ubffm/academic_main_text_classifier_en_annotated

labels int64 0 3	text stringlengths 1 1.23k
1	If symmetric predicates provide a collective antecedent, they do so only at the semantic, not
0	� ò /1/ ð 4@/12 QPQ ò¡ôs��ö�ø�ùiúdzlúlü öYq - ð <32B412�?12��(2�� ð>=Hð t ò / ð76 <Ym ï�O96�= 2 O 2%<s/ / 6 ð <
1	explanation is thathe is not (it to move about with a gun, since he does not know how
1	It is interesting to observe that only the first person singular pronoun
0	– kill – rv past 3SG – ACC.
0	27.890
0	1902
0	787
1	of course):
2	(120) The apples weigh two ounces.
0	��#��'�� 1��
3	National development: Seminar Proceedings Ife, Nigerian folklore Society,
1	local languages is no longer acceptable because words have varying meanings in
0	� ÜG#ÉN�N&�Ò�3tÉ~Zr ÀM �¹TU"�í ó�éæî�øJï°ôõî��}òJî�ô��ëòÀï�é>í"ö��\m"éÜñ�ï�í�òJì"éaî�øÀï ñÜòJí°éo�ëòJì"úJéÜó+#�3tÉ~�y ÀM �¹TU"�í ó�éæî�øJï°ôõî��;ôõî�òJî�ô��ëòÀï°é>í°ö��\m"éæñæï�í=òJì°é�î�øJïFñMòJí"éo�ëòJì°úJéæó+#�$w ~Zr ÀM �¹TU"�í ó�éæî�øJï°ôõî��}òJî�ôE�ëòÀï�é�ø��Gm"éæñæï°í=òJì"éaî�øJïFñMòÀí°éo�ëòJì°úJéæó+#�$w ~�y ÀM �¹TU"�í ó�éæî�øJï°ôõî��;ô îDòJî�ô��ëòÀï°é>ø��\m"éÜñ�ï�í=òÀì°éaî�øJï ñÜòJí°ée�KòJì"úJéÜóZ#
2	("The time~away construction")
0	484
1	use of excremental images in the above excerpt from the text is to graphically
1	will therefore annotate the structure with functor-argument relationships. Hence, the meaning
1	than NRCs with non-adjacent antecedents (2.8). RRCs with adjacent heads were judged a bit
3	Fry, D.B. 1979. The physics of speech. Cambridge: Cambridge University
2	Òchi ágha gwú ru  anu  n’o hia! Commander of the war that
1	ram is never tied to a stake. It soon kills itself if tied to a stake. It considers itself
1	to which the contrast can apply: temporal, spatial and epistemic dimensions.
2	Ósità nwá Ēzinwa! Ósità son of Ezinwa!
0	0,22
1	hitherto had gradually grown to become an atheist and a school drop-out, decides to
0	308
1	making constraints language – particular, but that constraints are universal
2	(15) little Julio attending the Italian Nobleman above-mentioned, he also
0	877.125
2	Since I have a red cap
1	& Stokhof, 1984, 1991). Consequently, the proposition that a sentence with identificational
0	Dongxue 1
0	Tone and Vowel Harmony in Oworo 869
0	190
1	This enveloping poverty made two of her brothers commit suicide through drowning;
0	10.554
0	( 1 2) a. Hans left after his mother had cooked something and he didn't want to
1	(10b) - (10d). Was (‘which’) can be resolved (i) by the proposition denoted
2	#Magatte
0	$ �+µ�©��n¢�µâá6��º�ÄJÁn½-ºF¯d¨�¡�© Öªn« ©$ÎO©� ¬>±:©$«Ö±M¬-Î�© Q¬3±H¯p¡Pµ�¬3 �« ¬3«=ô¼ÎO©M±�¬�³Vµ�¬3« ¬> �¨� µ�¬�²�¯p $¨�°-©�¡Mô
0	− indicates choice MC = multiple choice
2	Óbìézùó àpu tá n’āma! Óbìézùé has emerged at the arena!
2	(1)[[S]](A)= λQ.∃x∈A&∃A'(A'⊆{x':x'≤x}&Q=λP.∃x[A'∩P≠∅])
2	(11) a. In slow progression, every organ student struck a note on the Wurlitzer.
1	(1) Who will come to the banquet? (?x Cx)
1	3.2 Grade 1 Verb:
2	(11) OKO David só escreveu este artigo desde Janeiro.
0	� éMòÀì°î�éæóYôõîYòÀî&%X÷WòA%�ôE�ëò��Jô îDò�� é�#
1	Without going too far into the details of conceptual knowledge that are implicit in this
1	there is no semantic antecedent available for the NRC in these cases. For cross-sentential dis-
2	(10) a. John should be at work.
0	753
0	18.421
0	� ò ?��R� ðPQ7Q 2 QÕôk� öxô3xsz
0	�� %��F�@1��
1	situation si. To derive the semantics of the whole copular sentence in Russian the semantics of
1	- - Analysis of Variance - -
0	�!��!�*��!��
1	one sketched above, is that something similar holds for question-answer pairs.
0	("、a咽P阶re叩p-inc∞or叩poωra刽te邱S呻into-me'丁
1	cf. (23). The corresponding sentence with nominative is derived in (25).
2	Ka dibia okpotaonweya gwara anyi
1	sentences in Russian.
1	motives in his poetic texts is to strive constantly to establish relationship with his
2	Ó rùolé o – o – o It is now time (for action)
1	African cultures, the situation and the status of the hunter were the same. Shaka the
0	12.307
0	Mai 75
3	& London: Kluwer Academic Publisheres.
1	Humour, good descriptive power, and use of details are important aspects of
2	(5) a. offen sein ≈ offenstehen
0	��$��!�� .��*��$��!��
1	– either (i) they pick out a certain amount of sets (corresponding to their cardinality ) at the
0	�&~�tf~�t4�
1	In a first questionnaire, with 39 participants, we tested the acceptability of non-conjoined
0	� ò ? òRô õJörøg�h�hsglü ö �� (_ � W��\ Ø þ � þ �� þ X\M� þ��
1	In his study of the language of Igbo poetry, Uzochukwu (1993) notes that the Igbo
1	actions and attitudes. They serve as social charters condemning some
1	"participant" of a situation described by averb, when a verb has a special argument place for
1	"unkörperliche Natur", zu der auch die Arten und Gattung gehören, für sich zu
0	1260
2	Ô yá nà-etú anū  n’o fya. It is he that trails game in the bush.
2	Etiwe n’aka aja aja
1	Another issue that seems unsatisfactory as handled by autosegmental
1	and more preferred means of receiving information by the Nigerian ruralites
2	(i) Acha iko nnee
1	"John was touched, and Mary was a causal factor in this event"
1	this is to distinguish between the logical representation (epsilon terms) and the semantic
1	43. The Poet & his Audience: The Stylistic Significance of Addresser-
0	�� 0��/�� .�� '� 1��
2	(1) a. The temperature (of the liquid) is rising.
1	what appears pejorative attributes functioning, conversely, as complimentary
2	- *C’est un disinfectant medical efficacement contre les bacteries
1	& Strigin 2003). No such contrast is implied in (26b) with nominative case. This is what our
3	& Swam J. (eds.) Language and Language Use. London: Heinemann
1	they tone down our revulsion on seeing the character because we empathize with
0	---- 2014.6.19
2	(17) John chased Bill for an hour/*in an hour.
1	However, we repeat some of the examples here for clarity:

1

If symmetric predicates provide a collective antecedent, they do so only at the semantic, not

0

� ò /1/ ð 4@/12 QPQ ò¡ôs��ö�ø�ùiúdzlúlü öYq - ð <32B412�?12��(2�� ð>=Hð t ò / ð76 <Ym ï�O96�= 2 O 2%<s/ / 6 ð <

1

explanation is thathe is not (it to move about with a gun, since he does not know how

1

It is interesting to observe that only the first person singular pronoun

0

– kill – rv past 3SG – ACC.

0

27.890

0

1902

0

787

1

of course):

2

(120) The apples weigh two ounces.

0

��#��'�� 1��

3

National development: Seminar Proceedings Ife, Nigerian folklore Society,

1

local languages is no longer acceptable because words have varying meanings in

0

� ÜG#ÉN�N&�Ò�3tÉ~Zr ÀM �¹TU"�í ó�éæî�øJï°ôõî��}òJî�ô��ëòÀï�é>í"ö��\m"éÜñ�ï�í�òJì"éaî�øÀï ñÜòJí°éo�ëòJì"úJéÜó+#�3tÉ~�y ÀM �¹TU"�í ó�éæî�øJï°ôõî��;ôõî�òJî�ô��ëòÀï°é>í°ö��\m"éæñæï�í=òJì°é�î�øJïFñMòJí"éo�ëòJì°úJéæó+#�$w ~Zr ÀM �¹TU"�í ó�éæî�øJï°ôõî��}òJî�ôE�ëòÀï�é�ø��Gm"éæñæï°í=òJì"éaî�øJïFñMòÀí°éo�ëòJì°úJéæó+#�$w ~�y ÀM �¹TU"�í ó�éæî�øJï°ôõî��;ô îDòJî�ô��ëòÀï°é>ø��\m"éÜñ�ï�í=òÀì°éaî�øJï ñÜòJí°ée�KòJì"úJéÜóZ#

2

("The time~away construction")

0

484

1

use of excremental images in the above excerpt from the text is to graphically

1

will therefore annotate the structure with functor-argument relationships. Hence, the meaning

1

than NRCs with non-adjacent antecedents (2.8). RRCs with adjacent heads were judged a bit

3

Fry, D.B. 1979. The physics of speech. Cambridge: Cambridge University

2

Òchi ágha gwú ru  anu  n’o hia! Commander of the war that

1

ram is never tied to a stake. It soon kills itself if tied to a stake. It considers itself

1

to which the contrast can apply: temporal, spatial and epistemic dimensions.

2

Ósità nwá Ēzinwa! Ósità son of Ezinwa!

0

0,22

1

hitherto had gradually grown to become an atheist and a school drop-out, decides to

0

308

1

making constraints language – particular, but that constraints are universal

2

(15) little Julio attending the Italian Nobleman above-mentioned, he also

0

877.125

2

Since I have a red cap

1

& Stokhof, 1984, 1991). Consequently, the proposition that a sentence with identificational

0

Dongxue 1

0

Tone and Vowel Harmony in Oworo 869

0

190

1

This enveloping poverty made two of her brothers commit suicide through drowning;

0

10.554

0

( 1 2) a. Hans left after his mother had cooked something and he didn't want to

1

(10b) - (10d). Was (‘which’) can be resolved (i) by the proposition denoted

2

#Magatte

0

$ �+µ�©��n¢�µâá6��º�ÄJÁn½-ºF¯d¨�¡�© Öªn« ©$ÎO©� ¬>±:©$«Ö±M¬-Î�© Q¬3±H¯p¡Pµ�¬3 �« ¬3«=ô¼ÎO©M±�¬�³Vµ�¬3« ¬> �¨� µ�¬�²�¯p $¨�°-©�¡Mô

0

− indicates choice MC = multiple choice

2

Óbìézùó àpu tá n’āma! Óbìézùé has emerged at the arena!

2

(1)[[S]](A)= λQ.∃x∈A&∃A'(A'⊆{x':x'≤x}&Q=λP.∃x[A'∩P≠∅])

2

(11) a. In slow progression, every organ student struck a note on the Wurlitzer.

1

(1) Who will come to the banquet? (?x Cx)

1

3.2 Grade 1 Verb:

2

(11) OKO David só escreveu este artigo desde Janeiro.

0

� éMòÀì°î�éæóYôõîYòÀî&%X÷WòA%�ôE�ëò��Jô îDò�� é�#

1

Without going too far into the details of conceptual knowledge that are implicit in this

1

there is no semantic antecedent available for the NRC in these cases. For cross-sentential dis-

2

(10) a. John should be at work.

0

753

0

18.421

0

� ò ?��R� ðPQ7Q 2 QÕôk� öxô3xsz

0

�� %��F�@1��

1

situation si. To derive the semantics of the whole copular sentence in Russian the semantics of

1

- - Analysis of Variance - -

0

�!��!�*��!��

1

one sketched above, is that something similar holds for question-answer pairs.

0

("、a咽P阶re叩p-inc∞or叩poωra刽te邱S呻into-me'丁

1

cf. (23). The corresponding sentence with nominative is derived in (25).

2

Ka dibia okpotaonweya gwara anyi

1

sentences in Russian.

1

motives in his poetic texts is to strive constantly to establish relationship with his

2

Ó rùolé o – o – o It is now time (for action)

1

African cultures, the situation and the status of the hunter were the same. Shaka the

0

12.307

0

Mai 75

3

& London: Kluwer Academic Publisheres.

1

Humour, good descriptive power, and use of details are important aspects of

2

(5) a. offen sein ≈ offenstehen

0

��$��!�� .��*��$��!��

1

– either (i) they pick out a certain amount of sets (corresponding to their cardinality ) at the

0

�&~�tf~�t4�

1

In a first questionnaire, with 39 participants, we tested the acceptability of non-conjoined

0

� ò ? òRô õJörø*g�h�hsglü ö �� (_ � W��*\ Ø þ � þ �� þ X\M� þ��

1

In his study of the language of Igbo poetry, Uzochukwu (1993) notes that the Igbo

1

actions and attitudes. They serve as social charters condemning some

1

"participant" of a situation described by averb, when a verb has a special argument place for

1

"unkörperliche Natur", zu der auch die Arten und Gattung gehören, für sich zu

0

1260

2

Ô yá nà-etú anū  n’o fya. It is he that trails game in the bush.

2

Etiwe n’aka aja aja

1

Another issue that seems unsatisfactory as handled by autosegmental

1

and more preferred means of receiving information by the Nigerian ruralites

2

(i) Acha iko nnee

1

"John was touched, and Mary was a causal factor in this event"

1

this is to distinguish between the logical representation (epsilon terms) and the semantic

1

43. The Poet & his Audience: The Stylistic Significance of Addresser-

0

�� 0��/�� .�� '� 1��

2

(1) a. The temperature (of the liquid) is rising.

1

what appears pejorative attributes functioning, conversely, as complimentary

2

- *C’est un disinfectant medical efficacement contre les bacteries

1

& Strigin 2003). No such contrast is implied in (26b) with nominative case. This is what our

3

& Swam J. (eds.) Language and Language Use. London: Heinemann

1

they tone down our revulsion on seeing the character because we empathize with

0

---- 2014.6.19

2

(17) John chased Bill for an hour/*in an hour.

1

However, we repeat some of the examples here for clarity: