subreddit stringclasses 7
values | author stringlengths 3 20 | id stringlengths 5 7 | content stringlengths 67 30.4k | score int64 0 140k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
programmingcirclejerk | aikii | jka2dj7 | <|sols|><|sot|>I love pre-commit, it's amazing and makes my life so much easier and @asottile I appreciate you almost single-handedly maintaining it, but you're very rude.<|eot|><|sol|>https://github.com/pre-commit/pre-commit/issues/2243#issuecomment-1036438838<|eol|><|soopr|>Grab your popcorns and scroll through [pre-commit](https://github.com/pre-commit/pre-commit/) closed issues, it's just .. wow.<|eoopr|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 61 |
programmingcirclejerk | gendermarie | jkalfdl | <|sols|><|sot|>I love pre-commit, it's amazing and makes my life so much easier and @asottile I appreciate you almost single-handedly maintaining it, but you're very rude.<|eot|><|sol|>https://github.com/pre-commit/pre-commit/issues/2243#issuecomment-1036438838<|eol|><|sor|>>because the cargo.toml isn't invalid to begin with?
*nervous laughter*<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 47 |
programmingcirclejerk | mizzu704 | jkcdbo7 | <|sols|><|sot|>I love pre-commit, it's amazing and makes my life so much easier and @asottile I appreciate you almost single-handedly maintaining it, but you're very rude.<|eot|><|sol|>https://github.com/pre-commit/pre-commit/issues/2243#issuecomment-1036438838<|eol|><|soopr|>Grab your popcorns and scroll through [pre-commit](https://github.com/pre-commit/pre-commit/) closed issues, it's just .. wow.<|eoopr|><|sor|>/uj this is how you do open-source<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 40 |
programmingcirclejerk | _Vyvyan | jkcnovq | <|sols|><|sot|>I love pre-commit, it's amazing and makes my life so much easier and @asottile I appreciate you almost single-handedly maintaining it, but you're very rude.<|eot|><|sol|>https://github.com/pre-commit/pre-commit/issues/2243#issuecomment-1036438838<|eol|><|soopr|>Grab your popcorns and scroll through [pre-commit](https://github.com/pre-commit/pre-commit/) closed issues, it's just .. wow.<|eoopr|><|sor|>/uj this is how you do open-source<|eor|><|sor|>/uj truly. this is how you avoid inevitable burnout and a lengthy blogpost about how your work was exploited by The Man. He's not even being mean, just standing his ground.<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 37 |
programmingcirclejerk | pandakekok9 | jkb8oci | <|sols|><|sot|>I love pre-commit, it's amazing and makes my life so much easier and @asottile I appreciate you almost single-handedly maintaining it, but you're very rude.<|eot|><|sol|>https://github.com/pre-commit/pre-commit/issues/2243#issuecomment-1036438838<|eol|><|sor|>> is not compatible with Python 3.10
lol no stable abi<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 32 |
programmingcirclejerk | Foreign-Butterfly-97 | jkcqbdx | <|sols|><|sot|>I love pre-commit, it's amazing and makes my life so much easier and @asottile I appreciate you almost single-handedly maintaining it, but you're very rude.<|eot|><|sol|>https://github.com/pre-commit/pre-commit/issues/2243#issuecomment-1036438838<|eol|><|sor|>> do you have an actual problem you're trying to solve?
> (...) Gentoo (...)
I said **actual** problem.<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 28 |
programmingcirclejerk | Schmittfried | jkchwli | <|sols|><|sot|>I love pre-commit, it's amazing and makes my life so much easier and @asottile I appreciate you almost single-handedly maintaining it, but you're very rude.<|eot|><|sol|>https://github.com/pre-commit/pre-commit/issues/2243#issuecomment-1036438838<|eol|><|soopr|>Grab your popcorns and scroll through [pre-commit](https://github.com/pre-commit/pre-commit/) closed issues, it's just .. wow.<|eoopr|><|sor|>/uj Read several. Cant find the popcorn-worthy stuff.<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 25 |
programmingcirclejerk | starlevel01 | jkcy8fe | <|sols|><|sot|>I love pre-commit, it's amazing and makes my life so much easier and @asottile I appreciate you almost single-handedly maintaining it, but you're very rude.<|eot|><|sol|>https://github.com/pre-commit/pre-commit/issues/2243#issuecomment-1036438838<|eol|><|soopr|>Grab your popcorns and scroll through [pre-commit](https://github.com/pre-commit/pre-commit/) closed issues, it's just .. wow.<|eoopr|><|sor|>/uj this is how you do open-source<|eor|><|sor|>/uj truly. this is how you avoid inevitable burnout and a lengthy blogpost about how your work was exploited by The Man. He's not even being mean, just standing his ground.<|eor|><|sor|>/uj u can stand your ground without being an ass about it.<|eor|><|sor|>0.1xer when someone doesn't talk in Professional Programmer Twitter cadence:<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 18 |
programmingcirclejerk | aikii | jkcdiyw | <|sols|><|sot|>I love pre-commit, it's amazing and makes my life so much easier and @asottile I appreciate you almost single-handedly maintaining it, but you're very rude.<|eot|><|sol|>https://github.com/pre-commit/pre-commit/issues/2243#issuecomment-1036438838<|eol|><|soopr|>Grab your popcorns and scroll through [pre-commit](https://github.com/pre-commit/pre-commit/) closed issues, it's just .. wow.<|eoopr|><|sor|>/uj this is how you do open-source<|eor|><|soopr|>Tyrannical single-maintainer overhyped projects offers the best entertainment <|eoopr|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 11 |
programmingcirclejerk | vedyzal | jkct7wt | <|sols|><|sot|>I love pre-commit, it's amazing and makes my life so much easier and @asottile I appreciate you almost single-handedly maintaining it, but you're very rude.<|eot|><|sol|>https://github.com/pre-commit/pre-commit/issues/2243#issuecomment-1036438838<|eol|><|soopr|>Grab your popcorns and scroll through [pre-commit](https://github.com/pre-commit/pre-commit/) closed issues, it's just .. wow.<|eoopr|><|sor|>/uj this is how you do open-source<|eor|><|sor|>/uj truly. this is how you avoid inevitable burnout and a lengthy blogpost about how your work was exploited by The Man. He's not even being mean, just standing his ground.<|eor|><|sor|>/uj u can stand your ground without being an ass about it.<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 10 |
programmingcirclejerk | matu3ba | jkc1vm1 | <|sols|><|sot|>I love pre-commit, it's amazing and makes my life so much easier and @asottile I appreciate you almost single-handedly maintaining it, but you're very rude.<|eot|><|sol|>https://github.com/pre-commit/pre-commit/issues/2243#issuecomment-1036438838<|eol|><|sor|>> is not compatible with Python 3.10
lol no stable abi<|eor|><|sor|>/uj? Better ask about why there are still broken parts like mini tree printing or readline of pseudo file backed TCP can silently drop your data on timeout.
At least its deterministic in contrast to std::map::emplace of string, object returning the first time true and thereafter false<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 9 |
programmingcirclejerk | tuckmuck203 | jkdfbo1 | <|sols|><|sot|>I love pre-commit, it's amazing and makes my life so much easier and @asottile I appreciate you almost single-handedly maintaining it, but you're very rude.<|eot|><|sol|>https://github.com/pre-commit/pre-commit/issues/2243#issuecomment-1036438838<|eol|><|soopr|>Grab your popcorns and scroll through [pre-commit](https://github.com/pre-commit/pre-commit/) closed issues, it's just .. wow.<|eoopr|><|sor|>/uj this is how you do open-source<|eor|><|sor|>/uj truly. this is how you avoid inevitable burnout and a lengthy blogpost about how your work was exploited by The Man. He's not even being mean, just standing his ground.<|eor|><|sor|>/uj u can stand your ground without being an ass about it.<|eor|><|sor|>Being an ass == being snarky<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 7 |
programmingcirclejerk | Zlodo2 | jkdmefn | <|sols|><|sot|>I love pre-commit, it's amazing and makes my life so much easier and @asottile I appreciate you almost single-handedly maintaining it, but you're very rude.<|eot|><|sol|>https://github.com/pre-commit/pre-commit/issues/2243#issuecomment-1036438838<|eol|><|soopr|>Grab your popcorns and scroll through [pre-commit](https://github.com/pre-commit/pre-commit/) closed issues, it's just .. wow.<|eoopr|><|sor|>I did and saw this:
"BUG: expected environment for python to be healthy immediately after install"
new flair plz<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 6 |
programmingcirclejerk | cheater00 | jkdjb81 | <|sols|><|sot|>I love pre-commit, it's amazing and makes my life so much easier and @asottile I appreciate you almost single-handedly maintaining it, but you're very rude.<|eot|><|sol|>https://github.com/pre-commit/pre-commit/issues/2243#issuecomment-1036438838<|eol|><|soopr|>Grab your popcorns and scroll through [pre-commit](https://github.com/pre-commit/pre-commit/) closed issues, it's just .. wow.<|eoopr|><|sor|>/uj Read several. Cant find the popcorn-worthy stuff.<|eor|><|sor|>yeah OP, where's the jerk??? put up or shut up<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 6 |
programmingcirclejerk | 757DrDuck | z7wwxz | <|sols|><|sot|>Ive come to terms that there is a difference between those who will graduate and go on to be readers of hacker news and write this kind of article, and those who wont.<|eot|><|sol|>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=33787857<|eol|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 133 |
programmingcirclejerk | mach_kernel | iy90stv | <|sols|><|sot|>Ive come to terms that there is a difference between those who will graduate and go on to be readers of hacker news and write this kind of article, and those who wont.<|eot|><|sol|>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=33787857<|eol|><|sor|>> go on to become readers of hacker news
/uj
> go on to irritate the fuck out of everyone during planning meetings by proposing a new architecture for everything because hacker news said so<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 64 |
programmingcirclejerk | alecStewart1 | iy8nhd3 | <|sols|><|sot|>Ive come to terms that there is a difference between those who will graduate and go on to be readers of hacker news and write this kind of article, and those who wont.<|eot|><|sol|>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=33787857<|eol|><|sor|>> But theres also a part of me thats just like, how can you not be curious? How can you write Python for 5 years of your life and never look at a bit of source code and try to understand how it works, why it was designed a certain way, and why a particular file in the repo is there? How can you fit a dozen regressions and not try to understand where those coefficients come from and the linear algebra behind it? I dunno, man.
But theres also a part of me thats just like, how can you not be curious? How can you write Java apps for decades and never look at a bit of source code and try and understand how it works, why it was designed a certain way, and why a particular file in the repo is there? How can you pump out dozens of Spring CRUD apps and not try to understand how the packaged and Lombak annotations work and view the assembly output the Java compiler and the bytecode for the JVM created in order to figure out at the low level how to [better](https://openjdk.org/projects/shenandoah) [optimize](https://openjdk.org/projects/tsan) the JVM warmup time and [functional](https://beyondjava.net/functional-programming-java-performace-impact) [programming](https://openjdk.org/projects/valhalla)? I dunno, man.
Hm? What's that? You don't want your job to also be your hobby? That's 1Xer talk.<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 58 |
programmingcirclejerk | UnicornPrince4U | iy9svky | <|sols|><|sot|>Ive come to terms that there is a difference between those who will graduate and go on to be readers of hacker news and write this kind of article, and those who wont.<|eot|><|sol|>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=33787857<|eol|><|sor|>> But theres also a part of me thats just like, how can you not be curious? How can you write Python for 5 years of your life and never look at a bit of source code and try to understand how it works, why it was designed a certain way, and why a particular file in the repo is there? How can you fit a dozen regressions and not try to understand where those coefficients come from and the linear algebra behind it? I dunno, man.
But theres also a part of me thats just like, how can you not be curious? How can you write Java apps for decades and never look at a bit of source code and try and understand how it works, why it was designed a certain way, and why a particular file in the repo is there? How can you pump out dozens of Spring CRUD apps and not try to understand how the packaged and Lombak annotations work and view the assembly output the Java compiler and the bytecode for the JVM created in order to figure out at the low level how to [better](https://openjdk.org/projects/shenandoah) [optimize](https://openjdk.org/projects/tsan) the JVM warmup time and [functional](https://beyondjava.net/functional-programming-java-performace-impact) [programming](https://openjdk.org/projects/valhalla)? I dunno, man.
Hm? What's that? You don't want your job to also be your hobby? That's 1Xer talk.<|eor|><|sor|>How can you not be curious? How can you just never take a hand mirror and gaze into your own anus?<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 36 |
programmingcirclejerk | CarolineLovesArt | iy9rscg | <|sols|><|sot|>Ive come to terms that there is a difference between those who will graduate and go on to be readers of hacker news and write this kind of article, and those who wont.<|eot|><|sol|>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=33787857<|eol|><|sor|>> go on to become readers of hacker news
/uj
> go on to irritate the fuck out of everyone during planning meetings by proposing a new architecture for everything because hacker news said so<|eor|><|sor|>It's not their fault you didn't learn Rust<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 34 |
programmingcirclejerk | LloydAtkinson | iyax133 | <|sols|><|sot|>Ive come to terms that there is a difference between those who will graduate and go on to be readers of hacker news and write this kind of article, and those who wont.<|eot|><|sol|>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=33787857<|eol|><|sor|>/uj
I mean he isn't wrong. I'm sure we have all had experiences both in formal education and in our day jobs of developers that seem to just blindly cruise through the day, pumping out tech debt and bad code, never questioning or wanting to learn more, going through the motions, copy pasting SO code without understanding it, breaking everything, ignoring warnings and errors, not even attempting to follow any standards or language idioms, just kind of mentally checked out.<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 21 |
programmingcirclejerk | ProfessorSexyTime | iy9w7jo | <|sols|><|sot|>Ive come to terms that there is a difference between those who will graduate and go on to be readers of hacker news and write this kind of article, and those who wont.<|eot|><|sol|>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=33787857<|eol|><|sor|>> But theres also a part of me thats just like, how can you not be curious? How can you write Python for 5 years of your life and never look at a bit of source code and try to understand how it works, why it was designed a certain way, and why a particular file in the repo is there? How can you fit a dozen regressions and not try to understand where those coefficients come from and the linear algebra behind it? I dunno, man.
But theres also a part of me thats just like, how can you not be curious? How can you write Java apps for decades and never look at a bit of source code and try and understand how it works, why it was designed a certain way, and why a particular file in the repo is there? How can you pump out dozens of Spring CRUD apps and not try to understand how the packaged and Lombak annotations work and view the assembly output the Java compiler and the bytecode for the JVM created in order to figure out at the low level how to [better](https://openjdk.org/projects/shenandoah) [optimize](https://openjdk.org/projects/tsan) the JVM warmup time and [functional](https://beyondjava.net/functional-programming-java-performace-impact) [programming](https://openjdk.org/projects/valhalla)? I dunno, man.
Hm? What's that? You don't want your job to also be your hobby? That's 1Xer talk.<|eor|><|sor|>How can you not be curious? How can you just never take a hand mirror and gaze into your own anus?<|eor|><|sor|>Petition to use "anal gazing" in place of "navel gazing."<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 16 |
programmingcirclejerk | BarefootUnicorn | iyafxp0 | <|sols|><|sot|>Ive come to terms that there is a difference between those who will graduate and go on to be readers of hacker news and write this kind of article, and those who wont.<|eot|><|sol|>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=33787857<|eol|><|sor|>I've been writing Python for about 20 years (started with version 2) and have never looked at the source code. Maybe that's why I've been shadowbanned on Hacker News.<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 12 |
programmingcirclejerk | hyperion2011 | iy9kt6y | <|sols|><|sot|>Ive come to terms that there is a difference between those who will graduate and go on to be readers of hacker news and write this kind of article, and those who wont.<|eot|><|sol|>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=33787857<|eol|><|sor|>> But theres also a part of me thats just like, how can you not be curious? How can you write Python for 5 years of your life and never look at a bit of source code and try to understand how it works, why it was designed a certain way, and why a particular file in the repo is there? How can you fit a dozen regressions and not try to understand where those coefficients come from and the linear algebra behind it? I dunno, man.
But theres also a part of me thats just like, how can you not be curious? How can you write Java apps for decades and never look at a bit of source code and try and understand how it works, why it was designed a certain way, and why a particular file in the repo is there? How can you pump out dozens of Spring CRUD apps and not try to understand how the packaged and Lombak annotations work and view the assembly output the Java compiler and the bytecode for the JVM created in order to figure out at the low level how to [better](https://openjdk.org/projects/shenandoah) [optimize](https://openjdk.org/projects/tsan) the JVM warmup time and [functional](https://beyondjava.net/functional-programming-java-performace-impact) [programming](https://openjdk.org/projects/valhalla)? I dunno, man.
Hm? What's that? You don't want your job to also be your hobby? That's 1Xer talk.<|eor|><|sor|>In time honored slashdot tradition:
But theres also a part of me thats just like, how can you not be curious? How can you drive a car for decades and never pop the hood to look at the engine and try and understand how it works, why it was designed a certain way, and why a particular manifold is there?<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 12 |
programmingcirclejerk | sohang-3112 | iycfj7q | <|sols|><|sot|>Ive come to terms that there is a difference between those who will graduate and go on to be readers of hacker news and write this kind of article, and those who wont.<|eot|><|sol|>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=33787857<|eol|><|sor|>/uj
I mean he isn't wrong. I'm sure we have all had experiences both in formal education and in our day jobs of developers that seem to just blindly cruise through the day, pumping out tech debt and bad code, never questioning or wanting to learn more, going through the motions, copy pasting SO code without understanding it, breaking everything, ignoring warnings and errors, not even attempting to follow any standards or language idioms, just kind of mentally checked out.<|eor|><|sor|>/uj
Nothing necessarily wrong with that. IMO for the vast majority of people, their job is something they hate but have to do for the salary - NOT their hobby!<|eor|><|sor|>/uj Its hard for me to accept that there may be people who choose and and stay in this career only for the money. Like, there must be better paying and/or less annoying careers if you dont enjoy programming.<|eor|><|sor|>> there must be better paying and/or less annoying careers
Really?? All things considered, IMO IT, CS / Programming is one of the most highly paid jobs AND vastly easier than many other types of jobs (like Engineers, Doctors, etc.)<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 8 |
programmingcirclejerk | casino_r0yale | iyc3cry | <|sols|><|sot|>Ive come to terms that there is a difference between those who will graduate and go on to be readers of hacker news and write this kind of article, and those who wont.<|eot|><|sol|>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=33787857<|eol|><|sor|>/uj
I mean he isn't wrong. I'm sure we have all had experiences both in formal education and in our day jobs of developers that seem to just blindly cruise through the day, pumping out tech debt and bad code, never questioning or wanting to learn more, going through the motions, copy pasting SO code without understanding it, breaking everything, ignoring warnings and errors, not even attempting to follow any standards or language idioms, just kind of mentally checked out.<|eor|><|sor|>/uj
Yeah I see why this comment would be posted here, but there is a nugget of truth to it. If youre not curious about how something works, I.e just going through the motions with it, it *could* be a sign that you dont really enjoy/appreciate it.
Personality types excepted though, some people just want shit to work and dont care how, thats valid too<|eor|><|sor|>/uj the type of people you describe in your second paragraph are usually incompetent to fix things when they break in non trivial ways<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 6 |
programmingcirclejerk | mexicocitibluez | x1i7hx | <|sols|><|sot|>If someone can't write quicksort, they certainly can't talk to a database or write a ui.<|eot|><|sol|>https://www.reddit.com/r/csharp/comments/x1f2th/c_is_underrated/imdm7um/<|eol|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 133 |
programmingcirclejerk | alecStewart1 | ime139a | <|sols|><|sot|>If someone can't write quicksort, they certainly can't talk to a database or write a ui.<|eot|><|sol|>https://www.reddit.com/r/csharp/comments/x1f2th/c_is_underrated/imdm7um/<|eol|><|sor|>If you don't have every algorithm memorized, how could you possibly develop UIs with Electron?<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 96 |
programmingcirclejerk | Safe_Ask_8798 | ime1xtm | <|sols|><|sot|>If someone can't write quicksort, they certainly can't talk to a database or write a ui.<|eot|><|sol|>https://www.reddit.com/r/csharp/comments/x1f2th/c_is_underrated/imdm7um/<|eol|><|sor|>it's true, after 200 LC hards I'm finally ready to parse a json object<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 70 |
programmingcirclejerk | ProfessorSexyTime | imeixcw | <|sols|><|sot|>If someone can't write quicksort, they certainly can't talk to a database or write a ui.<|eot|><|sol|>https://www.reddit.com/r/csharp/comments/x1f2th/c_is_underrated/imdm7um/<|eol|><|sor|>> How many of us actually need to know this low level stuff in 2022.
Algorithms are low-level now. I can't wait until we progressive to arrays, all kinds, being low level. Unless if by "low-level" they mean "below my pay grade."<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 51 |
programmingcirclejerk | VariationDistinct330 | imdptye | <|sols|><|sot|>If someone can't write quicksort, they certainly can't talk to a database or write a ui.<|eot|><|sol|>https://www.reddit.com/r/csharp/comments/x1f2th/c_is_underrated/imdm7um/<|eol|><|sor|>This is supposed to be a one way mirror, you should either delete that one, or this one<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 37 |
programmingcirclejerk | recycle4science | imeiq3y | <|sols|><|sot|>If someone can't write quicksort, they certainly can't talk to a database or write a ui.<|eot|><|sol|>https://www.reddit.com/r/csharp/comments/x1f2th/c_is_underrated/imdm7um/<|eol|><|sor|>[deleted]<|eor|><|sor|>Does it have to be a _good_ compiler?<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 30 |
programmingcirclejerk | le0rik | imefsyj | <|sols|><|sot|>If someone can't write quicksort, they certainly can't talk to a database or write a ui.<|eot|><|sol|>https://www.reddit.com/r/csharp/comments/x1f2th/c_is_underrated/imdm7um/<|eol|><|sor|>Don't talk to me or my database ever again<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 24 |
programmingcirclejerk | irqlnotdispatchlevel | imfllr1 | <|sols|><|sot|>If someone can't write quicksort, they certainly can't talk to a database or write a ui.<|eot|><|sol|>https://www.reddit.com/r/csharp/comments/x1f2th/c_is_underrated/imdm7um/<|eol|><|sor|>> How many of us actually need to know this low level stuff in 2022.
Algorithms are low-level now. I can't wait until we progressive to arrays, all kinds, being low level. Unless if by "low-level" they mean "below my pay grade."<|eor|><|sor|>We are already there, keep up. Arrays are confusing and not webscale so I use hashmaps with sequential numbers as keys. Bonus points if it's dynamically typed so you can agilely insert a new element with a double for a key if you later decide you want to do so.<|eor|><|sor|>I hope your hashmap is actually a microservice.<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 22 |
programmingcirclejerk | Playful_Ad_7555 | imgg75t | <|sols|><|sot|>If someone can't write quicksort, they certainly can't talk to a database or write a ui.<|eot|><|sol|>https://www.reddit.com/r/csharp/comments/x1f2th/c_is_underrated/imdm7um/<|eol|><|sor|>If you don't have every algorithm memorized, how could you possibly develop UIs with Electron?<|eor|><|sor|>How could anyone make a video game unless theyve done computational geometry for 20 years?<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 21 |
programmingcirclejerk | __JDQ__ | imfizy6 | <|sols|><|sot|>If someone can't write quicksort, they certainly can't talk to a database or write a ui.<|eot|><|sol|>https://www.reddit.com/r/csharp/comments/x1f2th/c_is_underrated/imdm7um/<|eol|><|sor|>it's true, after 200 LC hards I'm finally ready to parse a json object<|eor|><|sor|>Godspeed and good luck!<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 18 |
programmingcirclejerk | another_day_passes | imepbps | <|sols|><|sot|>If someone can't write quicksort, they certainly can't talk to a database or write a ui.<|eot|><|sol|>https://www.reddit.com/r/csharp/comments/x1f2th/c_is_underrated/imdm7um/<|eol|><|sor|>[deleted]<|eor|><|sor|>Does it have to be a _good_ compiler?<|eor|><|sor|>Its fine if you spill variables on the stack.<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 18 |
programmingcirclejerk | irqlnotdispatchlevel | imflxph | <|sols|><|sot|>If someone can't write quicksort, they certainly can't talk to a database or write a ui.<|eot|><|sol|>https://www.reddit.com/r/csharp/comments/x1f2th/c_is_underrated/imdm7um/<|eol|><|sor|>> In practice every problem you will be paid to solve at work is completely new and non trivial.
That's what I don't know quick sort. Every time I need to sort something I invent a new algorithm for sorting. Every array is unique.<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 17 |
programmingcirclejerk | zeGolem83 | imgfski | <|sols|><|sot|>If someone can't write quicksort, they certainly can't talk to a database or write a ui.<|eot|><|sol|>https://www.reddit.com/r/csharp/comments/x1f2th/c_is_underrated/imdm7um/<|eol|><|sor|>[deleted]<|eor|><|sor|>`cat src/* > compiled`
Hey, I did _compile_ your code. What exactly is the problem?
Fine, I can even make you a binary with `xxd` if you want.<|eor|><|sor|>```
tar -cf a.out src/*
```
Or, if you want it with optimizations:
```
tar -czf a.out src/*
```<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 15 |
programmingcirclejerk | tomwhoiscontrary | imequbj | <|sols|><|sot|>If someone can't write quicksort, they certainly can't talk to a database or write a ui.<|eot|><|sol|>https://www.reddit.com/r/csharp/comments/x1f2th/c_is_underrated/imdm7um/<|eol|><|sor|>[deleted]<|eor|><|sor|>Does it have to be a _good_ compiler?<|eor|><|sor|>Its fine if you spill variables on the stack.<|eor|><|sor|>How about to the boot sector?<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 15 |
programmingcirclejerk | freak_dessert2 | ime21qy | <|sols|><|sot|>If someone can't write quicksort, they certainly can't talk to a database or write a ui.<|eot|><|sol|>https://www.reddit.com/r/csharp/comments/x1f2th/c_is_underrated/imdm7um/<|eol|><|sor|>This is supposed to be a one way mirror, you should either delete that one, or this one<|eor|><|sor|>I remember when I didn't realize this, and I got banned. Someone even made a petition in this sub to ban me and everything kek<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 14 |
programmingcirclejerk | Unicorn_Colombo | imfzn7c | <|sols|><|sot|>If someone can't write quicksort, they certainly can't talk to a database or write a ui.<|eot|><|sol|>https://www.reddit.com/r/csharp/comments/x1f2th/c_is_underrated/imdm7um/<|eol|><|sor|>[deleted]<|eor|><|sor|>`cat src/* > compiled`
Hey, I did _compile_ your code. What exactly is the problem?
Fine, I can even make you a binary with `xxd` if you want.<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 13 |
programmingcirclejerk | feral_brick | imhcrcy | <|sols|><|sot|>If someone can't write quicksort, they certainly can't talk to a database or write a ui.<|eot|><|sol|>https://www.reddit.com/r/csharp/comments/x1f2th/c_is_underrated/imdm7um/<|eol|><|sor|>it's true, after 200 LC hards I'm finally ready to parse a json object<|eor|><|sor|>I have a regex for that, I posted it to my PornHub if you'd like to fork it<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 12 |
programmingcirclejerk | recycle4science | imeimsm | <|sols|><|sot|>If someone can't write quicksort, they certainly can't talk to a database or write a ui.<|eot|><|sol|>https://www.reddit.com/r/csharp/comments/x1f2th/c_is_underrated/imdm7um/<|eol|><|sor|>This is supposed to be a one way mirror, you should either delete that one, or this one<|eor|><|sor|>I remember when I didn't realize this, and I got banned. Someone even made a petition in this sub to ban me and everything kek<|eor|><|sor|>Flair checks out.<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 11 |
programmingcirclejerk | martinmine | uiuuqx | <|sols|><|sot|>"Hare leaves _you_ in control of the memory management" - Presentation of the Hare Programming Language<|eot|><|sol|>https://spacepub.space/w/ajS983L4cEG82jiiaTYfXv<|eol|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 136 |
programmingcirclejerk | pythonesqueviper | i7ewead | <|sols|><|sot|>"Hare leaves _you_ in control of the memory management" - Presentation of the Hare Programming Language<|eot|><|sol|>https://spacepub.space/w/ajS983L4cEG82jiiaTYfXv<|eol|><|sor|>As we all know, memory management is easy and bugs related to it are very rare<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 196 |
programmingcirclejerk | xmcqdpt2 | i7f0he6 | <|sols|><|sot|>"Hare leaves _you_ in control of the memory management" - Presentation of the Hare Programming Language<|eot|><|sol|>https://spacepub.space/w/ajS983L4cEG82jiiaTYfXv<|eol|><|sor|>unsafe manual memory management
artisanal DIY memory crafting<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 166 |
programmingcirclejerk | spider-mario | i7gf3d7 | <|sols|><|sot|>"Hare leaves _you_ in control of the memory management" - Presentation of the Hare Programming Language<|eot|><|sol|>https://spacepub.space/w/ajS983L4cEG82jiiaTYfXv<|eol|><|sor|>> Talk begins at 6:10.
They even leave _you_ in control of skipping six minutes of silence that could have been trimmed from the recording.<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 96 |
programmingcirclejerk | OctagonClock | i7fxj3s | <|sols|><|sot|>"Hare leaves _you_ in control of the memory management" - Presentation of the Hare Programming Language<|eot|><|sol|>https://spacepub.space/w/ajS983L4cEG82jiiaTYfXv<|eol|><|sor|>Lol no generics. If err != nil. Syntax highlighting. Our programmers are googlers. Long ago, the four nations lived in harmony. But that all changed when Rob Pike added generics. Only the Rustacean, master of all eight bullet points, could stop him - but when the world needed him most, he vanished. A few weeks passed and Drew DeVault announced a new language, called Hare. And although it's potential is great, it has a lot of CVEs to learn before it's ready to be made fun of. But I believe that Hare can save this subredddit.<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 77 |
programmingcirclejerk | bdingus | i7f778o | <|sols|><|sot|>"Hare leaves _you_ in control of the memory management" - Presentation of the Hare Programming Language<|eot|><|sol|>https://spacepub.space/w/ajS983L4cEG82jiiaTYfXv<|eol|><|sor|>[deleted]<|eor|><|sor|>Oh boy I can't wait to embrace the immense stability of not being able to use any features implemented in the past two years because of Debian users!<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 75 |
programmingcirclejerk | Gaho | i7gkp7s | <|sols|><|sot|>"Hare leaves _you_ in control of the memory management" - Presentation of the Hare Programming Language<|eot|><|sol|>https://spacepub.space/w/ajS983L4cEG82jiiaTYfXv<|eol|><|sor|>At this rate, I think that this sub should become a Platinum Sponsor of the Hare Programming Language for all the quality jerk it is bringing to the masses.
Edit: just jumping around randomly there seems to be some hidden jerk, for instance at 22:39
> Let me check real quick how long it [llvm] takes to build on my machine ... 2 hours 3 minutes was my last build.
>
> And what kind of system do you...
>
> Gentoo !
>
> I mean, what was the hardware?<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 64 |
programmingcirclejerk | winepath | i7fmh9b | <|sols|><|sot|>"Hare leaves _you_ in control of the memory management" - Presentation of the Hare Programming Language<|eot|><|sol|>https://spacepub.space/w/ajS983L4cEG82jiiaTYfXv<|eol|><|sor|>Ddv is delusional. We've known for several decades now that C is perfect and cannot be improved.<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 58 |
programmingcirclejerk | Gobrosse | i7f5859 | <|sols|><|sot|>"Hare leaves _you_ in control of the memory management" - Presentation of the Hare Programming Language<|eot|><|sol|>https://spacepub.space/w/ajS983L4cEG82jiiaTYfXv<|eol|><|sor|>[deleted]<|eor|><|sor|>The author has seen the divine light that graced Blow and Casey before him, and has bravely rejected the twisted teachings of "computer science"<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 34 |
programmingcirclejerk | FreezerWave | i7fic1q | <|sols|><|sot|>"Hare leaves _you_ in control of the memory management" - Presentation of the Hare Programming Language<|eot|><|sol|>https://spacepub.space/w/ajS983L4cEG82jiiaTYfXv<|eol|><|sor|>[deleted]<|eor|><|sor|>Oh boy I can't wait to embrace the immense stability of not being able to use any features implemented in the past two years because of Debian users!<|eor|><|sor|>Debian: the IE6 of software development.<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 30 |
programmingcirclejerk | theangeryemacsshibe | i7j592d | <|sols|><|sot|>"Hare leaves _you_ in control of the memory management" - Presentation of the Hare Programming Language<|eot|><|sol|>https://spacepub.space/w/ajS983L4cEG82jiiaTYfXv<|eol|><|sor|>1:11:48: "We don't support threading at all. We don't like parallelism in userspace"<|eor|><|sor|>I always liked to only use 1/12 of my CPU<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 28 |
programmingcirclejerk | tomwhoiscontrary | i7g0wor | <|sols|><|sot|>"Hare leaves _you_ in control of the memory management" - Presentation of the Hare Programming Language<|eot|><|sol|>https://spacepub.space/w/ajS983L4cEG82jiiaTYfXv<|eol|><|sor|>[deleted]<|eor|><|sor|>Oh boy I can't wait to embrace the immense stability of not being able to use any features implemented in the past two years because of Debian users!<|eor|><|sor|>What do you mean? Debian provides many exciting and unknown new features as tantalising [mystery meat](https://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/jdk8u-dev/2019-May/009330.html).<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 28 |
programmingcirclejerk | SirNuke | i7gupyu | <|sols|><|sot|>"Hare leaves _you_ in control of the memory management" - Presentation of the Hare Programming Language<|eot|><|sol|>https://spacepub.space/w/ajS983L4cEG82jiiaTYfXv<|eol|><|sor|>[deleted]<|eor|><|sor|>Oh boy I can't wait to embrace the immense stability of not being able to use any features implemented in the past two years because of Debian users!<|eor|><|sor|>What do you mean? Debian provides many exciting and unknown new features as tantalising [mystery meat](https://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/jdk8u-dev/2019-May/009330.html).<|eor|><|sor|> $ ar x unjerk_2.5-1_amd64.deb
$ cat debian-binary
Some people say software development isn't engineering because it doesn't have the processes and knowledge to reliably build software. That's not accurate. Software development isn't engineering because the whole field happily lets bridges collapse over and over and over again even when we know how to avoid it.
And this isn't on Debian. In 2019 OpenJDK had no idea who was making the official OpenJDK Docker images? [It had their branding and the words 'official'](https://web.archive.org/web/20181212033844/https://hub.docker.com/_/openjdk/) and I'm not sure whether to blame Docker for marking their unofficial efforts as official or OpenJDK for not noticing or caring.
Actually maybe this is on Debian because they resist project branding restrictions that prevent this sort of stunt.
$ ^D
A programming language that lets users manually manage memory? About time!<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 23 |
programmingcirclejerk | Resident_Clue_5627 | i7h6aa3 | <|sols|><|sot|>"Hare leaves _you_ in control of the memory management" - Presentation of the Hare Programming Language<|eot|><|sol|>https://spacepub.space/w/ajS983L4cEG82jiiaTYfXv<|eol|><|sor|>Hare applications are really unpredictable. Even in the simplest of functions, can memory errors occur out of nowhere, and a 1.5-month fully loaded client catastrophe, heading straight from the highly-stressed CEO's mouth, be placed right on your team's tickets in the next moment.
I was doing laundry in my basement, and I tripped over a DDR4 that wasn't there the moment before. I looked down: "Memory Error? WTF?" and then I saw SSD's underneath and heard the spinning.
Blinding benchmark speed. I dumped my wife's pants, unfolded, and dove behind the coffee machine. It was a floating-point rounding error, headed straight towards the repository of the continously integrated, continously deployed server (DevOps). Majestic as hell: 75K RPS, 6 cores, distributed power: 4 SATA's reading, and 2 NVMe's writing, all for one build. Whole ticket log looked like a waterfall for a couple of hours!
Fact is, there is no way to discern whether the application has a memory error, so you really have to be watchful. If only there were some way of knowing the footguns Hare applications use; maybe some sort of compiler check, like red error messages screaming out the lines of potentially unsafe code. You could look for memory errors when you encounter the dereferenced pointer in the third function, and avoid these sorts of collisions. But such a measure would be extremely expensive. And how would one enforce a rule keeping the Hare developers within those constraints?
A big hole in homeland security is software engineer screening and hijacking prevention. There is nothing to stop a rogue engineer, or an ISIS terrorist, from building a Hare application on the Pentagon, the White House or the Statue of Liberty servers, and our government has done fuck-all to prevent it.<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 22 |
programmingcirclejerk | Reddit1396 | i7h7452 | <|sols|><|sot|>"Hare leaves _you_ in control of the memory management" - Presentation of the Hare Programming Language<|eot|><|sol|>https://spacepub.space/w/ajS983L4cEG82jiiaTYfXv<|eol|><|sor|>At this rate, I think that this sub should become a Platinum Sponsor of the Hare Programming Language for all the quality jerk it is bringing to the masses.
Edit: just jumping around randomly there seems to be some hidden jerk, for instance at 22:39
> Let me check real quick how long it [llvm] takes to build on my machine ... 2 hours 3 minutes was my last build.
>
> And what kind of system do you...
>
> Gentoo !
>
> I mean, what was the hardware?<|eor|><|sor|>> oh, uh... [Thinkpad A485](https://www.notebookcheck.net/Lenovo-ThinkPad-A485-Ryzen-5-Pro-Laptop-Review.334528.0.html#4776484-2)... with AMD processor..
Just like every /g/entoo power user genius. Drew should feel honored to have him in the audience.<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 21 |
programmingcirclejerk | jamil333 | i7ip7cx | <|sols|><|sot|>"Hare leaves _you_ in control of the memory management" - Presentation of the Hare Programming Language<|eot|><|sol|>https://spacepub.space/w/ajS983L4cEG82jiiaTYfXv<|eol|><|sor|>1:11:48: "We don't support threading at all. We don't like parallelism in userspace"<|eor|><|sor|>What the actual fuck<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 20 |
programmingcirclejerk | cmov | tfkc86 | <|sols|><|sot|>I don't consider those kinds of people [who have never heard of fuzzing] engineers at all. They're people who have learned a syntax, some patterns and, thanks to their human brain, can adopt it slightly to certain situations. But they're not engineers. What you've described are skilled labourers.<|eot|><|sol|>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=30693384<|eol|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 135 |
programmingcirclejerk | crowbarous | i0woyjm | <|sols|><|sot|>I don't consider those kinds of people [who have never heard of fuzzing] engineers at all. They're people who have learned a syntax, some patterns and, thanks to their human brain, can adopt it slightly to certain situations. But they're not engineers. What you've described are skilled labourers.<|eot|><|sol|>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=30693384<|eol|><|sor|>Everything I currently understand is trivial and should be required knowledge. Everything I don't understand is unnecessary and academic wankery.<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 177 |
programmingcirclejerk | cmov | i0weieo | <|sols|><|sot|>I don't consider those kinds of people [who have never heard of fuzzing] engineers at all. They're people who have learned a syntax, some patterns and, thanks to their human brain, can adopt it slightly to certain situations. But they're not engineers. What you've described are skilled labourers.<|eot|><|sol|>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=30693384<|eol|><|soopr|>I don't consider those kinds of people [who write Go] engineers at all. They're people who have learned a syntax, some patterns and, thanks to their human brain, can adopt it slightly to certain situations. But they're not engineers. What you've described are skilled labourers.<|eoopr|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 98 |
programmingcirclejerk | Erelde | i0wyrdg | <|sols|><|sot|>I don't consider those kinds of people [who have never heard of fuzzing] engineers at all. They're people who have learned a syntax, some patterns and, thanks to their human brain, can adopt it slightly to certain situations. But they're not engineers. What you've described are skilled labourers.<|eot|><|sol|>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=30693384<|eol|><|sor|>Everything I currently understand is trivial and should be required knowledge. Everything I don't understand is unnecessary and academic wankery.<|eor|><|sor|>The monadic conundrum<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 46 |
programmingcirclejerk | Goheeca | i0wcetk | <|sols|><|sot|>I don't consider those kinds of people [who have never heard of fuzzing] engineers at all. They're people who have learned a syntax, some patterns and, thanks to their human brain, can adopt it slightly to certain situations. But they're not engineers. What you've described are skilled labourers.<|eot|><|sol|>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=30693384<|eol|><|sor|>> I'm harsh with my judgement because I believe our industry has a lot of "statically minded" individuals who stay in their lane, never going outside their boxes
Exactly, you can't effectively change your mind to a Neanderthalic one without `update-instance-for-different-class`.<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 43 |
programmingcirclejerk | ProfessorSexyTime | i0wemjd | <|sols|><|sot|>I don't consider those kinds of people [who have never heard of fuzzing] engineers at all. They're people who have learned a syntax, some patterns and, thanks to their human brain, can adopt it slightly to certain situations. But they're not engineers. What you've described are skilled labourers.<|eot|><|sol|>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=30693384<|eol|><|sor|>I've heard of fuzzing so therefore I'm an engineer and I have grounds to tell my employer they need to bump up my pay since I'm now qualified to be an engineer.<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 40 |
programmingcirclejerk | pareidolist | i0wb1ce | <|sols|><|sot|>I don't consider those kinds of people [who have never heard of fuzzing] engineers at all. They're people who have learned a syntax, some patterns and, thanks to their human brain, can adopt it slightly to certain situations. But they're not engineers. What you've described are skilled labourers.<|eot|><|sol|>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=30693384<|eol|><|sor|>Where's the lie.<|eor|><|sor|>> skilled<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 37 |
programmingcirclejerk | lampshadish2 | i0wfpm5 | <|sols|><|sot|>I don't consider those kinds of people [who have never heard of fuzzing] engineers at all. They're people who have learned a syntax, some patterns and, thanks to their human brain, can adopt it slightly to certain situations. But they're not engineers. What you've described are skilled labourers.<|eot|><|sol|>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=30693384<|eol|><|sor|>He considers them people? This is how standards drop in this industry. Bs hire Cs.<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 33 |
programmingcirclejerk | reddit_pls_fix | i0wtufg | <|sols|><|sot|>I don't consider those kinds of people [who have never heard of fuzzing] engineers at all. They're people who have learned a syntax, some patterns and, thanks to their human brain, can adopt it slightly to certain situations. But they're not engineers. What you've described are skilled labourers.<|eot|><|sol|>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=30693384<|eol|><|sor|>The key point here is our programmers are skilled labourers, theyre not engineers. Theyre typically, fairly young, fresh out of school, probably learned Java, maybe learned C or C++, probably learned Python. Theyre not capable of understanding a brilliant language but we want to use them to build good software. So, the language that we give them has to be easy for them to understand and easy to adopt.<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 33 |
programmingcirclejerk | Karyo_Ten | i0xi2e7 | <|sols|><|sot|>I don't consider those kinds of people [who have never heard of fuzzing] engineers at all. They're people who have learned a syntax, some patterns and, thanks to their human brain, can adopt it slightly to certain situations. But they're not engineers. What you've described are skilled labourers.<|eot|><|sol|>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=30693384<|eol|><|soopr|>I don't consider those kinds of people [who write Go] engineers at all. They're people who have learned a syntax, some patterns and, thanks to their human brain, can adopt it slightly to certain situations. But they're not engineers. What you've described are skilled labourers.<|eoopr|><|sor|>One pasta to rule them all and in spaghetti code bind them.<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 28 |
programmingcirclejerk | defunkydrummer | i0wxiqh | <|sols|><|sot|>I don't consider those kinds of people [who have never heard of fuzzing] engineers at all. They're people who have learned a syntax, some patterns and, thanks to their human brain, can adopt it slightly to certain situations. But they're not engineers. What you've described are skilled labourers.<|eot|><|sol|>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=30693384<|eol|><|sor|>I've heard of fuzzing so therefore I'm an engineer and I have grounds to tell my employer they need to bump up my pay since I'm now qualified to be an engineer.<|eor|><|sor|>Any CTO worth his/her salt would bump your pay after finding out your PCJ flair and karma level, both of which scream "100xer" with formidable acoustic impact.<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 28 |
programmingcirclejerk | ProfessorSexyTime | i0x4b49 | <|sols|><|sot|>I don't consider those kinds of people [who have never heard of fuzzing] engineers at all. They're people who have learned a syntax, some patterns and, thanks to their human brain, can adopt it slightly to certain situations. But they're not engineers. What you've described are skilled labourers.<|eot|><|sol|>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=30693384<|eol|><|sor|>I've heard of fuzzing so therefore I'm an engineer and I have grounds to tell my employer they need to bump up my pay since I'm now qualified to be an engineer.<|eor|><|sor|>Any CTO worth his/her salt would bump your pay after finding out your PCJ flair and karma level, both of which scream "100xer" with formidable acoustic impact.<|eor|><|sor|>> both of which scream "100xer" with formidable ~~acoustic~~ autistic impact.<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 22 |
programmingcirclejerk | VinceMiguel | i0ygdpe | <|sols|><|sot|>I don't consider those kinds of people [who have never heard of fuzzing] engineers at all. They're people who have learned a syntax, some patterns and, thanks to their human brain, can adopt it slightly to certain situations. But they're not engineers. What you've described are skilled labourers.<|eot|><|sol|>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=30693384<|eol|><|soopr|>I don't consider those kinds of people [who write Go] engineers at all. They're people who have learned a syntax, some patterns and, thanks to their human brain, can adopt it slightly to certain situations. But they're not engineers. What you've described are skilled labourers.<|eoopr|><|sor|>It's funny because it's true.<|eor|><|sor|>> who write Go
> skilled labourers
Where's the truth?<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 15 |
programmingcirclejerk | ilikeguitarsandsuch | i0wavu1 | <|sols|><|sot|>I don't consider those kinds of people [who have never heard of fuzzing] engineers at all. They're people who have learned a syntax, some patterns and, thanks to their human brain, can adopt it slightly to certain situations. But they're not engineers. What you've described are skilled labourers.<|eot|><|sol|>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=30693384<|eol|><|sor|>Where's the lie.<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 12 |
programmingcirclejerk | defunkydrummer | i0wdbhr | <|sols|><|sot|>I don't consider those kinds of people [who have never heard of fuzzing] engineers at all. They're people who have learned a syntax, some patterns and, thanks to their human brain, can adopt it slightly to certain situations. But they're not engineers. What you've described are skilled labourers.<|eot|><|sol|>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=30693384<|eol|><|sor|>Where's the jerk?<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 11 |
programmingcirclejerk | AccurateCandidate | i0xscxy | <|sols|><|sot|>I don't consider those kinds of people [who have never heard of fuzzing] engineers at all. They're people who have learned a syntax, some patterns and, thanks to their human brain, can adopt it slightly to certain situations. But they're not engineers. What you've described are skilled labourers.<|eot|><|sol|>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=30693384<|eol|><|sor|>Everything I currently understand is trivial and should be required knowledge. Everything I don't understand is unnecessary and academic wankery.<|eor|><|sor|>Anyway, why should I care about environment variables?<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 11 |
programmingcirclejerk | voidvector | i0ykf6c | <|sols|><|sot|>I don't consider those kinds of people [who have never heard of fuzzing] engineers at all. They're people who have learned a syntax, some patterns and, thanks to their human brain, can adopt it slightly to certain situations. But they're not engineers. What you've described are skilled labourers.<|eot|><|sol|>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=30693384<|eol|><|sor|>Everything I currently understand is trivial and should be required knowledge. Everything I don't understand is unnecessary and academic wankery.<|eor|><|sor|>For optimal circlejerking, you need to backup your statement with concrete examples (e.g. generics, fearless concurrency)<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 10 |
programmingcirclejerk | Karyo_Ten | i0xj1cl | <|sols|><|sot|>I don't consider those kinds of people [who have never heard of fuzzing] engineers at all. They're people who have learned a syntax, some patterns and, thanks to their human brain, can adopt it slightly to certain situations. But they're not engineers. What you've described are skilled labourers.<|eot|><|sol|>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=30693384<|eol|><|sor|>Only true engineers use afl-gcc, the skilled wage slaves are still stuck with GCC.<|eor|><|sor|>Let me interject for a moment, what you are referring to as afl-gcc, is in fact GNU/afl-gcc, or as I've recently taken to calling it GNU+AFL+GCC. AFL+GCC is not a fuzzer onto itself. Adding the GNU moniker isn't just cosmetic, it's a whole upgrade to the ultimate fuzzer stage of evolution, the confuzzer.<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 10 |
programmingcirclejerk | babuloseo | i0x382n | <|sols|><|sot|>I don't consider those kinds of people [who have never heard of fuzzing] engineers at all. They're people who have learned a syntax, some patterns and, thanks to their human brain, can adopt it slightly to certain situations. But they're not engineers. What you've described are skilled labourers.<|eot|><|sol|>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=30693384<|eol|><|sor|>The key point here is our programmers are skilled labourers, theyre not engineers. Theyre typically, fairly young, fresh out of school, probably learned Java, maybe learned C or C++, probably learned Python. Theyre not capable of understanding a brilliant language but we want to use them to build good software. So, the language that we give them has to be easy for them to understand and easy to adopt.<|eor|><|sor|>The key point here is our programmers are skilled labourers, theyre not engineers. Theyre typically, fairly young, fresh out of school, probably learned Java, maybe learned C or C++, probably learned Python. Theyre not capable of understanding a brilliant language but we want to use them to build good software. So, the language that we give them has to be easy for them to understand and easy to adopt.<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 8 |
programmingcirclejerk | Shorttail0 | i0xb1m5 | <|sols|><|sot|>I don't consider those kinds of people [who have never heard of fuzzing] engineers at all. They're people who have learned a syntax, some patterns and, thanks to their human brain, can adopt it slightly to certain situations. But they're not engineers. What you've described are skilled labourers.<|eot|><|sol|>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=30693384<|eol|><|sor|>I consider reading hn fuzzing<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 7 |
programmingcirclejerk | ProgrammersAreSexy | i0xi1yj | <|sols|><|sot|>I don't consider those kinds of people [who have never heard of fuzzing] engineers at all. They're people who have learned a syntax, some patterns and, thanks to their human brain, can adopt it slightly to certain situations. But they're not engineers. What you've described are skilled labourers.<|eot|><|sol|>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=30693384<|eol|><|sor|>Mods can we get a skilled labourer flair<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 7 |
loljs | Nwallins | 4bkatr | <|sols|><|sot|>An 11 line npm package called left-pad with only 10 stars on github was unpublished...it broke some of the most important packages on all of npm.<|eot|><|sol|>https://np.reddit.com/r/programming/comments/4bjss2/an_11_line_npm_package_called_leftpad_with_only/<|eol|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 48 |
loljs | jmcs | d1arept | <|sols|><|sot|>An 11 line npm package called left-pad with only 10 stars on github was unpublished...it broke some of the most important packages on all of npm.<|eot|><|sol|>https://np.reddit.com/r/programming/comments/4bjss2/an_11_line_npm_package_called_leftpad_with_only/<|eol|><|sor|>Because you need a package to pad a string. <|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 9 |
loljs | Nwallins | d1bepse | <|sols|><|sot|>An 11 line npm package called left-pad with only 10 stars on github was unpublished...it broke some of the most important packages on all of npm.<|eot|><|sol|>https://np.reddit.com/r/programming/comments/4bjss2/an_11_line_npm_package_called_leftpad_with_only/<|eol|><|soopr|>http://www.haneycodes.net/npm-left-pad-have-we-forgotten-how-to-program/<|eoopr|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 6 |
loljs | Takeoded | 53lgfs | <|sols|><|sot|>good parts of javascript in perspective<|eot|><|sol|>http://i.imgur.com/wR3ZxfB.jpg<|eol|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 40 |
loljs | hunyeti | dbwkqvf | <|sols|><|sot|>good parts of javascript in perspective<|eot|><|sol|>http://i.imgur.com/wR3ZxfB.jpg<|eol|><|sor|>To be honest, it's a very verbose book, full of anecdotes, and not much real technical content.
No, not the definitive guide, but the other book "The Good Parts"<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 16 |
loljs | hurenkind5 | 42ux0q | <|sols|><|sot|>"Want to speed up `npm install`? Disable the progress bar for a massive speed boost"<|eot|><|sol|>https://twitter.com/gavinjoyce/status/691783314261331969<|eol|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 39 |
loljs | Vogtinator | 565rpa | <|sols|><|sot|>HTMLMediaElement.canPlayType() returns one of ["probably", "maybe", ""]<|eot|><|sol|>https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/API/HTMLMediaElement/canPlayType<|eol|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 36 |
loljs | Vogtinator | d8gq5mm | <|sols|><|sot|>HTMLMediaElement.canPlayType() returns one of ["probably", "maybe", ""]<|eot|><|sol|>https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/API/HTMLMediaElement/canPlayType<|eol|><|soopr|>I wonder why they chose "" instead of "definitely not" if they like the expressiveness...<|eoopr|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 11 |
loljs | Drainedsoul | d8gubrv | <|sols|><|sot|>HTMLMediaElement.canPlayType() returns one of ["probably", "maybe", ""]<|eot|><|sol|>https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/API/HTMLMediaElement/canPlayType<|eol|><|soopr|>I wonder why they chose "" instead of "definitely not" if they like the expressiveness...<|eoopr|><|sor|>"definitely not" isn't falsey. <|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 8 |
loljs | Vortico | d8hctys | <|sols|><|sot|>HTMLMediaElement.canPlayType() returns one of ["probably", "maybe", ""]<|eot|><|sol|>https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/API/HTMLMediaElement/canPlayType<|eol|><|soopr|>I wonder why they chose "" instead of "definitely not" if they like the expressiveness...<|eoopr|><|sor|>"definitely not" isn't falsey. <|eor|><|sor|>They should fix that by adding that particular string to the Javascript standard so that !!"definitely not" returns false.<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 8 |
loljs | pxpxy | d8gu1e2 | <|sols|><|sot|>HTMLMediaElement.canPlayType() returns one of ["probably", "maybe", ""]<|eot|><|sol|>https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/API/HTMLMediaElement/canPlayType<|eol|><|sor|>This is the best thing I have seen all day!<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 7 |
loljs | ThisIs_MyName | ddpbz8o | <|sols|><|sot|>HTMLMediaElement.canPlayType() returns one of ["probably", "maybe", ""]<|eot|><|sol|>https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/API/HTMLMediaElement/canPlayType<|eol|><|sor|>is this real or an april fools joke released early?<|eor|><|sor|>You must be new to web development. <|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 5 |
loljs | KeinBaum | 8sud99 | <|soss|><|sot|>[] == ![]<|eot|><|sost|><|eost|><|eoss|><|endoftext|> | 36 |
loljs | BoltKey | e12j056 | <|soss|><|sot|>[] == ![]<|eot|><|sost|><|eost|><|sor|>I did not solve this one and had to look at the docs. What happens is this:
[] == ![]
[] == false
Number([]) == false
0 == false
Boolean(0) == false
false == false
true
http://www.ecma-international.org/ecma-262/5.1/#sec-11.9.3<|eor|><|eoss|><|endoftext|> | 28 |
loljs | himdel | e7jg2uq | <|soss|><|sot|>[] == ![]<|eot|><|sost|><|eost|><|sor|>Hamlet: "To be, or not to be"
Javascript: "Uhh, what's the difference?"<|eor|><|eoss|><|endoftext|> | 5 |
loljs | hurenkind5 | 58iu99 | <|sols|><|sot|>Github is down? 1 + 2 = 404<|eot|><|sol|>https://twitter.com/ckolderup/status/789002880246177792<|eol|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 32 |
loljs | MazeChaZer | 6ggvql | <|soss|><|sot|>Should acronyms be spelled all caps or camel case? XMLHttpRequest: Why not both?<|eot|><|sost|><|eost|><|eoss|><|endoftext|> | 30 |
loljs | kenman | diqirte | <|soss|><|sot|>Should acronyms be spelled all caps or camel case? XMLHttpRequest: Why not both?<|eot|><|sost|><|eost|><|sor|>[deleted]<|eor|><|sor|>As is HTTP...<|eor|><|eoss|><|endoftext|> | 21 |
loljs | Vortico | diq6khs | <|soss|><|sot|>Should acronyms be spelled all caps or camel case? XMLHttpRequest: Why not both?<|eot|><|sost|><|eost|><|sor|>Blame it on Microsoft, not Javascript.<|eor|><|eoss|><|endoftext|> | 13 |
loljs | senntenial | dir2gxx | <|soss|><|sot|>Should acronyms be spelled all caps or camel case? XMLHttpRequest: Why not both?<|eot|><|sost|><|eost|><|sor|>Blame it on Microsoft, not Javascript.<|eor|><|sor|>Why not blame both<|eor|><|eoss|><|endoftext|> | 13 |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.