ubffm/academic_main_text_classifier_en_annotated

labels int64 0 3	text stringlengths 1 1.23k
0	��"�"��!��$��
1	Head (‘rains’) being talked about, and in 13)b by “hollow chieftains” for whose
0	�� !�� $��"��
1	The Abednegos’ marriage is blessed with two children: Rebeccah and Bozo;
1	" Note that the indefinite others would not be adequate:
0	649
2	(11) a) die [Rede], die er __ geschwungen hat eine Rede schwingen
0	��$��+��*�
1	Such information could be of a general, technical or specialized nature. At the
1	segments associated to a mora have identical values for the tonal
3	Publishers Limited.
1	feet”, “these practiced eyes”. Thus, the NGPs are meaning-sensitive, just as they are
1	in Winter (2016), as it stands, does not seem to predict SpAs for NRCs. However, if we can
2	a. 7Vx 3y [book(y) -> x = y & See(william, x)]
2	And water created air.
2	(16) [[almost≈]] = λw.λp<s,t>. ¬p(w) & ∃q [ q ≈ p & q(w)]
3	— (1990) “Development of Nigerian Languages, Publishing Problems and Prospects”
1	participants. We had to exclude 3 participants because they rated more than 4 of the 9 negative
1	- Fam found 17 kms east of Kungana in Bali LGA with less than 1,000
2	Ḿ gbabà l’ó hya wē achu ru m byá If I run into the bush they chase me on
3	Ikwubuzo, I., Ogbulogo, C.U. and Okoro, L.C. (1992). Omenka. Lagos: Logomedia.
0	�� &$��"�� 0�'� ��!"��/�
3	Stalnaker, R.: 1998, On the representation of context, Journal of Logic, Language and Informa-
0	�� St4��vx��5v§vx�4�&s �u~��§�4¸r~�} �:vx\|4wz� ��~�t4{4\|4}�� {Bô��Æv��4�©wz� {4\|4}�� { ��f�fw�� z��~�yStBÞ�~�¸�¸¨ø¦õ�¸�¸
2	(1) a. Eventualities are perceptible.
1	Sascha BARGMANN— Goethe University Frankfurt a.M.
1	there are structural relations between subsequent moves such as anaphoric dependencies, ellipsis
2	(10) Six months pass. . . (p. 235)
0	1359
0	23.846
2	((sagt etwas, aber wird von Gisela unterbrochen))
0	Dora email ........................................................................................................................................... 386
2	And the teeth will be beaten
0	403
1	modification are reduced to operations on predicates; but this only concerned the level of
1	investments as well as economic strangulation of an already pauperised nation.
1	The verbs of this grade are termed Ventive (see Newman 2000 and
0	900
1	Again, in the poem ‘Wolf Gift’, he refers to these same ‘people’: “But tell me this.
0	� chá
0	37
3	paper presented at the London phonology seminar held at the School of
0	852 Language, Literature & Culture in a Multilingual Society
3	Nigerian Languages, Bayero University, Kano.
2	T
0	1092
2	Of hanky-panky and fraud
1	(<max). An attribute dimension is a triple hDATTR,Ds,ordi s.t. DATTR is the interpretation of
1	symmetric predicates. They differ, however, in that Gleitman derives the unary use from the
1	SpAs depending on the TYPE of the relative clause (RRC vs. NRC) and the SYMMETRY
1	constraints are universally present in any grammar. What differentiates
1	Although the continent is caught in the mire of underdevelopment, this may have
1	contribution of the Pred head consists of providing the link to a specific topic situation. The
1	& K. Kusumoto (Eds.), Proceedings of NELS 28 (pp. 283–297).
0	-2002
0	��$��!�!��
2	addresses his ‘land’:
2	(17) [CT /Minden könyvet] [FP \ki olvasott el?]
1	(13) p(S)(x)(w) , x is female in w
0	Jun 40
1	As stated earlier, scatology as a critical attitude best explains the structure of
0	� � �� I� Ó`Ñ � Ø��pÔ � Ñ�� ¢¡ � � � �� ¤£
2	time rain
0	#-----------------------------------------------------------------
0	13.290
0	34.963
2	(16) JTHEK = lP
2	(¬Bs[p]_¬BsBa[Bs[p]) p])^Bs[p] ✏ ¬BsBa[Bs[p]) p]
3	- (1e) taken from Cooper 2010.)
2	(157) § the [picture of Billi]j [CP [Op [ ]j]1 that hei likes
3	Cunningham, H.W. (1986). Writing for Mass Communication. Ibadan: Mackay
1	rules of simplicity, balance, objectivity (as much as possible), and relevance, with a
2	(11) [λw1 Mary thinks-w1 [λw2 Sue belongs-w2 to the same denomination-w2 as John
2	(§3.1.4), clause-final particles (§4.3), and adverbs (§4.4). Of these the
0	�#�B�è
1	stipulate the simultaneous presence of the protopredicate quarrel and the binary symmetric
0	�� *�� &��
1	those who run around with ‘bags’ of naira to bribe their ways through what
0	interview ............................................................................................................................... 216
1	picked up the bony remains of somebody’s long-dead grandfather… As the
1	"process nominals" by Rappaport (1998).
0	– + + +
2	Nà-ékèné Osità nwá Ēzinwa Salutes Osita son of Ezinwa!
1	Kamp & Reyle (1993, 290) assume with Fodor & Sag that specific indefinite NPs are
0	� ��#�Z� �Z��
0	405
0	1632
2	Ø i.e. Pronoun vowel
1	of the antecedent and that the entire RRC is integrated in such a way that it imposes a further
0	1.167.192
0	�� .���� 9�=��!�9��=8� �� #��*�� $��"��
0	10.176
1	rendered in English.
0	��&�'�'�&�� +��
0	�� rltvzr
1	Geurts (2001) explains specificity in terms of backgrounding. He assumes that
1	enough. In other words, the deeds do not take place in the realm of these extra-
2	Ndi na ejiko aka
2	But anywhere they have been to
1	low F2=back vowel. F3 is lowered by rounding of front vowels, though this

0

��"�"��!��$��

1

Head (‘rains’) being talked about, and in 13)b by “hollow chieftains” for whose

0

�� !�� $��"��

1

The Abednegos’ marriage is blessed with two children: Rebeccah and Bozo;

1

" Note that the indefinite others would not be adequate:

0

649

2

(11) a) die [Rede], die er __ geschwungen hat eine Rede schwingen

0

��$��+��*�

1

Such information could be of a general, technical or specialized nature. At the

1

segments associated to a mora have identical values for the tonal

3

Publishers Limited.

1

feet”, “these practiced eyes”. Thus, the NGPs are meaning-sensitive, just as they are

1

in Winter (2016), as it stands, does not seem to predict SpAs for NRCs. However, if we can

2

a. 7Vx 3y [book(y) -> x = y & See(william, x)]

2

And water created air.

2

(16) [[almost≈]] = λw.λp<s,t>. ¬p(w) & ∃q [ q ≈ p & q(w)]

3

— (1990) “Development of Nigerian Languages, Publishing Problems and Prospects”

1

participants. We had to exclude 3 participants because they rated more than 4 of the 9 negative

1

- Fam found 17 kms east of Kungana in Bali LGA with less than 1,000

2

Ḿ gbabà l’ó hya wē achu ru m byá If I run into the bush they chase me on

3

Ikwubuzo, I., Ogbulogo, C.U. and Okoro, L.C. (1992). Omenka. Lagos: Logomedia.

0

�� &$��"�� 0�'� ��!"��/�

3

Stalnaker, R.: 1998, On the representation of context, Journal of Logic, Language and Informa-

0

�� St4��vx��5v§vx�4�&s �u~��§�4¸r~�} �:vx|4wz� ��~�t4{4|4}�� {Bô��Æv��4�©wz� {4|4}�� { ��f�fw�� z��~�yStBÞ�~�¸�¸¨ø¦õ�¸�¸

2

(1) a. Eventualities are perceptible.

1

Sascha BARGMANN— Goethe University Frankfurt a.M.

1

there are structural relations between subsequent moves such as anaphoric dependencies, ellipsis

2

(10) Six months pass. . . (p. 235)

0

1359

0

23.846

2

((sagt etwas, aber wird von Gisela unterbrochen))

0

Dora email ........................................................................................................................................... 386

2

And the teeth will be beaten

0

403

1

modification are reduced to operations on predicates; but this only concerned the level of

1

investments as well as economic strangulation of an already pauperised nation.

1

The verbs of this grade are termed Ventive (see Newman 2000 and

0

900

1

Again, in the poem ‘Wolf Gift’, he refers to these same ‘people’: “But tell me this.

0

� chá

0

37

3

paper presented at the London phonology seminar held at the School of

0

852 Language, Literature & Culture in a Multilingual Society

3

Nigerian Languages, Bayero University, Kano.

2

T

0

1092

2

Of hanky-panky and fraud

1

(<max). An attribute dimension is a triple hDATTR,Ds,ordi s.t. DATTR is the interpretation of

1

symmetric predicates. They differ, however, in that Gleitman derives the unary use from the

1

SpAs depending on the TYPE of the relative clause (RRC vs. NRC) and the SYMMETRY

1

constraints are universally present in any grammar. What differentiates

1

Although the continent is caught in the mire of underdevelopment, this may have

1

contribution of the Pred head consists of providing the link to a specific topic situation. The

1

& K. Kusumoto (Eds.), Proceedings of NELS 28 (pp. 283–297).

0

-2002

0

��$��!�!��

2

addresses his ‘land’:

2

(17) [CT /Minden könyvet] [FP \ki olvasott el?]

1

(13) p(S)(x)(w) , x is female in w

0

Jun 40

1

As stated earlier, scatology as a critical attitude best explains the structure of

0

� � �� I� Ó`Ñ � Ø��pÔ � Ñ�� ¢¡ � � � �� ¤£

2

time rain

0

#-----------------------------------------------------------------

0

13.290

0

34.963

2

(16) JTHEK = lP

2

(¬Bs[p]_¬BsBa[Bs[p]) p])^Bs[p] ✏ ¬BsBa[Bs[p]) p]

3

- (1e) taken from Cooper 2010.)

2

(157) § the [picture of Billi]j [CP [Op [ ]j]1 that hei likes

3

Cunningham, H.W. (1986). Writing for Mass Communication. Ibadan: Mackay

1

rules of simplicity, balance, objectivity (as much as possible), and relevance, with a

2

(11) [λw1 Mary thinks-w1 [λw2 Sue belongs-w2 to the same denomination-w2 as John

2

(§3.1.4), clause-final particles (§4.3), and adverbs (§4.4). Of these the

0

�#�B�è

1

stipulate the simultaneous presence of the protopredicate quarrel and the binary symmetric

0

�� *�� &��

1

those who run around with ‘bags’ of naira to bribe their ways through what

0

interview ............................................................................................................................... 216

1

picked up the bony remains of somebody’s long-dead grandfather… As the

1

"process nominals" by Rappaport (1998).

0

– + + +

2

Nà-ékèné Osità nwá Ēzinwa Salutes Osita son of Ezinwa!

1

Kamp & Reyle (1993, 290) assume with Fodor & Sag that specific indefinite NPs are

0

� ��#�Z� �Z��

0

405

0

1632

2

Ø i.e. Pronoun vowel

1

of the antecedent and that the entire RRC is integrated in such a way that it imposes a further

0

1.167.192

0

�� .��*�� 9*�=��!�9��=8� �� #��*�� $��"��

0

10.176

1

rendered in English.

0

��&�'�'�&�� +��

0

�� rltvzr

1

Geurts (2001) explains specificity in terms of backgrounding. He assumes that

1

enough. In other words, the deeds do not take place in the realm of these extra-

2

Ndi na ejiko aka

2

But anywhere they have been to

1

low F2=back vowel. F3 is lowered by rounding of front vowels, though this