Instruction
stringlengths
45
106
input_code
stringlengths
1
13.7k
output_code
stringlengths
1
13.7k
Change the programming language of this snippet from Nim to PHP without modifying what it does.
import times, os, strutils let t = epochTime() proc handler() {.noconv.} = echo "Program has run for ", formatFloat(epochTime() - t, precision = 0), " seconds." quit 0 setControlCHook(handler) for n in 1 ..< int64.high: sleep 500 echo n
<?php declare(ticks = 1); $start = microtime(true); function mySigHandler() { global $start; $elapsed = microtime(true) - $start; echo "Ran for $elapsed seconds.\n"; exit(); } pcntl_signal(SIGINT, 'mySigHandler'); for ($n = 0; ; usleep(500000)) // 0.5 seconds echo ++$n, "\n"; ?>
Produce a functionally identical PHP code for the snippet given in OCaml.
#load "unix.cma";; let start = Unix.gettimeofday ();; Sys.set_signal Sys.sigint (Sys.Signal_handle (fun _signum -> Printf.printf "Ran for %f seconds.\n" (Unix.gettimeofday () -. start); exit 0));; let rec loop n = Printf.printf "%d\n%!" n; Unix.sleep 1; loop (n + 1) in loop 1;;
<?php declare(ticks = 1); $start = microtime(true); function mySigHandler() { global $start; $elapsed = microtime(true) - $start; echo "Ran for $elapsed seconds.\n"; exit(); } pcntl_signal(SIGINT, 'mySigHandler'); for ($n = 0; ; usleep(500000)) // 0.5 seconds echo ++$n, "\n"; ?>
Rewrite this program in PHP while keeping its functionality equivalent to the Perl version.
my $start = time; my $arlm=5; my $i; $SIG{QUIT} = sub {print " Ran for ", time - $start, " seconds.\n"; die; }; $SIG{INT} = sub {print " Running for ", time - $start, " seconds.\n"; }; $SIG{ALRM} = sub {print " After $arlm seconds i= $i. Executing for ", time - $start, " seconds.\n"; alarm $arlm }; alarm $arlm; print " ^C to inerrupt, ^\\ to quit, takes a break at $arlm seconds \n"; while ( 1 ) { for ( $w=11935000; $w--; $w>0 ){}; print ( ++$i," \n"); }
<?php declare(ticks = 1); $start = microtime(true); function mySigHandler() { global $start; $elapsed = microtime(true) - $start; echo "Ran for $elapsed seconds.\n"; exit(); } pcntl_signal(SIGINT, 'mySigHandler'); for ($n = 0; ; usleep(500000)) // 0.5 seconds echo ++$n, "\n"; ?>
Produce a functionally identical PHP code for the snippet given in PowerShell.
$Start_Time = (Get-date).second Write-Host "Type CTRL-C to Terminate..." $n = 1 Try { While($true) { Write-Host $n $n ++ Start-Sleep -m 500 } } Finally { $End_Time = (Get-date).second $Time_Diff = $End_Time - $Start_Time Write-Host "Total time in seconds"$Time_Diff }
<?php declare(ticks = 1); $start = microtime(true); function mySigHandler() { global $start; $elapsed = microtime(true) - $start; echo "Ran for $elapsed seconds.\n"; exit(); } pcntl_signal(SIGINT, 'mySigHandler'); for ($n = 0; ; usleep(500000)) // 0.5 seconds echo ++$n, "\n"; ?>
Write a version of this Racket function in PHP with identical behavior.
#lang racket (define now current-milliseconds) (define start (now)) (with-handlers ([exn:break? (λ(x) (define elapsed (/ (- (now) start) 1000.)) (displayln (~a "Total time: " elapsed)))]) (for ([i (in-naturals)]) (displayln i) (sleep 0.5)))
<?php declare(ticks = 1); $start = microtime(true); function mySigHandler() { global $start; $elapsed = microtime(true) - $start; echo "Ran for $elapsed seconds.\n"; exit(); } pcntl_signal(SIGINT, 'mySigHandler'); for ($n = 0; ; usleep(500000)) // 0.5 seconds echo ++$n, "\n"; ?>
Change the following COBOL code into PHP without altering its purpose.
identification division. program-id. signals. data division. working-storage section. 01 signal-flag pic 9 external. 88 signalled value 1. 01 half-seconds usage binary-long. 01 start-time usage binary-c-long. 01 end-time usage binary-c-long. 01 handler usage program-pointer. 01 SIGINT constant as 2. procedure division. call "gettimeofday" using start-time null set handler to entry "handle-sigint" call "signal" using by value SIGINT by value handler perform until exit if signalled then exit perform end-if call "CBL_OC_NANOSLEEP" using 500000000 if signalled then exit perform end-if add 1 to half-seconds display half-seconds end-perform call "gettimeofday" using end-time null subtract start-time from end-time display "Program ran for " end-time " seconds" goback. end program signals. identification division. program-id. handle-sigint. data division. working-storage section. 01 signal-flag pic 9 external. linkage section. 01 the-signal usage binary-long. procedure division using by value the-signal returning omitted. move 1 to signal-flag goback. end program handle-sigint.
<?php declare(ticks = 1); $start = microtime(true); function mySigHandler() { global $start; $elapsed = microtime(true) - $start; echo "Ran for $elapsed seconds.\n"; exit(); } pcntl_signal(SIGINT, 'mySigHandler'); for ($n = 0; ; usleep(500000)) // 0.5 seconds echo ++$n, "\n"; ?>
Transform the following REXX implementation into PHP, maintaining the same output and logic.
call time 'Reset' signal on halt do j=1 say right(j,20) t=time('E') do forever; u=time('Elapsed') if u<t | u>t+.5 then iterate j end end halt: say 'program HALTed, it ran for' format(time("ELapsed"),,2) 'seconds.'
<?php declare(ticks = 1); $start = microtime(true); function mySigHandler() { global $start; $elapsed = microtime(true) - $start; echo "Ran for $elapsed seconds.\n"; exit(); } pcntl_signal(SIGINT, 'mySigHandler'); for ($n = 0; ; usleep(500000)) // 0.5 seconds echo ++$n, "\n"; ?>
Write a version of this Ruby function in PHP with identical behavior.
start = Time.utc ch = Channel(Int32 | Symbol).new spawn do i = 0 loop do sleep 1 ch.send(i += 1) end end Signal::INT.trap do Signal::INT.reset ch.send(:kill) end loop do x = ch.receive break if x == :kill puts x end elapsed = Time.utc - start puts "Program has run for %5.3f seconds." % elapsed.total_seconds
<?php declare(ticks = 1); $start = microtime(true); function mySigHandler() { global $start; $elapsed = microtime(true) - $start; echo "Ran for $elapsed seconds.\n"; exit(); } pcntl_signal(SIGINT, 'mySigHandler'); for ($n = 0; ; usleep(500000)) // 0.5 seconds echo ++$n, "\n"; ?>
Rewrite the snippet below in PHP so it works the same as the original Scala code.
import sun.misc.Signal import sun.misc.SignalHandler fun main(args: Array<String>) { val startTime = System.currentTimeMillis() Signal.handle(Signal("INT"), object : SignalHandler { override fun handle(sig: Signal) { val elapsedTime = (System.currentTimeMillis() - startTime) / 1000.0 println("\nThe program has run for $elapsedTime seconds") System.exit(0) } }) var i = 0 while(true) { println(i++) Thread.sleep(500) } }
<?php declare(ticks = 1); $start = microtime(true); function mySigHandler() { global $start; $elapsed = microtime(true) - $start; echo "Ran for $elapsed seconds.\n"; exit(); } pcntl_signal(SIGINT, 'mySigHandler'); for ($n = 0; ; usleep(500000)) // 0.5 seconds echo ++$n, "\n"; ?>
Rewrite the snippet below in PHP so it works the same as the original Swift code.
import Foundation let startTime = NSDate() var signalReceived: sig_atomic_t = 0 signal(SIGINT) { signal in signalReceived = 1 } for var i = 0;; { if signalReceived == 1 { break } usleep(500_000) if signalReceived == 1 { break } print(++i) } let endTime = NSDate() print("Program has run for \(endTime.timeIntervalSinceDate(startTime)) seconds")
<?php declare(ticks = 1); $start = microtime(true); function mySigHandler() { global $start; $elapsed = microtime(true) - $start; echo "Ran for $elapsed seconds.\n"; exit(); } pcntl_signal(SIGINT, 'mySigHandler'); for ($n = 0; ; usleep(500000)) // 0.5 seconds echo ++$n, "\n"; ?>
Port the provided Tcl code into PHP while preserving the original functionality.
package require Expect proc sigint_handler {} { puts "elapsed time: [expr {[clock seconds] - $::start_time}] seconds" set ::looping false } trap sigint_handler SIGINT set start_time [clock seconds] set n 0 set looping true while {$looping} { puts [incr n] after 500 }
<?php declare(ticks = 1); $start = microtime(true); function mySigHandler() { global $start; $elapsed = microtime(true) - $start; echo "Ran for $elapsed seconds.\n"; exit(); } pcntl_signal(SIGINT, 'mySigHandler'); for ($n = 0; ; usleep(500000)) // 0.5 seconds echo ++$n, "\n"; ?>
Write a version of this C++ function in Rust with identical behavior.
#include <chrono> #include <csignal> #include <ctime> #include <iostream> #include <thread> volatile sig_atomic_t gotint = 0; void handler(int signum) { gotint = 1; } int main() { using namespace std; signal(SIGINT, handler); int i = 0; clock_t startTime = clock(); while (true) { if (gotint) break; std::this_thread::sleep_for(std::chrono::milliseconds(500)); if (gotint) break; cout << ++i << endl; } clock_t endTime = clock(); double dt = (endTime - startTime) / (double)CLOCKS_PER_SEC; cout << "Program has run for " << dt << " seconds" << endl; return 0; }
#[cfg(unix)] fn main() { use std::sync::atomic::{AtomicBool, Ordering}; use std::thread; use std::time::{Duration, Instant}; use libc::{sighandler_t, SIGINT}; let duration = Duration::from_secs(1) / 2; static mut GOT_SIGINT: AtomicBool = AtomicBool::new(false); unsafe { GOT_SIGINT.store(false, Ordering::Release); unsafe fn handle_sigint() { GOT_SIGINT.store(true, Ordering::Release); } libc::signal(SIGINT, handle_sigint as sighandler_t); } let start = Instant::now(); let mut i = 0u32; loop { thread::sleep(duration); if unsafe { GOT_SIGINT.load(Ordering::Acquire) } { break; } i += 1; println!("{}", i); } let elapsed = start.elapsed(); println!("Program has run for {} seconds", elapsed.as_secs()); } #[cfg(not(unix))] fn main() { println!("Not supported on this platform"); }
Keep all operations the same but rewrite the snippet in Rust.
import sun.misc.Signal; import sun.misc.SignalHandler; public class ExampleSignalHandler { public static void main(String... args) throws InterruptedException { final long start = System.nanoTime(); Signal.handle(new Signal("INT"), new SignalHandler() { public void handle(Signal sig) { System.out.format("\nProgram execution took %f seconds\n", (System.nanoTime() - start) / 1e9f); System.exit(0); } }); int counter = 0; while(true) { System.out.println(counter++); Thread.sleep(500); } } }
#[cfg(unix)] fn main() { use std::sync::atomic::{AtomicBool, Ordering}; use std::thread; use std::time::{Duration, Instant}; use libc::{sighandler_t, SIGINT}; let duration = Duration::from_secs(1) / 2; static mut GOT_SIGINT: AtomicBool = AtomicBool::new(false); unsafe { GOT_SIGINT.store(false, Ordering::Release); unsafe fn handle_sigint() { GOT_SIGINT.store(true, Ordering::Release); } libc::signal(SIGINT, handle_sigint as sighandler_t); } let start = Instant::now(); let mut i = 0u32; loop { thread::sleep(duration); if unsafe { GOT_SIGINT.load(Ordering::Acquire) } { break; } i += 1; println!("{}", i); } let elapsed = start.elapsed(); println!("Program has run for {} seconds", elapsed.as_secs()); } #[cfg(not(unix))] fn main() { println!("Not supported on this platform"); }
Port the following code from Go to Rust with equivalent syntax and logic.
package main import ( "fmt" "os" "os/signal" "time" ) func main() { start := time.Now() k := time.Tick(time.Second / 2) sc := make(chan os.Signal, 1) signal.Notify(sc, os.Interrupt) for n := 1; ; { select { case <-k: fmt.Println(n) n++ case <-sc: fmt.Printf("Ran for %f seconds.\n", time.Now().Sub(start).Seconds()) return } } }
#[cfg(unix)] fn main() { use std::sync::atomic::{AtomicBool, Ordering}; use std::thread; use std::time::{Duration, Instant}; use libc::{sighandler_t, SIGINT}; let duration = Duration::from_secs(1) / 2; static mut GOT_SIGINT: AtomicBool = AtomicBool::new(false); unsafe { GOT_SIGINT.store(false, Ordering::Release); unsafe fn handle_sigint() { GOT_SIGINT.store(true, Ordering::Release); } libc::signal(SIGINT, handle_sigint as sighandler_t); } let start = Instant::now(); let mut i = 0u32; loop { thread::sleep(duration); if unsafe { GOT_SIGINT.load(Ordering::Acquire) } { break; } i += 1; println!("{}", i); } let elapsed = start.elapsed(); println!("Program has run for {} seconds", elapsed.as_secs()); } #[cfg(not(unix))] fn main() { println!("Not supported on this platform"); }
Generate an equivalent Python version of this Rust code.
#[cfg(unix)] fn main() { use std::sync::atomic::{AtomicBool, Ordering}; use std::thread; use std::time::{Duration, Instant}; use libc::{sighandler_t, SIGINT}; let duration = Duration::from_secs(1) / 2; static mut GOT_SIGINT: AtomicBool = AtomicBool::new(false); unsafe { GOT_SIGINT.store(false, Ordering::Release); unsafe fn handle_sigint() { GOT_SIGINT.store(true, Ordering::Release); } libc::signal(SIGINT, handle_sigint as sighandler_t); } let start = Instant::now(); let mut i = 0u32; loop { thread::sleep(duration); if unsafe { GOT_SIGINT.load(Ordering::Acquire) } { break; } i += 1; println!("{}", i); } let elapsed = start.elapsed(); println!("Program has run for {} seconds", elapsed.as_secs()); } #[cfg(not(unix))] fn main() { println!("Not supported on this platform"); }
import time def counter(): n = 0 t1 = time.time() while True: try: time.sleep(0.5) n += 1 print n except KeyboardInterrupt, e: print 'Program has run for %5.3f seconds.' % (time.time() - t1) break counter()
Can you help me rewrite this code in VB instead of Rust, keeping it the same logically?
#[cfg(unix)] fn main() { use std::sync::atomic::{AtomicBool, Ordering}; use std::thread; use std::time::{Duration, Instant}; use libc::{sighandler_t, SIGINT}; let duration = Duration::from_secs(1) / 2; static mut GOT_SIGINT: AtomicBool = AtomicBool::new(false); unsafe { GOT_SIGINT.store(false, Ordering::Release); unsafe fn handle_sigint() { GOT_SIGINT.store(true, Ordering::Release); } libc::signal(SIGINT, handle_sigint as sighandler_t); } let start = Instant::now(); let mut i = 0u32; loop { thread::sleep(duration); if unsafe { GOT_SIGINT.load(Ordering::Acquire) } { break; } i += 1; println!("{}", i); } let elapsed = start.elapsed(); println!("Program has run for {} seconds", elapsed.as_secs()); } #[cfg(not(unix))] fn main() { println!("Not supported on this platform"); }
Module Module1 Dim startTime As Date Sub Main() startTime = Date.Now AddHandler Console.CancelKeyPress, AddressOf Console_CancelKeyPress Dim counter = 0 While True counter += 1 Console.WriteLine(counter) Threading.Thread.Sleep(500) End While End Sub Sub Console_CancelKeyPress(sender As Object, e As ConsoleCancelEventArgs) Dim stopTime = Date.Now Console.WriteLine("This program ran for {0:000.000} seconds", (stopTime - startTime).TotalMilliseconds / 1000) Environment.Exit(0) End Sub End Module
Convert the following code from C# to Rust, ensuring the logic remains intact.
using System; class Program { static DateTime start; static void Main(string[] args) { start = DateTime.Now; Console.CancelKeyPress += new ConsoleCancelEventHandler(Console_CancelKeyPress); int counter = 0; while (true) { Console.WriteLine(++counter); System.Threading.Thread.Sleep(500); } } static void Console_CancelKeyPress(object sender, ConsoleCancelEventArgs e) { var end = DateTime.Now; Console.WriteLine("This program ran for {0:000.000} seconds.", (end - start).TotalMilliseconds / 1000); Environment.Exit(0); } }
#[cfg(unix)] fn main() { use std::sync::atomic::{AtomicBool, Ordering}; use std::thread; use std::time::{Duration, Instant}; use libc::{sighandler_t, SIGINT}; let duration = Duration::from_secs(1) / 2; static mut GOT_SIGINT: AtomicBool = AtomicBool::new(false); unsafe { GOT_SIGINT.store(false, Ordering::Release); unsafe fn handle_sigint() { GOT_SIGINT.store(true, Ordering::Release); } libc::signal(SIGINT, handle_sigint as sighandler_t); } let start = Instant::now(); let mut i = 0u32; loop { thread::sleep(duration); if unsafe { GOT_SIGINT.load(Ordering::Acquire) } { break; } i += 1; println!("{}", i); } let elapsed = start.elapsed(); println!("Program has run for {} seconds", elapsed.as_secs()); } #[cfg(not(unix))] fn main() { println!("Not supported on this platform"); }
Convert the following code from C to Rust, ensuring the logic remains intact.
#include <stdio.h> #include <stdlib.h> #include <signal.h> #include <time.h> #include <unistd.h> volatile sig_atomic_t gotint = 0; void handleSigint() { gotint = 1; } int main() { clock_t startTime = clock(); signal(SIGINT, handleSigint); int i=0; for (;;) { if (gotint) break; usleep(500000); if (gotint) break; printf("%d\n", ++i); } clock_t endTime = clock(); double td = (endTime - startTime) / (double)CLOCKS_PER_SEC; printf("Program has run for %5.3f seconds\n", td); return 0; }
#[cfg(unix)] fn main() { use std::sync::atomic::{AtomicBool, Ordering}; use std::thread; use std::time::{Duration, Instant}; use libc::{sighandler_t, SIGINT}; let duration = Duration::from_secs(1) / 2; static mut GOT_SIGINT: AtomicBool = AtomicBool::new(false); unsafe { GOT_SIGINT.store(false, Ordering::Release); unsafe fn handle_sigint() { GOT_SIGINT.store(true, Ordering::Release); } libc::signal(SIGINT, handle_sigint as sighandler_t); } let start = Instant::now(); let mut i = 0u32; loop { thread::sleep(duration); if unsafe { GOT_SIGINT.load(Ordering::Acquire) } { break; } i += 1; println!("{}", i); } let elapsed = start.elapsed(); println!("Program has run for {} seconds", elapsed.as_secs()); } #[cfg(not(unix))] fn main() { println!("Not supported on this platform"); }
Write the same code in C# as shown below in Ada.
with Ada.Integer_Text_IO; use Ada.Integer_Text_IO; with Ada.Text_IO; use Ada.Text_IO; procedure Test_Integer_Text_IO is begin for I in 1..33 loop Put (I, Width =>3, Base=> 10); Put (I, Width =>7, Base=> 16); Put (I, Width =>6, Base=> 8); New_Line; end loop; end Test_Integer_Text_IO;
using System; namespace NonDecimalRadicesOutput { class Program { static void Main(string[] args) { for (int i = 0; i < 42; i++) { string binary = Convert.ToString(i, 2); string octal = Convert.ToString(i, 8); string hexadecimal = Convert.ToString(i, 16); Console.WriteLine(string.Format("Decimal: {0}, Binary: {1}, Octal: {2}, Hexadecimal: {3}", i, binary, octal, hexadecimal)); } Console.ReadKey(); } } }
Translate the given Ada code snippet into C without altering its behavior.
with Ada.Integer_Text_IO; use Ada.Integer_Text_IO; with Ada.Text_IO; use Ada.Text_IO; procedure Test_Integer_Text_IO is begin for I in 1..33 loop Put (I, Width =>3, Base=> 10); Put (I, Width =>7, Base=> 16); Put (I, Width =>6, Base=> 8); New_Line; end loop; end Test_Integer_Text_IO;
#include <stdio.h> int main() { int i; for(i=1; i <= 33; i++) printf("%6d %6x %6o\n", i, i, i); return 0; }
Change the programming language of this snippet from Ada to C++ without modifying what it does.
with Ada.Integer_Text_IO; use Ada.Integer_Text_IO; with Ada.Text_IO; use Ada.Text_IO; procedure Test_Integer_Text_IO is begin for I in 1..33 loop Put (I, Width =>3, Base=> 10); Put (I, Width =>7, Base=> 16); Put (I, Width =>6, Base=> 8); New_Line; end loop; end Test_Integer_Text_IO;
#include <iostream> #include <iomanip> int main() { for (int i = 0; i <= 33; i++) std::cout << std::setw(6) << std::dec << i << " " << std::setw(6) << std::hex << i << " " << std::setw(6) << std::oct << i << std::endl; return 0; }
Convert the following code from Ada to Go, ensuring the logic remains intact.
with Ada.Integer_Text_IO; use Ada.Integer_Text_IO; with Ada.Text_IO; use Ada.Text_IO; procedure Test_Integer_Text_IO is begin for I in 1..33 loop Put (I, Width =>3, Base=> 10); Put (I, Width =>7, Base=> 16); Put (I, Width =>6, Base=> 8); New_Line; end loop; end Test_Integer_Text_IO;
package main import ( "fmt" "math/big" "strconv" ) func main() { fmt.Printf("%b\n", 13) fmt.Printf("%o\n", 13) fmt.Printf("%d\n", 13) fmt.Printf("%x\n", 13) d := big.NewInt(13) fmt.Printf("%b\n", d) fmt.Printf("%o\n", d) fmt.Printf("%d\n", d) fmt.Printf("%x\n", d) fmt.Println(strconv.FormatInt(1313, 19)) }
Rewrite this program in Java while keeping its functionality equivalent to the Ada version.
with Ada.Integer_Text_IO; use Ada.Integer_Text_IO; with Ada.Text_IO; use Ada.Text_IO; procedure Test_Integer_Text_IO is begin for I in 1..33 loop Put (I, Width =>3, Base=> 10); Put (I, Width =>7, Base=> 16); Put (I, Width =>6, Base=> 8); New_Line; end loop; end Test_Integer_Text_IO;
public static void main(String args[]){ for(int a= 0;a < 33;a++){ System.out.println(Integer.toBinaryString(a)); System.out.println(Integer.toOctalString(a)); System.out.println(Integer.toHexString(a)); System.out.printf("%3o %2d %2x\n",a ,a ,a); } }
Transform the following Ada implementation into Python, maintaining the same output and logic.
with Ada.Integer_Text_IO; use Ada.Integer_Text_IO; with Ada.Text_IO; use Ada.Text_IO; procedure Test_Integer_Text_IO is begin for I in 1..33 loop Put (I, Width =>3, Base=> 10); Put (I, Width =>7, Base=> 16); Put (I, Width =>6, Base=> 8); New_Line; end loop; end Test_Integer_Text_IO;
>>> for n in range(34): print " {0:6b} {1:3o} {2:2d} {3:2X}".format(n, n, n, n) 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 1 10 2 2 2 11 3 3 3 100 4 4 4 101 5 5 5 110 6 6 6 111 7 7 7 1000 10 8 8 1001 11 9 9 1010 12 10 A 1011 13 11 B 1100 14 12 C 1101 15 13 D 1110 16 14 E 1111 17 15 F 10000 20 16 10 10001 21 17 11 10010 22 18 12 10011 23 19 13 10100 24 20 14 10101 25 21 15 10110 26 22 16 10111 27 23 17 11000 30 24 18 11001 31 25 19 11010 32 26 1A 11011 33 27 1B 11100 34 28 1C 11101 35 29 1D 11110 36 30 1E 11111 37 31 1F 100000 40 32 20 100001 41 33 21 >>>
Translate the given Arturo code snippet into C without altering its behavior.
loop 0..33 'i -> print [ pad as.binary i 6 pad as.octal i 2 pad to :string i 2 pad as.hex i 2 ]
#include <stdio.h> int main() { int i; for(i=1; i <= 33; i++) printf("%6d %6x %6o\n", i, i, i); return 0; }
Please provide an equivalent version of this Arturo code in C#.
loop 0..33 'i -> print [ pad as.binary i 6 pad as.octal i 2 pad to :string i 2 pad as.hex i 2 ]
using System; namespace NonDecimalRadicesOutput { class Program { static void Main(string[] args) { for (int i = 0; i < 42; i++) { string binary = Convert.ToString(i, 2); string octal = Convert.ToString(i, 8); string hexadecimal = Convert.ToString(i, 16); Console.WriteLine(string.Format("Decimal: {0}, Binary: {1}, Octal: {2}, Hexadecimal: {3}", i, binary, octal, hexadecimal)); } Console.ReadKey(); } } }
Ensure the translated C++ code behaves exactly like the original Arturo snippet.
loop 0..33 'i -> print [ pad as.binary i 6 pad as.octal i 2 pad to :string i 2 pad as.hex i 2 ]
#include <iostream> #include <iomanip> int main() { for (int i = 0; i <= 33; i++) std::cout << std::setw(6) << std::dec << i << " " << std::setw(6) << std::hex << i << " " << std::setw(6) << std::oct << i << std::endl; return 0; }
Produce a language-to-language conversion: from Arturo to Java, same semantics.
loop 0..33 'i -> print [ pad as.binary i 6 pad as.octal i 2 pad to :string i 2 pad as.hex i 2 ]
public static void main(String args[]){ for(int a= 0;a < 33;a++){ System.out.println(Integer.toBinaryString(a)); System.out.println(Integer.toOctalString(a)); System.out.println(Integer.toHexString(a)); System.out.printf("%3o %2d %2x\n",a ,a ,a); } }
Keep all operations the same but rewrite the snippet in Python.
loop 0..33 'i -> print [ pad as.binary i 6 pad as.octal i 2 pad to :string i 2 pad as.hex i 2 ]
>>> for n in range(34): print " {0:6b} {1:3o} {2:2d} {3:2X}".format(n, n, n, n) 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 1 10 2 2 2 11 3 3 3 100 4 4 4 101 5 5 5 110 6 6 6 111 7 7 7 1000 10 8 8 1001 11 9 9 1010 12 10 A 1011 13 11 B 1100 14 12 C 1101 15 13 D 1110 16 14 E 1111 17 15 F 10000 20 16 10 10001 21 17 11 10010 22 18 12 10011 23 19 13 10100 24 20 14 10101 25 21 15 10110 26 22 16 10111 27 23 17 11000 30 24 18 11001 31 25 19 11010 32 26 1A 11011 33 27 1B 11100 34 28 1C 11101 35 29 1D 11110 36 30 1E 11111 37 31 1F 100000 40 32 20 100001 41 33 21 >>>
Translate the given Arturo code snippet into Go without altering its behavior.
loop 0..33 'i -> print [ pad as.binary i 6 pad as.octal i 2 pad to :string i 2 pad as.hex i 2 ]
package main import ( "fmt" "math/big" "strconv" ) func main() { fmt.Printf("%b\n", 13) fmt.Printf("%o\n", 13) fmt.Printf("%d\n", 13) fmt.Printf("%x\n", 13) d := big.NewInt(13) fmt.Printf("%b\n", d) fmt.Printf("%o\n", d) fmt.Printf("%d\n", d) fmt.Printf("%x\n", d) fmt.Println(strconv.FormatInt(1313, 19)) }
Produce a functionally identical C code for the snippet given in AutoHotKey.
MsgBox % BC("FF",16,3)  BC(NumStr,InputBase=8,OutputBase=10) { Static S = 12345678901234567890123456789012345678901234567890123456789012345 DllCall("msvcrt\_i64toa","Int64",DllCall("msvcrt\_strtoui64","Str",NumStr,"Uint",0,"UInt",InputBase,"CDECLInt64"),"Str",S,"UInt",OutputBase,"CDECL") Return S }
#include <stdio.h> int main() { int i; for(i=1; i <= 33; i++) printf("%6d %6x %6o\n", i, i, i); return 0; }
Generate a C# translation of this AutoHotKey snippet without changing its computational steps.
MsgBox % BC("FF",16,3)  BC(NumStr,InputBase=8,OutputBase=10) { Static S = 12345678901234567890123456789012345678901234567890123456789012345 DllCall("msvcrt\_i64toa","Int64",DllCall("msvcrt\_strtoui64","Str",NumStr,"Uint",0,"UInt",InputBase,"CDECLInt64"),"Str",S,"UInt",OutputBase,"CDECL") Return S }
using System; namespace NonDecimalRadicesOutput { class Program { static void Main(string[] args) { for (int i = 0; i < 42; i++) { string binary = Convert.ToString(i, 2); string octal = Convert.ToString(i, 8); string hexadecimal = Convert.ToString(i, 16); Console.WriteLine(string.Format("Decimal: {0}, Binary: {1}, Octal: {2}, Hexadecimal: {3}", i, binary, octal, hexadecimal)); } Console.ReadKey(); } } }
Convert this AutoHotKey snippet to C++ and keep its semantics consistent.
MsgBox % BC("FF",16,3)  BC(NumStr,InputBase=8,OutputBase=10) { Static S = 12345678901234567890123456789012345678901234567890123456789012345 DllCall("msvcrt\_i64toa","Int64",DllCall("msvcrt\_strtoui64","Str",NumStr,"Uint",0,"UInt",InputBase,"CDECLInt64"),"Str",S,"UInt",OutputBase,"CDECL") Return S }
#include <iostream> #include <iomanip> int main() { for (int i = 0; i <= 33; i++) std::cout << std::setw(6) << std::dec << i << " " << std::setw(6) << std::hex << i << " " << std::setw(6) << std::oct << i << std::endl; return 0; }
Generate an equivalent Java version of this AutoHotKey code.
MsgBox % BC("FF",16,3)  BC(NumStr,InputBase=8,OutputBase=10) { Static S = 12345678901234567890123456789012345678901234567890123456789012345 DllCall("msvcrt\_i64toa","Int64",DllCall("msvcrt\_strtoui64","Str",NumStr,"Uint",0,"UInt",InputBase,"CDECLInt64"),"Str",S,"UInt",OutputBase,"CDECL") Return S }
public static void main(String args[]){ for(int a= 0;a < 33;a++){ System.out.println(Integer.toBinaryString(a)); System.out.println(Integer.toOctalString(a)); System.out.println(Integer.toHexString(a)); System.out.printf("%3o %2d %2x\n",a ,a ,a); } }
Write the same algorithm in Python as shown in this AutoHotKey implementation.
MsgBox % BC("FF",16,3)  BC(NumStr,InputBase=8,OutputBase=10) { Static S = 12345678901234567890123456789012345678901234567890123456789012345 DllCall("msvcrt\_i64toa","Int64",DllCall("msvcrt\_strtoui64","Str",NumStr,"Uint",0,"UInt",InputBase,"CDECLInt64"),"Str",S,"UInt",OutputBase,"CDECL") Return S }
>>> for n in range(34): print " {0:6b} {1:3o} {2:2d} {3:2X}".format(n, n, n, n) 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 1 10 2 2 2 11 3 3 3 100 4 4 4 101 5 5 5 110 6 6 6 111 7 7 7 1000 10 8 8 1001 11 9 9 1010 12 10 A 1011 13 11 B 1100 14 12 C 1101 15 13 D 1110 16 14 E 1111 17 15 F 10000 20 16 10 10001 21 17 11 10010 22 18 12 10011 23 19 13 10100 24 20 14 10101 25 21 15 10110 26 22 16 10111 27 23 17 11000 30 24 18 11001 31 25 19 11010 32 26 1A 11011 33 27 1B 11100 34 28 1C 11101 35 29 1D 11110 36 30 1E 11111 37 31 1F 100000 40 32 20 100001 41 33 21 >>>
Generate a Go translation of this AutoHotKey snippet without changing its computational steps.
MsgBox % BC("FF",16,3)  BC(NumStr,InputBase=8,OutputBase=10) { Static S = 12345678901234567890123456789012345678901234567890123456789012345 DllCall("msvcrt\_i64toa","Int64",DllCall("msvcrt\_strtoui64","Str",NumStr,"Uint",0,"UInt",InputBase,"CDECLInt64"),"Str",S,"UInt",OutputBase,"CDECL") Return S }
package main import ( "fmt" "math/big" "strconv" ) func main() { fmt.Printf("%b\n", 13) fmt.Printf("%o\n", 13) fmt.Printf("%d\n", 13) fmt.Printf("%x\n", 13) d := big.NewInt(13) fmt.Printf("%b\n", d) fmt.Printf("%o\n", d) fmt.Printf("%d\n", d) fmt.Printf("%x\n", d) fmt.Println(strconv.FormatInt(1313, 19)) }
Change the programming language of this snippet from AWK to C without modifying what it does.
$ awk '{printf("%d 0%o 0x%x\n",$1,$1,$1)}' 10 10 012 0xa 16 16 020 0x10 255 255 0377 0xff
#include <stdio.h> int main() { int i; for(i=1; i <= 33; i++) printf("%6d %6x %6o\n", i, i, i); return 0; }
Convert the following code from AWK to C#, ensuring the logic remains intact.
$ awk '{printf("%d 0%o 0x%x\n",$1,$1,$1)}' 10 10 012 0xa 16 16 020 0x10 255 255 0377 0xff
using System; namespace NonDecimalRadicesOutput { class Program { static void Main(string[] args) { for (int i = 0; i < 42; i++) { string binary = Convert.ToString(i, 2); string octal = Convert.ToString(i, 8); string hexadecimal = Convert.ToString(i, 16); Console.WriteLine(string.Format("Decimal: {0}, Binary: {1}, Octal: {2}, Hexadecimal: {3}", i, binary, octal, hexadecimal)); } Console.ReadKey(); } } }
Rewrite this program in C++ while keeping its functionality equivalent to the AWK version.
$ awk '{printf("%d 0%o 0x%x\n",$1,$1,$1)}' 10 10 012 0xa 16 16 020 0x10 255 255 0377 0xff
#include <iostream> #include <iomanip> int main() { for (int i = 0; i <= 33; i++) std::cout << std::setw(6) << std::dec << i << " " << std::setw(6) << std::hex << i << " " << std::setw(6) << std::oct << i << std::endl; return 0; }
Produce a language-to-language conversion: from AWK to Java, same semantics.
$ awk '{printf("%d 0%o 0x%x\n",$1,$1,$1)}' 10 10 012 0xa 16 16 020 0x10 255 255 0377 0xff
public static void main(String args[]){ for(int a= 0;a < 33;a++){ System.out.println(Integer.toBinaryString(a)); System.out.println(Integer.toOctalString(a)); System.out.println(Integer.toHexString(a)); System.out.printf("%3o %2d %2x\n",a ,a ,a); } }
Change the programming language of this snippet from AWK to Python without modifying what it does.
$ awk '{printf("%d 0%o 0x%x\n",$1,$1,$1)}' 10 10 012 0xa 16 16 020 0x10 255 255 0377 0xff
>>> for n in range(34): print " {0:6b} {1:3o} {2:2d} {3:2X}".format(n, n, n, n) 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 1 10 2 2 2 11 3 3 3 100 4 4 4 101 5 5 5 110 6 6 6 111 7 7 7 1000 10 8 8 1001 11 9 9 1010 12 10 A 1011 13 11 B 1100 14 12 C 1101 15 13 D 1110 16 14 E 1111 17 15 F 10000 20 16 10 10001 21 17 11 10010 22 18 12 10011 23 19 13 10100 24 20 14 10101 25 21 15 10110 26 22 16 10111 27 23 17 11000 30 24 18 11001 31 25 19 11010 32 26 1A 11011 33 27 1B 11100 34 28 1C 11101 35 29 1D 11110 36 30 1E 11111 37 31 1F 100000 40 32 20 100001 41 33 21 >>>
Generate a Go translation of this AWK snippet without changing its computational steps.
$ awk '{printf("%d 0%o 0x%x\n",$1,$1,$1)}' 10 10 012 0xa 16 16 020 0x10 255 255 0377 0xff
package main import ( "fmt" "math/big" "strconv" ) func main() { fmt.Printf("%b\n", 13) fmt.Printf("%o\n", 13) fmt.Printf("%d\n", 13) fmt.Printf("%x\n", 13) d := big.NewInt(13) fmt.Printf("%b\n", d) fmt.Printf("%o\n", d) fmt.Printf("%d\n", d) fmt.Printf("%x\n", d) fmt.Println(strconv.FormatInt(1313, 19)) }
Convert the following code from BBC_Basic to C, ensuring the logic remains intact.
PRINT STR$(0) PRINT STR$(123456789) PRINT STR$(-987654321) PRINT STR$~(43981) PRINT STR$~(-1)
#include <stdio.h> int main() { int i; for(i=1; i <= 33; i++) printf("%6d %6x %6o\n", i, i, i); return 0; }
Maintain the same structure and functionality when rewriting this code in C#.
PRINT STR$(0) PRINT STR$(123456789) PRINT STR$(-987654321) PRINT STR$~(43981) PRINT STR$~(-1)
using System; namespace NonDecimalRadicesOutput { class Program { static void Main(string[] args) { for (int i = 0; i < 42; i++) { string binary = Convert.ToString(i, 2); string octal = Convert.ToString(i, 8); string hexadecimal = Convert.ToString(i, 16); Console.WriteLine(string.Format("Decimal: {0}, Binary: {1}, Octal: {2}, Hexadecimal: {3}", i, binary, octal, hexadecimal)); } Console.ReadKey(); } } }
Port the following code from BBC_Basic to C++ with equivalent syntax and logic.
PRINT STR$(0) PRINT STR$(123456789) PRINT STR$(-987654321) PRINT STR$~(43981) PRINT STR$~(-1)
#include <iostream> #include <iomanip> int main() { for (int i = 0; i <= 33; i++) std::cout << std::setw(6) << std::dec << i << " " << std::setw(6) << std::hex << i << " " << std::setw(6) << std::oct << i << std::endl; return 0; }
Convert this BBC_Basic snippet to Java and keep its semantics consistent.
PRINT STR$(0) PRINT STR$(123456789) PRINT STR$(-987654321) PRINT STR$~(43981) PRINT STR$~(-1)
public static void main(String args[]){ for(int a= 0;a < 33;a++){ System.out.println(Integer.toBinaryString(a)); System.out.println(Integer.toOctalString(a)); System.out.println(Integer.toHexString(a)); System.out.printf("%3o %2d %2x\n",a ,a ,a); } }
Please provide an equivalent version of this BBC_Basic code in Python.
PRINT STR$(0) PRINT STR$(123456789) PRINT STR$(-987654321) PRINT STR$~(43981) PRINT STR$~(-1)
>>> for n in range(34): print " {0:6b} {1:3o} {2:2d} {3:2X}".format(n, n, n, n) 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 1 10 2 2 2 11 3 3 3 100 4 4 4 101 5 5 5 110 6 6 6 111 7 7 7 1000 10 8 8 1001 11 9 9 1010 12 10 A 1011 13 11 B 1100 14 12 C 1101 15 13 D 1110 16 14 E 1111 17 15 F 10000 20 16 10 10001 21 17 11 10010 22 18 12 10011 23 19 13 10100 24 20 14 10101 25 21 15 10110 26 22 16 10111 27 23 17 11000 30 24 18 11001 31 25 19 11010 32 26 1A 11011 33 27 1B 11100 34 28 1C 11101 35 29 1D 11110 36 30 1E 11111 37 31 1F 100000 40 32 20 100001 41 33 21 >>>
Convert the following code from BBC_Basic to Go, ensuring the logic remains intact.
PRINT STR$(0) PRINT STR$(123456789) PRINT STR$(-987654321) PRINT STR$~(43981) PRINT STR$~(-1)
package main import ( "fmt" "math/big" "strconv" ) func main() { fmt.Printf("%b\n", 13) fmt.Printf("%o\n", 13) fmt.Printf("%d\n", 13) fmt.Printf("%x\n", 13) d := big.NewInt(13) fmt.Printf("%b\n", d) fmt.Printf("%o\n", d) fmt.Printf("%d\n", d) fmt.Printf("%x\n", d) fmt.Println(strconv.FormatInt(1313, 19)) }
Convert the following code from Common_Lisp to C, ensuring the logic remains intact.
(Integer/toBinaryString 25) (Integer/toOctalString 25) (Integer/toHexString 25) (dotimes [i 20] (println (Integer/toHexString i)))
#include <stdio.h> int main() { int i; for(i=1; i <= 33; i++) printf("%6d %6x %6o\n", i, i, i); return 0; }
Ensure the translated C# code behaves exactly like the original Common_Lisp snippet.
(Integer/toBinaryString 25) (Integer/toOctalString 25) (Integer/toHexString 25) (dotimes [i 20] (println (Integer/toHexString i)))
using System; namespace NonDecimalRadicesOutput { class Program { static void Main(string[] args) { for (int i = 0; i < 42; i++) { string binary = Convert.ToString(i, 2); string octal = Convert.ToString(i, 8); string hexadecimal = Convert.ToString(i, 16); Console.WriteLine(string.Format("Decimal: {0}, Binary: {1}, Octal: {2}, Hexadecimal: {3}", i, binary, octal, hexadecimal)); } Console.ReadKey(); } } }
Keep all operations the same but rewrite the snippet in C++.
(Integer/toBinaryString 25) (Integer/toOctalString 25) (Integer/toHexString 25) (dotimes [i 20] (println (Integer/toHexString i)))
#include <iostream> #include <iomanip> int main() { for (int i = 0; i <= 33; i++) std::cout << std::setw(6) << std::dec << i << " " << std::setw(6) << std::hex << i << " " << std::setw(6) << std::oct << i << std::endl; return 0; }
Write the same algorithm in Java as shown in this Common_Lisp implementation.
(Integer/toBinaryString 25) (Integer/toOctalString 25) (Integer/toHexString 25) (dotimes [i 20] (println (Integer/toHexString i)))
public static void main(String args[]){ for(int a= 0;a < 33;a++){ System.out.println(Integer.toBinaryString(a)); System.out.println(Integer.toOctalString(a)); System.out.println(Integer.toHexString(a)); System.out.printf("%3o %2d %2x\n",a ,a ,a); } }
Write the same code in Python as shown below in Common_Lisp.
(Integer/toBinaryString 25) (Integer/toOctalString 25) (Integer/toHexString 25) (dotimes [i 20] (println (Integer/toHexString i)))
>>> for n in range(34): print " {0:6b} {1:3o} {2:2d} {3:2X}".format(n, n, n, n) 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 1 10 2 2 2 11 3 3 3 100 4 4 4 101 5 5 5 110 6 6 6 111 7 7 7 1000 10 8 8 1001 11 9 9 1010 12 10 A 1011 13 11 B 1100 14 12 C 1101 15 13 D 1110 16 14 E 1111 17 15 F 10000 20 16 10 10001 21 17 11 10010 22 18 12 10011 23 19 13 10100 24 20 14 10101 25 21 15 10110 26 22 16 10111 27 23 17 11000 30 24 18 11001 31 25 19 11010 32 26 1A 11011 33 27 1B 11100 34 28 1C 11101 35 29 1D 11110 36 30 1E 11111 37 31 1F 100000 40 32 20 100001 41 33 21 >>>
Produce a functionally identical Go code for the snippet given in Common_Lisp.
(Integer/toBinaryString 25) (Integer/toOctalString 25) (Integer/toHexString 25) (dotimes [i 20] (println (Integer/toHexString i)))
package main import ( "fmt" "math/big" "strconv" ) func main() { fmt.Printf("%b\n", 13) fmt.Printf("%o\n", 13) fmt.Printf("%d\n", 13) fmt.Printf("%x\n", 13) d := big.NewInt(13) fmt.Printf("%b\n", d) fmt.Printf("%o\n", d) fmt.Printf("%d\n", d) fmt.Printf("%x\n", d) fmt.Println(strconv.FormatInt(1313, 19)) }
Port the provided D code into C while preserving the original functionality.
import std.stdio; void main() { writeln("Base: 2 8 10 16"); writeln("----------------------------"); foreach (i; 0 .. 34) writefln(" %6b %6o %6d %6x", i, i, i, i); }
#include <stdio.h> int main() { int i; for(i=1; i <= 33; i++) printf("%6d %6x %6o\n", i, i, i); return 0; }
Can you help me rewrite this code in C# instead of D, keeping it the same logically?
import std.stdio; void main() { writeln("Base: 2 8 10 16"); writeln("----------------------------"); foreach (i; 0 .. 34) writefln(" %6b %6o %6d %6x", i, i, i, i); }
using System; namespace NonDecimalRadicesOutput { class Program { static void Main(string[] args) { for (int i = 0; i < 42; i++) { string binary = Convert.ToString(i, 2); string octal = Convert.ToString(i, 8); string hexadecimal = Convert.ToString(i, 16); Console.WriteLine(string.Format("Decimal: {0}, Binary: {1}, Octal: {2}, Hexadecimal: {3}", i, binary, octal, hexadecimal)); } Console.ReadKey(); } } }
Convert the following code from D to C++, ensuring the logic remains intact.
import std.stdio; void main() { writeln("Base: 2 8 10 16"); writeln("----------------------------"); foreach (i; 0 .. 34) writefln(" %6b %6o %6d %6x", i, i, i, i); }
#include <iostream> #include <iomanip> int main() { for (int i = 0; i <= 33; i++) std::cout << std::setw(6) << std::dec << i << " " << std::setw(6) << std::hex << i << " " << std::setw(6) << std::oct << i << std::endl; return 0; }
Port the provided D code into Java while preserving the original functionality.
import std.stdio; void main() { writeln("Base: 2 8 10 16"); writeln("----------------------------"); foreach (i; 0 .. 34) writefln(" %6b %6o %6d %6x", i, i, i, i); }
public static void main(String args[]){ for(int a= 0;a < 33;a++){ System.out.println(Integer.toBinaryString(a)); System.out.println(Integer.toOctalString(a)); System.out.println(Integer.toHexString(a)); System.out.printf("%3o %2d %2x\n",a ,a ,a); } }
Maintain the same structure and functionality when rewriting this code in Python.
import std.stdio; void main() { writeln("Base: 2 8 10 16"); writeln("----------------------------"); foreach (i; 0 .. 34) writefln(" %6b %6o %6d %6x", i, i, i, i); }
>>> for n in range(34): print " {0:6b} {1:3o} {2:2d} {3:2X}".format(n, n, n, n) 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 1 10 2 2 2 11 3 3 3 100 4 4 4 101 5 5 5 110 6 6 6 111 7 7 7 1000 10 8 8 1001 11 9 9 1010 12 10 A 1011 13 11 B 1100 14 12 C 1101 15 13 D 1110 16 14 E 1111 17 15 F 10000 20 16 10 10001 21 17 11 10010 22 18 12 10011 23 19 13 10100 24 20 14 10101 25 21 15 10110 26 22 16 10111 27 23 17 11000 30 24 18 11001 31 25 19 11010 32 26 1A 11011 33 27 1B 11100 34 28 1C 11101 35 29 1D 11110 36 30 1E 11111 37 31 1F 100000 40 32 20 100001 41 33 21 >>>
Convert this D block to Go, preserving its control flow and logic.
import std.stdio; void main() { writeln("Base: 2 8 10 16"); writeln("----------------------------"); foreach (i; 0 .. 34) writefln(" %6b %6o %6d %6x", i, i, i, i); }
package main import ( "fmt" "math/big" "strconv" ) func main() { fmt.Printf("%b\n", 13) fmt.Printf("%o\n", 13) fmt.Printf("%d\n", 13) fmt.Printf("%x\n", 13) d := big.NewInt(13) fmt.Printf("%b\n", d) fmt.Printf("%o\n", d) fmt.Printf("%d\n", d) fmt.Printf("%x\n", d) fmt.Println(strconv.FormatInt(1313, 19)) }
Write the same code in C as shown below in Elixir.
Enum.each(0..32, fn i -> :io.format "~2w :~6.2B, ~2.8B, ~2.16B~n", [i,i,i,i] end)
#include <stdio.h> int main() { int i; for(i=1; i <= 33; i++) printf("%6d %6x %6o\n", i, i, i); return 0; }
Change the following Elixir code into C# without altering its purpose.
Enum.each(0..32, fn i -> :io.format "~2w :~6.2B, ~2.8B, ~2.16B~n", [i,i,i,i] end)
using System; namespace NonDecimalRadicesOutput { class Program { static void Main(string[] args) { for (int i = 0; i < 42; i++) { string binary = Convert.ToString(i, 2); string octal = Convert.ToString(i, 8); string hexadecimal = Convert.ToString(i, 16); Console.WriteLine(string.Format("Decimal: {0}, Binary: {1}, Octal: {2}, Hexadecimal: {3}", i, binary, octal, hexadecimal)); } Console.ReadKey(); } } }
Please provide an equivalent version of this Elixir code in C++.
Enum.each(0..32, fn i -> :io.format "~2w :~6.2B, ~2.8B, ~2.16B~n", [i,i,i,i] end)
#include <iostream> #include <iomanip> int main() { for (int i = 0; i <= 33; i++) std::cout << std::setw(6) << std::dec << i << " " << std::setw(6) << std::hex << i << " " << std::setw(6) << std::oct << i << std::endl; return 0; }
Write the same code in Java as shown below in Elixir.
Enum.each(0..32, fn i -> :io.format "~2w :~6.2B, ~2.8B, ~2.16B~n", [i,i,i,i] end)
public static void main(String args[]){ for(int a= 0;a < 33;a++){ System.out.println(Integer.toBinaryString(a)); System.out.println(Integer.toOctalString(a)); System.out.println(Integer.toHexString(a)); System.out.printf("%3o %2d %2x\n",a ,a ,a); } }
Generate an equivalent Python version of this Elixir code.
Enum.each(0..32, fn i -> :io.format "~2w :~6.2B, ~2.8B, ~2.16B~n", [i,i,i,i] end)
>>> for n in range(34): print " {0:6b} {1:3o} {2:2d} {3:2X}".format(n, n, n, n) 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 1 10 2 2 2 11 3 3 3 100 4 4 4 101 5 5 5 110 6 6 6 111 7 7 7 1000 10 8 8 1001 11 9 9 1010 12 10 A 1011 13 11 B 1100 14 12 C 1101 15 13 D 1110 16 14 E 1111 17 15 F 10000 20 16 10 10001 21 17 11 10010 22 18 12 10011 23 19 13 10100 24 20 14 10101 25 21 15 10110 26 22 16 10111 27 23 17 11000 30 24 18 11001 31 25 19 11010 32 26 1A 11011 33 27 1B 11100 34 28 1C 11101 35 29 1D 11110 36 30 1E 11111 37 31 1F 100000 40 32 20 100001 41 33 21 >>>
Produce a functionally identical Go code for the snippet given in Elixir.
Enum.each(0..32, fn i -> :io.format "~2w :~6.2B, ~2.8B, ~2.16B~n", [i,i,i,i] end)
package main import ( "fmt" "math/big" "strconv" ) func main() { fmt.Printf("%b\n", 13) fmt.Printf("%o\n", 13) fmt.Printf("%d\n", 13) fmt.Printf("%x\n", 13) d := big.NewInt(13) fmt.Printf("%b\n", d) fmt.Printf("%o\n", d) fmt.Printf("%d\n", d) fmt.Printf("%x\n", d) fmt.Println(strconv.FormatInt(1313, 19)) }
Convert this F# snippet to C and keep its semantics consistent.
let ns = [30..33] ns |> Seq.iter (fun n -> printfn " %3o %2d %2X" n n n)
#include <stdio.h> int main() { int i; for(i=1; i <= 33; i++) printf("%6d %6x %6o\n", i, i, i); return 0; }
Change the programming language of this snippet from F# to C# without modifying what it does.
let ns = [30..33] ns |> Seq.iter (fun n -> printfn " %3o %2d %2X" n n n)
using System; namespace NonDecimalRadicesOutput { class Program { static void Main(string[] args) { for (int i = 0; i < 42; i++) { string binary = Convert.ToString(i, 2); string octal = Convert.ToString(i, 8); string hexadecimal = Convert.ToString(i, 16); Console.WriteLine(string.Format("Decimal: {0}, Binary: {1}, Octal: {2}, Hexadecimal: {3}", i, binary, octal, hexadecimal)); } Console.ReadKey(); } } }
Write the same code in C++ as shown below in F#.
let ns = [30..33] ns |> Seq.iter (fun n -> printfn " %3o %2d %2X" n n n)
#include <iostream> #include <iomanip> int main() { for (int i = 0; i <= 33; i++) std::cout << std::setw(6) << std::dec << i << " " << std::setw(6) << std::hex << i << " " << std::setw(6) << std::oct << i << std::endl; return 0; }
Change the following F# code into Java without altering its purpose.
let ns = [30..33] ns |> Seq.iter (fun n -> printfn " %3o %2d %2X" n n n)
public static void main(String args[]){ for(int a= 0;a < 33;a++){ System.out.println(Integer.toBinaryString(a)); System.out.println(Integer.toOctalString(a)); System.out.println(Integer.toHexString(a)); System.out.printf("%3o %2d %2x\n",a ,a ,a); } }
Rewrite the snippet below in Python so it works the same as the original F# code.
let ns = [30..33] ns |> Seq.iter (fun n -> printfn " %3o %2d %2X" n n n)
>>> for n in range(34): print " {0:6b} {1:3o} {2:2d} {3:2X}".format(n, n, n, n) 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 1 10 2 2 2 11 3 3 3 100 4 4 4 101 5 5 5 110 6 6 6 111 7 7 7 1000 10 8 8 1001 11 9 9 1010 12 10 A 1011 13 11 B 1100 14 12 C 1101 15 13 D 1110 16 14 E 1111 17 15 F 10000 20 16 10 10001 21 17 11 10010 22 18 12 10011 23 19 13 10100 24 20 14 10101 25 21 15 10110 26 22 16 10111 27 23 17 11000 30 24 18 11001 31 25 19 11010 32 26 1A 11011 33 27 1B 11100 34 28 1C 11101 35 29 1D 11110 36 30 1E 11111 37 31 1F 100000 40 32 20 100001 41 33 21 >>>
Transform the following F# implementation into Go, maintaining the same output and logic.
let ns = [30..33] ns |> Seq.iter (fun n -> printfn " %3o %2d %2X" n n n)
package main import ( "fmt" "math/big" "strconv" ) func main() { fmt.Printf("%b\n", 13) fmt.Printf("%o\n", 13) fmt.Printf("%d\n", 13) fmt.Printf("%x\n", 13) d := big.NewInt(13) fmt.Printf("%b\n", d) fmt.Printf("%o\n", d) fmt.Printf("%d\n", d) fmt.Printf("%x\n", d) fmt.Println(strconv.FormatInt(1313, 19)) }
Please provide an equivalent version of this Factor code in C.
1234567 2 36 [a,b] [ >base print ] with each
#include <stdio.h> int main() { int i; for(i=1; i <= 33; i++) printf("%6d %6x %6o\n", i, i, i); return 0; }
Translate the given Factor code snippet into C# without altering its behavior.
1234567 2 36 [a,b] [ >base print ] with each
using System; namespace NonDecimalRadicesOutput { class Program { static void Main(string[] args) { for (int i = 0; i < 42; i++) { string binary = Convert.ToString(i, 2); string octal = Convert.ToString(i, 8); string hexadecimal = Convert.ToString(i, 16); Console.WriteLine(string.Format("Decimal: {0}, Binary: {1}, Octal: {2}, Hexadecimal: {3}", i, binary, octal, hexadecimal)); } Console.ReadKey(); } } }
Translate the given Factor code snippet into C++ without altering its behavior.
1234567 2 36 [a,b] [ >base print ] with each
#include <iostream> #include <iomanip> int main() { for (int i = 0; i <= 33; i++) std::cout << std::setw(6) << std::dec << i << " " << std::setw(6) << std::hex << i << " " << std::setw(6) << std::oct << i << std::endl; return 0; }
Ensure the translated Java code behaves exactly like the original Factor snippet.
1234567 2 36 [a,b] [ >base print ] with each
public static void main(String args[]){ for(int a= 0;a < 33;a++){ System.out.println(Integer.toBinaryString(a)); System.out.println(Integer.toOctalString(a)); System.out.println(Integer.toHexString(a)); System.out.printf("%3o %2d %2x\n",a ,a ,a); } }
Transform the following Factor implementation into Python, maintaining the same output and logic.
1234567 2 36 [a,b] [ >base print ] with each
>>> for n in range(34): print " {0:6b} {1:3o} {2:2d} {3:2X}".format(n, n, n, n) 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 1 10 2 2 2 11 3 3 3 100 4 4 4 101 5 5 5 110 6 6 6 111 7 7 7 1000 10 8 8 1001 11 9 9 1010 12 10 A 1011 13 11 B 1100 14 12 C 1101 15 13 D 1110 16 14 E 1111 17 15 F 10000 20 16 10 10001 21 17 11 10010 22 18 12 10011 23 19 13 10100 24 20 14 10101 25 21 15 10110 26 22 16 10111 27 23 17 11000 30 24 18 11001 31 25 19 11010 32 26 1A 11011 33 27 1B 11100 34 28 1C 11101 35 29 1D 11110 36 30 1E 11111 37 31 1F 100000 40 32 20 100001 41 33 21 >>>
Keep all operations the same but rewrite the snippet in Go.
1234567 2 36 [a,b] [ >base print ] with each
package main import ( "fmt" "math/big" "strconv" ) func main() { fmt.Printf("%b\n", 13) fmt.Printf("%o\n", 13) fmt.Printf("%d\n", 13) fmt.Printf("%x\n", 13) d := big.NewInt(13) fmt.Printf("%b\n", d) fmt.Printf("%o\n", d) fmt.Printf("%d\n", d) fmt.Printf("%x\n", d) fmt.Println(strconv.FormatInt(1313, 19)) }
Ensure the translated C code behaves exactly like the original Forth snippet.
: main 34 1 do cr i dec. i hex. loop ; main ... 11 $B ...
#include <stdio.h> int main() { int i; for(i=1; i <= 33; i++) printf("%6d %6x %6o\n", i, i, i); return 0; }
Please provide an equivalent version of this Forth code in C#.
: main 34 1 do cr i dec. i hex. loop ; main ... 11 $B ...
using System; namespace NonDecimalRadicesOutput { class Program { static void Main(string[] args) { for (int i = 0; i < 42; i++) { string binary = Convert.ToString(i, 2); string octal = Convert.ToString(i, 8); string hexadecimal = Convert.ToString(i, 16); Console.WriteLine(string.Format("Decimal: {0}, Binary: {1}, Octal: {2}, Hexadecimal: {3}", i, binary, octal, hexadecimal)); } Console.ReadKey(); } } }
Change the programming language of this snippet from Forth to C++ without modifying what it does.
: main 34 1 do cr i dec. i hex. loop ; main ... 11 $B ...
#include <iostream> #include <iomanip> int main() { for (int i = 0; i <= 33; i++) std::cout << std::setw(6) << std::dec << i << " " << std::setw(6) << std::hex << i << " " << std::setw(6) << std::oct << i << std::endl; return 0; }
Produce a functionally identical Java code for the snippet given in Forth.
: main 34 1 do cr i dec. i hex. loop ; main ... 11 $B ...
public static void main(String args[]){ for(int a= 0;a < 33;a++){ System.out.println(Integer.toBinaryString(a)); System.out.println(Integer.toOctalString(a)); System.out.println(Integer.toHexString(a)); System.out.printf("%3o %2d %2x\n",a ,a ,a); } }
Please provide an equivalent version of this Forth code in Python.
: main 34 1 do cr i dec. i hex. loop ; main ... 11 $B ...
>>> for n in range(34): print " {0:6b} {1:3o} {2:2d} {3:2X}".format(n, n, n, n) 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 1 10 2 2 2 11 3 3 3 100 4 4 4 101 5 5 5 110 6 6 6 111 7 7 7 1000 10 8 8 1001 11 9 9 1010 12 10 A 1011 13 11 B 1100 14 12 C 1101 15 13 D 1110 16 14 E 1111 17 15 F 10000 20 16 10 10001 21 17 11 10010 22 18 12 10011 23 19 13 10100 24 20 14 10101 25 21 15 10110 26 22 16 10111 27 23 17 11000 30 24 18 11001 31 25 19 11010 32 26 1A 11011 33 27 1B 11100 34 28 1C 11101 35 29 1D 11110 36 30 1E 11111 37 31 1F 100000 40 32 20 100001 41 33 21 >>>
Transform the following Forth implementation into Go, maintaining the same output and logic.
: main 34 1 do cr i dec. i hex. loop ; main ... 11 $B ...
package main import ( "fmt" "math/big" "strconv" ) func main() { fmt.Printf("%b\n", 13) fmt.Printf("%o\n", 13) fmt.Printf("%d\n", 13) fmt.Printf("%x\n", 13) d := big.NewInt(13) fmt.Printf("%b\n", d) fmt.Printf("%o\n", d) fmt.Printf("%d\n", d) fmt.Printf("%x\n", d) fmt.Println(strconv.FormatInt(1313, 19)) }
Change the programming language of this snippet from Fortran to C# without modifying what it does.
do n = 1, 33 write(*, "(b6, o4, i4, z4)") n, n, n, n end do
using System; namespace NonDecimalRadicesOutput { class Program { static void Main(string[] args) { for (int i = 0; i < 42; i++) { string binary = Convert.ToString(i, 2); string octal = Convert.ToString(i, 8); string hexadecimal = Convert.ToString(i, 16); Console.WriteLine(string.Format("Decimal: {0}, Binary: {1}, Octal: {2}, Hexadecimal: {3}", i, binary, octal, hexadecimal)); } Console.ReadKey(); } } }
Keep all operations the same but rewrite the snippet in C++.
do n = 1, 33 write(*, "(b6, o4, i4, z4)") n, n, n, n end do
#include <iostream> #include <iomanip> int main() { for (int i = 0; i <= 33; i++) std::cout << std::setw(6) << std::dec << i << " " << std::setw(6) << std::hex << i << " " << std::setw(6) << std::oct << i << std::endl; return 0; }
Write the same code in C as shown below in Fortran.
do n = 1, 33 write(*, "(b6, o4, i4, z4)") n, n, n, n end do
#include <stdio.h> int main() { int i; for(i=1; i <= 33; i++) printf("%6d %6x %6o\n", i, i, i); return 0; }
Write the same code in Java as shown below in Fortran.
do n = 1, 33 write(*, "(b6, o4, i4, z4)") n, n, n, n end do
public static void main(String args[]){ for(int a= 0;a < 33;a++){ System.out.println(Integer.toBinaryString(a)); System.out.println(Integer.toOctalString(a)); System.out.println(Integer.toHexString(a)); System.out.printf("%3o %2d %2x\n",a ,a ,a); } }
Rewrite the snippet below in Python so it works the same as the original Fortran code.
do n = 1, 33 write(*, "(b6, o4, i4, z4)") n, n, n, n end do
>>> for n in range(34): print " {0:6b} {1:3o} {2:2d} {3:2X}".format(n, n, n, n) 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 1 10 2 2 2 11 3 3 3 100 4 4 4 101 5 5 5 110 6 6 6 111 7 7 7 1000 10 8 8 1001 11 9 9 1010 12 10 A 1011 13 11 B 1100 14 12 C 1101 15 13 D 1110 16 14 E 1111 17 15 F 10000 20 16 10 10001 21 17 11 10010 22 18 12 10011 23 19 13 10100 24 20 14 10101 25 21 15 10110 26 22 16 10111 27 23 17 11000 30 24 18 11001 31 25 19 11010 32 26 1A 11011 33 27 1B 11100 34 28 1C 11101 35 29 1D 11110 36 30 1E 11111 37 31 1F 100000 40 32 20 100001 41 33 21 >>>
Convert this Fortran snippet to PHP and keep its semantics consistent.
do n = 1, 33 write(*, "(b6, o4, i4, z4)") n, n, n, n end do
<?php foreach (range(0, 33) as $n) { echo decbin($n), "\t", decoct($n), "\t", $n, "\t", dechex($n), "\n"; } ?>
Can you help me rewrite this code in C instead of Haskell, keeping it the same logically?
import Text.Printf main :: IO () main = mapM_ f [0..33] where f :: Int -> IO () f n = printf " %3o %2d %2X\n" n n n
#include <stdio.h> int main() { int i; for(i=1; i <= 33; i++) printf("%6d %6x %6o\n", i, i, i); return 0; }
Can you help me rewrite this code in C# instead of Haskell, keeping it the same logically?
import Text.Printf main :: IO () main = mapM_ f [0..33] where f :: Int -> IO () f n = printf " %3o %2d %2X\n" n n n
using System; namespace NonDecimalRadicesOutput { class Program { static void Main(string[] args) { for (int i = 0; i < 42; i++) { string binary = Convert.ToString(i, 2); string octal = Convert.ToString(i, 8); string hexadecimal = Convert.ToString(i, 16); Console.WriteLine(string.Format("Decimal: {0}, Binary: {1}, Octal: {2}, Hexadecimal: {3}", i, binary, octal, hexadecimal)); } Console.ReadKey(); } } }
Ensure the translated C++ code behaves exactly like the original Haskell snippet.
import Text.Printf main :: IO () main = mapM_ f [0..33] where f :: Int -> IO () f n = printf " %3o %2d %2X\n" n n n
#include <iostream> #include <iomanip> int main() { for (int i = 0; i <= 33; i++) std::cout << std::setw(6) << std::dec << i << " " << std::setw(6) << std::hex << i << " " << std::setw(6) << std::oct << i << std::endl; return 0; }
Ensure the translated Java code behaves exactly like the original Haskell snippet.
import Text.Printf main :: IO () main = mapM_ f [0..33] where f :: Int -> IO () f n = printf " %3o %2d %2X\n" n n n
public static void main(String args[]){ for(int a= 0;a < 33;a++){ System.out.println(Integer.toBinaryString(a)); System.out.println(Integer.toOctalString(a)); System.out.println(Integer.toHexString(a)); System.out.printf("%3o %2d %2x\n",a ,a ,a); } }
Convert this Haskell block to Python, preserving its control flow and logic.
import Text.Printf main :: IO () main = mapM_ f [0..33] where f :: Int -> IO () f n = printf " %3o %2d %2X\n" n n n
>>> for n in range(34): print " {0:6b} {1:3o} {2:2d} {3:2X}".format(n, n, n, n) 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 1 10 2 2 2 11 3 3 3 100 4 4 4 101 5 5 5 110 6 6 6 111 7 7 7 1000 10 8 8 1001 11 9 9 1010 12 10 A 1011 13 11 B 1100 14 12 C 1101 15 13 D 1110 16 14 E 1111 17 15 F 10000 20 16 10 10001 21 17 11 10010 22 18 12 10011 23 19 13 10100 24 20 14 10101 25 21 15 10110 26 22 16 10111 27 23 17 11000 30 24 18 11001 31 25 19 11010 32 26 1A 11011 33 27 1B 11100 34 28 1C 11101 35 29 1D 11110 36 30 1E 11111 37 31 1F 100000 40 32 20 100001 41 33 21 >>>
Rewrite the snippet below in Go so it works the same as the original Haskell code.
import Text.Printf main :: IO () main = mapM_ f [0..33] where f :: Int -> IO () f n = printf " %3o %2d %2X\n" n n n
package main import ( "fmt" "math/big" "strconv" ) func main() { fmt.Printf("%b\n", 13) fmt.Printf("%o\n", 13) fmt.Printf("%d\n", 13) fmt.Printf("%x\n", 13) d := big.NewInt(13) fmt.Printf("%b\n", d) fmt.Printf("%o\n", d) fmt.Printf("%d\n", d) fmt.Printf("%x\n", d) fmt.Println(strconv.FormatInt(1313, 19)) }
Generate a C translation of this Icon snippet without changing its computational steps.
procedure main() write("Non-decimal radices/Output") every i := 255 | 2 | 5 | 16 do { printf("%%d = %d\n",i) printf("%%x = %x\n",i) printf("%%o = %o\n",i) printf("%%s = %s\n",i) printf("%%i = %i\n",i) } end
#include <stdio.h> int main() { int i; for(i=1; i <= 33; i++) printf("%6d %6x %6o\n", i, i, i); return 0; }
Please provide an equivalent version of this Icon code in C#.
procedure main() write("Non-decimal radices/Output") every i := 255 | 2 | 5 | 16 do { printf("%%d = %d\n",i) printf("%%x = %x\n",i) printf("%%o = %o\n",i) printf("%%s = %s\n",i) printf("%%i = %i\n",i) } end
using System; namespace NonDecimalRadicesOutput { class Program { static void Main(string[] args) { for (int i = 0; i < 42; i++) { string binary = Convert.ToString(i, 2); string octal = Convert.ToString(i, 8); string hexadecimal = Convert.ToString(i, 16); Console.WriteLine(string.Format("Decimal: {0}, Binary: {1}, Octal: {2}, Hexadecimal: {3}", i, binary, octal, hexadecimal)); } Console.ReadKey(); } } }
Change the following Icon code into C++ without altering its purpose.
procedure main() write("Non-decimal radices/Output") every i := 255 | 2 | 5 | 16 do { printf("%%d = %d\n",i) printf("%%x = %x\n",i) printf("%%o = %o\n",i) printf("%%s = %s\n",i) printf("%%i = %i\n",i) } end
#include <iostream> #include <iomanip> int main() { for (int i = 0; i <= 33; i++) std::cout << std::setw(6) << std::dec << i << " " << std::setw(6) << std::hex << i << " " << std::setw(6) << std::oct << i << std::endl; return 0; }
Can you help me rewrite this code in Java instead of Icon, keeping it the same logically?
procedure main() write("Non-decimal radices/Output") every i := 255 | 2 | 5 | 16 do { printf("%%d = %d\n",i) printf("%%x = %x\n",i) printf("%%o = %o\n",i) printf("%%s = %s\n",i) printf("%%i = %i\n",i) } end
public static void main(String args[]){ for(int a= 0;a < 33;a++){ System.out.println(Integer.toBinaryString(a)); System.out.println(Integer.toOctalString(a)); System.out.println(Integer.toHexString(a)); System.out.printf("%3o %2d %2x\n",a ,a ,a); } }