text
stringlengths
0
6.73k
moving in the material—and with these basic contributions of the fñeld travelling
at the ultimate velocity c. Our problem ¡is to understand how the apparenth
slower velocity comes about.
We shall try to understand the efect in a very simple case. A source which we
shall call “the ez#ernal source” is placed a large distance away om a thin plate
of transparent material, say glass. We inquire about the fñeld at a large distance
on the opposite side of the plate. The situation is illustrated by the diagram
of FEig. 31-1, where Š and ? are imagined to be very far away from the plate.
According to the principles we have stated earlier, an electric ñeld anywhere
--- Trang 536 ---
Arriving wave ; “Transmitted” wave
s8) =/
ì É What is me
SE Han th
“Reflected”
Wave / Glass plate
Fig. 31-1. Electric waves passing through a layer of transparent
material.
that is far from all moving charges is the (vector) sum of the felds produced by
the external source (at ,S) ønd the fields produced by cách of the charges in the
plate of glass, cuer one tuith is proper retardation at the 0elocitu c. Remember
that the contribution of each charge is not changed by the presence of the other
charges. These are our basic principles. The fñield at can be written thus:
Eb—= » J2cách charge (31.1)
all charges
b—= +1. + » đ2cách charge› (31.2)
all other charges
where #2, ¡is the feld due to the source alone and would be precisely the fñeld
at ÐP 7 there tuere no rmmatertal present. We expect the field at P to be diferent
trom #⁄, ïf there are any other moving charges.
'Why should there be charges moving in the glass? We know that all material
consists of atoms which contain electrons. When the electric fñeld oøƒ the source
acts on these atoms it drives the electrons up and down, because I1 exerts a
force on the electrons. And moving electrons generate a field—they constitute
new radiators. These new radiators are related to the source Š, because they
are driven by the fñeld of the source. "The total fñeld is not just the feld of the
source Š, but it is modifñed by the additional contribution from the other moving
charges. This means that the fñeld is not the same as the one which was there
before the glass was there, but is modified, and it turns out that it is modified
in such a way that the field inside the glass appears to be moving at a diferent
speed. 'Phat is the idea which we would like to work out quantitatively.
--- Trang 537 ---
Now this is, in the exact case, pretty complicated, because although we have
said that all the other moving charges are driven by the source field, that is not
quite true. If we think of a particular charge, it feels not only the source, but like
anything else in the world, it feels øi/ of the charges that are moving. I§ feels,
in particular, the charges that are moving somewhere else in the glass. So the
total feld which is acting on a particular chorge is a combination of the fields
from the other charges, +0„ose rmmotions depend on tuhat this particular charge 1s
đo”ng! You can see that it would take a complicated set of equations to get the
complete and exact formula. Ït is so complicated that we postpone this problem
until next year.
Instead we shall work out a very simple case in order to understand all the
physical principles very clearly. We take a cireumstance in which the efects from
the other atoms are very small relative to the efects from the source. In other
words, we take a material in which the total fñeld is not modifed very much
by the motion of the other charges. That corresponds to a material in which
the index of refraction is very close to 1, which will happen, for example, 1f the
density of the atoms 1s very low. Our calculation will be valid for any case In
which the index is for any reason very close to 1. In this way we shall avoid the
complications of the most general, complete solution.
Incidentally, you should notice that there is another efect caused by the
motion of the charges in the plate. These charges will also radiate waves back
toward the source Š. 'Phis backward-going fñeld is the light we see relected from
the surfaces of transparent materials. It does not come from just the surface. The
backward radiation comes from everywhere in the Interior, but it turns out that
the total efect is equivalent to a refection from the surfaces. These refection
efects are beyond our approximation at the moment because we shall be limited
to a calculation for a material with an index so close to 1 that very little light is
refected.
Before we proceed with our study of how the index of refraction comes about,
we should understand that all that is required to understand refraction is to
understand why the apparent wave 0elocitu is diferent in diferent materials. Thhe
bending of light rays comes about just 0ecause the efective speed of the waves is
difÑferent in the materials. To remind you how that comes about we have drawn
in Eig. 31-2 several successive crests of an electric wave which arrives from a
vacuum onto the surface of a block of glass. The arrow perpendicular to the
--- Trang 538 ---
⁄⁄ ⁄ /
VACUUM „⁄ˆ ,⁄ ˆ/⁄ GILASS
⁄ ⁄ „ ,⁄
"4 ⁄ XS
crests `\⁄ ⁄
Fig. 31-2. Relation between refraction and velocity change.
wave crests indicates the direction of travel of the wave. Now all oscillations in
the wave must have the same ƒreqguenec. (We have seen that driven oscillations
have the same frequency as the driving source.) This means, also, that the wave
crests for the waves on both sides of the surface must have the same spacïng
qlong the surƒace because they must travel together, so that a charge sitting
at the boundary will feel only one frequency. The shorfes‡ distance bebween
crests of the wave, however, ¡is the wavelength which is the velocity divided by
the requency. Ôn the vacuum side it is Ào = 2zc/œ, and on the other side it is
À = 270/u or 2#c/(œn, 1Ÿ 0 = cƒn is the velocity of the wave. From the fgure we
can see that the only way for the waves to “ft” properly at the boundary is for
the waves in the material to be travelling at a dilferent angle with respect to the
surface. From the geometry of the fñgure you can see that for a “ñt” we must
have Ào/sin Øo = À/sin 0, or sin Øo/sỉn Ø = ø=, which is Snell's law. We shall, for
the resi of our discussion, consider only why light has an efective speed oŸ c/n
in material of index m=, and no longer worry, in this chapter, about the bending
of the light direction.