Instruction
stringlengths
45
106
input_code
stringlengths
1
13.7k
output_code
stringlengths
1
13.7k
Convert the following code from R to Python, ensuring the logic remains intact.
exists("x")
try: name except NameError: print "name is undefined at first check" name = "Chocolate" try: name except NameError: print "name is undefined at second check" del name try: name except NameError: print "name is undefined at third check" name = 42 try: name except NameError: print "name is undefined at fourt...
Convert the following code from R to Go, ensuring the logic remains intact.
exists("x")
package main import "fmt" var ( s []int p *int f func() i interface{} m map[int]int c chan int ) func main() { fmt.Println("Exercise nil objects:") status() s = make([]int, 1) p = &s[0] f = func() { fmt.Println("function call") } i = user(0) m = make(map[in...
Change the programming language of this snippet from Racket to C without modifying what it does.
-> (letrec ([x x]) x) #<undefined>
#include <stdio.h> #include <stdlib.h> int main() { int junk, *junkp; printf("junk: %d\n", junk); junkp = malloc(sizeof *junkp); if (junkp) printf("*junkp: %d\n", *junkp); return 0; }
Change the programming language of this snippet from Racket to C++ without modifying what it does.
-> (letrec ([x x]) x) #<undefined>
#include <iostream> int main() { int undefined; if (undefined == 42) { std::cout << "42"; } if (undefined != 42) { std::cout << "not 42"; } }
Write a version of this Racket function in Java with identical behavior.
-> (letrec ([x x]) x) #<undefined>
String string = null; System.out.println(string); System.out.println(string.length());
Change the following Racket code into Python without altering its purpose.
-> (letrec ([x x]) x) #<undefined>
try: name except NameError: print "name is undefined at first check" name = "Chocolate" try: name except NameError: print "name is undefined at second check" del name try: name except NameError: print "name is undefined at third check" name = 42 try: name except NameError: print "name is undefined at fourt...
Please provide an equivalent version of this Racket code in Go.
-> (letrec ([x x]) x) #<undefined>
package main import "fmt" var ( s []int p *int f func() i interface{} m map[int]int c chan int ) func main() { fmt.Println("Exercise nil objects:") status() s = make([]int, 1) p = &s[0] f = func() { fmt.Println("function call") } i = user(0) m = make(map[in...
Translate this program into C but keep the logic exactly as in REXX.
tlaloc = "rain god of the Aztecs." y= 'tlaloc' if symbol(y)=="VAR" then say y ' is defined.' else say y "isn't defined." y= 'xiuhtecuhtli' if symbol(y)=="VAR" then say y ' is defin...
#include <stdio.h> #include <stdlib.h> int main() { int junk, *junkp; printf("junk: %d\n", junk); junkp = malloc(sizeof *junkp); if (junkp) printf("*junkp: %d\n", *junkp); return 0; }
Please provide an equivalent version of this REXX code in C#.
tlaloc = "rain god of the Aztecs." y= 'tlaloc' if symbol(y)=="VAR" then say y ' is defined.' else say y "isn't defined." y= 'xiuhtecuhtli' if symbol(y)=="VAR" then say y ' is defin...
string foo = null;
Can you help me rewrite this code in C++ instead of REXX, keeping it the same logically?
tlaloc = "rain god of the Aztecs." y= 'tlaloc' if symbol(y)=="VAR" then say y ' is defined.' else say y "isn't defined." y= 'xiuhtecuhtli' if symbol(y)=="VAR" then say y ' is defin...
#include <iostream> int main() { int undefined; if (undefined == 42) { std::cout << "42"; } if (undefined != 42) { std::cout << "not 42"; } }
Convert this REXX block to Java, preserving its control flow and logic.
tlaloc = "rain god of the Aztecs." y= 'tlaloc' if symbol(y)=="VAR" then say y ' is defined.' else say y "isn't defined." y= 'xiuhtecuhtli' if symbol(y)=="VAR" then say y ' is defin...
String string = null; System.out.println(string); System.out.println(string.length());
Transform the following REXX implementation into Python, maintaining the same output and logic.
tlaloc = "rain god of the Aztecs." y= 'tlaloc' if symbol(y)=="VAR" then say y ' is defined.' else say y "isn't defined." y= 'xiuhtecuhtli' if symbol(y)=="VAR" then say y ' is defin...
try: name except NameError: print "name is undefined at first check" name = "Chocolate" try: name except NameError: print "name is undefined at second check" del name try: name except NameError: print "name is undefined at third check" name = 42 try: name except NameError: print "name is undefined at fourt...
Maintain the same structure and functionality when rewriting this code in Go.
tlaloc = "rain god of the Aztecs." y= 'tlaloc' if symbol(y)=="VAR" then say y ' is defined.' else say y "isn't defined." y= 'xiuhtecuhtli' if symbol(y)=="VAR" then say y ' is defin...
package main import "fmt" var ( s []int p *int f func() i interface{} m map[int]int c chan int ) func main() { fmt.Println("Exercise nil objects:") status() s = make([]int, 1) p = &s[0] f = func() { fmt.Println("function call") } i = user(0) m = make(map[in...
Rewrite this program in C while keeping its functionality equivalent to the Ruby version.
puts "var is undefined at first check" unless defined? var var = "Chocolate" puts "var is undefined at second check" unless defined? var puts "Done"
#include <stdio.h> #include <stdlib.h> int main() { int junk, *junkp; printf("junk: %d\n", junk); junkp = malloc(sizeof *junkp); if (junkp) printf("*junkp: %d\n", *junkp); return 0; }
Produce a functionally identical C# code for the snippet given in Ruby.
puts "var is undefined at first check" unless defined? var var = "Chocolate" puts "var is undefined at second check" unless defined? var puts "Done"
string foo = null;
Rewrite the snippet below in C++ so it works the same as the original Ruby code.
puts "var is undefined at first check" unless defined? var var = "Chocolate" puts "var is undefined at second check" unless defined? var puts "Done"
#include <iostream> int main() { int undefined; if (undefined == 42) { std::cout << "42"; } if (undefined != 42) { std::cout << "not 42"; } }
Can you help me rewrite this code in Java instead of Ruby, keeping it the same logically?
puts "var is undefined at first check" unless defined? var var = "Chocolate" puts "var is undefined at second check" unless defined? var puts "Done"
String string = null; System.out.println(string); System.out.println(string.length());
Ensure the translated Python code behaves exactly like the original Ruby snippet.
puts "var is undefined at first check" unless defined? var var = "Chocolate" puts "var is undefined at second check" unless defined? var puts "Done"
try: name except NameError: print "name is undefined at first check" name = "Chocolate" try: name except NameError: print "name is undefined at second check" del name try: name except NameError: print "name is undefined at third check" name = 42 try: name except NameError: print "name is undefined at fourt...
Generate a Go translation of this Ruby snippet without changing its computational steps.
puts "var is undefined at first check" unless defined? var var = "Chocolate" puts "var is undefined at second check" unless defined? var puts "Done"
package main import "fmt" var ( s []int p *int f func() i interface{} m map[int]int c chan int ) func main() { fmt.Println("Exercise nil objects:") status() s = make([]int, 1) p = &s[0] f = func() { fmt.Println("function call") } i = user(0) m = make(map[in...
Port the following code from Scala to C with equivalent syntax and logic.
class SomeClass class SomeOtherClass { lateinit var sc: SomeClass fun initialize() { sc = SomeClass() } fun printSomething() { println(sc) } fun someFunc(): String { TODO("someFunc not yet implemented") } } fun main(args: Array<String>) { va...
#include <stdio.h> #include <stdlib.h> int main() { int junk, *junkp; printf("junk: %d\n", junk); junkp = malloc(sizeof *junkp); if (junkp) printf("*junkp: %d\n", *junkp); return 0; }
Generate an equivalent C# version of this Scala code.
class SomeClass class SomeOtherClass { lateinit var sc: SomeClass fun initialize() { sc = SomeClass() } fun printSomething() { println(sc) } fun someFunc(): String { TODO("someFunc not yet implemented") } } fun main(args: Array<String>) { va...
string foo = null;
Please provide an equivalent version of this Scala code in C++.
class SomeClass class SomeOtherClass { lateinit var sc: SomeClass fun initialize() { sc = SomeClass() } fun printSomething() { println(sc) } fun someFunc(): String { TODO("someFunc not yet implemented") } } fun main(args: Array<String>) { va...
#include <iostream> int main() { int undefined; if (undefined == 42) { std::cout << "42"; } if (undefined != 42) { std::cout << "not 42"; } }
Preserve the algorithm and functionality while converting the code from Scala to Java.
class SomeClass class SomeOtherClass { lateinit var sc: SomeClass fun initialize() { sc = SomeClass() } fun printSomething() { println(sc) } fun someFunc(): String { TODO("someFunc not yet implemented") } } fun main(args: Array<String>) { va...
String string = null; System.out.println(string); System.out.println(string.length());
Change the following Scala code into Python without altering its purpose.
class SomeClass class SomeOtherClass { lateinit var sc: SomeClass fun initialize() { sc = SomeClass() } fun printSomething() { println(sc) } fun someFunc(): String { TODO("someFunc not yet implemented") } } fun main(args: Array<String>) { va...
try: name except NameError: print "name is undefined at first check" name = "Chocolate" try: name except NameError: print "name is undefined at second check" del name try: name except NameError: print "name is undefined at third check" name = 42 try: name except NameError: print "name is undefined at fourt...
Preserve the algorithm and functionality while converting the code from Scala to Go.
class SomeClass class SomeOtherClass { lateinit var sc: SomeClass fun initialize() { sc = SomeClass() } fun printSomething() { println(sc) } fun someFunc(): String { TODO("someFunc not yet implemented") } } fun main(args: Array<String>) { va...
package main import "fmt" var ( s []int p *int f func() i interface{} m map[int]int c chan int ) func main() { fmt.Println("Exercise nil objects:") status() s = make([]int, 1) p = &s[0] f = func() { fmt.Println("function call") } i = user(0) m = make(map[in...
Translate the given Tcl code snippet into C without altering its behavior.
if {![info exists var]} {puts "var is undefind at first check"} set var "Screwy Squirrel" if {![info exists var]} {puts "var is undefind at second check"} unset var if {![info exists var]} {puts "var is undefind at third check"} set var 12345 if {![info exists var]} {puts "var is undefind at fourth check...
#include <stdio.h> #include <stdlib.h> int main() { int junk, *junkp; printf("junk: %d\n", junk); junkp = malloc(sizeof *junkp); if (junkp) printf("*junkp: %d\n", *junkp); return 0; }
Write a version of this Tcl function in C# with identical behavior.
if {![info exists var]} {puts "var is undefind at first check"} set var "Screwy Squirrel" if {![info exists var]} {puts "var is undefind at second check"} unset var if {![info exists var]} {puts "var is undefind at third check"} set var 12345 if {![info exists var]} {puts "var is undefind at fourth check...
string foo = null;
Preserve the algorithm and functionality while converting the code from Tcl to C++.
if {![info exists var]} {puts "var is undefind at first check"} set var "Screwy Squirrel" if {![info exists var]} {puts "var is undefind at second check"} unset var if {![info exists var]} {puts "var is undefind at third check"} set var 12345 if {![info exists var]} {puts "var is undefind at fourth check...
#include <iostream> int main() { int undefined; if (undefined == 42) { std::cout << "42"; } if (undefined != 42) { std::cout << "not 42"; } }
Generate an equivalent Java version of this Tcl code.
if {![info exists var]} {puts "var is undefind at first check"} set var "Screwy Squirrel" if {![info exists var]} {puts "var is undefind at second check"} unset var if {![info exists var]} {puts "var is undefind at third check"} set var 12345 if {![info exists var]} {puts "var is undefind at fourth check...
String string = null; System.out.println(string); System.out.println(string.length());
Write the same code in Python as shown below in Tcl.
if {![info exists var]} {puts "var is undefind at first check"} set var "Screwy Squirrel" if {![info exists var]} {puts "var is undefind at second check"} unset var if {![info exists var]} {puts "var is undefind at third check"} set var 12345 if {![info exists var]} {puts "var is undefind at fourth check...
try: name except NameError: print "name is undefined at first check" name = "Chocolate" try: name except NameError: print "name is undefined at second check" del name try: name except NameError: print "name is undefined at third check" name = 42 try: name except NameError: print "name is undefined at fourt...
Can you help me rewrite this code in Go instead of Tcl, keeping it the same logically?
if {![info exists var]} {puts "var is undefind at first check"} set var "Screwy Squirrel" if {![info exists var]} {puts "var is undefind at second check"} unset var if {![info exists var]} {puts "var is undefind at third check"} set var 12345 if {![info exists var]} {puts "var is undefind at fourth check...
package main import "fmt" var ( s []int p *int f func() i interface{} m map[int]int c chan int ) func main() { fmt.Println("Exercise nil objects:") status() s = make([]int, 1) p = &s[0] f = func() { fmt.Println("function call") } i = user(0) m = make(map[in...
Please provide an equivalent version of this Rust code in PHP.
use std::ptr; let p: *const i32 = ptr::null(); assert!(p.is_null());
<?php if (!isset($var)) echo "var is undefined at first check\n"; $var = "Chocolate"; if (!isset($var)) echo "var is undefined at second check\n"; unset($var); if (!isset($var)) echo "var is undefined at third check\n"; $var = 42; if (!isset($var)) echo "var is undefined at fourth check\n"; ...
Can you help me rewrite this code in PHP instead of Ada, keeping it the same logically?
pragma Initialize_Scalars; with Ada.Text_IO; use Ada.Text_IO; procedure Invalid_Value is type Color is (Red, Green, Blue); X : Float; Y : Color; begin if not X'Valid then Put_Line ("X is not valid"); end if; X := 1.0; if X'Valid then Put_Line ("X is" & Float'Image (X)); end if; ...
<?php if (!isset($var)) echo "var is undefined at first check\n"; $var = "Chocolate"; if (!isset($var)) echo "var is undefined at second check\n"; unset($var); if (!isset($var)) echo "var is undefined at third check\n"; $var = 42; if (!isset($var)) echo "var is undefined at fourth check\n"; ...
Change the following Arturo code into PHP without altering its purpose.
undef: null print undef
<?php if (!isset($var)) echo "var is undefined at first check\n"; $var = "Chocolate"; if (!isset($var)) echo "var is undefined at second check\n"; unset($var); if (!isset($var)) echo "var is undefined at third check\n"; $var = 42; if (!isset($var)) echo "var is undefined at fourth check\n"; ...
Rewrite this program in PHP while keeping its functionality equivalent to the BBC_Basic version.
ok% = TRUE ON ERROR LOCAL IF ERR<>26 REPORT : END ELSE ok% = FALSE IF ok% THEN PRINT variable$ ELSE PRINT "Not defined" ENDIF RESTORE ERROR
<?php if (!isset($var)) echo "var is undefined at first check\n"; $var = "Chocolate"; if (!isset($var)) echo "var is undefined at second check\n"; unset($var); if (!isset($var)) echo "var is undefined at third check\n"; $var = 42; if (!isset($var)) echo "var is undefined at fourth check\n"; ...
Translate this program into PHP but keep the logic exactly as in Common_Lisp.
(defvar *x*) (defvar *y* 42) (special-variable-p '*x*) -> T (boundp '*x*) -> NIL (boundp '*y*) -> T (special-variable-p '*z*) -> NIL
<?php if (!isset($var)) echo "var is undefined at first check\n"; $var = "Chocolate"; if (!isset($var)) echo "var is undefined at second check\n"; unset($var); if (!isset($var)) echo "var is undefined at third check\n"; $var = 42; if (!isset($var)) echo "var is undefined at fourth check\n"; ...
Convert the following code from D to PHP, ensuring the logic remains intact.
void main() { int a = 5; double b = 5.0; char c = 'f'; int[] d = [1, 2, 3]; int aa; double bb; char cc; int[] dd; int[3] ee; int aaa = void; double[] bbb = void; int[3] eee = void; }
<?php if (!isset($var)) echo "var is undefined at first check\n"; $var = "Chocolate"; if (!isset($var)) echo "var is undefined at second check\n"; unset($var); if (!isset($var)) echo "var is undefined at third check\n"; $var = 42; if (!isset($var)) echo "var is undefined at fourth check\n"; ...
Transform the following Delphi implementation into PHP, maintaining the same output and logic.
var P: PInteger; begin New(P); try If Assigned(P) Then begin P^ := 42; end; finally Dispose(P); end; end;
<?php if (!isset($var)) echo "var is undefined at first check\n"; $var = "Chocolate"; if (!isset($var)) echo "var is undefined at second check\n"; unset($var); if (!isset($var)) echo "var is undefined at third check\n"; $var = 42; if (!isset($var)) echo "var is undefined at fourth check\n"; ...
Change the following Erlang code into PHP without altering its purpose.
-module( undefined_values ). -export( [task/0] ). -record( a_record, {member_1, member_2} ). task() -> Record = #a_record{member_1=a_value}, io:fwrite( "Record member_1 ~p, member_2 ~p~n", [Record#a_record.member_1, Record#a_record.member_2] ), io:fwrite( "Member_2 is undefined ~p~n", [Record#a_record...
<?php if (!isset($var)) echo "var is undefined at first check\n"; $var = "Chocolate"; if (!isset($var)) echo "var is undefined at second check\n"; unset($var); if (!isset($var)) echo "var is undefined at third check\n"; $var = 42; if (!isset($var)) echo "var is undefined at fourth check\n"; ...
Generate a PHP translation of this Factor snippet without changing its computational steps.
42 .
<?php if (!isset($var)) echo "var is undefined at first check\n"; $var = "Chocolate"; if (!isset($var)) echo "var is undefined at second check\n"; unset($var); if (!isset($var)) echo "var is undefined at third check\n"; $var = 42; if (!isset($var)) echo "var is undefined at fourth check\n"; ...
Preserve the algorithm and functionality while converting the code from Fortran to PHP.
IsNaN(x)
<?php if (!isset($var)) echo "var is undefined at first check\n"; $var = "Chocolate"; if (!isset($var)) echo "var is undefined at second check\n"; unset($var); if (!isset($var)) echo "var is undefined at third check\n"; $var = 42; if (!isset($var)) echo "var is undefined at fourth check\n"; ...
Write the same algorithm in PHP as shown in this Haskell implementation.
main = print $ "Incoming error
<?php if (!isset($var)) echo "var is undefined at first check\n"; $var = "Chocolate"; if (!isset($var)) echo "var is undefined at second check\n"; unset($var); if (!isset($var)) echo "var is undefined at third check\n"; $var = 42; if (!isset($var)) echo "var is undefined at fourth check\n"; ...
Convert the following code from J to PHP, ensuring the logic remains intact.
foo=: 3 nc;:'foo bar' 0 _1
<?php if (!isset($var)) echo "var is undefined at first check\n"; $var = "Chocolate"; if (!isset($var)) echo "var is undefined at second check\n"; unset($var); if (!isset($var)) echo "var is undefined at third check\n"; $var = 42; if (!isset($var)) echo "var is undefined at fourth check\n"; ...
Translate this program into PHP but keep the logic exactly as in Julia.
julia> arr = [1, 2, nothing, 3] 4-element Array{Union{Nothing, Int64},1}: 1 2 nothing 3 julia> x = arr .+ 5 ERROR: MethodError: no method matching +(::Nothing, ::Int64) Closest candidates are: +(::Any, ::Any, ::Any, ::Any...) at operators.jl:502 +(::Complex{Bool}, ::Real) at complex.jl:292 +(::Missing, ::Nu...
<?php if (!isset($var)) echo "var is undefined at first check\n"; $var = "Chocolate"; if (!isset($var)) echo "var is undefined at second check\n"; unset($var); if (!isset($var)) echo "var is undefined at third check\n"; $var = 42; if (!isset($var)) echo "var is undefined at fourth check\n"; ...
Transform the following Lua implementation into PHP, maintaining the same output and logic.
print( a ) local b print( b ) if b == nil then b = 5 end print( b )
<?php if (!isset($var)) echo "var is undefined at first check\n"; $var = "Chocolate"; if (!isset($var)) echo "var is undefined at second check\n"; unset($var); if (!isset($var)) echo "var is undefined at third check\n"; $var = 42; if (!isset($var)) echo "var is undefined at fourth check\n"; ...
Transform the following Mathematica implementation into PHP, maintaining the same output and logic.
a -> a a + a -> 2 a ValueQ[a] -> False a = 5 -> 5 ValueQ[a] -> True
<?php if (!isset($var)) echo "var is undefined at first check\n"; $var = "Chocolate"; if (!isset($var)) echo "var is undefined at second check\n"; unset($var); if (!isset($var)) echo "var is undefined at third check\n"; $var = 42; if (!isset($var)) echo "var is undefined at fourth check\n"; ...
Port the following code from MATLAB to PHP with equivalent syntax and logic.
global var;
<?php if (!isset($var)) echo "var is undefined at first check\n"; $var = "Chocolate"; if (!isset($var)) echo "var is undefined at second check\n"; unset($var); if (!isset($var)) echo "var is undefined at third check\n"; $var = 42; if (!isset($var)) echo "var is undefined at fourth check\n"; ...
Preserve the algorithm and functionality while converting the code from Nim to PHP.
var a {.noInit.}: array[1_000_000, int] proc p(): array[1000, int] {.noInit.} = for i in 0..999: result[i] = i
<?php if (!isset($var)) echo "var is undefined at first check\n"; $var = "Chocolate"; if (!isset($var)) echo "var is undefined at second check\n"; unset($var); if (!isset($var)) echo "var is undefined at third check\n"; $var = 42; if (!isset($var)) echo "var is undefined at fourth check\n"; ...
Keep all operations the same but rewrite the snippet in PHP.
let inc = function Some n -> Some (n+1) | None -> failwith "Undefined argument";; inc (Some 0);; inc None;;
<?php if (!isset($var)) echo "var is undefined at first check\n"; $var = "Chocolate"; if (!isset($var)) echo "var is undefined at second check\n"; unset($var); if (!isset($var)) echo "var is undefined at third check\n"; $var = 42; if (!isset($var)) echo "var is undefined at fourth check\n"; ...
Preserve the algorithm and functionality while converting the code from Perl to PHP.
use strict; our $var; print "var contains an undefined value at first check\n" unless defined $var; $var = "Chocolate"; print "var contains an undefined value at second check\n" unless defined $var; $var = undef; undef($var); print "var contains an undefined value at third check\n" unless defined $var; ...
<?php if (!isset($var)) echo "var is undefined at first check\n"; $var = "Chocolate"; if (!isset($var)) echo "var is undefined at second check\n"; unset($var); if (!isset($var)) echo "var is undefined at third check\n"; $var = 42; if (!isset($var)) echo "var is undefined at fourth check\n"; ...
Produce a functionally identical PHP code for the snippet given in PowerShell.
if (Get-Variable -Name noSuchVariable -ErrorAction SilentlyContinue) { $true } else { $false }
<?php if (!isset($var)) echo "var is undefined at first check\n"; $var = "Chocolate"; if (!isset($var)) echo "var is undefined at second check\n"; unset($var); if (!isset($var)) echo "var is undefined at third check\n"; $var = 42; if (!isset($var)) echo "var is undefined at fourth check\n"; ...
Produce a language-to-language conversion: from R to PHP, same semantics.
exists("x")
<?php if (!isset($var)) echo "var is undefined at first check\n"; $var = "Chocolate"; if (!isset($var)) echo "var is undefined at second check\n"; unset($var); if (!isset($var)) echo "var is undefined at third check\n"; $var = 42; if (!isset($var)) echo "var is undefined at fourth check\n"; ...
Ensure the translated PHP code behaves exactly like the original Racket snippet.
-> (letrec ([x x]) x) #<undefined>
<?php if (!isset($var)) echo "var is undefined at first check\n"; $var = "Chocolate"; if (!isset($var)) echo "var is undefined at second check\n"; unset($var); if (!isset($var)) echo "var is undefined at third check\n"; $var = 42; if (!isset($var)) echo "var is undefined at fourth check\n"; ...
Rewrite this program in PHP while keeping its functionality equivalent to the REXX version.
tlaloc = "rain god of the Aztecs." y= 'tlaloc' if symbol(y)=="VAR" then say y ' is defined.' else say y "isn't defined." y= 'xiuhtecuhtli' if symbol(y)=="VAR" then say y ' is defin...
<?php if (!isset($var)) echo "var is undefined at first check\n"; $var = "Chocolate"; if (!isset($var)) echo "var is undefined at second check\n"; unset($var); if (!isset($var)) echo "var is undefined at third check\n"; $var = 42; if (!isset($var)) echo "var is undefined at fourth check\n"; ...
Please provide an equivalent version of this Ruby code in PHP.
puts "var is undefined at first check" unless defined? var var = "Chocolate" puts "var is undefined at second check" unless defined? var puts "Done"
<?php if (!isset($var)) echo "var is undefined at first check\n"; $var = "Chocolate"; if (!isset($var)) echo "var is undefined at second check\n"; unset($var); if (!isset($var)) echo "var is undefined at third check\n"; $var = 42; if (!isset($var)) echo "var is undefined at fourth check\n"; ...
Preserve the algorithm and functionality while converting the code from Scala to PHP.
class SomeClass class SomeOtherClass { lateinit var sc: SomeClass fun initialize() { sc = SomeClass() } fun printSomething() { println(sc) } fun someFunc(): String { TODO("someFunc not yet implemented") } } fun main(args: Array<String>) { va...
<?php if (!isset($var)) echo "var is undefined at first check\n"; $var = "Chocolate"; if (!isset($var)) echo "var is undefined at second check\n"; unset($var); if (!isset($var)) echo "var is undefined at third check\n"; $var = 42; if (!isset($var)) echo "var is undefined at fourth check\n"; ...
Rewrite the snippet below in PHP so it works the same as the original Tcl code.
if {![info exists var]} {puts "var is undefind at first check"} set var "Screwy Squirrel" if {![info exists var]} {puts "var is undefind at second check"} unset var if {![info exists var]} {puts "var is undefind at third check"} set var 12345 if {![info exists var]} {puts "var is undefind at fourth check...
<?php if (!isset($var)) echo "var is undefined at first check\n"; $var = "Chocolate"; if (!isset($var)) echo "var is undefined at second check\n"; unset($var); if (!isset($var)) echo "var is undefined at third check\n"; $var = 42; if (!isset($var)) echo "var is undefined at fourth check\n"; ...
Write the same algorithm in Rust as shown in this Java implementation.
String string = null; System.out.println(string); System.out.println(string.length());
use std::ptr; let p: *const i32 = ptr::null(); assert!(p.is_null());
Produce a functionally identical Rust code for the snippet given in Go.
package main import "fmt" var ( s []int p *int f func() i interface{} m map[int]int c chan int ) func main() { fmt.Println("Exercise nil objects:") status() s = make([]int, 1) p = &s[0] f = func() { fmt.Println("function call") } i = user(0) m = make(map[in...
use std::ptr; let p: *const i32 = ptr::null(); assert!(p.is_null());
Translate the given Rust code snippet into Python without altering its behavior.
use std::ptr; let p: *const i32 = ptr::null(); assert!(p.is_null());
try: name except NameError: print "name is undefined at first check" name = "Chocolate" try: name except NameError: print "name is undefined at second check" del name try: name except NameError: print "name is undefined at third check" name = 42 try: name except NameError: print "name is undefined at fourt...
Change the programming language of this snippet from C to Rust without modifying what it does.
#include <stdio.h> #include <stdlib.h> int main() { int junk, *junkp; printf("junk: %d\n", junk); junkp = malloc(sizeof *junkp); if (junkp) printf("*junkp: %d\n", *junkp); return 0; }
use std::ptr; let p: *const i32 = ptr::null(); assert!(p.is_null());
Keep all operations the same but rewrite the snippet in Rust.
#include <iostream> int main() { int undefined; if (undefined == 42) { std::cout << "42"; } if (undefined != 42) { std::cout << "not 42"; } }
use std::ptr; let p: *const i32 = ptr::null(); assert!(p.is_null());
Convert the following code from Ada to C#, ensuring the logic remains intact.
with Ada.Finalization; package BT is type Balanced_Ternary is private; function To_Balanced_Ternary (Num : Integer) return Balanced_Ternary; function To_Balanced_Ternary (Str : String) return Balanced_Ternary; function To_Integer (Num : Balanced_Ternary) return Integer; function To_string ...
using System; using System.Text; using System.Collections.Generic; public class BalancedTernary { public static void Main() { BalancedTernary a = new BalancedTernary("+-0++0+"); System.Console.WriteLine("a: " + a + " = " + a.ToLong()); BalancedTernary b = new BalancedTernary(-436); System.Console.WriteLine("...
Can you help me rewrite this code in C# instead of Ada, keeping it the same logically?
with Ada.Finalization; package BT is type Balanced_Ternary is private; function To_Balanced_Ternary (Num : Integer) return Balanced_Ternary; function To_Balanced_Ternary (Str : String) return Balanced_Ternary; function To_Integer (Num : Balanced_Ternary) return Integer; function To_string ...
using System; using System.Text; using System.Collections.Generic; public class BalancedTernary { public static void Main() { BalancedTernary a = new BalancedTernary("+-0++0+"); System.Console.WriteLine("a: " + a + " = " + a.ToLong()); BalancedTernary b = new BalancedTernary(-436); System.Console.WriteLine("...
Port the following code from Ada to C with equivalent syntax and logic.
with Ada.Finalization; package BT is type Balanced_Ternary is private; function To_Balanced_Ternary (Num : Integer) return Balanced_Ternary; function To_Balanced_Ternary (Str : String) return Balanced_Ternary; function To_Integer (Num : Balanced_Ternary) return Integer; function To_string ...
#include <stdio.h> #include <string.h> void reverse(char *p) { size_t len = strlen(p); char *r = p + len - 1; while (p < r) { *p ^= *r; *r ^= *p; *p++ ^= *r--; } } void to_bt(int n, char *b) { static char d[] = { '0', '+', '-' }; static int v[] = { 0, 1, -1 }; char...
Transform the following Ada implementation into C, maintaining the same output and logic.
with Ada.Finalization; package BT is type Balanced_Ternary is private; function To_Balanced_Ternary (Num : Integer) return Balanced_Ternary; function To_Balanced_Ternary (Str : String) return Balanced_Ternary; function To_Integer (Num : Balanced_Ternary) return Integer; function To_string ...
#include <stdio.h> #include <string.h> void reverse(char *p) { size_t len = strlen(p); char *r = p + len - 1; while (p < r) { *p ^= *r; *r ^= *p; *p++ ^= *r--; } } void to_bt(int n, char *b) { static char d[] = { '0', '+', '-' }; static int v[] = { 0, 1, -1 }; char...
Generate an equivalent C++ version of this Ada code.
with Ada.Finalization; package BT is type Balanced_Ternary is private; function To_Balanced_Ternary (Num : Integer) return Balanced_Ternary; function To_Balanced_Ternary (Str : String) return Balanced_Ternary; function To_Integer (Num : Balanced_Ternary) return Integer; function To_string ...
#include <iostream> #include <string> #include <climits> using namespace std; class BalancedTernary { protected: string value; int charToInt(char c) const { if (c == '0') return 0; return 44 - c; } string negate(string s) const { for (int i = 0; i < s.length(); ++i) { if (s[i] == '+') s[i] ...
Maintain the same structure and functionality when rewriting this code in C++.
with Ada.Finalization; package BT is type Balanced_Ternary is private; function To_Balanced_Ternary (Num : Integer) return Balanced_Ternary; function To_Balanced_Ternary (Str : String) return Balanced_Ternary; function To_Integer (Num : Balanced_Ternary) return Integer; function To_string ...
#include <iostream> #include <string> #include <climits> using namespace std; class BalancedTernary { protected: string value; int charToInt(char c) const { if (c == '0') return 0; return 44 - c; } string negate(string s) const { for (int i = 0; i < s.length(); ++i) { if (s[i] == '+') s[i] ...
Translate this program into Go but keep the logic exactly as in Ada.
with Ada.Finalization; package BT is type Balanced_Ternary is private; function To_Balanced_Ternary (Num : Integer) return Balanced_Ternary; function To_Balanced_Ternary (Str : String) return Balanced_Ternary; function To_Integer (Num : Balanced_Ternary) return Integer; function To_string ...
package main import ( "fmt" "strings" ) type bt []int8 func btString(s string) (*bt, bool) { s = strings.TrimLeft(s, "0") b := make(bt, len(s)) for i, last := 0, len(s)-1; i < len(s); i++ { switch s[i] { case '-': b[last-i] = -1 case '0': b...
Convert this Ada snippet to Go and keep its semantics consistent.
with Ada.Finalization; package BT is type Balanced_Ternary is private; function To_Balanced_Ternary (Num : Integer) return Balanced_Ternary; function To_Balanced_Ternary (Str : String) return Balanced_Ternary; function To_Integer (Num : Balanced_Ternary) return Integer; function To_string ...
package main import ( "fmt" "strings" ) type bt []int8 func btString(s string) (*bt, bool) { s = strings.TrimLeft(s, "0") b := make(bt, len(s)) for i, last := 0, len(s)-1; i < len(s); i++ { switch s[i] { case '-': b[last-i] = -1 case '0': b...
Change the programming language of this snippet from Ada to Java without modifying what it does.
with Ada.Finalization; package BT is type Balanced_Ternary is private; function To_Balanced_Ternary (Num : Integer) return Balanced_Ternary; function To_Balanced_Ternary (Str : String) return Balanced_Ternary; function To_Integer (Num : Balanced_Ternary) return Integer; function To_string ...
public class BalancedTernary { public static void main(String[] args) { BTernary a=new BTernary("+-0++0+"); BTernary b=new BTernary(-436); BTernary c=new BTernary("+-++-"); System.out.println("a="+a.intValue()); System.out.println("b="+b.intValue()); System.out.println("c="+c.intValue()); System.o...
Convert this Ada snippet to Java and keep its semantics consistent.
with Ada.Finalization; package BT is type Balanced_Ternary is private; function To_Balanced_Ternary (Num : Integer) return Balanced_Ternary; function To_Balanced_Ternary (Str : String) return Balanced_Ternary; function To_Integer (Num : Balanced_Ternary) return Integer; function To_string ...
public class BalancedTernary { public static void main(String[] args) { BTernary a=new BTernary("+-0++0+"); BTernary b=new BTernary(-436); BTernary c=new BTernary("+-++-"); System.out.println("a="+a.intValue()); System.out.println("b="+b.intValue()); System.out.println("c="+c.intValue()); System.o...
Produce a language-to-language conversion: from Ada to Python, same semantics.
with Ada.Finalization; package BT is type Balanced_Ternary is private; function To_Balanced_Ternary (Num : Integer) return Balanced_Ternary; function To_Balanced_Ternary (Str : String) return Balanced_Ternary; function To_Integer (Num : Balanced_Ternary) return Integer; function To_string ...
class BalancedTernary: str2dig = {'+': 1, '-': -1, '0': 0} dig2str = {1: '+', -1: '-', 0: '0'} table = ((0, -1), (1, -1), (-1, 0), (0, 0), (1, 0), (-1, 1), (0, 1)) def __init__(self, inp): if isinstance(inp, str): self.digits = [BalancedTernary.str2dig[c] for c in reversed(...
Preserve the algorithm and functionality while converting the code from Ada to Python.
with Ada.Finalization; package BT is type Balanced_Ternary is private; function To_Balanced_Ternary (Num : Integer) return Balanced_Ternary; function To_Balanced_Ternary (Str : String) return Balanced_Ternary; function To_Integer (Num : Balanced_Ternary) return Integer; function To_string ...
class BalancedTernary: str2dig = {'+': 1, '-': -1, '0': 0} dig2str = {1: '+', -1: '-', 0: '0'} table = ((0, -1), (1, -1), (-1, 0), (0, 0), (1, 0), (-1, 1), (0, 1)) def __init__(self, inp): if isinstance(inp, str): self.digits = [BalancedTernary.str2dig[c] for c in reversed(...
Write the same algorithm in VB as shown in this Ada implementation.
with Ada.Finalization; package BT is type Balanced_Ternary is private; function To_Balanced_Ternary (Num : Integer) return Balanced_Ternary; function To_Balanced_Ternary (Str : String) return Balanced_Ternary; function To_Integer (Num : Balanced_Ternary) return Integer; function To_string ...
Imports System.Text Module Module1 Sub Main() Dim a As New BalancedTernary("+-0++0+") Console.WriteLine("a: {0} = {1}", a, a.ToLong) Dim b As New BalancedTernary(-436) Console.WriteLine("b: {0} = {1}", b, b.ToLong) Dim c As New BalancedTernary("+-++-") Console.WriteL...
Convert the following code from Ada to VB, ensuring the logic remains intact.
with Ada.Finalization; package BT is type Balanced_Ternary is private; function To_Balanced_Ternary (Num : Integer) return Balanced_Ternary; function To_Balanced_Ternary (Str : String) return Balanced_Ternary; function To_Integer (Num : Balanced_Ternary) return Integer; function To_string ...
Imports System.Text Module Module1 Sub Main() Dim a As New BalancedTernary("+-0++0+") Console.WriteLine("a: {0} = {1}", a, a.ToLong) Dim b As New BalancedTernary(-436) Console.WriteLine("b: {0} = {1}", b, b.ToLong) Dim c As New BalancedTernary("+-++-") Console.WriteL...
Translate this program into C but keep the logic exactly as in AutoHotKey.
BalancedTernary(n){ k = 0 if abs(n)<2 return n=1?"+":n=0?"0":"-" if n<1 negative := true, n:= -1*n while !break { d := Mod(n, 3**(k+1)) / 3**k d := d=2?-1:d n := n - (d * 3**k) r := (d=-1?"-":d=1?"+":0) . r k++ if (n = 3**k) r := "+" . r , break := true } if negative { StringReplace, r, r, -,...
#include <stdio.h> #include <string.h> void reverse(char *p) { size_t len = strlen(p); char *r = p + len - 1; while (p < r) { *p ^= *r; *r ^= *p; *p++ ^= *r--; } } void to_bt(int n, char *b) { static char d[] = { '0', '+', '-' }; static int v[] = { 0, 1, -1 }; char...
Generate an equivalent C version of this AutoHotKey code.
BalancedTernary(n){ k = 0 if abs(n)<2 return n=1?"+":n=0?"0":"-" if n<1 negative := true, n:= -1*n while !break { d := Mod(n, 3**(k+1)) / 3**k d := d=2?-1:d n := n - (d * 3**k) r := (d=-1?"-":d=1?"+":0) . r k++ if (n = 3**k) r := "+" . r , break := true } if negative { StringReplace, r, r, -,...
#include <stdio.h> #include <string.h> void reverse(char *p) { size_t len = strlen(p); char *r = p + len - 1; while (p < r) { *p ^= *r; *r ^= *p; *p++ ^= *r--; } } void to_bt(int n, char *b) { static char d[] = { '0', '+', '-' }; static int v[] = { 0, 1, -1 }; char...
Change the programming language of this snippet from AutoHotKey to C# without modifying what it does.
BalancedTernary(n){ k = 0 if abs(n)<2 return n=1?"+":n=0?"0":"-" if n<1 negative := true, n:= -1*n while !break { d := Mod(n, 3**(k+1)) / 3**k d := d=2?-1:d n := n - (d * 3**k) r := (d=-1?"-":d=1?"+":0) . r k++ if (n = 3**k) r := "+" . r , break := true } if negative { StringReplace, r, r, -,...
using System; using System.Text; using System.Collections.Generic; public class BalancedTernary { public static void Main() { BalancedTernary a = new BalancedTernary("+-0++0+"); System.Console.WriteLine("a: " + a + " = " + a.ToLong()); BalancedTernary b = new BalancedTernary(-436); System.Console.WriteLine("...
Write the same algorithm in C# as shown in this AutoHotKey implementation.
BalancedTernary(n){ k = 0 if abs(n)<2 return n=1?"+":n=0?"0":"-" if n<1 negative := true, n:= -1*n while !break { d := Mod(n, 3**(k+1)) / 3**k d := d=2?-1:d n := n - (d * 3**k) r := (d=-1?"-":d=1?"+":0) . r k++ if (n = 3**k) r := "+" . r , break := true } if negative { StringReplace, r, r, -,...
using System; using System.Text; using System.Collections.Generic; public class BalancedTernary { public static void Main() { BalancedTernary a = new BalancedTernary("+-0++0+"); System.Console.WriteLine("a: " + a + " = " + a.ToLong()); BalancedTernary b = new BalancedTernary(-436); System.Console.WriteLine("...
Change the programming language of this snippet from AutoHotKey to C++ without modifying what it does.
BalancedTernary(n){ k = 0 if abs(n)<2 return n=1?"+":n=0?"0":"-" if n<1 negative := true, n:= -1*n while !break { d := Mod(n, 3**(k+1)) / 3**k d := d=2?-1:d n := n - (d * 3**k) r := (d=-1?"-":d=1?"+":0) . r k++ if (n = 3**k) r := "+" . r , break := true } if negative { StringReplace, r, r, -,...
#include <iostream> #include <string> #include <climits> using namespace std; class BalancedTernary { protected: string value; int charToInt(char c) const { if (c == '0') return 0; return 44 - c; } string negate(string s) const { for (int i = 0; i < s.length(); ++i) { if (s[i] == '+') s[i] ...
Generate a C++ translation of this AutoHotKey snippet without changing its computational steps.
BalancedTernary(n){ k = 0 if abs(n)<2 return n=1?"+":n=0?"0":"-" if n<1 negative := true, n:= -1*n while !break { d := Mod(n, 3**(k+1)) / 3**k d := d=2?-1:d n := n - (d * 3**k) r := (d=-1?"-":d=1?"+":0) . r k++ if (n = 3**k) r := "+" . r , break := true } if negative { StringReplace, r, r, -,...
#include <iostream> #include <string> #include <climits> using namespace std; class BalancedTernary { protected: string value; int charToInt(char c) const { if (c == '0') return 0; return 44 - c; } string negate(string s) const { for (int i = 0; i < s.length(); ++i) { if (s[i] == '+') s[i] ...
Write the same algorithm in Java as shown in this AutoHotKey implementation.
BalancedTernary(n){ k = 0 if abs(n)<2 return n=1?"+":n=0?"0":"-" if n<1 negative := true, n:= -1*n while !break { d := Mod(n, 3**(k+1)) / 3**k d := d=2?-1:d n := n - (d * 3**k) r := (d=-1?"-":d=1?"+":0) . r k++ if (n = 3**k) r := "+" . r , break := true } if negative { StringReplace, r, r, -,...
public class BalancedTernary { public static void main(String[] args) { BTernary a=new BTernary("+-0++0+"); BTernary b=new BTernary(-436); BTernary c=new BTernary("+-++-"); System.out.println("a="+a.intValue()); System.out.println("b="+b.intValue()); System.out.println("c="+c.intValue()); System.o...
Convert this AutoHotKey block to Java, preserving its control flow and logic.
BalancedTernary(n){ k = 0 if abs(n)<2 return n=1?"+":n=0?"0":"-" if n<1 negative := true, n:= -1*n while !break { d := Mod(n, 3**(k+1)) / 3**k d := d=2?-1:d n := n - (d * 3**k) r := (d=-1?"-":d=1?"+":0) . r k++ if (n = 3**k) r := "+" . r , break := true } if negative { StringReplace, r, r, -,...
public class BalancedTernary { public static void main(String[] args) { BTernary a=new BTernary("+-0++0+"); BTernary b=new BTernary(-436); BTernary c=new BTernary("+-++-"); System.out.println("a="+a.intValue()); System.out.println("b="+b.intValue()); System.out.println("c="+c.intValue()); System.o...
Convert this AutoHotKey block to Python, preserving its control flow and logic.
BalancedTernary(n){ k = 0 if abs(n)<2 return n=1?"+":n=0?"0":"-" if n<1 negative := true, n:= -1*n while !break { d := Mod(n, 3**(k+1)) / 3**k d := d=2?-1:d n := n - (d * 3**k) r := (d=-1?"-":d=1?"+":0) . r k++ if (n = 3**k) r := "+" . r , break := true } if negative { StringReplace, r, r, -,...
class BalancedTernary: str2dig = {'+': 1, '-': -1, '0': 0} dig2str = {1: '+', -1: '-', 0: '0'} table = ((0, -1), (1, -1), (-1, 0), (0, 0), (1, 0), (-1, 1), (0, 1)) def __init__(self, inp): if isinstance(inp, str): self.digits = [BalancedTernary.str2dig[c] for c in reversed(...
Write the same algorithm in Python as shown in this AutoHotKey implementation.
BalancedTernary(n){ k = 0 if abs(n)<2 return n=1?"+":n=0?"0":"-" if n<1 negative := true, n:= -1*n while !break { d := Mod(n, 3**(k+1)) / 3**k d := d=2?-1:d n := n - (d * 3**k) r := (d=-1?"-":d=1?"+":0) . r k++ if (n = 3**k) r := "+" . r , break := true } if negative { StringReplace, r, r, -,...
class BalancedTernary: str2dig = {'+': 1, '-': -1, '0': 0} dig2str = {1: '+', -1: '-', 0: '0'} table = ((0, -1), (1, -1), (-1, 0), (0, 0), (1, 0), (-1, 1), (0, 1)) def __init__(self, inp): if isinstance(inp, str): self.digits = [BalancedTernary.str2dig[c] for c in reversed(...
Transform the following AutoHotKey implementation into VB, maintaining the same output and logic.
BalancedTernary(n){ k = 0 if abs(n)<2 return n=1?"+":n=0?"0":"-" if n<1 negative := true, n:= -1*n while !break { d := Mod(n, 3**(k+1)) / 3**k d := d=2?-1:d n := n - (d * 3**k) r := (d=-1?"-":d=1?"+":0) . r k++ if (n = 3**k) r := "+" . r , break := true } if negative { StringReplace, r, r, -,...
Imports System.Text Module Module1 Sub Main() Dim a As New BalancedTernary("+-0++0+") Console.WriteLine("a: {0} = {1}", a, a.ToLong) Dim b As New BalancedTernary(-436) Console.WriteLine("b: {0} = {1}", b, b.ToLong) Dim c As New BalancedTernary("+-++-") Console.WriteL...
Write the same code in VB as shown below in AutoHotKey.
BalancedTernary(n){ k = 0 if abs(n)<2 return n=1?"+":n=0?"0":"-" if n<1 negative := true, n:= -1*n while !break { d := Mod(n, 3**(k+1)) / 3**k d := d=2?-1:d n := n - (d * 3**k) r := (d=-1?"-":d=1?"+":0) . r k++ if (n = 3**k) r := "+" . r , break := true } if negative { StringReplace, r, r, -,...
Imports System.Text Module Module1 Sub Main() Dim a As New BalancedTernary("+-0++0+") Console.WriteLine("a: {0} = {1}", a, a.ToLong) Dim b As New BalancedTernary(-436) Console.WriteLine("b: {0} = {1}", b, b.ToLong) Dim c As New BalancedTernary("+-++-") Console.WriteL...
Change the following AutoHotKey code into Go without altering its purpose.
BalancedTernary(n){ k = 0 if abs(n)<2 return n=1?"+":n=0?"0":"-" if n<1 negative := true, n:= -1*n while !break { d := Mod(n, 3**(k+1)) / 3**k d := d=2?-1:d n := n - (d * 3**k) r := (d=-1?"-":d=1?"+":0) . r k++ if (n = 3**k) r := "+" . r , break := true } if negative { StringReplace, r, r, -,...
package main import ( "fmt" "strings" ) type bt []int8 func btString(s string) (*bt, bool) { s = strings.TrimLeft(s, "0") b := make(bt, len(s)) for i, last := 0, len(s)-1; i < len(s); i++ { switch s[i] { case '-': b[last-i] = -1 case '0': b...
Ensure the translated Go code behaves exactly like the original AutoHotKey snippet.
BalancedTernary(n){ k = 0 if abs(n)<2 return n=1?"+":n=0?"0":"-" if n<1 negative := true, n:= -1*n while !break { d := Mod(n, 3**(k+1)) / 3**k d := d=2?-1:d n := n - (d * 3**k) r := (d=-1?"-":d=1?"+":0) . r k++ if (n = 3**k) r := "+" . r , break := true } if negative { StringReplace, r, r, -,...
package main import ( "fmt" "strings" ) type bt []int8 func btString(s string) (*bt, bool) { s = strings.TrimLeft(s, "0") b := make(bt, len(s)) for i, last := 0, len(s)-1; i < len(s); i++ { switch s[i] { case '-': b[last-i] = -1 case '0': b...
Transform the following Common_Lisp implementation into C, maintaining the same output and logic.
(defun bt-integer (b) (reduce (lambda (x y) (+ x (* 3 y))) b :from-end t :initial-value 0)) (defun integer-bt (n) (if (zerop n) nil (case (mod n 3) (0 (cons 0 (integer-bt (/ n 3)))) (1 (cons 1 (integer-bt (floor n 3)))) (2 (cons -1 (integer-bt (floor (1+ n) 3))))))) (defun string-...
#include <stdio.h> #include <string.h> void reverse(char *p) { size_t len = strlen(p); char *r = p + len - 1; while (p < r) { *p ^= *r; *r ^= *p; *p++ ^= *r--; } } void to_bt(int n, char *b) { static char d[] = { '0', '+', '-' }; static int v[] = { 0, 1, -1 }; char...
Please provide an equivalent version of this Common_Lisp code in C.
(defun bt-integer (b) (reduce (lambda (x y) (+ x (* 3 y))) b :from-end t :initial-value 0)) (defun integer-bt (n) (if (zerop n) nil (case (mod n 3) (0 (cons 0 (integer-bt (/ n 3)))) (1 (cons 1 (integer-bt (floor n 3)))) (2 (cons -1 (integer-bt (floor (1+ n) 3))))))) (defun string-...
#include <stdio.h> #include <string.h> void reverse(char *p) { size_t len = strlen(p); char *r = p + len - 1; while (p < r) { *p ^= *r; *r ^= *p; *p++ ^= *r--; } } void to_bt(int n, char *b) { static char d[] = { '0', '+', '-' }; static int v[] = { 0, 1, -1 }; char...
Change the following Common_Lisp code into C# without altering its purpose.
(defun bt-integer (b) (reduce (lambda (x y) (+ x (* 3 y))) b :from-end t :initial-value 0)) (defun integer-bt (n) (if (zerop n) nil (case (mod n 3) (0 (cons 0 (integer-bt (/ n 3)))) (1 (cons 1 (integer-bt (floor n 3)))) (2 (cons -1 (integer-bt (floor (1+ n) 3))))))) (defun string-...
using System; using System.Text; using System.Collections.Generic; public class BalancedTernary { public static void Main() { BalancedTernary a = new BalancedTernary("+-0++0+"); System.Console.WriteLine("a: " + a + " = " + a.ToLong()); BalancedTernary b = new BalancedTernary(-436); System.Console.WriteLine("...
Translate the given Common_Lisp code snippet into C# without altering its behavior.
(defun bt-integer (b) (reduce (lambda (x y) (+ x (* 3 y))) b :from-end t :initial-value 0)) (defun integer-bt (n) (if (zerop n) nil (case (mod n 3) (0 (cons 0 (integer-bt (/ n 3)))) (1 (cons 1 (integer-bt (floor n 3)))) (2 (cons -1 (integer-bt (floor (1+ n) 3))))))) (defun string-...
using System; using System.Text; using System.Collections.Generic; public class BalancedTernary { public static void Main() { BalancedTernary a = new BalancedTernary("+-0++0+"); System.Console.WriteLine("a: " + a + " = " + a.ToLong()); BalancedTernary b = new BalancedTernary(-436); System.Console.WriteLine("...
Produce a functionally identical C++ code for the snippet given in Common_Lisp.
(defun bt-integer (b) (reduce (lambda (x y) (+ x (* 3 y))) b :from-end t :initial-value 0)) (defun integer-bt (n) (if (zerop n) nil (case (mod n 3) (0 (cons 0 (integer-bt (/ n 3)))) (1 (cons 1 (integer-bt (floor n 3)))) (2 (cons -1 (integer-bt (floor (1+ n) 3))))))) (defun string-...
#include <iostream> #include <string> #include <climits> using namespace std; class BalancedTernary { protected: string value; int charToInt(char c) const { if (c == '0') return 0; return 44 - c; } string negate(string s) const { for (int i = 0; i < s.length(); ++i) { if (s[i] == '+') s[i] ...
Write the same algorithm in C++ as shown in this Common_Lisp implementation.
(defun bt-integer (b) (reduce (lambda (x y) (+ x (* 3 y))) b :from-end t :initial-value 0)) (defun integer-bt (n) (if (zerop n) nil (case (mod n 3) (0 (cons 0 (integer-bt (/ n 3)))) (1 (cons 1 (integer-bt (floor n 3)))) (2 (cons -1 (integer-bt (floor (1+ n) 3))))))) (defun string-...
#include <iostream> #include <string> #include <climits> using namespace std; class BalancedTernary { protected: string value; int charToInt(char c) const { if (c == '0') return 0; return 44 - c; } string negate(string s) const { for (int i = 0; i < s.length(); ++i) { if (s[i] == '+') s[i] ...
Write the same code in Java as shown below in Common_Lisp.
(defun bt-integer (b) (reduce (lambda (x y) (+ x (* 3 y))) b :from-end t :initial-value 0)) (defun integer-bt (n) (if (zerop n) nil (case (mod n 3) (0 (cons 0 (integer-bt (/ n 3)))) (1 (cons 1 (integer-bt (floor n 3)))) (2 (cons -1 (integer-bt (floor (1+ n) 3))))))) (defun string-...
public class BalancedTernary { public static void main(String[] args) { BTernary a=new BTernary("+-0++0+"); BTernary b=new BTernary(-436); BTernary c=new BTernary("+-++-"); System.out.println("a="+a.intValue()); System.out.println("b="+b.intValue()); System.out.println("c="+c.intValue()); System.o...
Convert the following code from Common_Lisp to Java, ensuring the logic remains intact.
(defun bt-integer (b) (reduce (lambda (x y) (+ x (* 3 y))) b :from-end t :initial-value 0)) (defun integer-bt (n) (if (zerop n) nil (case (mod n 3) (0 (cons 0 (integer-bt (/ n 3)))) (1 (cons 1 (integer-bt (floor n 3)))) (2 (cons -1 (integer-bt (floor (1+ n) 3))))))) (defun string-...
public class BalancedTernary { public static void main(String[] args) { BTernary a=new BTernary("+-0++0+"); BTernary b=new BTernary(-436); BTernary c=new BTernary("+-++-"); System.out.println("a="+a.intValue()); System.out.println("b="+b.intValue()); System.out.println("c="+c.intValue()); System.o...
Write the same code in Python as shown below in Common_Lisp.
(defun bt-integer (b) (reduce (lambda (x y) (+ x (* 3 y))) b :from-end t :initial-value 0)) (defun integer-bt (n) (if (zerop n) nil (case (mod n 3) (0 (cons 0 (integer-bt (/ n 3)))) (1 (cons 1 (integer-bt (floor n 3)))) (2 (cons -1 (integer-bt (floor (1+ n) 3))))))) (defun string-...
class BalancedTernary: str2dig = {'+': 1, '-': -1, '0': 0} dig2str = {1: '+', -1: '-', 0: '0'} table = ((0, -1), (1, -1), (-1, 0), (0, 0), (1, 0), (-1, 1), (0, 1)) def __init__(self, inp): if isinstance(inp, str): self.digits = [BalancedTernary.str2dig[c] for c in reversed(...
Rewrite the snippet below in Python so it works the same as the original Common_Lisp code.
(defun bt-integer (b) (reduce (lambda (x y) (+ x (* 3 y))) b :from-end t :initial-value 0)) (defun integer-bt (n) (if (zerop n) nil (case (mod n 3) (0 (cons 0 (integer-bt (/ n 3)))) (1 (cons 1 (integer-bt (floor n 3)))) (2 (cons -1 (integer-bt (floor (1+ n) 3))))))) (defun string-...
class BalancedTernary: str2dig = {'+': 1, '-': -1, '0': 0} dig2str = {1: '+', -1: '-', 0: '0'} table = ((0, -1), (1, -1), (-1, 0), (0, 0), (1, 0), (-1, 1), (0, 1)) def __init__(self, inp): if isinstance(inp, str): self.digits = [BalancedTernary.str2dig[c] for c in reversed(...