Instruction
stringlengths
45
106
input_code
stringlengths
1
13.7k
output_code
stringlengths
1
13.7k
Generate a VB translation of this Elixir snippet without changing its computational steps.
defmodule Short_circuit do defp a(bool) do IO.puts "a( bool end defp b(bool) do IO.puts "b( bool end def task do Enum.each([true, false], fn i -> Enum.each([true, false], fn j -> IO.puts "a( IO.puts "a( end) end) end end Short_circuit.task
Private Function a(i As Variant) As Boolean Debug.Print "a: "; i = 1, a = i End Function Private Function b(j As Variant) As Boolean Debug.Print "b: "; j = 1; b = j End Function Public Sub short_circuit() Dim x As Boolean, y As Boolean Debug.Print "=====AND=====" & vbCrLf For p = 0 To 1 For q = 0 To 1 If a(p) Then x = b(q) End If Debug.Print " = x" Next q Debug.Print Next p Debug.Print "======OR=====" & vbCrLf For p = 0 To 1 For q = 0 To 1 If Not a(p) Then x = b(q) End If Debug.Print " = x" Next q Debug.Print Next p Debug.Print End Sub
Write the same code in Go as shown below in Elixir.
defmodule Short_circuit do defp a(bool) do IO.puts "a( bool end defp b(bool) do IO.puts "b( bool end def task do Enum.each([true, false], fn i -> Enum.each([true, false], fn j -> IO.puts "a( IO.puts "a( end) end) end end Short_circuit.task
package main import "fmt" func a(v bool) bool { fmt.Print("a") return v } func b(v bool) bool { fmt.Print("b") return v } func test(i, j bool) { fmt.Printf("Testing a(%t) && b(%t)\n", i, j) fmt.Print("Trace: ") fmt.Println("\nResult:", a(i) && b(j)) fmt.Printf("Testing a(%t) || b(%t)\n", i, j) fmt.Print("Trace: ") fmt.Println("\nResult:", a(i) || b(j)) fmt.Println("") } func main() { test(false, false) test(false, true) test(true, false) test(true, true) }
Write the same algorithm in C as shown in this Erlang implementation.
-module( short_circuit_evaluation ). -export( [task/0] ). task() -> [task_helper(X, Y) || X <- [true, false], Y <- [true, false]]. a( Boolean ) -> io:fwrite( " a ~p~n", [Boolean] ), Boolean. b( Boolean ) -> io:fwrite( " b ~p~n", [Boolean] ), Boolean. task_helper( Boolean1, Boolean2 ) -> io:fwrite( "~p andalso ~p~n", [Boolean1, Boolean2] ), io:fwrite( "=> ~p~n", [a(Boolean1) andalso b(Boolean2)] ), io:fwrite( "~p orelse ~p~n", [Boolean1, Boolean2] ), io:fwrite( "=> ~p~n", [a(Boolean1) orelse b(Boolean2)] ).
#include <stdio.h> #include <stdbool.h> bool a(bool in) { printf("I am a\n"); return in; } bool b(bool in) { printf("I am b\n"); return in; } #define TEST(X,Y,O) \ do { \ x = a(X) O b(Y); \ printf(#X " " #O " " #Y " = %s\n\n", x ? "true" : "false"); \ } while(false); int main() { bool x; TEST(false, true, &&); TEST(true, false, ||); TEST(true, false, &&); TEST(false, false, ||); return 0; }
Translate this program into C# but keep the logic exactly as in Erlang.
-module( short_circuit_evaluation ). -export( [task/0] ). task() -> [task_helper(X, Y) || X <- [true, false], Y <- [true, false]]. a( Boolean ) -> io:fwrite( " a ~p~n", [Boolean] ), Boolean. b( Boolean ) -> io:fwrite( " b ~p~n", [Boolean] ), Boolean. task_helper( Boolean1, Boolean2 ) -> io:fwrite( "~p andalso ~p~n", [Boolean1, Boolean2] ), io:fwrite( "=> ~p~n", [a(Boolean1) andalso b(Boolean2)] ), io:fwrite( "~p orelse ~p~n", [Boolean1, Boolean2] ), io:fwrite( "=> ~p~n", [a(Boolean1) orelse b(Boolean2)] ).
using System; class Program { static bool a(bool value) { Console.WriteLine("a"); return value; } static bool b(bool value) { Console.WriteLine("b"); return value; } static void Main() { foreach (var i in new[] { false, true }) { foreach (var j in new[] { false, true }) { Console.WriteLine("{0} and {1} = {2}", i, j, a(i) && b(j)); Console.WriteLine(); Console.WriteLine("{0} or {1} = {2}", i, j, a(i) || b(j)); Console.WriteLine(); } } } }
Produce a functionally identical C++ code for the snippet given in Erlang.
-module( short_circuit_evaluation ). -export( [task/0] ). task() -> [task_helper(X, Y) || X <- [true, false], Y <- [true, false]]. a( Boolean ) -> io:fwrite( " a ~p~n", [Boolean] ), Boolean. b( Boolean ) -> io:fwrite( " b ~p~n", [Boolean] ), Boolean. task_helper( Boolean1, Boolean2 ) -> io:fwrite( "~p andalso ~p~n", [Boolean1, Boolean2] ), io:fwrite( "=> ~p~n", [a(Boolean1) andalso b(Boolean2)] ), io:fwrite( "~p orelse ~p~n", [Boolean1, Boolean2] ), io:fwrite( "=> ~p~n", [a(Boolean1) orelse b(Boolean2)] ).
#include <iostream> bool a(bool in) { std::cout << "a" << std::endl; return in; } bool b(bool in) { std::cout << "b" << std::endl; return in; } void test(bool i, bool j) { std::cout << std::boolalpha << i << " and " << j << " = " << (a(i) && b(j)) << std::endl; std::cout << std::boolalpha << i << " or " << j << " = " << (a(i) || b(j)) << std::endl; } int main() { test(false, false); test(false, true); test(true, false); test(true, true); return 0; }
Keep all operations the same but rewrite the snippet in Java.
-module( short_circuit_evaluation ). -export( [task/0] ). task() -> [task_helper(X, Y) || X <- [true, false], Y <- [true, false]]. a( Boolean ) -> io:fwrite( " a ~p~n", [Boolean] ), Boolean. b( Boolean ) -> io:fwrite( " b ~p~n", [Boolean] ), Boolean. task_helper( Boolean1, Boolean2 ) -> io:fwrite( "~p andalso ~p~n", [Boolean1, Boolean2] ), io:fwrite( "=> ~p~n", [a(Boolean1) andalso b(Boolean2)] ), io:fwrite( "~p orelse ~p~n", [Boolean1, Boolean2] ), io:fwrite( "=> ~p~n", [a(Boolean1) orelse b(Boolean2)] ).
module test { @Inject Console console; static Boolean show(String name, Boolean value) { console.print($"{name}()={value}"); return value; } void run() { val a = show("a", _); val b = show("b", _); for (Boolean v1 : False..True) { for (Boolean v2 : False..True) { console.print($"a({v1}) && b({v2}) == {a(v1) && b(v2)}"); console.print(); console.print($"a({v1}) || b({v2}) == {a(v1) || b(v2)}"); console.print(); } } } }
Convert this Erlang snippet to Python and keep its semantics consistent.
-module( short_circuit_evaluation ). -export( [task/0] ). task() -> [task_helper(X, Y) || X <- [true, false], Y <- [true, false]]. a( Boolean ) -> io:fwrite( " a ~p~n", [Boolean] ), Boolean. b( Boolean ) -> io:fwrite( " b ~p~n", [Boolean] ), Boolean. task_helper( Boolean1, Boolean2 ) -> io:fwrite( "~p andalso ~p~n", [Boolean1, Boolean2] ), io:fwrite( "=> ~p~n", [a(Boolean1) andalso b(Boolean2)] ), io:fwrite( "~p orelse ~p~n", [Boolean1, Boolean2] ), io:fwrite( "=> ~p~n", [a(Boolean1) orelse b(Boolean2)] ).
>>> def a(answer): print(" return answer >>> def b(answer): print(" return answer >>> for i in (False, True): for j in (False, True): print ("\nCalculating: x = a(i) and b(j)") x = a(i) and b(j) print ("Calculating: y = a(i) or b(j)") y = a(i) or b(j) Calculating: x = a(i) and b(j) Calculating: y = a(i) or b(j) Calculating: x = a(i) and b(j) Calculating: y = a(i) or b(j) Calculating: x = a(i) and b(j) Calculating: y = a(i) or b(j) Calculating: x = a(i) and b(j) Calculating: y = a(i) or b(j)
Produce a language-to-language conversion: from Erlang to VB, same semantics.
-module( short_circuit_evaluation ). -export( [task/0] ). task() -> [task_helper(X, Y) || X <- [true, false], Y <- [true, false]]. a( Boolean ) -> io:fwrite( " a ~p~n", [Boolean] ), Boolean. b( Boolean ) -> io:fwrite( " b ~p~n", [Boolean] ), Boolean. task_helper( Boolean1, Boolean2 ) -> io:fwrite( "~p andalso ~p~n", [Boolean1, Boolean2] ), io:fwrite( "=> ~p~n", [a(Boolean1) andalso b(Boolean2)] ), io:fwrite( "~p orelse ~p~n", [Boolean1, Boolean2] ), io:fwrite( "=> ~p~n", [a(Boolean1) orelse b(Boolean2)] ).
Private Function a(i As Variant) As Boolean Debug.Print "a: "; i = 1, a = i End Function Private Function b(j As Variant) As Boolean Debug.Print "b: "; j = 1; b = j End Function Public Sub short_circuit() Dim x As Boolean, y As Boolean Debug.Print "=====AND=====" & vbCrLf For p = 0 To 1 For q = 0 To 1 If a(p) Then x = b(q) End If Debug.Print " = x" Next q Debug.Print Next p Debug.Print "======OR=====" & vbCrLf For p = 0 To 1 For q = 0 To 1 If Not a(p) Then x = b(q) End If Debug.Print " = x" Next q Debug.Print Next p Debug.Print End Sub
Keep all operations the same but rewrite the snippet in Go.
-module( short_circuit_evaluation ). -export( [task/0] ). task() -> [task_helper(X, Y) || X <- [true, false], Y <- [true, false]]. a( Boolean ) -> io:fwrite( " a ~p~n", [Boolean] ), Boolean. b( Boolean ) -> io:fwrite( " b ~p~n", [Boolean] ), Boolean. task_helper( Boolean1, Boolean2 ) -> io:fwrite( "~p andalso ~p~n", [Boolean1, Boolean2] ), io:fwrite( "=> ~p~n", [a(Boolean1) andalso b(Boolean2)] ), io:fwrite( "~p orelse ~p~n", [Boolean1, Boolean2] ), io:fwrite( "=> ~p~n", [a(Boolean1) orelse b(Boolean2)] ).
package main import "fmt" func a(v bool) bool { fmt.Print("a") return v } func b(v bool) bool { fmt.Print("b") return v } func test(i, j bool) { fmt.Printf("Testing a(%t) && b(%t)\n", i, j) fmt.Print("Trace: ") fmt.Println("\nResult:", a(i) && b(j)) fmt.Printf("Testing a(%t) || b(%t)\n", i, j) fmt.Print("Trace: ") fmt.Println("\nResult:", a(i) || b(j)) fmt.Println("") } func main() { test(false, false) test(false, true) test(true, false) test(true, true) }
Write the same code in C as shown below in F#.
let a (x : bool) = printf "(a)"; x let b (x : bool) = printf "(b)"; x [for x in [true; false] do for y in [true; false] do yield (x, y)] |> List.iter (fun (x, y) -> printfn "%b AND %b = %b" x y ((a x) && (b y)) printfn "%b OR %b = %b" x y ((a x) || (b y)))
#include <stdio.h> #include <stdbool.h> bool a(bool in) { printf("I am a\n"); return in; } bool b(bool in) { printf("I am b\n"); return in; } #define TEST(X,Y,O) \ do { \ x = a(X) O b(Y); \ printf(#X " " #O " " #Y " = %s\n\n", x ? "true" : "false"); \ } while(false); int main() { bool x; TEST(false, true, &&); TEST(true, false, ||); TEST(true, false, &&); TEST(false, false, ||); return 0; }
Port the following code from F# to C# with equivalent syntax and logic.
let a (x : bool) = printf "(a)"; x let b (x : bool) = printf "(b)"; x [for x in [true; false] do for y in [true; false] do yield (x, y)] |> List.iter (fun (x, y) -> printfn "%b AND %b = %b" x y ((a x) && (b y)) printfn "%b OR %b = %b" x y ((a x) || (b y)))
using System; class Program { static bool a(bool value) { Console.WriteLine("a"); return value; } static bool b(bool value) { Console.WriteLine("b"); return value; } static void Main() { foreach (var i in new[] { false, true }) { foreach (var j in new[] { false, true }) { Console.WriteLine("{0} and {1} = {2}", i, j, a(i) && b(j)); Console.WriteLine(); Console.WriteLine("{0} or {1} = {2}", i, j, a(i) || b(j)); Console.WriteLine(); } } } }
Translate the given F# code snippet into C++ without altering its behavior.
let a (x : bool) = printf "(a)"; x let b (x : bool) = printf "(b)"; x [for x in [true; false] do for y in [true; false] do yield (x, y)] |> List.iter (fun (x, y) -> printfn "%b AND %b = %b" x y ((a x) && (b y)) printfn "%b OR %b = %b" x y ((a x) || (b y)))
#include <iostream> bool a(bool in) { std::cout << "a" << std::endl; return in; } bool b(bool in) { std::cout << "b" << std::endl; return in; } void test(bool i, bool j) { std::cout << std::boolalpha << i << " and " << j << " = " << (a(i) && b(j)) << std::endl; std::cout << std::boolalpha << i << " or " << j << " = " << (a(i) || b(j)) << std::endl; } int main() { test(false, false); test(false, true); test(true, false); test(true, true); return 0; }
Convert this F# block to Java, preserving its control flow and logic.
let a (x : bool) = printf "(a)"; x let b (x : bool) = printf "(b)"; x [for x in [true; false] do for y in [true; false] do yield (x, y)] |> List.iter (fun (x, y) -> printfn "%b AND %b = %b" x y ((a x) && (b y)) printfn "%b OR %b = %b" x y ((a x) || (b y)))
module test { @Inject Console console; static Boolean show(String name, Boolean value) { console.print($"{name}()={value}"); return value; } void run() { val a = show("a", _); val b = show("b", _); for (Boolean v1 : False..True) { for (Boolean v2 : False..True) { console.print($"a({v1}) && b({v2}) == {a(v1) && b(v2)}"); console.print(); console.print($"a({v1}) || b({v2}) == {a(v1) || b(v2)}"); console.print(); } } } }
Preserve the algorithm and functionality while converting the code from F# to Python.
let a (x : bool) = printf "(a)"; x let b (x : bool) = printf "(b)"; x [for x in [true; false] do for y in [true; false] do yield (x, y)] |> List.iter (fun (x, y) -> printfn "%b AND %b = %b" x y ((a x) && (b y)) printfn "%b OR %b = %b" x y ((a x) || (b y)))
>>> def a(answer): print(" return answer >>> def b(answer): print(" return answer >>> for i in (False, True): for j in (False, True): print ("\nCalculating: x = a(i) and b(j)") x = a(i) and b(j) print ("Calculating: y = a(i) or b(j)") y = a(i) or b(j) Calculating: x = a(i) and b(j) Calculating: y = a(i) or b(j) Calculating: x = a(i) and b(j) Calculating: y = a(i) or b(j) Calculating: x = a(i) and b(j) Calculating: y = a(i) or b(j) Calculating: x = a(i) and b(j) Calculating: y = a(i) or b(j)
Port the provided F# code into VB while preserving the original functionality.
let a (x : bool) = printf "(a)"; x let b (x : bool) = printf "(b)"; x [for x in [true; false] do for y in [true; false] do yield (x, y)] |> List.iter (fun (x, y) -> printfn "%b AND %b = %b" x y ((a x) && (b y)) printfn "%b OR %b = %b" x y ((a x) || (b y)))
Private Function a(i As Variant) As Boolean Debug.Print "a: "; i = 1, a = i End Function Private Function b(j As Variant) As Boolean Debug.Print "b: "; j = 1; b = j End Function Public Sub short_circuit() Dim x As Boolean, y As Boolean Debug.Print "=====AND=====" & vbCrLf For p = 0 To 1 For q = 0 To 1 If a(p) Then x = b(q) End If Debug.Print " = x" Next q Debug.Print Next p Debug.Print "======OR=====" & vbCrLf For p = 0 To 1 For q = 0 To 1 If Not a(p) Then x = b(q) End If Debug.Print " = x" Next q Debug.Print Next p Debug.Print End Sub
Generate a Go translation of this F# snippet without changing its computational steps.
let a (x : bool) = printf "(a)"; x let b (x : bool) = printf "(b)"; x [for x in [true; false] do for y in [true; false] do yield (x, y)] |> List.iter (fun (x, y) -> printfn "%b AND %b = %b" x y ((a x) && (b y)) printfn "%b OR %b = %b" x y ((a x) || (b y)))
package main import "fmt" func a(v bool) bool { fmt.Print("a") return v } func b(v bool) bool { fmt.Print("b") return v } func test(i, j bool) { fmt.Printf("Testing a(%t) && b(%t)\n", i, j) fmt.Print("Trace: ") fmt.Println("\nResult:", a(i) && b(j)) fmt.Printf("Testing a(%t) || b(%t)\n", i, j) fmt.Print("Trace: ") fmt.Println("\nResult:", a(i) || b(j)) fmt.Println("") } func main() { test(false, false) test(false, true) test(true, false) test(true, true) }
Convert this Factor snippet to C and keep its semantics consistent.
USING: combinators.short-circuit.smart io prettyprint ; IN: rosetta-code.short-circuit : a ( ? -- ? ) "(a)" write ; : b ( ? -- ? ) "(b)" write ; "f && f = " write { [ f a ] [ f b ] } && . "f || f = " write { [ f a ] [ f b ] } || . "f && t = " write { [ f a ] [ t b ] } && . "f || t = " write { [ f a ] [ t b ] } || . "t && f = " write { [ t a ] [ f b ] } && . "t || f = " write { [ t a ] [ f b ] } || . "t && t = " write { [ t a ] [ t b ] } && . "t || t = " write { [ t a ] [ t b ] } || .
#include <stdio.h> #include <stdbool.h> bool a(bool in) { printf("I am a\n"); return in; } bool b(bool in) { printf("I am b\n"); return in; } #define TEST(X,Y,O) \ do { \ x = a(X) O b(Y); \ printf(#X " " #O " " #Y " = %s\n\n", x ? "true" : "false"); \ } while(false); int main() { bool x; TEST(false, true, &&); TEST(true, false, ||); TEST(true, false, &&); TEST(false, false, ||); return 0; }
Maintain the same structure and functionality when rewriting this code in C#.
USING: combinators.short-circuit.smart io prettyprint ; IN: rosetta-code.short-circuit : a ( ? -- ? ) "(a)" write ; : b ( ? -- ? ) "(b)" write ; "f && f = " write { [ f a ] [ f b ] } && . "f || f = " write { [ f a ] [ f b ] } || . "f && t = " write { [ f a ] [ t b ] } && . "f || t = " write { [ f a ] [ t b ] } || . "t && f = " write { [ t a ] [ f b ] } && . "t || f = " write { [ t a ] [ f b ] } || . "t && t = " write { [ t a ] [ t b ] } && . "t || t = " write { [ t a ] [ t b ] } || .
using System; class Program { static bool a(bool value) { Console.WriteLine("a"); return value; } static bool b(bool value) { Console.WriteLine("b"); return value; } static void Main() { foreach (var i in new[] { false, true }) { foreach (var j in new[] { false, true }) { Console.WriteLine("{0} and {1} = {2}", i, j, a(i) && b(j)); Console.WriteLine(); Console.WriteLine("{0} or {1} = {2}", i, j, a(i) || b(j)); Console.WriteLine(); } } } }
Produce a language-to-language conversion: from Factor to C++, same semantics.
USING: combinators.short-circuit.smart io prettyprint ; IN: rosetta-code.short-circuit : a ( ? -- ? ) "(a)" write ; : b ( ? -- ? ) "(b)" write ; "f && f = " write { [ f a ] [ f b ] } && . "f || f = " write { [ f a ] [ f b ] } || . "f && t = " write { [ f a ] [ t b ] } && . "f || t = " write { [ f a ] [ t b ] } || . "t && f = " write { [ t a ] [ f b ] } && . "t || f = " write { [ t a ] [ f b ] } || . "t && t = " write { [ t a ] [ t b ] } && . "t || t = " write { [ t a ] [ t b ] } || .
#include <iostream> bool a(bool in) { std::cout << "a" << std::endl; return in; } bool b(bool in) { std::cout << "b" << std::endl; return in; } void test(bool i, bool j) { std::cout << std::boolalpha << i << " and " << j << " = " << (a(i) && b(j)) << std::endl; std::cout << std::boolalpha << i << " or " << j << " = " << (a(i) || b(j)) << std::endl; } int main() { test(false, false); test(false, true); test(true, false); test(true, true); return 0; }
Transform the following Factor implementation into Java, maintaining the same output and logic.
USING: combinators.short-circuit.smart io prettyprint ; IN: rosetta-code.short-circuit : a ( ? -- ? ) "(a)" write ; : b ( ? -- ? ) "(b)" write ; "f && f = " write { [ f a ] [ f b ] } && . "f || f = " write { [ f a ] [ f b ] } || . "f && t = " write { [ f a ] [ t b ] } && . "f || t = " write { [ f a ] [ t b ] } || . "t && f = " write { [ t a ] [ f b ] } && . "t || f = " write { [ t a ] [ f b ] } || . "t && t = " write { [ t a ] [ t b ] } && . "t || t = " write { [ t a ] [ t b ] } || .
module test { @Inject Console console; static Boolean show(String name, Boolean value) { console.print($"{name}()={value}"); return value; } void run() { val a = show("a", _); val b = show("b", _); for (Boolean v1 : False..True) { for (Boolean v2 : False..True) { console.print($"a({v1}) && b({v2}) == {a(v1) && b(v2)}"); console.print(); console.print($"a({v1}) || b({v2}) == {a(v1) || b(v2)}"); console.print(); } } } }
Convert this Factor snippet to Python and keep its semantics consistent.
USING: combinators.short-circuit.smart io prettyprint ; IN: rosetta-code.short-circuit : a ( ? -- ? ) "(a)" write ; : b ( ? -- ? ) "(b)" write ; "f && f = " write { [ f a ] [ f b ] } && . "f || f = " write { [ f a ] [ f b ] } || . "f && t = " write { [ f a ] [ t b ] } && . "f || t = " write { [ f a ] [ t b ] } || . "t && f = " write { [ t a ] [ f b ] } && . "t || f = " write { [ t a ] [ f b ] } || . "t && t = " write { [ t a ] [ t b ] } && . "t || t = " write { [ t a ] [ t b ] } || .
>>> def a(answer): print(" return answer >>> def b(answer): print(" return answer >>> for i in (False, True): for j in (False, True): print ("\nCalculating: x = a(i) and b(j)") x = a(i) and b(j) print ("Calculating: y = a(i) or b(j)") y = a(i) or b(j) Calculating: x = a(i) and b(j) Calculating: y = a(i) or b(j) Calculating: x = a(i) and b(j) Calculating: y = a(i) or b(j) Calculating: x = a(i) and b(j) Calculating: y = a(i) or b(j) Calculating: x = a(i) and b(j) Calculating: y = a(i) or b(j)
Preserve the algorithm and functionality while converting the code from Factor to VB.
USING: combinators.short-circuit.smart io prettyprint ; IN: rosetta-code.short-circuit : a ( ? -- ? ) "(a)" write ; : b ( ? -- ? ) "(b)" write ; "f && f = " write { [ f a ] [ f b ] } && . "f || f = " write { [ f a ] [ f b ] } || . "f && t = " write { [ f a ] [ t b ] } && . "f || t = " write { [ f a ] [ t b ] } || . "t && f = " write { [ t a ] [ f b ] } && . "t || f = " write { [ t a ] [ f b ] } || . "t && t = " write { [ t a ] [ t b ] } && . "t || t = " write { [ t a ] [ t b ] } || .
Private Function a(i As Variant) As Boolean Debug.Print "a: "; i = 1, a = i End Function Private Function b(j As Variant) As Boolean Debug.Print "b: "; j = 1; b = j End Function Public Sub short_circuit() Dim x As Boolean, y As Boolean Debug.Print "=====AND=====" & vbCrLf For p = 0 To 1 For q = 0 To 1 If a(p) Then x = b(q) End If Debug.Print " = x" Next q Debug.Print Next p Debug.Print "======OR=====" & vbCrLf For p = 0 To 1 For q = 0 To 1 If Not a(p) Then x = b(q) End If Debug.Print " = x" Next q Debug.Print Next p Debug.Print End Sub
Keep all operations the same but rewrite the snippet in Go.
USING: combinators.short-circuit.smart io prettyprint ; IN: rosetta-code.short-circuit : a ( ? -- ? ) "(a)" write ; : b ( ? -- ? ) "(b)" write ; "f && f = " write { [ f a ] [ f b ] } && . "f || f = " write { [ f a ] [ f b ] } || . "f && t = " write { [ f a ] [ t b ] } && . "f || t = " write { [ f a ] [ t b ] } || . "t && f = " write { [ t a ] [ f b ] } && . "t || f = " write { [ t a ] [ f b ] } || . "t && t = " write { [ t a ] [ t b ] } && . "t || t = " write { [ t a ] [ t b ] } || .
package main import "fmt" func a(v bool) bool { fmt.Print("a") return v } func b(v bool) bool { fmt.Print("b") return v } func test(i, j bool) { fmt.Printf("Testing a(%t) && b(%t)\n", i, j) fmt.Print("Trace: ") fmt.Println("\nResult:", a(i) && b(j)) fmt.Printf("Testing a(%t) || b(%t)\n", i, j) fmt.Print("Trace: ") fmt.Println("\nResult:", a(i) || b(j)) fmt.Println("") } func main() { test(false, false) test(false, true) test(true, false) test(true, true) }
Convert this Forth block to C, preserving its control flow and logic.
: ENDIF postpone THEN ; immediate : COND 0 ; immediate : ENDIFS BEGIN DUP WHILE postpone ENDIF REPEAT DROP ; immediate : ORELSE s" ?DUP 0= IF" evaluate ; immediate : ANDIF s" DUP IF DROP" evaluate ; immediate : .bool IF ." true " ELSE ." false " THEN ; : A ." A=" DUP .bool ; : B ." B=" DUP .bool ; : test CR 1 -1 DO 1 -1 DO COND I A ANDIF J B ENDIFS ." ANDIF=" .bool CR COND I A ORELSE J B ENDIFS ." ORELSE=" .bool CR LOOP LOOP ; : END-PRIOR-IF 1 CS-ROLL postpone ENDIF ; immediate : test CR 1 -1 DO 1 -1 DO I A IF J B IF 1 ELSE END-PRIOR-IF 0 ENDIF ." ANDIF=" .bool CR I A 0= IF J B IF END-PRIOR-IF 1 ELSE 0 ENDIF ." ORELSE=" .bool CR LOOP LOOP ;
#include <stdio.h> #include <stdbool.h> bool a(bool in) { printf("I am a\n"); return in; } bool b(bool in) { printf("I am b\n"); return in; } #define TEST(X,Y,O) \ do { \ x = a(X) O b(Y); \ printf(#X " " #O " " #Y " = %s\n\n", x ? "true" : "false"); \ } while(false); int main() { bool x; TEST(false, true, &&); TEST(true, false, ||); TEST(true, false, &&); TEST(false, false, ||); return 0; }
Write the same code in C# as shown below in Forth.
: ENDIF postpone THEN ; immediate : COND 0 ; immediate : ENDIFS BEGIN DUP WHILE postpone ENDIF REPEAT DROP ; immediate : ORELSE s" ?DUP 0= IF" evaluate ; immediate : ANDIF s" DUP IF DROP" evaluate ; immediate : .bool IF ." true " ELSE ." false " THEN ; : A ." A=" DUP .bool ; : B ." B=" DUP .bool ; : test CR 1 -1 DO 1 -1 DO COND I A ANDIF J B ENDIFS ." ANDIF=" .bool CR COND I A ORELSE J B ENDIFS ." ORELSE=" .bool CR LOOP LOOP ; : END-PRIOR-IF 1 CS-ROLL postpone ENDIF ; immediate : test CR 1 -1 DO 1 -1 DO I A IF J B IF 1 ELSE END-PRIOR-IF 0 ENDIF ." ANDIF=" .bool CR I A 0= IF J B IF END-PRIOR-IF 1 ELSE 0 ENDIF ." ORELSE=" .bool CR LOOP LOOP ;
using System; class Program { static bool a(bool value) { Console.WriteLine("a"); return value; } static bool b(bool value) { Console.WriteLine("b"); return value; } static void Main() { foreach (var i in new[] { false, true }) { foreach (var j in new[] { false, true }) { Console.WriteLine("{0} and {1} = {2}", i, j, a(i) && b(j)); Console.WriteLine(); Console.WriteLine("{0} or {1} = {2}", i, j, a(i) || b(j)); Console.WriteLine(); } } } }
Convert this Forth block to C++, preserving its control flow and logic.
: ENDIF postpone THEN ; immediate : COND 0 ; immediate : ENDIFS BEGIN DUP WHILE postpone ENDIF REPEAT DROP ; immediate : ORELSE s" ?DUP 0= IF" evaluate ; immediate : ANDIF s" DUP IF DROP" evaluate ; immediate : .bool IF ." true " ELSE ." false " THEN ; : A ." A=" DUP .bool ; : B ." B=" DUP .bool ; : test CR 1 -1 DO 1 -1 DO COND I A ANDIF J B ENDIFS ." ANDIF=" .bool CR COND I A ORELSE J B ENDIFS ." ORELSE=" .bool CR LOOP LOOP ; : END-PRIOR-IF 1 CS-ROLL postpone ENDIF ; immediate : test CR 1 -1 DO 1 -1 DO I A IF J B IF 1 ELSE END-PRIOR-IF 0 ENDIF ." ANDIF=" .bool CR I A 0= IF J B IF END-PRIOR-IF 1 ELSE 0 ENDIF ." ORELSE=" .bool CR LOOP LOOP ;
#include <iostream> bool a(bool in) { std::cout << "a" << std::endl; return in; } bool b(bool in) { std::cout << "b" << std::endl; return in; } void test(bool i, bool j) { std::cout << std::boolalpha << i << " and " << j << " = " << (a(i) && b(j)) << std::endl; std::cout << std::boolalpha << i << " or " << j << " = " << (a(i) || b(j)) << std::endl; } int main() { test(false, false); test(false, true); test(true, false); test(true, true); return 0; }
Port the provided Forth code into Java while preserving the original functionality.
: ENDIF postpone THEN ; immediate : COND 0 ; immediate : ENDIFS BEGIN DUP WHILE postpone ENDIF REPEAT DROP ; immediate : ORELSE s" ?DUP 0= IF" evaluate ; immediate : ANDIF s" DUP IF DROP" evaluate ; immediate : .bool IF ." true " ELSE ." false " THEN ; : A ." A=" DUP .bool ; : B ." B=" DUP .bool ; : test CR 1 -1 DO 1 -1 DO COND I A ANDIF J B ENDIFS ." ANDIF=" .bool CR COND I A ORELSE J B ENDIFS ." ORELSE=" .bool CR LOOP LOOP ; : END-PRIOR-IF 1 CS-ROLL postpone ENDIF ; immediate : test CR 1 -1 DO 1 -1 DO I A IF J B IF 1 ELSE END-PRIOR-IF 0 ENDIF ." ANDIF=" .bool CR I A 0= IF J B IF END-PRIOR-IF 1 ELSE 0 ENDIF ." ORELSE=" .bool CR LOOP LOOP ;
module test { @Inject Console console; static Boolean show(String name, Boolean value) { console.print($"{name}()={value}"); return value; } void run() { val a = show("a", _); val b = show("b", _); for (Boolean v1 : False..True) { for (Boolean v2 : False..True) { console.print($"a({v1}) && b({v2}) == {a(v1) && b(v2)}"); console.print(); console.print($"a({v1}) || b({v2}) == {a(v1) || b(v2)}"); console.print(); } } } }
Change the programming language of this snippet from Forth to Python without modifying what it does.
: ENDIF postpone THEN ; immediate : COND 0 ; immediate : ENDIFS BEGIN DUP WHILE postpone ENDIF REPEAT DROP ; immediate : ORELSE s" ?DUP 0= IF" evaluate ; immediate : ANDIF s" DUP IF DROP" evaluate ; immediate : .bool IF ." true " ELSE ." false " THEN ; : A ." A=" DUP .bool ; : B ." B=" DUP .bool ; : test CR 1 -1 DO 1 -1 DO COND I A ANDIF J B ENDIFS ." ANDIF=" .bool CR COND I A ORELSE J B ENDIFS ." ORELSE=" .bool CR LOOP LOOP ; : END-PRIOR-IF 1 CS-ROLL postpone ENDIF ; immediate : test CR 1 -1 DO 1 -1 DO I A IF J B IF 1 ELSE END-PRIOR-IF 0 ENDIF ." ANDIF=" .bool CR I A 0= IF J B IF END-PRIOR-IF 1 ELSE 0 ENDIF ." ORELSE=" .bool CR LOOP LOOP ;
>>> def a(answer): print(" return answer >>> def b(answer): print(" return answer >>> for i in (False, True): for j in (False, True): print ("\nCalculating: x = a(i) and b(j)") x = a(i) and b(j) print ("Calculating: y = a(i) or b(j)") y = a(i) or b(j) Calculating: x = a(i) and b(j) Calculating: y = a(i) or b(j) Calculating: x = a(i) and b(j) Calculating: y = a(i) or b(j) Calculating: x = a(i) and b(j) Calculating: y = a(i) or b(j) Calculating: x = a(i) and b(j) Calculating: y = a(i) or b(j)
Maintain the same structure and functionality when rewriting this code in VB.
: ENDIF postpone THEN ; immediate : COND 0 ; immediate : ENDIFS BEGIN DUP WHILE postpone ENDIF REPEAT DROP ; immediate : ORELSE s" ?DUP 0= IF" evaluate ; immediate : ANDIF s" DUP IF DROP" evaluate ; immediate : .bool IF ." true " ELSE ." false " THEN ; : A ." A=" DUP .bool ; : B ." B=" DUP .bool ; : test CR 1 -1 DO 1 -1 DO COND I A ANDIF J B ENDIFS ." ANDIF=" .bool CR COND I A ORELSE J B ENDIFS ." ORELSE=" .bool CR LOOP LOOP ; : END-PRIOR-IF 1 CS-ROLL postpone ENDIF ; immediate : test CR 1 -1 DO 1 -1 DO I A IF J B IF 1 ELSE END-PRIOR-IF 0 ENDIF ." ANDIF=" .bool CR I A 0= IF J B IF END-PRIOR-IF 1 ELSE 0 ENDIF ." ORELSE=" .bool CR LOOP LOOP ;
Private Function a(i As Variant) As Boolean Debug.Print "a: "; i = 1, a = i End Function Private Function b(j As Variant) As Boolean Debug.Print "b: "; j = 1; b = j End Function Public Sub short_circuit() Dim x As Boolean, y As Boolean Debug.Print "=====AND=====" & vbCrLf For p = 0 To 1 For q = 0 To 1 If a(p) Then x = b(q) End If Debug.Print " = x" Next q Debug.Print Next p Debug.Print "======OR=====" & vbCrLf For p = 0 To 1 For q = 0 To 1 If Not a(p) Then x = b(q) End If Debug.Print " = x" Next q Debug.Print Next p Debug.Print End Sub
Change the following Forth code into Go without altering its purpose.
: ENDIF postpone THEN ; immediate : COND 0 ; immediate : ENDIFS BEGIN DUP WHILE postpone ENDIF REPEAT DROP ; immediate : ORELSE s" ?DUP 0= IF" evaluate ; immediate : ANDIF s" DUP IF DROP" evaluate ; immediate : .bool IF ." true " ELSE ." false " THEN ; : A ." A=" DUP .bool ; : B ." B=" DUP .bool ; : test CR 1 -1 DO 1 -1 DO COND I A ANDIF J B ENDIFS ." ANDIF=" .bool CR COND I A ORELSE J B ENDIFS ." ORELSE=" .bool CR LOOP LOOP ; : END-PRIOR-IF 1 CS-ROLL postpone ENDIF ; immediate : test CR 1 -1 DO 1 -1 DO I A IF J B IF 1 ELSE END-PRIOR-IF 0 ENDIF ." ANDIF=" .bool CR I A 0= IF J B IF END-PRIOR-IF 1 ELSE 0 ENDIF ." ORELSE=" .bool CR LOOP LOOP ;
package main import "fmt" func a(v bool) bool { fmt.Print("a") return v } func b(v bool) bool { fmt.Print("b") return v } func test(i, j bool) { fmt.Printf("Testing a(%t) && b(%t)\n", i, j) fmt.Print("Trace: ") fmt.Println("\nResult:", a(i) && b(j)) fmt.Printf("Testing a(%t) || b(%t)\n", i, j) fmt.Print("Trace: ") fmt.Println("\nResult:", a(i) || b(j)) fmt.Println("") } func main() { test(false, false) test(false, true) test(true, false) test(true, true) }
Ensure the translated C# code behaves exactly like the original Fortran snippet.
program Short_Circuit_Eval implicit none logical :: x, y logical, dimension(2) :: l = (/ .false., .true. /) integer :: i, j do i = 1, 2 do j = 1, 2 write(*, "(a,l1,a,l1,a)") "Calculating x = a(", l(i), ") and b(", l(j), ")" x = a(l(i)) if(x) then x = b(l(j)) write(*, "(a,l1)") "x = ", x else write(*, "(a,l1)") "x = ", x end if write(*,*) write(*, "(a,l1,a,l1,a)") "Calculating y = a(", l(i), ") or b(", l(j), ")" y = a(l(i)) if(y) then write(*, "(a,l1)") "y = ", y else y = b(l(j)) write(*, "(a,l1)") "y = ", y end if write(*,*) end do end do contains function a(value) logical :: a logical, intent(in) :: value a = value write(*, "(a,l1,a)") "Called function a(", value, ")" end function function b(value) logical :: b logical, intent(in) :: value b = value write(*, "(a,l1,a)") "Called function b(", value, ")" end function end program
using System; class Program { static bool a(bool value) { Console.WriteLine("a"); return value; } static bool b(bool value) { Console.WriteLine("b"); return value; } static void Main() { foreach (var i in new[] { false, true }) { foreach (var j in new[] { false, true }) { Console.WriteLine("{0} and {1} = {2}", i, j, a(i) && b(j)); Console.WriteLine(); Console.WriteLine("{0} or {1} = {2}", i, j, a(i) || b(j)); Console.WriteLine(); } } } }
Generate an equivalent C++ version of this Fortran code.
program Short_Circuit_Eval implicit none logical :: x, y logical, dimension(2) :: l = (/ .false., .true. /) integer :: i, j do i = 1, 2 do j = 1, 2 write(*, "(a,l1,a,l1,a)") "Calculating x = a(", l(i), ") and b(", l(j), ")" x = a(l(i)) if(x) then x = b(l(j)) write(*, "(a,l1)") "x = ", x else write(*, "(a,l1)") "x = ", x end if write(*,*) write(*, "(a,l1,a,l1,a)") "Calculating y = a(", l(i), ") or b(", l(j), ")" y = a(l(i)) if(y) then write(*, "(a,l1)") "y = ", y else y = b(l(j)) write(*, "(a,l1)") "y = ", y end if write(*,*) end do end do contains function a(value) logical :: a logical, intent(in) :: value a = value write(*, "(a,l1,a)") "Called function a(", value, ")" end function function b(value) logical :: b logical, intent(in) :: value b = value write(*, "(a,l1,a)") "Called function b(", value, ")" end function end program
#include <iostream> bool a(bool in) { std::cout << "a" << std::endl; return in; } bool b(bool in) { std::cout << "b" << std::endl; return in; } void test(bool i, bool j) { std::cout << std::boolalpha << i << " and " << j << " = " << (a(i) && b(j)) << std::endl; std::cout << std::boolalpha << i << " or " << j << " = " << (a(i) || b(j)) << std::endl; } int main() { test(false, false); test(false, true); test(true, false); test(true, true); return 0; }
Ensure the translated C code behaves exactly like the original Fortran snippet.
program Short_Circuit_Eval implicit none logical :: x, y logical, dimension(2) :: l = (/ .false., .true. /) integer :: i, j do i = 1, 2 do j = 1, 2 write(*, "(a,l1,a,l1,a)") "Calculating x = a(", l(i), ") and b(", l(j), ")" x = a(l(i)) if(x) then x = b(l(j)) write(*, "(a,l1)") "x = ", x else write(*, "(a,l1)") "x = ", x end if write(*,*) write(*, "(a,l1,a,l1,a)") "Calculating y = a(", l(i), ") or b(", l(j), ")" y = a(l(i)) if(y) then write(*, "(a,l1)") "y = ", y else y = b(l(j)) write(*, "(a,l1)") "y = ", y end if write(*,*) end do end do contains function a(value) logical :: a logical, intent(in) :: value a = value write(*, "(a,l1,a)") "Called function a(", value, ")" end function function b(value) logical :: b logical, intent(in) :: value b = value write(*, "(a,l1,a)") "Called function b(", value, ")" end function end program
#include <stdio.h> #include <stdbool.h> bool a(bool in) { printf("I am a\n"); return in; } bool b(bool in) { printf("I am b\n"); return in; } #define TEST(X,Y,O) \ do { \ x = a(X) O b(Y); \ printf(#X " " #O " " #Y " = %s\n\n", x ? "true" : "false"); \ } while(false); int main() { bool x; TEST(false, true, &&); TEST(true, false, ||); TEST(true, false, &&); TEST(false, false, ||); return 0; }
Write the same code in Java as shown below in Fortran.
program Short_Circuit_Eval implicit none logical :: x, y logical, dimension(2) :: l = (/ .false., .true. /) integer :: i, j do i = 1, 2 do j = 1, 2 write(*, "(a,l1,a,l1,a)") "Calculating x = a(", l(i), ") and b(", l(j), ")" x = a(l(i)) if(x) then x = b(l(j)) write(*, "(a,l1)") "x = ", x else write(*, "(a,l1)") "x = ", x end if write(*,*) write(*, "(a,l1,a,l1,a)") "Calculating y = a(", l(i), ") or b(", l(j), ")" y = a(l(i)) if(y) then write(*, "(a,l1)") "y = ", y else y = b(l(j)) write(*, "(a,l1)") "y = ", y end if write(*,*) end do end do contains function a(value) logical :: a logical, intent(in) :: value a = value write(*, "(a,l1,a)") "Called function a(", value, ")" end function function b(value) logical :: b logical, intent(in) :: value b = value write(*, "(a,l1,a)") "Called function b(", value, ")" end function end program
module test { @Inject Console console; static Boolean show(String name, Boolean value) { console.print($"{name}()={value}"); return value; } void run() { val a = show("a", _); val b = show("b", _); for (Boolean v1 : False..True) { for (Boolean v2 : False..True) { console.print($"a({v1}) && b({v2}) == {a(v1) && b(v2)}"); console.print(); console.print($"a({v1}) || b({v2}) == {a(v1) || b(v2)}"); console.print(); } } } }
Write the same algorithm in Python as shown in this Fortran implementation.
program Short_Circuit_Eval implicit none logical :: x, y logical, dimension(2) :: l = (/ .false., .true. /) integer :: i, j do i = 1, 2 do j = 1, 2 write(*, "(a,l1,a,l1,a)") "Calculating x = a(", l(i), ") and b(", l(j), ")" x = a(l(i)) if(x) then x = b(l(j)) write(*, "(a,l1)") "x = ", x else write(*, "(a,l1)") "x = ", x end if write(*,*) write(*, "(a,l1,a,l1,a)") "Calculating y = a(", l(i), ") or b(", l(j), ")" y = a(l(i)) if(y) then write(*, "(a,l1)") "y = ", y else y = b(l(j)) write(*, "(a,l1)") "y = ", y end if write(*,*) end do end do contains function a(value) logical :: a logical, intent(in) :: value a = value write(*, "(a,l1,a)") "Called function a(", value, ")" end function function b(value) logical :: b logical, intent(in) :: value b = value write(*, "(a,l1,a)") "Called function b(", value, ")" end function end program
>>> def a(answer): print(" return answer >>> def b(answer): print(" return answer >>> for i in (False, True): for j in (False, True): print ("\nCalculating: x = a(i) and b(j)") x = a(i) and b(j) print ("Calculating: y = a(i) or b(j)") y = a(i) or b(j) Calculating: x = a(i) and b(j) Calculating: y = a(i) or b(j) Calculating: x = a(i) and b(j) Calculating: y = a(i) or b(j) Calculating: x = a(i) and b(j) Calculating: y = a(i) or b(j) Calculating: x = a(i) and b(j) Calculating: y = a(i) or b(j)
Rewrite the snippet below in VB so it works the same as the original Fortran code.
program Short_Circuit_Eval implicit none logical :: x, y logical, dimension(2) :: l = (/ .false., .true. /) integer :: i, j do i = 1, 2 do j = 1, 2 write(*, "(a,l1,a,l1,a)") "Calculating x = a(", l(i), ") and b(", l(j), ")" x = a(l(i)) if(x) then x = b(l(j)) write(*, "(a,l1)") "x = ", x else write(*, "(a,l1)") "x = ", x end if write(*,*) write(*, "(a,l1,a,l1,a)") "Calculating y = a(", l(i), ") or b(", l(j), ")" y = a(l(i)) if(y) then write(*, "(a,l1)") "y = ", y else y = b(l(j)) write(*, "(a,l1)") "y = ", y end if write(*,*) end do end do contains function a(value) logical :: a logical, intent(in) :: value a = value write(*, "(a,l1,a)") "Called function a(", value, ")" end function function b(value) logical :: b logical, intent(in) :: value b = value write(*, "(a,l1,a)") "Called function b(", value, ")" end function end program
Private Function a(i As Variant) As Boolean Debug.Print "a: "; i = 1, a = i End Function Private Function b(j As Variant) As Boolean Debug.Print "b: "; j = 1; b = j End Function Public Sub short_circuit() Dim x As Boolean, y As Boolean Debug.Print "=====AND=====" & vbCrLf For p = 0 To 1 For q = 0 To 1 If a(p) Then x = b(q) End If Debug.Print " = x" Next q Debug.Print Next p Debug.Print "======OR=====" & vbCrLf For p = 0 To 1 For q = 0 To 1 If Not a(p) Then x = b(q) End If Debug.Print " = x" Next q Debug.Print Next p Debug.Print End Sub
Can you help me rewrite this code in C instead of Groovy, keeping it the same logically?
def f = { println ' AHA!'; it instanceof String } def g = { printf ('%5d ', it); it > 50 } println 'bitwise' assert g(100) & f('sss') assert g(2) | f('sss') assert ! (g(1) & f('sss')) assert g(200) | f('sss') println ''' logical''' assert g(100) && f('sss') assert g(2) || f('sss') assert ! (g(1) && f('sss')) assert g(200) || f('sss')
#include <stdio.h> #include <stdbool.h> bool a(bool in) { printf("I am a\n"); return in; } bool b(bool in) { printf("I am b\n"); return in; } #define TEST(X,Y,O) \ do { \ x = a(X) O b(Y); \ printf(#X " " #O " " #Y " = %s\n\n", x ? "true" : "false"); \ } while(false); int main() { bool x; TEST(false, true, &&); TEST(true, false, ||); TEST(true, false, &&); TEST(false, false, ||); return 0; }
Convert the following code from Groovy to C#, ensuring the logic remains intact.
def f = { println ' AHA!'; it instanceof String } def g = { printf ('%5d ', it); it > 50 } println 'bitwise' assert g(100) & f('sss') assert g(2) | f('sss') assert ! (g(1) & f('sss')) assert g(200) | f('sss') println ''' logical''' assert g(100) && f('sss') assert g(2) || f('sss') assert ! (g(1) && f('sss')) assert g(200) || f('sss')
using System; class Program { static bool a(bool value) { Console.WriteLine("a"); return value; } static bool b(bool value) { Console.WriteLine("b"); return value; } static void Main() { foreach (var i in new[] { false, true }) { foreach (var j in new[] { false, true }) { Console.WriteLine("{0} and {1} = {2}", i, j, a(i) && b(j)); Console.WriteLine(); Console.WriteLine("{0} or {1} = {2}", i, j, a(i) || b(j)); Console.WriteLine(); } } } }
Keep all operations the same but rewrite the snippet in C++.
def f = { println ' AHA!'; it instanceof String } def g = { printf ('%5d ', it); it > 50 } println 'bitwise' assert g(100) & f('sss') assert g(2) | f('sss') assert ! (g(1) & f('sss')) assert g(200) | f('sss') println ''' logical''' assert g(100) && f('sss') assert g(2) || f('sss') assert ! (g(1) && f('sss')) assert g(200) || f('sss')
#include <iostream> bool a(bool in) { std::cout << "a" << std::endl; return in; } bool b(bool in) { std::cout << "b" << std::endl; return in; } void test(bool i, bool j) { std::cout << std::boolalpha << i << " and " << j << " = " << (a(i) && b(j)) << std::endl; std::cout << std::boolalpha << i << " or " << j << " = " << (a(i) || b(j)) << std::endl; } int main() { test(false, false); test(false, true); test(true, false); test(true, true); return 0; }
Convert the following code from Groovy to Java, ensuring the logic remains intact.
def f = { println ' AHA!'; it instanceof String } def g = { printf ('%5d ', it); it > 50 } println 'bitwise' assert g(100) & f('sss') assert g(2) | f('sss') assert ! (g(1) & f('sss')) assert g(200) | f('sss') println ''' logical''' assert g(100) && f('sss') assert g(2) || f('sss') assert ! (g(1) && f('sss')) assert g(200) || f('sss')
module test { @Inject Console console; static Boolean show(String name, Boolean value) { console.print($"{name}()={value}"); return value; } void run() { val a = show("a", _); val b = show("b", _); for (Boolean v1 : False..True) { for (Boolean v2 : False..True) { console.print($"a({v1}) && b({v2}) == {a(v1) && b(v2)}"); console.print(); console.print($"a({v1}) || b({v2}) == {a(v1) || b(v2)}"); console.print(); } } } }
Can you help me rewrite this code in Python instead of Groovy, keeping it the same logically?
def f = { println ' AHA!'; it instanceof String } def g = { printf ('%5d ', it); it > 50 } println 'bitwise' assert g(100) & f('sss') assert g(2) | f('sss') assert ! (g(1) & f('sss')) assert g(200) | f('sss') println ''' logical''' assert g(100) && f('sss') assert g(2) || f('sss') assert ! (g(1) && f('sss')) assert g(200) || f('sss')
>>> def a(answer): print(" return answer >>> def b(answer): print(" return answer >>> for i in (False, True): for j in (False, True): print ("\nCalculating: x = a(i) and b(j)") x = a(i) and b(j) print ("Calculating: y = a(i) or b(j)") y = a(i) or b(j) Calculating: x = a(i) and b(j) Calculating: y = a(i) or b(j) Calculating: x = a(i) and b(j) Calculating: y = a(i) or b(j) Calculating: x = a(i) and b(j) Calculating: y = a(i) or b(j) Calculating: x = a(i) and b(j) Calculating: y = a(i) or b(j)
Rewrite this program in VB while keeping its functionality equivalent to the Groovy version.
def f = { println ' AHA!'; it instanceof String } def g = { printf ('%5d ', it); it > 50 } println 'bitwise' assert g(100) & f('sss') assert g(2) | f('sss') assert ! (g(1) & f('sss')) assert g(200) | f('sss') println ''' logical''' assert g(100) && f('sss') assert g(2) || f('sss') assert ! (g(1) && f('sss')) assert g(200) || f('sss')
Private Function a(i As Variant) As Boolean Debug.Print "a: "; i = 1, a = i End Function Private Function b(j As Variant) As Boolean Debug.Print "b: "; j = 1; b = j End Function Public Sub short_circuit() Dim x As Boolean, y As Boolean Debug.Print "=====AND=====" & vbCrLf For p = 0 To 1 For q = 0 To 1 If a(p) Then x = b(q) End If Debug.Print " = x" Next q Debug.Print Next p Debug.Print "======OR=====" & vbCrLf For p = 0 To 1 For q = 0 To 1 If Not a(p) Then x = b(q) End If Debug.Print " = x" Next q Debug.Print Next p Debug.Print End Sub
Please provide an equivalent version of this Groovy code in Go.
def f = { println ' AHA!'; it instanceof String } def g = { printf ('%5d ', it); it > 50 } println 'bitwise' assert g(100) & f('sss') assert g(2) | f('sss') assert ! (g(1) & f('sss')) assert g(200) | f('sss') println ''' logical''' assert g(100) && f('sss') assert g(2) || f('sss') assert ! (g(1) && f('sss')) assert g(200) || f('sss')
package main import "fmt" func a(v bool) bool { fmt.Print("a") return v } func b(v bool) bool { fmt.Print("b") return v } func test(i, j bool) { fmt.Printf("Testing a(%t) && b(%t)\n", i, j) fmt.Print("Trace: ") fmt.Println("\nResult:", a(i) && b(j)) fmt.Printf("Testing a(%t) || b(%t)\n", i, j) fmt.Print("Trace: ") fmt.Println("\nResult:", a(i) || b(j)) fmt.Println("") } func main() { test(false, false) test(false, true) test(true, false) test(true, true) }
Generate an equivalent C version of this Haskell code.
module ShortCircuit where import Prelude hiding ((&&), (||)) import Debug.Trace False && _ = False True && False = False _ && _ = True True || _ = True False || True = True _ || _ = False a p = trace ("<a " ++ show p ++ ">") p b p = trace ("<b " ++ show p ++ ">") p main = mapM_ print ( [ a p || b q | p <- [False, True], q <- [False, True] ] ++ [ a p && b q | p <- [False, True], q <- [False, True] ])
#include <stdio.h> #include <stdbool.h> bool a(bool in) { printf("I am a\n"); return in; } bool b(bool in) { printf("I am b\n"); return in; } #define TEST(X,Y,O) \ do { \ x = a(X) O b(Y); \ printf(#X " " #O " " #Y " = %s\n\n", x ? "true" : "false"); \ } while(false); int main() { bool x; TEST(false, true, &&); TEST(true, false, ||); TEST(true, false, &&); TEST(false, false, ||); return 0; }
Produce a language-to-language conversion: from Haskell to C#, same semantics.
module ShortCircuit where import Prelude hiding ((&&), (||)) import Debug.Trace False && _ = False True && False = False _ && _ = True True || _ = True False || True = True _ || _ = False a p = trace ("<a " ++ show p ++ ">") p b p = trace ("<b " ++ show p ++ ">") p main = mapM_ print ( [ a p || b q | p <- [False, True], q <- [False, True] ] ++ [ a p && b q | p <- [False, True], q <- [False, True] ])
using System; class Program { static bool a(bool value) { Console.WriteLine("a"); return value; } static bool b(bool value) { Console.WriteLine("b"); return value; } static void Main() { foreach (var i in new[] { false, true }) { foreach (var j in new[] { false, true }) { Console.WriteLine("{0} and {1} = {2}", i, j, a(i) && b(j)); Console.WriteLine(); Console.WriteLine("{0} or {1} = {2}", i, j, a(i) || b(j)); Console.WriteLine(); } } } }
Convert this Haskell snippet to C++ and keep its semantics consistent.
module ShortCircuit where import Prelude hiding ((&&), (||)) import Debug.Trace False && _ = False True && False = False _ && _ = True True || _ = True False || True = True _ || _ = False a p = trace ("<a " ++ show p ++ ">") p b p = trace ("<b " ++ show p ++ ">") p main = mapM_ print ( [ a p || b q | p <- [False, True], q <- [False, True] ] ++ [ a p && b q | p <- [False, True], q <- [False, True] ])
#include <iostream> bool a(bool in) { std::cout << "a" << std::endl; return in; } bool b(bool in) { std::cout << "b" << std::endl; return in; } void test(bool i, bool j) { std::cout << std::boolalpha << i << " and " << j << " = " << (a(i) && b(j)) << std::endl; std::cout << std::boolalpha << i << " or " << j << " = " << (a(i) || b(j)) << std::endl; } int main() { test(false, false); test(false, true); test(true, false); test(true, true); return 0; }
Write a version of this Haskell function in Java with identical behavior.
module ShortCircuit where import Prelude hiding ((&&), (||)) import Debug.Trace False && _ = False True && False = False _ && _ = True True || _ = True False || True = True _ || _ = False a p = trace ("<a " ++ show p ++ ">") p b p = trace ("<b " ++ show p ++ ">") p main = mapM_ print ( [ a p || b q | p <- [False, True], q <- [False, True] ] ++ [ a p && b q | p <- [False, True], q <- [False, True] ])
module test { @Inject Console console; static Boolean show(String name, Boolean value) { console.print($"{name}()={value}"); return value; } void run() { val a = show("a", _); val b = show("b", _); for (Boolean v1 : False..True) { for (Boolean v2 : False..True) { console.print($"a({v1}) && b({v2}) == {a(v1) && b(v2)}"); console.print(); console.print($"a({v1}) || b({v2}) == {a(v1) || b(v2)}"); console.print(); } } } }
Change the following Haskell code into Python without altering its purpose.
module ShortCircuit where import Prelude hiding ((&&), (||)) import Debug.Trace False && _ = False True && False = False _ && _ = True True || _ = True False || True = True _ || _ = False a p = trace ("<a " ++ show p ++ ">") p b p = trace ("<b " ++ show p ++ ">") p main = mapM_ print ( [ a p || b q | p <- [False, True], q <- [False, True] ] ++ [ a p && b q | p <- [False, True], q <- [False, True] ])
>>> def a(answer): print(" return answer >>> def b(answer): print(" return answer >>> for i in (False, True): for j in (False, True): print ("\nCalculating: x = a(i) and b(j)") x = a(i) and b(j) print ("Calculating: y = a(i) or b(j)") y = a(i) or b(j) Calculating: x = a(i) and b(j) Calculating: y = a(i) or b(j) Calculating: x = a(i) and b(j) Calculating: y = a(i) or b(j) Calculating: x = a(i) and b(j) Calculating: y = a(i) or b(j) Calculating: x = a(i) and b(j) Calculating: y = a(i) or b(j)
Can you help me rewrite this code in VB instead of Haskell, keeping it the same logically?
module ShortCircuit where import Prelude hiding ((&&), (||)) import Debug.Trace False && _ = False True && False = False _ && _ = True True || _ = True False || True = True _ || _ = False a p = trace ("<a " ++ show p ++ ">") p b p = trace ("<b " ++ show p ++ ">") p main = mapM_ print ( [ a p || b q | p <- [False, True], q <- [False, True] ] ++ [ a p && b q | p <- [False, True], q <- [False, True] ])
Private Function a(i As Variant) As Boolean Debug.Print "a: "; i = 1, a = i End Function Private Function b(j As Variant) As Boolean Debug.Print "b: "; j = 1; b = j End Function Public Sub short_circuit() Dim x As Boolean, y As Boolean Debug.Print "=====AND=====" & vbCrLf For p = 0 To 1 For q = 0 To 1 If a(p) Then x = b(q) End If Debug.Print " = x" Next q Debug.Print Next p Debug.Print "======OR=====" & vbCrLf For p = 0 To 1 For q = 0 To 1 If Not a(p) Then x = b(q) End If Debug.Print " = x" Next q Debug.Print Next p Debug.Print End Sub
Port the following code from Haskell to Go with equivalent syntax and logic.
module ShortCircuit where import Prelude hiding ((&&), (||)) import Debug.Trace False && _ = False True && False = False _ && _ = True True || _ = True False || True = True _ || _ = False a p = trace ("<a " ++ show p ++ ">") p b p = trace ("<b " ++ show p ++ ">") p main = mapM_ print ( [ a p || b q | p <- [False, True], q <- [False, True] ] ++ [ a p && b q | p <- [False, True], q <- [False, True] ])
package main import "fmt" func a(v bool) bool { fmt.Print("a") return v } func b(v bool) bool { fmt.Print("b") return v } func test(i, j bool) { fmt.Printf("Testing a(%t) && b(%t)\n", i, j) fmt.Print("Trace: ") fmt.Println("\nResult:", a(i) && b(j)) fmt.Printf("Testing a(%t) || b(%t)\n", i, j) fmt.Print("Trace: ") fmt.Println("\nResult:", a(i) || b(j)) fmt.Println("") } func main() { test(false, false) test(false, true) test(true, false) test(true, true) }
Change the following Icon code into C without altering its purpose.
procedure main() &trace := -1 every (i := false | true ) & ( j := false | true) do { write("i,j := ",image(i),", ",image(j)) write("i & j:") x := i() & j() write("i | j:") y := i() | j() } end procedure true() return end procedure false() fail end
#include <stdio.h> #include <stdbool.h> bool a(bool in) { printf("I am a\n"); return in; } bool b(bool in) { printf("I am b\n"); return in; } #define TEST(X,Y,O) \ do { \ x = a(X) O b(Y); \ printf(#X " " #O " " #Y " = %s\n\n", x ? "true" : "false"); \ } while(false); int main() { bool x; TEST(false, true, &&); TEST(true, false, ||); TEST(true, false, &&); TEST(false, false, ||); return 0; }
Convert this Icon snippet to C# and keep its semantics consistent.
procedure main() &trace := -1 every (i := false | true ) & ( j := false | true) do { write("i,j := ",image(i),", ",image(j)) write("i & j:") x := i() & j() write("i | j:") y := i() | j() } end procedure true() return end procedure false() fail end
using System; class Program { static bool a(bool value) { Console.WriteLine("a"); return value; } static bool b(bool value) { Console.WriteLine("b"); return value; } static void Main() { foreach (var i in new[] { false, true }) { foreach (var j in new[] { false, true }) { Console.WriteLine("{0} and {1} = {2}", i, j, a(i) && b(j)); Console.WriteLine(); Console.WriteLine("{0} or {1} = {2}", i, j, a(i) || b(j)); Console.WriteLine(); } } } }
Port the following code from Icon to C++ with equivalent syntax and logic.
procedure main() &trace := -1 every (i := false | true ) & ( j := false | true) do { write("i,j := ",image(i),", ",image(j)) write("i & j:") x := i() & j() write("i | j:") y := i() | j() } end procedure true() return end procedure false() fail end
#include <iostream> bool a(bool in) { std::cout << "a" << std::endl; return in; } bool b(bool in) { std::cout << "b" << std::endl; return in; } void test(bool i, bool j) { std::cout << std::boolalpha << i << " and " << j << " = " << (a(i) && b(j)) << std::endl; std::cout << std::boolalpha << i << " or " << j << " = " << (a(i) || b(j)) << std::endl; } int main() { test(false, false); test(false, true); test(true, false); test(true, true); return 0; }
Change the programming language of this snippet from Icon to Java without modifying what it does.
procedure main() &trace := -1 every (i := false | true ) & ( j := false | true) do { write("i,j := ",image(i),", ",image(j)) write("i & j:") x := i() & j() write("i | j:") y := i() | j() } end procedure true() return end procedure false() fail end
module test { @Inject Console console; static Boolean show(String name, Boolean value) { console.print($"{name}()={value}"); return value; } void run() { val a = show("a", _); val b = show("b", _); for (Boolean v1 : False..True) { for (Boolean v2 : False..True) { console.print($"a({v1}) && b({v2}) == {a(v1) && b(v2)}"); console.print(); console.print($"a({v1}) || b({v2}) == {a(v1) || b(v2)}"); console.print(); } } } }
Change the programming language of this snippet from Icon to Python without modifying what it does.
procedure main() &trace := -1 every (i := false | true ) & ( j := false | true) do { write("i,j := ",image(i),", ",image(j)) write("i & j:") x := i() & j() write("i | j:") y := i() | j() } end procedure true() return end procedure false() fail end
>>> def a(answer): print(" return answer >>> def b(answer): print(" return answer >>> for i in (False, True): for j in (False, True): print ("\nCalculating: x = a(i) and b(j)") x = a(i) and b(j) print ("Calculating: y = a(i) or b(j)") y = a(i) or b(j) Calculating: x = a(i) and b(j) Calculating: y = a(i) or b(j) Calculating: x = a(i) and b(j) Calculating: y = a(i) or b(j) Calculating: x = a(i) and b(j) Calculating: y = a(i) or b(j) Calculating: x = a(i) and b(j) Calculating: y = a(i) or b(j)
Write the same algorithm in VB as shown in this Icon implementation.
procedure main() &trace := -1 every (i := false | true ) & ( j := false | true) do { write("i,j := ",image(i),", ",image(j)) write("i & j:") x := i() & j() write("i | j:") y := i() | j() } end procedure true() return end procedure false() fail end
Private Function a(i As Variant) As Boolean Debug.Print "a: "; i = 1, a = i End Function Private Function b(j As Variant) As Boolean Debug.Print "b: "; j = 1; b = j End Function Public Sub short_circuit() Dim x As Boolean, y As Boolean Debug.Print "=====AND=====" & vbCrLf For p = 0 To 1 For q = 0 To 1 If a(p) Then x = b(q) End If Debug.Print " = x" Next q Debug.Print Next p Debug.Print "======OR=====" & vbCrLf For p = 0 To 1 For q = 0 To 1 If Not a(p) Then x = b(q) End If Debug.Print " = x" Next q Debug.Print Next p Debug.Print End Sub
Change the programming language of this snippet from Icon to Go without modifying what it does.
procedure main() &trace := -1 every (i := false | true ) & ( j := false | true) do { write("i,j := ",image(i),", ",image(j)) write("i & j:") x := i() & j() write("i | j:") y := i() | j() } end procedure true() return end procedure false() fail end
package main import "fmt" func a(v bool) bool { fmt.Print("a") return v } func b(v bool) bool { fmt.Print("b") return v } func test(i, j bool) { fmt.Printf("Testing a(%t) && b(%t)\n", i, j) fmt.Print("Trace: ") fmt.Println("\nResult:", a(i) && b(j)) fmt.Printf("Testing a(%t) || b(%t)\n", i, j) fmt.Print("Trace: ") fmt.Println("\nResult:", a(i) || b(j)) fmt.Println("") } func main() { test(false, false) test(false, true) test(true, false) test(true, true) }
Ensure the translated C code behaves exactly like the original J snippet.
labeled=:1 :'[ smoutput@,&":~&m' A=: 'A ' labeled B=: 'B ' labeled and=: ^: or=: 2 :'u^:(-.@v)'
#include <stdio.h> #include <stdbool.h> bool a(bool in) { printf("I am a\n"); return in; } bool b(bool in) { printf("I am b\n"); return in; } #define TEST(X,Y,O) \ do { \ x = a(X) O b(Y); \ printf(#X " " #O " " #Y " = %s\n\n", x ? "true" : "false"); \ } while(false); int main() { bool x; TEST(false, true, &&); TEST(true, false, ||); TEST(true, false, &&); TEST(false, false, ||); return 0; }
Convert this J snippet to C# and keep its semantics consistent.
labeled=:1 :'[ smoutput@,&":~&m' A=: 'A ' labeled B=: 'B ' labeled and=: ^: or=: 2 :'u^:(-.@v)'
using System; class Program { static bool a(bool value) { Console.WriteLine("a"); return value; } static bool b(bool value) { Console.WriteLine("b"); return value; } static void Main() { foreach (var i in new[] { false, true }) { foreach (var j in new[] { false, true }) { Console.WriteLine("{0} and {1} = {2}", i, j, a(i) && b(j)); Console.WriteLine(); Console.WriteLine("{0} or {1} = {2}", i, j, a(i) || b(j)); Console.WriteLine(); } } } }
Write the same algorithm in C++ as shown in this J implementation.
labeled=:1 :'[ smoutput@,&":~&m' A=: 'A ' labeled B=: 'B ' labeled and=: ^: or=: 2 :'u^:(-.@v)'
#include <iostream> bool a(bool in) { std::cout << "a" << std::endl; return in; } bool b(bool in) { std::cout << "b" << std::endl; return in; } void test(bool i, bool j) { std::cout << std::boolalpha << i << " and " << j << " = " << (a(i) && b(j)) << std::endl; std::cout << std::boolalpha << i << " or " << j << " = " << (a(i) || b(j)) << std::endl; } int main() { test(false, false); test(false, true); test(true, false); test(true, true); return 0; }
Generate an equivalent Java version of this J code.
labeled=:1 :'[ smoutput@,&":~&m' A=: 'A ' labeled B=: 'B ' labeled and=: ^: or=: 2 :'u^:(-.@v)'
module test { @Inject Console console; static Boolean show(String name, Boolean value) { console.print($"{name}()={value}"); return value; } void run() { val a = show("a", _); val b = show("b", _); for (Boolean v1 : False..True) { for (Boolean v2 : False..True) { console.print($"a({v1}) && b({v2}) == {a(v1) && b(v2)}"); console.print(); console.print($"a({v1}) || b({v2}) == {a(v1) || b(v2)}"); console.print(); } } } }
Please provide an equivalent version of this J code in Python.
labeled=:1 :'[ smoutput@,&":~&m' A=: 'A ' labeled B=: 'B ' labeled and=: ^: or=: 2 :'u^:(-.@v)'
>>> def a(answer): print(" return answer >>> def b(answer): print(" return answer >>> for i in (False, True): for j in (False, True): print ("\nCalculating: x = a(i) and b(j)") x = a(i) and b(j) print ("Calculating: y = a(i) or b(j)") y = a(i) or b(j) Calculating: x = a(i) and b(j) Calculating: y = a(i) or b(j) Calculating: x = a(i) and b(j) Calculating: y = a(i) or b(j) Calculating: x = a(i) and b(j) Calculating: y = a(i) or b(j) Calculating: x = a(i) and b(j) Calculating: y = a(i) or b(j)
Maintain the same structure and functionality when rewriting this code in VB.
labeled=:1 :'[ smoutput@,&":~&m' A=: 'A ' labeled B=: 'B ' labeled and=: ^: or=: 2 :'u^:(-.@v)'
Private Function a(i As Variant) As Boolean Debug.Print "a: "; i = 1, a = i End Function Private Function b(j As Variant) As Boolean Debug.Print "b: "; j = 1; b = j End Function Public Sub short_circuit() Dim x As Boolean, y As Boolean Debug.Print "=====AND=====" & vbCrLf For p = 0 To 1 For q = 0 To 1 If a(p) Then x = b(q) End If Debug.Print " = x" Next q Debug.Print Next p Debug.Print "======OR=====" & vbCrLf For p = 0 To 1 For q = 0 To 1 If Not a(p) Then x = b(q) End If Debug.Print " = x" Next q Debug.Print Next p Debug.Print End Sub
Translate the given J code snippet into Go without altering its behavior.
labeled=:1 :'[ smoutput@,&":~&m' A=: 'A ' labeled B=: 'B ' labeled and=: ^: or=: 2 :'u^:(-.@v)'
package main import "fmt" func a(v bool) bool { fmt.Print("a") return v } func b(v bool) bool { fmt.Print("b") return v } func test(i, j bool) { fmt.Printf("Testing a(%t) && b(%t)\n", i, j) fmt.Print("Trace: ") fmt.Println("\nResult:", a(i) && b(j)) fmt.Printf("Testing a(%t) || b(%t)\n", i, j) fmt.Print("Trace: ") fmt.Println("\nResult:", a(i) || b(j)) fmt.Println("") } func main() { test(false, false) test(false, true) test(true, false) test(true, true) }
Ensure the translated C code behaves exactly like the original Julia snippet.
a(x) = (println("\t b(x) = (println("\t for i in [true,false], j in [true, false] println("\nCalculating: x = a($i) && b($j)"); x = a(i) && b(j) println("\tResult: x = $x") println("\nCalculating: y = a($i) || b($j)"); y = a(i) || b(j) println("\tResult: y = $y") end
#include <stdio.h> #include <stdbool.h> bool a(bool in) { printf("I am a\n"); return in; } bool b(bool in) { printf("I am b\n"); return in; } #define TEST(X,Y,O) \ do { \ x = a(X) O b(Y); \ printf(#X " " #O " " #Y " = %s\n\n", x ? "true" : "false"); \ } while(false); int main() { bool x; TEST(false, true, &&); TEST(true, false, ||); TEST(true, false, &&); TEST(false, false, ||); return 0; }
Translate the given Julia code snippet into C# without altering its behavior.
a(x) = (println("\t b(x) = (println("\t for i in [true,false], j in [true, false] println("\nCalculating: x = a($i) && b($j)"); x = a(i) && b(j) println("\tResult: x = $x") println("\nCalculating: y = a($i) || b($j)"); y = a(i) || b(j) println("\tResult: y = $y") end
using System; class Program { static bool a(bool value) { Console.WriteLine("a"); return value; } static bool b(bool value) { Console.WriteLine("b"); return value; } static void Main() { foreach (var i in new[] { false, true }) { foreach (var j in new[] { false, true }) { Console.WriteLine("{0} and {1} = {2}", i, j, a(i) && b(j)); Console.WriteLine(); Console.WriteLine("{0} or {1} = {2}", i, j, a(i) || b(j)); Console.WriteLine(); } } } }
Port the provided Julia code into C++ while preserving the original functionality.
a(x) = (println("\t b(x) = (println("\t for i in [true,false], j in [true, false] println("\nCalculating: x = a($i) && b($j)"); x = a(i) && b(j) println("\tResult: x = $x") println("\nCalculating: y = a($i) || b($j)"); y = a(i) || b(j) println("\tResult: y = $y") end
#include <iostream> bool a(bool in) { std::cout << "a" << std::endl; return in; } bool b(bool in) { std::cout << "b" << std::endl; return in; } void test(bool i, bool j) { std::cout << std::boolalpha << i << " and " << j << " = " << (a(i) && b(j)) << std::endl; std::cout << std::boolalpha << i << " or " << j << " = " << (a(i) || b(j)) << std::endl; } int main() { test(false, false); test(false, true); test(true, false); test(true, true); return 0; }
Transform the following Julia implementation into Java, maintaining the same output and logic.
a(x) = (println("\t b(x) = (println("\t for i in [true,false], j in [true, false] println("\nCalculating: x = a($i) && b($j)"); x = a(i) && b(j) println("\tResult: x = $x") println("\nCalculating: y = a($i) || b($j)"); y = a(i) || b(j) println("\tResult: y = $y") end
module test { @Inject Console console; static Boolean show(String name, Boolean value) { console.print($"{name}()={value}"); return value; } void run() { val a = show("a", _); val b = show("b", _); for (Boolean v1 : False..True) { for (Boolean v2 : False..True) { console.print($"a({v1}) && b({v2}) == {a(v1) && b(v2)}"); console.print(); console.print($"a({v1}) || b({v2}) == {a(v1) || b(v2)}"); console.print(); } } } }
Translate this program into Python but keep the logic exactly as in Julia.
a(x) = (println("\t b(x) = (println("\t for i in [true,false], j in [true, false] println("\nCalculating: x = a($i) && b($j)"); x = a(i) && b(j) println("\tResult: x = $x") println("\nCalculating: y = a($i) || b($j)"); y = a(i) || b(j) println("\tResult: y = $y") end
>>> def a(answer): print(" return answer >>> def b(answer): print(" return answer >>> for i in (False, True): for j in (False, True): print ("\nCalculating: x = a(i) and b(j)") x = a(i) and b(j) print ("Calculating: y = a(i) or b(j)") y = a(i) or b(j) Calculating: x = a(i) and b(j) Calculating: y = a(i) or b(j) Calculating: x = a(i) and b(j) Calculating: y = a(i) or b(j) Calculating: x = a(i) and b(j) Calculating: y = a(i) or b(j) Calculating: x = a(i) and b(j) Calculating: y = a(i) or b(j)
Write a version of this Julia function in VB with identical behavior.
a(x) = (println("\t b(x) = (println("\t for i in [true,false], j in [true, false] println("\nCalculating: x = a($i) && b($j)"); x = a(i) && b(j) println("\tResult: x = $x") println("\nCalculating: y = a($i) || b($j)"); y = a(i) || b(j) println("\tResult: y = $y") end
Private Function a(i As Variant) As Boolean Debug.Print "a: "; i = 1, a = i End Function Private Function b(j As Variant) As Boolean Debug.Print "b: "; j = 1; b = j End Function Public Sub short_circuit() Dim x As Boolean, y As Boolean Debug.Print "=====AND=====" & vbCrLf For p = 0 To 1 For q = 0 To 1 If a(p) Then x = b(q) End If Debug.Print " = x" Next q Debug.Print Next p Debug.Print "======OR=====" & vbCrLf For p = 0 To 1 For q = 0 To 1 If Not a(p) Then x = b(q) End If Debug.Print " = x" Next q Debug.Print Next p Debug.Print End Sub
Transform the following Julia implementation into Go, maintaining the same output and logic.
a(x) = (println("\t b(x) = (println("\t for i in [true,false], j in [true, false] println("\nCalculating: x = a($i) && b($j)"); x = a(i) && b(j) println("\tResult: x = $x") println("\nCalculating: y = a($i) || b($j)"); y = a(i) || b(j) println("\tResult: y = $y") end
package main import "fmt" func a(v bool) bool { fmt.Print("a") return v } func b(v bool) bool { fmt.Print("b") return v } func test(i, j bool) { fmt.Printf("Testing a(%t) && b(%t)\n", i, j) fmt.Print("Trace: ") fmt.Println("\nResult:", a(i) && b(j)) fmt.Printf("Testing a(%t) || b(%t)\n", i, j) fmt.Print("Trace: ") fmt.Println("\nResult:", a(i) || b(j)) fmt.Println("") } func main() { test(false, false) test(false, true) test(true, false) test(true, true) }
Change the programming language of this snippet from Lua to C without modifying what it does.
function a(i) print "Function a(i) called." return i end function b(i) print "Function b(i) called." return i end i = true x = a(i) and b(i); print "" y = a(i) or b(i); print "" i = false x = a(i) and b(i); print "" y = a(i) or b(i)
#include <stdio.h> #include <stdbool.h> bool a(bool in) { printf("I am a\n"); return in; } bool b(bool in) { printf("I am b\n"); return in; } #define TEST(X,Y,O) \ do { \ x = a(X) O b(Y); \ printf(#X " " #O " " #Y " = %s\n\n", x ? "true" : "false"); \ } while(false); int main() { bool x; TEST(false, true, &&); TEST(true, false, ||); TEST(true, false, &&); TEST(false, false, ||); return 0; }
Change the following Lua code into C# without altering its purpose.
function a(i) print "Function a(i) called." return i end function b(i) print "Function b(i) called." return i end i = true x = a(i) and b(i); print "" y = a(i) or b(i); print "" i = false x = a(i) and b(i); print "" y = a(i) or b(i)
using System; class Program { static bool a(bool value) { Console.WriteLine("a"); return value; } static bool b(bool value) { Console.WriteLine("b"); return value; } static void Main() { foreach (var i in new[] { false, true }) { foreach (var j in new[] { false, true }) { Console.WriteLine("{0} and {1} = {2}", i, j, a(i) && b(j)); Console.WriteLine(); Console.WriteLine("{0} or {1} = {2}", i, j, a(i) || b(j)); Console.WriteLine(); } } } }
Preserve the algorithm and functionality while converting the code from Lua to C++.
function a(i) print "Function a(i) called." return i end function b(i) print "Function b(i) called." return i end i = true x = a(i) and b(i); print "" y = a(i) or b(i); print "" i = false x = a(i) and b(i); print "" y = a(i) or b(i)
#include <iostream> bool a(bool in) { std::cout << "a" << std::endl; return in; } bool b(bool in) { std::cout << "b" << std::endl; return in; } void test(bool i, bool j) { std::cout << std::boolalpha << i << " and " << j << " = " << (a(i) && b(j)) << std::endl; std::cout << std::boolalpha << i << " or " << j << " = " << (a(i) || b(j)) << std::endl; } int main() { test(false, false); test(false, true); test(true, false); test(true, true); return 0; }
Write the same algorithm in Java as shown in this Lua implementation.
function a(i) print "Function a(i) called." return i end function b(i) print "Function b(i) called." return i end i = true x = a(i) and b(i); print "" y = a(i) or b(i); print "" i = false x = a(i) and b(i); print "" y = a(i) or b(i)
module test { @Inject Console console; static Boolean show(String name, Boolean value) { console.print($"{name}()={value}"); return value; } void run() { val a = show("a", _); val b = show("b", _); for (Boolean v1 : False..True) { for (Boolean v2 : False..True) { console.print($"a({v1}) && b({v2}) == {a(v1) && b(v2)}"); console.print(); console.print($"a({v1}) || b({v2}) == {a(v1) || b(v2)}"); console.print(); } } } }
Port the provided Lua code into Python while preserving the original functionality.
function a(i) print "Function a(i) called." return i end function b(i) print "Function b(i) called." return i end i = true x = a(i) and b(i); print "" y = a(i) or b(i); print "" i = false x = a(i) and b(i); print "" y = a(i) or b(i)
>>> def a(answer): print(" return answer >>> def b(answer): print(" return answer >>> for i in (False, True): for j in (False, True): print ("\nCalculating: x = a(i) and b(j)") x = a(i) and b(j) print ("Calculating: y = a(i) or b(j)") y = a(i) or b(j) Calculating: x = a(i) and b(j) Calculating: y = a(i) or b(j) Calculating: x = a(i) and b(j) Calculating: y = a(i) or b(j) Calculating: x = a(i) and b(j) Calculating: y = a(i) or b(j) Calculating: x = a(i) and b(j) Calculating: y = a(i) or b(j)
Convert this Lua block to VB, preserving its control flow and logic.
function a(i) print "Function a(i) called." return i end function b(i) print "Function b(i) called." return i end i = true x = a(i) and b(i); print "" y = a(i) or b(i); print "" i = false x = a(i) and b(i); print "" y = a(i) or b(i)
Private Function a(i As Variant) As Boolean Debug.Print "a: "; i = 1, a = i End Function Private Function b(j As Variant) As Boolean Debug.Print "b: "; j = 1; b = j End Function Public Sub short_circuit() Dim x As Boolean, y As Boolean Debug.Print "=====AND=====" & vbCrLf For p = 0 To 1 For q = 0 To 1 If a(p) Then x = b(q) End If Debug.Print " = x" Next q Debug.Print Next p Debug.Print "======OR=====" & vbCrLf For p = 0 To 1 For q = 0 To 1 If Not a(p) Then x = b(q) End If Debug.Print " = x" Next q Debug.Print Next p Debug.Print End Sub
Produce a language-to-language conversion: from Lua to Go, same semantics.
function a(i) print "Function a(i) called." return i end function b(i) print "Function b(i) called." return i end i = true x = a(i) and b(i); print "" y = a(i) or b(i); print "" i = false x = a(i) and b(i); print "" y = a(i) or b(i)
package main import "fmt" func a(v bool) bool { fmt.Print("a") return v } func b(v bool) bool { fmt.Print("b") return v } func test(i, j bool) { fmt.Printf("Testing a(%t) && b(%t)\n", i, j) fmt.Print("Trace: ") fmt.Println("\nResult:", a(i) && b(j)) fmt.Printf("Testing a(%t) || b(%t)\n", i, j) fmt.Print("Trace: ") fmt.Println("\nResult:", a(i) || b(j)) fmt.Println("") } func main() { test(false, false) test(false, true) test(true, false) test(true, true) }
Write the same code in C as shown below in Mathematica.
a[in_] := (Print["a"]; in) b[in_] := (Print["b"]; in) a[False] && b[True] a[True] || b[False]
#include <stdio.h> #include <stdbool.h> bool a(bool in) { printf("I am a\n"); return in; } bool b(bool in) { printf("I am b\n"); return in; } #define TEST(X,Y,O) \ do { \ x = a(X) O b(Y); \ printf(#X " " #O " " #Y " = %s\n\n", x ? "true" : "false"); \ } while(false); int main() { bool x; TEST(false, true, &&); TEST(true, false, ||); TEST(true, false, &&); TEST(false, false, ||); return 0; }
Transform the following Mathematica implementation into C#, maintaining the same output and logic.
a[in_] := (Print["a"]; in) b[in_] := (Print["b"]; in) a[False] && b[True] a[True] || b[False]
using System; class Program { static bool a(bool value) { Console.WriteLine("a"); return value; } static bool b(bool value) { Console.WriteLine("b"); return value; } static void Main() { foreach (var i in new[] { false, true }) { foreach (var j in new[] { false, true }) { Console.WriteLine("{0} and {1} = {2}", i, j, a(i) && b(j)); Console.WriteLine(); Console.WriteLine("{0} or {1} = {2}", i, j, a(i) || b(j)); Console.WriteLine(); } } } }
Change the following Mathematica code into C++ without altering its purpose.
a[in_] := (Print["a"]; in) b[in_] := (Print["b"]; in) a[False] && b[True] a[True] || b[False]
#include <iostream> bool a(bool in) { std::cout << "a" << std::endl; return in; } bool b(bool in) { std::cout << "b" << std::endl; return in; } void test(bool i, bool j) { std::cout << std::boolalpha << i << " and " << j << " = " << (a(i) && b(j)) << std::endl; std::cout << std::boolalpha << i << " or " << j << " = " << (a(i) || b(j)) << std::endl; } int main() { test(false, false); test(false, true); test(true, false); test(true, true); return 0; }
Generate a Java translation of this Mathematica snippet without changing its computational steps.
a[in_] := (Print["a"]; in) b[in_] := (Print["b"]; in) a[False] && b[True] a[True] || b[False]
module test { @Inject Console console; static Boolean show(String name, Boolean value) { console.print($"{name}()={value}"); return value; } void run() { val a = show("a", _); val b = show("b", _); for (Boolean v1 : False..True) { for (Boolean v2 : False..True) { console.print($"a({v1}) && b({v2}) == {a(v1) && b(v2)}"); console.print(); console.print($"a({v1}) || b({v2}) == {a(v1) || b(v2)}"); console.print(); } } } }
Ensure the translated Python code behaves exactly like the original Mathematica snippet.
a[in_] := (Print["a"]; in) b[in_] := (Print["b"]; in) a[False] && b[True] a[True] || b[False]
>>> def a(answer): print(" return answer >>> def b(answer): print(" return answer >>> for i in (False, True): for j in (False, True): print ("\nCalculating: x = a(i) and b(j)") x = a(i) and b(j) print ("Calculating: y = a(i) or b(j)") y = a(i) or b(j) Calculating: x = a(i) and b(j) Calculating: y = a(i) or b(j) Calculating: x = a(i) and b(j) Calculating: y = a(i) or b(j) Calculating: x = a(i) and b(j) Calculating: y = a(i) or b(j) Calculating: x = a(i) and b(j) Calculating: y = a(i) or b(j)
Generate an equivalent VB version of this Mathematica code.
a[in_] := (Print["a"]; in) b[in_] := (Print["b"]; in) a[False] && b[True] a[True] || b[False]
Private Function a(i As Variant) As Boolean Debug.Print "a: "; i = 1, a = i End Function Private Function b(j As Variant) As Boolean Debug.Print "b: "; j = 1; b = j End Function Public Sub short_circuit() Dim x As Boolean, y As Boolean Debug.Print "=====AND=====" & vbCrLf For p = 0 To 1 For q = 0 To 1 If a(p) Then x = b(q) End If Debug.Print " = x" Next q Debug.Print Next p Debug.Print "======OR=====" & vbCrLf For p = 0 To 1 For q = 0 To 1 If Not a(p) Then x = b(q) End If Debug.Print " = x" Next q Debug.Print Next p Debug.Print End Sub
Rewrite this program in Go while keeping its functionality equivalent to the Mathematica version.
a[in_] := (Print["a"]; in) b[in_] := (Print["b"]; in) a[False] && b[True] a[True] || b[False]
package main import "fmt" func a(v bool) bool { fmt.Print("a") return v } func b(v bool) bool { fmt.Print("b") return v } func test(i, j bool) { fmt.Printf("Testing a(%t) && b(%t)\n", i, j) fmt.Print("Trace: ") fmt.Println("\nResult:", a(i) && b(j)) fmt.Printf("Testing a(%t) || b(%t)\n", i, j) fmt.Print("Trace: ") fmt.Println("\nResult:", a(i) || b(j)) fmt.Println("") } func main() { test(false, false) test(false, true) test(true, false) test(true, true) }
Produce a functionally identical C code for the snippet given in MATLAB.
function x=a(x) printf('a: end; function x=b(x) printf('b: end; a(1) && b(1) a(0) && b(1) a(1) || b(1) a(0) || b(1)
#include <stdio.h> #include <stdbool.h> bool a(bool in) { printf("I am a\n"); return in; } bool b(bool in) { printf("I am b\n"); return in; } #define TEST(X,Y,O) \ do { \ x = a(X) O b(Y); \ printf(#X " " #O " " #Y " = %s\n\n", x ? "true" : "false"); \ } while(false); int main() { bool x; TEST(false, true, &&); TEST(true, false, ||); TEST(true, false, &&); TEST(false, false, ||); return 0; }
Rewrite this program in C# while keeping its functionality equivalent to the MATLAB version.
function x=a(x) printf('a: end; function x=b(x) printf('b: end; a(1) && b(1) a(0) && b(1) a(1) || b(1) a(0) || b(1)
using System; class Program { static bool a(bool value) { Console.WriteLine("a"); return value; } static bool b(bool value) { Console.WriteLine("b"); return value; } static void Main() { foreach (var i in new[] { false, true }) { foreach (var j in new[] { false, true }) { Console.WriteLine("{0} and {1} = {2}", i, j, a(i) && b(j)); Console.WriteLine(); Console.WriteLine("{0} or {1} = {2}", i, j, a(i) || b(j)); Console.WriteLine(); } } } }
Produce a functionally identical C++ code for the snippet given in MATLAB.
function x=a(x) printf('a: end; function x=b(x) printf('b: end; a(1) && b(1) a(0) && b(1) a(1) || b(1) a(0) || b(1)
#include <iostream> bool a(bool in) { std::cout << "a" << std::endl; return in; } bool b(bool in) { std::cout << "b" << std::endl; return in; } void test(bool i, bool j) { std::cout << std::boolalpha << i << " and " << j << " = " << (a(i) && b(j)) << std::endl; std::cout << std::boolalpha << i << " or " << j << " = " << (a(i) || b(j)) << std::endl; } int main() { test(false, false); test(false, true); test(true, false); test(true, true); return 0; }
Rewrite this program in Java while keeping its functionality equivalent to the MATLAB version.
function x=a(x) printf('a: end; function x=b(x) printf('b: end; a(1) && b(1) a(0) && b(1) a(1) || b(1) a(0) || b(1)
module test { @Inject Console console; static Boolean show(String name, Boolean value) { console.print($"{name}()={value}"); return value; } void run() { val a = show("a", _); val b = show("b", _); for (Boolean v1 : False..True) { for (Boolean v2 : False..True) { console.print($"a({v1}) && b({v2}) == {a(v1) && b(v2)}"); console.print(); console.print($"a({v1}) || b({v2}) == {a(v1) || b(v2)}"); console.print(); } } } }
Write the same code in Python as shown below in MATLAB.
function x=a(x) printf('a: end; function x=b(x) printf('b: end; a(1) && b(1) a(0) && b(1) a(1) || b(1) a(0) || b(1)
>>> def a(answer): print(" return answer >>> def b(answer): print(" return answer >>> for i in (False, True): for j in (False, True): print ("\nCalculating: x = a(i) and b(j)") x = a(i) and b(j) print ("Calculating: y = a(i) or b(j)") y = a(i) or b(j) Calculating: x = a(i) and b(j) Calculating: y = a(i) or b(j) Calculating: x = a(i) and b(j) Calculating: y = a(i) or b(j) Calculating: x = a(i) and b(j) Calculating: y = a(i) or b(j) Calculating: x = a(i) and b(j) Calculating: y = a(i) or b(j)
Produce a functionally identical VB code for the snippet given in MATLAB.
function x=a(x) printf('a: end; function x=b(x) printf('b: end; a(1) && b(1) a(0) && b(1) a(1) || b(1) a(0) || b(1)
Private Function a(i As Variant) As Boolean Debug.Print "a: "; i = 1, a = i End Function Private Function b(j As Variant) As Boolean Debug.Print "b: "; j = 1; b = j End Function Public Sub short_circuit() Dim x As Boolean, y As Boolean Debug.Print "=====AND=====" & vbCrLf For p = 0 To 1 For q = 0 To 1 If a(p) Then x = b(q) End If Debug.Print " = x" Next q Debug.Print Next p Debug.Print "======OR=====" & vbCrLf For p = 0 To 1 For q = 0 To 1 If Not a(p) Then x = b(q) End If Debug.Print " = x" Next q Debug.Print Next p Debug.Print End Sub
Write a version of this MATLAB function in Go with identical behavior.
function x=a(x) printf('a: end; function x=b(x) printf('b: end; a(1) && b(1) a(0) && b(1) a(1) || b(1) a(0) || b(1)
package main import "fmt" func a(v bool) bool { fmt.Print("a") return v } func b(v bool) bool { fmt.Print("b") return v } func test(i, j bool) { fmt.Printf("Testing a(%t) && b(%t)\n", i, j) fmt.Print("Trace: ") fmt.Println("\nResult:", a(i) && b(j)) fmt.Printf("Testing a(%t) || b(%t)\n", i, j) fmt.Print("Trace: ") fmt.Println("\nResult:", a(i) || b(j)) fmt.Println("") } func main() { test(false, false) test(false, true) test(true, false) test(true, true) }
Generate an equivalent C version of this Nim code.
proc a(x): bool = echo "a called" result = x proc b(x): bool = echo "b called" result = x let x = a(false) and b(true) let y = a(true) or b(true)
#include <stdio.h> #include <stdbool.h> bool a(bool in) { printf("I am a\n"); return in; } bool b(bool in) { printf("I am b\n"); return in; } #define TEST(X,Y,O) \ do { \ x = a(X) O b(Y); \ printf(#X " " #O " " #Y " = %s\n\n", x ? "true" : "false"); \ } while(false); int main() { bool x; TEST(false, true, &&); TEST(true, false, ||); TEST(true, false, &&); TEST(false, false, ||); return 0; }
Please provide an equivalent version of this Nim code in C#.
proc a(x): bool = echo "a called" result = x proc b(x): bool = echo "b called" result = x let x = a(false) and b(true) let y = a(true) or b(true)
using System; class Program { static bool a(bool value) { Console.WriteLine("a"); return value; } static bool b(bool value) { Console.WriteLine("b"); return value; } static void Main() { foreach (var i in new[] { false, true }) { foreach (var j in new[] { false, true }) { Console.WriteLine("{0} and {1} = {2}", i, j, a(i) && b(j)); Console.WriteLine(); Console.WriteLine("{0} or {1} = {2}", i, j, a(i) || b(j)); Console.WriteLine(); } } } }
Write the same algorithm in C++ as shown in this Nim implementation.
proc a(x): bool = echo "a called" result = x proc b(x): bool = echo "b called" result = x let x = a(false) and b(true) let y = a(true) or b(true)
#include <iostream> bool a(bool in) { std::cout << "a" << std::endl; return in; } bool b(bool in) { std::cout << "b" << std::endl; return in; } void test(bool i, bool j) { std::cout << std::boolalpha << i << " and " << j << " = " << (a(i) && b(j)) << std::endl; std::cout << std::boolalpha << i << " or " << j << " = " << (a(i) || b(j)) << std::endl; } int main() { test(false, false); test(false, true); test(true, false); test(true, true); return 0; }
Produce a language-to-language conversion: from Nim to Java, same semantics.
proc a(x): bool = echo "a called" result = x proc b(x): bool = echo "b called" result = x let x = a(false) and b(true) let y = a(true) or b(true)
module test { @Inject Console console; static Boolean show(String name, Boolean value) { console.print($"{name}()={value}"); return value; } void run() { val a = show("a", _); val b = show("b", _); for (Boolean v1 : False..True) { for (Boolean v2 : False..True) { console.print($"a({v1}) && b({v2}) == {a(v1) && b(v2)}"); console.print(); console.print($"a({v1}) || b({v2}) == {a(v1) || b(v2)}"); console.print(); } } } }
Port the following code from Nim to Python with equivalent syntax and logic.
proc a(x): bool = echo "a called" result = x proc b(x): bool = echo "b called" result = x let x = a(false) and b(true) let y = a(true) or b(true)
>>> def a(answer): print(" return answer >>> def b(answer): print(" return answer >>> for i in (False, True): for j in (False, True): print ("\nCalculating: x = a(i) and b(j)") x = a(i) and b(j) print ("Calculating: y = a(i) or b(j)") y = a(i) or b(j) Calculating: x = a(i) and b(j) Calculating: y = a(i) or b(j) Calculating: x = a(i) and b(j) Calculating: y = a(i) or b(j) Calculating: x = a(i) and b(j) Calculating: y = a(i) or b(j) Calculating: x = a(i) and b(j) Calculating: y = a(i) or b(j)
Translate the given Nim code snippet into VB without altering its behavior.
proc a(x): bool = echo "a called" result = x proc b(x): bool = echo "b called" result = x let x = a(false) and b(true) let y = a(true) or b(true)
Private Function a(i As Variant) As Boolean Debug.Print "a: "; i = 1, a = i End Function Private Function b(j As Variant) As Boolean Debug.Print "b: "; j = 1; b = j End Function Public Sub short_circuit() Dim x As Boolean, y As Boolean Debug.Print "=====AND=====" & vbCrLf For p = 0 To 1 For q = 0 To 1 If a(p) Then x = b(q) End If Debug.Print " = x" Next q Debug.Print Next p Debug.Print "======OR=====" & vbCrLf For p = 0 To 1 For q = 0 To 1 If Not a(p) Then x = b(q) End If Debug.Print " = x" Next q Debug.Print Next p Debug.Print End Sub
Change the following Nim code into Go without altering its purpose.
proc a(x): bool = echo "a called" result = x proc b(x): bool = echo "b called" result = x let x = a(false) and b(true) let y = a(true) or b(true)
package main import "fmt" func a(v bool) bool { fmt.Print("a") return v } func b(v bool) bool { fmt.Print("b") return v } func test(i, j bool) { fmt.Printf("Testing a(%t) && b(%t)\n", i, j) fmt.Print("Trace: ") fmt.Println("\nResult:", a(i) && b(j)) fmt.Printf("Testing a(%t) || b(%t)\n", i, j) fmt.Print("Trace: ") fmt.Println("\nResult:", a(i) || b(j)) fmt.Println("") } func main() { test(false, false) test(false, true) test(true, false) test(true, true) }
Write the same code in C as shown below in OCaml.
let a r = print_endline " > function a called"; r let b r = print_endline " > function b called"; r let test_and b1 b2 = Printf.printf "# testing (%b && %b)\n" b1 b2; ignore (a b1 && b b2) let test_or b1 b2 = Printf.printf "# testing (%b || %b)\n" b1 b2; ignore (a b1 || b b2) let test_this test = test true true; test true false; test false true; test false false; ;; let () = print_endline "==== Testing and ===="; test_this test_and; print_endline "==== Testing or ===="; test_this test_or; ;;
#include <stdio.h> #include <stdbool.h> bool a(bool in) { printf("I am a\n"); return in; } bool b(bool in) { printf("I am b\n"); return in; } #define TEST(X,Y,O) \ do { \ x = a(X) O b(Y); \ printf(#X " " #O " " #Y " = %s\n\n", x ? "true" : "false"); \ } while(false); int main() { bool x; TEST(false, true, &&); TEST(true, false, ||); TEST(true, false, &&); TEST(false, false, ||); return 0; }