text stringlengths 0 6.73k |
|---|
while near the sodium ion we are more likely to ñnd the oxygen end, because the |
sodium is positive and the oxygen end of the water is negative, and they attract |
electrically. Can we tell from this picture whether the salt is đ/ssolưing ín water |
or crstallizing out of water? Of course we cønnot tell, because while some of |
the atoms are leaving the crystal other atoms are rejoining it. The process is a |
đụngmïc one, just as in the case of evaporation, and it depends on whether there |
is more or less salt in the water than the amount needed for equilibrium. By |
cquilibrium we mean that situation in which the rate at which atoms are leaving |
Just matches the rate at which they are coming back. If there is almost no salt in |
the water, more atoms leave than return, and the salt dissolves. If, on the other |
hand, there are too many “salt atoms,” more return than leave, and the salt is |
crystallizing. |
In passing, we mention that the concept of a rmmolecule oŸ a substanece is onÌy |
approximate and exists only for a certain class of substances. It is clear in the |
case of water that the three atoms are actually stuck together. lt is not so clear in |
the case of sodium chloride in the solid. 'Phere is just an arrangement of sodiun |
and chlorine Ions in a cubic pattern. There is no natural way to group them as |
“molecules of salt.” |
Returning to our discussion of solution and precipitation, if we increase the |
temperature of the salt solution, then the rate at which atoms are taken away |
1s increased, and so is the rate at which atoms are brought back. It turns out |
to be very diflcult, in general, to predict which way it is going to go, whether |
more or less of the solid will dissolve. Most substances dissolve more, but some |
substances dissolve less, as the temperature increases. |
1-4 Chemical reactions |
In all of the processes which have been described so far, the atoms and the |
lons have not changed partners, but of course there are cireumstances in which |
the atoms do change combinations, forming new molecules. 'This is ilustrated in |
Eig. I-8. Á process in which the rearrangement of the atomic partners OcCUTS is |
what we call a chemjcal reaction. The other processes so far described are called |
physical processes, but there is no sharp distinction bebween the bwo. (Nature |
does not care what we call it, she just keeps on doïng it.) Thịs figure is supposed |
to represent carbon burning in oxygen. In the case oŸ oxygen, #o oxygen atoms |
sbick together very stronply. (Why do not #hree or even ƒour stick together? That |
is one of the very peculiar characteristics of such atomic processes. Atoms are |
--- Trang 46 --- |
`/{Š Ý |
¬ K.ey 0559555 956 |
CARBON BURNING IN OXYGEN |
Figure 1-8 |
very special: they like certain particular partners, certain particular directions, |
and so on. lt is the job of physics to analyze why each one wants what it wants. |
At any rate, two oxygen atoms form, saturated and happy, a molecule.) |
The carbon atoms are supposed to be in a solid crystal (which could be |
graphite or diamond*). Now, for example, one of the oxygen molecules can come |
over to the carbon, and each atom can pick up a carbon atom and go fying of |
in a new combination—“carbon-oxygen”—which is a molecule of the gas called |
carbon monoxide. It is given the chemical name CO. It is very simple: the letters |
“CO” are practically a picbure of that molecule. But carbon attracts oxygen |
much more than oxygen attracts oxygen or carbon attracts carbon. 'Pherefore |
in this process the oxygen may arrive with only a little energy, but the oxygen |
and carbon will snap together with a tremendous vengeance and commotion, and |
everything near them will pick up the energy. A large amount of motion energy, |
kinetic energy, is thus generated. This of course 1s burnzng; we are getting hea |
from the combination oŸ oxygen and carbon. The heat is ordinarily in the form |
of the molecular motion of the hot gas, but in certain circumstances it can be so |
enormous that it generates /2gh. That is how one gets fiames. |
In addition, the carbon monoxide is not quite satisfed. It is possible for it to |
attach another oxygen, so that we might have a much more complicated reaction |
in which the oxygen is combining with the carbon, while at the same time there |
happens to be a collision with a carbon monoxide molecule. Ône oxygen atom |
could attach itself to the CO and ultimately form a molecule, composed of one |
carbon and two oxygens, which is designated COsa and called carbon dioxide. lf |
we burn the carbon with very little oxygen in a very rapid reaction (for example, |
in an automobile engine, where the explosion 1s so fast that there is not time |
* One can burn a diamond in air. |
--- Trang 47 --- |
for it to make carbon dioxide) a considerable amount of carbon monoxide is |
formed. In many such rearrangements, a very large amount oŸ energy is released, |
forming explosions, Ñames, etc., depending on the reactions. Chemists have |
studied these arrangements of the atoms, and found that every substance is some |
type OŸ arrangement oƒ atoms. |
To illustrate thịs idea, let us consider another example. lIf we go into a fñeld |
of small violets, we know what “that smell” is. It is some kind of molecule, or |
arrangement of atoms, that has worked Its way into our noses. First of all, hou |
dịd it work its way in? That is rather easy. If the smell is some kind of molecule |
in the aïr, jiggling around and being knocked every which way, it might have |
accidentallu worked its way into the nose. Certainly it has no particular desire to |
get into our nose. lt is merely one helpless part of a jostling crowd of molecules, |
and in its aimless wanderings this particular chunk of matter happens to fñnd |
1tself in the nose. |
Now chemists can take special molecules like the odor of violets, and analyze |
them and tell us the ezøc# arrangement of the atoms in space. We know that |
the carbon dioxide molecule is straight and symmetrical: O—C——O. (That can |
be determined easily, too, by physical methods.) However, even for the vastly |
more complicated arrangements of atoms that there are in chemistry, one can, |
by a long, remarkable process of detective work, fnd the arrangements of the |
atoms. Figure l-9 is a picture of the air in the neighborhood of a violet; again |
we find nitrogen and oxygen in the air, and water vapor. (Why is there water |
vapor? Because the violet is œef. AII plants transpire.) However, we also see |
a “monster” composed of carbon atoms, hydrogen atoms, and oxygen atoms, |
which have picked a certain particular pattern in which to be arranged. It is |
a mụch more complicated arrangement than that of carbon dioxide; in fact, 1% |
2 ©° 42 |
4JDD4Đ |
ODOR OF VIOLETS |
Figure 1-9 |
--- Trang 48 --- |
CHa: CHs |
N >c< HN ọ |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.