text stringlengths 0 8.13M |
|---|
CNot= |
0001 |
|
0010 |
|
Figure 7 - Step of simulation of CNot |
3 Universal families of observables |
There exist two types of quantum computation universalities: |
4 |
– AfamilyF ofoperators(unitarytransformationsormeasurements)isquan- |
tumuniversal iffforalloperatorO,thereexistsacombination(compositions |
and tensor products) of some elements of F which simulates O. |
– A family F of operators is approximatively quantum universal iff for all |
operatorO andforallǫ>0,thereexistsanoperatorO andacombination |
1 2 |
of some elements of F which simulates O , with ||O −O ||≤ǫ. |
2 1 2 |
Since the family of unitary transformations F = {H,HT,CNot} is ap- |
0 |
proximatively quantum universal [5,1], the family of observables F = {Z ⊗ |
1 |
X,X,Z,X Y} is also approximatively quantum universal[6]. The approximate |
√− |
2 |
quantum universality of F is based on the ability to simulate each element of |
1 |
F using elements of F only (see fig. 4, 6 and 7). |
0 1 |
Theorem 1. The family of observables F ={Z⊗X,Z,cos(θ)X+sin(θ)Y,θ ∈ |
2 |
[0 2π]} is quantum universal. |
Proof. Since the family of unitary transformations F = {CNot}∪U (where |
3 1 |
U is the set of all one-qubit unitary transformations)is quantum universal,the |
1 |
quantum universality of F is reduced to the simulation of each element of F . |
2 3 |
The proof consists in exhibiting a step of simulation (i.e. a simulation up to a |
Paulioperator)of eachoperatorof F . The stages of correction,omitted in this |
3 |
proof, are presented in [6] for F . |
1 |
A step of simulation of CNot is presented in figure 7. For a given U ∈ U , |
1 |
U can be decomposed into three successive elementary rotations about the zˆ, xˆ |
and zˆ axes in the Bloch sphere. The elementary rotation R can be expressed |
xˆ |
using an elementary rotation R and the Hadamard transformation H: |
zˆ |
∀ϕ,R (ϕ)=HR (ϕ)H. |
xˆ zˆ |
Thus for all one-qubit unitary transformation U, there exist ϕ ,ϕ ,ϕ such |
1 2 3 |
that U =R (ϕ )HR (ϕ )HR (ϕ ), where |
zˆ 3 zˆ 2 zˆ 1 |
1 0 |
R (ϕ)= |
zˆ (cid:18)0eiϕ(cid:19) |
So U can be decomposed into 4 operators: |
U = (H)(HR (ϕ ))(HR (ϕ ))(HR (ϕ )) |
zˆ 3 zˆ 2 zˆ 1 |
U4 U3 U2 U1 |
|{z}| {z }| {z }| {z } |
A step of simulation of U = H is presented in figure 4, and the simulation of |
4 |
U =HR (ϕ ),i∈[1,3]is obtainedusing the generalizedstate transferof figure |
i zˆ i |
3.SinceR (ϕ) ZR (ϕ)=Z andR (ϕ) XR (ϕ)=cos(ϕ)X−sin(ϕ)Y,itcomes |
zˆ † zˆ zˆ † zˆ |
the following step of simulation of HR (ϕ): |
zˆ |
Figure 8 - Step of simulation of HRzˆ(ϕ): V1=Rzˆ(ϕ) and V2=H. |
(note that for all σ, there exists σ′ such that Hσ=σ′H) |
5 |
Thus the simulation of any one-qubit unitary transformationcan be decom- |
posedintofourunitarytransformationssuchthateachoftheseunitarytransfor- |
mations can be simulated using only observables of F . Therefore the family of |
2 |
observablesF ={Z⊗X,Z,cos(θ)X+sin(θ)Y,θ ∈[0,2π]}isquantumuniversal. |
2 |
(cid:3) |
4 The secret of the One-Way Quantum Computer is |
hidden in the initial cluster state |
One-wayquantumcomputationconsistsinmeasuringqubitafter qubita lattice |
ofqubits,initiallypreparedinanentangledstate:theclusterstate.Thisisaone- |
way computationbecausetheentanglementisconsumedstepbystep.Therefore |
the creation of the intial cluster state is a crutial point. |
In order to create the initial cluster state on a given lattice of qubits, the |
following preparationis performed: |
– Some qubits of the lattice are input qubits, i.e. qubits which are in an un- |
knownstate|φi,othersareauxiliaryqubits.Eachauxiliaryqubitisinitialized |
in the state |+i= 1 (|0i+|1i). |
√2 |
– An Ising transformationis applied on the whole lattice. This Ising transfor- |
mationisequivalenttotheapplicationofthe2-qubitunitarytransformation |
Controlled-Z (C ) on each pair of neighboring qubits, where: |
Z |
100 0 |
010 0 |
C = |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.