labels
int64
0
3
text
stringlengths
1
1.23k
1
rains have kept their time this year” (The Eye 3, stanza 2, line 1), he assumes we are
1
from extensional similar sets can be different.
2
Ego a
1
This question asks for a specification of the give-relation; in any possibility it will have to
0
��$��#�0��'� 1�� � ������� ����� $����� ������� �����
1
included by Chinua Achebe, in his novel Arrow of God3. This is apparently the Igbo
0
865
3
'' Cf. Chu (1983), p. 72.
2
[mà kò]
1
This approach differs from other approaches using choice functions (Winter 1997,
3
Stirling-Harden Publishers Nig. Ltd.
2
& LOC (v, AT (pt)) & PONY-TAIL (pt) & pt c maria]
1
town of Nsukka, while in 4)f. it extends its admiration to an admonition that the hills
1
Many concepts require an analysis with a richer structure in which the conceptual dimensions
1
(13)? That is, why is it the case·that activity verbs in R<;>mance cannot typically take a SCR
3
(Eds.), Proceedings of NELS, Volume 47, pp. 141–154.
2
(16) I’ll take which*(ever) book you give me.
2
reglos motionless = "without moving"
0
� +X,/.B=(243�����
2
A&¬B + + - +
1
to need a proper syntactic antecedent to which they can be attached. We hence expected to
2
Únù ékwēkwala ya gbapù  ma Ótù You must not allow its escape at all
0
690
2
4)g “O poor Livingstone / you have died in vain”
1
The Igbo Hunter Poet 439
2
Keep flirting
3
Strentz, H. (1989). News Reporting and News Sources. Ames, Iowa: Iowa State
0
".��������
0
Mrz 95
0
393.684
2
(14) *Eu vi [ o Joãoi a {PROk / prok} correr(em). ] (cf. (7))
1
symbolizes the dog cannot fall. The seeming ineffectiveness of the dog is translated
0
462
1
This study has attempted an acoustic investigation into the vowels of the
1
1The research reported here was carried out as part of the Research Unit 1783 Relative Clauses of the Deutsche
1
representation for a speaker specific reading - here the indefinite has wide scope.
1
Concerning the first point, we could show that our data motivate a simplification of the theory of
2
(1) a. A quantifier Q is Upward Entailing (UE), if A⊆A’ ⇒ Q(A)⊆Q(A’)
2
(56) b. Most linguists ... every analysis ... some problem 0 narrow scope
1
- Kacicere in Kachia and Jama’a LGAs with 700 speakers (Crozier and
2
( 14) a. blaka $ir flap RFX ‘ getlost'
0
Pa H 0.29463 963.787 1346.97 2117.81
0
��� ��!
1
protest as the writer takes us through the fictional world of the novel. For example, in
0
3.3 D-States
0
" Cf. ihid., p. 115.
0
�'�� ��
2
(12) HTLD: Adjunct islands
1
6Note that symmetric readings are available even if the set consists of more than two members. In this case the
0
464
0
______________________________
1
to descriptive material of the indefinite is used to "widen" the scope (Schwarzschild)
2
(10) ⇧ -positions
2
�� PRED “pro”
0
-30
2
‘Audu heard him/her/you/you/us/you/them’
1
not make sense, I think, to go to the banquet. (Inspect the third row of the table, which contains
0
&�!�'/+�.����������
1
for details). There are three categories of these verbs depending on the
0
( 1 2) For p and q to be ambiguous, p ~ q has to be grammatical and non-redundant.
2
L
0
11.604
2
(16) a. Ist Hein wohl auf See?
1
with some intuitive understanding.
1
head. Again, this creates an informal tone. This same informality is present in 5)
1
contemplate suicide because of their acute economic suffocation and psychological
1
“context of situation”.
1
(2001) proposes accommodation for discourse semantics approach.
2
(10) a. Heute hat Otto Kolleginnen zLrtlich umarmt
0
������� ����� �����������.���� ��$�$����"������������
2
(< DIR + root).
0
---- 2014.7.7
1
(14b) is identical to (13b). The question then arises as to why the semantic complementarity
0
683.421
1
originality. Thus, the literary artist in making use of original established possibilities
1
� Editing in English
1
Specificity and Definiteness in Scntencc and Discourse Structure
0
-858
0
1574
1
((4.110)-(4.112)), or with the negative prefix to mean Ænot yetfl ((4.113)-
2
But man was proud.
0
������!���
2
(10.3) 寸he relevant distinguishing propt?,rty associated with somecontextually given individual' holds of'
1
the copula is zero, the predicate NP always bears nominative case.1
1
in one condition. An example for a test item in all four conditions is given in (10).
1
passively any incursion into its territory. Every man is expected to be charged with
1
is bitterly resented.
0
��� 28� 4���� ���!������� �����0�� �������� ���
2
(17) (A AND [(¬B AND (D →C)) OR (B AND C AND ¬D)]) OR(C AND ¬B AND ¬D)?
2
(14) Every x of which it holds that x is a farmer that owns a donkey that has no fleas is
1
claims that since those words in the bisyllabic forms are only used in the
0
���������������������������$�����$����"�����������%�����$������.�����������������.���� ��$�$����"
1
While this account of modification targets property values, it is equivalent to the familiar
1
choice of would and utterances, courtship and choice of marriage partner etc.
0
��� -5� ��� ���� ��$�� �������� J�
1
(13a), though it clearly is the element contrasting with something.
1
taking the initiative at enormous costs to widen the possibilities available to users.
0
2,08
1
In this way it becomes clear why the verb leuchten / shine supports more modifiers than hell /
0
2207