ubffm/academic_main_text_classifier_en_annotated

labels int64 0 3	text stringlengths 1 1.23k
2	(10) Aaman
0	-39
2	(10) er hat wen wieder geheilt
2	‘They slapped her/you (ms.)/k (fs.)/k (pl.)/us/them’
2	12. The performance of Ègbenúō ba, Ìfité-Ūkpo, Anambra State.
2	(1 1) *it is true for [ I any arbitrary book I ] that a specific professor gave it to a
1	rather, the neo-Davidsonian semantics for manner modification would have to be seen as a
1	� Comprehension
0	��$��!��0��0��+��!��J*��+��!��!�
0	675
1	sifting information continuously in order to give their audience what they think is
2	(13) a. *[Masilo]F
1	It is believed that it behoves in the woman to do whatever is needed to retain her
2	Then Doondari came and he created the stone.
0	Fiona 3
1	Lack of receiver-oriented messages, a patronising disposition of senders of
1	It has often been assumed that the opposition ser vs. estar reflects the semantic opposition
1	overcome the difference in number between its syntactic and its semantic arguments – just as
2	(110) a. Four men lifted three tables.
1	In all these instances, the tenor that the poet adopts is an informal one. In his choice
1	air as it is being earmarked. To the poet and indeed to the masses whose mind he is
3	Disseminating Development Messages to the Grassroots” in Unilag
1	more preferred because of their tendency to be more objective. Of course, there are
1	"dynamic potentials". It is not clear that all such concepts can uniformly be analysed as event-
0	11.764
1	do not participate in putting together these micro-events, then the eventual product
0	��$��0��
2	(10) a. Grammaticalization Scale (Goosens 1987: 1 18)
0	6066
0	(12).
1	"what mun)' an en joyah l~ evening, *chr cosi tanti l ihr i ('how so many books'). This shows that the
1	Many symmetric predicates allow for a use with a plural in one of the argument slots and a
2	(10) eyi ire okwùn .
1	content is perceived as patronizing by a rural audience that understands English, the
0	�!��!��$��&B/'��$�0�"��!��*�
0	599
1	non-symmetric predicate is not defined. Similarly, for a non-symmetric protopredicate, there
1	Scatology, Form & Meaning 473
3	State”, Unpublished Ph.D. Thesis, University Of Lagos.
2	(14) Tous les garçons sont partis à la guerre
0	( 1 00 )
0	369
2	(6) Few of the children ate their ice cream, . . .
2	(12) a. Partition([[HOW-QUD]]) = {{w1}, {w2,w3,w4},{w5,w6,w7},{w8}}
0	Vera email ........................................................................................................................................... 355
0	��%(@
0	323.462
2	Aburu ihe a naara chie n’ala
1	(16) The university is public, while nourished by the strong support of its alumni.11
0	� } ~
2	the monstrosity of the apartheid regime and to show the way it dehumanized the
3	International Conference on Hausa Language, Literature and Culture.
0	��$��!����!��.����%��+��!!��!��$�
2	(127) Not allowed in ACE
1	tions and present two questionnaire studies that we carried out to test them, see Section 4. In
0	2740
1	assume that one can ignore and underrate whatever is hidden from public library
1	basis: the linking (or the lack of such linking) to a specific topic situation. The next step is the
1	� Teaching Advanced Interpretation, Applied Linguistics, Intensive
1	"Amiga-Cocktail", bei "Da lacht der Bär" oder zu den zahlreichen Veranstaltungen
2	‘Audu caught me/him/her/you (ms.)/you (fs.)/us/you (pl.)/them a
0	& allUnEd$vHpitchST < allUnEd$sHpitchST
2	(14) r = sprinkler-was-on ---> grass-is-wet
1	(1) semantic equivalence, which involves assessing whether the words have the same meaning,
2	Oh My! Do you not yet know “Eze Igwe”
1	(`open'), sauber (`clean'), trocken (`dry'), hart (`hard') are among the adjectives that were
1	include the protopredicate in the interpretation, an NRC would be possible, though an RRC
1	ferreting out the game and to keep the gunmen at alert to pursue and shoot any
0	interview ............................................................................................................................... 475
0	460
1	Key words: natural language interpretation, dynamic semantics, semantics-pragmatics in-
2	(11) John-i Mary-ka coh-ta. (Adjective)
2	Another example of vibrant self-glorification is contained in the performance
1	"' Farkas focuses on a sorncwhlll different case, namely on indefinites in the scope ot'sorne operator. She
2	Ego na-ekwu, o kwadoro oke ochicho na ajo amume,
1	question I face (the publicly posed question formally entailing the first one I really face), so the
1	the other antecedent by an auxiliary in V2 position. In (11), we provide an example for a test
1	At the systematic phonetic level, a supposedly long vowel (sequence of
1	specification for regions on arbitrary property scales, e.g. very denotes the upper end of any
2	(13) der seit zwei Wochen 0 cop kranke Nachbar
1	tive, the various answers can be interpreted as partial answers, while the closing statement is
0	$ ×D²�©�«Q« ©�³�Qµ�¬� ¬3« Î&%´²�¯p¡n±M¯p¡�¢`¨ µ�¯�Èb('OÈg«Q©�Î) F¬3¬-¡n �¡]³Vµ�©T�n¨=¬>¨/ µ�¬fª�µ�«I �¨ ¬Ö ©e±M¬3¨Q°"«Q¯�²�¬O µ�¬
1	insights into these subjects, and show by means of one case study that such a formalization
0	– +/–66 +
2	(16) a. [ Jan ] war [ am Schreiben eines Briefes. ] (German)
1	(16)-(23) and (25)-(30) are in pair of affirmative and negative sentences. (16a-19a)
0	Juliana 2
0	- - - 84 27 24 - -
1	concept may be decomposed into sub-concepts which themselves exhibit a decomposition
0	1392
2	(16) #John smokes a cigarette.
1	this in mind, we can say that a discourse is optimal iff the participants’ questions are answered,
2	Uwe agbada ka o yiri bia
1	referent, X , accessible, the antecedent construal can proceed as usual.
2	(11) na-nun
1	"emit". The component "light" functions as an argument, it is true, but does not surface in the
0	Vera 1
1	Split-antecedent relative clauses and the symmetry of predicates 259
2	(?)fl) / khåi®ue (< Ch.
2	(10) 、 a.

2

(10) Aaman

0

-39

2

(10) er hat wen wieder geheilt

2

‘They slapped *her/*you (ms.)/*k (fs.)/*k (pl.)/*us/*them’

2

12. The performance of Ègbenúō ba, Ìfité-Ūkpo, Anambra State.

2

(1 1) *it is true for [ I any arbitrary book I ] that a specific professor gave it to a

1

rather, the neo-Davidsonian semantics for manner modification would have to be seen as a

1

� Comprehension

0

��$��!��0��0��+��!��J*��+��!��!�

0

675

1

sifting information continuously in order to give their audience what they think is

2

(13) a. *[Masilo]F

1

It is believed that it behoves in the woman to do whatever is needed to retain her

2

Then Doondari came and he created the stone.

0

Fiona 3

1

Lack of receiver-oriented messages, a patronising disposition of senders of

1

It has often been assumed that the opposition ser vs. estar reflects the semantic opposition

1

overcome the difference in number between its syntactic and its semantic arguments – just as

2

(110) a. Four men lifted three tables.

1

In all these instances, the tenor that the poet adopts is an informal one. In his choice

1

air as it is being earmarked. To the poet and indeed to the masses whose mind he is

3

Disseminating Development Messages to the Grassroots” in Unilag

1

more preferred because of their tendency to be more objective. Of course, there are

1

"dynamic potentials". It is not clear that all such concepts can uniformly be analysed as event-

0

11.764

1

do not participate in putting together these micro-events, then the eventual product

0

��$��0��

2

(10) a. Grammaticalization Scale (Goosens 1987: 1 18)

0

6066

0

(12).

1

"what mun)' an en joyah l~ evening, *chr cosi tanti l ihr i ('how so many books'). This shows that the

1

Many symmetric predicates allow for a use with a plural in one of the argument slots and a

2

(10) eyi ire okwùn .

1

content is perceived as patronizing by a rural audience that understands English, the

0

�!��!��$��&B/'��$�0�"��!��*�

0

599

1

non-symmetric predicate is not defined. Similarly, for a non-symmetric protopredicate, there

1

Scatology, Form & Meaning 473

3

State”, Unpublished Ph.D. Thesis, University Of Lagos.

2

(14) Tous les garçons sont partis à la guerre

0

( 1 00 )

0

369

2

(6) Few of the children ate their ice cream, . . .

2

(12) a. Partition([[HOW-QUD]]) = {{w1}, {w2,w3,w4},{w5,w6,w7},{w8}}

0

Vera email ........................................................................................................................................... 355

0

��%(@

0

323.462

2

Aburu ihe a naara chie n’ala

1

(16) The university is public, while nourished by the strong support of its alumni.11

0

� } ~

2

the monstrosity of the apartheid regime and to show the way it dehumanized the

3

International Conference on Hausa Language, Literature and Culture.

0

��$��!��*��!��.��*��%��+��!!��!��$�

2

(127) Not allowed in ACE

1

tions and present two questionnaire studies that we carried out to test them, see Section 4. In

0

2740

1

assume that one can ignore and underrate whatever is hidden from public library

1

basis: the linking (or the lack of such linking) to a specific topic situation. The next step is the

1

� Teaching Advanced Interpretation, Applied Linguistics, Intensive

1

"Amiga-Cocktail", bei "Da lacht der Bär" oder zu den zahlreichen Veranstaltungen

2

‘Audu caught me/him/her/you (ms.)/you (fs.)/us/you (pl.)/them a

0

& allUnEd$vHpitchST < allUnEd$sHpitchST

2

(14) r = sprinkler-was-on ---> grass-is-wet

1

(1) semantic equivalence, which involves assessing whether the words have the same meaning,

2

Oh My! Do you not yet know “Eze Igwe”

1

(`open'), sauber (`clean'), trocken (`dry'), hart (`hard') are among the adjectives that were

1

include the protopredicate in the interpretation, an NRC would be possible, though an RRC

1

ferreting out the game and to keep the gunmen at alert to pursue and shoot any

0

interview ............................................................................................................................... 475

0

460

1

Key words: natural language interpretation, dynamic semantics, semantics-pragmatics in-

2

(11) John-i Mary-ka coh-ta. (Adjective)

2

Another example of vibrant self-glorification is contained in the performance

1

"' Farkas focuses on a sorncwhlll different case, namely on indefinites in the scope ot'sorne operator. She

2

Ego na-ekwu, o kwadoro oke ochicho na ajo amume,

1

question I face (the publicly posed question formally entailing the first one I really face), so the

1

the other antecedent by an auxiliary in V2 position. In (11), we provide an example for a test

1

At the systematic phonetic level, a supposedly long vowel (sequence of

1

specification for regions on arbitrary property scales, e.g. very denotes the upper end of any

2

(13) der seit zwei Wochen 0 cop kranke Nachbar

1

tive, the various answers can be interpreted as partial answers, while the closing statement is

0

$ ×D²�©�«Q« ©�³�Qµ�¬� ¬3« Î&%´²�¯p¡n±M¯p¡�¢`¨ µ�¯�Èb('OÈg«Q©�Î) F¬3¬-¡n �¡]³Vµ�©T�n¨=¬>¨/ µ�¬fª�µ�«I �¨ ¬Ö ©e±M¬3¨Q°"«Q¯�²�¬O µ�¬

1

insights into these subjects, and show by means of one case study that such a formalization

0

– +/–66 +

2

(16) a. [ Jan ] war [ am Schreiben eines Briefes. ] (German)

1

(16)-(23) and (25)-(30) are in pair of affirmative and negative sentences. (16a-19a)

0

Juliana 2

0

- - - 84 27 24 - -

1

concept may be decomposed into sub-concepts which themselves exhibit a decomposition

0

1392

2

(16) #John smokes a cigarette.

1

this in mind, we can say that a discourse is optimal iff the participants’ questions are answered,

2

Uwe agbada ka o yiri bia

1

referent, X , accessible, the antecedent construal can proceed as usual.

2

(11) na-nun

1

"emit". The component "light" functions as an argument, it is true, but does not surface in the

0

Vera 1

1

Split-antecedent relative clauses and the symmetry of predicates 259

2

(?)fl) / khåi®ue (< Ch.

2

(10) 、 a.