text stringlengths 0 6.73k |
|---|
elastically to the atoms, which means that If a force is applied to an electron its |
displacement from its normal position will be proportional to the force. |
You may think that this is a funny model of an atom ïŸ you have heard about |
electrons whirling around in orbits. But that is just an oversimplifed picture. |
'The correct picture of an atom, which is given by the theory of wave mechanics, |
says that, so far as problems imuolưing light are concerned, the electrons behave |
as though they were held by springs. So we shall suppose that the electrons have |
a linear restoring force which, together with their mass rm, makes them behave |
like little oscillators, with a resonant frequency œọ. We have already studied such |
oscillators, and we know that the equation of their motion is written this way: |
where #' is the driving force. |
For our problem, the driving force comes from the electric fñeld of the wave |
from the source, so we should use |
=q.B, = qeEoe"°°, (31.12) |
where q¿ is the electric charge on the electron and for #⁄; we use the expres- |
sion = Eoe”f from (31.10). Our equation of motion for the electron is |
dŠz 2 In) |
m dP + uậ# ] = qeEoe'”“”. (31.13) |
W© have solved this equation before, and we know that the solution is |
2 = øoc 1°, (31.14) |
where, by substituting in (31.13), we fnd that |
=————x 31.15 |
#0 m(u — œ2) ) ( ) |
so that |
I7 - |
ca (31.16) |
m(uỗ — Ø3) |
--- Trang 543 --- |
We have what we needed to know——the motion of the electrons in the plate. And |
1t is the same for every electron, except that the mean position (the “zero” of |
the motion) is, oŸ course, diferent for each electron. |
Now we are ready to fnd the fñeld !„ that these atoms produce at the |
point , because we have already worked out (at the end of Chapter 30) what |
ñeld is produced by a sheet of charges that all move together. Referring back to |
Eq. (30.19), we see that the field + at ÐP is just a negative constant times the |
velocity of the charges retarded in time by the amount z/c. Diferentiating z in |
Eq. (31.16) to get the velocity, and sticking in the retardation |or just putting #o |
from (31.15) into (30.18)] yields |
Tdqe |. qeEo 2œ(—z/c) |
#„=—=—— ———=—— : 31.17 |
` 2co€ le mÁ(œ8 — (2) , ' ) |
Just as we expected, the driven motion of the electrons produced an extra wave |
which travels to the right (that is what the factor e“2ữ=Z/ says), and the |
amplitude of this wave is proportional to the number of atoms per unit area |
in the plate (the factor 7?) and also proportional to the strength of the source |
fñeld (the factor #o). Then there are some factors which depend on the atomic |
properties (qe, rm, and œạ), as we should expect. |
The most important thing, however, is that this formula (31.17) for 2+ looks |
very much like the expression for ⁄„ that we got in Bq. (31.8) by saying that |
the original wave was delayed in passing through a material with an index of |
refraction n. 'Phe bwo expressions will, in fact, be identical if |
—1)Az=—————.. 31.18 |
(x— À2 2com(uậ — œ2) ' ) |
Notice that both sides are proportional to Az, since ?, which is the number of |
atoms øer ni œrea, is equal to N Az, where is the number of atoms per unit |
0olume of the plate. Substituting Az for and cancelling the Az, we get our |
main result, a formula for the index of refraction in terms of the properties of |
the atoms of the material—and of the frequency of the light: |
=l+———.-. 31.19 |
⁄ " 2cogm(„8 — œ2) ' ) |
'This equation gives the “explanation” of the index of refraction that we wished |
to obtain. |
--- Trang 544 --- |
31-3 Dispersion |
Notice that in the above process we have obtained something very interesting. |
For we have not only a number for the index of refraction which can be computed |
from the basic atomic quantities, but we have also learned how the index of |
refraction should vary with the frequency œ of the light. 'This is something we |
would never understand from the simple statement that “light travels slower in |
a transparent material” We still have the problem, of course, of knowing how |
many atoms per unit volume there are, and what is their natural frequenecy œọ. |
W©e do not know this just yet, because it is diferent for every diferent material, |
and we cannot get a general theory of that now. Formulation oŸ a general theory |
of the properties of diferent substances—their natural frequencies, and so on——1s |
possible only with quantum atomic mechanics. Also, diferent materials have |
diÑferent properties and diferent indexes, so we cannot expect, anyway, to get a |
general formula for the index which will apply to all substanees. |
However, we shall discuss the formula we have obtained, in various possible |
circumstances. Pirst of all, for most ordinary gases (for instance, for air, most |
colorless gases, hydrogen, helium, and so on) the natural frequencies of the |
electron oscillators correspond to ultraviolet light. These requencies are higher |
than the frequencies of visible light, that is, œọ is mụuch larger than œ of visible |
light, and to a frst approximation, we can disregard œŠ in comparison with øÿ. |
Then we fñnd that the index is nearly constant. So for a gas, the index is nearly |
constant. This is also true for most other transparent substances, like glass. If |
we look at our expression a little more closely, however, we notice that as œ Tis©s, |
taking a little bit more away from the denominator, the index also rises. 5o ?t |
rises slowly with frequency. The index is higher for blue light than for red light. |
That is the reason why a prism bends the light more in the blue than in the red. |
The phenomenon that the index depends upon the frequency is called the |
phenomenon of đ/sperszon, because it is the basis of the fact that light is “dispersed” |
by a prism into a spectrum. “The equation for the index of refraction as a function |
of frequeney 1s called a d¿spersion equation. So we have obtained a dispersion |
cquation. (In the past few years “dispersion equations” have been fnding a new |
use in the theory of elementary particles.) |
Our dispersion equation suggests other interesting efects. If we have a |
natural requency œọ which lies in the visible region, or if we measure the index |
of refraction of a material like glass in the ultraviolet, where œ gets near œọ, we |
see that at Írequencies very close to the natural frequency the index can get |
--- Trang 545 --- |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.