Instruction
stringlengths
45
106
input_code
stringlengths
1
13.7k
output_code
stringlengths
1
13.7k
Rewrite the snippet below in Python so it works the same as the original Racket code.
#lang racket (define (lex-sort n) (sort (if (< 0 n) (range 1 (add1 n)) (range n 2)) string<? #:key number->string)) (define (show n) (printf "~a: ~a\n" n (lex-sort n))) (show 0) (show 1) (show 5) (show 13) (show 21) (show -22)
n=13 print(sorted(range(1,n+1), key=str))
Can you help me rewrite this code in VB instead of Racket, keeping it the same logically?
#lang racket (define (lex-sort n) (sort (if (< 0 n) (range 1 (add1 n)) (range n 2)) string<? #:key number->string)) (define (show n) (printf "~a: ~a\n" n (lex-sort n))) (show 0) (show 1) (show 5) (show 13) (show 21) (show -22)
Public Function sortlexicographically(N As Integer) Dim arrList As Object Set arrList = CreateObject("System.Collections.ArrayList") For i = 1 To N arrList.Add CStr(i) Next i arrList.Sort Dim item As Variant For Each item In arrList Debug.Print item & ", "; Next End Funct...
Change the programming language of this snippet from Racket to Go without modifying what it does.
#lang racket (define (lex-sort n) (sort (if (< 0 n) (range 1 (add1 n)) (range n 2)) string<? #:key number->string)) (define (show n) (printf "~a: ~a\n" n (lex-sort n))) (show 0) (show 1) (show 5) (show 13) (show 21) (show -22)
package main import ( "fmt" "sort" "strconv" ) func lexOrder(n int) []int { first, last, k := 1, n, n if n < 1 { first, last, k = n, 1, 2-n } strs := make([]string, k) for i := first; i <= last; i++ { strs[i-first] = strconv.Itoa(i) } sort.Strings(strs) ints...
Produce a functionally identical C code for the snippet given in COBOL.
identification division. program-id. LexicographicalNumbers. data division. working-storage section. 78 MAX-NUMBERS value 21. 77 i pic 9(2). 77 edited-number pic z(2). 01 lex-table. 05 table-itms occ...
#include <math.h> #include <stdio.h> #include <stdlib.h> #include <string.h> int compareStrings(const void *a, const void *b) { const char **aa = (const char **)a; const char **bb = (const char **)b; return strcmp(*aa, *bb); } void lexOrder(int n, int *ints) { char **strs; int i, first = 1, last =...
Port the provided COBOL code into C# while preserving the original functionality.
identification division. program-id. LexicographicalNumbers. data division. working-storage section. 78 MAX-NUMBERS value 21. 77 i pic 9(2). 77 edited-number pic z(2). 01 lex-table. 05 table-itms occ...
using static System.Console; using static System.Linq.Enumerable; public class Program { public static void Main() { foreach (int n in new [] { 0, 5, 13, 21, -22 }) WriteLine($"{n}: {string.Join(", ", LexOrder(n))}"); } public static IEnumerable<int> LexOrder(int n) => (n < 1 ? Range(n, 2 - n) : R...
Convert this COBOL block to C++, preserving its control flow and logic.
identification division. program-id. LexicographicalNumbers. data division. working-storage section. 78 MAX-NUMBERS value 21. 77 i pic 9(2). 77 edited-number pic z(2). 01 lex-table. 05 table-itms occ...
#include <algorithm> #include <iostream> #include <numeric> #include <string> #include <vector> void lexicographical_sort(std::vector<int>& numbers) { std::vector<std::string> strings(numbers.size()); std::transform(numbers.begin(), numbers.end(), strings.begin(), [](int i) { return std::to_...
Convert this COBOL snippet to Java and keep its semantics consistent.
identification division. program-id. LexicographicalNumbers. data division. working-storage section. 78 MAX-NUMBERS value 21. 77 i pic 9(2). 77 edited-number pic z(2). 01 lex-table. 05 table-itms occ...
import java.util.List; import java.util.stream.*; public class LexicographicalNumbers { static List<Integer> lexOrder(int n) { int first = 1, last = n; if (n < 1) { first = n; last = 1; } return IntStream.rangeClosed(first, last) .map...
Keep all operations the same but rewrite the snippet in Python.
identification division. program-id. LexicographicalNumbers. data division. working-storage section. 78 MAX-NUMBERS value 21. 77 i pic 9(2). 77 edited-number pic z(2). 01 lex-table. 05 table-itms occ...
n=13 print(sorted(range(1,n+1), key=str))
Translate this program into VB but keep the logic exactly as in COBOL.
identification division. program-id. LexicographicalNumbers. data division. working-storage section. 78 MAX-NUMBERS value 21. 77 i pic 9(2). 77 edited-number pic z(2). 01 lex-table. 05 table-itms occ...
Public Function sortlexicographically(N As Integer) Dim arrList As Object Set arrList = CreateObject("System.Collections.ArrayList") For i = 1 To N arrList.Add CStr(i) Next i arrList.Sort Dim item As Variant For Each item In arrList Debug.Print item & ", "; Next End Funct...
Convert this COBOL block to Go, preserving its control flow and logic.
identification division. program-id. LexicographicalNumbers. data division. working-storage section. 78 MAX-NUMBERS value 21. 77 i pic 9(2). 77 edited-number pic z(2). 01 lex-table. 05 table-itms occ...
package main import ( "fmt" "sort" "strconv" ) func lexOrder(n int) []int { first, last, k := 1, n, n if n < 1 { first, last, k = n, 1, 2-n } strs := make([]string, k) for i := first; i <= last; i++ { strs[i-first] = strconv.Itoa(i) } sort.Strings(strs) ints...
Maintain the same structure and functionality when rewriting this code in C.
parse arg LO HI INC . if LO=='' | LO=="," then LO= 1 if HI=='' | HI=="," then HI= 13 if INC=='' | INC=="," then INC= 1 #= 0 do j=LO to HI by INC #...
#include <math.h> #include <stdio.h> #include <stdlib.h> #include <string.h> int compareStrings(const void *a, const void *b) { const char **aa = (const char **)a; const char **bb = (const char **)b; return strcmp(*aa, *bb); } void lexOrder(int n, int *ints) { char **strs; int i, first = 1, last =...
Rewrite this program in C# while keeping its functionality equivalent to the REXX version.
parse arg LO HI INC . if LO=='' | LO=="," then LO= 1 if HI=='' | HI=="," then HI= 13 if INC=='' | INC=="," then INC= 1 #= 0 do j=LO to HI by INC #...
using static System.Console; using static System.Linq.Enumerable; public class Program { public static void Main() { foreach (int n in new [] { 0, 5, 13, 21, -22 }) WriteLine($"{n}: {string.Join(", ", LexOrder(n))}"); } public static IEnumerable<int> LexOrder(int n) => (n < 1 ? Range(n, 2 - n) : R...
Produce a language-to-language conversion: from REXX to C++, same semantics.
parse arg LO HI INC . if LO=='' | LO=="," then LO= 1 if HI=='' | HI=="," then HI= 13 if INC=='' | INC=="," then INC= 1 #= 0 do j=LO to HI by INC #...
#include <algorithm> #include <iostream> #include <numeric> #include <string> #include <vector> void lexicographical_sort(std::vector<int>& numbers) { std::vector<std::string> strings(numbers.size()); std::transform(numbers.begin(), numbers.end(), strings.begin(), [](int i) { return std::to_...
Change the programming language of this snippet from REXX to Java without modifying what it does.
parse arg LO HI INC . if LO=='' | LO=="," then LO= 1 if HI=='' | HI=="," then HI= 13 if INC=='' | INC=="," then INC= 1 #= 0 do j=LO to HI by INC #...
import java.util.List; import java.util.stream.*; public class LexicographicalNumbers { static List<Integer> lexOrder(int n) { int first = 1, last = n; if (n < 1) { first = n; last = 1; } return IntStream.rangeClosed(first, last) .map...
Rewrite the snippet below in Python so it works the same as the original REXX code.
parse arg LO HI INC . if LO=='' | LO=="," then LO= 1 if HI=='' | HI=="," then HI= 13 if INC=='' | INC=="," then INC= 1 #= 0 do j=LO to HI by INC #...
n=13 print(sorted(range(1,n+1), key=str))
Convert this REXX block to VB, preserving its control flow and logic.
parse arg LO HI INC . if LO=='' | LO=="," then LO= 1 if HI=='' | HI=="," then HI= 13 if INC=='' | INC=="," then INC= 1 #= 0 do j=LO to HI by INC #...
Public Function sortlexicographically(N As Integer) Dim arrList As Object Set arrList = CreateObject("System.Collections.ArrayList") For i = 1 To N arrList.Add CStr(i) Next i arrList.Sort Dim item As Variant For Each item In arrList Debug.Print item & ", "; Next End Funct...
Generate a Go translation of this REXX snippet without changing its computational steps.
parse arg LO HI INC . if LO=='' | LO=="," then LO= 1 if HI=='' | HI=="," then HI= 13 if INC=='' | INC=="," then INC= 1 #= 0 do j=LO to HI by INC #...
package main import ( "fmt" "sort" "strconv" ) func lexOrder(n int) []int { first, last, k := 1, n, n if n < 1 { first, last, k = n, 1, 2-n } strs := make([]string, k) for i := first; i <= last; i++ { strs[i-first] = strconv.Itoa(i) } sort.Strings(strs) ints...
Change the programming language of this snippet from Ruby to C without modifying what it does.
n = 13 p (1..n).sort_by(&:to_s)
#include <math.h> #include <stdio.h> #include <stdlib.h> #include <string.h> int compareStrings(const void *a, const void *b) { const char **aa = (const char **)a; const char **bb = (const char **)b; return strcmp(*aa, *bb); } void lexOrder(int n, int *ints) { char **strs; int i, first = 1, last =...
Translate the given Ruby code snippet into C# without altering its behavior.
n = 13 p (1..n).sort_by(&:to_s)
using static System.Console; using static System.Linq.Enumerable; public class Program { public static void Main() { foreach (int n in new [] { 0, 5, 13, 21, -22 }) WriteLine($"{n}: {string.Join(", ", LexOrder(n))}"); } public static IEnumerable<int> LexOrder(int n) => (n < 1 ? Range(n, 2 - n) : R...
Convert this Ruby snippet to C++ and keep its semantics consistent.
n = 13 p (1..n).sort_by(&:to_s)
#include <algorithm> #include <iostream> #include <numeric> #include <string> #include <vector> void lexicographical_sort(std::vector<int>& numbers) { std::vector<std::string> strings(numbers.size()); std::transform(numbers.begin(), numbers.end(), strings.begin(), [](int i) { return std::to_...
Produce a language-to-language conversion: from Ruby to Java, same semantics.
n = 13 p (1..n).sort_by(&:to_s)
import java.util.List; import java.util.stream.*; public class LexicographicalNumbers { static List<Integer> lexOrder(int n) { int first = 1, last = n; if (n < 1) { first = n; last = 1; } return IntStream.rangeClosed(first, last) .map...
Change the following Ruby code into Python without altering its purpose.
n = 13 p (1..n).sort_by(&:to_s)
n=13 print(sorted(range(1,n+1), key=str))
Transform the following Ruby implementation into VB, maintaining the same output and logic.
n = 13 p (1..n).sort_by(&:to_s)
Public Function sortlexicographically(N As Integer) Dim arrList As Object Set arrList = CreateObject("System.Collections.ArrayList") For i = 1 To N arrList.Add CStr(i) Next i arrList.Sort Dim item As Variant For Each item In arrList Debug.Print item & ", "; Next End Funct...
Keep all operations the same but rewrite the snippet in Go.
n = 13 p (1..n).sort_by(&:to_s)
package main import ( "fmt" "sort" "strconv" ) func lexOrder(n int) []int { first, last, k := 1, n, n if n < 1 { first, last, k = n, 1, 2-n } strs := make([]string, k) for i := first; i <= last; i++ { strs[i-first] = strconv.Itoa(i) } sort.Strings(strs) ints...
Generate a C translation of this Scala snippet without changing its computational steps.
fun lexOrder(n: Int): List<Int> { var first = 1 var last = n if (n < 1) { first = n last = 1 } return (first..last).map { it.toString() }.sorted().map { it.toInt() } } fun main(args: Array<String>) { println("In lexicographical order:\n") for (n in listOf(0, 5, 13, 21, -22...
#include <math.h> #include <stdio.h> #include <stdlib.h> #include <string.h> int compareStrings(const void *a, const void *b) { const char **aa = (const char **)a; const char **bb = (const char **)b; return strcmp(*aa, *bb); } void lexOrder(int n, int *ints) { char **strs; int i, first = 1, last =...
Can you help me rewrite this code in C# instead of Scala, keeping it the same logically?
fun lexOrder(n: Int): List<Int> { var first = 1 var last = n if (n < 1) { first = n last = 1 } return (first..last).map { it.toString() }.sorted().map { it.toInt() } } fun main(args: Array<String>) { println("In lexicographical order:\n") for (n in listOf(0, 5, 13, 21, -22...
using static System.Console; using static System.Linq.Enumerable; public class Program { public static void Main() { foreach (int n in new [] { 0, 5, 13, 21, -22 }) WriteLine($"{n}: {string.Join(", ", LexOrder(n))}"); } public static IEnumerable<int> LexOrder(int n) => (n < 1 ? Range(n, 2 - n) : R...
Write the same code in C++ as shown below in Scala.
fun lexOrder(n: Int): List<Int> { var first = 1 var last = n if (n < 1) { first = n last = 1 } return (first..last).map { it.toString() }.sorted().map { it.toInt() } } fun main(args: Array<String>) { println("In lexicographical order:\n") for (n in listOf(0, 5, 13, 21, -22...
#include <algorithm> #include <iostream> #include <numeric> #include <string> #include <vector> void lexicographical_sort(std::vector<int>& numbers) { std::vector<std::string> strings(numbers.size()); std::transform(numbers.begin(), numbers.end(), strings.begin(), [](int i) { return std::to_...
Transform the following Scala implementation into Java, maintaining the same output and logic.
fun lexOrder(n: Int): List<Int> { var first = 1 var last = n if (n < 1) { first = n last = 1 } return (first..last).map { it.toString() }.sorted().map { it.toInt() } } fun main(args: Array<String>) { println("In lexicographical order:\n") for (n in listOf(0, 5, 13, 21, -22...
import java.util.List; import java.util.stream.*; public class LexicographicalNumbers { static List<Integer> lexOrder(int n) { int first = 1, last = n; if (n < 1) { first = n; last = 1; } return IntStream.rangeClosed(first, last) .map...
Can you help me rewrite this code in Python instead of Scala, keeping it the same logically?
fun lexOrder(n: Int): List<Int> { var first = 1 var last = n if (n < 1) { first = n last = 1 } return (first..last).map { it.toString() }.sorted().map { it.toInt() } } fun main(args: Array<String>) { println("In lexicographical order:\n") for (n in listOf(0, 5, 13, 21, -22...
n=13 print(sorted(range(1,n+1), key=str))
Translate this program into VB but keep the logic exactly as in Scala.
fun lexOrder(n: Int): List<Int> { var first = 1 var last = n if (n < 1) { first = n last = 1 } return (first..last).map { it.toString() }.sorted().map { it.toInt() } } fun main(args: Array<String>) { println("In lexicographical order:\n") for (n in listOf(0, 5, 13, 21, -22...
Public Function sortlexicographically(N As Integer) Dim arrList As Object Set arrList = CreateObject("System.Collections.ArrayList") For i = 1 To N arrList.Add CStr(i) Next i arrList.Sort Dim item As Variant For Each item In arrList Debug.Print item & ", "; Next End Funct...
Write a version of this Scala function in Go with identical behavior.
fun lexOrder(n: Int): List<Int> { var first = 1 var last = n if (n < 1) { first = n last = 1 } return (first..last).map { it.toString() }.sorted().map { it.toInt() } } fun main(args: Array<String>) { println("In lexicographical order:\n") for (n in listOf(0, 5, 13, 21, -22...
package main import ( "fmt" "sort" "strconv" ) func lexOrder(n int) []int { first, last, k := 1, n, n if n < 1 { first, last, k = n, 1, 2-n } strs := make([]string, k) for i := first; i <= last; i++ { strs[i-first] = strconv.Itoa(i) } sort.Strings(strs) ints...
Convert this Swift block to C, preserving its control flow and logic.
func lex(n: Int) -> [Int] { return stride(from: 1, through: n, by: n.signum()).map({ String($0) }).sorted().compactMap(Int.init) } print("13: \(lex(n: 13))") print("21: \(lex(n: 21))") print("-22: \(lex(n: -22))")
#include <math.h> #include <stdio.h> #include <stdlib.h> #include <string.h> int compareStrings(const void *a, const void *b) { const char **aa = (const char **)a; const char **bb = (const char **)b; return strcmp(*aa, *bb); } void lexOrder(int n, int *ints) { char **strs; int i, first = 1, last =...
Change the following Swift code into C# without altering its purpose.
func lex(n: Int) -> [Int] { return stride(from: 1, through: n, by: n.signum()).map({ String($0) }).sorted().compactMap(Int.init) } print("13: \(lex(n: 13))") print("21: \(lex(n: 21))") print("-22: \(lex(n: -22))")
using static System.Console; using static System.Linq.Enumerable; public class Program { public static void Main() { foreach (int n in new [] { 0, 5, 13, 21, -22 }) WriteLine($"{n}: {string.Join(", ", LexOrder(n))}"); } public static IEnumerable<int> LexOrder(int n) => (n < 1 ? Range(n, 2 - n) : R...
Write the same algorithm in C++ as shown in this Swift implementation.
func lex(n: Int) -> [Int] { return stride(from: 1, through: n, by: n.signum()).map({ String($0) }).sorted().compactMap(Int.init) } print("13: \(lex(n: 13))") print("21: \(lex(n: 21))") print("-22: \(lex(n: -22))")
#include <algorithm> #include <iostream> #include <numeric> #include <string> #include <vector> void lexicographical_sort(std::vector<int>& numbers) { std::vector<std::string> strings(numbers.size()); std::transform(numbers.begin(), numbers.end(), strings.begin(), [](int i) { return std::to_...
Please provide an equivalent version of this Swift code in Java.
func lex(n: Int) -> [Int] { return stride(from: 1, through: n, by: n.signum()).map({ String($0) }).sorted().compactMap(Int.init) } print("13: \(lex(n: 13))") print("21: \(lex(n: 21))") print("-22: \(lex(n: -22))")
import java.util.List; import java.util.stream.*; public class LexicographicalNumbers { static List<Integer> lexOrder(int n) { int first = 1, last = n; if (n < 1) { first = n; last = 1; } return IntStream.rangeClosed(first, last) .map...
Rewrite the snippet below in Python so it works the same as the original Swift code.
func lex(n: Int) -> [Int] { return stride(from: 1, through: n, by: n.signum()).map({ String($0) }).sorted().compactMap(Int.init) } print("13: \(lex(n: 13))") print("21: \(lex(n: 21))") print("-22: \(lex(n: -22))")
n=13 print(sorted(range(1,n+1), key=str))
Convert this Swift block to VB, preserving its control flow and logic.
func lex(n: Int) -> [Int] { return stride(from: 1, through: n, by: n.signum()).map({ String($0) }).sorted().compactMap(Int.init) } print("13: \(lex(n: 13))") print("21: \(lex(n: 21))") print("-22: \(lex(n: -22))")
Public Function sortlexicographically(N As Integer) Dim arrList As Object Set arrList = CreateObject("System.Collections.ArrayList") For i = 1 To N arrList.Add CStr(i) Next i arrList.Sort Dim item As Variant For Each item In arrList Debug.Print item & ", "; Next End Funct...
Keep all operations the same but rewrite the snippet in Go.
func lex(n: Int) -> [Int] { return stride(from: 1, through: n, by: n.signum()).map({ String($0) }).sorted().compactMap(Int.init) } print("13: \(lex(n: 13))") print("21: \(lex(n: 21))") print("-22: \(lex(n: -22))")
package main import ( "fmt" "sort" "strconv" ) func lexOrder(n int) []int { first, last, k := 1, n, n if n < 1 { first, last, k = n, 1, 2-n } strs := make([]string, k) for i := first; i <= last; i++ { strs[i-first] = strconv.Itoa(i) } sort.Strings(strs) ints...
Generate an equivalent C version of this Tcl code.
proc iota {num {start 0} {step 1}} { set res {} set end [+ $start [* $step $num]] for {set n $start} {$n != $end} {incr n $step} { lappend res $n } return $res } puts [lsort [iota 13 1]]
#include <math.h> #include <stdio.h> #include <stdlib.h> #include <string.h> int compareStrings(const void *a, const void *b) { const char **aa = (const char **)a; const char **bb = (const char **)b; return strcmp(*aa, *bb); } void lexOrder(int n, int *ints) { char **strs; int i, first = 1, last =...
Keep all operations the same but rewrite the snippet in C#.
proc iota {num {start 0} {step 1}} { set res {} set end [+ $start [* $step $num]] for {set n $start} {$n != $end} {incr n $step} { lappend res $n } return $res } puts [lsort [iota 13 1]]
using static System.Console; using static System.Linq.Enumerable; public class Program { public static void Main() { foreach (int n in new [] { 0, 5, 13, 21, -22 }) WriteLine($"{n}: {string.Join(", ", LexOrder(n))}"); } public static IEnumerable<int> LexOrder(int n) => (n < 1 ? Range(n, 2 - n) : R...
Change the programming language of this snippet from Tcl to C++ without modifying what it does.
proc iota {num {start 0} {step 1}} { set res {} set end [+ $start [* $step $num]] for {set n $start} {$n != $end} {incr n $step} { lappend res $n } return $res } puts [lsort [iota 13 1]]
#include <algorithm> #include <iostream> #include <numeric> #include <string> #include <vector> void lexicographical_sort(std::vector<int>& numbers) { std::vector<std::string> strings(numbers.size()); std::transform(numbers.begin(), numbers.end(), strings.begin(), [](int i) { return std::to_...
Produce a language-to-language conversion: from Tcl to Java, same semantics.
proc iota {num {start 0} {step 1}} { set res {} set end [+ $start [* $step $num]] for {set n $start} {$n != $end} {incr n $step} { lappend res $n } return $res } puts [lsort [iota 13 1]]
import java.util.List; import java.util.stream.*; public class LexicographicalNumbers { static List<Integer> lexOrder(int n) { int first = 1, last = n; if (n < 1) { first = n; last = 1; } return IntStream.rangeClosed(first, last) .map...
Rewrite the snippet below in Python so it works the same as the original Tcl code.
proc iota {num {start 0} {step 1}} { set res {} set end [+ $start [* $step $num]] for {set n $start} {$n != $end} {incr n $step} { lappend res $n } return $res } puts [lsort [iota 13 1]]
n=13 print(sorted(range(1,n+1), key=str))
Please provide an equivalent version of this Tcl code in VB.
proc iota {num {start 0} {step 1}} { set res {} set end [+ $start [* $step $num]] for {set n $start} {$n != $end} {incr n $step} { lappend res $n } return $res } puts [lsort [iota 13 1]]
Public Function sortlexicographically(N As Integer) Dim arrList As Object Set arrList = CreateObject("System.Collections.ArrayList") For i = 1 To N arrList.Add CStr(i) Next i arrList.Sort Dim item As Variant For Each item In arrList Debug.Print item & ", "; Next End Funct...
Keep all operations the same but rewrite the snippet in Go.
proc iota {num {start 0} {step 1}} { set res {} set end [+ $start [* $step $num]] for {set n $start} {$n != $end} {incr n $step} { lappend res $n } return $res } puts [lsort [iota 13 1]]
package main import ( "fmt" "sort" "strconv" ) func lexOrder(n int) []int { first, last, k := 1, n, n if n < 1 { first, last, k = n, 1, 2-n } strs := make([]string, k) for i := first; i <= last; i++ { strs[i-first] = strconv.Itoa(i) } sort.Strings(strs) ints...
Ensure the translated Rust code behaves exactly like the original C# snippet.
using static System.Console; using static System.Linq.Enumerable; public class Program { public static void Main() { foreach (int n in new [] { 0, 5, 13, 21, -22 }) WriteLine($"{n}: {string.Join(", ", LexOrder(n))}"); } public static IEnumerable<int> LexOrder(int n) => (n < 1 ? Range(n, 2 - n) : R...
fn lex_sorted_vector(num: i32) -> Vec<i32> { let (min, max) = if num >= 1 { (1, num) } else { (num, 1) }; let mut str: Vec<String> = (min..=max).map(|i| i.to_string()).collect(); str.sort(); str.iter().map(|s| s.parse::<i32>().unwrap()).collect() } fn main() { for n in &[0, 5, 13, 21, -22] { ...
Maintain the same structure and functionality when rewriting this code in Rust.
import java.util.List; import java.util.stream.*; public class LexicographicalNumbers { static List<Integer> lexOrder(int n) { int first = 1, last = n; if (n < 1) { first = n; last = 1; } return IntStream.rangeClosed(first, last) .map...
fn lex_sorted_vector(num: i32) -> Vec<i32> { let (min, max) = if num >= 1 { (1, num) } else { (num, 1) }; let mut str: Vec<String> = (min..=max).map(|i| i.to_string()).collect(); str.sort(); str.iter().map(|s| s.parse::<i32>().unwrap()).collect() } fn main() { for n in &[0, 5, 13, 21, -22] { ...
Transform the following Go implementation into Rust, maintaining the same output and logic.
package main import ( "fmt" "sort" "strconv" ) func lexOrder(n int) []int { first, last, k := 1, n, n if n < 1 { first, last, k = n, 1, 2-n } strs := make([]string, k) for i := first; i <= last; i++ { strs[i-first] = strconv.Itoa(i) } sort.Strings(strs) ints...
fn lex_sorted_vector(num: i32) -> Vec<i32> { let (min, max) = if num >= 1 { (1, num) } else { (num, 1) }; let mut str: Vec<String> = (min..=max).map(|i| i.to_string()).collect(); str.sort(); str.iter().map(|s| s.parse::<i32>().unwrap()).collect() } fn main() { for n in &[0, 5, 13, 21, -22] { ...
Port the provided Rust code into VB while preserving the original functionality.
fn lex_sorted_vector(num: i32) -> Vec<i32> { let (min, max) = if num >= 1 { (1, num) } else { (num, 1) }; let mut str: Vec<String> = (min..=max).map(|i| i.to_string()).collect(); str.sort(); str.iter().map(|s| s.parse::<i32>().unwrap()).collect() } fn main() { for n in &[0, 5, 13, 21, -22] { ...
Public Function sortlexicographically(N As Integer) Dim arrList As Object Set arrList = CreateObject("System.Collections.ArrayList") For i = 1 To N arrList.Add CStr(i) Next i arrList.Sort Dim item As Variant For Each item In arrList Debug.Print item & ", "; Next End Funct...
Convert this C snippet to Rust and keep its semantics consistent.
#include <math.h> #include <stdio.h> #include <stdlib.h> #include <string.h> int compareStrings(const void *a, const void *b) { const char **aa = (const char **)a; const char **bb = (const char **)b; return strcmp(*aa, *bb); } void lexOrder(int n, int *ints) { char **strs; int i, first = 1, last =...
fn lex_sorted_vector(num: i32) -> Vec<i32> { let (min, max) = if num >= 1 { (1, num) } else { (num, 1) }; let mut str: Vec<String> = (min..=max).map(|i| i.to_string()).collect(); str.sort(); str.iter().map(|s| s.parse::<i32>().unwrap()).collect() } fn main() { for n in &[0, 5, 13, 21, -22] { ...
Convert the following code from C++ to Rust, ensuring the logic remains intact.
#include <algorithm> #include <iostream> #include <numeric> #include <string> #include <vector> void lexicographical_sort(std::vector<int>& numbers) { std::vector<std::string> strings(numbers.size()); std::transform(numbers.begin(), numbers.end(), strings.begin(), [](int i) { return std::to_...
fn lex_sorted_vector(num: i32) -> Vec<i32> { let (min, max) = if num >= 1 { (1, num) } else { (num, 1) }; let mut str: Vec<String> = (min..=max).map(|i| i.to_string()).collect(); str.sort(); str.iter().map(|s| s.parse::<i32>().unwrap()).collect() } fn main() { for n in &[0, 5, 13, 21, -22] { ...
Change the following Rust code into Python without altering its purpose.
fn lex_sorted_vector(num: i32) -> Vec<i32> { let (min, max) = if num >= 1 { (1, num) } else { (num, 1) }; let mut str: Vec<String> = (min..=max).map(|i| i.to_string()).collect(); str.sort(); str.iter().map(|s| s.parse::<i32>().unwrap()).collect() } fn main() { for n in &[0, 5, 13, 21, -22] { ...
n=13 print(sorted(range(1,n+1), key=str))
Change the programming language of this snippet from Ada to C# without modifying what it does.
with Ada.Text_IO; use Ada.Text_IO; with Ada.Strings.Unbounded; use Ada.Strings.Unbounded; procedure Main is subtype Vowel is Character with Static_Predicate => Vowel in 'A' | 'E' | 'I' | 'O' | 'U' | 'a' | 'e' | 'i' | 'o' | 'u'; function Remove_Vowels (S : in String) return String i...
static string remove_vowels(string value) { var stripped = from c in value.ToCharArray() where !"aeiouAEIOU".Contains(c) select c; return new string(stripped.ToArray()); } static void test(string value) { Console.WriteLine("Input: " + value); Console.WriteLine("O...
Keep all operations the same but rewrite the snippet in C#.
with Ada.Text_IO; use Ada.Text_IO; with Ada.Strings.Unbounded; use Ada.Strings.Unbounded; procedure Main is subtype Vowel is Character with Static_Predicate => Vowel in 'A' | 'E' | 'I' | 'O' | 'U' | 'a' | 'e' | 'i' | 'o' | 'u'; function Remove_Vowels (S : in String) return String i...
static string remove_vowels(string value) { var stripped = from c in value.ToCharArray() where !"aeiouAEIOU".Contains(c) select c; return new string(stripped.ToArray()); } static void test(string value) { Console.WriteLine("Input: " + value); Console.WriteLine("O...
Write the same code in C as shown below in Ada.
with Ada.Text_IO; use Ada.Text_IO; with Ada.Strings.Unbounded; use Ada.Strings.Unbounded; procedure Main is subtype Vowel is Character with Static_Predicate => Vowel in 'A' | 'E' | 'I' | 'O' | 'U' | 'a' | 'e' | 'i' | 'o' | 'u'; function Remove_Vowels (S : in String) return String i...
#include <stdio.h> void print_no_vowels(const char *s) { for (; *s != 0; s++) { switch (*s) { case 'A': case 'E': case 'I': case 'O': case 'U': case 'a': case 'e': case 'i': case 'o': case 'u': break; defaul...
Generate a C translation of this Ada snippet without changing its computational steps.
with Ada.Text_IO; use Ada.Text_IO; with Ada.Strings.Unbounded; use Ada.Strings.Unbounded; procedure Main is subtype Vowel is Character with Static_Predicate => Vowel in 'A' | 'E' | 'I' | 'O' | 'U' | 'a' | 'e' | 'i' | 'o' | 'u'; function Remove_Vowels (S : in String) return String i...
#include <stdio.h> void print_no_vowels(const char *s) { for (; *s != 0; s++) { switch (*s) { case 'A': case 'E': case 'I': case 'O': case 'U': case 'a': case 'e': case 'i': case 'o': case 'u': break; defaul...
Produce a language-to-language conversion: from Ada to C++, same semantics.
with Ada.Text_IO; use Ada.Text_IO; with Ada.Strings.Unbounded; use Ada.Strings.Unbounded; procedure Main is subtype Vowel is Character with Static_Predicate => Vowel in 'A' | 'E' | 'I' | 'O' | 'U' | 'a' | 'e' | 'i' | 'o' | 'u'; function Remove_Vowels (S : in String) return String i...
#include <algorithm> #include <iostream> class print_no_vowels { private: const std::string &str; public: print_no_vowels(const std::string &s) : str(s) {} friend std::ostream &operator<<(std::ostream &, print_no_vowels); }; std::ostream &operator<<(std::ostream &os, print_no_vowels pnv) { auto it = p...
Keep all operations the same but rewrite the snippet in C++.
with Ada.Text_IO; use Ada.Text_IO; with Ada.Strings.Unbounded; use Ada.Strings.Unbounded; procedure Main is subtype Vowel is Character with Static_Predicate => Vowel in 'A' | 'E' | 'I' | 'O' | 'U' | 'a' | 'e' | 'i' | 'o' | 'u'; function Remove_Vowels (S : in String) return String i...
#include <algorithm> #include <iostream> class print_no_vowels { private: const std::string &str; public: print_no_vowels(const std::string &s) : str(s) {} friend std::ostream &operator<<(std::ostream &, print_no_vowels); }; std::ostream &operator<<(std::ostream &os, print_no_vowels pnv) { auto it = p...
Rewrite this program in Go while keeping its functionality equivalent to the Ada version.
with Ada.Text_IO; use Ada.Text_IO; with Ada.Strings.Unbounded; use Ada.Strings.Unbounded; procedure Main is subtype Vowel is Character with Static_Predicate => Vowel in 'A' | 'E' | 'I' | 'O' | 'U' | 'a' | 'e' | 'i' | 'o' | 'u'; function Remove_Vowels (S : in String) return String i...
package main import ( "fmt" "strings" ) func removeVowels(s string) string { var sb strings.Builder vowels := "aeiouAEIOU" for _, c := range s { if !strings.ContainsAny(string(c), vowels) { sb.WriteRune(c) } } return sb.String() } func main() { s := "Go Pro...
Write the same code in Java as shown below in Ada.
with Ada.Text_IO; use Ada.Text_IO; with Ada.Strings.Unbounded; use Ada.Strings.Unbounded; procedure Main is subtype Vowel is Character with Static_Predicate => Vowel in 'A' | 'E' | 'I' | 'O' | 'U' | 'a' | 'e' | 'i' | 'o' | 'u'; function Remove_Vowels (S : in String) return String i...
public static String removeVowelse(String str){ String re = ""; char c; for(int x = 0; x<str.length(); x++){ c = str.charAt(x); if(!(c=='a'||c=='e'||c=='i'||c=='o'||c=='u')) re+=c; } return re; }
Translate the given Ada code snippet into Java without altering its behavior.
with Ada.Text_IO; use Ada.Text_IO; with Ada.Strings.Unbounded; use Ada.Strings.Unbounded; procedure Main is subtype Vowel is Character with Static_Predicate => Vowel in 'A' | 'E' | 'I' | 'O' | 'U' | 'a' | 'e' | 'i' | 'o' | 'u'; function Remove_Vowels (S : in String) return String i...
public static String removeVowelse(String str){ String re = ""; char c; for(int x = 0; x<str.length(); x++){ c = str.charAt(x); if(!(c=='a'||c=='e'||c=='i'||c=='o'||c=='u')) re+=c; } return re; }
Translate this program into Python but keep the logic exactly as in Ada.
with Ada.Text_IO; use Ada.Text_IO; with Ada.Strings.Unbounded; use Ada.Strings.Unbounded; procedure Main is subtype Vowel is Character with Static_Predicate => Vowel in 'A' | 'E' | 'I' | 'O' | 'U' | 'a' | 'e' | 'i' | 'o' | 'u'; function Remove_Vowels (S : in String) return String i...
def exceptGlyphs(exclusions): def go(s): return ''.join( c for c in s if c not in exclusions ) return go def main(): txt = print( exceptGlyphs('eau')(txt) ) if __name__ == '__main__': main()
Translate the given Ada code snippet into Python without altering its behavior.
with Ada.Text_IO; use Ada.Text_IO; with Ada.Strings.Unbounded; use Ada.Strings.Unbounded; procedure Main is subtype Vowel is Character with Static_Predicate => Vowel in 'A' | 'E' | 'I' | 'O' | 'U' | 'a' | 'e' | 'i' | 'o' | 'u'; function Remove_Vowels (S : in String) return String i...
def exceptGlyphs(exclusions): def go(s): return ''.join( c for c in s if c not in exclusions ) return go def main(): txt = print( exceptGlyphs('eau')(txt) ) if __name__ == '__main__': main()
Change the programming language of this snippet from Ada to VB without modifying what it does.
with Ada.Text_IO; use Ada.Text_IO; with Ada.Strings.Unbounded; use Ada.Strings.Unbounded; procedure Main is subtype Vowel is Character with Static_Predicate => Vowel in 'A' | 'E' | 'I' | 'O' | 'U' | 'a' | 'e' | 'i' | 'o' | 'u'; function Remove_Vowels (S : in String) return String i...
Imports System.Text Module Module1 Function RemoveVowels(s As String) As String Dim sb As New StringBuilder For Each c In s Select Case c Case "A", "a" Case "E", "e" Case "I", "i" Case "O", "o" Case "U", "u...
Change the programming language of this snippet from Ada to VB without modifying what it does.
with Ada.Text_IO; use Ada.Text_IO; with Ada.Strings.Unbounded; use Ada.Strings.Unbounded; procedure Main is subtype Vowel is Character with Static_Predicate => Vowel in 'A' | 'E' | 'I' | 'O' | 'U' | 'a' | 'e' | 'i' | 'o' | 'u'; function Remove_Vowels (S : in String) return String i...
Imports System.Text Module Module1 Function RemoveVowels(s As String) As String Dim sb As New StringBuilder For Each c In s Select Case c Case "A", "a" Case "E", "e" Case "I", "i" Case "O", "o" Case "U", "u...
Preserve the algorithm and functionality while converting the code from Arturo to C.
str: "Remove vowels from a string" print str -- split "aeiouAEIOU"
#include <stdio.h> void print_no_vowels(const char *s) { for (; *s != 0; s++) { switch (*s) { case 'A': case 'E': case 'I': case 'O': case 'U': case 'a': case 'e': case 'i': case 'o': case 'u': break; defaul...
Produce a language-to-language conversion: from Arturo to C, same semantics.
str: "Remove vowels from a string" print str -- split "aeiouAEIOU"
#include <stdio.h> void print_no_vowels(const char *s) { for (; *s != 0; s++) { switch (*s) { case 'A': case 'E': case 'I': case 'O': case 'U': case 'a': case 'e': case 'i': case 'o': case 'u': break; defaul...
Write the same algorithm in C# as shown in this Arturo implementation.
str: "Remove vowels from a string" print str -- split "aeiouAEIOU"
static string remove_vowels(string value) { var stripped = from c in value.ToCharArray() where !"aeiouAEIOU".Contains(c) select c; return new string(stripped.ToArray()); } static void test(string value) { Console.WriteLine("Input: " + value); Console.WriteLine("O...
Please provide an equivalent version of this Arturo code in C#.
str: "Remove vowels from a string" print str -- split "aeiouAEIOU"
static string remove_vowels(string value) { var stripped = from c in value.ToCharArray() where !"aeiouAEIOU".Contains(c) select c; return new string(stripped.ToArray()); } static void test(string value) { Console.WriteLine("Input: " + value); Console.WriteLine("O...
Write the same code in C++ as shown below in Arturo.
str: "Remove vowels from a string" print str -- split "aeiouAEIOU"
#include <algorithm> #include <iostream> class print_no_vowels { private: const std::string &str; public: print_no_vowels(const std::string &s) : str(s) {} friend std::ostream &operator<<(std::ostream &, print_no_vowels); }; std::ostream &operator<<(std::ostream &os, print_no_vowels pnv) { auto it = p...
Keep all operations the same but rewrite the snippet in C++.
str: "Remove vowels from a string" print str -- split "aeiouAEIOU"
#include <algorithm> #include <iostream> class print_no_vowels { private: const std::string &str; public: print_no_vowels(const std::string &s) : str(s) {} friend std::ostream &operator<<(std::ostream &, print_no_vowels); }; std::ostream &operator<<(std::ostream &os, print_no_vowels pnv) { auto it = p...
Translate this program into Java but keep the logic exactly as in Arturo.
str: "Remove vowels from a string" print str -- split "aeiouAEIOU"
public static String removeVowelse(String str){ String re = ""; char c; for(int x = 0; x<str.length(); x++){ c = str.charAt(x); if(!(c=='a'||c=='e'||c=='i'||c=='o'||c=='u')) re+=c; } return re; }
Can you help me rewrite this code in Java instead of Arturo, keeping it the same logically?
str: "Remove vowels from a string" print str -- split "aeiouAEIOU"
public static String removeVowelse(String str){ String re = ""; char c; for(int x = 0; x<str.length(); x++){ c = str.charAt(x); if(!(c=='a'||c=='e'||c=='i'||c=='o'||c=='u')) re+=c; } return re; }
Preserve the algorithm and functionality while converting the code from Arturo to Python.
str: "Remove vowels from a string" print str -- split "aeiouAEIOU"
def exceptGlyphs(exclusions): def go(s): return ''.join( c for c in s if c not in exclusions ) return go def main(): txt = print( exceptGlyphs('eau')(txt) ) if __name__ == '__main__': main()
Please provide an equivalent version of this Arturo code in Python.
str: "Remove vowels from a string" print str -- split "aeiouAEIOU"
def exceptGlyphs(exclusions): def go(s): return ''.join( c for c in s if c not in exclusions ) return go def main(): txt = print( exceptGlyphs('eau')(txt) ) if __name__ == '__main__': main()
Rewrite this program in VB while keeping its functionality equivalent to the Arturo version.
str: "Remove vowels from a string" print str -- split "aeiouAEIOU"
Imports System.Text Module Module1 Function RemoveVowels(s As String) As String Dim sb As New StringBuilder For Each c In s Select Case c Case "A", "a" Case "E", "e" Case "I", "i" Case "O", "o" Case "U", "u...
Change the programming language of this snippet from Arturo to VB without modifying what it does.
str: "Remove vowels from a string" print str -- split "aeiouAEIOU"
Imports System.Text Module Module1 Function RemoveVowels(s As String) As String Dim sb As New StringBuilder For Each c In s Select Case c Case "A", "a" Case "E", "e" Case "I", "i" Case "O", "o" Case "U", "u...
Keep all operations the same but rewrite the snippet in Go.
str: "Remove vowels from a string" print str -- split "aeiouAEIOU"
package main import ( "fmt" "strings" ) func removeVowels(s string) string { var sb strings.Builder vowels := "aeiouAEIOU" for _, c := range s { if !strings.ContainsAny(string(c), vowels) { sb.WriteRune(c) } } return sb.String() } func main() { s := "Go Pro...
Produce a language-to-language conversion: from Arturo to Go, same semantics.
str: "Remove vowels from a string" print str -- split "aeiouAEIOU"
package main import ( "fmt" "strings" ) func removeVowels(s string) string { var sb strings.Builder vowels := "aeiouAEIOU" for _, c := range s { if !strings.ContainsAny(string(c), vowels) { sb.WriteRune(c) } } return sb.String() } func main() { s := "Go Pro...
Produce a language-to-language conversion: from AutoHotKey to C, same semantics.
str := "The quick brown fox jumps over the lazy dog" for i, v in StrSplit("aeiou") str := StrReplace(str, v) MsgBox % str
#include <stdio.h> void print_no_vowels(const char *s) { for (; *s != 0; s++) { switch (*s) { case 'A': case 'E': case 'I': case 'O': case 'U': case 'a': case 'e': case 'i': case 'o': case 'u': break; defaul...
Rewrite this program in C while keeping its functionality equivalent to the AutoHotKey version.
str := "The quick brown fox jumps over the lazy dog" for i, v in StrSplit("aeiou") str := StrReplace(str, v) MsgBox % str
#include <stdio.h> void print_no_vowels(const char *s) { for (; *s != 0; s++) { switch (*s) { case 'A': case 'E': case 'I': case 'O': case 'U': case 'a': case 'e': case 'i': case 'o': case 'u': break; defaul...
Maintain the same structure and functionality when rewriting this code in C#.
str := "The quick brown fox jumps over the lazy dog" for i, v in StrSplit("aeiou") str := StrReplace(str, v) MsgBox % str
static string remove_vowels(string value) { var stripped = from c in value.ToCharArray() where !"aeiouAEIOU".Contains(c) select c; return new string(stripped.ToArray()); } static void test(string value) { Console.WriteLine("Input: " + value); Console.WriteLine("O...
Can you help me rewrite this code in C# instead of AutoHotKey, keeping it the same logically?
str := "The quick brown fox jumps over the lazy dog" for i, v in StrSplit("aeiou") str := StrReplace(str, v) MsgBox % str
static string remove_vowels(string value) { var stripped = from c in value.ToCharArray() where !"aeiouAEIOU".Contains(c) select c; return new string(stripped.ToArray()); } static void test(string value) { Console.WriteLine("Input: " + value); Console.WriteLine("O...
Convert the following code from AutoHotKey to C++, ensuring the logic remains intact.
str := "The quick brown fox jumps over the lazy dog" for i, v in StrSplit("aeiou") str := StrReplace(str, v) MsgBox % str
#include <algorithm> #include <iostream> class print_no_vowels { private: const std::string &str; public: print_no_vowels(const std::string &s) : str(s) {} friend std::ostream &operator<<(std::ostream &, print_no_vowels); }; std::ostream &operator<<(std::ostream &os, print_no_vowels pnv) { auto it = p...
Convert this AutoHotKey snippet to C++ and keep its semantics consistent.
str := "The quick brown fox jumps over the lazy dog" for i, v in StrSplit("aeiou") str := StrReplace(str, v) MsgBox % str
#include <algorithm> #include <iostream> class print_no_vowels { private: const std::string &str; public: print_no_vowels(const std::string &s) : str(s) {} friend std::ostream &operator<<(std::ostream &, print_no_vowels); }; std::ostream &operator<<(std::ostream &os, print_no_vowels pnv) { auto it = p...
Produce a functionally identical Java code for the snippet given in AutoHotKey.
str := "The quick brown fox jumps over the lazy dog" for i, v in StrSplit("aeiou") str := StrReplace(str, v) MsgBox % str
public static String removeVowelse(String str){ String re = ""; char c; for(int x = 0; x<str.length(); x++){ c = str.charAt(x); if(!(c=='a'||c=='e'||c=='i'||c=='o'||c=='u')) re+=c; } return re; }
Please provide an equivalent version of this AutoHotKey code in Java.
str := "The quick brown fox jumps over the lazy dog" for i, v in StrSplit("aeiou") str := StrReplace(str, v) MsgBox % str
public static String removeVowelse(String str){ String re = ""; char c; for(int x = 0; x<str.length(); x++){ c = str.charAt(x); if(!(c=='a'||c=='e'||c=='i'||c=='o'||c=='u')) re+=c; } return re; }
Generate a Python translation of this AutoHotKey snippet without changing its computational steps.
str := "The quick brown fox jumps over the lazy dog" for i, v in StrSplit("aeiou") str := StrReplace(str, v) MsgBox % str
def exceptGlyphs(exclusions): def go(s): return ''.join( c for c in s if c not in exclusions ) return go def main(): txt = print( exceptGlyphs('eau')(txt) ) if __name__ == '__main__': main()
Can you help me rewrite this code in Python instead of AutoHotKey, keeping it the same logically?
str := "The quick brown fox jumps over the lazy dog" for i, v in StrSplit("aeiou") str := StrReplace(str, v) MsgBox % str
def exceptGlyphs(exclusions): def go(s): return ''.join( c for c in s if c not in exclusions ) return go def main(): txt = print( exceptGlyphs('eau')(txt) ) if __name__ == '__main__': main()
Write a version of this AutoHotKey function in VB with identical behavior.
str := "The quick brown fox jumps over the lazy dog" for i, v in StrSplit("aeiou") str := StrReplace(str, v) MsgBox % str
Imports System.Text Module Module1 Function RemoveVowels(s As String) As String Dim sb As New StringBuilder For Each c In s Select Case c Case "A", "a" Case "E", "e" Case "I", "i" Case "O", "o" Case "U", "u...
Change the programming language of this snippet from AutoHotKey to VB without modifying what it does.
str := "The quick brown fox jumps over the lazy dog" for i, v in StrSplit("aeiou") str := StrReplace(str, v) MsgBox % str
Imports System.Text Module Module1 Function RemoveVowels(s As String) As String Dim sb As New StringBuilder For Each c In s Select Case c Case "A", "a" Case "E", "e" Case "I", "i" Case "O", "o" Case "U", "u...
Convert the following code from AutoHotKey to Go, ensuring the logic remains intact.
str := "The quick brown fox jumps over the lazy dog" for i, v in StrSplit("aeiou") str := StrReplace(str, v) MsgBox % str
package main import ( "fmt" "strings" ) func removeVowels(s string) string { var sb strings.Builder vowels := "aeiouAEIOU" for _, c := range s { if !strings.ContainsAny(string(c), vowels) { sb.WriteRune(c) } } return sb.String() } func main() { s := "Go Pro...
Keep all operations the same but rewrite the snippet in Go.
str := "The quick brown fox jumps over the lazy dog" for i, v in StrSplit("aeiou") str := StrReplace(str, v) MsgBox % str
package main import ( "fmt" "strings" ) func removeVowels(s string) string { var sb strings.Builder vowels := "aeiouAEIOU" for _, c := range s { if !strings.ContainsAny(string(c), vowels) { sb.WriteRune(c) } } return sb.String() } func main() { s := "Go Pro...
Ensure the translated C code behaves exactly like the original AWK snippet.
BEGIN { IGNORECASE = 1 arr[++n] = "The AWK Programming Language" arr[++n] = "The quick brown fox jumps over the lazy dog" for (i=1; i<=n; i++) { str = arr[i] printf("old: %s\n",str) gsub(/[aeiou]/,"",str) printf("new: %s\n\n",str) } exit(0) }
#include <stdio.h> void print_no_vowels(const char *s) { for (; *s != 0; s++) { switch (*s) { case 'A': case 'E': case 'I': case 'O': case 'U': case 'a': case 'e': case 'i': case 'o': case 'u': break; defaul...
Translate the given AWK code snippet into C without altering its behavior.
BEGIN { IGNORECASE = 1 arr[++n] = "The AWK Programming Language" arr[++n] = "The quick brown fox jumps over the lazy dog" for (i=1; i<=n; i++) { str = arr[i] printf("old: %s\n",str) gsub(/[aeiou]/,"",str) printf("new: %s\n\n",str) } exit(0) }
#include <stdio.h> void print_no_vowels(const char *s) { for (; *s != 0; s++) { switch (*s) { case 'A': case 'E': case 'I': case 'O': case 'U': case 'a': case 'e': case 'i': case 'o': case 'u': break; defaul...
Rewrite the snippet below in C# so it works the same as the original AWK code.
BEGIN { IGNORECASE = 1 arr[++n] = "The AWK Programming Language" arr[++n] = "The quick brown fox jumps over the lazy dog" for (i=1; i<=n; i++) { str = arr[i] printf("old: %s\n",str) gsub(/[aeiou]/,"",str) printf("new: %s\n\n",str) } exit(0) }
static string remove_vowels(string value) { var stripped = from c in value.ToCharArray() where !"aeiouAEIOU".Contains(c) select c; return new string(stripped.ToArray()); } static void test(string value) { Console.WriteLine("Input: " + value); Console.WriteLine("O...
Port the provided AWK code into C# while preserving the original functionality.
BEGIN { IGNORECASE = 1 arr[++n] = "The AWK Programming Language" arr[++n] = "The quick brown fox jumps over the lazy dog" for (i=1; i<=n; i++) { str = arr[i] printf("old: %s\n",str) gsub(/[aeiou]/,"",str) printf("new: %s\n\n",str) } exit(0) }
static string remove_vowels(string value) { var stripped = from c in value.ToCharArray() where !"aeiouAEIOU".Contains(c) select c; return new string(stripped.ToArray()); } static void test(string value) { Console.WriteLine("Input: " + value); Console.WriteLine("O...
Preserve the algorithm and functionality while converting the code from AWK to C++.
BEGIN { IGNORECASE = 1 arr[++n] = "The AWK Programming Language" arr[++n] = "The quick brown fox jumps over the lazy dog" for (i=1; i<=n; i++) { str = arr[i] printf("old: %s\n",str) gsub(/[aeiou]/,"",str) printf("new: %s\n\n",str) } exit(0) }
#include <algorithm> #include <iostream> class print_no_vowels { private: const std::string &str; public: print_no_vowels(const std::string &s) : str(s) {} friend std::ostream &operator<<(std::ostream &, print_no_vowels); }; std::ostream &operator<<(std::ostream &os, print_no_vowels pnv) { auto it = p...
Generate an equivalent C++ version of this AWK code.
BEGIN { IGNORECASE = 1 arr[++n] = "The AWK Programming Language" arr[++n] = "The quick brown fox jumps over the lazy dog" for (i=1; i<=n; i++) { str = arr[i] printf("old: %s\n",str) gsub(/[aeiou]/,"",str) printf("new: %s\n\n",str) } exit(0) }
#include <algorithm> #include <iostream> class print_no_vowels { private: const std::string &str; public: print_no_vowels(const std::string &s) : str(s) {} friend std::ostream &operator<<(std::ostream &, print_no_vowels); }; std::ostream &operator<<(std::ostream &os, print_no_vowels pnv) { auto it = p...
Please provide an equivalent version of this AWK code in Java.
BEGIN { IGNORECASE = 1 arr[++n] = "The AWK Programming Language" arr[++n] = "The quick brown fox jumps over the lazy dog" for (i=1; i<=n; i++) { str = arr[i] printf("old: %s\n",str) gsub(/[aeiou]/,"",str) printf("new: %s\n\n",str) } exit(0) }
public static String removeVowelse(String str){ String re = ""; char c; for(int x = 0; x<str.length(); x++){ c = str.charAt(x); if(!(c=='a'||c=='e'||c=='i'||c=='o'||c=='u')) re+=c; } return re; }