text stringlengths 0 6.73k |
|---|
đu; Ằ ` Gm¿m (Ui /) |
mị th = TT TH, (9.18) |
J=I 19 |
".. » _ CmunjG¡ —) |
đt m Tỉ, |
Further, we defne r¿¿ as the distance between the two planets ¿ and 7; this is |
equal to |
tụ = V8 — #7)? + (Mi — 9ý)” + (#¡ — 22). (9.19) |
AIso, 3) means a sum over all values of j—all other bodies——except, of course, |
for j ==. Thus all we have to do is to make more columns, /o2#s more columns. |
W© need nine columns for the motions of Jupiter, nine for the motions of Saturn, |
and so on. Then when we have all initial positions and velocities we can calculate |
all the accelerations from Eq. (9.18) by first calculating all the distances, using |
Eq. (9.19). How long will it take to do it? TỶ you do i9 at home, it will take a |
very long timel But in modern times we have machines which do arithmetic |
very rapidly; a very good computing machine may take 1 microsecond, that is, a |
millionth of a second, to do an addition. To do a multiplication takes longer, say |
10 microseconds. lt may be that in one cycle of calculation, depending on the |
problem, we may have 30 multiplications, or something like that, so one cycle will |
take 300 microseconds. 'Phat means that we can do 3000 cycles of computation |
per second. In order to get an accuracy, of, say, one part in a billion, we would |
need 4 x 105 eycles to correspond to one revolution of a planet around the sun. |
That corresponds to a computation time of 130 seconds or about two minutes. |
Thus it take only 6wo minutes to follow Jupiter around the sun, with all the |
perturbations of all the planets correct to one part in a billion, by this methodl |
(It turns out that the error varies about as the square of the interval e. lÝ we |
make the interval a thousand times smaller, it is a million times more accurate. |
So, let us make the interval 10,000 times smaller.) |
So, as we said, we began this chapter not knowing how to calculate even |
the motion of a mass on a spring. Now, armed with the tremendous power of |
--- Trang 194 --- |
Newton”s laws, we can not only calculate such simple motions but also, given |
only a machine to handle the arithmetic, even the tremendously complex motions |
of the planets, to as hipgh a degree of precision as we wishl |
--- Trang 195 --- |
I0 |
(t©rtsorterff©ore @œŸ WQ@rt©refErrrrt |
10-1 Newton?s Third Law |
On the basis of NÑewton”s second law of motion, which gives the relation |
between the acceleration of any body and the force acting on it, any problem in |
mmechanies can be solved in principle. EFor example, to determine the motion of |
a few particles, one can use the numerical method developed in the preceding |
chapter. But there are good reasons to make a further study of Newton”s laws. |
First, there are quite simple cases of motion which can be analyzed not only |
by numerical methods, but also by direct mathematical analysis. For example, |
although we know that the acceleration of a falling body is 32 ft/sec2, and |
trom this fact could calculate the motion by numerical methods, i% is much |
casier and more satisfactory to analyze the motion and fñnd the general solution, |
8 = 8g + 0g + 162. In the same way, although we can work out the positions of a |
harmonic oscillator by numerical methods, ït is also possible to show analytically |
that the general solution is a simple cosine function of £, and so it is unnecessary |
to go to all that arithmetical trouble when there is a simple and more accurate |
way to get the result. In the same manner, although the motion of one body |
around the sun, determined by gravitation, can be calculated point by point by |
the numerical methods of Chapter 9, which show the general shape of the orbit, |
1E is nice also to get the exact shape, which analysis reveals as a perfect ellipse. |
Unfortunately, there are really very few problems which can be solved exactly |
by analysis. In the case of the harmonic oscillator, for example, if the spring |
force is not proportional to the displacement, but is something more complicated, |
one must fall back on the numerical method. Ôr ïf there are two bodies goïng |
around the sun, so that the total number of bodies is three, then analysis cannot |
produce a simple formula for the motion, and in practice the problem must |
be done numerically. “That ¡is the famous three-body problem, which so long |
challenged human powers of analysis; it is very interesting how long it took |
people to appreciate the fact that perhaps the powers of mathematical analysis |
--- Trang 196 --- |
were limited and ¡it might be necessary to use the numerical methods. Today an |
enormous number oŸ problems that cannot be done analytically are solved by |
numerical methods, and the old three-body problem, which was supposed to be |
so difficult, is solved as a matter of routine in exactly the same manner that was |
described in the preceding chapter, namely, by doing enough arithmetic. However, |
there are also situations where both methods fail: the simple problems we can |
do by analysis, and the moderately difcult problems by numerical, arithmetical |
methods, but the very complicated problems we cannot do by either method. A |
complicated problem 1s, for example, the collision of two automobiles, or even |
the motion of the molecules of a gas. There are countless particles in a cubic |
millimeter of gas, and ¡it would be ridiculous to try to make calculations with |
so many variables (about 10!——a hundred million billion). Anything like the |
motion of the molecules or atoms of a gas or a block or iron, or the motion of |
the stars in a globular cluster, instead of just two or three planets goïing around |
the sun——such problems we cannot do directly, so we have to seek other means. |
In the situations in which we cannot follow details, we need to know some |
general properties, that is, general theorems or principles which are consequences |
of Newton's laws. One of these is the principle oŸ conservation of energy, which |
was discussed in Chapter 4. Another is the principle of conservation oŸ momentum, |
the subject of this chapter. Another reason for studying mechanics further is |
that there are certain patterns of motion that are repeated in many diferent |
circumstances, so iÈ is good to study these patterns in one particular cireumstance. |
For example, we shall study collisions; diferent kinds of collisions have much |
in common. In the fow of Ñuids, it does not make mụuch diference what the |
fuid is, the laws of the fow are similar. Other problems that we shall study |
are vibrations and oscillations and, in particular, the peculiar phenomena of |
mmechanical waves—sound, vibrations of rods, and so on. |
In our discussion of NÑewton”s laws it was explained that these laws are a kind |
of program that says “Pay attention to the forces,” and that Newton told us only |
two things about the nature of forces. In the case of gravitation, he gave us the |
complete law of the force. In the case of the very complicated forces between |
atoms, he was not aware of the right laws for the forces; however, he discovered |
one rule, one general property of forces, which is expressed in his 'Third Law, and |
that is the total knowledge that Newton had about the nature of forces—the law |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.