subreddit stringclasses 7
values | author stringlengths 3 20 | id stringlengths 5 7 | content stringlengths 67 30.4k | score int64 0 140k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
programmingcirclejerk | MurphLinear712 | guz0n1a | <|sols|><|sot|>A computer scientist in theory should be able to design a programming language such as Python which you use. So keep that in mind <|eot|><|sol|>https://twitter.com/sansPanicDev/status/1383104319839428609?s=19<|eol|><|sor|>STOP CALLING ME A FUCKING CODER OR PROGRAMMER SHOW ME SOME RESPECT AND CALL ME BY M... | 31 |
programmingcirclejerk | avinassh | guyyfw7 | <|sols|><|sot|>A computer scientist in theory should be able to design a programming language such as Python which you use. So keep that in mind <|eot|><|sol|>https://twitter.com/sansPanicDev/status/1383104319839428609?s=19<|eol|><|sor|>[deleted]<|eor|><|sor|>> I mean "software engineer" is just a title and whatever co... | 24 |
programmingcirclejerk | xmcqdpt2 | guypkdv | <|sols|><|sot|>A computer scientist in theory should be able to design a programming language such as Python which you use. So keep that in mind <|eot|><|sol|>https://twitter.com/sansPanicDev/status/1383104319839428609?s=19<|eol|><|sor|>canada professional societies: where is the jerk?
https://www.peo.on.ca/public-pro... | 23 |
programmingcirclejerk | categorical-girl | guycid3 | <|sols|><|sot|>A computer scientist in theory should be able to design a programming language such as Python which you use. So keep that in mind <|eot|><|sol|>https://twitter.com/sansPanicDev/status/1383104319839428609?s=19<|eol|><|sor|>/uj
Holy crap is LinkedIn a toxic slum.<|eor|><|sor|>Either you die an underapprec... | 23 |
programmingcirclejerk | TheGidbinn | guya4pf | <|sols|><|sot|>A computer scientist in theory should be able to design a programming language such as Python which you use. So keep that in mind <|eot|><|sol|>https://twitter.com/sansPanicDev/status/1383104319839428609?s=19<|eol|><|sor|>as a code artisan i don't rate software engineers in the same way i don't rate regu... | 22 |
programmingcirclejerk | sierramikeromeo | guyhzsv | <|sols|><|sot|>A computer scientist in theory should be able to design a programming language such as Python which you use. So keep that in mind <|eot|><|sol|>https://twitter.com/sansPanicDev/status/1383104319839428609?s=19<|eol|><|sor|>Nobody that decides to use indents for scoping deserves the title of a software eng... | 17 |
programmingcirclejerk | fp_weenie | k3h6lw | <|sols|><|sot|>For many of us, switching from a Java-like language to a Haskell-like language was a profound experience, causing us to convert to the Functional Programming religion and to travel the land, singing its praises and extolling its virtues<|eot|><|sol|>https://www.reddit.com/r/haskell/comments/k36yp5/does_f... | 134 |
programmingcirclejerk | MisterOfScience | ge33wf4 | <|sols|><|sot|>For many of us, switching from a Java-like language to a Haskell-like language was a profound experience, causing us to convert to the Functional Programming religion and to travel the land, singing its praises and extolling its virtues<|eot|><|sol|>https://www.reddit.com/r/haskell/comments/k36yp5/does_f... | 79 |
programmingcirclejerk | Adolora | ge39hcw | <|sols|><|sot|>For many of us, switching from a Java-like language to a Haskell-like language was a profound experience, causing us to convert to the Functional Programming religion and to travel the land, singing its praises and extolling its virtues<|eot|><|sol|>https://www.reddit.com/r/haskell/comments/k36yp5/does_f... | 60 |
programmingcirclejerk | BlueMarble007 | ge38g3o | <|sols|><|sot|>For many of us, switching from a Java-like language to a Haskell-like language was a profound experience, causing us to convert to the Functional Programming religion and to travel the land, singing its praises and extolling its virtues<|eot|><|sol|>https://www.reddit.com/r/haskell/comments/k36yp5/does_f... | 34 |
programmingcirclejerk | BlueMarble007 | ge3g4yc | <|sols|><|sot|>For many of us, switching from a Java-like language to a Haskell-like language was a profound experience, causing us to convert to the Functional Programming religion and to travel the land, singing its praises and extolling its virtues<|eot|><|sol|>https://www.reddit.com/r/haskell/comments/k36yp5/does_f... | 20 |
programmingcirclejerk | fp_weenie | ge3aua7 | <|sols|><|sot|>For many of us, switching from a Java-like language to a Haskell-like language was a profound experience, causing us to convert to the Functional Programming religion and to travel the land, singing its praises and extolling its virtues<|eot|><|sol|>https://www.reddit.com/r/haskell/comments/k36yp5/does_f... | 19 |
programmingcirclejerk | fp_weenie | ge3at3a | <|sols|><|sot|>For many of us, switching from a Java-like language to a Haskell-like language was a profound experience, causing us to convert to the Functional Programming religion and to travel the land, singing its praises and extolling its virtues<|eot|><|sol|>https://www.reddit.com/r/haskell/comments/k36yp5/does_f... | 19 |
programmingcirclejerk | ProgVal | ge52cpd | <|sols|><|sot|>For many of us, switching from a Java-like language to a Haskell-like language was a profound experience, causing us to convert to the Functional Programming religion and to travel the land, singing its praises and extolling its virtues<|eot|><|sol|>https://www.reddit.com/r/haskell/comments/k36yp5/does_f... | 16 |
programmingcirclejerk | Jumpy-Locksmith6812 | ge4cq9l | <|sols|><|sot|>For many of us, switching from a Java-like language to a Haskell-like language was a profound experience, causing us to convert to the Functional Programming religion and to travel the land, singing its praises and extolling its virtues<|eot|><|sol|>https://www.reddit.com/r/haskell/comments/k36yp5/does_f... | 14 |
programmingcirclejerk | HINDBRAIN | ge4wuh8 | <|sols|><|sot|>For many of us, switching from a Java-like language to a Haskell-like language was a profound experience, causing us to convert to the Functional Programming religion and to travel the land, singing its praises and extolling its virtues<|eot|><|sol|>https://www.reddit.com/r/haskell/comments/k36yp5/does_f... | 13 |
programmingcirclejerk | csb06 | ge4jj93 | <|sols|><|sot|>For many of us, switching from a Java-like language to a Haskell-like language was a profound experience, causing us to convert to the Functional Programming religion and to travel the land, singing its praises and extolling its virtues<|eot|><|sol|>https://www.reddit.com/r/haskell/comments/k36yp5/does_f... | 12 |
programmingcirclejerk | Uberhipster | ge4vfjh | <|sols|><|sot|>For many of us, switching from a Java-like language to a Haskell-like language was a profound experience, causing us to convert to the Functional Programming religion and to travel the land, singing its praises and extolling its virtues<|eot|><|sol|>https://www.reddit.com/r/haskell/comments/k36yp5/does_f... | 8 |
programmingcirclejerk | Jumpy-Locksmith6812 | ge4d6p4 | <|sols|><|sot|>For many of us, switching from a Java-like language to a Haskell-like language was a profound experience, causing us to convert to the Functional Programming religion and to travel the land, singing its praises and extolling its virtues<|eot|><|sol|>https://www.reddit.com/r/haskell/comments/k36yp5/does_f... | 8 |
programmingcirclejerk | jfb1337 | ge5rvv4 | <|sols|><|sot|>For many of us, switching from a Java-like language to a Haskell-like language was a profound experience, causing us to convert to the Functional Programming religion and to travel the land, singing its praises and extolling its virtues<|eot|><|sol|>https://www.reddit.com/r/haskell/comments/k36yp5/does_f... | 7 |
programmingcirclejerk | Busti | ge9em2l | <|sols|><|sot|>For many of us, switching from a Java-like language to a Haskell-like language was a profound experience, causing us to convert to the Functional Programming religion and to travel the land, singing its praises and extolling its virtues<|eot|><|sol|>https://www.reddit.com/r/haskell/comments/k36yp5/does_f... | 7 |
programmingcirclejerk | nmarshall23 | ge4hsfm | <|sols|><|sot|>For many of us, switching from a Java-like language to a Haskell-like language was a profound experience, causing us to convert to the Functional Programming religion and to travel the land, singing its praises and extolling its virtues<|eot|><|sol|>https://www.reddit.com/r/haskell/comments/k36yp5/does_f... | 6 |
programmingcirclejerk | hexane360 | ge3z4uz | <|sols|><|sot|>For many of us, switching from a Java-like language to a Haskell-like language was a profound experience, causing us to convert to the Functional Programming religion and to travel the land, singing its praises and extolling its virtues<|eot|><|sol|>https://www.reddit.com/r/haskell/comments/k36yp5/does_f... | 6 |
programmingcirclejerk | tnbd | ju1gwe | <|sols|><|sot|>Ask HN: What is the most Pythonic spoken language?<|eot|><|sol|>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=25090224<|eol|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 133 |
programmingcirclejerk | tesch34 | gc8zxjb | <|sols|><|sot|>Ask HN: What is the most Pythonic spoken language?<|eot|><|sol|>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=25090224<|eol|><|sor|>> I dont know. But I will tell you that my native language (Spanish) is probably C++.
you can feed this sub for a year with the comments in this thread<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 106 |
programmingcirclejerk | ProfessorSexyTime | gc9ao8u | <|sols|><|sot|>Ask HN: What is the most Pythonic spoken language?<|eot|><|sol|>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=25090224<|eol|><|sor|>Next week on Ask HN: What is the most Pythonic sex position?<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 86 |
programmingcirclejerk | muntaxitome | gca8u86 | <|sols|><|sot|>Ask HN: What is the most Pythonic spoken language?<|eot|><|sol|>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=25090224<|eol|><|sor|>Ok given the keywords in these languages such as 'for', 'while', 'import', I would go with:
Python: English
PHP: English
Java: English
Javascript: English
Fortran: Eng... | 62 |
programmingcirclejerk | iloveyouyes | gc91giw | <|sols|><|sot|>Ask HN: What is the most Pythonic spoken language?<|eot|><|sol|>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=25090224<|eol|><|sor|>> I dont know. But I will tell you that my native language (Spanish) is probably C++.
you can feed this sub for a year with the comments in this thread<|eor|><|sor|>Latin is C or a... | 54 |
programmingcirclejerk | voidvector | gca9yig | <|sols|><|sot|>Ask HN: What is the most Pythonic spoken language?<|eot|><|sol|>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=25090224<|eol|><|sor|>Next week on Ask HN: What is the most Pythonic sex position?<|eor|><|sor|>Circle jerking<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 39 |
programmingcirclejerk | PEP20_NAZI | gc9pwdw | <|sols|><|sot|>Ask HN: What is the most Pythonic spoken language?<|eot|><|sol|>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=25090224<|eol|><|sor|>BEAUTIFUL IS BETTER THAN UGLY
EXPLICIT IS BETTER THAN IMPLICIT
SIMPLE IS BETTER THAN COMPLEX
COMPLEX IS BETTER THAN COMPLICATED
FLAT IS BETTER THAN NESTED
SPARSE IS BETTER THAN ... | 32 |
programmingcirclejerk | stingraycharles | gc99rlm | <|sols|><|sot|>Ask HN: What is the most Pythonic spoken language?<|eot|><|sol|>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=25090224<|eol|><|sor|>> I dont know. But I will tell you that my native language (Spanish) is probably C++.
you can feed this sub for a year with the comments in this thread<|eor|><|sor|>Latin is C or a... | 27 |
programmingcirclejerk | tfehring | gcagx3q | <|sols|><|sot|>Ask HN: What is the most Pythonic spoken language?<|eot|><|sol|>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=25090224<|eol|><|sor|>Next week on Ask HN: What is the most Pythonic sex position?<|eor|><|sor|>Glory holes obviously. Doesn't matter who's on the other side, all you care about is what they do.<|eor|><|e... | 24 |
programmingcirclejerk | GetRekt | gc97jl8 | <|sols|><|sot|>Ask HN: What is the most Pythonic spoken language?<|eot|><|sol|>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=25090224<|eol|><|sor|>[If you have words with absolutely precise meaning, you have a branch of math, pure or applied. That happens all of the time. Philosophy is a big, weird fuzzy field because when the ... | 16 |
programmingcirclejerk | freak_dessert2 | gc8zyc4 | <|sols|><|sot|>Ask HN: What is the most Pythonic spoken language?<|eot|><|sol|>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=25090224<|eol|><|sor|>Literally lojban<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 16 |
programmingcirclejerk | Amphorax | gcam8ou | <|sols|><|sot|>Ask HN: What is the most Pythonic spoken language?<|eot|><|sol|>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=25090224<|eol|><|sor|>BEAUTIFUL IS BETTER THAN UGLY
EXPLICIT IS BETTER THAN IMPLICIT
SIMPLE IS BETTER THAN COMPLEX
COMPLEX IS BETTER THAN COMPLICATED
FLAT IS BETTER THAN NESTED
SPARSE IS BETTER THAN ... | 13 |
programmingcirclejerk | spider-mario | gcaw4wy | <|sols|><|sot|>Ask HN: What is the most Pythonic spoken language?<|eot|><|sol|>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=25090224<|eol|><|sor|>> For some time now I have been thinking about the idea that every philosophical problem is inherently a linguistics problem
Not 100% sure whether /r/badlinguistics or /r/badphiloso... | 12 |
programmingcirclejerk | ProgVal | gcafsvm | <|sols|><|sot|>Ask HN: What is the most Pythonic spoken language?<|eot|><|sol|>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=25090224<|eol|><|sor|>> I dont know. But I will tell you that my native language (Spanish) is probably C++.
you can feed this sub for a year with the comments in this thread<|eor|><|sor|>OCaml is en fra... | 8 |
programmingcirclejerk | HueHuey | gcahadi | <|sols|><|sot|>Ask HN: What is the most Pythonic spoken language?<|eot|><|sol|>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=25090224<|eol|><|sor|>Next week on Ask HN: What is the most Pythonic sex position?<|eor|><|sor|>self fellatio<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 7 |
programmingcirclejerk | officerthegeek | gc9cn28 | <|sols|><|sot|>Ask HN: What is the most Pythonic spoken language?<|eot|><|sol|>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=25090224<|eol|><|sor|>[If you have words with absolutely precise meaning, you have a branch of math, pure or applied. That happens all of the time. Philosophy is a big, weird fuzzy field because when the ... | 7 |
programmingcirclejerk | lackofsupervision | gcd2078 | <|sols|><|sot|>Ask HN: What is the most Pythonic spoken language?<|eot|><|sol|>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=25090224<|eol|><|sor|>BEAUTIFUL IS BETTER THAN UGLY
EXPLICIT IS BETTER THAN IMPLICIT
SIMPLE IS BETTER THAN COMPLEX
COMPLEX IS BETTER THAN COMPLICATED
FLAT IS BETTER THAN NESTED
SPARSE IS BETTER THAN ... | 7 |
programmingcirclejerk | csb06 | gc9kob3 | <|sols|><|sot|>Ask HN: What is the most Pythonic spoken language?<|eot|><|sol|>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=25090224<|eol|><|sor|>Parseltongue.<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 6 |
programmingcirclejerk | camelCaseIsWebScale | ixphv3 | <|sols|><|sot|>std::launder<|eot|><|sol|>https://en.cppreference.com/w/cpp/utility/launder<|eol|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 131 |
programmingcirclejerk | SuspiciousScript | g68fjmw | <|sols|><|sot|>std::launder<|eot|><|sol|>https://en.cppreference.com/w/cpp/utility/launder<|eol|><|sor|>> `auto p = std::launder(reinterpret_cast<int(*)[10]>(&x[0]));`
Sufficiently advanced C++ is indistinguishable from satire<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 136 |
programmingcirclejerk | Bizzaro_Murphy | g685xta | <|sols|><|sot|>std::launder<|eot|><|sol|>https://en.cppreference.com/w/cpp/utility/launder<|eol|><|sor|>Template for a C++ keyword man page:
>**If** *very specific, hard to decipher, practically impossible to guarantee set of conditions are met*
>**Then** *keyword does something that could be more easily done with a... | 134 |
programmingcirclejerk | etaionshrd | g6838nu | <|sols|><|sot|>std::launder<|eot|><|sol|>https://en.cppreference.com/w/cpp/utility/launder<|eol|><|sor|>Sadly `std::launder` does not make it legal for you to do what you likely want it to do<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 58 |
programmingcirclejerk | irqlnotdispatchlevel | g688dm5 | <|sols|><|sot|>std::launder<|eot|><|sol|>https://en.cppreference.com/w/cpp/utility/launder<|eol|><|sor|>Template for a C++ keyword man page:
>**If** *very specific, hard to decipher, practically impossible to guarantee set of conditions are met*
>**Then** *keyword does something that could be more easily done with a... | 38 |
programmingcirclejerk | JohnMcPineapple | g68hivq | <|sols|><|sot|>std::launder<|eot|><|sol|>https://en.cppreference.com/w/cpp/utility/launder<|eol|><|sor|>After reading it twice I've come to the conclusion that this is a terrible crutch for code no one should ever write and language features that shouldn't exist.<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 35 |
programmingcirclejerk | CodenameLambda | g68n9uz | <|sols|><|sot|>std::launder<|eot|><|sol|>https://en.cppreference.com/w/cpp/utility/launder<|eol|><|sor|>I have little C++ experience, and I'm trying to figure out what does this actually do? The page says it takes a pointer to an object and returns a pointer to the same object? So it does nothing?<|eor|><|sor|>/uj
htt... | 34 |
programmingcirclejerk | exploooooosions | g68wky1 | <|sols|><|sot|>std::launder<|eot|><|sol|>https://en.cppreference.com/w/cpp/utility/launder<|eol|><|sor|>I have little C++ experience, and I'm trying to figure out what does this actually do? The page says it takes a pointer to an object and returns a pointer to the same object? So it does nothing?<|eor|><|sor|>/uj
Pag... | 34 |
programmingcirclejerk | vytah | g695h8i | <|sols|><|sot|>std::launder<|eot|><|sol|>https://en.cppreference.com/w/cpp/utility/launder<|eol|><|sor|>I have little C++ experience, and I'm trying to figure out what does this actually do? The page says it takes a pointer to an object and returns a pointer to the same object? So it does nothing?<|eor|><|sor|>/uj
htt... | 28 |
programmingcirclejerk | northrupthebandgeek | g699ggy | <|sols|><|sot|>std::launder<|eot|><|sol|>https://en.cppreference.com/w/cpp/utility/launder<|eol|><|sor|>Sadly `std::launder` does not make it legal for you to do what you likely want it to do<|eor|><|sor|>But it does at least automatically spawn Italian restaurants and used car dealerships for me, so it's a start.<|eor... | 24 |
programmingcirclejerk | ceeant | g68kvjc | <|sols|><|sot|>std::launder<|eot|><|sol|>https://en.cppreference.com/w/cpp/utility/launder<|eol|><|sor|>After reading it twice I've come to the conclusion that this is a terrible crutch for code no one should ever write and language features that shouldn't exist.<|eor|><|sor|>C++ Comity: Yes.jpg<|eor|><|eols|><|endofte... | 23 |
programmingcirclejerk | segv | g68r911 | <|sols|><|sot|>std::launder<|eot|><|sol|>https://en.cppreference.com/w/cpp/utility/launder<|eol|><|sor|>Template for a C++ keyword man page:
>**If** *very specific, hard to decipher, practically impossible to guarantee set of conditions are met*
>**Then** *keyword does something that could be more easily done with a... | 23 |
programmingcirclejerk | FascinatedBox | g681b0z | <|sols|><|sot|>std::launder<|eot|><|sol|>https://en.cppreference.com/w/cpp/utility/launder<|eol|><|sor|>This is the zygo blah blah of C++.<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 22 |
programmingcirclejerk | feeeedback | g68lp78 | <|sols|><|sot|>std::launder<|eot|><|sol|>https://en.cppreference.com/w/cpp/utility/launder<|eol|><|sor|>I have little C++ experience, and I'm trying to figure out what does this actually do? The page says it takes a pointer to an object and returns a pointer to the same object? So it does nothing?<|eor|><|eols|><|endof... | 21 |
programmingcirclejerk | victor_sales | g68o2i4 | <|sols|><|sot|>std::launder<|eot|><|sol|>https://en.cppreference.com/w/cpp/utility/launder<|eol|><|sor|>I have little C++ experience, and I'm trying to figure out what does this actually do? The page says it takes a pointer to an object and returns a pointer to the same object? So it does nothing?<|eor|><|sor|>/uj
htt... | 21 |
programmingcirclejerk | lorslara2000 | g68xqca | <|sols|><|sot|>std::launder<|eot|><|sol|>https://en.cppreference.com/w/cpp/utility/launder<|eol|><|sor|>I have little C++ experience, and I'm trying to figure out what does this actually do? The page says it takes a pointer to an object and returns a pointer to the same object? So it does nothing?<|eor|><|sor|>/uj
htt... | 20 |
programmingcirclejerk | tubbshonesty | g69d39t | <|sols|><|sot|>std::launder<|eot|><|sol|>https://en.cppreference.com/w/cpp/utility/launder<|eol|><|sor|>/uj
std::launder is pretty much for telling the compiler to not assume anything about the lifetime of an object referred to by a pointer. You need to use std::launder when you reuse a piece of memory to store a new ... | 19 |
programmingcirclejerk | zip117 | g69o757 | <|sols|><|sot|>std::launder<|eot|><|sol|>https://en.cppreference.com/w/cpp/utility/launder<|eol|><|sor|>/uj
std::launder is pretty much for telling the compiler to not assume anything about the lifetime of an object referred to by a pointer. You need to use std::launder when you reuse a piece of memory to store a new ... | 17 |
programmingcirclejerk | Karyo_Ten | g68uvwo | <|sols|><|sot|>std::launder<|eot|><|sol|>https://en.cppreference.com/w/cpp/utility/launder<|eol|><|sor|>I am `transmogrified`<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 13 |
programmingcirclejerk | ws-ilazki | g69ypd8 | <|sols|><|sot|>std::launder<|eot|><|sol|>https://en.cppreference.com/w/cpp/utility/launder<|eol|><|sor|>> `auto p = std::launder(reinterpret_cast<int(*)[10]>(&x[0]));`
Sufficiently advanced C++ is indistinguishable from satire<|eor|><|sor|>> Sufficiently advanced C++ is indistinguishable from ~~satire~~ **Perl**<|eor|... | 13 |
programmingcirclejerk | haskell_leghumper | i9cjt0 | <|sols|><|sot|>I write software for over 26 years now and I have no fucking clue what 'discriminated unions' are. I'm sure they're lovely. I'm also sure you don't need any of that for good software. KISS is a feature.<|eot|><|sol|>https://twitter.com/fransbouma/status/1293634897962205186<|eol|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 134 |
programmingcirclejerk | fp_weenie | g1e6kqx | <|sols|><|sot|>I write software for over 26 years now and I have no fucking clue what 'discriminated unions' are. I'm sure they're lovely. I'm also sure you don't need any of that for good software. KISS is a feature.<|eot|><|sol|>https://twitter.com/fransbouma/status/1293634897962205186<|eol|><|sor|>I am a genius and ... | 133 |
programmingcirclejerk | ds84182 | g1eenqi | <|sols|><|sot|>I write software for over 26 years now and I have no fucking clue what 'discriminated unions' are. I'm sure they're lovely. I'm also sure you don't need any of that for good software. KISS is a feature.<|eot|><|sol|>https://twitter.com/fransbouma/status/1293634897962205186<|eol|><|sor|>You don't need tha... | 64 |
programmingcirclejerk | Beheddard | g1eddzm | <|sols|><|sot|>I write software for over 26 years now and I have no fucking clue what 'discriminated unions' are. I'm sure they're lovely. I'm also sure you don't need any of that for good software. KISS is a feature.<|eot|><|sol|>https://twitter.com/fransbouma/status/1293634897962205186<|eol|><|sor|>gate**K**eeping **... | 43 |
programmingcirclejerk | ws-ilazki | g1ekzr9 | <|sols|><|sot|>I write software for over 26 years now and I have no fucking clue what 'discriminated unions' are. I'm sure they're lovely. I'm also sure you don't need any of that for good software. KISS is a feature.<|eot|><|sol|>https://twitter.com/fransbouma/status/1293634897962205186<|eol|><|sor|>> Yeah I see the a... | 36 |
programmingcirclejerk | andiconda | g1egswg | <|sols|><|sot|>I write software for over 26 years now and I have no fucking clue what 'discriminated unions' are. I'm sure they're lovely. I'm also sure you don't need any of that for good software. KISS is a feature.<|eot|><|sol|>https://twitter.com/fransbouma/status/1293634897962205186<|eol|><|sor|>You don't need tha... | 33 |
programmingcirclejerk | camelCaseIsWebScale | g1etd8d | <|sols|><|sot|>I write software for over 26 years now and I have no fucking clue what 'discriminated unions' are. I'm sure they're lovely. I'm also sure you don't need any of that for good software. KISS is a feature.<|eot|><|sol|>https://twitter.com/fransbouma/status/1293634897962205186<|eol|><|sor|>Anyone who doesn't... | 31 |
programmingcirclejerk | rafgro | g1epmp2 | <|sols|><|sot|>I write software for over 26 years now and I have no fucking clue what 'discriminated unions' are. I'm sure they're lovely. I'm also sure you don't need any of that for good software. KISS is a feature.<|eot|><|sol|>https://twitter.com/fransbouma/status/1293634897962205186<|eol|><|sor|>What the fuck did ... | 25 |
programmingcirclejerk | ws-ilazki | g1f2chp | <|sols|><|sot|>I write software for over 26 years now and I have no fucking clue what 'discriminated unions' are. I'm sure they're lovely. I'm also sure you don't need any of that for good software. KISS is a feature.<|eot|><|sol|>https://twitter.com/fransbouma/status/1293634897962205186<|eol|><|sor|>I'm going to guess... | 25 |
programmingcirclejerk | officerthegeek | g1ew3ed | <|sols|><|sot|>I write software for over 26 years now and I have no fucking clue what 'discriminated unions' are. I'm sure they're lovely. I'm also sure you don't need any of that for good software. KISS is a feature.<|eot|><|sol|>https://twitter.com/fransbouma/status/1293634897962205186<|eol|><|sor|>What the fuck did ... | 23 |
programmingcirclejerk | ws-ilazki | g1el3eq | <|sols|><|sot|>I write software for over 26 years now and I have no fucking clue what 'discriminated unions' are. I'm sure they're lovely. I'm also sure you don't need any of that for good software. KISS is a feature.<|eot|><|sol|>https://twitter.com/fransbouma/status/1293634897962205186<|eol|><|sor|>Jeez that guy seem... | 20 |
programmingcirclejerk | andiconda | g1fle1u | <|sols|><|sot|>I write software for over 26 years now and I have no fucking clue what 'discriminated unions' are. I'm sure they're lovely. I'm also sure you don't need any of that for good software. KISS is a feature.<|eot|><|sol|>https://twitter.com/fransbouma/status/1293634897962205186<|eol|><|sor|>You don't need tha... | 20 |
programmingcirclejerk | ws-ilazki | g1ernu9 | <|sols|><|sot|>I write software for over 26 years now and I have no fucking clue what 'discriminated unions' are. I'm sure they're lovely. I'm also sure you don't need any of that for good software. KISS is a feature.<|eot|><|sol|>https://twitter.com/fransbouma/status/1293634897962205186<|eol|><|sor|>I'm going to guess... | 19 |
programmingcirclejerk | univalence | g1f21za | <|sols|><|sot|>I write software for over 26 years now and I have no fucking clue what 'discriminated unions' are. I'm sure they're lovely. I'm also sure you don't need any of that for good software. KISS is a feature.<|eot|><|sol|>https://twitter.com/fransbouma/status/1293634897962205186<|eol|><|sor|>I'm going to guess... | 18 |
programmingcirclejerk | tetroxid | g1fd2ra | <|sols|><|sot|>I write software for over 26 years now and I have no fucking clue what 'discriminated unions' are. I'm sure they're lovely. I'm also sure you don't need any of that for good software. KISS is a feature.<|eot|><|sol|>https://twitter.com/fransbouma/status/1293634897962205186<|eol|><|sor|>You don't need tha... | 17 |
programmingcirclejerk | Beefster09 | g1fvx65 | <|sols|><|sot|>I write software for over 26 years now and I have no fucking clue what 'discriminated unions' are. I'm sure they're lovely. I'm also sure you don't need any of that for good software. KISS is a feature.<|eot|><|sol|>https://twitter.com/fransbouma/status/1293634897962205186<|eol|><|sor|>You don't need tha... | 14 |
programmingcirclejerk | nyanpasu64 | hanzj0 | <|sols|><|sot|>Go has the unfortunate circumstances of its birth being before widespread recognition of the value of generics and better type systems.<|eot|><|sol|>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=23545702<|eol|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 136 |
programmingcirclejerk | xeveri | fv3xvjl | <|sols|><|sot|>Go has the unfortunate circumstances of its birth being before widespread recognition of the value of generics and better type systems.<|eot|><|sol|>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=23545702<|eol|><|sor|>Too bad Go came out before Rust invented generics, destructors and algebraic data types.<|eor|><|... | 136 |
programmingcirclejerk | TheLastMeritocrat | fv40god | <|sols|><|sot|>Go has the unfortunate circumstances of its birth being before widespread recognition of the value of generics and better type systems.<|eot|><|sol|>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=23545702<|eol|><|sor|>It's true. The **consensus** for most software engineers was that "sum types" are hard and "gener... | 42 |
programmingcirclejerk | ReversedGif | fv53zgu | <|sols|><|sot|>Go has the unfortunate circumstances of its birth being before widespread recognition of the value of generics and better type systems.<|eot|><|sol|>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=23545702<|eol|><|sor|>Too bad Go came out before Rust invented generics, destructors and algebraic data types.<|eor|><|... | 42 |
programmingcirclejerk | camelCaseIsWebScale | fv46qe8 | <|sols|><|sot|>Go has the unfortunate circumstances of its birth being before widespread recognition of the value of generics and better type systems.<|eot|><|sol|>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=23545702<|eol|><|sor|>Too bad Go came out before Rust invented generics, destructors and algebraic data types.<|eor|><|... | 35 |
programmingcirclejerk | muntaxitome | fv4yeky | <|sols|><|sot|>Go has the unfortunate circumstances of its birth being before widespread recognition of the value of generics and better type systems.<|eot|><|sol|>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=23545702<|eol|><|sor|>what, did they create go in the 60s?<|eor|><|sor|>Given that Go has its roots in the Bible itself... | 35 |
programmingcirclejerk | VeganVagiVore | fv4831j | <|sols|><|sot|>Go has the unfortunate circumstances of its birth being before widespread recognition of the value of generics and better type systems.<|eot|><|sol|>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=23545702<|eol|><|sor|>It's true. The **consensus** for most software engineers was that "sum types" are hard and "gener... | 33 |
programmingcirclejerk | tunczyko | fv4hp13 | <|sols|><|sot|>Go has the unfortunate circumstances of its birth being before widespread recognition of the value of generics and better type systems.<|eot|><|sol|>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=23545702<|eol|><|sor|>what, did they create go in the 60s?<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 32 |
programmingcirclejerk | logicchains | fv4aicq | <|sols|><|sot|>Go has the unfortunate circumstances of its birth being before widespread recognition of the value of generics and better type systems.<|eot|><|sol|>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=23545702<|eol|><|sor|>It's true. The **consensus** for most software engineers was that "sum types" are hard and "gener... | 31 |
programmingcirclejerk | fp_weenie | fv4uvku | <|sols|><|sot|>Go has the unfortunate circumstances of its birth being before widespread recognition of the value of generics and better type systems.<|eot|><|sol|>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=23545702<|eol|><|sor|>I am a hacker news poster (top 10% IQ) so if I hadn't heard of it it probably didn't exist.
Just... | 28 |
programmingcirclejerk | 28f272fe556a1363cc31 | fv4zv0a | <|sols|><|sot|>Go has the unfortunate circumstances of its birth being before widespread recognition of the value of generics and better type systems.<|eot|><|sol|>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=23545702<|eol|><|sor|>Too bad Go came out before Rust invented generics, destructors and algebraic data types.<|eor|><|... | 23 |
programmingcirclejerk | vicarofyanks | fv4rlop | <|sols|><|sot|>Go has the unfortunate circumstances of its birth being before widespread recognition of the value of generics and better type systems.<|eot|><|sol|>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=23545702<|eol|><|sor|>It's true. The **consensus** for most software engineers was that "sum types" are hard and "gener... | 22 |
programmingcirclejerk | secdeal | fv4mk2h | <|sols|><|sot|>Go has the unfortunate circumstances of its birth being before widespread recognition of the value of generics and better type systems.<|eot|><|sol|>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=23545702<|eol|><|sor|>It's true. The **consensus** for most software engineers was that "sum types" are hard and "gener... | 21 |
programmingcirclejerk | orgulodfan82 | fv4qgbx | <|sols|><|sot|>Go has the unfortunate circumstances of its birth being before widespread recognition of the value of generics and better type systems.<|eot|><|sol|>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=23545702<|eol|><|sor|>It's true. The **consensus** for most software engineers was that "sum types" are hard and "gener... | 18 |
programmingcirclejerk | 15rthughes | fv4lk89 | <|sols|><|sot|>Go has the unfortunate circumstances of its birth being before widespread recognition of the value of generics and better type systems.<|eot|><|sol|>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=23545702<|eol|><|sor|>Zoomer programmers OUT OUT OUT<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 17 |
programmingcirclejerk | logicchains | fv49k33 | <|sols|><|sot|>Go has the unfortunate circumstances of its birth being before widespread recognition of the value of generics and better type systems.<|eot|><|sol|>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=23545702<|eol|><|sor|>Too bad Go came out before Rust invented generics, destructors and algebraic data types.<|eor|><|... | 17 |
programmingcirclejerk | nyanpasu64 | fv41jjo | <|sols|><|sot|>Go has the unfortunate circumstances of its birth being before widespread recognition of the value of generics and better type systems.<|eot|><|sol|>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=23545702<|eol|><|sor|>It's true. The **consensus** for most software engineers was that "sum types" are hard and "gener... | 17 |
programmingcirclejerk | TheLastMeritocrat | fv4dxj5 | <|sols|><|sot|>Go has the unfortunate circumstances of its birth being before widespread recognition of the value of generics and better type systems.<|eot|><|sol|>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=23545702<|eol|><|sor|>It's true. The **consensus** for most software engineers was that "sum types" are hard and "gener... | 15 |
programmingcirclejerk | jeremyjh | fv53i3r | <|sols|><|sot|>Go has the unfortunate circumstances of its birth being before widespread recognition of the value of generics and better type systems.<|eot|><|sol|>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=23545702<|eol|><|sor|>what, did they create go in the 60s?<|eor|><|sor|>Given that Go has its roots in the Bible itself... | 15 |
programmingcirclejerk | cmov | eikyh1 | <|sols|><|sot|>What if Go 2 was better than Go 1 not because it had more features, but fewer?<|eot|><|sol|>https://old.reddit.com/r/golang/comments/ehtacc/proposal_let_go_2_be_a_subset_of_go_1/<|eol|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 135 |
programmingcirclejerk | Uiropa | fcryn0w | <|sols|><|sot|>What if Go 2 was better than Go 1 not because it had more features, but fewer?<|eot|><|sol|>https://old.reddit.com/r/golang/comments/ehtacc/proposal_let_go_2_be_a_subset_of_go_1/<|eol|><|sor|>I propose this complete list of 4 features for Go 2:
* based on a polymorphic lambda calculus
* lazy evaluation
... | 83 |
programmingcirclejerk | fp_weenie | fcrpsjg | <|sols|><|sot|>What if Go 2 was better than Go 1 not because it had more features, but fewer?<|eot|><|sol|>https://old.reddit.com/r/golang/comments/ehtacc/proposal_let_go_2_be_a_subset_of_go_1/<|eol|><|sor|>I agree. Functions are ivory-tower elitism, your average programmer (nothing like me btw, I totally understand th... | 74 |
programmingcirclejerk | Uiropa | fcry0oq | <|sols|><|sot|>What if Go 2 was better than Go 1 not because it had more features, but fewer?<|eot|><|sol|>https://old.reddit.com/r/golang/comments/ehtacc/proposal_let_go_2_be_a_subset_of_go_1/<|eol|><|sor|>Ive always felt that multiplication is too complex. You have your star symbol (what is this, god damn pointer lan... | 52 |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.