Instruction stringlengths 45 106 | input_code stringlengths 1 13.7k | output_code stringlengths 1 13.7k |
|---|---|---|
Convert this REXX block to C#, preserving its control flow and logic. |
lims= 23 37 43 53 67 83
data= 95 21 94 12 99 4 70 75 83 93 52 80 57 5 53 86 65 17 92 83 71 61 54 58 47 ,
16 8 9 32 84 7 87 46 19 30 37 96 6 98 40 79 97 45 64 60 29 49 36 43 55
call lims lims; call bins data
call show 'the 1st set of bin counts for the specified data:'
... | using System;
public class Program
{
static void Main()
{
PrintBins(new [] { 23, 37, 43, 53, 67, 83 },
95,21,94,12,99,4,70,75,83,93,52,80,57,5,53,86,65,17,92,83,71,61,54,58,47,
16, 8, 9,32,84,7,87,46,19,30,37,96,6,98,40,79,97,45,64,60,29,49,36,43,55
);
Console.Wr... |
Translate this program into C# but keep the logic exactly as in REXX. |
lims= 23 37 43 53 67 83
data= 95 21 94 12 99 4 70 75 83 93 52 80 57 5 53 86 65 17 92 83 71 61 54 58 47 ,
16 8 9 32 84 7 87 46 19 30 37 96 6 98 40 79 97 45 64 60 29 49 36 43 55
call lims lims; call bins data
call show 'the 1st set of bin counts for the specified data:'
... | using System;
public class Program
{
static void Main()
{
PrintBins(new [] { 23, 37, 43, 53, 67, 83 },
95,21,94,12,99,4,70,75,83,93,52,80,57,5,53,86,65,17,92,83,71,61,54,58,47,
16, 8, 9,32,84,7,87,46,19,30,37,96,6,98,40,79,97,45,64,60,29,49,36,43,55
);
Console.Wr... |
Write the same code in C++ as shown below in REXX. |
lims= 23 37 43 53 67 83
data= 95 21 94 12 99 4 70 75 83 93 52 80 57 5 53 86 65 17 92 83 71 61 54 58 47 ,
16 8 9 32 84 7 87 46 19 30 37 96 6 98 40 79 97 45 64 60 29 49 36 43 55
call lims lims; call bins data
call show 'the 1st set of bin counts for the specified data:'
... | #include <algorithm>
#include <cassert>
#include <iomanip>
#include <iostream>
#include <vector>
std::vector<int> bins(const std::vector<int>& limits,
const std::vector<int>& data) {
std::vector<int> result(limits.size() + 1, 0);
for (int n : data) {
auto i = std::upper_bound(limi... |
Generate an equivalent C++ version of this REXX code. |
lims= 23 37 43 53 67 83
data= 95 21 94 12 99 4 70 75 83 93 52 80 57 5 53 86 65 17 92 83 71 61 54 58 47 ,
16 8 9 32 84 7 87 46 19 30 37 96 6 98 40 79 97 45 64 60 29 49 36 43 55
call lims lims; call bins data
call show 'the 1st set of bin counts for the specified data:'
... | #include <algorithm>
#include <cassert>
#include <iomanip>
#include <iostream>
#include <vector>
std::vector<int> bins(const std::vector<int>& limits,
const std::vector<int>& data) {
std::vector<int> result(limits.size() + 1, 0);
for (int n : data) {
auto i = std::upper_bound(limi... |
Preserve the algorithm and functionality while converting the code from REXX to Java. |
lims= 23 37 43 53 67 83
data= 95 21 94 12 99 4 70 75 83 93 52 80 57 5 53 86 65 17 92 83 71 61 54 58 47 ,
16 8 9 32 84 7 87 46 19 30 37 96 6 98 40 79 97 45 64 60 29 49 36 43 55
call lims lims; call bins data
call show 'the 1st set of bin counts for the specified data:'
... | import java.util.Arrays;
import java.util.Collections;
import java.util.List;
public class Bins {
public static <T extends Comparable<? super T>> int[] bins(
List<? extends T> limits, Iterable<? extends T> data) {
int[] result = new int[limits.size() + 1];
for (T n : data) {
... |
Convert this REXX block to Java, preserving its control flow and logic. |
lims= 23 37 43 53 67 83
data= 95 21 94 12 99 4 70 75 83 93 52 80 57 5 53 86 65 17 92 83 71 61 54 58 47 ,
16 8 9 32 84 7 87 46 19 30 37 96 6 98 40 79 97 45 64 60 29 49 36 43 55
call lims lims; call bins data
call show 'the 1st set of bin counts for the specified data:'
... | import java.util.Arrays;
import java.util.Collections;
import java.util.List;
public class Bins {
public static <T extends Comparable<? super T>> int[] bins(
List<? extends T> limits, Iterable<? extends T> data) {
int[] result = new int[limits.size() + 1];
for (T n : data) {
... |
Translate this program into Python but keep the logic exactly as in REXX. |
lims= 23 37 43 53 67 83
data= 95 21 94 12 99 4 70 75 83 93 52 80 57 5 53 86 65 17 92 83 71 61 54 58 47 ,
16 8 9 32 84 7 87 46 19 30 37 96 6 98 40 79 97 45 64 60 29 49 36 43 55
call lims lims; call bins data
call show 'the 1st set of bin counts for the specified data:'
... | from bisect import bisect_right
def bin_it(limits: list, data: list) -> list:
"Bin data according to (ascending) limits."
bins = [0] * (len(limits) + 1)
for d in data:
bins[bisect_right(limits, d)] += 1
return bins
def bin_print(limits: list, bins: list) -> list:
print(f" < ... |
Generate an equivalent Python version of this REXX code. |
lims= 23 37 43 53 67 83
data= 95 21 94 12 99 4 70 75 83 93 52 80 57 5 53 86 65 17 92 83 71 61 54 58 47 ,
16 8 9 32 84 7 87 46 19 30 37 96 6 98 40 79 97 45 64 60 29 49 36 43 55
call lims lims; call bins data
call show 'the 1st set of bin counts for the specified data:'
... | from bisect import bisect_right
def bin_it(limits: list, data: list) -> list:
"Bin data according to (ascending) limits."
bins = [0] * (len(limits) + 1)
for d in data:
bins[bisect_right(limits, d)] += 1
return bins
def bin_print(limits: list, bins: list) -> list:
print(f" < ... |
Keep all operations the same but rewrite the snippet in Go. |
lims= 23 37 43 53 67 83
data= 95 21 94 12 99 4 70 75 83 93 52 80 57 5 53 86 65 17 92 83 71 61 54 58 47 ,
16 8 9 32 84 7 87 46 19 30 37 96 6 98 40 79 97 45 64 60 29 49 36 43 55
call lims lims; call bins data
call show 'the 1st set of bin counts for the specified data:'
... | package main
import (
"fmt"
"sort"
)
func getBins(limits, data []int) []int {
n := len(limits)
bins := make([]int, n+1)
for _, d := range data {
index := sort.SearchInts(limits, d)
if index < len(limits) && d == limits[index] {
index++
}
bins[index]++
... |
Convert this REXX snippet to Go and keep its semantics consistent. |
lims= 23 37 43 53 67 83
data= 95 21 94 12 99 4 70 75 83 93 52 80 57 5 53 86 65 17 92 83 71 61 54 58 47 ,
16 8 9 32 84 7 87 46 19 30 37 96 6 98 40 79 97 45 64 60 29 49 36 43 55
call lims lims; call bins data
call show 'the 1st set of bin counts for the specified data:'
... | package main
import (
"fmt"
"sort"
)
func getBins(limits, data []int) []int {
n := len(limits)
bins := make([]int, n+1)
for _, d := range data {
index := sort.SearchInts(limits, d)
if index < len(limits) && d == limits[index] {
index++
}
bins[index]++
... |
Ensure the translated C code behaves exactly like the original Ruby snippet. | Test = Struct.new(:limits, :data)
tests = Test.new( [23, 37, 43, 53, 67, 83],
[95,21,94,12,99,4,70,75,83,93,52,80,57,5,53,86,65,17,92,83,71,61,54,58,47,
16, 8, 9,32,84,7,87,46,19,30,37,96,6,98,40,79,97,45,64,60,29,49,36,43,55]),
Test.new( [14, 18, 249, 312, 389, 392, 513, 59... | #include <stdio.h>
#include <stdlib.h>
size_t upper_bound(const int* array, size_t n, int value) {
size_t start = 0;
while (n > 0) {
size_t step = n / 2;
size_t index = start + step;
if (value >= array[index]) {
start = index + 1;
n -= step + 1;
} else {
... |
Change the following Ruby code into C without altering its purpose. | Test = Struct.new(:limits, :data)
tests = Test.new( [23, 37, 43, 53, 67, 83],
[95,21,94,12,99,4,70,75,83,93,52,80,57,5,53,86,65,17,92,83,71,61,54,58,47,
16, 8, 9,32,84,7,87,46,19,30,37,96,6,98,40,79,97,45,64,60,29,49,36,43,55]),
Test.new( [14, 18, 249, 312, 389, 392, 513, 59... | #include <stdio.h>
#include <stdlib.h>
size_t upper_bound(const int* array, size_t n, int value) {
size_t start = 0;
while (n > 0) {
size_t step = n / 2;
size_t index = start + step;
if (value >= array[index]) {
start = index + 1;
n -= step + 1;
} else {
... |
Convert this Ruby snippet to C# and keep its semantics consistent. | Test = Struct.new(:limits, :data)
tests = Test.new( [23, 37, 43, 53, 67, 83],
[95,21,94,12,99,4,70,75,83,93,52,80,57,5,53,86,65,17,92,83,71,61,54,58,47,
16, 8, 9,32,84,7,87,46,19,30,37,96,6,98,40,79,97,45,64,60,29,49,36,43,55]),
Test.new( [14, 18, 249, 312, 389, 392, 513, 59... | using System;
public class Program
{
static void Main()
{
PrintBins(new [] { 23, 37, 43, 53, 67, 83 },
95,21,94,12,99,4,70,75,83,93,52,80,57,5,53,86,65,17,92,83,71,61,54,58,47,
16, 8, 9,32,84,7,87,46,19,30,37,96,6,98,40,79,97,45,64,60,29,49,36,43,55
);
Console.Wr... |
Transform the following Ruby implementation into C#, maintaining the same output and logic. | Test = Struct.new(:limits, :data)
tests = Test.new( [23, 37, 43, 53, 67, 83],
[95,21,94,12,99,4,70,75,83,93,52,80,57,5,53,86,65,17,92,83,71,61,54,58,47,
16, 8, 9,32,84,7,87,46,19,30,37,96,6,98,40,79,97,45,64,60,29,49,36,43,55]),
Test.new( [14, 18, 249, 312, 389, 392, 513, 59... | using System;
public class Program
{
static void Main()
{
PrintBins(new [] { 23, 37, 43, 53, 67, 83 },
95,21,94,12,99,4,70,75,83,93,52,80,57,5,53,86,65,17,92,83,71,61,54,58,47,
16, 8, 9,32,84,7,87,46,19,30,37,96,6,98,40,79,97,45,64,60,29,49,36,43,55
);
Console.Wr... |
Preserve the algorithm and functionality while converting the code from Ruby to C++. | Test = Struct.new(:limits, :data)
tests = Test.new( [23, 37, 43, 53, 67, 83],
[95,21,94,12,99,4,70,75,83,93,52,80,57,5,53,86,65,17,92,83,71,61,54,58,47,
16, 8, 9,32,84,7,87,46,19,30,37,96,6,98,40,79,97,45,64,60,29,49,36,43,55]),
Test.new( [14, 18, 249, 312, 389, 392, 513, 59... | #include <algorithm>
#include <cassert>
#include <iomanip>
#include <iostream>
#include <vector>
std::vector<int> bins(const std::vector<int>& limits,
const std::vector<int>& data) {
std::vector<int> result(limits.size() + 1, 0);
for (int n : data) {
auto i = std::upper_bound(limi... |
Convert this Ruby block to C++, preserving its control flow and logic. | Test = Struct.new(:limits, :data)
tests = Test.new( [23, 37, 43, 53, 67, 83],
[95,21,94,12,99,4,70,75,83,93,52,80,57,5,53,86,65,17,92,83,71,61,54,58,47,
16, 8, 9,32,84,7,87,46,19,30,37,96,6,98,40,79,97,45,64,60,29,49,36,43,55]),
Test.new( [14, 18, 249, 312, 389, 392, 513, 59... | #include <algorithm>
#include <cassert>
#include <iomanip>
#include <iostream>
#include <vector>
std::vector<int> bins(const std::vector<int>& limits,
const std::vector<int>& data) {
std::vector<int> result(limits.size() + 1, 0);
for (int n : data) {
auto i = std::upper_bound(limi... |
Port the following code from Ruby to Java with equivalent syntax and logic. | Test = Struct.new(:limits, :data)
tests = Test.new( [23, 37, 43, 53, 67, 83],
[95,21,94,12,99,4,70,75,83,93,52,80,57,5,53,86,65,17,92,83,71,61,54,58,47,
16, 8, 9,32,84,7,87,46,19,30,37,96,6,98,40,79,97,45,64,60,29,49,36,43,55]),
Test.new( [14, 18, 249, 312, 389, 392, 513, 59... | import java.util.Arrays;
import java.util.Collections;
import java.util.List;
public class Bins {
public static <T extends Comparable<? super T>> int[] bins(
List<? extends T> limits, Iterable<? extends T> data) {
int[] result = new int[limits.size() + 1];
for (T n : data) {
... |
Translate the given Ruby code snippet into Java without altering its behavior. | Test = Struct.new(:limits, :data)
tests = Test.new( [23, 37, 43, 53, 67, 83],
[95,21,94,12,99,4,70,75,83,93,52,80,57,5,53,86,65,17,92,83,71,61,54,58,47,
16, 8, 9,32,84,7,87,46,19,30,37,96,6,98,40,79,97,45,64,60,29,49,36,43,55]),
Test.new( [14, 18, 249, 312, 389, 392, 513, 59... | import java.util.Arrays;
import java.util.Collections;
import java.util.List;
public class Bins {
public static <T extends Comparable<? super T>> int[] bins(
List<? extends T> limits, Iterable<? extends T> data) {
int[] result = new int[limits.size() + 1];
for (T n : data) {
... |
Write a version of this Ruby function in Python with identical behavior. | Test = Struct.new(:limits, :data)
tests = Test.new( [23, 37, 43, 53, 67, 83],
[95,21,94,12,99,4,70,75,83,93,52,80,57,5,53,86,65,17,92,83,71,61,54,58,47,
16, 8, 9,32,84,7,87,46,19,30,37,96,6,98,40,79,97,45,64,60,29,49,36,43,55]),
Test.new( [14, 18, 249, 312, 389, 392, 513, 59... | from bisect import bisect_right
def bin_it(limits: list, data: list) -> list:
"Bin data according to (ascending) limits."
bins = [0] * (len(limits) + 1)
for d in data:
bins[bisect_right(limits, d)] += 1
return bins
def bin_print(limits: list, bins: list) -> list:
print(f" < ... |
Translate this program into Python but keep the logic exactly as in Ruby. | Test = Struct.new(:limits, :data)
tests = Test.new( [23, 37, 43, 53, 67, 83],
[95,21,94,12,99,4,70,75,83,93,52,80,57,5,53,86,65,17,92,83,71,61,54,58,47,
16, 8, 9,32,84,7,87,46,19,30,37,96,6,98,40,79,97,45,64,60,29,49,36,43,55]),
Test.new( [14, 18, 249, 312, 389, 392, 513, 59... | from bisect import bisect_right
def bin_it(limits: list, data: list) -> list:
"Bin data according to (ascending) limits."
bins = [0] * (len(limits) + 1)
for d in data:
bins[bisect_right(limits, d)] += 1
return bins
def bin_print(limits: list, bins: list) -> list:
print(f" < ... |
Write a version of this Ruby function in Go with identical behavior. | Test = Struct.new(:limits, :data)
tests = Test.new( [23, 37, 43, 53, 67, 83],
[95,21,94,12,99,4,70,75,83,93,52,80,57,5,53,86,65,17,92,83,71,61,54,58,47,
16, 8, 9,32,84,7,87,46,19,30,37,96,6,98,40,79,97,45,64,60,29,49,36,43,55]),
Test.new( [14, 18, 249, 312, 389, 392, 513, 59... | package main
import (
"fmt"
"sort"
)
func getBins(limits, data []int) []int {
n := len(limits)
bins := make([]int, n+1)
for _, d := range data {
index := sort.SearchInts(limits, d)
if index < len(limits) && d == limits[index] {
index++
}
bins[index]++
... |
Change the following Tcl code into C without altering its purpose. | namespace path {::tcl::mathop ::tcl::mathfunc}
proc lincr {_list index} {
upvar $_list list
lset list $index [+ [lindex $list $index] 1]
}
proc distribute_bins {binlims data} {
set bins [lrepeat [+ [llength $binlims] 1] 0]
foreach val $data {
lincr bins [+ [lsearch -exact -integer -sorted -bisect $binlims $val... | #include <stdio.h>
#include <stdlib.h>
size_t upper_bound(const int* array, size_t n, int value) {
size_t start = 0;
while (n > 0) {
size_t step = n / 2;
size_t index = start + step;
if (value >= array[index]) {
start = index + 1;
n -= step + 1;
} else {
... |
Ensure the translated C code behaves exactly like the original Tcl snippet. | namespace path {::tcl::mathop ::tcl::mathfunc}
proc lincr {_list index} {
upvar $_list list
lset list $index [+ [lindex $list $index] 1]
}
proc distribute_bins {binlims data} {
set bins [lrepeat [+ [llength $binlims] 1] 0]
foreach val $data {
lincr bins [+ [lsearch -exact -integer -sorted -bisect $binlims $val... | #include <stdio.h>
#include <stdlib.h>
size_t upper_bound(const int* array, size_t n, int value) {
size_t start = 0;
while (n > 0) {
size_t step = n / 2;
size_t index = start + step;
if (value >= array[index]) {
start = index + 1;
n -= step + 1;
} else {
... |
Maintain the same structure and functionality when rewriting this code in C#. | namespace path {::tcl::mathop ::tcl::mathfunc}
proc lincr {_list index} {
upvar $_list list
lset list $index [+ [lindex $list $index] 1]
}
proc distribute_bins {binlims data} {
set bins [lrepeat [+ [llength $binlims] 1] 0]
foreach val $data {
lincr bins [+ [lsearch -exact -integer -sorted -bisect $binlims $val... | using System;
public class Program
{
static void Main()
{
PrintBins(new [] { 23, 37, 43, 53, 67, 83 },
95,21,94,12,99,4,70,75,83,93,52,80,57,5,53,86,65,17,92,83,71,61,54,58,47,
16, 8, 9,32,84,7,87,46,19,30,37,96,6,98,40,79,97,45,64,60,29,49,36,43,55
);
Console.Wr... |
Rewrite the snippet below in C# so it works the same as the original Tcl code. | namespace path {::tcl::mathop ::tcl::mathfunc}
proc lincr {_list index} {
upvar $_list list
lset list $index [+ [lindex $list $index] 1]
}
proc distribute_bins {binlims data} {
set bins [lrepeat [+ [llength $binlims] 1] 0]
foreach val $data {
lincr bins [+ [lsearch -exact -integer -sorted -bisect $binlims $val... | using System;
public class Program
{
static void Main()
{
PrintBins(new [] { 23, 37, 43, 53, 67, 83 },
95,21,94,12,99,4,70,75,83,93,52,80,57,5,53,86,65,17,92,83,71,61,54,58,47,
16, 8, 9,32,84,7,87,46,19,30,37,96,6,98,40,79,97,45,64,60,29,49,36,43,55
);
Console.Wr... |
Change the following Tcl code into C++ without altering its purpose. | namespace path {::tcl::mathop ::tcl::mathfunc}
proc lincr {_list index} {
upvar $_list list
lset list $index [+ [lindex $list $index] 1]
}
proc distribute_bins {binlims data} {
set bins [lrepeat [+ [llength $binlims] 1] 0]
foreach val $data {
lincr bins [+ [lsearch -exact -integer -sorted -bisect $binlims $val... | #include <algorithm>
#include <cassert>
#include <iomanip>
#include <iostream>
#include <vector>
std::vector<int> bins(const std::vector<int>& limits,
const std::vector<int>& data) {
std::vector<int> result(limits.size() + 1, 0);
for (int n : data) {
auto i = std::upper_bound(limi... |
Convert this Tcl block to C++, preserving its control flow and logic. | namespace path {::tcl::mathop ::tcl::mathfunc}
proc lincr {_list index} {
upvar $_list list
lset list $index [+ [lindex $list $index] 1]
}
proc distribute_bins {binlims data} {
set bins [lrepeat [+ [llength $binlims] 1] 0]
foreach val $data {
lincr bins [+ [lsearch -exact -integer -sorted -bisect $binlims $val... | #include <algorithm>
#include <cassert>
#include <iomanip>
#include <iostream>
#include <vector>
std::vector<int> bins(const std::vector<int>& limits,
const std::vector<int>& data) {
std::vector<int> result(limits.size() + 1, 0);
for (int n : data) {
auto i = std::upper_bound(limi... |
Translate the given Tcl code snippet into Java without altering its behavior. | namespace path {::tcl::mathop ::tcl::mathfunc}
proc lincr {_list index} {
upvar $_list list
lset list $index [+ [lindex $list $index] 1]
}
proc distribute_bins {binlims data} {
set bins [lrepeat [+ [llength $binlims] 1] 0]
foreach val $data {
lincr bins [+ [lsearch -exact -integer -sorted -bisect $binlims $val... | import java.util.Arrays;
import java.util.Collections;
import java.util.List;
public class Bins {
public static <T extends Comparable<? super T>> int[] bins(
List<? extends T> limits, Iterable<? extends T> data) {
int[] result = new int[limits.size() + 1];
for (T n : data) {
... |
Can you help me rewrite this code in Java instead of Tcl, keeping it the same logically? | namespace path {::tcl::mathop ::tcl::mathfunc}
proc lincr {_list index} {
upvar $_list list
lset list $index [+ [lindex $list $index] 1]
}
proc distribute_bins {binlims data} {
set bins [lrepeat [+ [llength $binlims] 1] 0]
foreach val $data {
lincr bins [+ [lsearch -exact -integer -sorted -bisect $binlims $val... | import java.util.Arrays;
import java.util.Collections;
import java.util.List;
public class Bins {
public static <T extends Comparable<? super T>> int[] bins(
List<? extends T> limits, Iterable<? extends T> data) {
int[] result = new int[limits.size() + 1];
for (T n : data) {
... |
Preserve the algorithm and functionality while converting the code from Tcl to Python. | namespace path {::tcl::mathop ::tcl::mathfunc}
proc lincr {_list index} {
upvar $_list list
lset list $index [+ [lindex $list $index] 1]
}
proc distribute_bins {binlims data} {
set bins [lrepeat [+ [llength $binlims] 1] 0]
foreach val $data {
lincr bins [+ [lsearch -exact -integer -sorted -bisect $binlims $val... | from bisect import bisect_right
def bin_it(limits: list, data: list) -> list:
"Bin data according to (ascending) limits."
bins = [0] * (len(limits) + 1)
for d in data:
bins[bisect_right(limits, d)] += 1
return bins
def bin_print(limits: list, bins: list) -> list:
print(f" < ... |
Generate an equivalent Python version of this Tcl code. | namespace path {::tcl::mathop ::tcl::mathfunc}
proc lincr {_list index} {
upvar $_list list
lset list $index [+ [lindex $list $index] 1]
}
proc distribute_bins {binlims data} {
set bins [lrepeat [+ [llength $binlims] 1] 0]
foreach val $data {
lincr bins [+ [lsearch -exact -integer -sorted -bisect $binlims $val... | from bisect import bisect_right
def bin_it(limits: list, data: list) -> list:
"Bin data according to (ascending) limits."
bins = [0] * (len(limits) + 1)
for d in data:
bins[bisect_right(limits, d)] += 1
return bins
def bin_print(limits: list, bins: list) -> list:
print(f" < ... |
Write the same algorithm in Go as shown in this Tcl implementation. | namespace path {::tcl::mathop ::tcl::mathfunc}
proc lincr {_list index} {
upvar $_list list
lset list $index [+ [lindex $list $index] 1]
}
proc distribute_bins {binlims data} {
set bins [lrepeat [+ [llength $binlims] 1] 0]
foreach val $data {
lincr bins [+ [lsearch -exact -integer -sorted -bisect $binlims $val... | package main
import (
"fmt"
"sort"
)
func getBins(limits, data []int) []int {
n := len(limits)
bins := make([]int, n+1)
for _, d := range data {
index := sort.SearchInts(limits, d)
if index < len(limits) && d == limits[index] {
index++
}
bins[index]++
... |
Convert the following code from Tcl to Go, ensuring the logic remains intact. | namespace path {::tcl::mathop ::tcl::mathfunc}
proc lincr {_list index} {
upvar $_list list
lset list $index [+ [lindex $list $index] 1]
}
proc distribute_bins {binlims data} {
set bins [lrepeat [+ [llength $binlims] 1] 0]
foreach val $data {
lincr bins [+ [lsearch -exact -integer -sorted -bisect $binlims $val... | package main
import (
"fmt"
"sort"
)
func getBins(limits, data []int) []int {
n := len(limits)
bins := make([]int, n+1)
for _, d := range data {
index := sort.SearchInts(limits, d)
if index < len(limits) && d == limits[index] {
index++
}
bins[index]++
... |
Produce a functionally identical Rust code for the snippet given in C. | #include <stdio.h>
#include <stdlib.h>
size_t upper_bound(const int* array, size_t n, int value) {
size_t start = 0;
while (n > 0) {
size_t step = n / 2;
size_t index = start + step;
if (value >= array[index]) {
start = index + 1;
n -= step + 1;
} else {
... | fn make_bins(limits: &Vec<usize>, data: &Vec<usize>) -> Vec<Vec<usize>> {
let mut bins: Vec<Vec<usize>> = Vec::with_capacity(limits.len() + 1);
for _ in 0..=limits.len() {bins.push(Vec::new());}
limits.iter().enumerate().for_each(|(idx, limit)| {
data.iter().for_each(|elem| {
if id... |
Rewrite this program in Rust while keeping its functionality equivalent to the C version. | #include <stdio.h>
#include <stdlib.h>
size_t upper_bound(const int* array, size_t n, int value) {
size_t start = 0;
while (n > 0) {
size_t step = n / 2;
size_t index = start + step;
if (value >= array[index]) {
start = index + 1;
n -= step + 1;
} else {
... | fn make_bins(limits: &Vec<usize>, data: &Vec<usize>) -> Vec<Vec<usize>> {
let mut bins: Vec<Vec<usize>> = Vec::with_capacity(limits.len() + 1);
for _ in 0..=limits.len() {bins.push(Vec::new());}
limits.iter().enumerate().for_each(|(idx, limit)| {
data.iter().for_each(|elem| {
if id... |
Rewrite the snippet below in Rust so it works the same as the original C++ code. | #include <algorithm>
#include <cassert>
#include <iomanip>
#include <iostream>
#include <vector>
std::vector<int> bins(const std::vector<int>& limits,
const std::vector<int>& data) {
std::vector<int> result(limits.size() + 1, 0);
for (int n : data) {
auto i = std::upper_bound(limi... | fn make_bins(limits: &Vec<usize>, data: &Vec<usize>) -> Vec<Vec<usize>> {
let mut bins: Vec<Vec<usize>> = Vec::with_capacity(limits.len() + 1);
for _ in 0..=limits.len() {bins.push(Vec::new());}
limits.iter().enumerate().for_each(|(idx, limit)| {
data.iter().for_each(|elem| {
if id... |
Port the provided C# code into Rust while preserving the original functionality. | using System;
public class Program
{
static void Main()
{
PrintBins(new [] { 23, 37, 43, 53, 67, 83 },
95,21,94,12,99,4,70,75,83,93,52,80,57,5,53,86,65,17,92,83,71,61,54,58,47,
16, 8, 9,32,84,7,87,46,19,30,37,96,6,98,40,79,97,45,64,60,29,49,36,43,55
);
Console.Wr... | fn make_bins(limits: &Vec<usize>, data: &Vec<usize>) -> Vec<Vec<usize>> {
let mut bins: Vec<Vec<usize>> = Vec::with_capacity(limits.len() + 1);
for _ in 0..=limits.len() {bins.push(Vec::new());}
limits.iter().enumerate().for_each(|(idx, limit)| {
data.iter().for_each(|elem| {
if id... |
Generate a Rust translation of this C# snippet without changing its computational steps. | using System;
public class Program
{
static void Main()
{
PrintBins(new [] { 23, 37, 43, 53, 67, 83 },
95,21,94,12,99,4,70,75,83,93,52,80,57,5,53,86,65,17,92,83,71,61,54,58,47,
16, 8, 9,32,84,7,87,46,19,30,37,96,6,98,40,79,97,45,64,60,29,49,36,43,55
);
Console.Wr... | fn make_bins(limits: &Vec<usize>, data: &Vec<usize>) -> Vec<Vec<usize>> {
let mut bins: Vec<Vec<usize>> = Vec::with_capacity(limits.len() + 1);
for _ in 0..=limits.len() {bins.push(Vec::new());}
limits.iter().enumerate().for_each(|(idx, limit)| {
data.iter().for_each(|elem| {
if id... |
Can you help me rewrite this code in Rust instead of Java, keeping it the same logically? | import java.util.Arrays;
import java.util.Collections;
import java.util.List;
public class Bins {
public static <T extends Comparable<? super T>> int[] bins(
List<? extends T> limits, Iterable<? extends T> data) {
int[] result = new int[limits.size() + 1];
for (T n : data) {
... | fn make_bins(limits: &Vec<usize>, data: &Vec<usize>) -> Vec<Vec<usize>> {
let mut bins: Vec<Vec<usize>> = Vec::with_capacity(limits.len() + 1);
for _ in 0..=limits.len() {bins.push(Vec::new());}
limits.iter().enumerate().for_each(|(idx, limit)| {
data.iter().for_each(|elem| {
if id... |
Port the following code from Go to Rust with equivalent syntax and logic. | package main
import (
"fmt"
"sort"
)
func getBins(limits, data []int) []int {
n := len(limits)
bins := make([]int, n+1)
for _, d := range data {
index := sort.SearchInts(limits, d)
if index < len(limits) && d == limits[index] {
index++
}
bins[index]++
... | fn make_bins(limits: &Vec<usize>, data: &Vec<usize>) -> Vec<Vec<usize>> {
let mut bins: Vec<Vec<usize>> = Vec::with_capacity(limits.len() + 1);
for _ in 0..=limits.len() {bins.push(Vec::new());}
limits.iter().enumerate().for_each(|(idx, limit)| {
data.iter().for_each(|elem| {
if id... |
Keep all operations the same but rewrite the snippet in Rust. | package main
import (
"fmt"
"sort"
)
func getBins(limits, data []int) []int {
n := len(limits)
bins := make([]int, n+1)
for _, d := range data {
index := sort.SearchInts(limits, d)
if index < len(limits) && d == limits[index] {
index++
}
bins[index]++
... | fn make_bins(limits: &Vec<usize>, data: &Vec<usize>) -> Vec<Vec<usize>> {
let mut bins: Vec<Vec<usize>> = Vec::with_capacity(limits.len() + 1);
for _ in 0..=limits.len() {bins.push(Vec::new());}
limits.iter().enumerate().for_each(|(idx, limit)| {
data.iter().for_each(|elem| {
if id... |
Convert the following code from Rust to Python, ensuring the logic remains intact. | fn make_bins(limits: &Vec<usize>, data: &Vec<usize>) -> Vec<Vec<usize>> {
let mut bins: Vec<Vec<usize>> = Vec::with_capacity(limits.len() + 1);
for _ in 0..=limits.len() {bins.push(Vec::new());}
limits.iter().enumerate().for_each(|(idx, limit)| {
data.iter().for_each(|elem| {
if id... | from bisect import bisect_right
def bin_it(limits: list, data: list) -> list:
"Bin data according to (ascending) limits."
bins = [0] * (len(limits) + 1)
for d in data:
bins[bisect_right(limits, d)] += 1
return bins
def bin_print(limits: list, bins: list) -> list:
print(f" < ... |
Translate the given C++ code snippet into Rust without altering its behavior. | #include <algorithm>
#include <cassert>
#include <iomanip>
#include <iostream>
#include <vector>
std::vector<int> bins(const std::vector<int>& limits,
const std::vector<int>& data) {
std::vector<int> result(limits.size() + 1, 0);
for (int n : data) {
auto i = std::upper_bound(limi... | fn make_bins(limits: &Vec<usize>, data: &Vec<usize>) -> Vec<Vec<usize>> {
let mut bins: Vec<Vec<usize>> = Vec::with_capacity(limits.len() + 1);
for _ in 0..=limits.len() {bins.push(Vec::new());}
limits.iter().enumerate().for_each(|(idx, limit)| {
data.iter().for_each(|elem| {
if id... |
Produce a functionally identical Rust code for the snippet given in Java. | import java.util.Arrays;
import java.util.Collections;
import java.util.List;
public class Bins {
public static <T extends Comparable<? super T>> int[] bins(
List<? extends T> limits, Iterable<? extends T> data) {
int[] result = new int[limits.size() + 1];
for (T n : data) {
... | fn make_bins(limits: &Vec<usize>, data: &Vec<usize>) -> Vec<Vec<usize>> {
let mut bins: Vec<Vec<usize>> = Vec::with_capacity(limits.len() + 1);
for _ in 0..=limits.len() {bins.push(Vec::new());}
limits.iter().enumerate().for_each(|(idx, limit)| {
data.iter().for_each(|elem| {
if id... |
Preserve the algorithm and functionality while converting the code from Rust to Python. | fn make_bins(limits: &Vec<usize>, data: &Vec<usize>) -> Vec<Vec<usize>> {
let mut bins: Vec<Vec<usize>> = Vec::with_capacity(limits.len() + 1);
for _ in 0..=limits.len() {bins.push(Vec::new());}
limits.iter().enumerate().for_each(|(idx, limit)| {
data.iter().for_each(|elem| {
if id... | from bisect import bisect_right
def bin_it(limits: list, data: list) -> list:
"Bin data according to (ascending) limits."
bins = [0] * (len(limits) + 1)
for d in data:
bins[bisect_right(limits, d)] += 1
return bins
def bin_print(limits: list, bins: list) -> list:
print(f" < ... |
Transform the following Ada implementation into C#, maintaining the same output and logic. | with Ada.Text_IO;
procedure Department_Numbers is
use Ada.Text_IO;
begin
Put_Line (" P S F");
for Police in 2 .. 6 loop
for Sanitation in 1 .. 7 loop
for Fire in 1 .. 7 loop
if
Police mod 2 = 0 and
Police + Sanitation + Fire = 12 and
... | using System;
public class Program
{
public static void Main() {
for (int p = 2; p <= 7; p+=2) {
for (int s = 1; s <= 7; s++) {
int f = 12 - p - s;
if (s >= f) break;
if (f > 7) continue;
if (s == p || f == p) continue;
... |
Translate the given Ada code snippet into C# without altering its behavior. | with Ada.Text_IO;
procedure Department_Numbers is
use Ada.Text_IO;
begin
Put_Line (" P S F");
for Police in 2 .. 6 loop
for Sanitation in 1 .. 7 loop
for Fire in 1 .. 7 loop
if
Police mod 2 = 0 and
Police + Sanitation + Fire = 12 and
... | using System;
public class Program
{
public static void Main() {
for (int p = 2; p <= 7; p+=2) {
for (int s = 1; s <= 7; s++) {
int f = 12 - p - s;
if (s >= f) break;
if (f > 7) continue;
if (s == p || f == p) continue;
... |
Convert this Ada snippet to C and keep its semantics consistent. | with Ada.Text_IO;
procedure Department_Numbers is
use Ada.Text_IO;
begin
Put_Line (" P S F");
for Police in 2 .. 6 loop
for Sanitation in 1 .. 7 loop
for Fire in 1 .. 7 loop
if
Police mod 2 = 0 and
Police + Sanitation + Fire = 12 and
... | #include<stdio.h>
int main()
{
int police,sanitation,fire;
printf("Police Sanitation Fire\n");
printf("----------------------------------");
for(police=2;police<=6;police+=2){
for(sanitation=1;sanitation<=7;sanitation++){
for(fire=1;fire<=7;fire++){
if(police!=sanitation && sanitation!=fir... |
Convert this Ada block to C, preserving its control flow and logic. | with Ada.Text_IO;
procedure Department_Numbers is
use Ada.Text_IO;
begin
Put_Line (" P S F");
for Police in 2 .. 6 loop
for Sanitation in 1 .. 7 loop
for Fire in 1 .. 7 loop
if
Police mod 2 = 0 and
Police + Sanitation + Fire = 12 and
... | #include<stdio.h>
int main()
{
int police,sanitation,fire;
printf("Police Sanitation Fire\n");
printf("----------------------------------");
for(police=2;police<=6;police+=2){
for(sanitation=1;sanitation<=7;sanitation++){
for(fire=1;fire<=7;fire++){
if(police!=sanitation && sanitation!=fir... |
Convert this Ada block to C++, preserving its control flow and logic. | with Ada.Text_IO;
procedure Department_Numbers is
use Ada.Text_IO;
begin
Put_Line (" P S F");
for Police in 2 .. 6 loop
for Sanitation in 1 .. 7 loop
for Fire in 1 .. 7 loop
if
Police mod 2 = 0 and
Police + Sanitation + Fire = 12 and
... | #include <iostream>
#include <iomanip>
int main( int argc, char* argv[] ) {
int sol = 1;
std::cout << "\t\tFIRE\t\tPOLICE\t\tSANITATION\n";
for( int f = 1; f < 8; f++ ) {
for( int p = 1; p < 8; p++ ) {
for( int s = 1; s < 8; s++ ) {
if( f != p && f != s && p != s && !( p... |
Change the following Ada code into C++ without altering its purpose. | with Ada.Text_IO;
procedure Department_Numbers is
use Ada.Text_IO;
begin
Put_Line (" P S F");
for Police in 2 .. 6 loop
for Sanitation in 1 .. 7 loop
for Fire in 1 .. 7 loop
if
Police mod 2 = 0 and
Police + Sanitation + Fire = 12 and
... | #include <iostream>
#include <iomanip>
int main( int argc, char* argv[] ) {
int sol = 1;
std::cout << "\t\tFIRE\t\tPOLICE\t\tSANITATION\n";
for( int f = 1; f < 8; f++ ) {
for( int p = 1; p < 8; p++ ) {
for( int s = 1; s < 8; s++ ) {
if( f != p && f != s && p != s && !( p... |
Change the following Ada code into Go without altering its purpose. | with Ada.Text_IO;
procedure Department_Numbers is
use Ada.Text_IO;
begin
Put_Line (" P S F");
for Police in 2 .. 6 loop
for Sanitation in 1 .. 7 loop
for Fire in 1 .. 7 loop
if
Police mod 2 = 0 and
Police + Sanitation + Fire = 12 and
... | package main
import "fmt"
func main() {
fmt.Println("Police Sanitation Fire")
fmt.Println("------ ---------- ----")
count := 0
for i := 2; i < 7; i += 2 {
for j := 1; j < 8; j++ {
if j == i { continue }
for k := 1; k < 8; k++ {
if k == i || k == j { ... |
Write a version of this Ada function in Go with identical behavior. | with Ada.Text_IO;
procedure Department_Numbers is
use Ada.Text_IO;
begin
Put_Line (" P S F");
for Police in 2 .. 6 loop
for Sanitation in 1 .. 7 loop
for Fire in 1 .. 7 loop
if
Police mod 2 = 0 and
Police + Sanitation + Fire = 12 and
... | package main
import "fmt"
func main() {
fmt.Println("Police Sanitation Fire")
fmt.Println("------ ---------- ----")
count := 0
for i := 2; i < 7; i += 2 {
for j := 1; j < 8; j++ {
if j == i { continue }
for k := 1; k < 8; k++ {
if k == i || k == j { ... |
Rewrite this program in Java while keeping its functionality equivalent to the Ada version. | with Ada.Text_IO;
procedure Department_Numbers is
use Ada.Text_IO;
begin
Put_Line (" P S F");
for Police in 2 .. 6 loop
for Sanitation in 1 .. 7 loop
for Fire in 1 .. 7 loop
if
Police mod 2 = 0 and
Police + Sanitation + Fire = 12 and
... | public class DepartmentNumbers {
public static void main(String[] args) {
System.out.println("Police Sanitation Fire");
System.out.println("------ ---------- ----");
int count = 0;
for (int i = 2; i <= 6; i += 2) {
for (int j = 1; j <= 7; ++j) {
if (j ... |
Convert the following code from Ada to Java, ensuring the logic remains intact. | with Ada.Text_IO;
procedure Department_Numbers is
use Ada.Text_IO;
begin
Put_Line (" P S F");
for Police in 2 .. 6 loop
for Sanitation in 1 .. 7 loop
for Fire in 1 .. 7 loop
if
Police mod 2 = 0 and
Police + Sanitation + Fire = 12 and
... | public class DepartmentNumbers {
public static void main(String[] args) {
System.out.println("Police Sanitation Fire");
System.out.println("------ ---------- ----");
int count = 0;
for (int i = 2; i <= 6; i += 2) {
for (int j = 1; j <= 7; ++j) {
if (j ... |
Produce a language-to-language conversion: from Ada to Python, same semantics. | with Ada.Text_IO;
procedure Department_Numbers is
use Ada.Text_IO;
begin
Put_Line (" P S F");
for Police in 2 .. 6 loop
for Sanitation in 1 .. 7 loop
for Fire in 1 .. 7 loop
if
Police mod 2 = 0 and
Police + Sanitation + Fire = 12 and
... | from itertools import permutations
def solve():
c, p, f, s = "\\,Police,Fire,Sanitation".split(',')
print(f"{c:>3} {p:^6} {f:^4} {s:^10}")
c = 1
for p, f, s in permutations(range(1, 8), r=3):
if p + s + f == 12 and p % 2 == 0:
print(f"{c:>3}: {p:^6} {f:^4} {s:^10}")
c ... |
Write the same algorithm in Python as shown in this Ada implementation. | with Ada.Text_IO;
procedure Department_Numbers is
use Ada.Text_IO;
begin
Put_Line (" P S F");
for Police in 2 .. 6 loop
for Sanitation in 1 .. 7 loop
for Fire in 1 .. 7 loop
if
Police mod 2 = 0 and
Police + Sanitation + Fire = 12 and
... | from itertools import permutations
def solve():
c, p, f, s = "\\,Police,Fire,Sanitation".split(',')
print(f"{c:>3} {p:^6} {f:^4} {s:^10}")
c = 1
for p, f, s in permutations(range(1, 8), r=3):
if p + s + f == 12 and p % 2 == 0:
print(f"{c:>3}: {p:^6} {f:^4} {s:^10}")
c ... |
Convert the following code from Ada to VB, ensuring the logic remains intact. | with Ada.Text_IO;
procedure Department_Numbers is
use Ada.Text_IO;
begin
Put_Line (" P S F");
for Police in 2 .. 6 loop
for Sanitation in 1 .. 7 loop
for Fire in 1 .. 7 loop
if
Police mod 2 = 0 and
Police + Sanitation + Fire = 12 and
... | Module Module1
Sub Main()
For p = 2 To 7 Step 2
For s = 1 To 7
Dim f = 12 - p - s
If s >= f Then
Exit For
End If
If f > 7 Then
Continue For
End If
If s = p OrE... |
Translate this program into VB but keep the logic exactly as in Ada. | with Ada.Text_IO;
procedure Department_Numbers is
use Ada.Text_IO;
begin
Put_Line (" P S F");
for Police in 2 .. 6 loop
for Sanitation in 1 .. 7 loop
for Fire in 1 .. 7 loop
if
Police mod 2 = 0 and
Police + Sanitation + Fire = 12 and
... | Module Module1
Sub Main()
For p = 2 To 7 Step 2
For s = 1 To 7
Dim f = 12 - p - s
If s >= f Then
Exit For
End If
If f > 7 Then
Continue For
End If
If s = p OrE... |
Generate a C translation of this Arturo snippet without changing its computational steps. | loop 1..7 'x [
loop 1..7 'y [
loop 1..7 'z [
if all? @[
even? x
12 = sum @[x y z]
3 = size unique @[x y z]
] -> print [x y z]
]
]
]
| #include<stdio.h>
int main()
{
int police,sanitation,fire;
printf("Police Sanitation Fire\n");
printf("----------------------------------");
for(police=2;police<=6;police+=2){
for(sanitation=1;sanitation<=7;sanitation++){
for(fire=1;fire<=7;fire++){
if(police!=sanitation && sanitation!=fir... |
Port the following code from Arturo to C with equivalent syntax and logic. | loop 1..7 'x [
loop 1..7 'y [
loop 1..7 'z [
if all? @[
even? x
12 = sum @[x y z]
3 = size unique @[x y z]
] -> print [x y z]
]
]
]
| #include<stdio.h>
int main()
{
int police,sanitation,fire;
printf("Police Sanitation Fire\n");
printf("----------------------------------");
for(police=2;police<=6;police+=2){
for(sanitation=1;sanitation<=7;sanitation++){
for(fire=1;fire<=7;fire++){
if(police!=sanitation && sanitation!=fir... |
Ensure the translated C# code behaves exactly like the original Arturo snippet. | loop 1..7 'x [
loop 1..7 'y [
loop 1..7 'z [
if all? @[
even? x
12 = sum @[x y z]
3 = size unique @[x y z]
] -> print [x y z]
]
]
]
| using System;
public class Program
{
public static void Main() {
for (int p = 2; p <= 7; p+=2) {
for (int s = 1; s <= 7; s++) {
int f = 12 - p - s;
if (s >= f) break;
if (f > 7) continue;
if (s == p || f == p) continue;
... |
Produce a functionally identical C# code for the snippet given in Arturo. | loop 1..7 'x [
loop 1..7 'y [
loop 1..7 'z [
if all? @[
even? x
12 = sum @[x y z]
3 = size unique @[x y z]
] -> print [x y z]
]
]
]
| using System;
public class Program
{
public static void Main() {
for (int p = 2; p <= 7; p+=2) {
for (int s = 1; s <= 7; s++) {
int f = 12 - p - s;
if (s >= f) break;
if (f > 7) continue;
if (s == p || f == p) continue;
... |
Keep all operations the same but rewrite the snippet in C++. | loop 1..7 'x [
loop 1..7 'y [
loop 1..7 'z [
if all? @[
even? x
12 = sum @[x y z]
3 = size unique @[x y z]
] -> print [x y z]
]
]
]
| #include <iostream>
#include <iomanip>
int main( int argc, char* argv[] ) {
int sol = 1;
std::cout << "\t\tFIRE\t\tPOLICE\t\tSANITATION\n";
for( int f = 1; f < 8; f++ ) {
for( int p = 1; p < 8; p++ ) {
for( int s = 1; s < 8; s++ ) {
if( f != p && f != s && p != s && !( p... |
Keep all operations the same but rewrite the snippet in C++. | loop 1..7 'x [
loop 1..7 'y [
loop 1..7 'z [
if all? @[
even? x
12 = sum @[x y z]
3 = size unique @[x y z]
] -> print [x y z]
]
]
]
| #include <iostream>
#include <iomanip>
int main( int argc, char* argv[] ) {
int sol = 1;
std::cout << "\t\tFIRE\t\tPOLICE\t\tSANITATION\n";
for( int f = 1; f < 8; f++ ) {
for( int p = 1; p < 8; p++ ) {
for( int s = 1; s < 8; s++ ) {
if( f != p && f != s && p != s && !( p... |
Convert the following code from Arturo to Java, ensuring the logic remains intact. | loop 1..7 'x [
loop 1..7 'y [
loop 1..7 'z [
if all? @[
even? x
12 = sum @[x y z]
3 = size unique @[x y z]
] -> print [x y z]
]
]
]
| public class DepartmentNumbers {
public static void main(String[] args) {
System.out.println("Police Sanitation Fire");
System.out.println("------ ---------- ----");
int count = 0;
for (int i = 2; i <= 6; i += 2) {
for (int j = 1; j <= 7; ++j) {
if (j ... |
Write the same algorithm in Java as shown in this Arturo implementation. | loop 1..7 'x [
loop 1..7 'y [
loop 1..7 'z [
if all? @[
even? x
12 = sum @[x y z]
3 = size unique @[x y z]
] -> print [x y z]
]
]
]
| public class DepartmentNumbers {
public static void main(String[] args) {
System.out.println("Police Sanitation Fire");
System.out.println("------ ---------- ----");
int count = 0;
for (int i = 2; i <= 6; i += 2) {
for (int j = 1; j <= 7; ++j) {
if (j ... |
Generate a Python translation of this Arturo snippet without changing its computational steps. | loop 1..7 'x [
loop 1..7 'y [
loop 1..7 'z [
if all? @[
even? x
12 = sum @[x y z]
3 = size unique @[x y z]
] -> print [x y z]
]
]
]
| from itertools import permutations
def solve():
c, p, f, s = "\\,Police,Fire,Sanitation".split(',')
print(f"{c:>3} {p:^6} {f:^4} {s:^10}")
c = 1
for p, f, s in permutations(range(1, 8), r=3):
if p + s + f == 12 and p % 2 == 0:
print(f"{c:>3}: {p:^6} {f:^4} {s:^10}")
c ... |
Generate an equivalent Python version of this Arturo code. | loop 1..7 'x [
loop 1..7 'y [
loop 1..7 'z [
if all? @[
even? x
12 = sum @[x y z]
3 = size unique @[x y z]
] -> print [x y z]
]
]
]
| from itertools import permutations
def solve():
c, p, f, s = "\\,Police,Fire,Sanitation".split(',')
print(f"{c:>3} {p:^6} {f:^4} {s:^10}")
c = 1
for p, f, s in permutations(range(1, 8), r=3):
if p + s + f == 12 and p % 2 == 0:
print(f"{c:>3}: {p:^6} {f:^4} {s:^10}")
c ... |
Keep all operations the same but rewrite the snippet in VB. | loop 1..7 'x [
loop 1..7 'y [
loop 1..7 'z [
if all? @[
even? x
12 = sum @[x y z]
3 = size unique @[x y z]
] -> print [x y z]
]
]
]
| Module Module1
Sub Main()
For p = 2 To 7 Step 2
For s = 1 To 7
Dim f = 12 - p - s
If s >= f Then
Exit For
End If
If f > 7 Then
Continue For
End If
If s = p OrE... |
Write the same algorithm in VB as shown in this Arturo implementation. | loop 1..7 'x [
loop 1..7 'y [
loop 1..7 'z [
if all? @[
even? x
12 = sum @[x y z]
3 = size unique @[x y z]
] -> print [x y z]
]
]
]
| Module Module1
Sub Main()
For p = 2 To 7 Step 2
For s = 1 To 7
Dim f = 12 - p - s
If s >= f Then
Exit For
End If
If f > 7 Then
Continue For
End If
If s = p OrE... |
Keep all operations the same but rewrite the snippet in Go. | loop 1..7 'x [
loop 1..7 'y [
loop 1..7 'z [
if all? @[
even? x
12 = sum @[x y z]
3 = size unique @[x y z]
] -> print [x y z]
]
]
]
| package main
import "fmt"
func main() {
fmt.Println("Police Sanitation Fire")
fmt.Println("------ ---------- ----")
count := 0
for i := 2; i < 7; i += 2 {
for j := 1; j < 8; j++ {
if j == i { continue }
for k := 1; k < 8; k++ {
if k == i || k == j { ... |
Produce a functionally identical Go code for the snippet given in Arturo. | loop 1..7 'x [
loop 1..7 'y [
loop 1..7 'z [
if all? @[
even? x
12 = sum @[x y z]
3 = size unique @[x y z]
] -> print [x y z]
]
]
]
| package main
import "fmt"
func main() {
fmt.Println("Police Sanitation Fire")
fmt.Println("------ ---------- ----")
count := 0
for i := 2; i < 7; i += 2 {
for j := 1; j < 8; j++ {
if j == i { continue }
for k := 1; k < 8; k++ {
if k == i || k == j { ... |
Convert the following code from AutoHotKey to C, ensuring the logic remains intact. | perm(elements, n, opt:="", Delim:="", str:="", res:="", j:=0, dup:="") {
res := IsObject(res) ? res : [], dup := IsObject(dup) ? dup : []
if (n > j)
Loop, parse, elements, % Delim
res := !(InStr(str, A_LoopField) && !(InStr(opt, "rep"))) ? perm(elements, n, opt, Delim, trim(str Delim A_LoopField, Delim), res, ... | #include<stdio.h>
int main()
{
int police,sanitation,fire;
printf("Police Sanitation Fire\n");
printf("----------------------------------");
for(police=2;police<=6;police+=2){
for(sanitation=1;sanitation<=7;sanitation++){
for(fire=1;fire<=7;fire++){
if(police!=sanitation && sanitation!=fir... |
Port the provided AutoHotKey code into C while preserving the original functionality. | perm(elements, n, opt:="", Delim:="", str:="", res:="", j:=0, dup:="") {
res := IsObject(res) ? res : [], dup := IsObject(dup) ? dup : []
if (n > j)
Loop, parse, elements, % Delim
res := !(InStr(str, A_LoopField) && !(InStr(opt, "rep"))) ? perm(elements, n, opt, Delim, trim(str Delim A_LoopField, Delim), res, ... | #include<stdio.h>
int main()
{
int police,sanitation,fire;
printf("Police Sanitation Fire\n");
printf("----------------------------------");
for(police=2;police<=6;police+=2){
for(sanitation=1;sanitation<=7;sanitation++){
for(fire=1;fire<=7;fire++){
if(police!=sanitation && sanitation!=fir... |
Keep all operations the same but rewrite the snippet in C#. | perm(elements, n, opt:="", Delim:="", str:="", res:="", j:=0, dup:="") {
res := IsObject(res) ? res : [], dup := IsObject(dup) ? dup : []
if (n > j)
Loop, parse, elements, % Delim
res := !(InStr(str, A_LoopField) && !(InStr(opt, "rep"))) ? perm(elements, n, opt, Delim, trim(str Delim A_LoopField, Delim), res, ... | using System;
public class Program
{
public static void Main() {
for (int p = 2; p <= 7; p+=2) {
for (int s = 1; s <= 7; s++) {
int f = 12 - p - s;
if (s >= f) break;
if (f > 7) continue;
if (s == p || f == p) continue;
... |
Write the same code in C# as shown below in AutoHotKey. | perm(elements, n, opt:="", Delim:="", str:="", res:="", j:=0, dup:="") {
res := IsObject(res) ? res : [], dup := IsObject(dup) ? dup : []
if (n > j)
Loop, parse, elements, % Delim
res := !(InStr(str, A_LoopField) && !(InStr(opt, "rep"))) ? perm(elements, n, opt, Delim, trim(str Delim A_LoopField, Delim), res, ... | using System;
public class Program
{
public static void Main() {
for (int p = 2; p <= 7; p+=2) {
for (int s = 1; s <= 7; s++) {
int f = 12 - p - s;
if (s >= f) break;
if (f > 7) continue;
if (s == p || f == p) continue;
... |
Convert this AutoHotKey block to C++, preserving its control flow and logic. | perm(elements, n, opt:="", Delim:="", str:="", res:="", j:=0, dup:="") {
res := IsObject(res) ? res : [], dup := IsObject(dup) ? dup : []
if (n > j)
Loop, parse, elements, % Delim
res := !(InStr(str, A_LoopField) && !(InStr(opt, "rep"))) ? perm(elements, n, opt, Delim, trim(str Delim A_LoopField, Delim), res, ... | #include <iostream>
#include <iomanip>
int main( int argc, char* argv[] ) {
int sol = 1;
std::cout << "\t\tFIRE\t\tPOLICE\t\tSANITATION\n";
for( int f = 1; f < 8; f++ ) {
for( int p = 1; p < 8; p++ ) {
for( int s = 1; s < 8; s++ ) {
if( f != p && f != s && p != s && !( p... |
Transform the following AutoHotKey implementation into C++, maintaining the same output and logic. | perm(elements, n, opt:="", Delim:="", str:="", res:="", j:=0, dup:="") {
res := IsObject(res) ? res : [], dup := IsObject(dup) ? dup : []
if (n > j)
Loop, parse, elements, % Delim
res := !(InStr(str, A_LoopField) && !(InStr(opt, "rep"))) ? perm(elements, n, opt, Delim, trim(str Delim A_LoopField, Delim), res, ... | #include <iostream>
#include <iomanip>
int main( int argc, char* argv[] ) {
int sol = 1;
std::cout << "\t\tFIRE\t\tPOLICE\t\tSANITATION\n";
for( int f = 1; f < 8; f++ ) {
for( int p = 1; p < 8; p++ ) {
for( int s = 1; s < 8; s++ ) {
if( f != p && f != s && p != s && !( p... |
Generate a Java translation of this AutoHotKey snippet without changing its computational steps. | perm(elements, n, opt:="", Delim:="", str:="", res:="", j:=0, dup:="") {
res := IsObject(res) ? res : [], dup := IsObject(dup) ? dup : []
if (n > j)
Loop, parse, elements, % Delim
res := !(InStr(str, A_LoopField) && !(InStr(opt, "rep"))) ? perm(elements, n, opt, Delim, trim(str Delim A_LoopField, Delim), res, ... | public class DepartmentNumbers {
public static void main(String[] args) {
System.out.println("Police Sanitation Fire");
System.out.println("------ ---------- ----");
int count = 0;
for (int i = 2; i <= 6; i += 2) {
for (int j = 1; j <= 7; ++j) {
if (j ... |
Rewrite the snippet below in Java so it works the same as the original AutoHotKey code. | perm(elements, n, opt:="", Delim:="", str:="", res:="", j:=0, dup:="") {
res := IsObject(res) ? res : [], dup := IsObject(dup) ? dup : []
if (n > j)
Loop, parse, elements, % Delim
res := !(InStr(str, A_LoopField) && !(InStr(opt, "rep"))) ? perm(elements, n, opt, Delim, trim(str Delim A_LoopField, Delim), res, ... | public class DepartmentNumbers {
public static void main(String[] args) {
System.out.println("Police Sanitation Fire");
System.out.println("------ ---------- ----");
int count = 0;
for (int i = 2; i <= 6; i += 2) {
for (int j = 1; j <= 7; ++j) {
if (j ... |
Convert the following code from AutoHotKey to Python, ensuring the logic remains intact. | perm(elements, n, opt:="", Delim:="", str:="", res:="", j:=0, dup:="") {
res := IsObject(res) ? res : [], dup := IsObject(dup) ? dup : []
if (n > j)
Loop, parse, elements, % Delim
res := !(InStr(str, A_LoopField) && !(InStr(opt, "rep"))) ? perm(elements, n, opt, Delim, trim(str Delim A_LoopField, Delim), res, ... | from itertools import permutations
def solve():
c, p, f, s = "\\,Police,Fire,Sanitation".split(',')
print(f"{c:>3} {p:^6} {f:^4} {s:^10}")
c = 1
for p, f, s in permutations(range(1, 8), r=3):
if p + s + f == 12 and p % 2 == 0:
print(f"{c:>3}: {p:^6} {f:^4} {s:^10}")
c ... |
Write the same code in Python as shown below in AutoHotKey. | perm(elements, n, opt:="", Delim:="", str:="", res:="", j:=0, dup:="") {
res := IsObject(res) ? res : [], dup := IsObject(dup) ? dup : []
if (n > j)
Loop, parse, elements, % Delim
res := !(InStr(str, A_LoopField) && !(InStr(opt, "rep"))) ? perm(elements, n, opt, Delim, trim(str Delim A_LoopField, Delim), res, ... | from itertools import permutations
def solve():
c, p, f, s = "\\,Police,Fire,Sanitation".split(',')
print(f"{c:>3} {p:^6} {f:^4} {s:^10}")
c = 1
for p, f, s in permutations(range(1, 8), r=3):
if p + s + f == 12 and p % 2 == 0:
print(f"{c:>3}: {p:^6} {f:^4} {s:^10}")
c ... |
Generate a VB translation of this AutoHotKey snippet without changing its computational steps. | perm(elements, n, opt:="", Delim:="", str:="", res:="", j:=0, dup:="") {
res := IsObject(res) ? res : [], dup := IsObject(dup) ? dup : []
if (n > j)
Loop, parse, elements, % Delim
res := !(InStr(str, A_LoopField) && !(InStr(opt, "rep"))) ? perm(elements, n, opt, Delim, trim(str Delim A_LoopField, Delim), res, ... | Module Module1
Sub Main()
For p = 2 To 7 Step 2
For s = 1 To 7
Dim f = 12 - p - s
If s >= f Then
Exit For
End If
If f > 7 Then
Continue For
End If
If s = p OrE... |
Convert this AutoHotKey block to VB, preserving its control flow and logic. | perm(elements, n, opt:="", Delim:="", str:="", res:="", j:=0, dup:="") {
res := IsObject(res) ? res : [], dup := IsObject(dup) ? dup : []
if (n > j)
Loop, parse, elements, % Delim
res := !(InStr(str, A_LoopField) && !(InStr(opt, "rep"))) ? perm(elements, n, opt, Delim, trim(str Delim A_LoopField, Delim), res, ... | Module Module1
Sub Main()
For p = 2 To 7 Step 2
For s = 1 To 7
Dim f = 12 - p - s
If s >= f Then
Exit For
End If
If f > 7 Then
Continue For
End If
If s = p OrE... |
Rewrite this program in Go while keeping its functionality equivalent to the AutoHotKey version. | perm(elements, n, opt:="", Delim:="", str:="", res:="", j:=0, dup:="") {
res := IsObject(res) ? res : [], dup := IsObject(dup) ? dup : []
if (n > j)
Loop, parse, elements, % Delim
res := !(InStr(str, A_LoopField) && !(InStr(opt, "rep"))) ? perm(elements, n, opt, Delim, trim(str Delim A_LoopField, Delim), res, ... | package main
import "fmt"
func main() {
fmt.Println("Police Sanitation Fire")
fmt.Println("------ ---------- ----")
count := 0
for i := 2; i < 7; i += 2 {
for j := 1; j < 8; j++ {
if j == i { continue }
for k := 1; k < 8; k++ {
if k == i || k == j { ... |
Convert the following code from AutoHotKey to Go, ensuring the logic remains intact. | perm(elements, n, opt:="", Delim:="", str:="", res:="", j:=0, dup:="") {
res := IsObject(res) ? res : [], dup := IsObject(dup) ? dup : []
if (n > j)
Loop, parse, elements, % Delim
res := !(InStr(str, A_LoopField) && !(InStr(opt, "rep"))) ? perm(elements, n, opt, Delim, trim(str Delim A_LoopField, Delim), res, ... | package main
import "fmt"
func main() {
fmt.Println("Police Sanitation Fire")
fmt.Println("------ ---------- ----")
count := 0
for i := 2; i < 7; i += 2 {
for j := 1; j < 8; j++ {
if j == i { continue }
for k := 1; k < 8; k++ {
if k == i || k == j { ... |
Port the following code from AWK to C with equivalent syntax and logic. |
BEGIN {
print("
for (fire=1; fire<=7; fire++) {
for (police=1; police<=7; police++) {
for (sanitation=1; sanitation<=7; sanitation++) {
if (rules() ~ /^1+$/) {
printf("%2d %2d %2d %2d\n",++count,fire,police,sanitation)
}
}
}
}
exit(0)
}
funct... | #include<stdio.h>
int main()
{
int police,sanitation,fire;
printf("Police Sanitation Fire\n");
printf("----------------------------------");
for(police=2;police<=6;police+=2){
for(sanitation=1;sanitation<=7;sanitation++){
for(fire=1;fire<=7;fire++){
if(police!=sanitation && sanitation!=fir... |
Change the programming language of this snippet from AWK to C without modifying what it does. |
BEGIN {
print("
for (fire=1; fire<=7; fire++) {
for (police=1; police<=7; police++) {
for (sanitation=1; sanitation<=7; sanitation++) {
if (rules() ~ /^1+$/) {
printf("%2d %2d %2d %2d\n",++count,fire,police,sanitation)
}
}
}
}
exit(0)
}
funct... | #include<stdio.h>
int main()
{
int police,sanitation,fire;
printf("Police Sanitation Fire\n");
printf("----------------------------------");
for(police=2;police<=6;police+=2){
for(sanitation=1;sanitation<=7;sanitation++){
for(fire=1;fire<=7;fire++){
if(police!=sanitation && sanitation!=fir... |
Generate an equivalent C# version of this AWK code. |
BEGIN {
print("
for (fire=1; fire<=7; fire++) {
for (police=1; police<=7; police++) {
for (sanitation=1; sanitation<=7; sanitation++) {
if (rules() ~ /^1+$/) {
printf("%2d %2d %2d %2d\n",++count,fire,police,sanitation)
}
}
}
}
exit(0)
}
funct... | using System;
public class Program
{
public static void Main() {
for (int p = 2; p <= 7; p+=2) {
for (int s = 1; s <= 7; s++) {
int f = 12 - p - s;
if (s >= f) break;
if (f > 7) continue;
if (s == p || f == p) continue;
... |
Write the same algorithm in C# as shown in this AWK implementation. |
BEGIN {
print("
for (fire=1; fire<=7; fire++) {
for (police=1; police<=7; police++) {
for (sanitation=1; sanitation<=7; sanitation++) {
if (rules() ~ /^1+$/) {
printf("%2d %2d %2d %2d\n",++count,fire,police,sanitation)
}
}
}
}
exit(0)
}
funct... | using System;
public class Program
{
public static void Main() {
for (int p = 2; p <= 7; p+=2) {
for (int s = 1; s <= 7; s++) {
int f = 12 - p - s;
if (s >= f) break;
if (f > 7) continue;
if (s == p || f == p) continue;
... |
Convert this AWK snippet to C++ and keep its semantics consistent. |
BEGIN {
print("
for (fire=1; fire<=7; fire++) {
for (police=1; police<=7; police++) {
for (sanitation=1; sanitation<=7; sanitation++) {
if (rules() ~ /^1+$/) {
printf("%2d %2d %2d %2d\n",++count,fire,police,sanitation)
}
}
}
}
exit(0)
}
funct... | #include <iostream>
#include <iomanip>
int main( int argc, char* argv[] ) {
int sol = 1;
std::cout << "\t\tFIRE\t\tPOLICE\t\tSANITATION\n";
for( int f = 1; f < 8; f++ ) {
for( int p = 1; p < 8; p++ ) {
for( int s = 1; s < 8; s++ ) {
if( f != p && f != s && p != s && !( p... |
Port the following code from AWK to C++ with equivalent syntax and logic. |
BEGIN {
print("
for (fire=1; fire<=7; fire++) {
for (police=1; police<=7; police++) {
for (sanitation=1; sanitation<=7; sanitation++) {
if (rules() ~ /^1+$/) {
printf("%2d %2d %2d %2d\n",++count,fire,police,sanitation)
}
}
}
}
exit(0)
}
funct... | #include <iostream>
#include <iomanip>
int main( int argc, char* argv[] ) {
int sol = 1;
std::cout << "\t\tFIRE\t\tPOLICE\t\tSANITATION\n";
for( int f = 1; f < 8; f++ ) {
for( int p = 1; p < 8; p++ ) {
for( int s = 1; s < 8; s++ ) {
if( f != p && f != s && p != s && !( p... |
Can you help me rewrite this code in Java instead of AWK, keeping it the same logically? |
BEGIN {
print("
for (fire=1; fire<=7; fire++) {
for (police=1; police<=7; police++) {
for (sanitation=1; sanitation<=7; sanitation++) {
if (rules() ~ /^1+$/) {
printf("%2d %2d %2d %2d\n",++count,fire,police,sanitation)
}
}
}
}
exit(0)
}
funct... | public class DepartmentNumbers {
public static void main(String[] args) {
System.out.println("Police Sanitation Fire");
System.out.println("------ ---------- ----");
int count = 0;
for (int i = 2; i <= 6; i += 2) {
for (int j = 1; j <= 7; ++j) {
if (j ... |
Convert this AWK snippet to Java and keep its semantics consistent. |
BEGIN {
print("
for (fire=1; fire<=7; fire++) {
for (police=1; police<=7; police++) {
for (sanitation=1; sanitation<=7; sanitation++) {
if (rules() ~ /^1+$/) {
printf("%2d %2d %2d %2d\n",++count,fire,police,sanitation)
}
}
}
}
exit(0)
}
funct... | public class DepartmentNumbers {
public static void main(String[] args) {
System.out.println("Police Sanitation Fire");
System.out.println("------ ---------- ----");
int count = 0;
for (int i = 2; i <= 6; i += 2) {
for (int j = 1; j <= 7; ++j) {
if (j ... |
Translate this program into Python but keep the logic exactly as in AWK. |
BEGIN {
print("
for (fire=1; fire<=7; fire++) {
for (police=1; police<=7; police++) {
for (sanitation=1; sanitation<=7; sanitation++) {
if (rules() ~ /^1+$/) {
printf("%2d %2d %2d %2d\n",++count,fire,police,sanitation)
}
}
}
}
exit(0)
}
funct... | from itertools import permutations
def solve():
c, p, f, s = "\\,Police,Fire,Sanitation".split(',')
print(f"{c:>3} {p:^6} {f:^4} {s:^10}")
c = 1
for p, f, s in permutations(range(1, 8), r=3):
if p + s + f == 12 and p % 2 == 0:
print(f"{c:>3}: {p:^6} {f:^4} {s:^10}")
c ... |
Translate this program into Python but keep the logic exactly as in AWK. |
BEGIN {
print("
for (fire=1; fire<=7; fire++) {
for (police=1; police<=7; police++) {
for (sanitation=1; sanitation<=7; sanitation++) {
if (rules() ~ /^1+$/) {
printf("%2d %2d %2d %2d\n",++count,fire,police,sanitation)
}
}
}
}
exit(0)
}
funct... | from itertools import permutations
def solve():
c, p, f, s = "\\,Police,Fire,Sanitation".split(',')
print(f"{c:>3} {p:^6} {f:^4} {s:^10}")
c = 1
for p, f, s in permutations(range(1, 8), r=3):
if p + s + f == 12 and p % 2 == 0:
print(f"{c:>3}: {p:^6} {f:^4} {s:^10}")
c ... |
Generate a VB translation of this AWK snippet without changing its computational steps. |
BEGIN {
print("
for (fire=1; fire<=7; fire++) {
for (police=1; police<=7; police++) {
for (sanitation=1; sanitation<=7; sanitation++) {
if (rules() ~ /^1+$/) {
printf("%2d %2d %2d %2d\n",++count,fire,police,sanitation)
}
}
}
}
exit(0)
}
funct... | Module Module1
Sub Main()
For p = 2 To 7 Step 2
For s = 1 To 7
Dim f = 12 - p - s
If s >= f Then
Exit For
End If
If f > 7 Then
Continue For
End If
If s = p OrE... |
Ensure the translated VB code behaves exactly like the original AWK snippet. |
BEGIN {
print("
for (fire=1; fire<=7; fire++) {
for (police=1; police<=7; police++) {
for (sanitation=1; sanitation<=7; sanitation++) {
if (rules() ~ /^1+$/) {
printf("%2d %2d %2d %2d\n",++count,fire,police,sanitation)
}
}
}
}
exit(0)
}
funct... | Module Module1
Sub Main()
For p = 2 To 7 Step 2
For s = 1 To 7
Dim f = 12 - p - s
If s >= f Then
Exit For
End If
If f > 7 Then
Continue For
End If
If s = p OrE... |
Maintain the same structure and functionality when rewriting this code in Go. |
BEGIN {
print("
for (fire=1; fire<=7; fire++) {
for (police=1; police<=7; police++) {
for (sanitation=1; sanitation<=7; sanitation++) {
if (rules() ~ /^1+$/) {
printf("%2d %2d %2d %2d\n",++count,fire,police,sanitation)
}
}
}
}
exit(0)
}
funct... | package main
import "fmt"
func main() {
fmt.Println("Police Sanitation Fire")
fmt.Println("------ ---------- ----")
count := 0
for i := 2; i < 7; i += 2 {
for j := 1; j < 8; j++ {
if j == i { continue }
for k := 1; k < 8; k++ {
if k == i || k == j { ... |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.