ubffm/academic_main_text_classifier_en_annotated

labels int64 0 3	text stringlengths 1 1.23k
1	stop form being a selfish person. The impression is that a man should be continually
2	Ich sah ihn den Mund aufsperren (~ I saw him have his mouth (wide) open)
1	uniform analysis of indefinites. Indefinites have either a specific or referential reading or
1	verbs (cf. Stamm 2005). Either we have to formulate specific conditions as to the accessibility
0	70
0	National Institute for Nigerian Languages, Aba
3	Kasher, Asa & Gabbay, Dov (1976). On the semantics and pragmatics of specific and
1	Conclusion
0	21.892
0	' C
2	(11) Cred că Maria este / # ar fi bolnav ă . √IND / #SUBJB
0	(`
0	Mrz 18
2	6) Oh time
2	44. a. Audù yaa kaawoo nì ‘Audu brought me’ b. Audù yaa kaawoo manì/minì kudîn ‘Audu brought me the money’ b. Audù yaa kaawoo mân/mîn kudîn ‘Audu brought me the money’
0	974
1	do not show effects of an event argument. Consider her example (12a) along with the
1	& K. W. Todrys (Eds.), Papers from the Fourteenth Regional Meeting of the Chicago
0	�� *�� !��$��"��
0	35
0	�� (_ � W@� ø�N3Nªö�g�blû¡evg�zsglü�ö(q6ò�O I3? ð F3ld2im q9ò�O I3? ð F3ld2o:�< ð>= 2%?14 ð /RA^,E?@2%4@4 ö
1	the following assertions with ‘embedded questions’:
2	attitude to Osundare’s poetry generally, Chuzzy Udenwa and Sanni Folajike view
0	617
2	(15) a. Boys don’t cry.
2	LEFT
1	protopredicate hug, for example, there is a binary non-symmetric predicate hugbns and a unary
1	possible with the first person singular and the third person masculine
0	Janet 2
0	��'�-�!! ��E� ��
1	Message Design & the Appropriateness of Language 417
0	19.500
1	Kratzer (1998) defends the lexical ambiguity hypothesis of Fodor & Sag (1982). She
0	� ñM�Wï°è�éo�ëéæñ è�òJî�ôõñæí øJû@ï�è�é 6 7X9 òJî�ó�� ó��Wï°è�éo��ôõó�ôõì°éæñæï°ôõøùîDò.�ÌòÀê�ê��õô ñMòþï�ô øùî�øJû:ï°è�øùí°é
0	!�!�B6��!�BI�$��'��1��
1	� Interpretation of
0	946
3	Obianika, Evelyn C. 1999. Autosegmental analysis of tone in Igbo
1	cigar. Similarly for the other examples. In the second place, any exhaustive answer to these
1	Consequently the Dahomean “hunters are held most vast in magic”
2	(10). Under neutral stress conditions, a verb-adjacent modifier may only bear the primary
2	aborigine of wood and wind (‘Forest Echoes’ 8).
1	� Standard for
0	2147
1	However, there is no record of ode to any animal except the dog in our
1	‘voices’ he brings to confront the reader. These voices appear as subjects in his
3	— (1989): The Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria 1989. Lagos: Law
2	Nke o na afoduru mmadu.
1	precede the head are called pre-modifiers, while those which follow the head are
1	– grammatically simplified – examples:
0	µ�¬Ó F¬-¬-¡. ¡i¨ ¬-¡n¨ ¬3¨3Æ¶ �¡n±i >Ï�©$¯p±M¯p¡�¢P µn¬Ô��¬>¨´Q¯�©$¡n¨� �²�©��M;Ï� �« ¯p©��.¨C© Qµ�¬-«;ÇA¯�¡.±�¨�© ÈÖ°"©$¡$Q«Q $¨´>Ê�+µ�¯p¨X¯p¨X±�©�¡�¬�©�¡n§�®CÈg©$«+Qµ�¬lª��«Qª�©$¨ ¬�°Qµ�©M©$¨ ¯�¡�¢f f¨=¯pÎ�ª�§�¬�¨´I « ¯p¡�¢�ª�©�¯p¡$>Æn �¡n±� µ�¬lª�¯d°JQ��« ¬�°"©��§d±
0	118
1	4.2.3. Results
1	fate under the jaws of the rabid dog. (92-3)
0	"1.... and then Til say...tu as souvenu notre anniversaire de marriage...ox should I say
0	471
1	13We only provide the existential component of the definite subject and gloss over the uniqueness condition.
2	(12) The ordering ÆSAL: For all a,b that are discourse referents in c: a ÆSAL b if (a) b is
1	(10)-(11) below, from Gundel et al (1993).
0	877
1	defined via a set of property values as in (19) above can always be mapped onto a set of
2	(10) (a) moótàa fáraá
1	different from the language of everyday usage. The created imagery shows creativity
2	Fojuchaa ji anyi n’ime ya
1	including that of keeping the conversation running, testing agreement, establishing face, making
0	- -
2	� F , iff
2	By the rain.)
2	(15) Rule of use for counterfactuals – The use of a subjunctive conditional sentence is a
1	� Specialized in Applied Linguistics, Second Language Acquisition
1	been a big fire, and lighter owners are suspect, then the inspector asking (20) is most probably
1	expression “the chase” is of the pattern modifier + Head, the modifying element
0	-711
1	Congo), in Senegal and in Rwanda.
0	101
1	prominence that makes a conceptual dimension accessible for simple degree modifiers; or we
1	(12) by means of a verb form used in subordinate clauses (indicated by the form of the
2	11. a. Yaa yi ‘he did’ > yay > yai
0	$�� !� ��8� � 1�� !"��
1	"sulla base delle deliberazioni concernenti le aliquote e detrazioni " pubblicati sul
2	(22) How do I get to the station?
1	binary symmetric predicates is fully incorporated in our analysis.
2	(155) A customer has a Visacard and a Mastercard. SimpleMat accepts them.
0	849
2	# Ivan vypil [F VODKU]
1	context supports some topic situation contrast” (Maienborn 2005:171). There are several
0	619
2	(15) John ate the cake piece by piece.
1	has been made, and, if no objections are made, that its contents are added to the stock of com-
1	interpretation (choice functions). The epsilon operator is interpreted as a choice function
1	6. Graphological Devices
1	NRCs and their antecedents.2
1	At the same time, however, it would not seem to be incompatible with Maienborn's analysis:
0	�� .�� $��
1	"may no~have: moved 0川 oftheconjunction phrase. Thecol飞junction phrasedoininat~s the
1	A full and true answer specifies, in each possibility, all of those whom come in that possibility,
0	- =
2	Íhe nta ya niile ká wùu n’ó hya All his hunting weapons, ka
1	� Class 2b in the Semantic Complexity Hierarchy � indicate that children acquire relative
2	‘Ladi called for me/him/her/you (ms.)/you (fs.)/us/you (pl.)/them the

1

stop form being a selfish person. The impression is that a man should be continually

2

Ich sah ihn den Mund aufsperren (~ I saw him have his mouth (wide) open)

1

uniform analysis of indefinites. Indefinites have either a specific or referential reading or

1

verbs (cf. Stamm 2005). Either we have to formulate specific conditions as to the accessibility

0

70

0

National Institute for Nigerian Languages, Aba

3

Kasher, Asa & Gabbay, Dov (1976). On the semantics and pragmatics of specific and

1

Conclusion

0

21.892

0

' C

2

(11) Cred că Maria este / # ar fi bolnav ă . √IND / #SUBJB

0

(`

0

Mrz 18

2

6) Oh time

2

44. a. Audù yaa kaawoo nì ‘Audu brought me’ b. Audù yaa kaawoo manì/minì kudîn ‘Audu brought me the money’ b. Audù yaa kaawoo mân/mîn kudîn ‘Audu brought me the money’

0

974

1

do not show effects of an event argument. Consider her example (12a) along with the

1

& K. W. Todrys (Eds.), Papers from the Fourteenth Regional Meeting of the Chicago

0

�� *�� !��$��"��

0

35

0

�� (_ � W@� ø�N3Nªö�g�blû¡evg�zsglü�ö(q6ò�O I3? ð F3ld2im q9ò�O I3? ð F3ld2o:�< ð>= 2%?14 ð /RA^,E?@2%4@4 ö

1

the following assertions with ‘embedded questions’:

2

attitude to Osundare’s poetry generally, Chuzzy Udenwa and Sanni Folajike view

0

617

2

(15) a. Boys don’t cry.

2

LEFT

1

protopredicate hug, for example, there is a binary non-symmetric predicate hugbns and a unary

1

possible with the first person singular and the third person masculine

0

Janet 2

0

��'�-�!! ��E� ��

1

Message Design & the Appropriateness of Language 417

0

19.500

1

Kratzer (1998) defends the lexical ambiguity hypothesis of Fodor & Sag (1982). She

0

� ñM�Wï°è�éo�ëéæñ è�òJî�ôõñæí øJû@ï�è�é 6 7X9 òJî�ó�� ó��Wï°è�éo��ôõó�ôõì°éæñæï°ôõøùîDò.�ÌòÀê�ê��õô ñMòþï�ô øùî�øJû:ï°è�øùí°é

0

!�!�B6��!�BI�$��'��1��

1

� Interpretation of

0

946

3

Obianika, Evelyn C. 1999. Autosegmental analysis of tone in Igbo

1

cigar. Similarly for the other examples. In the second place, any exhaustive answer to these

1

Consequently the Dahomean “hunters are held most vast in magic”

2

(10). Under neutral stress conditions, a verb-adjacent modifier may only bear the primary

2

aborigine of wood and wind (‘Forest Echoes’ 8).

1

� Standard for

0

2147

1

However, there is no record of ode to any animal except the dog in our

1

‘voices’ he brings to confront the reader. These voices appear as subjects in his

3

— (1989): The Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria 1989. Lagos: Law

2

Nke o na afoduru mmadu.

1

precede the head are called pre-modifiers, while those which follow the head are

1

– grammatically simplified – examples:

0

µ�¬Ó F¬-¬-¡. ¡i¨ ¬-¡n¨ ¬3¨3Æ¶ �¡n±i >Ï�©$¯p±M¯p¡�¢P µn¬Ô��¬>¨´Q¯�©$¡n¨� �²�©��M;Ï� �« ¯p©��.¨C© Qµ�¬-«;ÇA¯�¡.±�¨�© ÈÖ°"©$¡$Q«Q $¨´>Ê�+µ�¯p¨X¯p¨X±�©�¡�¬�©�¡n§�®CÈg©$«+Qµ�¬lª��«Qª�©$¨ ¬�°Qµ�©M©$¨ ¯�¡�¢f f¨=¯pÎ�ª�§�¬�¨´I « ¯p¡�¢�ª�©�¯p¡$>Æn �¡n±� µ�¬lª�¯d°JQ��« ¬�°"©��§d±

0

118

1

4.2.3. Results

1

fate under the jaws of the rabid dog. (92-3)

0

"1.... and then Til say...tu as souvenu notre anniversaire de marriage...ox should I say

0

471

1

13We only provide the existential component of the definite subject and gloss over the uniqueness condition.

2

(12) The ordering ÆSAL: For all a,b that are discourse referents in c: a ÆSAL b if (a) b is

1

(10)-(11) below, from Gundel et al (1993).

0

877

1

defined via a set of property values as in (19) above can always be mapped onto a set of

2

(10) (a) moótàa fáraá

1

different from the language of everyday usage. The created imagery shows creativity

2

Fojuchaa ji anyi n’ime ya

1

including that of keeping the conversation running, testing agreement, establishing face, making

0

- -

2

� F , iff

2

By the rain.)

2

(15) Rule of use for counterfactuals – The use of a subjunctive conditional sentence is a

1

� Specialized in Applied Linguistics, Second Language Acquisition

1

been a big fire, and lighter owners are suspect, then the inspector asking (20) is most probably

1

expression “the chase” is of the pattern modifier + Head, the modifying element

0

-711

1

Congo), in Senegal and in Rwanda.

0

101

1

prominence that makes a conceptual dimension accessible for simple degree modifiers; or we

1

(12) by means of a verb form used in subordinate clauses (indicated by the form of the

2

11. a. Yaa yi ‘he did’ > yay > yai

0

$�� !� ��8� � 1�� !"��

1

"sulla base delle deliberazioni concernenti le aliquote e detrazioni " pubblicati sul

2

(22) How do I get to the station?

1

binary symmetric predicates is fully incorporated in our analysis.

2

(155) A customer has a Visacard and a Mastercard. SimpleMat accepts them.

0

849

2

# Ivan vypil [F VODKU]

1

context supports some topic situation contrast” (Maienborn 2005:171). There are several

0

619

2

(15) John ate the cake piece by piece.

1

has been made, and, if no objections are made, that its contents are added to the stock of com-

1

interpretation (choice functions). The epsilon operator is interpreted as a choice function

1

6. Graphological Devices

1

NRCs and their antecedents.2

1

At the same time, however, it would not seem to be incompatible with Maienborn's analysis:

0

�� .�� $��

1

"may no~have: moved 0川 oftheconjunction phrase. Thecol飞junction phrasedoininat~s the

1

A full and true answer specifies, in each possibility, all of those whom come in that possibility,

0

- =

2

Íhe nta ya niile ká wùu n’ó hya All his hunting weapons, ka

1

� Class 2b in the Semantic Complexity Hierarchy � indicate that children acquire relative

2

‘Ladi called for me/him/her/you (ms.)/you (fs.)/us/you (pl.)/them the