text stringlengths 0 6.73k |
|---|
we could simply refer to a general component as ø;, and say that ¿ could either |
be z, , or z, and that these are the three components; that is, imagine that ¿ is |
any one of three directions, ø, , or z. The notation that we use for four-vecftors |
is analogous to this: we write ø„ for the four-vector, and / stands for the ƒour |
possible directions Ý, ø, , Or Z. |
W© could, of course, use any notation we want; do not laugh at notations; |
Invent them, they are powerful. In fact, mathematics is, to a large extent, |
Invention of better notations. “The whole idea of a four-vector, In fact, is an |
improvement in notation so that the transformations can be remembered easily. |
A„, then, is a general four-vector, but for the special case oŸ momentum, the ?¿ |
is identified as the energy, ø„ is the momentum in the z-direction, øy is that in |
the -direction, and ø; is that in the z-direction. To add four-vectors, we add |
the corresponding componenfs. |
TỶ there is an equation among four-vectors, then the equation is true for cœch |
cơmponen‡. Eor instance, 1f the law of conservation of three-vector momentum is |
to be true in particle collisions, i.e., if the sum of the momenta for a large number |
of interacting or colliding particles is to be a constant, that must mean that the |
sums of all momenta in the z-direction, in the -direction, and in the z-direction, |
for all the particles, must each be constant. 'This law alone would be impossible |
in relativity because it 1s Zncomjplete; it is like talking about only bwo of the |
components of a three-vector. lt is incomplete because iŸ we rotate the axes, we |
mix the various componentfs, so we must include all three components in our law. |
Thus, in relativity, we must complete the law of conservation of momentum by |
extending it to include the #ữne component. This is øbsolutel necessar to go |
with the other three, or there cannot be relativistic invariance. 'Phe conseruation |
öƒ energụ 1s the fourth equation which goes with the conservation of momentum |
--- Trang 331 --- |
to make a valid four-vector relationship in the geometry of space and time. Thus |
the law of conservation of energy and momentum in four-dimensional notation is |
» Pụ — » Đụ (17.13) |
particles particles |
in out |
or, in a slightly diferent notation |
À pụ, = À ` Địu, (17.14) |
where ? = l, 2,... refers to the particles goïng into the collision, 7 = 1, 2,... |
refers to the particles coming out of the collision, and / = ø, , z, or ứ. You say, |
“In which axes?” It makes no diference. The law is true for each component, |
USINE đn axes. |
In vector analysis we discussed one other thing, the dot produect oŸ bwo vecbors. |
Let us now consider the corresponding thing in space-time. In ordinary rotation |
we discovered there was an unchanged quantity #2 + #2 + z2. In four dimensions, |
we find that the corresponding quantity is £ — #7 — 2 — z2 (Eq. 17.3). How can |
we write that? One way would be to write some kind of four-dimensional thing |
with a square dot between, like A„ L-] „; one of the notations which is actually |
used is |
3) A,A,=A?— A?— A?— A2. (17.15) |
The prime on 3` means that the first term, the “time” term, is positive, but the |
other three terms have minus signs. This quantity, then, will be the same in any |
coordinate system, and we may call it the square of the length of the four-vector. |
For instance, what is the square of the length of the four-vector momentum of |
a single particle? This will be equal to gøý — Ø2 — Ø2 — Ø2 or, in other words, |
E2 — p2, because we know that p¿ is . What is #2 — p?? It must be something |
which is the same in every coordinate system. In particular, it must be the same |
for a coordinate system which is moving right along with the particle, in which |
the particle is standing still. If the particle is standing still, it would have no |
mmomentum. So in that coordinate system, iÈ is purely i%s energy, which is the |
same as its rest mass. Thus #3 — p° = m. So we see that the square of the |
length of this vector, the four-vector momentum, is equal to mã. |
--- Trang 332 --- |
From the square of a vector, we can go on to invent the “dot product,” or the |
product which is a scalar: iŸ ø„ is one four-vector and b„ is another four-vector, |
then the scalar product is |
» dubu = đi — ayÙy — quby — g„by. (17.16) |
Tt is the same in all coordinate systems. |
Finally, we shall mention certain things whose rest mass mọ is zero. A photon |
of light, for example. A photon is like a particle, in that ib carries an energy |
and a momentum. The energy of a photon is a certain constant, called Planeck”s |
constant, times the frequency of the photon: # = hz. Such a photon also carries |
a momentum, and the momentum of a photon (or of any other particle, in fact) |
is 5 divided by the wavelength: p = h/^A. But, for a photon, there is a delnite |
relationship bebween the frequency and the wavelength: = c/A. (The number |
of waves per second, times the wavelength of each, is the distance that the light |
goes in one second, which, oŸ course, is c.) Thus we see immmediately that the |
energy of a photon must be the momentum times c, or 1Í c=— 1, the energụ œnd |
momentưm are cqual. That 1s to say, the rest mass 1s zero. Let us look at that |
again; that is quite curious. lf it is a particle of zero rest mass, what happens |
when it stops? ϣ neuer stopsf Tt always goes at the speed c. The usual formula |
for energy is mo/V 1 — 02. Ñow can we say that rmọ = 0Ö and 0 = 1, so the energy |
is 0? We cannof say that it is zero; the photon really can (and does) have energy |
even though it has no rest mass, but this it possesses by perpetually going at the |
speed of lightl |
W© also know that the momentum of any particle is equal to its total energy |
tỉmes is velocity: iŸ e = 1, p = 0# or, in ordinary units, p = 0/c?. Eor any |
particle moving at the speed of light, p = ifc = 1. The formulas for the energy |
of a photon as seen from a moving system are, of course, given by Eq. (17.12), |
but for the momentum we must substitute the energy times é (or times 1 in this |
case). The different energies after transformation means that there are diferent |
frequencies. 'Phis is called the Doppler eÑfect, and one can calculate it easily from |
Eq. (17.12), using also = p and = hứ. |
As Minkowski said, “Space of itself, and time of itself will sink into mere |
shadows, and only a kind of union between them shall survive.” |
--- Trang 333 --- |
}Ổo((tffGrt tro tro ŸÌf110©OrtSf@reS |
18-1 The center of mass |
In the previous chapters we have been studying the mechanics oŸ points, or |
small particles whose internal structure does not concern us. For the next few |
chapters we shall study the application of NÑewton's laws to more complicated |
things. When the world becomes more complicated, it also becomes more |
interesting, and we shall ñnd that the phenomena associated with the mechanics |
of a more complex object than just a point are really quite striking. Of course |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.