a driver to accelerate, brake, and basically any of the basic car functions? That it was all programmed to do these things? Sounds crazy, right? It may sound crazy, but it's happening. Google cofounder, Sergey Brin, has found a way to have cars to do just that. They're called driveless cars. I, personally, think that these cars are a terrible idea, to be honest. There are plenty of positive and negative aspects for these cars though, which I will talk about now. These driveless cars sound pretty cool, right? They're very extraordinary really. Movies, television and books have imagined this moment for centuries, saying that the future would consist of them. Being \"pretty cool\" is just one of a few positive aspects. Obviously, you wouldn't need to drive, so if you got tired or bored, you could just be fine (under certain conditions, which I will discuss later). These cars also would have more flexibility than a bus and using half of the fuel needed for a taxi cab. That's a big deal with gas prices rising lately. There's really only one negative aspect to these cars, but it's a pretty big one. You didn't think it would be perfect, did you? Everything has a flaw or twelve to it. That negative aspect is that you have to stay alert the entire time that you are driving. Yes, it is a driveless car, which is supposed to mean that you don't have to drive. That statement is only half true. The car is specifically made to do the basics, like accelerate, brake, turn, and other stuff. But, say there is an accident or an animal in the road. You'd have to turn out of the way so that you can get out of the way of it. They're not programmed to do so on their own. You have to do that. But, on the bright side, if for some reason you're not paying attention to the road, there is a car assistant programmed the car system. It would alert you of when you need to take control of the car to move out of the way, or something along those lines. As you can tell, these \"driveless cars\" have some perks to them, but they also have some disadvantages to them as well. I still stick with my opinion of not having these cars though. It's not that much work to move your hands to steer a wheel and to push your foot down on a pedal to make it go and stop. The negative aspects weigh out the positive aspects, if we're being honest here. Google cars might be cool and might be \"the best thing possibly\" to other people, who are most likely lazy, but I stick with my opinion and hopefully, others will too. So, once again, I say that Google cars are not a good idea and should not be promoted.", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 2.0", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances. Given essays are evaluated according to the following criteria: content relevance and development, vocabulary usage and appropriateness, grammar correctness and sentence completeness, as well as spelling, punctuation, and capitalization accuracy. Do not change any of the instructions above. Append-only rules below define how to compute the single numeric score. Scoring rubric (four dimensions, each 0–25, total 0–100): Content (0–25): 25=all required/relevant items fully covered with detailed support; 20=most relevant items covered with some detail; 15=some relevant items covered with limited development; 10=few relevant items with minimal development; 5=mostly off-topic; 0=no relevant content. Vocabulary (0–25): 25=excellent appropriate range, uses ≥10 target words if a list is provided; 20=good, 8–9 words; 15=adequate but repetitive, 5–7 words; 10=limited with some misuse, 3–4 words; 5=very limited, 1–2 words; 0=inappropriate/0 words. If no target list, ignore numeric counts and judge appropriateness/range. Grammar (0–25): 25=all sentences complete, target structures correct, 0–3 mistakes; 20=most sentences complete, 4–5 mistakes; 15=some incomplete sentences, 6–7 mistakes; 10=several incomplete, 8–9 mistakes; 5=many incomplete, 10–12 mistakes; 0=most incomplete, >12 mistakes. If no target structures given, judge accuracy/complexity only. Spelling/Punctuation/Capitalization (0–25): 25=0–3 errors; 20=4–5; 15=6–7; 10=8–9; 5=10–12; 0=>12. Computation: (1) assign each dimension a banded score (0,5,10,15,20,25); (2) sum for Total_100; (3) convert to 0–5 integer overall by rounding Total_100/20 (clamp 0–5 if needed); (4) output exactly one line in the required format with that integer. Edge cases: empty/off-topic essays → Content=0; ignore absent vocab/structure targets; count each unique error, repeated typos count each time; if borderline between bands, choose the stricter (lower). Remember: you must not output anything except the single required line and integer per the original instruction.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "In the current era, some individuals have believed that tackling the environmental consequences can prevent horrible climate changes, which bring various negative outcomes to either humans or wildlife while some opine that living with it is the best way to solve the problems. Personally, I strongly agree that people should solve those effects and I will elaborate in this following essay. Regarding the reasons why I believe so, Many individuals tend to live with the climate changes, including CO2 emission, sea-level rising and others, since if they alter the behaviour, a convenient's lifestyle would change, leading to increase facilities in their life such as diminishing air conditioner using. Consequently, Ignoring the environmental issues allows them to gain a better life. As a result, The environment keeps indirectly destroyed by human beings, leading to terrible global warming in the near future. For instance, Keeping utilising an air conditioner or private transportation leads to rising air pollution, which doubled heat in the atmosphere, which affects the temperature rising of the earth. Furthermore, Temperature-rising affects both people and creatures, especially polar bears, as glaciers are no longer exist because of heating. Thus, If people all over the world tend to ignore the consequences, both human beings and animals would face the horrible effects of climate change. Additionally, authorities and individuals should effectively cooperate to solve those issues, especially at the root causes, not the consequences in order to prevent those. In conclusion, The government and the population should be concerned about those problems instead of ignoring the negative outcomes in order to stay comfortable as those can lead to long-term effects on both humans and animals.", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 5.0", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances. Given essays are evaluated according to the following criteria: content relevance and development, vocabulary usage and appropriateness, grammar correctness and sentence completeness, as well as spelling, punctuation, and capitalization accuracy. Do not change any of the instructions above. Append-only rules below define how to compute the single numeric score. Scoring rubric (four dimensions, each 0–25, total 0–100): Content (0–25): 25=all required/relevant items fully covered with detailed support; 20=most relevant items covered with some detail; 15=some relevant items covered with limited development; 10=few relevant items with minimal development; 5=mostly off-topic; 0=no relevant content. Vocabulary (0–25): 25=excellent appropriate range, uses ≥10 target words if a list is provided; 20=good, 8–9 words; 15=adequate but repetitive, 5–7 words; 10=limited with some misuse, 3–4 words; 5=very limited, 1–2 words; 0=inappropriate/0 words. If no target list, ignore numeric counts and judge appropriateness/range. Grammar (0–25): 25=all sentences complete, target structures correct, 0–3 mistakes; 20=most sentences complete, 4–5 mistakes; 15=some incomplete sentences, 6–7 mistakes; 10=several incomplete, 8–9 mistakes; 5=many incomplete, 10–12 mistakes; 0=most incomplete, >12 mistakes. If no target structures given, judge accuracy/complexity only. Spelling/Punctuation/Capitalization (0–25): 25=0–3 errors; 20=4–5; 15=6–7; 10=8–9; 5=10–12; 0=>12. Computation: (1) assign each dimension a banded score (0,5,10,15,20,25); (2) sum for Total_100; (3) convert to 0–5 integer overall by rounding Total_100/20 (clamp 0–5 if needed); (4) output exactly one line in the required format with that integer. Edge cases: empty/off-topic essays → Content=0; ignore absent vocab/structure targets; count each unique error, repeated typos count each time; if borderline between bands, choose the stricter (lower). Remember: you must not output anything except the single required line and integer per the original instruction.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Some people believe that getting a university degree is the best path to succeed in life, while others think that ones do not need to graduate from a university to become successful. In this essay, I will be discussing both views and giving my opinion. Nowadays, a standard to be employed in a good company in order to earn a high salary is to have a university education. In other words, most organizations require their employees to have at least a bachelor's degree. For instance, in Thailand, a degree from a particular university can determine what company each person can join, which is the more reputable university, the better job position. In contrast, if a person has lower education levels, one can only become a labour force or worker. On the other hand, some people can become successful without university degrees. For example, the most popular social media platform, Facebook, was established by a university student that later decided to drop out of school to pursue his career. That is to say, without university degrees, one can achieve success in their career. However, the chances are slim for ordinary people, in which the possibility can be only one in a million. To succeed while having lower education levels requires talents, money, and lucks, and most people do not acquire all of these requirements. In conclusion, although some persons can achieve promising careers, the chances that it will happen to the majority of people are slim. Graduating from a university is the best guarantee that one will be employed in a good firm.", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 5.0", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances. Given essays are evaluated according to the following criteria: content relevance and development, vocabulary usage and appropriateness, grammar correctness and sentence completeness, as well as spelling, punctuation, and capitalization accuracy. Do not change any of the instructions above. Append-only rules below define how to compute the single numeric score. Scoring rubric (four dimensions, each 0–25, total 0–100): Content (0–25): 25=all required/relevant items fully covered with detailed support; 20=most relevant items covered with some detail; 15=some relevant items covered with limited development; 10=few relevant items with minimal development; 5=mostly off-topic; 0=no relevant content. Vocabulary (0–25): 25=excellent appropriate range, uses ≥10 target words if a list is provided; 20=good, 8–9 words; 15=adequate but repetitive, 5–7 words; 10=limited with some misuse, 3–4 words; 5=very limited, 1–2 words; 0=inappropriate/0 words. If no target list, ignore numeric counts and judge appropriateness/range. Grammar (0–25): 25=all sentences complete, target structures correct, 0–3 mistakes; 20=most sentences complete, 4–5 mistakes; 15=some incomplete sentences, 6–7 mistakes; 10=several incomplete, 8–9 mistakes; 5=many incomplete, 10–12 mistakes; 0=most incomplete, >12 mistakes. If no target structures given, judge accuracy/complexity only. Spelling/Punctuation/Capitalization (0–25): 25=0–3 errors; 20=4–5; 15=6–7; 10=8–9; 5=10–12; 0=>12. Computation: (1) assign each dimension a banded score (0,5,10,15,20,25); (2) sum for Total_100; (3) convert to 0–5 integer overall by rounding Total_100/20 (clamp 0–5 if needed); (4) output exactly one line in the required format with that integer. Edge cases: empty/off-topic essays → Content=0; ignore absent vocab/structure targets; count each unique error, repeated typos count each time; if borderline between bands, choose the stricter (lower). Remember: you must not output anything except the single required line and integer per the original instruction.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "The author concludes story paragraph failed driver s test She saying get s little warmer outside plants grow maybe take test hopefully pass I know failed test said As Saeng walks home Failing driver s test I guess snow ground cause make mistakes taking test In conclusion thats author concludes story paragraph", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 1.0", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances. Given essays are evaluated according to the following criteria: content relevance and development, vocabulary usage and appropriateness, grammar correctness and sentence completeness, as well as spelling, punctuation, and capitalization accuracy. Do not change any of the instructions above. Append-only rules below define how to compute the single numeric score. Scoring rubric (four dimensions, each 0–25, total 0–100): Content (0–25): 25=all required/relevant items fully covered with detailed support; 20=most relevant items covered with some detail; 15=some relevant items covered with limited development; 10=few relevant items with minimal development; 5=mostly off-topic; 0=no relevant content. Vocabulary (0–25): 25=excellent appropriate range, uses ≥10 target words if a list is provided; 20=good, 8–9 words; 15=adequate but repetitive, 5–7 words; 10=limited with some misuse, 3–4 words; 5=very limited, 1–2 words; 0=inappropriate/0 words. If no target list, ignore numeric counts and judge appropriateness/range. Grammar (0–25): 25=all sentences complete, target structures correct, 0–3 mistakes; 20=most sentences complete, 4–5 mistakes; 15=some incomplete sentences, 6–7 mistakes; 10=several incomplete, 8–9 mistakes; 5=many incomplete, 10–12 mistakes; 0=most incomplete, >12 mistakes. If no target structures given, judge accuracy/complexity only. Spelling/Punctuation/Capitalization (0–25): 25=0–3 errors; 20=4–5; 15=6–7; 10=8–9; 5=10–12; 0=>12. Computation: (1) assign each dimension a banded score (0,5,10,15,20,25); (2) sum for Total_100; (3) convert to 0–5 integer overall by rounding Total_100/20 (clamp 0–5 if needed); (4) output exactly one line in the required format with that integer. Edge cases: empty/off-topic essays → Content=0; ignore absent vocab/structure targets; count each unique error, repeated typos count each time; if borderline between bands, choose the stricter (lower). Remember: you must not output anything except the single required line and integer per the original instruction.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "The computer able many things It think computers posotive effects people But experts believe dont I m writing paper I explain positions sides Did know everyone house chances computer lucky telephone Computers believe help us life wether keep information talk online find good recipe ever That computers positive It computers would technological advances one important devices Let share expierence okay I job interview right well I could find street I went computer gave directions I made interview Thats I think computers posotive effects Now opposite side says people spending much time computer less time exercising enjoying nature interacting fiends family Well I people spend much time computer completely choice And people usually nt alot self control And exercising said everyone need exercise persons already skinny need exercise For interacting friends family I mean long person look computer screen So conclusion see computers good self control enjoyed bad side effects So next time computer enjoy remember friends family health important", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 3.0", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances. Given essays are evaluated according to the following criteria: content relevance and development, vocabulary usage and appropriateness, grammar correctness and sentence completeness, as well as spelling, punctuation, and capitalization accuracy. Do not change any of the instructions above. Append-only rules below define how to compute the single numeric score. Scoring rubric (four dimensions, each 0–25, total 0–100): Content (0–25): 25=all required/relevant items fully covered with detailed support; 20=most relevant items covered with some detail; 15=some relevant items covered with limited development; 10=few relevant items with minimal development; 5=mostly off-topic; 0=no relevant content. Vocabulary (0–25): 25=excellent appropriate range, uses ≥10 target words if a list is provided; 20=good, 8–9 words; 15=adequate but repetitive, 5–7 words; 10=limited with some misuse, 3–4 words; 5=very limited, 1–2 words; 0=inappropriate/0 words. If no target list, ignore numeric counts and judge appropriateness/range. Grammar (0–25): 25=all sentences complete, target structures correct, 0–3 mistakes; 20=most sentences complete, 4–5 mistakes; 15=some incomplete sentences, 6–7 mistakes; 10=several incomplete, 8–9 mistakes; 5=many incomplete, 10–12 mistakes; 0=most incomplete, >12 mistakes. If no target structures given, judge accuracy/complexity only. Spelling/Punctuation/Capitalization (0–25): 25=0–3 errors; 20=4–5; 15=6–7; 10=8–9; 5=10–12; 0=>12. Computation: (1) assign each dimension a banded score (0,5,10,15,20,25); (2) sum for Total_100; (3) convert to 0–5 integer overall by rounding Total_100/20 (clamp 0–5 if needed); (4) output exactly one line in the required format with that integer. Edge cases: empty/off-topic essays → Content=0; ignore absent vocab/structure targets; count each unique error, repeated typos count each time; if borderline between bands, choose the stricter (lower). Remember: you must not output anything except the single required line and integer per the original instruction.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "remembers child hood fondly memoir home New Jersey He creates setting many people relate general feel family heritage The tone memoir nostalgic recalls hard work parents people considers family food music Rodriguez recounts childhood many people would telling readers grateful parents warm welcoming home seemed Even time segregation US numerous people different cultures formed community Rodriguez s home This place Rodriguez describes welcoming exactly mood memoir welcoming The author recreates welcoming warm musical home reader visit enjoy", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 4.0", "role": "assistant" } ]

Subsets and Splits

No community queries yet

The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.