text stringlengths 0 6.73k |
|---|
This equation is a statement of the He¿senberg uncertaintụ principle that we |
mentioned earlier. |
Since the right-hand side of Eq. (6.22) is a constant, this equation says that |
1Í we try to “pin down” a particle by forcing it to be at a particular place, 1% |
ends up by having a high speed. Or if we try to fÍorce it to go very slowly, or at a |
precise velocity, it “spreads out” so that we do not know very well just where ït |
1s. Particles behave in a funny wayl |
'The uncertainty principle describes an inherent fuzziness that must exist in |
any attempt to describe nature. Ôur most precise description of nature rwusf |
ben terms of probabilöties. There are some people who do not like this way of |
describing nature. They feel somehow that if they could only tell what is reallu |
going on with a particle, they could know its speed and position simultaneously. |
In the early days of the development of quantum mechanics, Einstein was quite |
worried about this problem. He used to shake his head and say, “But, surely God |
--- Trang 137 --- |
Fig. 6-11. A way of visualizing a hydrogen atom. The density (white- |
ness) of the cloud represents the probability density for observing the |
electron. |
does not throw dice in determining how electrons should go!” He worried about |
that problem for a long time and he probably never really reconciled himself to |
the fact that this is the best description of nature that one can give. There are |
still one or two physicists who are working on the problem who have an intuitive |
conviction that it is possible somehow to describe the world in a different way |
and that all of this uncertainty about the way things are can be removed. No |
one has yet been successful. |
The necessary uncertainty in our specifcation of the position of a particle |
becomes most important when we wish to describe the structure of atoms. In the |
hydrogen atom, which has a nucleus of one proton with one electron outside of |
the nucleus, the uncertainty in the position of the electron is as large as the atom |
itselft We cannot, therefore, properly speak of the electron moving in some “orbit” |
around the proton. The most we can say is that there is a certain chanee p(r) AV, |
of observing the electron in an element of volume AV at the distance r from |
the proton. The probability density p(z) is given by quantum mechanics. For |
an undisturbed hydrogen atom p(z) = Ae~?*/*, The number ø is the “typical” |
radius, where the function is decreasing rapidly. 5ince there is a small probability |
of fñnding the electron at distances from the nucleus mụuch greater than ø, we |
may think of ø as “the radius of the atom,” about 10—†19 meter. |
W© can form an image of the hydrogen atom by imagining a “cloud” whose |
density is proportional to the probability density for observing the electron. A |
--- Trang 138 --- |
sample of such a cloud is shown in EFig. 6-11. “Thus our best “picture” of a |
hydrogen atom is a nucleus surrounded by an “electron cloud” (although we |
reall mean a “probability cloud”). The electron is there somewhere, but nature |
permits us to know only the chance of fñnding it at any particular place. |
In its eforts to learn as much as possible about nature, modern physics has |
found that certain things can never be “known” with certainty. Much of our |
knowledge must always remain uncertain. "The mos we can know is in terms of |
probabilities. |
--- Trang 139 --- |
Tho Thoortg ©Ÿ Ấnrcrtff(rffOre |
7-1 Planetary motions |
In this chapter we shall diseuss one of the most far-reaching generalizations oŸ |
the human mỉnd. While we are admiring the human mind, we should take some |
time of to stand in awe of a na#ure that could follow with such completeness |
and generality such an elegantly simple principle as the law of gravitation. What |
1s this law of gravitation? It is that every object in the universe attracts every |
other obJect with a force which for any two bodies is proportional to the mass |
of each and varies inversely as the square of the distance between them. “This |
statement can be expressed mathematically by the equation |
F=G——.. |
T to this we add the fact that an object responds to a force by accelerating in |
the direction of the force by an amount that is inversely proportional to the mass |
of the object, we shall have said everything required, for a sufficiently talented |
mathematician could then deduce all the consequences of these two principles. |
However, since you are not assumed to be sufficiently talented yet, we shall |
discuss the consequences in more detail, and not just leave you with only these |
two bare principles. We shall brieRy relate the story of the discovery of the |
law of gravitation and discuss some of its consequences, its efects on history, |
the mysteries that such a law entails, and some reñnements of the law made |
by Einstein; we shall also discuss the relationships of the law to the other laws |
of physics. All this cannot be done in one chapter, but these subjects will be |
treated in due time in subsequent chapters. |
The story begins with the ancients observing the motions of planets among |
the stars, and finally deducing that they went around the sun, a fact that was |
rediscovered later by Copernicus. Exactly ho the planets went around the sun, |
--- Trang 140 --- |
with exactly t0høt motion, took a littÌe more work to discover. In the beginning |
of the fñfteenth century there were great debates as to whether they really went |
around the sun or not. 'Eycho Brahe had an idea that was diferent from anything |
proposed by the ancients: his idea was that these debates about the nature of the |
motions of the planets would best be resolved if the actual positions of the planets |
in the sky were measured sufficiently accurately. IÝ measurement showed exactly |
how the planets moved, then perhaps it would be possible to establish one or |
another viewpoint. 'This was a tremendous idea—that to fñnd something out, it is |
better to perform some careful experiments than to carry on deep philosophical |
areuments. Pursuing this idea, Tycho Brahe studied the positions of the planets |
for many years in his observatory on the island of Hven, near Copenhagen. He |
made voluminous tables, which were then studied by the mathematician Kepler, |
after Iycho's death. Kepler discovered from the data some very beautiful and |
remarkable, but simple, laws regarding planetary motion. |
7-2 Kepler?s laws |
First of all, Kepler found that each planet goes around the sun in a curve |
called an ellpse, with the sun at a focus of the ellipse. An ellipse is not just an |
oval, but is a very specifc and precise curve that can be obtained by using two |
tacks, one at each focus, a loop oŸ string, and a pencil; more mathematically, it |
1s the locus oŸ all points the sum oŸ whose distances from two fixed points (the |
foci) is a constant. Ôr, iŸ you will, it is a foreshortened circle (Fig. 7-1). |
“EN | |
rị + ra = 2a |
Fig. 7-1. An ellipse. |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.