Instruction
stringlengths
45
106
input_code
stringlengths
1
13.7k
output_code
stringlengths
1
13.7k
Write the same code in Java as shown below in Racket.
#lang racket (define a 3+4i) (define b 8+0i) (+ a b) (- a b) (/ a b) (* a b) (- a) (/ 1 a) (conjugate a)
public class Complex { public final double real; public final double imag; public Complex() { this(0, 0); } public Complex(double r, double i) { real = r; imag = i; } public Complex add(Complex b) { return new Complex(this.real + b.real, this.imag + b.imag)...
Write a version of this Racket function in Python with identical behavior.
#lang racket (define a 3+4i) (define b 8+0i) (+ a b) (- a b) (/ a b) (* a b) (- a) (/ 1 a) (conjugate a)
>>> z1 = 1.5 + 3j >>> z2 = 1.5 + 1.5j >>> z1 + z2 (3+4.5j) >>> z1 - z2 1.5j >>> z1 * z2 (-2.25+6.75j) >>> z1 / z2 (1.5+0.5j) >>> - z1 (-1.5-3j) >>> z1.conjugate() (1.5-3j) >>> abs(z1) 3.3541019662496847 >>> z1 ** z2 (-1.1024829553277784-0.38306415117199333j) >>> z1.real 1.5 >>> z1.imag 3.0 >>>
Write the same code in Go as shown below in Racket.
#lang racket (define a 3+4i) (define b 8+0i) (+ a b) (- a b) (/ a b) (* a b) (- a) (/ 1 a) (conjugate a)
package main import ( "fmt" "math/cmplx" ) func main() { a := 1 + 1i b := 3.14159 + 1.25i fmt.Println("a: ", a) fmt.Println("b: ", b) fmt.Println("a + b: ", a+b) fmt.Println("a * b: ", a*b) fmt.Println("-a: ", -a) fmt.Println("1 / a: ", 1/a) fmt.Println("a̅...
Transform the following COBOL implementation into C, maintaining the same output and logic.
$SET SOURCEFORMAT "FREE" $SET ILUSING "System" $SET ILUSING "System.Numerics" class-id Prog. method-id. Main static. procedure division. declare num as type Complex = type Complex::ImaginaryOne() declare results as type Complex occurs any set content of results to ((num + num), (num * num), (- num), (...
#include <complex.h> #include <stdio.h> void cprint(double complex c) { printf("%f%+fI", creal(c), cimag(c)); } void complex_operations() { double complex a = 1.0 + 1.0I; double complex b = 3.14159 + 1.2I; double complex c; printf("\na="); cprint(a); printf("\nb="); cprint(b); c = a + b; printf("...
Translate this program into C# but keep the logic exactly as in COBOL.
$SET SOURCEFORMAT "FREE" $SET ILUSING "System" $SET ILUSING "System.Numerics" class-id Prog. method-id. Main static. procedure division. declare num as type Complex = type Complex::ImaginaryOne() declare results as type Complex occurs any set content of results to ((num + num), (num * num), (- num), (...
namespace RosettaCode.Arithmetic.Complex { using System; using System.Numerics; internal static class Program { private static void Main() { var number = Complex.ImaginaryOne; foreach (var result in new[] { number + number, number * number, -number, 1 / number, C...
Convert the following code from COBOL to C++, ensuring the logic remains intact.
$SET SOURCEFORMAT "FREE" $SET ILUSING "System" $SET ILUSING "System.Numerics" class-id Prog. method-id. Main static. procedure division. declare num as type Complex = type Complex::ImaginaryOne() declare results as type Complex occurs any set content of results to ((num + num), (num * num), (- num), (...
#include <iostream> #include <complex> using std::complex; void complex_operations() { complex<double> a(1.0, 1.0); complex<double> b(3.14159, 1.25); std::cout << a + b << std::endl; std::cout << a * b << std::endl; std::cout << 1.0 / a << std::endl; std::cout << -a << std::endl; std::cou...
Change the following COBOL code into Java without altering its purpose.
$SET SOURCEFORMAT "FREE" $SET ILUSING "System" $SET ILUSING "System.Numerics" class-id Prog. method-id. Main static. procedure division. declare num as type Complex = type Complex::ImaginaryOne() declare results as type Complex occurs any set content of results to ((num + num), (num * num), (- num), (...
public class Complex { public final double real; public final double imag; public Complex() { this(0, 0); } public Complex(double r, double i) { real = r; imag = i; } public Complex add(Complex b) { return new Complex(this.real + b.real, this.imag + b.imag)...
Convert the following code from COBOL to Python, ensuring the logic remains intact.
$SET SOURCEFORMAT "FREE" $SET ILUSING "System" $SET ILUSING "System.Numerics" class-id Prog. method-id. Main static. procedure division. declare num as type Complex = type Complex::ImaginaryOne() declare results as type Complex occurs any set content of results to ((num + num), (num * num), (- num), (...
>>> z1 = 1.5 + 3j >>> z2 = 1.5 + 1.5j >>> z1 + z2 (3+4.5j) >>> z1 - z2 1.5j >>> z1 * z2 (-2.25+6.75j) >>> z1 / z2 (1.5+0.5j) >>> - z1 (-1.5-3j) >>> z1.conjugate() (1.5-3j) >>> abs(z1) 3.3541019662496847 >>> z1 ** z2 (-1.1024829553277784-0.38306415117199333j) >>> z1.real 1.5 >>> z1.imag 3.0 >>>
Port the provided COBOL code into Go while preserving the original functionality.
$SET SOURCEFORMAT "FREE" $SET ILUSING "System" $SET ILUSING "System.Numerics" class-id Prog. method-id. Main static. procedure division. declare num as type Complex = type Complex::ImaginaryOne() declare results as type Complex occurs any set content of results to ((num + num), (num * num), (- num), (...
package main import ( "fmt" "math/cmplx" ) func main() { a := 1 + 1i b := 3.14159 + 1.25i fmt.Println("a: ", a) fmt.Println("b: ", b) fmt.Println("a + b: ", a+b) fmt.Println("a * b: ", a*b) fmt.Println("-a: ", -a) fmt.Println("1 / a: ", 1/a) fmt.Println("a̅...
Translate the given REXX code snippet into C without altering its behavior.
c1 = .complex~new(1, 2) c2 = .complex~new(3, 4) r = 7 say "c1 =" c1 say "c2 =" c2 say "r =" r say "-c1 =" (-c1) say "c1 + r =" c1 + r say "c1 + c2 =" c1 + c2 say "c1 - r =" c1 - r say "c1 - c2 =" c1 - c2 say "c1 * r =" c1 * r say "c1 * c2 =" c1 *...
#include <complex.h> #include <stdio.h> void cprint(double complex c) { printf("%f%+fI", creal(c), cimag(c)); } void complex_operations() { double complex a = 1.0 + 1.0I; double complex b = 3.14159 + 1.2I; double complex c; printf("\na="); cprint(a); printf("\nb="); cprint(b); c = a + b; printf("...
Can you help me rewrite this code in C# instead of REXX, keeping it the same logically?
c1 = .complex~new(1, 2) c2 = .complex~new(3, 4) r = 7 say "c1 =" c1 say "c2 =" c2 say "r =" r say "-c1 =" (-c1) say "c1 + r =" c1 + r say "c1 + c2 =" c1 + c2 say "c1 - r =" c1 - r say "c1 - c2 =" c1 - c2 say "c1 * r =" c1 * r say "c1 * c2 =" c1 *...
namespace RosettaCode.Arithmetic.Complex { using System; using System.Numerics; internal static class Program { private static void Main() { var number = Complex.ImaginaryOne; foreach (var result in new[] { number + number, number * number, -number, 1 / number, C...
Produce a functionally identical C++ code for the snippet given in REXX.
c1 = .complex~new(1, 2) c2 = .complex~new(3, 4) r = 7 say "c1 =" c1 say "c2 =" c2 say "r =" r say "-c1 =" (-c1) say "c1 + r =" c1 + r say "c1 + c2 =" c1 + c2 say "c1 - r =" c1 - r say "c1 - c2 =" c1 - c2 say "c1 * r =" c1 * r say "c1 * c2 =" c1 *...
#include <iostream> #include <complex> using std::complex; void complex_operations() { complex<double> a(1.0, 1.0); complex<double> b(3.14159, 1.25); std::cout << a + b << std::endl; std::cout << a * b << std::endl; std::cout << 1.0 / a << std::endl; std::cout << -a << std::endl; std::cou...
Generate an equivalent Java version of this REXX code.
c1 = .complex~new(1, 2) c2 = .complex~new(3, 4) r = 7 say "c1 =" c1 say "c2 =" c2 say "r =" r say "-c1 =" (-c1) say "c1 + r =" c1 + r say "c1 + c2 =" c1 + c2 say "c1 - r =" c1 - r say "c1 - c2 =" c1 - c2 say "c1 * r =" c1 * r say "c1 * c2 =" c1 *...
public class Complex { public final double real; public final double imag; public Complex() { this(0, 0); } public Complex(double r, double i) { real = r; imag = i; } public Complex add(Complex b) { return new Complex(this.real + b.real, this.imag + b.imag)...
Produce a language-to-language conversion: from REXX to Python, same semantics.
c1 = .complex~new(1, 2) c2 = .complex~new(3, 4) r = 7 say "c1 =" c1 say "c2 =" c2 say "r =" r say "-c1 =" (-c1) say "c1 + r =" c1 + r say "c1 + c2 =" c1 + c2 say "c1 - r =" c1 - r say "c1 - c2 =" c1 - c2 say "c1 * r =" c1 * r say "c1 * c2 =" c1 *...
>>> z1 = 1.5 + 3j >>> z2 = 1.5 + 1.5j >>> z1 + z2 (3+4.5j) >>> z1 - z2 1.5j >>> z1 * z2 (-2.25+6.75j) >>> z1 / z2 (1.5+0.5j) >>> - z1 (-1.5-3j) >>> z1.conjugate() (1.5-3j) >>> abs(z1) 3.3541019662496847 >>> z1 ** z2 (-1.1024829553277784-0.38306415117199333j) >>> z1.real 1.5 >>> z1.imag 3.0 >>>
Transform the following REXX implementation into Go, maintaining the same output and logic.
c1 = .complex~new(1, 2) c2 = .complex~new(3, 4) r = 7 say "c1 =" c1 say "c2 =" c2 say "r =" r say "-c1 =" (-c1) say "c1 + r =" c1 + r say "c1 + c2 =" c1 + c2 say "c1 - r =" c1 - r say "c1 - c2 =" c1 - c2 say "c1 * r =" c1 * r say "c1 * c2 =" c1 *...
package main import ( "fmt" "math/cmplx" ) func main() { a := 1 + 1i b := 3.14159 + 1.25i fmt.Println("a: ", a) fmt.Println("b: ", b) fmt.Println("a + b: ", a+b) fmt.Println("a * b: ", a*b) fmt.Println("-a: ", -a) fmt.Println("1 / a: ", 1/a) fmt.Println("a̅...
Produce a language-to-language conversion: from Ruby to C, same semantics.
a = Complex(1, 1) i = Complex::I b = 3.14159 + 1.25 * i c = '1/2+3/4i'.to_c c = 1.0/2+3/4i puts a + b puts a * b puts -a puts 1.quo a puts a.conjugate puts a.conj
#include <complex.h> #include <stdio.h> void cprint(double complex c) { printf("%f%+fI", creal(c), cimag(c)); } void complex_operations() { double complex a = 1.0 + 1.0I; double complex b = 3.14159 + 1.2I; double complex c; printf("\na="); cprint(a); printf("\nb="); cprint(b); c = a + b; printf("...
Transform the following Ruby implementation into C#, maintaining the same output and logic.
a = Complex(1, 1) i = Complex::I b = 3.14159 + 1.25 * i c = '1/2+3/4i'.to_c c = 1.0/2+3/4i puts a + b puts a * b puts -a puts 1.quo a puts a.conjugate puts a.conj
namespace RosettaCode.Arithmetic.Complex { using System; using System.Numerics; internal static class Program { private static void Main() { var number = Complex.ImaginaryOne; foreach (var result in new[] { number + number, number * number, -number, 1 / number, C...
Change the following Ruby code into C++ without altering its purpose.
a = Complex(1, 1) i = Complex::I b = 3.14159 + 1.25 * i c = '1/2+3/4i'.to_c c = 1.0/2+3/4i puts a + b puts a * b puts -a puts 1.quo a puts a.conjugate puts a.conj
#include <iostream> #include <complex> using std::complex; void complex_operations() { complex<double> a(1.0, 1.0); complex<double> b(3.14159, 1.25); std::cout << a + b << std::endl; std::cout << a * b << std::endl; std::cout << 1.0 / a << std::endl; std::cout << -a << std::endl; std::cou...
Change the programming language of this snippet from Ruby to Java without modifying what it does.
a = Complex(1, 1) i = Complex::I b = 3.14159 + 1.25 * i c = '1/2+3/4i'.to_c c = 1.0/2+3/4i puts a + b puts a * b puts -a puts 1.quo a puts a.conjugate puts a.conj
public class Complex { public final double real; public final double imag; public Complex() { this(0, 0); } public Complex(double r, double i) { real = r; imag = i; } public Complex add(Complex b) { return new Complex(this.real + b.real, this.imag + b.imag)...
Generate a Python translation of this Ruby snippet without changing its computational steps.
a = Complex(1, 1) i = Complex::I b = 3.14159 + 1.25 * i c = '1/2+3/4i'.to_c c = 1.0/2+3/4i puts a + b puts a * b puts -a puts 1.quo a puts a.conjugate puts a.conj
>>> z1 = 1.5 + 3j >>> z2 = 1.5 + 1.5j >>> z1 + z2 (3+4.5j) >>> z1 - z2 1.5j >>> z1 * z2 (-2.25+6.75j) >>> z1 / z2 (1.5+0.5j) >>> - z1 (-1.5-3j) >>> z1.conjugate() (1.5-3j) >>> abs(z1) 3.3541019662496847 >>> z1 ** z2 (-1.1024829553277784-0.38306415117199333j) >>> z1.real 1.5 >>> z1.imag 3.0 >>>
Convert this Ruby block to Go, preserving its control flow and logic.
a = Complex(1, 1) i = Complex::I b = 3.14159 + 1.25 * i c = '1/2+3/4i'.to_c c = 1.0/2+3/4i puts a + b puts a * b puts -a puts 1.quo a puts a.conjugate puts a.conj
package main import ( "fmt" "math/cmplx" ) func main() { a := 1 + 1i b := 3.14159 + 1.25i fmt.Println("a: ", a) fmt.Println("b: ", b) fmt.Println("a + b: ", a+b) fmt.Println("a * b: ", a*b) fmt.Println("-a: ", -a) fmt.Println("1 / a: ", 1/a) fmt.Println("a̅...
Ensure the translated C code behaves exactly like the original Scala snippet.
class Complex(private val real: Double, private val imag: Double) { operator fun plus(other: Complex) = Complex(real + other.real, imag + other.imag) operator fun times(other: Complex) = Complex( real * other.real - imag * other.imag, real * other.imag + imag * other.real ) fun inv(): ...
#include <complex.h> #include <stdio.h> void cprint(double complex c) { printf("%f%+fI", creal(c), cimag(c)); } void complex_operations() { double complex a = 1.0 + 1.0I; double complex b = 3.14159 + 1.2I; double complex c; printf("\na="); cprint(a); printf("\nb="); cprint(b); c = a + b; printf("...
Produce a language-to-language conversion: from Scala to C#, same semantics.
class Complex(private val real: Double, private val imag: Double) { operator fun plus(other: Complex) = Complex(real + other.real, imag + other.imag) operator fun times(other: Complex) = Complex( real * other.real - imag * other.imag, real * other.imag + imag * other.real ) fun inv(): ...
namespace RosettaCode.Arithmetic.Complex { using System; using System.Numerics; internal static class Program { private static void Main() { var number = Complex.ImaginaryOne; foreach (var result in new[] { number + number, number * number, -number, 1 / number, C...
Convert this Scala block to C++, preserving its control flow and logic.
class Complex(private val real: Double, private val imag: Double) { operator fun plus(other: Complex) = Complex(real + other.real, imag + other.imag) operator fun times(other: Complex) = Complex( real * other.real - imag * other.imag, real * other.imag + imag * other.real ) fun inv(): ...
#include <iostream> #include <complex> using std::complex; void complex_operations() { complex<double> a(1.0, 1.0); complex<double> b(3.14159, 1.25); std::cout << a + b << std::endl; std::cout << a * b << std::endl; std::cout << 1.0 / a << std::endl; std::cout << -a << std::endl; std::cou...
Write a version of this Scala function in Java with identical behavior.
class Complex(private val real: Double, private val imag: Double) { operator fun plus(other: Complex) = Complex(real + other.real, imag + other.imag) operator fun times(other: Complex) = Complex( real * other.real - imag * other.imag, real * other.imag + imag * other.real ) fun inv(): ...
public class Complex { public final double real; public final double imag; public Complex() { this(0, 0); } public Complex(double r, double i) { real = r; imag = i; } public Complex add(Complex b) { return new Complex(this.real + b.real, this.imag + b.imag)...
Ensure the translated Python code behaves exactly like the original Scala snippet.
class Complex(private val real: Double, private val imag: Double) { operator fun plus(other: Complex) = Complex(real + other.real, imag + other.imag) operator fun times(other: Complex) = Complex( real * other.real - imag * other.imag, real * other.imag + imag * other.real ) fun inv(): ...
>>> z1 = 1.5 + 3j >>> z2 = 1.5 + 1.5j >>> z1 + z2 (3+4.5j) >>> z1 - z2 1.5j >>> z1 * z2 (-2.25+6.75j) >>> z1 / z2 (1.5+0.5j) >>> - z1 (-1.5-3j) >>> z1.conjugate() (1.5-3j) >>> abs(z1) 3.3541019662496847 >>> z1 ** z2 (-1.1024829553277784-0.38306415117199333j) >>> z1.real 1.5 >>> z1.imag 3.0 >>>
Preserve the algorithm and functionality while converting the code from Scala to Go.
class Complex(private val real: Double, private val imag: Double) { operator fun plus(other: Complex) = Complex(real + other.real, imag + other.imag) operator fun times(other: Complex) = Complex( real * other.real - imag * other.imag, real * other.imag + imag * other.real ) fun inv(): ...
package main import ( "fmt" "math/cmplx" ) func main() { a := 1 + 1i b := 3.14159 + 1.25i fmt.Println("a: ", a) fmt.Println("b: ", b) fmt.Println("a + b: ", a+b) fmt.Println("a * b: ", a*b) fmt.Println("-a: ", -a) fmt.Println("1 / a: ", 1/a) fmt.Println("a̅...
Port the following code from Swift to C with equivalent syntax and logic.
public struct Complex { public let real : Double public let imaginary : Double public init(real inReal:Double, imaginary inImaginary:Double) { real = inReal imaginary = inImaginary } public static var i : Complex = Complex(real:0, imaginary: 1) public static var ze...
#include <complex.h> #include <stdio.h> void cprint(double complex c) { printf("%f%+fI", creal(c), cimag(c)); } void complex_operations() { double complex a = 1.0 + 1.0I; double complex b = 3.14159 + 1.2I; double complex c; printf("\na="); cprint(a); printf("\nb="); cprint(b); c = a + b; printf("...
Write the same algorithm in C# as shown in this Swift implementation.
public struct Complex { public let real : Double public let imaginary : Double public init(real inReal:Double, imaginary inImaginary:Double) { real = inReal imaginary = inImaginary } public static var i : Complex = Complex(real:0, imaginary: 1) public static var ze...
namespace RosettaCode.Arithmetic.Complex { using System; using System.Numerics; internal static class Program { private static void Main() { var number = Complex.ImaginaryOne; foreach (var result in new[] { number + number, number * number, -number, 1 / number, C...
Please provide an equivalent version of this Swift code in C++.
public struct Complex { public let real : Double public let imaginary : Double public init(real inReal:Double, imaginary inImaginary:Double) { real = inReal imaginary = inImaginary } public static var i : Complex = Complex(real:0, imaginary: 1) public static var ze...
#include <iostream> #include <complex> using std::complex; void complex_operations() { complex<double> a(1.0, 1.0); complex<double> b(3.14159, 1.25); std::cout << a + b << std::endl; std::cout << a * b << std::endl; std::cout << 1.0 / a << std::endl; std::cout << -a << std::endl; std::cou...
Write the same code in Java as shown below in Swift.
public struct Complex { public let real : Double public let imaginary : Double public init(real inReal:Double, imaginary inImaginary:Double) { real = inReal imaginary = inImaginary } public static var i : Complex = Complex(real:0, imaginary: 1) public static var ze...
public class Complex { public final double real; public final double imag; public Complex() { this(0, 0); } public Complex(double r, double i) { real = r; imag = i; } public Complex add(Complex b) { return new Complex(this.real + b.real, this.imag + b.imag)...
Port the provided Swift code into Python while preserving the original functionality.
public struct Complex { public let real : Double public let imaginary : Double public init(real inReal:Double, imaginary inImaginary:Double) { real = inReal imaginary = inImaginary } public static var i : Complex = Complex(real:0, imaginary: 1) public static var ze...
>>> z1 = 1.5 + 3j >>> z2 = 1.5 + 1.5j >>> z1 + z2 (3+4.5j) >>> z1 - z2 1.5j >>> z1 * z2 (-2.25+6.75j) >>> z1 / z2 (1.5+0.5j) >>> - z1 (-1.5-3j) >>> z1.conjugate() (1.5-3j) >>> abs(z1) 3.3541019662496847 >>> z1 ** z2 (-1.1024829553277784-0.38306415117199333j) >>> z1.real 1.5 >>> z1.imag 3.0 >>>
Produce a functionally identical Go code for the snippet given in Swift.
public struct Complex { public let real : Double public let imaginary : Double public init(real inReal:Double, imaginary inImaginary:Double) { real = inReal imaginary = inImaginary } public static var i : Complex = Complex(real:0, imaginary: 1) public static var ze...
package main import ( "fmt" "math/cmplx" ) func main() { a := 1 + 1i b := 3.14159 + 1.25i fmt.Println("a: ", a) fmt.Println("b: ", b) fmt.Println("a + b: ", a+b) fmt.Println("a * b: ", a*b) fmt.Println("-a: ", -a) fmt.Println("1 / a: ", 1/a) fmt.Println("a̅...
Preserve the algorithm and functionality while converting the code from Tcl to C.
package require math::complexnumbers namespace import math::complexnumbers::* set a [complex 1 1] set b [complex 3.14159 1.2] puts [tostring [+ $a $b]] ; puts [tostring [* $a $b]] ; puts [tostring [pow $a [complex -1 0]]] ; puts [tostring [- $a]] ;
#include <complex.h> #include <stdio.h> void cprint(double complex c) { printf("%f%+fI", creal(c), cimag(c)); } void complex_operations() { double complex a = 1.0 + 1.0I; double complex b = 3.14159 + 1.2I; double complex c; printf("\na="); cprint(a); printf("\nb="); cprint(b); c = a + b; printf("...
Change the following Tcl code into C# without altering its purpose.
package require math::complexnumbers namespace import math::complexnumbers::* set a [complex 1 1] set b [complex 3.14159 1.2] puts [tostring [+ $a $b]] ; puts [tostring [* $a $b]] ; puts [tostring [pow $a [complex -1 0]]] ; puts [tostring [- $a]] ;
namespace RosettaCode.Arithmetic.Complex { using System; using System.Numerics; internal static class Program { private static void Main() { var number = Complex.ImaginaryOne; foreach (var result in new[] { number + number, number * number, -number, 1 / number, C...
Translate the given Tcl code snippet into C++ without altering its behavior.
package require math::complexnumbers namespace import math::complexnumbers::* set a [complex 1 1] set b [complex 3.14159 1.2] puts [tostring [+ $a $b]] ; puts [tostring [* $a $b]] ; puts [tostring [pow $a [complex -1 0]]] ; puts [tostring [- $a]] ;
#include <iostream> #include <complex> using std::complex; void complex_operations() { complex<double> a(1.0, 1.0); complex<double> b(3.14159, 1.25); std::cout << a + b << std::endl; std::cout << a * b << std::endl; std::cout << 1.0 / a << std::endl; std::cout << -a << std::endl; std::cou...
Convert this Tcl block to Java, preserving its control flow and logic.
package require math::complexnumbers namespace import math::complexnumbers::* set a [complex 1 1] set b [complex 3.14159 1.2] puts [tostring [+ $a $b]] ; puts [tostring [* $a $b]] ; puts [tostring [pow $a [complex -1 0]]] ; puts [tostring [- $a]] ;
public class Complex { public final double real; public final double imag; public Complex() { this(0, 0); } public Complex(double r, double i) { real = r; imag = i; } public Complex add(Complex b) { return new Complex(this.real + b.real, this.imag + b.imag)...
Port the following code from Tcl to Python with equivalent syntax and logic.
package require math::complexnumbers namespace import math::complexnumbers::* set a [complex 1 1] set b [complex 3.14159 1.2] puts [tostring [+ $a $b]] ; puts [tostring [* $a $b]] ; puts [tostring [pow $a [complex -1 0]]] ; puts [tostring [- $a]] ;
>>> z1 = 1.5 + 3j >>> z2 = 1.5 + 1.5j >>> z1 + z2 (3+4.5j) >>> z1 - z2 1.5j >>> z1 * z2 (-2.25+6.75j) >>> z1 / z2 (1.5+0.5j) >>> - z1 (-1.5-3j) >>> z1.conjugate() (1.5-3j) >>> abs(z1) 3.3541019662496847 >>> z1 ** z2 (-1.1024829553277784-0.38306415117199333j) >>> z1.real 1.5 >>> z1.imag 3.0 >>>
Can you help me rewrite this code in Go instead of Tcl, keeping it the same logically?
package require math::complexnumbers namespace import math::complexnumbers::* set a [complex 1 1] set b [complex 3.14159 1.2] puts [tostring [+ $a $b]] ; puts [tostring [* $a $b]] ; puts [tostring [pow $a [complex -1 0]]] ; puts [tostring [- $a]] ;
package main import ( "fmt" "math/cmplx" ) func main() { a := 1 + 1i b := 3.14159 + 1.25i fmt.Println("a: ", a) fmt.Println("b: ", b) fmt.Println("a + b: ", a+b) fmt.Println("a * b: ", a*b) fmt.Println("-a: ", -a) fmt.Println("1 / a: ", 1/a) fmt.Println("a̅...
Transform the following C implementation into Rust, maintaining the same output and logic.
#include <complex.h> #include <stdio.h> void cprint(double complex c) { printf("%f%+fI", creal(c), cimag(c)); } void complex_operations() { double complex a = 1.0 + 1.0I; double complex b = 3.14159 + 1.2I; double complex c; printf("\na="); cprint(a); printf("\nb="); cprint(b); c = a + b; printf("...
extern crate num; use num::complex::Complex; fn main() { let a = Complex {re:-4.0, im: 5.0}; let b = Complex::new(1.0, 1.0); println!(" a = {}", a); println!(" b = {}", b); println!(" a + b = {}", a + b); println!(" a * b = {}", a * b); println!(" 1 / a = {}", a.inv()); ...
Port the following code from C# to Rust with equivalent syntax and logic.
namespace RosettaCode.Arithmetic.Complex { using System; using System.Numerics; internal static class Program { private static void Main() { var number = Complex.ImaginaryOne; foreach (var result in new[] { number + number, number * number, -number, 1 / number, C...
extern crate num; use num::complex::Complex; fn main() { let a = Complex {re:-4.0, im: 5.0}; let b = Complex::new(1.0, 1.0); println!(" a = {}", a); println!(" b = {}", b); println!(" a + b = {}", a + b); println!(" a * b = {}", a * b); println!(" 1 / a = {}", a.inv()); ...
Keep all operations the same but rewrite the snippet in Rust.
public class Complex { public final double real; public final double imag; public Complex() { this(0, 0); } public Complex(double r, double i) { real = r; imag = i; } public Complex add(Complex b) { return new Complex(this.real + b.real, this.imag + b.imag)...
extern crate num; use num::complex::Complex; fn main() { let a = Complex {re:-4.0, im: 5.0}; let b = Complex::new(1.0, 1.0); println!(" a = {}", a); println!(" b = {}", b); println!(" a + b = {}", a + b); println!(" a * b = {}", a * b); println!(" 1 / a = {}", a.inv()); ...
Change the programming language of this snippet from Rust to Python without modifying what it does.
extern crate num; use num::complex::Complex; fn main() { let a = Complex {re:-4.0, im: 5.0}; let b = Complex::new(1.0, 1.0); println!(" a = {}", a); println!(" b = {}", b); println!(" a + b = {}", a + b); println!(" a * b = {}", a * b); println!(" 1 / a = {}", a.inv()); ...
>>> z1 = 1.5 + 3j >>> z2 = 1.5 + 1.5j >>> z1 + z2 (3+4.5j) >>> z1 - z2 1.5j >>> z1 * z2 (-2.25+6.75j) >>> z1 / z2 (1.5+0.5j) >>> - z1 (-1.5-3j) >>> z1.conjugate() (1.5-3j) >>> abs(z1) 3.3541019662496847 >>> z1 ** z2 (-1.1024829553277784-0.38306415117199333j) >>> z1.real 1.5 >>> z1.imag 3.0 >>>
Write the same code in Rust as shown below in C++.
#include <iostream> #include <complex> using std::complex; void complex_operations() { complex<double> a(1.0, 1.0); complex<double> b(3.14159, 1.25); std::cout << a + b << std::endl; std::cout << a * b << std::endl; std::cout << 1.0 / a << std::endl; std::cout << -a << std::endl; std::cou...
extern crate num; use num::complex::Complex; fn main() { let a = Complex {re:-4.0, im: 5.0}; let b = Complex::new(1.0, 1.0); println!(" a = {}", a); println!(" b = {}", b); println!(" a + b = {}", a + b); println!(" a * b = {}", a * b); println!(" 1 / a = {}", a.inv()); ...
Port the following code from Go to Rust with equivalent syntax and logic.
package main import ( "fmt" "math/cmplx" ) func main() { a := 1 + 1i b := 3.14159 + 1.25i fmt.Println("a: ", a) fmt.Println("b: ", b) fmt.Println("a + b: ", a+b) fmt.Println("a * b: ", a*b) fmt.Println("-a: ", -a) fmt.Println("1 / a: ", 1/a) fmt.Println("a̅...
extern crate num; use num::complex::Complex; fn main() { let a = Complex {re:-4.0, im: 5.0}; let b = Complex::new(1.0, 1.0); println!(" a = {}", a); println!(" b = {}", b); println!(" a + b = {}", a + b); println!(" a * b = {}", a * b); println!(" 1 / a = {}", a.inv()); ...
Preserve the algorithm and functionality while converting the code from Ada to C#.
with Ada.Directories; use Ada.Directories; with Ada.Text_IO; procedure Test_Directory_Walk is procedure Walk (Name : String; Pattern : String) is procedure Print (Item : Directory_Entry_Type) is begin Ada.Text_IO.Put_Line (Full_Name (Item)); end Print; procedure Walk (Item : Direct...
using System; using System.Collections.Generic; using System.IO; using System.Linq; namespace RosettaRecursiveDirectory { class Program { static IEnumerable<FileInfo> TraverseDirectory(string rootPath, Func<FileInfo, bool> Pattern) { var directoryStack = new Stack<DirectoryInfo>(); ...
Maintain the same structure and functionality when rewriting this code in C.
with Ada.Directories; use Ada.Directories; with Ada.Text_IO; procedure Test_Directory_Walk is procedure Walk (Name : String; Pattern : String) is procedure Print (Item : Directory_Entry_Type) is begin Ada.Text_IO.Put_Line (Full_Name (Item)); end Print; procedure Walk (Item : Direct...
#include <sys/types.h> #include <sys/stat.h> #include <unistd.h> #include <dirent.h> #include <regex.h> #include <stdio.h> #include <string.h> #include <errno.h> #include <err.h> enum { WALK_OK = 0, WALK_BADPATTERN, WALK_NAMETOOLONG, WALK_BADIO, }; #define WS_NONE 0 #define WS_RECURSIVE (1 << 0) #define WS_DEFAU...
Convert this Ada snippet to C++ and keep its semantics consistent.
with Ada.Directories; use Ada.Directories; with Ada.Text_IO; procedure Test_Directory_Walk is procedure Walk (Name : String; Pattern : String) is procedure Print (Item : Directory_Entry_Type) is begin Ada.Text_IO.Put_Line (Full_Name (Item)); end Print; procedure Walk (Item : Direct...
#include "boost/filesystem.hpp" #include "boost/regex.hpp" #include <iostream> using namespace boost::filesystem; int main() { path current_dir("."); boost::regex pattern("a.*"); for (recursive_directory_iterator iter(current_dir), end; iter != end; ++iter) { std::string name = iter->path(...
Rewrite the snippet below in Go so it works the same as the original Ada code.
with Ada.Directories; use Ada.Directories; with Ada.Text_IO; procedure Test_Directory_Walk is procedure Walk (Name : String; Pattern : String) is procedure Print (Item : Directory_Entry_Type) is begin Ada.Text_IO.Put_Line (Full_Name (Item)); end Print; procedure Walk (Item : Direct...
package main import ( "fmt" "os" "path/filepath" ) func VisitFile(fp string, fi os.FileInfo, err error) error { if err != nil { fmt.Println(err) return nil } if fi.IsDir() { return nil } matched, err := filepath.Match("*.mp3", fi.Name()) if err != n...
Generate an equivalent Java version of this Ada code.
with Ada.Directories; use Ada.Directories; with Ada.Text_IO; procedure Test_Directory_Walk is procedure Walk (Name : String; Pattern : String) is procedure Print (Item : Directory_Entry_Type) is begin Ada.Text_IO.Put_Line (Full_Name (Item)); end Print; procedure Walk (Item : Direct...
import java.io.File; public class MainEntry { public static void main(String[] args) { walkin(new File("/home/user")); } public static void walkin(File dir) { String pattern = ".mp3"; File listFile[] = dir.listFiles(); if (listFile != null) { ...
Maintain the same structure and functionality when rewriting this code in Python.
with Ada.Directories; use Ada.Directories; with Ada.Text_IO; procedure Test_Directory_Walk is procedure Walk (Name : String; Pattern : String) is procedure Print (Item : Directory_Entry_Type) is begin Ada.Text_IO.Put_Line (Full_Name (Item)); end Print; procedure Walk (Item : Direct...
from pathlib import Path for path in Path('.').rglob('*.*'): print(path)
Can you help me rewrite this code in VB instead of Ada, keeping it the same logically?
with Ada.Directories; use Ada.Directories; with Ada.Text_IO; procedure Test_Directory_Walk is procedure Walk (Name : String; Pattern : String) is procedure Print (Item : Directory_Entry_Type) is begin Ada.Text_IO.Put_Line (Full_Name (Item)); end Print; procedure Walk (Item : Direct...
Sub printFiles(parentDir As FolderItem, pattern As String) For i As Integer = 1 To parentDir.Count If parentDir.Item(i).Directory Then printFiles(parentDir.Item(i), pattern) Else Dim rg as New RegEx Dim myMatch as RegExMatch rg.SearchPattern = pattern myMatch = rg.search(parentDi...
Translate this program into C but keep the logic exactly as in Arturo.
print list.recursive "." select list.recursive "some/path" => [".md" = extract.extension] select list.recursive "some/path" => [in? "test"]
#include <sys/types.h> #include <sys/stat.h> #include <unistd.h> #include <dirent.h> #include <regex.h> #include <stdio.h> #include <string.h> #include <errno.h> #include <err.h> enum { WALK_OK = 0, WALK_BADPATTERN, WALK_NAMETOOLONG, WALK_BADIO, }; #define WS_NONE 0 #define WS_RECURSIVE (1 << 0) #define WS_DEFAU...
Please provide an equivalent version of this Arturo code in C#.
print list.recursive "." select list.recursive "some/path" => [".md" = extract.extension] select list.recursive "some/path" => [in? "test"]
using System; using System.Collections.Generic; using System.IO; using System.Linq; namespace RosettaRecursiveDirectory { class Program { static IEnumerable<FileInfo> TraverseDirectory(string rootPath, Func<FileInfo, bool> Pattern) { var directoryStack = new Stack<DirectoryInfo>(); ...
Maintain the same structure and functionality when rewriting this code in C++.
print list.recursive "." select list.recursive "some/path" => [".md" = extract.extension] select list.recursive "some/path" => [in? "test"]
#include "boost/filesystem.hpp" #include "boost/regex.hpp" #include <iostream> using namespace boost::filesystem; int main() { path current_dir("."); boost::regex pattern("a.*"); for (recursive_directory_iterator iter(current_dir), end; iter != end; ++iter) { std::string name = iter->path(...
Write the same code in Java as shown below in Arturo.
print list.recursive "." select list.recursive "some/path" => [".md" = extract.extension] select list.recursive "some/path" => [in? "test"]
import java.io.File; public class MainEntry { public static void main(String[] args) { walkin(new File("/home/user")); } public static void walkin(File dir) { String pattern = ".mp3"; File listFile[] = dir.listFiles(); if (listFile != null) { ...
Convert this Arturo block to Python, preserving its control flow and logic.
print list.recursive "." select list.recursive "some/path" => [".md" = extract.extension] select list.recursive "some/path" => [in? "test"]
from pathlib import Path for path in Path('.').rglob('*.*'): print(path)
Generate a VB translation of this Arturo snippet without changing its computational steps.
print list.recursive "." select list.recursive "some/path" => [".md" = extract.extension] select list.recursive "some/path" => [in? "test"]
Sub printFiles(parentDir As FolderItem, pattern As String) For i As Integer = 1 To parentDir.Count If parentDir.Item(i).Directory Then printFiles(parentDir.Item(i), pattern) Else Dim rg as New RegEx Dim myMatch as RegExMatch rg.SearchPattern = pattern myMatch = rg.search(parentDi...
Generate a Go translation of this Arturo snippet without changing its computational steps.
print list.recursive "." select list.recursive "some/path" => [".md" = extract.extension] select list.recursive "some/path" => [in? "test"]
package main import ( "fmt" "os" "path/filepath" ) func VisitFile(fp string, fi os.FileInfo, err error) error { if err != nil { fmt.Println(err) return nil } if fi.IsDir() { return nil } matched, err := filepath.Match("*.mp3", fi.Name()) if err != n...
Change the following AutoHotKey code into C without altering its purpose.
Loop, %A_Temp%\*.tmp,,1 out .= A_LoopFileName "`n" MsgBox,% out
#include <sys/types.h> #include <sys/stat.h> #include <unistd.h> #include <dirent.h> #include <regex.h> #include <stdio.h> #include <string.h> #include <errno.h> #include <err.h> enum { WALK_OK = 0, WALK_BADPATTERN, WALK_NAMETOOLONG, WALK_BADIO, }; #define WS_NONE 0 #define WS_RECURSIVE (1 << 0) #define WS_DEFAU...
Port the following code from AutoHotKey to C# with equivalent syntax and logic.
Loop, %A_Temp%\*.tmp,,1 out .= A_LoopFileName "`n" MsgBox,% out
using System; using System.Collections.Generic; using System.IO; using System.Linq; namespace RosettaRecursiveDirectory { class Program { static IEnumerable<FileInfo> TraverseDirectory(string rootPath, Func<FileInfo, bool> Pattern) { var directoryStack = new Stack<DirectoryInfo>(); ...
Write the same code in C++ as shown below in AutoHotKey.
Loop, %A_Temp%\*.tmp,,1 out .= A_LoopFileName "`n" MsgBox,% out
#include "boost/filesystem.hpp" #include "boost/regex.hpp" #include <iostream> using namespace boost::filesystem; int main() { path current_dir("."); boost::regex pattern("a.*"); for (recursive_directory_iterator iter(current_dir), end; iter != end; ++iter) { std::string name = iter->path(...
Please provide an equivalent version of this AutoHotKey code in Java.
Loop, %A_Temp%\*.tmp,,1 out .= A_LoopFileName "`n" MsgBox,% out
import java.io.File; public class MainEntry { public static void main(String[] args) { walkin(new File("/home/user")); } public static void walkin(File dir) { String pattern = ".mp3"; File listFile[] = dir.listFiles(); if (listFile != null) { ...
Preserve the algorithm and functionality while converting the code from AutoHotKey to Python.
Loop, %A_Temp%\*.tmp,,1 out .= A_LoopFileName "`n" MsgBox,% out
from pathlib import Path for path in Path('.').rglob('*.*'): print(path)
Maintain the same structure and functionality when rewriting this code in VB.
Loop, %A_Temp%\*.tmp,,1 out .= A_LoopFileName "`n" MsgBox,% out
Sub printFiles(parentDir As FolderItem, pattern As String) For i As Integer = 1 To parentDir.Count If parentDir.Item(i).Directory Then printFiles(parentDir.Item(i), pattern) Else Dim rg as New RegEx Dim myMatch as RegExMatch rg.SearchPattern = pattern myMatch = rg.search(parentDi...
Translate this program into Go but keep the logic exactly as in AutoHotKey.
Loop, %A_Temp%\*.tmp,,1 out .= A_LoopFileName "`n" MsgBox,% out
package main import ( "fmt" "os" "path/filepath" ) func VisitFile(fp string, fi os.FileInfo, err error) error { if err != nil { fmt.Println(err) return nil } if fi.IsDir() { return nil } matched, err := filepath.Match("*.mp3", fi.Name()) if err != n...
Preserve the algorithm and functionality while converting the code from BBC_Basic to C.
directory$ = "C:\Windows\" pattern$ = "*.chm" PROClisttree(directory$, pattern$) END DEF PROClisttree(dir$, filter$) LOCAL dir%, sh%, res% DIM dir% LOCAL 317 IF RIGHT$(dir$) <> "\" IF RIGHT$(dir$) <> "/" dir$ += "\" SYS "FindFirstFile", dir$ + filter$, dir% T...
#include <sys/types.h> #include <sys/stat.h> #include <unistd.h> #include <dirent.h> #include <regex.h> #include <stdio.h> #include <string.h> #include <errno.h> #include <err.h> enum { WALK_OK = 0, WALK_BADPATTERN, WALK_NAMETOOLONG, WALK_BADIO, }; #define WS_NONE 0 #define WS_RECURSIVE (1 << 0) #define WS_DEFAU...
Change the following BBC_Basic code into C# without altering its purpose.
directory$ = "C:\Windows\" pattern$ = "*.chm" PROClisttree(directory$, pattern$) END DEF PROClisttree(dir$, filter$) LOCAL dir%, sh%, res% DIM dir% LOCAL 317 IF RIGHT$(dir$) <> "\" IF RIGHT$(dir$) <> "/" dir$ += "\" SYS "FindFirstFile", dir$ + filter$, dir% T...
using System; using System.Collections.Generic; using System.IO; using System.Linq; namespace RosettaRecursiveDirectory { class Program { static IEnumerable<FileInfo> TraverseDirectory(string rootPath, Func<FileInfo, bool> Pattern) { var directoryStack = new Stack<DirectoryInfo>(); ...
Ensure the translated C++ code behaves exactly like the original BBC_Basic snippet.
directory$ = "C:\Windows\" pattern$ = "*.chm" PROClisttree(directory$, pattern$) END DEF PROClisttree(dir$, filter$) LOCAL dir%, sh%, res% DIM dir% LOCAL 317 IF RIGHT$(dir$) <> "\" IF RIGHT$(dir$) <> "/" dir$ += "\" SYS "FindFirstFile", dir$ + filter$, dir% T...
#include "boost/filesystem.hpp" #include "boost/regex.hpp" #include <iostream> using namespace boost::filesystem; int main() { path current_dir("."); boost::regex pattern("a.*"); for (recursive_directory_iterator iter(current_dir), end; iter != end; ++iter) { std::string name = iter->path(...
Keep all operations the same but rewrite the snippet in Java.
directory$ = "C:\Windows\" pattern$ = "*.chm" PROClisttree(directory$, pattern$) END DEF PROClisttree(dir$, filter$) LOCAL dir%, sh%, res% DIM dir% LOCAL 317 IF RIGHT$(dir$) <> "\" IF RIGHT$(dir$) <> "/" dir$ += "\" SYS "FindFirstFile", dir$ + filter$, dir% T...
import java.io.File; public class MainEntry { public static void main(String[] args) { walkin(new File("/home/user")); } public static void walkin(File dir) { String pattern = ".mp3"; File listFile[] = dir.listFiles(); if (listFile != null) { ...
Convert this BBC_Basic block to Python, preserving its control flow and logic.
directory$ = "C:\Windows\" pattern$ = "*.chm" PROClisttree(directory$, pattern$) END DEF PROClisttree(dir$, filter$) LOCAL dir%, sh%, res% DIM dir% LOCAL 317 IF RIGHT$(dir$) <> "\" IF RIGHT$(dir$) <> "/" dir$ += "\" SYS "FindFirstFile", dir$ + filter$, dir% T...
from pathlib import Path for path in Path('.').rglob('*.*'): print(path)
Write the same code in VB as shown below in BBC_Basic.
directory$ = "C:\Windows\" pattern$ = "*.chm" PROClisttree(directory$, pattern$) END DEF PROClisttree(dir$, filter$) LOCAL dir%, sh%, res% DIM dir% LOCAL 317 IF RIGHT$(dir$) <> "\" IF RIGHT$(dir$) <> "/" dir$ += "\" SYS "FindFirstFile", dir$ + filter$, dir% T...
Sub printFiles(parentDir As FolderItem, pattern As String) For i As Integer = 1 To parentDir.Count If parentDir.Item(i).Directory Then printFiles(parentDir.Item(i), pattern) Else Dim rg as New RegEx Dim myMatch as RegExMatch rg.SearchPattern = pattern myMatch = rg.search(parentDi...
Can you help me rewrite this code in Go instead of BBC_Basic, keeping it the same logically?
directory$ = "C:\Windows\" pattern$ = "*.chm" PROClisttree(directory$, pattern$) END DEF PROClisttree(dir$, filter$) LOCAL dir%, sh%, res% DIM dir% LOCAL 317 IF RIGHT$(dir$) <> "\" IF RIGHT$(dir$) <> "/" dir$ += "\" SYS "FindFirstFile", dir$ + filter$, dir% T...
package main import ( "fmt" "os" "path/filepath" ) func VisitFile(fp string, fi os.FileInfo, err error) error { if err != nil { fmt.Println(err) return nil } if fi.IsDir() { return nil } matched, err := filepath.Match("*.mp3", fi.Name()) if err != n...
Write the same code in C as shown below in Clojure.
(use '[clojure.java.io]) (defn walk [dirpath pattern] (doall (filter #(re-matches pattern (.getName %)) (file-seq (file dirpath))))) (map #(println (.getPath %)) (walk "src" #".*\.clj"))
#include <sys/types.h> #include <sys/stat.h> #include <unistd.h> #include <dirent.h> #include <regex.h> #include <stdio.h> #include <string.h> #include <errno.h> #include <err.h> enum { WALK_OK = 0, WALK_BADPATTERN, WALK_NAMETOOLONG, WALK_BADIO, }; #define WS_NONE 0 #define WS_RECURSIVE (1 << 0) #define WS_DEFAU...
Keep all operations the same but rewrite the snippet in C#.
(use '[clojure.java.io]) (defn walk [dirpath pattern] (doall (filter #(re-matches pattern (.getName %)) (file-seq (file dirpath))))) (map #(println (.getPath %)) (walk "src" #".*\.clj"))
using System; using System.Collections.Generic; using System.IO; using System.Linq; namespace RosettaRecursiveDirectory { class Program { static IEnumerable<FileInfo> TraverseDirectory(string rootPath, Func<FileInfo, bool> Pattern) { var directoryStack = new Stack<DirectoryInfo>(); ...
Change the programming language of this snippet from Clojure to C++ without modifying what it does.
(use '[clojure.java.io]) (defn walk [dirpath pattern] (doall (filter #(re-matches pattern (.getName %)) (file-seq (file dirpath))))) (map #(println (.getPath %)) (walk "src" #".*\.clj"))
#include "boost/filesystem.hpp" #include "boost/regex.hpp" #include <iostream> using namespace boost::filesystem; int main() { path current_dir("."); boost::regex pattern("a.*"); for (recursive_directory_iterator iter(current_dir), end; iter != end; ++iter) { std::string name = iter->path(...
Can you help me rewrite this code in Java instead of Clojure, keeping it the same logically?
(use '[clojure.java.io]) (defn walk [dirpath pattern] (doall (filter #(re-matches pattern (.getName %)) (file-seq (file dirpath))))) (map #(println (.getPath %)) (walk "src" #".*\.clj"))
import java.io.File; public class MainEntry { public static void main(String[] args) { walkin(new File("/home/user")); } public static void walkin(File dir) { String pattern = ".mp3"; File listFile[] = dir.listFiles(); if (listFile != null) { ...
Convert this Clojure block to Python, preserving its control flow and logic.
(use '[clojure.java.io]) (defn walk [dirpath pattern] (doall (filter #(re-matches pattern (.getName %)) (file-seq (file dirpath))))) (map #(println (.getPath %)) (walk "src" #".*\.clj"))
from pathlib import Path for path in Path('.').rglob('*.*'): print(path)
Convert the following code from Clojure to VB, ensuring the logic remains intact.
(use '[clojure.java.io]) (defn walk [dirpath pattern] (doall (filter #(re-matches pattern (.getName %)) (file-seq (file dirpath))))) (map #(println (.getPath %)) (walk "src" #".*\.clj"))
Sub printFiles(parentDir As FolderItem, pattern As String) For i As Integer = 1 To parentDir.Count If parentDir.Item(i).Directory Then printFiles(parentDir.Item(i), pattern) Else Dim rg as New RegEx Dim myMatch as RegExMatch rg.SearchPattern = pattern myMatch = rg.search(parentDi...
Port the provided Clojure code into Go while preserving the original functionality.
(use '[clojure.java.io]) (defn walk [dirpath pattern] (doall (filter #(re-matches pattern (.getName %)) (file-seq (file dirpath))))) (map #(println (.getPath %)) (walk "src" #".*\.clj"))
package main import ( "fmt" "os" "path/filepath" ) func VisitFile(fp string, fi os.FileInfo, err error) error { if err != nil { fmt.Println(err) return nil } if fi.IsDir() { return nil } matched, err := filepath.Match("*.mp3", fi.Name()) if err != n...
Transform the following Common_Lisp implementation into C, maintaining the same output and logic.
(ql:quickload :cl-fad) (defun mapc-directory-tree (fn directory &key (depth-first-p t)) (dolist (entry (cl-fad:list-directory directory)) (unless depth-first-p (funcall fn entry)) (when (cl-fad:directory-pathname-p entry) (mapc-directory-tree fn entry)) (when depth-first-p (funcall fn en...
#include <sys/types.h> #include <sys/stat.h> #include <unistd.h> #include <dirent.h> #include <regex.h> #include <stdio.h> #include <string.h> #include <errno.h> #include <err.h> enum { WALK_OK = 0, WALK_BADPATTERN, WALK_NAMETOOLONG, WALK_BADIO, }; #define WS_NONE 0 #define WS_RECURSIVE (1 << 0) #define WS_DEFAU...
Produce a functionally identical C# code for the snippet given in Common_Lisp.
(ql:quickload :cl-fad) (defun mapc-directory-tree (fn directory &key (depth-first-p t)) (dolist (entry (cl-fad:list-directory directory)) (unless depth-first-p (funcall fn entry)) (when (cl-fad:directory-pathname-p entry) (mapc-directory-tree fn entry)) (when depth-first-p (funcall fn en...
using System; using System.Collections.Generic; using System.IO; using System.Linq; namespace RosettaRecursiveDirectory { class Program { static IEnumerable<FileInfo> TraverseDirectory(string rootPath, Func<FileInfo, bool> Pattern) { var directoryStack = new Stack<DirectoryInfo>(); ...
Write the same algorithm in C++ as shown in this Common_Lisp implementation.
(ql:quickload :cl-fad) (defun mapc-directory-tree (fn directory &key (depth-first-p t)) (dolist (entry (cl-fad:list-directory directory)) (unless depth-first-p (funcall fn entry)) (when (cl-fad:directory-pathname-p entry) (mapc-directory-tree fn entry)) (when depth-first-p (funcall fn en...
#include "boost/filesystem.hpp" #include "boost/regex.hpp" #include <iostream> using namespace boost::filesystem; int main() { path current_dir("."); boost::regex pattern("a.*"); for (recursive_directory_iterator iter(current_dir), end; iter != end; ++iter) { std::string name = iter->path(...
Write the same code in Java as shown below in Common_Lisp.
(ql:quickload :cl-fad) (defun mapc-directory-tree (fn directory &key (depth-first-p t)) (dolist (entry (cl-fad:list-directory directory)) (unless depth-first-p (funcall fn entry)) (when (cl-fad:directory-pathname-p entry) (mapc-directory-tree fn entry)) (when depth-first-p (funcall fn en...
import java.io.File; public class MainEntry { public static void main(String[] args) { walkin(new File("/home/user")); } public static void walkin(File dir) { String pattern = ".mp3"; File listFile[] = dir.listFiles(); if (listFile != null) { ...
Can you help me rewrite this code in Python instead of Common_Lisp, keeping it the same logically?
(ql:quickload :cl-fad) (defun mapc-directory-tree (fn directory &key (depth-first-p t)) (dolist (entry (cl-fad:list-directory directory)) (unless depth-first-p (funcall fn entry)) (when (cl-fad:directory-pathname-p entry) (mapc-directory-tree fn entry)) (when depth-first-p (funcall fn en...
from pathlib import Path for path in Path('.').rglob('*.*'): print(path)
Convert the following code from Common_Lisp to VB, ensuring the logic remains intact.
(ql:quickload :cl-fad) (defun mapc-directory-tree (fn directory &key (depth-first-p t)) (dolist (entry (cl-fad:list-directory directory)) (unless depth-first-p (funcall fn entry)) (when (cl-fad:directory-pathname-p entry) (mapc-directory-tree fn entry)) (when depth-first-p (funcall fn en...
Sub printFiles(parentDir As FolderItem, pattern As String) For i As Integer = 1 To parentDir.Count If parentDir.Item(i).Directory Then printFiles(parentDir.Item(i), pattern) Else Dim rg as New RegEx Dim myMatch as RegExMatch rg.SearchPattern = pattern myMatch = rg.search(parentDi...
Keep all operations the same but rewrite the snippet in Go.
(ql:quickload :cl-fad) (defun mapc-directory-tree (fn directory &key (depth-first-p t)) (dolist (entry (cl-fad:list-directory directory)) (unless depth-first-p (funcall fn entry)) (when (cl-fad:directory-pathname-p entry) (mapc-directory-tree fn entry)) (when depth-first-p (funcall fn en...
package main import ( "fmt" "os" "path/filepath" ) func VisitFile(fp string, fi os.FileInfo, err error) error { if err != nil { fmt.Println(err) return nil } if fi.IsDir() { return nil } matched, err := filepath.Match("*.mp3", fi.Name()) if err != n...
Produce a language-to-language conversion: from D to C, same semantics.
void main() { import std.stdio, std.file; dirEntries("", "*.d", SpanMode.breadth).writeln; }
#include <sys/types.h> #include <sys/stat.h> #include <unistd.h> #include <dirent.h> #include <regex.h> #include <stdio.h> #include <string.h> #include <errno.h> #include <err.h> enum { WALK_OK = 0, WALK_BADPATTERN, WALK_NAMETOOLONG, WALK_BADIO, }; #define WS_NONE 0 #define WS_RECURSIVE (1 << 0) #define WS_DEFAU...
Ensure the translated C# code behaves exactly like the original D snippet.
void main() { import std.stdio, std.file; dirEntries("", "*.d", SpanMode.breadth).writeln; }
using System; using System.Collections.Generic; using System.IO; using System.Linq; namespace RosettaRecursiveDirectory { class Program { static IEnumerable<FileInfo> TraverseDirectory(string rootPath, Func<FileInfo, bool> Pattern) { var directoryStack = new Stack<DirectoryInfo>(); ...
Port the provided D code into C++ while preserving the original functionality.
void main() { import std.stdio, std.file; dirEntries("", "*.d", SpanMode.breadth).writeln; }
#include "boost/filesystem.hpp" #include "boost/regex.hpp" #include <iostream> using namespace boost::filesystem; int main() { path current_dir("."); boost::regex pattern("a.*"); for (recursive_directory_iterator iter(current_dir), end; iter != end; ++iter) { std::string name = iter->path(...
Write a version of this D function in Java with identical behavior.
void main() { import std.stdio, std.file; dirEntries("", "*.d", SpanMode.breadth).writeln; }
import java.io.File; public class MainEntry { public static void main(String[] args) { walkin(new File("/home/user")); } public static void walkin(File dir) { String pattern = ".mp3"; File listFile[] = dir.listFiles(); if (listFile != null) { ...
Rewrite this program in Python while keeping its functionality equivalent to the D version.
void main() { import std.stdio, std.file; dirEntries("", "*.d", SpanMode.breadth).writeln; }
from pathlib import Path for path in Path('.').rglob('*.*'): print(path)
Generate a VB translation of this D snippet without changing its computational steps.
void main() { import std.stdio, std.file; dirEntries("", "*.d", SpanMode.breadth).writeln; }
Sub printFiles(parentDir As FolderItem, pattern As String) For i As Integer = 1 To parentDir.Count If parentDir.Item(i).Directory Then printFiles(parentDir.Item(i), pattern) Else Dim rg as New RegEx Dim myMatch as RegExMatch rg.SearchPattern = pattern myMatch = rg.search(parentDi...
Translate the given D code snippet into Go without altering its behavior.
void main() { import std.stdio, std.file; dirEntries("", "*.d", SpanMode.breadth).writeln; }
package main import ( "fmt" "os" "path/filepath" ) func VisitFile(fp string, fi os.FileInfo, err error) error { if err != nil { fmt.Println(err) return nil } if fi.IsDir() { return nil } matched, err := filepath.Match("*.mp3", fi.Name()) if err != n...
Change the programming language of this snippet from Delphi to C without modifying what it does.
program Walk_a_directory; uses System.IOUtils; var Files: TArray<string>; FileName, Directory: string; begin Directory := TDirectory.GetCurrentDirectory; Files := TDirectory.GetFiles(Directory, '*.*', TSearchOption.soAllDirectories); for FileName in Files do begin Writeln(FileName); end; ...
#include <sys/types.h> #include <sys/stat.h> #include <unistd.h> #include <dirent.h> #include <regex.h> #include <stdio.h> #include <string.h> #include <errno.h> #include <err.h> enum { WALK_OK = 0, WALK_BADPATTERN, WALK_NAMETOOLONG, WALK_BADIO, }; #define WS_NONE 0 #define WS_RECURSIVE (1 << 0) #define WS_DEFAU...
Write a version of this Delphi function in C# with identical behavior.
program Walk_a_directory; uses System.IOUtils; var Files: TArray<string>; FileName, Directory: string; begin Directory := TDirectory.GetCurrentDirectory; Files := TDirectory.GetFiles(Directory, '*.*', TSearchOption.soAllDirectories); for FileName in Files do begin Writeln(FileName); end; ...
using System; using System.Collections.Generic; using System.IO; using System.Linq; namespace RosettaRecursiveDirectory { class Program { static IEnumerable<FileInfo> TraverseDirectory(string rootPath, Func<FileInfo, bool> Pattern) { var directoryStack = new Stack<DirectoryInfo>(); ...
Please provide an equivalent version of this Delphi code in C++.
program Walk_a_directory; uses System.IOUtils; var Files: TArray<string>; FileName, Directory: string; begin Directory := TDirectory.GetCurrentDirectory; Files := TDirectory.GetFiles(Directory, '*.*', TSearchOption.soAllDirectories); for FileName in Files do begin Writeln(FileName); end; ...
#include "boost/filesystem.hpp" #include "boost/regex.hpp" #include <iostream> using namespace boost::filesystem; int main() { path current_dir("."); boost::regex pattern("a.*"); for (recursive_directory_iterator iter(current_dir), end; iter != end; ++iter) { std::string name = iter->path(...
Convert this Delphi snippet to Java and keep its semantics consistent.
program Walk_a_directory; uses System.IOUtils; var Files: TArray<string>; FileName, Directory: string; begin Directory := TDirectory.GetCurrentDirectory; Files := TDirectory.GetFiles(Directory, '*.*', TSearchOption.soAllDirectories); for FileName in Files do begin Writeln(FileName); end; ...
import java.io.File; public class MainEntry { public static void main(String[] args) { walkin(new File("/home/user")); } public static void walkin(File dir) { String pattern = ".mp3"; File listFile[] = dir.listFiles(); if (listFile != null) { ...
Write a version of this Delphi function in Python with identical behavior.
program Walk_a_directory; uses System.IOUtils; var Files: TArray<string>; FileName, Directory: string; begin Directory := TDirectory.GetCurrentDirectory; Files := TDirectory.GetFiles(Directory, '*.*', TSearchOption.soAllDirectories); for FileName in Files do begin Writeln(FileName); end; ...
from pathlib import Path for path in Path('.').rglob('*.*'): print(path)
Preserve the algorithm and functionality while converting the code from Delphi to VB.
program Walk_a_directory; uses System.IOUtils; var Files: TArray<string>; FileName, Directory: string; begin Directory := TDirectory.GetCurrentDirectory; Files := TDirectory.GetFiles(Directory, '*.*', TSearchOption.soAllDirectories); for FileName in Files do begin Writeln(FileName); end; ...
Sub printFiles(parentDir As FolderItem, pattern As String) For i As Integer = 1 To parentDir.Count If parentDir.Item(i).Directory Then printFiles(parentDir.Item(i), pattern) Else Dim rg as New RegEx Dim myMatch as RegExMatch rg.SearchPattern = pattern myMatch = rg.search(parentDi...