text stringlengths 0 6.73k |
|---|
of the dots are stars. Although they look as ïf they are packed solid toward the |
center, that is due to the fallibility of our instruments. Actually, the distances |
between even the centermost stars are very great and they very rarely collide. |
There are more stars in the Interior than farther out, and as we move outward |
there are fewer and fewer. It is obvious that there is an attraction among these |
stars. It is clear that gravitation exists at these enormous dimensions, perhaps |
100,000 times the size of the solar system. Let us now go further, and look at an |
--- Trang 151 --- |
w : : : |
: nhà, : ° |
`... k---: |
sử : : b kc¿ xả ¬ |
ĂĂằ-< 'ẽẺ .. |
Fig. 7-9. A galaxy. |
cntire galaz, shown in Fìg. 7-9. 'The shape of this galaxy indicates an obvious |
tendency for its matter to agglomerate. OÝ course we cannot prove that the |
law here is precisely Inverse square, only that there ¡s still an attraction, at this |
enormous dimension, that holds the whole thing together. One may say, “Well, |
that is all very clever but why is it not Just a ball?” Because it is sp#mn#ng and |
has angular rmnormmnentưm which it cannot give up as it contracts; it must contract |
mostly in a plane. (Incidentally, if you are looking for a good problem, the |
exact details of how the arms are formed and what determines the shapes of |
these galaxies has not been worked out.) It is, however, clear that the shape of |
the galaxy is due to gravitation even though the complexities of its structure |
have not yet allowed us to analyze it completely. In a galaxy we have a scale |
of perhaps 50,000 to 100,000 light years. The earth's distance from the sun 1s |
8 light mưnutes, so you can see how large these dimensions are. |
Gravity appears to exist at even bigger dimensions, as indicated by Fig. 7-10, |
which shows many “little” things clustered together. This is a clusfer oƒ galazies, |
Just like a star cluster. Thus galaxies attract each other at such distances that |
they too are agglomerated into clusters. Perhaps gravitation exists even OVer |
distances of tens oƒ mmillions of light years; so far as we now know, gravity seems |
to go out forever inversely as the square of the distanee. |
--- Trang 152 --- |
Fig. 7-10. A cluster of galaxies. |
lự% Z © NS ° > x R |
Ỹ c® Ề % ỏ . «° 4 4 |
l..C s pÔ cã ; đ. ° Lẻ 1 |
"N... _—— ^ |
h + Ẵ k : |
% Huy Thị t * : : |
Fig. 7-11. An interstellar dust cloud. |
--- Trang 153 --- |
Fig. 7-12. The formation of new stars? |
Not only can we understand the nebulae, but from the law of gravitation we |
can even get some ideas about the origin of the stars. If we have a big cloud of |
dust and gas, as indicated in Eig. 7-11, the gravitational attractions of the pieces |
of dust for one another might make them form little lumps. Barely visible in the |
figure are “little” black spots which may be the beginning of the accumulations |
of dust and gases which, due to their gravitation, begin to form stars. Whether |
we have ever seen a star form or not is still debatable. Figure 7-12 shows the one |
piece of evidence which suggests that we have. At the left is a picture oŸ a region |
of gas with some stars in it taken in 1947, and at the right is another picture, |
taken only 7 years later, which shows two new bright spots. Has gas accumulated, |
has gravity acted hard enough and collected it into a ball big enough that the |
stellar nuclear reaction starts in the interior and turns ¡it into a star? Perhaps, |
and perhaps not. Ït is unreasonable that in only seven years we should be so |
lucky as to see a star change itself into visible form; it is much less probable that |
we should see #of |
7-6 Cavendish°s experiment |
Gravitation, therefore, extends over enormous distances. But ï1f there is a |
force bebween ønw pair of objects, we ought to be able to measure the force |
--- Trang 154 --- |
bebween our own objects. Instead of having to watch the stars go around each |
other, why can we not take a ball of lead and a marble and watch the marble go |
toward the ball of lead? 'Phe difficulty of this experiment when done in such a |
simple manner is the very weakness or delicacy of the force. It must be done with |
extreme care, which means covering the apparatus to keep the air out, making |
sure it is not electrically charged, and so on; then the force can be measured. |
lt was first measured by Cavendish with an apparatus which is schematically |
indicated in Eig. 7-13. 'This ñrst demonstrated the direct force bebween ©wo large, |
fñxed balls of lead and two smaller balls of lead on the ends of an arm supported |
by a very fñne fñber, called a torsion fber. By measuring how much the fñber |
gets twisted, one can measure the strength of the force, verify that it is inversely |
proportional to the square of the distance, and determine how strong it is. Thus, |
one may accurately determine the coefficient G in the formula |
AII the masses and distances are known. You say, “We knew it already for |
the earth” Yes, but we did not know the rmass of the earth. By knowing G |
from this experiment and by knowing how strongly the earth attracts, we can |
indirectly learn how great is the mass of the earthl "This experiment has been |
called “weighing the earth” by some people, and it can be used to determine the |
coefficient G of the gravity law. 'This is the only way in which the mass of the |
GÌ I Ww |
Fig. 7-13. A simplified diagram of the apparatus used by Cavendish to |
verify the law of universal gravitation for small objects and to measure |
the gravitational constant G. |
--- Trang 155 --- |
earth can be determined. Œ turns out to be |
6.670 x 10~!! newton - m”/kgŸ. |
Tt is hard to exaggerate the importance of the efect on the history of sclence |
produced by this great success of the theory of gravitation. Compare the confusion, |
the lack of confidence, the ineomplete knowledge that prevailed in the earlier ages, |
when there were endless debates and paradoxes, with the clarity and simplicity |
of this law—this fact that all the moons and planets and stars have such a sữmnpÏle |
ruïe to govern them, and further that man could understønd it and deduce how |
the planets should movel "This is the reason for the success of the sciences in |
following years, for it gave hope that the other phenomena of the world might |
also have such beautifully simple laws. |
7-7 What is gravity? |
But is this such a simple law? What about the machinery ofit? All we have |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.