subreddit stringclasses 7
values | author stringlengths 3 20 | id stringlengths 5 7 | content stringlengths 67 30.4k | score int64 0 140k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
programmingcirclejerk | tomwhoiscontrary | h1rpbng | <|sols|><|sot|>I feel very productive in Rust because I'm making a lot of decisions, but most of the time most of the decisions are unrelated to solving the problem at hand<|eot|><|sol|>https://github.com/pretzelhammer/rust-blog/blob/master/posts/restful-api-in-sync-and-async-rust.md#rust-vs-js<|eol|><|sor|>Nonsense. Working in Rust, you are *extremely* productive. What he's missing is that you are producing morality, not features.<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 80 |
programmingcirclejerk | its_that_dude_ | h1rgpqz | <|sols|><|sot|>I feel very productive in Rust because I'm making a lot of decisions, but most of the time most of the decisions are unrelated to solving the problem at hand<|eot|><|sol|>https://github.com/pretzelhammer/rust-blog/blob/master/posts/restful-api-in-sync-and-async-rust.md#rust-vs-js<|eol|><|sor|>Rust is the jerk here, not the guy who said it.<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 78 |
programmingcirclejerk | Kodiologist | h1rqzv8 | <|sols|><|sot|>I feel very productive in Rust because I'm making a lot of decisions, but most of the time most of the decisions are unrelated to solving the problem at hand<|eot|><|sol|>https://github.com/pretzelhammer/rust-blog/blob/master/posts/restful-api-in-sync-and-async-rust.md#rust-vs-js<|eol|><|sor|>The real eye-opener here is capitalizing "PostgreSQL" as "PostgresQL".<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 43 |
programmingcirclejerk | 32gbsd | h1rhq83 | <|sols|><|sot|>I feel very productive in Rust because I'm making a lot of decisions, but most of the time most of the decisions are unrelated to solving the problem at hand<|eot|><|sol|>https://github.com/pretzelhammer/rust-blog/blob/master/posts/restful-api-in-sync-and-async-rust.md#rust-vs-js<|eol|><|sor|>busy work for the sake of busy work. this guy doesnt seem to mind. its self torture.<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 36 |
programmingcirclejerk | HorstKugel | h1s9w1i | <|sols|><|sot|>I feel very productive in Rust because I'm making a lot of decisions, but most of the time most of the decisions are unrelated to solving the problem at hand<|eot|><|sol|>https://github.com/pretzelhammer/rust-blog/blob/master/posts/restful-api-in-sync-and-async-rust.md#rust-vs-js<|eol|><|sor|>> pretzelhammer/rust-blog
>> Educational blog posts for Rust beginners
OP; did you find this because you don't know Rust, you heathen?<|eor|><|soopr|><|eoopr|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 31 |
programmingcirclejerk | usernameqwerty005 | h1rxw3e | <|sols|><|sot|>I feel very productive in Rust because I'm making a lot of decisions, but most of the time most of the decisions are unrelated to solving the problem at hand<|eot|><|sol|>https://github.com/pretzelhammer/rust-blog/blob/master/posts/restful-api-in-sync-and-async-rust.md#rust-vs-js<|eol|><|sor|>Nonsense. Working in Rust, you are *extremely* productive. What he's missing is that you are producing morality, not features.<|eor|><|sor|>Customer value? No! Metaphysical value!<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 26 |
programmingcirclejerk | ProfessorSexyTime | h1s3d3z | <|sols|><|sot|>I feel very productive in Rust because I'm making a lot of decisions, but most of the time most of the decisions are unrelated to solving the problem at hand<|eot|><|sol|>https://github.com/pretzelhammer/rust-blog/blob/master/posts/restful-api-in-sync-and-async-rust.md#rust-vs-js<|eol|><|sor|>> pretzelhammer/rust-blog
>> Educational blog posts for Rust beginners
OP; did you find this because you don't know Rust, you heathen?<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 23 |
programmingcirclejerk | lazyubertoad | h1rnrqq | <|sols|><|sot|>I feel very productive in Rust because I'm making a lot of decisions, but most of the time most of the decisions are unrelated to solving the problem at hand<|eot|><|sol|>https://github.com/pretzelhammer/rust-blog/blob/master/posts/restful-api-in-sync-and-async-rust.md#rust-vs-js<|eol|><|sor|>Making decisions is what I really hate about this whole career. I just wanted a quiet peaceful job. Instead, every moment I'm making decisions decisions decisions, and everything I do is risky, stressful and a tradeoff between bad and awful.<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 19 |
programmingcirclejerk | VeganVagiVore | h1sa6px | <|sols|><|sot|>I feel very productive in Rust because I'm making a lot of decisions, but most of the time most of the decisions are unrelated to solving the problem at hand<|eot|><|sol|>https://github.com/pretzelhammer/rust-blog/blob/master/posts/restful-api-in-sync-and-async-rust.md#rust-vs-js<|eol|><|sor|>Veggie's decision journal for June 14th:
- Just clone
- Just unwrap
- Just clone
- Just clone<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 17 |
programmingcirclejerk | 32gbsd | h1s0weo | <|sols|><|sot|>I feel very productive in Rust because I'm making a lot of decisions, but most of the time most of the decisions are unrelated to solving the problem at hand<|eot|><|sol|>https://github.com/pretzelhammer/rust-blog/blob/master/posts/restful-api-in-sync-and-async-rust.md#rust-vs-js<|eol|><|sor|>busy work for the sake of busy work. this guy doesnt seem to mind. its self torture.<|eor|><|sor|>[deleted]<|eor|><|sor|>I think jquery should be its own language like Lua or redlang. Its potential is wasted on html and javascript.<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 12 |
programmingcirclejerk | dfirecmv | h1t04te | <|sols|><|sot|>I feel very productive in Rust because I'm making a lot of decisions, but most of the time most of the decisions are unrelated to solving the problem at hand<|eot|><|sol|>https://github.com/pretzelhammer/rust-blog/blob/master/posts/restful-api-in-sync-and-async-rust.md#rust-vs-js<|eol|><|sor|>Rust is the jerk here, not the guy who said it.<|eor|><|sor|>r/rustjerk<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 11 |
programmingcirclejerk | Karyo_Ten | h1rmt56 | <|sols|><|sot|>I feel very productive in Rust because I'm making a lot of decisions, but most of the time most of the decisions are unrelated to solving the problem at hand<|eot|><|sol|>https://github.com/pretzelhammer/rust-blog/blob/master/posts/restful-api-in-sync-and-async-rust.md#rust-vs-js<|eol|><|sor|>So the evolution of pencil pushers -> mouse pushers?<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 10 |
programmingcirclejerk | opinions_guy_14 | h1sjuhn | <|sols|><|sot|>I feel very productive in Rust because I'm making a lot of decisions, but most of the time most of the decisions are unrelated to solving the problem at hand<|eot|><|sol|>https://github.com/pretzelhammer/rust-blog/blob/master/posts/restful-api-in-sync-and-async-rust.md#rust-vs-js<|eol|><|sor|>busy work for the sake of busy work. this guy doesnt seem to mind. its self torture.<|eor|><|sor|>[deleted]<|eor|><|sor|>/uj Well most web developer jobs now require proficiency in at least one of those frameworks, mostly either React or Angular.<|eor|><|sor|>[deleted]<|eor|><|sor|>/uj
i would rather die than work on your project that doesn't use a framework<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 10 |
programmingcirclejerk | lumpySnakes | h1tq0dh | <|sols|><|sot|>I feel very productive in Rust because I'm making a lot of decisions, but most of the time most of the decisions are unrelated to solving the problem at hand<|eot|><|sol|>https://github.com/pretzelhammer/rust-blog/blob/master/posts/restful-api-in-sync-and-async-rust.md#rust-vs-js<|eol|><|sor|>> while async Rust can be as simple as sync Rust, it also can be way more complicated!
> working with futures and async Rust can still be really challenging
really sad to see outright slander against the folks who worked so hard on async rust<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 9 |
programmingcirclejerk | duckbill_principate | h1rywcq | <|sols|><|sot|>I feel very productive in Rust because I'm making a lot of decisions, but most of the time most of the decisions are unrelated to solving the problem at hand<|eot|><|sol|>https://github.com/pretzelhammer/rust-blog/blob/master/posts/restful-api-in-sync-and-async-rust.md#rust-vs-js<|eol|><|sor|>*stares at my init.el*
*whistles innocently and carries on*<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 8 |
programmingcirclejerk | LlamaChair | h1sm1mw | <|sols|><|sot|>I feel very productive in Rust because I'm making a lot of decisions, but most of the time most of the decisions are unrelated to solving the problem at hand<|eot|><|sol|>https://github.com/pretzelhammer/rust-blog/blob/master/posts/restful-api-in-sync-and-async-rust.md#rust-vs-js<|eol|><|sor|>Veggie's decision journal for June 14th:
- Just clone
- Just unwrap
- Just clone
- Just clone<|eor|><|sor|>You should be using `expect` instead of `unwrap`. You're missing the opportunity to taunt your future self when your expectations don't hold up. Or, more realistically, when your laziness comes back to haunt you.<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 7 |
programmingcirclejerk | YM_Industries | h1t7tsr | <|sols|><|sot|>I feel very productive in Rust because I'm making a lot of decisions, but most of the time most of the decisions are unrelated to solving the problem at hand<|eot|><|sol|>https://github.com/pretzelhammer/rust-blog/blob/master/posts/restful-api-in-sync-and-async-rust.md#rust-vs-js<|eol|><|sor|>busy work for the sake of busy work. this guy doesnt seem to mind. its self torture.<|eor|><|sor|>[deleted]<|eor|><|sor|>/uj Well most web developer jobs now require proficiency in at least one of those frameworks, mostly either React or Angular.<|eor|><|sor|>Angular and React were invented because there wasn't enough busywork involved in writing AngularJS and KnockoutJS.
Thanks to moving from AngularJS to Angular I can now write 4 times as much code to achieve the same thing. Everyone knows that golfed code is impossible to work on, so that's a direct 300% increase in maintainability.<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 7 |
programmingcirclejerk | xigoi | n36h8z | <|sols|><|sot|>Ugh... "coder" is so cringe to my ears. Like asking someone in the Navy what kind of "boat" they were on (non-sarcastically).<|eot|><|sol|>https://reddit.com/r/programming/comments/n2za7x/skipping_an_update_on_docker_is_a_paid_feature/gwnqko3?context=3<|eol|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 157 |
programmingcirclejerk | ProfessorSexyTime | gwnu3aj | <|sols|><|sot|>Ugh... "coder" is so cringe to my ears. Like asking someone in the Navy what kind of "boat" they were on (non-sarcastically).<|eot|><|sol|>https://reddit.com/r/programming/comments/n2za7x/skipping_an_update_on_docker_is_a_paid_feature/gwnqko3?context=3<|eol|><|sor|>Can't jerk.
I'd prefer if people refer to me as a "Code Artisan" or "Software Astronaut."<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 159 |
programmingcirclejerk | duckbill_principate | gwnvxvd | <|sols|><|sot|>Ugh... "coder" is so cringe to my ears. Like asking someone in the Navy what kind of "boat" they were on (non-sarcastically).<|eot|><|sol|>https://reddit.com/r/programming/comments/n2za7x/skipping_an_update_on_docker_is_a_paid_feature/gwnqko3?context=3<|eol|><|sor|>Excuse me, sir, but *Python* is a boat. *Haskell* is a *ship*.<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 89 |
programmingcirclejerk | planet36 | gwoljse | <|sols|><|sot|>Ugh... "coder" is so cringe to my ears. Like asking someone in the Navy what kind of "boat" they were on (non-sarcastically).<|eot|><|sol|>https://reddit.com/r/programming/comments/n2za7x/skipping_an_update_on_docker_is_a_paid_feature/gwnqko3?context=3<|eol|><|sor|>I'd just like to interject for a moment. What you're referring to as a boat, is in fact, GNU/boat, or as I've recently taken to calling it, GNU plus boat.<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 84 |
programmingcirclejerk | ashes_of_aesir | gwnw4ld | <|sols|><|sot|>Ugh... "coder" is so cringe to my ears. Like asking someone in the Navy what kind of "boat" they were on (non-sarcastically).<|eot|><|sol|>https://reddit.com/r/programming/comments/n2za7x/skipping_an_update_on_docker_is_a_paid_feature/gwnqko3?context=3<|eol|><|sor|>Can't jerk.
I'd prefer if people refer to me as a "Code Artisan" or "Software Astronaut."<|eor|><|sor|>Im partial to bit lyrist<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 65 |
programmingcirclejerk | needleful | gwohzng | <|sols|><|sot|>Ugh... "coder" is so cringe to my ears. Like asking someone in the Navy what kind of "boat" they were on (non-sarcastically).<|eot|><|sol|>https://reddit.com/r/programming/comments/n2za7x/skipping_an_update_on_docker_is_a_paid_feature/gwnqko3?context=3<|eol|><|sor|>I prefer "overpaid IT guy who occasionally writes database queries to search through logs"<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 51 |
programmingcirclejerk | Infernio | gwoovyg | <|sols|><|sot|>Ugh... "coder" is so cringe to my ears. Like asking someone in the Navy what kind of "boat" they were on (non-sarcastically).<|eot|><|sol|>https://reddit.com/r/programming/comments/n2za7x/skipping_an_update_on_docker_is_a_paid_feature/gwnqko3?context=3<|eol|><|sor|>I'd just like to interject for a moment. What you're referring to as a boat, is in fact, GNU/boat, or as I've recently taken to calling it, GNU plus boat.<|eor|><|sor|>No, Richard, it's 'boat', not 'GNU/boat'. The most important contributions that the FSF made to boat building were the creation of rudders and the GCC harbor.<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 40 |
programmingcirclejerk | duckbill_principate | gwnxeok | <|sols|><|sot|>Ugh... "coder" is so cringe to my ears. Like asking someone in the Navy what kind of "boat" they were on (non-sarcastically).<|eot|><|sol|>https://reddit.com/r/programming/comments/n2za7x/skipping_an_update_on_docker_is_a_paid_feature/gwnqko3?context=3<|eol|><|sor|>Can't jerk.
I'd prefer if people refer to me as a "Code Artisan" or "Software Astronaut."<|eor|><|sor|>I prefer Trinitarian Type Topologist myself. My friends call me T^3, but when we are under sail, I prefer to observe formalities and be strictly referred to as my typonautical rank of Commodore<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 30 |
programmingcirclejerk | THICC_DICC_PRICC | gwnzt3u | <|sols|><|sot|>Ugh... "coder" is so cringe to my ears. Like asking someone in the Navy what kind of "boat" they were on (non-sarcastically).<|eot|><|sol|>https://reddit.com/r/programming/comments/n2za7x/skipping_an_update_on_docker_is_a_paid_feature/gwnqko3?context=3<|eol|><|sor|>Can't jerk.
I'd prefer if people refer to me as a "Code Artisan" or "Software Astronaut."<|eor|><|sor|>Too general, you must indicate the tech you use,
Im a Python Patrician, a React Royal and an Arch Aristocrat<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 26 |
programmingcirclejerk | drakinosh | gwoq2ky | <|sols|><|sot|>Ugh... "coder" is so cringe to my ears. Like asking someone in the Navy what kind of "boat" they were on (non-sarcastically).<|eot|><|sol|>https://reddit.com/r/programming/comments/n2za7x/skipping_an_update_on_docker_is_a_paid_feature/gwnqko3?context=3<|eol|><|sor|>I'd just like to interject for a moment. What you're referring to as a boat, is in fact, GNU/boat, or as I've recently taken to calling it, GNU plus boat.<|eor|><|sor|>>not calling it GNU/bloat<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 26 |
programmingcirclejerk | duckbill_principate | gwpohxf | <|sols|><|sot|>Ugh... "coder" is so cringe to my ears. Like asking someone in the Navy what kind of "boat" they were on (non-sarcastically).<|eot|><|sol|>https://reddit.com/r/programming/comments/n2za7x/skipping_an_update_on_docker_is_a_paid_feature/gwnqko3?context=3<|eol|><|sor|>Excuse me, sir, but *Python* is a boat. *Haskell* is a *ship*.<|eor|><|sor|>And as everyone knows, Java is an 800ft long inflatable dinghy.
C is raft made from metal oil drums.<|eor|><|sor|>Careful, youre sailing yourself right into /r/ProgrammerHumor waters.<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 23 |
programmingcirclejerk | Kodiologist | gwo96ll | <|sols|><|sot|>Ugh... "coder" is so cringe to my ears. Like asking someone in the Navy what kind of "boat" they were on (non-sarcastically).<|eot|><|sol|>https://reddit.com/r/programming/comments/n2za7x/skipping_an_update_on_docker_is_a_paid_feature/gwnqko3?context=3<|eol|><|sor|>Excuse me, sir, but *Python* is a boat. *Haskell* is a *ship*.<|eor|><|sor|>Which characters are being shipped? Simon Peyton Jones with Haskell Curry?<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 21 |
programmingcirclejerk | muntaxitome | gwold4o | <|sols|><|sot|>Ugh... "coder" is so cringe to my ears. Like asking someone in the Navy what kind of "boat" they were on (non-sarcastically).<|eot|><|sol|>https://reddit.com/r/programming/comments/n2za7x/skipping_an_update_on_docker_is_a_paid_feature/gwnqko3?context=3<|eol|><|sor|>Coding means going into cardiac failure right? I always thought it was an apt term given the diet and lifestyle of these people.<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 19 |
programmingcirclejerk | xaranetic | gwpnfqf | <|sols|><|sot|>Ugh... "coder" is so cringe to my ears. Like asking someone in the Navy what kind of "boat" they were on (non-sarcastically).<|eot|><|sol|>https://reddit.com/r/programming/comments/n2za7x/skipping_an_update_on_docker_is_a_paid_feature/gwnqko3?context=3<|eol|><|sor|>Excuse me, sir, but *Python* is a boat. *Haskell* is a *ship*.<|eor|><|sor|>And as everyone knows, Java is an 800ft long inflatable dinghy.
C is raft made from metal oil drums.<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 14 |
programmingcirclejerk | duckbill_principate | gwo2t7b | <|sols|><|sot|>Ugh... "coder" is so cringe to my ears. Like asking someone in the Navy what kind of "boat" they were on (non-sarcastically).<|eot|><|sol|>https://reddit.com/r/programming/comments/n2za7x/skipping_an_update_on_docker_is_a_paid_feature/gwnqko3?context=3<|eol|><|sor|>Can't jerk.
I'd prefer if people refer to me as a "Code Artisan" or "Software Astronaut."<|eor|><|sor|>Im partial to bit lyrist<|eor|><|sor|>lyres are legacy tooling bro<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 14 |
programmingcirclejerk | ProfessorSexyTime | gwp93dk | <|sols|><|sot|>Ugh... "coder" is so cringe to my ears. Like asking someone in the Navy what kind of "boat" they were on (non-sarcastically).<|eot|><|sol|>https://reddit.com/r/programming/comments/n2za7x/skipping_an_update_on_docker_is_a_paid_feature/gwnqko3?context=3<|eol|><|sor|>`\input{unjerk}`
"Boat" is how some [vessels are referred to in the US Navy](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RXXMJAU6vY8). Examples include [General Dynamics Electric Boat](http://www.gdeb.com/) which makes subs.
`\input{jerk}`
[Only mediocre devs care about this shit.](https://i.imgflip.com/57ytg0.jpg) They hand-wring about job titles and try to cram the latest language feature into every line of code they write to try to be clever. The 0.1xers are too busy trying to copy snippits of Node/Rails code from StackOverflow until they pass their boss's unit tests and 10xers just write simple code that's easy to read and maintain. This is why I, as someone with a 145 IQ, use Arch and write Golang.<|eor|><|sor|>[What does CV stand for Mr navy smarty pants?](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_aircraft_carriers_of_the_United_States_Navy)<|eor|><|sor|>Cum vacuum?
I mean, it is the Navy after all.<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 14 |
programmingcirclejerk | duckbill_principate | gwp3e4b | <|sols|><|sot|>Ugh... "coder" is so cringe to my ears. Like asking someone in the Navy what kind of "boat" they were on (non-sarcastically).<|eot|><|sol|>https://reddit.com/r/programming/comments/n2za7x/skipping_an_update_on_docker_is_a_paid_feature/gwnqko3?context=3<|eol|><|sor|>`\input{unjerk}`
"Boat" is how some [vessels are referred to in the US Navy](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RXXMJAU6vY8). Examples include [General Dynamics Electric Boat](http://www.gdeb.com/) which makes subs.
`\input{jerk}`
[Only mediocre devs care about this shit.](https://i.imgflip.com/57ytg0.jpg) They hand-wring about job titles and try to cram the latest language feature into every line of code they write to try to be clever. The 0.1xers are too busy trying to copy snippits of Node/Rails code from StackOverflow until they pass their boss's unit tests and 10xers just write simple code that's easy to read and maintain. This is why I, as someone with a 145 IQ, use Arch and write Golang.<|eor|><|sor|>??? This isnt even remotely correct.
Almost any large surface craft in the USN is a ship. Aircraft carriers, destroyers, litoral combat ship (right there in the name), amphibious expeditionary ships, etc. are all ships.
Anything else is a boat. The includes subs and small surface craft like patrol boats (again, right there in the name), whale boat, mine sweeper, etc.
The majority of craft in the USN (by tonnage) are ships.<|eor|><|sor|>Bruh, the universal quantifier was never implied<|eor|><|sor|>lol nice edit<|eor|><|sor|>I typed "bruh" and hit post by accident, my bad<|eor|><|sor|>I was referring to you changing boats are how ships are referred to to boats are how some vessels are referred to.<|eor|><|sor|>Oh. My original reply was the universal quantifier was never implied, and so I changed what I wrote to make that explicit. I never intended to claim *all* vessels in the United States Navy are referred to as boats, just that there *exists* non-trivial vessels referred to as boats.<|eor|><|sor|>It occurred to me before posting that you probably just made a typo, however, I find my life is a lot more comforting if I assume that someone is a raving idiot rather than that they made an honest mistake.<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 14 |
programmingcirclejerk | Poddster | gwpg5qs | <|sols|><|sot|>Ugh... "coder" is so cringe to my ears. Like asking someone in the Navy what kind of "boat" they were on (non-sarcastically).<|eot|><|sol|>https://reddit.com/r/programming/comments/n2za7x/skipping_an_update_on_docker_is_a_paid_feature/gwnqko3?context=3<|eol|><|sor|>There's a reason books aimed at children are always entitled *Coding For Kids* and books aimed at adults always use the term "programming"....
and that's because of alliteration
and also because "coders" are childish and unprofessional.<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 13 |
programmingcirclejerk | xaranetic | gwpol55 | <|sols|><|sot|>Ugh... "coder" is so cringe to my ears. Like asking someone in the Navy what kind of "boat" they were on (non-sarcastically).<|eot|><|sol|>https://reddit.com/r/programming/comments/n2za7x/skipping_an_update_on_docker_is_a_paid_feature/gwnqko3?context=3<|eol|><|sor|>I'd just like to interject for a moment. What you're referring to as a boat, is in fact, GNU/boat, or as I've recently taken to calling it, GNU plus boat.<|eor|><|sor|>No, Richard, it's 'boat', not 'GNU/boat'. The most important contributions that the FSF made to boat building were the creation of rudders and the GCC harbor.<|eor|><|sor|>Of course, GNU/boat was itself a clone of the preexisting commercial product "float". When the distinction is unimportant, we tend to refer to them both as *oat<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 13 |
programmingcirclejerk | butterdrinker | gwpjalh | <|sols|><|sot|>Ugh... "coder" is so cringe to my ears. Like asking someone in the Navy what kind of "boat" they were on (non-sarcastically).<|eot|><|sol|>https://reddit.com/r/programming/comments/n2za7x/skipping_an_update_on_docker_is_a_paid_feature/gwnqko3?context=3<|eol|><|sor|>Can't jerk.
I'd prefer if people refer to me as a "Code Artisan" or "Software Astronaut."<|eor|><|sor|>Too general, you must indicate the tech you use,
Im a Python Patrician, a React Royal and an Arch Aristocrat<|eor|><|sor|>I'm a Java Sandcrawler<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 12 |
programmingcirclejerk | ____ben____ | imbeof | <|sols|><|sot|>I personally have no interest in typescript and think it's existence is pretty pointless and tries to solve a problem that never existed.<|eot|><|sol|>https://github.com/feross/simple-peer/issues/605#issuecomment-654520057<|eol|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 158 |
programmingcirclejerk | LeeHide | g3ymefq | <|sols|><|sot|>I personally have no interest in typescript and think it's existence is pretty pointless and tries to solve a problem that never existed.<|eot|><|sol|>https://github.com/feross/simple-peer/issues/605#issuecomment-654520057<|eol|><|sor|>I dont see why you would want to change anything about javascript.
Pure javascript is the reason i met my wife.<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 103 |
programmingcirclejerk | Urban_3lf | g3yo4bn | <|sols|><|sot|>I personally have no interest in typescript and think it's existence is pretty pointless and tries to solve a problem that never existed.<|eot|><|sol|>https://github.com/feross/simple-peer/issues/605#issuecomment-654520057<|eol|><|sor|>I personally have no interest in *insert language here* and think it's existence is pretty pointless and tries to solve a problem that never existed. It makes me feel dumb to have to learn a new "version" of *insert language here* while I've been developing *insert other language here* since the *insert year here*'s when it was first invented<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 60 |
programmingcirclejerk | Laodic3an | g3yr11j | <|sols|><|sot|>I personally have no interest in typescript and think it's existence is pretty pointless and tries to solve a problem that never existed.<|eot|><|sol|>https://github.com/feross/simple-peer/issues/605#issuecomment-654520057<|eol|><|sor|>If you are going to add generics support, please make it OPTIONAL and not convert everything and force end users to use it.
I personally have no interest in generics and think it's existence is pretty pointless and tries to solve a problem that never existed. It makes me feel dumb to have to learn a new "version" of go while I've been
developing go since the 2010's when it was first invented.<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 53 |
programmingcirclejerk | qh4os | g3yxvxh | <|sols|><|sot|>I personally have no interest in typescript and think it's existence is pretty pointless and tries to solve a problem that never existed.<|eot|><|sol|>https://github.com/feross/simple-peer/issues/605#issuecomment-654520057<|eol|><|sor|>I dont see why you would want to change anything about javascript.
Pure javascript is the reason i met my wife.<|eor|><|sor|>Is she a crab?<|eor|><|sor|>The term is ***rustacean***, you unsafe loving fool<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 43 |
programmingcirclejerk | powerhcm8 | g3yxir2 | <|sols|><|sot|>I personally have no interest in typescript and think it's existence is pretty pointless and tries to solve a problem that never existed.<|eot|><|sol|>https://github.com/feross/simple-peer/issues/605#issuecomment-654520057<|eol|><|sor|>I personally have no interest in *insert language here* and think it's existence is pretty pointless and tries to solve a problem that never existed. It makes me feel dumb to have to learn a new "version" of *insert language here* while I've been developing *insert other language here* since the *insert year here*'s when it was first invented<|eor|><|sor|>I personally have no interest in Scratch and think it's existence is pretty pointless and tried to solve a problem that never existed. It makes me feel dumb to have to learn a new "version" of Scratch while I've been developing Assembly since the 1949 when it's first invented<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 42 |
programmingcirclejerk | VeganVagiVore | g3z2438 | <|sols|><|sot|>I personally have no interest in typescript and think it's existence is pretty pointless and tries to solve a problem that never existed.<|eot|><|sol|>https://github.com/feross/simple-peer/issues/605#issuecomment-654520057<|eol|><|sor|>I personally have no interest in *insert language here* and think it's existence is pretty pointless and tries to solve a problem that never existed. It makes me feel dumb to have to learn a new "version" of *insert language here* while I've been developing *insert other language here* since the *insert year here*'s when it was first invented<|eor|><|sor|>I personally have no interest in Scratch and think it's existence is pretty pointless and tried to solve a problem that never existed. It makes me feel dumb to have to learn a new "version" of Scratch while I've been developing Assembly since the 1949 when it's first invented<|eor|><|sor|>Assembly is a high-level language that isolates modern quiche-eating programmers from the harsh reality of the machine code<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 30 |
programmingcirclejerk | diegovsky_pvp | g3yu7oe | <|sols|><|sot|>I personally have no interest in typescript and think it's existence is pretty pointless and tries to solve a problem that never existed.<|eot|><|sol|>https://github.com/feross/simple-peer/issues/605#issuecomment-654520057<|eol|><|sor|>I dont see why you would want to change anything about javascript.
Pure javascript is the reason i met my wife.<|eor|><|sor|>Is she a crab?<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 29 |
programmingcirclejerk | Deibu251 | g3zgv4c | <|sols|><|sot|>I personally have no interest in typescript and think it's existence is pretty pointless and tries to solve a problem that never existed.<|eot|><|sol|>https://github.com/feross/simple-peer/issues/605#issuecomment-654520057<|eol|><|sor|>I personally have no interest in *insert language here* and think it's existence is pretty pointless and tries to solve a problem that never existed. It makes me feel dumb to have to learn a new "version" of *insert language here* while I've been developing *insert other language here* since the *insert year here*'s when it was first invented<|eor|><|sor|>I personally have no interest in Rust and think it's existence is pretty pointless and tries to solve a problem that never existed. It makes me feel dumb to have to learn a new "version" of C while I've been developing C since the 70's when it was first invented<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 21 |
programmingcirclejerk | powerhcm8 | g3ywupl | <|sols|><|sot|>I personally have no interest in typescript and think it's existence is pretty pointless and tries to solve a problem that never existed.<|eot|><|sol|>https://github.com/feross/simple-peer/issues/605#issuecomment-654520057<|eol|><|sor|>I dont see why you would want to change anything about javascript.
Pure javascript is the reason i met my wife.<|eor|><|sor|>In understand you, if you were using typescript instead you might not have been her type.<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 20 |
programmingcirclejerk | pcopley | g3zktig | <|sols|><|sot|>I personally have no interest in typescript and think it's existence is pretty pointless and tries to solve a problem that never existed.<|eot|><|sol|>https://github.com/feross/simple-peer/issues/605#issuecomment-654520057<|eol|><|sor|>I dont see why you would want to change anything about javascript.
Pure javascript is the reason i met my wife.<|eor|><|sor|>Is she a crab?<|eor|><|sor|>The term is ***rustacean***, you unsafe loving fool<|eor|><|sor|>If they're married they probably have unsafe loving every now and then.<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 19 |
programmingcirclejerk | officerthegeek | g3yx843 | <|sols|><|sot|>I personally have no interest in typescript and think it's existence is pretty pointless and tries to solve a problem that never existed.<|eot|><|sol|>https://github.com/feross/simple-peer/issues/605#issuecomment-654520057<|eol|><|sor|>If you are going to add generics support, please make it OPTIONAL and not convert everything and force end users to use it.
I personally have no interest in generics and think it's existence is pretty pointless and tries to solve a problem that never existed. It makes me feel dumb to have to learn a new "version" of go while I've been
developing go since the 2010's when it was first invented.<|eor|><|sor|>I detest the very existence of generic hash maps.<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 18 |
programmingcirclejerk | yojimbo_beta | g40sk2g | <|sols|><|sot|>I personally have no interest in typescript and think it's existence is pretty pointless and tries to solve a problem that never existed.<|eot|><|sol|>https://github.com/feross/simple-peer/issues/605#issuecomment-654520057<|eol|><|sor|>/uj
Genuinely interested, what are some of the pains of Typescript r/pcj have found?
(Besides `tsc` not caring whether you specify types or not.)
EDIT: This is not me trying to white-knight Typescript, lol. I just don't have any experience with it and I hear it's shit so I'm curious.<|eor|><|sor|>Pains: typescript can be used as a typed functional programming language but is not Haskell
Gains: typescript can be used as a typed functional programming language but is not Haskell<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 18 |
programmingcirclejerk | fp_weenie | g3z8xpy | <|sols|><|sot|>I personally have no interest in typescript and think it's existence is pretty pointless and tries to solve a problem that never existed.<|eot|><|sol|>https://github.com/feross/simple-peer/issues/605#issuecomment-654520057<|eol|><|sor|>Why catch bugs? Much more pragmatic to finish with buggy code and ship it!<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 16 |
programmingcirclejerk | relok123 | g3z2tnr | <|sols|><|sot|>I personally have no interest in typescript and think it's existence is pretty pointless and tries to solve a problem that never existed.<|eot|><|sol|>https://github.com/feross/simple-peer/issues/605#issuecomment-654520057<|eol|><|sor|>Never liked this Typescript fad, how many github stars does it have?<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 14 |
programmingcirclejerk | ryeguy | g4056ej | <|sols|><|sot|>I personally have no interest in typescript and think it's existence is pretty pointless and tries to solve a problem that never existed.<|eot|><|sol|>https://github.com/feross/simple-peer/issues/605#issuecomment-654520057<|eol|><|sor|>I personally have no interest in *insert language here* and think it's existence is pretty pointless and tries to solve a problem that never existed. It makes me feel dumb to have to learn a new "version" of *insert language here* while I've been developing *insert other language here* since the *insert year here*'s when it was first invented<|eor|><|sor|>I personally have no interest in monads and think their existence is pretty pointless and tries to solve a problem that never existed. It makes me feel dumb to have to learn a new "version" of burritos while I've been developing with side effects since the 60's.<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 13 |
programmingcirclejerk | Volt | g41mlsz | <|sols|><|sot|>I personally have no interest in typescript and think it's existence is pretty pointless and tries to solve a problem that never existed.<|eot|><|sol|>https://github.com/feross/simple-peer/issues/605#issuecomment-654520057<|eol|><|sor|>I personally have no interest in *insert language here* and think it's existence is pretty pointless and tries to solve a problem that never existed. It makes me feel dumb to have to learn a new "version" of *insert language here* while I've been developing *insert other language here* since the *insert year here*'s when it was first invented<|eor|><|sor|>I personally have no interest in Rust and think it's existence is pretty pointless and tries to solve a problem that never existed. It makes me feel dumb to have to learn a new "version" of C while I've been developing C since the 70's when it was first invented<|eor|><|sor|>Now you've gone too far<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 11 |
programmingcirclejerk | i-can-sleep-for-days | g40dfyr | <|sols|><|sot|>I personally have no interest in typescript and think it's existence is pretty pointless and tries to solve a problem that never existed.<|eot|><|sol|>https://github.com/feross/simple-peer/issues/605#issuecomment-654520057<|eol|><|sor|>I dont see why you would want to change anything about javascript.
Pure javascript is the reason i met my wife.<|eor|><|sor|>Is she a crab?<|eor|><|sor|>The term is ***rustacean***, you unsafe loving fool<|eor|><|sor|>If they're married they probably have unsafe loving every now and then.<|eor|><|sor|>Thats how you get bugs and unwanted features.<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 10 |
programmingcirclejerk | geggleto | g41fveq | <|sols|><|sot|>I personally have no interest in typescript and think it's existence is pretty pointless and tries to solve a problem that never existed.<|eot|><|sol|>https://github.com/feross/simple-peer/issues/605#issuecomment-654520057<|eol|><|sor|>[deleted]<|eor|><|sor|>current weekly download count... 0.
​
ok maintainer.<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 9 |
programmingcirclejerk | SDL_assert_paranoid | dtrreo | <|sols|><|sot|>Programmers are bright people. Let's face it. We're some of the smartest people on Earth.<|eot|><|sol|>https://www.reddit.com/r/linux/comments/3gt6r1/richard_stallman_is_right/cu1vul2<|eol|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 158 |
programmingcirclejerk | AsmCoder110 | f6ylro5 | <|sols|><|sot|>Programmers are bright people. Let's face it. We're some of the smartest people on Earth.<|eot|><|sol|>https://www.reddit.com/r/linux/comments/3gt6r1/richard_stallman_is_right/cu1vul2<|eol|><|sor|>Nothing to jerk about, its true.<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 105 |
programmingcirclejerk | MCRusher | f6z3h6j | <|sols|><|sot|>Programmers are bright people. Let's face it. We're some of the smartest people on Earth.<|eot|><|sol|>https://www.reddit.com/r/linux/comments/3gt6r1/richard_stallman_is_right/cu1vul2<|eol|><|sor|>The fact that I'm bad at math means math is bad.<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 81 |
programmingcirclejerk | FascinatedBox | f706oer | <|sols|><|sot|>Programmers are bright people. Let's face it. We're some of the smartest people on Earth.<|eot|><|sol|>https://www.reddit.com/r/linux/comments/3gt6r1/richard_stallman_is_right/cu1vul2<|eol|><|sor|>If we were so smart why aren't we unionized?<|eor|><|sor|>Unions only support one initialized member at a time you clod.<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 56 |
programmingcirclejerk | kirakun | f6zip51 | <|sols|><|sot|>Programmers are bright people. Let's face it. We're some of the smartest people on Earth.<|eot|><|sol|>https://www.reddit.com/r/linux/comments/3gt6r1/richard_stallman_is_right/cu1vul2<|eol|><|sor|>Nothing to jerk about, its true.<|eor|><|sor|>Can we post to this subreddit a post from this subreddit?<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 54 |
programmingcirclejerk | accountforshit | f6zb2h9 | <|sols|><|sot|>Programmers are bright people. Let's face it. We're some of the smartest people on Earth.<|eot|><|sol|>https://www.reddit.com/r/linux/comments/3gt6r1/richard_stallman_is_right/cu1vul2<|eol|><|sor|>To be fair, you have to have a pretty high IQ to understand progra...
ah, fuck that pasta<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 45 |
programmingcirclejerk | VeganVagiVore | f6zaezi | <|sols|><|sot|>Programmers are bright people. Let's face it. We're some of the smartest people on Earth.<|eot|><|sol|>https://www.reddit.com/r/linux/comments/3gt6r1/richard_stallman_is_right/cu1vul2<|eol|><|sor|>The fact that I'm bad at math means math is bad.<|eor|><|sor|>It's really more that math is bad at me<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 40 |
programmingcirclejerk | NakeyDooCrew | f6zamcb | <|sols|><|sot|>Programmers are bright people. Let's face it. We're some of the smartest people on Earth.<|eot|><|sol|>https://www.reddit.com/r/linux/comments/3gt6r1/richard_stallman_is_right/cu1vul2<|eol|><|sor|>"The measure of a man is not how much he is loved during his lifetime but what he contributes to the society. In the case of Mr. Stallman, his most important contributions have been telling it like it is". This is holy truth. I can't even count (despite my genius) how many times I've seen a project fail for want of people to tell it like it is. Give me ten men who aren't afraid to just sit there and tell it like it is and we can achieve anything, or at least give you several good reasons why it's not our fault we failed. It's important for programmers to give back to society though - volunteer your unvarnished opinions at your local homeless shelter today!<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 37 |
programmingcirclejerk | jk_scowling | f6zbq5q | <|sols|><|sot|>Programmers are bright people. Let's face it. We're some of the smartest people on Earth.<|eot|><|sol|>https://www.reddit.com/r/linux/comments/3gt6r1/richard_stallman_is_right/cu1vul2<|eol|><|sor|>Any person who spends a lot of time around software testers will no doubt develop an overestimation of their own intelligence.<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 25 |
programmingcirclejerk | SDL_assert_paranoid | f6yenzr | <|sols|><|sot|>Programmers are bright people. Let's face it. We're some of the smartest people on Earth.<|eot|><|sol|>https://www.reddit.com/r/linux/comments/3gt6r1/richard_stallman_is_right/cu1vul2<|eol|><|soopr|>Vintage jerk<|eoopr|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 25 |
programmingcirclejerk | jk_scowling | f6zp42a | <|sols|><|sot|>Programmers are bright people. Let's face it. We're some of the smartest people on Earth.<|eot|><|sol|>https://www.reddit.com/r/linux/comments/3gt6r1/richard_stallman_is_right/cu1vul2<|eol|><|sor|>Any person who spends a lot of time around software testers will no doubt develop an overestimation of their own intelligence.<|eor|><|sor|>> Any person who spends a lot of time around users will no doubt develop an overestimation of their own intelligence.<|eor|><|sor|>I try and avoid users as much as possible to keep my code pure.<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 25 |
programmingcirclejerk | ijauradunbi | f6zeo7j | <|sols|><|sot|>Programmers are bright people. Let's face it. We're some of the smartest people on Earth.<|eot|><|sol|>https://www.reddit.com/r/linux/comments/3gt6r1/richard_stallman_is_right/cu1vul2<|eol|><|sor|>Not wrong. Programmers are some of the most insufferable people on earth.<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 22 |
programmingcirclejerk | SDL_assert_paranoid | f705eei | <|sols|><|sot|>Programmers are bright people. Let's face it. We're some of the smartest people on Earth.<|eot|><|sol|>https://www.reddit.com/r/linux/comments/3gt6r1/richard_stallman_is_right/cu1vul2<|eol|><|sor|>The fact that I'm bad at math means math is bad.<|eor|><|sor|>It's really more that math is bad at me<|eor|><|sor|>Math is just not beginner-friendly - it's complicated and tries to be clever. We should just create a new and *simple* math without generics.<|eor|><|soopr|>Mathematics is user friendly. It's just picky about who its friends are.<|eoopr|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 14 |
programmingcirclejerk | rohitkg98 | f749wdb | <|sols|><|sot|>Programmers are bright people. Let's face it. We're some of the smartest people on Earth.<|eot|><|sol|>https://www.reddit.com/r/linux/comments/3gt6r1/richard_stallman_is_right/cu1vul2<|eol|><|sor|>If we were so smart why aren't we unionized?<|eor|><|sor|>I read it as un ionized ._.<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 11 |
programmingcirclejerk | Zillux | f70a1w3 | <|sols|><|sot|>Programmers are bright people. Let's face it. We're some of the smartest people on Earth.<|eot|><|sol|>https://www.reddit.com/r/linux/comments/3gt6r1/richard_stallman_is_right/cu1vul2<|eol|><|sor|>Nothing to jerk about, its true.<|eor|><|sor|>Can we post to this subreddit a post from this subreddit?<|eor|><|sor|>I seem to recall our resident Obersturmfhrer veto:ing that after it was done once.<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 11 |
programmingcirclejerk | theangeryemacsshibe | dc0lvj | <|sols|><|sot|>Python still use Mark-Sweep and graph ADT depth first traversal, why not use some machine learning algorithm to classify garbage or not?<|eot|><|sol|>https://medium.com/@yunjianxin5/python-still-use-mark-sweep-and-graph-adt-depth-first-traversal-why-not-use-some-machine-learning-165321320153<|eol|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 163 |
programmingcirclejerk | Spfifle | f258x8o | <|sols|><|sot|>Python still use Mark-Sweep and graph ADT depth first traversal, why not use some machine learning algorithm to classify garbage or not?<|eot|><|sol|>https://medium.com/@yunjianxin5/python-still-use-mark-sweep-and-graph-adt-depth-first-traversal-why-not-use-some-machine-learning-165321320153<|eol|><|sor|>If there's one thing that would make Python a more reliable language, it's the GC randomly deleting your data out from under you because it 'looked wrong'. Then we can invent a meta-GC that automatically keeps all live objects tangled in spaghetti to ensure the AI doesn't mistakenly delete them.<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 154 |
programmingcirclejerk | ProfessorSexyTime | f25en5d | <|sols|><|sot|>Python still use Mark-Sweep and graph ADT depth first traversal, why not use some machine learning algorithm to classify garbage or not?<|eot|><|sol|>https://medium.com/@yunjianxin5/python-still-use-mark-sweep-and-graph-adt-depth-first-traversal-why-not-use-some-machine-learning-165321320153<|eol|><|sor|>If there's one thing that would make Python a more reliable language, it's the GC randomly deleting your data out from under you because it 'looked wrong'. Then we can invent a meta-GC that automatically keeps all live objects tangled in spaghetti to ensure the AI doesn't mistakenly delete them.<|eor|><|sor|>Do you work for YouTube?<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 55 |
programmingcirclejerk | thephotoman | f25ighg | <|sols|><|sot|>Python still use Mark-Sweep and graph ADT depth first traversal, why not use some machine learning algorithm to classify garbage or not?<|eot|><|sol|>https://medium.com/@yunjianxin5/python-still-use-mark-sweep-and-graph-adt-depth-first-traversal-why-not-use-some-machine-learning-165321320153<|eol|><|sor|>That guy: Memory management is hard, so let's just pray to the machine god to solve it.<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 36 |
programmingcirclejerk | ws-ilazki | f25vnez | <|sols|><|sot|>Python still use Mark-Sweep and graph ADT depth first traversal, why not use some machine learning algorithm to classify garbage or not?<|eot|><|sol|>https://medium.com/@yunjianxin5/python-still-use-mark-sweep-and-graph-adt-depth-first-traversal-why-not-use-some-machine-learning-165321320153<|eol|><|sor|>If there's one thing that would make Python a more reliable language, it's the GC randomly deleting your data out from under you because it 'looked wrong'. Then we can invent a meta-GC that automatically keeps all live objects tangled in spaghetti to ensure the AI doesn't mistakenly delete them.<|eor|><|sor|>> If there's one thing that would make Python a more reliable language, it's the GC randomly deleting your data out from under you because it 'looked wrong'.
That reminds me of how [Vigil](https://github.com/munificent/vigil) handles programming errors. It's basically Python, but if you make a mistake in a function, Vigil punishes that function by deleting it from the source file. It will continue to do this, deleting broken functions (including ones that break because of the punishment of a previously-broken function) until the program is purified.<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 35 |
programmingcirclejerk | theangeryemacsshibe | f25ahjn | <|sols|><|sot|>Python still use Mark-Sweep and graph ADT depth first traversal, why not use some machine learning algorithm to classify garbage or not?<|eot|><|sol|>https://medium.com/@yunjianxin5/python-still-use-mark-sweep-and-graph-adt-depth-first-traversal-why-not-use-some-machine-learning-165321320153<|eol|><|sor|>Why not use some machine learning algorithm to know when to put that little Tick Mark (') explicit annotation on a Rust function declaration?
​
`fn print_refs<'a, 'b>(x: &'a i32, y: &'b i32)`
`println!("x is {} and y is {}", x, y);`
`}`<|eor|><|soopr|>Why ~~not~~ use ~~some machine learning algorithm to know when to put that little Tick Mark (') explicit annotation on a~~ Rust ~~function declaration~~?<|eoopr|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 30 |
programmingcirclejerk | jeremyjh | f25g72l | <|sols|><|sot|>Python still use Mark-Sweep and graph ADT depth first traversal, why not use some machine learning algorithm to classify garbage or not?<|eot|><|sol|>https://medium.com/@yunjianxin5/python-still-use-mark-sweep-and-graph-adt-depth-first-traversal-why-not-use-some-machine-learning-165321320153<|eol|><|sor|>If you just memory map /dev/null you don't have to worry about collecting the garbage.<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 28 |
programmingcirclejerk | BarefootUnicorn | f25adlg | <|sols|><|sot|>Python still use Mark-Sweep and graph ADT depth first traversal, why not use some machine learning algorithm to classify garbage or not?<|eot|><|sol|>https://medium.com/@yunjianxin5/python-still-use-mark-sweep-and-graph-adt-depth-first-traversal-why-not-use-some-machine-learning-165321320153<|eol|><|sor|>Why not use some machine learning algorithm to know when to put that little Tick Mark (') explicit annotation on a Rust function declaration?
​
`fn print_refs<'a, 'b>(x: &'a i32, y: &'b i32)`
`println!("x is {} and y is {}", x, y);`
`}`<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 28 |
programmingcirclejerk | fnordulicious | f25kdet | <|sols|><|sot|>Python still use Mark-Sweep and graph ADT depth first traversal, why not use some machine learning algorithm to classify garbage or not?<|eot|><|sol|>https://medium.com/@yunjianxin5/python-still-use-mark-sweep-and-graph-adt-depth-first-traversal-why-not-use-some-machine-learning-165321320153<|eol|><|sor|>If there's one thing that would make Python a more reliable language, it's the GC randomly deleting your data out from under you because it 'looked wrong'. Then we can invent a meta-GC that automatically keeps all live objects tangled in spaghetti to ensure the AI doesn't mistakenly delete them.<|eor|><|sor|>> Then we can invent a meta-GC that automatically keeps all live objects tangled in spaghetti to ensure the AI doesn't mistakenly delete them.
Make all objects circular and use reference counting. Problem solved!<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 28 |
programmingcirclejerk | theangeryemacsshibe | f25ij2d | <|sols|><|sot|>Python still use Mark-Sweep and graph ADT depth first traversal, why not use some machine learning algorithm to classify garbage or not?<|eot|><|sol|>https://medium.com/@yunjianxin5/python-still-use-mark-sweep-and-graph-adt-depth-first-traversal-why-not-use-some-machine-learning-165321320153<|eol|><|sor|>That guy: Memory management is hard, so let's just pray to the machine god to solve it.<|eor|><|soopr|> python super_magic_ai_box.py < GarbageCollectionHandbook.pdf
problem solved<|eoopr|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 26 |
programmingcirclejerk | silentconfessor | f25wu3e | <|sols|><|sot|>Python still use Mark-Sweep and graph ADT depth first traversal, why not use some machine learning algorithm to classify garbage or not?<|eot|><|sol|>https://medium.com/@yunjianxin5/python-still-use-mark-sweep-and-graph-adt-depth-first-traversal-why-not-use-some-machine-learning-165321320153<|eol|><|sor|>[deleted]<|eor|><|sor|>Python can't run on Turing computers. Remember, it's not Turing complete.<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 25 |
programmingcirclejerk | fp_weenie | f25kqz3 | <|sols|><|sot|>Python still use Mark-Sweep and graph ADT depth first traversal, why not use some machine learning algorithm to classify garbage or not?<|eot|><|sol|>https://medium.com/@yunjianxin5/python-still-use-mark-sweep-and-graph-adt-depth-first-traversal-why-not-use-some-machine-learning-165321320153<|eol|><|sor|>If there's one thing that would make Python a more reliable language, it's the GC randomly deleting your data out from under you because it 'looked wrong'. Then we can invent a meta-GC that automatically keeps all live objects tangled in spaghetti to ensure the AI doesn't mistakenly delete them.<|eor|><|sor|>> Then we can invent a meta-GC that automatically keeps all live objects tangled in spaghetti to ensure the AI doesn't mistakenly delete them.
Make all objects circular and use reference counting. Problem solved!<|eor|><|sor|>> Make all objects circular
you've hurt the Rustaceans<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 25 |
programmingcirclejerk | RoburexButBetter | f26jci9 | <|sols|><|sot|>Python still use Mark-Sweep and graph ADT depth first traversal, why not use some machine learning algorithm to classify garbage or not?<|eot|><|sol|>https://medium.com/@yunjianxin5/python-still-use-mark-sweep-and-graph-adt-depth-first-traversal-why-not-use-some-machine-learning-165321320153<|eol|><|sor|>If there's one thing that would make Python a more reliable language, it's the GC randomly deleting your data out from under you because it 'looked wrong'. Then we can invent a meta-GC that automatically keeps all live objects tangled in spaghetti to ensure the AI doesn't mistakenly delete them.<|eor|><|sor|>> If there's one thing that would make Python a more reliable language, it's the GC randomly deleting your data out from under you because it 'looked wrong'.
That reminds me of how [Vigil](https://github.com/munificent/vigil) handles programming errors. It's basically Python, but if you make a mistake in a function, Vigil punishes that function by deleting it from the source file. It will continue to do this, deleting broken functions (including ones that break because of the punishment of a previously-broken function) until the program is purified.<|eor|><|sor|>>Infinitely more important than mere syntax and semantics are its addition of supreme moral vigilance.
Has this essential piece of morality been integrated into rust yet?<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 23 |
programmingcirclejerk | ProfessorSexyTime | f25lo4j | <|sols|><|sot|>Python still use Mark-Sweep and graph ADT depth first traversal, why not use some machine learning algorithm to classify garbage or not?<|eot|><|sol|>https://medium.com/@yunjianxin5/python-still-use-mark-sweep-and-graph-adt-depth-first-traversal-why-not-use-some-machine-learning-165321320153<|eol|><|sor|>If there's one thing that would make Python a more reliable language, it's the GC randomly deleting your data out from under you because it 'looked wrong'. Then we can invent a meta-GC that automatically keeps all live objects tangled in spaghetti to ensure the AI doesn't mistakenly delete them.<|eor|><|sor|>[removed]<|eor|><|soopr|>/uj but then to "check", you have to traverse the heap again from the roots which is approximately as slow as just doing the GC normally.<|eoopr|><|sor|>[removed]<|eor|><|sor|>[removed]<|eor|><|sor|>So if we can mark certain nodes quickly as being definitely not alive this is potentially of benefit, no? Just a way of pruning the search tree.<|eor|><|sor|>Alright lads, gonna have to stop you here.
We're programmers here. We don't *actually* solve problems. We just create different problems.<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 22 |
programmingcirclejerk | theangeryemacsshibe | f2595uf | <|sols|><|sot|>Python still use Mark-Sweep and graph ADT depth first traversal, why not use some machine learning algorithm to classify garbage or not?<|eot|><|sol|>https://medium.com/@yunjianxin5/python-still-use-mark-sweep-and-graph-adt-depth-first-traversal-why-not-use-some-machine-learning-165321320153<|eol|><|sor|>[deleted]<|eor|><|soopr|>/uj that just sorts parts of a database to optimise queries I think? it'd be closer to a NN guessing what generation some object belongs in, rather than "classify garbage or not"<|eoopr|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 18 |
programmingcirclejerk | theangeryemacsshibe | f259z5a | <|sols|><|sot|>Python still use Mark-Sweep and graph ADT depth first traversal, why not use some machine learning algorithm to classify garbage or not?<|eot|><|sol|>https://medium.com/@yunjianxin5/python-still-use-mark-sweep-and-graph-adt-depth-first-traversal-why-not-use-some-machine-learning-165321320153<|eol|><|sor|>If there's one thing that would make Python a more reliable language, it's the GC randomly deleting your data out from under you because it 'looked wrong'. Then we can invent a meta-GC that automatically keeps all live objects tangled in spaghetti to ensure the AI doesn't mistakenly delete them.<|eor|><|sor|>[removed]<|eor|><|soopr|>/uj but then to "check", you have to traverse the heap again from the roots which is approximately as slow as just doing the GC normally.<|eoopr|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 16 |
programmingcirclejerk | GoogleBen | f263qs3 | <|sols|><|sot|>Python still use Mark-Sweep and graph ADT depth first traversal, why not use some machine learning algorithm to classify garbage or not?<|eot|><|sol|>https://medium.com/@yunjianxin5/python-still-use-mark-sweep-and-graph-adt-depth-first-traversal-why-not-use-some-machine-learning-165321320153<|eol|><|sor|>[deleted]<|eor|><|sor|>Python can't run on Turing computers. Remember, it's not Turing complete.<|eor|><|sor|>Python 3 not being Turing complete is a feature. By limiting the scope of problems the language can solve, we effectively solve the halting problem. Who wants to run code that may run forever? All languages should strive to be as simple as possible so as to prevent the misuse of CPU time. In fact, we ought to create a new fusion of Python 3 and Go: static typing, no generics, and not Turing complete. Us 100xers are able to perfectly reason about the code we carefully hand-craft with , but it's our burden to ensure the lowly <10xers can't write incorrect code.<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 15 |
programmingcirclejerk | cmqv | wl4wn0 | <|sols|><|sot|>C-Pointers are often all the "generics" I need<|eot|><|sol|>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=32366682<|eol|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 158 |
programmingcirclejerk | winepath | ijrd2iy | <|sols|><|sot|>C-Pointers are often all the "generics" I need<|eot|><|sol|>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=32366682<|eol|><|sor|>Honestly everything beyond `int` and `void *`was a mistake in my opinion<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 105 |
programmingcirclejerk | AprilSpektra | ijrfhi1 | <|sols|><|sot|>C-Pointers are often all the "generics" I need<|eot|><|sol|>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=32366682<|eol|><|sor|>Everything is bytes type system.<|eor|><|sor|>Bytes are an abstraction. If you want to get as close to the metal as possible, you only work with bare bits. No, my code does not function correctly on architectures with different endianness, why do you ask?<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 104 |
programmingcirclejerk | Philpax | ijs5dl0 | <|sols|><|sot|>C-Pointers are often all the "generics" I need<|eot|><|sol|>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=32366682<|eol|><|sor|>a type system is bourgeoisie excess<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 57 |
programmingcirclejerk | serg06 | ijtmi0p | <|sols|><|sot|>C-Pointers are often all the "generics" I need<|eot|><|sol|>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=32366682<|eol|><|sor|>Honestly everything beyond `int` and `void *`was a mistake in my opinion<|eor|><|sor|>floats are just ints packed in a funny way<|eor|><|sor|>Floats are an abstraction that only lead to dangerous runtime bugs. (E.g. floating point errors.) Something so unreliable should never be part of the C standard, and Im disappointed with the Standards Committee for letting it slip in.
Floating point numbers should be represented as a struct with mantissa, exponent, etc. By writing it out explicitly, we can force the programmers to think about what theyre doing and avoid accidental bugs.<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 54 |
programmingcirclejerk | lowspeccorgi | ijr7k9s | <|sols|><|sot|>C-Pointers are often all the "generics" I need<|eot|><|sol|>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=32366682<|eol|><|sor|>Void pointers solve all the worlds problems.<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 49 |
programmingcirclejerk | fp_weenie | ijsucv9 | <|sols|><|sot|>C-Pointers are often all the "generics" I need<|eot|><|sol|>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=32366682<|eol|><|sor|>Honestly everything beyond `int` and `void *`was a mistake in my opinion<|eor|><|sor|>floats are just ints packed in a funny way<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 49 |
programmingcirclejerk | Masztufa | ijsc5wd | <|sols|><|sot|>C-Pointers are often all the "generics" I need<|eot|><|sol|>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=32366682<|eol|><|sor|>Everything is bytes type system.<|eor|><|sor|>Bytes are an abstraction. If you want to get as close to the metal as possible, you only work with bare bits. No, my code does not function correctly on architectures with different endianness, why do you ask?<|eor|><|sor|>Average fpga developer<|eor|><|sor|>Can't get fucked by endianness if you route the bits one by one
*gets fucked by source synchronous clock instead*<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 31 |
programmingcirclejerk | PL_Design | ijriusx | <|sols|><|sot|>C-Pointers are often all the "generics" I need<|eot|><|sol|>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=32366682<|eol|><|sor|>Everything is bytes type system.<|eor|><|sor|>Bytes are an abstraction. If you want to get as close to the metal as possible, you only work with bare bits. No, my code does not function correctly on architectures with different endianness, why do you ask?<|eor|><|sor|>network order was a big mistake. we got mud on our faces<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 24 |
programmingcirclejerk | marmakoide | ijrvk8q | <|sols|><|sot|>C-Pointers are often all the "generics" I need<|eot|><|sol|>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=32366682<|eol|><|sor|>Structs are overrated, good old arrays is enough<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 23 |
programmingcirclejerk | do_some_fucking_work | iju8rfr | <|sols|><|sot|>C-Pointers are often all the "generics" I need<|eot|><|sol|>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=32366682<|eol|><|sor|>Honestly everything beyond `int` and `void *`was a mistake in my opinion<|eor|><|sor|>floats are just ints packed in a funny way<|eor|><|sor|>Floats are an abstraction that only lead to dangerous runtime bugs. (E.g. floating point errors.) Something so unreliable should never be part of the C standard, and Im disappointed with the Standards Committee for letting it slip in.
Floating point numbers should be represented as a struct with mantissa, exponent, etc. By writing it out explicitly, we can force the programmers to think about what theyre doing and avoid accidental bugs.<|eor|><|sor|>All numbers are floats in javascript and I applaud the decision makers for their consistency.<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 23 |
programmingcirclejerk | clarkcox3 | ijs9k0h | <|sols|><|sot|>C-Pointers are often all the "generics" I need<|eot|><|sol|>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=32366682<|eol|><|sor|>AllI need is a labeled block of data in assembly; types are for the weak<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 19 |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.